WEBVTT - GM Slashes Guidance, Kohl’s Fires CEO 

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 2>It's the Bloomberg Intelligence Radio. We are broadcasting to you

0:00:25.920 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 2>live from our Interactive broker studio right here in midtown Manhattan.

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:32.160
<v Speaker 2>All right, So two days later, we finally get GM's

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:35.240
<v Speaker 2>conference call slashing guidance with up to five billion dollar

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 2>hit from taruffs. Joining US now David Well to Bloomberg

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:39.560
<v Speaker 2>Detroit Bureau chief.

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:40.240
<v Speaker 1>David.

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 2>I thought that these offsets that were announced on Monday

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:45.519
<v Speaker 2>or Tuesday, I forget, my time has no meaning, were

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:48.080
<v Speaker 2>supposed to help this part from the administration.

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 3>They did. I mean, some analysts had they hit to

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 3>General Motors from tariffs being as high as ten billion dollars. Wow,

0:00:55.960 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 3>so it did help some. You still have a twenty

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 3>five percent tariff on imported vehicle. This does help offset

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 3>some of the parts tariffs. And I think what GM's

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:09.039
<v Speaker 3>hoping for here is that eventually the Trump administration gets

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 3>trade deals with South Korea for example, and some something

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 3>new with USMCA, because that's where GM's really taking a

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 3>big hit. Here are those countries in terms of where

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:24.840
<v Speaker 3>they get imported vehicles from, and so it's four to

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 3>five billion dollars. Two billion of that is from the

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:30.680
<v Speaker 3>vehicles they important, the rest is parts. So if the

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:33.960
<v Speaker 3>automotisy wants to escape heavy hit from tariffs, there's still

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 3>a lot more to be done in terms of either

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 3>resourcing parts or getting some new trade deals.

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 4>So, David, is the expectation this is kind of a

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:46.479
<v Speaker 4>worst case scenario, or this is a company positioning that as, hey,

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 4>this is kind of what we know when this is

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 4>kind of our best guess.

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 3>It's what they know based on the structure of the

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 3>tariffs right now. So let's say next week the Trump

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 3>administration cut a deal to lower tariffs with South Korea.

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 3>GM gets a couple hundred thousand vehicles, all entry level

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:12.359
<v Speaker 3>models from its factories in Korea. That would lower this burden.

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:16.800
<v Speaker 3>If they got something that would reduce the tariffs on

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 3>the non US parts in vehicles. GM makes some Canada

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 3>and Mexico that would also give them some relief. But

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:27.080
<v Speaker 3>right now those are the so called Ventanyl tariffs with

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 3>Canada and Mexico. Those are still hanging out there. Those

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 3>are still in force here, So they would need something

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 3>that would either lower that or get rid of those

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:39.799
<v Speaker 3>to really get this burden down unless they start relocating

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 3>vehicles and doing things like that.

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 4>David earlier the Wall Street Journal reporting that the board

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 4>at Tesla may have started efforts to take a look

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 4>at a search for a new chief executive officer to

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:54.960
<v Speaker 4>succeed Elon Musk. What's your take on.

0:02:54.880 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 3>That big company denied it about these things when there's

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:05.920
<v Speaker 3>there's a story written with conviction, uh, and then a

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:09.919
<v Speaker 3>denial with conviction. You know, you do wonder if maybe

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 3>some people on the board started talking to other executives

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 3>or executive search firms out there to get some ideas.

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 3>But it wasn't maybe an official board search. That's me speculating,

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:24.519
<v Speaker 3>But look, Elon Musk has a lot of interest here

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 3>and this has always been an issue with Tesla's shareholders.

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:31.360
<v Speaker 3>And this is well before he was in the Trump

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 3>administration and politically active with Doge. He had the boring

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 3>company of course has SpaceX. Then he got Twitter now

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 3>X and he's got Tesla, and then you add him

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 3>to a big government role, and this is somebody who

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 3>has a lot of different things going on. And when

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 3>Tesla starts to struggle shareholders and the board has to

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 3>do it's fiduciary duty. If shareholders are asking questions, maybe

0:03:56.840 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 3>there's maybe they're asking questions about when this guy is

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 3>going to come back in the chair, and if he's not,

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 3>then they need someone who's going to really take a

0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 3>look at getting their sales turned around.

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 2>If Elon Musk goes back, as it looks like he

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 2>will to Tesla, does all the problem just go away?

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 5>Now?

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:17.480
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't mean Tesla's got some real issues here. The

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:20.239
<v Speaker 3>product line is very stale, right. Most of these vehicles,

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 3>the model esc goes back twelve years and the other

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 3>vehicles in the lineup, with the exception of cyber truck,

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:29.600
<v Speaker 3>all kind of carry the same basic styling on the exterior, right,

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 3>So nothing looks fresh. The cyber truck is obviously very

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:34.280
<v Speaker 3>fresh and different, but it's a niche product. It's an

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 3>expensive pickup truck that a lot of people think is

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 3>pretty weird looking. So this is a company with stale product.

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 3>A lot of new competition from the Korean automakers in

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 3>the US from General motors, heavy competition in China. European automakers,

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 3>especially on the high end, have a lot of new

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:56.120
<v Speaker 3>EV's in Europe, so they don't have an Olagaboli like

0:04:56.160 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 3>they did five years ago, and they just haven't freshened

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 3>up the product line. And then there's there's the AI

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:05.600
<v Speaker 3>and the autonomy UH strategy of Tesla's. I think that's

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:07.719
<v Speaker 3>going to take a while. It took Waynwell a very

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 3>long time of testing vehicles on public roads to actually

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 3>launch a service. Tesla hasn't done any of that yet.

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:18.840
<v Speaker 3>So you're looking at turning around a product line that's

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 3>pretty stale in the face of tough competition, and you're

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:26.559
<v Speaker 3>looking at going from you know, an announcement last year

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 3>on autonomous vehicles to robotaxis on the road, which took

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:35.839
<v Speaker 3>Waymewell about at least a decade. These are things that

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 3>that are difficult to do, and you know, getting an

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 3>active CEO back in the chair helps, but it's still

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 3>it's still a lot of heavy lifting to get those

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:45.800
<v Speaker 3>initiatives going.

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:48.480
<v Speaker 4>All right, David, thank you so much. Appreciate a lot

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:51.360
<v Speaker 4>going on in the world of the automobile. David Walsh,

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:53.360
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Detroit, a bureau chief.

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:58.919
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:02.359
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten an on Apple, colocklay and Android Auto

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever you

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's get more on Cole's here. That stock

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:18.680
<v Speaker 2>readjusting after we saw the CEO being ousted from inappropriate

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 2>behavior and a probe that uncovers personal ties to the vendor.

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 2>Yet but overall, like the stock's not done well, as

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 2>Nora was saying, Mary Ross Gilbert s Bloomberg Intelligence senior

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:29.720
<v Speaker 2>equity analyst who covers retail for us. Hey, Mary, if

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:32.159
<v Speaker 2>we just take out this ten minute pop, ten minute,

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 2>ten percent pop on the CEO ouster, how is Coles

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 2>actually doing?

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 6>So that's a good question, Alex, So really, what's happening here? Yes,

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:45.279
<v Speaker 6>we had the news that the CEO was ousted, but

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 6>that that's a big It's big news, right because now

0:06:48.880 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 6>we have Michael Bender stepping in as CEO, and he's

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:55.160
<v Speaker 6>the fourth and under three years. But let's give you

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:58.440
<v Speaker 6>a little bit of a backdrop since twenty twenty one,

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:02.280
<v Speaker 6>when the company added so far Warris shops to their stores.

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 6>Their revenues have fallen two point two billion, but in

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:09.360
<v Speaker 6>the meantime, so Fura added one point eight billion, So

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 6>that means that their revenues are down almost five billion

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 6>away from Beauty, So that kind of gives you the

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 6>backdrop of what's happening operationally here and with these different CEOs,

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 6>nobody has seemed to find the formula of how to

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 6>get back to growth. The reason why the stock has

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 6>popped today is really because they came out with their

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 6>first quarter preliminary figures showing that their comp sales were

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 6>down four to four point three percent, when the company

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 6>was guiding down six percent and consensus was at down

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 6>six point four percent, and earnings were even higher. So

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 6>what I mean by higher is from an operating income perspective,

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:53.920
<v Speaker 6>consensus was at six million, and they're guiding to, you know,

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 6>somewhere around forty million, So that's much better. And so

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 6>from an EPs perspective, the loss is going to be

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 6>about half of what analysts expected, and that's really the

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 6>pop and the good news here is that the company

0:08:06.520 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 6>is rich in real estate, and so if you look

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 6>at the value potential value of the real estate holdings,

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 6>which could be nearly six billion, And if you look

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:17.640
<v Speaker 6>at their stock and where it's trading and how it's

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 6>valuing the business, that's under five billion. So that kind

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:23.680
<v Speaker 6>of gives you, I sort of a framework.

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 4>When you start going to the value of the real estate,

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 4>then you know the business. It's never a good sign trouble.

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 4>We did that with Macy's and the value of their

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 4>air rights in Manhattan. That's not good. So, Mary, what

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 4>is Cole saying? What are some of the retailers that

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 4>you cover. What are they saying about tariffs, their ability

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:44.360
<v Speaker 4>to manage terrorsts, how much they will take in their

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 4>profit margin versus how much they'll try to pass along

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 4>to consumers.

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 6>Paul, You're right, tariffs is really a big issue, and

0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 6>there was no commentary regarding that, neither in this call

0:08:56.080 --> 0:08:56.960
<v Speaker 6>and neither in their.

0:08:56.880 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 5>Fourth quarter call.

0:08:57.840 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 6>But we do know that roughly thirty over thirty percent

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 6>of their revenues they directly import. So there is going

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:09.680
<v Speaker 6>to be a hit here or some sort of exposure.

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:13.200
<v Speaker 6>And we're still early in the earnings for the first quarter,

0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 6>because that's where we're going to really get an update.

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 6>Because when these companies reported their fourth quarter earnings. We

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:22.559
<v Speaker 6>were talking about tariffs in that sort of twenty percent

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 6>range and now we're at one forty five for China.

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:31.400
<v Speaker 6>So yeah, so we're going to learn more obviously when

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 6>we get the call, but for now there's not a

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:36.560
<v Speaker 6>lot of disclosure around it, but we do know there

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 6>is an impact.

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 4>All right, Mary, thank you so much. We always appreciate

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 4>getting your thoughts on the global retailers here, Mary Ross,

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 4>Gilbert Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Equdannilysty covers the retail space.

0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:51.320
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on appleclock Lay and Android

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:09:57.880 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 4>One of the big stories here today from an earning's

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:07.440
<v Speaker 4>perspective is Facebook. Some of the kids call it meta

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 4>metaight stocks up six percent here today on some pretty

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:13.560
<v Speaker 4>solid numbers. And you want to talk about this company,

0:10:13.679 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 4>There's really only a couple of folks you want to

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 4>talk to, and one of them is David Kirkpatrick, founder

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:20.679
<v Speaker 4>of Techomanie in New York, and of course he is

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 4>the author of what I think remains the definitive book

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:26.439
<v Speaker 4>about Facebook in the early days of Facebook. It's called

0:10:26.480 --> 0:10:29.880
<v Speaker 4>The Facebook Effect. It's a great book, highly recommended. Hey David,

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:32.760
<v Speaker 4>what do you make of the numbers coming out of

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:34.200
<v Speaker 4>Meta these days?

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 5>Well, thanks, Paul, thanks for your nice comments.

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 7>Well, Meta really is the kind of Bellweather I think

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:44.840
<v Speaker 7>for what's happening with the digital economy, and their numbers

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 7>were quite surprisingly good, almost spectacular, you might say.

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:51.600
<v Speaker 5>I mean, they've been delivering very steadily for a long time.

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 7>But I think the most important thing that their numbers indicated,

0:10:56.800 --> 0:11:00.560
<v Speaker 7>in the comments that Zuckerberg made yesterday, indicated are that,

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 7>you know, this very crazy, unpredictable economic environment we're in

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:10.440
<v Speaker 7>right now, which you were just discussing regarding retail, is

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:11.560
<v Speaker 7>not likely.

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 5>To affect these companies as much as some feared, at

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:17.320
<v Speaker 5>least in the near term. And that's really good news.

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 7>There's a whole lot about AI and other stuff that

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 7>we learned about what they're doing that was quite spectacular also.

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so let's get to that. So, as you mentioned,

0:11:25.559 --> 0:11:27.560
<v Speaker 2>the advertising business, which is ninety eight percent of the

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 2>company's revenue, is continued to grow.

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:30.200
<v Speaker 8>So check that box.

0:11:30.480 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Let's get to the AI because they unveiled a new

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:36.840
<v Speaker 2>standalone AI app called Meta AI. What is that? What's

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:37.600
<v Speaker 2>it going to do for me?

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 5>Well, thanks, Alex Meda.

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 7>You know, Meta is one of the top players in AI,

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 7>there's no question.

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:48.200
<v Speaker 5>And they are spending an extraordinary amount on this.

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:52.440
<v Speaker 7>I mean they up their capital expenditure estimate to up

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:55.319
<v Speaker 7>to seventy two billion from a high of sixty five billion,

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 7>and that's like a huge percentage above last year which

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 7>was under forty billion. So they're really really ranking really

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 7>hard on data center investment and AAR. And what they

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 7>want to do is they want to compete head to

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 7>head with chat, GPT and all the other claud et cetera,

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 7>all the other AIS that are directed particularly at consumers.

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 7>And they have a unique advantage in doing that because

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:24.880
<v Speaker 7>they have this extraordinary, unique trove of data about all

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:28.080
<v Speaker 7>of us that they have been accumulating for decades and

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:30.760
<v Speaker 7>they can use that in the training of the AI

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:34.720
<v Speaker 7>to customize and personalize the results they give to people

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 7>in a way that could be a major competitive differentiator

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 7>down the road. And of course they'll use it in

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 7>all the normal ways, you know, they bring it into.

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 5>A WhatsApp, Chat, et cetera.

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 7>But they I think are extremely well positioned to become

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 7>a very very major force in especially consumer AI.

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 4>And Alexander Cockter parties. People often come up to me

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 4>and say, hey, Paul, give me an example of AI.

0:12:58.559 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 4>An example I give is just what David explained to you.

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 4>So long these advertising companies like Google and Facebook, they

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 4>can really get to know who the consumer is better

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:10.440
<v Speaker 4>and better and better and then charge more for the ads.

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 8>I mean, and that's what kind of what I think, right.

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 7>Well, that's true too, yeah, I mean, they're customizing the

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 7>ads using AI.

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:18.199
<v Speaker 5>That's the thing I didn't even mention. I'm talking about the.

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:21.320
<v Speaker 7>Results before, but the ads themselves will be far more

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:22.320
<v Speaker 7>accurately targeted.

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 5>And they're already doing that tremendously often.

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 2>And isn't that just like free training because you have

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 2>all the input from Instagram and threads and Facebook and

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:31.200
<v Speaker 2>all that.

0:13:32.480 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 7>Absolutely, they have the best train one of the best

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 7>training maybe the best training purpose for consumer.

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:41.160
<v Speaker 5>AI that anybody has.

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 7>I mean, this is the thing that has differentiated Facebook

0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:47.400
<v Speaker 7>and Meta from the beginning was the depth and volume

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:51.320
<v Speaker 7>of their data about individuals. It continues to get more

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 7>and more rich and they're figuring out new ways to

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:56.320
<v Speaker 7>mine it in the age of AI, and that is

0:13:56.360 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 7>going to be a huge advantage.

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 4>Hey, Dave, you look at this stock chart. Since it's IPO,

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:03.920
<v Speaker 4>the only thing that's ever derailed this stock has been

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 4>the metaverse. What's the latest on that whole thing? How

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 4>are you positioning it?

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:12.679
<v Speaker 7>Well, they don't talk about it nearly as much as

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 7>they did, but you know, I think what they're finding

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 7>is that there may be an overlap between the metaverse

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 7>and AI. And you know, they're they're one of the

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 7>things that I'd say they got into because of their

0:14:24.760 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 7>metaverse obsession is hardware, and they are now saying that

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 7>their hardware business, their ray Ban AI glasses, their Quest

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 7>gaming and other virtual reality headsets, those are going to

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 7>be an incredible entree into the world of AI. And

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 7>I think what we'll see is that they dovetail their

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 7>work in metaverse in immersive content.

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 5>With their work in AI. I don't think we can

0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 5>exactly predict how that's going to.

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 7>Happen, but certainly, you know, glasses that sort of look

0:14:56.880 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 7>at the world around you and make give you answers

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 7>and information about everything you see. That's something we can

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 7>all use, and it's starting to happen, and they would

0:15:07.120 --> 0:15:10.120
<v Speaker 7>not be in that position had they not made that many,

0:15:10.240 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 7>many tens of billions dollar investment in Metaverse.

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 5>Now was that a good investment? I don't know. I

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 5>don't think Zuckerberg.

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:19.320
<v Speaker 7>Would today say that metaverse is their future the way

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 7>he did not very long real clearly AI is the future,

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 7>but there will be an.

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 2>Overlat Just some breaking news here for you. Apparently the

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 2>US is now weighing easing Navidia Chip curbs on the UAE.

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 2>This comes as Trump is planning a visit to the region.

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 2>Apparently it's his first overseas trip aside from going to

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 2>the Pope s funeral, so that is definitely quite interesting.

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 2>In Vidia and other tech companies have been pushing for

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 2>this us A rule change, and Trump said President Trump

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 2>sad to visit the UAE on a golf trip coming

0:15:49.440 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 2>later this month. All right, David, we're gonna leave it there.

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 2>David Kirkpatrick joining us one of the best. He literally

0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 2>wrote the book on Facebook, founder of Teconomy, helping us

0:15:58.160 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 2>to break through meta earnings. Here's my question. Oh well,

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 2>went away, look at that question. Oh video and video

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 2>got a celebrating yesterday from Seagate. Did you see that?

0:16:06.640 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 4>I did not see that.

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 2>Say AI is priced in and their customers are going

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:11.520
<v Speaker 2>to start making their own AI check.

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 4>Interesting. The stocks up five percent today, so a good

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 4>move here, and again seems like when you think about

0:16:17.680 --> 0:16:20.360
<v Speaker 4>these TIFFs, I think what we learned from the first

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 4>Trump presidency to now is a very fluid situation. There's

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 4>an announcement, then there's some negotiation, then there's some walk back,

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 4>there's some change, and you're not really sure where you're

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:31.920
<v Speaker 4>going to end up. I just go back and look

0:16:31.920 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 4>at kind of how everybody behaved back in the first

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 4>Trump administration. Stock market did okay? I mean, it's just everything.

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 5>It just relaxs.

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 2>Really with the UA is not China, I don't know.

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 4>I would suggest maybe those conversations are ongoing and we'll see,

0:16:45.640 --> 0:16:47.480
<v Speaker 4>but it gives us something to talk about.

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:16:55.960 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 1>you get your pod, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:17:03.080 --> 0:17:05.800
<v Speaker 4>Let's check in with the professional here, Marsha McGregor, head

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:09.639
<v Speaker 4>of Portfolio Strategy, where the CIO at Meryl and Bank

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:13.840
<v Speaker 4>of America Private Bank. I like keeping the Meryl name

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:18.119
<v Speaker 4>because the Meryl names wanted the great names on the

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 4>makes a title really long. But I would have kept

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 4>Marylyn the name. I worked at Maryland, so the Thundering

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:25.040
<v Speaker 4>heard all that kind of stuff. I think when I

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 4>worked at Meryl's a biker, I felt like we could

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 4>get any deal. I don't care who I was competing against.

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:32.160
<v Speaker 4>I felt like we could beat them because that's how

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 4>good I thought the Meryl folks were. So Marshie, thanks

0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:38.160
<v Speaker 4>so much for joining us here. Boy volatility, I mean,

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:40.440
<v Speaker 4>if you like it, this is your kind of market.

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 4>I guess what kind of conversations are you having with

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:43.880
<v Speaker 4>your clients these days?

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean we're trying to help our clients kind

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:49.400
<v Speaker 8>of navigate through what I think of almost as this

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:53.240
<v Speaker 8>dense fog of uncertainty of course, on the policy front,

0:17:53.280 --> 0:17:55.679
<v Speaker 8>on the macro front, and really trying to get our

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 8>clients to take a step back understand that being really

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 8>well to versified, being really disciplined in a market that

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:05.880
<v Speaker 8>can be can probably continue.

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:06.200
<v Speaker 5>To feel choppy.

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 8>From here is the most important thing we can do

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 8>with investors. So I say, like, stay diversified, stay invested,

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:15.919
<v Speaker 8>really stick to our knitting here. This fog will lift

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:18.200
<v Speaker 8>and we'll be able to see through to the other side.

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:21.640
<v Speaker 2>When you say diversify, everyone says that what does diversify

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 2>mean to you over there at Bank of America, Meryl.

0:18:25.200 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, when I think about our portfolio positioning right now,

0:18:28.040 --> 0:18:30.959
<v Speaker 8>we do have a preference for equities over fixed income,

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 8>and its global equities, so we have a pretty significant

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 8>strategic weighting both to international developed equities and emerging markets.

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 8>And then on the fixed income side, we're actually not

0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:45.119
<v Speaker 8>taking huge positions on the fixed income side. We like

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:48.399
<v Speaker 8>to use fixed income as a diversifier, kind of as

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:50.879
<v Speaker 8>that ballast of the portfolio. And then, of course, for

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:55.960
<v Speaker 8>our clients that are qualified investors, alternative investments makes a

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:58.160
<v Speaker 8>lot of sense, private markets makes a lot of sense

0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 8>in a well diversified portfolio, and of course those big

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 8>overarching themes. So yes, we're in this moment of you know,

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:08.120
<v Speaker 8>I think peak uncertainty is behind us, fortunately, but we're

0:19:08.119 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 8>in this moment of uncertainty about what the economy looks

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:14.679
<v Speaker 8>like going forward. But I think there's a lot of

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 8>trends and themes that aren't changing, like the innovation in

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:22.920
<v Speaker 8>our economy, like investment in infrastructure, data centers, areas like that.

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:26.680
<v Speaker 8>I don't think those big picture trends are necessarily going

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 8>to change because they're so long term.

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 4>Marshie, we've seen over the list, I think, just here

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 4>in twenty twenty five and maybe late twenty four kind

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 4>of a move into international equities, maybe even fun flows

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 4>material fun flows out of the US market into other

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:41.920
<v Speaker 4>parts of the world. How do you guys think about

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:43.480
<v Speaker 4>the US versus non US?

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:47.159
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, when I think about international markets, certainly a dollar

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 8>coming off the way I think of it like the

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:53.240
<v Speaker 8>eye popping strength that we had seen recently. So we

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 8>have this dollar that's moderating. Our few is that the

0:19:55.800 --> 0:20:00.040
<v Speaker 8>dollar likely continues to moderate from here, really kind of

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 8>lending some support to international markets. But what keeps me

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:06.639
<v Speaker 8>from getting outright bullish outside of the US is we

0:20:06.720 --> 0:20:10.479
<v Speaker 8>haven't seen the earnings come through. While the US earnings

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 8>picture expectations have clearly been trimmed over the last several weeks,

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:18.440
<v Speaker 8>we still think US corporate earnings stay positive in terms

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:21.919
<v Speaker 8>of a growth rate through all of this uncertainty, So

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:24.800
<v Speaker 8>I need to see the green shoots on the earning

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 8>side to get me a lot more positive on international markets.

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:31.160
<v Speaker 8>But a dollar that is moderating I think will likely

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 8>continue to help international from here, probably for the balance

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 8>of this year. So the answer is I want to

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 8>own both, but I do still have a preference for

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 8>US relative to the rest of the world.

0:20:42.920 --> 0:20:46.480
<v Speaker 2>What about other themes that we've seen. Energy has just

0:20:46.520 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 2>gotten crushed, Utilities were kind of rising with the AI play.

0:20:51.119 --> 0:20:53.600
<v Speaker 2>They became a growth story even though they're also considered

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 2>a safe haven. What about those trends we were looking

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:57.679
<v Speaker 2>at like like eight months ago that now have kind

0:20:57.680 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 2>of fallen out by the wayside.

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:03.720
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, well, it's really interesting if we rewind before April. Second,

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:08.439
<v Speaker 8>this market weakness really started as a rotational correction away

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:13.640
<v Speaker 8>from kind of the most overvalued expensive magnificent seven tech names.

0:21:13.800 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 8>So our view had been it would be the other

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:18.359
<v Speaker 8>four hundred and ninety three that led the way for

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:21.120
<v Speaker 8>twenty twenty five, and that's still the case. I think

0:21:21.160 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 8>it's going to be this broader market participation. We're talking

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:28.160
<v Speaker 8>to clients about playing defense end offense. So defense, as

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 8>you mentioned, still looks like utilities a way to kind

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 8>of think about playing that defense just through the S

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:37.960
<v Speaker 8>and P five hundred. I also like dividend paying stocks,

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:40.880
<v Speaker 8>especially in a world where we're wondering if the FED

0:21:40.920 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 8>will or won't cut as the economy shows signs of softening.

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:48.119
<v Speaker 8>I think dividend paying stocks and dividend growers it's going

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 8>to be really interesting. You know, when I think about

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:53.880
<v Speaker 8>energy as a sector, it's the only sector I think

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 8>that's in negative territory in the most recent period for

0:21:57.320 --> 0:22:00.640
<v Speaker 8>the index this year. You know, I'm a little cautious

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:02.959
<v Speaker 8>on energy. I do think when I think about what

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:05.919
<v Speaker 8>else could come from Washington to provide a little bit

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 8>of a cushion from growth, lower energy prices would be

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 8>a boost to the consumer. We need the consumer to

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:15.040
<v Speaker 8>stay resilient here, so I would think about it is

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 8>less positive on energy. The area of the market that

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 8>I think has the potential to continue to lead as

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:25.240
<v Speaker 8>we get to the other side of this uncertainty is financials.

0:22:25.600 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 8>Financials are going to be insulated from some of this

0:22:28.080 --> 0:22:31.720
<v Speaker 8>trade noise as long as the consumer hangs in and

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 8>our base cases that the US economy avoids a recession.

0:22:35.720 --> 0:22:38.359
<v Speaker 8>I think that tees up financials which have pretty strong

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 8>internals to once again emerges market leadership. But to your point,

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:47.480
<v Speaker 8>artificial intelligence innovation, none of those trends are going anywhere,

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 8>So I think the investment cycle continues as we're in

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 8>this kind of big picture arms race for technology and AI.

0:22:56.640 --> 0:23:00.359
<v Speaker 4>Marcy, my notes, tell me that you're based in Savannah, Orga.

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 4>Please tell me.

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:01.879
<v Speaker 3>That's not the case.

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 8>That is the case.

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:09.400
<v Speaker 4>How did you wrangle that? He's just jealous, hugely jealous.

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:11.919
<v Speaker 8>Well, if it makes you feel better, I'm in New

0:23:11.960 --> 0:23:15.199
<v Speaker 8>York pretty regularly. But yeah, as I look out the

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 8>window here, I.

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:19.919
<v Speaker 4>Mean that might be, pound for pound, the prettiest city

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 4>in all of America. It is awesome, is it down there?

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 4>And the word I mean, she went the Rutgers good,

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 4>but then she ends up in Savannah, Georgia for banks

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 4>a jealousy.

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 5>Marcia, thank you so much.

0:23:33.320 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 4>For joining us.

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:34.520
<v Speaker 5>We'll have you back.

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:36.879
<v Speaker 4>I really appreciate getting some of your thoughts on Marcia Gregor.

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:39.960
<v Speaker 4>She's had a portfolio strategy for the CIO at Merrill

0:23:40.080 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 4>and Bank of America Private Bank from Savannah.

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:44.960
<v Speaker 8>George Savannah.

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 4>Oh, it is just it's a great long weekend trip

0:23:48.280 --> 0:23:51.160
<v Speaker 4>from New York. Yeah, it's good, it's I highly recommend.

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:23:56.760 --> 0:24:00.720
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:04.199
<v Speaker 1>ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, the

0:24:04.280 --> 0:24:08.159
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 1>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:13.640
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg terminal