WEBVTT - Paul Goydos

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I miss the green.

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:03.480
<v Speaker 2>For example, I'm already upset. When I find my ball

0:00:03.520 --> 0:00:05.720
<v Speaker 2>in the bunker, I'm really upset. And when I find

0:00:05.760 --> 0:00:08.360
<v Speaker 2>my ball in a fried egg Friday Egg, the dreaded

0:00:08.440 --> 0:00:12.600
<v Speaker 2>Frida Egg, Friday Friday Bride Egg, Lie, I'm about ready

0:00:12.680 --> 0:00:41.159
<v Speaker 2>to run off of the course. Ladies and gentlemen, Welcome

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 2>back to another edition of the Friday Egg Podcast. Today,

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm joined by PGA Tour Champions Star and former PGA

0:00:49.800 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 2>Tour winner Paul Paul. Thanks for coming on.

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Good Thanks. Star kind of caught me off guard, but

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Journeyman been more the title, but I'll pick Star for

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 1>this time.

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 2>Hey, you got some wins on the Champions Store.

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:07.760
<v Speaker 1>I do have a I do have a couple.

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, former assistant Ryder Cup Captain. They don't

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:12.320
<v Speaker 2>they don't give that out to anyway.

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, I can base the argument that the

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>fact that I was an assistant Ryder company belies that argument.

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, yeah, Corey saw something that nobody else saw

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:26.119
<v Speaker 1>that was quite the experience.

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:31.200
<v Speaker 2>So to kick things off, I think you're you're most

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:34.399
<v Speaker 2>known for your fifty nine and I'm I want to

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:38.039
<v Speaker 2>know about what went on, you know, the night before

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:40.959
<v Speaker 2>the preceedings to the fifty nine. You know, was there

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 2>anything that was different than a usual you know night

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 2>before a tournament.

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 1>No, not really, And i'd really been actually been struggling

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. I think I'd missed three cuts in

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>a row prior to and you know, it was going

0:01:57.880 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 1>through my usual prep that week and then Wednesday in

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 1>the program on on Wednesday morning, and as soon as

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 1>we got done, you know, the skies opened up, and

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean it rained so hard. I remember I was

0:02:10.000 --> 0:02:11.959
<v Speaker 1>trying to go to the I think I was trying

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 1>to go to a store and you could get out

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 1>of your car because it was flooding everything. And so,

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:19.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, normally you'd be practicing Wednesday afternoon. That was

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 1>a Wednesday. I knew he just kind of watched it

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 1>at the hotel and watched it rain, which obviously led

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:28.800
<v Speaker 1>to little easier scoring conditions the next day. But no, nothing, nothing.

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:30.360
<v Speaker 1>I had no expectations. Zero.

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's Golf's the funny game. And uh I remember

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:39.519
<v Speaker 2>David Devall saying that he like never hit balls a

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 2>lot because when he was struggling, he didn't want to

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:45.360
<v Speaker 2>hit balls, and when he was hitting it good, he

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 2>didn't want to hit balls to, you know, lose rhythm.

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 2>Was that the type of yeah, I don't.

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:54.959
<v Speaker 1>I tend to I have, you know, if I'm really

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:57.400
<v Speaker 1>struggling sometimes look at my Caddy will talk about going

0:02:57.400 --> 0:02:59.639
<v Speaker 1>to the range and having to purge and just trying

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 1>to get all bet swings out. But I do think

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 1>there's you know it. I tend to try to do

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of reflection, so I think, you know, some

0:03:09.480 --> 0:03:11.360
<v Speaker 1>of the best practice that get done is kind of

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 1>sitting down, like I said, like that Wednesday or it rained,

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 1>and you can kind of think, hey, I've been struggling,

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 1>why I've been struggling, And sometimes you know that self

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:23.639
<v Speaker 1>analysis is an important part of it, and I tend

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 1>to do that a lot too. Having said that, there

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 1>are times when you just feel lost, and there are

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 1>plenty of times in the range where I've hit it

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:31.360
<v Speaker 1>that and just said, you know what, I don't need

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 1>to hit it. I don't. I'm gonna go practice something else.

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 1>This is awful or even putty it kept on. You

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>throw down a ball at four feet and try to

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 1>make ten in a row, and you can't make one

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>in a row, and you you know, sometimes the best

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Speaker 1>thing you can do is just you know, hey, today's

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 1>not your day, Tomorrow's another day.

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think everybody's been there with like the shot cut.

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>It happens, Yeah, it happens. You know, your linement gets

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 1>a little squirrely and something something's just not registering for

0:03:56.080 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 1>whatever reason. Maybe you you know, you sat, you slept

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 1>funny that night, and you're hips get a little owl.

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Who knows. So there are there are things that happen

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>in our sport, and sometimes we tend to especially younger guys.

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>I knows, I've gotten older hopefully experience sometimes you can

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 1>you can't kind of practice yourself into a funk, and

0:04:13.520 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 1>sometimes you just need to say, step step back, take

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 1>a look, take a breath, and say to level their day,

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:18.160
<v Speaker 1>we'll go back to work.

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 2>So as your perspective on just the game. And you know,

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 2>getting ready for tournaments changed a lot over your career.

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, again that goes back to experience. I'll never forget.

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I was, I don't know, middle of my career playing

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Hartford and i'd had a really good tuesday. I played

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>a practice round and really really had a good couple

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, went to the range and really hit the ball,

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:47.479
<v Speaker 1>really really happened with everything. You know, went to the

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:49.719
<v Speaker 1>chipping you work on a short day and chipping everything in.

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I went to the putting rain and making thirty footers.

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:54.719
<v Speaker 1>I remember talking to John Wood, who's a caddie out there.

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 1>I think he's working for Matt Kotcher now and going

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 1>then you know, hey, this has been kind of you know,

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 1>I can't I don't know what to practice now, I'm

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 1>making everything, I'm chipping in and I'm picnic good, and

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:08.359
<v Speaker 1>he goes, let's just go home. Yeah, you've done, You're good.

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:11.600
<v Speaker 1>And then again the same thing happened. I was at

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the prime got ready down, so I actually took thirty

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 1>six hours, didn't touch a club, went out a shot,

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 1>out't know ten or eleven under for the first two days.

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 1>And it's kind of funny how this concept of of

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 1>over practicing. I have five hours of daylight. I need

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:27.719
<v Speaker 1>to use that. And sometimes, as a younger player get

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>caught into this. I need to I need to work,

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:32.279
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes the best thing you can do is say, hey,

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:34.359
<v Speaker 1>things are good, let's go relax and get ready.

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:37.960
<v Speaker 2>H I think I find that in my older age.

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, I played amateur stuff, but I've as I've

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 2>gotten older, I practiced way, way, way less, and it

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:49.039
<v Speaker 2>seems like I almost better than I was when I

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 2>practice all the time outside of it.

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:52.280
<v Speaker 1>But I think part of that, part of that scouse

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 1>were better. Part of that Scouds were better at practicing.

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:57.720
<v Speaker 1>We get more focused on our practice. We kind of

0:05:57.720 --> 0:05:59.359
<v Speaker 1>said that you get you get you get good at

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:02.359
<v Speaker 1>setting goals your practice, you get good at you know,

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:04.840
<v Speaker 1>just getting better at practicing. You can get more done

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 1>in an hour when you're at my age now that

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I could get done that, you know, two or three

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:11.360
<v Speaker 1>hours when I was twenty five. They really know I

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:13.839
<v Speaker 1>was doing. And so I've gotten a better idea of

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:15.920
<v Speaker 1>what it takes and how to play well. What I

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:17.719
<v Speaker 1>need to do. What are what are my strengths? That

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:20.360
<v Speaker 1>self evaluation issue that you need to have if you're

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:22.839
<v Speaker 1>going to get better, I mean on a self evaluation

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:25.480
<v Speaker 1>is something that every I don't care what your whether,

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:27.919
<v Speaker 1>you don't care what you do for a living, you

0:06:28.000 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 1>need to have that. And sometimes it's you think and

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:33.719
<v Speaker 1>need to go to work, but sometimes hey, things are good,

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:36.160
<v Speaker 1>you need to go rest and be ready to go apply.

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 2>What in terms of like self evaluation, it had how

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:45.159
<v Speaker 2>much has stats changed the way you can do that.

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 1>You know the problem with golf stats is they tend

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 1>to be intermixed to some extent. Now they have these

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:57.680
<v Speaker 1>new ones. It's these the engineers that come up with

0:06:57.720 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 1>about strokes, game cutting and driving and whatnot, and I'm

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 1>not sure how they work. I'll be honest with you.

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:05.600
<v Speaker 1>There was something someone had told me. I don't know

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 1>if it's true or not that that when I shot

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:09.520
<v Speaker 1>fifty nine, I had like the greatest stroke screen putting

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 1>around and they had ever measured. I don't know if

0:07:12.840 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 1>that was durious of that time. I don't know if

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>that was true or not. And I don't know if

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 1>you even find that out. But the problem you have

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 1>with some of the staffs that's take you know, you know,

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>say putts per green and regulation. You know, if I

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>had a good drive in the ferway and hold my

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 1>whole five iron, I have zero puts for green and

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>reulation in the course of this tour. I'm the best

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 1>potter on tour. That seems odd. I haven't putted, you know.

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 1>You know bunkers, you know sand saves. You know, if

0:07:41.000 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I hit a three feet and miss it, my sand

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:44.920
<v Speaker 1>game and I'm forty two percent. That doesn't mean I

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 1>need to work on my standing any work on my

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 1>three footers. There's a lot of so there's a lot

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 1>of intermingling, and after that the evaluation actually kind of

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I would actually say the opposite. You need to be

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 1>enough self aware about yourself and again to you know,

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>know thyself is probably the best piece of advice you

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 1>could give a young players. Know who you are and

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>you know what you can do, and against evaluate. But

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 1>if I go out and look at the stats and

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>seven forty Sam says, there's there's a deeper deal there

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 1>that you need to dive into. And but again, if

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 1>a player can place for six months and can't realize

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 1>what he's struggling with, then that's that's another set of problems.

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I think you see a lot of times when

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 2>when players try and like you know, they have a

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 2>lot of success and then they try and you know,

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:36.960
<v Speaker 2>you know Martin Kaimer famously, I think he was trying

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:39.560
<v Speaker 2>to add a fade or a draw. I think it

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 2>was a draw for Augusta a draw, yeah, right, And uh,

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:44.959
<v Speaker 2>you know Luke Donald, you know, went on a quest

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 2>for more distance when he was world number one, did

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 2>you ever have anything like in your career where you

0:08:51.480 --> 0:08:54.440
<v Speaker 2>tried to implement something and it it just was the

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:55.080
<v Speaker 2>wrong move.

0:08:56.760 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Now, we never really went down that path as on

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:01.840
<v Speaker 1>how I evaluated myself. I take the loose. I can't.

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I can't you know, for me to be you know,

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Martin Kimer, when you played bad, was a better player

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:09.440
<v Speaker 1>than I was. Let alone, when he played good, he

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't choose Yeah, not yet anyway. The lou Donald issues

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 1>is though again got the number one in the world.

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:22.839
<v Speaker 1>That's that's a stratosphere that I never even looked at,

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:24.959
<v Speaker 1>but he looked at it and try to get more length.

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 1>And that's a part of That's an age. He's thirties,

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:28.839
<v Speaker 1>in his thirties, and he's looking at how the game

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 1>is changing. You know, I've always been a short hitter.

0:09:31.440 --> 0:09:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Kind of my last ten years on tour, I was

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 1>in the bottom ten percent in distance, and I never

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 1>really tried to hit it farther. I said, well, I'm

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:40.840
<v Speaker 1>never going to hit it farther or he's not significant.

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I always tried to figure out way to hit straighter.

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I said, if I'm going to hit it, if you're

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 1>going to drive it short, you have to drive it straight.

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you're in short and cruk that you

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:51.720
<v Speaker 1>know that's again that's a whole other set of problems

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 1>that I that I so I never tried to to

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 1>make to fix the things that I think maybe deficiencies.

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 1>I tried to make my strength stronger. I was always

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:05.839
<v Speaker 1>kind of way I looked at it improving my game.

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:09.439
<v Speaker 1>For me to be successful, I need to drive the

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 1>ball in the fairway and you need to make potts.

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 1>If I do those two things, I'm probably gonna be okay.

0:10:14.080 --> 0:10:16.000
<v Speaker 1>And I always felt that that's kind of goes back

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:20.839
<v Speaker 1>to that evaluation. I remember Ry McElroy saying something kind

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 1>of similar, saying that you know, he had a weakness,

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:25.319
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know what. Be honestly, I don't know

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:27.959
<v Speaker 1>what Rory mcroy's weaknesses are, as I haven't really seen them.

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Saying healthy seems to be his biggest problem playing soccer,

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>probably maybe not high in the list of things he

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:39.079
<v Speaker 1>should do. But he mentioned that he didn't want his

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:41.679
<v Speaker 1>weakness was X. He said, I don't want to spend

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:43.840
<v Speaker 1>so much time trying to make X better that I

0:10:43.880 --> 0:10:47.160
<v Speaker 1>lose my strength. And I thought that was a very

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 1>profound thing to say. His strength is driving a golf

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:52.560
<v Speaker 1>ball and long and reasonably straight, and that's how he

0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 1>when he does that, he's very difficult to beat. And

0:10:55.800 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm the same I need to drive the ball straight

0:10:58.240 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and I need to make putts. And so that's where

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the bast majority of my of my thought process goes,

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 1>not trying to fix what, you know, deficiencies I might have.

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 1>And obviously, if I'm fat hooking five irons, I'm gonna

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 1>go figure out why. But I mean, if I if

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:15.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm more comfortable hitting a draw, I see no reason

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:17.679
<v Speaker 1>to work on the faith. If that that, to me,

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 1>that would be I would need to have everything else

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:22.320
<v Speaker 1>in such good shape that to where I would do

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 1>that make that kind of that kind of change would

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:28.560
<v Speaker 1>have to be you know, I'd have to be in

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 1>a much better in a great place.

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 2>Zach Blair who once said to me and and Zach is,

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 2>despite what he says he's one of the shorter hitters.

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 2>He always says, you know, I'm one of the longest hits.

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 2>Zach Blair, younger guy.

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, okay, okay, yeah.

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:48.680
<v Speaker 2>He uh he's a shorter hitter, but he you know,

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 2>he hits it really straight. He found himself, he hits

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:53.959
<v Speaker 2>He hits driver almost everywhere on tour. Did you find

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 2>that much like hitting a straight you know, on tighter holes?

0:11:57.840 --> 0:11:59.200
<v Speaker 2>Hitting driver gave you.

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:03.599
<v Speaker 1>A yeah to some extent? To some extent, yeah, I

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:09.560
<v Speaker 1>mean to me, if guys who drive it reasonably straight

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:13.439
<v Speaker 1>and who are in the top safe twenty and driving

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 1>accuracy tend to hit driver more because they're more comfortable

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 1>hitting dr I think I hit my driver straight and

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I hit my three with off the tea. I definitely

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:22.680
<v Speaker 1>think i'd hit my driver straight and I hit you know,

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 1>for what or a long or a hybrid off the

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:27.839
<v Speaker 1>tea is. It's just it just to me, unless there's

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 1>some reasons, there's a really compelling reason. You get holes

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 1>where you know, you out there two hundred and fifty

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 1>yards and it becomes twenty yards alive with the hazards

0:12:35.280 --> 0:12:37.839
<v Speaker 1>and you're gonna lay up obviously, But generally I hit

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 1>my driver just just straight as anything else. And again

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 1>it goes back to what I said before. If I'm

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:45.960
<v Speaker 1>not driving it good, it really doesn't matter. So if

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:48.439
<v Speaker 1>we've got a fairway that's thirty yards wide with trouble,

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not hitting driver into that fairway to the vast

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:53.319
<v Speaker 1>joring at the time, I'm probably not having a good

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:56.079
<v Speaker 1>week anyways, good.

0:12:55.920 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 2>Way to look at it.

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:00.160
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I mean again, you live by this and

0:13:00.200 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 1>die by the sort of a little bit, and and

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you said these are things that I generally need to do.

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Now you can obviously get that's a that's a big

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:10.160
<v Speaker 1>long term concept. There are rounds where you kind of

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:12.200
<v Speaker 1>to drivers not feeling good and you're just getting it

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>to getting it in the house to survive that round

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>and get to the range and figure out why you're

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 1>not doing whatever you need to do. There are times

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 1>and again you get a little bit out of whack

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:23.440
<v Speaker 1>and you have to kind of way to fix that

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. And so you will, I will manipulate

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the round or am I hit three woods or whatever

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>just to get the ball in play and get it

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:32.200
<v Speaker 1>on the green and get that get through that round

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:34.560
<v Speaker 1>as little damage as possible. That happens. But on a

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 1>big from a big picture standpoint, you know, my strength

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:39.720
<v Speaker 1>is driving it straight.

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 2>So with your career, like one of the you know, uh,

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:50.680
<v Speaker 2>I guess a stereotype for Californians and Florida Philoridians is

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 2>that Californians don't play well in Florida, and Floridians don't

0:13:55.440 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 2>play well in California. But you know two of your

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 2>best tournaments happened in Florida. You know it was it?

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:04.720
<v Speaker 2>Did you just buck the trend? Or is that just

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 2>a you know, a a not a real thing.

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it's again as experienced. The first time I

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 1>took a look at Bermuda grass, to me, it was like,

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:15.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, I couldn't figure out how your tail of

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 1>what was going on there, But you know I got

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:23.280
<v Speaker 1>to I got through that. I would argue that the

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 1>bigger problem is going from Florida to Californian putting in Polana,

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 1>then going from California to Florida and learning how to

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 1>put on Maria to Brina grass. Now, to me, is

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 1>much more consistent. You can kind of if you spend

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 1>some time and get some experience. It's it's to me,

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 1>it's Bermuda tends to be a much better, more consistent

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 1>putting surface than Californian struggle on Polana too at times.

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 1>And but uh, going from a place where you know,

0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 1>you watch the at and T and that's the way

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 1>you've got reasonably you got you got tough saying tough

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 1>soil conditions to grow grass, and you got pumping grains

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:00.160
<v Speaker 1>and they got quick, and you know, you just have

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 1>to accept that. Some of those courses Tory Pines as

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 1>an example too, where you're going to miss a couple

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 1>of three footers during the week even when you hit

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 1>good potts. That's not the case in Florida. You can

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 1>get going in Bermuda grass. I don't care who you are.

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 1>The good puts they generally go in. And it's not

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 1>a function of it's a function of dealing with that situation.

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 1>California is just deal with missing three footers every once

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 1>in a while when they hit good pots. In Florida,

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 1>if you get the Marina grass is in good shape

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 1>and you hit a good putt, they generally go in.

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 1>That isn't the case on Polanna sometimes.

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I lived in la and spent a lot of

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 2>late afternoons playing Rancho Park, which, yeah, those things got

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 2>pretty bumpy.

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 1>And from yeah, I grew up in a recreation park

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 1>and you play in the afternoon bumpy Polana. It's yeah,

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a test of your patient. So you know, you

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 1>go from you know, and when you go to Florida

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 1>and we play wherever. We'll play at Boca Ratona and

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 1>we'll play in Naples. The greens are perfect. They're permuta,

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 1>but they're perfect if I hit a four footer on

0:15:57.080 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the line that's read correctly and it goes in. I've

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>had plenty of four footers a pebble Beach or Riviera

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 1>or Tory Pines, and I thought I hit a pretty

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 1>good pet on the rune. I was trying to hit

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 1>it and it just kind of didn't go in. That happens.

0:16:11.080 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 2>It's well, you know, people talk about like agronomy being

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 2>a huge thing that's like gone through a big, you know,

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 2>advancement in the game over the last twenty years. Having

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 2>had a career that spanned like you know, you know

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:30.400
<v Speaker 2>a long time, have you is that you know, would

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 2>you say that's really, you know, changed the game.

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it's changed the professional game. I can't I

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 1>can't speak for cause we're going in a golf course. They're

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 1>spending a lot of time to get the golf course

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 1>hit ready. I mean, a normal golf club doesn't have

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 1>that kind of money to spend that they that say

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>a tournament site is going to spend to keep the

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 1>course in tour shape. But having said that, yeah, I

0:16:55.400 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 1>mean the golf course conditioning has lowered scores. The fairies

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:04.480
<v Speaker 1>are better. The grasses that need less water and can

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:07.200
<v Speaker 1>stay so you know, the greens are smoother and stay

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 1>smooth longer. Soft spikes of the know, if you have

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:11.400
<v Speaker 1>firm greens, you know you don't get a lot of rain.

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Soft spikes are make I think make a big difference

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:18.399
<v Speaker 1>over over metal spikes, which is this is what on

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the PJA Tour, capty more than twenty five percent of

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the guys that wearing metal spikes anymore. And with firm

0:17:23.240 --> 0:17:25.240
<v Speaker 1>greens that makes a big difference, especially for the guys

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:28.640
<v Speaker 1>playing and say later in the afternoon. But agronomy has

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:31.680
<v Speaker 1>made a big I think agronomy is is a big

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:34.440
<v Speaker 1>part of why the golf scoring is so much better people.

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:39.119
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you watch major champions We played the

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the Open Championship at Turnberry the year that Watson lost

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:47.400
<v Speaker 1>in the playoff, and I'm playing pressure with Kevin Sutherland.

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:49.199
<v Speaker 1>We played really we were playing like in the We're

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:51.439
<v Speaker 1>both playing at four o'clock on Thursday, so we played

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 1>like at three o'clock in the afternoon, two o'clock in

0:17:53.280 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the afternoon on Wednesday as a practice round, and we

0:17:57.560 --> 0:17:59.880
<v Speaker 1>got done and the superintendent was on the eighteenth green

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 1>and we were just stunned by how good the greens were.

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 1>And and you know, and this is seven o'clock in

0:18:05.040 --> 0:18:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the afternoon. This is the little last guys. You one

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:09.160
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty guys that played, and they hadn't even

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:11.159
<v Speaker 1>moted yet. And it was perfect. I mean, it was

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 1>absolutely perfect. And you know, if you if you read

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the green right from twenty feet and hit the butt,

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:18.240
<v Speaker 1>you're making it. There nothing to keep the ball. I

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:20.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know if that was the case twenty five years ago.

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:25.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, with the Champions story, you know, as the pen

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 2>the setups are as I understand it a little bit

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 2>more benign with pins more in the middle. Does it

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:32.680
<v Speaker 2>make it more of a putting contest?

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't necessarily. I think that, you know, our pins

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:37.640
<v Speaker 1>are all going to be four or five from the edge,

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Like the difference is probably more length. You know, we're

0:18:42.200 --> 0:18:45.120
<v Speaker 1>playing golf courses that are between sixty nine and seventy

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:47.679
<v Speaker 1>two or three. Well, the PJ Tour is playing between

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:50.439
<v Speaker 1>seventy two or three and I'm assuming almost eight thousand

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 1>now I think that's a bigger difference, and we're probably

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:59.200
<v Speaker 1>playing we're playing golf courses that are that are take

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 1>away are majors. But you know, let's take the We

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 1>just played the Schwab Cup Championship at a Phoenix country,

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 1>but we basically played it. The member wanted to put

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:11.639
<v Speaker 1>their golf course in the best possible shape they had

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:14.120
<v Speaker 1>for their member, guests or whatever. That's basically what we're playing.

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 1>We're playing you know, rough penal but not unplayable. Greens

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 1>are perfect. They're trying to get you know, trying to

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:23.919
<v Speaker 1>get anything firm, but that's a weather issue. So we're playing,

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 1>we're playing golf courses that they aren't trying as hard

0:19:27.080 --> 0:19:30.679
<v Speaker 1>to make it as difficult either from a offen Our

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:33.200
<v Speaker 1>fairways instead of being twenty yards twenty five yards wide,

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 1>are going to be thirty to thirty five yards wid

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:37.879
<v Speaker 1>Our greens instead of being trying to get to twelve

0:19:38.000 --> 0:19:40.400
<v Speaker 1>or thirteen, we're trying to get to twelve, eleven or twelve.

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 1>There's just little slight differences that that tend to you know,

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 1>bunch the field. I can go back to what you're saying,

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:50.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, putting it, but putting to answer your question, now,

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 1>putting you used to should be a statement that you

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:54.720
<v Speaker 1>knowed you drive for show in putford, Dellen, we've obviously

0:19:54.840 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 1>proven it. That's not the case in professional golf. But

0:19:58.000 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 1>everybody's a good putter is now a prerequisite to being

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:03.639
<v Speaker 1>a professional golfer. If you're not a good part of

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 1>you're not professional golfer anymore. It used to be guys

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:08.480
<v Speaker 1>could ball strike their way around and be average putters

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 1>and be pretty consistent good players. Just isn't the case

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:13.159
<v Speaker 1>in the game today, mainly because of the conditioning of

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the greens.

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 2>You know, speaking to the transition from the PGA Tour

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:24.720
<v Speaker 2>to the Champions Tour, what would you say is, you know,

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:27.719
<v Speaker 2>the biggest difference outside of say the course set up

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 2>in you know, rounds in three rounds.

0:20:29.840 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Versus four, Well, I think the biggest difference is that

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:36.359
<v Speaker 1>you're playing against your basically one generation of players, you know,

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:39.040
<v Speaker 1>generation being about ten years and the most of the

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:42.879
<v Speaker 1>players are between fifteen and sixty. While the PGA Tour

0:20:42.920 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 1>you might play against through four generations of players. You

0:20:45.119 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 1>got twenty year olds and forty five year olds playing

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 1>out there, and so you're playing against you know, we're

0:20:49.600 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 1>playing against I'm playing against the best of a generation.

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:57.160
<v Speaker 1>They're playing against the best of all generations. But once

0:20:57.160 --> 0:20:59.120
<v Speaker 1>you get inside the ropes, it's the same thing. It's

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:02.119
<v Speaker 1>just as the competitions are saying. You're trying to do

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:03.879
<v Speaker 1>the same things. You're trying to beat the guys and

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to play the best you can. But the difference

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:11.720
<v Speaker 1>to me is that I'm only facing If the PGA

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Tour were for twenty to thirty year olds, it'd be

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 1>very similar if we had it. You know, the Champions

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Tour is just one generation of players.

0:21:22.040 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 2>One of our I send a tweet out to get

0:21:24.600 --> 0:21:27.159
<v Speaker 2>some listener questions, and one of our listeners had a

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:30.919
<v Speaker 2>question that related on that, with like the influx of

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:35.880
<v Speaker 2>cash on the PGA Tour now and do you think that,

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:39.359
<v Speaker 2>you know, fifteen twenty years for now, there's going to

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:42.439
<v Speaker 2>be less players playing past forty.

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, that question gets has been brought up. I

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 1>think as persons have increased, you know, probably since the

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:52.880
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifties. I mean, I'm sure the people in nineteen

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 1>fifties couldn't believe how much money the guys in the

0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 1>seventies were playing for, and in the end of the day.

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:02.159
<v Speaker 1>You hear a lot of players talk about it, but

0:22:02.200 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 1>we all like to compete, you know, we don't once

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:09.679
<v Speaker 1>you get past the money. The guys who are really successful,

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:13.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't care what sport it might be, and wanted

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:15.560
<v Speaker 1>to want to compete. And you see that in other

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:17.879
<v Speaker 1>sports too. Guys seem to hang on longer than they

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:20.160
<v Speaker 1>should because they think they can still compete. They still

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:22.400
<v Speaker 1>want to do that, that compete and golf, you're lucky

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 1>you can do it. I mean, nine ers winning tournaments

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 1>at sixty and he's going to win tournaments next year

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:30.720
<v Speaker 1>at sixty one. And that drive to compete is always

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be there, regardless of where their bank account

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:38.680
<v Speaker 1>may be. And everyone talks about you know, while there's

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:40.440
<v Speaker 1>the these thirty five year old kids, they say, I'm

0:22:40.480 --> 0:22:41.920
<v Speaker 1>not going to play the Champions to it, and they're

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:44.200
<v Speaker 1>forty five. We'll see, and then they're fifty, they're playing

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the Champions Tour because this is what we do and

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:50.240
<v Speaker 1>we want to be We want to you know, maybe

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 1>it's ego driven, I don't know, but you wanted you

0:22:53.720 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 1>want to compete, and you want to show your skills

0:22:55.800 --> 0:22:57.239
<v Speaker 1>off and you want to see what you can do,

0:22:57.320 --> 0:22:59.680
<v Speaker 1>and you really can't do that with it, you can't.

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:01.720
<v Speaker 1>They can't do that in other fields. They can go

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:04.440
<v Speaker 1>into television and whatnot. But the reality is what they've

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 1>been doing their whole lives is competing against their fellow players,

0:23:07.840 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and that drive doesn't go away just because your bank

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 1>accounts bigger.

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:14.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I think that same way. Like my

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:17.360
<v Speaker 2>wife does not understand why I play in like mid

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 2>am events around the States, But it's just, you know,

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:23.919
<v Speaker 2>the there's nothing like competition.

0:23:23.520 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 1>And you know, he challenges yourself. And Jack Nichols talked

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 1>about retiring when he was forty and he's still playing

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the Masters. He've just one of the Masters when he's

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 1>fifty eight. All these guys talked about that. I've always

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 1>talked about, I'm not going to do this longer than next,

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and they all them doing it until they're sixty. So

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing that tells me that that Ricky Fowler is

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:44.680
<v Speaker 1>not in the same way.

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, it's like what else are they going to do?

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:49.359
<v Speaker 2>Just play money games right now?

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:51.159
<v Speaker 1>There's plenty of other things that I think, there are

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:53.479
<v Speaker 1>plenty of things they can do. They're all smart guys,

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:55.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, these things are all really smart guys,

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 1>but what drives them to be Ricky Fowler is this

0:23:58.160 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 1>competitive nature. What drives Jordany on Justin Thomas to be

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:05.119
<v Speaker 1>Justin Thomas as his competitive nature. And then that's not

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:08.119
<v Speaker 1>going to go away because they're doing golf course architecture

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 1>or they're doing something else. They're still going to have

0:24:09.840 --> 0:24:12.920
<v Speaker 1>that desire to compete.

0:24:13.160 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, having played on the Hogan Tour, which was

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 2>then the Web, then you played on the.

0:24:19.640 --> 0:24:22.639
<v Speaker 1>Another way around the web to it.

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, then then I got it all mixed up, the

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:29.879
<v Speaker 2>PGA Tour and now the champions Right, How would you

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 2>kind of contrast the difference that what? What are like

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:36.439
<v Speaker 2>the little things that you enjoyed about each Maybe not

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:37.360
<v Speaker 2>the most obvious.

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the Hogan Tour, I was being just compiled, no idea.

0:24:43.160 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I'd never played any national level golf, however in college,

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:48.200
<v Speaker 1>I never played in NC double as, I never played

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:49.920
<v Speaker 1>at USAM, and I've never really done any I didn't

0:24:49.920 --> 0:24:51.359
<v Speaker 1>even know anybody out there. I did even heard of

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:54.119
<v Speaker 1>these people except maybe which you read in Golf digest.

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I never really paid that much attention to who was

0:24:56.000 --> 0:24:58.160
<v Speaker 1>a great player and college golf. I remember were playing

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:03.359
<v Speaker 1>one a PJ Tour event when he was a college player.

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 1>He won the Western Open, I think, and he played

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:06.879
<v Speaker 1>at Oklahoma State and we played against him, but you know,

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know anything. Okan Tour was just kind of

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:11.960
<v Speaker 1>like to me was the biggest thing was was going

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 1>out there and playing and and and that's when I

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 1>first realized that, hey, you know, maybe there is a

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 1>future playing I was at that point. I was just

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:21.399
<v Speaker 1>got in my college degree and I was kind of

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:24.000
<v Speaker 1>you know him and hung and you know, give it

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:25.720
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years and see what happens. And I

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 1>had some success, you know, and it kind of allowed

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 1>me to kind of re evaluate in the sense I

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:36.399
<v Speaker 1>what what my goals would be, my goals were. You're

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 1>obviously your ultimate goals will be the best player in

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the world, but those are you have other goals too,

0:25:40.480 --> 0:25:42.359
<v Speaker 1>and kind of see where this goes. And it kind

0:25:42.400 --> 0:25:43.800
<v Speaker 1>of went in a good direction. So I kind of

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 1>kept going and it, you know, here I am today.

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:53.600
<v Speaker 1>PG Tour. It's a pretty cool thing, you know. I got.

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I got. I got to play for whatever it was,

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years the Tiger Woods. And to know that when

0:26:02.040 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 1>you're playing a tournament you're playing against you. It's the

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:08.159
<v Speaker 1>ultimate challenge. And the European Tour has gotten better. But

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 1>when I played the PGA Tour forstal yearly it was

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 1>that week when I won bay Hill, it was the

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 1>fifthest field in the world that year. This concept of

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:19.040
<v Speaker 1>and then maybe that's just your ego, that you you've

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 1>got a chance, you're playing against the best possible players

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and you're one of them is a pretty cool thing

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:26.480
<v Speaker 1>once you step back and take a look at it.

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:28.959
<v Speaker 1>Now you're not thinking that I'm the first team. But

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:31.960
<v Speaker 1>like in the offseason and especially the last few years

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:35.439
<v Speaker 1>now that I've you know, gotten older and kind of

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:37.600
<v Speaker 1>seen what's going watching the kids today, got hey, I

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:39.199
<v Speaker 1>got a chance to do that for twenty years, that

0:26:39.240 --> 0:26:42.639
<v Speaker 1>was That's a pretty cool thing. You know. Maybe I'm

0:26:42.680 --> 0:26:47.359
<v Speaker 1>too much of a fan of professional golf, but you know,

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:49.320
<v Speaker 1>having a chance to play with Tiger, I shot twenty

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 1>eight playing the first time played the Tiger Woods, I

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:54.160
<v Speaker 1>shot twenty eight on the front nine. Things like that,

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:56.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, against the greatest players in the world. That's

0:26:56.160 --> 0:26:57.560
<v Speaker 1>just a cool thing to be able to do. I

0:26:57.560 --> 0:26:59.239
<v Speaker 1>see that in other sports, Baseball. I have a big

0:26:59.280 --> 0:27:01.960
<v Speaker 1>baseball fan it's gonna be pretty cool out and play

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 1>center field for the angel in your my trap. That's

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty cool thing. And then the Champions Tour it

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:11.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of gets back to what golf is really about.

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 1>And you and you and you, and you know, golf

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:18.240
<v Speaker 1>is a great a great sport. It's it's a it's

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 1>it's you play. But when you're not playing golf, you

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 1>play golf for fifty I play a PGA Tour event,

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:26.880
<v Speaker 1>if I say a Champions Tour event, I'm actually playing

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:30.479
<v Speaker 1>golf for about fifteen minutes, you know, you know, I'm

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:32.919
<v Speaker 1>hitting and playing, hitting my hopefully sixty five shots at

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 1>about fifteen minutes. So you know, you realize how you know,

0:27:36.119 --> 0:27:37.959
<v Speaker 1>how good the people are in golf, because you get

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:40.760
<v Speaker 1>you have all this time to to talk and spend

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:43.400
<v Speaker 1>time with them, you know. And and I look back

0:27:43.400 --> 0:27:45.159
<v Speaker 1>over the years and some city, how would you describe

0:27:45.160 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the PGA Tour And it's a bunch of guys who

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:49.800
<v Speaker 1>you'd love to have as your next door neighbor. And

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:52.360
<v Speaker 1>golf tends to breed that in our sport. And that's

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the nice things about the Champions Tour. You

0:27:54.080 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 1>go to player dining and you have a choice of

0:27:57.880 --> 0:27:59.879
<v Speaker 1>fifteen different tables you can sit there, and you know

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 1>fifteen of them are going to be pretty good guys.

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 1>You're going to enjoy a conversation with all eat lunch.

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 1>And I think that best describes our game. The people

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:09.879
<v Speaker 1>that end up playing our game for long periods of

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 1>time tend to understand that part of our game. The

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:15.520
<v Speaker 1>people who don't like the etiquette and don't like the

0:28:15.960 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 1>slowness and don't like that stuff tend to go play

0:28:18.080 --> 0:28:20.000
<v Speaker 1>other sports. They get bored when they're ten years older,

0:28:20.040 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 1>twelve years old, or fifteen years old to move on,

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 1>while the people stick it out tend to be you know,

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:26.920
<v Speaker 1>I've always said about the first t is that you know,

0:28:27.119 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 1>what junior golf makes is not great golfers. It makes

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:35.199
<v Speaker 1>great citizens. And golf's always been very good at that.

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:38.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean you could say that we all have

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 2>We're all we're all sick os. You know, we are

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:44.800
<v Speaker 2>all self deprecators that like to give themselves a hard

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 2>time for this pursuit.

0:28:47.120 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, golf tends to produce losers. I mean I played

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 1>five hundred PGA Tour events and I went twice. I mean,

0:28:51.600 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 1>if you eventually I will admit that golf eventually gets

0:28:55.040 --> 0:28:59.280
<v Speaker 1>to everybody's driver a little bit crazy, but probably in

0:28:59.280 --> 0:29:02.840
<v Speaker 1>a good way, because you do it's the greatest players

0:29:02.840 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 1>in the world, you know, are losing the majority of

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the time, and that's difficult to deal with at times.

0:29:10.760 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 2>So you spoke about playing with Tiger a little bit,

0:29:14.040 --> 0:29:18.200
<v Speaker 2>and I'm curious as to you know, I've heard a

0:29:18.240 --> 0:29:20.280
<v Speaker 2>lot of other players talk about like there was this

0:29:20.320 --> 0:29:24.800
<v Speaker 2>intimidation factor. What was it like being in the ropes

0:29:24.840 --> 0:29:27.160
<v Speaker 2>with him? I mean, obviously you shot twenty eight that

0:29:27.280 --> 0:29:27.720
<v Speaker 2>first sign.

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he uh. You know, first of all, Tiger I

0:29:32.320 --> 0:29:34.959
<v Speaker 1>probably did sing knew, but you know, we grew up

0:29:34.960 --> 0:29:37.360
<v Speaker 1>in the same place. He was, you know, a five

0:29:37.440 --> 0:29:39.320
<v Speaker 1>year old kid hit involved at Hartville Park and it's

0:29:39.320 --> 0:29:41.120
<v Speaker 1>a part three course. I had a lighted range and

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:44.360
<v Speaker 1>I was, you know, sixteen or seventeen, so we kind

0:29:44.360 --> 0:29:46.240
<v Speaker 1>of you know, he grew up in the city next

0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:48.840
<v Speaker 1>door to me, and we actually the Navy course which

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 1>he talks about playing a lot, where he ran into

0:29:51.040 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 1>some trouble because of the color of the skin. My

0:29:55.680 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 1>dad was a military guy and I played golf there

0:29:57.720 --> 0:30:01.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot, too, So it wasn't Tiger didn't have that

0:30:01.600 --> 0:30:03.520
<v Speaker 1>same effect on me because I knew I saw him

0:30:03.560 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 1>when he was five, hitting balls of the range. I mean,

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 1>had a different, slightly different perspective of having said that

0:30:08.880 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 1>he's a you know he good players can know that.

0:30:13.240 --> 0:30:16.360
<v Speaker 1>They know that you're intimidated, not necessarily by the person,

0:30:16.440 --> 0:30:18.880
<v Speaker 1>but by his skill set. He didn't intimidate me as

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:22.320
<v Speaker 1>a person. He intimidated because he was so freaking good.

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:25.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I played with him at the practice round

0:30:25.960 --> 0:30:28.680
<v Speaker 1>on Wednesday before the US Open at Double Beach, was

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:31.959
<v Speaker 1>John Cook and Marco Mayor and myself and Tiger Woods

0:30:32.000 --> 0:30:36.480
<v Speaker 1>on Wednesday morning, and I don't know, I don't know

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 1>if it's intimidating, but there's no way I was going

0:30:38.760 --> 0:30:41.320
<v Speaker 1>to beat him that week. And I missed a caud,

0:30:41.360 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 1>but there was no way anybody was going to beat

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:44.320
<v Speaker 1>him that week. And I knew that on Wednesday. And

0:30:44.320 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that's intimidation or just respect, but

0:30:49.160 --> 0:30:51.920
<v Speaker 1>I do remember it was an instant. We're playing together

0:30:52.000 --> 0:30:55.240
<v Speaker 1>at the Buick Open in Michigan, and you know you're

0:30:55.240 --> 0:30:57.160
<v Speaker 1>playing with Tiger, You're gonna have the are gonna be

0:30:57.160 --> 0:30:59.360
<v Speaker 1>five deep on every hole, which you know we weren't.

0:30:59.600 --> 0:31:05.200
<v Speaker 1>We were in the top twenty maybe and on the

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 1>in the fourth hole, I had about a three or

0:31:07.520 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 1>four foot for par and he he'd cut it out

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:10.880
<v Speaker 1>and he was just waiting to go to the next

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 1>twa and I looked at I look up at the

0:31:12.880 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 1>whole of the last time before me to get my

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:17.680
<v Speaker 1>tott and so he takes a picture, flash goes off

0:31:18.040 --> 0:31:21.720
<v Speaker 1>anyone taking a picture of me. Tiger was somewhere, but

0:31:21.760 --> 0:31:23.360
<v Speaker 1>I happened to catch it in his eye in my eyes,

0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:25.360
<v Speaker 1>and I started used to you know, I was smart

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:26.920
<v Speaker 1>enough the back of way and you're blinking and was

0:31:27.000 --> 0:31:30.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of catch off guard a little bit. And I'm

0:31:30.000 --> 0:31:32.440
<v Speaker 1>sitting there trying to get my vision just to stop,

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:35.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, to get cleared up before I can hit

0:31:35.520 --> 0:31:38.200
<v Speaker 1>this three footer. And I walked in there and I

0:31:38.280 --> 0:31:40.640
<v Speaker 1>finally hit this button, knock it in, and I'm kind

0:31:40.640 --> 0:31:42.160
<v Speaker 1>of walking up with Tiger, and I well, I was

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:46.920
<v Speaker 1>he I'm thinking he's going to say, you know, sorry,

0:31:46.960 --> 0:31:49.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know whatever. He just said, welcome to

0:31:49.360 --> 0:31:51.520
<v Speaker 1>my world, because it happens to him every shot. You know,

0:31:52.040 --> 0:31:54.480
<v Speaker 1>he has to deal with that stuff. And you know,

0:31:55.000 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't intimidating he was. He just said, this is

0:31:58.560 --> 0:31:59.880
<v Speaker 1>this is if you want to be you want to

0:31:59.920 --> 0:32:01.320
<v Speaker 1>be a great player, this is what you got to

0:32:01.320 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 1>deal with. And he dealt with that and still won.

0:32:04.720 --> 0:32:06.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean the fact that again, how he won. How

0:32:06.760 --> 0:32:08.720
<v Speaker 1>these guys Nicholas and they put Nicholas and him in

0:32:08.720 --> 0:32:11.000
<v Speaker 1>a similar category, How they could you know, win at

0:32:11.000 --> 0:32:14.200
<v Speaker 1>that clip. What are those circumstances. It's pretty impressive. We've

0:32:14.200 --> 0:32:17.200
<v Speaker 1>already forgotten how good Tiger was. We've completely forgotten. Yeah,

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 1>I completely forgotten.

0:32:19.480 --> 0:32:22.240
<v Speaker 2>This week with it coming back. It's you know, you

0:32:22.760 --> 0:32:26.360
<v Speaker 2>I was reading this morning all these you know stats,

0:32:26.400 --> 0:32:28.560
<v Speaker 2>and you've seen it all the week with people putting

0:32:28.600 --> 0:32:31.480
<v Speaker 2>stats out there. I mean, it is unbelievable how good

0:32:31.560 --> 0:32:32.360
<v Speaker 2>he was.

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:35.080
<v Speaker 1>They had they had an ever to Jason Day when

0:32:35.080 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 1>he won the PGA listening straight and then he quite

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:38.880
<v Speaker 1>good the rest of that year and into the next year,

0:32:39.040 --> 0:32:42.239
<v Speaker 1>maybe he won the match Player or something, and they

0:32:42.240 --> 0:32:44.120
<v Speaker 1>had mentioned that he had won seventeen seven out of

0:32:44.160 --> 0:32:47.800
<v Speaker 1>seventeen starts, which is ridiculous. I mean, that's just a

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:50.320
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous thing to do on the PGA two. I guess

0:32:50.360 --> 0:32:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the best players in the world have seven wins in

0:32:52.680 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 1>seventeen starts. Tiger did that seven different times. I mean,

0:32:58.320 --> 0:33:04.000
<v Speaker 1>that's just that's ludicrous. Again, Jordan Speace had a great

0:33:04.000 --> 0:33:06.120
<v Speaker 1>start to his career and as channel, I don't know

0:33:06.120 --> 0:33:07.400
<v Speaker 1>if he still does it might have a chance to

0:33:07.440 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the youngest person ever won the Grand Slam, you know,

0:33:10.160 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the career Grand Slam. Anyways, we talk about you. Yeah,

0:33:14.800 --> 0:33:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it's it's not even I mean, Tiger,

0:33:20.600 --> 0:33:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Speace is a great player, maybe the best player

0:33:22.560 --> 0:33:24.240
<v Speaker 1>in the world. We've got Tiger would like a news

0:33:24.240 --> 0:33:24.880
<v Speaker 1>for everybody.

0:33:25.600 --> 0:33:28.520
<v Speaker 2>It's uh, I mean I was as a stat to

0:33:28.600 --> 0:33:31.840
<v Speaker 2>that is like Jordan Speed smissed thirteen cuts in his career,

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:36.040
<v Speaker 2>Tiger Smith fifteen and Tigers started his career was two.

0:33:37.160 --> 0:33:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Right, It's it's ridiculous.

0:33:38.720 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's uh. That's my favorite set I read that

0:33:41.560 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 2>I had never heard before was the His forty European

0:33:45.720 --> 0:33:49.720
<v Speaker 2>Tour wins is third all time and he never played

0:33:49.720 --> 0:33:51.600
<v Speaker 2>one full season on the European too.

0:33:51.680 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I understand. I thought it one time. He wanted

0:33:54.080 --> 0:33:55.600
<v Speaker 1>he was the all time leading money winner on the

0:33:55.600 --> 0:33:59.880
<v Speaker 1>European Tour. He was definitely the top two or three

0:34:01.120 --> 0:34:02.880
<v Speaker 1>just based on you know the events, you know, you know,

0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:05.880
<v Speaker 1>he's just there's a dominance there that we've forgotten.

0:34:06.920 --> 0:34:10.920
<v Speaker 2>What what have you been watching? What do you expect

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:14.440
<v Speaker 2>from you know, this week? And do you know his

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:17.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, do you think there's anything uh, you know

0:34:17.239 --> 0:34:18.880
<v Speaker 2>left in the tank for return?

0:34:18.960 --> 0:34:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Obviously back to the conversation, the guy who wants to compete,

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:25.840
<v Speaker 1>he loves to compete, and there's you know, he's the

0:34:25.920 --> 0:34:28.440
<v Speaker 1>ultimate that I would say if all the players we've

0:34:28.440 --> 0:34:31.600
<v Speaker 1>talked talked about he I think he loves that competition

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:35.359
<v Speaker 1>as much as anybody. Whether his body can allow him

0:34:35.360 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 1>to do that, it's a different question. Again. If he's

0:34:40.040 --> 0:34:42.400
<v Speaker 1>healthy and can play, he's going to be he's gonna

0:34:42.400 --> 0:34:45.440
<v Speaker 1>he's he's going to have some another player for all

0:34:45.440 --> 0:34:47.719
<v Speaker 1>those guys to deal with. If you know he has

0:34:48.160 --> 0:34:53.520
<v Speaker 1>again he has that that intangible that you have to

0:34:53.560 --> 0:34:56.360
<v Speaker 1>have to be that good. I mean, there there are

0:34:56.440 --> 0:34:59.839
<v Speaker 1>plenty of players over the years who have had incredible

0:35:00.239 --> 0:35:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and let's say take Tiger Wood's won seventy tournaments and

0:35:04.480 --> 0:35:09.840
<v Speaker 1>he won I think it's what fourteen majors. And you

0:35:09.960 --> 0:35:14.120
<v Speaker 1>take another player like say Davis Love, who won twenty

0:35:14.120 --> 0:35:17.520
<v Speaker 1>tournaments in one major, well, Tiger's not five times better

0:35:17.560 --> 0:35:21.680
<v Speaker 1>than Davis Love. There's an intangible there that Tiger has

0:35:21.680 --> 0:35:23.600
<v Speaker 1>that Davis didn't have. And Davis is one of the

0:35:23.640 --> 0:35:25.719
<v Speaker 1>twenty greatest players of all time, maybe twenty or thirty

0:35:25.760 --> 0:35:28.160
<v Speaker 1>greatest players of all time, and Tiger's that much has

0:35:28.239 --> 0:35:30.879
<v Speaker 1>that much better. So Nicholas had obviously had it too,

0:35:30.960 --> 0:35:33.040
<v Speaker 1>and you think there's probably three or four guys, so

0:35:33.080 --> 0:35:37.080
<v Speaker 1>that intangible doesn't go away. So if Tiger's healthy and

0:35:37.160 --> 0:35:39.239
<v Speaker 1>can play and can get you know, said gets a

0:35:39.239 --> 0:35:44.239
<v Speaker 1>few some reps under him, there's nothing that tells me

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:46.200
<v Speaker 1>that if his body lets him play, he won't be

0:35:46.239 --> 0:35:46.960
<v Speaker 1>a great player again.

0:35:47.680 --> 0:35:51.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, outside of Tiger in that era, who did you

0:35:51.239 --> 0:35:53.160
<v Speaker 2>think was the next best player?

0:35:55.360 --> 0:35:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, obviously Phil. I mean, you know, Phil did it

0:35:57.880 --> 0:36:00.960
<v Speaker 1>over a longer. Phillas VJ had good years, Erniels had

0:36:00.960 --> 0:36:05.080
<v Speaker 1>good years. Phil did it over a decade, you know,

0:36:05.160 --> 0:36:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and Phil kind of had that had that swash buckling attitude.

0:36:08.600 --> 0:36:12.000
<v Speaker 1>But still one. I think Phill's one close to forty events,

0:36:12.080 --> 0:36:15.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure exactly what it is and five majors

0:36:15.560 --> 0:36:17.479
<v Speaker 1>and he really didn't start winning. He once started winning

0:36:17.480 --> 0:36:19.239
<v Speaker 1>majors a little late in his career and he still

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:22.440
<v Speaker 1>won five, he won three. You know, there's nothing that

0:36:22.480 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 1>says he might not win the US Open in the

0:36:24.239 --> 0:36:26.160
<v Speaker 1>next few years too. And when they career, Dan slam

0:36:26.560 --> 0:36:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and I think he was definitely the second best player

0:36:28.560 --> 0:36:32.160
<v Speaker 1>they had that Steven. If you saw the stat on

0:36:32.160 --> 0:36:35.680
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter about from you know, the tour from nineteen

0:36:35.760 --> 0:36:37.440
<v Speaker 1>ninety seven to sometimes two.

0:36:37.320 --> 0:36:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Thousand oh the top fifty things, well.

0:36:40.960 --> 0:36:44.840
<v Speaker 1>The top the relation to PARR Major championships, that Tiger

0:36:44.920 --> 0:36:47.800
<v Speaker 1>was one hundred and twenty eight under. Phil was third

0:36:47.840 --> 0:36:50.280
<v Speaker 1>at like one hundred and twenty eight over.

0:36:51.000 --> 0:36:53.440
<v Speaker 2>Yes, Steve flesh.

0:36:52.560 --> 0:36:55.239
<v Speaker 1>Flash was actually Steve Fleshy was the flushy good friend

0:36:55.239 --> 0:36:57.640
<v Speaker 1>of my flesh. He was number two at two hundred

0:36:57.680 --> 0:37:00.120
<v Speaker 1>and fifty shots, you know over at you know, it

0:37:00.200 --> 0:37:02.480
<v Speaker 1>was a fifteen year period or something. I mean that's

0:37:02.520 --> 0:37:05.799
<v Speaker 1>a but it shows you Phil, you know, flush he's

0:37:05.840 --> 0:37:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a fush, he's an underrated player, and he's tremendous talent.

0:37:10.600 --> 0:37:12.000
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't surprise me as his name of it, but

0:37:12.000 --> 0:37:13.600
<v Speaker 1>it shows you how good Pill was at that time.

0:37:14.360 --> 0:37:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean so in a sense amazing how big a

0:37:17.480 --> 0:37:21.240
<v Speaker 1>person feels, a big personality it feels. I always consider

0:37:21.280 --> 0:37:23.719
<v Speaker 1>Phil a friend and he's I've always liked so to

0:37:23.800 --> 0:37:26.839
<v Speaker 1>be that big a personality and can completely overshadowed by

0:37:26.880 --> 0:37:29.239
<v Speaker 1>Tiger Woods tells you how again how great Tiger Woods was.

0:37:29.760 --> 0:37:33.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's a good point. My listeners are gonna get

0:37:33.280 --> 0:37:36.439
<v Speaker 2>ask for me. I always contend Ernie was number two

0:37:36.600 --> 0:37:38.160
<v Speaker 2>in that era, so.

0:37:39.360 --> 0:37:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Ernie had Ernie. Ernie definitely competed. It's hard sometimes he

0:37:43.960 --> 0:37:46.960
<v Speaker 1>was Ernie still slightly in the era where the European

0:37:46.960 --> 0:37:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Tour and the PGA Tour were apart. So it's hard

0:37:50.080 --> 0:37:53.480
<v Speaker 1>to measure Nick Faldough, I mean, Nick Faldo, how do

0:37:53.520 --> 0:37:55.360
<v Speaker 1>we measure How do you measure Colin Montgomery have? Do

0:37:55.360 --> 0:37:57.840
<v Speaker 1>you measure something these guys? Nowadays, it's a little easier

0:37:57.840 --> 0:38:00.680
<v Speaker 1>because there's a lot more competition among the top players

0:38:00.680 --> 0:38:02.480
<v Speaker 1>from both tours or from the world. I guess now

0:38:02.480 --> 0:38:07.080
<v Speaker 1>you'd call it. Back then, Ornie didn't still was bouncing

0:38:07.120 --> 0:38:08.719
<v Speaker 1>back and forth and it was it didn't have the

0:38:08.719 --> 0:38:10.879
<v Speaker 1>same we didn't have the ability to so he could

0:38:10.880 --> 0:38:13.720
<v Speaker 1>be a reasonable choice there. It's just harder to figure

0:38:13.719 --> 0:38:16.480
<v Speaker 1>out because there wasn't so much intertur competition.

0:38:17.200 --> 0:38:20.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if you look at their major championship stuff, I mean,

0:38:20.960 --> 0:38:24.080
<v Speaker 2>they're they're so close. It's it's you know, I think

0:38:24.080 --> 0:38:27.680
<v Speaker 2>they're like they're separated, like top all time top tens

0:38:27.760 --> 0:38:31.399
<v Speaker 2>is like they have like one or two uh between them,

0:38:31.440 --> 0:38:33.760
<v Speaker 2>and you know, one win more.

0:38:33.600 --> 0:38:38.120
<v Speaker 1>For Phil right and Phil again fills a bigger personality. Yeah,

0:38:38.760 --> 0:38:40.439
<v Speaker 1>and so that tends to help him in those types

0:38:40.440 --> 0:38:41.160
<v Speaker 1>of rankings. Too.

0:38:41.640 --> 0:38:44.440
<v Speaker 2>American too, you know, there's this American buys sure.

0:38:45.200 --> 0:38:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Sure.

0:38:47.080 --> 0:38:51.640
<v Speaker 2>So with a kind of spanning this era, there's been

0:38:51.640 --> 0:38:55.680
<v Speaker 2>a lot of talk about bifurcation in the game. You know,

0:38:55.719 --> 0:38:58.080
<v Speaker 2>where where do you kind of stand on the golf

0:38:58.120 --> 0:38:59.080
<v Speaker 2>ball and technology?

0:39:00.880 --> 0:39:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, again, this is you know, we're running a business

0:39:02.960 --> 0:39:06.759
<v Speaker 1>and we can talk a lot about how I think

0:39:06.800 --> 0:39:10.800
<v Speaker 1>some of these concepts. Well, first of all, this concept

0:39:10.840 --> 0:39:12.720
<v Speaker 1>that we need to play eight thousand yard golf courses

0:39:12.920 --> 0:39:15.440
<v Speaker 1>is an interesting concept. I know Chamblie talked about it

0:39:15.480 --> 0:39:17.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot on Twitter. It's Chembley's fun to follow because

0:39:17.719 --> 0:39:21.839
<v Speaker 1>he'll always say crazy stuff. And but again, no one

0:39:22.200 --> 0:39:24.719
<v Speaker 1>if you look at you look on the PGA tour,

0:39:24.719 --> 0:39:26.719
<v Speaker 1>I'd say the two courses at places the shortest on

0:39:26.800 --> 0:39:29.080
<v Speaker 1>tour a Hilton Head and Colonial. No one shoots thirty

0:39:29.160 --> 0:39:30.960
<v Speaker 1>end at part they're shooting actually higher a bitch of

0:39:30.960 --> 0:39:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the stroke coverage of those relations apart is higher than

0:39:33.120 --> 0:39:36.319
<v Speaker 1>average up tour. So length is not the it's not

0:39:36.400 --> 0:39:39.279
<v Speaker 1>the end all to be. I remember we at the

0:39:39.320 --> 0:39:41.399
<v Speaker 1>Houston Open. I don't know, I've got twenty fifteen years

0:39:41.400 --> 0:39:44.200
<v Speaker 1>ago they switched over to displays redstone thing. It's called

0:39:44.200 --> 0:39:46.400
<v Speaker 1>the thing. It's called the Houston Golf Club now. But

0:39:46.440 --> 0:39:49.200
<v Speaker 1>we played the members course the first couple of years

0:39:49.520 --> 0:39:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and the back nine was four a little over four

0:39:53.640 --> 0:39:57.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand yards long. And I remember playing the practice round

0:39:57.040 --> 0:39:58.600
<v Speaker 1>and getting done and God, this hit a bunch of

0:39:58.600 --> 0:40:00.520
<v Speaker 1>three woods every hole. What the hell they had it

0:40:00.560 --> 0:40:03.600
<v Speaker 1>that it was four thousand and thirty yards as a

0:40:03.640 --> 0:40:07.439
<v Speaker 1>back nine. Thank god, Holy that's long. When they shot

0:40:07.520 --> 0:40:09.439
<v Speaker 1>in tred couples, I think one day he shot twenty

0:40:09.440 --> 0:40:12.520
<v Speaker 1>two hundred. Park length is not going to deterred scoring.

0:40:13.280 --> 0:40:17.760
<v Speaker 1>So the ball, you know, forever, for all the greatness

0:40:17.760 --> 0:40:19.759
<v Speaker 1>that the golf ball has, which it goes farther and

0:40:19.800 --> 0:40:22.839
<v Speaker 1>spins glass, well there's a way for architects to deal

0:40:22.880 --> 0:40:27.200
<v Speaker 1>with that. You know, just watch the tour players play

0:40:27.239 --> 0:40:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the ten Folt Riviera and how bad they mess it up.

0:40:31.360 --> 0:40:32.640
<v Speaker 1>You see a lot of you see twos and you

0:40:32.640 --> 0:40:35.959
<v Speaker 1>see sixes. You know, length is Apple's a three wood,

0:40:36.080 --> 0:40:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the three wood part four for all these guys, and

0:40:37.840 --> 0:40:40.000
<v Speaker 1>they struggle with So there's ways to deal with that.

0:40:40.000 --> 0:40:42.640
<v Speaker 1>That that the golf ball is harder to control distance wise.

0:40:42.719 --> 0:40:47.239
<v Speaker 1>So there's ways for architects to to fix that through

0:40:47.280 --> 0:40:49.480
<v Speaker 1>making distance control being more important than you know, being

0:40:49.520 --> 0:40:52.680
<v Speaker 1>able to hit your pitching wedge. You know Marion for

0:40:52.719 --> 0:40:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the US Open, till Micholson, you know he had a

0:40:56.560 --> 0:40:59.200
<v Speaker 1>pitching legend. I think it's fourteen to part of three

0:40:59.719 --> 0:41:03.200
<v Speaker 1>thirteen whatever the short part three is by the clubhouse

0:41:03.800 --> 0:41:05.919
<v Speaker 1>and then and then the next role, he had two

0:41:05.960 --> 0:41:07.640
<v Speaker 1>wed shots that he hit the wrong distance and he

0:41:07.680 --> 0:41:09.600
<v Speaker 1>went bogey bogey and left he was open. Not because

0:41:09.600 --> 0:41:11.520
<v Speaker 1>he didn't hit it, didn't play a five hundred and

0:41:11.520 --> 0:41:14.040
<v Speaker 1>fifty yard part four well, but because he didn't hit

0:41:14.120 --> 0:41:15.960
<v Speaker 1>wedge at the right distance. And the architect you need

0:41:15.960 --> 0:41:19.120
<v Speaker 1>to figure out a way to make distance control more

0:41:19.160 --> 0:41:21.359
<v Speaker 1>important than When you do that, then the players will

0:41:21.400 --> 0:41:23.400
<v Speaker 1>demand up all that they can control better. But right

0:41:23.440 --> 0:41:25.640
<v Speaker 1>now we're not doing that with architecture. We're just making

0:41:25.640 --> 0:41:28.760
<v Speaker 1>it longer to where distance control is less important.

0:41:29.120 --> 0:41:32.239
<v Speaker 2>That's I had Bill Corr on the podcast a couple

0:41:32.280 --> 0:41:36.399
<v Speaker 2>of weeks ago, and he said, when a reporter called

0:41:36.480 --> 0:41:38.560
<v Speaker 2>him about, you know, how he was going to combat

0:41:38.600 --> 0:41:42.160
<v Speaker 2>the distance problem with Trinity Forrest, he said, you know,

0:41:42.320 --> 0:41:46.239
<v Speaker 2>I want to make golf courses shorter and wider and

0:41:46.560 --> 0:41:50.120
<v Speaker 2>make it more about them hitting it the right distance

0:41:50.320 --> 0:41:53.560
<v Speaker 2>and the right line. You know where it's you know,

0:41:53.719 --> 0:41:55.279
<v Speaker 2>they have to pick a line and they have to

0:41:55.360 --> 0:41:57.919
<v Speaker 2>hit it execute the distance on that line.

0:41:57.960 --> 0:42:00.560
<v Speaker 1>What's the hard what's the hardest hole in Major championship

0:42:00.600 --> 0:42:05.480
<v Speaker 1>golf under pressure? It's not. It's twelve in Augusta, which

0:42:05.520 --> 0:42:07.480
<v Speaker 1>forces you to either hit it at the right side

0:42:07.520 --> 0:42:09.319
<v Speaker 1>of the green. It's forced you to hit the right club.

0:42:09.400 --> 0:42:10.920
<v Speaker 1>You hit it at the right you know, And it

0:42:11.200 --> 0:42:12.640
<v Speaker 1>was just throw a little bit of wind in there,

0:42:12.680 --> 0:42:15.319
<v Speaker 1>and guys struggle because distance control is harder with the

0:42:15.320 --> 0:42:17.040
<v Speaker 1>new golf ball. If you hit your nine nine hundred

0:42:17.040 --> 0:42:19.360
<v Speaker 1>and sixty yards, one hundred and fifty yard shots a

0:42:19.400 --> 0:42:21.480
<v Speaker 1>lot harder. But if you hit your seminiro and one

0:42:21.520 --> 0:42:23.640
<v Speaker 1>hundred and sixty yards, one hundred and fifty yard shot

0:42:23.719 --> 0:42:27.640
<v Speaker 1>is a lot easier. I think that mathematically makes sense.

0:42:27.960 --> 0:42:30.719
<v Speaker 1>Being skilled being the same. So when you start, when

0:42:30.719 --> 0:42:33.800
<v Speaker 1>they start hitting the ball farther, it makes the gaps

0:42:33.800 --> 0:42:37.800
<v Speaker 1>between the clubs bigger. So architects by by straight Chamblie

0:42:38.000 --> 0:42:40.800
<v Speaker 1>with burying me on Twitter with this, but between lengthy

0:42:40.800 --> 0:42:42.680
<v Speaker 1>and the golf courses plays into the hands of the

0:42:42.719 --> 0:42:45.200
<v Speaker 1>long hitters into the golf ball while shortening and tightening.

0:42:45.239 --> 0:42:47.680
<v Speaker 1>And again what Bill colere saying, making guys hit at

0:42:47.719 --> 0:42:50.360
<v Speaker 1>the right distance, and you do have angling greens and whatnot.

0:42:51.680 --> 0:42:54.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're hitting it twenty feet pin high left

0:42:54.239 --> 0:42:56.479
<v Speaker 1>is no good or twenty feet pin high rights no good.

0:42:57.120 --> 0:42:59.399
<v Speaker 1>You know that makes them hit the ball not only

0:42:59.400 --> 0:43:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the right disc, but also you said the right line.

0:43:03.719 --> 0:43:07.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I agree with that, and it's yeah, I think

0:43:07.120 --> 0:43:11.239
<v Speaker 2>that's where like, that's where Die changed everything with Harbortown

0:43:11.440 --> 0:43:14.400
<v Speaker 2>was he reintroduced this idea of like, it's not just

0:43:14.440 --> 0:43:16.640
<v Speaker 2>about hitting it long end straight, it's about hitting it

0:43:16.680 --> 0:43:18.920
<v Speaker 2>straight and the right distance and right.

0:43:18.760 --> 0:43:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Now colonials like that and again Coloni.

0:43:20.800 --> 0:43:22.919
<v Speaker 2>Farware, Yeah, it's port worth.

0:43:22.960 --> 0:43:24.200
<v Speaker 1>You just have to firware.

0:43:24.640 --> 0:43:26.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and it takes driver out of so many of

0:43:26.840 --> 0:43:29.839
<v Speaker 2>those guys hands because of those dog likes and right you.

0:43:29.800 --> 0:43:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Got you get well, you gotta shape it, which is

0:43:31.560 --> 0:43:34.719
<v Speaker 1>harder to do with today's ball. Yeah, it's harder to

0:43:34.800 --> 0:43:36.560
<v Speaker 1>hit shots because spin enough.

0:43:36.840 --> 0:43:39.520
<v Speaker 2>That's I noticed with all the you know, like the

0:43:39.520 --> 0:43:42.800
<v Speaker 2>famous shots from nineteen ninety nine versus the famous shots

0:43:42.800 --> 0:43:47.040
<v Speaker 2>from like twenty seventeen, you don't see any All the

0:43:47.080 --> 0:43:50.240
<v Speaker 2>shots today are just these towering you know, three woods

0:43:50.320 --> 0:43:50.840
<v Speaker 2>or irons.

0:43:50.920 --> 0:43:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Right, it's dead straight like.

0:43:52.960 --> 0:43:55.120
<v Speaker 2>Versus the recovery shot.

0:43:56.200 --> 0:44:00.000
<v Speaker 1>But there's a pretty big caveat here. And I think

0:44:00.200 --> 0:44:05.080
<v Speaker 1>is that's not talked about, and the professional golfers of

0:44:05.160 --> 0:44:10.040
<v Speaker 1>today are taking advantage or figuring out, what do I

0:44:10.080 --> 0:44:14.480
<v Speaker 1>need to do to be successful. If tomorrow they decided

0:44:14.520 --> 0:44:16.560
<v Speaker 1>to completely to shorten the golf ball and make it

0:44:16.640 --> 0:44:20.359
<v Speaker 1>spinnier and make driving accuracy and distance control the most

0:44:20.360 --> 0:44:22.560
<v Speaker 1>important thing in golf, and they could do those things,

0:44:23.120 --> 0:44:26.160
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't be any good After a couple of years.

0:44:26.160 --> 0:44:31.480
<v Speaker 1>The same guys at the unpopped, Yeah they So I

0:44:31.520 --> 0:44:33.719
<v Speaker 1>do think, yeah, because the best players figure this out.

0:44:33.760 --> 0:44:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Best players are the best players for a reason. So

0:44:36.000 --> 0:44:37.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, back in the day when Tiger and Phil

0:44:38.120 --> 0:44:41.000
<v Speaker 1>it's driving when they weren't driving it great, if driving

0:44:41.040 --> 0:44:42.960
<v Speaker 1>accuracy were the most important thing in golf. Those guys

0:44:43.280 --> 0:44:45.680
<v Speaker 1>would have had a totally different style of play and

0:44:45.800 --> 0:44:48.960
<v Speaker 1>still be the best players. They've adapted themselves and figured

0:44:49.000 --> 0:44:51.760
<v Speaker 1>out the best way to be competitive under these circumstances.

0:44:52.040 --> 0:44:55.080
<v Speaker 1>And the great players do that. So some of this stuff,

0:44:55.320 --> 0:44:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to me, some of this stuff to be is a

0:44:57.000 --> 0:44:59.719
<v Speaker 1>little cringe wordy. When I hear about the way the

0:44:59.760 --> 0:45:02.560
<v Speaker 1>game has played today, well that's that's a chicken an

0:45:02.560 --> 0:45:06.240
<v Speaker 1>egg issue, and I don't I think it's very unfair

0:45:06.280 --> 0:45:08.840
<v Speaker 1>to today's top players to say, well, the ball and

0:45:08.880 --> 0:45:10.839
<v Speaker 1>this and that and the other thing. Well that they

0:45:10.920 --> 0:45:14.520
<v Speaker 1>they're playing the equipment that they've been given and figured

0:45:14.560 --> 0:45:17.120
<v Speaker 1>out the best way to be competitive with that equipment,

0:45:17.200 --> 0:45:20.919
<v Speaker 1>and so to say that that equipment is why they're good,

0:45:20.960 --> 0:45:23.480
<v Speaker 1>I think is a completely wrong. I think it's the

0:45:23.560 --> 0:45:25.440
<v Speaker 1>other way around. These guys are great players, and the

0:45:25.480 --> 0:45:27.000
<v Speaker 1>figure they have to be the best with the equipment,

0:45:27.040 --> 0:45:30.680
<v Speaker 1>and today's says that Jack Nicholas were playing today, he'd

0:45:30.680 --> 0:45:32.040
<v Speaker 1>be playing like those guys.

0:45:32.360 --> 0:45:36.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I think TrackMan is underrated in it too, because

0:45:36.480 --> 0:45:39.359
<v Speaker 2>it's taught everybody how to, you know, get to where

0:45:39.360 --> 0:45:41.160
<v Speaker 2>they're perfectly optimized.

0:45:41.960 --> 0:45:43.959
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, can I'm sure it does. I mean I've never

0:45:44.040 --> 0:45:46.400
<v Speaker 1>done that. I like what Dustin does with track memory.

0:45:46.719 --> 0:45:49.120
<v Speaker 1>He optimizes distance, yea, he figures out how far to

0:45:49.160 --> 0:45:51.000
<v Speaker 1>hit each shot. He's turned into the best short iron

0:45:51.000 --> 0:45:53.359
<v Speaker 1>the ledge player in the world from the fair way.

0:45:53.400 --> 0:45:57.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, cor the stats and and that says, that's

0:45:57.040 --> 0:46:01.080
<v Speaker 1>got to be pretty scary if you're Barry macroy and

0:46:01.200 --> 0:46:02.719
<v Speaker 1>h's where he is and he turns into a great

0:46:02.719 --> 0:46:06.080
<v Speaker 1>player from one hundred and fifty yards. But again, I

0:46:06.080 --> 0:46:08.160
<v Speaker 1>think it does a disservice to our top players. And

0:46:08.160 --> 0:46:11.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that there it's just that they're not there

0:46:11.680 --> 0:46:14.520
<v Speaker 1>because of the equipment. They're there because they're the best players.

0:46:14.520 --> 0:46:16.120
<v Speaker 1>And don't under don't go over and forget that.

0:46:18.480 --> 0:46:20.759
<v Speaker 2>So I want to get you out of here. We

0:46:20.800 --> 0:46:23.880
<v Speaker 2>had some some listener questions. I wanted to get to

0:46:24.080 --> 0:46:27.680
<v Speaker 2>real quick. Okay, Sean Martin, friend of the pod, and

0:46:28.000 --> 0:46:30.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, a long time golf writer wants to know

0:46:30.440 --> 0:46:33.400
<v Speaker 2>your best story from days as a substitute teacher.

0:46:36.760 --> 0:46:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Wow, I mean, you can't repeat those. Do you have secrets?

0:46:39.600 --> 0:46:45.200
<v Speaker 1>And we'll keep teaching stays in substitute teaching, I can remember,

0:46:45.280 --> 0:46:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I remember the luckiest thing I can remember as lucky.

0:46:47.640 --> 0:46:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I got lucky. One time, as I told the story,

0:46:50.239 --> 0:46:52.680
<v Speaker 1>I was working a seventh grade pe class and some

0:46:52.800 --> 0:46:55.799
<v Speaker 1>kid behind was you just I'm trying to take roles.

0:46:55.840 --> 0:46:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I can roll out some basketball so they can do

0:46:57.440 --> 0:47:00.080
<v Speaker 1>whatever they want to do for half an hour. And

0:47:00.120 --> 0:47:02.400
<v Speaker 1>so it's in p He's always chaotic and trying to

0:47:02.520 --> 0:47:04.000
<v Speaker 1>just to get that they have assistant. He's stand in

0:47:04.040 --> 0:47:06.799
<v Speaker 1>a number of whatever numbers aren't standing on that to

0:47:06.960 --> 0:47:10.799
<v Speaker 1>Mark Abson and uh, this kid was behind me while

0:47:10.800 --> 0:47:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking roll and he had his jim shorts, you know,

0:47:12.600 --> 0:47:14.440
<v Speaker 1>down around his thighs and his shirt tucked it and

0:47:14.440 --> 0:47:18.120
<v Speaker 1>he was dancing and whatnot. It's a long story. Hope

0:47:18.120 --> 0:47:21.480
<v Speaker 1>you have time, and I hope you and kids are

0:47:21.520 --> 0:47:23.760
<v Speaker 1>kids are giggling and whatnot. And and I finally figure

0:47:23.800 --> 0:47:26.120
<v Speaker 1>out and I go, hey, you could stop like an

0:47:26.160 --> 0:47:29.000
<v Speaker 1>idy and get out your number. And he goes, hey,

0:47:29.000 --> 0:47:30.520
<v Speaker 1>you can't call me an idiot, he says to me.

0:47:30.560 --> 0:47:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I go, well, I can call you. And I said,

0:47:31.680 --> 0:47:33.319
<v Speaker 1>you're actually like an idiot, but get on your number,

0:47:33.320 --> 0:47:34.759
<v Speaker 1>and he goes, well, he started giving me a lip

0:47:34.760 --> 0:47:37.480
<v Speaker 1>about it. I say, hey, look, you know I don't care.

0:47:37.760 --> 0:47:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Once you head on down to the office. I'll just

0:47:40.719 --> 0:47:42.200
<v Speaker 1>mark the absent and you can have your You can

0:47:42.239 --> 0:47:44.759
<v Speaker 1>deal with it tomorrow. It's not my problem. And so

0:47:44.800 --> 0:47:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I sent him off to the office and goes to

0:47:46.160 --> 0:47:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the office and I finished role and finished the class,

0:47:48.520 --> 0:47:50.080
<v Speaker 1>and you have to go back down to the school.

0:47:50.120 --> 0:47:52.319
<v Speaker 1>Let me grab a little car. Did you sign out?

0:47:52.360 --> 0:47:55.439
<v Speaker 1>And that's how they know you were there? And nobody

0:47:55.560 --> 0:47:57.160
<v Speaker 1>signed me out and the principal wasn't none on my card.

0:47:57.200 --> 0:48:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Then go talk to the principal. You know on I

0:48:01.040 --> 0:48:02.640
<v Speaker 1>don't need to go to the principal's office too. I

0:48:02.640 --> 0:48:03.759
<v Speaker 1>did that when I was a kid. I don't need

0:48:03.760 --> 0:48:06.359
<v Speaker 1>to do it now. And so I walk in there

0:48:06.400 --> 0:48:09.400
<v Speaker 1>and he goes, hey, did you send a kid down here,

0:48:09.400 --> 0:48:10.920
<v Speaker 1>saying yeah, I did, and he goes he said, you

0:48:10.920 --> 0:48:12.120
<v Speaker 1>called hi an idiot, and I go, well, no, I

0:48:12.120 --> 0:48:14.360
<v Speaker 1>did so, I said, I said, he's actually an idiot,

0:48:14.680 --> 0:48:16.279
<v Speaker 1>and he goes, well, we don't want he starts going

0:48:16.320 --> 0:48:17.920
<v Speaker 1>in and we don't like to use that kind of language

0:48:17.920 --> 0:48:21.920
<v Speaker 1>with her, which might be reasonable. Well I know, and

0:48:22.680 --> 0:48:26.920
<v Speaker 1>I go ahead, you know this is he's addiction. He

0:48:26.960 --> 0:48:29.040
<v Speaker 1>has a dictionary on his desk and I go open

0:48:29.080 --> 0:48:32.520
<v Speaker 1>a dictionary and look up the word idiot, and he

0:48:32.840 --> 0:48:35.560
<v Speaker 1>started looking at me. He just do it, and he so,

0:48:35.760 --> 0:48:37.040
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know what it's going to say. So

0:48:37.080 --> 0:48:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I said, this is I explained to him what his

0:48:38.960 --> 0:48:44.719
<v Speaker 1>student was doing. And he had Jimmy shorts down around

0:48:44.760 --> 0:48:46.239
<v Speaker 1>his knees and his shirt tucked in and he was

0:48:46.320 --> 0:48:50.640
<v Speaker 1>dancing like whatever behind me. Yeah, again, he looks up it.

0:48:50.760 --> 0:48:52.239
<v Speaker 1>I go, what's the first word under idiot? Now, I

0:48:52.239 --> 0:48:54.439
<v Speaker 1>don't know, I have no idea what it's going to say.

0:48:54.440 --> 0:48:59.920
<v Speaker 1>And the thing it says is buffoon, which is just

0:49:00.080 --> 0:49:02.239
<v Speaker 1>stupid luck. It's a dumb luck on my part. And

0:49:02.280 --> 0:49:04.040
<v Speaker 1>so I go, look, I don't know what kind of

0:49:04.040 --> 0:49:06.040
<v Speaker 1>school you're running here where you think it's okay to

0:49:06.040 --> 0:49:08.799
<v Speaker 1>act your students to act like that. But you know,

0:49:08.840 --> 0:49:10.360
<v Speaker 1>if you don't want me again, they have they have

0:49:10.360 --> 0:49:14.439
<v Speaker 1>a massive shortage of substitute teachers. They probably still do today.

0:49:14.480 --> 0:49:16.200
<v Speaker 1>And if you don't want me coming back here and teaching

0:49:16.200 --> 0:49:17.640
<v Speaker 1>your classes, I'll be more than happy to tell them

0:49:17.760 --> 0:49:19.239
<v Speaker 1>enough to send me here anymore. You know, I'm moren't

0:49:19.239 --> 0:49:20.960
<v Speaker 1>happy to tell all the other substitute teachers don't begun

0:49:21.000 --> 0:49:23.000
<v Speaker 1>there either, And they kind of looked at me, looked

0:49:23.040 --> 0:49:25.080
<v Speaker 1>at the dictionary, looked at me, signed the card and said, no,

0:49:25.120 --> 0:49:28.400
<v Speaker 1>I think we're okay. But I was try the luckiest thing.

0:49:28.400 --> 0:49:30.239
<v Speaker 1>It's maybe one of the five luckiest things that's ever

0:49:30.239 --> 0:49:32.600
<v Speaker 1>happened to me because I could have said anything and

0:49:32.680 --> 0:49:36.239
<v Speaker 1>it said buffoon that particular dictionary. I said, buffoon isn't

0:49:36.280 --> 0:49:38.480
<v Speaker 1>exactly what he's acting like. Maybe you guys can do

0:49:38.480 --> 0:49:40.160
<v Speaker 1>a better job of getting your kids to act better,

0:49:41.120 --> 0:49:41.319
<v Speaker 1>you know.

0:49:41.360 --> 0:49:44.120
<v Speaker 2>I feel like buffoon needs to be used more in.

0:49:44.200 --> 0:49:45.719
<v Speaker 1>The Yeah, it's a great word.

0:49:45.920 --> 0:49:49.360
<v Speaker 2>It is. I mean, it's quite if you call somebody

0:49:49.400 --> 0:49:50.920
<v Speaker 2>a buffoon is pretty insulting.

0:49:51.840 --> 0:49:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Yes it is.

0:49:52.600 --> 0:49:59.680
<v Speaker 2>I agree, that's fine. So I DK in Massachusetts wants

0:49:59.719 --> 0:50:03.480
<v Speaker 2>to know, wants you to rank w reck Park, Skylinks

0:50:03.480 --> 0:50:07.200
<v Speaker 2>and El Dorado and uh and and best or worst.

0:50:08.760 --> 0:50:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean, I'm by reck Park's one of the

0:50:11.080 --> 0:50:15.600
<v Speaker 1>great municipal courses, you know, the original Virginia Country Club

0:50:16.719 --> 0:50:19.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's been around since the reck Park's been around

0:50:19.840 --> 0:50:22.399
<v Speaker 1>one hundred years almost, And I would I would argue

0:50:22.440 --> 0:50:24.200
<v Speaker 1>reck Parks won a great minisalant off courses in the

0:50:24.239 --> 0:50:26.560
<v Speaker 1>country about the world. So that's that's an obvious number

0:50:26.560 --> 0:50:29.759
<v Speaker 1>one Skyling's Eldon Rodders probably two in Skyland's three. They

0:50:29.760 --> 0:50:32.800
<v Speaker 1>redid Skylink, but for no apparent reason. The old Skylings

0:50:32.880 --> 0:50:34.000
<v Speaker 1>used to be fun. They used to have a game

0:50:34.040 --> 0:50:36.439
<v Speaker 1>out there on Fridays. You go out and play and guys,

0:50:36.480 --> 0:50:37.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, you get a guy out there with you know,

0:50:38.320 --> 0:50:40.560
<v Speaker 1>a six a sixteen pack of beer and a broken

0:50:40.600 --> 0:50:42.760
<v Speaker 1>for wood and seven irons and a putter and shoots

0:50:42.760 --> 0:50:45.440
<v Speaker 1>sixty five all day long. And it was a it

0:50:45.480 --> 0:50:48.279
<v Speaker 1>was a fun game to play with. And eld Roda

0:50:48.320 --> 0:50:49.960
<v Speaker 1>was a good Eldorado. They've done a good job. You

0:50:50.000 --> 0:50:52.600
<v Speaker 1>know what they've done that for for municipal golf courses.

0:50:52.640 --> 0:50:54.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, like my what I would say is you

0:50:54.360 --> 0:50:56.399
<v Speaker 1>go play. I haven't play Skylis much lately, but Elder

0:50:56.440 --> 0:50:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Rod of reck parker terrific condition. And consider they are

0:50:59.360 --> 0:51:01.279
<v Speaker 1>getting I don't know, I mean, I don't know your

0:51:01.320 --> 0:51:02.480
<v Speaker 1>rounds of golf they get. They got to get one

0:51:02.520 --> 0:51:05.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand rounds a year there. It's amazing.

0:51:05.760 --> 0:51:09.080
<v Speaker 2>It's it's a Recklar Red Parks iconic.

0:51:09.160 --> 0:51:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Reck Park's iconic. Didn't like it.

0:51:10.880 --> 0:51:14.120
<v Speaker 2>Reck Park. It's like Branchip Park produced a lot of

0:51:14.120 --> 0:51:15.720
<v Speaker 2>PGA Tour players.

0:51:16.280 --> 0:51:18.200
<v Speaker 1>If I ask you, guys at Joe John Merrick, you

0:51:18.200 --> 0:51:20.800
<v Speaker 1>know you go back to the Jamie Mulligan deal. I

0:51:20.800 --> 0:51:23.680
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't surprise if Patrick Cantley played Summer Reck Park growing up,

0:51:24.000 --> 0:51:26.759
<v Speaker 1>you know. And then there's a story that hasn't you know,

0:51:26.880 --> 0:51:28.920
<v Speaker 1>it's starting to get told. Well, what Patrick Cantlay did

0:51:29.000 --> 0:51:30.759
<v Speaker 1>last year? Get a tolling off on a tangent about

0:51:30.760 --> 0:51:33.719
<v Speaker 1>Long Beach. Here's the guy who took off, didn't play

0:51:33.719 --> 0:51:37.520
<v Speaker 1>for four years and injuries and whatnot. You know, had

0:51:37.520 --> 0:51:40.040
<v Speaker 1>his best friend and caddy died in his arms, and

0:51:40.120 --> 0:51:43.439
<v Speaker 1>you hit by a car. Show up last year, played

0:51:43.440 --> 0:51:46.799
<v Speaker 1>twelve events, make twelve cuts, make Tour Championship and then

0:51:46.840 --> 0:51:49.160
<v Speaker 1>win the second start. So he lost fourteen events, He's

0:51:49.719 --> 0:51:53.400
<v Speaker 1>made fourteen cuts as a win Tour Championship. I mean,

0:51:54.239 --> 0:51:56.040
<v Speaker 1>how many guys in the history of the sport could

0:51:56.040 --> 0:51:59.400
<v Speaker 1>have taken four years off between twenty one and twenty

0:51:59.400 --> 0:52:03.239
<v Speaker 1>five and then the tour championship in twelve starts. I

0:52:03.239 --> 0:52:06.200
<v Speaker 1>can think of about three Nicholas and Wood and maybe

0:52:06.239 --> 0:52:08.479
<v Speaker 1>Holding get hit by a boss in one three major.

0:52:08.520 --> 0:52:10.960
<v Speaker 1>So I got to give him some Very few people

0:52:11.040 --> 0:52:13.799
<v Speaker 1>could have ever accomplished that, and I don't know that

0:52:13.800 --> 0:52:15.719
<v Speaker 1>that story is being told. Then he won obviously won

0:52:15.760 --> 0:52:19.560
<v Speaker 1>at Las Vegas here in the in the fall. I mean,

0:52:19.760 --> 0:52:23.479
<v Speaker 1>this guy, this kid is unbelievably good. I mean I've played,

0:52:23.520 --> 0:52:25.920
<v Speaker 1>I played with him and a few times and it's

0:52:26.440 --> 0:52:28.840
<v Speaker 1>he's better. He's he he just went out and playing

0:52:29.239 --> 0:52:31.440
<v Speaker 1>with us at Virginia. He's better than I ever was,

0:52:31.520 --> 0:52:36.799
<v Speaker 1>and and talking about a limitless expectations. That guy's going

0:52:36.840 --> 0:52:39.040
<v Speaker 1>to be a really good player for a really long time.

0:52:39.600 --> 0:52:43.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I hope he stays healthy. I did this article

0:52:43.680 --> 0:52:44.080
<v Speaker 2>last year.

0:52:44.160 --> 0:52:44.919
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot of work.

0:52:45.400 --> 0:52:48.359
<v Speaker 2>The uh. I did this article twenty five the top

0:52:48.360 --> 0:52:51.520
<v Speaker 2>twenty five Americans under twenty five. And I was going

0:52:51.560 --> 0:52:54.000
<v Speaker 2>through it and I, you know, I haven't, you know,

0:52:54.120 --> 0:52:57.400
<v Speaker 2>play an amateur golf. You remember Patrick Cantley, you know,

0:52:57.560 --> 0:52:59.680
<v Speaker 2>like and I saw he was still twenty four. I

0:52:59.680 --> 0:53:02.080
<v Speaker 2>was like, he's got to be in this top twenty five.

0:53:02.120 --> 0:53:04.520
<v Speaker 2>And then he came back. I was so excited. But

0:53:04.719 --> 0:53:07.719
<v Speaker 2>people forget, like, you know, like this was a guy

0:53:07.800 --> 0:53:11.920
<v Speaker 2>that completely overshadowed speed at that at that same age,

0:53:11.960 --> 0:53:14.520
<v Speaker 2>like you know, like it was Patrick Cantley. I mean

0:53:14.560 --> 0:53:16.520
<v Speaker 2>what he did when he was nineteen, was out of

0:53:16.560 --> 0:53:22.680
<v Speaker 2>this world. I I I'm really excited if you know,

0:53:22.719 --> 0:53:25.480
<v Speaker 2>if we can get you know, ten great years of

0:53:25.560 --> 0:53:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Patrick Cantley, I'd be really awesome. I love his doing

0:53:29.080 --> 0:53:29.759
<v Speaker 2>on the course too.

0:53:29.800 --> 0:53:31.439
<v Speaker 1>He's got a good plan. He's got a good plan

0:53:31.440 --> 0:53:34.319
<v Speaker 1>about hisself, and you know, him and Jamie really worked

0:53:34.320 --> 0:53:36.720
<v Speaker 1>hard and done a lot. You know, it's it's obviously

0:53:36.719 --> 0:53:40.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm a big Jamie Mulligan fan. Who's his teacher,

0:53:40.600 --> 0:53:45.520
<v Speaker 1>And Jamie Mulligan has taken three kids basically high school kids,

0:53:45.600 --> 0:53:48.359
<v Speaker 1>made him tour players. There's everything. I understand that. Butch

0:53:48.360 --> 0:53:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Harmon's a great teacher. But he made Tiger Woods better. Well,

0:53:50.480 --> 0:53:53.799
<v Speaker 1>I think I could make Tiger Woods better, can't.

0:53:54.040 --> 0:53:54.160
<v Speaker 2>You know?

0:53:54.200 --> 0:53:57.439
<v Speaker 1>He took John Merrick, Patrick Cantley, John Mallinger. These guys

0:53:57.440 --> 0:54:00.520
<v Speaker 1>were just high school kids slash college kids, just kind

0:54:00.520 --> 0:54:04.520
<v Speaker 1>of especially American, can't way it's just kids. Junior programs

0:54:04.520 --> 0:54:08.280
<v Speaker 1>at their club turned them into tour players and tour winners.

0:54:08.320 --> 0:54:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Now that's unprecedented in my opinion.

0:54:11.480 --> 0:54:16.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he's I feel like, yeah, that that is a

0:54:16.239 --> 0:54:17.560
<v Speaker 2>story that probably should be.

0:54:17.520 --> 0:54:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Told and then we won't say what what Jamie's done

0:54:20.480 --> 0:54:24.400
<v Speaker 1>for John Cook and Luke List and Peter Thomas Ulo myself.

0:54:24.800 --> 0:54:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's a long list of people who have

0:54:26.560 --> 0:54:28.680
<v Speaker 1>worked with Luke. Luke List worked with him for a

0:54:28.719 --> 0:54:30.359
<v Speaker 1>year and once my guy struggling to keep his card.

0:54:30.400 --> 0:54:31.879
<v Speaker 1>He had a great year last year, and I expect

0:54:31.920 --> 0:54:33.200
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna have a great year this year.

0:54:33.560 --> 0:54:36.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah he I mean, he was a like a top

0:54:36.280 --> 0:54:37.560
<v Speaker 2>twenty machine last year.

0:54:38.000 --> 0:54:40.000
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, he's a he's a really good player.

0:54:40.239 --> 0:54:43.160
<v Speaker 2>He he hits it so far as such a you know,

0:54:43.280 --> 0:54:45.800
<v Speaker 2>it's like that's a guy with a ton of potential.

0:54:45.880 --> 0:54:47.440
<v Speaker 2>Let's say, you know, you look at a guy that

0:54:47.480 --> 0:54:50.960
<v Speaker 2>could win five times in two three years and definitely one.

0:54:51.120 --> 0:54:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Jamie's got another guy, Max Homo, he's worked with is

0:54:53.400 --> 0:54:54.280
<v Speaker 1>a really good player.

0:54:55.080 --> 0:54:57.920
<v Speaker 2>He's uh, he's a funny guy, just from following them

0:54:57.920 --> 0:55:02.879
<v Speaker 2>on Twitter. So we do this thing. We won't get

0:55:02.880 --> 0:55:05.520
<v Speaker 2>you out of here, so you don't know, we don't

0:55:05.560 --> 0:55:07.799
<v Speaker 2>take up too much of your time. We do this

0:55:08.120 --> 0:55:11.799
<v Speaker 2>overrated underrated. So it's just a question. You gotta say

0:55:11.960 --> 0:55:15.000
<v Speaker 2>overrated or underrated. There's no properly rated.

0:55:16.000 --> 0:55:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay, all right, mock Turtlenecks, way underrated.

0:55:26.280 --> 0:55:29.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm you know what, they might be ripped down so

0:55:29.600 --> 0:55:31.719
<v Speaker 2>much that they could be underrated.

0:55:32.320 --> 0:55:35.319
<v Speaker 1>Another way underrated. They're very comfortable, they are, especially if

0:55:35.280 --> 0:55:37.440
<v Speaker 1>you guys don't have especially guys who don't have shoulders

0:55:37.440 --> 0:55:38.320
<v Speaker 1>and big necks.

0:55:42.160 --> 0:55:46.720
<v Speaker 2>All right now that Furik posted fifty eight is fifty

0:55:46.800 --> 0:55:49.960
<v Speaker 2>nine watch overrated? And this is from Derek Goss.

0:55:50.320 --> 0:55:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Yes, the overrated. Yeah, over the fifty nine watches overrated.

0:55:57.120 --> 0:55:58.719
<v Speaker 1>I would think that they sent enough of them there

0:55:58.719 --> 0:56:01.160
<v Speaker 1>and fifty eight change things little, but sure.

0:56:01.320 --> 0:56:03.799
<v Speaker 2>Somebody else if somebody asked us, and I forgot to

0:56:03.840 --> 0:56:08.080
<v Speaker 2>write down who was more pissed after your fifty nine

0:56:08.560 --> 0:56:11.799
<v Speaker 2>stricker that he wasn't leading after shooting sixty or you

0:56:11.840 --> 0:56:14.360
<v Speaker 2>that you were only leading by one after that?

0:56:14.800 --> 0:56:17.759
<v Speaker 1>To me, it had been me. I mean I woke

0:56:17.800 --> 0:56:20.319
<v Speaker 1>up next morning with the Starbucks, came back turning theater

0:56:20.360 --> 0:56:23.000
<v Speaker 1>and I was three back. He was not leading the

0:56:23.040 --> 0:56:25.840
<v Speaker 1>turnam that was three back. He almost hold it on

0:56:25.880 --> 0:56:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the last hole too. I think he columns caught the

0:56:27.440 --> 0:56:28.960
<v Speaker 1>edge of the hole almost hold it for fifty nine

0:56:29.000 --> 0:56:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the last hole with like a long iron or something that.

0:56:32.080 --> 0:56:34.479
<v Speaker 2>Was during his run there where it was.

0:56:34.719 --> 0:56:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey one over here, I mean beating stricker. John Deere

0:56:37.719 --> 0:56:39.239
<v Speaker 1>was like beating Tiger Firestone, you.

0:56:39.200 --> 0:56:42.920
<v Speaker 2>Know, between him and Zach Johnson. It was those guys.

0:56:43.239 --> 0:56:46.719
<v Speaker 2>That golf course just Taylor made for that. I mean

0:56:46.760 --> 0:56:47.840
<v Speaker 2>their local agree.

0:56:48.120 --> 0:56:49.480
<v Speaker 1>It's uh yeah, I agree.

0:56:49.680 --> 0:56:51.840
<v Speaker 2>But that's an example, not a long course.

0:56:52.760 --> 0:56:55.120
<v Speaker 1>No. And again that golf course if you played there

0:56:55.160 --> 0:56:56.520
<v Speaker 1>in the fall. We played there right in the middle

0:56:56.520 --> 0:56:57.919
<v Speaker 1>of summer where they can't get it firm. We played

0:56:57.920 --> 0:56:59.160
<v Speaker 1>there in the fall when they got firms. Would to

0:56:59.200 --> 0:57:00.960
<v Speaker 1>see the scoring like that. It's a better golf course

0:57:01.000 --> 0:57:03.120
<v Speaker 1>than that. It's just there so you can't play everywhere

0:57:03.160 --> 0:57:04.120
<v Speaker 1>at the perfect time of year.

0:57:04.719 --> 0:57:08.319
<v Speaker 2>I grew up and we'd have like tournaments in October there.

0:57:08.400 --> 0:57:10.640
<v Speaker 2>It was tough, especially cold.

0:57:11.920 --> 0:57:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it gets firm. It's not that easy.

0:57:13.760 --> 0:57:17.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, cold and wendy and firm. That place has teeth,

0:57:18.600 --> 0:57:22.480
<v Speaker 2>right all right. The last last one from al Pandera

0:57:22.880 --> 0:57:26.840
<v Speaker 2>the button, the top button, butting the top button of

0:57:26.880 --> 0:57:27.360
<v Speaker 2>your shirt.

0:57:28.200 --> 0:57:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Mm hmm overrated, under it, way underrated. I mean again,

0:57:33.800 --> 0:57:35.360
<v Speaker 1>that's that button is there for a reason, isn't it.

0:57:35.400 --> 0:57:38.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean I never again when you have a big

0:57:38.480 --> 0:57:40.960
<v Speaker 1>knack and I have like a nineteen inch nineteen in

0:57:41.000 --> 0:57:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the quarter atch neck. I make dress shirts, so if

0:57:44.240 --> 0:57:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't button the top button my shirt, I need

0:57:46.720 --> 0:57:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to have a gold chain to play. But sure it

0:57:48.640 --> 0:57:50.760
<v Speaker 1>would be the collar would be so play. That's why

0:57:50.760 --> 0:57:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I do it. There's a caller. I mean, I don't

0:57:52.800 --> 0:57:54.280
<v Speaker 1>have I don't if I had like a little neck

0:57:54.280 --> 0:57:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and the buttons just stay right there. But if I

0:57:57.040 --> 0:57:59.480
<v Speaker 1>don't button that button, my whole shirt opens up like

0:58:00.160 --> 0:58:03.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, a nineteen seventies disco dancer.

0:58:04.040 --> 0:58:07.440
<v Speaker 2>See, that's an interesting perspective. I am so anti the

0:58:07.520 --> 0:58:10.200
<v Speaker 2>top button, but I have a skinny knack.

0:58:11.080 --> 0:58:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Right, So it wouldn't make sense for you when I

0:58:13.560 --> 0:58:13.840
<v Speaker 1>do it.

0:58:13.920 --> 0:58:17.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm my god, this just doesn't This would never look right.

0:58:17.440 --> 0:58:19.720
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not the only person does. Somebody else is

0:58:19.760 --> 0:58:21.680
<v Speaker 1>doing it now too. I don't know who. There. I

0:58:21.720 --> 0:58:23.160
<v Speaker 1>thought there's a somebody else that done it.

0:58:23.280 --> 0:58:27.040
<v Speaker 2>Bubba does it, and there you go. I mean Daval

0:58:27.160 --> 0:58:30.200
<v Speaker 2>did it for a while, Tiger did it for a while. Yeah,

0:58:30.280 --> 0:58:32.600
<v Speaker 2>of course that's some good company.

0:58:32.640 --> 0:58:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Devall and Tiger exactly. Buba Bubba's one two Masters talk

0:58:36.600 --> 0:58:39.080
<v Speaker 1>about over the Masters is the most overrated golf tournament

0:58:39.080 --> 0:58:39.480
<v Speaker 1>in the world.

0:58:40.080 --> 0:58:43.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I do you think that has to do with

0:58:44.120 --> 0:58:46.520
<v Speaker 2>them playing the same course every single year.

0:58:46.760 --> 0:58:47.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that has a lot to do with I

0:58:47.960 --> 0:58:50.160
<v Speaker 1>think it has to do with I think Augustus only

0:58:50.280 --> 0:58:54.800
<v Speaker 1>is the smartest, for the four Majors are the smartest people.

0:58:55.680 --> 0:58:59.040
<v Speaker 1>They make the show, the golf course, you know, the

0:58:59.120 --> 0:59:02.760
<v Speaker 1>USGA makes the sh show par and you know, but

0:59:02.920 --> 0:59:05.840
<v Speaker 1>they do such a great job that they have no problem.

0:59:06.280 --> 0:59:08.840
<v Speaker 1>They love. As a matter of fact, when when again

0:59:08.880 --> 0:59:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Nicholas shoots sixty five and making eagles the last day

0:59:11.520 --> 0:59:15.320
<v Speaker 1>and making hitting good shots and being nobody rewards good

0:59:15.320 --> 0:59:18.720
<v Speaker 1>play more than Augusta National on Sunday, no tournament and

0:59:18.800 --> 0:59:21.680
<v Speaker 1>they do. So there's so there's nothing. It's the it's

0:59:21.680 --> 0:59:24.920
<v Speaker 1>the most underrated telecast. But from a tournament standpoint, to me,

0:59:26.000 --> 0:59:29.200
<v Speaker 1>it's it's overrated. But they do such a great job

0:59:29.680 --> 0:59:32.640
<v Speaker 1>of creating drama with their golf course. They aren't trying

0:59:32.680 --> 0:59:34.880
<v Speaker 1>to make it play the hardest on Sunday. They're trying

0:59:34.880 --> 0:59:37.280
<v Speaker 1>to make it play the most exciting on Sunday, And

0:59:37.360 --> 0:59:40.600
<v Speaker 1>every other tournament misses that. Every tournament misses that. They're

0:59:40.640 --> 0:59:42.680
<v Speaker 1>always talking about Sunday pins, with the Sunday pins of

0:59:42.720 --> 0:59:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the gusts that are a lot of the easiest ones

0:59:45.160 --> 0:59:49.080
<v Speaker 1>they're in like the Fun Team eighteen sixteen, eighteen's in

0:59:49.120 --> 0:59:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the bowl, but in seventeen's in a very difficult spot

0:59:52.280 --> 0:59:53.920
<v Speaker 1>where you make a mistake. It's a problem that they do.

0:59:54.040 --> 0:59:57.560
<v Speaker 1>They're they're set up, they have they have perfected golf

0:59:57.600 --> 0:59:59.680
<v Speaker 1>course set up, in my opinion from a whole location

0:59:59.720 --> 1:00:04.000
<v Speaker 1>stand point, perfected it and nobody else does that.

1:00:04.240 --> 1:00:07.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, the players is starting. You know that the PGA

1:00:07.800 --> 1:00:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Tour has done such a smart thing with the players

1:00:09.640 --> 1:00:13.040
<v Speaker 2>having it at Sawgrass year and year out, because now

1:00:13.400 --> 1:00:16.400
<v Speaker 2>when you come down the stretch of everybody knows what's

1:00:16.400 --> 1:00:20.800
<v Speaker 2>coming versus when you play, you know, a US Open

1:00:21.080 --> 1:00:24.320
<v Speaker 2>at you know Aaron Hills or Chambers Bay, nobody, nobody.

1:00:24.120 --> 1:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Has a clue what's going at right, right and again.

1:00:27.000 --> 1:00:28.960
<v Speaker 1>But the USA is trying to make us j is

1:00:29.000 --> 1:00:31.960
<v Speaker 1>trying and also would never stick the pin. If the

1:00:32.040 --> 1:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>USJA ran the US Open at at Augusta National on

1:00:35.600 --> 1:00:39.480
<v Speaker 1>sixteen on Sunday, the pin wouldn't be there, so you

1:00:39.480 --> 1:00:42.000
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't see all the drama. The tiger Woods chip, in

1:00:42.040 --> 1:00:44.640
<v Speaker 1>which one of the greatst iconic shots in golf when

1:00:44.640 --> 1:00:48.280
<v Speaker 1>he beat the marc Up. You know, Nicholas almost hold

1:00:48.320 --> 1:00:51.480
<v Speaker 1>it there in eighty six when he won, they wouldn't

1:00:51.520 --> 1:00:52.880
<v Speaker 1>put the pin. They put the pin back right, and

1:00:52.880 --> 1:00:55.920
<v Speaker 1>everybody making double and everybody kind of going, okay. You

1:00:55.960 --> 1:00:58.360
<v Speaker 1>know the year I played, the year that Zach shot,

1:00:58.560 --> 1:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it was Zac shot. One of the part

1:01:00.040 --> 1:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>won the tournament taking a lay from Zach. But I'm

1:01:02.040 --> 1:01:04.520
<v Speaker 1>sure the ratings weren't as good. Then you get bad

1:01:04.520 --> 1:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>weather and over par wins a gust, it's not as good.

1:01:07.600 --> 1:01:09.880
<v Speaker 1>And you know when you get fifteen hunder par and

1:01:09.880 --> 1:01:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you get a guy, you know birding, you know, Birdie

1:01:11.520 --> 1:01:14.200
<v Speaker 1>in the last holes to win that people love that stuff.

1:01:14.400 --> 1:01:15.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's a good finish.

1:01:15.880 --> 1:01:19.400
<v Speaker 1>It's like and it's not like everyone's doing it either,

1:01:19.480 --> 1:01:21.680
<v Speaker 1>gus that spread it out on Sunday, you get two

1:01:21.760 --> 1:01:23.479
<v Speaker 1>or three guys in a chance to win. It's there's

1:01:23.560 --> 1:01:25.680
<v Speaker 1>plenty of guys shooting seventy five on Sunday, whether guys

1:01:25.680 --> 1:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>are shooting sixty five.

1:01:27.720 --> 1:01:31.720
<v Speaker 2>So you know, last question, if one one course that

1:01:31.840 --> 1:01:35.439
<v Speaker 2>never hosts tournaments that you'd love to see, say, say

1:01:35.480 --> 1:01:38.520
<v Speaker 2>the PGA Championship could go anywhere and this is you know,

1:01:38.640 --> 1:01:41.040
<v Speaker 2>and they didn't have to worry about grand stands or anything,

1:01:41.520 --> 1:01:45.320
<v Speaker 2>and it would be the permanent host of the PGA Championship.

1:01:45.840 --> 1:01:49.880
<v Speaker 2>Where would you go with it?

1:01:49.920 --> 1:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>To me, the best golf course I've played is pie Valley,

1:01:54.240 --> 1:01:55.959
<v Speaker 1>and I think it bes again. I think Pine Valley

1:01:55.960 --> 1:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>would be very similar to Augusta National. I think you'd

1:01:59.800 --> 1:02:04.640
<v Speaker 1>see the low score, lower scores than you'd expect. You know,

1:02:04.680 --> 1:02:06.800
<v Speaker 1>ten or fifteen under might win the tournament. But I

1:02:06.800 --> 1:02:09.040
<v Speaker 1>think even parking finished, you know, six or seven, so

1:02:09.120 --> 1:02:11.360
<v Speaker 1>it's spread things out. Guys would get rewarded for good

1:02:11.360 --> 1:02:14.840
<v Speaker 1>shots and penalized for bad shots. So that's literally what

1:02:14.840 --> 1:02:17.880
<v Speaker 1>we're looking for. And the USh tends to tends to

1:02:17.880 --> 1:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>penalize bad shots and good shots at the times gust

1:02:20.640 --> 1:02:24.200
<v Speaker 1>that very rarely does Augustine National penali is a bad shot,

1:02:24.400 --> 1:02:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean a good shot, very rarely. And Pine Valley's

1:02:28.080 --> 1:02:29.840
<v Speaker 1>like that. Pine Valley tends if you out and play good,

1:02:29.840 --> 1:02:31.120
<v Speaker 1>you can shoot a good score there. I know that,

1:02:31.600 --> 1:02:33.640
<v Speaker 1>you know. But if you don't play well, man, you

1:02:33.680 --> 1:02:35.880
<v Speaker 1>can shoot a million there, and I mean a million,

1:02:36.600 --> 1:02:39.000
<v Speaker 1>And I like that. I think another calf course is

1:02:39.080 --> 1:02:41.200
<v Speaker 1>like that, though maybe again the equipment may have changed

1:02:41.200 --> 1:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the cyper's point to the golf course that if you

1:02:44.600 --> 1:02:46.040
<v Speaker 1>play good you can shoot seven or eight in a

1:02:46.040 --> 1:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>part you played that you shoot eighty in a hurry.

1:02:48.640 --> 1:02:53.280
<v Speaker 1>And that's that's that's a great thing about golf. Too

1:02:53.320 --> 1:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>many golf courses are today we've gotten into this golf

1:02:57.120 --> 1:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>course have gone hardware. Good round is seventy and a

1:02:58.880 --> 1:03:00.480
<v Speaker 1>bad round in the ninety five of the teak out

1:03:00.520 --> 1:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>pursh where a good round with sixty five and the

1:03:02.040 --> 1:03:03.080
<v Speaker 1>bad round seventy five.

1:03:03.760 --> 1:03:07.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's I I agree, I agree, I like. I

1:03:07.320 --> 1:03:09.400
<v Speaker 2>love golf courses that allow you.

1:03:10.200 --> 1:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Augusta does that a great job of that for the pros.

1:03:14.040 --> 1:03:18.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's uh, we're on the same page there, I

1:03:18.160 --> 1:03:21.960
<v Speaker 2>I that's I'm excited to see Trinity for us. You know,

1:03:22.160 --> 1:03:25.160
<v Speaker 2>modern designed by you know, a great architect. That's I

1:03:25.160 --> 1:03:28.000
<v Speaker 2>think what's kind of lacking with the you know, it's

1:03:28.040 --> 1:03:30.440
<v Speaker 2>the explosion in the driving distance is that you know,

1:03:30.840 --> 1:03:32.840
<v Speaker 2>you know some of the golf course you know playing

1:03:33.280 --> 1:03:36.040
<v Speaker 2>but you know these guys don't design golf courses for

1:03:36.120 --> 1:03:38.120
<v Speaker 2>them for the PGA Tour pro you know.

1:03:38.240 --> 1:03:40.000
<v Speaker 1>So that's right. We need more of that too. We

1:03:40.040 --> 1:03:42.560
<v Speaker 1>have too many golf plerses being designed for pros and

1:03:42.560 --> 1:03:45.760
<v Speaker 1>not enough golf courses being designed for the everyday player. Yeah,

1:03:46.120 --> 1:03:49.800
<v Speaker 1>this concept of seventeen sets of teas to me as

1:03:49.880 --> 1:03:51.680
<v Speaker 1>bad for our game, not good for our game. It

1:03:51.720 --> 1:03:54.720
<v Speaker 1>takes away from the what's great about our sport is

1:03:54.720 --> 1:03:56.360
<v Speaker 1>that everyone kind of played the same course. And the

1:03:56.440 --> 1:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>golf ball has effected that a little bit. But we don't,

1:04:00.280 --> 1:04:02.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, we golfers should have three or four, three

1:04:02.600 --> 1:04:05.240
<v Speaker 1>sets of teas, and they should have a front, metal

1:04:05.240 --> 1:04:06.960
<v Speaker 1>and back and that's all you really should knee and

1:04:06.960 --> 1:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>if you need more than that, then maybe get to

1:04:08.400 --> 1:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>look at your design and not necessarily look at the

1:04:13.000 --> 1:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>figure out how to make tolls longer.

1:04:15.480 --> 1:04:18.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I figure out how to make them wider.

1:04:19.920 --> 1:04:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Again, I get again. I told this to Fell and

1:04:23.120 --> 1:04:27.080
<v Speaker 1>you didn't that tight had this conversation that the biggest deturn,

1:04:27.240 --> 1:04:29.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, rough to me is the worst hazards in golf,

1:04:31.160 --> 1:04:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and it just penalizes, you know, if you get a

1:04:34.000 --> 1:04:35.800
<v Speaker 1>golf first like the US Open, and you can go

1:04:35.960 --> 1:04:38.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty yard white fairways and knee deep rough that favors

1:04:38.960 --> 1:04:42.760
<v Speaker 1>long hitters but does not favorite short hitters because everybody

1:04:42.840 --> 1:04:44.520
<v Speaker 1>drives in the rough. And I figure long and the rough.

1:04:44.520 --> 1:04:45.960
<v Speaker 1>You mightley get it up by the green, but you're

1:04:45.960 --> 1:04:48.280
<v Speaker 1>short in the rough of chipping out. So I always

1:04:48.280 --> 1:04:50.760
<v Speaker 1>thought that if you really wanted to make it fairy again,

1:04:50.920 --> 1:04:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I think trees are great urns. I think dog legs

1:04:53.200 --> 1:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>are a real dog legs are great deterrence, and again

1:04:58.160 --> 1:05:00.840
<v Speaker 1>wind and then firmness and then angles, you know, forcing

1:05:00.840 --> 1:05:02.520
<v Speaker 1>players to hit the ball on the pick a line

1:05:02.520 --> 1:05:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and hit it on that line. If you don't, you

1:05:03.880 --> 1:05:06.600
<v Speaker 1>gotta pentalized and hitting at the right distance. That's how

1:05:06.600 --> 1:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>you make the game harder as supposed to. Just let

1:05:09.680 --> 1:05:12.080
<v Speaker 1>me tell you something, and from an architecturals, now, I

1:05:12.120 --> 1:05:14.280
<v Speaker 1>don't mean that if you have a five hundred and

1:05:14.280 --> 1:05:17.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty yard part four that's difficult. All you need is

1:05:17.480 --> 1:05:19.360
<v Speaker 1>a tee a fair way in the green. You don't

1:05:19.360 --> 1:05:22.360
<v Speaker 1>need anything else to make a three hundred and thirty

1:05:22.400 --> 1:05:25.480
<v Speaker 1>yard part four difficult. You actually need some imaginations skill

1:05:27.240 --> 1:05:29.600
<v Speaker 1>And take the fourteenth hole at Nearfield Village, one of

1:05:29.600 --> 1:05:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the great short part fours in golf. Jack did a

1:05:33.280 --> 1:05:35.200
<v Speaker 1>good job of thinking you hit the ball on the

1:05:35.240 --> 1:05:38.320
<v Speaker 1>right line the right distance. Twelve all against the National

1:05:38.440 --> 1:05:41.240
<v Speaker 1>is a perfect example of that. Anybody could make the

1:05:41.400 --> 1:05:43.520
<v Speaker 1>a two hundred and fifty yard part three hard. It's

1:05:43.560 --> 1:05:45.959
<v Speaker 1>not that difficult. You just need tea in the green.

1:05:46.080 --> 1:05:48.680
<v Speaker 1>That's it. You know, it could be anything. It's going

1:05:48.720 --> 1:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>to play difficult. It's making the short one that the

1:05:52.200 --> 1:05:54.600
<v Speaker 1>one where everyone can play difficult. The challenge is good

1:05:54.600 --> 1:05:57.320
<v Speaker 1>players and allows bad players to play. That's the skill

1:05:57.320 --> 1:06:00.880
<v Speaker 1>in architecture that we seem to be losing a little bit.

1:06:01.760 --> 1:06:05.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I bang that. I talk about narrow

1:06:05.560 --> 1:06:10.040
<v Speaker 2>fairways and and favoring the long hitters so much. You know,

1:06:10.520 --> 1:06:13.560
<v Speaker 2>if you miss the fairways like the twenty yard wide faaraway,

1:06:13.560 --> 1:06:15.560
<v Speaker 2>everybody's gonna miss a handful of times.

1:06:16.480 --> 1:06:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Well again, the straightest driver on tour it's about ten

1:06:20.360 --> 1:06:23.480
<v Speaker 1>out of fourteen faraways, and the most crooked driver on

1:06:23.520 --> 1:06:28.680
<v Speaker 1>tour hits about seven. Yeah, that's and the three fairways.

1:06:28.880 --> 1:06:30.800
<v Speaker 2>I think that's why you saw so much good, so

1:06:30.880 --> 1:06:33.800
<v Speaker 2>much variety at Aaron Hills was because these faraways were

1:06:33.800 --> 1:06:36.520
<v Speaker 2>wide and guys could go out and hit twelve fairways.

1:06:37.200 --> 1:06:38.720
<v Speaker 1>But I thought it was a good turn. And the

1:06:38.800 --> 1:06:41.200
<v Speaker 1>USJ doesn't like those kinds of scoring. I think, did

1:06:41.200 --> 1:06:43.880
<v Speaker 1>he shoot fifteen when he shot there? A pretty decent

1:06:44.000 --> 1:06:48.960
<v Speaker 1>under four but again I think we've That's where the

1:06:49.000 --> 1:06:52.160
<v Speaker 1>us J is wrong, is that that score is the champion.

1:06:52.560 --> 1:06:54.360
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't hard to figure out who the best player

1:06:54.400 --> 1:06:58.360
<v Speaker 1>that week was, and to me, that means you've done

1:06:58.440 --> 1:07:02.160
<v Speaker 1>your goal. And when Rory got sixteen hundred Congressional, it

1:07:02.200 --> 1:07:03.920
<v Speaker 1>wasn't hard to figure out who. It's not like some

1:07:04.000 --> 1:07:07.600
<v Speaker 1>flukey guy who didn't. He deserved to win, and you can,

1:07:07.640 --> 1:07:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you can. You guys are into this. You go back,

1:07:09.360 --> 1:07:13.680
<v Speaker 1>and the lower the score is relation to par, almost invariably,

1:07:13.720 --> 1:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the more worthy the champion was. You know, when two

1:07:17.560 --> 1:07:19.640
<v Speaker 1>over par wins the Overville Moody ones, when eight under

1:07:19.640 --> 1:07:22.840
<v Speaker 1>part wins, Jack Nicholas wins, that's a great point and

1:07:24.320 --> 1:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>we Augusta does it again. I hate to say this,

1:07:26.440 --> 1:07:29.080
<v Speaker 1>A Guesta does a great job with that too. But

1:07:29.320 --> 1:07:32.160
<v Speaker 1>when you see really low scores in major championships, a

1:07:32.200 --> 1:07:34.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of times it's Tiger Woods and Jack Nicholas and

1:07:34.320 --> 1:07:39.200
<v Speaker 1>guys okay, Rory McElroy, Jordan Speed. Mean, I think this

1:07:39.840 --> 1:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Kupka guy and he pronounces name, this guy holy, he

1:07:43.520 --> 1:07:46.280
<v Speaker 1>can really apply. Man, he's gonna win a lot of

1:07:46.280 --> 1:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>major championships.

1:07:47.240 --> 1:07:51.880
<v Speaker 2>I would guess, Yeah, he he's got a lot of game.

1:07:52.040 --> 1:07:52.720
<v Speaker 2>There's that much.

1:07:52.840 --> 1:07:53.800
<v Speaker 1>He has a lot of games.

1:07:53.920 --> 1:07:56.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he hits the great, he puts well, and he

1:07:56.840 --> 1:07:58.880
<v Speaker 2>chips well, it's not like there's any holes.

1:07:59.240 --> 1:08:00.400
<v Speaker 1>So is known.

1:08:01.640 --> 1:08:04.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, Hey paul I, I appreciate the time.

1:08:04.960 --> 1:08:07.040
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, no problem, and.

1:08:06.920 --> 1:08:10.600
<v Speaker 2>Uh I'll see you that. You guys got the senior

1:08:10.640 --> 1:08:14.200
<v Speaker 2>players that of course. I uh I grew up playing

1:08:14.480 --> 1:08:19.720
<v Speaker 2>around and more. Yeah, old school Donald Ross course. So

1:08:20.439 --> 1:08:22.639
<v Speaker 2>we'll see you out there next summer.

1:08:23.439 --> 1:08:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, come find me

1:08:24.400 --> 1:08:46.560
<v Speaker 2>All right, Thanks a lot, and thank you