WEBVTT - This Is the Evergrande Endgame as China’s Property Problems Spread

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the All Thoughts podcast.

0:00:14.360 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Alloway and I'm Joe. So Joe, it feels

0:00:19.120 --> 0:00:23.959
<v Speaker 1>like it's another day, another default by a Chinese property developer,

0:00:24.400 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and so just today, I should say we're recording this.

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>On January, we saw a company called Oian I'm probably

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>not pronouncing that right, saying that it won't make payments

0:00:35.600 --> 0:00:39.600
<v Speaker 1>on four bonds that I think add up to almost

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 1>seven hundred million dollars. But here's the weird thing. For

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:48.239
<v Speaker 1>a brief moment this week, it seemed like people investors

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:52.200
<v Speaker 1>were getting more optimistic about the Chinese real estate space.

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>We actually saw a pretty dramatic rally in dollar bonds

0:00:55.880 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>from junk rated property developers because there were some reports

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 1>that China would make it easier for property companies to

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 1>get cash from pre sales of developments. And then of

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 1>course we saw China lower its interest rates earlier this week,

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>which you know, obviously monetary easing is going to be

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:17.279
<v Speaker 1>good for housing. So there seemed to be these really

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 1>opposite push pull factors at the moment, and no one

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:24.840
<v Speaker 1>seems to know quite what is going on in the space.

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I have to say, I kind of missed, you know,

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 1>in all the my scanning of the news, I actually

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of missed the optimism period you were talking about

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 1>because every time, I mean it was only a day. Okay,

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 1>we're back to pessimism already, because I have to say,

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>like every time I read like you know, obviously look

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 1>at uh sort of like Q four of last year,

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>we're talking a lot about ever Ground and the trouble

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>they were getting into, and it feels like since then

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 1>things have metaestasized, more developers getting into trouble, more fears

0:01:56.520 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 1>of default, maybe companies that were perceived as a safer

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 1>credit risks than ever Grand was getting into trouble. So

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 1>it really feels that the big story, or at least

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 1>every time I look into it, it's like this situation

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>is getting worse. Yeah, So we haven't really seen an

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 1>extreme financial crisis like a Lehman moment that some people

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 1>were talking about, you know, late last year. But we

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 1>have seen contagion in the sense that we have seen

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:25.960
<v Speaker 1>spreads on other junk rated dollar bonds go up quite

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 1>a bit. But really, I think the question no one

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:33.079
<v Speaker 1>quite knows yet is what exactly is the end game here?

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Like what exactly is China trying to achieve. Are they

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 1>going to provide policy support for property developers or are

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 1>they going to reform the market and let the weaker

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 1>players fail. So today I'm very pleased to say that

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 1>we have the perfect person to come on and give

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 1>us an update on what's really going on in Chinese

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>real estate. We're going to be speaking with Travis Lundie.

0:02:56.440 --> 0:03:00.799
<v Speaker 1>He's an independent analyst who publishes on the smart Karmat platform,

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and of course we had him on the show last

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 1>year to talk about China Evergrand, which has since then

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>finally and officially defaulted on its debt. So, Travis, thank

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:13.839
<v Speaker 1>you so much for coming back on the show. Thank

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 1>you for having me. I'm trying to think where to

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 1>begin because there has been so much going on in

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 1>the space, But maybe just to start, you can give

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:25.959
<v Speaker 1>us an update on I guess, the current situation around

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Chinese property developers. What have we seen since we last

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:34.640
<v Speaker 1>spoke to you and since Evergrand actually defaulted. Okay, if

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 1>we take it back a little bit further back to

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 1>when we last spoke, and I can I think we

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>can use ever Grand as a kind of case study

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 1>for the way other developers have also seen deterioration, and

0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>because ever Grand is so large, it effectively encompasses the

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>size of several other smaller developers who might default. The

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 1>loan interest payments were not made on domestic bank loans.

0:03:57.640 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>It appears trust loan repayments were not made. Wealth management

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>products have not been repaid at their maturity. At some

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 1>point in late Q three to early q four, something

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>like half of the projects that ever Grand was working

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 1>on had been at sea work suspended. At that point,

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 1>we've seen a certain amount of positioning. People are positioning

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 1>for the fall. Local governments started looking at taking back land.

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Ever Grant was trying to reduce its its debt by

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>delivering assets, selling assets to other developers, selling assets to

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:40.160
<v Speaker 1>local government affiliated s o ees. Basically none of that worked. Eventually,

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:43.360
<v Speaker 1>ever Grand ran into problems paying its coupons on its

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:46.159
<v Speaker 1>offshore debt, paid a bunch of them late. It got

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:49.280
<v Speaker 1>an extension on a guarantee on a private debt which

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:53.159
<v Speaker 1>people did not know existed. That extension required delivery of

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>certain documentation from a municipal government. That documentation didn't derive.

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:01.360
<v Speaker 1>The bond holders demanded repayment. That came with the great

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 1>end of a grace period of another coupon, and you know,

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Evergrhanad just tossed in the towel and said, you know,

0:05:05.680 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 1>we're not paying. That triggered an event of default on

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the on the offshore notes, all of them. Uh. And

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 1>since that time it hasn't made any sense to pay

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:17.279
<v Speaker 1>any of the other coupons or redemptions on the offshore notes.

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:20.480
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, people are looking at these and saying, woo,

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:23.039
<v Speaker 1>they didn't pay that coupon, or maybe they're not going

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 1>to pay that redemption at the end of this month.

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:27.279
<v Speaker 1>Well they're not going to. They can't simply decide to

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 1>start repaying these things without paying back the other ones.

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 1>In the meantime, the onshore bonds are seeing pressure. There

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:38.840
<v Speaker 1>was an effort to extend the repayment on some onshore

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>bonds last week that was successful, but it's not sure

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 1>how much of that was effectively prodded by local authorities.

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 1>You either extend or you get nothing. When the Jumble

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Fortune redemption missed, that triggered you know, considerable upset in

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 1>local circles, and a working group was dispatched and they

0:05:57.520 --> 0:06:00.360
<v Speaker 1>set up a new risk management committee. That work group

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:02.599
<v Speaker 1>is very similar to the way H and A group

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:08.040
<v Speaker 1>was resolved in February two after years of debt issues

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:11.839
<v Speaker 1>and over investment which had gone sour and some you know,

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:15.719
<v Speaker 1>likelihood of missed payments in Q one two, the high

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:17.919
<v Speaker 1>non government sent in a working group. And this is

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 1>you know H and A says, we will request you

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:22.679
<v Speaker 1>to send in the working group, and that's the official story.

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 1>What really happens is, you know, the local government says,

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 1>we would like you to request us to send in

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 1>a working group, and they say yes, sir, So they

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:33.279
<v Speaker 1>send in a working group, and that working group chairman

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 1>became the new chairman of the company. And the goal

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 1>was quote to diffuse risks and safeguard the interests of

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 1>all parties. And so that's the risk management part. And

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:44.040
<v Speaker 1>given that the local government in every grand's case has

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:47.279
<v Speaker 1>been tasked with sorting out all of the claims, financial

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and otherwise, its involvement is key to safeguard the interests

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 1>of all the parties. And so if we look at

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the H n A process, we can look and we

0:06:56.440 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 1>can see that there's a possibility that EVERGRAND turns out

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 1>roughly the same way. H and A basically went into

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 1>a kind of suspended animation. Bond holders didn't know what

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>was going on. Non strategic assets which could be sold

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 1>were sold to non local parties that raised a little

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:17.680
<v Speaker 1>bit of cash. The local operating businesses continued running and

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, at a negative earnings rate. The working groups

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>spent basically a year figuring out where all the bodies

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 1>were buried and what needed to be done. And in

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>February two thousand twenty one, the company filed for bankruptcy.

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 1>That got the court officially involved in the working group.

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Managed company could then solicit sponsors to take over the

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>businesses and the assets, and they took all three hundred

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 1>assets and and companies bunched them into a group of

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>four and then said please bid. And it was the

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 1>bids which were presented which proposed breakdowns of how much

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>each of the creditor classes got. And that meant that

0:07:56.960 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, people who were who didn't have money, they

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:03.119
<v Speaker 1>were waiting to get repaid. It took them a long

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 1>time to get repaid. And I think that ever Grand

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 1>is going to be in much the same situation. Instead

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 1>of three units, it has you know, a thousand units.

0:08:11.760 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Right now, everyone is quote unquote cooperating U and the

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 1>highest goal here is to just keep on working, building,

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 1>finishing projects and delivering them. The home buyers, you know,

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 1>homebuyers and local governments are the protected classes here. Importantly,

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:26.560
<v Speaker 1>they're also the way that cash eventually gets back to

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the Onshore Real Estate parent company. So without these projects continuing,

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:35.200
<v Speaker 1>there's no resolution on the other end. That progress rate

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 1>is now up into the nineties, and there will be

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:40.600
<v Speaker 1>positive news because every grand will say, you know, we're

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 1>doing this, we're doing that, and the negative news simply

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't come out. So Tracy said something interesting in the beginning,

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's something to the extent of like, well, what

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:54.320
<v Speaker 1>is the Chinese government attempting to achieve here? What is

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the endgame? Which to me raising the question of like, okay,

0:08:57.840 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 1>how much of what we've seen over the last several

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 1>months is the result of some policy aim versus some

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:08.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of unintended consequence of something that was not the

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:12.080
<v Speaker 1>aim at all. And so when you look at what's transpired,

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and you know, as we haven't had anything like Lehman,

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 1>but it's certainly been messy. There's certainly been a lot

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:21.559
<v Speaker 1>of pressure on the protected groups of homebuyers and local governments.

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 1>How much was this a goal versus how much was

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:28.320
<v Speaker 1>this a unfortunate side effect of aiming to achieve something else.

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 1>That's a really good question. I'm not sure I have

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 1>a good answer for that one, and if I did,

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:38.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure I could say it. It's pretty clear

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 1>this was not a policy or a group of policies

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 1>which happened out of the blue. The p POC started

0:09:45.840 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 1>cracking down on excessive debt at financialized developers, which included

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 1>every grand at that time, in two thousand eighteen, they

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 1>warned them. At the beginning of two thousand eighteen, they

0:09:56.800 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 1>labeled them in a report. At the end of two

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand eighteen, the Chairman Hua went on the tape saying

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 1>we will reduce debt. He went on the tape again

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 1>in early two thousand twenties saying he would reduce debt

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 1>drastically in the next three years. This was a plan,

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:13.559
<v Speaker 1>and it only came to the August two thousand twenty

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 1>when the p POC, the Housing and Urban Development Ministry

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 1>came out and said you twelve, we need you to

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 1>abide by these new rules. These are the three red lines.

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:26.559
<v Speaker 1>And it never became official policy as far as I

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:28.720
<v Speaker 1>can tell, but everyone knows what they are. And it

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 1>meant that, you know, those who were triggering two to

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:35.400
<v Speaker 1>three of those red lines, and ever grand triggered all three,

0:10:35.880 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 1>there was simply nothing to do other than shrink. If

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 1>you're running a business and you're growing top line and

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:47.960
<v Speaker 1>you have a hundred and you're financing at ten, that

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:50.840
<v Speaker 1>means in order to roll your financing next year, you

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 1>need to roll a hundred and ten. Well, if you've

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:57.560
<v Speaker 1>got new new assets and new obligations because you bought

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 1>some land bank last year and you've got an increased

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 1>number of projects this year, well, you know, to start

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:06.079
<v Speaker 1>a project, you pay off the government with the local

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 1>government with your payment for the land. You have to

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:11.319
<v Speaker 1>go get debt to do that. So you go get

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 1>some debt, you pay the land, you start pre selling,

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:16.080
<v Speaker 1>You get some cash in the door. Some of that

0:11:16.160 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 1>has to stay in escrow, but that debt to pay

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 1>off the land at the start of a building is

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:23.600
<v Speaker 1>a kind of a bridge. You have to increase the

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:27.240
<v Speaker 1>capacity for that bridge. If you can't have any ability

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 1>to increase interest bearing debt, then you have to sell stuff.

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 1>It's not as much as you know buying land bank,

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:38.680
<v Speaker 1>you actually have to sell stuff. And I think that

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the problem is that if you do that for the

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 1>twelve largest developers, well that's going to trickle down. It's

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:47.440
<v Speaker 1>going to hurt everybody. This was not something which was

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>an accident. There was a real design to reduce over

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 1>leverage at developers. There has been efforts to reduce upward

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 1>price pressure in a bunch of markets. There have been

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:04.960
<v Speaker 1>efforts to reduce excessive lending against property. They've put pressure

0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 1>on the banks for years to keep the cap at

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:10.959
<v Speaker 1>the allocated level or below. They get really nasty when

0:12:10.960 --> 0:12:14.079
<v Speaker 1>a bank goes anywhere near that level. So they've been

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 1>reducing the leverage available in all of the domains until

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 1>they got to developers. Then they finally pushed it on

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:24.320
<v Speaker 1>developers too. This was not a coincidence. Now, you know,

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:27.319
<v Speaker 1>the common prosperity theme became very popular in two thousand

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:29.559
<v Speaker 1>twenty one. It existed before that. I think most of

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Speaker 1>us didn't pay quite enough attention to it. But the

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:34.720
<v Speaker 1>houses are for living in, not for speculation. That was

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 1>around for even more and we you know, we didn't

0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:40.320
<v Speaker 1>pay attention to that either. I think that the the

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 1>government has spent a great deal of effort to try

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:49.679
<v Speaker 1>and close off avenues of rescue. You know, the banks

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 1>may find it tough to increase lending because they are

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 1>at their limits. The central government made it us a

0:12:57.120 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 1>part of the fifty five year Plan to increase development

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and financing for local and regional rejuvenation and urbanization. And

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 1>this was basically, you know, them putting money into the

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 1>pot for growing the equality of of real estate access

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:23.440
<v Speaker 1>to people who didn't have that access before. However, that's

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:27.200
<v Speaker 1>a very small part of the country. It's not small

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>in terms of people. But the land price starts lower,

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the aspirations are lower, the total nominal amount spent is

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 1>lower um if you increase that by but you decrease

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 1>the the major urban centers by is a very large

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 1>net drop. Now, the other thing is that this is

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:48.080
<v Speaker 1>this is a big part of the economy, right so

0:13:48.120 --> 0:13:53.080
<v Speaker 1>it's it's some odd percent of the economy residential real

0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 1>estate is and that means that if you dampen its growth,

0:13:57.200 --> 0:14:00.360
<v Speaker 1>you dampen the growth of the overall economy. And another

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:04.319
<v Speaker 1>part pivot of the five year Plan was they were

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:09.319
<v Speaker 1>going to increase quality growth and decrease quantity of growth

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 1>or emphasize quality versus quantity. That means that they were

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:17.240
<v Speaker 1>telling you very clearly, the stuff that we did before

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 1>to get a high growth rate, we're not going to

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 1>do it anymore. That's a policy decision. So I think

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 1>there's there's a fair bit of effort put into changing

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the direction here. I think also that it's important to

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:31.360
<v Speaker 1>notice that real estate is considered to be like the

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>driver of inequality. So if you want to decrease inequality,

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 1>you've got to decrease the inequality embedded in real estate.

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 1>So I want to get into how real estate actually

0:14:57.520 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 1>impacts all the various parts of the economy, including things

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 1>like local government financing. But before we do, you know,

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 1>you just described the response to the redlines policy, which

0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 1>was basically I mean, it wasn't nothing. But the only

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 1>thing that developers could really do is try to shrink

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 1>sell off assets. I'm wondering, you know, even if they

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 1>sell off assets, they still have these massive liabilities that

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 1>they need to fund somehow. And given all the uncertainty

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 1>in the market, it seems very unlikely that a lot

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 1>of foreign investors are going to step into buy those

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 1>dollar bonds. So I'm curious, how are real estate developers

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>actually funding themselves right now. I ever, Grant spent much

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 1>of two thousand one extending the terms on its non

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 1>interest bearing liabilities. So if you look at the interest

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:57.200
<v Speaker 1>bearing liabilities, they actually shrunk from December two thousand twenty

0:15:57.240 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 1>to June two one. If you look at the the

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 1>commercial bills or the trade payables, those increased. So the

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:13.680
<v Speaker 1>debt numbers, which was the intersparing liabilities portion, that actually shrunk,

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and they made their target of shrinking debt by a

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty billion RMB. But that's that's doesn't help anything.

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 1>If you put more suppliers on the hook and they

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 1>stopped working for you, then you can't finish your project,

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and that's what happened in the second half of two

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>If we ask ourselves what can replace the foreign funding,

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 1>that's a good question so far. I think in this

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:45.479
<v Speaker 1>year there's something like thirty six billion dollars of redemptions

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 1>of the US dollar debt for Chinese developers. That's a

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 1>fair bit. That means that that money has got to

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:55.600
<v Speaker 1>come from someplace else. It's not clear to me that

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 1>banks will want to increase there lending in order to

0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 1>repay they're already under pressure to not increase. If you

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 1>look at what the n d r C said as

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:10.160
<v Speaker 1>a side note to the four five year plan last year,

0:17:11.520 --> 0:17:13.440
<v Speaker 1>it was very clear they were going to crack down

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:17.880
<v Speaker 1>on the unconstrained growth of local government debt and hidden debt,

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:25.400
<v Speaker 1>and they were going to emphasize prudent fiscal rotation rather

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:31.479
<v Speaker 1>than monetary easing in the sector and in the growth

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 1>mix of the economy. And Lika Shine came out and

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:38.959
<v Speaker 1>said six people have been expecting a higher number, had

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 1>always been a higher number, and he came out with

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:43.879
<v Speaker 1>a lower GDP target for two thow it ends up

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 1>higher than that according to the stats, but the willingness

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:50.879
<v Speaker 1>to accept a lower target was seen as proof that

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 1>there was a goal to to crack down on on

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the excesses of the quantity of growth versus quality of

0:17:58.520 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 1>growth problem. In this case, it's tough to see who

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:04.880
<v Speaker 1>picks up the slack. If you look at foreign markets,

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:09.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, the European markets or US markets, when the

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>end user stops buying, usually it comes out to longer,

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:19.359
<v Speaker 1>more patient money buying at a discount. Oftentimes that's some

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of private equity venture where people pull their funds together,

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 1>either incorporated or in a very professional fund buy the

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:30.199
<v Speaker 1>assets and rent them out and hope that they can

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 1>wait for five years and sell them at a at

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:37.400
<v Speaker 1>a markup. In August of two one, the government basically

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:43.359
<v Speaker 1>ordered the entity which approves funds to stop approving private

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>equity funds in the residential real estate market because obviously

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:52.200
<v Speaker 1>housing is for living in, not for speculation, and that

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:58.639
<v Speaker 1>means that you won't see non developer companies coming in

0:18:58.680 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 1>to buy these projects unless they can convince people that

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the project which they buy is for the betterment of

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:09.919
<v Speaker 1>the company. Maybe they buy a project and develop an

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 1>asset and turn it into dormitories or something like that,

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:15.919
<v Speaker 1>and they can convince the local government that it's the

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 1>appropriate thing to do to further, you know, the development

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 1>of the local economy. But it's basically going to come

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:26.720
<v Speaker 1>down to s O s and s OE developers financing

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the purchases of assets from troubled developers, and the other

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:34.080
<v Speaker 1>place is going to have to be, you know, end

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:36.120
<v Speaker 1>users are going to have to step up and right now,

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:39.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, for the longest time, China has had a

0:19:39.119 --> 0:19:42.679
<v Speaker 1>real estate market which was characterized by prices go up

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 1>and demand goes up, prices go down, demand goes down.

0:19:45.200 --> 0:19:46.879
<v Speaker 1>It's a combination of a gift and good and a

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:50.199
<v Speaker 1>Veblin good, depending on whether your status is housing as

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 1>a staple or housing is a luxury. In this case,

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the government has warned, you know, pretty clearly, we don't

0:19:57.240 --> 0:19:59.959
<v Speaker 1>want you to speculate. So there goes the Veblin good.

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:04.359
<v Speaker 1>They've introduced the concept of a property tax, and the

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:08.880
<v Speaker 1>property tax means that everybody's ownership gets registered. There are

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:11.119
<v Speaker 1>a whole bunch of people out there who don't want

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 1>to be known as the owner of five different properties.

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 1>And if you're if you're a communist party cadre in

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:23.639
<v Speaker 1>some regional city where you you purchased a bunch of

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 1>properties at a very low price, and now you're the

0:20:27.840 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>owner of those properties, and it's really great, and you

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 1>are independently wealthy because you, your dog, your three year

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 1>old daughter, they all own properties. You don't want to

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 1>have the property tax come in and suddenly have to

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:42.720
<v Speaker 1>figure out what to do. And if that happens, then

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:47.960
<v Speaker 1>that actually creates, you know, another problem. Currently the developers

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 1>aren't selling as many properties as they want to, and

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:57.120
<v Speaker 1>if luxury buyers and savings buyers, investment buyers can't buy

0:20:57.240 --> 0:21:01.399
<v Speaker 1>multiple properties anymore because of a they want to discourage speculation.

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Then that reduces the total you know, new home sales

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:09.879
<v Speaker 1>and a property tax would invite increased secondary home sales.

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 1>That's not a great thing for the market, and it's

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 1>honestly not a great thing for local governments because local

0:21:17.800 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 1>governments make their not by selling land to new property development.

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 1>And if if new property development stops and the rotation

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:30.879
<v Speaker 1>comes from secondary property market where you know, must must

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 1>sell holders transfer to new people, well the local government

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:37.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't take a cut of that. So it's not sure

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:40.400
<v Speaker 1>where all this money's gonna come from. It's so it's

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:43.639
<v Speaker 1>so interesting. We just did an episode recently on the

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:46.960
<v Speaker 1>lack of inventory in the US housing market and this

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of rise of small landlords, people who might own

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 1>one to three or four homes, and the same issue

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:55.880
<v Speaker 1>of like in states, California being the big one where

0:21:55.880 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 1>there isn't much of a tax on property, you just

0:21:58.280 --> 0:22:02.160
<v Speaker 1>get incentivized to hold and how placed, whether it's higher

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 1>taxes that match the value of the home, you sort

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:09.159
<v Speaker 1>of create that churn and greater inventory. So it's interesting

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 1>to hear the same dynamic. I mean, it makes sense,

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:13.639
<v Speaker 1>but it's interesting to hear the same dynamic in China.

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 1>So that I wanted to focus on though, is you know,

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:19.360
<v Speaker 1>it seems to me when we talk about like debt,

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's sort of like the financial debt and

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the real debt and of course the financial data, the

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 1>bonds and the various payments that these companies have to make,

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 1>and then the real debt is of course the housing

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 1>units that the companies owe to people who have put

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:36.400
<v Speaker 1>down a down payment, and it's a very big deal

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 1>if those aren't delivered in a timely manner. Talk about

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:43.119
<v Speaker 1>the connection, like, what is it that has made the

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 1>actual like process of creating new units, creating new homes?

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 1>What caused these sort of like the physical process to

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 1>slow down such that the real debt has been difficult

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 1>for some of these developers to fulfill. Well, that comes

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:02.120
<v Speaker 1>down to a financial debt actually, I mean the process

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 1>basically is developer says, I got a project, I want

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:07.080
<v Speaker 1>to go bid for this land. He bids for the land.

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:10.160
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't have to pay for it usually on day one. Instead,

0:23:10.160 --> 0:23:12.879
<v Speaker 1>he pays for it in a year, or he's got

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 1>a time limit says you must develop this within three years,

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:17.639
<v Speaker 1>so you know, two years and a half later he

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:21.879
<v Speaker 1>goes and starts developing. And developing means that they probably

0:23:21.880 --> 0:23:25.679
<v Speaker 1>have to break ground and put a foundation in. There

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:28.880
<v Speaker 1>are different definitions depending on the different contract the developer

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 1>signs with the local government. When the local government sells

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the land, however, you know, land prices go up ten

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:37.879
<v Speaker 1>percent a year. If you don't have to pay until

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 1>year two and a half, you can promise to pay

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 1>a hundred, and land prices go up, you know, ten

0:23:44.880 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 1>percent a year, let's say, and in year two and

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:49.399
<v Speaker 1>a half that hundred is now worth a hundred and

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty five. And you all you gotta do is now

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 1>you've got to go fund a hundred two pay the

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:57.720
<v Speaker 1>local government, and it's worth a hundred and twenty five.

0:23:57.720 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 1>It's on your books on a hundred and twenty five.

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Then you go out pre sell it and because it's

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:05.440
<v Speaker 1>worth and you only paid a hundred, the bank will

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 1>give you a small loan to start, you know, construction,

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 1>and you pre sell it and once you get to

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:14.879
<v Speaker 1>a certain level of construction, then you can take the

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 1>full payment from the mortgage and that will all go

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:21.679
<v Speaker 1>into an escrow account, and you know, different different localities

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:25.200
<v Speaker 1>have different rules on how much money can be taken

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 1>out at what point in the process. Some of them

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 1>are extraordinarily detailed schedules. You know, if you if you

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 1>have a height of the building of forty then when

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:39.320
<v Speaker 1>you get to seven ms and you can take out.

0:24:39.800 --> 0:24:42.080
<v Speaker 1>When you get to twelve ms, you can take out

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:45.439
<v Speaker 1>a different level. And that money is meant you know,

0:24:45.840 --> 0:24:49.160
<v Speaker 1>to fund the work in progress so that the end

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the money is out and the and the delivery is made.

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:58.040
<v Speaker 1>A lot of these processes or projects were perhaps less

0:24:58.119 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 1>well supervised then they should have been. And this is

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the things we're going to see, I think

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:07.520
<v Speaker 1>in in Evergrand. What we saw last year was that

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 1>when it came out at ever Grand had taken money

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 1>out of the escrow account faster than it should have.

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 1>A bunch of local governments came in and started suing

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:22.080
<v Speaker 1>ever Grant to get money put back in, and they

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:24.199
<v Speaker 1>were successful and never Grand put the money back in.

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:26.399
<v Speaker 1>But that was you know, again part of the Q

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:29.679
<v Speaker 1>two problem last year where things started going south for

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:32.920
<v Speaker 1>them as a result, you know, with the government cracking

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:35.280
<v Speaker 1>down on banks saying you have to be more prudent.

0:25:35.320 --> 0:25:37.120
<v Speaker 1>You have to make sure you're not letting lending more.

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 1>They went in and did line by line on all

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the exposure to the major developers, including especially Evergrand, and

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:46.440
<v Speaker 1>all the local governments were you know, brought in to cooperate,

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:50.880
<v Speaker 1>and that meant that they had to you know, excuse

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:53.680
<v Speaker 1>my French, but do a c I a exercise, and

0:25:54.520 --> 0:25:57.400
<v Speaker 1>that meant that they got very strict. And one thing

0:25:57.400 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 1>we've seen here very recently is that there's been a

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 1>proposal in the past week or so which says that

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the national government will come out with a new rule

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:09.679
<v Speaker 1>on escrow accounts to supersede the local rules because perhaps

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:12.439
<v Speaker 1>the local governments have now been too strict in in

0:26:12.840 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 1>releasing funds. So you've got this problem where it was

0:26:15.880 --> 0:26:20.199
<v Speaker 1>loosey goosey, and now it's much less loosey goosey. And

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 1>so there's been a there's been a a swing from

0:26:23.680 --> 0:26:26.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of over the curve to under the curve, and

0:26:27.440 --> 0:26:30.920
<v Speaker 1>developers use that money to go speculate, like you ever

0:26:31.000 --> 0:26:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Grant has a soccer team, it's building a stadium or

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:36.879
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of stadiums. It owns this, that and the

0:26:36.880 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 1>other thing. There's been some large dividends paid out over years,

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 1>and there's certainly been some luxury spending on expenses, and

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 1>if you look at some of that, the money just disappeared.

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:50.760
<v Speaker 1>There's just not enough money in the pot. And when

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the government local governments start restricting the amount of money

0:26:53.960 --> 0:26:57.480
<v Speaker 1>coming out, you start being unable to pay your suppliers,

0:26:57.600 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 1>and instead you pay your suppliers with a note. We said,

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 1>rather than pay you cash, now, i'll pay you ten

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:05.960
<v Speaker 1>percent more cash in three months. Well that starts that's

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:08.240
<v Speaker 1>a financial liability because if you actually have to go

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:11.639
<v Speaker 1>pay that guy in three months, well, now you need

0:27:11.680 --> 0:27:13.480
<v Speaker 1>to source that cash from someplace else, and they just

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:17.640
<v Speaker 1>don't have that. They just started basically creating non interest

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:22.639
<v Speaker 1>bearing but premium payout liabilities which they couldn't they couldn't

0:27:22.680 --> 0:27:25.199
<v Speaker 1>keep up with. So suppliers didn't get paid and they

0:27:25.240 --> 0:27:28.639
<v Speaker 1>stopped work. And then you know what really happened was

0:27:28.960 --> 0:27:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the government stepped in and said, you will pay your

0:27:31.280 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 1>suppliers in order to start these things working again, and

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 1>whatever you need to do it to pay your suppliers

0:27:36.840 --> 0:27:53.199
<v Speaker 1>to start working again. So you mentioned the possible change

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:55.720
<v Speaker 1>in escrow rules, and I think this was one of

0:27:55.720 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the things that sparked that very very brief rally that

0:27:59.080 --> 0:28:02.199
<v Speaker 1>I was talking about in the intro in property bonds.

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:04.840
<v Speaker 1>And of course this week we also saw China cut

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:08.240
<v Speaker 1>interest rates, and you know, it seems to be embarking

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:11.920
<v Speaker 1>on some sort of easing cycle, which presumably would help

0:28:11.960 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the property sector. I guess my question is, how do

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 1>we feel about the policy response right now? Does it

0:28:18.119 --> 0:28:21.359
<v Speaker 1>seem like the authorities are maybe trying to calibrate their

0:28:21.400 --> 0:28:25.760
<v Speaker 1>crackdown and their efforts to reduce leverage in the opposite direction,

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:28.720
<v Speaker 1>So maybe they think they've gone too far and they

0:28:28.760 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 1>need to start to roll back some of these measures.

0:28:33.160 --> 0:28:35.640
<v Speaker 1>That's a good question. I think that we will continue

0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:40.360
<v Speaker 1>to see statements from the PBOC, from the c B

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:45.240
<v Speaker 1>I r C, from the Financial Stability and Development Commission,

0:28:45.360 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 1>who's the you know, the top financial regulator. I think

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 1>we'll continue to see statements from all of these bodies

0:28:51.440 --> 0:28:58.680
<v Speaker 1>saying that China will not return to aggressive growth of

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 1>real estate to bail out the on me. They've said

0:29:01.960 --> 0:29:03.920
<v Speaker 1>that constantly. I think it's going to be the mantra

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:07.520
<v Speaker 1>for a long while. The question I think we have

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 1>to get to is, and I think I mentioned this

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:12.720
<v Speaker 1>The last time was you know, China is teaching a lesson,

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 1>and the question is how hard and to whom are

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:17.600
<v Speaker 1>they teaching this lesson? And I don't think we've answered

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:20.320
<v Speaker 1>that yet. The beginning question here was what is the

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:23.440
<v Speaker 1>end game? I think the end game is is a

0:29:23.520 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 1>two thousand thirty to two thousand fifty outlook where we

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 1>have a China is a moderately prosperous society in two

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 1>thousand thirty and is a leader in global and regional markets,

0:29:36.840 --> 0:29:40.680
<v Speaker 1>and is has common prosperity for all. And if you

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 1>look at what Shi Jimping has said with regard to

0:29:43.960 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 1>his common prosperity, this is not a two thousand twenty

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 1>two thing. This is a long dated thing. So we

0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:50.960
<v Speaker 1>really have to look at where the long dated end

0:29:50.960 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 1>game is. And a long dated end game for common

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:56.960
<v Speaker 1>prosperity means a reduction in inequality. And I think the

0:29:57.040 --> 0:30:01.080
<v Speaker 1>question has to be asked because China has a fujie

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:05.480
<v Speaker 1>system where you have a you have your effective household

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 1>registration or if you will, local citizenship based on where

0:30:09.800 --> 0:30:11.800
<v Speaker 1>you live, and that really comes out to where you

0:30:11.840 --> 0:30:15.880
<v Speaker 1>were born. Uh, And the question is should Chinese people

0:30:15.960 --> 0:30:20.400
<v Speaker 1>have their relative wealth and prosperity determined by where they

0:30:20.400 --> 0:30:24.880
<v Speaker 1>were born, and that is a particularly un siji being

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:28.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of attitude. So I think that he's looking at

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:29.840
<v Speaker 1>that and saying, no, that's not the way it should

0:30:29.840 --> 0:30:31.600
<v Speaker 1>be done. And if you look at, for example, to

0:30:31.760 --> 0:30:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the changes in the education sector in the past year,

0:30:33.840 --> 0:30:37.360
<v Speaker 1>that's very clearly you know, let's not give excess advantage

0:30:37.400 --> 0:30:39.960
<v Speaker 1>to those who happen to have excess funds right now,

0:30:41.040 --> 0:30:46.160
<v Speaker 1>let's make education something accessible to all. And I think

0:30:46.200 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 1>that he's looking at real estate much the same way.

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:50.640
<v Speaker 1>And the question here is, well, is that unfair to

0:30:50.680 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the people who bought all the property? Well, then the

0:30:53.160 --> 0:30:55.560
<v Speaker 1>question is is that unfair to all the rich people?

0:30:56.240 --> 0:30:58.360
<v Speaker 1>And I think his answer might be, well, you know,

0:30:58.480 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 1>that's just one of those things. So I think if

0:31:00.920 --> 0:31:03.280
<v Speaker 1>we look at the end game, the endgame is clearly

0:31:03.960 --> 0:31:11.479
<v Speaker 1>a very non capitalist, non libertarian, socialist view of the

0:31:11.480 --> 0:31:15.760
<v Speaker 1>way assets should be distributed across an economy. And if

0:31:15.760 --> 0:31:17.840
<v Speaker 1>I look at that, that means that there's a bunch

0:31:17.840 --> 0:31:19.480
<v Speaker 1>of people who are going to hurt. And if you

0:31:19.480 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 1>think about what the developers really represent and all of us,

0:31:22.640 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's been something like eighty billion dollars of

0:31:25.000 --> 0:31:28.080
<v Speaker 1>value lost in the offshore bond markets or Chinese developers

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:32.240
<v Speaker 1>in the past year. Great well, most of the developers

0:31:32.240 --> 0:31:35.640
<v Speaker 1>are still functioning and building houses. Contract sales are down,

0:31:35.680 --> 0:31:37.960
<v Speaker 1>but they are still out there everyday building houses and

0:31:37.960 --> 0:31:41.440
<v Speaker 1>delivering houses to their homes to their home buyers. What

0:31:41.560 --> 0:31:44.640
<v Speaker 1>has been lost has been the capital ownership of those entities.

0:31:44.720 --> 0:31:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Those operating entities continue to operate and will continue to build,

0:31:48.080 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 1>and as long as they fulfill a social function, then

0:31:50.840 --> 0:31:54.440
<v Speaker 1>that's what the end goal is going to be. Now,

0:31:54.720 --> 0:31:57.240
<v Speaker 1>capital owners and capital providers are going to take a

0:31:57.240 --> 0:32:00.200
<v Speaker 1>big hit here. They already have and I don't see

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:04.200
<v Speaker 1>it getting much better, but you don't see such pain

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:07.560
<v Speaker 1>they have to backtrack, and so you talk about twenty

0:32:07.680 --> 0:32:12.840
<v Speaker 1>thirty or what what the endgame looks like. Real estate

0:32:13.000 --> 0:32:15.680
<v Speaker 1>is not such an important part of the economy, and

0:32:16.000 --> 0:32:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the wealthy who brought up multiple homes early have taken

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:21.000
<v Speaker 1>a hit. Can they? I mean, I guess the question

0:32:21.040 --> 0:32:23.719
<v Speaker 1>is can they get there without having to backcheck or

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:26.920
<v Speaker 1>would there be so much acute pain in the meantime

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:30.360
<v Speaker 1>from people who do have equity in uh in their

0:32:30.400 --> 0:32:34.040
<v Speaker 1>own home or so forth, such that it becomes untenable

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 1>to go all the way through without further easy or

0:32:37.640 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 1>without further sort of like juicing the sector. Again, I

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:43.520
<v Speaker 1>think this comes down to what is what is acceptable

0:32:43.520 --> 0:32:46.719
<v Speaker 1>and what is not acceptable as a response, And if

0:32:46.760 --> 0:32:48.360
<v Speaker 1>you look at what the PBOC and c d i

0:32:48.440 --> 0:32:52.280
<v Speaker 1>RC have said specifically about Evergrand, it's almost exactly the

0:32:52.320 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 1>same wording they used about H and A. This company

0:32:55.160 --> 0:33:01.840
<v Speaker 1>exercised poor management and took blind risk for expansion. And

0:33:02.480 --> 0:33:05.840
<v Speaker 1>this is the chickens coming home to roost and there's

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:08.360
<v Speaker 1>no pity for them here. And what that also tells

0:33:08.400 --> 0:33:10.480
<v Speaker 1>you is that you know there will be heads will

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 1>roll on this. There will be as John gall Braves

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 1>put it in when you've described the bezel, and we're

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:18.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, Michael Pettis and I have both described this

0:33:18.560 --> 0:33:20.800
<v Speaker 1>as the downside of the bezel, the discovery phase of

0:33:20.800 --> 0:33:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the bezel. Audits are are penetrating and meticulous. People are

0:33:25.160 --> 0:33:28.600
<v Speaker 1>assumed to be dishonest until they're proven otherwise, and commercial

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:32.720
<v Speaker 1>morality improves when the truth comes out. I think we're

0:33:32.720 --> 0:33:35.400
<v Speaker 1>going to see that, and I think that's what that's

0:33:35.400 --> 0:33:38.960
<v Speaker 1>what the goal is here. So the trick is what

0:33:39.240 --> 0:33:43.120
<v Speaker 1>is acceptable and what is unacceptable. You know, speculators losing money,

0:33:43.320 --> 0:33:48.640
<v Speaker 1>that's acceptable. Home Buyers in the streets, that's unacceptable. Forty

0:33:48.680 --> 0:33:55.160
<v Speaker 1>million migrant laborers involved in the real estate construction sector

0:33:55.720 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 1>out of work and not getting paid and not being

0:33:58.840 --> 0:34:01.800
<v Speaker 1>able to eat. That's a real problem. And so I

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:05.320
<v Speaker 1>think that there's a there's a difference between what is

0:34:05.840 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 1>deemed to be an acceptable risk and was deemed to

0:34:08.520 --> 0:34:11.840
<v Speaker 1>be an unacceptable risk. In this particular case, there's obviously

0:34:11.880 --> 0:34:16.280
<v Speaker 1>a path risk, and I don't think that China has

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:21.520
<v Speaker 1>adequately prepared to the ground for that financing path. And

0:34:21.520 --> 0:34:25.279
<v Speaker 1>the financing path in the end comes down to the

0:34:25.560 --> 0:34:28.799
<v Speaker 1>local governments. So this is something that you and I

0:34:28.840 --> 0:34:32.879
<v Speaker 1>have discussed previously. And one way I like to think

0:34:32.880 --> 0:34:35.400
<v Speaker 1>about the housing market and the way it fits into

0:34:35.480 --> 0:34:39.800
<v Speaker 1>China's financial system is sort of like a supply chain.

0:34:40.000 --> 0:34:42.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think you said this, but a supply chain

0:34:42.640 --> 0:34:46.399
<v Speaker 1>of capital, right, it's moving in a straight line, and

0:34:46.640 --> 0:34:50.239
<v Speaker 1>one disruption at one end of the capital supply chain

0:34:50.320 --> 0:34:54.120
<v Speaker 1>is going to reverberate and have consequences for other things

0:34:54.280 --> 0:34:57.239
<v Speaker 1>further down the supply chain. So maybe you can walk

0:34:57.320 --> 0:35:00.520
<v Speaker 1>us through those connections and how a disturb in the

0:35:00.560 --> 0:35:05.680
<v Speaker 1>housing market. Lower inventory, lower prices might actually have a

0:35:05.800 --> 0:35:10.440
<v Speaker 1>knock on effect to things like local governments, Chinese banks

0:35:11.280 --> 0:35:15.319
<v Speaker 1>so ease, state owned enterprises and things like that. If

0:35:15.320 --> 0:35:18.279
<v Speaker 1>we look at the status, if we think about this

0:35:18.360 --> 0:35:21.160
<v Speaker 1>as as a shooting star, it's shot up. There was

0:35:21.160 --> 0:35:23.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of profit under the curve, a lot of

0:35:23.960 --> 0:35:29.360
<v Speaker 1>spread taken out by different parties, and growth, a nominal growth,

0:35:29.360 --> 0:35:32.080
<v Speaker 1>which was quantity of growth rather than quality of growth.

0:35:32.560 --> 0:35:34.800
<v Speaker 1>The pivot point in all of this is the supply

0:35:34.880 --> 0:35:38.040
<v Speaker 1>of land. The government of China owns all the land

0:35:38.280 --> 0:35:42.360
<v Speaker 1>in the early nineties that the decision on who sold

0:35:42.480 --> 0:35:45.440
<v Speaker 1>land to whom was then delegated to the local governments,

0:35:45.440 --> 0:35:48.400
<v Speaker 1>and the local governments could raise revenue because they were

0:35:48.400 --> 0:35:52.120
<v Speaker 1>not allowed to issue definite bonds, they could raise revenue

0:35:52.160 --> 0:35:55.360
<v Speaker 1>by by by selling land. And they would sell land

0:35:55.480 --> 0:35:57.200
<v Speaker 1>and then the developer would develop it, and then they

0:35:57.239 --> 0:36:01.320
<v Speaker 1>would earn a developer tax from the from the developers

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:06.719
<v Speaker 1>sale of the land and property to buyers. If we

0:36:06.760 --> 0:36:12.000
<v Speaker 1>look at the local government funding sources, something like thirty

0:36:13.480 --> 0:36:17.440
<v Speaker 1>is across all of China is in the sale of

0:36:18.600 --> 0:36:22.280
<v Speaker 1>land and the special taxes which come from the development.

0:36:22.920 --> 0:36:25.840
<v Speaker 1>That's a very big portion of you know, local government funding,

0:36:26.480 --> 0:36:30.279
<v Speaker 1>and that has been growing, you know, roughly in line

0:36:30.320 --> 0:36:33.319
<v Speaker 1>with GDP because it's a big part of GDP. When

0:36:33.320 --> 0:36:36.440
<v Speaker 1>we look at this supply chain of capital, h you know,

0:36:36.440 --> 0:36:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the people providing capital, those people providing capital, they provide

0:36:40.120 --> 0:36:43.399
<v Speaker 1>it to a developer who buys the asset. Then the

0:36:43.480 --> 0:36:48.040
<v Speaker 1>asset is rotated into savings capital, which is purchased by

0:36:48.040 --> 0:36:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the the new home buyer or the investor. And if

0:36:51.560 --> 0:36:53.560
<v Speaker 1>you think about these, there's a there are a bunch

0:36:53.560 --> 0:36:57.360
<v Speaker 1>of flows going on. If the local governments have sold

0:36:57.360 --> 0:36:59.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of land and that is going to decrease,

0:37:00.120 --> 0:37:02.279
<v Speaker 1>that means that the grade of growth that they are

0:37:02.320 --> 0:37:06.000
<v Speaker 1>able to raise money at will drop. We can look

0:37:06.040 --> 0:37:08.880
<v Speaker 1>at this and say, you know, in two thousand there

0:37:08.920 --> 0:37:11.839
<v Speaker 1>was no such thing as a land bank. Governments were

0:37:11.840 --> 0:37:15.200
<v Speaker 1>starting out from scratch, Developers were starting out from scratch,

0:37:15.400 --> 0:37:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and then we ran into the you know, the late

0:37:17.120 --> 0:37:19.400
<v Speaker 1>naughties problem, the GFC, and then there was suddenly a

0:37:19.400 --> 0:37:22.279
<v Speaker 1>burst of financing. But the burst of financing allowed developers

0:37:22.280 --> 0:37:24.280
<v Speaker 1>to build land bank. So if we take the idea

0:37:24.280 --> 0:37:26.839
<v Speaker 1>of a land bank, from two thousand ten to two

0:37:26.880 --> 0:37:31.759
<v Speaker 1>thousand twenty, developers have grown land bank to be you know,

0:37:31.920 --> 0:37:35.480
<v Speaker 1>on average, something like three years worth of land on

0:37:35.520 --> 0:37:39.840
<v Speaker 1>their books, and that means that local governments have sold

0:37:40.040 --> 0:37:44.319
<v Speaker 1>thirteen years worth of land in ten years. If we

0:37:44.360 --> 0:37:46.719
<v Speaker 1>look forward and we say that the developers aren't going

0:37:46.760 --> 0:37:48.879
<v Speaker 1>to be able to carry that because you know, they're

0:37:48.960 --> 0:37:53.680
<v Speaker 1>high funding costs uh and the lower sales rate means

0:37:53.719 --> 0:37:55.719
<v Speaker 1>that they simply can't hold it. They will burn through

0:37:55.760 --> 0:37:59.800
<v Speaker 1>their inventory. But over the next ten years, basically the

0:37:59.840 --> 0:38:04.000
<v Speaker 1>low governments will sell eight years worth of land bank

0:38:04.520 --> 0:38:06.879
<v Speaker 1>to the developers who will then spend ten years worth

0:38:06.880 --> 0:38:11.520
<v Speaker 1>of land bank. So they were you know, earning at

0:38:11.640 --> 0:38:15.040
<v Speaker 1>thirteen years out of ten so of what they probably

0:38:15.040 --> 0:38:17.839
<v Speaker 1>should have, and now they're going to melt back down

0:38:17.880 --> 0:38:20.880
<v Speaker 1>to eight years out of ten. Let's say that's drop

0:38:21.760 --> 0:38:25.359
<v Speaker 1>versus your straight line growth, and drop is a lot

0:38:25.400 --> 0:38:29.600
<v Speaker 1>of money to be taken out of the flow into

0:38:29.880 --> 0:38:34.080
<v Speaker 1>local government coffers. And that's where the pivot point comes.

0:38:34.480 --> 0:38:36.879
<v Speaker 1>If we look at all of these the logistics here.

0:38:37.320 --> 0:38:40.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, real estate is a local government funding source.

0:38:41.480 --> 0:38:45.080
<v Speaker 1>It is a g d P source because all of

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the development creates jobs. It creates construction jobs, financing jobs.

0:38:50.880 --> 0:38:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Mortgage spread is the single biggest contributor to the bottom

0:38:55.120 --> 0:38:58.720
<v Speaker 1>line of most Chinese banks. There's a there's a clear

0:38:59.520 --> 0:39:02.440
<v Speaker 1>incentive for everybody to have this all go well. But

0:39:02.600 --> 0:39:06.520
<v Speaker 1>when it doesn't go well, you know, volume drops, spread drops,

0:39:07.440 --> 0:39:10.360
<v Speaker 1>volume drops on the sales, land sales, and local governments

0:39:10.360 --> 0:39:15.920
<v Speaker 1>find themselves unable to fund their other infrastructure products. And

0:39:16.640 --> 0:39:20.400
<v Speaker 1>that means fewer jobs. Uh, And it means that savings

0:39:20.440 --> 0:39:23.040
<v Speaker 1>assets are not created at the same rate they were

0:39:23.040 --> 0:39:26.480
<v Speaker 1>created before. In the end, I think that people are

0:39:26.520 --> 0:39:29.400
<v Speaker 1>okay with the idea that savings assets, which are heavily

0:39:29.520 --> 0:39:36.080
<v Speaker 1>levered aren't created because it's a relatively low spread asset.

0:39:36.520 --> 0:39:39.080
<v Speaker 1>A lot of these assets aren't earning any money. People

0:39:39.120 --> 0:39:42.560
<v Speaker 1>are financing them, but they're just held empty. So it's

0:39:42.600 --> 0:39:46.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a relatively inefficient way to create a gross levered

0:39:46.880 --> 0:39:50.560
<v Speaker 1>financial asset. But all of this stuff between then, you know,

0:39:50.760 --> 0:39:56.760
<v Speaker 1>local government financing, GDP, jobs, bank health, it's all connected.

0:39:57.040 --> 0:40:00.359
<v Speaker 1>And when you put a stop on one end of it,

0:40:00.480 --> 0:40:03.839
<v Speaker 1>that means, you know, the block cascades through the chain.

0:40:04.560 --> 0:40:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to point people to Michael Pettis is odd Lots.

0:40:09.160 --> 0:40:12.919
<v Speaker 1>Back in October, he really addressed this issue of expansion

0:40:12.960 --> 0:40:16.920
<v Speaker 1>and contraction and local government as a place where it

0:40:17.000 --> 0:40:19.319
<v Speaker 1>was going to hurt. I think that is part and

0:40:19.440 --> 0:40:22.759
<v Speaker 1>parcel of where we're going to see the problem addressed.

0:40:23.080 --> 0:40:28.360
<v Speaker 1>In the end. The biggest savior here will be probably

0:40:28.440 --> 0:40:33.040
<v Speaker 1>local governments selling land to local government financing vehicles who

0:40:33.120 --> 0:40:37.200
<v Speaker 1>will then build low income housing that will create jobs,

0:40:37.200 --> 0:40:40.840
<v Speaker 1>It will create spread, and perhaps they will rent those

0:40:40.880 --> 0:40:46.080
<v Speaker 1>two low income households on a kind of a rent

0:40:46.160 --> 0:40:49.960
<v Speaker 1>to own basis, so that people are building a certain

0:40:50.280 --> 0:40:55.360
<v Speaker 1>wealth and basis of future prosperity for their household and

0:40:55.440 --> 0:40:59.880
<v Speaker 1>it will in effect dampen the pain that we're seeing.

0:41:00.200 --> 0:41:02.440
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think that we're going to see a

0:41:02.480 --> 0:41:05.800
<v Speaker 1>return to people buying five or six apartments in a

0:41:05.880 --> 0:41:10.440
<v Speaker 1>project because they can and expecting, you know, property prices

0:41:10.480 --> 0:41:13.840
<v Speaker 1>to rise fifteen a year for the foreseeable future. I

0:41:13.880 --> 0:41:17.600
<v Speaker 1>don't think that that's coming back. Travis. That was a

0:41:17.640 --> 0:41:22.040
<v Speaker 1>fantastic explanation and update of what's going on. Really appreciate

0:41:22.080 --> 0:41:25.360
<v Speaker 1>you coming back on all thoughts. Thank you all right, Travis,

0:41:25.400 --> 0:41:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much. So It's always great having Travis

0:41:40.960 --> 0:41:44.320
<v Speaker 1>on because he's immensely knowledgeable about pretty much any space

0:41:44.360 --> 0:41:46.839
<v Speaker 1>you throw at him. But I thought, in particular, what

0:41:46.880 --> 0:41:49.920
<v Speaker 1>was interesting in that well, I thought the thing that

0:41:49.960 --> 0:41:53.160
<v Speaker 1>stood out in that conversation was the emphasis on changing

0:41:53.239 --> 0:41:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the quality or the makeup of China's growth, the idea

0:41:57.200 --> 0:42:00.200
<v Speaker 1>that you don't want to have financialized growth anymore, or

0:42:00.239 --> 0:42:03.279
<v Speaker 1>not as much of it. You don't want growth that's

0:42:03.360 --> 0:42:07.160
<v Speaker 1>driven by asset price inflation and debt and leverage, and

0:42:07.200 --> 0:42:09.879
<v Speaker 1>so you're taking leverage out of the system. I mean,

0:42:09.960 --> 0:42:12.960
<v Speaker 1>China has been pretty direct about doing this. If you're

0:42:13.000 --> 0:42:15.520
<v Speaker 1>taking leverage out of the system and saying that you

0:42:15.560 --> 0:42:19.680
<v Speaker 1>don't want housing to be purely for speculation, then inevitably

0:42:19.719 --> 0:42:22.120
<v Speaker 1>those prices are going to have to fall and funding

0:42:22.280 --> 0:42:24.800
<v Speaker 1>is going to fall too, And that's the big question

0:42:24.880 --> 0:42:28.919
<v Speaker 1>for me, like where does the money actually come from

0:42:28.960 --> 0:42:31.440
<v Speaker 1>and how much of it will be available because that's

0:42:31.719 --> 0:42:37.200
<v Speaker 1>also going to dictate warehouse prices actually end up, right, Yeah,

0:42:37.239 --> 0:42:41.160
<v Speaker 1>And this idea that or the goal like can you

0:42:41.320 --> 0:42:46.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of hurt the capitalists, the investors, the bond holders

0:42:46.840 --> 0:42:51.400
<v Speaker 1>while also maintaining a healthy pace of volume growth in

0:42:51.480 --> 0:42:54.560
<v Speaker 1>homes like building more homes or making more homes available,

0:42:54.560 --> 0:42:58.319
<v Speaker 1>because obviously that's still a multi year priority and there's

0:42:58.360 --> 0:43:00.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of development yet to be done, and and

0:43:00.760 --> 0:43:05.480
<v Speaker 1>as he described it, like the existing system was very

0:43:05.480 --> 0:43:08.000
<v Speaker 1>friendly to capital and there were all these ways to

0:43:08.600 --> 0:43:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if game is the right word, but

0:43:10.719 --> 0:43:13.840
<v Speaker 1>let's say make easy money in the example of Okay,

0:43:13.880 --> 0:43:16.000
<v Speaker 1>you buy land from the government at X, but you

0:43:16.000 --> 0:43:18.359
<v Speaker 1>don't have to pay it for a while, and then

0:43:18.360 --> 0:43:20.799
<v Speaker 1>by the time you do pay, it's up, and then

0:43:20.840 --> 0:43:23.080
<v Speaker 1>you can take money out of the system by the

0:43:23.120 --> 0:43:25.719
<v Speaker 1>time you've done a little bit. And so essentially, like

0:43:25.760 --> 0:43:28.399
<v Speaker 1>there's the leverage, and the question is can you keep

0:43:28.440 --> 0:43:31.719
<v Speaker 1>up that same pace of home creation while making it

0:43:31.840 --> 0:43:38.239
<v Speaker 1>less capital friendly? Is like a really interesting thing to watch. Yeah, well,

0:43:38.280 --> 0:43:40.919
<v Speaker 1>I thought the idea of China sort of killing two

0:43:40.920 --> 0:43:44.319
<v Speaker 1>birds with one stone by building low income housing that

0:43:44.360 --> 0:43:47.600
<v Speaker 1>will hopefully replace some of the lost inventory. Yes, that's

0:43:47.640 --> 0:43:50.120
<v Speaker 1>a really interesting notion and it makes a lot of

0:43:50.160 --> 0:43:54.200
<v Speaker 1>sense from a policy standpoint, So it'll be interesting to

0:43:54.200 --> 0:43:56.960
<v Speaker 1>see whether or not we actually see that. Now. It's

0:43:57.000 --> 0:44:01.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of interesting that, like in any economy anywhere around

0:44:01.120 --> 0:44:03.759
<v Speaker 1>the world, like especially these days, it's like whether the

0:44:03.800 --> 0:44:06.160
<v Speaker 1>US are trying to like there is this demand for

0:44:06.280 --> 0:44:09.680
<v Speaker 1>more house like more home volume, like people want, and

0:44:09.760 --> 0:44:15.560
<v Speaker 1>yet you know, you don't really see modern governments at least,

0:44:15.840 --> 0:44:17.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, at least in the West talking about like

0:44:17.840 --> 0:44:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the number of new homes built as a mad major

0:44:21.440 --> 0:44:23.160
<v Speaker 1>measuring stake, you know, the US to talk about like

0:44:23.160 --> 0:44:26.359
<v Speaker 1>wages and job creation, etcetera. But no, I've never heard

0:44:26.360 --> 0:44:29.040
<v Speaker 1>like a politician say like, oh, well we built two

0:44:29.080 --> 0:44:31.480
<v Speaker 1>million homes. Under my watcher, we built a million. You know,

0:44:31.680 --> 0:44:34.120
<v Speaker 1>but it would be intuitive, and so it would be

0:44:34.160 --> 0:44:37.759
<v Speaker 1>interesting if China, whe it's more sort of top down policy,

0:44:37.960 --> 0:44:41.600
<v Speaker 1>can just sort of like manufacture homes in a way

0:44:41.600 --> 0:44:45.120
<v Speaker 1>that's separate from the capital markets process totally. It makes

0:44:45.160 --> 0:44:47.319
<v Speaker 1>a lot of sense from a policy standpoint. But yeah,

0:44:47.360 --> 0:44:52.680
<v Speaker 1>you're right, historically it just hasn't been emphasized, although I

0:44:52.760 --> 0:44:55.960
<v Speaker 1>think in the UK politicians do make housings supply quite

0:44:56.120 --> 0:44:59.200
<v Speaker 1>a talking point. Um. But maybe that's yeah, maybe that's

0:44:59.200 --> 0:45:02.319
<v Speaker 1>a conversation another day. Shall we leave it there. Let's

0:45:02.360 --> 0:45:06.160
<v Speaker 1>leave it there alright. This has been another episode of

0:45:06.200 --> 0:45:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the Odd Thoughts podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow

0:45:09.080 --> 0:45:12.680
<v Speaker 1>me on Twitter at Tracy Alloway and I'm Joe wi

0:45:12.719 --> 0:45:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Isn't all. You could follow me on Twitter at the

0:45:15.040 --> 0:45:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Stalwart follow our guest Travis Lundie. He's at Travis Lundi Asia.

0:45:20.080 --> 0:45:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Follow our producer Laura Carlson at Laura M. Carlson. Follow

0:45:23.960 --> 0:45:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg head of podcast, Francesco Levi at Francesca Today,

0:45:27.960 --> 0:45:30.919
<v Speaker 1>and check out all of our podcast at Bloomberg under

0:45:30.960 --> 0:46:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the handle at podcasts. Thanks for listening, O