WEBVTT - Integrity’s Radke and Morey on Dividend Investing

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Inside Active, a podcast about active managers that

0:00:16.000 --> 0:00:18.840
<v Speaker 1>goes beyond sound bites and headlines and look steeper into

0:00:18.880 --> 0:00:24.200
<v Speaker 1>their processes, challenges and philosophies and security selection. I'm David Cone, I,

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 1>lead mutual fund on active research at Bloomberg Intelligence. Today

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 1>my co host is Michael Casper, small cap and sector

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:33.879
<v Speaker 1>strategist at Bloomberg Intelligence. Mike, thank you for joining me

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 1>today as my co host.

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:35.960
<v Speaker 2>Thanks David.

0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>So, there was a note published yesterday by Gina and

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Wendy that I wanted to ask you about. You know,

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 1>they mentioned stock buybacks have increased during the summer, you know,

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>wild dividends have risen. Why is capital deployment increasing?

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, there's two big factors at play. The first is

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 2>that cash is at or near all time highs if

0:00:57.280 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 2>you include financials, if you take out financial in real estate,

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 2>you actually get a much more muted picture, but still

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 2>compared to the pre pandemic period. We're looking at S

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 2>and P five hundred companies flush with cash right now,

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 2>and they're starting to use that in various ways. Buybacks

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 2>has been the main way they've been deploying capital.

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 3>Recently.

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 2>In the second quarter, buybacks jump thirty four percent from

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 2>a year ago for S and P five hundred companies.

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:26.840
<v Speaker 2>I think part of that has to do with some

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 2>of the volatility that there wasn't in stocks during the

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:33.320
<v Speaker 2>second quarter. You know, companies prefer to back cheap or

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 2>buyback stocks when it's cheap, But a lot of that

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:39.040
<v Speaker 2>does have to do with the high cash positions and

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:41.960
<v Speaker 2>kind of trying to boost their stocks. Second of all,

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 2>dividends are right about on the pre pandemic norm now

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 2>in terms of payout, and CAPEX has really been surging.

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 2>Capex has been one of the main ways that that

0:01:55.880 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 2>companies have been deploying capital, and a lot of that,

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 2>of course is coming from tech and their AI spending,

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 2>but in general, it all comes back to how big

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 2>the cash positions are for S and P five hundred

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 2>companies right now.

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, as we talk about capital deployment and dividends more specifically,

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 1>i'd like to bring on today's guests. Shannon Radke is

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Integrity Viking Funds and senior portfolio manager for

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:21.800
<v Speaker 1>a number of the firm's mutual funds, including the Integrity

0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Dividend Harvest Fund, which is a ticker of IDIVX. Also

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 1>joining us is Michael Moriy, chief investment officer Viking Fund

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Management and co portfolio manager on a number of the

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>firm's funds. Shannon, Mike, thank you so much for joining

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 1>us today.

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 3>Thank you guys for having us.

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:40.440
<v Speaker 1>So I'd like to start off hearing more about your backgrounds.

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 1>So we'll start with you, Shannon. How did you get

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 1>your start in the investment industry?

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 3>Sure, I guess my.

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 4>First exposure was an economics class in high school where

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 4>actually each student got to build their own stock portfolio,

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:55.919
<v Speaker 4>which I thought was pretty cool. That kind of led

0:02:55.960 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 4>me to pursue a finance degree at the University of Northakota,

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 4>where I fortunately there were more investment classes there economics

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 4>classes and so on, so I continued to enjoy I

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 4>guess that field of interest. I also joined a student

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 4>investment club at und Then, you know, as I was

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:21.800
<v Speaker 4>approaching graduation, I decided my preference was to be close

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 4>to home in mine at North Dakota, which left my

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 4>options at the time I thought fairly limited. I was

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 4>looking at potentially working for a bank, bank, trust department,

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 4>or brokerage firm, and that's when I heard that Bob

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 4>Wallstead from mine at I had just started up the

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 4>company that would ultimately become Integrity Mitual Funds, so the

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 4>timing could not have been better. On that I was

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:53.840
<v Speaker 4>able to go back to my hometown and mine not

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 4>go to work for Bob in the fall of nineteen

0:03:56.560 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 4>eighty eight and start pursuing my investment career there. I

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 4>actually started out in sales, and shortly after we opened

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 4>our first fund, which was actually at North Dakota Tax

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 4>Free Fund, we decided to bring in house the shareholder servicing,

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 4>fund accounting, and fund admin and Bob needed a guy

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:22.719
<v Speaker 4>to run that, so I became operations manager at the

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:26.479
<v Speaker 4>time we brought that in house. Eventually he promoted me

0:04:26.520 --> 0:04:30.719
<v Speaker 4>to COO where I worked directly with the various department heads,

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 4>including the PMS, which I very much enjoyed. Then in

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:40.360
<v Speaker 4>nineteen ninety eight, I left the firm to kind of

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 4>pursue a dream and open my own firm. I was,

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:47.159
<v Speaker 4>I guess thirty one years old at the time, so

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 4>it was pretty big undertaking for me. That's when I

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 4>got to work on writing the registration statement for Viking

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 4>Mutual Funds, and that really was a big undertaking, big

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:03.039
<v Speaker 4>process when you register a group of mutual funds with

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 4>the SEC. You know, it's not just the funds that

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 4>you're registering. You need to create and register an investment advisor.

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 4>You need to create and register a proper dealer to

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:19.480
<v Speaker 4>service underator for the funds. And we also decided to

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 4>create and register a transfer agent so that we could

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:24.559
<v Speaker 4>do the shareholders servicing and fund of coning in house.

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:27.919
<v Speaker 4>So that took quite a period of time, you know,

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 4>between writing the prospectus, the SAI, which both go in

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 4>the registration statement, the various exhibits, the agreements between the

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:39.839
<v Speaker 4>funds and the service providers, heck of a lot of

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:41.919
<v Speaker 4>work in a pretty big document that actually ends up

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 4>getting filed with the SEC. So at Viking we opened

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:50.920
<v Speaker 4>our first fund in nineteen ninety nine.

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:53.159
<v Speaker 3>And it was just a tremendous experience for me. I

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 3>think I've worn.

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 4>Every hat you can imagine in the mutual fund industry.

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 4>So I was actually seeing shareholder transactions, calculating net asset

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:10.040
<v Speaker 4>values for the funds, creating and filing the sem annual

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 4>reports to shareholders, filing various other reports with the SEC,

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 4>monitoring for compliance, doing the portfolio management, and they even

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 4>helped out the wholesalers from time to time. So I

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 4>think that experience at Viking really helped to make me a.

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 3>Better CEO today because I really.

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 4>Understand the inner workings of the entire mutual fund management company.

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 3>So as we move forward.

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 4>In two thousand and nine, came back together with Bob

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 4>Wolstead and we merged Integrity and Viking together to form

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:47.600
<v Speaker 4>Integrity Viking Funds.

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 3>And that's how we have our name today.

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:52.599
<v Speaker 4>And then at the time that we came back together,

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 4>I believe our AUM was sitting around two hundred and

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 4>fifty million. Today we are between nine hundred million and

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:02.839
<v Speaker 4>a billion, so we have grown. We're pretty proud of

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:06.480
<v Speaker 4>that growth. As you may know, it's pretty difficult in

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 4>the day and age for active managers to grow their

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 4>assets to actually have net inflows.

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 3>Buy and large.

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 4>On average, active managers have had outflows for many years off,

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 4>not decades, with a lot of money going into index

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 4>funds and ETFs.

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 3>So pretty pleased with where we're at.

0:07:24.520 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 4>You know, we often hear people getting pretty surprised when

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 4>the year we're operating out of North Dakota.

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 3>They're like, what you're where?

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 4>But I always say, why not? We have great people

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 4>in North Dakota. They have a great work ethic. We

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 4>have excellent universities. Und where I went in Grand Forks,

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 4>Minor State University is a great university. It has an

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 4>excellent finance program. Many of our employees have come from

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 4>my state, so we're lucky to have that university here.

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 4>We often take interns from the U. I would say

0:07:58.960 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 4>about half of them come employees, so happy to be

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 4>here working out of mine at We also.

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 3>Have a lot of employee ownership.

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 4>I think that's important for a company to have your

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 4>employees have skin in the game.

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Nice Mike, How about yourself.

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 5>I was excelled in math even from a young age,

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 5>you know, and growing up my father was a commodities broker,

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 5>so I've always found investments intriguing. My first job I

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 5>had in high school was at a bank, so it

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 5>was smaller number of stuff, but still, you know, just

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 5>very intriguing.

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 3>So my mind has always been kind of around numbers.

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:36.960
<v Speaker 5>When I went to college, you know, I attended my

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 5>first year, I didn't know if I still wanted to,

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 5>you know, pursue finance.

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:45.080
<v Speaker 3>Geology had really intrigued me.

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 5>So my freshman year I took a couple of different

0:08:48.240 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 5>classes in each of those respective fields and ultimately decided

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:57.079
<v Speaker 5>on finance. And that's at minut State University where I

0:08:57.120 --> 0:09:01.359
<v Speaker 5>attended college. I know Shannon did mention their finance program.

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:04.440
<v Speaker 5>I'd like to give a shout out to Jerry Sti.

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:07.560
<v Speaker 5>I think he was a professor that really pushed me

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 5>over the edge and got me fully committed to finance.

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 5>Senior year at Minus State University, I did an intern

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 5>at Integrity Viking Funds and began working when I graduated

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 5>in twenty ten at Integrity Biking.

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:26.319
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think we should, you know, kind of

0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:29.439
<v Speaker 1>really talk about the Integrity Dividend Harvest Fund. I think

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 1>it's an interesting fund. What is the process or the

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:36.320
<v Speaker 1>investment process that you guys go through to manage this fund?

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:39.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, the.

0:09:39.760 --> 0:09:42.960
<v Speaker 5>First kind of step of the processes is defining the

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:47.520
<v Speaker 5>goals of the portfolio. So you know, we have a

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 5>three tiered goal system where we're trying to maximize the

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:55.440
<v Speaker 5>current income as well as maximize the growth of that

0:09:55.520 --> 0:10:00.560
<v Speaker 5>income to our shareholders, all while minimizing volatility. And we

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:05.679
<v Speaker 5>feel this recipe and does an exceptional job providing our

0:10:05.800 --> 0:10:10.680
<v Speaker 5>shareholders superior risk adjusted returns you know, throughout the full

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:13.600
<v Speaker 5>cycle of the market. I think it's something that's kind

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 5>of gotten lost in this era or decade plus, you know,

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 5>period where growth has reigned supreme, you know, where the

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 5>classic value investing you know.

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 3>Still has a place in people's portfolio.

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 5>And on going forward basis, you know, I think it's

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 5>going to fully you know, solidify itself, you know, as

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:36.599
<v Speaker 5>as you know, a core of a portfolio.

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 3>You know, if you look.

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 5>At history, value has a very strong track record of

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:48.080
<v Speaker 5>outperforming growth, you know, despite the recent performance of growth.

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 5>So we feel that value is very important and dividend

0:10:51.280 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 5>investing is a true component component of value. So with

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 5>the defined portfolio goals, you know, we we really have

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 5>size on maintaining our investment style and our discipline regardless

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:07.559
<v Speaker 5>of market conditions. So we feel that removes a lot

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:11.440
<v Speaker 5>of emotions from what we do and it's more you know,

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:14.320
<v Speaker 5>factual and fundamental driven.

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 3>That would be our process. You know.

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 5>From there, we run the equities through our key portfolio

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 5>metrics screen which will ultimately define our universe.

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:29.560
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 5>So the metrics that we are looking at in our

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 5>initial screen are beata the current yield of a company

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 5>the number of years a company has consecutively increased its

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:44.679
<v Speaker 5>dividend and market capitalization.

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 3>So those are our four key.

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:50.559
<v Speaker 5>Portfolio metrics and those are used to define the dividend universe.

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 5>And once we have our dividend universe, we put it

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:57.960
<v Speaker 5>into a tiering system. You know, so companies that meet

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 5>all four of the requirements of the metrics that we're

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 5>looking for would be considered a Tier one company. Tier

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:08.719
<v Speaker 5>two company would meet three out of those four metrics,

0:12:08.880 --> 0:12:11.200
<v Speaker 5>and then a Tier three company would only meet two

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 5>out of the four metrics.

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 3>And by having a blend of Tier one.

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:19.679
<v Speaker 5>Two, and three companies from our dividend universe provides us

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 5>with ample flexibility to meet the goals of the portfolio. Last,

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 5>once we have our universe defined, we get into security selection,

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 5>and this is completely driven by how each individual company

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 5>contributes to the goals of the overall portfolio. Two great

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:41.320
<v Speaker 5>examples of how we use our process and how a

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 5>company can get positioned into the portfolio would be Abby.

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:50.840
<v Speaker 3>You know, we've owned this company almost sense inception.

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 5>It caught our radar because of its extremely attractive dividend yield,

0:12:57.040 --> 0:13:00.960
<v Speaker 5>its impressive growth rate of its dividend, which was largely

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:05.239
<v Speaker 5>driven by their blockbuster drug heme era, their ability to

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 5>integrate and expand their pipeline, you know, to offset the

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:10.479
<v Speaker 5>loss of exclusivity.

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:11.959
<v Speaker 3>But when you look.

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 5>At how it fits into our process, it meets, you know,

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 5>all the different pillars.

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 3>Of our growth.

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 5>It has above average divining neal, above average dividend growth,

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:26.160
<v Speaker 5>and low volatility. Is a dreamstock for this portfolio. Another example,

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 5>so that would be a Tier one company. Another example

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:32.320
<v Speaker 5>of a different tier company would be a Broadcome you

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 5>know where when we first bought the name back in

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:38.080
<v Speaker 5>twenty and eighteen, it was only a Tier three company.

0:13:38.160 --> 0:13:40.960
<v Speaker 3>It only had nine years of dividend increases.

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:45.079
<v Speaker 5>But we looked at you know, the historical dividend increases

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:48.560
<v Speaker 5>out of this name, some recent acquisitions they made that

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 5>solidified and smoothed their cash flows because of more recurring

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:58.079
<v Speaker 5>software sales. It really started to fit and it also

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:01.600
<v Speaker 5>allowed us to increase our ex closure to the technology sector,

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 5>which you know, with it being a dividend investor, you know,

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 5>the technology sector, it's it's difficult to find quality yield.

0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 5>You know, it seems like there's more value traps or

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 5>extremely low dividend yields because they're focused on growth. So

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 5>when Broadcom walked into our universe, we certainly took advantage

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 5>of that and established a decent position because of how

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 5>it was contributing to the yield of the fond as

0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 5>well as the growth of income. You know, So we're

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:32.360
<v Speaker 5>willing to sacrifice taken on a little bit more risk

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 5>because of the excess you know, contribution it gave to

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:41.400
<v Speaker 5>the yield and growth of yield. You know, So when

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 5>looking at our process and how you know I would

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 5>rate it, you know, when looking at you know, our

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 5>process since inception and the performance you know it has

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 5>delivered absolute superior not only risk adjusted returns, but absolute

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 5>returns versus our our peers, which in a sense is

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 5>returning more than our peers while taking on less risk.

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 2>Now you mentioned how you cheer the companies right by

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 2>dibend yield and so on. Are there any specific metrics

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 2>you like to look at to assess the sustainability of dividends?

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, dividend history is probably the number one, you know.

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 5>So the average company within our portfolio has raised its

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:27.240
<v Speaker 5>dividend for twenty four and second years and that gives us,

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 5>you know, pretty good comfort that you know, we're going

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 5>to be able to you know, deliver that that growing

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 5>income stream to our shareholders.

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 3>And we have a.

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:39.800
<v Speaker 5>Successfully done that since inception. We've grown the dividend every

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 5>single year, never seen a drop. And that's a commitment

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 5>that you know, we have on a going for basis

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 5>is to grow that dividend on a going for basis.

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 5>You know, other metrics that we're going to look at

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 5>would be a company's yield relative to its historic yield.

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's you know, another valuation metric that kind

0:15:59.520 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 3>of tells you.

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 5>You, you know, what income you're getting for what I'm paying. Obviously,

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 5>the payout ratio is going to be a metric that.

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 3>We look at.

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 5>A net debt to EBITA is a very important one

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 5>because if that number begins to climb, you're going to

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 5>have to start questioning the you know, ability of the

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 5>company to continue to pay that dividend and they may

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 5>have to put their focus elsewhere, which puts a little

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 5>cloud over the dividend side of things.

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:33.960
<v Speaker 3>And one can't deny long term, a total return of

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 3>a stock is very important.

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 5>You know, if you just simply look at yield in

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 5>particular dividend metrics without looking at how the company is

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 5>actually returned over a longer term period like ten years,

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 5>you can find yourself a value trap.

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 2>And do you care about buybacks at all, you know,

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 2>trying to deliver higher shareholder yield?

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, definitely we do.

0:16:56.840 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 4>We do place more emphasis on yield, you know, as

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:04.639
<v Speaker 4>ours returning capital to shareholders. Because this is a dividend fund,

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 4>we're paying most attention to the regular dividends. Occasionally there's

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 4>a special dividend, but really any form of returning capital

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:17.719
<v Speaker 4>to shareholders we like to see that, including buybacks. So

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:19.560
<v Speaker 4>definitely we're looking at that as well.

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 3>And one thing I would add to that is dividends are.

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:28.200
<v Speaker 5>Definitely more direct to investors, you know, where share purchases

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:33.800
<v Speaker 5>can be overshadowed by you know, executive compensation or share incentives.

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I do you want to ask a follow up question

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:41.199
<v Speaker 1>regarding valuations. You mentioned you looked at historic yields, but

0:17:41.640 --> 0:17:45.199
<v Speaker 1>are there other types of valuation metrics or just you know,

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 1>a way you look at valuations and underlying securities.

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think price to earnings would be the predominant

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 5>one that we use for a fund like this because

0:17:53.280 --> 0:17:56.160
<v Speaker 5>of how you know, developed the companies are that we're

0:17:56.840 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 5>invested in, and you know, the approach that we take,

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:03.200
<v Speaker 5>We're going to look at individual company price to earnings

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:07.239
<v Speaker 5>ratio versus its historic range, you know where it is

0:18:07.280 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 5>at on the range, as well as peer analysis, sector analysis,

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 5>and broad market analysis. You know, so by looking at

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 5>all those different phases, you're able to identify pockets of

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:21.440
<v Speaker 5>opportunity not just on the individual stock side of things,

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 5>but also sector industry side of things.

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:27.120
<v Speaker 3>You know, with that by gearing more, you.

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:31.280
<v Speaker 5>Know, money towards attract evaluation, you know, you get the

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:35.119
<v Speaker 5>opportunity for a multiple expansion and then vice versa.

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 3>When we begin to see extreme valuation.

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:42.679
<v Speaker 5>And I say that because you know, I feel selling

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 5>a company if it's a you know, two to three

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 5>turns above its historical range or average range, you know,

0:18:49.840 --> 0:18:53.119
<v Speaker 5>isn't necessarily fit the mantra of long term investing. The

0:18:53.240 --> 0:18:56.359
<v Speaker 5>extreme would be when you're five, six, seven turns above

0:18:56.359 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 5>its historic average. That's where we're going to start to

0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:03.440
<v Speaker 5>decrease the position. And you know that's largely a function

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 5>of multiple compression in contraction. Over time, you know, these

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:11.479
<v Speaker 5>companies will revert to their mean. And you know, if

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:14.720
<v Speaker 5>you're if you're heavily exposed to overvalued companies, you're you're

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:16.680
<v Speaker 5>you're adding more risk to your portfolio.

0:19:17.000 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 2>There's been a few companies recently initiating dividends. Meta comes

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 2>to mind. Do you care about those stocks at all?

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:27.160
<v Speaker 2>Are you willing to go into them as they initiate,

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:29.200
<v Speaker 2>or do you have to kind of wait for the

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 2>consecutive history of dividends.

0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 5>So with our tearing system, we do have flexibility in

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:41.240
<v Speaker 5>that front. It's pretty rare that we're going to invest

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:44.679
<v Speaker 5>in a company with less than five years, you know,

0:19:44.760 --> 0:19:47.359
<v Speaker 5>as in the case of Broadcom, we waited until they

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 5>were approaching that ten year mark, and we were highly

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 5>confident that they were going to excel through that tenure,

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 5>so we established a position. You know, but when looking

0:19:55.760 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 5>at these initiators, it's not very common where a company

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:02.440
<v Speaker 5>initiates a dividend and it's it's going to fall into

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 5>our universe because you know that the yield is going

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:07.479
<v Speaker 5>to be so light from the get go. So we

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 5>want the story to mature and for them to prove

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 5>up that they're fully committed to the dividend, and that's

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 5>when they would enter our universe and we would identify

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:19.200
<v Speaker 5>and decide whether it's an appropriate stock.

0:20:19.040 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 3>For our fund.

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Do you consider the macro environment at all when you're

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 1>looking at companies, Well, the.

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 5>Macro environment, you know, I think is going to impact

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 5>you know, each sector independently, you know, but we're pretty

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 5>agnostic about the macro environment, you know, by you know,

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:41.879
<v Speaker 5>following our process in committing to high quality companies with

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:47.119
<v Speaker 5>wide modes you know, really really drives our long term performance.

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 5>The macro environment does create pockets of opportunity.

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:52.159
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 5>A couple of great examples would be back in twenty sixteen,

0:20:56.280 --> 0:21:00.159
<v Speaker 5>you know, when the bond market kind of turned, you know,

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:03.200
<v Speaker 5>the bond proxies you know, started to come under pressure,

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:05.879
<v Speaker 5>and we were able to get ahead of that, you know,

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:08.720
<v Speaker 5>by reducing our exposure to our consumer staples.

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, before you know, the.

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:14.480
<v Speaker 5>Downturn happened, and that was largely a function you know,

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 5>of the macro It was macro driven as well as

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:21.520
<v Speaker 5>extreme valuation within consumer staples. The same thing happened in

0:21:21.560 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty two, you know, or the macro environment you know,

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:30.640
<v Speaker 5>pro push down the technology sector and again created opportunities

0:21:30.720 --> 0:21:33.320
<v Speaker 5>as the share price fall yields price and we were

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:35.680
<v Speaker 5>able to pick up you know, some technology names on

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 5>the cheap with you know, acceptable dividend yields, you know,

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 5>for how the you know, the.

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:43.119
<v Speaker 3>Companies are going to contribute to the portfolio goals.

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 5>And the most recent one was just late last year,

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:49.840
<v Speaker 5>we took our utility exposure you know, from eight percent

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 5>to close to fifteen percent just because of the backdrop

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 5>the attract evaluation, the you know, acceleration in capex which

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 5>will lead to further grow both largely driven by the

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 5>speculation of load growth driven by data centers.

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:08.639
<v Speaker 2>So what do you identify as the biggest risk to

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 2>dividend investing broadly? Is it just kind of higher inflation,

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 2>higher rates persisting for longer making bonds more attractive, or

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 2>is it something else?

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:19.960
<v Speaker 5>I would probably tend to agree that rates, you know,

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 5>would be you know the biggest you know.

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:27.160
<v Speaker 4>Threat time to time, I think dividend stocks go out

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 4>of favor, and you know, this has happened numerous times

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:34.120
<v Speaker 4>since we open the fund, you know, and recently with

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:38.200
<v Speaker 4>short term interest rates so high and you know where

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 4>people could go out and get a five five and

0:22:39.800 --> 0:22:42.920
<v Speaker 4>a half percent CD or you know the same thing

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:48.120
<v Speaker 4>in a money market fund that competed pretty pretty hard

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:51.679
<v Speaker 4>against you know, dividend stocks and you know fun link

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 4>ours that might pay three three and a half percent,

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:58.000
<v Speaker 4>while individual investors can go and buy a CD at

0:22:58.000 --> 0:22:59.360
<v Speaker 4>five percent risk free.

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 3>Many of them opted for that. You know.

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 4>Hopefully, now that it's pretty evident the fats can start cutting,

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:10.880
<v Speaker 4>we'll be able to compete dividend stocks dived in equity

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:14.399
<v Speaker 4>income type mutual funds I think will be much more competitive.

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 4>Probably already are you know, market rates have already fallen significantly,

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:22.440
<v Speaker 4>So I think that will will.

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 3>Help us moving forward.

0:23:23.680 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned the tier system when you're looking to purchase securities.

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Does it work on the the other end, you know,

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>does you know if a stock falls from tier you know,

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 1>your top tier to a lower tier, does that you know,

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 1>initiate a sell?

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:40.920
<v Speaker 3>You know, I think it would. It would.

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 5>There there'd be something going on where the company you know,

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 5>is following a tier. You know, So we're going to

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:49.439
<v Speaker 5>address again that individual company, how it's contributing to the

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:52.359
<v Speaker 5>portfolio goals, and if it starts a fall out of favor,

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:55.439
<v Speaker 5>we're going to begin to reduce the you know, our

0:23:55.480 --> 0:23:59.200
<v Speaker 5>exposure to that name. And a prime example would be

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 5>you know, with such a rapid rise and its share

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:07.120
<v Speaker 5>price over the last you know, five six years, it's

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 5>pushed its yield. When we initially purchased it, it was

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 5>you know four plus percent dividen yield. Now it's got

0:24:12.520 --> 0:24:15.919
<v Speaker 5>a little one handle, you know, so we've obviously you know,

0:24:16.000 --> 0:24:18.680
<v Speaker 5>reduced our our exposure to that name.

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 3>So yes, it certainly.

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:24.120
<v Speaker 5>Plays a role in our not only whether we're buying

0:24:24.200 --> 0:24:27.920
<v Speaker 5>or selling, but how how we're positioning it in the portfolio.

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:30.720
<v Speaker 2>Does it cut automatically force you out of a position

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 2>or do you reassess if you believe in company fundamentals.

0:24:35.800 --> 0:24:38.359
<v Speaker 5>Ninety five percent of the time, it's going to be

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:41.879
<v Speaker 5>it's going to exit the portfolio. You know, there have

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:45.200
<v Speaker 5>been cases where you know, there was a corporate restructure

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:48.960
<v Speaker 5>you know that caused you know, a reduction in the dividend,

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 5>you know, via a spin off of a portion of

0:24:51.320 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 5>the company's business, which would.

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:56.240
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's not what we like to see, but.

0:24:57.920 --> 0:25:01.679
<v Speaker 5>You know, it's less of a concern if versus like

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:07.640
<v Speaker 5>deteriorating fundamentals, you know, causing stress and ultimately the competator

0:25:07.720 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 5>reducer divid and that's not something we're looking for. And

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 5>there's been so many studies done, you know, on returns

0:25:13.760 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 5>by dividend policy, that it just should be a simple rule.

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:20.120
<v Speaker 3>If they cut, it's gone.

0:25:20.200 --> 0:25:22.160
<v Speaker 5>Because of they are at the bottom of the list

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 5>for you know, total return over long period of.

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:26.959
<v Speaker 3>Time, that would be dividend cutters.

0:25:26.960 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 5>And on the flip side of things, things dividend initiators

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 5>and razors have drastically outperformed the broader market.

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:36.200
<v Speaker 3>And that's why we feel this is, you know.

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:41.240
<v Speaker 5>Such an excellent fund at providing risk adjusted returns.

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:44.439
<v Speaker 2>And how do you deal with any sector biases that

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 2>might emerge? I mean, high payers can often be pretty clumpy, right.

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:54.359
<v Speaker 3>I guess what do you mean by sector biases?

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Like, you know, energy has like a pretty high proportion

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:03.040
<v Speaker 2>of high in yielders for example, Right, do you make

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:05.879
<v Speaker 2>sure that you have weights pretty close to the benchmark

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:08.960
<v Speaker 2>or whatever your benchmark might be, or do you just

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 2>let those drift? I went along with the yields and

0:26:12.840 --> 0:26:13.200
<v Speaker 2>so on.

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:15.960
<v Speaker 4>To answer that one, I would say that given the

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:19.680
<v Speaker 4>fact we're managing for low volatility, you know, we're generally

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 4>going to be overweight.

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:24.920
<v Speaker 3>Your staples, utilities, healthcare people.

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 4>Are always going to need toothpaste toilet paper, electricity.

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:31.880
<v Speaker 3>And medicine. So the companies that deliver those.

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 4>Products are going to have a very reliable, stable cash

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:40.359
<v Speaker 4>flow and very reliable dividends and typically less volatility of

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:44.200
<v Speaker 4>their share price. So I would say those are three

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:49.960
<v Speaker 4>sectors that we typically will overweight. As Mike mentioned, we

0:26:50.080 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 4>really like the utility sector now and stepping up our

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:54.440
<v Speaker 4>waiting coming into this year.

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 3>We believe they provide.

0:26:58.920 --> 0:27:04.080
<v Speaker 4>Obviously a degree a defense given their stable cash flows,

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 4>but definitely offense as well with a load growth that's

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:11.359
<v Speaker 4>going to be occurring over the country in the near years.

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:14.480
<v Speaker 4>And then you know, depending on the macro environment, we

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:17.399
<v Speaker 4>look for opportunities in other sectors so that we stay

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 4>fairly diversified across you know, all those sectors in the

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 4>S and P.

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:24.919
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, to add to that, you know, it's like I

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:28.239
<v Speaker 5>treat those defensive sectors you know, as the core of

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:33.359
<v Speaker 5>our portfolio. In the remainder being dynamic, you know, in

0:27:33.760 --> 0:27:37.439
<v Speaker 5>the opportunities present at any given time is going to

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:43.200
<v Speaker 5>you know, you know, I guess dictate our sector allocation.

0:27:43.920 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 5>As Shannon mentioned, we're not going to overly stretch our exposure.

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:50.919
<v Speaker 5>You know, as you mentioned energy and there is incredible

0:27:51.119 --> 0:27:56.199
<v Speaker 5>income opportunities at incredible evaluations with an energy but it

0:27:56.320 --> 0:28:00.639
<v Speaker 5>is very important to not you know, go overboard with

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:03.879
<v Speaker 5>with with exposure to an extremely volatile sector.

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:11.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and with some of the megacaps initial dividends, they

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:13.440
<v Speaker 2>might be creeping into your universe. But are are you

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:18.480
<v Speaker 2>worried about any concentration risk in the style maybe looking

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 2>out into the future of five five years or so, you.

0:28:21.520 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 5>Know, from our portfolio standpoint, you know, I think we've

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:27.800
<v Speaker 5>you know, kept away from, you know, any concentration. We've

0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:30.520
<v Speaker 5>had some strong performers at the top that we've you know,

0:28:30.600 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 5>kept in check to make sure we don't get overly concentrated,

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:35.679
<v Speaker 5>you know.

0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 3>But from a broad based standpoint, is that kind of

0:28:37.840 --> 0:28:38.680
<v Speaker 3>what you're referring to?

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Yeah, just in general. I mean, if you look

0:28:42.600 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 2>at the S and P for example, right you've got

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:48.120
<v Speaker 2>thirty to forty in the top seven stocks right now,

0:28:48.120 --> 0:28:52.360
<v Speaker 2>and it's getting a little bit concerning for investors broadly.

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:54.120
<v Speaker 2>I was just wondering if you were seeing this, Yeah.

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 5>And I think that would probably be a positive, you know,

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:02.040
<v Speaker 5>for a dividend investor because and we've already seen this

0:29:02.160 --> 0:29:04.840
<v Speaker 5>in the past couple of months as breadth has expanded,

0:29:05.840 --> 0:29:08.960
<v Speaker 5>you know, which is you know, greatly positive for the

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 5>rest of the market, negative for the meg seven.

0:29:12.920 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:19.040
<v Speaker 5>And when when looking at you know, valuations, I think

0:29:19.080 --> 0:29:21.640
<v Speaker 5>this trend you know, has a lot of potential to continue.

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:24.960
<v Speaker 5>And it also gets back to you know, my my

0:29:25.040 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 5>comments of you know, diving and investing in how you know,

0:29:29.360 --> 0:29:32.960
<v Speaker 5>how they are correlated into value and values long term

0:29:33.080 --> 0:29:36.960
<v Speaker 5>history versus growth. There's a study done back in twenty

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:40.280
<v Speaker 5>nineteen and if I adjust the numbers to twenty twenty three,

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:44.560
<v Speaker 5>value on a rolling fifteen year basis as outperform growth

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:47.959
<v Speaker 5>nearly ninety percent of the time going back to nineteen

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:48.640
<v Speaker 5>twenty seven.

0:29:49.280 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 3>You know, so value is the true leader, you know

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 3>in the market. It's you know, it's been growth for

0:29:55.720 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 3>my lifetime, you know.

0:29:57.600 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 5>But ultimately, you know, we see value gaining its leadership.

0:30:03.200 --> 0:30:06.200
<v Speaker 2>And uh, there's a lot of cash flush companies out there,

0:30:06.320 --> 0:30:08.880
<v Speaker 2>especially I mean tech comes to mind right off the

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:11.640
<v Speaker 2>top of my head. What do you think is necessary

0:30:11.680 --> 0:30:14.320
<v Speaker 2>to spur some of these make it caps maybe to

0:30:14.400 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 2>return more capital shareholders. There's a lack of opportunities or yeah, or.

0:30:18.360 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 3>Both opportunities would have to dry out.

0:30:21.640 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 5>And that I don't see that happening, I guess anytime

0:30:24.680 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 5>in the next few years. There's ample opportunities where even

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:30.680
<v Speaker 5>the massive piles are sitting.

0:30:30.520 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 3>On aren't enough for what they could realistically spend.

0:30:33.920 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and do you think rate cuts at all will

0:30:36.600 --> 0:30:41.280
<v Speaker 2>will kind of impact that, maybe urge companies to give

0:30:41.360 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 2>more back to shareholders.

0:30:43.720 --> 0:30:47.400
<v Speaker 5>That's difficult, you know, on the growth companies, because you know,

0:30:47.480 --> 0:30:49.760
<v Speaker 5>in a lower rate environment it does create you know,

0:30:49.920 --> 0:30:54.479
<v Speaker 5>more attractive returns for growth products, So I would say

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:57.720
<v Speaker 5>they'd be more inclined to, you know, continue on towards that,

0:30:57.960 --> 0:30:59.240
<v Speaker 5>the growth side side of things.

0:30:59.320 --> 0:31:00.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, I've actually just got one more question actually for

0:31:04.040 --> 0:31:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the both of you. What are your favorite investment books.

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:08.880
<v Speaker 1>We'll start with you, Shannon.

0:31:09.160 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 3>No particular one comes to mind. When I have free time,

0:31:11.920 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 3>I read more research.

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, fair enough.

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:17.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I just need to read as much research as

0:31:17.640 --> 0:31:19.960
<v Speaker 4>I can and try and keep up with Mike on

0:31:20.680 --> 0:31:21.480
<v Speaker 4>on my research.

0:31:22.480 --> 0:31:23.120
<v Speaker 1>How about you, Mike.

0:31:23.360 --> 0:31:25.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I don't know if it'll ever catch me, but no,

0:31:28.040 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 5>I would say definitively it's The Automatic Millionaire.

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:37.000
<v Speaker 3>By David Bach. Received that book when I was a senior.

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 5>Well, graduated high school, read it front to back and

0:31:42.280 --> 0:31:46.040
<v Speaker 5>really changed my perspective on, you know, on investing and

0:31:46.400 --> 0:31:50.040
<v Speaker 5>paying yourself first and just being a little bit more responsible,

0:31:50.520 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 5>you know, about how you invest. So that's definitively the

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:56.480
<v Speaker 5>top of my list, even though it's been I don't know,

0:31:56.520 --> 0:31:57.800
<v Speaker 5>probably twenty years since.

0:31:57.600 --> 0:32:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I've read it, so it's nice. Well, you know, this

0:32:01.720 --> 0:32:04.000
<v Speaker 1>was great, Shannon, Mike, thank you so much for joining

0:32:04.040 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 1>us today.

0:32:04.600 --> 0:32:06.440
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, Dave, and thank you Mike. Yep.

0:32:06.520 --> 0:32:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Thanks guys and Mike, thank you for being my co host.

0:32:09.800 --> 0:32:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Thank you until our next episode. This is David Cohne

0:32:13.320 --> 0:32:14.240
<v Speaker 1>with Inside Active