WEBVTT - The Reach-A-Round

0:00:01.160 --> 0:00:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio.

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from I Heart Radio,

0:00:11.240 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy speculation and

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>advice Now League dot com. Here's your host. Welcome to

0:00:24.400 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly. I am Paul Chargy and my co

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 1>host this week are Scott Fish and Matt Harrison. Hello, gentlemen, Hello, Hi.

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Excited to get everybody ready for drafts and auctions. It's

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:39.920
<v Speaker 1>getting closer. Feeling heating up now. Normally this would have

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>been the first weekend with preseason games. We don't have that.

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:48.240
<v Speaker 1>It's okay. I was hated doing those preseason recaps anyway,

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:52.239
<v Speaker 1>especially after the first game when you know, nothing happens.

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 1>The starters played one this this third string running back

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>really popped off in this game. Yeah, but that's not

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 1>to say there's no news, and we'll be getting to

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>a variety of news items from around the league very shortly. Also,

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 1>we will over the course of the show, we will

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:12.679
<v Speaker 1>identify the true bell cow running backs, the guys you

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 1>can count on to get a lot of touches. Who

0:01:15.360 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 1>are they? And not just rehashing last year's bell cows

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:23.119
<v Speaker 1>because you already know that looking forward to this year's

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:27.559
<v Speaker 1>crop of running backs, we'll talk about the stink hole

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 1>and beyond. What's the stinkhole? You might ask. The stinkhole

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:36.959
<v Speaker 1>is that spot in the first round where the obvious

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:40.840
<v Speaker 1>choices are gone and now you're up. What do you

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>do with that spot? Where is the stinkhole this year?

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:46.320
<v Speaker 1>And what are you doing in that vicinity? We'll give

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 1>you three tough questions and perhaps everybody's favorite segment all

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>preseason over the course of this show, the reach around,

0:01:57.240 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 1>We got a stinkhole, and reach around. We got a

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 1>stinkhole and reach around. In the reach around will tell

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 1>you the guys you should reach one round early, go

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:09.239
<v Speaker 1>get that's what you meant. That's the reach around. We'll

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 1>talk about vacated targets. Scott Fish will help us identify

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the teams that have lost the most receiving targets and

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 1>who could step into those spots. And then, at the

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 1>end of the show, as we do every week, our

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:27.360
<v Speaker 1>sleepers three sleepers, one from each of us. These are

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:32.240
<v Speaker 1>guys that will significantly outperform their draft position. Al right, guys,

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 1>let's go to the news. We begin with the Carolina

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Panthers Matt Jeremy Fowler of ESPN reported last weekend that

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:44.080
<v Speaker 1>left tackle Russell Okung is contemplating retirement due to COVID.

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:48.359
<v Speaker 1>Pro Football Talk says he's keeping his options open right now,

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 1>so he could just quit. Oku is a fascinating guy.

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 1>He's extremely smart, He's negotiated his own contracts. He's um,

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 1>He's got a lot of interests outside of football. Wouldn't

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 1>surprise me. Not That wouldn't be good for Christian McCaffrey

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:06.679
<v Speaker 1>or nor would it be good for Teddy Bridgewater. We

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:08.519
<v Speaker 1>think needs all the help he can get. So we'll

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 1>be watching the status of the starting left tackle for

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the Carolina Panthers, Scott Let's go to Las Vegas with

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders. Yeah so? Uh? Josh Josh Jacob says he's

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>going to catch at least sixty passes this year, and

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:24.680
<v Speaker 1>John Gruden is reportedly wants to get him more involved.

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>It was upset they didn't good Rookie of the Year.

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:29.079
<v Speaker 1>All the b reporters are saying they want him on

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the field of ton. John Garden's gonna try to win

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:35.120
<v Speaker 1>him Rookie of the Year this year. But there's something

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>to be aware of. They want to get him really

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 1>involved in the passing game. He is, Jacobs has top

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>three or four. We'll talk about him and later. All right,

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 1>we'll be talking more about him later. Okay, let's go

0:03:49.560 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 1>to the Texans. Why receiver Kenny still still hasn't passed

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 1>his physical and looks like a cut candidate in Parks.

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna make seven million dollars guaranteed if he's on

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the rosters. Good chance he's gonna go and will help

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 1>cement playing time for Will Fuller and Brandon Cooks and

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Reggie Cobb. Let's go to the Randall. Randall, not Reggie.

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Brangie cop played for Tampa a long times ago, showing

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:13.800
<v Speaker 1>my age. Let's go to the Washington football team. As

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 1>of about twenty minutes after we recorded last week's show,

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Darius Geiss was released, opening up the running back competition

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>to Adrian Peterson, Peyton Barber, Antonio Gibson, Bryce Love and

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 1>j D mckissic. J D mcsuck it. No, No, that's

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:33.840
<v Speaker 1>a terrible nickname. It's it's not even that clever. It's

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:36.479
<v Speaker 1>well earned, if you ask me, Scott. Let's go to

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:39.599
<v Speaker 1>the Jets. Uh Levian Bella has reportedly slimmed down like

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:42.479
<v Speaker 1>fifteen pounds, and he's the lightest he's ben since high school.

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I know you hate when running backs, especially speedy ones

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 1>like that, gain weight. What do you think of Levan

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Bell dropping weight? He's always been an agility guy. Yeah,

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that might be okay. I don't know, that

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:55.280
<v Speaker 1>might be all right. I'm willing to you know more,

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Oftentimes these guys end up gaining weight over the course

0:04:58.200 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of the season. So if he's starting a little light,

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:01.919
<v Speaker 1>well he took that one year off, that's where he

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 1>gained the way. It's probably true. It's taken a year

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:06.680
<v Speaker 1>to to work that part off. The Colts Frank Reich

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 1>says that Marlon Mack is his starting running back. Jonathan

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Taylor will be in the mix, though I'm intrigued by

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>a strategy of drafting both and starting both. Did you

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:22.240
<v Speaker 1>see his His line in that same thing, in that

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 1>same interview was he'll play the hot hand and then

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 1>they'll stay in the field. I hate that. That's that's

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 1>why you have to do both. I either what both

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>are neither hand. It's going to be Jonathan Taylor. Come on,

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:36.720
<v Speaker 1>he wouldn't you think so? All that said, um, it's

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Marlon Max's job to lose. By the you know, maybe

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the best offensive line in football. Somebody's going to be

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:45.040
<v Speaker 1>successful there. It's a nice bast ball strategy. I think,

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:46.719
<v Speaker 1>taking both guys, you know, have to guess which one

0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be when Jonathan Taylor hits the field, that's

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:54.159
<v Speaker 1>the problem. Probably let's go to the Let's go to

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. Ronald Jones is receiving pass catching

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 1>tips from noted asked thrower Tom Brady, and Keyshawn Vaughn

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 1>was officially activated off the COVID list to put some

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 1>pressure on Road Joe Um. He's a Ronald Jones, a

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 1>terrible pass bat blocking back, and that is how he

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:16.279
<v Speaker 1>can lose this job. That's how he will lose this

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 1>And that's the that is the concern, and it's one

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons I'm I'm I'm not playing. I'm not

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:23.480
<v Speaker 1>gambling on either of those guys because I don't feel

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 1>like I can trust him that way. Scott, the Denver

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Broncos have news. Yeah, so beer reporters are expecting Melvin

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Gordon to be the Week one starter, which is really

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:38.359
<v Speaker 1>no surprise after paying him sixteen million dollars. But what

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 1>they are saying, they're expecting like a sixty thirty five

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>or even seventy thirty split, which I found was surprising. Yeah,

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:48.599
<v Speaker 1>that is I I think Philip people. People are assuming

0:06:48.640 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Philip Lindsay is dead, and I am not ready. I

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>am not ready to be that guy. The death of

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Philip Lindsay has been greatly exaggerated. Really has Travis Kelsey

0:06:57.720 --> 0:06:59.559
<v Speaker 1>signed an extension that will keep him with the Chiefs

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:02.360
<v Speaker 1>through twy d twenty five. Great news for his dynasty

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 1>owners because now you have the security of knowing it's

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 1>got Patrick Mahomes throwing to him. Great news for Patrick

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 1>mahomes dynasty and Empire owners as well. He gets to

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 1>throw to Travis Kelsey. So winners all all around if

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 1>you're invested in Travis Kelsey and your dynasty or Empire league. Matt,

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the Seattle Seahawks have news. Just Chris Carson. He's not

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 1>in Seahawks camp right now as he deals with a

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 1>personal matter. And that's according to NFL Network. Um, it

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 1>is not a toward love affair with me. No Dolphins,

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Although I like him, I like him on my fantasy team,

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 1>let's hope. So Yeah, but I don't love him. Let's

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 1>go to uh let's go to the Dolphins. Preston Williams

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>is awesome. That's all. That's all. No, there's more. He's

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 1>running fine and making one handed catches in the corner

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 1>of the end zone. Jordan Howard. They're expecting to be

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the lead back, with Breda taking on almost all the

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 1>passing down work and which the amount of targets available.

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting. You'll get well. I think there'll be more

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 1>on that later in this show, won't there. It's possible.

0:07:58.080 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Viking social media shows justin Jefferson making a variety of

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 1>amazing catches, not in pads and not while he's covered

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>by defenders for the most part, but nevertheless, good to

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:11.960
<v Speaker 1>see him making those catches. Let's go to the Philadelphia Eagles.

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Matt greg Ward remember him? I do? He was a

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 1>starting wide receiver for this team. Well, according to Doug Peterson,

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 1>he's in the starting mix again. Right now, get greg

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Ward with the three pick off the board in your

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 1>league and get a starting wide receiver for the Eagles.

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember. It looks like all Sean Jeffrey's not

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 1>going to start to start the season healthy, So you

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>know it's it's Jalen reagor de Sean Jackson. Yeah, probably

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 1>for a while. Yeah, and Greg Ward, let's go to

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots. Scott the Patriots son Lamar Miller this year

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 1>this week to a one we one year deal. It's

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a one week deal, and immediately placed him

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 1>on the on the publist because he's got a torn

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 1>a c L. He lands there with Sonny Michelle, who

0:08:56.400 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 1>is dealing with not being good at football. Yeah, and

0:08:58.880 --> 0:09:01.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, as a reminder, the torn a c L was.

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>It makes it sound like it just happened to this

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:06.960
<v Speaker 1>time last year when he walked into the offices in

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Foxboro signed the contract. Um a baffling move for the

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:15.960
<v Speaker 1>for the Patriots. You know you knew he was hurt?

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:18.679
<v Speaker 1>Did you check the physical? Did you did you know

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:20.839
<v Speaker 1>that he was going to start the season on the publis? Hey,

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 1>did you wait till he was healthy? Bill Belichick's playing

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:26.200
<v Speaker 1>three D chess here? Who are we? Who are we'd argue?

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Alvin Camaris confirmed that he played last year with a

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 1>tear in his knee, and he's also been reported to

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 1>have dealing with Hianchael sprain and back issues last year

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 1>rolls into this season fully healthy and it has a

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:40.960
<v Speaker 1>current ADP of four. So obviously a lot of people

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 1>are willing to look past last year's trouble, but he has.

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:45.400
<v Speaker 1>He did confirm that he played with the tear in

0:09:45.440 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 1>his knee this past week. Uh, he played with it

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 1>last year. Confirmation was this week. Yes. Dallas Cowboys, Matt Uh.

0:09:52.840 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 1>They signed Everson Griffin to help bolster their defensive line.

0:09:56.320 --> 0:09:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Insert the Deck Prescott gift where he's doing some sort

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 1>of well, well, I guess I'm not getting any money

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:06.439
<v Speaker 1>this year. I think he's gonna go Okay. He's making

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the average of the top five paid quarterbacks. Yeah. Uh,

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Scott Titans, Uh, Titans. This week, coaches hyping, heaping a

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of praise on one John wu Smith. Well, you

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 1>don't say John Smith. They were hyping and heaping John Smith,

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 1>both of those things. Wanting to find creative ways to

0:10:26.040 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 1>give him the ball because he can do so many things.

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 1>He might be Derrick Henry's backup, by the way, he

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 1>might be Derek Starter. Yeah, the way he can. He's

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 1>great with the ball in the hands. He's had great runs,

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, fifty seven yard rob last year. Yeah, and now,

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:44.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't even think that was his best Church put

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 1>your pants back on a run outside the lines last

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 1>year that broke a bunch of tackles and then went

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 1>out of bounds. But yeah, he's had a couple of

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:55.560
<v Speaker 1>them telling you, Johnny Smith, he's already been a member

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 1>of my sleeper segment. I think that was we our

0:10:57.840 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 1>first show of this season was john Nu Smith identified

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 1>as my my probably he's probably he's one of my

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 1>two favorite sleepers for this year. M let's see what's next.

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Steelers of media reports say that Jalen Samuel's could be cut.

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 1>There are simultaneous reports that Benny Snell looks vastly improved.

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Snow was a bitter disappointment last year with many opportunities

0:11:25.360 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 1>to to take get more reps but never look good.

0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:30.719
<v Speaker 1>They're saying physically he looks like a different back right now,

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:33.320
<v Speaker 1>and coaches have been uh and Mike Tomlin has said

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:35.560
<v Speaker 1>that he's mentally in a better spot in year two.

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 1>The biggest year rookies their players always make is year one.

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Year two it's always the big lead, and for running backs,

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 1>if they don't make the leap within two years, they're

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:48.320
<v Speaker 1>almost always dead. As you either got it within two

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 1>years or you don't. But Snell is still there's still

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:52.680
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity here, and he's going undrafted in the vast

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:55.319
<v Speaker 1>majority of leagues. Let's go to the Giants. Matt Evan

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Engram back in camp after a very strong and aggressive

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:02.319
<v Speaker 1>rehab from frank surgery last year in his left foot.

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Scott the Bengals. John Ross left camp to take care

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 1>of his son and wife, who both tested positive for

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:12.480
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen and uh, that makes him a threat to

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:14.679
<v Speaker 1>sit out. Yeah, And it also makes him a threat

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:16.840
<v Speaker 1>being that he was already going to be fighting Tee

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:21.559
<v Speaker 1>Higgins and Audentaid for that third role, So there might

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 1>be issues there, So maybe not, maybe hold off on

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 1>drafting him late in the late rounds now George Kittle

0:12:26.840 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 1>got an extension that will keep him with the team

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Speaker 1>through five and it certainly Booy's the dynasty and empire

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 1>value of Jimmy Garoppolo a lot. Also, media reports have

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 1>first round pick Brandon Ayouk starting on the outside, and

0:12:38.640 --> 0:12:41.319
<v Speaker 1>I believe that will happen in Week one. I believe

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 1>he is NFL ready and the team needs him anyway.

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 1>With Deebo Samuel's very unlikely to be available in Week one.

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:53.439
<v Speaker 1>The Falcons Matt Todd Gurley was walking with a limp

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:56.840
<v Speaker 1>yesterday man, and then ready it's starting man. Then Twitter

0:12:56.960 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 1>spent most of Thursday just freaking out about Atlanta uh

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:04.320
<v Speaker 1>starting center Alex mac also limited in camp right now,

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:10.319
<v Speaker 1>with an explanation of veteran he's limited day off? Is it?

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:15.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't know he's old? I guess. Raven's offensive coordinator

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Greg Roman says that training camp will be used to

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 1>settle his running back depth chart, which currently features three

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:24.080
<v Speaker 1>or four quality backs, depending on whether or not you

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:26.959
<v Speaker 1>think Justice Hill's a quality back. Mark Ingram is the

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 1>presumed starter there. When we come back to Fantasy Football Weekly,

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 1>we will tell you who the bell cows are. These

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 1>are the guys that the running backs in particular, who

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 1>are going to get a lot of carries. Nothing more

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 1>important than opportunity to the success of any fantasy player.

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Will tell you the guys who are gonna have the

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:52.680
<v Speaker 1>football in their hands the most. When we come back

0:13:52.800 --> 0:14:15.200
<v Speaker 1>to Fantasy Football Weekly, Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly on

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the air. Paul char chi In, Matt Harrison, Scott Fish

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 1>with you. Thank you for joining us. Your number six

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 1>show number three. The segment is dedicated to the bell

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 1>cow backs. These are the runners that are going to

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 1>carry the pigskin. Many many times I have challenged Matt

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Harrison to project into his crystal ball about who the

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 1>bell cow running backs will be this year. I need

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:43.240
<v Speaker 1>to get a crystal ball just just for segments like

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 1>this so I can have the visual so you can

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 1>see me looking into it. Yes, Um, so I can

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 1>have to rub the crystal ball, right, don't you have to,

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:52.400
<v Speaker 1>like I think you hover your hands above it. You don't, Actually,

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 1>you don't want fingerprints on the um. We're gonna divide

0:14:57.040 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 1>these backs into four category. Those categories will be three bells,

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 1>which are running backs projected for over three touches and

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 1>little to know competition. All right, those are these are

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 1>lot You're not you know, necessarily a lot. That's a lot.

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 1>There's not many runners in that category. Two bells are

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 1>projected for about two fifty touches with some competition around them. Uh.

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 1>The one bell backs are projected for over two hunderd touches,

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 1>but there's a lot of variants and competition for them.

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 1>And then there's workhorses. They're kind of in split back

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:35.480
<v Speaker 1>fields where I think they're going to get more than half,

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 1>but it's going to be definitely a split backfield. Uh.

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 1>And then finally there's questionable backfields. We're not going to

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>talk about New England, Miami, Washington and the Rams. Those

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 1>backfields are really crazy. So let's start with the three

0:15:50.120 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 1>bells Church. They didn't quiver. Alright, there's your three bells

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 1>right there. Hold on, maybe this is okay, that's maybe better,

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 1>So don't play that three slay bells. These are bell

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 1>cow runners, not slay bell runners. Well, that kind of works.

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Leave the sligh bells for the work has to be

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 1>slay bells. They can just be bells. You can, you don't.

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 1>You could take a slagh bell off a sleigh and

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:24.920
<v Speaker 1>put it on. The belling needs have to be attached

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 1>to a slagh. There's not a ton to discuss about

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 1>these five backs. I think they're very clearly the bell

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 1>cow in their backfield. That's Christian McCaffrey, whose only backup

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 1>is Reggie Bonafone. Yeah, that's that's a clear case. Sae

0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Kwon Barkley, who's not going to be pushed by Wayne

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Gallman or Dion Lewis Derrick Henry and Darnton Evans isn't

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 1>pushing him. Joe Mixon I think is in there as well.

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Joe is really going to push him

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 1>much anymore. Yeah, there was mixing so good out of

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the backfield and catching the ball too. So there was

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 1>a time that that Giovanni Ard looked like he was

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 1>going to have a lengthy career as a second running

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:08.359
<v Speaker 1>back who would siphon off a lot of work from

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 1>whoever the starter was. It just hasn't come around due

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 1>to injury and inconsistency unfortunately, So maybe it's better, you know,

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Joe Mixon is and Hugh Jackson and Freddie Kitchens that too.

0:17:20.840 --> 0:17:25.160
<v Speaker 1>And then my final three bell cow uh Ezekiel Elliott,

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 1>which I left him for last because I know Charge

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:31.960
<v Speaker 1>has some feelings about Ezekiel Elliott with Tony Pollard in Toe.

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 1>We haven't talked about it and in the on air

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 1>version of Fantasy Football Weekly, but we've hit on it

0:17:36.640 --> 0:17:39.520
<v Speaker 1>in the the the off air podcast version of Fantasy

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:44.399
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly and months past. I I I worry that

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Tony Pollard is so good that they just have to

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 1>give him more reps. And part of it was I

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 1>came out of last year feeling like just my eyes

0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:57.000
<v Speaker 1>told me that Tony Pollard was really really good. And

0:17:57.040 --> 0:17:59.639
<v Speaker 1>then I went back looked at it some more quantified

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:02.359
<v Speaker 1>at as I could looked at Pro Football Focus, the

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:06.880
<v Speaker 1>graded every run Tony Pollard in a much smaller sample

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 1>size was graded out better in virtually everything everything than

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Ezekiel Elliott. And Ezekiel Elliott's still really good, and Elliott

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 1>is really good. Pollard's really good too. And I think

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 1>there's a sneaky case here where this goes from like

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:30.400
<v Speaker 1>eighty twenty Zeke to Pollard to sixty Pollard. That would

0:18:30.440 --> 0:18:33.200
<v Speaker 1>be that would be a sizeable step down in production

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:36.040
<v Speaker 1>for Ezekiel Elliott, who has been like a three touch

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 1>guy almost every year, right, so this would you know?

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 1>This would turn Elliott into like more like a two

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 1>fifty guy, and he's no longer you know, You're it's

0:18:42.960 --> 0:18:45.400
<v Speaker 1>hard to be a first rounder on that anymore. So

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 1>I've got and this is just a hunch. I have

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 1>no no inside knowledge of this. I'm just looking at it.

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:54.879
<v Speaker 1>If I if I ran the Cowboys, and I should,

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I would I would be protecting my investment in Zeke

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:01.880
<v Speaker 1>by giving him us work and making sure that my

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:04.359
<v Speaker 1>other extremely talented running back down on the field a

0:19:04.440 --> 0:19:11.960
<v Speaker 1>lot more. By the way, it's Marvin Lewis for then

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 1>the same same stage. It's very understandable. We've all done

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 1>it all right. Okay, let's move to the two bell

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:24.920
<v Speaker 1>backs Church. That's two bells, good job, two shakes right there. Um,

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:28.679
<v Speaker 1>So these guys, if everything breaks as expected, they're bell cowse.

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:32.399
<v Speaker 1>Dalvin Cook is the first one on that list. His

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 1>red flags are he's a possible hold out. Still, alex

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Madison is a very good backup. I don't think there's

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:43.879
<v Speaker 1>any real holdout concern here, but go ahead, and Dalvin

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 1>gets injured every year. That is that is if that's

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:49.199
<v Speaker 1>the biggest concern. Yeah, that is a fact. And by

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:51.720
<v Speaker 1>the way, I'll mention this. On Friday, Dalvin Cook was

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 1>talking up Alexander Madison about how grad he is, so

0:19:56.359 --> 0:20:00.200
<v Speaker 1>he seems to believe that his backup is pretty good too. Yeah,

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 1>next guy, Alvin Camara. His red flags are as you

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:06.160
<v Speaker 1>alluded to in an earlier segment. He was injured most

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:09.200
<v Speaker 1>of last year. He's never had more than two hundred

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:12.360
<v Speaker 1>carries in a season. But it is a contract here

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and I'm going to talk more about Alvin Camara a

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit later. Alright, uh, next guy, they don't. Latavius

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Murray's the only, you know, the only quality backup they've

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:28.840
<v Speaker 1>got there, and that Murray's just not the next back

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:34.159
<v Speaker 1>Clyde Edwards Hilaire laire. I want to move him up

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:36.399
<v Speaker 1>to a three bell category so much, but he's a

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:40.000
<v Speaker 1>rookie and there are some veteran backups including Patrick mahomes

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 1>is best buddy from college, DeAndre Washington, plus Darryl Williams

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and Darwin Thompson there who I think will get some

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 1>touches here in some touches. I think you're doing the

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>safe thing with Clyde Edwards Hilaire by having him in

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:55.359
<v Speaker 1>this second category. This feels about right, and he is

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:57.119
<v Speaker 1>still a rookie. We don't know what the usage is

0:20:57.160 --> 0:21:01.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna be, but the upside for him is what Kareem

0:21:01.880 --> 0:21:05.159
<v Speaker 1>Hunt did it, and that could be back to you know,

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 1>touch territory. By the way, the Chiefs lost ten touches

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:16.400
<v Speaker 1>inside the five. Mm hmm, just ten. Well that's that's fine, Okay, Well,

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 1>that team passes a lot inside the five. It's true,

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, they don't always run side but those are

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:25.119
<v Speaker 1>ten available touchdowns, easy touchdowns that could be going to

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Clyde Edwards, Hilaire. Let's talk about Josh Jacobs for the

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:32.199
<v Speaker 1>Las Vegas Raiders. No big time red flags here, no

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:36.440
<v Speaker 1>clear backup between Jalen Rochard and Lynn Bowden. He did

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 1>average twenty touches over his thirteen games last year, so

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:41.159
<v Speaker 1>he's by the way, he did most of that with

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:44.920
<v Speaker 1>a fractured shoulder playing through that. Yeah, he's he's closer

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:47.919
<v Speaker 1>to the three bell category. I'm surprised he's not a

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:53.639
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna get I like Josh Jacobs for this. I

0:21:53.960 --> 0:21:56.239
<v Speaker 1>think he will end up closer to three al right.

0:21:56.359 --> 0:22:00.720
<v Speaker 1>How about Nick Chubb the red flag Kareem Hunt, Yes,

0:22:00.920 --> 0:22:04.920
<v Speaker 1>that's it, that's it. Otherwise, Chubb's great Chub, really really

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:08.359
<v Speaker 1>good back, and they will find time, they will find enough,

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>They'll find enough ways to get him the ball and

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:15.159
<v Speaker 1>give it Stefanski. Will Stefanski fed Dalvid Cook like crazy.

0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:18.880
<v Speaker 1>But I think I worry about cream Hunt eating into

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 1>his totals. But he'll probably get to the two fifty

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 1>range you're talking about. Let's talk Miles Sanders of the

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:28.919
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia Eagles. Uh, the red flag here, is Philly's insistence

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:34.160
<v Speaker 1>under Doug Peterson to not use the workhorse back. Boston

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Scott and Corey Clement are both capable pass catching backs

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:40.080
<v Speaker 1>and should take some third down work and maybe more.

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:42.879
<v Speaker 1>But Miles Sanders looked really good over the tail end

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 1>of last year. Fantastic. I was gonna say, can I

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 1>play counter counter Devil's Advocate? But like four games at

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the end of last season with eight plus percent snaps? Okay,

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:56.639
<v Speaker 1>but all the rest of the depth except Boston Scott,

0:22:56.680 --> 0:23:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and there was Boston Scots actually good. Boston Scott is good.

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, Yeah, I like him. I do too. Uh.

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, in in PPR leagues, Boston Scott

0:23:06.320 --> 0:23:09.120
<v Speaker 1>should be getting drafted. He's going to be that bye

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 1>week guy that can get you five receptions in fifty yards.

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 1>That's he ought to he ought to be bi getting drafted.

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 1>And mostly every time I hear about Boston Scott, I

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:20.399
<v Speaker 1>think about Michael Scott from the office, and that's like

0:23:20.400 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 1>a character he does. Hey, I'm Boston Scott like prison Mike.

0:23:23.440 --> 0:23:25.880
<v Speaker 1>In fairness to the other players being injured then last

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 1>year they're gone. Now it's sharp, but they have fell

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:32.440
<v Speaker 1>a healthy guy no, No, it's Sanders Boston Scott. Oh,

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:35.119
<v Speaker 1>I guess there's that. I always think of Boston Market,

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:38.160
<v Speaker 1>but that's because I like food. It's Boston Market even

0:23:38.160 --> 0:23:40.919
<v Speaker 1>still a thing. They think there's still a few around

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:43.640
<v Speaker 1>here and there used all the time. Did you would

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 1>call me Boston Scott. Kenyan Drake of the Arizona Cardinals.

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:56.680
<v Speaker 1>His red flag thirty five percent of his fantasy points

0:23:56.760 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 1>last year came in two games. Two. Okay, that's not

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:04.679
<v Speaker 1>a usage scenario, right, Well, it's a little bit of

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 1>using a little bit of maybe. Um. It's also a

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:14.399
<v Speaker 1>past happy offense with DeAndre Hopkins added to the mix,

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:16.840
<v Speaker 1>a running quarterback who should take away some of his

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:20.200
<v Speaker 1>rushing touches, and Chase Edmonds is actually a very good

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 1>backup to him. I think he's he's good enough. He's

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:29.920
<v Speaker 1>good enough, good enough Bell, let's move on. He's kind

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:33.120
<v Speaker 1>of old, but he's getting lighter. The Jets are going

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 1>to be bad and might be throwing all the time.

0:24:36.040 --> 0:24:38.680
<v Speaker 1>That's another big red flag, lady on. Bell just might

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:42.399
<v Speaker 1>be out of the game script by halftime in most games. Plus,

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 1>he's got an even older Frank Gore backing him up,

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 1>and Frank Gore will steal touches because Frank always gets

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:54.000
<v Speaker 1>on the field. You say it every time. Yeah, he's

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry charged. Frank will be on the field. This

0:24:57.400 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 1>is the year a team realizes that giving Frank carries

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:04.920
<v Speaker 1>at this stage waste Until he's on the couch, Frank

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 1>care will get touch. We have. This is why Bell

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:08.639
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be on the field. I mean, who is it?

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:11.359
<v Speaker 1>Lamercle p Ryan and Frank Gore. That's it behind him.

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I got five more on the two bells. Chris Carson

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:16.679
<v Speaker 1>injury history. Carlos Hyde is the backup, but he's not

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:18.720
<v Speaker 1>much of a wherey Rashad Penny's still dealing with his

0:25:18.760 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 1>injury from last year. Chris Carson over twenty touches per

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:26.360
<v Speaker 1>game last year. Leonard four net. New offensive coordinator Jake

0:25:26.400 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Gruden brought his favorite pass catcher, Chris Thompson with him

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of four nets value was wrapped into

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the pass catching which came out of nowhere last year.

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's gonna go away just as quickly. Uh,

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:41.680
<v Speaker 1>David Johnson, Bill O'Brien will use him until he gets hurt.

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:44.359
<v Speaker 1>And he will get hurt because he was the return

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 1>and the DeAndre Hopkins trade, and they gotta make it

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:49.919
<v Speaker 1>look like they got something. Todd Gurley will never be

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 1>healthy again, but there's really no one behind him on

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the depth chart. UH Falcons were one of the more

0:25:56.520 --> 0:25:58.399
<v Speaker 1>pass heavy teams in the red zone last year, and

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:00.959
<v Speaker 1>that could change with Todd Gurley though. And finally, one

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 1>of my favorites, Austin Ekeler. I debated where to put him.

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:08.240
<v Speaker 1>He averaged twenty touches per game in games without Melvin

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Gordon last year, but he's never had a bell cow workload,

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 1>so I'm a little worried about him. Um, finally I

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>got the one bell, guys, and there's only three now,

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:21.199
<v Speaker 1>that was three bells. Let's try it again. There we go.

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Jones. This is controversial, right, Aaron Jones. We've outlined

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:31.560
<v Speaker 1>it enough on this show. He had a historic success

0:26:31.640 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 1>rate inside the five, but they drafted his replacement, who

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:39.439
<v Speaker 1>is bigger, stronger, more physical, can leap higher, and a

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:44.400
<v Speaker 1>goal line specialist in a J Dillon James Conner. It's

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the injuries for Connor that keep killing his seasons. I

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 1>think he'll get the work if he can stay healthy,

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:52.280
<v Speaker 1>but he can't stay healthy and finally David Montgomery answered

0:26:52.320 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Brian Johnson getting all angry. He's really the only pure

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:59.200
<v Speaker 1>runner on rosters. Treat Cohen's more of a gadgety scattie

0:26:59.240 --> 0:27:02.320
<v Speaker 1>guy than any thing, so he'll get the one bell category,

0:27:02.359 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 1>even though his talent is very much in question. There

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:08.240
<v Speaker 1>are seven workhorse backs. We don't have time for them,

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:10.439
<v Speaker 1>but just sip through the list of names that you

0:27:10.520 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 1>are calling. When you say workhorse, you mean they're gonna

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:15.399
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna get more than half of the carries. But

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be close to half, Okay, So Melvin Gordon

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:22.119
<v Speaker 1>over Philip Lindsay, Jonathan Taylor over, Marlon Mack, maybe Devin

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Singletarry over, Zack Moss, Ronald Jones over Keyshawn Vaughan, mark

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Ingram over JK. Dobbins, DeAndre Swift over carry On Johnson,

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:34.159
<v Speaker 1>and Raheem Mostert over the rest of the crew in

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:38.120
<v Speaker 1>San Franz Alright, great job on the bell cow running backs.

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, we will spend a little bit

0:27:41.800 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 1>of time in the stinkhole. What is the stinkhole? This

0:27:45.600 --> 0:27:48.399
<v Speaker 1>is the draft position where the obvious choices are gone,

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:52.480
<v Speaker 1>and now you've got to figure out what to do next.

0:27:52.720 --> 0:27:54.120
<v Speaker 1>If you would like my cheat sheet, you can get

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:56.120
<v Speaker 1>it for free by going to Guillotine leagues dot com

0:27:56.119 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 1>giveteen leagues dot com. My cheat sheet is there with

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:02.880
<v Speaker 1>all of my playerkings available in for drafts auctions however

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 1>we'd like it. Guillotine leagues dot com Back in moments

0:28:07.040 --> 0:28:49.800
<v Speaker 1>with more Fantasy Football Weekly. Ye, welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly.

0:28:49.840 --> 0:28:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I am Well Church and your co hosts are Matt

0:28:52.800 --> 0:28:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Harrison and Scott Fish. It's time for a segment we

0:28:57.880 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 1>call the Stinkhole and beyond sounder. For that that was

0:29:04.080 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the sounders. I mean just going down a register. It's

0:29:07.960 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 1>not really a sounder. I don't think. Um, every year

0:29:11.520 --> 0:29:15.720
<v Speaker 1>there's a spot in the first round where the obvious

0:29:15.840 --> 0:29:19.440
<v Speaker 1>choices are gone and now you got really a plethora

0:29:19.600 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 1>of available options to you. I want to first identify

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:27.160
<v Speaker 1>where the stink hole is this year, and then secondarily,

0:29:27.280 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 1>let's figure out what we want to do with that

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:31.840
<v Speaker 1>spot in the spot immediately spots immediately after it. I

0:29:31.880 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 1>got a fun idea, why not the count of three?

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:36.960
<v Speaker 1>We all say who we're going to pick first? Overall,

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 1>that's can we identify which spot it is first? First? Overall. Well,

0:29:41.120 --> 0:29:45.320
<v Speaker 1>for who would you pick first overall in the draft? One? Two, three?

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, that is all right? So it's Christian john

0:29:51.720 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Smith second pick? Is it Sae Kwon Barkley? For everybody? Say, kwan,

0:29:56.120 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I've I've I've toyed with having se Kwon number one? Okay,

0:29:59.520 --> 0:30:02.960
<v Speaker 1>so one too? CMC and Barkley? Are you are you

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:05.640
<v Speaker 1>in agreement? Scott? Sure? Yeah, yeah, we all are. I

0:30:05.640 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 1>think that's that's the universal consensus. I think ninety two

0:30:10.840 --> 0:30:14.480
<v Speaker 1>of drafts. You're going with those two guys like Ezekiel

0:30:14.520 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 1>at two out there, we should we try our number three?

0:30:18.240 --> 0:30:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Well together. The whole point, that point of this now

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:26.720
<v Speaker 1>we found it is that yes, um, there's there is

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:30.480
<v Speaker 1>not a unanimous number three pick, or even very close

0:30:30.520 --> 0:30:34.600
<v Speaker 1>to unanimous number three pick. I think now many people

0:30:34.640 --> 0:30:37.320
<v Speaker 1>are going to Ezekiel Elliott, but there's a lot of

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 1>available options, and so I want to I want to

0:30:40.600 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 1>first let's just let's just start here. Is Christian McCaffrey

0:30:44.640 --> 0:30:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the right selection at number one? Yes? Probably? Yeah. Probably.

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Now I've been like you, I've been, I'm there, but

0:30:54.360 --> 0:30:56.960
<v Speaker 1>like there's a part of me that says, man Barkley

0:30:57.000 --> 0:30:59.440
<v Speaker 1>can really make some place, and and that offense could

0:30:59.440 --> 0:31:01.600
<v Speaker 1>be really because they never had all those players on

0:31:01.640 --> 0:31:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the field. They have a hideous schedule to open up.

0:31:03.680 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 1>By the way, the Giants. Giants are very difficult first month.

0:31:08.120 --> 0:31:09.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm I've been so close on this, but I've got

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:12.800
<v Speaker 1>McCaffrey number one. Now, if Russell kun does end up

0:31:13.280 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 1>not playing left tackle, that might be enough to flip

0:31:16.200 --> 0:31:17.760
<v Speaker 1>it for me where I would I would go with

0:31:17.800 --> 0:31:21.120
<v Speaker 1>sake Kwon Barkley. The other side of it is there's

0:31:21.120 --> 0:31:26.480
<v Speaker 1>a chance this Teddy Bridgewater led offense is bad, just

0:31:26.800 --> 0:31:32.080
<v Speaker 1>bad that he can't stretch fields nearly enough. Well, that's

0:31:32.080 --> 0:31:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the maybe maybe, I mean, I don't know. I'm a

0:31:37.960 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit nervous about that part of it. See the

0:31:40.160 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 1>scenes offense was still good, but Teddy's numbers were terrible

0:31:43.240 --> 0:31:46.760
<v Speaker 1>in those games last year. He threw a lot of short,

0:31:47.040 --> 0:31:52.520
<v Speaker 1>catchable passes. Michael, Michael, Tom, It's that's right. Yes, Um,

0:31:52.800 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 1>we'll find out if that's gonna be the case or not?

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 1>All right? Is say Kwon Barkley number two? Is that correct?

0:31:59.080 --> 0:32:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Sacon Barkley is abou running back. If he's not number one,

0:32:01.200 --> 0:32:03.360
<v Speaker 1>he's number two for you guys, right, all right. If

0:32:03.360 --> 0:32:06.400
<v Speaker 1>se Kwon Barkley were on a different team, he'd be

0:32:06.440 --> 0:32:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the number one back. He's you know, this is just

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately the Giants have been terrible offensive line, and you

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:14.400
<v Speaker 1>know I got hurt. Last year he was the number

0:32:14.400 --> 0:32:17.160
<v Speaker 1>one player. He was the consensus number one player last year.

0:32:17.840 --> 0:32:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Now he's the number two player. So we all agree

0:32:20.600 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 1>that those are the correct number one and number two's

0:32:22.720 --> 0:32:25.040
<v Speaker 1>all right. Now let's figure out what we're gonna do

0:32:25.080 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 1>at pick number three. I want to begin with Scott.

0:32:28.360 --> 0:32:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Who do you believe is the correct player to go

0:32:31.520 --> 0:32:34.920
<v Speaker 1>into the stink hole at number three? Where you have

0:32:35.040 --> 0:32:38.040
<v Speaker 1>to rely and now your own good judgment with your

0:32:38.120 --> 0:32:41.280
<v Speaker 1>ass on the line. Because the obvious picks are over,

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:45.320
<v Speaker 1>You've now got everybody to draft to pick from except

0:32:45.320 --> 0:32:47.840
<v Speaker 1>for two players. Who's the right guy in your mind?

0:32:48.960 --> 0:32:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm probably leaning either Elliott or Derrick Henry. I hate

0:32:53.080 --> 0:32:55.200
<v Speaker 1>to say it, but he's like seventh or eighth and ADP.

0:32:55.400 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 1>But I really do consider him there. He's gotten his

0:32:58.800 --> 0:33:00.440
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm gonna go with Henry. He's got his

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:03.880
<v Speaker 1>entire offensive line coming back, which I love when that

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:06.920
<v Speaker 1>happens for a running back. Just signed a new contract. Well,

0:33:07.000 --> 0:33:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Jack Conklin's gone the Oh yeah, he went to Cleveland's right.

0:33:12.120 --> 0:33:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I forgot that. I was thinking of Staffold and Lawan

0:33:15.240 --> 0:33:20.440
<v Speaker 1>and and Jones, of his life coming back. Uh. My

0:33:20.840 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 1>only concern is the four nine touches last year. But

0:33:23.440 --> 0:33:27.040
<v Speaker 1>if there's anybody built to handle four hun nine touches

0:33:27.080 --> 0:33:29.440
<v Speaker 1>and that come back, it's probably him. The lack of

0:33:29.440 --> 0:33:32.080
<v Speaker 1>passing game work is is an issue, but he really

0:33:32.080 --> 0:33:35.720
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have any competitions for any touches. I think he's

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:38.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a touch of game guy, and uh, I

0:33:38.920 --> 0:33:42.040
<v Speaker 1>think he's a safe pick there. All right, Matt, what

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:44.440
<v Speaker 1>would you do in the the stink hoole at pick

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:47.360
<v Speaker 1>number three? I'm so sad because Scott stole my thunder

0:33:47.400 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Because everybody's saying Zeke that, Zeke that at three. I'm

0:33:50.640 --> 0:33:53.200
<v Speaker 1>sick of it. The best pound for pound running back

0:33:53.200 --> 0:33:56.120
<v Speaker 1>in the league is Derrick Henry. He had about the

0:33:56.160 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 1>same amount of carries as Zeke last year. He finished

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:02.800
<v Speaker 1>with two hundred more yards. Well, Henry wasn't used a

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:05.640
<v Speaker 1>ton in the passing game. He averaged eleven point four

0:34:05.720 --> 0:34:08.640
<v Speaker 1>yards per catch, while Zekeo was only at seven point seven.

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Henry's backup is not scary. Who was the second rated

0:34:13.680 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 1>running back in Fantasy points last year? It was Derrick Henry.

0:34:17.200 --> 0:34:19.399
<v Speaker 1>Why is it going off seventh or eighth right now?

0:34:19.520 --> 0:34:21.040
<v Speaker 1>And if you go back to the tail end of

0:34:22.200 --> 0:34:25.200
<v Speaker 1>don't forget that he went from eight to ten touches

0:34:25.239 --> 0:34:30.360
<v Speaker 1>per game at the beginning of Thanks Matt Lafleur, to

0:34:30.600 --> 0:34:33.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty carries per game. Over the last five games of

0:34:33.160 --> 0:34:36.360
<v Speaker 1>that season, he scored eight times, an average a hundred

0:34:36.360 --> 0:34:38.920
<v Speaker 1>and twenty five rushing yards per game in those five games.

0:34:39.200 --> 0:34:41.560
<v Speaker 1>So in his last twenty three games as a pro,

0:34:41.680 --> 0:34:45.400
<v Speaker 1>including the playoffs, he's averaging twenty one carries, a hundred

0:34:45.400 --> 0:34:48.640
<v Speaker 1>and thirteen yards per game, and a score point one

0:34:49.000 --> 0:34:52.160
<v Speaker 1>per game. He only had one game in which he

0:34:52.280 --> 0:34:56.319
<v Speaker 1>didn't clear at least seventy yards or score. He's just

0:34:56.400 --> 0:35:00.399
<v Speaker 1>a lock. Uh. I can't take Derrick Kenn you pick

0:35:00.480 --> 0:35:03.759
<v Speaker 1>number three if I'm in a PPR league. It just

0:35:04.080 --> 0:35:09.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't catch enough. And what those receptions do is they

0:35:09.200 --> 0:35:12.759
<v Speaker 1>mitigate the bad rushing day that all runners have, even

0:35:12.800 --> 0:35:16.279
<v Speaker 1>the great ones Barry Sanders, they all had bad rushing days.

0:35:16.360 --> 0:35:22.839
<v Speaker 1>Henry gets one years had bad games too. They the

0:35:22.920 --> 0:35:25.880
<v Speaker 1>reception when you have that forty yard rushing day, you

0:35:26.200 --> 0:35:28.840
<v Speaker 1>know you're that means probably the game script on upside

0:35:28.840 --> 0:35:32.279
<v Speaker 1>down on your defense, and if you can catch, you're

0:35:32.400 --> 0:35:35.160
<v Speaker 1>they're still gonna throw you the ball. So that's why

0:35:35.200 --> 0:35:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I can't go Derrick Henry this high. And I wouldn't

0:35:37.160 --> 0:35:40.200
<v Speaker 1>take down to Derrick Henry actually for me in the

0:35:40.239 --> 0:35:43.839
<v Speaker 1>first six picks, because I'm in I'm in PPR leagues. Now,

0:35:43.840 --> 0:35:44.920
<v Speaker 1>if you're you know, if you're not, you're in a

0:35:44.920 --> 0:35:47.120
<v Speaker 1>half point PBR. You're in a standard scoring the great

0:35:47.200 --> 0:35:50.200
<v Speaker 1>take Derrick Henry. I'm in a six point per touchdown league,

0:35:50.200 --> 0:35:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and that's why I'm taking Derrick Henry. Alvin Kamara is

0:35:54.040 --> 0:35:56.279
<v Speaker 1>my choice. I do believe this is where he was

0:35:56.360 --> 0:35:59.120
<v Speaker 1>going last year. Right here had a season with three

0:35:59.239 --> 0:36:02.600
<v Speaker 1>different May Jr. Injuries that he gallantly played through and

0:36:02.680 --> 0:36:06.000
<v Speaker 1>lied on the injury report about, and I believe he

0:36:06.000 --> 0:36:08.319
<v Speaker 1>bounces right back to form here. I like we all

0:36:08.320 --> 0:36:10.000
<v Speaker 1>want a part of the Saints offense is a very

0:36:10.000 --> 0:36:12.120
<v Speaker 1>good offense. It's gonna go through him. He's gonna catch

0:36:12.160 --> 0:36:13.799
<v Speaker 1>a ton of balls. We're gonna see the same game

0:36:13.800 --> 0:36:17.200
<v Speaker 1>breaking skill that he showed two years ago but couldn't

0:36:17.200 --> 0:36:20.440
<v Speaker 1>display last season. I am going with somebody closer to

0:36:20.480 --> 0:36:23.920
<v Speaker 1>the consensus here with Alvin Kamara. By the way, with Kamara,

0:36:23.960 --> 0:36:26.040
<v Speaker 1>he was averaging like a hundred and seventeen yards of

0:36:26.120 --> 0:36:28.480
<v Speaker 1>game and five catches a game before the injury. That's

0:36:28.520 --> 0:36:31.000
<v Speaker 1>that's in PPR. That's like seventeen points a game without

0:36:31.040 --> 0:36:34.560
<v Speaker 1>any touchdowns. Yeah, great point. Yeah, and and the touchdowns

0:36:34.560 --> 0:36:36.200
<v Speaker 1>were a big problem for people. He scored in two

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:38.160
<v Speaker 1>games last year. Now it's got to come back to

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:41.200
<v Speaker 1>the normalcy. Yeah. Before that, he had scored thirty one

0:36:41.239 --> 0:36:43.760
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns in his first two years. Yeah, great point. Yeah,

0:36:43.880 --> 0:36:45.680
<v Speaker 1>you know there, so he was on over a touchdown

0:36:45.719 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 1>a game pace. Yea. And through his first two years,

0:36:49.120 --> 0:36:53.719
<v Speaker 1>remember his Alvin commerce rookie year, he didn't even start

0:36:53.800 --> 0:36:56.719
<v Speaker 1>doing anything until like game six. Wasn't even involved in

0:36:56.760 --> 0:37:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the offense. All right, let's move on now. This segment

0:37:00.520 --> 0:37:02.759
<v Speaker 1>is called the stinkhole and beyond. We've identified what we

0:37:02.800 --> 0:37:04.640
<v Speaker 1>do in the stinkhole. What would you do with the

0:37:04.719 --> 0:37:08.480
<v Speaker 1>two picks after that, Scott, What's what would you do

0:37:08.520 --> 0:37:12.000
<v Speaker 1>with pick number four and pick number five? Well, we've

0:37:12.080 --> 0:37:14.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of talked about it now because I picked four,

0:37:14.719 --> 0:37:18.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking Kamara yes, Uh that I I like you.

0:37:18.840 --> 0:37:21.319
<v Speaker 1>It's I mentioned the stats on what he's done in

0:37:21.320 --> 0:37:24.839
<v Speaker 1>the first two years with touchdowns. He was hindered last year. Uh.

0:37:25.400 --> 0:37:27.080
<v Speaker 1>A big point is I think the Stains are going

0:37:27.120 --> 0:37:28.919
<v Speaker 1>to score a ton of points and I just want

0:37:28.920 --> 0:37:31.720
<v Speaker 1>one of the if I'm not if I'm going running

0:37:31.719 --> 0:37:34.720
<v Speaker 1>back heavy, if I'm going robust running back is my strategy,

0:37:34.719 --> 0:37:37.120
<v Speaker 1>which I do every year. I know that you've hated

0:37:37.120 --> 0:37:39.319
<v Speaker 1>that year's past with your do the opposite, but not

0:37:39.400 --> 0:37:43.640
<v Speaker 1>this year. Anything goes and this year I came up

0:37:43.640 --> 0:37:46.160
<v Speaker 1>with a name for the three five to what's the

0:37:46.239 --> 0:37:49.399
<v Speaker 1>three five to the one we talked about last back

0:37:49.560 --> 0:37:52.359
<v Speaker 1>the opposite a week ago. Oh, it's called the Gainesville.

0:37:52.360 --> 0:37:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Now the Gainesville what's that? Gainesville, Florida's area code is

0:37:56.000 --> 0:38:00.400
<v Speaker 1>three five too. Hey, that's asking a lot the listener

0:38:00.440 --> 0:38:07.080
<v Speaker 1>to keep track that, I'll be honest. Yeah, that's it. Yeah,

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:08.960
<v Speaker 1>what are you doing to pick four and five? Scott?

0:38:09.560 --> 0:38:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking Kamara four and I am still taking Ezekiel

0:38:13.200 --> 0:38:17.359
<v Speaker 1>Elliott at five. It's just it feels like value there.

0:38:17.400 --> 0:38:20.560
<v Speaker 1>He's a guy that gets that's averaged nearly two thousand

0:38:20.680 --> 0:38:24.000
<v Speaker 1>yards or the year that he missed six games. He

0:38:24.040 --> 0:38:27.160
<v Speaker 1>would have gotten about that every year, three plus touches

0:38:27.200 --> 0:38:29.560
<v Speaker 1>every year. He's had a hundred plus catches of the

0:38:29.600 --> 0:38:32.360
<v Speaker 1>last two years, which I do think comes down with

0:38:32.360 --> 0:38:34.799
<v Speaker 1>the addition of Ceedee Lamb and and Tony Pollard coming on.

0:38:35.040 --> 0:38:37.440
<v Speaker 1>But he'll still catch thirty or forty, you know. So

0:38:37.719 --> 0:38:40.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm still taking Zeke at that. I think he's never

0:38:40.360 --> 0:38:43.359
<v Speaker 1>missed a game from injury, not one in his career yet. No,

0:38:43.520 --> 0:38:46.279
<v Speaker 1>that means a work horse. You know. Again from last

0:38:46.320 --> 0:38:48.640
<v Speaker 1>people who may have missed it last segment, I'm speculating

0:38:48.640 --> 0:38:50.640
<v Speaker 1>that Tony Pollard has a much bigger role, and I'm

0:38:50.680 --> 0:38:53.000
<v Speaker 1>nervous about Zeke. But I'm on the outside of this,

0:38:53.080 --> 0:38:55.560
<v Speaker 1>and I openly acknowledge. I'm I'm the only one who's

0:38:55.560 --> 0:38:58.040
<v Speaker 1>not willing to just replay the last year and assume

0:38:58.120 --> 0:38:59.799
<v Speaker 1>this year is going to be just like it. By

0:38:59.800 --> 0:39:02.279
<v Speaker 1>the A in a in a draft just weeks ago,

0:39:02.360 --> 0:39:05.839
<v Speaker 1>I took c h ahead of both And we'll talk

0:39:05.880 --> 0:39:08.600
<v Speaker 1>more about him in just a minute. Uh, Matt, we've

0:39:08.600 --> 0:39:11.080
<v Speaker 1>done the stinkhole pick three in the first round. Now

0:39:11.120 --> 0:39:13.359
<v Speaker 1>it's picks four and five. Who are you taking in those?

0:39:13.600 --> 0:39:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I wish we would have traded info beforehand, Scott, because

0:39:16.640 --> 0:39:19.360
<v Speaker 1>we have the exact same order and the exact same guys.

0:39:19.600 --> 0:39:23.160
<v Speaker 1>I have Camara at four and Zeke at five. Um.

0:39:23.360 --> 0:39:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Camara has never had a three hundred touch season, never

0:39:26.840 --> 0:39:28.640
<v Speaker 1>if he and he may not if he gets there.

0:39:29.480 --> 0:39:33.080
<v Speaker 1>He's a great candidate for fifteen plus touchdowns because he

0:39:33.120 --> 0:39:36.759
<v Speaker 1>had eighteen in his rookie year and thirteen uh the

0:39:37.040 --> 0:39:39.840
<v Speaker 1>year before the year after that. So he's a great

0:39:39.920 --> 0:39:42.000
<v Speaker 1>candidate for huge numbers if he can just get to

0:39:42.040 --> 0:39:45.359
<v Speaker 1>the three d touch mark. Not three hundred carries three

0:39:45.440 --> 0:39:48.680
<v Speaker 1>hundred touches and and that's it's a barrier. He's got

0:39:48.800 --> 0:39:51.719
<v Speaker 1>like two EIGHTIESO, so it's not a huge barrier for

0:39:51.800 --> 0:39:56.239
<v Speaker 1>him to overcome. And then Zeke, as Scott said, he's

0:39:56.280 --> 0:39:59.239
<v Speaker 1>just super consistent. Uh, he will likely finish in the

0:39:59.280 --> 0:40:03.320
<v Speaker 1>top eight. He's durable. Uh. The offense is good. Uh,

0:40:03.400 --> 0:40:06.160
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna put up yards and ten touchdowns easy on

0:40:06.200 --> 0:40:08.239
<v Speaker 1>the ground. All right, Well, I will now go with

0:40:08.280 --> 0:40:10.839
<v Speaker 1>my pick four and my pick five, stinkholes. Pick three.

0:40:10.920 --> 0:40:16.400
<v Speaker 1>We've given our guys for that. Um. Who wants to

0:40:16.440 --> 0:40:20.919
<v Speaker 1>have the starting running back for the Chiefs? I do.

0:40:21.760 --> 0:40:24.320
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to have the starting running back for the Chiefs.

0:40:24.680 --> 0:40:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to have it. I want to have the

0:40:26.080 --> 0:40:28.640
<v Speaker 1>starting running back for an offense that's going to score,

0:40:28.920 --> 0:40:32.440
<v Speaker 1>that has last year scored ten more points than the

0:40:32.480 --> 0:40:35.799
<v Speaker 1>average offense. I would like to have a part of that.

0:40:36.200 --> 0:40:37.880
<v Speaker 1>I want the guy that's going to get the ball

0:40:37.960 --> 0:40:40.920
<v Speaker 1>at the three yard line. I would like Clyde Edwards

0:40:40.960 --> 0:40:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Hilaire with my pick number four, if you don't mind.

0:40:43.840 --> 0:40:47.839
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, he's really good. I mean it's

0:40:47.880 --> 0:40:52.040
<v Speaker 1>not just about the fact that he's the Chiefs starting

0:40:52.120 --> 0:40:55.480
<v Speaker 1>running back. He's also a really good running back. And

0:40:55.560 --> 0:40:59.600
<v Speaker 1>when you put a really good running back on a

0:40:59.600 --> 0:41:04.000
<v Speaker 1>team that is almost indefensible in the passing game, man,

0:41:04.080 --> 0:41:06.200
<v Speaker 1>the yards are gonna come easy to Clyde Edwards Hilaire.

0:41:06.320 --> 0:41:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Can I speak to someone on as well. A lot

0:41:09.080 --> 0:41:11.880
<v Speaker 1>of people talk about his pass pro that it's not great, etcetera.

0:41:12.360 --> 0:41:14.800
<v Speaker 1>The Chiefs asked they're running backs to pass protect twelve

0:41:14.800 --> 0:41:17.120
<v Speaker 1>percent of the time last year. That's fifth lowest in

0:41:17.160 --> 0:41:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the league. They're not going to ask him to do

0:41:19.440 --> 0:41:21.080
<v Speaker 1>that a bunch. He doesn't need to be that. No,

0:41:21.320 --> 0:41:24.120
<v Speaker 1>and you know he's he's very He's obviously diminutive, in

0:41:24.360 --> 0:41:27.480
<v Speaker 1>at least in height, although he's strong for his size.

0:41:27.760 --> 0:41:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Marie Jones Drew has always been my comparative player to him,

0:41:30.680 --> 0:41:33.560
<v Speaker 1>and Jones Drew has built much the same way. Um

0:41:33.600 --> 0:41:38.640
<v Speaker 1>all right, now pick number five. Matt tell listeners about

0:41:38.920 --> 0:41:44.239
<v Speaker 1>Austin Ekeler for anybody who missed the show last week. Um,

0:41:45.360 --> 0:41:48.840
<v Speaker 1>welly average is about seven yards per touch. Yes, every

0:41:48.840 --> 0:41:51.880
<v Speaker 1>time he touches the ball seven yards. Yes. The problem

0:41:51.960 --> 0:41:55.160
<v Speaker 1>is that he only got two undertouches last year, but

0:41:55.239 --> 0:41:59.040
<v Speaker 1>now Melvin Gordon's gone. Those are not vacated targets but

0:41:59.160 --> 0:42:03.200
<v Speaker 1>vacated touches, and he should jump into close to the

0:42:03.400 --> 0:42:08.120
<v Speaker 1>three touch category. If he does that, he's well ahead

0:42:08.120 --> 0:42:12.080
<v Speaker 1>of Christian McCaffrey's numbers from last year. Yes, and that's uh.

0:42:12.200 --> 0:42:14.400
<v Speaker 1>I think the upside is there. He's strong enough to

0:42:14.520 --> 0:42:18.520
<v Speaker 1>run inside to him to pitch your side. He's uh.

0:42:18.560 --> 0:42:22.279
<v Speaker 1>He is quietly one of the most talented running backs

0:42:22.280 --> 0:42:25.600
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL, so I'm a big fan. Now, last

0:42:25.600 --> 0:42:27.640
<v Speaker 1>thing I want to talk about is we examine this

0:42:27.680 --> 0:42:30.879
<v Speaker 1>first round the stink hole and beyond where in your

0:42:30.920 --> 0:42:35.120
<v Speaker 1>mind Scott is the sweet spot in round one? If

0:42:35.160 --> 0:42:37.640
<v Speaker 1>you could pick a draft spot in round one. Do

0:42:37.680 --> 0:42:39.120
<v Speaker 1>you want to be at the beginning for one of

0:42:39.120 --> 0:42:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the first two guys we talked about, or do you

0:42:41.360 --> 0:42:42.520
<v Speaker 1>want to be in the middle or do you want

0:42:42.520 --> 0:42:44.600
<v Speaker 1>to be in the end? First off, the middle sucks

0:42:44.640 --> 0:42:47.799
<v Speaker 1>seven and eight or terrible eight. Eight is my least

0:42:47.840 --> 0:42:49.920
<v Speaker 1>favorite spot this year out of all the draft. Eight

0:42:50.000 --> 0:42:53.799
<v Speaker 1>is just terrible. Uh. This is a question versus data

0:42:53.920 --> 0:42:56.319
<v Speaker 1>versus my heart. Like data will tell you the one

0:42:56.320 --> 0:42:59.000
<v Speaker 1>on one is the best because twenty five in a

0:42:59.040 --> 0:43:02.120
<v Speaker 1>deep lee eep here like this, you're getting McCaffrey and

0:43:02.120 --> 0:43:04.120
<v Speaker 1>you're getting two really good players. You're the first team

0:43:04.120 --> 0:43:06.600
<v Speaker 1>to three players. But I'm I'm I am a self

0:43:06.640 --> 0:43:10.120
<v Speaker 1>proclaimed forever back, a hoolic. I need my running backs,

0:43:10.120 --> 0:43:12.080
<v Speaker 1>so I want to be at the tail end. And

0:43:12.160 --> 0:43:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I just I just did a draft with mad that

0:43:14.120 --> 0:43:16.279
<v Speaker 1>I got, Like, who who did I get? I got

0:43:16.280 --> 0:43:19.319
<v Speaker 1>Ekela and Josh Jacobs at the back corner. I'm like,

0:43:19.719 --> 0:43:22.239
<v Speaker 1>give me that all day long. I will start my

0:43:22.320 --> 0:43:24.719
<v Speaker 1>team with that. So I'm going back corner. I don't

0:43:24.719 --> 0:43:27.000
<v Speaker 1>blame him. Matt. Where in the first round do you

0:43:27.040 --> 0:43:29.399
<v Speaker 1>think is the sweet spot? Why do you keep going

0:43:29.440 --> 0:43:32.840
<v Speaker 1>to Scott first? Better? Because he just says all the

0:43:32.880 --> 0:43:36.600
<v Speaker 1>stuff that I want to say. Um. I just recently

0:43:36.640 --> 0:43:40.320
<v Speaker 1>did a Best Ball draft where I was picked number eleven,

0:43:40.880 --> 0:43:43.440
<v Speaker 1>and to pick number eleven, I got Derrick Henry and

0:43:43.440 --> 0:43:46.160
<v Speaker 1>then on the turn I got Austin Ekeler and I

0:43:46.200 --> 0:43:49.759
<v Speaker 1>felt absolutely thrilled about it. I I have theact same

0:43:49.760 --> 0:43:52.120
<v Speaker 1>stuff in my notes. I I hate being in the middle.

0:43:52.160 --> 0:43:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I want to be at the back end where I

0:43:53.719 --> 0:43:58.080
<v Speaker 1>get a combination of Derrick Henry, Tyreek Hill, Davante Adams,

0:43:58.120 --> 0:44:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Clyde Edwards, Hilaire, Austin Alert, Josh Jacob. Joe Mixon is

0:44:01.920 --> 0:44:04.040
<v Speaker 1>in there a lot too. I'm not a mixing your

0:44:04.080 --> 0:44:07.040
<v Speaker 1>left Joe mixing. You're gonna get two great players that

0:44:07.160 --> 0:44:10.439
<v Speaker 1>you cannot you can't execute from the middle or front

0:44:10.480 --> 0:44:14.120
<v Speaker 1>part of of the first round. When we come back,

0:44:14.200 --> 0:44:17.640
<v Speaker 1>our number two begins with three tough questions. We will

0:44:17.719 --> 0:44:21.560
<v Speaker 1>challenge the brain power of my co host when we

0:44:21.600 --> 0:44:48.520
<v Speaker 1>come back to Fantasy Football Weekly. Do welcome back to

0:44:48.560 --> 0:44:52.719
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly and pult charge from Guillotine Leagues dot com.

0:44:52.880 --> 0:44:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Scott Fish with me as well and Matt Harrison. Scott

0:44:57.840 --> 0:45:04.319
<v Speaker 1>and then Matt Harrison at come on, we were now

0:45:04.480 --> 0:45:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Glancy Football Weekly, starring Paul Charching and Scott Fish, also

0:45:08.520 --> 0:45:14.600
<v Speaker 1>with Matt Harrison. Thank you. This is a segment we

0:45:14.640 --> 0:45:16.800
<v Speaker 1>called three Tough Questions. We encourage you to play along.

0:45:16.840 --> 0:45:19.719
<v Speaker 1>I will ask three difficult questions my co host. They

0:45:19.760 --> 0:45:21.799
<v Speaker 1>will try to find the right answers. See if you

0:45:21.840 --> 0:45:26.080
<v Speaker 1>can go three and oh, tough question number one. Last year,

0:45:26.120 --> 0:45:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Michael Gallup took a big jump forward and then the

0:45:30.000 --> 0:45:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys drafted Ceedee Lamb. How worried should a Marie Cooper

0:45:35.320 --> 0:45:41.520
<v Speaker 1>owners be not at all concerned, somewhat concerned, or bowl

0:45:41.680 --> 0:45:47.799
<v Speaker 1>looseningly concerned. Let's begin with Scott Fish. I thought I

0:45:47.840 --> 0:45:51.399
<v Speaker 1>was gonna go first. Scott gets to go first. He's

0:45:51.400 --> 0:45:56.920
<v Speaker 1>got all the good data. Nice, alright, I'm assuming so alright. So, So,

0:45:57.040 --> 0:45:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Michael Gallup was already kind of better than than Amary Cop.

0:46:00.040 --> 0:46:03.000
<v Speaker 1>He was down the stretch posting better fantasy numbers in

0:46:03.120 --> 0:46:06.120
<v Speaker 1>six of the final eight games. Land was my wide

0:46:06.120 --> 0:46:08.959
<v Speaker 1>receiver one coming out. There's been reports of him making

0:46:09.000 --> 0:46:13.680
<v Speaker 1>some unreal, unreal catches. Already they have a hundred vacated targets.

0:46:13.680 --> 0:46:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Granted that's a lot of Witten. Yeah, So Jarwin is

0:46:17.719 --> 0:46:21.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna get some. Lamb will get some. I'm not sure

0:46:21.440 --> 0:46:24.439
<v Speaker 1>Cooper or Gallup take much of a target hit at all.

0:46:24.520 --> 0:46:26.719
<v Speaker 1>I think Jackson for a prime year. But I'm gonna

0:46:26.760 --> 0:46:29.359
<v Speaker 1>say somewhat concerned because he's a MARII Cooper and he's

0:46:29.360 --> 0:46:31.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna get a bunch of big games and a bunch

0:46:31.640 --> 0:46:34.360
<v Speaker 1>of nothing games. So you always have to be somewhat

0:46:34.360 --> 0:46:37.840
<v Speaker 1>concerned for a Mari Cooper. All right, well done, Scott.

0:46:37.880 --> 0:46:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I knew you could handle it. Matt. I think I'm

0:46:41.960 --> 0:46:45.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna get the wrong answer here. Uh, not at all.

0:46:45.480 --> 0:46:47.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not concerned about a Mark Cooper at all, because

0:46:47.760 --> 0:46:50.399
<v Speaker 1>Jerry don't pay a hundred million dollars to a Mary

0:46:50.480 --> 0:46:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Cooper if Jerry ain't gonna mandate that Amari Cooper gets

0:46:53.600 --> 0:46:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the ball. He just turned twenty six, He's entering his

0:46:56.960 --> 0:46:59.160
<v Speaker 1>sixth year in the league. But the thing I love

0:46:59.200 --> 0:47:02.960
<v Speaker 1>about Cooper is he gets the job done efficiently. He

0:47:03.040 --> 0:47:05.840
<v Speaker 1>only had a hundred and nineteen targets last year, that

0:47:05.920 --> 0:47:10.760
<v Speaker 1>was the most in the league. Still, he logged yards

0:47:10.840 --> 0:47:13.680
<v Speaker 1>and had eight touchdowns. And to put that into perspective,

0:47:14.160 --> 0:47:17.640
<v Speaker 1>he finished as the seventh best fantasy receiver with the

0:47:17.680 --> 0:47:21.640
<v Speaker 1>eighteenth most targets. He's efficient, and while Lamb and Gallup

0:47:21.640 --> 0:47:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and Jarwin are gonna get targets, I don't see a

0:47:23.600 --> 0:47:27.959
<v Speaker 1>big drop from one nineteen because that's not a huge

0:47:27.960 --> 0:47:30.640
<v Speaker 1>obscle overcome. He can get seven half targets per game

0:47:31.160 --> 0:47:34.839
<v Speaker 1>fairly easily, so I'm not really worried. Plus, what's good

0:47:34.880 --> 0:47:37.000
<v Speaker 1>for the offense is good for the offense, and that's

0:47:37.040 --> 0:47:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Seedee Lamb, that's good for the offense. Um, well quoted,

0:47:40.760 --> 0:47:43.600
<v Speaker 1>and you're right about that. Things that help any player,

0:47:43.680 --> 0:47:46.040
<v Speaker 1>and if anything, it helps the offense, helps everybody on

0:47:46.080 --> 0:47:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the offense. Oh what is it? Rising tides raise all ships? Right, Um,

0:47:51.440 --> 0:47:54.000
<v Speaker 1>that is true, and that is why you do not

0:47:54.239 --> 0:47:58.120
<v Speaker 1>have to have any bowel loosening levels of concern over

0:47:58.120 --> 0:48:00.799
<v Speaker 1>a Marii Cooper. But you should have. I'm concerned, and

0:48:00.840 --> 0:48:04.000
<v Speaker 1>of course I got it's for the reasons that Scott

0:48:04.840 --> 0:48:09.600
<v Speaker 1>artfully demonstrate. At moments ago. People do not realize how

0:48:09.640 --> 0:48:11.960
<v Speaker 1>close Gallop was the Cooper last year. By the way,

0:48:12.040 --> 0:48:13.799
<v Speaker 1>you talked about the second half of the season when

0:48:13.800 --> 0:48:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Gallup was statistically better, but even on the full season,

0:48:16.440 --> 0:48:19.799
<v Speaker 1>get how close these do were. They were separated by

0:48:20.160 --> 0:48:27.720
<v Speaker 1>six targets. Thirteen catches, only eighty two yards and two scores.

0:48:28.320 --> 0:48:30.719
<v Speaker 1>Gallup and Cooper were practically the same guy last year,

0:48:30.800 --> 0:48:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and I'm gonna Gallop gave you the consistency that Cooper didn't.

0:48:33.800 --> 0:48:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say half of Cooper's points came in

0:48:36.239 --> 0:48:39.279
<v Speaker 1>four games. That is actually pretty close to right. You know,

0:48:39.320 --> 0:48:43.200
<v Speaker 1>with Cooper you get the huge variance of output. His

0:48:43.360 --> 0:48:46.400
<v Speaker 1>nine best games were great and his other seven games.

0:48:47.000 --> 0:48:53.280
<v Speaker 1>In Cooper's bad seven games, he averaged two catches, thirty

0:48:53.320 --> 0:48:55.759
<v Speaker 1>two yards and did not score. So he's like a

0:48:55.760 --> 0:48:58.480
<v Speaker 1>healthy will Fuller. He has a healthy will Fuller. It's

0:48:58.520 --> 0:49:02.239
<v Speaker 1>a disaster level will put for him. So roll all

0:49:02.280 --> 0:49:07.279
<v Speaker 1>those things together, you should be somewhat concerned. All right,

0:49:07.719 --> 0:49:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Now we go to question number two. Last year, Washington

0:49:12.719 --> 0:49:15.360
<v Speaker 1>receiver Terry McLaurin got robbed of the Rookie of the

0:49:15.440 --> 0:49:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Year award. This year, he'll try to improve despite massive

0:49:20.600 --> 0:49:25.160
<v Speaker 1>question marks at quarterback. Will he a be about the

0:49:25.160 --> 0:49:30.480
<v Speaker 1>same as last year? Be make a modest gain? Or

0:49:30.640 --> 0:49:35.479
<v Speaker 1>see will Terry McLaren make a big jump? Scott, Wait

0:49:35.480 --> 0:49:38.600
<v Speaker 1>a minute, wait, wait, you never go to the same guy.

0:49:39.920 --> 0:49:42.960
<v Speaker 1>This is right to go again, because he got the

0:49:42.960 --> 0:49:46.960
<v Speaker 1>first how it goes now, I guess I guess Matt's

0:49:46.960 --> 0:49:52.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna be talking second all season. Then alright, uh, Terry

0:49:53.000 --> 0:49:57.600
<v Speaker 1>McLaren um, So he as you mentioned, he was robbed

0:49:57.600 --> 0:49:59.080
<v Speaker 1>at the Rookie of the Year or yes he was?

0:49:59.320 --> 0:50:02.120
<v Speaker 1>He just yeah, he was. He was really really good

0:50:02.200 --> 0:50:04.680
<v Speaker 1>last year. There's there's a ton of targets missing from

0:50:04.680 --> 0:50:06.719
<v Speaker 1>that that passing game. A lot of them do tend

0:50:06.760 --> 0:50:08.520
<v Speaker 1>to be running back targets, but there's still a bunch

0:50:08.520 --> 0:50:12.120
<v Speaker 1>of targets that that are possible. My only problem and

0:50:12.200 --> 0:50:17.120
<v Speaker 1>nobody came in Antonio Gandy Golden, uh is the only

0:50:17.120 --> 0:50:20.000
<v Speaker 1>guy that came came in. So you think he could

0:50:20.000 --> 0:50:24.080
<v Speaker 1>make a huge jump because he only had ninety three targets.

0:50:24.800 --> 0:50:26.960
<v Speaker 1>But I think that offense is not going to be good.

0:50:26.960 --> 0:50:29.200
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna be behind. So that's gonna help a little.

0:50:29.239 --> 0:50:32.680
<v Speaker 1>But but I think Gibson and Gandy Golden are going

0:50:32.719 --> 0:50:35.440
<v Speaker 1>to take up what was lost. I think he's gonna

0:50:35.440 --> 0:50:37.920
<v Speaker 1>make a jump, but I don't think it's gonna be huge.

0:50:38.440 --> 0:50:40.960
<v Speaker 1>That's said like, he's one of those guys that if

0:50:41.000 --> 0:50:43.120
<v Speaker 1>everything hits right, he could be a wide receiver one

0:50:43.160 --> 0:50:44.640
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the season, I love his game

0:50:44.680 --> 0:50:48.560
<v Speaker 1>of play. But I'm going with I'm going to I

0:50:48.560 --> 0:50:51.640
<v Speaker 1>think the safe play is just a modest improvement. Maybe

0:50:51.680 --> 0:50:56.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty extra targets, twenty fifteen extra catches, whatever, I don't

0:50:56.040 --> 0:50:58.479
<v Speaker 1>know if you can improve on that, Matt, it's gonna

0:50:58.480 --> 0:51:03.200
<v Speaker 1>be a huge jump. This is gonna be a huge tell. Um.

0:51:03.280 --> 0:51:06.520
<v Speaker 1>He had of the target share last year and then

0:51:06.560 --> 0:51:10.200
<v Speaker 1>everybody left. There's no good players around. He might get

0:51:11.080 --> 0:51:15.719
<v Speaker 1>of the target share. They're they're all gone. Are you

0:51:15.760 --> 0:51:20.040
<v Speaker 1>afraid of Steven Sims or Antonio Gandy golden stealing targets

0:51:20.040 --> 0:51:22.920
<v Speaker 1>for Terry McClaren, Of course you do. Are you afraid

0:51:22.920 --> 0:51:25.799
<v Speaker 1>of Logan Thomas as the top tight end? No, you're not.

0:51:26.440 --> 0:51:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Plus Scott Turner is the offensive coordinator. There, Scott Turner's

0:51:32.200 --> 0:51:37.960
<v Speaker 1>offenses as his as an offensive coordinator, throw sixty percent

0:51:38.040 --> 0:51:40.440
<v Speaker 1>of the time, and they're going to be behind a

0:51:40.480 --> 0:51:47.799
<v Speaker 1>lot Terry mccon Terry McLaren, it's gonna make a huge jump. Yeah,

0:51:47.840 --> 0:51:52.799
<v Speaker 1>that's not gonna work. Um, he's too good to level

0:51:52.840 --> 0:51:54.520
<v Speaker 1>out already, so we'll just take that off the board.

0:51:54.600 --> 0:52:00.360
<v Speaker 1>He's not gonna level Matt, You're wrong. Modest improvement even

0:52:00.440 --> 0:52:04.719
<v Speaker 1>with the dubious prospects of Dwayne Haskins. McLaren's just too

0:52:04.760 --> 0:52:07.839
<v Speaker 1>talented to think that he doesn't get better. He will

0:52:07.920 --> 0:52:11.840
<v Speaker 1>get better. And Haskins had those two really good games

0:52:11.880 --> 0:52:13.200
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the year, and I you know,

0:52:13.280 --> 0:52:15.560
<v Speaker 1>it's it's way too small a sample size to really

0:52:15.600 --> 0:52:18.560
<v Speaker 1>dwell on. But I'll note that McLaren went off in

0:52:18.600 --> 0:52:20.840
<v Speaker 1>those two games. There are great games from the window

0:52:20.880 --> 0:52:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Ohio standing together, and the five catches hundred thirty yards

0:52:25.040 --> 0:52:29.000
<v Speaker 1>in one touchdown in one game, seven catches eighty six

0:52:29.120 --> 0:52:32.600
<v Speaker 1>yards in the other game. Even if Haskins doesn't pan out,

0:52:33.040 --> 0:52:36.840
<v Speaker 1>this might be the deepest set of quarterbacks in the NFL.

0:52:36.960 --> 0:52:41.840
<v Speaker 1>If if Alex Smith, If Alex Smith is able to rebound,

0:52:41.840 --> 0:52:46.280
<v Speaker 1>because Kyle Allen was serviceable last year as as a backup,

0:52:46.280 --> 0:52:48.279
<v Speaker 1>he'd be good. And then you may as well have

0:52:48.360 --> 0:52:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Alex Smith at some point over the course of the season.

0:52:51.080 --> 0:52:54.680
<v Speaker 1>He might be He might be a plausible starter. Terry

0:52:54.760 --> 0:52:59.960
<v Speaker 1>McLaren will end up making a modest improvement. Tough question

0:53:00.360 --> 0:53:05.400
<v Speaker 1>number three. Deshaun Watson's average draft position is Round four

0:53:06.760 --> 0:53:10.800
<v Speaker 1>as the fifth quarterback off the board, but his starting

0:53:10.880 --> 0:53:14.920
<v Speaker 1>receivers rank as why and by rank I mean average

0:53:14.960 --> 0:53:20.400
<v Speaker 1>draft position wide receiver thirty four, wide receiver thirty seven,

0:53:20.800 --> 0:53:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and his top tight end is tight end forty. There're

0:53:23.560 --> 0:53:25.960
<v Speaker 1>only thirty two teams in the league. I'll remind listeners

0:53:27.560 --> 0:53:30.600
<v Speaker 1>that makes his receiving group among the lowest ranked in

0:53:30.640 --> 0:53:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the league by average draft position. Now, finally to the

0:53:34.239 --> 0:53:39.239
<v Speaker 1>question after this long preamble, which is more accurate Watson's

0:53:39.320 --> 0:53:46.040
<v Speaker 1>lofty average draft position or his receivers lower draft position.

0:53:46.560 --> 0:53:49.200
<v Speaker 1>We begin with Scott Fishing. I'm going over here, and

0:53:49.320 --> 0:53:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I thought you I thought you were gonna flip at

0:53:51.160 --> 0:53:55.960
<v Speaker 1>that time, not until I got one. Okay, I'm going

0:53:56.040 --> 0:53:59.440
<v Speaker 1>with Watson's ADP. We've seen qbs have solid seasons in

0:53:59.480 --> 0:54:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the past, ridding the ball around and not having like

0:54:02.960 --> 0:54:07.919
<v Speaker 1>guys be just extreme studs, elite level talents. I think

0:54:08.000 --> 0:54:10.359
<v Speaker 1>a big reason of the lower ADPs in the wide

0:54:10.360 --> 0:54:14.440
<v Speaker 1>receivers is injury history. They can very easily if they

0:54:14.520 --> 0:54:18.000
<v Speaker 1>just stay healthy, very easily. I would do those a DPS.

0:54:18.320 --> 0:54:20.400
<v Speaker 1>And you mentioned the tight end there, tight top tight end,

0:54:20.400 --> 0:54:22.719
<v Speaker 1>his tight end forty. Well, there are two tight ends.

0:54:22.800 --> 0:54:25.719
<v Speaker 1>Again spreading it out because you're a good quarterback, there

0:54:25.760 --> 0:54:28.160
<v Speaker 1>are two tight ends combined for nearly eight hundred yards

0:54:28.160 --> 0:54:32.880
<v Speaker 1>and nine touchdowns last year nine times tight end six.

0:54:33.560 --> 0:54:38.200
<v Speaker 1>That would have been tight ends six nine times. So

0:54:38.680 --> 0:54:41.000
<v Speaker 1>even even though they have a tight end forty as

0:54:41.000 --> 0:54:43.440
<v Speaker 1>their top ranking tight end, he spread it around to

0:54:43.480 --> 0:54:45.919
<v Speaker 1>his tight ends and made you know, had the numbers there.

0:54:46.000 --> 0:54:48.880
<v Speaker 1>It's I I think Watson's ADP is fine, and I

0:54:48.920 --> 0:54:52.040
<v Speaker 1>think the other's ADP is more injury based. And because

0:54:52.040 --> 0:54:56.719
<v Speaker 1>he spreads it around a little, all right, is Watson's

0:54:56.800 --> 0:55:00.480
<v Speaker 1>average draft position correct his lofty average traft position or

0:55:00.480 --> 0:55:04.680
<v Speaker 1>his receiver's diminished a average draft position more correct? Let's

0:55:04.760 --> 0:55:10.160
<v Speaker 1>try this here. I want to say exactly what Scott said.

0:55:12.200 --> 0:55:16.160
<v Speaker 1>How about that? All right? Um, I'll add on you

0:55:16.640 --> 0:55:20.160
<v Speaker 1>to uh, you want to just stay fuller Fuller, Cooks,

0:55:20.239 --> 0:55:23.879
<v Speaker 1>Randall Cobb, Kenny Stills. That's about as deep as four

0:55:23.880 --> 0:55:28.200
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers as anybody has in the league. There he

0:55:28.239 --> 0:55:31.480
<v Speaker 1>goes still place, sure, but even with Kiki Cutie in

0:55:31.520 --> 0:55:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and his wide receiver four, that's a really deep wide

0:55:33.800 --> 0:55:35.960
<v Speaker 1>receiver depth chart right there. And when you don't know

0:55:36.000 --> 0:55:38.160
<v Speaker 1>who's going to be the best wide receiver, you take

0:55:38.200 --> 0:55:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback, and I think the quarterback is going to

0:55:40.160 --> 0:55:42.760
<v Speaker 1>do well. Nobody even mentioned the fact that he runs.

0:55:43.640 --> 0:55:46.120
<v Speaker 1>He does, He's a running quarterback, and much of his

0:55:46.160 --> 0:55:48.279
<v Speaker 1>fantasy relevance he is tied to his running and we

0:55:48.280 --> 0:55:50.400
<v Speaker 1>don't even care his receivers are at that point. Okay,

0:55:50.560 --> 0:55:53.120
<v Speaker 1>So I mean there's there's that as well. And the

0:55:53.200 --> 0:55:57.120
<v Speaker 1>correct answer is Scott's answer Watson's average draft position? Did

0:55:57.160 --> 0:55:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I did I get it right? To then? What did

0:55:59.080 --> 0:56:01.879
<v Speaker 1>you say? Again? I said whatever Scott said? Oh? Then

0:56:01.960 --> 0:56:07.760
<v Speaker 1>then no, Scott got it right. Our draft position is correct,

0:56:07.800 --> 0:56:10.480
<v Speaker 1>and frankly, I think we're probably underdrafting his receivers a

0:56:10.480 --> 0:56:13.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit as well. They should probably go higher. You

0:56:13.200 --> 0:56:15.239
<v Speaker 1>can make a good case for which one. I mean,

0:56:15.239 --> 0:56:17.000
<v Speaker 1>it would be a good argument who should be higher?

0:56:17.040 --> 0:56:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Will Fuller with the upside and everything else or Brandon

0:56:19.960 --> 0:56:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Cooks with more of the consistency but maybe not the

0:56:23.160 --> 0:56:27.400
<v Speaker 1>same ceiling that Will Fullers. Fuller has scored fourteen touchdowns

0:56:27.400 --> 0:56:30.640
<v Speaker 1>in his twenty one games with Watson, which is crazy. Yes,

0:56:31.760 --> 0:56:33.879
<v Speaker 1>and he's that double digit fantasy points in two thirds

0:56:33.880 --> 0:56:35.600
<v Speaker 1>of the games too. Well, if he's scored that much

0:56:35.600 --> 0:56:38.280
<v Speaker 1>of now you're just showing off, do you guys believe

0:56:39.520 --> 0:56:42.400
<v Speaker 1>is a sub topic. Do you believe there's such a

0:56:42.440 --> 0:56:45.360
<v Speaker 1>thing as injury prone or is it just that bad

0:56:45.440 --> 0:56:47.719
<v Speaker 1>luck happens to strike, you know, but by by just

0:56:47.760 --> 0:56:52.600
<v Speaker 1>odds are somebody's gonna hit bad luck repeatedly. I don't

0:56:52.600 --> 0:56:54.480
<v Speaker 1>really believe an injury prone too much, but when you

0:56:54.480 --> 0:56:57.000
<v Speaker 1>have soft tissue injuries, you tend to get them more

0:56:57.000 --> 0:57:01.240
<v Speaker 1>and more frequently. Soft tissues a problem. Like ask Leonard

0:57:01.360 --> 0:57:03.520
<v Speaker 1>soft tissue for net as. I like to call him

0:57:03.560 --> 0:57:06.560
<v Speaker 1>as a guy who severely sprained his ankle playing basketball

0:57:06.560 --> 0:57:09.399
<v Speaker 1>in high school. Very relevant and and it never has

0:57:09.480 --> 0:57:12.160
<v Speaker 1>fully healed all the way I turn it all the time,

0:57:12.200 --> 0:57:14.839
<v Speaker 1>and it's still bad. Yeah, injury history is a thing.

0:57:15.800 --> 0:57:19.640
<v Speaker 1>The turned ankle stings. It's smarts for sure. When we

0:57:19.800 --> 0:57:23.640
<v Speaker 1>come back, you've been waiting for it all preseason. It's

0:57:23.680 --> 0:57:28.400
<v Speaker 1>time for the reach around. Don't be a slave to

0:57:28.520 --> 0:57:31.880
<v Speaker 1>average draft position. We're going to tell you the players

0:57:31.920 --> 0:57:34.920
<v Speaker 1>that you will want to reach a round early on.

0:57:35.360 --> 0:57:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Scott will tell you, will give you the right answer

0:57:40.760 --> 0:57:44.200
<v Speaker 1>on boa feature around. When we come back to Fantasy

0:57:44.200 --> 0:57:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly, and I'll mention if you want to try

0:57:47.520 --> 0:57:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the freshest new format in fantasy sports, it's guillotine Leagues s.

0:57:50.600 --> 0:57:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Guillotine leagues dot com will explain how it works, give

0:57:53.240 --> 0:57:55.360
<v Speaker 1>you opportunities to play with friends or play with strangers

0:57:55.360 --> 0:58:21.080
<v Speaker 1>for cash your choice at Guillotine leagues dot com. Fantasy

0:58:21.120 --> 0:58:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Fball Weekly returns Bult Georgie in, Scott Fish and Matt

0:58:24.120 --> 0:58:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Harrison with you. This is, in the years of many

0:58:28.680 --> 0:58:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the most popular preseason segment of Fantasy Football Weekly. We

0:58:34.240 --> 0:58:38.480
<v Speaker 1>do it every year. It's called to reach around the premise. Here,

0:58:39.240 --> 0:58:42.160
<v Speaker 1>we're going to identify a player in each of the

0:58:42.280 --> 0:58:46.640
<v Speaker 1>first eleven rounds that you should take one round earlier

0:58:47.400 --> 0:58:52.560
<v Speaker 1>than when they normally go. So the example would be

0:58:53.160 --> 0:58:56.240
<v Speaker 1>which of the second rounders should be taken in the

0:58:56.400 --> 0:59:01.040
<v Speaker 1>first round. We'll go through each of our designated people

0:59:01.120 --> 0:59:03.000
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't. You choose whever you want well, and we'll

0:59:03.040 --> 0:59:04.920
<v Speaker 1>see who we agree on who we don't, and you

0:59:04.920 --> 0:59:07.040
<v Speaker 1>can play along as well. And I want to say

0:59:07.040 --> 0:59:12.000
<v Speaker 1>broadly to start this off, many fantasy owners, especially polished

0:59:12.000 --> 0:59:13.800
<v Speaker 1>ones that are doing a lot of pre drafts and

0:59:13.800 --> 0:59:16.520
<v Speaker 1>they really know their average draft position, tend to be

0:59:16.520 --> 0:59:19.240
<v Speaker 1>a slave of average draft position and then tend to

0:59:19.280 --> 0:59:22.000
<v Speaker 1>feel like, Oh, I really like this guy, but I'm

0:59:22.040 --> 0:59:25.400
<v Speaker 1>just gonna wait and you know at him later because

0:59:25.480 --> 0:59:29.240
<v Speaker 1>average draft position says, this guy's gonna go next round. Man,

0:59:29.320 --> 0:59:33.000
<v Speaker 1>just go get your guys at the moment kickoff happens

0:59:33.000 --> 0:59:36.320
<v Speaker 1>in week one. Nobody cares about the average draft position

0:59:36.440 --> 0:59:39.240
<v Speaker 1>where you got guys. All the matters is whether or

0:59:39.280 --> 0:59:41.800
<v Speaker 1>not you've got the guys you want. Go get the

0:59:41.880 --> 0:59:45.560
<v Speaker 1>guys you want. Don't worry about somebody going you could

0:59:45.560 --> 0:59:49.360
<v Speaker 1>add them next round. Just go get your guys, all right.

0:59:49.920 --> 0:59:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Beginning now, let's go with round one. Who would you

0:59:54.080 --> 0:59:56.720
<v Speaker 1>take from? Who would you take in round one that

0:59:56.720 --> 0:59:59.600
<v Speaker 1>would normally go? In round two? We begin with it's

0:59:59.600 --> 1:00:04.960
<v Speaker 1>got what. I was certain you'd go to Matt that time,

1:00:05.200 --> 1:00:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely certain. Since I know what Matt is gonna say,

1:00:10.720 --> 1:00:13.440
<v Speaker 1>I should go No, but I'm not going to I'm

1:00:13.480 --> 1:00:16.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna go with Josh Jacobs. I I absolutely love Josh

1:00:16.320 --> 1:00:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Jacobs this year. I think if he if he has

1:00:19.800 --> 1:00:23.400
<v Speaker 1>any injuries that are less than a fractured shoulder, he's

1:00:23.440 --> 1:00:27.080
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna play sixteen games. Uh. There's been lots of

1:00:27.120 --> 1:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>word about him getting heavily involved in the passing game.

1:00:30.760 --> 1:00:32.960
<v Speaker 1>I just think he's going to be one of those

1:00:32.960 --> 1:00:36.360
<v Speaker 1>guys that gets you three plus touches. All right, Matt,

1:00:36.520 --> 1:00:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Who should people take in round one that would normally

1:00:38.600 --> 1:00:40.920
<v Speaker 1>go in around two? I got Austin Ekeler. And if

1:00:40.920 --> 1:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>you want to hear more about Austin Ekeler, go to

1:00:43.680 --> 1:00:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio or your favorite podcast app. Go to

1:00:46.720 --> 1:00:49.480
<v Speaker 1>last week's episode of Fantasy Football Weekly and find the

1:00:49.480 --> 1:00:52.520
<v Speaker 1>peacock off and I will outline it for you in

1:00:52.720 --> 1:00:55.280
<v Speaker 1>great detail. Or just listen to two segments ago when

1:00:55.280 --> 1:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I was talking about how I take Austin Ekeler in

1:00:57.040 --> 1:00:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the first round. Yeah, but mine was

1:01:00.000 --> 1:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>at her It was better, honestly last year. A reminder.

1:01:03.240 --> 1:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Last year in those games, though Melvin Gordon, Austin Ekeler

1:01:06.520 --> 1:01:10.800
<v Speaker 1>was the highest scoring running back in football in PPR,

1:01:11.080 --> 1:01:12.760
<v Speaker 1>I have reason to believe he won't be there this

1:01:12.840 --> 1:01:14.800
<v Speaker 1>year either, Melvin Gordon. That is, I have reason to

1:01:14.800 --> 1:01:16.960
<v Speaker 1>believe you are correct. All right, let's go to the

1:01:17.000 --> 1:01:18.800
<v Speaker 1>next round. Who would you take in round two that

1:01:18.840 --> 1:01:23.440
<v Speaker 1>normally goes in round three? Fish? Do you have to

1:01:23.440 --> 1:01:25.480
<v Speaker 1>ask if you look at that list, do you even

1:01:25.520 --> 1:01:31.640
<v Speaker 1>have to ask? I'm asking Kenny Golladay. Kenny Golladay, It's

1:01:31.680 --> 1:01:34.680
<v Speaker 1>always gonna be Nook of the North there, baby tron

1:01:34.800 --> 1:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Kenny Golladay. You know what bugs me about Kenny Golladay.

1:01:38.640 --> 1:01:41.080
<v Speaker 1>He has like just like a junior nickname off of

1:01:41.120 --> 1:01:45.280
<v Speaker 1>everybody else, Like give him his own nickname. Come on, right,

1:01:45.320 --> 1:01:47.480
<v Speaker 1>can't you have his own name? This is a good point.

1:01:47.760 --> 1:01:49.760
<v Speaker 1>This isn't really all work on it, all right, Kenny

1:01:49.800 --> 1:01:54.120
<v Speaker 1>g How about that? That's kind of taken And honestly,

1:01:54.200 --> 1:01:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Kenny Golladay is the opposite of droning soft fusion jazz.

1:01:59.160 --> 1:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. He's he's very smooth when he plays,

1:02:03.760 --> 1:02:06.560
<v Speaker 1>and there's a lot of improvisation, one of the one

1:02:06.560 --> 1:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>of the best in the league of deep ball catches,

1:02:08.240 --> 1:02:10.240
<v Speaker 1>one of the best in the league at contested catches.

1:02:10.600 --> 1:02:14.280
<v Speaker 1>And if matthe Matthew Stafford gets back and his excuse me,

1:02:14.320 --> 1:02:17.080
<v Speaker 1>if his back is healthy and he plays a full season,

1:02:17.120 --> 1:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>he gets back to that thirty touchdown form. Kenny Golladay

1:02:21.480 --> 1:02:24.720
<v Speaker 1>could very, very easily crack into that top five or

1:02:24.760 --> 1:02:26.680
<v Speaker 1>six wide receivers as here all right, Matt who are

1:02:26.720 --> 1:02:28.840
<v Speaker 1>you taking in round two? That would normally go in

1:02:28.920 --> 1:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>round three. I don't know why he's going in round three,

1:02:31.200 --> 1:02:33.919
<v Speaker 1>but it's Mike Evans of the Tampa Bay Bucks over

1:02:33.960 --> 1:02:36.919
<v Speaker 1>a thousand yards in every year of his career, eight

1:02:37.000 --> 1:02:39.640
<v Speaker 1>or more touchdowns and three of his last four seasons.

1:02:39.760 --> 1:02:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Three top ten finishes amongst wide receivers in the last

1:02:43.360 --> 1:02:45.880
<v Speaker 1>four years, and he's never been worse than twenty four

1:02:46.600 --> 1:02:49.160
<v Speaker 1>in his career in a PPR league. So Mike Evans

1:02:49.280 --> 1:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>is a pretty nice wide receiver town your roster. My

1:02:52.120 --> 1:02:56.919
<v Speaker 1>reach around in round two is Chris Carson, Seattle running back.

1:02:57.240 --> 1:02:59.840
<v Speaker 1>He was running back nine last year in PPR, scoring

1:03:00.040 --> 1:03:03.160
<v Speaker 1>nine and he has almost no competition for the job.

1:03:03.240 --> 1:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Carlos Hyde is on his fourth team in three years.

1:03:05.720 --> 1:03:09.240
<v Speaker 1>And remember over the last three years, Seattle has had

1:03:09.440 --> 1:03:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the most handoffs two running backs. There's no downside to

1:03:13.680 --> 1:03:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Chris Carson. He belongs in the second round. Let's go

1:03:16.720 --> 1:03:21.560
<v Speaker 1>to round three. Scott, which round four player will you take?

1:03:21.600 --> 1:03:24.080
<v Speaker 1>In round three? This is really this was a really,

1:03:24.080 --> 1:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>really tough one for me because Calvin Ridley there's a

1:03:27.280 --> 1:03:29.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of targets available and he has primed for a breakout.

1:03:30.760 --> 1:03:32.960
<v Speaker 1>But I'm going to do something that I usually do.

1:03:33.080 --> 1:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>I take tight ends early in leagues. I do. I

1:03:34.960 --> 1:03:37.000
<v Speaker 1>load up on running backs in tight end and I'm

1:03:37.040 --> 1:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the guy that grabs the tight end early because I

1:03:38.920 --> 1:03:41.360
<v Speaker 1>want to stud tight end and Mark Andrews with Hayden

1:03:41.400 --> 1:03:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Hurst leaving. Mark Andrews is in that clear top three

1:03:45.600 --> 1:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>for me now, and I'm I'm taking him there. I

1:03:48.160 --> 1:03:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I think he's he's primed to move into that upper

1:03:51.520 --> 1:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>echelon for years to come. All right. I've got a J.

1:03:54.800 --> 1:03:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Brown um fourth in the league last year with five

1:03:59.400 --> 1:04:03.520
<v Speaker 1>yard outing. He tied for ninth with eight receiving touchdowns,

1:04:03.840 --> 1:04:07.080
<v Speaker 1>had the most long ball touchdowns of forty plus yards

1:04:07.080 --> 1:04:10.480
<v Speaker 1>in the league with four, just over twenty yards perception.

1:04:10.600 --> 1:04:13.120
<v Speaker 1>And he did all of that, not only eighty four

1:04:13.160 --> 1:04:16.320
<v Speaker 1>targets and fifty two catches. In year two. You have

1:04:16.400 --> 1:04:19.280
<v Speaker 1>to think he cracks at least a hundred targets, but

1:04:19.360 --> 1:04:22.000
<v Speaker 1>probably a lot more. Probably a J. Brown is a

1:04:22.000 --> 1:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>guy that'll get whatever. John. I've done a ton of

1:04:25.160 --> 1:04:27.160
<v Speaker 1>draps and I've not seen a J. Brown get to

1:04:27.200 --> 1:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the fourth So this never, this is a good call.

1:04:30.120 --> 1:04:33.720
<v Speaker 1>He really should be a third rounder. I've got Cooper

1:04:33.800 --> 1:04:38.120
<v Speaker 1>cup ranked as my wide receiver. I think it is

1:04:38.120 --> 1:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver six seven. He is my wide receiver seven,

1:04:42.560 --> 1:04:45.560
<v Speaker 1>and I'm getting him in the third round. He finished

1:04:45.560 --> 1:04:48.680
<v Speaker 1>his wide receiver three last year Cooper Cup did, yet

1:04:48.720 --> 1:04:51.680
<v Speaker 1>nobody wants him. Brandon Cooks is gone, so you know

1:04:51.800 --> 1:04:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the volume isn't gonna go down any any farther than that.

1:04:54.680 --> 1:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>He was the second most wide receiver targeted in the

1:04:57.440 --> 1:04:59.520
<v Speaker 1>red zone last year, and the year before he was

1:04:59.560 --> 1:05:01.560
<v Speaker 1>white up the there. And it's a second year off

1:05:01.560 --> 1:05:03.080
<v Speaker 1>a c L. There are a lot of players who

1:05:03.120 --> 1:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>have that that year after the first year back from

1:05:05.400 --> 1:05:08.200
<v Speaker 1>a c L are better and more explosive. He scored

1:05:08.240 --> 1:05:10.760
<v Speaker 1>in nine different games last year. He only had two

1:05:10.840 --> 1:05:14.960
<v Speaker 1>bad clunker games all of last season. Two. That's it,

1:05:15.120 --> 1:05:18.919
<v Speaker 1>Cooper Cup is my round three reach around? That Round

1:05:18.920 --> 1:05:23.720
<v Speaker 1>four is really good. It's loaded. Last last I said,

1:05:23.720 --> 1:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>trade out trader picks from first and second round. Just

1:05:26.320 --> 1:05:28.880
<v Speaker 1>keep trading down in stockpile third and fourth rounders because

1:05:28.920 --> 1:05:31.880
<v Speaker 1>of this very reason. All right, let's go to round

1:05:31.880 --> 1:05:34.680
<v Speaker 1>at number four. Which fifth rounder would you take in

1:05:34.760 --> 1:05:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the reach around? Scott Scott Again, we've talked about him

1:05:39.720 --> 1:05:42.080
<v Speaker 1>in bunch and I think he takes the jump forward

1:05:42.160 --> 1:05:44.440
<v Speaker 1>to be like a top eighteen or so wide receiver.

1:05:45.120 --> 1:05:47.720
<v Speaker 1>It's it's Terry mclaarin going in the fifth. There are

1:05:47.720 --> 1:05:49.560
<v Speaker 1>a couple of guys in this round d J chart

1:05:49.640 --> 1:05:51.320
<v Speaker 1>as well that I think can make that jump in

1:05:51.640 --> 1:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>top eighteen, top twenty four wide receivers, and you're getting

1:05:54.000 --> 1:05:56.840
<v Speaker 1>them as your wide receiver. To um, I think that's

1:05:56.880 --> 1:05:58.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a good spot for him. Okay, Matt

1:05:59.200 --> 1:06:02.920
<v Speaker 1>t even what are and off discussed already twice in

1:06:02.960 --> 1:06:06.600
<v Speaker 1>this episode, we can move on. I'm taking Kareem Hunt

1:06:07.200 --> 1:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>as my reach around in round four. Remember last year

1:06:10.440 --> 1:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>when he came back from suspension, he was running back fifteen.

1:06:13.240 --> 1:06:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Right now he's going off the board as running back.

1:06:16.800 --> 1:06:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Why everybody believes Cleveland's gonna be better this year than

1:06:19.920 --> 1:06:23.600
<v Speaker 1>they were last year. So if you are of the

1:06:23.600 --> 1:06:26.080
<v Speaker 1>same mindset I am. Kareem Hunt makes a ton of

1:06:26.120 --> 1:06:28.920
<v Speaker 1>sense as a quick reset to what we're doing. This

1:06:29.000 --> 1:06:30.840
<v Speaker 1>is the reach around we're talking about players we would

1:06:30.840 --> 1:06:33.840
<v Speaker 1>take one round earlier than their their typical draft position

1:06:35.360 --> 1:06:37.800
<v Speaker 1>charge now round five. By the way, I will share

1:06:37.800 --> 1:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>our a DP that we're using so people can follow

1:06:40.800 --> 1:06:43.680
<v Speaker 1>along on Twitter. That explosive output, so people will be

1:06:43.720 --> 1:06:45.800
<v Speaker 1>able to see who we're picking out of these rounds.

1:06:45.800 --> 1:06:48.040
<v Speaker 1>To Matt, is that explosive output? I am at Paul

1:06:48.080 --> 1:06:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Charchi and Scott fishes at Scott Fish twenty four. Nick Chubb,

1:06:55.680 --> 1:06:58.479
<v Speaker 1>All that works, all right, that's a good move. Let's

1:06:58.480 --> 1:07:01.919
<v Speaker 1>go to round five. Which sixth rounder would you take

1:07:01.960 --> 1:07:06.400
<v Speaker 1>in round five? Matt Harrison? Oh my god, it's a

1:07:06.400 --> 1:07:11.000
<v Speaker 1>pity start for Matt. I wasn't even ready a J. Green.

1:07:11.680 --> 1:07:14.040
<v Speaker 1>He's going in the sixth round, yes, but I'll take

1:07:14.120 --> 1:07:16.440
<v Speaker 1>him in the fifth. He missed all of last season

1:07:16.480 --> 1:07:19.720
<v Speaker 1>with an injury, but really read into that he got

1:07:19.760 --> 1:07:21.720
<v Speaker 1>hurt and he didn't really want to play for the

1:07:21.760 --> 1:07:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Bengals anymore. But they put him on the franchise tag

1:07:24.560 --> 1:07:27.280
<v Speaker 1>this year, so he's got one more year there. He's

1:07:27.360 --> 1:07:30.600
<v Speaker 1>missed time in two of the previous three, but in

1:07:30.720 --> 1:07:35.200
<v Speaker 1>seasons where he's been healthy, he's been basically a slightly

1:07:35.240 --> 1:07:38.640
<v Speaker 1>better version of Julio Jones. And Julio Jones you're picking

1:07:38.640 --> 1:07:41.200
<v Speaker 1>in round two, you can get a J. Green, and

1:07:41.840 --> 1:07:44.480
<v Speaker 1>you can pick him up easily in round five. Alright, Scott,

1:07:45.120 --> 1:07:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I am going with J. K. Dobbins. It's possible he's

1:07:48.880 --> 1:07:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the best back on that team, but it's definitely probable

1:07:51.680 --> 1:07:54.720
<v Speaker 1>that he's better than Gus Edwards and Justice Hill, who

1:07:54.720 --> 1:07:58.520
<v Speaker 1>had two six total touches last year. Only three running

1:07:58.520 --> 1:08:00.440
<v Speaker 1>backs on that entire team had more than your touches

1:08:00.520 --> 1:08:02.840
<v Speaker 1>last year, and those those two, I think all those

1:08:02.920 --> 1:08:05.440
<v Speaker 1>carries go to Dobbins, and Dobbins is a guy that

1:08:05.520 --> 1:08:08.760
<v Speaker 1>can be your league winner if he does supplant mark

1:08:08.880 --> 1:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Ingram or if marketing they rest mark Ingram more for

1:08:12.120 --> 1:08:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs? Are they? Or you know, he just beats

1:08:14.840 --> 1:08:17.519
<v Speaker 1>him out. I've got t Y Hilton is my reach

1:08:17.520 --> 1:08:20.080
<v Speaker 1>around player now healthy with Philip Rivers at the helm.

1:08:20.160 --> 1:08:23.439
<v Speaker 1>Most most people, including me, expect a nice rebound for

1:08:23.640 --> 1:08:26.720
<v Speaker 1>t Y Hilton back to his eighteen fantasy production two

1:08:26.800 --> 1:08:29.120
<v Speaker 1>years ago, but always drafting him that way. He was

1:08:29.120 --> 1:08:32.760
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver fourteen two seasons ago, and now he's got

1:08:32.960 --> 1:08:35.160
<v Speaker 1>competent quarterbacking. I think he gets right back into that

1:08:35.200 --> 1:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver fourteen fifteen level, and he's being drafted his

1:08:39.360 --> 1:08:42.560
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver twenty eight off the board. Let's go to

1:08:42.680 --> 1:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>round six. Which seventh rounder would you take in round six?

1:08:46.080 --> 1:08:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Scott See, I love me and just some Deonte Johnson,

1:08:48.880 --> 1:08:51.040
<v Speaker 1>but this is easily Michael Gallup for me. He's I

1:08:51.080 --> 1:08:53.639
<v Speaker 1>think he's a lock for a hundred plus targets We've

1:08:53.640 --> 1:08:57.040
<v Speaker 1>talked about him enough already. All Right, I got James White.

1:08:57.040 --> 1:08:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I highlighted White is my sleeper of the week last week.

1:08:59.680 --> 1:09:02.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll available on the podcast. Uh. It's a combination of

1:09:02.920 --> 1:09:06.640
<v Speaker 1>a bad and injured sony Michelle Slash Lamar Miller and

1:09:06.720 --> 1:09:09.880
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback who has thrown shorter and shorter every year.

1:09:10.360 --> 1:09:13.320
<v Speaker 1>In fact, Cam's average depth of target went from ten

1:09:13.360 --> 1:09:18.439
<v Speaker 1>point six sixteen to eight point four to seven point

1:09:18.560 --> 1:09:22.200
<v Speaker 1>three eighteen. He's getting shorter and shorter with his passes,

1:09:22.200 --> 1:09:24.479
<v Speaker 1>but they're becoming more accurate. He's gonna at James White

1:09:24.479 --> 1:09:27.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot um. That's interesting. I also have James White here,

1:09:27.360 --> 1:09:29.639
<v Speaker 1>and I think, are we just bored of James White?

1:09:29.680 --> 1:09:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Is that what's happening? I think so. I don't understand

1:09:32.160 --> 1:09:34.759
<v Speaker 1>why James White, who just every year finishes like running

1:09:34.760 --> 1:09:38.120
<v Speaker 1>back fifteen in PPR and get nobody seems to ever

1:09:38.120 --> 1:09:40.439
<v Speaker 1>want to draft James White for some reason. Let's go

1:09:40.479 --> 1:09:43.200
<v Speaker 1>to running Let's go to round number seven. Which eighth

1:09:43.280 --> 1:09:47.679
<v Speaker 1>rounder would you take here? Matt Oh, I'm gonna take

1:09:47.800 --> 1:09:51.519
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady And he's another guy I highlighted last week. Um,

1:09:52.080 --> 1:09:54.799
<v Speaker 1>I just I think he has the opportunity to finish

1:09:54.840 --> 1:09:57.320
<v Speaker 1>as a top five quarterback for sure, but a top

1:09:57.360 --> 1:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>three quarterback is where he predicted him last week. H

1:10:00.080 --> 1:10:04.640
<v Speaker 1>um weapons coaching philosophy, his uncanny ability to steal for

1:10:04.920 --> 1:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>throw for over six hundred times in a season well

1:10:08.280 --> 1:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>into his forties. Best wide receivers he's ever had, Tom

1:10:12.439 --> 1:10:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Brady Scott as much as I love Christen Kirk in

1:10:16.000 --> 1:10:18.599
<v Speaker 1>this spot, it's got to be Alexander Mandison because I'm

1:10:18.640 --> 1:10:21.920
<v Speaker 1>that guy in your draft that is stealing Madison. I'm

1:10:21.960 --> 1:10:24.759
<v Speaker 1>stealing Zach Moss, I'm stealing J. K. Dobbins, I'm stealing

1:10:24.800 --> 1:10:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Tony Pollard. I'm going after all these guys to hopefully

1:10:28.080 --> 1:10:31.080
<v Speaker 1>if something has happen. I'm getting a stud running back.

1:10:31.520 --> 1:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm going with a stud tight end because they're still

1:10:33.960 --> 1:10:37.040
<v Speaker 1>out there at this stage. It's it's my round seven player.

1:10:37.160 --> 1:10:40.080
<v Speaker 1>That round eight player I'm taking around seven is Hayden Hurst.

1:10:40.439 --> 1:10:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Hayden Hurst drops into the Austin Hooper role in Atlanta,

1:10:43.080 --> 1:10:46.479
<v Speaker 1>where Hooper was very successful. Hooper average six catches, sixty

1:10:46.479 --> 1:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>one yards and half a touchdown per game. Here comes

1:10:49.120 --> 1:10:52.000
<v Speaker 1>hayden Hurst was a former first rounder with probably much

1:10:52.000 --> 1:10:54.360
<v Speaker 1>more talent than Austin Hooper has ever had, so I

1:10:54.439 --> 1:10:56.920
<v Speaker 1>think he walks into at least the Hooper numbers and

1:10:56.920 --> 1:10:59.600
<v Speaker 1>I can get him in round seven. Let's go to

1:11:00.160 --> 1:11:04.080
<v Speaker 1>round eight, Scott, Which round nine player are you willing

1:11:04.080 --> 1:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>to take in round eight? Well? Uh, the guy I

1:11:07.400 --> 1:11:09.519
<v Speaker 1>want to take you're gonna talk about so while you

1:11:09.640 --> 1:11:12.720
<v Speaker 1>remove your pants, Matt can uh you can? You can

1:11:12.760 --> 1:11:15.880
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute. It's as Zack Moss Bonanza, go chart. Okay,

1:11:15.920 --> 1:11:18.519
<v Speaker 1>we all got Zack Moss. Sorry for the broken record.

1:11:18.560 --> 1:11:20.160
<v Speaker 1>And Zack Moss We've talked about him a lot in

1:11:20.160 --> 1:11:23.200
<v Speaker 1>this show. Utah's all time leading rusher. He inherits Frank

1:11:23.240 --> 1:11:26.559
<v Speaker 1>Gore's eleven carries inside the five and his eighteen carries

1:11:26.600 --> 1:11:30.720
<v Speaker 1>inside the ten. He's got double digit upside, and I've

1:11:30.760 --> 1:11:35.240
<v Speaker 1>already predicted he will score more Fantasy points than Devin Singletarry.

1:11:35.680 --> 1:11:38.000
<v Speaker 1>I will continue to work that. All right, we continue

1:11:38.000 --> 1:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>with our reach around. We're gonna do one final round here.

1:11:41.120 --> 1:11:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Which round ten player are you willing to take? In

1:11:44.720 --> 1:11:48.320
<v Speaker 1>round nine? Scott? I'm taking Tony Pollard here for the

1:11:48.400 --> 1:11:50.639
<v Speaker 1>same reasons I said with Madison. I think Tony Pollard,

1:11:50.680 --> 1:11:53.400
<v Speaker 1>if anything happens, is zeke. He's a top five running back.

1:11:55.080 --> 1:11:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I got Mike Gasicki, one of two tight ends in

1:11:57.800 --> 1:12:01.639
<v Speaker 1>the league with over fifty targets last year and zero drops.

1:12:02.439 --> 1:12:05.559
<v Speaker 1>Really fifty targets, not one drop. The other tight end,

1:12:05.960 --> 1:12:09.360
<v Speaker 1>George Kittle. He's pretty good. He's pretty good. So is Mikesicki.

1:12:09.760 --> 1:12:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Uh And it was shown at the end of last

1:12:12.000 --> 1:12:14.160
<v Speaker 1>year where he had seven or more targets in five

1:12:14.200 --> 1:12:17.080
<v Speaker 1>of his last six games and had five touchdowns in

1:12:17.120 --> 1:12:19.000
<v Speaker 1>those final six games. He was top ten in a

1:12:19.040 --> 1:12:23.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of categories. He's good. I'm taking Manuel Sanders, a

1:12:23.160 --> 1:12:27.200
<v Speaker 1>guy just completely overlooked by by fantasy owners. He probably

1:12:27.240 --> 1:12:32.040
<v Speaker 1>finishes as Drew Brees second most targeted player behind Michael Thomas.

1:12:32.160 --> 1:12:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Only Michael Thomas and Brice hasn't had the luxury of

1:12:34.760 --> 1:12:40.760
<v Speaker 1>a competent second receiver since Brandon Cooks in twenties sixteen,

1:12:41.320 --> 1:12:44.879
<v Speaker 1>the last he was the last competent number two receiver

1:12:45.280 --> 1:12:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Drew Brees had you know what Cooks did that year

1:12:48.040 --> 1:12:53.120
<v Speaker 1>twelve hundred yards and eight touchdowns. Lander seems good. A

1:12:53.240 --> 1:12:57.800
<v Speaker 1>competent number two to Drew Brees, maybe most of yards

1:12:57.800 --> 1:13:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and eight touchdowns, that would be fantastic. Emmanuel Sanders is

1:13:02.000 --> 1:13:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the final reach around for us if you have not

1:13:04.920 --> 1:13:07.679
<v Speaker 1>yet tried a Guillotine League. It's a fascinating, fresh new

1:13:07.760 --> 1:13:11.040
<v Speaker 1>format in which seventeen teams start the season and every

1:13:11.080 --> 1:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>week the low scoring team of that week gets cut

1:13:14.360 --> 1:13:18.439
<v Speaker 1>and their entire roster goes the waiver wire and become

1:13:18.479 --> 1:13:21.000
<v Speaker 1>free agents where everybody else can bid on them. It

1:13:21.120 --> 1:13:23.640
<v Speaker 1>is the most fascinating new format and fantasy sports and

1:13:23.640 --> 1:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you can play it at Guillotine leagues dot com. Paul Charchi,

1:13:26.200 --> 1:13:29.799
<v Speaker 1>Matt Harrison, Scott Fish with you for more Fantasy Football Weekly.

1:13:30.160 --> 1:13:55.559
<v Speaker 1>Final segment coming up next final segment of Fantasy Football Weekly.

1:13:55.640 --> 1:13:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Paul Chiarchi in, Scott Fish, Matt Harrison, thank you for

1:13:59.120 --> 1:14:01.120
<v Speaker 1>joining us. If you any part of the show, we

1:14:01.200 --> 1:14:03.360
<v Speaker 1>encourage you to check out the podcast version if you

1:14:03.360 --> 1:14:05.000
<v Speaker 1>are listening to it over the air, where you can

1:14:05.040 --> 1:14:08.519
<v Speaker 1>go back and hear the entire show. And I think

1:14:08.520 --> 1:14:10.320
<v Speaker 1>it's safe to say that we were brilliant early in

1:14:10.320 --> 1:14:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the show, so you ought to do that. Well, you

1:14:12.680 --> 1:14:14.840
<v Speaker 1>and Scott were, that's for sure. That's a good point.

1:14:15.080 --> 1:14:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I think Scott Scott I really carried the show. If

1:14:17.240 --> 1:14:19.519
<v Speaker 1>you were just going to be frank about it in

1:14:19.560 --> 1:14:23.080
<v Speaker 1>this segment. We're going to look at the vacated targets,

1:14:23.200 --> 1:14:27.040
<v Speaker 1>by which we mean when teams go through their off season,

1:14:27.280 --> 1:14:29.519
<v Speaker 1>a lot of a lot of the past is thrown.

1:14:29.680 --> 1:14:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Are the players that are gone now? So where those

1:14:31.360 --> 1:14:33.599
<v Speaker 1>paths is gonna go this year? One of the great

1:14:33.640 --> 1:14:37.080
<v Speaker 1>ways to identify players who are about to emerge with

1:14:37.200 --> 1:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>bigger seasons is to look at the vacated targets from

1:14:39.960 --> 1:14:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the teams they are on. Scott, I have challenged you

1:14:43.240 --> 1:14:46.680
<v Speaker 1>to come up with the list, and perhaps this is

1:14:46.800 --> 1:14:49.840
<v Speaker 1>by do we want to go by the most vacated target.

1:14:50.120 --> 1:14:52.519
<v Speaker 1>Let's go by the most vacated He actually challenged me,

1:14:52.600 --> 1:14:54.519
<v Speaker 1>but then pulled it back and said, no, Scott will

1:14:54.560 --> 1:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>do a better job. You know what, you know, take

1:14:57.200 --> 1:15:03.080
<v Speaker 1>it back. Can you hand me your computer please? Well,

1:15:03.160 --> 1:15:05.679
<v Speaker 1>let's let's start off with the Atlanta Falcons who lost

1:15:05.760 --> 1:15:09.920
<v Speaker 1>a ridiculous uh basically over sixteen targets per game. I'll

1:15:09.920 --> 1:15:13.320
<v Speaker 1>do it per game instead of act I think that

1:15:13.400 --> 1:15:15.439
<v Speaker 1>is better. Yeah, let's go see. Targets per game is

1:15:15.479 --> 1:15:19.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot. You know, most quarterbacks might throw thirty two

1:15:19.160 --> 1:15:21.559
<v Speaker 1>a game. You know, like half your targets are gone. Yep,

1:15:21.720 --> 1:15:26.759
<v Speaker 1>exactly so, so half of the Falcons targets per game left,

1:15:26.880 --> 1:15:30.240
<v Speaker 1>and in came Todd Gurley, who's had ninety receptions over

1:15:30.240 --> 1:15:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the last two years. He not catch the ball, but

1:15:33.040 --> 1:15:38.519
<v Speaker 1>he's and basically what Freeman left, he's gonna probably pick off. Uh.

1:15:38.560 --> 1:15:41.680
<v Speaker 1>And then a whole bunch from Austin Hooper, which is

1:15:41.720 --> 1:15:43.680
<v Speaker 1>basically going to go to hayden Hurst unless we think

1:15:43.680 --> 1:15:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Treadwell is gonna I don't think that's gonna happen. No,

1:15:47.439 --> 1:15:49.600
<v Speaker 1>So you're predicting a big year out of hers, do

1:15:49.600 --> 1:15:53.400
<v Speaker 1>you think? Yes? As I as I mentioned last last segment,

1:15:53.479 --> 1:15:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I love hayden Hurst. He's my number four tight end.

1:15:56.120 --> 1:15:58.200
<v Speaker 1>By the way, we joke about the preseason games, but

1:15:58.520 --> 1:16:01.120
<v Speaker 1>I called well, we all called us last year the

1:16:01.120 --> 1:16:04.799
<v Speaker 1>first preseason last game last year where Atlanta kept throwing

1:16:04.840 --> 1:16:07.160
<v Speaker 1>to their tight ends, we called it out on the show,

1:16:07.640 --> 1:16:11.559
<v Speaker 1>and then Austin Hooper happened. From time to time, we

1:16:11.680 --> 1:16:14.400
<v Speaker 1>do get things right on this show. It's we all

1:16:14.400 --> 1:16:16.960
<v Speaker 1>want to brag about all the things that we get right.

1:16:17.120 --> 1:16:19.240
<v Speaker 1>But we got that one right. But by the way,

1:16:19.400 --> 1:16:22.959
<v Speaker 1>eighteen targets inside the ten gone from the Atlanta Falcons.

1:16:23.680 --> 1:16:27.439
<v Speaker 1>Julio Jones get to double digit touchdowns. He's gotten better

1:16:27.479 --> 1:16:30.920
<v Speaker 1>recently over on his touchdown only one season and double

1:16:30.960 --> 1:16:34.400
<v Speaker 1>digits though, He's do all right. So if Atlanta has

1:16:34.400 --> 1:16:37.519
<v Speaker 1>the most vacated targets, two second Dallas Cowboys with about

1:16:37.560 --> 1:16:41.360
<v Speaker 1>twelve and most of that is twelve per game, which

1:16:41.600 --> 1:16:44.920
<v Speaker 1>most of it is Witten. And if you think, if

1:16:44.920 --> 1:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>you think Jarwin's gonna slide right into that role, uh,

1:16:47.920 --> 1:16:49.759
<v Speaker 1>you know he was. He was about tight end twelve

1:16:49.840 --> 1:16:52.840
<v Speaker 1>last year Witten. Jarwin's got that upside, I guess if

1:16:52.840 --> 1:16:54.759
<v Speaker 1>he can take it on. But remember they got see

1:16:54.840 --> 1:16:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Lamb too catches and yep, yep. So that's the tricky

1:16:59.160 --> 1:17:01.240
<v Speaker 1>part on on jar when I think he feels like

1:17:01.280 --> 1:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>to me, a matchup based starter, Yeah, a matchup based

1:17:04.120 --> 1:17:06.479
<v Speaker 1>tight end two is what with with with some decent

1:17:06.560 --> 1:17:09.160
<v Speaker 1>upside just because it is that opportunity is there and

1:17:09.200 --> 1:17:11.799
<v Speaker 1>that offense could be really good with all those weapons,

1:17:12.160 --> 1:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, possibly raising that target number. Uh. Washington Redskins

1:17:17.120 --> 1:17:19.880
<v Speaker 1>eleven points seven targets per game opened up with a

1:17:19.920 --> 1:17:24.200
<v Speaker 1>loss of guys like Paul Richardson and Jordan Read guys

1:17:24.240 --> 1:17:28.000
<v Speaker 1>that they got a G. G. Gandy Golden came in. Uh,

1:17:28.040 --> 1:17:29.880
<v Speaker 1>they got a couple of running backs that catch the

1:17:29.880 --> 1:17:33.800
<v Speaker 1>ball J J. H. Mckissic, J. D. Mckissic and uh

1:17:33.840 --> 1:17:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Gibson. I think they're gonna use it gives in

1:17:36.640 --> 1:17:39.920
<v Speaker 1>a decent amount catching the ball um. But yeah, that

1:17:40.080 --> 1:17:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I can see those those eleven twelve targets per game

1:17:43.360 --> 1:17:45.640
<v Speaker 1>going mostly there and maybe a little bit extra to

1:17:45.720 --> 1:17:49.799
<v Speaker 1>McLaren um. Next down the list, about the same amount

1:17:49.840 --> 1:17:53.639
<v Speaker 1>lost the New York Jets. They only they lost Robbie Anderson,

1:17:53.680 --> 1:17:56.679
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of low level players brought in Mims and Perriman.

1:17:56.760 --> 1:18:00.679
<v Speaker 1>Mims already dealing with a hamstring injury. We we see

1:18:00.800 --> 1:18:03.679
<v Speaker 1>we see Pairman probably jumping right into the Robbie roll.

1:18:04.600 --> 1:18:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's almost a one for one change right there.

1:18:07.160 --> 1:18:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I I would I would project Pairman right in line

1:18:09.360 --> 1:18:11.880
<v Speaker 1>with what Robbie did, which was just okay. Now, what

1:18:11.920 --> 1:18:14.160
<v Speaker 1>about Chris Herndon's who's getting a lot of love for

1:18:14.200 --> 1:18:16.800
<v Speaker 1>people as a sleeper tight end and he's flashed some

1:18:16.880 --> 1:18:20.120
<v Speaker 1>ability before, but super inconsistent injuries and a lot of

1:18:20.120 --> 1:18:23.519
<v Speaker 1>other risk with him. Yep, he could play into that.

1:18:23.760 --> 1:18:26.840
<v Speaker 1>It's uh, it's it's not an offense. I really want

1:18:26.920 --> 1:18:30.800
<v Speaker 1>to invest in the problem, right, Who wants to invest

1:18:30.840 --> 1:18:34.320
<v Speaker 1>in Adam gay slid offense? Yeah? Not me. Yeah, he's

1:18:34.360 --> 1:18:37.200
<v Speaker 1>been he's been day near the league low in place

1:18:37.240 --> 1:18:41.360
<v Speaker 1>per game offensive place per games since even the Miami years. Yeah,

1:18:41.720 --> 1:18:46.160
<v Speaker 1>it's really tough to score points when you just don't

1:18:46.240 --> 1:18:49.599
<v Speaker 1>have the ball for enough place. Who is your fifth

1:18:49.960 --> 1:18:52.960
<v Speaker 1>most what's the team with the fifth most vacated targets? Right?

1:18:53.000 --> 1:18:55.760
<v Speaker 1>About the same as the Redskins and Jets. Excuse me,

1:18:55.800 --> 1:18:59.439
<v Speaker 1>the Washington team and the Jets. The Miami Dolphins with

1:18:59.479 --> 1:19:02.280
<v Speaker 1>eleven targets per game gone. A lot of them were

1:19:02.360 --> 1:19:06.200
<v Speaker 1>running back targets, believe it or not, layered ballage. Yeah,

1:19:06.439 --> 1:19:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Walton Draking Gaskin combined for a hundred twenty targets. Man

1:19:12.000 --> 1:19:15.960
<v Speaker 1>is Matt Brita a sneaky super sleeper. That's exactly where

1:19:15.960 --> 1:19:18.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm going with this, is that Matt Brita, that hundred

1:19:18.760 --> 1:19:20.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty targets. I know some of those players are still

1:19:20.760 --> 1:19:23.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of there, but let's be honest, they're lost. Those

1:19:23.120 --> 1:19:25.360
<v Speaker 1>players are not getting those targets. They're not this year.

1:19:25.600 --> 1:19:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Those hundred twenty targets. Jargean Howard doesn't catch if you

1:19:29.080 --> 1:19:32.360
<v Speaker 1>tell me Brita gets seventy catches this year. I'm not

1:19:32.400 --> 1:19:34.439
<v Speaker 1>shocked at the end of the year. Man, you know,

1:19:34.600 --> 1:19:37.479
<v Speaker 1>I didn't realize that they had lost that many passes

1:19:37.520 --> 1:19:40.519
<v Speaker 1>to running back. That's just running back targets. A hundred

1:19:41.240 --> 1:19:46.000
<v Speaker 1>darn Brita sneaky last pick off your draft, all right?

1:19:46.280 --> 1:19:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I like that angle, all right? So that's our top

1:19:48.360 --> 1:19:52.839
<v Speaker 1>five vacated targets. Yes, I will say on the Miami Dolphins,

1:19:52.920 --> 1:19:56.400
<v Speaker 1>they lost Albert Wilson and Alan Hearn's who who had

1:19:56.439 --> 1:19:58.680
<v Speaker 1>more targets than I thought they would. So I think

1:19:58.760 --> 1:20:02.400
<v Speaker 1>that only really ample eyes Preston Williams. It always comes

1:20:02.400 --> 1:20:07.120
<v Speaker 1>back to Preston Williams. Yeah. I know there's some Isaiah

1:20:07.240 --> 1:20:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Ford slot love out there. That's Brian's sleeper from last week,

1:20:11.400 --> 1:20:16.000
<v Speaker 1>But it's Preston Williams. Brian's more wrong than I am.

1:20:18.000 --> 1:20:21.160
<v Speaker 1>There's a pecking order here, I think very firmly established

1:20:21.200 --> 1:20:23.120
<v Speaker 1>that do you want to go any deeper than the

1:20:23.160 --> 1:20:26.040
<v Speaker 1>top five? Well, I could. I could say the Arizona

1:20:26.080 --> 1:20:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Cardinals lost a hundred fifty six targets and Hopkins had

1:20:28.960 --> 1:20:31.519
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and fifty last year, So did they get

1:20:31.760 --> 1:20:34.640
<v Speaker 1>absorbed by Hopkins? I made this joke earlier. It's like

1:20:34.680 --> 1:20:37.840
<v Speaker 1>a fantasy league where you lose a bunch of like

1:20:37.880 --> 1:20:39.840
<v Speaker 1>you trade a bunch of bottom level players and you

1:20:39.920 --> 1:20:43.120
<v Speaker 1>just get one stud back. That's that's basically what they did.

1:20:43.400 --> 1:20:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Add that up. That always works. Yeah, so that's about it.

1:20:47.280 --> 1:20:48.880
<v Speaker 1>I could go more if you want me to, but

1:20:49.000 --> 1:20:50.960
<v Speaker 1>we got sleepers to talk. We do have sleepers to

1:20:51.000 --> 1:20:56.320
<v Speaker 1>talk about. Every week of the season, we unveil a

1:20:56.640 --> 1:21:00.479
<v Speaker 1>different sleeper that we are backing. Matprit just could just

1:21:00.520 --> 1:21:03.480
<v Speaker 1>be mine not I mean, I don't tempt me. Um

1:21:03.520 --> 1:21:07.200
<v Speaker 1>that we that we think is going vastly under drafted,

1:21:07.400 --> 1:21:09.680
<v Speaker 1>we think, well, I'll perform his draft position. So it

1:21:09.680 --> 1:21:11.680
<v Speaker 1>could be a guy who's going in round ten, do

1:21:11.720 --> 1:21:13.800
<v Speaker 1>you think will perform like a sixth rounder, or could

1:21:13.800 --> 1:21:16.120
<v Speaker 1>even be a fourth rounder. You think it's gonna be

1:21:16.120 --> 1:21:19.280
<v Speaker 1>like a first rounder. So anybody who's going to significantly

1:21:19.280 --> 1:21:27.120
<v Speaker 1>outperform his draft position. We begin with WHOA I'm feeling

1:21:27.160 --> 1:21:30.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm feeling some remorse right now. I don't think I

1:21:30.600 --> 1:21:32.599
<v Speaker 1>have treated you fairly over the course of the show, Matt.

1:21:33.760 --> 1:21:37.439
<v Speaker 1>I want you to leave with your head on up high. Well,

1:21:38.080 --> 1:21:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I'll leave with my head held high. If somebody comes

1:21:40.800 --> 1:21:43.400
<v Speaker 1>to Shock Fantasy and subscribes using the promo code f

1:21:43.560 --> 1:21:47.240
<v Speaker 1>f W for Fantasy Football Weekly, you get the first

1:21:47.360 --> 1:21:50.719
<v Speaker 1>year for twenty bucks a Shock Fantasy nice and easy.

1:21:51.160 --> 1:21:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Um my sleeper And I did mention this in the

1:21:53.400 --> 1:21:56.919
<v Speaker 1>Bell cowse segment. There were four backfields that are awful

1:21:56.960 --> 1:22:00.160
<v Speaker 1>and brutal to try to predict. Last week I trick

1:22:00.200 --> 1:22:02.240
<v Speaker 1>to James White out of the New England backfield. That's

1:22:02.280 --> 1:22:04.920
<v Speaker 1>one of them. This week, I'm going Malcolm Brown out

1:22:04.960 --> 1:22:09.360
<v Speaker 1>of the l a Rams back, very unpopular, pick the popular.

1:22:09.479 --> 1:22:11.840
<v Speaker 1>He's the third and a DP among the Rams backs

1:22:11.920 --> 1:22:15.320
<v Speaker 1>right now. Last year, the Rams were third in the

1:22:15.439 --> 1:22:18.960
<v Speaker 1>league in red zone carries and second in touchdowns in

1:22:18.960 --> 1:22:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the red zone. In fact, in three years under Sean McVeigh,

1:22:23.439 --> 1:22:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the Rams have never finished worse then third in the

1:22:27.280 --> 1:22:32.439
<v Speaker 1>league in carries inside the twenty while Todd Gurley took

1:22:32.560 --> 1:22:35.599
<v Speaker 1>fifteen carries from inside the five last year and converted

1:22:35.640 --> 1:22:41.719
<v Speaker 1>eight touchdowns, which is a really good right there. Malcolm

1:22:41.720 --> 1:22:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Brown had eight carries, which is just over half, and

1:22:46.720 --> 1:22:50.439
<v Speaker 1>he had five touchdowns. That's a sixty two percent success rate.

1:22:50.920 --> 1:22:54.160
<v Speaker 1>So together Gurley and Brown made up of the runs

1:22:54.200 --> 1:22:56.760
<v Speaker 1>inside the five. So I'm not worried about Darrell Henderson here.

1:22:57.080 --> 1:22:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Cam Akers is the other guy. He could end up

1:22:59.200 --> 1:23:01.679
<v Speaker 1>being the between mean the twenties runner. But I think

1:23:01.680 --> 1:23:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the success that Malcolm Brown showed last year makes him

1:23:05.000 --> 1:23:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the goal line guy on one of the most prolific

1:23:08.120 --> 1:23:11.040
<v Speaker 1>goal line running offenses in the league. So get that

1:23:11.080 --> 1:23:13.040
<v Speaker 1>guy on your roster with the very last pick in

1:23:13.040 --> 1:23:15.120
<v Speaker 1>your draft. Malcolm Brown, I like it. You made a

1:23:15.120 --> 1:23:19.120
<v Speaker 1>compelling case. That's I'm You've kind of convinced me. You're

1:23:19.120 --> 1:23:21.519
<v Speaker 1>always surprised when I kind of convinced you too. It's

1:23:21.680 --> 1:23:25.240
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty funny, Scott, who is your sleeper this week?

1:23:25.640 --> 1:23:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go with Joshua Kelly, the guy I'm grabbing

1:23:29.240 --> 1:23:32.360
<v Speaker 1>late in a lot of leagues. Uh. Matt has gone

1:23:32.360 --> 1:23:35.240
<v Speaker 1>over all that the Chargers lost with Melvin Gordon and

1:23:35.560 --> 1:23:38.799
<v Speaker 1>mentioned maybe Austin Clark takes a lot of work. Austin

1:23:38.800 --> 1:23:42.439
<v Speaker 1>Ekeler had two touches this year the last year. Even

1:23:42.479 --> 1:23:44.479
<v Speaker 1>if he gets up to seventy five, there's about two

1:23:44.560 --> 1:23:50.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred more touches to go around. The Chargers lost fourteen

1:23:50.320 --> 1:23:54.519
<v Speaker 1>touches inside the five um with the loss of Melvin

1:23:54.600 --> 1:23:57.000
<v Speaker 1>which is a lot. Yeah, which touches for one player

1:23:57.040 --> 1:23:59.680
<v Speaker 1>inside the five is a lot of carries. Yeah, and

1:24:00.160 --> 1:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Kelly is easily the biggest of them, although it looks fine,

1:24:04.880 --> 1:24:08.439
<v Speaker 1>even though Kelly's bigger, Austin Uler looks pretty big. But

1:24:08.520 --> 1:24:12.599
<v Speaker 1>that's a hundred carries, sixty three sixty three receptions all

1:24:12.640 --> 1:24:16.000
<v Speaker 1>that Josh Kelly could get. And another thing people aren't

1:24:16.000 --> 1:24:18.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about quite enough. This offense is going to be different.

1:24:18.960 --> 1:24:21.599
<v Speaker 1>They threw the ball in five ninety seven times last year.

1:24:21.800 --> 1:24:25.599
<v Speaker 1>Tyrad Teller has never thrown the ball over. They might

1:24:25.680 --> 1:24:28.439
<v Speaker 1>run a ton more, I think this year, so there

1:24:28.479 --> 1:24:30.760
<v Speaker 1>might be even more carries available for Josh Kelly. And

1:24:30.800 --> 1:24:32.320
<v Speaker 1>we don't even know that that. We don't even know

1:24:32.360 --> 1:24:34.200
<v Speaker 1>what the starting quarterback is going to be. You know,

1:24:34.320 --> 1:24:36.240
<v Speaker 1>probably be tailor in week one, but at some point

1:24:36.280 --> 1:24:39.040
<v Speaker 1>they may he may hand the reins off to Herbert

1:24:39.160 --> 1:24:42.680
<v Speaker 1>and then run that much more. We know as they

1:24:42.720 --> 1:24:47.120
<v Speaker 1>work in a rookie quarterback. My sleeper is Baker Mayfield.

1:24:47.880 --> 1:24:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Last year, he was quarterback six in drafts at this

1:24:51.360 --> 1:24:56.439
<v Speaker 1>time last year. Now he's quarterback sixteen. Despite the fact

1:24:56.479 --> 1:25:00.400
<v Speaker 1>that he is a year older, wiser, more exp rienst

1:25:00.560 --> 1:25:02.720
<v Speaker 1>and has so many more things going for him now,

1:25:03.080 --> 1:25:08.599
<v Speaker 1>like competent coaching and Kevin Stefanski, who unlocked the best

1:25:08.640 --> 1:25:12.240
<v Speaker 1>season of Kirk Cousin's career last year. He's got the

1:25:12.640 --> 1:25:17.160
<v Speaker 1>He's got five receiving options around him, including new edition

1:25:17.280 --> 1:25:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Austin Hooper plus Odell Beckham Jarvis Landry, both of his

1:25:21.680 --> 1:25:24.960
<v Speaker 1>starting running backs are excellent receivers out of the backfield.

1:25:25.160 --> 1:25:29.759
<v Speaker 1>He's got all of those. Reminder that Baker Mayfield finished

1:25:29.840 --> 1:25:33.280
<v Speaker 1>last year pretty well. He was RB sorry Qbirt in

1:25:33.320 --> 1:25:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the second half of last year. I've despite a disastrous

1:25:35.920 --> 1:25:39.320
<v Speaker 1>start when he was like QB. The team addressed that

1:25:39.400 --> 1:25:42.080
<v Speaker 1>offensive line, and I love this part for him signing

1:25:42.160 --> 1:25:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Jack Conklin in free agency and then putting that first

1:25:45.000 --> 1:25:48.439
<v Speaker 1>round draft pick on Jedrick Wills. The two tackle upgrades,

1:25:48.840 --> 1:25:52.479
<v Speaker 1>and their interior line was actually really really good as

1:25:52.520 --> 1:25:55.679
<v Speaker 1>far as grades with Pro Football focus, and their tackles

1:25:55.680 --> 1:26:00.439
<v Speaker 1>were brutal. Yeah, and it's expressed it all the things

1:26:00.439 --> 1:26:03.080
<v Speaker 1>that are going right in Cleveland, and yet Baker Mayfield

1:26:03.840 --> 1:26:08.639
<v Speaker 1>going off the board in the eleventh round. Right, many

1:26:08.640 --> 1:26:11.840
<v Speaker 1>people got burned by Baker last thing. So hey, speaking

1:26:11.840 --> 1:26:14.559
<v Speaker 1>of the of the Chargers, let's talk Keenan Allen for

1:26:14.560 --> 1:26:18.120
<v Speaker 1>just a moment um. Currently going off the board roughly

1:26:18.240 --> 1:26:23.799
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver twenty five. Is there something wrong with Keenan

1:26:23.800 --> 1:26:26.519
<v Speaker 1>Allen besides this quarterback? Do you guys feel like this

1:26:26.560 --> 1:26:29.280
<v Speaker 1>is the right spot for I think I think he's

1:26:29.320 --> 1:26:32.120
<v Speaker 1>being underdrafted by a fair margin. I'm gobbling him up

1:26:32.120 --> 1:26:34.320
<v Speaker 1>in like the fifth round and like just about every

1:26:34.400 --> 1:26:36.120
<v Speaker 1>draft I'm in, and I didn't mention him and reach

1:26:36.160 --> 1:26:40.120
<v Speaker 1>around though us did. He's just always there. I think

1:26:40.120 --> 1:26:42.000
<v Speaker 1>he's boring. He's been around for a long time. He

1:26:42.000 --> 1:26:44.639
<v Speaker 1>hasn't scored a lot of touchdowns in the last few years,

1:26:45.000 --> 1:26:48.040
<v Speaker 1>but he's very consistent from receptions and yard standpoints. So

1:26:48.880 --> 1:26:50.599
<v Speaker 1>it's a great guy to have. Is your wide receiver

1:26:50.680 --> 1:26:53.840
<v Speaker 1>two or maybe wide receiver three on a really good team.

1:26:53.880 --> 1:26:55.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, one of the things we've talked about in

1:26:55.439 --> 1:26:59.280
<v Speaker 1>past seasons, not this year, is a boring draft in

1:26:59.280 --> 1:27:01.120
<v Speaker 1>which you just you draft a lot of players that

1:27:01.439 --> 1:27:03.560
<v Speaker 1>people are just bored up for no good reason. I

1:27:03.600 --> 1:27:06.679
<v Speaker 1>think t Y Hilton fits the bill, James White fits

1:27:06.720 --> 1:27:10.599
<v Speaker 1>that bill. Keenan Allen fits that bill. As just players

1:27:10.640 --> 1:27:14.600
<v Speaker 1>that are really good players, maybe not explosive players, but

1:27:14.720 --> 1:27:16.960
<v Speaker 1>really good players who were just like man, I've been

1:27:17.000 --> 1:27:19.920
<v Speaker 1>drafting a guy for years and he just doesn't excite

1:27:19.960 --> 1:27:21.880
<v Speaker 1>me as much as some of the other players do.

1:27:22.320 --> 1:27:24.479
<v Speaker 1>And I think Keenan Allen falls into that a little bit.

1:27:24.640 --> 1:27:28.360
<v Speaker 1>How much, if any does Tyrod Taylor hurt Keenan Allen.

1:27:29.560 --> 1:27:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it hurts. Tyrod's a professional quarterback. I

1:27:33.120 --> 1:27:35.240
<v Speaker 1>mean he's been a he's been a backup for years.

1:27:35.280 --> 1:27:38.559
<v Speaker 1>But if if that team is throwing the ball hunter

1:27:38.600 --> 1:27:40.679
<v Speaker 1>in fifty less times, I mean it's gonna it's gonna

1:27:40.760 --> 1:27:43.960
<v Speaker 1>hurt a little would hurt. Yeah, I think maybe Keenan

1:27:44.000 --> 1:27:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Allen's his issue is probably just like we've talked about,

1:27:48.280 --> 1:27:50.400
<v Speaker 1>that fourth and fifth round for the fourth round is

1:27:50.439 --> 1:27:55.360
<v Speaker 1>just loaded with high high up the Ridley's, the A. J. Brown's,

1:27:55.400 --> 1:27:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the Metcalfs, the Cooper Cops, the Kenny Golladays. Like you

1:27:58.920 --> 1:28:01.320
<v Speaker 1>want the sky high potential of all of those instead

1:28:01.320 --> 1:28:03.360
<v Speaker 1>of the safe I'm going to be wide receiver nine

1:28:03.439 --> 1:28:06.839
<v Speaker 1>to fifteen Keenan Allen. Keenan Allen is a Guillotine League receiver.

1:28:07.520 --> 1:28:09.839
<v Speaker 1>You want to get him in a gill team safe

1:28:10.240 --> 1:28:14.400
<v Speaker 1>easy numbers. Every week, I'll give you another guy, Julian Edelman. Sure,

1:28:14.560 --> 1:28:17.960
<v Speaker 1>older veteran receiver, always good. Nobody wants him. Is he

1:28:18.000 --> 1:28:21.120
<v Speaker 1>going wide receiver? But people are doing with this with

1:28:21.200 --> 1:28:23.639
<v Speaker 1>zach Ertz this year too. Yeah, there's probably a little

1:28:23.640 --> 1:28:25.360
<v Speaker 1>bit of that for zach Ertz. Yeah. I don't like,

1:28:26.240 --> 1:28:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't get it. But there are opportunities out there

1:28:28.080 --> 1:28:31.280
<v Speaker 1>for savvy fantasy players. If you are a savvy fantasy player,

1:28:31.320 --> 1:28:33.160
<v Speaker 1>you'll want to listen to the beginning of this show.

1:28:33.200 --> 1:28:36.839
<v Speaker 1>We encourage you to go back and podcast Fantasy Football

1:28:36.840 --> 1:28:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Weekly all the way to the beginning of the show

1:28:39.040 --> 1:28:42.479
<v Speaker 1>when we were still fresh, not worn down and boring

1:28:42.520 --> 1:28:44.599
<v Speaker 1>like we are now. I think you'll enjoy it a

1:28:44.600 --> 1:28:47.400
<v Speaker 1>lot more than this segment. I'm out a mountain dew absolutely,

1:28:47.680 --> 1:28:50.479
<v Speaker 1>Scott Matt, great job. Thank you very much, Brianna producer.

1:28:50.520 --> 1:28:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for all your help. We'll talk to you next week,

1:28:52.840 --> 1:28:58.680
<v Speaker 1>everybody for more Fantasy Football Weekly. Fantasy Football Weekly is

1:28:58.720 --> 1:29:01.400
<v Speaker 1>a production of I Heart Radio. For more podcasts from

1:29:01.400 --> 1:29:04.680
<v Speaker 1>my Heart Radio, visit the i Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

1:29:04.800 --> 1:29:06.799
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.