WEBVTT - DPS BestOf

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>You are listening to the Dan Patrick Show on Fox

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio. Oh it's great to be back on this Monday.

0:00:07.600 --> 0:00:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Gangs all here ready to go. Thanks for joining us,

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Dan and the Dan As Dan Patrick Show as we

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>do every Monday, best and worst till the weekend. Once

0:00:16.840 --> 0:00:18.480
<v Speaker 1>you saw that you liked you didn't like, you can

0:00:18.520 --> 0:00:20.920
<v Speaker 1>dial thise up, you can email, you can tweet, you

0:00:20.920 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>can watch, you can do all the above. We say

0:00:22.920 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>good morning to those watching on Peacock, our streaming partner,

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 1>download the app watch for free. We say load to iHeartRadio,

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Premiere Radio, Fox Sports Radio, and the other affiliates around

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the country. Play of the day, stat of the day,

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:40.319
<v Speaker 1>poll question, all of that forthcoming the former coach now

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>analyst for the Mothership Jeff Van Gundy in a couple

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:46.479
<v Speaker 1>of minutes Peter King, NBC Sports. He will join us

0:00:46.520 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit later on Peter hinting maybe the Jags

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 1>do something interesting, maybe a surprise at the number one

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 1>overall pick. We'll talk about that coming up in a moment.

0:00:57.680 --> 0:01:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Here are the details eight seven seven three d P

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Show email address, DPA dan Patrick dot com, Twitter handle

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:06.959
<v Speaker 1>at DPS show Setan will provide us with a poll question,

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 1>and your input is always welcome. Pelicans, Sons tied at

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>two games, Apiece, Bucks, Nuggets and Heat all win tonight, Celtics, Nets, Raptors,

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 1>seventy six Ers, Jazz and the Mavericks. We'll talk about

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:23.399
<v Speaker 1>that with Jeff Van Gundy here in a moment. We

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>start draft week now normally during draft week, as we

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 1>get ready on that Monday, we go, boy, this is

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:32.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna be interesting because we're gonna go who's going number one,

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 1>who's going number two? Any trades, what's going to happen here?

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, you always have those moments where you go,

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I didn't see that one coming. So when you say,

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:46.680
<v Speaker 1>or I'm gonna say, or I've thought, I don't know

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>how much buzz there is with this draft. And because

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 1>we don't have the Marquis quarterbacks, we don't even have

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 1>we have a lot of wide receivers. You don't even

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>have that edge rusher that you go, boy, he's gonna

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>be great. This is one of those drafts where you go, yeah,

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>all right, we got a couple of wide receivers, he

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:08.080
<v Speaker 1>got some offensive lineman, you got a great defensive back

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:12.520
<v Speaker 1>or two. Not a lot of headline making moments here,

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:16.640
<v Speaker 1>we don't have that Trevor Lawrence player in this draft.

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't mean something wild won't happen. After all the

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:24.240
<v Speaker 1>drafts in Vegas, who knows, you could say and such

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:29.359
<v Speaker 1>and such selects such and such is he? Here is he? Here?

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:35.080
<v Speaker 1>It is Vegas. But you go into the week and

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>you go, Okay, what are the possibilities here? Because there'll

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 1>be a team where you go, oh, boy, like the

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Niners with Trey Lance, Wow, I didn't see that one coming.

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:47.919
<v Speaker 1>Or will the Falcons take a quarterback? Denver didn't take

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback? That means that they're going to be taking

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:55.359
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers. They're gonna trade him. Patriots Bill Belichick, Oh,

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>he found his Tom Brady, His Tom Brady, Matt Jones.

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:04.519
<v Speaker 1>There's always something there and it'll be the same this year, guaranteed.

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 1>And it might be a player that you're not that

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 1>familiar with. It might be a backstory you're not familiar with.

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:13.520
<v Speaker 1>It might be a team that reaches a team that

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, all of a sudden has somebody fall right

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 1>into their laps. There could be a trade. Do the

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Steelers take Kenny Pick? Do they take Malik Willis? By

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 1>the way. And I've said this over the years, but

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>you know we still buy into it. Nobody tells you

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the truth, no one. Why would they unless they want

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>to give you information. You know what the culprits are

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the agents, because the agents ago, hey, you you want

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:42.120
<v Speaker 1>some information. I'm hearing this. That's why I don't trust

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the agents. You know, I do have some sources. Uh,

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, I have a source who's a scout who said, hey,

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>this is what I'm hearing. With Jacksonville at the top,

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 1>you know they're gonna go with the guy who's either

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the safe pick in Hutchinson at Michigan or Trayvon Walker,

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 1>the edge rusher defensive player out of Georgia who has

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 1>a higher ceiling. That that's when I'm hearing. And plus

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:11.320
<v Speaker 1>he went through all the particulars with these players, being

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 1>able to talk to them or examine them or watch

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:17.359
<v Speaker 1>their workouts. So I trust his information. He's also the

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>one that told me that the Cleveland Browns were going

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:23.279
<v Speaker 1>to take Baker Mayfield, a story that we had before

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:26.720
<v Speaker 1>anybody else did. But a lot of people have agendas,

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of people want to give you information,

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 1>but they want to help out their client. I'll go

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:34.839
<v Speaker 1>back to when I was hosting the NBA Draft on

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the mother Ship and I had an agent come up

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 1>to me and said, are you going to address the

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:44.919
<v Speaker 1>knee injuries? Who was the kid out of Washington State

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 1>drafted by Portland, Brandon Roy. Yeah. So he says, you're gonna,

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 1>you guys gonna talk about the needs and I said, well,

0:04:53.720 --> 0:04:56.599
<v Speaker 1>I'll leave that to my analyst, you know, but he goes, yeah,

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he won't stay in the league that long

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:02.840
<v Speaker 1>got bad knees. So then you know, you start asking

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 1>your analysts there said, hey, how is Brandon Roy? You know,

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 1>he could be Rookie of the Year. One of my

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:13.160
<v Speaker 1>analysts said, I said, does he have you know, knee issues? Yeah,

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:16.479
<v Speaker 1>but I don't don't know the severity of it. I said, well,

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I just had somebody who said, hey, you know, he's

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 1>got like a degenerative knee and issue. And I was told,

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 1>you're going to get a lot of that from agents

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:30.839
<v Speaker 1>or people close to agents, sources closed to So it's

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:34.360
<v Speaker 1>a game that's played. And I've been used before where

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:36.159
<v Speaker 1>somebody will tell you something and you go, no, no,

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>I got it on a good good you know, a

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 1>good authority, and then you realize, oh, I think I

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:45.279
<v Speaker 1>got played. And having been at the Mothership for eighteen years,

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 1>I saw that happen to our analysts, you know, even

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 1>as great as like Peter Gammon's I remember he was

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>given information about the next head coach I think for

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay and it turned out that it wasn't true.

0:05:57.320 --> 0:05:59.479
<v Speaker 1>But you know, somebody was trying to help their client.

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it's a game, and that's why you

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 1>get a little closer, maybe you know, Tuesday afternoon or Wednesday.

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Then you start to hear a little bit more information.

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Then it starts to get a little bit more serious.

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:14.719
<v Speaker 1>But all this stuff leading up to it, all these

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>mock drafts, all of that stuff that's for entertainment purposes only.

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>And what I've found is it does introduce you to

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:26.720
<v Speaker 1>certain players that you might not be aware of, like

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:29.599
<v Speaker 1>Sauce Gardener. I was told by a scout that guy's

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 1>a top five pick. And I even talked to my

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 1>source yesterday and I said, is Sauce Gardner is still

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:38.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be a top five pick? He goes he

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 1>could be the best player in the draft, Cincinnati defensive back.

0:06:43.400 --> 0:06:46.280
<v Speaker 1>But my source said the best player doesn't always go

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:48.800
<v Speaker 1>number one. Keep that in mind because a lot of

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 1>times there'll be somebody who's better, or have a longer

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:55.799
<v Speaker 1>career or more of an impact, but quarterbacks are normally taken.

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:58.359
<v Speaker 1>How many times in the last twenty years have we

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 1>had a draft where we didn't have a quarterback take

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:05.680
<v Speaker 1>in number one overall? Because I can remember Jadeveon Clowney,

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Eric Fisher, Oh, good call out of Central Michigan. Yeah call,

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't a good call by the Chiefs. He was

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:16.000
<v Speaker 1>a nice player for them, he was. But but we

0:07:16.080 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 1>never say he was a bust. I think he made

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 1>a Pro Bowl or two. I had a nice career there. Okay,

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 1>he was not number one pick Alzheimer, Okay. And Jadeveon

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Clowney to me, has never lived up to the tackle

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 1>he made in the Outback Bowl, although he has made

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 1>three Pro Bowls, yeah, three, So he's not He's not

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the impact player that you know, we thought he was

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be. Yes point two thousand and eight, Jake

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Long tackle on a Michigan from Miami. Four Pro Bowls.

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Nice career. I got to Mario Williams defensive out in

0:07:47.000 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 1>North Carolina State went to the Houston Texans. That was

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the big debate between Reggie Bush and Mario Williams. Signability Yes,

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>and then all of a sudden, like we can't sign

0:07:56.920 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Reggie Bush and the Buffalo Bills take Mario william You're

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 1>going sign ability? Yeah, boy? Then Miles Garrett twenty seventeen

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 1>dot Texas A and m he's, you know, first team

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 1>All Pro he's yeah, he's he's a great player. But

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I you're gonna have that this year where you know,

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 1>do you take the safe pick? Do you take Aidan Hutchinson,

0:08:17.640 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 1>do you take Trey Von Walker that's gonna be or

0:08:21.120 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>is there a surprise? As Peter King has pointed out

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 1>in his Muddy Morning Quarterback column, all right, we'll get

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 1>phone calls coming up, Seatan, what kind of pulled question

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:32.840
<v Speaker 1>do you have for me? Well, we could go with

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 1>one that's semi NFL Draft related and that where will

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Deebo end up? See? That to me is going to

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:42.319
<v Speaker 1>be the big storyline here. There's two storylines that I'm

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 1>looking at. This broke last week when we're on vacation,

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:49.720
<v Speaker 1>and Deebo's probably looking around going, uh, do you see

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:53.559
<v Speaker 1>what diary kill got? Did you see what Damante Adam's got. Um,

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm every bit what those players are, and he's more

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 1>valuable to his team the Niners, then Tyree Hill and

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Davante Adams were to their teams, And certainly I would

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 1>rank it as Debo and then Davante Adams and Tyree Hill.

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 1>What Deebo did is basically move the chains, Like, what

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:18.120
<v Speaker 1>do you need me to do? Because I got a

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 1>quarterback who I know all he does is win, But

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I got to run the ball and catch the ball

0:09:23.000 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 1>and I got to do everything here. Yeah, but if

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 1>you look at it's been a crazy year for the

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 1>forty nine ers, right because if you go back to

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 1>the last draft, where now they were getting mac Jones

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 1>at number three, Yeah, they were getting Mack at number three,

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 1>and then all, no, wait, we got Trey And now

0:09:36.800 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 1>who is Trey got a start over Jimmy? When are

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:41.079
<v Speaker 1>we trading Jimmy? Is Jimmy even gonna be on the

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:43.440
<v Speaker 1>roster in twenty two? From what I was told, there's

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:46.199
<v Speaker 1>not a trademarket for Jimmy Garoppolo. Now Debo wants out,

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and Debo wants out. Would money solve all of this? Though?

0:09:52.160 --> 0:09:55.080
<v Speaker 1>That's what I'm curious because if I'm Trey Lance, I

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 1>gotta be you know, say in the management and I

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:01.960
<v Speaker 1>really need deep and here have I gonna be taken

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 1>over a starting quarterback here. So that is one storyline.

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:09.079
<v Speaker 1>The other one's Baker Mayfield. You know, I'll go with

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 1>my source who said Baker Mayfield. He thinks after the

0:10:14.080 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 1>first round is when you might see Baker Mayfield traded

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 1>teams if they get their quarterback. How many quarterbacks are taken?

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:24.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm hearing Sam how At North Carolina is

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 1>a and mat Matt Carroll as we talked about. I

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 1>think Kenny Pickett is probably a second round talent. I

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 1>think all these quarterbacks in a normal draft or second

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>round talents, but there's no quarterbacks, so somebody's got to

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 1>be the first quarterback off the board. And I think

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield probably gets traded after the first round once teams,

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:51.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe second round. But you know, when you have that day,

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 1>you know the rest of the night to figure things out,

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and you go, all right, well, who who are we

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 1>taking when we missed out on here? All right, why

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 1>don't you see if we'll get a fourth round draft pick?

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:03.960
<v Speaker 1>For if I'm Seattle. If you miss out on a quarterback,

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 1>if you're you're looking for one, all right, give him

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 1>a fourth round pick and uh, you know, see if

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 1>they'll split his salary with us or something. Yeah, Paul,

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 1>how about Thursday night, after the first round completes, we

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 1>have the guys nobody wants draft? Well, one round draft

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>and Baker Mayfield could go, Jimmy Garoppolov could go, and

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:21.320
<v Speaker 1>you have to give up like a fixed price and

0:11:21.360 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 1>you got a fixed contract. That's good TV. Yeah, I

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:27.679
<v Speaker 1>think Baker's gonna have to wait. And look, I know

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 1>this is a click bait when it comes to Baker Mayfield,

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 1>and it'll stay that way because the Mothership and NFL Network,

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 1>they'll milk it for all it's worth because we're gonna

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:42.680
<v Speaker 1>find out where Bake. You know, nobody wants Baker Mayfield,

0:11:42.679 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 1>it feels like, but everybody wants to talk about Baker Mayfield,

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Deebo Samuel. Where's it gonna end up? You got a

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 1>trade for him, and then you gotta pay him. That's

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 1>one of those crazy ones. I give your Green Bay.

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Do you end up paying what you would have paid

0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Damante Adams? But then you're gonna have to give up

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a couple of first round pick or whatever you're going

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>to give up for Gebo Samuel. That's how crazy it

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:06.439
<v Speaker 1>could turn out. But wide receivers are going to be

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:10.719
<v Speaker 1>front and center. But I'm gonna guess that, uh, you know,

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 1>first pick, and the Jacksonville Jaguars take dray Bon Walker,

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:19.560
<v Speaker 1>then you go okay, and then the Lions will be

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:21.840
<v Speaker 1>on the clock with the Lions take Malik Will? Would

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 1>they go that early on a quarterback? Like? These are

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the things. This is how you play it up. You know,

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 1>you gotta add to the suspense there. What other poll

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:31.840
<v Speaker 1>questions do we have today, Seaton? Well, just this is

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:34.319
<v Speaker 1>a totally random thought that I'm seeing just off of Twitter,

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:36.320
<v Speaker 1>has nothing to do with a poll question. But isn't

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 1>it crazy how comfortable we are? Kyle Kuzma tweeted this.

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I know we're numb to a lot of things, but

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:43.079
<v Speaker 1>in this society, a seven foot center just cast a

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 1>three to win a playoff game. It's crazy. How many

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 1>super tall you know what formerly would have been big

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:51.440
<v Speaker 1>men are such great outside shooters, and that it's just

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:55.840
<v Speaker 1>not even a thought anymore. It's the Dirk Nubitsky effect. Yeah,

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:59.680
<v Speaker 1>when you think about twenty years later, Dirk Nuvitski. But

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:03.079
<v Speaker 1>all so, if you look at how players are developed

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:07.560
<v Speaker 1>in Europe, they're developed to be either you know, your

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>ball handling skills as a seven footer or if you're

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:13.559
<v Speaker 1>a six footer. They want you to have the fundamentals

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 1>to end to be able to shoot, to be able

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to have great form, be able to shoot free throws

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:21.839
<v Speaker 1>like these are all important things for those players. And

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I think you're starting to see the trickle down of

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:27.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, Joe Lmbiid can hit a jumper, Carl Anthony

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Towns can shoot outside, you know the Joker can. There's

0:13:32.440 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 1>so many of them that can. But you're right, it's

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:38.320
<v Speaker 1>commonplace now where you go? Man, all right, seven footer

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:42.440
<v Speaker 1>on the perimeter, who would have thought, yes, seton we

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:45.080
<v Speaker 1>could go with basically off of our next guests. Maybe

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 1>a little better question for him, which team down three

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 1>and one is most likely to pull off a comeback?

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 1>So you have Atlanta right now, they're down three one

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 1>to the heat, Denver's down to the Warriors, Toronto down

0:13:57.000 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 1>to the sixers, and then Bowls down three one to

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the walk. Any of them coming back? Well, New Orleans

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:07.439
<v Speaker 1>is the one series that I'm curious about because it's

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:10.959
<v Speaker 1>tied to two games apiece. The Devin Booker situation. Could

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Zion Williamson play right? Because we keep saying, well, where's Zion?

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 1>He should be playing, he's dunking and the whole thing. Okay,

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Ben Simmons, then we're going, now, you can't have him play?

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Aren't they sort of the same that you're saying to

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Ben Simmons? He's been ten days pain free? Shouldn't he play?

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Zion Williamson? Put him in there, Let's bring him back. Yes. See,

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>if you had those guys play, aren't you sort of

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 1>setting them up for failure? I get that there's some

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 1>upside to it, but we'll talk about that. Thanks for

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 1>listening to The Dan Patrick Show podcast. Be sure to

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 1>catch us live every weekday morning nine to noon Eastern

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 1>or six to nine Pacific on Fox Sports Radio. Find

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:56.720
<v Speaker 1>your local station for The Dan Patrick Show at Fox

0:14:56.760 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio dot com, or stream us live every day

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:04.160
<v Speaker 1>on the iHeartRadio app by searching f s R, or

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 1>stream us live on the Peacock Act. Brooklyn Nets spent

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 1>big money to acquire stars like Katie and Kyrie Ben Simmons.

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Over the last couple of years, all that star power

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 1>has or at least it did, make the Nets a

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>favor to win the title. And we've seen a lot

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 1>of teams become championship contenders after acquiring multiple superstars. I mean,

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 1>look at the Lakers, you know, look at what the

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 1>La Rams did. You know the Nets first round matchup

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>with the Celtics is there's you know, this building a roster.

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Celtics are all homegrown if you look at it. Jason Tatum,

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Brown, Mark is smart, all drafted by Boston. You know,

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 1>you have the Nets trying to throw in Kyrie with

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 1>KD and it's not working. But give credit. What'll get

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 1>lost in this is how great Boston has been this

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:52.320
<v Speaker 1>year and certainly playing defense. This program brought to you

0:15:52.360 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 1>by the great folks at Mercedes. Groundbreaking runs in the Family,

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Safety runs in the Family, Extraordinary Runs in the Family.

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Twenty twenty two. Mercedes been range of SUVs, every member

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 1>waiting to impress. Learn more at MBUSA dot com. We

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:08.160
<v Speaker 1>make the way, make way for the great analysts from

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the Mothership. Jeff Van Gundi, former head coach. He was

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 1>on the call Celtics Nets games one in three and

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 1>joins US. Now what's the big difference in the Celtics

0:16:18.280 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and Nets and why the Celtics are up in a

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 1>commanding fashion? Well, I thought, actually, Brooklyn played an outstanding

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 1>first two games on the road. They gave themselves chances

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 1>to win in both games. They shot the ball better

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 1>than fifty percent in both games against a great Celtics defense.

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 1>So I really liked the way they played the first

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 1>two games. It was Game three. It was the turnovers

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 1>combined with Durant obviously not playing or Irving playing particularly well,

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and the other guys, the complimentary players around them other

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 1>than Bruce Brown, didn't have good nights either. So it

0:16:58.040 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 1>was a bad night all the way around, and one

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 1>they could ill afford. Would you sign up Kyrie for

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:09.160
<v Speaker 1>a long term contract if you're the Nets? Well it's

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:12.440
<v Speaker 1>tough choices now, you know, because right now their depth

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 1>has been compromised. Joe Harris has been out most of

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:20.119
<v Speaker 1>the year, so very good for them from a shooting standpoint,

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>good rebounder and he's got stability to him. And then

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:27.160
<v Speaker 1>you know Ben Simmons, if you're gonna say you're gonna

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:30.879
<v Speaker 1>trade hardened, and in this one year, what you're going

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:34.200
<v Speaker 1>to get back for Harden is Seth Curry who's hobbled,

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>and Andre Drummond. That's a lose from a talent standpoint too.

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:40.879
<v Speaker 1>So I think you have to look at your roster

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and totality. I know this because guys don't play as

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:50.359
<v Speaker 1>much now, either minutes in a game or over the

0:17:50.440 --> 0:17:54.200
<v Speaker 1>course of the season. You have to have quality depth,

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's what right now the Celtics have built. They've

0:17:57.080 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 1>built a strong eight nine man rotation, and right now

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:07.160
<v Speaker 1>that the Nets don't have enough depth due to injury

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:10.440
<v Speaker 1>to be able to put it together and make a

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:15.639
<v Speaker 1>championship run. Would you sign Kyrie long term? I'd have

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 1>to look at all those factors, U Dan. I mean,

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:23.200
<v Speaker 1>obviously he's had durability issues for many different reasons, and

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 1>my team has had durability issues. You know. The talent

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:31.880
<v Speaker 1>is obviously a unique offensive talent to handle and all

0:18:31.920 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that shot making. He hasn't played very well in the

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:38.160
<v Speaker 1>last couple of games here after a great second half

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:42.679
<v Speaker 1>in Game one. Just in general, for getting Kyrie for

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the second I think you always have to ask yourself,

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:48.239
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know what he'd get let's say, make

0:18:48.280 --> 0:18:52.119
<v Speaker 1>forty million. Are you better getting one forty million dollar

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 1>player or are you better getting you know, not as

0:18:56.560 --> 0:19:00.680
<v Speaker 1>good as the forty million, but having two really good

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty million dollar players. I think you have to think

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:07.320
<v Speaker 1>about how you want to surround Simmons and Durant because

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 1>those two are there, and you know you're gonna have

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:14.440
<v Speaker 1>to build around those two. Let's go back a week

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 1>or so ago, it felt like the nets, you know,

0:19:17.000 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 1>they're saying, hey, Ben's you know, he's been pain free,

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:25.880
<v Speaker 1>he's been working out, Like, why why are they setting

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:28.720
<v Speaker 1>him up to be the fall guy from the standpoint

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:32.120
<v Speaker 1>of lady not playing again? Why why not just say

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 1>we believe he's out, we're not expecting him to play

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 1>in this series, instead of hey, this could maybe tonight. Like,

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:43.639
<v Speaker 1>I just don't understand the philosophy unless they're trying to

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of push him into come on, let's go, let's play,

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 1>let's let's suck it up here. Well, Dan, I think,

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:53.359
<v Speaker 1>at least what I've read, those are the sources saying

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 1>that he's you know, on track to play in game four.

0:19:57.600 --> 0:19:59.920
<v Speaker 1>When we've talked to Steve Nash prior to the game

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:04.159
<v Speaker 1>games that we've done. He's always said, you know, I

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 1>think it's too early to say. And so the reports

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:11.680
<v Speaker 1>that were coming out of whatever camp never matched up

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:14.679
<v Speaker 1>with what Steve Nash was saying to us, which was,

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 1>hold on, he hasn't even practiced yet. And again, I

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:24.440
<v Speaker 1>have no idea what's going on. People who I think

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to make these hard and fast pronouncements that

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 1>he's either letting his team down or he's injured, Like

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 1>none of us really know if he's truly injured, if

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a mental health situation, or he could play, he's

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 1>just not comfortable to play. And so I find it

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:50.920
<v Speaker 1>a really odd situation and I certainly am going to

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:55.920
<v Speaker 1>remain judgment free on him and what he stands for. Yeah,

0:20:55.920 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 1>it just feels like and all Steve Nash has to

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 1>say is look, he's not playing, that's it, and that

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>if he does come back, then we would have said,

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:08.440
<v Speaker 1>oh wow, okay, you know, hey, he's progressing farther along

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:12.480
<v Speaker 1>like Zion Williamson. Why is Zion not playing? I mean

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 1>he can can. He played fifteen minutes, ten minutes, twelve minutes.

0:21:17.520 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Why why would you not put him back in or

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 1>why is he not being put back in. Well, that's

0:21:22.760 --> 0:21:28.639
<v Speaker 1>an interesting question right there. If he's I think, right now, Phoenix,

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think New Orleans is going to win

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 1>that series once Booker went out and let's say he

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 1>can't come back, I think they have even though they

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 1>were ten games under five hundred during the regular season

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:44.639
<v Speaker 1>and Phoenix was sixty four and eighteen. I think offensive

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 1>talent wise, New Orleans has the better team with the

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 1>addition of McCollum and Valanciunas in the off season. But

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 1>if you throw in Zion for fifteen minutes a game

0:21:57.320 --> 0:22:01.200
<v Speaker 1>off the bench, I mean, then I think they become

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the prohibitive favorite over these last three games. So I've

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 1>got to believe that, you know, Williamson just isn't healthy

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 1>enough to play, because why wouldn't you want to play

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:18.320
<v Speaker 1>if you were healthy enough in the playoffs. But I

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 1>also look back to Michael Jordan's second year in the league.

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:25.200
<v Speaker 1>He breaks his foot. If we fast forward to now,

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Michael Jordan doesn't play in the playoffs, probably, I mean,

0:22:30.080 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 1>and really that was his coming out party when he

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 1>faced the Celtics in the Garden and had that dominating

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 1>series and they lost. But now it's about caution, load management,

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:43.400
<v Speaker 1>all of that. So I'm just curious and it's not Hey,

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:46.359
<v Speaker 1>the guys in my day era were tougher. It's just

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:50.240
<v Speaker 1>the philosophy I think is different than it used to be. Oh,

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 1>it's absolutely different. But it's not just different in the playoffs, Dan,

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 1>you know that. It's it's different in how you work

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 1>at the summer. Sometimes I think we take more pride

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 1>in how we work out in the summer than how

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 1>we play in the winter. Um. I always hear about

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:12.680
<v Speaker 1>guys having great summers. I used to make We used

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:15.880
<v Speaker 1>to make light of one guy when in UH back

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:20.400
<v Speaker 1>in the late nineties early two thousands that we competed against.

0:23:20.400 --> 0:23:22.439
<v Speaker 1>All they ever would say about him was what a

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 1>great summer we had? This guy had always say, well,

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:28.160
<v Speaker 1>how about having a great April and day for money?

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, I just think there's a lot different. Caution

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:41.679
<v Speaker 1>is uh is a word that you know, is you know,

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 1>very InVogue. And I think the one thing that used

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 1>to be asked was well, if this was a playoff game,

0:23:50.720 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>could he go that's that's out now too, Like, it's

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:58.119
<v Speaker 1>just different. It's not different bad or good. The league

0:23:58.200 --> 0:24:05.240
<v Speaker 1>looks at playing through things much differently than fifteen twenty

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:08.120
<v Speaker 1>years ago. That may be good or that may be bad.

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:11.080
<v Speaker 1>It depends on your perspective. Talking to Jeff Van Gundy,

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the analyst for ESPN and ABC, I brought this up

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 1>with Commissioners Silver a couple of weeks ago, where I said,

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:20.680
<v Speaker 1>how about you just say you got to play in

0:24:20.680 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 1>a certain number of games or certain number of minutes

0:24:23.800 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 1>to qualify for first team, second team, third Team, All NBA,

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:30.680
<v Speaker 1>all your postseason awards. You have to check in at

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 1>a certain level. Therefore, you know you're going to get

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 1>those players because of all the bonuses that are attached

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 1>to first second, third team, or winning the MVP or

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Defensive Player that year, all of those things. What do

0:24:42.240 --> 0:24:47.359
<v Speaker 1>you think of that idea? Love the idea, unfortunately, because

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 1>like you just said, bonuses are tied to it all.

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 1>You'd have to work that out with the players Association

0:24:53.960 --> 0:24:57.639
<v Speaker 1>and they're never going to give on that. But I

0:24:57.680 --> 0:25:01.359
<v Speaker 1>do think going forward in the next collective bargaining, you

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 1>have to I know it sounds strange because you don't

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:10.440
<v Speaker 1>give incentives in other professions to show up at work,

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Like hey, today, if you show up at work, we're

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 1>going to give you the chance to be all first

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:21.480
<v Speaker 1>team fire Department. But in this situation, the way the

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:24.480
<v Speaker 1>trends are heading, and I think in a negative way

0:25:24.520 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 1>as far as for fans, they really don't know oftentimes

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:30.359
<v Speaker 1>going to a game, buying tickets for a game, tune,

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:33.679
<v Speaker 1>and into a game, who's going to play. So I

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 1>think to give extra incentive to either games played minutes

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>played for all the awards, I think is an outstanding

0:25:41.920 --> 0:25:46.639
<v Speaker 1>idea that I think the commissioner should think very long

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:50.400
<v Speaker 1>about trying to include in the next collective bargaining agreement.

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I think you should be able to buy Star insurance

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:57.840
<v Speaker 1>so you play an overage on your ticket and let's

0:25:57.840 --> 0:26:01.119
<v Speaker 1>say you're showing up to see Steph Curry and he

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:04.720
<v Speaker 1>doesn't play and you get your money back, or Luca.

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 1>You're showing up to see Luca and you know you've

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 1>got that in that Star insurance. What do you think?

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:17.400
<v Speaker 1>I like it. I think it's also unfortunate that we're

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:22.399
<v Speaker 1>having that conversation, you know, but I listen, I do

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:25.639
<v Speaker 1>think we have to protect the customer and the consumer.

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Right now, we're on this high that you know, people

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:37.200
<v Speaker 1>are watching, they're excited about NBA basketball, but we can

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 1>never take for granted the fans and that they drive

0:26:41.840 --> 0:26:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the freight. And I don't think Adam Silver takes him

0:26:45.000 --> 0:26:49.720
<v Speaker 1>for granted. I hope we as teams and as a

0:26:49.840 --> 0:26:53.840
<v Speaker 1>league don't take him for granted because once you're not

0:26:53.960 --> 0:26:57.960
<v Speaker 1>giving them the product they think is warranted for the price,

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:01.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, obviously they're gonna they're gonna spend their money elsewhere.

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:04.439
<v Speaker 1>So I think we have to have I don't know

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:07.199
<v Speaker 1>if it's insurance, and I think Dan, I don't know

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:11.479
<v Speaker 1>about you, but I think fans understand the difference between

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:17.880
<v Speaker 1>legit injury and just taking a night off when they

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:19.960
<v Speaker 1>choose to take a night off. Yeah, but we can't

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 1>ask that question, Jeff. We're not allowed to ask Ben Simmons, Hey,

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 1>where don't you playing? So you're not unfortunately because now

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:32.960
<v Speaker 1>even and it used to, hey listen, the media is

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot different to Dan. You used to be held

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:42.719
<v Speaker 1>account after every game. You didn't get a choice, you know,

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:46.159
<v Speaker 1>the reporters were allowed into the locker room and you

0:27:46.200 --> 0:27:49.120
<v Speaker 1>could run away, but it was it was harder back

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:52.200
<v Speaker 1>back then to run away. Now with the zooms, teams

0:27:52.200 --> 0:27:55.440
<v Speaker 1>don't make people available. They don't have to answer for

0:27:56.440 --> 0:28:00.880
<v Speaker 1>either their playoff in times. And that's why I admire

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the players that winner loss, good game or bad game.

0:28:06.200 --> 0:28:10.480
<v Speaker 1>They stand before the media and they're not just there

0:28:10.600 --> 0:28:13.160
<v Speaker 1>when they're giving them praise. They're there when they're taking

0:28:13.600 --> 0:28:16.720
<v Speaker 1>on hard questions. And that's why I admired what duranted.

0:28:17.000 --> 0:28:19.640
<v Speaker 1>It had to be hard, you know, after game three,

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:23.080
<v Speaker 1>to be disappointed in the result in your own play,

0:28:23.119 --> 0:28:25.639
<v Speaker 1>but to stand there and take it. That's what part

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 1>of your pay is for, your responsibility is for. But

0:28:29.880 --> 0:28:33.600
<v Speaker 1>now it's harder, and frankly, a lot of the questions

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 1>are more softballish because they are relying on players and

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the players agents for leaks and sources off the record.

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:45.160
<v Speaker 1>So a lot has changed in the climate of how

0:28:45.200 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the game is covered too. Is James Harden getting old

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 1>right before our very eyes? Well? I think he certainly

0:28:56.360 --> 0:29:00.080
<v Speaker 1>hasn't played to the MVP level that we're accustomed to,

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 1>and that was in Brooklyn and in Philly, But I

0:29:05.160 --> 0:29:10.920
<v Speaker 1>would not underestimate his greatness. I think I always thought

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the dynamic between he and embid were was going to

0:29:13.520 --> 0:29:17.480
<v Speaker 1>be a challenge because Harden has a style that's very

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:22.560
<v Speaker 1>unique in how he dominates the ball and ebid when

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:26.600
<v Speaker 1>they play through him, whether it's in the high post,

0:29:26.680 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the elbow or the low post, is absolutely dominant. So

0:29:31.440 --> 0:29:34.680
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a hard dance to master. Actually, I think

0:29:34.720 --> 0:29:40.560
<v Speaker 1>they played together exceptionally well. I think they fit together

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:43.239
<v Speaker 1>better than I thought. I just don't think Harden has

0:29:43.280 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 1>been as efficient from a shooting standpoint as they need

0:29:47.520 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 1>him to be if they're going to win it all.

0:29:49.560 --> 0:29:52.719
<v Speaker 1>I'll leave you with this bigger disappointment this season, the

0:29:52.800 --> 0:29:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Lakers or the Nets. Well, I think it all is

0:29:59.320 --> 0:30:02.600
<v Speaker 1>where you're you start with your expectations. I never thought

0:30:02.640 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers were good, Like I didn't understand the hype

0:30:07.120 --> 0:30:11.080
<v Speaker 1>for their team. You know they were there. They have

0:30:11.120 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 1>an often injured team. They took away and stripped down

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 1>all depth, and I think depth is incredibly important in

0:30:19.480 --> 0:30:23.240
<v Speaker 1>today's NBA because of games missed and people don't play

0:30:23.320 --> 0:30:28.280
<v Speaker 1>big minutes. So my expectations for the Lakers, I can't

0:30:28.280 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 1>say I didn't think they'd make the play in. I

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:33.680
<v Speaker 1>thought they would be, you know, an eight, nine, ten

0:30:33.800 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 1>type of team, but I'm not disappointed. I thought their

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:43.960
<v Speaker 1>roster was not very good. The Nets, on the other hand,

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:46.760
<v Speaker 1>I thought going into the year before you knew about

0:30:47.800 --> 0:30:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Irving's vaccination status and the inability to play Hardens. I

0:30:53.040 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't know he was going to be discontent, and all

0:30:56.600 --> 0:31:00.400
<v Speaker 1>of that being said January, I think it was twenty third.

0:31:00.720 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 1>The Nets were in first place in the Eastern Conference

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:08.480
<v Speaker 1>at twenty nine and sixteen, and then Durrant's injury wiped

0:31:08.560 --> 0:31:12.920
<v Speaker 1>them out. So you took you know, Irving's vaccination status,

0:31:12.920 --> 0:31:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Harden's discontent, which led to Simmons not being able to play,

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Joe Harris being out all year, then Rant. They just

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 1>got hit with a tidal wave of roster issues that

0:31:26.000 --> 0:31:30.320
<v Speaker 1>truly could not be overcome. And I think Boston is

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the best team in the NBA. I think they will

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:36.200
<v Speaker 1>win it if they can stay healthy. I think they're

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:41.760
<v Speaker 1>that good defensively and roster construction wise. And so I

0:31:41.800 --> 0:31:45.480
<v Speaker 1>think they got a horrible first round opponent as well.

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 1>So everything that could go wrong so far for the

0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Nets has gone wrong. What's the coolest thing in your office?

0:31:54.200 --> 0:31:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Let me look here my Mount Killing and Garol picture. Dan.

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I climbed Mount Killing Majaro about eight years ago. And

0:32:05.360 --> 0:32:09.440
<v Speaker 1>when I say I whimpered to the finish line, I

0:32:09.640 --> 0:32:13.320
<v Speaker 1>basically had to be dragged to the finish line because

0:32:13.600 --> 0:32:17.360
<v Speaker 1>we made a midnight walk up was the last day,

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:21.520
<v Speaker 1>on like two hours sleep, and the guys who were

0:32:21.520 --> 0:32:24.880
<v Speaker 1>our guides, they basically told the friend I did it with,

0:32:25.360 --> 0:32:26.960
<v Speaker 1>you got to go up and see your guy. He's

0:32:26.960 --> 0:32:31.240
<v Speaker 1>having a mental breakdown because at like four am, in

0:32:31.320 --> 0:32:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the cold of Mount killing Majaro, I was ready to break.

0:32:35.400 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Did you cry? I didn't, but literally if it had

0:32:40.600 --> 0:32:45.280
<v Speaker 1>been five more steps, I might have. And then the

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:48.000
<v Speaker 1>climb down was actually harder than the climb up, and

0:32:48.040 --> 0:32:50.160
<v Speaker 1>they were just dragging me down. I mean they were

0:32:50.200 --> 0:32:53.040
<v Speaker 1>just like, this dude is weak minded, and I was

0:32:53.200 --> 0:32:57.200
<v Speaker 1>so you know that I made it all the way

0:32:57.240 --> 0:32:59.720
<v Speaker 1>to the top. Just you know, I worked for this

0:32:59.720 --> 0:33:02.560
<v Speaker 1>guy id and like long ago named Gordon Jaza was

0:33:02.560 --> 0:33:05.320
<v Speaker 1>a longtime assistant with the Utah Jazz, but I worked

0:33:05.360 --> 0:33:08.280
<v Speaker 1>with him at Providence College and he used to always

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:12.800
<v Speaker 1>tell players, despite yourself, you're gonna be great like because

0:33:13.080 --> 0:33:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and that was me on that climb, despite myself, I

0:33:16.160 --> 0:33:18.520
<v Speaker 1>made it to the top. I never understood why we

0:33:18.560 --> 0:33:22.560
<v Speaker 1>don't celebrate the sherpas more. You know, Sir Edmund Hillary,

0:33:22.800 --> 0:33:25.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't give a damn about you. It's the sherpa

0:33:25.280 --> 0:33:29.000
<v Speaker 1>who was carrying all your gear. Listen, I could have

0:33:29.040 --> 0:33:31.320
<v Speaker 1>paid I think it was like one hundred more bucks

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:33.000
<v Speaker 1>for them, not so I didn't have to carry the

0:33:33.080 --> 0:33:36.800
<v Speaker 1>fifty pound backpack that I was carrying. I'm like, I

0:33:36.960 --> 0:33:39.479
<v Speaker 1>waste money all the time. I didn't spend it on that,

0:33:39.680 --> 0:33:41.400
<v Speaker 1>all right, because I was trying to be tough. That

0:33:41.480 --> 0:33:44.040
<v Speaker 1>was stupid. But what used to kill me is we

0:33:44.040 --> 0:33:46.360
<v Speaker 1>would get up in the morning. I think we're flying

0:33:46.480 --> 0:33:50.320
<v Speaker 1>up on this hike, and these dudes are breaking down

0:33:50.360 --> 0:33:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the camp and they're like sprinting bias and there they

0:33:55.320 --> 0:33:57.600
<v Speaker 1>finished the next day's camp. They had to be there

0:33:57.640 --> 0:34:00.840
<v Speaker 1>two hours early. They're cooking. I'm like, how do they do?

0:34:00.960 --> 0:34:06.640
<v Speaker 1>These people are super human? Well, congratulations on not crying.

0:34:08.640 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I want to say this because my friend is probably

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:14.359
<v Speaker 1>if he listens to you every days, he's out there

0:34:14.400 --> 0:34:18.279
<v Speaker 1>listening Chris Loman and he's saying, yeah, but he almost did.

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:23.920
<v Speaker 1>I almost had it, yeah, barely. You are a warrior.

0:34:23.960 --> 0:34:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Hashtag warrior yeh, hashtag weak minded. Thank you, Jeff, Safe

0:34:30.360 --> 0:34:33.680
<v Speaker 1>travels and we appreciate your time. All right, take care damn.

0:34:33.800 --> 0:34:38.600
<v Speaker 1>That's Jeff and Gundhi of the Mother's ship. Yeah. These sherpas, man,

0:34:39.320 --> 0:34:43.240
<v Speaker 1>those are the stars. Oh and let's celebrate Sir Edmund

0:34:43.239 --> 0:34:47.120
<v Speaker 1>and Hillary the first man too in lame like the sherpa.

0:34:47.360 --> 0:34:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Sherpa did all the damn work all Sir Edmund. Hillary

0:34:51.200 --> 0:34:52.880
<v Speaker 1>did his comb his hair when he got to the

0:34:52.920 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 1>top and said, all right, how do I look for

0:34:54.680 --> 0:34:58.799
<v Speaker 1>my photo opportunity? Yeah? Yeah, I paid for this trip. See.

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Is there any group of people are like at a

0:35:02.280 --> 0:35:05.680
<v Speaker 1>job or a position more underappreciated than the sherpa? Yeah,

0:35:05.840 --> 0:35:09.560
<v Speaker 1>more underrecognized? Yeah. Yeah. Thanks for listening to The Dan

0:35:09.640 --> 0:35:12.399
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Show podcast. Be sure to catch us live every

0:35:12.440 --> 0:35:15.480
<v Speaker 1>weekday morning nine until noon eastern six to nine Pacific

0:35:15.520 --> 0:35:17.920
<v Speaker 1>on Fox Sports Radio, and you can find us on

0:35:17.960 --> 0:35:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app at FSR or stream us live on

0:35:22.200 --> 0:35:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the Peacock app. Hey it's me Rob Parker. Check out

0:35:26.680 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 1>my weekly MLB podcast, Inside the Parker for twenty two

0:35:31.200 --> 0:35:35.040
<v Speaker 1>minutes of piping hot baseball talk, featuring the biggest names

0:35:35.040 --> 0:35:38.400
<v Speaker 1>of newsmakers in the sport. Whether you believe in analytics

0:35:38.560 --> 0:35:42.239
<v Speaker 1>or the iecast, We've got all the bases covered. New

0:35:42.320 --> 0:35:46.319
<v Speaker 1>episodes drop every Thursday, so do yourself a favor. And

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:49.600
<v Speaker 1>listen to Inside the Parker with Rob Parker on the

0:35:49.719 --> 0:35:54.280
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcast. By the way,

0:35:54.520 --> 0:35:59.160
<v Speaker 1>best show on TV new season just started. Guys, want

0:35:59.160 --> 0:36:01.799
<v Speaker 1>to take a guess. You shouldn't have to gas. You

0:36:01.840 --> 0:36:05.600
<v Speaker 1>should know, Yes, Bolling years ago you have said Bosh.

0:36:05.640 --> 0:36:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I loved Bosh, but Bosh wasn't the best show on TV. Seton? Uh,

0:36:10.719 --> 0:36:13.839
<v Speaker 1>what's the one? The Flight Attendant that's season two is

0:36:13.880 --> 0:36:17.640
<v Speaker 1>back on? I Love that with Rosie Perez and Kaylee Quoquo,

0:36:18.680 --> 0:36:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Barry Bill Hayder o season three Fritzie. Is Bill Hayder

0:36:24.600 --> 0:36:26.399
<v Speaker 1>going to join us? He is joining us sometime this week,

0:36:26.400 --> 0:36:29.319
<v Speaker 1>for sure, it'd be nice. Peter King joins us right now.

0:36:29.360 --> 0:36:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Football Morning in America, columnist NBC Sports dot Com. Best

0:36:33.239 --> 0:36:38.360
<v Speaker 1>show on TV to you, Peter is what? Uh? Great

0:36:38.360 --> 0:36:43.239
<v Speaker 1>British Baking Show? Okay, I don't know. I like the

0:36:43.360 --> 0:36:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Great British Baking Show. It's a great show. Been been

0:36:48.239 --> 0:36:52.640
<v Speaker 1>on a long time. Yeah, and uh, look we're we're

0:36:53.680 --> 0:36:57.319
<v Speaker 1>We're not. I've missed so many of these shows. It's

0:36:57.360 --> 0:37:01.600
<v Speaker 1>almost intimidating when you start to when somebody says, hey,

0:37:01.760 --> 0:37:04.919
<v Speaker 1>have you seen this? This, and this. I haven't even

0:37:04.960 --> 0:37:07.799
<v Speaker 1>seen Breaking Bad yet. Oh, I mean, I got a

0:37:07.840 --> 0:37:11.040
<v Speaker 1>long way to go. I'm stuck on the Sopranos. Yeah,

0:37:11.080 --> 0:37:12.840
<v Speaker 1>and then if you do Breaking Bad, you got to

0:37:12.840 --> 0:37:16.120
<v Speaker 1>do better, call Saul. Yeah, you know, so that's the

0:37:16.160 --> 0:37:18.200
<v Speaker 1>prequel to that. Yeah, you got a lot. Well, you're

0:37:18.200 --> 0:37:22.920
<v Speaker 1>always working, Pete, You're always on the football. Not really,

0:37:23.280 --> 0:37:25.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not really, Dan. Life is a little bit slowed

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:31.080
<v Speaker 1>down now around draft time. Life stinks because you just

0:37:31.160 --> 0:37:33.839
<v Speaker 1>get competitive and you want to get as many of

0:37:33.840 --> 0:37:39.280
<v Speaker 1>these right as you can, and it's eminently frustrating. But anyway,

0:37:39.320 --> 0:37:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I got a big, big sigh of relief today because

0:37:42.120 --> 0:37:44.600
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing else I can do right now. Okay, if

0:37:44.640 --> 0:37:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I said, I'm gonna give you a crystal ball and

0:37:47.160 --> 0:37:50.000
<v Speaker 1>you could find out what this one team would be

0:37:50.080 --> 0:37:53.879
<v Speaker 1>doing for the draft, the entire draft, what team would

0:37:53.880 --> 0:37:59.160
<v Speaker 1>that be that you would want to know? You know,

0:37:59.200 --> 0:38:01.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a weird team because I'd really want to know

0:38:01.680 --> 0:38:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the Pittsburgh Steelers because I have a feeling at twenty

0:38:06.120 --> 0:38:09.640
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna go quarterback. I said Kenny Pickett. Won't shock

0:38:09.719 --> 0:38:15.080
<v Speaker 1>me at all if they go Malik Willis. But Pittsburgh

0:38:15.160 --> 0:38:19.480
<v Speaker 1>is such an interesting team because they are They take

0:38:19.719 --> 0:38:25.680
<v Speaker 1>great pride in hiding everything that they do, and I

0:38:25.719 --> 0:38:28.640
<v Speaker 1>applaud them for that. You know, secrets really don't get

0:38:28.640 --> 0:38:32.320
<v Speaker 1>out of that building. I'd probably be most curious about

0:38:32.360 --> 0:38:35.239
<v Speaker 1>what the Steelers are going to do at twenty. I

0:38:35.320 --> 0:38:37.400
<v Speaker 1>know that you hinted at maybe a surprise at the

0:38:37.400 --> 0:38:39.960
<v Speaker 1>top of the draft. I saw where the new betting

0:38:40.080 --> 0:38:43.520
<v Speaker 1>favorite according to Las Vegas, is a Trayvon Walker out

0:38:43.520 --> 0:38:48.640
<v Speaker 1>of Georgia. Is that a surprise to you, Well, I've

0:38:48.640 --> 0:38:50.759
<v Speaker 1>been hearing it for a couple of weeks now, so

0:38:50.880 --> 0:38:54.839
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't say it's that big a surprise. I don't

0:38:54.840 --> 0:38:58.960
<v Speaker 1>know if it's going to happen, Dan, but I think

0:38:59.160 --> 0:39:02.040
<v Speaker 1>that you know, the guy who's got the most power

0:39:02.080 --> 0:39:06.879
<v Speaker 1>in that building, honestly is Trent Bulky. He always has

0:39:06.920 --> 0:39:10.560
<v Speaker 1>been a tools guy with you know, at the top

0:39:10.600 --> 0:39:13.160
<v Speaker 1>of the draft, you saw what he did, and it's

0:39:13.840 --> 0:39:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Alden Smith is used as the great comparison because he

0:39:17.480 --> 0:39:21.240
<v Speaker 1>picked Alden Smith over JJ Watt. If Alden Smith didn't

0:39:21.239 --> 0:39:23.680
<v Speaker 1>have all the problems that he had in his personal life,

0:39:24.320 --> 0:39:26.759
<v Speaker 1>he could have been he could have had the impact

0:39:27.320 --> 0:39:30.080
<v Speaker 1>long term that JJ Watt has had could he have

0:39:30.080 --> 0:39:34.279
<v Speaker 1>won three D poise? Probably not, but he could have

0:39:34.360 --> 0:39:38.759
<v Speaker 1>been a great player. And so I think, and I

0:39:38.800 --> 0:39:41.000
<v Speaker 1>think there is something to it. Some of the plays

0:39:41.040 --> 0:39:45.040
<v Speaker 1>you've seen Trayvon Walker make on tape are incredible, but

0:39:45.680 --> 0:39:48.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, he has not made nearly the number of

0:39:48.800 --> 0:39:52.200
<v Speaker 1>plays that Aiden Hutchinson has made in his college career.

0:39:52.680 --> 0:39:55.440
<v Speaker 1>And that is what is really kind of a different

0:39:55.640 --> 0:39:59.279
<v Speaker 1>deal right now. And I had a source tell me

0:39:59.400 --> 0:40:02.040
<v Speaker 1>that hutch Pinson is the safer pick. Walker has the

0:40:02.120 --> 0:40:07.239
<v Speaker 1>higher ceiling here. Yeah, and I wonder about that. You

0:40:07.280 --> 0:40:10.280
<v Speaker 1>know what Chris Long, Well, Chris Long was the second

0:40:10.280 --> 0:40:13.759
<v Speaker 1>pick overall out of Virginia and wasn't he considered a

0:40:13.800 --> 0:40:16.880
<v Speaker 1>safe pick for the Rams? Now, I think that's a

0:40:16.920 --> 0:40:22.759
<v Speaker 1>really good comparison because he basically was the guy who,

0:40:24.719 --> 0:40:28.000
<v Speaker 1>you know who, who everybody thought was the safest pick. Now,

0:40:28.000 --> 0:40:31.759
<v Speaker 1>Aiden Hutchinson, you might call him a safe pick, but man,

0:40:31.880 --> 0:40:36.720
<v Speaker 1>he had He's made some explosive plays in college too.

0:40:36.880 --> 0:40:40.759
<v Speaker 1>I I personally think that Aidan Hutchinson will have the

0:40:40.840 --> 0:40:44.319
<v Speaker 1>longer and better career. But Dan, if you asked me

0:40:44.400 --> 0:40:48.719
<v Speaker 1>what player in this draft five years from now, we're

0:40:48.719 --> 0:40:50.560
<v Speaker 1>going to look back and say, well, that is the

0:40:50.600 --> 0:40:53.520
<v Speaker 1>best player out of this, I'd say it's Derek Stingley,

0:40:53.880 --> 0:40:57.879
<v Speaker 1>and Derek Stingley could last past ten. Yeah. I loved

0:40:57.960 --> 0:41:01.000
<v Speaker 1>him his freshman year. In fact, I took to ed

0:41:01.160 --> 0:41:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Orgeron I said I could see him winning the Heisman,

0:41:04.440 --> 0:41:07.080
<v Speaker 1>having him be a two way player. I was that

0:41:07.239 --> 0:41:12.000
<v Speaker 1>impressed with him the freshman his freshman year. And it

0:41:12.040 --> 0:41:14.440
<v Speaker 1>was a while ago that I had a source say

0:41:14.480 --> 0:41:18.400
<v Speaker 1>sauce Gardner is a top five pick, and I thought, okay,

0:41:18.719 --> 0:41:20.960
<v Speaker 1>and then you started to watch Cincinnati and then all

0:41:20.960 --> 0:41:23.839
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, it feels like sauce Gardner could be

0:41:24.000 --> 0:41:26.759
<v Speaker 1>a top ten, maybe a top five pick. So you

0:41:26.880 --> 0:41:32.200
<v Speaker 1>like Stingley over Gardner, Well, I like him over the

0:41:32.280 --> 0:41:36.040
<v Speaker 1>long term better, but I think that sauce Gardner going

0:41:36.120 --> 0:41:39.360
<v Speaker 1>before him is probably going to happen, and it's justified.

0:41:40.120 --> 0:41:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Sauce Gardner basically has played eleven hundred snaps of past

0:41:46.640 --> 0:41:50.799
<v Speaker 1>coverage in his college career and in single coverage did

0:41:50.800 --> 0:41:54.759
<v Speaker 1>not allow one touchdown. And how do you not want

0:41:54.760 --> 0:41:59.160
<v Speaker 1>to pick him? I mean, obviously it gets tougher at

0:41:59.200 --> 0:42:02.799
<v Speaker 1>the next level, but to me, I think what he

0:42:03.120 --> 0:42:06.080
<v Speaker 1>is right now is he's more of a sure thing.

0:42:06.880 --> 0:42:12.520
<v Speaker 1>And somebody described to me over the weekend. Uh, somebody

0:42:12.840 --> 0:42:19.480
<v Speaker 1>described Stingley is Durrell Reeves. And and I think the

0:42:19.600 --> 0:42:24.680
<v Speaker 1>one thing about Stingley that people say is that he

0:42:25.120 --> 0:42:30.560
<v Speaker 1>is a very confident player, and that confidence is justified

0:42:30.920 --> 0:42:33.680
<v Speaker 1>by how he plays. And one other thing. Did he

0:42:33.880 --> 0:42:40.080
<v Speaker 1>practiced probably seventy five to one hundred times day to

0:42:40.239 --> 0:42:46.120
<v Speaker 1>day covering Jamar Chase in twenty nineteen, and you know,

0:42:46.239 --> 0:42:50.239
<v Speaker 1>like that's as tough as it gets. And so I

0:42:50.600 --> 0:42:54.920
<v Speaker 1>think he's trained well. He had a foot injury obviously

0:42:55.040 --> 0:42:58.759
<v Speaker 1>last year, and that's better. I think. I think. I

0:42:58.800 --> 0:43:00.640
<v Speaker 1>think Stingley is going to be a real good pro.

0:43:01.120 --> 0:43:04.080
<v Speaker 1>We're talking to Peter King football morning in America. I

0:43:04.160 --> 0:43:07.480
<v Speaker 1>know you're joining us from Berkeley, California. How big of

0:43:07.520 --> 0:43:12.120
<v Speaker 1>his story is, Deebo Samuel. I mean, it's a huge story,

0:43:12.280 --> 0:43:15.960
<v Speaker 1>especially if he sticks to his guns and he says

0:43:15.960 --> 0:43:17.960
<v Speaker 1>he wants out and he's not going to back down.

0:43:18.080 --> 0:43:21.759
<v Speaker 1>As you know, Dan, about twenty five percent if that

0:43:22.080 --> 0:43:25.960
<v Speaker 1>of guys who ever say I want out, I'm not

0:43:26.040 --> 0:43:31.080
<v Speaker 1>playing here ever again, blah blah blah. I mean guys

0:43:31.120 --> 0:43:34.959
<v Speaker 1>say that all the time and then five months later,

0:43:35.560 --> 0:43:38.080
<v Speaker 1>they're back in camp, or they're back playing for the

0:43:38.120 --> 0:43:42.000
<v Speaker 1>team they said they never play with again. So I

0:43:42.120 --> 0:43:45.759
<v Speaker 1>don't I don't mean that I think Deebo Samuel is

0:43:45.880 --> 0:43:49.800
<v Speaker 1>lying or anything like that. I just think that opinions change,

0:43:49.880 --> 0:43:55.720
<v Speaker 1>opinions become less hardened over time. And whether the forty

0:43:55.760 --> 0:43:57.600
<v Speaker 1>nine ers are going to do something, I'd be really

0:43:57.640 --> 0:44:00.719
<v Speaker 1>surprised if they did something by the draft this week.

0:44:01.600 --> 0:44:07.120
<v Speaker 1>But we'll see. Why does he want out? I don't

0:44:07.120 --> 0:44:11.000
<v Speaker 1>know the answer to that, And I think that people,

0:44:12.400 --> 0:44:17.400
<v Speaker 1>excuse me, people who know him say that he's a

0:44:17.400 --> 0:44:22.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit more of a homebody and that this very

0:44:22.040 --> 0:44:25.600
<v Speaker 1>well could be about the fact that he just wants

0:44:25.640 --> 0:44:28.799
<v Speaker 1>to be closer to South Carolina, you know where he's

0:44:29.080 --> 0:44:33.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Carolinas whereezed from. But I don't. I

0:44:33.960 --> 0:44:37.640
<v Speaker 1>don't know how hardened he is in his position, And

0:44:37.719 --> 0:44:40.880
<v Speaker 1>it just it seems a little odd too, because a

0:44:40.960 --> 0:44:45.399
<v Speaker 1>year ago, you know, Mike MCDANIELI then the offensive coordinator,

0:44:45.520 --> 0:44:47.920
<v Speaker 1>said if you do everything I tell you, you're going

0:44:48.000 --> 0:44:51.200
<v Speaker 1>to be first team All Pro. And he did everything

0:44:51.239 --> 0:44:55.560
<v Speaker 1>that McDaniel told him to do, and he was first

0:44:55.600 --> 0:45:01.480
<v Speaker 1>team All Pro. And I personally wonder about the absence

0:45:01.800 --> 0:45:04.960
<v Speaker 1>of the guy who even he said Deebo said is

0:45:05.000 --> 0:45:07.960
<v Speaker 1>his favorite coach that he's ever had. So, you know,

0:45:08.000 --> 0:45:11.440
<v Speaker 1>we'll see if that plays into it. Baker Mayfield more

0:45:11.480 --> 0:45:15.040
<v Speaker 1>likely to get traded during the draft or after the draft.

0:45:15.520 --> 0:45:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it wouldn't make any sense to me. First

0:45:20.600 --> 0:45:23.520
<v Speaker 1>of all, I don't know what you really get for

0:45:23.680 --> 0:45:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield. I keep wondering could this be a brock

0:45:27.040 --> 0:45:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Osweiler kind of trade. It's a weird it's a weird

0:45:31.360 --> 0:45:34.080
<v Speaker 1>situation that they're in. Everybody knows that he can't go

0:45:34.160 --> 0:45:37.000
<v Speaker 1>back there, but you don't want to make him just

0:45:37.120 --> 0:45:40.480
<v Speaker 1>a free agent. As Jeff Darlington said last week, Mike

0:45:40.520 --> 0:45:43.759
<v Speaker 1>Florio has been talking about it for weeks that the

0:45:43.800 --> 0:45:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh Steelers would just go ahead and sign him. How

0:45:46.640 --> 0:45:51.760
<v Speaker 1>weird would it be if the Steelers take Picketer Willis

0:45:51.880 --> 0:45:55.440
<v Speaker 1>at number twenty and they've got Mitchell Turbiski on their

0:45:55.440 --> 0:45:59.440
<v Speaker 1>team and two weeks later signed Baker Mayfield with the

0:45:59.520 --> 0:46:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland Browns paying their paying his salary. That's why I

0:46:03.520 --> 0:46:06.920
<v Speaker 1>don't think the Browns are going to release him, because

0:46:07.040 --> 0:46:10.799
<v Speaker 1>they want to have some control over where he goes. Yeah,

0:46:10.880 --> 0:46:13.640
<v Speaker 1>I wonder what he's worth, and then is Cleveland gonna

0:46:13.640 --> 0:46:16.440
<v Speaker 1>have to pick up the tab with his salary? Do

0:46:16.480 --> 0:46:19.120
<v Speaker 1>you think they're gonna have to pick up most if

0:46:19.160 --> 0:46:22.319
<v Speaker 1>not all? Because they're the ones that said we're going

0:46:22.400 --> 0:46:24.520
<v Speaker 1>to pick up the option. There's not a lot of

0:46:24.560 --> 0:46:27.160
<v Speaker 1>teams that have the cap space to do it now anyway.

0:46:27.680 --> 0:46:32.879
<v Speaker 1>I just don't see any way right now that that

0:46:33.000 --> 0:46:37.919
<v Speaker 1>they can get away with making a deal for him

0:46:38.560 --> 0:46:43.200
<v Speaker 1>without picking up most of the salary. How difficult is

0:46:43.239 --> 0:46:45.840
<v Speaker 1>it to try to do a mock draft and factor

0:46:45.920 --> 0:46:50.000
<v Speaker 1>in the draft history of certain teams. Certain teams are

0:46:50.040 --> 0:46:53.880
<v Speaker 1>really good at drafting, and certain teams are not. Here's

0:46:53.920 --> 0:46:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the thing, Dan, the thing I thought was hardest about

0:46:56.960 --> 0:46:59.040
<v Speaker 1>this year. I wish I had written about it because

0:46:59.440 --> 0:47:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I thought about it a few times. Look at all

0:47:03.160 --> 0:47:08.399
<v Speaker 1>of the people near the top of the draft who

0:47:08.440 --> 0:47:13.880
<v Speaker 1>have no draft history, are very little. You know, Trent

0:47:14.000 --> 0:47:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Bulky has some, which is helpful. Brad Holmes in Detroit

0:47:19.560 --> 0:47:24.000
<v Speaker 1>at number two. Dan Campbell, they have virtually no draft history.

0:47:25.200 --> 0:47:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Nick Cassario, he's got three and thirteen, virtually no draft history.

0:47:30.960 --> 0:47:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Joe Douglas at four and ten, a little draft history.

0:47:34.239 --> 0:47:39.479
<v Speaker 1>Joe Shane five and seven, no draft history whatsoever. I mean,

0:47:39.600 --> 0:47:43.120
<v Speaker 1>so that's one of the things you can't say, well,

0:47:43.560 --> 0:47:46.640
<v Speaker 1>you know three years ago, this GM did this and this.

0:47:47.080 --> 0:47:51.000
<v Speaker 1>There are so many new and neophyte general managers who

0:47:51.000 --> 0:47:53.640
<v Speaker 1>were in control of this draft. That's one of the

0:47:53.680 --> 0:47:57.000
<v Speaker 1>reasons why it's so hard to figure it out. Pete,

0:47:57.000 --> 0:47:59.200
<v Speaker 1>always great to talk to you. Thanks for joining us

0:47:59.200 --> 0:48:02.960
<v Speaker 1>and save travels. Hey appreciate it. Dan, thank you. That's

0:48:02.960 --> 0:48:06.319
<v Speaker 1>Peter King Football Morning in America and you can get

0:48:06.320 --> 0:48:11.360
<v Speaker 1>it every Monday morning NBC Sports dot Com. Yeah. I

0:48:11.400 --> 0:48:13.760
<v Speaker 1>would think Deebo Samuel, if he's going to be traded,

0:48:13.760 --> 0:48:16.400
<v Speaker 1>he'd be traded prior to the draft. And you know,

0:48:16.600 --> 0:48:19.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe after Day two of the draft, some team goes, hey,

0:48:20.440 --> 0:48:26.120
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna give fourth round pick Baker Mayfield. I don't know.

0:48:27.760 --> 0:48:30.759
<v Speaker 1>It feels like there's gonna be a curveball somewhere. There

0:48:30.800 --> 0:48:32.640
<v Speaker 1>always is. There's always a team where you go, what

0:48:32.680 --> 0:48:37.440
<v Speaker 1>are they thinking, and it's somebody going up, somebody reaches

0:48:37.480 --> 0:48:39.640
<v Speaker 1>for somebody. There's always going to be that team that

0:48:39.680 --> 0:48:41.839
<v Speaker 1>takes a player. Because if you go back and look

0:48:41.840 --> 0:48:44.319
<v Speaker 1>at these drafts, whenever you see a mock draft, you go, oh,

0:48:44.320 --> 0:48:48.880
<v Speaker 1>that makes sense. They don't always make sense, but in

0:48:49.160 --> 0:48:51.399
<v Speaker 1>the in the moment, you go, okay, I can all right,

0:48:51.480 --> 0:48:55.400
<v Speaker 1>I can see that you get talked into it, and

0:48:55.920 --> 0:49:00.080
<v Speaker 1>it's just that's not reality. If you get seven and

0:49:01.280 --> 0:49:04.120
<v Speaker 1>correct in the first round, you're probably doing pretty well

0:49:05.080 --> 0:49:07.560
<v Speaker 1>because all it takes is one team does something that

0:49:07.760 --> 0:49:10.160
<v Speaker 1>changes everything when you're trying to do a mock draft.

0:49:10.360 --> 0:49:13.359
<v Speaker 1>So I don't look at mock drafts other than let

0:49:13.400 --> 0:49:17.800
<v Speaker 1>me see who's held in high regard and also introduced

0:49:17.880 --> 0:49:20.080
<v Speaker 1>me to some of these players that maybe I didn't

0:49:20.120 --> 0:49:22.200
<v Speaker 1>follow that much in college. That's what I look at

0:49:22.239 --> 0:49:24.320
<v Speaker 1>with the mock drafts. I don't go, boy, this is

0:49:24.360 --> 0:49:26.520
<v Speaker 1>what they're going to do. Way you guys miss that

0:49:26.640 --> 0:49:30.080
<v Speaker 1>you're wrong. It's really difficult to handicap this because these

0:49:30.080 --> 0:49:32.719
<v Speaker 1>teams don't tell you the truth. Now you're going to

0:49:32.800 --> 0:49:39.000
<v Speaker 1>rely on sources close to sources. Somebody's saying I'm thinking, yeah, pauling,

0:49:39.160 --> 0:49:40.840
<v Speaker 1>And if you go back out, here's one that was

0:49:40.880 --> 0:49:43.480
<v Speaker 1>a curveball. The twenty nineteen draft, I think the New

0:49:43.520 --> 0:49:46.719
<v Speaker 1>York Giants had a sixth pick and they had oh man,

0:49:46.760 --> 0:49:49.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe like the twentieth pick, and everyone thought with the

0:49:49.440 --> 0:49:51.560
<v Speaker 1>twentieth pick, maybe they'll take Daniel Jones out of Duke.

0:49:51.600 --> 0:49:53.480
<v Speaker 1>They liked them, they liked them, and all the mock

0:49:53.560 --> 0:49:55.520
<v Speaker 1>drafts I'm looking at right up to the drafts had

0:49:55.680 --> 0:49:58.279
<v Speaker 1>had maybe Daniel Jones going later in the first round

0:49:58.280 --> 0:50:00.320
<v Speaker 1>to the Giants or another team, and then with a

0:50:00.320 --> 0:50:03.640
<v Speaker 1>sixth pick they take him way earlier they weren't expected,

0:50:03.680 --> 0:50:06.920
<v Speaker 1>which throw off the whole draft. After that, well, it was,

0:50:07.280 --> 0:50:10.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Bears trading up to get Mitchell Trubisky

0:50:12.120 --> 0:50:14.759
<v Speaker 1>because you're going, wait a minute, what is going on here,

0:50:15.440 --> 0:50:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Mitchell l You're trading to get up to get him.

0:50:18.520 --> 0:50:21.399
<v Speaker 1>You don't you don't have to trade up to get him.

0:50:21.520 --> 0:50:24.759
<v Speaker 1>You could have had him. That That was the one

0:50:24.800 --> 0:50:27.560
<v Speaker 1>where I went, oh my god, I should have watched

0:50:27.560 --> 0:50:32.000
<v Speaker 1>more ACC football. And then Daniel Jones and I'm like, man,

0:50:32.080 --> 0:50:36.480
<v Speaker 1>i gotta start watching ACC football. So I watched Sam

0:50:36.640 --> 0:50:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Howell this year. I'm ready ACC football. And I still

0:50:42.600 --> 0:50:45.160
<v Speaker 1>think the value that you could get with Matt Carroll

0:50:45.280 --> 0:50:47.040
<v Speaker 1>or Sam Howe is going to be the same as

0:50:47.080 --> 0:50:50.680
<v Speaker 1>you could get for Kenny Pickett. I really feel then,

0:50:51.160 --> 0:50:54.600
<v Speaker 1>But all it takes is one person. It's all you

0:50:54.600 --> 0:50:57.600
<v Speaker 1>gotta do. Just go wait, what do you what are

0:50:57.600 --> 0:51:01.560
<v Speaker 1>you guys doing? Barry and Nafa Hi Berry, thanks for

0:51:01.600 --> 0:51:06.320
<v Speaker 1>holding best and worst. Good morning fellas, and good morning

0:51:06.400 --> 0:51:11.960
<v Speaker 1>chat Row. Best of the weekend, My New York Mets

0:51:12.600 --> 0:51:16.800
<v Speaker 1>winning five consecutive series. The pitching is awesome. We're getting

0:51:16.800 --> 0:51:22.280
<v Speaker 1>two out RBIs all of this without Jacob deGrom Worst

0:51:22.400 --> 0:51:26.640
<v Speaker 1>of the weekend if I hear twenty seven rings one

0:51:26.680 --> 0:51:32.040
<v Speaker 1>more time from those dopey Yankee fans, classless louts who

0:51:32.080 --> 0:51:37.719
<v Speaker 1>have disgraced the great name of New York City. Enough

0:51:37.760 --> 0:51:43.040
<v Speaker 1>of them. Thank you Berry, Thank you Jack in Dallas, Ni, Jack,

0:51:43.120 --> 0:51:46.600
<v Speaker 1>what's on your mind today? First time a long time?

0:51:47.000 --> 0:51:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Five nine. I want to get your take on if

0:51:54.040 --> 0:51:56.360
<v Speaker 1>you believe that Steve Nass is on the hot seat

0:51:57.520 --> 0:51:59.959
<v Speaker 1>potentially next year if they don't get past the first round.

0:52:00.800 --> 0:52:02.520
<v Speaker 1>And I want to I want to see if I

0:52:02.560 --> 0:52:05.879
<v Speaker 1>can make a guess about golf for you're at okay, okay, yeah,

0:52:07.400 --> 0:52:15.439
<v Speaker 1>the Vintage Club. No, no, it's the Madison Club. It's

0:52:15.480 --> 0:52:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the name of the place. It's right across the street

0:52:17.760 --> 0:52:22.399
<v Speaker 1>from Coachella, so you could play eighteen and then walk

0:52:22.440 --> 0:52:27.560
<v Speaker 1>over and see Harry Styles with Lizzo. I you know

0:52:27.600 --> 0:52:29.359
<v Speaker 1>my wife and I went. We drove by and it's

0:52:29.400 --> 0:52:33.600
<v Speaker 1>like a two hour queue to get in, and I

0:52:34.000 --> 0:52:36.040
<v Speaker 1>just I don't I wouldn't have the energy to do it.

0:52:36.080 --> 0:52:37.719
<v Speaker 1>As much as I'd love to go see some of

0:52:37.719 --> 0:52:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the bands, I just don't have the energy to get

0:52:40.080 --> 0:52:44.160
<v Speaker 1>in to see the band. Yeah. More festivals sound terrible,

0:52:44.440 --> 0:52:46.560
<v Speaker 1>by the way, like just being outside and then you're

0:52:46.600 --> 0:52:49.840
<v Speaker 1>just waiting and it's hot, and oh, when's Lizzo gonna

0:52:49.840 --> 0:52:55.560
<v Speaker 1>come out? But my daughter said that Coachella is so stressful,

0:52:55.600 --> 0:52:58.760
<v Speaker 1>and I said why she goes all the outfit changes

0:52:58.800 --> 0:53:04.360
<v Speaker 1>that I had, and I go, what what the outfit changes?

0:53:06.800 --> 0:53:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Can I wear this crown of daisies with this outfit?

0:53:09.440 --> 0:53:11.920
<v Speaker 1>I just don't know. It's hard, Okay,