WEBVTT - Bloomberg Tech Live in San Francisco

0:00:01.520 --> 0:00:02.240
<v Speaker 1>From our heart.

0:00:02.360 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 2>We're Innovation, Money and Power Collie in Silicon Valley, NBN.

0:00:07.120 --> 0:00:11.640
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 3>Live from sunny San Francisco and Caroline Hyde.

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 4>And our Ed Ludlow.

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:34.519
<v Speaker 5>This is a special edition of Bloomberg Technology. Coming up

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 5>will bring you live coverage from our technology event as

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 5>we speak with the CEOs and visionaries that are driving

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 5>change in Silicon Valley and beyond.

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:46.599
<v Speaker 3>Now at this hour, we're speaking with the CEOs of Arm,

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:50.240
<v Speaker 3>of Hugging, Face, of Writer, AI and more as part

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 3>of our live special.

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:52.880
<v Speaker 4>And a lot more to come.

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 5>We'll push your head to our keynote speakers later today.

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 5>That includes Adam Newman, Whitney Wolf Heard, Evan Spiegel and more.

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 4>And while it.

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 5>May not be a surprise to anyone too, did it's

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:05.840
<v Speaker 5>certainly not a surprised to us. Artificial intelligence is probably

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 5>the overriding theme of the event. It's AI everything, even

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 5>in some cases if you're not an AI company.

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:14.119
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean I think it has to be. Even

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 3>if you're not the AI company at heart, you're thinking

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 3>about how you adapt to it, push it forward and

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 3>bring out the productivity. But Ultimately, how do we live

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 3>up to the hype? The valuations are so extraordinary in

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 3>the private markets, they've been pretty heavy in the public

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 3>markets as well. Are we really seeing the level of

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 3>producted divity and growth and real use cases?

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 5>Do mindication that these events are always very interesting, very engaging.

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:35.960
<v Speaker 5>Everyone's very positive, But I would say in the background,

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 5>there's a talent war, frankly, and people are running out

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:40.480
<v Speaker 5>of cash.

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 4>So we've got to ask those difficult questions too.

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:45.839
<v Speaker 3>And geopolitics, how are you navigating the issue of China

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 3>as well? So so much to talk about in here

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 3>and the now. We're talking about one key infrastructure playing

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 3>When it comes to artificial intelligence, we're of course going

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 3>to be talking about the chip design firm ARM, which

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 3>has really bounced offlows in terms of its share price

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 3>throughout the trading of today. We're currently over the last

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 3>two days down by one point few percent. Coming out

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 3>after the bell with its earnings, tapid forecast head was

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 3>what the market seemed to be focusing in on, even

0:02:11.320 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 3>though they absolutely smashed it in terms of their fiscal

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 3>fourth quarter numbers and their fourth first quarter. To look ahead,

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 3>let's stick in to some of that caution with Renee

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 3>has is the arm CEO. Renee wonderful to have time

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 3>with you. And look, there does seem to be a

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 3>worry about your full year forecasts? Are you being cautious?

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, thanks both for having me Ed and Caroline. We

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 2>just came off a record year in terms of revenue.

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 2>We were up twenty percent a little bit over twenty

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 2>percent our fiscal twenty three from twenty twenty two, and

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 2>we're actually forecasting even higher growth this year, north of

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:49.919
<v Speaker 2>twenty percent. And we also signaled to the markets yesterday

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:53.799
<v Speaker 2>that in twenty five, twenty six, twenty seven, we see

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 2>that growth continuing. So we have incredible visibility to our

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 2>business and we're very, very confident of growth rate going forward.

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 5>We're just seeing your shares actually ticking to positive territory

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:11.240
<v Speaker 5>rene up now six tenths of one percent. The underlying

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 5>story is the build out in AI infrastructure. Right, we're

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 5>talking about data center powered GP by GPUs. Your numbers

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 5>were good. Tell me about the underlying demand then about

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:26.920
<v Speaker 5>the long term and the addressable market you think is

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 5>either intact or is not.

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 3>Well.

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 2>I think this AI buildout, as you describe, or maybe

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 2>said another way, just expanding capacity to run these foundation models,

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 2>to do more and more training, to do more and

0:03:39.920 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 2>more inference.

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 3>We really are only.

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 2>At the very beginning because when you start to think

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 2>about the capabilities that this could unleash, whether it's around healthcare,

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 2>farmer research, productivity, gains, call centers, we're still in the

0:03:55.000 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 2>very very early days. That all starts with having to

0:03:58.120 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 2>do this level of training and inprints in the cloud,

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 2>but it ultimately will find itself in every single edge device,

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 2>whether that's a PC, your smartphone, your car, and whether

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 2>it's all those devices I've mentioned from the data center

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 2>to the edge devices. They all run on ARM. So

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 2>we have incredible visibility to where this is all going,

0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 2>which is why we're very confident in the growth rates.

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 2>They're also one of the big problems you've got with

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 2>all of these AI data centers is around energy and power.

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 2>So power efficiency being so key, it's what ARM is

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:32.600
<v Speaker 2>really good at. Increasingly we're seeing the most complex applications

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 2>moving to ARM and most sophisticated training ship on the

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:39.719
<v Speaker 2>planet that was just announced Grace Blackwell, Well that's based

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:44.160
<v Speaker 2>on ARM.

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so you're managing to really think that you're going

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 3>to be the server play as well as the PC play,

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 3>the cell phone play, and I want to focus in

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 3>on the cell phone play, Renee, because that's been where

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:56.480
<v Speaker 3>your bread and butter has been in history. How are

0:04:56.480 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 3>we looking from a smartphone perspective? Is the market looking

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 3>strong to you? We've had many a mixed message coming

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 3>from China to MOD for example.

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Overall, what we've seen the smartphone market briftly for ARM

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 2>has been quite a good growth rate in terms of royalties.

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 2>Our version nine which is now being used in many

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:17.599
<v Speaker 2>of the premium mobile phones, that drives a higher royalty

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:21.039
<v Speaker 2>rate for ARM. There's also more complex CPUs that go

0:05:21.120 --> 0:05:24.839
<v Speaker 2>into that that's also better for ARM and going forward carrolling.

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 2>One of the things that we're seeing, and it's not

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 2>just in smartphones, is that as these AI models are

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:34.600
<v Speaker 2>moving so fast, the hardware can't keep up with the software.

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:38.919
<v Speaker 2>The software innovation is happening so quickly that by the

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 2>time the hardware is ready to run those models, everyone

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 2>wishes they had more performance, they had more efficiency.

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:46.280
<v Speaker 4>So what does that mean for ARM?

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:50.239
<v Speaker 2>It's driving growth in our licensing activity. People are looking

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 2>to do more and more design ships faster and faster,

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:56.160
<v Speaker 2>and that's all good for us going forward. So I

0:05:56.200 --> 0:05:58.040
<v Speaker 2>think going forward you're going to see more and more

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 2>innovation happening, not only in the smartphones, across all these

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 2>edge devices.

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 3>What's interesting in AY is it's hard to keep up

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 3>with the pace of geopolitical change as well. The latest

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:13.479
<v Speaker 3>news coming that Huawei, of course is not going to

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 3>have access to poll Kong to Intel chips. You were,

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 3>of course a UK based company, but are affected by

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:23.720
<v Speaker 3>US policies. Has this impacted your business? The limitations of

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 3>Huawei's access to chip designed to chip technology to licenses.

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:32.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So that issue they referred to specifically was when

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 2>Huawei was placed on the entity list I think twenty nineteen,

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:39.839
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty, companies had to apply for a license to

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 2>exempt them to ship to Huawei. So a number of

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:47.120
<v Speaker 2>companies asked for those licenses, they got those licenses. Now

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:49.919
<v Speaker 2>those licenses are being revoked. We don't follow in that

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:52.599
<v Speaker 2>category in any way, shape or form. We didn't apply

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 2>for any licenses at the time to share. We complied

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 2>with the export controls as they were laid out. So

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 2>there's really a non event for us in terms of

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:02.719
<v Speaker 2>what you're seeing with Qualcoman or Intel.

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:09.119
<v Speaker 5>We are speaking live to the ARMS CEO, Renee has

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 5>We're on the ground here at Bloomberg Tech in San Francisco.

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 5>Last week, Renee Christiano mom was on the show telling

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 5>Caroline and I, this is the year of the AIPC.

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 5>You were asked about that on your earning school last

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 5>night and you gave a slightly different answer. And maybe

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 5>it's not the year of the AIPC more the twelve

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 5>to thirty six month window. And you don't want to

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 5>see just one PC supplier, you said you'd like to

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 5>see two or three. What's your beef with Qualcom?

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Now?

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 2>When I look at the PC ecosystem, one large ecosystem

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 2>has already moved to ARM in a very big way.

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 2>Apple is now one based on ARM. All the Apple

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 2>silicon is based on ARM. And you see amazingly good

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 2>products relative to what they've delivered, fantastic battery life, performance,

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:00.720
<v Speaker 2>thin and light, no fans. When you think about the

0:08:00.760 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 2>Windows market, it's a very different market. It's highly fragmented.

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 2>You have lots of different players. The ecosystem matters, the

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 2>channel matters, price points matter, high end gaming machines versus

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 2>low end devices that are like cloud enabled. So what

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 2>does all that mean. It generally has meant that breath

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 2>vendor choice, multiple options to provide a full scope is

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:28.000
<v Speaker 2>what matters. And what I'm hearing is over the next

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 2>couple of years, the Windows ecosystem is going to be

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 2>able to afford that. And I think over the next

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 2>two three years, I do believe Windows Unarmed will be real.

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 2>I think you'll see multiple players, multiple price points, multiple units,

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 2>and I think you'll see meaningful market share that we

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 2>start to gain the kind of performance you see in

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:48.080
<v Speaker 2>the other ecosystem. I think we'll find its way into

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:52.640
<v Speaker 2>the Windows ecosystem.

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 4>Rennie, I wanted to talk about geography really quick.

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 5>We're here in San Francisco, right there's a lot about

0:08:57.679 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 5>Americas are in d focus on AI related chips.

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:05.240
<v Speaker 4>Are you seeing this sort of equivalent activity in.

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 5>Europe, for example, any of your customers outside of those markets.

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well I'm in San Francisco today too, so I

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 2>will see you a little bit later. But in general,

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 2>I think the geopolitics are something that all tech CEOs

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 2>are now having to figure out and work with AI models,

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:28.200
<v Speaker 2>foundation models, sovereign clouds, thinking about what level of training

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 2>takes place in a country, versus outside the country where

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:34.679
<v Speaker 2>the weights sit, et cetera. That these are all the

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:37.720
<v Speaker 2>kind of things that politicians have never really had to

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 2>think about in the past. So we're involved in a

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 2>lot of those conversations, whether that's in the United States,

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 2>whether that's in Europe, and really just trying to understand

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:49.960
<v Speaker 2>it because any lawmakers in all these jurisdictions are just

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:52.440
<v Speaker 2>trying to figure it all out. And as I mentioned before,

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 2>as the software and models are moving so fast, it's

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:58.720
<v Speaker 2>difficult for everyone to keep up. But we are central

0:09:58.760 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 2>to all those discussions.

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 3>Renee, what's been keeping up is your valuation?

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:06.959
<v Speaker 4>Boy?

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:10.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean, do you think there's too much exuberance around

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 3>AI valuations out there? Are you going to make the

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 3>most of it? By well, we talked to one point

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:17.080
<v Speaker 3>of listing in the UK too.

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:21.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, I don't think about the valuations as

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:23.839
<v Speaker 2>much as I just think about the AI opportunity, which

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 2>I frankly believe is undercalled in terms of just what

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:31.199
<v Speaker 2>it's going to mean relative to society and what it

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 2>can do for our planet. I think again we are

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:37.679
<v Speaker 2>in very very early days in terms of the capabilities

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 2>of what this can unleash for our society incredibly excited

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 2>to be part of it. But I don't think we're

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:45.680
<v Speaker 2>part of a hype cycle at all. I think there's

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:48.679
<v Speaker 2>a lot of innovation taking place, and you know, frankly,

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 2>the innovation that's taking place, any inventions that we're seeing,

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 2>it's just breathtaking. So no, I don't personally view it

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:56.439
<v Speaker 2>as a hype cycle at all.

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 5>They has I'm CEO really grateful you actually be here

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:06.080
<v Speaker 5>with us later today on site at Bloomberg Tech. Your

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:08.959
<v Speaker 5>stock open pretty low, and I think it's just a

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 5>little bit higher now during the conversation we've had.

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 4>Thank you so much.

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:13.719
<v Speaker 5>All Right, coming up on the program, we're going to

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 5>be joined by Clem DeLong, CEO of Hugging Face. That's

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:19.520
<v Speaker 5>coming up next. Stay tuned, we'll be right back. Is

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg Technology. Welcome back to this special edition of Bloomberg

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:38.559
<v Speaker 5>Technology live in San Francisco at the Bloomberg Tech event

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:40.840
<v Speaker 5>and artificial intelligence Surprise.

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:43.080
<v Speaker 4>Surprise is sort of the overarching theme.

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:45.319
<v Speaker 5>We've got a pretty good guest to talk about that

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 5>with and discuss all things large language model with Clemed Along,

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:52.679
<v Speaker 5>CEO of Hugging Face. You made this prediction which we're

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 5>going to hold you to account on that by the

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 5>end of this calendar year, and I appreciate we're not

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 5>even halfway. Source models would be equivalent to the best

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:07.560
<v Speaker 5>closed source models. Give us a status check of that

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 5>prediction place.

0:12:08.880 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 4>I think it's already happened.

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:13.560
<v Speaker 6>Open source now is better than closed source for most

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:19.960
<v Speaker 6>use cases. We've specialized customized models on the companies like

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 6>data sets. I have my meta reband glasses here that

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 6>are powered by Lammatri.

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 6>We've seen so many now use cases being powered by

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:34.079
<v Speaker 6>open source models, and most of the big tech companies

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:37.439
<v Speaker 6>are now publishing open models. Just last month, we've seen

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 6>Apple releasing open models on hogging Face. We've seen Nvidia,

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 6>we've seen Snowflakes, We've seen Data Bricks, we've seen Microsoft.

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 6>All of them now are publishing open models.

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 5>There maybe some people in attendance who don't agree with him,

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 5>which is why I asked the question.

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:55.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, also Microsoft published one and then quickly with DURI

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:58.719
<v Speaker 3>some of the reporting because they hadn't stress tested the

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 3>large language model enough. I hadn't whittled out some of

0:13:01.880 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 3>the toxicity checks. In particular, how are you feeling about

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 3>the way in which large language models are growing and

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:11.719
<v Speaker 3>the way in which governance is developing around it.

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 6>Well, we're starting to see that the most important question

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 6>is concentration of power. Right for such an important technology,

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 6>you don't want a world where just a few companies

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:22.480
<v Speaker 6>are controlling.

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 3>It, but that is the world we live in.

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 4>I don't think so, I think more and more.

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 6>What we're seeing is that with open source you can

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 6>actually distribute power more and you want to reduce the

0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:35.719
<v Speaker 6>gap between the most powerful companies and the rest of

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:40.719
<v Speaker 6>the world, not only other companies but policy makers, non profits,

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:42.439
<v Speaker 6>academia and all of that.

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:44.080
<v Speaker 4>And that's the purpose of open source.

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:47.680
<v Speaker 6>It reduces the gap between the most powerful companies and

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 6>the rest of the world, and that's what creates kind

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 6>of like a sustainable, balanced future for AI and technology.

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 5>It's a conversation where you're going to have all day

0:13:57.040 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 5>long and you point out that basically open source allows

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:02.960
<v Speaker 5>more groups to go.

0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:03.600
<v Speaker 4>To work on it.

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 5>The problem is, as we're learning the tens of billions

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 5>of dollars it takes to train models with yes, tens

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:15.440
<v Speaker 5>or hundreds of billions of parameters, and then you go

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:18.680
<v Speaker 5>lower down and now what we're hearing is that actually

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 5>there are the folks doing this running out of cash?

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 5>Are you seeing that as well?

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 6>So it's more less true because for example, now you

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 6>can use Lamastri that really has been closely but that

0:14:30.880 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 6>meta has released and finds units for a very small

0:14:35.040 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 6>amount of money. That's why I'm hugging face. There's over

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 6>one million models that have been trained by companies, and

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 6>a lot of these companies are very small and don't

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 6>have like really really big big budget. I feel like

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 6>today every single company has to build their own AI

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 6>otherwise they run the risk of being left behind. And

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 6>that's what we're seeing, and it doesn't require any more

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 6>really really big budget. An interesting point though, that we're

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 6>going to see this year though, is that we'll need

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 6>to find for AI companies better business models. That's what

0:15:11.120 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 6>kind of like you hinted at, something we really focused

0:15:14.280 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 6>on at Talking Face. We are looking grateful to be

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 6>close to profitable, which is very unusual for AI companies.

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 6>But we're starting to see that there are some ways

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 6>to generate revenue and not burn insane amounts of compute

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:34.720
<v Speaker 6>for AI startups today.

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 3>I mean, how on that profitability perspective of yours, how

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 3>many paying customers do you now have Can you give

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 3>us an update. You've got a million models. What about

0:15:42.320 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 3>paying customers?

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 6>We have more than ten thousand paying customers out of

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 6>the over one hundred thousand organizations, more than four million

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:54.480
<v Speaker 6>AI builders that are using our platform, and I think

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 6>we found the right balance between monetizing, especially with like

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:03.240
<v Speaker 6>big companies that are using the platform in.

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 4>Private enterprise companies exactly in.

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 6>Order to fund all the free community, open source work

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 6>that we're doing, and that is always going to stay

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 6>open source and free.

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 3>Of course, I want to go back to what I

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 3>was saying though about people running out of cash. You

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 3>actually put out a really interesting call on x basically saying, look,

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm here if you need me. Hugging face is here.

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 3>If there are good people out there building interesting businesses

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:28.080
<v Speaker 3>but you're running out of money, we could be a

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 3>home for you. Are you making acquisitions? Is it acquihiring

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 3>that goes on them?

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:36.239
<v Speaker 6>We make some acquisitions. We're going to have interesting announcements

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 6>in the next few weeks.

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 3>I oh, don't taaser, but that's interesting.

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:41.920
<v Speaker 6>But I think in geneoin AI you're going to see

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 6>more and more MNA because, as you said, I think

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 6>a lot of companies took very risky bets. A lot

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 6>of them are running out of money. And at the

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 6>same time you have other companies like Hugging Face and

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 6>others that are successful enough to be homes. Some of

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 6>these M and A is going to weird, right, We've

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:04.879
<v Speaker 6>seen that happening in Lidit with Deck with some.

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:09.879
<v Speaker 5>Usual marriage with necessity rather than choice.

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:10.480
<v Speaker 4>May's.

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:10.920
<v Speaker 6>Yes.

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:14.440
<v Speaker 5>One thing that's good about summits like these Bloomberg Tech

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 5>by the way, we can go around the room and

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 5>ask who you're going to be shopping for. That's going

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:20.359
<v Speaker 5>to be interesting. But you get all these people in

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:24.680
<v Speaker 5>one place. You've also used the time that you've been

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 5>in San Francisco because you're up in Seattle, right, Miami

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:32.639
<v Speaker 5>or Miami Apologies, you've been hiring, you've been interviewing candidates.

0:17:33.440 --> 0:17:35.680
<v Speaker 5>Is that just a function of the best candidates being

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 5>here in this city? How wide are you casting your net?

0:17:39.880 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:42.119
<v Speaker 6>I think I think San Francisco is still the heart

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 6>of technology and the I right, there's so much talent,

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 6>so much so many interesting companies, so many interesting big

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:53.119
<v Speaker 6>technology companies being here that it's important for us to

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:56.160
<v Speaker 6>kind of like you have a foot on the ground here.

0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:58.679
<v Speaker 6>We have a team already here, but we're also hiring

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 6>community for hugging face here.

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:03.720
<v Speaker 3>Applications being taken.

0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:09.200
<v Speaker 6>Yes, there's a really massive fight and struggle for AI

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:16.679
<v Speaker 6>talents right now with inflation of packages everywhere. But what

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 6>we're seeing is that when when you have a mission

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:23.160
<v Speaker 6>that's like interesting two candidates like we open source, then

0:18:23.200 --> 0:18:25.399
<v Speaker 6>you can attract really good talents. That's one of the

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:28.119
<v Speaker 6>reasons why. Also we're seeing big tech doing more and

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 6>more open source. Right if you look at Meta with

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 6>all the great work.

0:18:31.880 --> 0:18:34.960
<v Speaker 3>That favorites, you keep on. I mean you've only really

0:18:34.960 --> 0:18:37.680
<v Speaker 3>mentioned number three. You're trying to cajole Google into coming

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 3>even more open source.

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:42.640
<v Speaker 6>I think as long as companies contribute to the world

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:45.160
<v Speaker 6>and to the field, if we've open source, we open research,

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:48.680
<v Speaker 6>I think it benefits everyone. I think we've we've lost

0:18:48.680 --> 0:18:50.920
<v Speaker 6>a little bit this way in the US for the

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:54.200
<v Speaker 6>past few years. If you look at AI five years ago,

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 6>most of it was open source and open science. It

0:18:57.200 --> 0:18:59.360
<v Speaker 6>changed a little bit when some companies started to make

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:03.119
<v Speaker 6>money and and changing their approach to things. But I

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 6>think it would be positive for the world to get

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:08.440
<v Speaker 6>back to an AI domain that is more open, more transparent,

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 6>more inclusive.

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 5>And you asked a calendar date now, by the way,

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 5>because you told us you're going to announce.

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:16.440
<v Speaker 4>The news when you're ready four weeks. Yeah, we're holding you.

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 3>Thanks clems on, our joy to have you with us

0:19:19.800 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 3>and let you get to your breakfast where he's holding

0:19:22.320 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 3>court here seeo hugging face. What a great conversation. Welcome

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 3>back to this very special edition of Blue Meg Technology,

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:41.720
<v Speaker 3>Live in the Heart in San Francisco. All the grain

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:44.160
<v Speaker 3>and the good of industry movers shakers when it comes

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 3>to artificial intelligence, in particular the academics, but the companies

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:51.520
<v Speaker 3>behind it, the CEOs, and notably also the investors. And

0:19:51.560 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 3>this is an interesting one for the investor base. Right,

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:56.159
<v Speaker 3>we potentially have a new large language model getting at

0:19:56.160 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 3>a decent evaluation.

0:19:57.080 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:19:57.320 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 5>So, I think what we reported last night is that

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:03.639
<v Speaker 5>xa I, the AI company started by Elon Musk and

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:07.400
<v Speaker 5>which he built out pretty quickly, is closing this kind

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:12.400
<v Speaker 5>of mega funding round eighteen billion dollar valuation. The thing

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 5>is that we've learned right over the last year or

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:18.480
<v Speaker 5>more that is not actually that eyewatering. A number the

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:20.679
<v Speaker 5>numbers involved are not that iwak it wasn't he.

0:20:21.000 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 3>Actually raising an awful lot considering an eighteen billion valuation.

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:27.400
<v Speaker 5>Yes, I think we've reported sort of up to six

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:30.399
<v Speaker 5>billion dollars. The thing is that the compute costs a

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:33.399
<v Speaker 5>mega and I took a phone call this morning saying,

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 5>look past the cash and start asking whether the XAI

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 5>has got access to the GPUs. Now Elon Musk has

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:43.160
<v Speaker 5>an existing relationship with Nvidio Jensen hung in the Tesla context,

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 5>but it's a good gossip for the Bloomberg Tec event.

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:47.480
<v Speaker 4>It's a good thing to discuss well.

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:50.119
<v Speaker 3>And ultimately who are the investors? What we've seen I

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:52.160
<v Speaker 3>think really the rise in twenty twenty three and twenty

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:53.879
<v Speaker 3>twenty four, it's been corporate VC.

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 4>Yes, of course, a strategic investor.

0:20:56.720 --> 0:20:59.679
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you've got Sequoia Capitals being incredibly active, who were

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 3>going to have to co capital on a little bit later.

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:03.480
<v Speaker 3>But then more at the seed of the funding the

0:21:03.480 --> 0:21:07.000
<v Speaker 3>series A series people. Amount of money necessary for these

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:09.200
<v Speaker 3>large language les means and video has to be a

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:10.440
<v Speaker 3>player or a Google has.

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 5>And what I heard is that Jared Birchall, whose head

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:14.680
<v Speaker 5>of Musk's family office, has been in the Middle East

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 5>tolling the sovereigns a lot of that.

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:16.959
<v Speaker 4>Stuff going on.

0:21:27.400 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back to a special edition of Bloomberg Technology right

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:33.119
<v Speaker 3>here in San Francisco. An event is upon our hands

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:35.399
<v Speaker 3>that has all to do with artificial intelligence and what

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 3>to continue that conversation? Right here, right now at the

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:42.600
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Tech Summit is writer CEO Mayhabim, who joins us now,

0:21:42.640 --> 0:21:46.399
<v Speaker 3>who has been doing Janata AI for the enterprise before

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 3>everyone else got with the program. You both rate in

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty, you've got an enormous chunk of change from

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:54.679
<v Speaker 3>Iconic Capital and other key investors. And how does it

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 3>feel with everyone trying to surge in on the enterprise

0:21:57.160 --> 0:22:01.400
<v Speaker 3>opportunity here? How are you standing out? I'm making sure

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:04.199
<v Speaker 3>that you keep the keys like ubers and clients that

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:04.720
<v Speaker 3>you already have.

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, it's actually really exciting to see all of the investment.

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:10.719
<v Speaker 7>Right We've been working on this, my Covaner and I

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 7>for ten years previously in a machine translation startup, and

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:17.200
<v Speaker 7>so to see all of this attention is actually amazing.

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:19.960
<v Speaker 7>But the way we stand out, I think, is with

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 7>a really differentiated platform that helps enterprises with the last mile,

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 7>which is ninety percent of the work in AI.

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 5>May You've been on the show a number of times

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 5>over the last two years or so, and each time

0:22:32.880 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 5>I always reflect on sort of the rate of change

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:39.160
<v Speaker 5>for the industry, but also grow for your company. Clem

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:41.520
<v Speaker 5>DeLong of Hugging Face just gave us some numbers about

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:44.160
<v Speaker 5>the sort of size and scope of how they're doing

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:47.280
<v Speaker 5>if you say close to profit or near profit or

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:49.840
<v Speaker 5>something like that, but just tell us about your company

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 5>and how it's doing.

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I mean, it's been an incredible rate of change.

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:56.639
<v Speaker 7>When we started the company, we knew AI was going

0:22:56.680 --> 0:22:59.359
<v Speaker 7>to be better at people at reading and writing, and

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:02.520
<v Speaker 7>that has certainly happened. We now say, if you can

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:04.960
<v Speaker 7>write it, you can build it, because AI is not

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:08.080
<v Speaker 7>just the technology, it's the way to build new technology.

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:12.479
<v Speaker 7>But building AI apps is actually still quite difficult, and

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 7>so the rate of change of just what we've been

0:23:15.119 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 7>able to do, I mean, it's hundreds of enterprise customers,

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 7>hundreds of thousands of users, thousands of applications that are

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:26.120
<v Speaker 7>in production. So a lot of this kind of question around,

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:30.639
<v Speaker 7>like how you get applications from POC to scale. You know,

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:32.639
<v Speaker 7>we've been doing that for years now and it's just

0:23:32.720 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 7>had a tremendous impact on the growth.

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:34.879
<v Speaker 3>Of the business.

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:39.119
<v Speaker 5>You have some relatively new work on models, right, so

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:42.160
<v Speaker 5>tell us about the kind of the latest and greatest

0:23:42.200 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 5>on the tech side of your offerings.

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:43.880
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 7>So, over the past few months, we've introduced vision as

0:23:47.960 --> 0:23:52.200
<v Speaker 7>a capability into a platform. We've launched Palmyra in thirty

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:56.399
<v Speaker 7>two languages that really really high quality, beating human benchmarks

0:23:56.400 --> 0:23:59.119
<v Speaker 7>our customers tell us. And next up for us our

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:03.440
<v Speaker 7>large reasoning models, so software that write software, which we're

0:24:03.480 --> 0:24:06.479
<v Speaker 7>really excited about being able to go from you know,

0:24:06.560 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 7>work substitution to real work reinvention and orchestration using AI.

0:24:12.359 --> 0:24:15.639
<v Speaker 3>At the very start, you said basically ninety percent of

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 3>the work isn't just getting the right language, large language

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:20.520
<v Speaker 3>model in the door, but it's implementing it. It's all

0:24:20.560 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 3>the other bells and whistles that go to ensure that

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:24.879
<v Speaker 3>you get operational efficiencies that you put it to your

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:28.360
<v Speaker 3>own workflows. What are some of the best ways you're

0:24:28.359 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 3>seeing and being harnessed. What are some of the worst ways,

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:33.760
<v Speaker 3>Because everyone's still waiting for this Eureka moment where all

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:36.399
<v Speaker 3>of our exuberants around AI actually makes a real difference.

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 7>Around one hundred percent, there are fifteen hundred lms, right,

0:24:39.800 --> 0:24:41.840
<v Speaker 7>if large languine hundred Yeah, I mean, and.

0:24:41.800 --> 0:24:43.680
<v Speaker 3>They can pass the MCAT and the LSAT.

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 7>So if lllms were the answer, everyone would have the

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:48.919
<v Speaker 7>generative AI program of their dreams, right, But that's not

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 7>the case. There's so much work to get the data

0:24:52.080 --> 0:24:55.240
<v Speaker 7>and the context and the workflow from the business user

0:24:55.359 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 7>into the application, right, And that's what our platform does.

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:02.320
<v Speaker 7>It's this collaborative inner that combines the LLM with all

0:25:02.359 --> 0:25:05.360
<v Speaker 7>of those building blocks, and that's where the magic is

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:08.960
<v Speaker 7>because the llms themselves need so much more context about

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 7>the business to be able to do what customers need

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:12.159
<v Speaker 7>them to know.

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:15.439
<v Speaker 3>You said before that basically large language models are going

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:18.399
<v Speaker 3>to be commoditized. The foundational models are going to be commoditized,

0:25:18.400 --> 0:25:22.080
<v Speaker 3>particularly from a consumer perspective. Where then does the value

0:25:22.160 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 3>ultimately end up lying? Because there are so many people

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:27.639
<v Speaker 3>trying to fix problems using generative AI, A lot of

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 3>them are coming to you to try and be bought

0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 3>or helped at the moment, I assume because they're running

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 3>out of money themselves. Yeah, there's certainly a lot of air.

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:38.120
<v Speaker 7>Being sucked out of a room by big tech, right,

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:41.520
<v Speaker 7>but there's still a ton of opportunity for startups. Microsoft

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:44.919
<v Speaker 7>has to build for the lowest common denominator, right, so

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 7>individual productivity is very different than team productivity and team workflows.

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:53.400
<v Speaker 7>So even though it feels like we're going to go

0:25:53.440 --> 0:25:57.760
<v Speaker 7>through sort of a big consolidation phase, I do think

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:00.480
<v Speaker 7>there's still a ton of opportunity for for stars. We

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 7>have made a small acquisition that will announce soon, and

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:06.679
<v Speaker 7>I think we'll make others. So there certainly is a

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:10.640
<v Speaker 7>real high barrier for entry to come in and serve

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:13.879
<v Speaker 7>the enterprise. But it's still there's so much blank white

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 7>open space for startups to help enterprises compete.

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 5>It's interesting maybe that you use the c word consolidation.

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 5>I don't think glem DeLong went as far as using

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:26.400
<v Speaker 5>the word consolidation, but I think you know, you said

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 5>something a moment ago about big tech sucking the oxygen

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:31.880
<v Speaker 5>out of the room. It goes to the open source

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 5>closed debate. I assume you sit on the open source side,

0:26:37.400 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 5>but just wigh in.

0:26:38.800 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 3>So we're kind of in the middle.

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:43.639
<v Speaker 7>So our models are proprietary, A bunch are on hugging

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 7>face so later generations of models, but our latest models

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 7>are are closed source.

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 3>But by being in the middle.

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:55.400
<v Speaker 7>What enterprises really need is the ability to audit right

0:26:55.480 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 7>and have the transparency around training data and all sorts

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:02.359
<v Speaker 7>of things related to the models they don't really want,

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 7>like the last mile cumbersomeness of necessarily like fine tuning

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 7>or running the models themselves is what we're finding. And

0:27:10.600 --> 0:27:13.760
<v Speaker 7>so like in the in the kind of sucking the

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:17.640
<v Speaker 7>air out of the room, the confusion around what vendors

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:20.760
<v Speaker 7>to turn to and how to actually get great applications shift.

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:22.960
<v Speaker 7>That's where That's where I think there's still a lot

0:27:23.000 --> 0:27:25.880
<v Speaker 7>of confusion in the enterprise, and I think there's still

0:27:25.880 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 7>all that work to be done to minimize hallucinations.

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:32.199
<v Speaker 3>To ensure that we're seeing a clarity of where the

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:35.520
<v Speaker 3>underlying data is coming from and you're not having copyright issues.

0:27:35.880 --> 0:27:38.880
<v Speaker 3>Give us clarity on your business. Now, have you been

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:43.399
<v Speaker 3>approached to be bought? Are you remaining independent? Are you

0:27:43.520 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 3>raising more money?

0:27:44.880 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 7>So there's there's a really long, i think, product journey

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:53.720
<v Speaker 7>for us to really realize our vision. So I'm really

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:56.720
<v Speaker 7>excited about remaining independent. It used to be a year

0:27:56.760 --> 0:27:59.680
<v Speaker 7>ago that I would say, you know, lms are for

0:27:59.800 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 7>the rudgery, the work you don't want.

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:02.119
<v Speaker 3>To do today.

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:04.960
<v Speaker 7>The capabilities are so incredible, they're as good as us.

0:28:05.400 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 7>But the future is work where you get to do

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:11.560
<v Speaker 7>the work you want to do and lllms do the rest,

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 7>right because one person's drudgery is another person's creative passion,

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:16.600
<v Speaker 7>and that's kind of compelling.

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:17.679
<v Speaker 3>Vision for the future of work.

0:28:17.880 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 7>We're not seeing enterprises come up with. Yes, we talk

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 7>to hundreds of companies a week, and that really feels

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 7>missing right now. Kind of executives painting a vision for

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:29.160
<v Speaker 7>what AI looks like inside their companies in a way

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:32.199
<v Speaker 7>that brings people along. So there's a lot to do

0:28:32.400 --> 0:28:34.920
<v Speaker 7>both in you know, kind of bringing our vision into

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:37.080
<v Speaker 7>the world and helping companies achieve theirs.

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 8>Right.

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 5>A CEO may have be great to catch up here

0:28:40.960 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 5>at Blue veg Tech in San Francisco.

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 3>She slies every week from some Franciscot and on and

0:28:46.360 --> 0:28:46.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm back.

0:28:47.040 --> 0:28:49.480
<v Speaker 5>That's what we're hearing, the world of the CEO in

0:28:49.520 --> 0:28:52.160
<v Speaker 5>the world of AI on a plane coming out here.

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:54.240
<v Speaker 4>We're going to be joined by Stephanie Jang.

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 5>Partner at Sequoia, for her take on investing in AI startups.

0:28:59.120 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 5>Stay with us, we'll be right back. This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:19.720
<v Speaker 5>Welcome back to this special edition of Bloomberg Technology. We're

0:29:19.760 --> 0:29:23.480
<v Speaker 5>back together live in San Francisco a Bloomberg Tech, our

0:29:23.520 --> 0:29:26.600
<v Speaker 5>annual conference, and here at the Tech Summit, we've got

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 5>to talk about investing the first checks into those new

0:29:31.240 --> 0:29:34.240
<v Speaker 5>and early AI startups. We have a fantastic guest for

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:39.400
<v Speaker 5>today's Visa Spotlight, Stephanie Jan, partner at Sequoia. You guys

0:29:39.440 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 5>are so busy, you are writing lots of checks, but

0:29:45.000 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 5>the new companies being founded in AI are not the

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 5>same as they were one year ago, and certainly not

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:52.240
<v Speaker 5>eighteen months or.

0:29:52.240 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 4>Two years ago.

0:29:53.320 --> 0:29:55.160
<v Speaker 5>Just give us the sort of timeline of where we

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 5>are now in this industry way.

0:29:59.440 --> 0:30:01.040
<v Speaker 1>First of all, thank you so much for having me

0:30:01.120 --> 0:30:04.320
<v Speaker 1>at Caroline. It's an absolute joy to be here. We're

0:30:04.360 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 1>at a really interesting time in AI today, seven years

0:30:07.640 --> 0:30:10.920
<v Speaker 1>from the advent of the transformer, four years.

0:30:10.640 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 3>Since the advent of the GPT three moment.

0:30:13.600 --> 0:30:15.440
<v Speaker 1>I think twenty twenty four is going to be a

0:30:15.480 --> 0:30:17.080
<v Speaker 1>monumental year for AI.

0:30:17.480 --> 0:30:19.960
<v Speaker 3>And here's why. I think this year is.

0:30:19.920 --> 0:30:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Going to be a step function leap in digital intelligence,

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 1>everything from video to AI agents to robotics. I also

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:29.160
<v Speaker 1>think that this year is going to be the year

0:30:29.240 --> 0:30:32.400
<v Speaker 1>we see a shift in the ecosystem to a thriving

0:30:32.440 --> 0:30:36.960
<v Speaker 1>ecosystem with many winners in the models area across closed source,

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:40.640
<v Speaker 1>open source, large models, small models, and third, I also

0:30:40.680 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 1>think this is the year we start to see AI

0:30:42.440 --> 0:30:44.000
<v Speaker 1>commercialization at scale.

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:46.040
<v Speaker 3>And at Sequoia, we've been really busy.

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 1>As you noted, we're highly selective about the companies that

0:30:49.040 --> 0:30:51.680
<v Speaker 1>we partner with, but this year, in just the first

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:55.680
<v Speaker 1>four months alone, we've invested in ten new AI companies,

0:30:56.000 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 1>everything from new foundation models to new AI native applications.

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:01.960
<v Speaker 3>I love being went through the history like seven years

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:04.480
<v Speaker 3>ago since the transmission model. I mean it was twenty

0:31:04.520 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 3>years ago just over that Sequoia wrote the first check

0:31:07.760 --> 0:31:09.960
<v Speaker 3>into in video, and now we think there's still that

0:31:10.040 --> 0:31:13.320
<v Speaker 3>company really owning really the oxygen in the room.

0:31:13.240 --> 0:31:16.560
<v Speaker 5>And the value vest right they writing checks of their

0:31:16.600 --> 0:31:18.560
<v Speaker 5>own is a strategic investment.

0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:21.280
<v Speaker 3>And I'm interested therefore exactly to AT's point, how competitive

0:31:21.320 --> 0:31:23.960
<v Speaker 3>is it out there to get those first checks in

0:31:24.240 --> 0:31:26.920
<v Speaker 3>ho Who are you seeing coming? Is it the corporates

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:28.920
<v Speaker 3>that are wanting to write checks? Is it VC's wanted

0:31:28.960 --> 0:31:29.760
<v Speaker 3>to write checks.

0:31:30.240 --> 0:31:34.320
<v Speaker 1>It's an incredible ecosystem right now, with everyone pouring money

0:31:34.320 --> 0:31:37.680
<v Speaker 1>into the AI ecosystem. I think it's very much reflective

0:31:37.800 --> 0:31:41.160
<v Speaker 1>of the opportunity that we see in AI, the large

0:31:41.200 --> 0:31:44.320
<v Speaker 1>market opportunity that is to come. I actually think that

0:31:44.400 --> 0:31:46.680
<v Speaker 1>we're still in the very early innings.

0:31:46.320 --> 0:31:46.920
<v Speaker 3>Of all of this.

0:31:47.360 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, it's the classic saying of we overestimate

0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:53.480
<v Speaker 1>in the short run, but we really underestimate in.

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:56.320
<v Speaker 3>The long run. And video has done a wonderful.

0:31:56.000 --> 0:31:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Job of being such a critical hold in the ecosystem

0:31:59.520 --> 0:32:02.280
<v Speaker 1>with hard we're driving compute, but also now with so

0:32:02.320 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 1>many software tools and the entire developer ecosystem they've built

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:08.320
<v Speaker 1>around them. So I think that we're just in the

0:32:08.360 --> 0:32:10.040
<v Speaker 1>early innings and there's a lot more to come.

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:14.720
<v Speaker 3>We were just speaking with Clem from Hugging Face Anadeine Mayhembib,

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:17.880
<v Speaker 3>who highlight the fact that it's really expensive to do

0:32:17.960 --> 0:32:21.719
<v Speaker 3>this and video chips are a putty penny. How are

0:32:21.720 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 3>you seeing the companies that you back able to sustain

0:32:25.520 --> 0:32:27.160
<v Speaker 3>the investment they need to make. How do you make

0:32:27.200 --> 0:32:28.760
<v Speaker 3>sure the checks you write you're going in the right

0:32:28.800 --> 0:32:30.800
<v Speaker 3>direction and not just sort of going into the pool

0:32:30.840 --> 0:32:32.240
<v Speaker 3>of training money.

0:32:32.560 --> 0:32:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, I think that the classic conventional wisdom is

0:32:36.200 --> 0:32:40.520
<v Speaker 1>that incumbents with scale, data, capital and distribution have a

0:32:40.600 --> 0:32:44.560
<v Speaker 1>natural advantage, and that's absolutely correct. It also costs a

0:32:44.560 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 1>lot to build these models because of compute and for

0:32:46.920 --> 0:32:49.400
<v Speaker 1>AI talent, but I also think that there are so

0:32:49.520 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 1>many nimble ways for a startup to compete. Specifically, I

0:32:53.560 --> 0:32:57.520
<v Speaker 1>think the next leap is really around one high quality data,

0:32:57.640 --> 0:33:03.440
<v Speaker 1>specifically high quality labels of data and targeted domain specific data.

0:33:03.640 --> 0:33:06.080
<v Speaker 3>Second, it's really about what you do with that data.

0:33:06.800 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Reinforcement learning with human feedback I think will really shine

0:33:10.080 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 1>in this next era.

0:33:11.360 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 3>It's an idea.

0:33:12.040 --> 0:33:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Derived from reinforcement learning, but here an agent actually also

0:33:16.120 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 1>learns on the fly with human feedback, and that's what's

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 1>so brilliant about chat topt for example. And finally, I

0:33:23.360 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 1>think that you really differentiate not just on model performance,

0:33:26.360 --> 0:33:29.240
<v Speaker 1>which is where all the capital goes into, but it's

0:33:29.280 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 1>also around product distribution and the entire product experience that

0:33:32.920 --> 0:33:33.720
<v Speaker 1>you offer.

0:33:33.840 --> 0:33:34.840
<v Speaker 3>To the end customer.

0:33:35.800 --> 0:33:38.120
<v Speaker 5>You use the word incumbent, I think we should probably

0:33:38.120 --> 0:33:41.760
<v Speaker 5>talk about who those incumbents are because the point that

0:33:42.160 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 5>may have even right made to a certain extent claim

0:33:44.920 --> 0:33:47.360
<v Speaker 5>from Hogeyface is that big tech and where I think

0:33:47.360 --> 0:33:51.360
<v Speaker 5>we're talking about alphabet Microsoft in the first instance, are

0:33:51.400 --> 0:33:54.680
<v Speaker 5>sucking the oxygen out of the room. From a capital perspective,

0:33:54.680 --> 0:33:58.560
<v Speaker 5>a talent perspective, you invest in the preceed and seed sage.

0:33:59.120 --> 0:34:01.800
<v Speaker 4>Do you find that be true?

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think that incumbents absolutely have an advantage, as

0:34:04.840 --> 0:34:07.480
<v Speaker 1>we just outlined, but I also think that new startups

0:34:07.520 --> 0:34:11.360
<v Speaker 1>have a shop scales. At AI actually recently released the

0:34:11.480 --> 0:34:14.560
<v Speaker 1>survey last week where they interviewed thousands of developers on

0:34:14.680 --> 0:34:17.879
<v Speaker 1>their most popular models, and the ones that actually came

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:21.640
<v Speaker 1>into light were GPT four, GPT three point five, and

0:34:21.719 --> 0:34:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Gemini as the most popular models used. But we're also

0:34:25.080 --> 0:34:28.320
<v Speaker 1>starting to see new players come into play with models

0:34:28.320 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 1>that are just as competitive in performance. I'm really excited

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:35.839
<v Speaker 1>about the open source model ecosystem enabling many more new

0:34:35.840 --> 0:34:39.040
<v Speaker 1>players to come into play. LAMA three, for instance, is

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:42.600
<v Speaker 1>so powerful. The new eight billion PARAMETERAR model is a

0:34:42.880 --> 0:34:46.440
<v Speaker 1>longer trained, small model that I think will become a

0:34:46.480 --> 0:34:50.000
<v Speaker 1>really powerful building block for new developers to build new

0:34:50.040 --> 0:34:53.480
<v Speaker 1>applications on top of and to build new models around it.

0:34:53.480 --> 0:34:56.400
<v Speaker 1>It's going to drastically reduce the cost of what it

0:34:56.440 --> 0:34:57.959
<v Speaker 1>takes to build new experiences.

0:34:58.280 --> 0:35:03.360
<v Speaker 5>We are increasingly talking about Beta and its competence in

0:35:03.840 --> 0:35:08.319
<v Speaker 5>building large language models. You speak highly of them. Where

0:35:08.360 --> 0:35:11.120
<v Speaker 5>do you see them they? I think, Zuckerberg said on

0:35:11.160 --> 0:35:14.760
<v Speaker 5>the Cool last week, we want to be the world's

0:35:14.880 --> 0:35:16.080
<v Speaker 5>leading AI company.

0:35:16.920 --> 0:35:18.400
<v Speaker 4>Where are they in that journey?

0:35:19.400 --> 0:35:22.759
<v Speaker 1>I think that they have an incredible advantage, and not

0:35:22.920 --> 0:35:25.239
<v Speaker 1>just because of the capital that they're willing to pour

0:35:25.320 --> 0:35:28.399
<v Speaker 1>into play, but also because of the entire treasure trove

0:35:28.480 --> 0:35:32.280
<v Speaker 1>of data that they hold, all this proprietary UGC content

0:35:32.320 --> 0:35:35.640
<v Speaker 1>that they can really use to train their models. One

0:35:35.640 --> 0:35:38.080
<v Speaker 1>of the things I'm really excited to see them enter

0:35:38.120 --> 0:35:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the scene with this year is a new generative video

0:35:41.000 --> 0:35:42.799
<v Speaker 1>foundation model, similar.

0:35:42.560 --> 0:35:44.680
<v Speaker 3>To what we saw with Sora and open Ai.

0:35:45.440 --> 0:35:48.719
<v Speaker 1>To me, the most powerful thing that unlocked was that

0:35:48.800 --> 0:35:52.279
<v Speaker 1>the methodology we take for building large language models and

0:35:52.360 --> 0:35:56.279
<v Speaker 1>digital intelligence works for video as well. You take a

0:35:56.280 --> 0:35:59.439
<v Speaker 1>diffusion transformer model and you just scale it with enough

0:35:59.520 --> 0:36:03.480
<v Speaker 1>video dat and compute and meta has a wonderful advantage

0:36:03.600 --> 0:36:06.239
<v Speaker 1>given the entire treasure trow of content they have.

0:36:06.680 --> 0:36:07.960
<v Speaker 3>To compete in the bosom.

0:36:08.760 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 1>And then what they're doing with Lama three I think

0:36:10.800 --> 0:36:14.840
<v Speaker 1>is game changing entirely. It opens the playing field for

0:36:15.000 --> 0:36:19.720
<v Speaker 1>everyone themselves new startups, lowering the cost for a thriving

0:36:19.760 --> 0:36:21.160
<v Speaker 1>ecosystem with many winners.

0:36:21.640 --> 0:36:24.080
<v Speaker 3>Come back when you've got more checks you can announce

0:36:24.200 --> 0:36:26.560
<v Speaker 3>in that thriving ecosystem. Such a joy to be here

0:36:26.560 --> 0:36:28.480
<v Speaker 3>with you. Thank you so much for having it, Caroline,

0:36:28.480 --> 0:36:41.920
<v Speaker 3>and having by Sequoia partner Stephanie Chan. Welcome back to

0:36:41.960 --> 0:36:45.680
<v Speaker 3>this special edition of Bloomberg Technology, the heart of San Francisco,

0:36:46.080 --> 0:36:48.799
<v Speaker 3>big event upon our hands and every year in fact,

0:36:49.000 --> 0:36:52.160
<v Speaker 3>Rumbag Business Week releases in tandem. It's a list of

0:36:52.239 --> 0:36:55.160
<v Speaker 3>tech wants to watch. But these are the startup founders,

0:36:55.239 --> 0:36:59.520
<v Speaker 3>the big tech managers, the mom he investors as well,

0:36:59.680 --> 0:37:02.400
<v Speaker 3>who of playing a big role in shaping text future

0:37:02.760 --> 0:37:05.319
<v Speaker 3>and joining us now is one of these ones. To

0:37:05.360 --> 0:37:08.720
<v Speaker 3>words please to welcome you did madame Amazon vice president

0:37:09.120 --> 0:37:11.880
<v Speaker 3>for of course the worldwide operations side of the business,

0:37:12.320 --> 0:37:16.200
<v Speaker 3>your first interviews. It's taking on an enormous role of

0:37:16.239 --> 0:37:20.200
<v Speaker 3>more than a million people that you manage the focus

0:37:20.239 --> 0:37:23.080
<v Speaker 3>of getting my package to me in the swiftest way,

0:37:23.160 --> 0:37:26.239
<v Speaker 3>most cost efficient manner as possible. Can I just ask

0:37:26.280 --> 0:37:29.239
<v Speaker 3>what your day looks like? What is a day in like?

0:37:29.880 --> 0:37:32.640
<v Speaker 8>Well, first, Caroline and thank you for having me it's

0:37:32.640 --> 0:37:33.480
<v Speaker 8>supposed to be here.

0:37:33.920 --> 0:37:34.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:37:34.239 --> 0:37:37.680
<v Speaker 8>For me, really, my day starts, you know, fairly early

0:37:37.719 --> 0:37:39.800
<v Speaker 8>in the morning. But you know, it starts with thinking about,

0:37:40.040 --> 0:37:41.680
<v Speaker 8>you know, the team I've got.

0:37:41.760 --> 0:37:44.319
<v Speaker 4>You know, we've got a very very broad team all

0:37:44.360 --> 0:37:45.080
<v Speaker 4>around the world.

0:37:45.600 --> 0:37:48.520
<v Speaker 8>We've got four thousand different locations that we operate around

0:37:48.520 --> 0:37:50.960
<v Speaker 8>the world, and really it's focused on how do we

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:54.480
<v Speaker 8>continue to innovate on behalf of customers that do it

0:37:54.520 --> 0:37:56.440
<v Speaker 8>in a way that puts safety.

0:37:56.400 --> 0:37:57.680
<v Speaker 4>And people at the forefront.

0:37:58.080 --> 0:38:01.920
<v Speaker 8>And so my day is really focused on innovation across

0:38:02.120 --> 0:38:03.359
<v Speaker 8>four different spectrums.

0:38:03.600 --> 0:38:05.319
<v Speaker 4>Safety, really the.

0:38:05.320 --> 0:38:10.360
<v Speaker 8>Customer experience with delivery speeds innovating, especially with what's happening

0:38:10.360 --> 0:38:13.440
<v Speaker 8>with technology finding new ways, you know, whether that's through

0:38:13.480 --> 0:38:16.560
<v Speaker 8>robotics our operations to make things more efficient and driving

0:38:16.560 --> 0:38:17.480
<v Speaker 8>you when you're.

0:38:17.320 --> 0:38:20.120
<v Speaker 5>Talking about the technology, we're talking about everything from the fleets,

0:38:20.200 --> 0:38:23.520
<v Speaker 5>right so there's a transition to sustainable energy in the

0:38:23.600 --> 0:38:28.120
<v Speaker 5>fleet context, talking about robotics in the fulfillment centers, and

0:38:28.239 --> 0:38:31.520
<v Speaker 5>dare I say AI in tracking the data? What's the

0:38:31.560 --> 0:38:35.200
<v Speaker 5>biggest investment focused for you right now? And technology roll out?

0:38:35.560 --> 0:38:38.520
<v Speaker 8>You know, we've got technology all across our operations and

0:38:38.560 --> 0:38:41.680
<v Speaker 8>there's really two things that I would maybe thematically talk about.

0:38:41.800 --> 0:38:43.960
<v Speaker 8>One is, we do have a lot of investments in

0:38:44.000 --> 0:38:46.920
<v Speaker 8>automation and robotics that are going on, especially with how

0:38:47.000 --> 0:38:50.360
<v Speaker 8>quickly things are accelerating with General VII. We have investments

0:38:50.520 --> 0:38:55.000
<v Speaker 8>on really novel foundational models that look and use the

0:38:55.080 --> 0:38:57.600
<v Speaker 8>high quality data that we've gathered in source as we

0:38:57.640 --> 0:38:59.879
<v Speaker 8>ship tens of millions of products every day, and those

0:39:00.040 --> 0:39:01.920
<v Speaker 8>going to help make some of those robotic solutions more

0:39:01.920 --> 0:39:04.480
<v Speaker 8>generalizable as well as make them more efficient.

0:39:04.840 --> 0:39:05.800
<v Speaker 4>And the second is we've.

0:39:05.680 --> 0:39:09.719
<v Speaker 8>Been working on a set of really inventive robotic solutions

0:39:09.719 --> 0:39:12.120
<v Speaker 8>over the last few years that are finally reaching maturity

0:39:12.160 --> 0:39:14.680
<v Speaker 8>and scale and we'll start to roll out starting this year.

0:39:14.960 --> 0:39:17.120
<v Speaker 8>Both those are really exciting and it will be transformative

0:39:17.160 --> 0:39:17.520
<v Speaker 8>for operation.

0:39:17.560 --> 0:39:19.959
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you've got to be inventive because Annie Jase

0:39:20.120 --> 0:39:23.640
<v Speaker 3>is asking you to focus on costs, but I'm sure

0:39:23.640 --> 0:39:26.000
<v Speaker 3>the innovation in a way does longer term once you

0:39:26.080 --> 0:39:28.400
<v Speaker 3>made the investment strip out some of the costs, but

0:39:28.480 --> 0:39:30.680
<v Speaker 3>ultimately does that come at a sacrifice of labor. How

0:39:30.760 --> 0:39:32.400
<v Speaker 3>do you talk to those people that you are so

0:39:32.560 --> 0:39:34.719
<v Speaker 3>key when you focused on to ensure that they feel

0:39:34.719 --> 0:39:36.360
<v Speaker 3>that are being augmented not replaced.

0:39:36.680 --> 0:39:38.920
<v Speaker 8>You know, the best thing I can talk about is

0:39:38.960 --> 0:39:42.160
<v Speaker 8>our history. You've deployed seven hundred and fifty thousand robots

0:39:42.160 --> 0:39:45.400
<v Speaker 8>over the last decade across our operations. We've done that

0:39:45.440 --> 0:39:48.239
<v Speaker 8>while creating hundreds of thousands of jobs. And you know

0:39:48.280 --> 0:39:50.400
<v Speaker 8>what's really interesting and not a lot of people know,

0:39:50.520 --> 0:39:54.320
<v Speaker 8>is we've created dozens of new classic jobs, your skilled jobs,

0:39:54.440 --> 0:39:57.600
<v Speaker 8>technical jobs. And what we've learned in that process is

0:39:57.640 --> 0:39:59.799
<v Speaker 8>that one of the most important things that you can

0:39:59.880 --> 0:40:03.120
<v Speaker 8>do you as a company in this world of generatively

0:40:03.239 --> 0:40:07.040
<v Speaker 8>I and robotics, is to really focus on investing employees.

0:40:07.040 --> 0:40:10.279
<v Speaker 8>So we've launched two different programs. One is a twenty

0:40:10.320 --> 0:40:14.120
<v Speaker 8>twenty five off skilling pledge that really helps train people

0:40:14.480 --> 0:40:17.839
<v Speaker 8>for this new workplace in the future, and a Yeah

0:40:17.960 --> 0:40:21.080
<v Speaker 8>Ready program that's generally available to everybody that's really focused

0:40:21.120 --> 0:40:24.440
<v Speaker 8>on investing in helping provide a skill training.

0:40:24.239 --> 0:40:25.280
<v Speaker 4>Over two million people.

0:40:25.480 --> 0:40:29.040
<v Speaker 8>So really focusing on people alongside the investments who are

0:40:29.040 --> 0:40:29.520
<v Speaker 8>making in general.

0:40:29.600 --> 0:40:31.360
<v Speaker 4>VI in Revidy, we just have thirty seconds.

0:40:31.400 --> 0:40:33.840
<v Speaker 5>What's your one personal goal for the year, something you

0:40:33.840 --> 0:40:34.400
<v Speaker 5>want to achieve.

0:40:34.719 --> 0:40:37.160
<v Speaker 8>You know, for me, there's more than one, but I'll

0:40:37.239 --> 0:40:39.360
<v Speaker 8>quickly I'll try to answer it quickly. The first and

0:40:39.400 --> 0:40:41.120
<v Speaker 8>the highest priority for us is safety, and we want

0:40:41.160 --> 0:40:43.520
<v Speaker 8>to be the safest workplace across the industries we operate

0:40:43.560 --> 0:40:47.719
<v Speaker 8>in making measurable and really remarkable progress in that area.

0:40:47.719 --> 0:40:49.239
<v Speaker 8>I want to company to invest in that. And the

0:40:49.280 --> 0:40:52.560
<v Speaker 8>second is to compete to improve the convenience for customers

0:40:53.000 --> 0:40:54.720
<v Speaker 8>and delivery speeds is an area of focus.

0:40:55.880 --> 0:40:59.120
<v Speaker 3>Congratulations on being one of the key ones to watch.

0:40:59.480 --> 0:41:02.080
<v Speaker 3>Phenomenal the amount of people who manage young age that

0:41:02.080 --> 0:41:04.759
<v Speaker 3>you are, madame. We thank you, Amazon vice President of

0:41:04.880 --> 0:41:09.200
<v Speaker 3>Worldwide Operations. Meanwhile, I mean from ones to watch of

0:41:09.200 --> 0:41:11.760
<v Speaker 3>individuals to everything you've got to watch coming up, because

0:41:11.800 --> 0:41:14.160
<v Speaker 3>this is going to be an amazing set of conversations.

0:41:14.440 --> 0:41:16.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to be speaking with a key chip leader.

0:41:17.160 --> 0:41:19.360
<v Speaker 3>Of course, you're going to be speaking about the future

0:41:19.360 --> 0:41:20.799
<v Speaker 3>and technology. Who have you got lined up?

0:41:20.840 --> 0:41:22.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I'm going to talk to Tom Oxley of synchron

0:41:22.480 --> 0:41:24.759
<v Speaker 5>I'm going to talk about brain implants and what the

0:41:24.840 --> 0:41:28.239
<v Speaker 5>right method of putting a electrode into one's brain is.

0:41:29.160 --> 0:41:33.040
<v Speaker 3>I love asual casuals perspective. Renee James is joining me

0:41:33.080 --> 0:41:35.520
<v Speaker 3>and Perco. Look, this is the question that having just

0:41:35.560 --> 0:41:38.440
<v Speaker 3>spoken with Renee the other Renee and chips of arm.

0:41:38.480 --> 0:41:42.080
<v Speaker 3>Where is the market share being taken by these newer players,

0:41:42.160 --> 0:41:45.600
<v Speaker 3>taking from AMD, from Intel, even potentially in video.

0:41:46.239 --> 0:41:48.280
<v Speaker 5>Thank you so much for joining us on this special

0:41:48.400 --> 0:41:51.440
<v Speaker 5>edition of Bloomberg Technology. It's great to be back together

0:41:51.480 --> 0:41:53.920
<v Speaker 5>in the field, but we actually have a full day ahead,

0:41:54.000 --> 0:41:56.440
<v Speaker 5>so many great guests stay with us. Thank you for

0:41:56.480 --> 0:42:00.719
<v Speaker 5>tuning in from San Francisco at Bloomberg Tech for this

0:42:00.880 --> 0:42:01.480
<v Speaker 5>is Bloomberg