WEBVTT - Six Flags, Meta, and Markets

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller.

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Every business day we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 2>and Bloomberg experts, along with essential market moven news.

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:17.279
<v Speaker 1>Find the Bloomberg Markets podcast called Apple Podcasts or wherever

0:00:17.400 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you listen to podcasts, and at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast.

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Daniel de martinoz Booth Joints and she's the CEO in

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 1>chief Strategistic QI Research. Danielle The market likes with your

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:30.160
<v Speaker 1>fed Chairman j Powell had to say, shoulday, what's your takeaway?

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 3>Well, he didn't say much, Okay, I mean at the

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 3>beginning he.

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 4>Kind of read a lot of his answers.

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:38.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, dude, you're still reading your your statements over

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 3>quit reading already.

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:42.519
<v Speaker 2>I thought that was weird. I honestly, I listened. I

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 2>was on Comfort Radio, and I thought it was awkward.

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:48.159
<v Speaker 2>Why isn't this guy like taking a stand one way

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:50.839
<v Speaker 2>or the other one? Why even bother having the if

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:51.280
<v Speaker 2>you're not going to.

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 3>Say at the dot plot, oh it's meaningless. You know,

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 3>we've got all these employment reports and CPI reports before

0:00:57.160 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 3>we get to December twelfth and thirteen, So disregard that.

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it was it was I'm like, dude, do

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:04.400
<v Speaker 4>you know you're talking out loud?

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:07.399
<v Speaker 3>You're like on TV TV, right, yeah, I mean this, dude,

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 3>And I think what was disappointing was that so many

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:15.120
<v Speaker 3>of the reporters asked the same regurgitated question we reworded

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 3>over and over and abotton. I can somebody please take

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 3>off the gag order and let somebody ask him about

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 3>the balance sheet already?

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 5>All right, tell us about the balance sheet. What would

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:24.840
<v Speaker 5>you like about the balance sheet?

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean, gosh, you've seen other deposits, liabilities. My mentor,

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 3>doctor Lacey Hunt, you always I follow them every single week.

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 3>We're about to break underneath fifteen trillion.

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 4>When the data hit tomorrow afternoon.

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:37.639
<v Speaker 2>Wait, what do you say about Lacy Hunt from Hooisington, Right.

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, he's my mentor.

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:40.040
<v Speaker 2>Oh so he's taught me how.

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 3>I mean, every single week the Fed's data comes out

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:46.319
<v Speaker 3>and it shows you weekly liquidity on bank balance sheets,

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 3>and you've gone from just about seventeen trillion to next

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 3>week tomorrow afternoon, you're going to break fifteen trillion. You've

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 3>had two trillion dollars of liquidity sucked out of the

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 3>system because there's like a one point five multiple on

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 3>every dollar of quantity of tightening shows up as one

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 3>point five dollars of liquidity pulling being pulled out of

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 3>the system, which is why your bcy go functions on fire.

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 2>Okay, you've lost me and Paul already. I'm gonna say

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:11.920
<v Speaker 2>you see why I go.

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 3>That's your bankruptcy function. Look, it's companies rely on liquidity,

0:02:19.240 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 3>and right now we're seeing banks continue to tighten lending standards.

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:25.360
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I'll be up and ready on Monday morning

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 3>for the Senior Loan Officer survey, but the Dallas Fed

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:31.679
<v Speaker 3>has a more frequent lending survey, and it's just got

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 3>getting tighter and tighter and tighter. Everything we heard from

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 3>Capital One ally they're seeing normalization in defaults and credit

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 3>card delinquencies and auto default.

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:44.640
<v Speaker 2>Wait, you said normalization doing air quotes.

0:02:44.960 --> 0:02:48.520
<v Speaker 3>Normalization air quotes, that means that means it's going above subprime.

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:51.799
<v Speaker 3>So it's not contained to subprimes. I love to quote pernanky,

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 3>but it's not contained a subprime. And that's what we're seeing.

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 4>We've seen about a twelve and.

0:02:56.160 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 3>A half fold increase of prime all loans being downgraded

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:06.839
<v Speaker 3>into subprime territory based on where they're trading right now

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 3>on bank balance sheets. We've never seen anything like this,

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:11.920
<v Speaker 3>and it's because when you put the rent on hold,

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 3>the auto payment on hold, when you paid people twenty

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 3>five hundred dollars extra a month, when you put the

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 3>mortgages on, everything went on hold.

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 4>So we saw and Moody's has done some good work

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:20.800
<v Speaker 4>on this.

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 3>We saw insane levels of Fico's score inflation during the

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 3>pandemic and now it's all coming back to bite because

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 3>weges just aren't there and layoffs. You've got continuing jobless

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 3>claims up six weeks in a row north of one

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 3>point eight. They're just on top of where they were

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 3>in twenty sixteen.

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 1>So is your biggest concern that the consumer is not

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 1>nearly as strong as maybe we think it is.

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I think the consumers telling you they're not as strong.

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if you looked inside of the final University

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:52.440
<v Speaker 3>of Michigan consumer sentiment print at the medium tersile and

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 3>top tersile of earners, they're like, job cuts are coming,

0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 3>and it's the lowest tersile that doesn't see it. Coming,

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 3>but we're seeing it come out in the data week

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 3>after week after week. I was I was talking to

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:08.119
<v Speaker 3>Daily Jobcuts dot Com, the founder, and he's like, November

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 3>seasonally a quiet time. People don't fire people into Thanksgiving

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 3>and in the holidays, and he's like, it's out.

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:17.039
<v Speaker 4>They've come out of the gate. He seemed to twenty

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 4>five companies close in two days.

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:22.720
<v Speaker 2>This is the Austrian hangover coming after all of that

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 2>insane stimulus stimulus, it's still going on. Remember that Canes

0:04:27.080 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 2>versus High k Rap video. Look, I mean crisis you've got.

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 3>You've got some people are going to be paying their

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:36.600
<v Speaker 3>mortgage for the first time in December. That's how long

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 3>FHA Forbearance has been going since March of twenty two.

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 2>All Right, I got a listener question here writing in,

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:45.040
<v Speaker 2>did Danielle listen to the Drunken Miller interview with Paul

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 2>Tudor Jones? Stan thinks rates are going higher because of

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:52.359
<v Speaker 2>an out of control debt profile of the US. Do

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:53.040
<v Speaker 2>you agree?

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 4>I don't, No, I don't.

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we've been spending like drunken sailors since Reagan

0:04:57.720 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 3>was in office. It's just I think Wall Street wants

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 3>a narrative right now.

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 2>But you know, Reagan boosted spending on the military. We

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 2>were talking yesterday to Paul's mentor, Cam Harvey from Duke,

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:09.719
<v Speaker 2>and he pointed out that next year we're gonna have

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:13.799
<v Speaker 2>interest payment costs of nine hundred billion dollars. We're gonna

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 2>pay more to service our debt than we do to

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 2>fund the military.

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 5>Yep.

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 3>Actually we passed that up in the at the end

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:22.280
<v Speaker 3>of the fiscal year, about six hundred and eighty five

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:25.600
<v Speaker 3>billion for military, eight hundred and eight billion fiscal year

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 3>ended August thirty one interest payments. So we've already we've

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 3>already rounded that. And I the shame about the fiscal

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 3>spending right now is it's.

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 4>Not doing much.

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:39.280
<v Speaker 3>There's it's not creating anything. Like there's no Hoover Dam,

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 3>there's no Holland Tunnel.

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 2>There's so little way.

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 1>They're working like crazy out there, the people out in Jersey, right,

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>John Tucker, they were building that Oh.

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:51.920
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, number those gigantic cranes by the Gateway project.

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:54.159
<v Speaker 4>Question, I stand correct, Hey we're building a tunnel.

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it'll be ready.

0:05:57.279 --> 0:05:59.359
<v Speaker 4>I'm I'm always on the bridges going to LaGuardia.

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:03.720
<v Speaker 5>Sorry, exactly, So is recession in your scenario? In your I.

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 4>Think I think recession starts the current quarter.

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 5>Okay, this quarter Q four.

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 3>As of this morning's jobless claims data, the only state

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 3>holdout right now that does not have rising continuing jobless

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:18.240
<v Speaker 3>claims year over here is Kentucky.

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 4>Well, I mean Florida, but that's that's a base effect

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 4>from Hurricane Ian. So that's gonna go away here. But

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:25.039
<v Speaker 4>that's it.

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean September twenty twenty two, there were zero states

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 3>with rising continuing jobless claims.

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 4>Now we got fifty.

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:33.040
<v Speaker 5>Okay, so you have a recession in your outlook?

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 2>How deep?

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:34.120
<v Speaker 5>How long?

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 3>I think it's gonna last longer than we think because

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:41.040
<v Speaker 3>we've pulled so much demand forward. We're seeing one furniture

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:42.800
<v Speaker 3>company after another go out of business that had been

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 3>in business for one hundred years because we pulled so

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 3>much demand forward with all that stimulus money.

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 2>All Right, that's the hangover, dude.

0:06:49.720 --> 0:06:52.159
<v Speaker 4>It is a hangover, yes, but it's not as funny

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 4>as the movie.

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:55.280
<v Speaker 2>So so should the Fed?

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:57.280
<v Speaker 5>What should the Fed do here?

0:06:57.680 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 3>I think I think the Fed's on hold, I really do.

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 3>But again, it's about the balance sheet. Nobody's talking about Voldemort.

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 4>I'm saying it out loud. It's about the balance sheet, people,

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 4>It's real.

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 2>The worry. The worry is that the Fed went too

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 2>far right because, like Cam said, if you take out

0:07:12.840 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 2>whatever they call it, rent equivalent, inflation is below two percent.

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 2>And our buddy j Hatfield from Infrastructure Capital a smart one.

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 2>He's got his CPI dash R where they replace the

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 2>housing component with ky Schiller and that's one point three

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 2>percent year over year compared to the four point Everything's

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 2>great in Dallas, right.

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, no, Actually, war notices in the state of Textas

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 3>have gone through the roof. That's what's hard to believe.

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 3>And it's no longer like super cheap to live there.

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 3>So I mean, Austin's a cesspool of when it comes,

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 3>it's it's residential real estate ground zero.

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 2>It's a mess again.

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 3>And I'm a longhorn, and I mean, I love, I

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 3>love Austin, but they overbuilt.

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 5>They overbuilt, and there's and they don't have any infrastructure for.

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 2>The true but they have limescooters. That's all I care about.

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Burn Martino, CEO and chief strategist Research.

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 7>You're listening to the Team Ken's Are Live program Bloomberg

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 7>Markets weekdays at ten am eastering on Bloomberg dot com,

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 7>the iHeartRadio app and the Bloomberg Business app, or listen

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 7>on demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 1>A little bit of a M and a trade in

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:21.679
<v Speaker 1>the theme park business, Cedar Fair, six Flags, they're getting

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>together all Stock merger.

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 5>Let's break down a little bit.

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 2>We can do that with Jody Laura.

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 1>She covers the entertainment companies for Bloomberg Intelligence from the

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 1>credit side. So, Jody, thanks so much for joining us here. Boy,

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at the balance sheets of these two companies.

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:36.959
<v Speaker 5>They're almost the.

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Exact same two and a half billion dollars of debt,

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 1>about five hundred million of ibadas, so they're both levered

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty highly around five times leverage. Here from your perspective,

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:49.680
<v Speaker 1>what's the rational for putting these two companies together?

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 8>Fuir So, Paul, I mean, I think I think that's

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:55.240
<v Speaker 8>a great question. Is that really at the end of

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 8>the day, why are these companies joining? And I think

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:02.239
<v Speaker 8>it really comes down to the fact that the tailwinds

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:05.720
<v Speaker 8>that they experienced during the pandemic have sort of petered off,

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 8>and now they're saying what's next for these companies, they've

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 8>experienced tremendous weather related issues this year.

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:15.840
<v Speaker 9>That have sort of marred their opportunity and.

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:21.599
<v Speaker 8>Benefiting from people spending on leisure.

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:24.439
<v Speaker 2>Too hot, Yeah.

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 8>Well, so subplace was too hot, others it was too rainy.

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:30.200
<v Speaker 8>It was just you know, a mix of storms and

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 8>events that have happened. I mean, you look in the

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 8>southern California area and it was too hot and then

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 8>there were floods, and then it was rainy, and it's

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 8>just I mean, each of their calls, other than this

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:43.839
<v Speaker 8>one today, which obviously was just focused on the m

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 8>and a transaction, but the past two quarters, that was

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 8>sort of the explanation behind it was we didn't do

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 8>well or as well as expected, and we didn't get

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:58.720
<v Speaker 8>as much season pass buyers because of the effects of weather.

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 8>And I don't I know if that's necessarily going to

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 8>go away, but I think what they're hoping is the

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 8>expansion of their footprint will sort of diversify them enough

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 8>to make it so that weather isn't as much of

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 8>an issue. I don't know if that's necessarily what I'd

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:19.280
<v Speaker 8>hang my hat on, but that's certainly their argument.

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:24.959
<v Speaker 1>Got Disney. You look at Disney there love their theme

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:27.960
<v Speaker 1>park business. Comcast loves its universal theme park business. They're

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 1>both of those companies are increasing dramatically. They're capital spending

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 1>in those businesses. Is that just a benefit of scale

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 1>and that six Flags and Sedar don't enjoy that same

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of scale, so this is one way to get there?

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 9>Well, I would say.

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:46.959
<v Speaker 8>That they definitely have a lot of scale, particularly six Flags.

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:50.720
<v Speaker 9>Maybe even some would argue too much scale. It's a

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 9>different business model.

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:55.559
<v Speaker 8>When you're dealing with regional versus very focused theme parks. Right,

0:10:55.800 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 8>So Disney, like SeaWorld, benefits from having Florida, having Southern California,

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 8>and so that of course helps them from a cash

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:07.680
<v Speaker 8>flow perspective, more consistency because they don't have to shut

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 8>down for part of the year.

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 9>For six Flags and Cedar Fair, it's.

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:13.439
<v Speaker 8>A little bit more regional. The type of customer is

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 8>a little bit different. It's not as much destination. They're

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 8>hoping to shift that a little bit and you're certainly

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 8>seeing that. You know, Cedar Fair does have hotels at

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:23.960
<v Speaker 8>some of their properties, and so I think that the

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 8>thought process is is that once you're a bit larger,

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:30.280
<v Speaker 8>you can more actively have a branding and maybe more

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:32.760
<v Speaker 8>of a presence everywhere you go. So if you're a

0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 8>card carrier of a six Flags Great Adventure, you can

0:11:37.120 --> 0:11:40.199
<v Speaker 8>go to any six Flags. Perhaps maybe maybe that's the play,

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 8>is that you know a customer can participate in any area.

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, can I ask about the dreaded phrase merger of equals?

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 5>I think they're.

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:51.679
<v Speaker 2>Saying this themselves, like they think it's a good idea

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:55.560
<v Speaker 2>to spin that. Daimler Chrysler said the same thing, and

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:58.960
<v Speaker 2>it was anything but I mean, what a load of bs?

0:11:58.679 --> 0:11:58.719
<v Speaker 10>What?

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 2>What's who's buying? Who's buying whom?

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 10>Here? Right?

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:07.080
<v Speaker 9>So they structured the deal interestingly, So Cedar Fair is.

0:12:07.040 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 8>An LP or an MLP specifically, so a limited partnership

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:12.559
<v Speaker 8>right now, so they have unit holders.

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:14.680
<v Speaker 9>Six Flags is your standard CE corporation.

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 8>And the way that they structured it is that Cedar

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 8>Fair will get fifty one point two percent of the

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:23.960
<v Speaker 8>new company shares outstanding. And the reason why they did

0:12:24.040 --> 0:12:26.080
<v Speaker 8>that is I think it sort of helps them to

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 8>not trigger the change of control provision for bondholders, meaning

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 8>bond holders can't then put back the bonds at one

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 8>oh one percent of par and so that of course

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 8>frees up some cash for the two companies. It makes

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 8>it a really stock for stock transaction, except for the

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:46.319
<v Speaker 8>dividends that Six Flags shareholders get with the closure of

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 8>the deal. And so I think it's an interesting structure.

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 8>It makes it a little bit more beneficial for bondholders

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 8>in some sense, particularly the Six Flags bondholders. We saw

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 8>the bond's rally today and that's a function of the

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 8>fact that you know, Cedar Fair does to some extent,

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:08.080
<v Speaker 8>they've had better results, at least recently, and their business

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 8>model has been.

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 9>A little bit more.

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:15.679
<v Speaker 2>Right, well, they have, it's been stronger. They have Cedar Point,

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 2>which I grew up going to that in Sandusky. They

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:23.199
<v Speaker 2>have the Beast. It's King's Island in Cincinnati. When I

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:25.600
<v Speaker 2>was a kid. That was the longest, the fastest, the

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:30.200
<v Speaker 2>tallest wooden roller coaster in the world. Jody, You've got

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:34.319
<v Speaker 2>I'm guessing, uh, real amusement park experience.

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 5>What are the.

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 2>Best rides out there? What are the rides that the

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 2>roller coaster freaks are psyched about?

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 9>Well, there are quite a few.

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:46.840
<v Speaker 8>It's funny because I have this conversation a lot with

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 8>I'm gonna name job Ira Jersey, who sits in my

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:52.960
<v Speaker 8>little Hubble in Princeton. His his son is a roller

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 8>coaster enthusiast, so we're constantly trading discussions about all the

0:13:57.679 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 8>different roller coasters out there, so which ones are the best?

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:03.559
<v Speaker 9>I mean, I'm a traditionalist.

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 8>I still I grew up well, you know, grew up

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 8>relative once it finally came out the Batman, the original

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 8>Batman ride not you know, that was in Great Adventure.

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:16.199
<v Speaker 8>I just always have a soft spot for that, as

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 8>well as for Steel Force, which is at Dorney Park.

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 9>And so, I mean those are just rides.

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 8>That I always went to just because it was a

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 8>regional sort of feel that said. I mean, you know,

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 8>Disney obviously has its.

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 2>Own sort of space mountain right.

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 8>Well, they have Guardians with the Galaxy Now, which was

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 8>certainly an intense ride, definitely different. I mean from an

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 8>innovation standpoint, they certainly do a different sort of innovation

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 8>than what you see at the three regional guys.

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 5>All right, Jerdi, thanks so much for joining us. Appreciate it.

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Jody Lorii credit analysts Bloomberg Intelligence breaking down this Cedar

0:14:50.120 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Fair and six Flags a deal that it's a merger

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 1>of vehicles is what they're calling it. But trying to

0:14:55.120 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 1>get a little bit of scale in that theme park business.

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:00.120
<v Speaker 7>You're listening to the tape Cat's are Line program M

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 7>Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio,

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 7>the tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com.

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 10>And the Bloomberg Business App.

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 7>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 7>flagship New York station, Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 7>thirty Darkening door.

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 5>Here is Doug Adams.

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 1>He's a global cohead of ECM, that would be Equity

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 1>capital Markets at Citybank, one of my former places of employee.

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I used to run the street with Tyler Dixon.

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 5>We were due deals.

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 1>One day he called me out and says, hey, I

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 1>just took down a bunch of this clear channel stock.

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Can you tell me what the radio bis how where

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 1>radio company works? I was like, what I mean, that's

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the kind of risk we would take back in the day.

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Maybe stupid risk, but anyway, Doug Adams does a I'm

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 1>sure a better job than Tyler.

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:44.040
<v Speaker 2>Doug.

0:15:44.080 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 5>Thanks so much for joining us here, appreciate it.

0:15:46.160 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Talk to us about the equity capital markets these days.

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 5>It's tough market, tough geopolitical issues.

0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure the companies don't have a lot of confidence

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe in their forecasts or kind of just even the

0:15:56.880 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>next couple of quarters. What are the kind of conversations

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:03.360
<v Speaker 1>you have with clients these days about their capital structure?

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 11>Now, I appreciate the opportunity to share our thoughts with you,

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 11>and you're right, it's a complicated market right now. We're

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 11>dealing with a number of issues globally and there's a

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 11>lot of uncertainty, and so clients are trying to manage

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 11>their balance sheets, trying to manage their forecasts through that time.

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:26.600
<v Speaker 11>I do think we are expecting there to be some

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 11>capital raising come in. There are companies that need to

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 11>raise capital over the coming weeks and months. But you know,

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 11>as far as the IPO market, I think what we've

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 11>seen in the performance, and we were just talking about it,

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:41.960
<v Speaker 11>some of the aftermarket performance hasn't been as strong as

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 11>folks that expected or anticipated, and so in reality, we're

0:16:46.960 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 11>probably waiting until twenty twenty four until we start to

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 11>see a bigger pipeline of newly issued public IPOs.

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 2>So does that mean it's going to twenty twenty four

0:16:58.200 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 2>is going to be a better year than twenty twenty

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:00.840
<v Speaker 2>three for i POS.

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 11>That's certainly what we're hoping at this point.

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:05.160
<v Speaker 10>I mean, it's been a what.

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 2>If we fall into a recession, is it still does

0:17:08.080 --> 0:17:09.720
<v Speaker 2>it still look like it could be a good year

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:10.600
<v Speaker 2>for i pos.

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 11>There are a lot of companies lining up, and a

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 11>lot of them have secular growth as opposed to being

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 11>exposed to cyclical aspects in their business. The one thing

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:22.440
<v Speaker 11>that we have seen and we're tracking, you know, over

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 11>a thousand companies privately private companies right now, and you know,

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 11>there's a lot of really interesting, really exciting companies. The

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:31.640
<v Speaker 11>real question is when is the right time for them

0:17:31.680 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 11>to go public. When are they going to get the

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:37.119
<v Speaker 11>reception both at the IPO but importantly are they going

0:17:37.119 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 11>to see the aftermarket performance? And that's been the biggest

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 11>struggle of the recent vintage.

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:44.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, I've some of the deals that came public

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Doug after the Labor Day had what they called marquee investors.

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 5>I'm not sure what the term is. I never had

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 5>them in my deals.

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:56.359
<v Speaker 1>I just whatever that top application was. I gave Fiddel

0:17:56.440 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 1>like twice that amount and I'm done. What are these

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:01.920
<v Speaker 1>marquey investors? How does that come into it is that important.

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, we refer to them today as kind of corner

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:07.919
<v Speaker 11>service as investors. And you know, part of it is

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:11.000
<v Speaker 11>in a market that's reopening like we're going through. Part

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 11>of it is how do I de risk de risk

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:16.680
<v Speaker 11>a transaction? And so those investors act in two things.

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 11>One is they take some of the potential supply and

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 11>the second thing that they do is provide a validation

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 11>for investors and give them confidence other a broader group

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:27.680
<v Speaker 11>of investors that people have done more work, they've met

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:30.919
<v Speaker 11>the company privately early on, and they're willing to go

0:18:30.960 --> 0:18:33.240
<v Speaker 11>on the cover of perspectives, and so that provides greater

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:34.880
<v Speaker 11>validation in the market.

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:38.920
<v Speaker 1>So what's the you know, where are we in terms

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 1>of the private equity business and the private credit business

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Because it seems like companies can stay private a lot longer.

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 5>There's so many sources of capital for them.

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:49.439
<v Speaker 1>They don't need maybe to go public as much as

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe they did prior.

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:52.679
<v Speaker 5>Where are we in that continuum these days?

0:18:52.840 --> 0:18:55.719
<v Speaker 11>And so at say, we run our public and private

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:59.919
<v Speaker 11>capital raising all through our group in equity capital market,

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 11>and we are seeing that convergence, right, And so investors

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:06.959
<v Speaker 11>or companies are thinking about what do I raise capital?

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 11>What are the alternatives in the private market? What are

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:10.879
<v Speaker 11>the alternatives in the public market? And how do I

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 11>think about that? And you're right, you know, they are

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 11>more alternatives today in the private market, But that's not

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 11>a perfect market today either, as we've seen. I think

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:22.160
<v Speaker 11>that the real question for companies is is their strategic

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:23.440
<v Speaker 11>value in being public?

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 10>And what's the value?

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:27.679
<v Speaker 11>It helps in retention of employees, it helps that it's

0:19:27.720 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 11>an acquisition currency, and for many companies it helps from event,

0:19:31.400 --> 0:19:34.199
<v Speaker 11>branding event for them. And so there are different reasons

0:19:34.200 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 11>to go public than just raising the capital.

0:19:36.640 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 2>At the time of the IPO, I mean, how much

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:41.439
<v Speaker 2>have you when you're looking at your employees right in

0:19:41.480 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 2>your group, have you seen a shift from the amount

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 2>of women and men you hire to take companies public

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:49.879
<v Speaker 2>and the amount of women and men you hire to

0:19:49.880 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 2>give them money on the private side. I mean, you've

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:57.160
<v Speaker 2>been at city since like Nirvana, right, so yeah, the band.

0:19:57.440 --> 0:19:59.920
<v Speaker 2>You've been at a city since the early nineties, right.

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:00.359
<v Speaker 10>Have.

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 11>You know in terms of where people are spending their time.

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:06.360
<v Speaker 11>You know, we've asked our team to really focus on

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 11>understanding what companies needs are and then thinking about the

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:13.399
<v Speaker 11>public market solutions as well as private market solution, and

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:15.360
<v Speaker 11>so the teams are versatile to be able to talk

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:18.800
<v Speaker 11>to clients about the different alternatives that exist. And that's

0:20:18.840 --> 0:20:20.760
<v Speaker 11>one of the things that we've been really focused on

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 11>is understanding the client and coming up with solutions at

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 11>best at their needs.

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:27.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, in the private I know source of IPOs

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:31.680
<v Speaker 1>across the street of private private financed private equity finance companies,

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and you always are talking to your private equity clients

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:37.800
<v Speaker 1>about kind of what their needs are. There haven't been

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of IPO activity for several years now. I

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 1>would think the backlog from the big private equity companies

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 1>like guys, you give me a five minute window. I

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 1>got to get some stuff out the door because I

0:20:48.640 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>need some monetizations, I need to mark these things. I

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:54.119
<v Speaker 1>need some gains to show my LPs. Where is the

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:56.880
<v Speaker 1>backlog you know out there on the street these days.

0:20:56.760 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 11>I think the there's no question private equity firm are

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:04.679
<v Speaker 11>evaluating their portfolio companies and trying to decide which are

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 11>the right ones to exit in the public market and

0:21:07.240 --> 0:21:09.480
<v Speaker 11>which are the right companies to exit in the private market,

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:11.439
<v Speaker 11>and they do that all the time. I think with

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 11>a better functioning leverage finance market. One of the things

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 11>that has happened is that the notion of a dual

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:22.360
<v Speaker 11>track process has become back in viable alternatives for companies

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 11>versus just having one alternative. Having multiple alternatives always help

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 11>those sponsors. But you're right, there are under a lot

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 11>of pressure to return capital to their LPs as they

0:21:32.320 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 11>look to raise the.

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Next exactly, So what what's it used to be back

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 1>in the day, My day, we could take a company

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 1>public with just a thought, you know, an idea. Now

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:47.919
<v Speaker 1>you have to have revenue, you have to have profits,

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:51.800
<v Speaker 1>you have to have defendable franchises. It seems tougher and tougher.

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Where are you where's the market now? In terms of

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to bring my company public?

0:21:56.400 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 5>What would you tell me?

0:21:57.200 --> 0:22:00.439
<v Speaker 11>I'd have to have we focus on company that are

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 11>either profitable or a clear path to profitability in the

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:06.639
<v Speaker 11>near term. And that's what investors want. When we're in

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:09.359
<v Speaker 11>a market that's reopening, you have to really open the

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 11>market with the highest quality companies. Rebuild the confidence. That's

0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:16.679
<v Speaker 11>been challenge over the last twenty four months. You know,

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:18.920
<v Speaker 11>one of the things going back to twenty twenty one.

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 11>You know, we prior to twenty twenty one or twenty

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:24.919
<v Speaker 11>twenty there was an argument that companies are staying private

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:27.800
<v Speaker 11>too long, and in twenty twenty one everyone said companies

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:30.879
<v Speaker 11>are going public too early. And so finding that right balance,

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 11>especially in a market that's recovering, it's not a straight line.

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 11>And so starting with the strongest companies, rebuilding that confidence

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:41.120
<v Speaker 11>in the public markets, and then giving options to companies

0:22:41.119 --> 0:22:43.639
<v Speaker 11>in terms of you know, when and how and how

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 11>large to raise capital becomes important.

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:48.400
<v Speaker 5>Are there any sectors out there that you're seeing more

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:50.359
<v Speaker 5>or less demand from from your clients?

0:22:50.359 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 2>Hey, we want.

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:53.720
<v Speaker 1>More energy, or we want more tech, or you know

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 1>what are you hearing from your clients?

0:22:56.040 --> 0:22:59.400
<v Speaker 11>The clients are focused on growth and quality of company.

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:02.119
<v Speaker 11>So don't think it's necessarily those.

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 2>Two things didn't used to be the same thing, right,

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:07.680
<v Speaker 2>growth and quality. And when you say quality you mean

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:09.480
<v Speaker 2>like free cash flow, right, or.

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 11>We're profitability or path to profitability. People that have built

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 11>a moat around their businesses and are differentiated. There's a

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:20.440
<v Speaker 11>lot of companies working on really interesting as I mentioned earlier,

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:24.400
<v Speaker 11>you know, strategies and disrupting traditional industries. But the real

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 11>question is have they proven that they can actually operate

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:30.919
<v Speaker 11>as a business as opposed to a plan in those

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 11>in those areas. But we're seeing companies in certainly in

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:38.159
<v Speaker 11>the software space and technology. More broadly, we're seeing companies

0:23:38.200 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 11>in the consumer space. Healthcare has been one of the

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 11>most active spaces in the capital markets, but we're also

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:48.160
<v Speaker 11>seeing companies in financial services, real estate and others trying

0:23:48.160 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 11>to figure out when will be the right time to

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 11>access the public market.

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Are hedge funds where where the hedge funds in terms

0:23:54.560 --> 0:23:57.639
<v Speaker 1>of buyers of IPOs are just new issues? How important

0:23:57.640 --> 0:23:59.680
<v Speaker 1>are they to you know, an underwriutter like city.

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 11>Look all the investors, the active equity investors are important,

0:24:04.080 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 11>So long only accounts and mutual funds, hedge funds all

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 11>make up kind of the complexion of the investor base.

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 11>And one of the things is we look at the

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:15.640
<v Speaker 11>IPOs that came post Labor Day. It wasn't a demand issue,

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 11>right Those transactions were multiple times over subscribed.

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:18.840
<v Speaker 10>You know.

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 11>The challenge has been the aftermarket performance, and part of

0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 11>that is goes to whether you're a hedge fund or

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:27.359
<v Speaker 11>a long only investor, you know, the average or the

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:31.320
<v Speaker 11>typical active equity investor are trilling their indexes because the

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:33.960
<v Speaker 11>indexes have been dominated by a small number of stocks,

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:37.640
<v Speaker 11>and so if the stock isn't performing well, they can't

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:40.359
<v Speaker 11>chase that in the aftermarket. They have to cut their

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 11>losses rather than suffer.

0:24:42.080 --> 0:24:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Because I kept wondering, because I said, back in my day,

0:24:44.480 --> 0:24:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I know where you're buying here, here, here, how much

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:48.480
<v Speaker 1>you're buying. So if the stock does fall, I know

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:50.480
<v Speaker 1>you're coming in to buy more. But it seems like

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 1>we didn't see that this.

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I think there's some technical factors and some fundamental factors.

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:57.800
<v Speaker 11>I think the technical factors is the underperformance by the

0:24:57.840 --> 0:25:01.840
<v Speaker 11>active equity investment in investor relative to their benchmark. And

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:05.200
<v Speaker 11>the fundamental challenge has been you know that tenure has

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:07.920
<v Speaker 11>moved pretty significantly since labor Day, so the cost of

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:10.400
<v Speaker 11>capital for these companies has gone up significantly.

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 5>All right, Doug, great stuff.

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:12.919
<v Speaker 1>Appreciate you taking a few minutes your time to come

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:14.680
<v Speaker 1>across the street and talk to us. Doug Adams, he's

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 1>co head Global cohead of ECM four City.

0:25:18.400 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 7>You're listening to the tape CANSUR Live program Bloomberg Markets

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:25.480
<v Speaker 7>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the tune

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 7>in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the.

0:25:27.280 --> 0:25:28.480
<v Speaker 10>Bloomberg Business App.

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 7>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:36.400
<v Speaker 7>flagship New York station, Just say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:39.920
<v Speaker 1>There's a thing met here in the healthcare business called

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:43.359
<v Speaker 1>Obesity Week. It used to be a quiet annual meeting

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 1>of weight loss specialists and a few farmer reps. But

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 1>over four days in Dallas this month, it became clear

0:25:49.000 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 1>that the new obesity drugs are changing that along with

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:52.880
<v Speaker 1>everything else in their path.

0:25:52.920 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 5>Lisa Jarvis joins us to break it down.

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Lisa is a calumnist with Bloomberg Opinion covering biotech, healthcare,

0:25:58.440 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 1>and the pharmaceutical biz. Lisa, can you put into perspective

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 1>what these GLP one drugs are? How impactful are they?

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Where are we going with this stuff? Because it came

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:10.720
<v Speaker 1>out of nowhere and that's all anybody can talk about

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:11.440
<v Speaker 1>these days.

0:26:12.520 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 12>Right, Thanks for having me. Well, yeah, they're taking the

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:19.159
<v Speaker 12>world by storm, that's for sure. They've been used. This

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:21.280
<v Speaker 12>class of drugs has been used for a long time

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:25.720
<v Speaker 12>for diabetes, and you know a side effect was weight loss,

0:26:25.760 --> 0:26:28.879
<v Speaker 12>and so they decided to amp that up and you know,

0:26:28.920 --> 0:26:31.919
<v Speaker 12>explore the drugs for use for use, just for weight loss,

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:35.120
<v Speaker 12>and the difference between what they can do and kind

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:38.760
<v Speaker 12>of all the older diet pills that existed is best.

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:41.679
<v Speaker 12>You know, in the past. You know, basically what you

0:26:41.680 --> 0:26:44.080
<v Speaker 12>could expect was at the most about five percent weight

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:46.639
<v Speaker 12>loss with some of these older diet pills, and it

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 12>was often not sustainable. With Wegovi, which is Nova nerdist

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:54.560
<v Speaker 12>drug and with Minjaro, which is Lily's drugs still not

0:26:54.640 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 12>yet approved for weight loss, but expected to be by

0:26:56.880 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 12>the end of this year. You know, you're looking at

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 12>somewhere between fifteen even up to twenty five percent some

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:04.479
<v Speaker 12>of the newer drugs that are in the pipeline, you know,

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:07.159
<v Speaker 12>for segments of the population up to thirty percent of

0:27:07.200 --> 0:27:11.640
<v Speaker 12>their body weight. So it's pretty dramatic and needless to say,

0:27:11.720 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 12>and it's really taken the world by storm.

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:17.880
<v Speaker 2>I just want to lose like ten to fifteen percent

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:24.680
<v Speaker 2>of my body weight. But apparently, sorry, Novo Nordisk has

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:27.920
<v Speaker 2>put the starter doses on hold because they just can't

0:27:27.960 --> 0:27:30.679
<v Speaker 2>make enough. And we asked the CEO today Lars for

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 2>Regard Jurgensen, you know, what are you going to do

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:35.800
<v Speaker 2>about the supply. He's so cagy about it. He's like,

0:27:35.840 --> 0:27:38.919
<v Speaker 2>we have a plan, but I can't like tell you

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 2>about it, which is why if you're like boosting capacity

0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:46.840
<v Speaker 2>at factories, or if you're making it in a different country,

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 2>or like, why would you not be able to tell

0:27:48.640 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 2>us about it. I don't get that.

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:53.720
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I mean it's been an ongoing to struggle with

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:56.680
<v Speaker 12>all of these drugs, the fact that they can't keep

0:27:56.760 --> 0:27:59.919
<v Speaker 12>up with demand. I think the issue is less than

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 12>actual ingredient and then drug itself and more of the

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:06.119
<v Speaker 12>vials that they put it into. And so they've been

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 12>really you're right cage about it and been really careful

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:11.960
<v Speaker 12>about allowing new people out of the drugs. The problem is,

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:15.520
<v Speaker 12>you know, there's this whole gray market of compounding, compounded

0:28:15.560 --> 0:28:18.200
<v Speaker 12>pharmacies that are offering the drugs. So people are starting

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:22.480
<v Speaker 12>on it, buying it from kind of telehealth places somewhat sketchy,

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:25.720
<v Speaker 12>I would say. And yeah, I.

0:28:26.240 --> 0:28:30.440
<v Speaker 2>Heard a commercial yesterday on Bloomberg Radio on Serious XM

0:28:30.560 --> 0:28:33.359
<v Speaker 2>Channel one nineteen, and it was for what sounded like

0:28:33.480 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 2>probably a pretty sketchy place saying like, hey, call us up,

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 2>we can charge this to your insurance trust US, and

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:43.480
<v Speaker 2>I was thinking, cool, because it's one thousand dollars a month, right,

0:28:43.640 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 2>can they charge at LISA to my insurance or do

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:46.920
<v Speaker 2>I have to pay myself.

0:28:47.920 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 12>Well, that's the thing with these drugs right now. Very

0:28:50.560 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 12>few people are able to get them covered by insurance,

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 12>you know, because insurers are worried about how much it's

0:28:55.880 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 12>going to cost in the long term. If everybody goes

0:28:58.440 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 12>on them, and the idea is that you take them

0:29:00.840 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 12>for life, and you know, that could be a significant

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:08.360
<v Speaker 12>burn into most plans given the number of people in

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:11.040
<v Speaker 12>the US who are of a body weight where they

0:29:11.040 --> 0:29:14.960
<v Speaker 12>would qualify for these drugs. When it comes to the telehealth,

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:18.040
<v Speaker 12>they're often charging less, probably because they're getting it from

0:29:18.080 --> 0:29:21.880
<v Speaker 12>a different source and you're maybe taking it not in

0:29:21.960 --> 0:29:24.920
<v Speaker 12>the pen form, and maybe you're having to inject the

0:29:24.960 --> 0:29:28.000
<v Speaker 12>drug itself. It wouldn't be something I would recommend. I've

0:29:28.040 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 12>written another column about that that I think most doctors

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:33.240
<v Speaker 12>would say, don't do that, just hold off and try

0:29:33.280 --> 0:29:35.360
<v Speaker 12>to try to get it from you know, the real

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:36.280
<v Speaker 12>deal this is.

0:29:36.320 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 2>You know, Lars was telling us this morning too, because

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 2>I said, dude, I don't want like, I don't care

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:44.560
<v Speaker 2>that much about stomach problems. I definitely don't want suicidal thoughts,

0:29:44.600 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 2>which some reports have said, you know, that's a possibility potential.

0:29:49.360 --> 0:29:52.480
<v Speaker 2>And then I'm terrified of needles, and he said, you

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 2>know a lot of people like to go to the

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:57.360
<v Speaker 2>doctor once a week and get a shot. Is that

0:29:58.240 --> 0:30:00.680
<v Speaker 2>possibly true? Like I can't even get my couch to

0:30:00.720 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 2>go to the gym. I'm definitely not going to find

0:30:02.800 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 2>time to go to the doctor.

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:06.600
<v Speaker 12>You know, I think so well, you don't have to

0:30:06.640 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 12>go to the doctor. You do it at home yourself,

0:30:08.280 --> 0:30:11.800
<v Speaker 12>just like you do with if you had diabetes. Because

0:30:11.840 --> 0:30:13.960
<v Speaker 12>the people who are taking ozen Pick instead of we

0:30:14.080 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 12>go be ozen Pick is the same drug, lower dose

0:30:16.920 --> 0:30:20.520
<v Speaker 12>for diet approof for diabetes. But there's good news for

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:22.440
<v Speaker 12>you in the sense that there are pills that are

0:30:22.480 --> 0:30:26.160
<v Speaker 12>in the works that you know, could replace the need

0:30:26.240 --> 0:30:28.959
<v Speaker 12>for needles. The weight loss might not be quite as dramatic,

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:32.520
<v Speaker 12>we don't know yet, but it could still be substantial.

0:30:32.680 --> 0:30:34.480
<v Speaker 12>And some of those pills you might not even need

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:38.840
<v Speaker 12>to take as often as as the injection. So there's

0:30:38.880 --> 0:30:41.240
<v Speaker 12>a lot of different things that are in development. Because

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 12>obviously at a market that people are pegging at like

0:30:43.800 --> 0:30:46.640
<v Speaker 12>one hundred billion dollars by twenty thirty. Everybody wants to.

0:30:46.560 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 10>Get on it.

0:30:47.560 --> 0:30:51.160
<v Speaker 1>So, yeah, is there any scenario like I I was

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:52.480
<v Speaker 1>going to ask you a size of the business, but

0:30:52.520 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 1>that's that's a big size. Is this always going to

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:57.000
<v Speaker 1>be or is this expect it to always be a

0:30:57.040 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 1>prescription type situation or they're being over at the counter

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:01.000
<v Speaker 1>option at some point.

0:31:02.160 --> 0:31:04.480
<v Speaker 12>I think, I think we're going to stick to a

0:31:04.520 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 12>prescription for the foreseeable future in the sense that people

0:31:08.080 --> 0:31:09.800
<v Speaker 12>are going to want insurance to pay for it, and

0:31:09.960 --> 0:31:13.560
<v Speaker 12>oftentimes with over the counter that's that's not something that

0:31:13.600 --> 0:31:17.440
<v Speaker 12>insurance always covers. But you know, especially as we start

0:31:17.440 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 12>to see this drug, more data come out for the

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:23.480
<v Speaker 12>health outcomes. So you know, we're talking about weight loss,

0:31:23.600 --> 0:31:27.960
<v Speaker 12>but Novo has offered some data showing that taking this

0:31:28.040 --> 0:31:30.479
<v Speaker 12>drug can reduce the risk of heart attacks and strokes

0:31:30.520 --> 0:31:32.920
<v Speaker 12>by twenty percent. That's substantial. There's a lot of other

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:36.240
<v Speaker 12>trials running trying to show other health benefits, whether that's

0:31:36.680 --> 0:31:40.680
<v Speaker 12>you know, chronic kidney disease, you know NAFH which is

0:31:40.720 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 12>a NASH which is a fatty liver disease, or even addictions.

0:31:45.080 --> 0:31:47.320
<v Speaker 12>So I think probably we're not going to see it

0:31:47.360 --> 0:31:50.880
<v Speaker 12>over the counter, and the market is just so potentially

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:52.560
<v Speaker 12>huge as a prescription drug.

0:31:53.000 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of odd to think about this to be

0:31:56.000 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 1>a drug you have to commit to for life. I mean,

0:31:58.480 --> 0:32:01.320
<v Speaker 1>it's one thing if you're doing that for a disease

0:32:01.440 --> 0:32:02.440
<v Speaker 1>or something that you.

0:32:02.560 --> 0:32:04.880
<v Speaker 2>Have to, but this is more on the other hand, Dude,

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm committed to like hogen DAWs and Heinekens for life, right,

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:13.960
<v Speaker 2>And you know, I might even spend less on we

0:32:14.080 --> 0:32:17.840
<v Speaker 2>go Vi Euros Epic if I can. You know, I

0:32:18.040 --> 0:32:20.200
<v Speaker 2>don't know, Like I don't know how much it's gonna

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 2>limit my cravings to drink alcohol, to eat sugary foods,

0:32:26.880 --> 0:32:29.719
<v Speaker 2>to smoke cigarettes. But apparently it helps Lisa with all

0:32:29.800 --> 0:32:31.240
<v Speaker 2>those things.

0:32:31.240 --> 0:32:34.120
<v Speaker 12>It's so far anecdotally at least, it seems to be

0:32:34.160 --> 0:32:36.440
<v Speaker 12>helping with all those and it's now being studied as

0:32:36.560 --> 0:32:40.440
<v Speaker 12>for addiction. So whether that's alcohol, you know, other drugs,

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 12>illicit drugs, or other things. But you know, and you

0:32:43.400 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 12>can think of sugar in that same way. I've talked

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 12>to a lot of people who are taking these drugs

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 12>and they just most of them say almost instantly, like

0:32:50.960 --> 0:32:54.040
<v Speaker 12>within the first twenty four hours, they feel a change

0:32:54.120 --> 0:32:58.040
<v Speaker 12>in the they're kind of brain signals telling them to eat.

0:32:58.600 --> 0:33:01.040
<v Speaker 12>And so I think some of the concern is more

0:33:01.160 --> 0:33:04.640
<v Speaker 12>about making sure people are getting enough nutrition, to be

0:33:04.680 --> 0:33:07.880
<v Speaker 12>honest with you, because for some people, their diet is

0:33:07.920 --> 0:33:10.760
<v Speaker 12>so depressed that they just aren't they're not craving. They're

0:33:10.800 --> 0:33:12.360
<v Speaker 12>not craving Krispy Creaming anymore.

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:16.200
<v Speaker 2>That's the the interesting thing is, uh, well a couple things.

0:33:17.160 --> 0:33:21.520
<v Speaker 2>Can this reduce fat only and not reduce muscle mass?

0:33:21.920 --> 0:33:25.000
<v Speaker 2>And then also if people are smoking more weed, are

0:33:25.000 --> 0:33:26.800
<v Speaker 2>they gonna need this to counteract the munchies?

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:31.600
<v Speaker 12>Well, fair enough, although they might not desire the weed,

0:33:31.640 --> 0:33:33.680
<v Speaker 12>to be honest with you, if they're taking the drug.

0:33:33.800 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 12>So that's one thing. It's just hard. Everyone has a

0:33:35.880 --> 0:33:39.120
<v Speaker 12>different experience with it. Some people like just lose their

0:33:39.200 --> 0:33:45.240
<v Speaker 12>desire for you know, whatever was their vice. So on

0:33:45.320 --> 0:33:50.400
<v Speaker 12>that news, Yeah, I mean, you know, I think I

0:33:50.440 --> 0:33:53.400
<v Speaker 12>think there's a lot to a lot to we still

0:33:53.520 --> 0:33:56.239
<v Speaker 12>just don't know, you know, about how long people are

0:33:56.240 --> 0:34:00.240
<v Speaker 12>even gonna want to, for example, not enjoy some of

0:34:00.240 --> 0:34:02.520
<v Speaker 12>those things in life. I spoke with some doctors or

0:34:02.520 --> 0:34:04.480
<v Speaker 12>said they have patients who just want to take a

0:34:04.520 --> 0:34:07.360
<v Speaker 12>break because they want to go out to dinner and

0:34:07.560 --> 0:34:08.600
<v Speaker 12>for their birthday and.

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:13.319
<v Speaker 2>To have their cake and eat it too.

0:34:12.040 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 12>Or at least pause. But so yeah, so there's sort

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:16.600
<v Speaker 12>of like a lot of discussion about what how is

0:34:16.640 --> 0:34:19.600
<v Speaker 12>this sustainable in the long term? You take down the dose,

0:34:19.640 --> 0:34:23.040
<v Speaker 12>could you take breaks? You know, how could we think

0:34:23.080 --> 0:34:24.880
<v Speaker 12>about what it looks like in the long term so

0:34:24.920 --> 0:34:27.160
<v Speaker 12>that you can maintain that weight loss. And like you said,

0:34:27.480 --> 0:34:29.640
<v Speaker 12>you know, thinking about the muscle mass too. And I'll

0:34:29.640 --> 0:34:32.120
<v Speaker 12>just note the companies are also looking at ways of

0:34:32.160 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 12>combining these drugs with drugs that help you sustain your

0:34:35.760 --> 0:34:37.279
<v Speaker 12>muscle mass, so it.

0:34:37.320 --> 0:34:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Could be a whole new I'm gonna let I'm gonna

0:34:39.239 --> 0:34:41.000
<v Speaker 1>let other people take the lead on this. I'm gonna

0:34:41.000 --> 0:34:42.800
<v Speaker 1>be a big time follower at least drivers. Thanks so

0:34:42.880 --> 0:34:43.560
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us.

0:34:43.760 --> 0:34:46.880
<v Speaker 7>You're listening to the tape Can's Are Live program Bloomberg

0:34:46.960 --> 0:34:50.520
<v Speaker 7>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:34:50.600 --> 0:34:52.560
<v Speaker 7>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and.

0:34:52.520 --> 0:34:53.799
<v Speaker 10>The Bloomberg Business App.

0:34:53.880 --> 0:34:56.680
<v Speaker 7>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:34:56.719 --> 0:35:02.560
<v Speaker 7>flagship New York station, Just say Alexa, play Blue.

0:35:03.239 --> 0:35:04.759
<v Speaker 5>Let's kind of continue that legal thing.

0:35:04.880 --> 0:35:08.719
<v Speaker 1>Our next guest Nouvelle Gonzalo, founder Gonzalo Law Group. She

0:35:08.840 --> 0:35:11.840
<v Speaker 1>joins us live here in our Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio,

0:35:13.000 --> 0:35:13.560
<v Speaker 1>or she get.

0:35:13.400 --> 0:35:17.680
<v Speaker 13>Her JD b B Ohio State University, right, the Ohio

0:35:17.680 --> 0:35:22.239
<v Speaker 13>State University in conjunction with Oxford University in England too.

0:35:22.280 --> 0:35:23.759
<v Speaker 4>But yes, I feel like.

0:35:23.760 --> 0:35:27.000
<v Speaker 2>Those two are on the same level as they're excellent.

0:35:27.280 --> 0:35:29.480
<v Speaker 2>They're both excellent university exactly.

0:35:29.760 --> 0:35:30.920
<v Speaker 6>One has a better football.

0:35:31.080 --> 0:35:34.040
<v Speaker 1>One has a better football depending upon how you define

0:35:34.040 --> 0:35:37.959
<v Speaker 1>football throat all. Right, let's talk about Meta first, because

0:35:38.560 --> 0:35:41.120
<v Speaker 1>they have been sued by California and like, I don't know,

0:35:41.200 --> 0:35:44.960
<v Speaker 1>forty seven other states talk about harmful youth marketing.

0:35:45.600 --> 0:35:46.040
<v Speaker 2>What's going?

0:35:46.040 --> 0:35:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean the stock nobody cares in the stock sotocks

0:35:48.000 --> 0:35:50.520
<v Speaker 1>of one hundred fifty five percent. From a legal perspective,

0:35:50.760 --> 0:35:51.720
<v Speaker 1>is there anything there?

0:35:51.960 --> 0:35:52.160
<v Speaker 10>Oh?

0:35:52.200 --> 0:35:54.960
<v Speaker 13>My gracious, this is huge. This is an amazing case

0:35:55.040 --> 0:35:58.680
<v Speaker 13>because you were looking at over forty three attorney generals

0:35:58.719 --> 0:36:02.319
<v Speaker 13>from different states that are this case against Meta. And

0:36:02.360 --> 0:36:07.840
<v Speaker 13>we're talking about a platform that owns Facebook, Instagram, Messenger, WhatsApp.

0:36:07.880 --> 0:36:10.520
<v Speaker 13>There's about four billion users worldwide.

0:36:10.880 --> 0:36:14.800
<v Speaker 2>What's that threads Twitter competitor?

0:36:14.920 --> 0:36:15.080
<v Speaker 10>Right?

0:36:15.960 --> 0:36:19.000
<v Speaker 13>Yes, yes, so you know, this is huge and we

0:36:19.080 --> 0:36:22.040
<v Speaker 13>have not seen this type of bipartisan support with forty

0:36:22.080 --> 0:36:24.520
<v Speaker 13>three you know, states going against them. But essentially, what

0:36:24.560 --> 0:36:27.520
<v Speaker 13>the issue is here, this is not only data privacy law,

0:36:27.560 --> 0:36:31.120
<v Speaker 13>but this is data privacy law and children because essentially,

0:36:31.120 --> 0:36:34.040
<v Speaker 13>what the states are arguing is that, hey, you are

0:36:34.120 --> 0:36:38.040
<v Speaker 13>intentionally harming children with how you're handling your platforms, the

0:36:38.080 --> 0:36:40.920
<v Speaker 13>futures that you're putting in place. And there were memos,

0:36:41.000 --> 0:36:45.680
<v Speaker 13>internal memos that were leaked from Meta into the public marketplace,

0:36:45.920 --> 0:36:48.440
<v Speaker 13>and we found out that Meta was aware of the

0:36:48.480 --> 0:36:51.719
<v Speaker 13>harm that some of its futures caused to children. And

0:36:51.800 --> 0:36:54.960
<v Speaker 13>so now the states are in an uprising over this.

0:36:55.120 --> 0:36:57.520
<v Speaker 13>So that's what we're doing. That's what we're watching with

0:36:57.600 --> 0:37:00.680
<v Speaker 13>this case and watching the impact with it. And essentially

0:37:00.960 --> 0:37:03.240
<v Speaker 13>some of the main concerns because you might say, okay, well, look, listen,

0:37:03.280 --> 0:37:05.879
<v Speaker 13>isn't this just business as usual? You know, people want

0:37:06.080 --> 0:37:09.560
<v Speaker 13>companies want to have platforms that their users want to

0:37:09.600 --> 0:37:11.920
<v Speaker 13>be on. They want to make it user friendly, they

0:37:11.920 --> 0:37:14.160
<v Speaker 13>want people to be engaging with it, So how is

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:18.560
<v Speaker 13>this that different? But the concern here is not just that, Okay,

0:37:18.600 --> 0:37:21.239
<v Speaker 13>we have an engaging platform. People are using it. But

0:37:21.320 --> 0:37:24.000
<v Speaker 13>the concern here is that they have at a platform

0:37:24.040 --> 0:37:31.240
<v Speaker 13>that is specifically geared toward and working to psychologically hook kids.

0:37:31.280 --> 0:37:33.120
<v Speaker 13>And so we say, okay, well, what futures are that?

0:37:33.280 --> 0:37:36.160
<v Speaker 13>I mean, isn't it just kids, you know, online socializing

0:37:36.200 --> 0:37:39.799
<v Speaker 13>with one another. But actually we see the comparison like

0:37:39.880 --> 0:37:43.839
<v Speaker 13>future the filters they say are promoting body dysmorphia and

0:37:44.520 --> 0:37:47.759
<v Speaker 13>eating disorders. They're you know, saying, oh, did you have that?

0:37:48.440 --> 0:37:50.759
<v Speaker 6>No, No, I have none of that. What I'm what

0:37:50.840 --> 0:37:53.920
<v Speaker 6>I'm fascinated by. Look, there's a ton of studies that

0:37:53.960 --> 0:37:58.560
<v Speaker 6>show us that social media is in general toxic, but

0:37:58.640 --> 0:38:02.960
<v Speaker 6>it's especially toxic to children. But so are lots and

0:38:03.000 --> 0:38:07.359
<v Speaker 6>lots of other things. Hey, if are probably regulated for you. Yeah,

0:38:07.360 --> 0:38:09.640
<v Speaker 6>but isn't this something parents are supposed.

0:38:09.320 --> 0:38:12.759
<v Speaker 2>To regulate with their keep I was thinking exactly so.

0:38:13.520 --> 0:38:16.640
<v Speaker 6>And you know, to me, the bigger concern with Meta

0:38:16.760 --> 0:38:21.120
<v Speaker 6>I still call it Facebook is they and Google Google

0:38:21.280 --> 0:38:25.560
<v Speaker 6>just dominate online advertising. It seems like there's a little

0:38:25.600 --> 0:38:29.080
<v Speaker 6>bit of an anti trust question. How are two companies driving,

0:38:29.520 --> 0:38:33.760
<v Speaker 6>you know, the vast majority of ads online. It seems

0:38:34.040 --> 0:38:35.279
<v Speaker 6>there should be some competition.

0:38:35.480 --> 0:38:37.640
<v Speaker 2>It does seem I was gonna ask you, Novelle, is

0:38:37.680 --> 0:38:40.480
<v Speaker 2>this kind of a way in for prosecutors who have

0:38:41.200 --> 0:38:46.040
<v Speaker 2>concerns about monopolistic behaviors but just can't seem to bust

0:38:46.080 --> 0:38:47.759
<v Speaker 2>them on that kind of like you know, when they

0:38:47.760 --> 0:38:49.759
<v Speaker 2>were going after al Capone, they wanted to get him

0:38:49.760 --> 0:38:52.879
<v Speaker 2>for organized crime, and they actually ended up getting him

0:38:52.880 --> 0:38:56.759
<v Speaker 2>on taxi. So I just wonder if they're trying to

0:38:58.120 --> 0:38:59.799
<v Speaker 2>is that way for them to go in the back

0:38:59.840 --> 0:39:04.600
<v Speaker 2>door or and maybe kind of break up or minimize

0:39:04.600 --> 0:39:06.879
<v Speaker 2>a little bit the power of someone like Meta.

0:39:06.960 --> 0:39:10.160
<v Speaker 13>I'd say that it's possible, but it's not likely. And

0:39:10.200 --> 0:39:13.800
<v Speaker 13>that's because they're not asking them to break up their companies.

0:39:13.840 --> 0:39:16.960
<v Speaker 13>They're asking them to regulate how they're obtaining information on

0:39:17.040 --> 0:39:20.520
<v Speaker 13>the users and to really comply with data privacy laws.

0:39:20.560 --> 0:39:23.319
<v Speaker 13>And so that's a different question that we're asking. And

0:39:23.360 --> 0:39:26.719
<v Speaker 13>so when we're saying, okay, you're doing psychological research on

0:39:26.840 --> 0:39:29.879
<v Speaker 13>how to make sure things are engaging for children, how

0:39:29.880 --> 0:39:32.240
<v Speaker 13>to make sure that you're hooking them, you have research

0:39:32.280 --> 0:39:35.759
<v Speaker 13>that shows it's harming them. But then you say, we're

0:39:35.800 --> 0:39:38.560
<v Speaker 13>not doing anything wrong. What's the problem here? This is

0:39:38.719 --> 0:39:41.400
<v Speaker 13>very similar to what we saw with the tobacco companies.

0:39:41.440 --> 0:39:43.920
<v Speaker 13>What we saw with Big Pharma, and so we have

0:39:43.960 --> 0:39:45.839
<v Speaker 13>to look at this really closely. It's not just a

0:39:45.840 --> 0:39:49.000
<v Speaker 13>matter of okay, right, parents need to regulate what the

0:39:49.520 --> 0:39:52.840
<v Speaker 13>students are doing, what the kids are doing. So, but

0:39:52.920 --> 0:39:55.800
<v Speaker 13>if you have the information, you know what to regulate.

0:39:55.960 --> 0:39:58.719
<v Speaker 6>So you lived in Europe for a long time, Yes,

0:39:58.760 --> 0:40:02.759
<v Speaker 6>Europeans seem to take the right to privacy laws much

0:40:02.840 --> 0:40:06.240
<v Speaker 6>more seriously than we do in the United States. Wouldn't

0:40:06.480 --> 0:40:08.960
<v Speaker 6>those sort of things that say, it's my data and

0:40:09.040 --> 0:40:13.120
<v Speaker 6>I can control it, and Facebook or for that matter, Apple, Google,

0:40:13.120 --> 0:40:17.720
<v Speaker 6>Amazon can't be selling and reselling. Isn't that the choke

0:40:17.800 --> 0:40:23.000
<v Speaker 6>point to generate some control over not only how these

0:40:23.040 --> 0:40:26.480
<v Speaker 6>companies affect us, but specifically what we allow them to

0:40:26.520 --> 0:40:28.800
<v Speaker 6>do with our minor children's data.

0:40:29.320 --> 0:40:32.080
<v Speaker 13>Berry That is an excellent question, and I couldn't agree more.

0:40:32.440 --> 0:40:34.239
<v Speaker 13>What we're seeing in the United States is we take

0:40:34.280 --> 0:40:37.120
<v Speaker 13>a lot of our privacy laws from the European model

0:40:37.160 --> 0:40:40.520
<v Speaker 13>with the General Data Protection Regulation or the GDPR, and

0:40:40.600 --> 0:40:42.560
<v Speaker 13>so we're taking our laws a lot from that, or

0:40:42.640 --> 0:40:44.960
<v Speaker 13>kind of adopting our own set, but not as.

0:40:44.840 --> 0:40:48.120
<v Speaker 6>Strict that we seem to be much looser than the European.

0:40:47.760 --> 0:40:50.200
<v Speaker 13>We're by state, so we'll see, you know, each state

0:40:50.280 --> 0:40:54.320
<v Speaker 13>has their own sets of regulations California, Illinois, and so forth,

0:40:54.719 --> 0:40:57.440
<v Speaker 13>but we are looking at how they do things and

0:40:57.600 --> 0:41:00.360
<v Speaker 13>the reality is, yes we have those regulations, Yes we

0:41:00.400 --> 0:41:02.880
<v Speaker 13>have it to protect, but if they're not being followed,

0:41:03.120 --> 0:41:05.399
<v Speaker 13>then that's the problem. And that's what's being alleged here

0:41:05.400 --> 0:41:07.480
<v Speaker 13>that they're violating some of the children's.

0:41:07.080 --> 0:41:08.240
<v Speaker 2>Data protection laws.

0:41:08.600 --> 0:41:10.799
<v Speaker 13>And so if that, I will tell you if they

0:41:10.960 --> 0:41:16.320
<v Speaker 13>violated either the children's Data protection privacy laws or even

0:41:16.360 --> 0:41:19.920
<v Speaker 13>any of our state ones, they absolutely most likely violated

0:41:19.960 --> 0:41:23.080
<v Speaker 13>the global ones, because anytime you have a user from

0:41:23.160 --> 0:41:27.080
<v Speaker 13>the EU any part of Europe, the GDPR comes into effect.

0:41:27.360 --> 0:41:29.680
<v Speaker 13>So I will tell you it's most likely also that

0:41:29.760 --> 0:41:33.560
<v Speaker 13>the EU regulators are watching this case very closely, because

0:41:33.600 --> 0:41:35.600
<v Speaker 13>if they are in fact found to be in violation

0:41:35.680 --> 0:41:39.520
<v Speaker 13>of privacy laws consumer protection laws, then we're also going

0:41:39.560 --> 0:41:41.760
<v Speaker 13>to see probably some issues abroad as well.

0:41:41.760 --> 0:41:45.960
<v Speaker 6>What are the damages if Meta loses the case? What

0:41:46.120 --> 0:41:49.480
<v Speaker 6>sort of options are going to take place? Is this

0:41:49.520 --> 0:41:51.960
<v Speaker 6>going to be them riting a big check or are

0:41:51.960 --> 0:41:54.360
<v Speaker 6>they going to have to change how they do business?

0:41:54.760 --> 0:41:57.080
<v Speaker 13>I think we'll see a variety of things. One of

0:41:57.080 --> 0:41:58.759
<v Speaker 13>the things that ended up coming up is they were

0:41:58.800 --> 0:42:02.239
<v Speaker 13>launching getting ready to launch Instagram Kids. And so Instagram

0:42:02.320 --> 0:42:08.920
<v Speaker 13>Kids was a flatform, a platform for children age thirteen

0:42:08.960 --> 0:42:11.759
<v Speaker 13>and under, and so you're talking about some of the

0:42:11.800 --> 0:42:14.840
<v Speaker 13>most vulnerable parts of our population. Children's minds are not

0:42:14.960 --> 0:42:18.640
<v Speaker 13>even developed yet. And so they did this and they

0:42:18.640 --> 0:42:21.560
<v Speaker 13>were in works with it. Another memo was leaked and

0:42:21.600 --> 0:42:25.160
<v Speaker 13>when that was found out, over forty US states went

0:42:25.200 --> 0:42:28.239
<v Speaker 13>ahead and wrote Mark Zuckerberg and said, listen, please stop it,

0:42:28.320 --> 0:42:31.680
<v Speaker 13>don't do it, don't move forward with it, and they did.

0:42:31.719 --> 0:42:34.040
<v Speaker 13>They paused it. So we might see injunctions here, so

0:42:34.120 --> 0:42:36.960
<v Speaker 13>a pause on work that they're doing or projects that

0:42:37.000 --> 0:42:39.560
<v Speaker 13>are in the works. We might see change in the

0:42:39.560 --> 0:42:43.840
<v Speaker 13>platform and modification. We'll some disclosures, more disclosures because you

0:42:43.880 --> 0:42:46.319
<v Speaker 13>can't which you don't know is out there happening to

0:42:46.400 --> 0:42:48.960
<v Speaker 13>your child. So if you think, oh, what's the harm

0:42:49.040 --> 0:42:52.000
<v Speaker 13>and letting them, you know, have their comparison like Future

0:42:52.120 --> 0:42:54.560
<v Speaker 13>put their filters on. But if you don't know that

0:42:54.600 --> 0:42:57.560
<v Speaker 13>there's research that this harms your child and there's an

0:42:57.560 --> 0:42:59.880
<v Speaker 13>intent or problem, you can't regulate it.

0:43:00.000 --> 0:43:01.080
<v Speaker 2>So you'll see disclosures.

0:43:01.120 --> 0:43:02.799
<v Speaker 5>All right, Noville, thank you, so much for joining us.

0:43:03.000 --> 0:43:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Novelle Gonzalo, a founder of Gonzalo Law Group, bring us

0:43:06.600 --> 0:43:08.759
<v Speaker 1>up to date on some of the legal challenges out

0:43:08.800 --> 0:43:12.759
<v Speaker 1>there for meta as somebody, anybody in this case, the

0:43:12.800 --> 0:43:14.880
<v Speaker 1>States trying to get a handle on some of the

0:43:14.920 --> 0:43:18.040
<v Speaker 1>content that's being consumed out there, particularly by kids, so

0:43:18.080 --> 0:43:18.920
<v Speaker 1>we'll stay on top of that.

0:43:20.040 --> 0:43:23.120
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can

0:43:23.160 --> 0:43:26.960
<v Speaker 2>subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever

0:43:27.040 --> 0:43:30.760
<v Speaker 2>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter

0:43:30.960 --> 0:43:34.160
<v Speaker 2>at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three. And I'm Faull Sweeney.

0:43:34.200 --> 0:43:35.680
<v Speaker 5>I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:43:35.800 --> 0:43:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at

0:43:38.520 --> 0:43:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio