WEBVTT - Draymond's Suspension, Anonymous Player Poll & This or That

0:00:01.720 --> 0:00:04.480
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable. Discover the

0:00:04.519 --> 0:00:07.880
<v Speaker 1>inspiring true story about Anthony Robliss, who defined every expectation

0:00:07.960 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to become a national wrestling champion, and Unstoppable, a new

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>original movie from Amazon MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg,

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:24.759
<v Speaker 1>including Jirel Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Panya, and

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Bobby Canavali. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:46.040
<v Speaker 2>Welcome In episode on What's Right with Nick Wright, we

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 2>went very long in the previous on Tuesday's episode, I'll

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 2>be honest, We've gone long in about ninety percent of

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 2>these episodes in our history. Today is going to be

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 2>a tight forty minutes. We have a ton you don't

0:00:58.240 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 2>believe me. Noor, my daughter is here with us. As

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 2>you can see, she and I are wearing matching sweatshirts.

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 2>More on that in the moment if you're watching on YouTube,

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 2>and by in a moment, I mean at the end

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 2>of the show. Also on Tuesday show, we had a

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 2>very somber and serious final half hour. Really today, even

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 2>though there's been more news and more stories similar to

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 2>the ones we discussed, most notably the Texas shooting of

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 2>the cheerleader who got into the wrong car, just harfying incident.

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 2>Today we are going to try to have fun, just

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 2>talk sports and a little bit of life, but fun

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:40.480
<v Speaker 2>life stuff. But first, here's what did not make the

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:44.319
<v Speaker 2>cut for today's show. Not on the show. The A's

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 2>moving to Vegas. Vegas pretty soon gonna be a four

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 2>pro sport team city. They already have the Golden Night

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 2>hockey team, the Raiders football team, They're about to have

0:01:56.200 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 2>the Oakland A's Sorry for my friends in Oakland, that

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 2>really sucks. And Lebron's gonna bring a basketball team there

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 2>at some point. That'll be a four team city. It also,

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 2>one day, I think will be the city where I

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 2>live once. What you don't you just winced the young lady.

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 2>You don't think I'll ever live in Vegas. I didn't

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 2>say that your mom wants to open a Trentage in Vegas.

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm one day gonna be a professional poker player. There's

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:24.240
<v Speaker 2>no reason for me to not live in Las Vegas.

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 2>Calvin Ridley says, he's a fourteen hundred yard type of player,

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 2>and I might be losing my blue check mark. They

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 2>have been I don't care about losing the blue check mark.

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:37.920
<v Speaker 2>They have been saying, say it again, No, no, this.

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 3>Is he's so gonna buy it.

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 2>No zero percent chance am I gonna buy it. What

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 2>I will say is it is. And again I'm not

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:53.799
<v Speaker 2>a Galaxy brain marketing genius. However, the blue check mark went,

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 2>oh wow, they just made it evaporate on the screen.

0:02:56.880 --> 0:03:03.080
<v Speaker 2>At one point was kind of a status symbol, but

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 2>still a bit of a status symbol. And now the

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 2>big deal to get a check it was, it was

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 2>a big deal. And now within six months of taken

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:17.080
<v Speaker 2>over the company, I think the new owner has made

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 2>having a check mark be something you actively don't want

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:25.960
<v Speaker 2>because people see it and think you paid for Twitter.

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 2>It's a free service and you're paying them half the

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 2>price in Netflix, just so you can have longer tweets

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 2>and a blue check mark. Now, what I will miss,

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 2>I will say is if you have the old school

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 2>verified check mark, I can go to my mentions and

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 2>only see mentions from verified users. That was useful. So

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 2>if colleagues or athletes were trying to reach out to me.

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:51.920
<v Speaker 2>I saw it that way without having to go through

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 2>all the tweets of people photoshopping my head on other

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 2>people's bodies and horrible things. So that part all missed.

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 2>But no, I ain't paying for no eight dollars a

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 2>month for no blue check mark DIORA. Let's get to

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 2>today's show.

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So the Lakers lost to the Grizzlies without Job.

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:08.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 3>If they can't beat the team a team without their

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 3>best player, how are they ever going to win the finals? Okay?

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 3>So do you think you overreacted to Game one?

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 2>No? I didn't. Okay, but I will tell you right now.

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:29.720
<v Speaker 2>This will be a good test case for whomever your

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:35.559
<v Speaker 2>favorite media personalities are, whoever you consume, and how whether

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:40.159
<v Speaker 2>or not they understand how the NBA works, or whether

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 2>or not they are simply trying to give you the

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:52.599
<v Speaker 2>hottest Lakers take imagine them. Here's what Four teams went

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 2>on the road and one game one of their playoff series.

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:02.160
<v Speaker 2>There's eight series in four them. The home team won

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:05.720
<v Speaker 2>game one and game two, so that would be of

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 2>course Denver, Philly, Boston, and who am I leaving out

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:16.960
<v Speaker 2>as the other one, the Denver, Philly, Boston is that it?

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 2>Maybe that's it. Those teams went took care of home court.

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 2>Those series are two to two, right, Oh, and Sacramento

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 2>light the damn beam. That's why I was forgetting. I

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:33.279
<v Speaker 2>knew it was four of them. Four teams lost their

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 2>opening game of the playoffs as the home team, the Grizzlies,

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:45.360
<v Speaker 2>the Suns, the Bucks, and the Cavs. What did all

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 2>four of those teams then do for Game two? They

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 2>are desperate. The other team relaxes a bit because they

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 2>had to steal one. They already stole one. All four

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 2>of those teams, the Clippers, the Bucks, the the Calves,

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 2>and the Grizzlies came back and the Sun's pardon me,

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 2>and one game two to salvage a split. Now you

0:06:21.760 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 2>might say, yeah, Nick, but the Grizzlies didn't have John Morant.

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:31.599
<v Speaker 2>I understand that. But the Grizzlies are more equipped to

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:36.160
<v Speaker 2>play without John Morant than any team in the league

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 2>is equipped to play without their best player. Over the

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 2>last two seasons, with Joh, they win sixty three percent

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:48.279
<v Speaker 2>of their games. Over the last two seasons, they have

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 2>played fifty games five zero games without Job. The winning

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 2>percentage actually goes up a tick. They win sixty six

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 2>percent of their game. Now, are they better without joh

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 2>Of course not. But are they more equipped than any

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 2>other team in the league to win without their superstar?

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Of course they are because they they are such a

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 2>great defensive team. They don't have to score a ton

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 2>of points to win games. They are tough, they are

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 2>well coached. Now does so what am I concerned about

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:26.120
<v Speaker 2>from last night's Lakers game? It is not that, oh

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 2>my god, you lost to the team without Jah. It

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 2>is that D'Angelo Russell after the game, and he's been

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 2>brutal lately after a two of eleven to five point game,

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 2>was asked about being a point guard for this team,

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 2>and he was like, I'm not a point guard for

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 2>this team. I'm not a point guard. I'm just a

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 2>basketball player. He already seems, let's call it, a little

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 2>annoyed with his role, which is frustrating because right when

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 2>he got back to the Lakers, he played so well

0:07:57.160 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 2>in his role, they were already talking about out having

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 2>him be the long term solution at point guard instead

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 2>of Kyrie Irving. The other reason this is concerning if

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:12.679
<v Speaker 2>you're the Lakers, when it comes to Angelo Russell. Last

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 2>year in the postseason with the Minnesota Timberwolves, D'Angelo Russell

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:23.559
<v Speaker 2>twelve points a game on thirty three percent shooting. This year,

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 2>through two games of the postseason, twelve points a game

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 2>on thirty two percent shooting. They need him to be better.

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:33.719
<v Speaker 2>I think a lot of people today are going to

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:40.440
<v Speaker 2>be criticizing Anthony Davis. He was bad offensively, it was not. However,

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:44.360
<v Speaker 2>you cannot say he wasn't locked into yesterday's game because

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:49.079
<v Speaker 2>once again he was dominant defensively. The reason the Lakers

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 2>lost yesterday was because D'Angelo went two of eleven. They

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:59.959
<v Speaker 2>got nothing, absolutely nothing off their bench aside from Rum,

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:03.560
<v Speaker 2>who once again was excellent, and they couldn't hit a shot.

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 2>And then you add to it that Anthony Davis went

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:09.560
<v Speaker 2>four or fourteen. That's not a recipe to win the game.

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 2>So the Lakers relaxed a bit. The Grizzlies were desperate,

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 2>just like by the way, Clippers relaxed a bit. The

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:22.200
<v Speaker 2>Suns were desperate, The Heat relaxed a bit, The Bucks

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 2>without Giannis were desperate, The Knicks relaxed a bit, The

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 2>Calves were desperate. It is very rare the road team

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 2>wins both of the opening two games. So no, it

0:09:33.240 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 2>is not panic time in Los Angeles. And I think

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 2>you will see a sense of urgency in game three

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 2>for the Lakers that you did not see in game two.

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 2>What's your follow up? Do you were?

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 3>What were your thoughts on Dylan Brooks comments towards your bestie?

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so Dylan Brooks your enemy? Now, no, he's not

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 2>my end. Listen, He's a cartoon character, Dylan Brooks. Listen.

0:09:56.640 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 2>I there is a long line of Dylan Brooks. The

0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 2>first was Deshaun Stevenson, who tried to chirp at Lebron,

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 2>and then Lebron came out and said, uh, this would

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 2>be like jay Z replying to Soldier Boy. Then because

0:10:13.960 --> 0:10:17.839
<v Speaker 2>of that, Soldier Boy himself showed up to the next game.

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 2>Then because of that, jay Z dropped a disc track

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 2>on Soldier Boy and Deshaun Stevenson. That of course ended

0:10:26.480 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 2>with Lebron dispatching of Deshaun Stevenson and the Washington Wizards.

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:35.960
<v Speaker 2>Then the next Dylan Brooks there was was Lance Stephenson.

0:10:36.840 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 2>Lance Stephenson chirped at Lebron. They're not related. What's up

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 2>to your Lance Stevenson. You maybe have seen him play.

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:48.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean he just from something else.

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so well, Deshaun Stevenson's name wasn't a song. Lance Stephenson,

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 2>maybe's name was in a song. Lance chirped at Lebron,

0:10:56.640 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 2>including during a playoff game, once blowing in Lebron's ear

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:03.680
<v Speaker 2>to try to get under his skin. That, of course,

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 2>went with Lebron repeatedly sending Lance Stevenson's pacers home for

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:12.320
<v Speaker 2>the playoffs. Then there was Draymond Green, the best version

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:16.200
<v Speaker 2>of any of these players. Draymond Green chirped at Lebron

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 2>and then punched Lebron, punched, slapped Lebron in the groin.

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:26.200
<v Speaker 2>That ended with Draymond being suspended, Lebron winning three straight,

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:30.199
<v Speaker 2>and then Draymond literally crying in the parking lot after

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 2>losing the finals, calling Kevin Durant and asking him to

0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 2>come save him. And oh it was in a Nicki

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 2>Minaj song. You just found it, Lance Stevenson. Yeah, okay,

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 2>there you go. So and now there's Dylan Brooks. Dylan

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 2>Brooks said Lebron's old. Dylan Brooks said that he doesn't

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:51.320
<v Speaker 2>respect anyone until he scores forty on him Dylan Brooks

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:55.520
<v Speaker 2>had all this chirpin, and as soon as that happened,

0:11:56.200 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 2>everyone on Twitter was like, oh boy, can't wait to

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 2>bet the Lebron over props for Game three. He's gonna

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 2>score forty, He's gonna score fifty. None of those people

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 2>know what they're talking about.

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:12.679
<v Speaker 3>No one knows who they're talking about except for you.

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:16.560
<v Speaker 2>Right well, when it comes to certain things, you're.

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 3>Not supposed to agree on that.

0:12:17.960 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 2>When it comes to certain things, it would appear I'm

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:26.560
<v Speaker 2>the only person that hold on that. I'm the only

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 2>person that has watched Lebron for the last twenty years.

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 2>The idea that because Dylan Brooks talk trash, Lebron is

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 2>going to change his approach in the playoffs is utter nonsense.

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 3>It won't happen, blasphemy.

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 2>It's it is. He goes against who Lebron always has

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 2>been as a basketball player. He's not going to all

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 2>of a sudden making a one on one battle with

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 2>him and Dylan Brooks. It's just not gonna happen. Now,

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 2>if he gets the opportunity late in the series, when

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:12.120
<v Speaker 2>the Lakers have full control to embarrass Brooks, will hey, maybe,

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 2>But is he gonna go out there say I'm gonna

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 2>go get my forty. No, not who he is as

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 2>a player. And by the way, I got no quarrel

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:21.320
<v Speaker 2>with Dylan Brooks. This is who he is. He's a

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:27.199
<v Speaker 2>cartoon character. He's a wrestling heel. That Yeah. In wrestling,

0:13:27.679 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 2>a face is a good guy. A heel is a

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:33.120
<v Speaker 2>bad guy. Uh. And that's who he wants to be,

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 2>and that's how he's carved out his niche in this league.

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 2>He's a good defender, he's an abysmal offensive player, and

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 2>he is the kind of emotional support of this team.

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 2>But it's not gonna end well for him. But I

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 2>don't think it's because Lebron's gonna go out and try

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:52.079
<v Speaker 2>to score forty in Game three, all right.

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 3>Next, after stepping on Sabonis in Game two, Draymond was

0:13:56.840 --> 0:13:58.080
<v Speaker 3>suspended for Game three.

0:13:58.240 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:02.359
<v Speaker 3>The NBA said draymond excessive and over the top actions

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:06.560
<v Speaker 3>in his history as a repeat offender played a huge

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 3>role in the decision.

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 3>You keep saying that the Warriors are going to be

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 3>done with Draymond. Yeah, So two questions for you, okay, One,

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:18.319
<v Speaker 3>are you okay with Draymond's history factoring in his suspension

0:14:18.720 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 3>and two. Are you ready for another Warrior's take to

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 3>age poorly?

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 2>All right, let me deal with the second one first.

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 2>The Warriors are cooked h and this take one age poorly.

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Save all the clips, get ready to send them to

0:14:33.760 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 2>No my Warriors take last year did age poorly. I've

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 2>been wrong on them before, I'm not wrong this year.

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 2>Sacramento is better than them. They were better than them

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 2>in the regular season, They've been better than them in

0:14:46.440 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 2>the postseason. Both of these games have been tied with

0:14:50.120 --> 0:14:56.120
<v Speaker 2>six minutes left and the Kings have out executed. Now

0:14:56.840 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 2>on the Draymond party, Am I okay with this hit

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 2>street factoring in his suspension? Of course I am. It

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 2>would be ridiculous for it not to. And I want

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 2>to show you something. Do youra and you can tell

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 2>the audience.

0:15:11.560 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 3>He's definitely not staying under forty minutes.

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 2>If you okay? If you type in to YouTube Draymond

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 2>Green kicks, read what it auto fills. Just go down

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 2>the list. Read them on.

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 3>Adams Kicks, Lebron Kicks, Lebron James Kicks, Kicks, James Harden Kicks,

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 3>the Bonus, Steven Adams twice, Yeah Kicks, Nuts Kicks, Yeah Kicks,

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 3>fan out.

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so there it is. Google. No, there's another one.

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 2>There's two more names near the bottom that we haven't

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 2>gotten to.

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 3>Herb Jones, yeah fan and kri Kyrie Irving.

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 2>So if you type go to YouTube and type in

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 2>Draymond Green kicks, they're like, oh boy, we know you're

0:15:57.560 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 2>talking about him kicking a person, But man, which is

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 2>it Steven Adams? Is it Lebron? Is it James Harden?

0:16:03.720 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 2>Is it Demonte Sabonis? Is it Herb Jones? Is it

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 2>Kyrie Irving? Guys, of course his history should factor in.

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 2>And here's the other thing, Draymond, his history helps him

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 2>a lot. So guy Draymond does things on the court.

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 2>After calls that ninety percent, Dylan Brooks says this too,

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 2>by the way, that ninety percent of players would get

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 2>a technical for okay, but because he always does it,

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 2>the refs let it go. It's similar. I'll use a

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 2>family analogy.

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 3>They're about to say something that's gonna make me mad.

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 2>No, it won't make you mad. I think you'll agree

0:16:47.200 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 2>it's similar. So I am not a yeller, not like

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm not the yeller in the household. Mom.

0:16:54.320 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 3>Is he's yelling right now?

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 2>Just Okay, yeah, no, I always talk like this, but

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 2>like I'm not. So this is my point. When Deanna,

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 2>your little sister, if Mommy yells at her, she takes

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 2>it in stride because Mommy's a bit of a yeller.

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:17.719
<v Speaker 2>If I yell at her, she breaks down immediately. Do

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 2>you agree with that?

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 3>I think that's what any of us though.

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if I yell it correct because it's out of

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 2>the character. And again, Danielle's a better parent than me.

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:30.359
<v Speaker 2>I'm not I'm not indicting anything there, but she just

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:35.440
<v Speaker 2>runs a little hotter in these scenarios. Draymond gets away

0:17:36.160 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 2>with so much because he has smartly baked it into

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:43.880
<v Speaker 2>who he is. Go ahead, or like.

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 3>When someone who gets all d's get gets a C

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:51.200
<v Speaker 3>plus and then everyone's like, you did amazing.

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:54.639
<v Speaker 2>Exactly right. And if someone has straight a's and gets

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 2>a B that it's like, what the hell happened? It's

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:59.920
<v Speaker 2>exactly right. It's what you expect and did you meet

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 2>or exceed those expectations. So Draymond benefits from his history

0:18:06.520 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 2>a lot, but his history also factors in too. When

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:14.200
<v Speaker 2>you stomp on a guy's chest, the league's gonna look

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 2>at that. And I said this on TV. I'll say

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 2>it again because they said his press conference and his

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:24.399
<v Speaker 2>history onics after the stomp hurt him. If Draymond after

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 2>doing this didn't in try to incite the crowd and

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:31.400
<v Speaker 2>then at the press conference. So I'll be Draymond Green,

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:34.440
<v Speaker 2>you be the reporter. Ask me about the stump, and

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 2>I will tell you what Draymond should have said. And

0:18:37.119 --> 0:18:38.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't think he gets suspended.

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 3>So what happened with the stump? Why did you stop on?

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 2>Oh? You know, so, I'm really glad. I knew I

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 2>was gonna be asked that. I'm really glad you asked. So.

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:49.680
<v Speaker 2>As you guys saw, I couldn't believe they threw me

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 2>out of the game. I've now seen, you know, Coach

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 2>showed me the video and now I understand why they

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 2>threw me out of the game. It looks awful, and

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 2>I know because of my history what everybody thinks. I

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 2>want to tell you guys. If you see in the

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 2>video he grabs my ankle. It's a tight game where

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:16.959
<v Speaker 2>in the fourth quarter the ball's going up court, I

0:19:17.000 --> 0:19:18.919
<v Speaker 2>am trying to go ahead.

0:19:19.119 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 3>Nothing he did in the video it looked like he

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 3>was about to run correct and then after he stomped

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:27.440
<v Speaker 3>on him, he did a whole.

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:30.480
<v Speaker 2>Like jump exactly so this would have been plausible. I

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:32.440
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't have believed it, but it would have been plausible.

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 2>This is so again. I'm Draymond again. So if you

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 2>guys see the ball's going up court, he's grabbing my ankle.

0:19:40.000 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 2>I am trying to get back in the play. He's

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 2>a big, strong guy. I am trying to pull my

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:49.200
<v Speaker 2>foot out and run up court. Because he was holding

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 2>onto me, I ended up. It does look like a stump,

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:54.680
<v Speaker 2>but that's me running. I'm trying to get up court.

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:57.639
<v Speaker 2>I didn't mean to land on him, but I was.

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:00.399
<v Speaker 2>The reason that was so forceful was because I was

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 2>trying to get my foot out and go. So listen,

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:06.600
<v Speaker 2>I'll see Domas tomorrow or at the next game. I

0:20:06.640 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 2>hope he understands, because, yeah, that looked awful, but I

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:11.720
<v Speaker 2>wasn't trying to hurt him. I was trying to get

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:15.200
<v Speaker 2>back in the play. I honestly believe now I'm back

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:17.880
<v Speaker 2>to being me. If he said that they don't suspend.

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 3>Him, they wouldn't have been he but he just was like, yeah,

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 3>he grabbed my foot exactly right.

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:28.440
<v Speaker 2>He was his pride got in the way. He he

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:32.399
<v Speaker 2>wanted to play the victim card and he wanted to

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:35.880
<v Speaker 2>make it like, what did you expect me to do?

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:40.200
<v Speaker 2>This is? He said, yeah, they And by the way,

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 2>some people did some media did they the he said,

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 2>they grabbed my ankle two games in a row. What

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:48.359
<v Speaker 2>do you want me to do? And the entwer is

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:51.399
<v Speaker 2>not that. Now. One other thing about the media on this,

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:56.440
<v Speaker 2>and this is maybe why I don't have as many

0:20:56.440 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 2>friends as I should. The some of my colleagues hyper

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 2>ventilating about how the league has done the Warriors wrong

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:19.119
<v Speaker 2>is embarrassing. First of all, the idea that the Warriors

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:24.199
<v Speaker 2>are getting screwed by the officials is belied by the video,

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:29.160
<v Speaker 2>by the facts on the ground, and by logic, which

0:21:29.200 --> 0:21:33.200
<v Speaker 2>is the league with like nothing more than a Lakers

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 2>Warriors or Grizzlies Warriors round two. That's what's good for business,

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:43.719
<v Speaker 2>that's first of all. Second of all, the idea that

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:47.679
<v Speaker 2>now there's an asterisk on this series, give me a

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:53.880
<v Speaker 2>goddog break. Before the Draymond suspension was announced, the Warriors

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 2>were eight point home favorites. Now this morning, with Draymond

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:03.359
<v Speaker 2>not playing, they are six point home favors. So many

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:07.440
<v Speaker 2>of the people who are saying this forever Mars the series,

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 2>expect the Warriors to win tonight. I expect the Warriors

0:22:13.080 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 2>to win tonight. They're at home, They're desperate. They should be.

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 2>They're not gonna get swept. They should be able to

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:25.119
<v Speaker 2>win tonight. And it's just I understand. Draymond's got friends everywhere.

0:22:25.600 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 2>He works for Colin and does a podcast for him,

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 2>He works with TNT. I get all of it. Guys,

0:22:33.920 --> 0:22:39.119
<v Speaker 2>give me a break. He is who he is. He

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:42.159
<v Speaker 2>is an all time great player who is a dirty

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:46.680
<v Speaker 2>player who can't control himself, and this is the cost

0:22:46.680 --> 0:22:51.680
<v Speaker 2>of doing business. And he's now twice been suspended from

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 2>critical playoff games for his team. Part of the resume.

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 2>We all acknowledged it with Dennis Rodney. We nobody was

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 2>making excuses for Dennis rodmen great player, integral part of

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 2>multiple championships, and a live wire. Maybe I'm not gonna

0:23:11.760 --> 0:23:12.720
<v Speaker 2>be as fast as I thought.

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 3>Next I was about to say, TikTok yeah, okay. Booker

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:19.399
<v Speaker 3>and KD had big games for the Suns, who tied

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 3>the series after dropping Game one, but it's clear just

0:23:23.680 --> 0:23:26.680
<v Speaker 3>how flawed this team is Yeah, the bench only had

0:23:26.880 --> 0:23:30.359
<v Speaker 3>thirteen points. Monty Williams still doesn't seem to have his

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:33.880
<v Speaker 3>rotation down after the KD trade. Yeah, And even if

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:37.119
<v Speaker 3>they escape round one, are the Suns going to regret

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:39.960
<v Speaker 3>the KD trade? I think they will? You do? Yeah?

0:23:40.000 --> 0:23:40.440
<v Speaker 2>How come?

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:41.439
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:44.720
<v Speaker 2>It's just like they gave up so much and it's

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:47.920
<v Speaker 2>a small window. So here's the thing. It is hard

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:50.880
<v Speaker 2>to say you're gonna regret acquiring Kevin Durant when Durant's

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 2>been so great yakay. However, and that team before the

0:23:57.040 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 2>KD trade, that version of the Suns, in my opinion,

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:04.360
<v Speaker 2>was not going to win anything this year, and now

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 2>they do have a real chance at But Katie, of

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:13.119
<v Speaker 2>all the players in the NBA Playoffs so far, the

0:24:13.200 --> 0:24:15.960
<v Speaker 2>two will have played the most minutes are Kevin Durant

0:24:16.000 --> 0:24:19.880
<v Speaker 2>and Devin Booker. Chris Paul, who is my age, has

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:26.920
<v Speaker 2>played the twelfth most minutes. That's not sustainable and there

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 2>is a real concern, a real concern. The longer this

0:24:34.440 --> 0:24:37.920
<v Speaker 2>series with the Clippers goes that then in the next

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:43.920
<v Speaker 2>round against Denver at altitude, which is a huge factor

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 2>for every sport, road team's going to Denver, the thin

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:52.080
<v Speaker 2>air and them not being able to keep up there,

0:24:52.400 --> 0:24:55.240
<v Speaker 2>oh yeah, and them not being able to keep up

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 2>their stamming that they're going to be out of gas.

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:01.679
<v Speaker 2>And and if this team doesn't at least make the

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:04.679
<v Speaker 2>finals or win the championship this year, that is a

0:25:04.720 --> 0:25:08.960
<v Speaker 2>heavy bill coming due for Durant, who has been injured

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:12.359
<v Speaker 2>repeatedly over the last four years in his mid to

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 2>late thirties. Chris Paul, who maybe has one year left.

0:25:18.960 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 2>They don't regret it yet, but that was a huge

0:25:24.040 --> 0:25:27.679
<v Speaker 2>dice roll the new owner did so, mattish bee A

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:29.960
<v Speaker 2>bought the team and within twenty four hours they traded

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 2>for Durant. He wanted to make a huge splash, and

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 2>I get it. You can get Kevin bleeping Durant. But

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 2>Michale Bridges has been excellent for the Nets. We'll get

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 2>to see him this weekend when we go to the game.

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 2>And Cam Johnson's been good for the Nets and they

0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:51.159
<v Speaker 2>have four picks coming. So it is not a home

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:55.160
<v Speaker 2>run for the Suns, that's for sure, and we'll see

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:56.040
<v Speaker 2>how it ages all right.

0:25:56.119 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 3>Last one, Okay, the Athletic released their anonymous NBA player

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:05.439
<v Speaker 3>poll Tuesday. We have all heard the headlines, goat standings,

0:26:05.640 --> 0:26:08.240
<v Speaker 3>MVP Trey being oh by righted.

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh but I like that. That was good.

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 3>But a few things stood out to me and the producers.

0:26:15.560 --> 0:26:18.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so let's see him. Let's see so the what's

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:20.879
<v Speaker 2>the question for me, diora on this?

0:26:21.720 --> 0:26:25.120
<v Speaker 3>What is the under the radar result that no one

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 3>is talking about yet?

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:29.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so let's show the first one and we can

0:26:29.400 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 2>discuss it. Drew Holiday one for best defender and most

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 2>underrated player, So best defender. I really care what players say.

0:26:42.240 --> 0:26:46.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't always sometimes I think uh players are too

0:26:47.000 --> 0:26:49.760
<v Speaker 2>close to it. But who gives me the most trouble

0:26:49.760 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 2>when he's guarding me? The fact that Drew Holiday ran

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:56.240
<v Speaker 2>away with it really is meaningful to me. And shout

0:26:56.280 --> 0:27:00.840
<v Speaker 2>out to Lougan's Dort for coming in second. Then the

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 2>next one, I've also already seen the article, so I

0:27:03.880 --> 0:27:07.560
<v Speaker 2>knew what it was. The next one is that more

0:27:07.680 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 2>players said they'd want to build their team around Jokic

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 2>than Luca. Now it's one hundred and four votes voters total.

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 2>That means two more guys picked Jokic than Luca. Jannis

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 2>obviously ran away with it. I think it's hilarious that

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:27.399
<v Speaker 2>a few people picked Lebron even though he's in year twenty. Now,

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:29.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna be building your team around him very long,

0:27:29.840 --> 0:27:36.680
<v Speaker 2>I think, Luka, if I'm another here's the thing, Jokic,

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 2>If you're a star player, or even a fringe star,

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:44.360
<v Speaker 2>Jokic would be more fun to play with because he's

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:47.639
<v Speaker 2>such a willing passer. And Luca is a very good passer,

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:49.720
<v Speaker 2>but he's so ball dominant. But the answer to that

0:27:49.800 --> 0:27:53.840
<v Speaker 2>question is obviously Yannis. And then the last one, James

0:27:54.000 --> 0:27:57.840
<v Speaker 2>Johnson is the player no one wants to fight. This guy,

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:01.359
<v Speaker 2>diora James Johnson. He's got a twenty and oh record

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:04.120
<v Speaker 2>in kickboxing. But that's not the impressive thing. I mean,

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 2>that is impressive. When he was with the Miami Heat,

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 2>you ere they had a ball basketball stuck between the

0:28:12.600 --> 0:28:14.760
<v Speaker 2>rim and the backboard. You know that happens sometimes.

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:19.080
<v Speaker 3>He you know, I played basketball. You know, well, I

0:28:19.160 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 3>know what happened.

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:24.119
<v Speaker 2>Well, I don't know if I saw what you did? Play?

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:29.520
<v Speaker 3>I participate, a baby, I was a good player.

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:32.920
<v Speaker 2>Participated. What do you, baby?

0:28:33.520 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 3>I was the best defender on the team.

0:28:39.480 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 2>Okay, okay, if that's how you remember it, I'm with you.

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 3>I was a good player. I just wasn't good with

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 3>the rules.

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:49.520
<v Speaker 2>The rules or the dribbling of the shooting.

0:28:49.840 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 3>That's not I that is not true.

0:28:52.640 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I'm sorry.

0:28:53.400 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 3>I will not let him strag my name in the dirt.

0:28:56.960 --> 0:28:58.240
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I'm sorry.

0:28:58.600 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 3>I just shot in the wrong bast Yeah.

0:29:01.480 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, a few times.

0:29:02.880 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 3>A few times.

0:29:03.800 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm not talking about it. In the second grade. This

0:29:06.120 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 2>was high school.

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 3>No, it was it. It was eighth grade.

0:29:08.600 --> 0:29:09.719
<v Speaker 2>Okay, eighth grade.

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:10.680
<v Speaker 3>It was eighth grade.

0:29:10.720 --> 0:29:15.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay. So back to James Johnson. So the basketball was

0:29:15.760 --> 0:29:17.640
<v Speaker 2>stuck between the rim and the backboard.

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 3>Huh he.

0:29:20.760 --> 0:29:23.280
<v Speaker 2>Round house kicked it out.

0:29:23.480 --> 0:29:24.040
<v Speaker 3>Insane.

0:29:24.880 --> 0:29:28.320
<v Speaker 2>Think about that. He got high enough off the ground

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:33.680
<v Speaker 2>and did like a spinning kick to dislidge the basketball.

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:38.160
<v Speaker 3>So really badly. He could have just jumped up and.

0:29:38.200 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 2>He could get of course he could have. He could

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 2>get his foot to ten feet off the ground. It's crazy.

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:48.560
<v Speaker 2>That is crazy. And then what's the last one you eora,

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 2>Because in the goat pole it went like this, fifty

0:29:52.040 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 2>eight percent Michael, thirty three percent Lebron, six percent Kobe,

0:29:57.520 --> 0:30:01.160
<v Speaker 2>one percent Russell, and one percent Tracy McGrady.

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:04.080
<v Speaker 3>Who do you think voted t MAC best players.

0:30:04.200 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. Here's what I do know, it is

0:30:09.960 --> 0:30:14.200
<v Speaker 2>it is the same I like ideology that it's like,

0:30:14.240 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 2>man is Kyrie Irving one of the greatest point guards ever.

0:30:18.440 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 2>It's when you disconnect yourself from what it actually takes

0:30:24.480 --> 0:30:28.160
<v Speaker 2>to like have a sustained, great, long, winning career and

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:32.400
<v Speaker 2>just look at the talent. Because Tracy mcgrady's almost talented guys. Ever,

0:30:32.520 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 2>Tracy McGrady got a little unlucky on some of the

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:36.640
<v Speaker 2>winning stuff. I'm not calling him Kyrie in that regard.

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:42.720
<v Speaker 2>And Tracy McGrady at his apex Apex Tracy McGrady versus

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:46.200
<v Speaker 2>Kobe Bryant was a real conversation for a couple of years.

0:30:46.480 --> 0:30:50.000
<v Speaker 2>Uh so. I But by the way, the erasure there?

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:54.960
<v Speaker 2>Who do the there are? In my opinion, I think

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:58.000
<v Speaker 2>there's only three people who you credibly can argue as

0:30:58.040 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 2>the greatest player ever lebron On, Kareem and Jordan. There

0:31:02.920 --> 0:31:08.520
<v Speaker 2>are another four that if you wanted to make the argument,

0:31:09.240 --> 0:31:11.680
<v Speaker 2>I think you could create one. Do you have any

0:31:11.680 --> 0:31:13.360
<v Speaker 2>guesses or you just want me to say it? I

0:31:13.360 --> 0:31:17.680
<v Speaker 2>can guess, Okay, go ahead, Kobe, Kobe. Kobe is not

0:31:18.360 --> 0:31:20.400
<v Speaker 2>to me one of those guys. And here's the reason

0:31:20.440 --> 0:31:25.960
<v Speaker 2>why Kobe was trying to be Michael Jordan. Came closer

0:31:26.000 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 2>than anyone ever has to being Michael Jordan, but was

0:31:29.400 --> 0:31:31.520
<v Speaker 2>not and was not as good as Michael Jordan. So

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:33.840
<v Speaker 2>there's no argument that can possibly be made.

0:31:34.080 --> 0:31:36.120
<v Speaker 3>So you don't think someone could make the argument that

0:31:36.160 --> 0:31:37.000
<v Speaker 3>he's the best player.

0:31:37.400 --> 0:31:41.160
<v Speaker 2>Some people do. I think they're ridiculous because he has

0:31:41.240 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 2>an exact archetype. It was Jordan, and Jordan was better.

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:47.440
<v Speaker 2>So do you understand what I mean? Like he so

0:31:47.520 --> 0:31:51.000
<v Speaker 2>he is just a ninety percent of Jordan. So if

0:31:51.080 --> 0:31:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Jordan exists, he can't be the best ever. So he

0:31:53.800 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 2>and you know what I said, there's only seven guys

0:31:56.160 --> 0:32:01.959
<v Speaker 2>all expanded to eight guys that I again incredibly, I

0:32:01.960 --> 0:32:06.240
<v Speaker 2>can only argue for three lebron Kareem and Jordan. However,

0:32:07.240 --> 0:32:10.720
<v Speaker 2>if you wanted to argue for Wilt Chamberlain, who averaged

0:32:10.840 --> 0:32:13.760
<v Speaker 2>fifty points a game one year, had one hundred point game,

0:32:13.800 --> 0:32:16.520
<v Speaker 2>has all the records, I'll listen to it. If you

0:32:16.600 --> 0:32:20.360
<v Speaker 2>wanted to argue for Magic Johnson, one of the ones

0:32:20.920 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 2>you could argue it, I'll listen to it. If you

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:30.560
<v Speaker 2>wanted to argue for who's the I said, I said

0:32:30.560 --> 0:32:34.719
<v Speaker 2>there was, Oh, Bill Russell. I'll obviously listen to it.

0:32:34.760 --> 0:32:38.720
<v Speaker 2>He won eleven championships in thirteen years play and the

0:32:38.800 --> 0:32:42.400
<v Speaker 2>last two are the hardest arguments, but I would listen

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:45.720
<v Speaker 2>to it. If you want to argue for Shack simply

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:50.280
<v Speaker 2>saying at his most dominant, no one was as good

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:53.800
<v Speaker 2>as he was, I'll listen to it. And sneaky. If

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:57.880
<v Speaker 2>you want to argue for Steph be like, shooting's pretty important.

0:32:58.120 --> 0:33:01.840
<v Speaker 2>He is unanimously accepted is the greatest shooter ever. He

0:33:02.000 --> 0:33:04.960
<v Speaker 2>is as good of a teammate as anyone ever. I'll

0:33:05.000 --> 0:33:06.480
<v Speaker 2>listen to those arguments. Go ahead.

0:33:06.560 --> 0:33:08.880
<v Speaker 3>But you think that we can all agree that Lebron

0:33:08.960 --> 0:33:10.680
<v Speaker 3>is the best player playing right.

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 2>Now, No, I don't think. I don't even think that. Yeah,

0:33:15.720 --> 0:33:18.240
<v Speaker 2>that is correct. And Lebron, I don't think right now

0:33:18.280 --> 0:33:20.360
<v Speaker 2>is one of the three best players playing. Okay, he's

0:33:20.400 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 2>in year twenty, he's.

0:33:21.960 --> 0:33:24.800
<v Speaker 3>The But you think if Lebron was at his prime

0:33:24.920 --> 0:33:26.320
<v Speaker 3>playing the people right now?

0:33:26.400 --> 0:33:33.280
<v Speaker 2>Oh, it's no question. Okay, peak Lebron the only player ever,

0:33:33.680 --> 0:33:39.280
<v Speaker 2>Players ever who peak Lebron versus their peak would be

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:43.680
<v Speaker 2>a question. Is peak Shack, peak Kareem and peak Michael. Okay,

0:33:44.440 --> 0:33:47.640
<v Speaker 2>Jannis is an all timer, but peak Lebron. No, but

0:33:47.720 --> 0:33:52.840
<v Speaker 2>he's but he's year twenties, thirty eight, he's right now.

0:33:53.560 --> 0:33:55.200
<v Speaker 3>Is at his prime right now. I think he can

0:33:55.200 --> 0:33:55.880
<v Speaker 3>only get better.

0:33:58.200 --> 0:34:01.240
<v Speaker 2>Jannis can get a little better, but he doesn't need

0:34:01.280 --> 0:34:03.120
<v Speaker 2>to get better to be the best player in the league.

0:34:03.400 --> 0:34:05.719
<v Speaker 2>He can add a few things to his game. All Right,

0:34:05.760 --> 0:34:08.719
<v Speaker 2>we went fifteen minutes over Who knew? I said the

0:34:08.719 --> 0:34:10.319
<v Speaker 2>whole show is going to be forty minutes. We're already

0:34:10.320 --> 0:34:13.959
<v Speaker 2>at thirty five minutes? Quick break? Right back? What's right?

0:34:18.520 --> 0:34:20.839
<v Speaker 2>All right? Welcome back? In episode one forty four? What's

0:34:20.880 --> 0:34:22.239
<v Speaker 2>right with Nick? Right? Do you or? That was your

0:34:22.280 --> 0:34:24.880
<v Speaker 2>best segment ever? You were excellent there? You do that?

0:34:24.960 --> 0:34:28.040
<v Speaker 2>What do you mean last reinforcement? You're new to this.

0:34:28.040 --> 0:34:29.719
<v Speaker 3>And the people in the comments agree with me too.

0:34:29.800 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 2>What it's a little patronizing.

0:34:32.000 --> 0:34:33.200
<v Speaker 3>Ye, it's a little patronizing.

0:34:33.800 --> 0:34:37.080
<v Speaker 2>Do you are I am a What year is it?

0:34:37.080 --> 0:34:40.719
<v Speaker 2>Twenty twenty three? I've been doing this, okay for more

0:34:40.760 --> 0:34:41.800
<v Speaker 2>than fifteen years.

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:42.800
<v Speaker 3>It's really cool.

0:34:42.880 --> 0:34:47.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm one of America's most respected and beloved broadcasting.

0:34:47.120 --> 0:34:48.440
<v Speaker 3>If they say that or you said that.

0:34:48.800 --> 0:34:53.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's just generally accepted, and I am. I

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:59.160
<v Speaker 2>am mentoring you in a trade you do you you

0:34:59.200 --> 0:35:03.400
<v Speaker 2>know like you should just be I don't give false praise.

0:35:04.960 --> 0:35:07.480
<v Speaker 2>What is that? But we don't do this together. I'm

0:35:07.520 --> 0:35:11.400
<v Speaker 2>telling you in this for these forty to sixty five minutes,

0:35:11.640 --> 0:35:15.360
<v Speaker 2>six twice a week, we are. We are father and daughter.

0:35:15.760 --> 0:35:19.840
<v Speaker 2>But we said that where that relationship pauses? What once

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:21.680
<v Speaker 2>we walk in this room right now?

0:35:21.760 --> 0:35:24.000
<v Speaker 3>We like to stay the wilds like a between takes.

0:35:24.000 --> 0:35:26.760
<v Speaker 3>You did really good there, Yeah, give me a high five.

0:35:26.960 --> 0:35:29.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't do a high five. But of course he's learning.

0:35:30.400 --> 0:35:31.200
<v Speaker 2>He's new to this.

0:35:31.239 --> 0:35:32.000
<v Speaker 3>I've been wild.

0:35:32.480 --> 0:35:33.080
<v Speaker 1>You hear this?

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:35.560
<v Speaker 2>While it's true now, I don't say it to brew

0:35:35.680 --> 0:35:38.560
<v Speaker 2>because Bruce's been doing it longer than me. But I

0:35:38.600 --> 0:35:41.080
<v Speaker 2>mean occasionally, I like, you know, give him like the

0:35:41.200 --> 0:35:42.960
<v Speaker 2>broadcaster version of like a pad on the bed.

0:35:43.080 --> 0:35:46.759
<v Speaker 3>They walk, they say to each other like see the

0:35:46.800 --> 0:35:47.600
<v Speaker 3>way he said that.

0:35:48.360 --> 0:35:50.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean maybe they do. But then they also

0:35:50.719 --> 0:35:53.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, probably say you know when they're not around

0:35:53.360 --> 0:35:56.720
<v Speaker 2>each other. Man, good thing Nick's around. Man, he really

0:35:56.760 --> 0:35:59.719
<v Speaker 2>carried us today. No, I'm kidding. While we're a team,

0:36:00.040 --> 0:36:01.399
<v Speaker 2>where we're three ways money.

0:36:01.520 --> 0:36:01.800
<v Speaker 3>Edit that.

0:36:02.160 --> 0:36:04.919
<v Speaker 2>No, don't send it to them. I was kidding. Brew

0:36:05.000 --> 0:36:09.239
<v Speaker 2>and Wilde are great teammates. Ever, uh and I'm trying

0:36:09.239 --> 0:36:13.680
<v Speaker 2>to think it was analogy here. No, they're great. You know,

0:36:13.719 --> 0:36:16.279
<v Speaker 2>we're a big three. I mean, now if we were

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:20.919
<v Speaker 2>to in a big three, like who's Lebron, who's the Wade?

0:36:20.920 --> 0:36:21.440
<v Speaker 2>Who's Bosh?

0:36:21.560 --> 0:36:23.880
<v Speaker 3>Like somebody has to edit this and set like we

0:36:23.960 --> 0:36:26.319
<v Speaker 3>all know this is not okay.

0:36:26.200 --> 0:36:32.080
<v Speaker 2>I know who Lebron is, but what what I don't understand?

0:36:32.440 --> 0:36:36.640
<v Speaker 2>You think there's like a real question like, oh.

0:36:36.360 --> 0:36:37.640
<v Speaker 3>You're gonna get canceled.

0:36:37.760 --> 0:36:40.520
<v Speaker 2>We're not gonna get canceled. They're my teammates and I

0:36:40.560 --> 0:36:43.359
<v Speaker 2>love them and the you know, the the group is

0:36:43.400 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 2>greater than something. Okay, all right, what are we doing?

0:36:46.800 --> 0:36:52.120
<v Speaker 3>Dua said he was considering retirement after his concussions last year. However,

0:36:52.280 --> 0:36:54.480
<v Speaker 3>he decided to come back, saying how hard it would

0:36:54.520 --> 0:36:57.640
<v Speaker 3>be a walk away. The Dolphins can't be thrilled with

0:36:57.680 --> 0:37:01.160
<v Speaker 3>their situation. Could Miami be a sleeper for a QB

0:37:01.280 --> 0:37:01.880
<v Speaker 3>in the draft?

0:37:02.160 --> 0:37:05.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't think so. Keep in mind, remember they lost

0:37:05.160 --> 0:37:07.880
<v Speaker 2>their first round pick because of the tampering with Brady,

0:37:08.400 --> 0:37:11.359
<v Speaker 2>so they don't have like the extra draft capital move up.

0:37:11.800 --> 0:37:18.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure they're nervous about his long term future. However, Uh,

0:37:18.320 --> 0:37:20.880
<v Speaker 2>he's their quarterback for this year, unless, of course, they

0:37:20.920 --> 0:37:23.960
<v Speaker 2>try to sign Tom Brady again Brady comes out of retirement.

0:37:24.280 --> 0:37:26.160
<v Speaker 2>But no, they're not going to draft a quarterback. And

0:37:26.160 --> 0:37:27.799
<v Speaker 2>in fact, you know what, that's it. We're gonna move

0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:29.359
<v Speaker 2>on to a game now. I told you we're gonna

0:37:29.400 --> 0:37:31.640
<v Speaker 2>go faster. Also, by the way, we are gonna do

0:37:31.680 --> 0:37:34.480
<v Speaker 2>your questions and comments today in the C block, So

0:37:34.600 --> 0:37:37.000
<v Speaker 2>you put those in the chat now and we'll compile

0:37:37.040 --> 0:37:39.399
<v Speaker 2>them if you haven't already. All right, what's the game

0:37:39.440 --> 0:37:39.799
<v Speaker 2>we're doing?

0:37:40.280 --> 0:37:42.640
<v Speaker 3>We're playing this or that? Yeah, So our first one

0:37:42.719 --> 0:37:45.080
<v Speaker 3>is there are two There were two other games last

0:37:45.160 --> 0:37:50.120
<v Speaker 3>night as well, Heats, but Heat Bucks and Nuggets Timberwolves.

0:37:50.160 --> 0:37:54.320
<v Speaker 3>Pick one to discuss, Miami Milwaukee or Minnesota Denver.

0:37:54.440 --> 0:37:55.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm gonna pick them both.

0:37:56.440 --> 0:37:59.080
<v Speaker 3>That wasn't all right Miami when they hit.

0:37:58.960 --> 0:38:02.399
<v Speaker 2>Twenty five Milwaukee twenty five threes and now you maybe

0:38:02.480 --> 0:38:04.759
<v Speaker 2>have extra time to rest. Be honest, you need to Minnesota.

0:38:04.800 --> 0:38:09.719
<v Speaker 2>Denver was interesting because Denver it looked like Minnesota was

0:38:09.840 --> 0:38:14.600
<v Speaker 2>just okay, fair enough, it looked like Minnesota was just

0:38:14.600 --> 0:38:16.880
<v Speaker 2>not gonna show up for the series. They got blown

0:38:16.880 --> 0:38:19.520
<v Speaker 2>out in Game one, and in Game two they were

0:38:19.520 --> 0:38:22.120
<v Speaker 2>getting blown out at halftime, and then in the second

0:38:22.160 --> 0:38:27.759
<v Speaker 2>half last night, Anthony Edwards was spectacular. I give him credit.

0:38:27.880 --> 0:38:30.479
<v Speaker 2>Rudy Gobert was quite good as well, and they took

0:38:30.520 --> 0:38:34.720
<v Speaker 2>the lead in that game. Unfortunately for them, Carl Anthony

0:38:34.760 --> 0:38:40.120
<v Speaker 2>Towns hasn't shown up yet. And Carlyn the Town's number

0:38:40.160 --> 0:38:42.680
<v Speaker 2>one pick of the draft on a super max contract.

0:38:43.000 --> 0:38:46.360
<v Speaker 2>He's gotta be better. They can't win this series no

0:38:46.400 --> 0:38:50.280
<v Speaker 2>matter what, but he's got to be better or else.

0:38:50.360 --> 0:38:52.000
<v Speaker 2>And I know we're gonna talk about Trey Young later.

0:38:53.480 --> 0:38:56.440
<v Speaker 2>Carl and the Towns could be on the trade block.

0:38:57.320 --> 0:39:01.040
<v Speaker 2>Minnesota traded their whole future for Rudy gob thinking they're

0:39:01.040 --> 0:39:06.680
<v Speaker 2>gonna contend right now with Towns, Edwards Gobaar. They end

0:39:06.760 --> 0:39:08.360
<v Speaker 2>up be in the eight seed. Now. I know Towns

0:39:08.360 --> 0:39:12.520
<v Speaker 2>missed sixty games, but he's gotta be better, flatly, all right?

0:39:12.600 --> 0:39:15.839
<v Speaker 3>Next report say that teams have been calling out the

0:39:15.880 --> 0:39:19.040
<v Speaker 3>forty nine ers, calling about calling about the forty nine

0:39:19.120 --> 0:39:24.280
<v Speaker 3>ers QB Trey Lance, Yeah, GM, John Lynch has said

0:39:24.560 --> 0:39:25.520
<v Speaker 3>Brock Party.

0:39:25.640 --> 0:39:28.439
<v Speaker 2>These names are just so, They're just people's names.

0:39:28.520 --> 0:39:30.239
<v Speaker 3>Okay, is the starter.

0:39:30.280 --> 0:39:31.759
<v Speaker 2>Should be making fun of people's names.

0:39:31.800 --> 0:39:33.080
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead, have a really cool name.

0:39:33.120 --> 0:39:34.000
<v Speaker 2>Actually, go ahead.

0:39:34.200 --> 0:39:37.000
<v Speaker 3>But even Party is not sure if he'll be ready

0:39:37.040 --> 0:39:39.520
<v Speaker 3>to play. The forty nine ers should Trey Tray or

0:39:39.600 --> 0:39:40.040
<v Speaker 3>keep Trey?

0:39:40.160 --> 0:39:44.279
<v Speaker 2>You have to keep track they listen, Obviously, the forty

0:39:44.360 --> 0:39:46.759
<v Speaker 2>nine ers have soured on Trey Young a bit Trey Lance.

0:39:46.840 --> 0:39:51.440
<v Speaker 2>Pardon me, but you can't. You traded three first round

0:39:51.480 --> 0:39:54.399
<v Speaker 2>picks for the guy he calls almost nothing. You haven't

0:39:54.400 --> 0:39:56.880
<v Speaker 2>seen him play yet. You'd be trading him at his

0:39:57.040 --> 0:40:02.600
<v Speaker 2>nadir value wise, at his lowest possible point. That's the

0:40:02.600 --> 0:40:05.080
<v Speaker 2>thing I like to do. Sometimes use a fancy word

0:40:05.160 --> 0:40:07.200
<v Speaker 2>and then say the sentence again. But in the place

0:40:07.239 --> 0:40:10.400
<v Speaker 2>of the fancy word, define it. You know what I mean. Like,

0:40:10.480 --> 0:40:11.640
<v Speaker 2>he's a good way of making.

0:40:11.440 --> 0:40:13.760
<v Speaker 3>Sure everything is what patronizing means.

0:40:14.880 --> 0:40:18.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's patronizing a bit that I just acknowledge that

0:40:18.200 --> 0:40:20.680
<v Speaker 2>I do it. It's a little wink to like our

0:40:20.840 --> 0:40:23.560
<v Speaker 2>smarter listeners and viewers. When I do, I understand.

0:40:23.560 --> 0:40:25.040
<v Speaker 3>If anybody wants to log off.

0:40:25.000 --> 0:40:27.640
<v Speaker 2>No, don't log off. They got to keep him. They

0:40:27.680 --> 0:40:30.560
<v Speaker 2>got to keep him. You can't trade him when his

0:40:30.680 --> 0:40:34.239
<v Speaker 2>value has never been lower. And it also I don't

0:40:34.400 --> 0:40:37.080
<v Speaker 2>Rock Purty. You're in the exact same situation we were

0:40:37.080 --> 0:40:41.520
<v Speaker 2>with Jimmy Garoppolo, like a very physically limited game managing quarterback,

0:40:41.560 --> 0:40:42.960
<v Speaker 2>and this one's coming off an injury.

0:40:42.960 --> 0:40:47.600
<v Speaker 3>Next Okay, the Panthers will be picking first in the

0:40:47.680 --> 0:40:50.880
<v Speaker 3>draft A week from today. The Panthers will select Bryce

0:40:50.920 --> 0:40:52.080
<v Speaker 3>Young or CJ. Stroud.

0:40:52.160 --> 0:40:54.120
<v Speaker 2>It seems like Bryce Young. There was a lot of

0:40:54.160 --> 0:40:56.239
<v Speaker 2>momentum towards c J. Stroud, and then a lot of

0:40:56.280 --> 0:40:58.959
<v Speaker 2>reporters that I trust said it's over, it's Bryce Young.

0:40:59.200 --> 0:41:01.680
<v Speaker 2>I think it's Bryce Young. I wouldn't draft Bryce Young.

0:41:02.000 --> 0:41:05.600
<v Speaker 2>He's your size. He's way too small. He's not quite

0:41:05.640 --> 0:41:09.600
<v Speaker 2>your size, but he's tiny. Listen, Bryce seems like a

0:41:09.760 --> 0:41:15.440
<v Speaker 2>great kid, and he was excellent at Alabama, excellent. The

0:41:15.520 --> 0:41:19.720
<v Speaker 2>size is to me just a red line. Don't anyone

0:41:19.760 --> 0:41:22.120
<v Speaker 2>that is the biggest, would be the biggest ever or

0:41:22.160 --> 0:41:25.640
<v Speaker 2>the smallest ever concerns me. It's what I said about Kyler,

0:41:26.440 --> 0:41:28.400
<v Speaker 2>and what have we seen with Kyler dealt with a

0:41:28.400 --> 0:41:32.320
<v Speaker 2>bunch of injuries, Very very difficult to be the tiniest

0:41:32.360 --> 0:41:35.000
<v Speaker 2>quarterback in the NFL. That's what Bryce Young would be

0:41:35.040 --> 0:41:36.400
<v Speaker 2>trying to accomplish. Next.

0:41:36.640 --> 0:41:40.720
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Josh Allen says he needs to adapt and change

0:41:41.040 --> 0:41:44.400
<v Speaker 3>his playing style to avoid taking hits and putting himself

0:41:44.440 --> 0:41:47.320
<v Speaker 3>at risk by running the ball. Yeah, this is a

0:41:47.360 --> 0:41:49.240
<v Speaker 3>wise move or a red flag both.

0:41:50.440 --> 0:41:52.440
<v Speaker 2>So here's the thing. He's got to do this. I

0:41:52.560 --> 0:41:54.719
<v Speaker 2>was saying all year long, he had to do this.

0:41:55.120 --> 0:41:57.439
<v Speaker 2>The reason so it's a wise move. The reason it's

0:41:57.520 --> 0:42:01.839
<v Speaker 2>also a red flag is I don't know if he's

0:42:01.840 --> 0:42:06.480
<v Speaker 2>accurate enough to be what he's supposed to be, which

0:42:06.560 --> 0:42:09.319
<v Speaker 2>is a top three quarterback in this league, if he

0:42:09.719 --> 0:42:11.959
<v Speaker 2>removes the running as a huge part of his game.

0:42:13.000 --> 0:42:16.080
<v Speaker 2>Part of what makes Josh Allen special is he's like

0:42:16.120 --> 0:42:19.560
<v Speaker 2>a Bison back. There no pun intended with the bills,

0:42:20.000 --> 0:42:22.919
<v Speaker 2>and he can run through people and run over people

0:42:23.040 --> 0:42:26.120
<v Speaker 2>even the best part of their running game. But he

0:42:26.239 --> 0:42:31.799
<v Speaker 2>needs to get better on the layup throws. And I'd

0:42:31.840 --> 0:42:34.279
<v Speaker 2>be very interesting to watch because I do think he's

0:42:34.280 --> 0:42:35.920
<v Speaker 2>got to protect himself. I do think he has to

0:42:35.960 --> 0:42:38.920
<v Speaker 2>run the ball less. It was crazy how much Jeopardy

0:42:39.040 --> 0:42:41.040
<v Speaker 2>was putting himself in. But that means he needs to

0:42:41.080 --> 0:42:43.480
<v Speaker 2>become a more refined passer. If they're going to compete

0:42:43.520 --> 0:42:45.920
<v Speaker 2>for a super Bowl like everyone's been promising me, Buffalo's

0:42:46.000 --> 0:42:47.200
<v Speaker 2>going to next.

0:42:47.320 --> 0:42:51.919
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Demonte's probably enjoyed. The Celtics have demoralized the Hawks. Yeah,

0:42:52.000 --> 0:42:56.160
<v Speaker 3>and Trey Young was also voted the league's most overrated player. Yeah,

0:42:56.480 --> 0:42:59.200
<v Speaker 3>no one has this guy's back in the entire sports

0:42:59.280 --> 0:43:02.239
<v Speaker 3>media world. The Hawk should trade him or keep him.

0:43:02.320 --> 0:43:06.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you gotta trade him. Hopefully it changes scene or

0:43:06.200 --> 0:43:08.359
<v Speaker 2>he helps. I've got a fun trade. You guys want

0:43:08.360 --> 0:43:12.080
<v Speaker 2>to know my favorite three team, Tray Young trade. Here

0:43:12.120 --> 0:43:16.920
<v Speaker 2>we go, Tray Young to Portland.

0:43:18.600 --> 0:43:22.520
<v Speaker 3>They need to They need to.

0:43:21.960 --> 0:43:25.040
<v Speaker 2>Portland's great city. I think you'd like Portland. It's never been,

0:43:25.120 --> 0:43:28.480
<v Speaker 2>but it seems nice. Uh, Tray Young to Portland. They

0:43:28.520 --> 0:43:33.280
<v Speaker 2>need to get younger and kind of reboot. Dame to Philly.

0:43:34.600 --> 0:43:36.920
<v Speaker 2>Damon Embiid would be as good of a duo as

0:43:36.960 --> 0:43:40.560
<v Speaker 2>there is in the league. And then Philly sends Maxi,

0:43:41.120 --> 0:43:45.200
<v Speaker 2>Tobias Harris, and a draft pick or two to Atlanta.

0:43:45.600 --> 0:43:48.280
<v Speaker 2>They can have Dejante, Murray and Maxie as their backcourt,

0:43:48.640 --> 0:43:52.520
<v Speaker 2>add another scorer and Tobias. That's a trade. Send it in,

0:43:53.360 --> 0:43:56.000
<v Speaker 2>Send it Soon's the Hawks get bounced. Depending on what

0:43:56.040 --> 0:44:00.440
<v Speaker 2>happens with Philly. Send that in whether Harden stays or leaves,

0:44:00.680 --> 0:44:06.800
<v Speaker 2>that trade works, Dame de Philly, Maxie Harris and maybe

0:44:06.840 --> 0:44:10.319
<v Speaker 2>a few picks to Atlanta and trade of Portland. Trade

0:44:10.400 --> 0:44:11.120
<v Speaker 2>him next.

0:44:11.280 --> 0:44:14.400
<v Speaker 3>So pick your next client for a surprise quick public

0:44:14.680 --> 0:44:19.080
<v Speaker 3>defender Trey or Dre or secret answer Dylan.

0:44:18.800 --> 0:44:26.799
<v Speaker 2>Brooks all defend Tree Young. All right, that's tough thing.

0:44:28.840 --> 0:44:32.400
<v Speaker 2>Uh what do you think did you when you drafted

0:44:32.719 --> 0:44:39.640
<v Speaker 2>this short, incredibly skinny guard out Oklahoma? Did you think

0:44:39.680 --> 0:44:41.160
<v Speaker 2>my client was all of a sudden going to be

0:44:41.160 --> 0:44:45.040
<v Speaker 2>a lockdown defender. Have you watched basketball all of us?

0:44:45.160 --> 0:44:47.960
<v Speaker 2>You're like, oh, this guy, he's two ball dominant. You

0:44:48.000 --> 0:44:51.680
<v Speaker 2>can't defend. Did you see my client in college? You did,

0:44:51.719 --> 0:44:57.680
<v Speaker 2>didn't you? And despite that, you traded Luka Doncic for him.

0:44:58.320 --> 0:45:02.239
<v Speaker 2>You traded you had Luca and you traded him for

0:45:02.400 --> 0:45:04.840
<v Speaker 2>Trey Young. And now you're mad at Trey Young for

0:45:05.120 --> 0:45:08.760
<v Speaker 2>being Trey Young. Don't know what you want? Uh, your honor?

0:45:08.800 --> 0:45:11.879
<v Speaker 2>What about all the problems with coaches? I mean, we're

0:45:11.880 --> 0:45:15.200
<v Speaker 2>not here to discuss that. Where is you asked? You

0:45:15.239 --> 0:45:19.040
<v Speaker 2>asked Trey Young to what do you wanted to be

0:45:19.080 --> 0:45:21.239
<v Speaker 2>all of a sudden, Tony Allen, not who he is.

0:45:21.960 --> 0:45:23.759
<v Speaker 2>You want to play off the ball, not what he's

0:45:23.800 --> 0:45:29.400
<v Speaker 2>ever done. Don't blame him for being him, blame yourself

0:45:29.680 --> 0:45:32.919
<v Speaker 2>for trying to turn him into someone else. We're under

0:45:32.920 --> 0:45:36.160
<v Speaker 2>the wire. We have some great tweets from Demanse. We

0:45:36.200 --> 0:45:39.000
<v Speaker 2>explain these sweatshirts, it's not quite as simple as you think,

0:45:39.160 --> 0:45:44.480
<v Speaker 2>and we answer your questions. That's all Next, What's right?

0:45:49.440 --> 0:45:49.759
<v Speaker 3>All right?

0:45:49.800 --> 0:45:52.440
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back in episode one? What's right with Nick?

0:45:52.520 --> 0:45:52.640
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:45:52.640 --> 0:45:54.600
<v Speaker 2>Wol Did you just try to introduce us back?

0:45:54.719 --> 0:45:55.040
<v Speaker 3>I did?

0:45:55.160 --> 0:45:56.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay, that's not your role.

0:45:56.200 --> 0:45:57.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to take your place.

0:45:57.320 --> 0:46:01.480
<v Speaker 2>That's that's not your role. You. I bring us in,

0:46:01.560 --> 0:46:04.880
<v Speaker 2>I take us out. You add little comments in between.

0:46:05.200 --> 0:46:09.160
<v Speaker 2>This is a clearer dichotomy here, and a clear separation

0:46:09.280 --> 0:46:16.680
<v Speaker 2>of powers. Oh, I appreciate your precociousness. However, precociousness, however,

0:46:17.239 --> 0:46:20.400
<v Speaker 2>let's be clear here about you know who the audience

0:46:20.480 --> 0:46:23.200
<v Speaker 2>is here for and why the show exists. So let's

0:46:23.239 --> 0:46:25.400
<v Speaker 2>not go a little too far. Someone who used to

0:46:25.400 --> 0:46:28.640
<v Speaker 2>sit in that seat, Demonse now lives in Los Angeles.

0:46:28.960 --> 0:46:32.960
<v Speaker 2>We have some tweets from you for you from Demanse

0:46:33.080 --> 0:46:35.800
<v Speaker 2>to show you before we get to your listener questions

0:46:35.800 --> 0:46:39.480
<v Speaker 2>and comments. Demons tweets the ending of this Dodger game

0:46:39.560 --> 0:46:45.000
<v Speaker 2>genuinely got me excited. Demanse's baseball corner at get Nick right?

0:46:46.000 --> 0:46:49.160
<v Speaker 2>Did that tweet really have three hundred and sixty thousand views?

0:46:49.400 --> 0:46:53.799
<v Speaker 2>That's unbelievable. I love the idea of it. Also, Demanse

0:46:55.360 --> 0:46:58.719
<v Speaker 2>took him three days in LA to start missing the

0:46:58.800 --> 0:47:02.400
<v Speaker 2>bask in the glow the spotlight of the What's Right podcast,

0:47:02.680 --> 0:47:06.520
<v Speaker 2>and already is pining to get back to it. Uh

0:47:06.640 --> 0:47:08.960
<v Speaker 2>do you are? Also? Do you wanna? Do you want

0:47:08.960 --> 0:47:10.880
<v Speaker 2>to tell the audience what you caught me doing yesterday

0:47:10.880 --> 0:47:13.759
<v Speaker 2>before we get to Demande's next tweet? Well, you caught

0:47:13.760 --> 0:47:15.399
<v Speaker 2>me doing In regards to Demanse.

0:47:16.040 --> 0:47:20.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Oh, we were sitting in the office and he's

0:47:20.080 --> 0:47:24.400
<v Speaker 3>just like, just hold on, I hope is not watching this,

0:47:24.560 --> 0:47:27.000
<v Speaker 3>but go on either way, I'll text him. We're just

0:47:27.040 --> 0:47:29.000
<v Speaker 3>watching the game. And all of a sudden, my dad

0:47:29.040 --> 0:47:31.319
<v Speaker 3>just pulls out his phone and checks Demonsey's okay sal

0:47:31.400 --> 0:47:33.680
<v Speaker 3>quick and just goes hmm and then just put the

0:47:33.719 --> 0:47:34.919
<v Speaker 3>back in his pocket.

0:47:35.200 --> 0:47:36.320
<v Speaker 2>I can't help myself.

0:47:37.200 --> 0:47:38.200
<v Speaker 3>You're insane.

0:47:38.400 --> 0:47:40.919
<v Speaker 2>I know he's a grown man. He's a grown man.

0:47:41.560 --> 0:47:43.680
<v Speaker 3>I know you are insane.

0:47:44.000 --> 0:47:46.920
<v Speaker 2>I know. I just can't help myself. I just it

0:47:47.040 --> 0:47:50.640
<v Speaker 2>was yesterday was his first day in the office in

0:47:50.840 --> 0:47:53.680
<v Speaker 2>LA and it was right around the time that I

0:47:53.800 --> 0:47:57.640
<v Speaker 2>know some people leave work, but Demond on his first

0:47:57.719 --> 0:48:00.239
<v Speaker 2>day should not be leaving when everyone is leaving. So

0:48:00.280 --> 0:48:02.279
<v Speaker 2>I just checked he was in the office. You did

0:48:02.320 --> 0:48:04.560
<v Speaker 2>a good job, That's all. I just checked.

0:48:04.760 --> 0:48:08.920
<v Speaker 3>Or like when I'm out, my dad has my location

0:48:09.000 --> 0:48:12.279
<v Speaker 3>and he texts me, hey, where are you? Just like

0:48:12.480 --> 0:48:15.560
<v Speaker 3>just a little tester, just see what's going on, and

0:48:15.640 --> 0:48:17.560
<v Speaker 3>it'll be like school, like.

0:48:17.760 --> 0:48:20.920
<v Speaker 2>What's going on? Some what some you know, a little tester.

0:48:21.480 --> 0:48:22.520
<v Speaker 2>I just I don't.

0:48:22.320 --> 0:48:23.200
<v Speaker 3>You're in insane.

0:48:23.400 --> 0:48:24.000
<v Speaker 1>No, I'm not.

0:48:24.239 --> 0:48:25.440
<v Speaker 3>You're a little insane.

0:48:25.480 --> 0:48:27.600
<v Speaker 2>No. I just like to know where my children are

0:48:28.239 --> 0:48:32.440
<v Speaker 2>twenty four. I understand. But you know, we have a

0:48:32.800 --> 0:48:36.960
<v Speaker 2>I have a I have a rule, which is I

0:48:37.120 --> 0:48:41.919
<v Speaker 2>will continue to keep you guys on my phone plan

0:48:42.040 --> 0:48:46.200
<v Speaker 2>that I pay for, and the only prerequisite is you

0:48:46.280 --> 0:48:48.680
<v Speaker 2>have to share your location with me and the moment

0:48:49.040 --> 0:48:49.680
<v Speaker 2>and at this.

0:48:50.120 --> 0:48:52.120
<v Speaker 3>College is gonna be like you have class in the morning.

0:48:52.320 --> 0:48:55.120
<v Speaker 2>Of course I am of course I am Are you

0:48:55.200 --> 0:49:00.520
<v Speaker 2>kidding me? Yes, I am uh and listen. Deman's is

0:49:00.960 --> 0:49:04.720
<v Speaker 2>a responsible, grown adult. But he also, I think understandably,

0:49:04.760 --> 0:49:09.320
<v Speaker 2>has made the choice that the slight invasion of privacy

0:49:09.600 --> 0:49:12.080
<v Speaker 2>is not worth eighty dollars a month to him. So

0:49:12.200 --> 0:49:15.600
<v Speaker 2>because of that, you know it's a fair deal. Show

0:49:15.600 --> 0:49:19.600
<v Speaker 2>me another Demanse tweet. This one's a classic, this one.

0:49:20.280 --> 0:49:23.800
<v Speaker 2>This one was the day he bought a car. Different,

0:49:24.120 --> 0:49:27.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah you know why? So this one says, I feel

0:49:27.480 --> 0:49:30.440
<v Speaker 2>like blinkers should be called winkers. The guy had a

0:49:30.480 --> 0:49:32.880
<v Speaker 2>car fore bought a car, and twelve hours later is

0:49:32.920 --> 0:49:36.080
<v Speaker 2>renaming things. The view difference is because I didn't retweet

0:49:36.120 --> 0:49:39.000
<v Speaker 2>that one because I thought he would get roasted. But

0:49:39.160 --> 0:49:42.320
<v Speaker 2>I didn't have to retweet it for our fearless leader

0:49:42.640 --> 0:49:45.680
<v Speaker 2>producer Matt Ford to retweet it and him to say

0:49:45.840 --> 0:49:49.120
<v Speaker 2>the following, which was, I'm glad you were able to

0:49:49.160 --> 0:49:52.480
<v Speaker 2>find a dispensery. That picture, by the way, on there

0:49:53.040 --> 0:49:56.920
<v Speaker 2>is so good. These are great Demandse photoshops. All right,

0:49:57.480 --> 0:50:02.239
<v Speaker 2>so Demanse, we miss you, we love you, and you'll

0:50:02.239 --> 0:50:03.840
<v Speaker 2>be back on the show before full I.

0:50:03.840 --> 0:50:07.279
<v Speaker 3>Haven't heard from Demands since he left, really haven't heard

0:50:07.280 --> 0:50:08.000
<v Speaker 3>from him. Once.

0:50:08.600 --> 0:50:11.120
<v Speaker 2>Wow, all right, well that's no good. Have you reached

0:50:11.160 --> 0:50:16.200
<v Speaker 2>out to him? No, well you should, Okay, all right,

0:50:17.000 --> 0:50:20.480
<v Speaker 2>now let's talk about these sweatshirts. So if you can

0:50:20.520 --> 0:50:24.480
<v Speaker 2>read the sweatshirts, they say University of California, Santa Cruz.

0:50:25.480 --> 0:50:33.200
<v Speaker 2>So up to twenty four hours ago, we were pretty

0:50:33.280 --> 0:50:38.120
<v Speaker 2>certain Diorl was either going to University of California, Santa

0:50:38.120 --> 0:50:40.719
<v Speaker 2>Cruz or, as we talked about on the show, you

0:50:40.800 --> 0:50:43.720
<v Speaker 2>see Berkeley, who she's still waiting to hear back from.

0:50:43.840 --> 0:50:46.439
<v Speaker 2>And once again, i'll remind any of our viewers, many

0:50:46.480 --> 0:50:50.000
<v Speaker 2>of them, you know, work at University California, Berkeley. Many

0:50:50.040 --> 0:50:52.200
<v Speaker 2>of them are in the admissions department, and they're like,

0:50:52.239 --> 0:50:54.880
<v Speaker 2>oh my god, this is a very mature, smart, ery

0:50:54.960 --> 0:50:57.799
<v Speaker 2>dyte young woman. We'd love to have her on campus. Well,

0:50:57.840 --> 0:51:00.600
<v Speaker 2>we're waiting to hear back. But either way, those two

0:51:00.680 --> 0:51:05.040
<v Speaker 2>colleges are both in northern California, three thousand plus miles away.

0:51:06.360 --> 0:51:11.080
<v Speaker 2>I won't say this other school, do Youora, But Doora

0:51:11.200 --> 0:51:16.000
<v Speaker 2>found out yesterday she was accepted to a different acting

0:51:16.120 --> 0:51:22.160
<v Speaker 2>program in at a college in New York City with

0:51:22.280 --> 0:51:25.239
<v Speaker 2>a very generous, nice scholarship. Because they really want you

0:51:25.280 --> 0:51:27.480
<v Speaker 2>to go there, and.

0:51:27.360 --> 0:51:29.359
<v Speaker 3>Now I don't want to be that close to him though.

0:51:29.600 --> 0:51:35.240
<v Speaker 2>Now my beloved Scoote has a decision to make, which

0:51:35.320 --> 0:51:39.279
<v Speaker 2>is she is either going to be down the street.

0:51:40.040 --> 0:51:42.879
<v Speaker 2>Down the street is no, okay. She's either going to.

0:51:42.840 --> 0:51:44.920
<v Speaker 3>Be on the other side of Manhattan.

0:51:44.600 --> 0:51:48.640
<v Speaker 2>Right somewhere is in the same borough as me, or

0:51:49.480 --> 0:51:53.320
<v Speaker 2>a six hour flight away. She's either going to be

0:51:53.360 --> 0:51:59.160
<v Speaker 2>a ninety minute walk or a six hour flight. And

0:51:59.239 --> 0:52:01.160
<v Speaker 2>I just don't know if I'm a deal.

0:52:02.719 --> 0:52:04.759
<v Speaker 3>So everyone in California, no, okay, well.

0:52:04.640 --> 0:52:08.080
<v Speaker 2>Hold on, wait a second here, No, I don't want

0:52:08.120 --> 0:52:12.560
<v Speaker 2>you to make any rash decisions here. And the what

0:52:12.760 --> 0:52:15.400
<v Speaker 2>is true is this, if she ends up being accepted

0:52:15.440 --> 0:52:18.440
<v Speaker 2>to Berkeley, I would imagine that ends up being a

0:52:18.480 --> 0:52:21.279
<v Speaker 2>bit of a no brainer. But if if they make

0:52:21.320 --> 0:52:24.320
<v Speaker 2>a grievous error and that you don't get accepted, there's

0:52:24.320 --> 0:52:27.399
<v Speaker 2>a real decision to make. And I had already kind

0:52:27.440 --> 0:52:29.279
<v Speaker 2>of come to terms with the fact that you were

0:52:29.320 --> 0:52:33.280
<v Speaker 2>gonna be across the country. But now there's a chance.

0:52:33.760 --> 0:52:35.319
<v Speaker 2>I'm saying, there's a chance.

0:52:36.600 --> 0:52:37.200
<v Speaker 3>That he knows.

0:52:37.719 --> 0:52:39.720
<v Speaker 2>No, I know there's a chance because you have because

0:52:39.760 --> 0:52:42.000
<v Speaker 2>you know what, I think, there's a real chance because

0:52:42.040 --> 0:52:43.959
<v Speaker 2>some of your best friends are staying in New York

0:52:44.880 --> 0:52:47.120
<v Speaker 2>and so. But we'll see, we're gonna go visit UC

0:52:47.280 --> 0:52:49.960
<v Speaker 2>Santa Cruz. We're gonna check that out. We'll go visit

0:52:50.239 --> 0:52:52.640
<v Speaker 2>the school you got into here, We'll check it out.

0:52:52.680 --> 0:52:55.360
<v Speaker 2>We'll do the whole thing. But that. But at the

0:52:55.400 --> 0:52:57.640
<v Speaker 2>time being, that's why we're wearing these sweatshirts all right.

0:52:58.400 --> 0:53:03.280
<v Speaker 2>Time to read questions. KCBD says, what are your thoughts

0:53:03.280 --> 0:53:05.279
<v Speaker 2>with the chief sending Z eight flowers Texas work out

0:53:05.280 --> 0:53:07.799
<v Speaker 2>with Mahomes? Is that normal for teams to I don't

0:53:07.800 --> 0:53:10.839
<v Speaker 2>know if the Chiefs sent him or maybe they did.

0:53:10.880 --> 0:53:12.680
<v Speaker 2>I Mahomes been working to a lot of receivers in

0:53:12.719 --> 0:53:14.319
<v Speaker 2>this draft. I don't know if it's normal or not,

0:53:14.440 --> 0:53:18.000
<v Speaker 2>but I like it. Uh, you all need to explain.

0:53:18.200 --> 0:53:19.880
<v Speaker 2>How do you are a shot at the wrong basket

0:53:19.880 --> 0:53:20.480
<v Speaker 2>in eighth grade?

0:53:20.760 --> 0:53:20.920
<v Speaker 3>Oh?

0:53:21.040 --> 0:53:22.120
<v Speaker 2>That's from Seahorn.

0:53:22.440 --> 0:53:26.080
<v Speaker 3>Get. I got a little confused a few times, you know,

0:53:26.200 --> 0:53:30.439
<v Speaker 3>like after halftime when the basket switch. I have really

0:53:30.480 --> 0:53:33.840
<v Speaker 3>bad ADHD. You know, I get a little confused sometimes,

0:53:34.239 --> 0:53:38.520
<v Speaker 3>forget Sometimes you know, when you're running to the basket,

0:53:38.640 --> 0:53:41.840
<v Speaker 3>your team's yelling your name, You're not thinking, Oh, I

0:53:41.920 --> 0:53:45.360
<v Speaker 3>must be doing something wrong. You're like, yeah, like everyone's

0:53:45.480 --> 0:53:46.160
<v Speaker 3>cheering for me.

0:53:46.239 --> 0:53:50.400
<v Speaker 2>You know what about the second time and you were

0:53:50.480 --> 0:53:53.440
<v Speaker 2>running to the basket right, but you didn't have a

0:53:53.520 --> 0:53:56.640
<v Speaker 2>momentere You're like, h I don't usually have fast break

0:53:56.760 --> 0:53:59.960
<v Speaker 2>layups and they're yelling at me again, Maybe I should

0:54:00.040 --> 0:54:04.680
<v Speaker 2>pause and regroup. Yeah, no, that's a good point. You

0:54:04.680 --> 0:54:10.239
<v Speaker 2>know what defense from the Poker Odyssey my first time

0:54:10.280 --> 0:54:12.640
<v Speaker 2>watching live. Does Nick drack his poker stats and is

0:54:12.680 --> 0:54:17.719
<v Speaker 2>he a winning player? Yes? I do, and yes I am.

0:54:18.320 --> 0:54:23.239
<v Speaker 2>Now I guess there's a caveat there. I did lose

0:54:23.360 --> 0:54:26.880
<v Speaker 2>fifty thousand dollars in one heads up match with Phil Helmut,

0:54:27.920 --> 0:54:34.480
<v Speaker 2>so that that is I guess if you incorporate that

0:54:34.520 --> 0:54:39.000
<v Speaker 2>into the profit loss, it's a different story. Uh. However,

0:54:40.440 --> 0:54:43.480
<v Speaker 2>that was almost a one off type of thing in

0:54:43.520 --> 0:54:46.560
<v Speaker 2>a way that to me is not indicative of the

0:54:46.640 --> 0:54:49.640
<v Speaker 2>overall skill. I'm a much higher I have a much

0:54:49.719 --> 0:54:52.200
<v Speaker 2>higher win rate in PLO than I do in No

0:54:52.280 --> 0:54:56.200
<v Speaker 2>Women Hold Them. Uh, but yeah, the answer is yes.

0:54:56.600 --> 0:55:00.480
<v Speaker 2>Jackson Higknit says, any shot the Chiefs go get Michael

0:55:00.520 --> 0:55:02.719
<v Speaker 2>Meyer in the draft. Kelsey can only be ageless for

0:55:02.760 --> 0:55:05.319
<v Speaker 2>so long. I want the Chiefs to draft a tight

0:55:05.400 --> 0:55:09.879
<v Speaker 2>end with a top one hundred pick because I want who.

0:55:09.960 --> 0:55:14.279
<v Speaker 2>I want them to get a high level talent to

0:55:14.480 --> 0:55:17.960
<v Speaker 2>learn under Kelsey for a couple of years, because obviously

0:55:18.000 --> 0:55:21.760
<v Speaker 2>so much of Kelsey's brilliance is his technique and route running,

0:55:22.000 --> 0:55:24.640
<v Speaker 2>and I would like him to teach that. Do you

0:55:24.680 --> 0:55:26.719
<v Speaker 2>think Steph should leave Golden State to try and get

0:55:26.760 --> 0:55:29.520
<v Speaker 2>Ring five. No, he's never gonna leave Golden State. And

0:55:29.640 --> 0:55:32.160
<v Speaker 2>he just got Ring four last year, and Golden State

0:55:32.200 --> 0:55:34.480
<v Speaker 2>will spend money, even if they have to reboot it

0:55:34.520 --> 0:55:36.399
<v Speaker 2>a bit. It's gonna be hard to find a better

0:55:36.440 --> 0:55:39.319
<v Speaker 2>position for him, especially when he's making sixty million a year.

0:55:40.719 --> 0:55:44.680
<v Speaker 2>Has Duora ever beaten Demanse in basketball? If not, what

0:55:44.760 --> 0:55:48.279
<v Speaker 2>game activity does she dominate him in? Never? In basketball?

0:55:48.880 --> 0:55:51.799
<v Speaker 2>What'd you say? Deora is really good at risk and

0:55:51.800 --> 0:55:56.399
<v Speaker 2>Demase be getting frustrated? Man, he is. Demanse is not

0:55:56.600 --> 0:56:00.880
<v Speaker 2>good at losing board games. No, he gets real frustrated.

0:56:01.000 --> 0:56:05.000
<v Speaker 3>But also when he's winning, he is such an annoying winner.

0:56:05.960 --> 0:56:08.560
<v Speaker 2>It's not a great listen, this is why you weren't here.

0:56:08.600 --> 0:56:10.160
<v Speaker 2>But there was one day on the pod he was

0:56:10.200 --> 0:56:12.480
<v Speaker 2>talking about, Oh, I don't know if this's on the

0:56:12.480 --> 0:56:14.440
<v Speaker 2>pod or not, so I might be exposing him. I

0:56:14.440 --> 0:56:16.839
<v Speaker 2>don't mean to, but on or off the pod. One

0:56:16.880 --> 0:56:20.600
<v Speaker 2>time he was like, I have a risk date planned, yeah,

0:56:20.640 --> 0:56:22.520
<v Speaker 2>And I told him. I was like, I don't know

0:56:22.560 --> 0:56:25.239
<v Speaker 2>about that, buddy. He was like, what do you mean.

0:56:25.320 --> 0:56:29.319
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, you're kind of a bad loser and a

0:56:29.320 --> 0:56:31.759
<v Speaker 2>bad winner, so I don't know how this goes. He

0:56:31.800 --> 0:56:35.040
<v Speaker 2>gets really competitive, He gets really competitive and really frustrated.

0:56:35.640 --> 0:56:41.879
<v Speaker 2>DIORA don't nine point two out of ten. Nine point two.

0:56:42.000 --> 0:56:45.440
<v Speaker 3>Hi, everyone, thank you for a wonderful podcast. Time to go.

0:56:46.320 --> 0:56:50.160
<v Speaker 2>What's right? Hey? It's nick Er right. Thank you so

0:56:50.320 --> 0:56:53.560
<v Speaker 2>much for watching. Please do us a favor. Click subscribe.

0:56:53.600 --> 0:56:57.240
<v Speaker 2>It helps my ego and Demonsey's got a financial bonus

0:56:57.239 --> 0:57:00.000
<v Speaker 2>writing on a number of YouTube subscribers, so help him out.

0:57:00.280 --> 0:57:02.120
<v Speaker 2>And also click the bell. I don't know what the

0:57:02.120 --> 0:57:03.640
<v Speaker 2>bell does, but they tell me to tell you to

0:57:03.680 --> 0:57:06.920
<v Speaker 2>click the bell. And you're audio listeners. People that have

0:57:07.000 --> 0:57:10.680
<v Speaker 2>commute strives, whatever it is, subscribe to the podcast as well.

0:57:10.719 --> 0:57:13.640
<v Speaker 2>Wherever you get the podcast, same shows, just you know,

0:57:13.800 --> 0:57:15.839
<v Speaker 2>just in your ears instead of through your eyes. All

0:57:15.880 --> 0:57:17.160
<v Speaker 2>that check it out. Appreciate show.