WEBVTT - The Strong Dollar, Apple, And Oil (Podcast)

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:23.160
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Vince Signarella he's coming back,

0:00:23.200 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Global macro strategist for Bloomberg News. Literally the king of

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 1>work from home. Vince. He's still bullish here. Yeah, I'm

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 1>actually listening, you know, listen that when I see two

0:00:35.760 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 1>year years about one year yels back to me and

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:41.479
<v Speaker 1>and the rest of the curve something similar. That's the

0:00:41.520 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>fixed income market pushing back against these multiple aggressive FED

0:00:45.240 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>rate heights. I understand the argument, and the argument is

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:50.599
<v Speaker 1>we go from eight percent to six percent, but how

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:53.240
<v Speaker 1>do we get from six percent to two percent in

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:56.280
<v Speaker 1>in a in a short time? My argument against that

0:00:56.400 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 1>is number one, why does it have to be a

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 1>short time and why does it have to be two percent?

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>The two percent level was something green Span just pulled

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 1>out of the air. If we get to three or

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 1>three and a half percent, that's where they said, guesses

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the neutral rate is so there's no reason that's not

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 1>a good place to be. And if I think zero

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:17.479
<v Speaker 1>percent is a good level of inflation, that's just highway robbery. Dude.

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:19.959
<v Speaker 1>I don't like it. You know, it's not a good thing,

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>you know. So I do good grocery shopping usually, and

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 1>my wife went last week and it came back with

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the sheer look of Carol and everything. I've been in

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:30.960
<v Speaker 1>there in a while, and you know, looking at the

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 1>prices of a lot of things that doubled essentially. Yeah, yeah,

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>I'd like them to get inflation down as quickly as possible.

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:41.360
<v Speaker 1>But I guess you're what you're saying is, um, if

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:43.920
<v Speaker 1>they try and do that, they're going to cause so

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>much pain that what there will be a backlash and

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 1>riots in the streets, bricks through windows, and they'll have

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 1>to turn around and and cut Yeah. Well, I mean

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 1>think about it. You know, they're they're making statements, all

0:01:56.400 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 1>of them basically saying we don't care. We're gonna put

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>rates up and we're going to keep them there higher

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 1>for longer, and we don't care how that affects economy. Well,

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:07.919
<v Speaker 1>if you're in the one pent uh income level, believe

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 1>for you, but for the rest of the breast of

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the world, that's gonna be very difficult times. If if

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:14.919
<v Speaker 1>the economy rolls over and goes into a recession, you're

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 1>going to have people losing their jobs at the same

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:19.640
<v Speaker 1>time where prices are elevated. I'm not suggesting we're gonna

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 1>have statifylation type of scenario for a very long time,

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 1>But how do they keep pushing aways higher? If we

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 1>have negative growth and we've had two quarters of negative

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:30.239
<v Speaker 1>growth so far, we don't know what the third quarter

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 1>is going to bring yet. They don't know what the

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 1>third and fourth quarter is going to bring yet. So

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 1>if we even have a slight positive growth in the

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:38.120
<v Speaker 1>third quarter and then negative growth again in the fourth quarter,

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 1>what are they trying to accomplish. They're trying to beat

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 1>They're beating back on price increases that, let me use

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:48.679
<v Speaker 1>the word transitory. These energy increases are not going to

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:52.639
<v Speaker 1>be here to stay. I had a similar conversation last

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 1>week with Larry Summers, and he was saying, you know,

0:02:56.960 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 1>we're going to keep at these unemploy event levels seeing

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>inflation until we're at five five and a half percent

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 1>of unemployment basically saying that he's he thinks that to

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>our nehru is um, and getting there is going to

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:14.040
<v Speaker 1>be extremely painful. Uh. For for the U S economy,

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 1>for US workers nonetheless, UM, it's tough to be short

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>to be long these markets as they continue to fall, right,

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yes, we've turned around a little bit today,

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 1>but we're at thirty nine on the S and P

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 1>five hundred. Um. Where do you see it going in

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the short to medium term? Uh? Well, I got a

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 1>dinner bet with a trader over by the end of

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the year, so hopefully that's where it will be. Um.

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't mind buying dinner. I like them. UM. But

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I think for the markets in general, I think we

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 1>see it harder because I'm just not convinced. And that's

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:49.720
<v Speaker 1>under consensus. By the way, that's consensus. We were checking

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 1>yesterday's I think forty three seventy five right now. Yeah,

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 1>so against the consensus, So I guess not this time.

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 1>It just doesn't look good right now, especially after the

0:03:59.200 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 1>last few weeks. Drops out of the last seven sessions

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 1>were down six of those. Uh. And a lot of

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 1>times you'll get some turnarounds during the day, but we

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 1>end up in the red by the time the closing

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 1>bell rings. Yeah. I mean, look, I can tell you,

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>in all my years of trading, I never made money

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 1>on a real money on a trade. If I bought

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 1>and it went up the same day. I was always

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 1>layering into trades and it was always moving against me

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:24.360
<v Speaker 1>because I always thought it's better to be first than

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>last um And I think that's going to be a

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:29.360
<v Speaker 1>similar situation to this. I think once we get through

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:32.039
<v Speaker 1>September and we get into October and we see inflation

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:34.520
<v Speaker 1>numbers rolling over. We saw the I S M services

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:38.320
<v Speaker 1>prices paid dropping yet again this week. We at cp

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I next week. That's going to be a really interesting

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:43.040
<v Speaker 1>number ahead of the ahead of the FED meeting, And

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I think just going forward, we're going to see inflation

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 1>beginning to moderate, and that's going to give the Fed

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity to pause, and you know, if they don't,

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:53.359
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be what Larry Summer said, They're going

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 1>to drive us into a recession and it's going to

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 1>be very painful for everyone. And then I'd like to

0:04:57.680 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 1>see them stay there at high rates, Like what's going

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:01.160
<v Speaker 1>to be there argument to say we need to keep

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 1>rates at three to four percent with negative growth in

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:06.480
<v Speaker 1>the US of company makes absolutely no sense. Vince, do

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 1>you think we're going to get a rate hike in September?

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Then kind of the wait and see. I e. It

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 1>takes a while for rate hikes to really impact econmy

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's really what they should be doing.

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 1>And they're going against They're going against seven or five points, right,

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean they're doing seven. Yeah, I think I think

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna go seventy five basis points. Um. Powell was

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 1>very very hawkous the last time around. I don't think

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he wants to sacrifice credibility by by

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:36.599
<v Speaker 1>suggesting in any conversations coming up. I think he speaks tomorrow. Um,

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:39.039
<v Speaker 1>that's seventy five is not in the cards. I think

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 1>that's a given. If they go less than seventy five,

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the market's going to rally lot crazy. But I think

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>you're just a pencil wins. Seventy five it's there. The

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 1>question is what comes in October and November. And I'm

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 1>going to stay on the argument that they do nothing

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:55.720
<v Speaker 1>after September because I think that the data just will

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:58.839
<v Speaker 1>not support Yeah. And the Journal already had a story

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 1>this morning that they're gonna go set me five and

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 1>you know the journals where they leaked to that's right. Well,

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:05.159
<v Speaker 1>you know I'm gonna push back on that one because

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I worked at the journal the columns before coming to Bloomberg,

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and the hit and miss ratio for those guys who

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>covered the FED was bel So we're getting leaked, all right, Vince,

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 1>good stuff as always from the home office. Vince Signarella,

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Global macro strategists for Bloomberg News, former currency strategy It's

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 1>just not happening. Someday we're gonna get him in here,

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. He looks perfectly comfortable, comfortable at

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:34.679
<v Speaker 1>his work from home office. He has completely made the

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 1>evolution to work from home. Let's bring on our next guest,

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:45.719
<v Speaker 1>Mark Smith, Senior VP for Investments at Wells Fargo Advisors. Mark,

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:48.279
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us here. I'm sure your

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:51.479
<v Speaker 1>phone's ringing off the hook in this year two saying

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 1>my stocks they're not working, my bonds they're not working.

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:58.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, maybe I on the dollar, I'm I'm feeling okay,

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:00.800
<v Speaker 1>But what do you have? What what what the conversations like

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 1>with your clients these days? Well, thanks for having me

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 1>on it's always pleasure to be on Bloomberg. Uh, yeah,

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 1>you're absolutely right. Clients are calling, um, but they are

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>prepared for this. I mean that the FED has spoken

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty clearly about what they're intending to do, and uh,

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 1>they carry a pretty large mic. Everyone's listening. They've heard

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 1>that the rates are going up. And so folks are

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>my clients specifically, are expecting volatility because when you're having

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>a FED that's tightening, quantitative easing is not gonna be

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 1>there anymore. Everyone's expecting for there to be a little

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 1>bit of pain while this happens. And so the long

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 1>term investor is the one that's still in this. And

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 1>I gotta tell you there's a lot of folks out

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 1>there there in this for the long term. They've been

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 1>trained I think for the since two thousand and eight,

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 1>two thousand nine, UM, going into the pandemic that if

0:07:47.000 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 1>you kind of you know, buy and hold, good things happen.

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 1>And so, um, that's what I'm hearing. A lot of

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 1>folks looking for opportunities in this environment. You look at

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the tech sector, there are a ton of them. Um.

0:07:57.160 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 1>There are companies that we all know and love that

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 1>are down. Um, So folks are nibbling. All right, there's

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>dollar cost averaging. I think what's one term that investors

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 1>need to write down put on their fridge dollar cost averages.

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 1>If you see a bad day in the market by

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of some of those names that you've

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 1>been hoping and praying that we would go down this much.

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Don't get nervous when fearful. When people are fearful, be greedy.

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I hear you, Um, you know that's uh solid investment

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 1>theory and put to practice. I mean, if you step

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 1>back and look at the charts over a longer term,

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 1>you have to admit that it always proves correct. What

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 1>do you like right now? Mark? Where where are you

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 1>seeing the best opportunities in this environment? I think the

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 1>best opportunity is in the financials. And here's why since

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 1>oh eight oh nine, they're really one of the sectors

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:47.000
<v Speaker 1>that haven't rebounded as much as everyone else. Number two.

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>In a rising rate environment, historically financials outperform. You look

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 1>at the data. The financial sector is poised because of

0:08:55.400 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 1>um that interest margin and because of dot frank what

0:08:58.360 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 1>what the bank are forced to do into O A

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 1>go nine to shore up their balance sheet to make

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:04.960
<v Speaker 1>sure we never see another great recession again and having

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 1>a bank run. These banks, I think are primed for

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 1>this environment. They are lean and mean, they've been doing

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the right things because the FED made them do the

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 1>right things in O nine And they're already undervalued as

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 1>a sector compared to every other sector in this and

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 1>five harnts you're coming out of eight O nine if

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:22.440
<v Speaker 1>you look at the charts. So I like the financials,

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the regionals specifically. I think they're gonna do really well

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:28.080
<v Speaker 1>in this environment. Um, But um, any of the large

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>banks as well. I mean, you're going in there, who's

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:32.440
<v Speaker 1>keeping their money in bitcoin? Right now? That that that

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:35.559
<v Speaker 1>story is over, people are keeping keeping their money in banks. Um,

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 1>it's the safest place to be. And um, I think

0:09:38.040 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna see them do well over the next couple

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 1>of years. Mark Energies, you know had you know, it's

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:44.840
<v Speaker 1>it's day in the sun, a rare day in the sun.

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Over the last couple of years, I'm starting to see

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:50.080
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a pullback in in oil. Here.

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Do you guys have an energy call there? Should I

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:54.560
<v Speaker 1>take my money and say all right, I've done okay?

0:09:54.920 --> 0:09:58.679
<v Speaker 1>Where do I stick around? Look? Listen, I think if

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:00.679
<v Speaker 1>you look at where we are, because when you think

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 1>about energy, you guys think about it globally, right, you

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 1>can't just think about it here in the US. So

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 1>if you look at what's going on, we still got

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:08.560
<v Speaker 1>lockdowns and the one of the largest economies in the

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:11.680
<v Speaker 1>world in China. Once they fully get back on, I

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>think energy is gonna take off. You've got a huge

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:17.560
<v Speaker 1>issue with Putin and Europe UM and going into the winter.

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 1>These are all I think you a little brisks that

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:22.439
<v Speaker 1>are out there that I will could and could make

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>energy go up. And I think until all this is realized,

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 1>I think you've got to have a position and energy. Um,

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 1>given what you're seeing globally going on from Europe and

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Putin to UM to China and having them still being

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 1>locked down when all these things kind of swash out,

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I think you can still see some upside there all right,

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:45.079
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Fish Delight. Where was that restaurant that was in Harlem?

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 1>And thanks for bringing that up, although I like closed

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 1>it down a few years ago. Um, that was the

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 1>restaurant that I ran in Harlem for a couple of years.

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I was a restaurant our owner operator and it was

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 1>one of the hardest things I've ever done in my life.

0:10:56.920 --> 0:10:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I give my I sit my hat to all the

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:02.440
<v Speaker 1>restaurant owner is around the country for the work they've

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 1>done over the last couple of years, because it has

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>not been easy. It's hard to find good workers. Um.

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:08.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what these folks are doing nowadays, but

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:11.560
<v Speaker 1>they're not coming back to restaurants. Yeah, interesting stuff, you know.

0:11:11.720 --> 0:11:13.720
<v Speaker 1>It's just you know that you think about the restaurant business,

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 1>You've got inflation on your cost. Yes, obviously the restaurant

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 1>very difficult. But you know what, I imagine being senior

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:24.560
<v Speaker 1>VP for Investments at Wells Fargo Fargo Advisors in this

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:27.079
<v Speaker 1>climate is also fairly tough because Mark, you've got to

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>be fielding a ton of calls from people who are

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 1>freaking out, especially you know, investors who are close to retirement.

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Right here, Um, we have seen in the last nine days,

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:42.200
<v Speaker 1>we've seen uh nine consecutive drops in global stocks and

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:45.079
<v Speaker 1>that's the worst run we've seen in eleven years. Stuff

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 1>all right, Mark, thanks so much for joining us here.

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Mark Smith's senior VP Investments for Wells Fargo Advisor's former

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:54.680
<v Speaker 1>restaurant owner Supreme Fish Delight in Harlem, formerly up there,

0:11:54.760 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 1>so very interesting background. I'm looking at my phone, I

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:07.280
<v Speaker 1>phone model iPhone eleven. Dude, you really need an upgrade,

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 1>do I? What do you got? I have the thirteen. Yeah,

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:12.320
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't look any different, a better, it's no, but

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:14.320
<v Speaker 1>it's not the way it looks. I think, um, five

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 1>G started with the twelve. There's a couple of things.

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Five G started with the twelve. The other thing is

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the mag safe thing started with the twelve. So I

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:22.440
<v Speaker 1>can just like my charge at home. I just stick

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>my phone to it. I don't plug it in, I

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 1>just slap it on there. And uh yeah, alright, this

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 1>year's a good year. All right, we'll see what we'll see.

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:32.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't need an upgrade, it's probably the thing, but

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I do think you tell me a right Ed loud

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Low West Coast, corresponding from Bloomberg News. He's all over

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 1>this Apple event today taking place in Cupertino, where they're

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 1>going to launch some of their new products, including the

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:49.040
<v Speaker 1>iPhone fourteen. Ed, what's the buzz in the valley about

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 1>our friends and Cuppertino. There's this fantastic meme that someone

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 1>tweeted this morning of Christmas Day, and this man wearing

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 1>a red plaid shut opening a box and pulling out

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the exact saying red plaid shirt that he's wearing. And

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's what you guys are kind of

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:07.680
<v Speaker 1>getting at, right, that these are incremental updates. But you

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 1>know that that we get a new iPhone every year

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:13.560
<v Speaker 1>almost right, and between iPhone twelve to iPhone thirteen, which

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:17.559
<v Speaker 1>I also have, you know, the distinction in this day

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:19.240
<v Speaker 1>and age has been whether you get the sort of

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 1>bog standard consumer model or the Pro model, which has

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 1>higher spec camera and processing capabilities and is kind of

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:29.439
<v Speaker 1>aimed at creative professionals. And it's much the same with

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:31.719
<v Speaker 1>the iPhone four team. We expect same as people who

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:34.840
<v Speaker 1>like to think of themselves as creative well yes, yes

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 1>quite or who I guess work in the creative industries.

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 1>But you know, that's what we expect this time. Four

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 1>versions of the iPhone fourteen two Pro two Standard, no

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:49.440
<v Speaker 1>mini version. You remember. I know for some people that

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:51.440
<v Speaker 1>is a bummer, but Apple is kind of going in

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the direction the rest of the smartphone industry, including Samsung

0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 1>is which is bigger, screens are better. Um. The key

0:13:57.840 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 1>is in the hint of the poster for the event,

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:02.080
<v Speaker 1>which is called far Out. Have you guys seen it?

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:06.839
<v Speaker 1>So it is the Apple logo illuminated in the night

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 1>sky as a star constellation. And Mark German, our Apple reporter,

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 1>has this brilliant column and his newsletter talking about kind

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 1>of what that could mean. It could be as simple

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 1>as a wallpaper, right, and I know that sounds dumb.

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Or it could mean a tease to satellite capabilities. And

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the next technology area that the analysts

0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 1>are looking to. I dig that just googled. I just

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 1>googled the far out Apple and then you can see

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the um the sort of universe picture that Ed is

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about, very very cool um. And now I'm even

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:42.760
<v Speaker 1>more excited than I was before. What time five o'clock? Right?

0:14:42.800 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Is it five o'clock Eastern time? So two o'clock your time? Ed?

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:48.480
<v Speaker 1>What time do we start to hear these details? Isn't

0:14:48.520 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 1>it one o'clock eastern time? Hold on, let me look

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 1>it up. Give me a second. You guys talk amongst okay,

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 1>So I'll tell you while you look this up, I'll

0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 1>tell you. Do I get subsidized again? If I got

0:14:56.520 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 1>buy a phone and my shell now a thousand dollars

0:14:58.080 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I think now on, you're just from now on your

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 1>shelling out of that. Let's maybe you switch over from

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 1>contract to contract everything about that. But what I'm most

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 1>excited about myself is a new Apple watch because as

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 1>I get more um interested in the data. Are you

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 1>talking to your watch? No? I don't talk to it,

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 1>but it measures my heart rate and heart rate variability,

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 1>and it tells me how well I sleep, or at

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 1>least it tries to do that. It's not working quite

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 1>as well, I think as some of its competitors, um

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Polar has a much better heart rate monitor whoop maybe

0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 1>is better at telling me how I sleep and my

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 1>recovery time. And I think Apple could really up its

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 1>game um in terms of the health functions on the watch.

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 1>ED what are you hearing about that? Well, good news.

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean we're expecting a new generation of Apple watches

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 1>as well. It's interesting. I don't want to go in

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 1>too much of a tangent, but there's been a lot

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>of debate about whether Apple needs to buy Peloton. For example.

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's reports out there that Peloton is kind

0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 1>of shopping itself amongst its current difficulties, and a lot

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 1>of the response from the Street. It doesn't need to.

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, it has hardware in the watch, it has

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 1>the content already, why would it buy Peloton? So we

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 1>do expect a new generation of Apple Watch, and you know,

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 1>much with the phone, the question is whether you go

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 1>for the higher spec version of it with the larger screen,

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 1>or you go for the cheaper model. I think that

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the other big theme conscious of time is that you know,

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>from an analyst and investor's perspective, you want to see

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 1>how Apple prices all this stuff, right, because sales volumes

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 1>could drop going into the end of this year the

0:16:30.160 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 1>economy such as it is globally, so higher prices can

0:16:33.120 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 1>maintain the bottom line. How about for some emerging markets

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 1>where a lower price phone would do better? And I

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 1>know they had a model a couple of cycles ago

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 1>that we're kind of targeting that, you know, whether it's

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 1>India other merger markets. Where are we with it? Yeah?

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:50.240
<v Speaker 1>I think, well, I go back to the mini, right

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 1>that that the mini and the non pro versions of

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the phone are aimed at. That that you look at

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 1>a chart of ASPS average selling prices and they've gone

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 1>through the roof towards dollars of these handsets, right, I

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 1>remember why. I don't remember. I'm not that old, but

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:05.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, when I was a kid, you could just

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:08.399
<v Speaker 1>about afford the basic iPhone. It was much smaller, lower

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:11.520
<v Speaker 1>spec It's the size and the capabilities that driven the

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:14.840
<v Speaker 1>prices higher in markets like India, fascinating market. You know

0:17:14.880 --> 0:17:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Samsung does well, but you have to remember there's many

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:20.119
<v Speaker 1>other players in that market. Local players are the Asian

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 1>players who are much more focused at the lower end. Yeah,

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:25.959
<v Speaker 1>it'll be interesting to see what kind of a ray

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:30.120
<v Speaker 1>because at some points, at certain generations they do come

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:32.399
<v Speaker 1>out with like an R model or something which is

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:35.240
<v Speaker 1>I guess just as fast but doesn't have all the

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:38.960
<v Speaker 1>bells and we see, yeah, exactly. So hey, and where's

0:17:39.000 --> 0:17:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Apple in terms of the whole supply chain discussion? Ease

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:43.959
<v Speaker 1>kind of the poster child. What do they say these things?

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:46.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, Apple is the great bluffer, right, that's probably

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:50.640
<v Speaker 1>being a bit too stronger unkind, but often guides conservatively.

0:17:50.720 --> 0:17:53.640
<v Speaker 1>I think back to fiscal second unders and over deliver. Yeah,

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:56.400
<v Speaker 1>they have said for a decade they said that supply

0:17:56.480 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 1>chain issues. At that time, we were kind of in

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the depths of the Ukraine crisis, China zero COVID policy

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:04.880
<v Speaker 1>would cost them, or they'd leave between four and eight

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:08.240
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars of sales on the table. What materialized in

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the fiscal third quarter was a number significantly less than

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 1>four billion dollars, and they guided to the fiscal fourth

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:16.040
<v Speaker 1>courter the period where in now that it would continue

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 1>to be less than four billion dollars with an improving

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:21.639
<v Speaker 1>supply chain, even with a worsening global economy. So I

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:23.639
<v Speaker 1>think that that's well known. I mean, you guys know

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:25.720
<v Speaker 1>much better than I. They've done it a long time,

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 1>guided conservatively, and you know, I'll leave the person un

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:33.199
<v Speaker 1>named but telling us that we're so old. Yes, no, no,

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:36.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying Apple Apple, As someone who I respect

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:38.680
<v Speaker 1>and newsroom said, you know, Apple may go as far

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 1>as to be sandbagging the cell siders, which I think

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 1>is an interesting idea. And you're flying out here, yes

0:18:45.840 --> 0:18:48.399
<v Speaker 1>you are you a United? Are you flying with United?

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Because then it's kind of iffy if you're flying in

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:53.200
<v Speaker 1>a GfK with United area. Well, other airlines are available,

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:56.399
<v Speaker 1>but as people know, SFO as a United hub, and

0:18:56.400 --> 0:18:58.400
<v Speaker 1>I have been known to fly United. So what are

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 1>you coming here? Are you testing out some brand new

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 1>ev Well, are you looking at a new rocket, I

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:06.200
<v Speaker 1>mean New York City? What do you do here? Well?

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:09.359
<v Speaker 1>Do you guys remember a company called Nikola that has

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Yes Trevor on trial in the Southern District of New

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:17.879
<v Speaker 1>York three counts of securities fraud, one count of wire fraud.

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 1>And I'd like to come to town to cover the trial. Wow. Well,

0:19:21.840 --> 0:19:23.440
<v Speaker 1>I hope we can test drive some cars together. You

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:25.639
<v Speaker 1>know I got my truck right, yes, yes, and you

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 1>if you have me on the show, I'll come sit

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:30.919
<v Speaker 1>next to you in person. Coming to the East Coast.

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Famous see your producer back in the day, he was

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:39.119
<v Speaker 1>how bad? I have really fond memories of Matt and

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:41.399
<v Speaker 1>I cutting it very close to get to camera in

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Brussels because we were getting waffles. That is a true

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:49.240
<v Speaker 1>true story from many years ago. Alright, Ed, good stuff.

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 1>As always, we look forward to see you here in

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 1>New York soon. Ed Lulow, West Coast corresponder for Bloomberg

0:19:54.560 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 1>News getting us the latest on Apple. They're having a

0:19:57.119 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 1>product unveiled today, I guess is what they call out

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:04.120
<v Speaker 1>there and Cupertino always big news for the folks at App.

0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Right now is our weekly Crypto segment and to get started,

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:13.440
<v Speaker 1>I always just type in c R y P go

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 1>our crypto currency monitor, seeing what's moving here. We got

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:20.639
<v Speaker 1>some weakness in bitcoin and ethereum. Today, Jordy Visor joins us.

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:26.480
<v Speaker 1>He's president and c i O of Wise Multi Strategy Advisors. Jordy,

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:29.399
<v Speaker 1>you guys recently launched an n f E n f T.

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Tell us about that, well, thanks thanks for having me on.

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:37.639
<v Speaker 1>But in terms in terms of the n f T,

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 1>we've been focused on crypto and I think more specifically

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:46.640
<v Speaker 1>on the blockchain and web three point oh and becoming

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:49.440
<v Speaker 1>more and more in the belief that it's going to

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>have an impact on all of our lives. But in

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:55.159
<v Speaker 1>particular since we're involved in the financial world towards the

0:20:55.200 --> 0:20:58.359
<v Speaker 1>investment side, uh and so because of that belief, we

0:20:58.440 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 1>wanted to make a move into it for the experiential side,

0:21:02.280 --> 0:21:05.159
<v Speaker 1>the adapter die side, meaning we really need to If

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:07.480
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna believe in technology, you don't know what it's

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 1>how it's going to impact your business. So we did

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 1>this for a variety of reasons, but most of it

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:13.399
<v Speaker 1>had to do with our belief in the future of

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:18.080
<v Speaker 1>crypto and specifically the blockchain. It seems hard to maintain

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 1>that belief as we see um bitcoin stagnate at twenty

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:26.880
<v Speaker 1>thousand or below. Having said that, when I first started

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 1>covering bitcoin, that was trading for one thousand or below.

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's you know, obviously it's made a big move

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:36.119
<v Speaker 1>in the last um ten years, but people seem to

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:38.680
<v Speaker 1>be paying a lot more attention to the move from

0:21:38.680 --> 0:21:42.639
<v Speaker 1>sixty five to twenty than they are from you know, uh,

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 1>one thousand to twenty. Well, I'll just say I think

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 1>one of the problems when people think about crypto is

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 1>it just hasn't, in people's mind, become an asset that

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 1>they understand yet. And I think it transitioned into an

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:03.920
<v Speaker 1>asset and had a major turning point in during during

0:22:03.960 --> 0:22:07.119
<v Speaker 1>COVID for a variety of reasons. But the way that

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I think about it is just simply, there's about five

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:13.879
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars in fiat assets in the world. There's about

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:17.959
<v Speaker 1>a trillion dollars now of market cap withinside the crypto world,

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 1>and the easiest way to think about when Bitcoin, ethereum

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:24.119
<v Speaker 1>and the rest of of the tokens would have a

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 1>hard time, it would be number one. When the fiat

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 1>assets are going down. We've obviously seen one of the

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 1>worst years in both bonds and stocks and in quite

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 1>some time. But you've also had a situation where the

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 1>innovation names, particularly technology, had a really uh you know,

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 1>noteworthy fall this year. And I think if you were

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:48.159
<v Speaker 1>going to guess where you'd have problems for bitcoin and

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 1>ethereum as an innovation side, it would be if all

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:54.359
<v Speaker 1>FIAT assets fell and if innovation fell. So I'm not

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 1>surprised by the fall, uh, and I think people should

0:22:56.840 --> 0:22:58.639
<v Speaker 1>be taking it in the context of what's happened in

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the assets. The other hand, I was

0:23:00.760 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 1>hoping we would see, you know, ten years ago, I thought, oh,

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 1>this is a really cool new currency and I'll be

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 1>able to buy and sell stuff. I actually lived on

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin for a couple of weeks back in two thousand thirteen. UM.

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 1>But it hasn't evolved in that way. People aren't using

0:23:16.520 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 1>it for transaction transactional purposes. They're using it, I guess,

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:23.960
<v Speaker 1>as a store of wealth, which is why the move

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:29.359
<v Speaker 1>down is such a concern. Well, so again, I think

0:23:29.400 --> 0:23:34.120
<v Speaker 1>that my evolution in this space was, you know, really

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:38.240
<v Speaker 1>transition from money to asset, like I said in UM,

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:40.840
<v Speaker 1>and now I'm more focused on it from the innovation side.

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:43.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm a macro person and I try to put everything

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 1>in the context of how the macro world will will look. Uh.

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:50.159
<v Speaker 1>This at the end of the day is about less centralization,

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's about the users and creators having more ownership.

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:55.720
<v Speaker 1>And so when when we sit there and talk about

0:23:55.720 --> 0:23:57.480
<v Speaker 1>it as money, I don't think of it in that

0:23:57.520 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 1>way at all. I think of this has asset and

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:05.640
<v Speaker 1>to a degree, every token outside of say ethereum and bitcoin,

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:09.679
<v Speaker 1>to me is more like a company shares, uh. And

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 1>so I think it really depends on how you view

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 1>it into the listening audience. That's one of the big

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:18.680
<v Speaker 1>messages from this year for me was spending time on

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:21.280
<v Speaker 1>what n f t s. Last year, the whole explosion

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 1>we saw on n f t S, what that meant,

0:24:23.680 --> 0:24:26.639
<v Speaker 1>and for me, it transition for money, which is what

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:29.680
<v Speaker 1>it was in two thousand fifteen sixteen, to asset, which

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:32.560
<v Speaker 1>is what I think it was, and then in two

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand twenty one, I think it transitioned to something more

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 1>like what the app store did the web two point oh.

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:41.639
<v Speaker 1>So I've moved completely onto the innovation side, and I

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 1>think thinking about it as money, I agree with you.

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:46.160
<v Speaker 1>We're going to have so many different ways of this

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:49.879
<v Speaker 1>being money, whether it's CBD, c S. I'm just viewing

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 1>this more on the asset side and kind of a

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:55.879
<v Speaker 1>disruption to capitalism Johnny, real quick and as maybe unfair

0:24:55.920 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 1>given a time constraint. How do you define web three point? Oh? Well,

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 1>again for me to make it simple, because I think

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:06.639
<v Speaker 1>it confuses people, I've called it the borderless Internet, which

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:09.240
<v Speaker 1>basically means it opens it up to so many But

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:12.199
<v Speaker 1>I really I think people should focus on this in

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:15.720
<v Speaker 1>less centralization, which I think is a dominant theme, you know,

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 1>across the populist movement. I think it's a dominant theme

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 1>right now in terms of trying to get people to

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:24.560
<v Speaker 1>get back to work. So for corporates, obviously for banks, uh,

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the centralization really took an impact down two thousand and eight.

0:25:28.440 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 1>But then you have the other side, which is wealth.

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 1>And if there's one message to leave with everyone on

0:25:32.680 --> 0:25:35.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of where this gets more interesting, It gets back

0:25:35.400 --> 0:25:38.200
<v Speaker 1>to that point that there's five trillion dollars globally of

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:42.400
<v Speaker 1>FIAT assets, and so if you're gonna have less centralization

0:25:42.800 --> 0:25:44.560
<v Speaker 1>and the users and the creators are going to have

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 1>more ownership well, right now, the top twelve percent of

0:25:47.600 --> 0:25:52.159
<v Speaker 1>of people, uh or twelve percent of people of that

0:25:52.240 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 1>five trillion dollars. And so we're talking about spreading the

0:25:55.800 --> 0:25:57.480
<v Speaker 1>wealth more and more. And that's why I think, whether

0:25:57.520 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 1>it's talent going to cryptou and three point oh, you're

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna see more and more people focused on web three

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:07.400
<v Speaker 1>point oh as a less centralized world, which disrupts Web

0:26:07.400 --> 0:26:10.240
<v Speaker 1>two point out, which is platforms, got good stuff, and Jordan,

0:26:10.240 --> 0:26:12.520
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get your back going. Do actually make this

0:26:12.560 --> 0:26:16.719
<v Speaker 1>stuff somewhat understandable for us? Luddite Story Visitor, President CEO

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 1>of WIE Multi Strategy Advisers, talking all things crypto, including

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the evolution to web three point oh, you're talking prices,

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Madi's you've gotta have a demand call, you gotta have

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 1>a supply call. It just feels to me that oil

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of the demand equations kind of pushing things around here.

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:38.920
<v Speaker 1>But let's bring in somebody who does this stuff for living.

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Julia fanzeris oil futures reporter for Bloomberg News. She joins

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:45.919
<v Speaker 1>us live on our Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio. None of

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:48.360
<v Speaker 1>this phoning and in stuff and quite I think You're

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:51.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna have more of these Bloomberg folks in studio going forward.

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I know that you've been pushing for it. I have been,

0:26:54.880 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 1>and I mean, look, I think, um, well, Mike build

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 1>multi we had great experience. It's great office in our

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 1>offices around the world are incredible, and I think the

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 1>collaboration side of it is key. But more and more,

0:27:07.800 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people are doing it online

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 1>in the what do you call that the metaverse? Metaverse?

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I feel like the metaverse is here, I think so.

0:27:16.680 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but Julia is is live with us

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:21.640
<v Speaker 1>in the Interactive Broker studio on a day when Brent

0:27:21.720 --> 0:27:25.359
<v Speaker 1>crude um is below ninety dollars, nime x w t

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:29.919
<v Speaker 1>I is off more than four percent right now. This

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 1>is interesting, Julia, because we just had at the beginning

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 1>of the week an OPEC plus UH production cut. I

0:27:36.240 --> 0:27:38.359
<v Speaker 1>know it wasn't huge cut, but it was still going

0:27:38.400 --> 0:27:42.640
<v Speaker 1>in that direction, and um another going the other way,

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 1>another lockdown in China. So is this really a demand

0:27:45.560 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 1>issue rather than a supply It really does seem to

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 1>be the case, especially this morning, because the demand coming

0:27:51.560 --> 0:27:54.679
<v Speaker 1>out of China is obviously much lower with these new lockdowns.

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:56.720
<v Speaker 1>And also let's look at the fact that right now

0:27:56.760 --> 0:28:00.560
<v Speaker 1>everything looks very bearish for oil. Sure, the bull factors

0:28:00.600 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 1>of supply cuts and the possibility of the fact that

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:07.119
<v Speaker 1>the EU is also going to not allow Russian oil

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:10.080
<v Speaker 1>into the market. Sure, but that's further into the future.

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Right now, it's not looking good for markets, and the

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 1>liquidity is very low. We had the U S holiday

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 1>earlier on Monday when the OPEC meeting happens, so that

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of got priced in that day, but then it

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 1>really phased out and now we are at six month

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:26.520
<v Speaker 1>loads again. Basically, traders they're saying that there is no

0:28:26.720 --> 0:28:29.879
<v Speaker 1>real reward for taking huge risks in the market right now.

0:28:29.960 --> 0:28:32.440
<v Speaker 1>They just want to pull out. And w h I

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:37.400
<v Speaker 1>just formed its death cross, which means that that means

0:28:37.400 --> 0:28:40.280
<v Speaker 1>that the fifty day moving average fell below the two

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:42.880
<v Speaker 1>day moving average for the first time since twenty and

0:28:42.880 --> 0:28:45.760
<v Speaker 1>so that's a barrish technical signal. There is no reason

0:28:45.760 --> 0:28:47.800
<v Speaker 1>for traders right now from what they see and from

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 1>what they're telling me, to buy in right now. And

0:28:50.480 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>as we all know, Chinese demand is a huge factor

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:55.560
<v Speaker 1>for the crude markets because they are such a large

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 1>importer of crude with this COVID zero policy, it's really

0:28:58.480 --> 0:29:00.680
<v Speaker 1>not looking great for the markets. Don't know how we

0:29:00.720 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 1>get out of this China situation in terms of the

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:05.680
<v Speaker 1>COVID zero policy. It just seems like they're gonna have

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:09.600
<v Speaker 1>fits and starts for the foreseeable future. And I guess

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:11.240
<v Speaker 1>you're just if I'm going to be an oil trade

0:29:11.280 --> 0:29:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I just can't take on that much of a position

0:29:14.000 --> 0:29:16.320
<v Speaker 1>assuming demand is going to come up from China, because

0:29:16.480 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 1>you can't, I don't think exactly. And it's been so

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:20.960
<v Speaker 1>tricky obviously in these last couple of months with the

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Russia's invasion of the Ukraine. But oil has really given

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:25.680
<v Speaker 1>up all of those games, and so right now it's

0:29:25.720 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 1>a tricky place for people to be trading. And we

0:29:27.880 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 1>see that people have really backed out. Liquidity is still

0:29:29.800 --> 0:29:33.120
<v Speaker 1>at six year low, so people are not really pouring

0:29:33.200 --> 0:29:35.920
<v Speaker 1>money into crude at the moment. I wonder what you

0:29:35.960 --> 0:29:38.920
<v Speaker 1>think about the spr draw down that that UM President

0:29:38.960 --> 0:29:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration authorized that really brought down gasoline prices, but

0:29:43.600 --> 0:29:46.840
<v Speaker 1>it leaves us kind of vulnerable if there's any big problem.

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:51.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, UM is OPEC trying to give us a

0:29:51.840 --> 0:29:54.760
<v Speaker 1>message with these hundred thousand dollars. How there a thousand

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 1>barrel production cuts or what was the point of that?

0:29:57.720 --> 0:30:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Was a message opaque earlier, and Saudi Arabia is the

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 1>first one to say, Look, OPEC might cut because there

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:06.920
<v Speaker 1>is this disconnect from the crude markets and the actual

0:30:07.320 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 1>products that are on the market. As we know, we've

0:30:08.840 --> 0:30:11.320
<v Speaker 1>been talking about tight supplies. There is not enough actual

0:30:11.440 --> 0:30:13.640
<v Speaker 1>crude barrels on the market for the high demand in

0:30:13.680 --> 0:30:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the summer, and then the crude market because traders don't

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:18.640
<v Speaker 1>want to be putting their money and kept tanking and

0:30:18.640 --> 0:30:22.520
<v Speaker 1>taking despite the fact that supplies were still tight. Fundamentally,

0:30:22.560 --> 0:30:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the market was still tight. So OPEC said for this

0:30:24.680 --> 0:30:27.480
<v Speaker 1>not to ocquirk because obviously they don't want prices to tank.

0:30:27.720 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 1>They said, we're going to cut supplies in hopes of

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:35.080
<v Speaker 1>really helping the market meet the physical picture. How about

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:38.080
<v Speaker 1>our good friends down in Texas and Oklahoma. They never

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:41.479
<v Speaker 1>really ramped up their production, did they. I mean I

0:30:41.560 --> 0:30:44.440
<v Speaker 1>kept hearing they yeah, I kept hearing stories that they don't.

0:30:44.480 --> 0:30:47.000
<v Speaker 1>They really couldn't, and they didn't want to, you know,

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:49.960
<v Speaker 1>upset their shareholders and bondholders. So they said, we're going

0:30:50.040 --> 0:30:52.000
<v Speaker 1>to keep our keep the cash fload going to you guys,

0:30:52.000 --> 0:30:54.280
<v Speaker 1>and as opposed to putting it in the ground. Where

0:30:54.320 --> 0:30:55.960
<v Speaker 1>are those guys? What's the question is it is it

0:30:56.000 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 1>too expensive for them to boose production or are they

0:30:58.880 --> 0:31:03.080
<v Speaker 1>hesitant because of the regulatory environment in Washington. I think both.

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I think at this point the margins were much better

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 1>earlier in the summer, but as they had mentioned, it

0:31:06.720 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 1>takes time. So even though the margins were incredible for

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the money that they were going to put in right,

0:31:11.240 --> 0:31:13.480
<v Speaker 1>absolutely in that moment it would have made sense, but

0:31:13.560 --> 0:31:15.320
<v Speaker 1>it takes time to create those so they didn't know

0:31:15.320 --> 0:31:17.000
<v Speaker 1>if long term it was a good investment. They just

0:31:17.000 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 1>had their quarterly earnings. Obviously they've done very well for themselves.

0:31:20.680 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 1>But at the moment, it does seem that if there

0:31:22.840 --> 0:31:26.280
<v Speaker 1>is another spr release that could also really bring prices lower,

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:27.720
<v Speaker 1>and people are worried that there's just not going to

0:31:27.760 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 1>be a supply buffer in the market for when we

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:32.880
<v Speaker 1>really need sound like there needs to be another prices

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:36.200
<v Speaker 1>coming down. I've got the daily national average gasoline prices

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:39.320
<v Speaker 1>here on my screen. I do three A G S,

0:31:39.400 --> 0:31:41.840
<v Speaker 1>P R E M, so I can see what the

0:31:41.840 --> 0:31:44.800
<v Speaker 1>premium prices. You do the premium because that you have

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 1>to fill up with one at least, right and technically

0:31:48.600 --> 0:31:51.120
<v Speaker 1>I think you do too, yes, so even if you

0:31:51.160 --> 0:31:54.600
<v Speaker 1>puts worth of repairs, I just had four dollars and

0:31:54.680 --> 0:31:56.720
<v Speaker 1>fifty one cents is what I'm looking at right now.

0:31:56.840 --> 0:32:00.560
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, the gasoline price also went into

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:02.800
<v Speaker 1>a death cross at the end of August. It's been

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:07.480
<v Speaker 1>coming down, uh pretty, but diesels still very pressibly. Diesel

0:32:07.480 --> 0:32:09.520
<v Speaker 1>is still very high. Gasoline obviously came down. We've been

0:32:09.520 --> 0:32:12.240
<v Speaker 1>trying to track these demand numbers with the e A

0:32:12.320 --> 0:32:14.400
<v Speaker 1>seeing how much, and there have been they've been a

0:32:14.440 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 1>little bit funky these past couple of weeks, you know,

0:32:16.600 --> 0:32:18.719
<v Speaker 1>with some demand numbers saying, oh, it was lower than

0:32:18.760 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty and not all these treators are actually believing that. So,

0:32:22.200 --> 0:32:25.200
<v Speaker 1>but prices have really come down, especially as people weren't

0:32:25.280 --> 0:32:27.440
<v Speaker 1>driving that much, and we know that people didn't drive

0:32:27.480 --> 0:32:29.720
<v Speaker 1>that much as summer because of high gasoline prices, and

0:32:29.720 --> 0:32:33.200
<v Speaker 1>now obviously the summer season with labor Dagon over pd

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 1>S one is the ticker for diesel generic first and

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:40.360
<v Speaker 1>blah blah blah blah, it's something that's still high. I

0:32:40.400 --> 0:32:43.320
<v Speaker 1>mean it's just a month contract. Yeah, yeah, So it's

0:32:43.320 --> 0:32:46.280
<v Speaker 1>a fifteen dollars fifteen cents. You know, started a year

0:32:46.320 --> 0:32:49.160
<v Speaker 1>ago we were down below eighth, so it's had it

0:32:49.160 --> 0:32:51.120
<v Speaker 1>hasn't really come back down that much. So diesels, if

0:32:51.160 --> 0:32:54.400
<v Speaker 1>you're driving a diesel vehicle, that's tough, right. Well, and

0:32:54.840 --> 0:32:59.040
<v Speaker 1>well that's because Russian oil, for example, is a grade

0:32:59.040 --> 0:33:01.320
<v Speaker 1>that they used to produce diesel, right, and that's not

0:33:01.400 --> 0:33:04.120
<v Speaker 1>getting in here. Um, and the stuff that we produced

0:33:04.160 --> 0:33:08.320
<v Speaker 1>in Texas, Um, it's not it's not heavy enough. Is

0:33:08.400 --> 0:33:10.600
<v Speaker 1>that the case? Yeah, I think so. And also let's

0:33:10.600 --> 0:33:12.600
<v Speaker 1>think about the fact that American drivers are so focused

0:33:12.600 --> 0:33:14.560
<v Speaker 1>on gasling. But for Europe, as you mentioned, diesel is

0:33:14.560 --> 0:33:16.680
<v Speaker 1>still very high, so they're still feeling that crunch as

0:33:16.680 --> 0:33:18.480
<v Speaker 1>we go into winter, and there's going to be more

0:33:18.480 --> 0:33:21.320
<v Speaker 1>fuel switching from natural gas to oil because natural gas

0:33:21.320 --> 0:33:24.560
<v Speaker 1>prices are very high. So the market's murky right now.

0:33:24.720 --> 0:33:27.040
<v Speaker 1>People really don't know which direction it's going to take

0:33:27.040 --> 0:33:28.960
<v Speaker 1>in the upcoming months. All Right, it's gonna be I

0:33:29.040 --> 0:33:30.840
<v Speaker 1>tay that that story coming out of Europe is gonna

0:33:30.840 --> 0:33:33.400
<v Speaker 1>be really brutal. I think you know, it sounds like

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:35.600
<v Speaker 1>it's getting a little bit better that they've did. Your

0:33:35.640 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 1>putin this morning. No, he said, just give us our propellers,

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:43.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, and we'll continue to pump oil and gas. Sorry,

0:33:43.760 --> 0:33:46.120
<v Speaker 1>through nord Stream one. He said, it's really the European

0:33:46.200 --> 0:33:49.600
<v Speaker 1>sanctions and regulations that are doing this now. Whether or

0:33:49.600 --> 0:33:51.840
<v Speaker 1>not you want to take Ladimir Putin at his word

0:33:51.920 --> 0:33:54.680
<v Speaker 1>is your own decision. But he also said nord Stream

0:33:54.680 --> 0:33:56.160
<v Speaker 1>two is ready. We'll open it up as soon as

0:33:56.200 --> 0:33:58.560
<v Speaker 1>you want, all right, Julia, thanks so much for joining

0:33:58.600 --> 0:34:01.400
<v Speaker 1>us here. Julia Friends Sarris, oil futures reporter for a

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News joinings here. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg

0:34:06.760 --> 0:34:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews with

0:34:10.239 --> 0:34:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller.

0:34:15.320 --> 0:34:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller three. Pet On Ball

0:34:19.200 --> 0:34:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Sweeney I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast,

0:34:22.120 --> 0:34:24.640
<v Speaker 1>you can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio