WEBVTT - What are think tanks all about?

0:00:01.120 --> 0:00:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff you Should Know from how Stuff Works

0:00:04.600 --> 0:00:14.120
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark,

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:16.759
<v Speaker 1>and there's Charles W. Chuck Bryant and Jerry's over there

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:20.360
<v Speaker 1>actually sitting in today, and uh, this is stuff you

0:00:20.360 --> 0:00:23.960
<v Speaker 1>should know about. Think tanks, the thinking this kind of tanks.

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:26.600
<v Speaker 1>There are fish tanks. They don't think at all, well,

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 1>they barely think. They think, this water feels a little

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:33.160
<v Speaker 1>warm for me, and then they think what's water, what's

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:36.239
<v Speaker 1>being wet? And then that's about it. And then they're like,

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 1>how about some of those tasty flakes? Yeah, give me some,

0:00:39.360 --> 0:00:43.200
<v Speaker 1>and that's it. Think tanks. There's a lot more thinking

0:00:43.240 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 1>going on in these kind of tanks. Like stink tanks,

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:51.240
<v Speaker 1>it depends on your opinion, and uh that's everybody's opinion.

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:53.440
<v Speaker 1>So yes, I guess they are more like stink tanks

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>these days. This is one of those weird ones where

0:00:56.520 --> 0:01:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I for forty seven years just sort of had this,

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 1>never dug in on what a think tank was. I

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 1>hear it, and now it kind of assumed I knew

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>what it was. That was kind of right. Yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:12.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a good it's a good term for something. Yeah,

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:14.320
<v Speaker 1>I was like, within this is this like a bunch

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:18.280
<v Speaker 1>of smart people sitting around think thinking about smart stuff? Exactly.

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:21.480
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of right, That's exactly what it is. It's like,

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 1>it's like a place where people sit around and think

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>about things that eventually hopefully affects public policy in a

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 1>positive way. Is what you're ultimately hoping for. Yeah, and

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 1>b I think we don't mean if you went by

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:38.760
<v Speaker 1>a think tank, they would all just be sitting around.

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:42.680
<v Speaker 1>M hmmm. I think it depends on the day of

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the week or if it's right after lunch, like there's

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 1>a ton of research and study. Oh, I see stuff

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>like that. They're not just pulling stuff out of thin air. No. No,

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 1>that's the point of think tanks is they are groups

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 1>of people, UM nonprofit organizations in the US we should

0:01:57.680 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>say yeah, which will get to the finer points of

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 1>UM who say, you know what, we see this problem

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 1>in America and or the world or wherever. Great Britain

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:12.239
<v Speaker 1>has plenty China has a bunch, and they say, how

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 1>can we solve this problem. Let's get to it. We're

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna we're gonna take this problem on and figure it

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 1>out through pragmatic science and evidence based research. We're going

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 1>to come up with a solution to this problem. And

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 1>then the next step is to get it out there

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>to the public, to policy makers, to get people talking

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:34.799
<v Speaker 1>about it. And then once enough people talk about it

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:38.120
<v Speaker 1>and there's a public debate over it, ideally, if it's

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>a good idea, it will be adopted as public policy

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:44.520
<v Speaker 1>and that problem will be solved in a in a

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:49.440
<v Speaker 1>good way. Yeah, And that's the ideal function of a

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 1>an ideal think tank, which is to say it is nonpartisan,

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:58.919
<v Speaker 1>it is fact based, and it doesn't have an agenda necessarily.

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:02.799
<v Speaker 1>But things have changed over the years, as we will

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 1>see fairly recently, Chuck seems like and and think tanks

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 1>can be very much slanted. But well, we'll get into

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:13.080
<v Speaker 1>all that. That's just sort of a long winded setup.

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 1>That was a good set up, though, Man, should we

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:21.400
<v Speaker 1>go back and check on oural buddy Plato. Yeah, so

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Plato his academy. The Academy was some people say it

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>was sort of the world's first think tank, which makes sense. Yeah,

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 1>he would get dudes and they would sit around in

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the garden and I would imagine drink wine and talk

0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>smarts and philosophy and kind of you know, like it

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>was high minded stuff for the day to sit around

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and think about sort of what was going on around

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>them and how they could impact change. Yeah, or thinking

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 1>about the nature of reality or existence. Um, they once

0:03:56.160 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 1>decided that knowledge was uncertain and life is essentially craps

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 1>game based on probability rather than absolute truth. If you

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 1>step back and think about it, that is the basis

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 1>of quantum mechanics. Could you imagine if they had access

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>to LSD back then, I know, I don't think it

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>would have been too terribly different. Well, yeah, they were

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of traveling down that road anyway, but that was

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's that's pretty impressive some of the stuff

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>they came up with. This is again, you know, we

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:29.039
<v Speaker 1>did a skeptics episode. Skepticism episode, you know, um, I'm sorry,

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>not skepticism, a stoicism. And remember is this is where

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:36.839
<v Speaker 1>this stuff was. All these different philosophies were all like

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:39.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of grew from this academy. So you can make

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good case that it was the world's first

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 1>think tank. Yeah, it's a little it's not the first

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 1>modern think tank, but it it qualifies in a lot

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 1>of ways. No, there was one in eight thirty one,

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:54.360
<v Speaker 1>in Great Britain, the Duke of Wellington established what was

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 1>called the Royal United Services Institution, which studied like military science. Yeah.

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>And then here in the US in nineteen ten, the

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:06.039
<v Speaker 1>Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, which studied the results of

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:10.840
<v Speaker 1>military science. Right, and that's still around, uh, Carnegie man,

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean they still have endowed many things. Yeah, they're

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 1>well in doubt that they are very well in doubt. Uh.

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 1>And then of course the Brookings Institution, which maybe the

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 1>most famous modern American think tank to this day, This

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:30.799
<v Speaker 1>is the one you probably hear about the most. Uh.

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 1>It was founded by Robert Brookings in nineteen sixteen. And uh,

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 1>they had a lot of it. I mean they still

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:38.559
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of influence, but they had a great

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:42.719
<v Speaker 1>deal of influence. UM kind of post depression with FDRs.

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 1>New Deal helped construct the New Deal helped construct the

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Marshall Plan after World War Two. That was that was huge,

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:52.920
<v Speaker 1>very huge. So both were for sure. The New Deal

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>definitely was, but the Marshall Plan was. There was a

0:05:55.920 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 1>survey done, if I think, like four fifty historians and

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:04.600
<v Speaker 1>they the number one most important thing that any government

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 1>has done since UM, World War two between World War

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 1>two and the century was the Martiall Plan. Like it

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 1>it not only like brought Europe back from World War Two,

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>it set Europe on a path away from communism, where

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 1>if you're not into communism, that was a great positive benefit, right.

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 1>And the way it did that was in two years

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 1>based on this economic plan. In two years, it got

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:34.719
<v Speaker 1>Europe or ravaged world War two ravaged Europe back to

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>production levels higher than the production levels it was at

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:42.720
<v Speaker 1>before World War Two in two years. So it just

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:47.359
<v Speaker 1>went back to normal plus better. And Europe said, I

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:50.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of like this capitalism thing, and Western Europe went

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:55.240
<v Speaker 1>that way. I was kind of curious because Brookings, the

0:06:55.279 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Brookings Institution, gets a lot of like left leaning critics

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 1>SYSM today, so I kind of wonder where that all

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 1>came from. And uh, the article I read said that

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 1>is a victory of the conservative side to have Brookings

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 1>labeled liberal just from kind of pounding it in the press,

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 1>even though it's history and its member board throughout the

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 1>history has not been liberal at all, and it has

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 1>been filled from the top down over the years with

0:07:26.200 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 1>rank and file Republicans and conservatives from like the Reagan

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 1>era on through Bush one and two. Okay, so they've

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 1>they've gotten it across is liberals, so that liberals will

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 1>swallow the stuff that Brookings is is putting out there. No,

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I know what they undermine their own think tank. Well,

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's not their own think tank. It's

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 1>not a conservative think tank. Well it's centrist, like almost

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 1>right down the middle for right. But I think they

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 1>want to advance their own uh with their conservative think tanks.

0:07:56.800 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>They want to advance them, so they label Brookings is superliberal,

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 1>just so anything centrist is liberal. I think that's what

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 1>it is. I can't remember who scored it, but somebody

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>has a liberal score between zero and a hundred for

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 1>think tanks, and Brooking scored like a fifty three, right

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>down the middle. Like apparently, as far as think tanks go,

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 1>it's about as centrist as you possibly can get. Yeah,

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 1>and they've been around for a long time. Yeah, makes

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:29.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of sense. Yep. So, um, it's not just Brookings.

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Brookings is definitely one of the most famous around the

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:33.959
<v Speaker 1>world and has done quite a bit of stuff, but

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 1>there's plenty of others. There's Um, the Rand Corporation is

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:40.680
<v Speaker 1>a very famous think tank which did you know RAND

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:43.720
<v Speaker 1>is actually am I don't know what you call it,

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 1>but it's supposed it started out as R and D

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 1>like Research and Development RAND Corporation, And from what I understand,

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:56.959
<v Speaker 1>they've come up with the ideas for computers, the Internet, uh, spy, satellites,

0:08:57.040 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the space program, all that stuff that America could in

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the mid twentieth century technologically. Yes, the Rain Corporation, like

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 1>thinkers were the ones who came up with this stuff. Yeah,

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:09.440
<v Speaker 1>I think I knew some of that, and I don't

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it fully hit home that they were

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>a think tank. Yeah, with the name like the Rain

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Corporation sounds like just a corporation, but but they're they're

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 1>like a think tank that's really specifically there was specifically

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 1>zoned into America's technology progression. I guess, yeah. I mean

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:31.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of think tanks can be specialized like that,

0:09:31.440 --> 0:09:34.559
<v Speaker 1>Like some are very very much just concentrate on economics,

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 1>some concentrate on social issues in that case technology, and

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 1>then I think some like Brookings are sort of a

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:46.199
<v Speaker 1>little more broad. Yeah, they'll they'll take any case, right,

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 1>they'll take all comers. Yeah. So after World War Two, um,

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 1>like there were think tanks before, like you said, Brookings,

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Carnegie Um, the Royal United Services Institute in the UK,

0:09:57.960 --> 0:10:00.320
<v Speaker 1>there were like there were think tanks prior to World

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 1>War Two, but after World War Two they really proliferated.

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:07.200
<v Speaker 1>And the reason they started was government was just kind

0:10:07.240 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 1>of government it was in the in the early twentieth century.

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 1>It was just just this. It was. It wasn't anything

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 1>like you see it now. It wasn't this monolithic behemoth

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:21.320
<v Speaker 1>that has its tendrils in every aspect of people's lives

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:24.680
<v Speaker 1>or anything. It was a little too far the other

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:27.400
<v Speaker 1>way where it didn't quite know what it was doing.

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 1>So some of those early philanthropists like Carnegie Um and Brookings,

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 1>they they endowed these think tanks to kind of help

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:39.440
<v Speaker 1>government out to basically be like the research arm for government,

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 1>to help direct the best way for America to go.

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 1>And that's how it started out. And then after World

0:10:46.200 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>War Two, when America had like all this cash and

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 1>all this forward momentum, think tanks really popped up and

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>and there were all these kind of competing and then

0:10:56.559 --> 0:11:01.080
<v Speaker 1>sometimes harmonious um voices from these think tanks to say

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 1>go this way, go this way, let's say this way,

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:06.080
<v Speaker 1>but they all had something in common, and that was

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that they were staffed by very smart people who did

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:15.560
<v Speaker 1>very deliberate, very good research, who produced policy positions that

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 1>lawmakers could then take themselves and go out to the

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 1>people and say, see, this is what I'm talking about,

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 1>here's the data, here's a sound bite for you to

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:27.200
<v Speaker 1>make you understand it. That's what things tanks did, and

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:30.439
<v Speaker 1>in a way they were They very much were along

0:11:30.480 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the same track as lobby lobbyists, which we did an

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 1>episode on that that was pretty good too. But think

0:11:36.800 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 1>tanks stopped short of lobbying allegedly, Yeah, because they kind

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 1>of had to um. Starting in nineteen they were granted

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 1>tax exempt status, which is a very big deal because

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of money involved in many of these.

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I've been trying to get that for myself for years,

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:55.440
<v Speaker 1>and you're right, it is a very big deal. The

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Church of Josh, just get it going. That's so I'm

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:02.320
<v Speaker 1>wearing this robe right now. Uh. In the nineteen fifties, though,

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 1>is when Congress really kind of because they were tax exempt,

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 1>had to get involved and say, hey, listen, you gotta

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 1>walk a line here. You politically, you can't um if

0:12:12.160 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 1>you want to keep this tax exemption. Now, oh yeah,

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:18.680
<v Speaker 1>we for sure do. Um. They said, you can't be partisan,

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:23.080
<v Speaker 1>it's got to be good information. You can't um slant

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 1>things a certain way or support officially support or endorsed candidates. Um,

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:32.960
<v Speaker 1>you are here to educate with your objective work. And uh.

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:34.840
<v Speaker 1>That went along for a while, and then we started

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 1>getting think tanks that set out to do just that um,

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:43.319
<v Speaker 1>which they are called advocacy. Advocacy think tanks now, which

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure how they managed to skirt unless they

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 1>change the rules, skirt those rules and say, hey, we're

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a conservative think tank or or liberal think

0:12:53.040 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 1>tank and still be tax exempt. The do you know?

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:00.440
<v Speaker 1>The only thing that I can tell is that they're

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 1>still technically producing a public good if or if they

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:09.320
<v Speaker 1>believe that they're producing a public good, even if they

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:13.080
<v Speaker 1>have conservative alignment or a liberal alignment. They're trying to

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:15.840
<v Speaker 1>move society along in a way that they think is

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:19.839
<v Speaker 1>good or for the betterment of society. Stuff. Dude, That's

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:21.560
<v Speaker 1>what I've been telling I mean, could we be a

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:26.679
<v Speaker 1>think tank? Absolutely not. I mean think about it, like,

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:30.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess we could. I think that there's

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:32.320
<v Speaker 1>a I don't Okay, let me take that back. No,

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:34.840
<v Speaker 1>we absolutely couldn't because we can't be brought to you

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 1>by we don't have we don't have time. I don't know,

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 1>that's a good question, but we don't have. Yeah, you

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 1>couldn't advertise and have like you couldn't get advertiser money

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and be tax exempt. That's just like a doubt. If

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:52.439
<v Speaker 1>the Brookings institutions papers have like Burger King coupons on them,

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 1>you never know. So we'll get to why we can't

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 1>be later on. But one of the things about about

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:03.080
<v Speaker 1>think tanks is they're they're the reason they have a

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 1>tax exempt status is what they're doing is producing work

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 1>that furthers the public good. That's why they're supposed to

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 1>have tax exempt status. What you're pointing out is a

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 1>really good thing to point out, Like, wait a minute,

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:17.640
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of stuff here that that they could

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 1>lose their tax exempt status for. And if we fast

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 1>forward to three or five years from now, I think

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 1>we're going to start seeing them lose tax exempt status. Um,

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 1>they just haven't yet, I think is what it is. Yeah,

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>because some of them flat out like it's so obvious

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 1>when they come around like uh, when the Democrats were

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 1>beaten in two thousand, they got together and they started, uh,

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 1>left leaning thinkers got together and started the Center for

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 1>American Progress, which is an economic organization. It says it's nonpartisan,

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 1>but it literally says, as a quote, their goal is

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 1>to develop new policy ideas, critique the policy that stems

0:14:57.240 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>from conservative values, lanches the media to cover the issues

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 1>that truly matter and shape the national debate. So it's

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 1>they're they're kind of flat out saying like we're out

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 1>too prove, not just have an opinion about Maybe that's

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 1>a distinction, out to prove that conservative economic values are

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 1>bad for the country. Basically, Yeah, is that the difference.

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's like, here's our data. I honestly don't know, dude.

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 1>It's not a bunch of op eds thrown together. It's

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 1>so so No, it's not supposed to just be op eds.

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 1>It's supposed to be backed by data. Yeah. But but

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like Center for American Progress, or like the

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Heritage Foundation, or like ALEC, h the American Legislative Exchange Council,

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>like these are like and we're gonna do a whole

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 1>episode just on ALEC one day. Okay, seriously, but they're

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 1>like little, they're like Kareem Abdul Jabbar, like karate training

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 1>islands for liberals or for conservatives or for um rich

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 1>billionaire follow worse, like it doesn't matter, Like that's what

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 1>they are there there. They come up with new ideas

0:16:05.040 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 1>to push their agenda, and then they train activists to

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 1>go out and get that message out, to change people's minds,

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 1>to get themselves on CNN or Fox News or whatever,

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and to shape the public discussion on on something. It

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 1>has a lot of the contours of what think tanks

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 1>used to have, but there's this whole other layer of

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 1>like like seeing you and grizzle there that that that

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:29.760
<v Speaker 1>I think tanks aren't supposed to have. Should we take

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 1>a break? All right, we'll take a break in we'll

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit more about the Heritage Foundation right

0:16:34.120 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 1>after this. All right, nineteen eighties, the Heritage Foundation, which

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 1>you briefly mentured, mentored, that's the new mentioned before before

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:13.719
<v Speaker 1>he broke. They came about broke, they said, all right,

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 1>it's nineteen eighties. We got Ronald Reagan in there. He

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 1>is watching movies or asleep most of the time, so

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:24.159
<v Speaker 1>we have a good opportunity. That's how they want you

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:26.480
<v Speaker 1>to think he has a good Did you see the

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:30.879
<v Speaker 1>numbers about his uh movie watching? No? Oh man, it's great.

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Like a movie fan, it's great. How many movies did

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:36.199
<v Speaker 1>he watch? Your day? He watched a lot of movies.

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 1>And this is like back when they just had like reels,

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 1>right films trip. I guess they probably just you know,

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 1>cue the projector when he he and Nancy wanted to

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>watch it a good old fashioned western starring me. Can

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:51.440
<v Speaker 1>you do the rest of the episode as ready? No? Uh?

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:53.640
<v Speaker 1>So they came along and they said, all right, Reagan's

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>in in office. Here are our recommendations. What up I

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 1>would call a blueprint for grabbing the government by its

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:05.440
<v Speaker 1>frayed New Deal lapels and shaking out forty eight years

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:09.200
<v Speaker 1>of liberal policy. And it came by way of two thousand,

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 1>more than two thousand recommendations, and they tried to institute

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 1>about two thirds of them. Yeah. Reagan was like, great,

0:18:16.400 --> 0:18:22.359
<v Speaker 1>here's my thanks for the outline for what I should do. Right. Yeah,

0:18:22.440 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 1>so two thirds, like he said during his two terms,

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:27.200
<v Speaker 1>is what he tried to implement. And then, of course

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>when Bill Clinton gets in there, the Progressive Policy Institute, Um,

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it was two thousand plus, but

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 1>they offered similar recommendations. And that's how it goes the

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 1>think tanks right now. Yeah, because if you're a lawmaker,

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:43.879
<v Speaker 1>and again we said this in the Lobbying episode two,

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 1>you're not necessarily like some smart whip crack sharp person. No,

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:51.920
<v Speaker 1>I think we've seen that played out. You can just

0:18:52.000 --> 0:18:55.400
<v Speaker 1>like give people to vote for you. Yeah, on both

0:18:55.400 --> 0:18:57.439
<v Speaker 1>sides of the aisle. It's just a crack at like

0:18:57.520 --> 0:18:59.119
<v Speaker 1>you know Trump or anything. Oh no, no, no no, I

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 1>mean on all up and down the House and Senate. Right.

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 1>You don't like to think they're all geniuses, but they're not.

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:07.439
<v Speaker 1>They're not. And you don't have to be smart to

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 1>hold office. Um, you just have to get people to

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 1>vote for you. Again, which is why I think tanks

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 1>have flourished for so long, why lobbyists have flourished for

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 1>so long, because they're the ones who do the research

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and write the policy and say, here you go. You

0:19:21.840 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 1>want to go look smart, here you go, buddy. We

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 1>even like highlighted some sound bites for you to go,

0:19:27.720 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>say two people and get the get into the twenty

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:32.600
<v Speaker 1>four hour news cycle. And that's one of the big

0:19:32.720 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 1>roles that think tanks played today is by and and

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 1>have you know, especially since World War Two, is by

0:19:38.040 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 1>going to policy makers and being like, here's your agenda,

0:19:41.200 --> 0:19:42.920
<v Speaker 1>take your leave as much as you want. But all

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:46.119
<v Speaker 1>of this is backed by data, like it dovetails with

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 1>what you want to do with the country, and it

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:53.640
<v Speaker 1>is just gangbusters stuff. It's high quality, well researched stuff. Yeah,

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:56.120
<v Speaker 1>it's really interesting because I think there are still think

0:19:56.160 --> 0:20:02.879
<v Speaker 1>tanks that only craft U only do research and present

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 1>it and say do what you will with it. But

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:08.600
<v Speaker 1>those seem to be more and more gone by the wayside.

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:11.639
<v Speaker 1>Two ten was a real watershed year. It feels like

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 1>for think tanks. Yeah, like you mentioned ALEC, which we're

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:17.480
<v Speaker 1>going to cover in full, but I mean they are

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 1>they are a bill writing organization. They call them model bills.

0:20:23.400 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 1>But I mean when when you hear a senator or

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 1>something said, you know, we crafted this legislation, well, that

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:31.919
<v Speaker 1>probably means is an organization Like ALEC handed them the

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:35.679
<v Speaker 1>legislation and said here, you know, here it is if

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:38.400
<v Speaker 1>you want to use it, and you probably should want

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:41.440
<v Speaker 1>to use it. That's so. That is so ALEC I think,

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:44.120
<v Speaker 1>does in many ways qualify as a think tank. They're

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 1>not add percent standard think tank, but actually writing the law. Yeah,

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and for the lawmaker to go into do and go

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:57.160
<v Speaker 1>into Congress and introduce it as their own bill. That's

0:20:57.160 --> 0:21:00.160
<v Speaker 1>a little beyond what think tanks to think tanks were

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:04.440
<v Speaker 1>like write a paper that says, here's this problem in America,

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 1>here's some ideas to solve it. Here's this research to

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:10.479
<v Speaker 1>back up those ideas, go write a law based on it.

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 1>What things like ALEC does is take it a step further.

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 1>But ALEX still qualifies as a think tank. And ALEC

0:21:16.720 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 1>is part of something called the State Policy Network, which

0:21:20.840 --> 0:21:24.240
<v Speaker 1>apparently is there's one in every state and Puerto Rico.

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:26.919
<v Speaker 1>And they're like a confederation of think tanks that basically

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:30.879
<v Speaker 1>sit around and figure out ways to sue local, state

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:35.160
<v Speaker 1>and federal law lawmakers over laws, to try to get

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:38.680
<v Speaker 1>laws overturned, like they used the courts rather than the legislation.

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:43.119
<v Speaker 1>But um, it's still the stated goal is to affect

0:21:43.600 --> 0:21:47.120
<v Speaker 1>public policy and turn it in one direction or another. Yeah,

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 1>what was what was the website that you sent? Source Watch? Yes?

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Source Watch called them, uh, called ALEC a corporate bill mill. Right,

0:21:57.560 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 1>So they're just churning out hundreds of bill a year.

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Not all of them get used, but many of them do.

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:06.679
<v Speaker 1>And it's just I don't know. I don't think a

0:22:06.680 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of Americans realize that a lot of actual legislative

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:16.439
<v Speaker 1>policy is being written by McDonald's. Yeah, exactly, it's crazy.

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 1>I can't wait to do the alquum. We're both going

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:21.440
<v Speaker 1>to be well, our cars are gonna blow up right after,

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:24.359
<v Speaker 1>but by god, we're gonna get that episode. Maybe we

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:27.880
<v Speaker 1>should make that or like last episode in the year whatever,

0:22:28.080 --> 0:22:32.639
<v Speaker 1>what's twenty years from now, two thousands now? That was

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>eighteen years ago. I used to love that bit though. Um. Alright,

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 1>so we got to talk about money here because this uh,

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:49.840
<v Speaker 1>they are not, um, the independent most times these days

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 1>they're not the independent organizations that you think they are. Uh.

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:58.400
<v Speaker 1>They used to be funded by these endowments and um.

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:02.440
<v Speaker 1>More and more, it's it's corporation ends, large businesses. Sometimes

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:06.919
<v Speaker 1>private individuals of course, will give. And sometimes it's a

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:10.960
<v Speaker 1>great work around for campaign finance laws. Instead of directing

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:13.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know, tens of millions of dollars like

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 1>you can't do to a campaign, you can throw it

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:19.160
<v Speaker 1>in a think tank that will probably get a better result. Anyway,

0:23:19.200 --> 0:23:22.919
<v Speaker 1>that's new the time was it used to be like

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:28.240
<v Speaker 1>in my day, right, a rich philanthropist would say, I

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:32.640
<v Speaker 1>hate poverty and the effects that has on Americans. Go

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:35.720
<v Speaker 1>figure this out. I'm gonna fund to think tank. And

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 1>that's how you're dedicated to like just go make that happen.

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 1>And that's what think tanks were originally born from. And

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 1>that's largely the the only kind of oversight they worked

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:48.560
<v Speaker 1>under is they were trying to end poverty, or they

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:54.359
<v Speaker 1>were trying to work against communism, like these huge, haughty goals.

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:59.639
<v Speaker 1>Now they're being micromanaged. That's one thing that's happening to them. Yeah,

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 1>And the idea that the these think tanks are not

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 1>suede or influence are affected by their donors is not true.

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:11.159
<v Speaker 1>And the sort of the biggest problem going is that

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:14.680
<v Speaker 1>now you have legislation being drawn up by think tanks

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 1>because corporations are paying money to get research that looks

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:22.439
<v Speaker 1>like it's in their favor. Yeah. So, so one of

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the problems is the like, there's not as many philanthropists

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:31.320
<v Speaker 1>who are just endowing think tanks with no strings attached anymore.

0:24:31.720 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 1>There are plenty of philanthropists out there still that are

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 1>are funding think tanks, but their donations are directed, their

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 1>results oriented. They're very technocratic, right, they want to see

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:46.120
<v Speaker 1>bang for their buck. Whereas before it was just like

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:48.679
<v Speaker 1>to make America a better place and that was it.

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:52.720
<v Speaker 1>There wasn't a lot of like um um, nobody's feet

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 1>were being held to the fire, you know. Now it's like,

0:24:56.840 --> 0:25:00.960
<v Speaker 1>we want you to further this specific agenda, which is

0:25:01.160 --> 0:25:04.879
<v Speaker 1>um uh, we want to make sure that St. Louis's

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:08.680
<v Speaker 1>children there's not a single one malnourished any longer. Which

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:10.879
<v Speaker 1>is great, it's a great goal. There's nothing wrong with

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>that goal. But it's just so very narrowed and tailored,

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 1>and there's ways that you can hold the think tank accountable,

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 1>which is good in one hand, but it's also basically

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the introduction of like a corporate management to think tanks,

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 1>which that's not really how they were originally formed, and

0:25:29.040 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 1>it's having a weird effect on them. So think tanks

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:34.520
<v Speaker 1>are starting to say, all right, we thank you for

0:25:34.560 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 1>this money. We'll go save the children of St. Louis.

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 1>But and by the way, shout out at St. Louis.

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 1>That was a great show that um so again saving

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the children St. Louis good stuff, but we've got all

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:48.879
<v Speaker 1>this other stuff we want to do too, So to

0:25:49.000 --> 0:25:51.440
<v Speaker 1>keep that going, we're gonna have to also go find

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:55.480
<v Speaker 1>sources elsewhere. And again you can find them from other

0:25:55.640 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 1>other people, but one of the places they're finding them

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:02.560
<v Speaker 1>from his corporations. And that it's having a big negative

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:05.000
<v Speaker 1>impact on think tanks right now. Yeah, and it goes

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:08.399
<v Speaker 1>both ways. In the past, you know, eight or ten years,

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:11.960
<v Speaker 1>conservative billionaires of says that here they funneled a hundred

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:14.760
<v Speaker 1>and twenty million dollars to about a hundred groups and

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:20.120
<v Speaker 1>think tanks, uh to do things like discredit climate change science, um,

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:24.840
<v Speaker 1>which I mean, dude. The Koke Brothers and x On

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Mobile specifically funded a couple of think tanks called Atlas

0:26:29.160 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Economic Research Foundation and the International Policy Network to basically

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 1>to basically question the science behind climate change to further

0:26:39.160 --> 0:26:42.560
<v Speaker 1>fossil fuel interests, which is, see you guys in hell

0:26:43.080 --> 0:26:46.919
<v Speaker 1>for that one like that, What a crummy legacy to

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:50.240
<v Speaker 1>leave on Earth just to make a few extra bucks.

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Forget future generations they can all burn. Forget all the

0:26:55.160 --> 0:26:57.679
<v Speaker 1>endangered species that are on the brink of extinction that

0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:01.080
<v Speaker 1>are oh wait no, they're now extinct. It doesn't matter

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 1>because we made a few extra billion dollars. Yeah, that's

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that's despicable. Well what uh, it's funny. I just watched

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the movie Chinatown for a movie Crush episode and there's

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 1>that You ever seen that? Yeah, you know, most a

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:20.919
<v Speaker 1>lot of that movie is about It was originally titled

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Water and Power, you know, because it's about you know,

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 1>this weird uh political situation in Los Angeles and nineties

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:31.320
<v Speaker 1>where they were diverting water to the valley which was

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:34.679
<v Speaker 1>a desert and all these rich fat cats that were

0:27:34.720 --> 0:27:37.159
<v Speaker 1>getting the water diverted there, we're buying up land in

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:40.479
<v Speaker 1>the valley, like hundreds of thousands of acres because they

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:43.120
<v Speaker 1>knew it was going to be a lush green valley soon.

0:27:43.840 --> 0:27:46.119
<v Speaker 1>So all that really happened in l a Chinatown was

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:49.399
<v Speaker 1>based on that. But there's that great scene when Jack

0:27:49.480 --> 0:27:55.399
<v Speaker 1>Nicholson is Jake get us uh confronts John Houston about

0:27:55.720 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's the big bad guy no across and

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:00.720
<v Speaker 1>he says, you know, how much money do you need?

0:28:00.880 --> 0:28:03.480
<v Speaker 1>How much how many more things can you buy? Or

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:06.240
<v Speaker 1>this or that? And he says, what are you trying

0:28:06.280 --> 0:28:08.440
<v Speaker 1>to secure? And he looked at him and he said,

0:28:08.480 --> 0:28:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the future, Mr gittis and that's what it is. They're

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:14.520
<v Speaker 1>they're not after more billions to buy more planes and

0:28:14.600 --> 0:28:17.960
<v Speaker 1>are bigger house. They're trying to leave that they that's

0:28:17.960 --> 0:28:20.760
<v Speaker 1>what they want out of their legacy, is they're trying

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 1>to affect the future and in their own specific way,

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:27.040
<v Speaker 1>right But they're affecting the future in the worst way

0:28:27.080 --> 0:28:30.400
<v Speaker 1>possible according to us. And the problem is not according

0:28:30.400 --> 0:28:33.520
<v Speaker 1>to them, you know, but if you if you pull

0:28:33.760 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 1>enough people and just ask them plainly, if you took

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:39.960
<v Speaker 1>money and billionaires in power and all that out of it,

0:28:40.280 --> 0:28:44.160
<v Speaker 1>do you want a better future for humanity and for

0:28:44.320 --> 0:28:48.360
<v Speaker 1>earth a hundred years from now? I would guess the

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 1>majority of people would say yes. And if you can say, well,

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:55.280
<v Speaker 1>these guys are actually doing the opposite of ensuring that

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:58.200
<v Speaker 1>right now, how do you feel about that? Most people

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:01.719
<v Speaker 1>would say I don't feel so great about that. The

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:04.000
<v Speaker 1>problem is that most people would also follow up with,

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:07.440
<v Speaker 1>but what can we do? Right? They're they're rich, and

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:09.760
<v Speaker 1>that's a great point. Let what can you do? Let

0:29:09.760 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 1>me hop back on Facebook and find a goat video.

0:29:12.680 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 1>That's when the hopelessness sets in, and that's what's causing

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the paralysis in our our world right now is hopelessness.

0:29:20.000 --> 0:29:23.640
<v Speaker 1>That's that's not grim at all. By the way, everybody

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:26.840
<v Speaker 1>be sure to listen to my new podcast, uh The

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 1>End of the World with Josh Clark. It's it's a

0:29:29.040 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 1>really uplifting coming very soon. Yeah, coming this fall sometime eventually.

0:29:33.640 --> 0:29:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Just stuck up on your happy bills. Uh So. In

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:41.600
<v Speaker 1>two thousand thirteen, however, on the other side, uh left

0:29:41.680 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 1>leaning weekly magazine The Nation um revealed the positions of

0:29:47.720 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the left leaning Center for American Progress and other think

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:53.880
<v Speaker 1>tanks in DC are shaped by interest of their donors.

0:29:53.880 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 1>So it happens on both sides of the aisle for sure. Yeah,

0:29:58.240 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah, yeah, No, it's an equal opportunity screwing that

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the world is getting from lobbying from think tanks, from

0:30:06.080 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 1>from wealthy interests. Like, it's it's both both sides. Yeah.

0:30:09.720 --> 0:30:13.520
<v Speaker 1>So they're effectively unregistered lobbyist organizations now to a large degree,

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 1>and because their tax exempt, they're not obligated to release

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 1>financial statements or reveal their donors. So I'm surprised it

0:30:23.320 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 1>took that long for people to be like, wait a minute,

0:30:25.520 --> 0:30:28.000
<v Speaker 1>we can really take advantage here. So let's let's take

0:30:28.040 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 1>another break and then we'll get well, it will spell

0:30:29.920 --> 0:30:32.600
<v Speaker 1>out what the advantages are of hiring a think tank.

0:30:58.080 --> 0:31:01.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, Chuck, we're back a little warm under the collar.

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I feel like we should mention this thing with the

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Walton Family Foundation quickly, because that's interesting. I think this

0:31:07.160 --> 0:31:09.720
<v Speaker 1>is a great example of what I think tank can

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:13.560
<v Speaker 1>do these days. Yeah, it's UM. Obviously, the Sam Walton

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:17.640
<v Speaker 1>family of Walmart fame. UH. They fund a lot of

0:31:17.680 --> 0:31:20.600
<v Speaker 1>conservative think tanks. I think most people know that. UM.

0:31:20.640 --> 0:31:25.000
<v Speaker 1>But then they also fund funded one and think tanks

0:31:25.000 --> 0:31:28.840
<v Speaker 1>backed by Barack Obama when it came to the Affordable

0:31:28.880 --> 0:31:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Healthcare Act, and you're like, wait a minute, why would

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:33.800
<v Speaker 1>they do something like that if they are a conservative

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:37.560
<v Speaker 1>family supporting conservative causes. Then you do a little poking around,

0:31:37.640 --> 0:31:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and it turns out that uh, critics would say that um,

0:31:42.280 --> 0:31:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the healthcare bill that forced employers to pay for their

0:31:46.960 --> 0:31:50.680
<v Speaker 1>employees healthcare tax. Walmart was like, this is great because

0:31:50.760 --> 0:31:53.840
<v Speaker 1>we can afford to do this, but our mom and

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 1>pop competitors can't. So we're actually gonna try and get

0:31:56.840 --> 0:32:00.000
<v Speaker 1>this push through. Even though at its face it doesn't

0:32:00.040 --> 0:32:02.320
<v Speaker 1>quite make a lot of sense, it makes sense to them,

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 1>like why would Walmart take on the cost of their

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:08.720
<v Speaker 1>their employees healthcare because they know that they can go

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:13.160
<v Speaker 1>back to sleep. Everybody stop asking quests. Really interesting, it is,

0:32:13.320 --> 0:32:16.720
<v Speaker 1>it's fascinating. But that's one thing you can do is

0:32:17.280 --> 0:32:20.840
<v Speaker 1>donate to a think tank that's furthering your agenda. And

0:32:20.920 --> 0:32:25.720
<v Speaker 1>because think tanks are now largely agenda driven, there's a

0:32:25.760 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of think tanks out there that can help you out.

0:32:28.600 --> 0:32:31.760
<v Speaker 1>And there's a new thing that's happening with think tanks

0:32:31.800 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 1>these days is they're starting to solicit corporate donations. And

0:32:35.360 --> 0:32:38.360
<v Speaker 1>one of the saddest stories is the story of the

0:32:38.360 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Brookings Institution, the most centrist think tank that has put

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:47.080
<v Speaker 1>out the Martial Plan that helped figure out the New

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Deal and it's and how it addressed the depression, like

0:32:51.040 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 1>has done all this amazing stuff. Is now they hired

0:32:55.840 --> 0:33:01.240
<v Speaker 1>a lobbyist for their strategic development chief and they're now

0:33:01.360 --> 0:33:06.040
<v Speaker 1>soliciting corporate donations left and right, and they're basically this

0:33:06.120 --> 0:33:07.840
<v Speaker 1>is this is what you can get, Like if you

0:33:07.960 --> 0:33:11.400
<v Speaker 1>hire a think tanker, I'm sorry, you're you're not supposed

0:33:11.440 --> 0:33:15.280
<v Speaker 1>to say higher. If you enter into a partnership or

0:33:15.400 --> 0:33:18.720
<v Speaker 1>donate to a think tank and your your corporation or

0:33:18.720 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 1>a very wealthy person. You What the think tank will

0:33:22.480 --> 0:33:27.280
<v Speaker 1>do is they will basically get your ideas out there.

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:30.280
<v Speaker 1>They will deploy. So first of all, let's say there's

0:33:30.280 --> 0:33:33.800
<v Speaker 1>this really great New York Times article about them. What

0:33:33.920 --> 0:33:38.479
<v Speaker 1>was the name of that company, the Lennar Corporation. They

0:33:38.600 --> 0:33:41.400
<v Speaker 1>wanted to build in San Francisco. They wanted to redevelop

0:33:41.440 --> 0:33:44.800
<v Speaker 1>the site in San Francisco, which whatever, apparently there was

0:33:44.840 --> 0:33:47.320
<v Speaker 1>pushback on it, or they were getting some sort of

0:33:47.360 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 1>pushback from the residents of San Francisco. So I guess

0:33:52.160 --> 0:33:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the Brookings Institution went to them and said, hey, we've

0:33:54.920 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 1>got some ideas for you. We can support this as

0:33:58.120 --> 0:34:01.040
<v Speaker 1>basically like a great idea of cities of the future,

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:04.239
<v Speaker 1>and and we're going to lend the credibility of our

0:34:04.320 --> 0:34:08.000
<v Speaker 1>experts in our think tank to your project and make

0:34:08.040 --> 0:34:11.640
<v Speaker 1>it like a champion kind of thing, like a blue

0:34:11.640 --> 0:34:15.640
<v Speaker 1>type and archetype for how to further cities in America

0:34:15.880 --> 0:34:19.960
<v Speaker 1>your development projects. Their their home builders, but but with

0:34:20.200 --> 0:34:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Brookings Institution behind it, there was a veneer of something

0:34:23.719 --> 0:34:27.759
<v Speaker 1>bigger than building homes, bigger than redeveloping, something about the

0:34:27.800 --> 0:34:31.239
<v Speaker 1>future in progress, and Brookings like went to them and

0:34:31.320 --> 0:34:35.799
<v Speaker 1>in exchange for four grand Brookings like added this credibility

0:34:35.840 --> 0:34:37.879
<v Speaker 1>to it, got talking heads out there on the news

0:34:37.960 --> 0:34:40.480
<v Speaker 1>to talk up this development and like what it meant

0:34:40.520 --> 0:34:43.480
<v Speaker 1>for the future. And um, one of the other things

0:34:43.560 --> 0:34:46.040
<v Speaker 1>they did and can do is they can set up

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:50.279
<v Speaker 1>summits conferences on cities of the future and get the

0:34:50.360 --> 0:34:53.799
<v Speaker 1>home builders and lawmakers into the same room to hang

0:34:53.840 --> 0:34:58.759
<v Speaker 1>out together. And so that's lobbying. Sure, there's no other

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:01.040
<v Speaker 1>way to put it. That is lobbying, and they were

0:35:01.080 --> 0:35:04.160
<v Speaker 1>doing it on behalf of a specific corporation. There should

0:35:04.200 --> 0:35:07.799
<v Speaker 1>be no tax exemption whatsoever any longer. It doesn't matter

0:35:07.840 --> 0:35:10.080
<v Speaker 1>what side of the aisle you're on. If you're a taxpayer,

0:35:10.520 --> 0:35:16.279
<v Speaker 1>you are funding that bye bye through these tax exemptions

0:35:16.320 --> 0:35:19.839
<v Speaker 1>because we foot the bill for tax deduction. So if

0:35:20.160 --> 0:35:24.160
<v Speaker 1>a single corporation's interests are being served, even if society

0:35:24.239 --> 0:35:28.000
<v Speaker 1>in general is benefiting in some way, that's too much

0:35:28.000 --> 0:35:32.120
<v Speaker 1>of a slippery slope. That breaks the tax exemption status.

0:35:32.400 --> 0:35:34.880
<v Speaker 1>And then that that should go away. And that, sadly

0:35:35.000 --> 0:35:39.959
<v Speaker 1>is is apparently where Brookings the direction Brookings is going. Yeah,

0:35:40.040 --> 0:35:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and others too, I should say, oh, sure, sure, um,

0:35:43.040 --> 0:35:47.440
<v Speaker 1>even the ones that aren't maybe as outright uh are

0:35:47.520 --> 0:35:50.680
<v Speaker 1>on his bald face about this stuff. Um, Like a

0:35:50.680 --> 0:35:53.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of scholars say that you know, bought and paid

0:35:53.080 --> 0:35:56.320
<v Speaker 1>for research is sort of the exception. Still. But even

0:35:56.360 --> 0:35:59.759
<v Speaker 1>even so, there's still places where you know, you may

0:35:59.800 --> 0:36:03.280
<v Speaker 1>not it. Um, you may not push out certain research

0:36:03.320 --> 0:36:06.400
<v Speaker 1>if you think you're it might piss off your boss. Yeah,

0:36:06.400 --> 0:36:08.760
<v Speaker 1>which is the same thing or sort of self censor

0:36:08.840 --> 0:36:11.200
<v Speaker 1>yourself if you think, like, oh man, I don't know,

0:36:11.239 --> 0:36:14.960
<v Speaker 1>like we're getting donations now, like this might not please them,

0:36:15.120 --> 0:36:16.960
<v Speaker 1>it might make them look bad, so I probably should

0:36:17.040 --> 0:36:20.080
<v Speaker 1>just avoid this conclusion. Yeah. So maybe not of like

0:36:20.280 --> 0:36:24.680
<v Speaker 1>completely inventing a study or something, but being very selective

0:36:24.719 --> 0:36:27.440
<v Speaker 1>in what you choose to research or how you research

0:36:27.480 --> 0:36:30.160
<v Speaker 1>it or what you release is uh, you know, it's

0:36:30.160 --> 0:36:32.960
<v Speaker 1>another version of the same thing. It totally is. And

0:36:33.000 --> 0:36:34.880
<v Speaker 1>one of one of the other things that they've been

0:36:34.880 --> 0:36:37.439
<v Speaker 1>found to do a lot of think tanks um, or

0:36:37.520 --> 0:36:39.840
<v Speaker 1>one of the new things that think tanks do is

0:36:39.880 --> 0:36:43.319
<v Speaker 1>they will circulate drafts before there's a final draft two

0:36:43.400 --> 0:36:46.080
<v Speaker 1>donors like what do you think about this? And sometimes

0:36:46.160 --> 0:36:50.120
<v Speaker 1>their opinions will be incorporated into the final draft. That

0:36:50.360 --> 0:36:53.840
<v Speaker 1>is the antithesis of the spirit of think tanks and

0:36:53.880 --> 0:36:56.240
<v Speaker 1>what they were originally meant to do. They were supposed

0:36:56.280 --> 0:36:59.120
<v Speaker 1>to be, like, here's the facts, here's the research to

0:36:59.160 --> 0:37:01.279
<v Speaker 1>back it up. It is what it is. We think

0:37:01.320 --> 0:37:03.680
<v Speaker 1>you can apply it to make the world better in

0:37:03.719 --> 0:37:06.640
<v Speaker 1>this way, not what you know, what do you guys

0:37:06.640 --> 0:37:08.719
<v Speaker 1>think does this? Does this jibe with the kind of

0:37:08.760 --> 0:37:12.200
<v Speaker 1>sinks you selected for this redevelopment because we can change

0:37:12.200 --> 0:37:14.760
<v Speaker 1>this part to to jibe with the sinks you chose.

0:37:15.280 --> 0:37:17.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's just not what it's supposed to be.

0:37:17.840 --> 0:37:19.839
<v Speaker 1>And the reason that I think tanks are doing this

0:37:20.080 --> 0:37:25.399
<v Speaker 1>is they are in um existential danger through the death

0:37:25.440 --> 0:37:28.440
<v Speaker 1>of expertise that I remember I talked about in the

0:37:28.480 --> 0:37:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Elimination Diet episode. The problem is, it's not like America

0:37:32.680 --> 0:37:36.040
<v Speaker 1>just said we're sick of expertise, we're tired of you experts,

0:37:36.080 --> 0:37:38.400
<v Speaker 1>like you're always right, and we're tired of here and

0:37:38.440 --> 0:37:41.000
<v Speaker 1>you're always right. People got tired of being lied to

0:37:41.440 --> 0:37:46.000
<v Speaker 1>and misled and misinformed and manipulated, and they finally said,

0:37:46.080 --> 0:37:49.440
<v Speaker 1>you know what, experts, that's enough enough of you are

0:37:49.560 --> 0:37:51.839
<v Speaker 1>full of it, enough of you have let your credibility

0:37:51.880 --> 0:37:54.000
<v Speaker 1>be co opted. We're just not going to listen to

0:37:54.040 --> 0:37:56.520
<v Speaker 1>any of you anymore because we don't know who to trust.

0:37:57.120 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 1>And the experts brought about the death of expertise themselves

0:38:01.520 --> 0:38:04.520
<v Speaker 1>in large part. Yeah, and there's another Uh. There was

0:38:04.520 --> 0:38:07.360
<v Speaker 1>this article from the Washington Post called or think Tanks Obsolete,

0:38:07.920 --> 0:38:12.600
<v Speaker 1>which sort of argues along those lines um about and

0:38:12.640 --> 0:38:15.239
<v Speaker 1>also incorporates the Internet and the length of like a

0:38:15.280 --> 0:38:18.960
<v Speaker 1>research cycle, like with the Internet and Twitter and Facebook

0:38:18.960 --> 0:38:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and things like Ted talks. Uh. There's a guy, Donald Abelson,

0:38:22.760 --> 0:38:25.359
<v Speaker 1>a professor at University Western Ontario, wrote a book called

0:38:25.640 --> 0:38:28.799
<v Speaker 1>The Think Tanks Matter, where his conclusion basically is that

0:38:28.880 --> 0:38:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the marketplace of ideas, he says, has become congested and

0:38:33.520 --> 0:38:38.920
<v Speaker 1>you don't have time anymore to do a twelvemonth research

0:38:39.040 --> 0:38:44.839
<v Speaker 1>proposal to come to the following conclusions. When hundred Ted

0:38:44.880 --> 0:38:47.960
<v Speaker 1>talks over that twelve months will be published. Not picking

0:38:47.960 --> 0:38:50.919
<v Speaker 1>on ted talks are great, No, it's a good example though.

0:38:51.000 --> 0:38:52.560
<v Speaker 1>But you can push out of Ted talk. You can

0:38:52.560 --> 0:38:56.560
<v Speaker 1>push out uh Facebook live video as as an economist

0:38:56.880 --> 0:38:59.840
<v Speaker 1>and have a lot of sway you can They mentioned

0:38:59.840 --> 0:39:05.880
<v Speaker 1>in here the UH and the article about vaccines for instance. UH.

0:39:06.040 --> 0:39:07.880
<v Speaker 1>When as far as it goes with the vaccines. The

0:39:07.960 --> 0:39:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Rand Corporation one of the largest thing thanks that we

0:39:10.680 --> 0:39:14.319
<v Speaker 1>already mentioned. They did like a very thorough deep dive

0:39:14.360 --> 0:39:19.840
<v Speaker 1>in research, uh, debunking the notion that vaccines cause autism.

0:39:19.880 --> 0:39:23.040
<v Speaker 1>And it took a long time. But you can get

0:39:23.080 --> 0:39:26.279
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook and go to a group called Educate before

0:39:26.320 --> 0:39:31.120
<v Speaker 1>You Vaccinate and watch videos by non experts in people

0:39:31.120 --> 0:39:33.839
<v Speaker 1>are swayed these days by this stuff like why wait,

0:39:34.520 --> 0:39:36.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, the site the new cycle is so shortened.

0:39:37.239 --> 0:39:39.800
<v Speaker 1>You can't wait for a long deep dive research paper

0:39:39.840 --> 0:39:42.279
<v Speaker 1>to come out with some abstract summary that no one

0:39:42.360 --> 0:39:46.040
<v Speaker 1>reads anyway. And apparently now they're you know, they're written

0:39:46.040 --> 0:39:47.879
<v Speaker 1>in such a way where they will just say, uh,

0:39:48.520 --> 0:39:53.239
<v Speaker 1>abstract summary, this stinks. We shouldn't do it, you know,

0:39:53.320 --> 0:39:56.440
<v Speaker 1>they become so opinionated. I don't know, man, it's just

0:39:56.560 --> 0:39:59.799
<v Speaker 1>it's it's depressing to think that Facebook and Twitter have

0:40:00.719 --> 0:40:04.960
<v Speaker 1>outsized a think tank as far as they definitely have influence. Yeah,

0:40:05.600 --> 0:40:08.360
<v Speaker 1>and YouTube and basically anything that gives a voice to

0:40:08.520 --> 0:40:10.479
<v Speaker 1>the average person, which on the one hand is really

0:40:10.520 --> 0:40:13.760
<v Speaker 1>cool and great sort of democratizes it in a way,

0:40:13.800 --> 0:40:18.200
<v Speaker 1>but but at times, but it's tied into this death

0:40:18.200 --> 0:40:23.480
<v Speaker 1>of expertise in a really toxic manner. You know what

0:40:23.560 --> 0:40:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying, Like the two that that democratization of like

0:40:27.120 --> 0:40:30.200
<v Speaker 1>a like giving everybody like a mouthpieces, not in and

0:40:30.239 --> 0:40:33.520
<v Speaker 1>of itself like a bad thing, but when since it

0:40:33.600 --> 0:40:37.120
<v Speaker 1>coincided with the loss and trust and experts and expertise,

0:40:37.600 --> 0:40:41.160
<v Speaker 1>That's what where the problem came from. And that was

0:40:41.200 --> 0:40:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the reason why we couldn't be a think tank. Sadly,

0:40:43.560 --> 0:40:46.160
<v Speaker 1>we could be a think tank now, but we couldn't

0:40:46.200 --> 0:40:49.360
<v Speaker 1>be a bona fide think tank because, Chuck, we don't

0:40:49.400 --> 0:40:53.280
<v Speaker 1>have enough time in any given week to do so

0:40:53.360 --> 0:40:59.680
<v Speaker 1>much thorough um primary source research into stuff. If we do,

0:40:59.840 --> 0:41:01.880
<v Speaker 1>if we released one of these every couple of months,

0:41:01.880 --> 0:41:04.080
<v Speaker 1>sure we could be like a real think tank, but

0:41:05.320 --> 0:41:07.680
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't be near least fun six episodes a year.

0:41:08.640 --> 0:41:12.680
<v Speaker 1>People would love that, Yeah, they love you. Got anything else? Nope,

0:41:14.000 --> 0:41:17.239
<v Speaker 1>I guess I don't either. Sorry for going off, everybody,

0:41:17.280 --> 0:41:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening. I'm sure I'll gets an email, But

0:41:20.719 --> 0:41:23.440
<v Speaker 1>what els is worth it? Uh? If you want to

0:41:23.440 --> 0:41:26.360
<v Speaker 1>know more about think tanks, well, I don't know, go

0:41:26.400 --> 0:41:28.080
<v Speaker 1>on the internet and look up some think tanks and

0:41:28.120 --> 0:41:30.080
<v Speaker 1>see if there's any that you agree with. A lot

0:41:30.120 --> 0:41:33.279
<v Speaker 1>of them have like daily interpretations of news that kind

0:41:33.280 --> 0:41:36.719
<v Speaker 1>of go through their lens. Um it's it's it's a

0:41:36.760 --> 0:41:39.640
<v Speaker 1>way to keep up with things. Uh. And you can

0:41:39.680 --> 0:41:42.200
<v Speaker 1>also read this article on how stuff works just not

0:41:42.280 --> 0:41:45.120
<v Speaker 1>a think tank, called how think tanks Work. And since

0:41:45.160 --> 0:41:49.759
<v Speaker 1>I said that's time for listener mail, I'm gonna call

0:41:49.800 --> 0:41:53.920
<v Speaker 1>this a ballpoint pen addiction for just pin addiction. Hey guys,

0:41:53.920 --> 0:41:56.000
<v Speaker 1>been listening for a couple of months or so, new listener.

0:41:56.640 --> 0:41:58.680
<v Speaker 1>You were my first foray into podcast. I just really

0:41:58.760 --> 0:42:01.799
<v Speaker 1>enjoy listening to you two. I saw the Ballpoint Pin

0:42:01.920 --> 0:42:04.279
<v Speaker 1>podcast and I could not pass it up. I have

0:42:04.320 --> 0:42:07.040
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a pin problem, you see. I own

0:42:07.160 --> 0:42:11.760
<v Speaker 1>many many pins, especially the gael type inc rollerball pins.

0:42:13.160 --> 0:42:15.040
<v Speaker 1>You got taken a test by quite a few people

0:42:15.040 --> 0:42:20.839
<v Speaker 1>who were just like Josh Clark harresy gel pins. Yeah,

0:42:21.239 --> 0:42:23.960
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of I guess traditionalists to bhoopoo

0:42:24.040 --> 0:42:26.400
<v Speaker 1>that I think they're great. I got a lot of

0:42:26.440 --> 0:42:28.400
<v Speaker 1>support for that one too. I agreed, we got a

0:42:28.440 --> 0:42:31.239
<v Speaker 1>lot of pin recommendations. It was good to see. Uh.

0:42:31.239 --> 0:42:34.520
<v Speaker 1>And here's another one. I own many many pins, especially

0:42:34.560 --> 0:42:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the gel Inc roller ball pins. I also own a

0:42:36.400 --> 0:42:40.799
<v Speaker 1>collection of Sharpie's in various tip widths and colors. I

0:42:40.840 --> 0:42:43.640
<v Speaker 1>probably have a couple of gallon size zip block bags worth.

0:42:44.320 --> 0:42:46.120
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned the way certain pins right on certain types

0:42:46.160 --> 0:42:49.399
<v Speaker 1>of paper. I think it's probably the rollerball gel pins

0:42:49.400 --> 0:42:51.680
<v Speaker 1>that work best on the thermal paper that they use

0:42:51.719 --> 0:42:54.399
<v Speaker 1>the most restaurants. And I was talking about signing the check.

0:42:54.600 --> 0:42:56.319
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what she's talking. We still never found

0:42:56.360 --> 0:42:59.160
<v Speaker 1>out what that thing is called thermal paper. No, No,

0:42:59.480 --> 0:43:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the thing that the check comes out in the little portfolio,

0:43:02.280 --> 0:43:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the clamshell. Someone actually said, did you see that this

0:43:05.640 --> 0:43:09.239
<v Speaker 1>great couple sent in a picture of a clamshell check

0:43:09.840 --> 0:43:14.520
<v Speaker 1>delivery system. What are they called? I don't know, check Catty.

0:43:14.760 --> 0:43:17.600
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna we're gonna name them clamshells. Now, that's the

0:43:17.640 --> 0:43:19.839
<v Speaker 1>new name for him. So I have a favorite pin,

0:43:19.880 --> 0:43:22.440
<v Speaker 1>though guys by them by the box. Uh. It's the

0:43:22.560 --> 0:43:27.560
<v Speaker 1>pilot V ball B green pin, the point five millimeter.

0:43:28.320 --> 0:43:29.799
<v Speaker 1>I love the way they feel when they write. I

0:43:29.880 --> 0:43:32.680
<v Speaker 1>can't go back to ballpoint pins. Use them at work.

0:43:32.719 --> 0:43:34.239
<v Speaker 1>I carry at least three in my bag and I

0:43:34.320 --> 0:43:36.880
<v Speaker 1>draw and doodle with them. Using them on a newsprint

0:43:36.960 --> 0:43:41.200
<v Speaker 1>pad is my favorite thing when doing word art. Sorry

0:43:41.200 --> 0:43:42.840
<v Speaker 1>for the ramble, guys, have a great day. That is

0:43:42.840 --> 0:43:49.080
<v Speaker 1>from Davini and Barry, Davini Berry, Davini and Berry M. Berry.

0:43:49.200 --> 0:43:52.839
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't going okay, well, I didn't know if Davini's

0:43:52.840 --> 0:43:55.040
<v Speaker 1>middle initial was M, or if I was missed hearing

0:43:55.040 --> 0:43:58.600
<v Speaker 1>you and Davini and Berry. It's actually Davina, excuse me,

0:43:58.760 --> 0:44:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Davina M. Berry. If I would have said Davina and Barry,

0:44:01.719 --> 0:44:04.400
<v Speaker 1>that would have been much more clear. Or Embury. It

0:44:04.520 --> 0:44:07.719
<v Speaker 1>might be Davina Embury. What does it say Davina or Davinah?

0:44:08.040 --> 0:44:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh God about d E. Thanks d It's d I.

0:44:15.320 --> 0:44:17.960
<v Speaker 1>At any rate, we're glad that you started listening to us.

0:44:17.960 --> 0:44:19.920
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate and thanks for taking the time to let

0:44:20.000 --> 0:44:23.880
<v Speaker 1>us know about the Your benediction um totally fine with us.

0:44:24.560 --> 0:44:26.680
<v Speaker 1>If you want to let us know about something you're

0:44:26.680 --> 0:44:29.520
<v Speaker 1>super into, you can hang out with us on social meds.

0:44:29.840 --> 0:44:31.439
<v Speaker 1>You can go to stuff you Should Know dot com

0:44:31.480 --> 0:44:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and find all of our social media links. You can

0:44:34.080 --> 0:44:36.400
<v Speaker 1>also send us an email to stuff podcast at how

0:44:36.440 --> 0:44:43.440
<v Speaker 1>stuff works dot com for more on this and thousands

0:44:43.440 --> 0:44:53.080
<v Speaker 1>of other topics. Is it how stuff works dot com