WEBVTT - Steve Rolles on Legalizing Drugs

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Hi, I'm Ethan Nadelman, and this is Psychoactive, a production

0:00:07.760 --> 0:00:11.600
<v Speaker 1>of I Heart Radio and Protozoa Pictures. Psychoactive is the

0:00:11.600 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>show where we talk about all things drugs. But any

0:00:15.120 --> 0:00:18.760
<v Speaker 1>views expressed here do not represent those of my Heart Media,

0:00:18.920 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Protozoa Pictures, or their executives and employees. Indeed, heed as

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>an inveterate contrarian, I can tell you they may not

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>even represent my own and nothing contained in this show

0:00:30.840 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>should be used as medical advice or encouragement to use

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 1>any type of drugs. Hello, Psychoactive listeners. So today's a

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 1>big day for me because this will be the concluding

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 1>episode of season two of Psychoactive, which means we've put

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 1>out eighty episodes since the summer of plus a whole

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>bunch of bonus episodes, And so I thought this would

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 1>be a good time to really take the opportunity because

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:08.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure if and when Psychoactive will be returning

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 1>and in what form to thank a number of people.

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Let me start with Darren Aronovski and maybe of you

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:19.399
<v Speaker 1>know him as the famous movie director. Um. He and

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 1>I met about twenty years ago. We were introduced by

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:24.039
<v Speaker 1>phone named Gonga White who took each of us not

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 1>together separately on our first Ayahuaski experience. But Darren emailed

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:32.560
<v Speaker 1>me back in June and suggested the idea of my

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 1>hosting of podcast on psychedelics, actually he thought, and my

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:39.840
<v Speaker 1>response to him was, I'd actually rather do one on

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 1>all drugs, and he said, let's do it. So first, Darren,

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>thank you ever so much for initiating this project and

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:49.560
<v Speaker 1>for having the confidence in the faith in need to

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>make this happen. And then next let me thank the

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 1>producers who have put in the most time and effort recently.

0:01:56.920 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 1>That has been no him Osband at Protozoa and Josh

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Stain at My Heart, and then their predecessors who got

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 1>this going Catcha kum Coova at Protozoa and Benjamin kubrick

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Um also at Protozoa. I mean, at the top of

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the list, Dylan Golden, my key collaborator over there, but

0:02:14.200 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 1>also Ari Handel and Elizabeth Geeseus and a Vivit Barrio

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:22.520
<v Speaker 1>sph and Eric Watson, and over at my Heart there's

0:02:22.560 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Alex Williams and Matthew Frederick and of course the head

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:30.080
<v Speaker 1>of the whole enterprise, the Bob Pittman, and of course

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Robert Beatty, who came up with a wonderful logo for Psychoactive.

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 1>So thanks to all of you. It's been wonderful working

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:39.959
<v Speaker 1>with this team. And I apologize to those whose names

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I've forgotten who are working more behind the scenes on

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 1>all of this. But what I can tell you is

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the levels of professionalism and time and commitment and good

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 1>times with the folks at Protozoa and I heart the

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:54.520
<v Speaker 1>co producers of Psychoactive has just made this whole experience

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 1>a real pleasure. Next, I want to thank you the listeners.

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Of course I don't know exactly who all of you are.

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Some of you do tell me, but I can tell

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 1>you this about the data that we collect. Most of

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the listeners maybe have been in the United States, but

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 1>there have been listeners in over a hundred seventy countries

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>and territories around the world, so the audience truly is global,

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and I want to thank especially those of you who

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>are listening in countries with fairly oppressive governments, where these

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 1>sorts of conversations that we have on Psychoactive would not

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:34.400
<v Speaker 1>be so well tolerated in your own countries. I hope

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 1>these conversations have been a source of inspiration and enlightenment

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 1>for all of you. Now, as I said, I'm not

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>sure what the next incarnation of Psychoactive will be or

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:47.120
<v Speaker 1>when I am going to take a break for a

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 1>while at least, but I would welcome your feedback. So

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 1>contact me through Instagram or other social media, or email

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 1>me directly at Ethan at Napleman dot net. That's Ethan

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 1>at Napleman dot net. I can't promise to get back

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 1>to you, but I always enjoy getting the feedback, not

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>just the positive, you know, but also the negative and

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 1>critical ideas for the future. Please keep posting your comments,

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>whether it's on iHeart or Google or Apple or wherever

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 1>you listen to podcasts. The episodes will remain up for

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the foreseeable future on all of the platforms, so please

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:25.799
<v Speaker 1>keep listening. And so with this let me launch into

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>episode number eighty. And for number this one, I decided

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 1>to ask somebody who has been a long time ally

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:39.159
<v Speaker 1>and friend of mine. His name is Steve Roles. He's

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>based in the u K's British. He has been the

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:48.280
<v Speaker 1>senior policy analyst at the British Drug post Reform Organization

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:53.039
<v Speaker 1>TRANSFORM almost since its inception, since that organization was founded

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 1>by Danny Kushlick in the mid nine so he's been

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 1>there for twenty five years. He's widely regarded, but not

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 1>US as an expert in the UK, but perhaps as

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the single most knowledgeable person when it comes to thinking

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 1>about the legal regulation of drugs. I mean that means

0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 1>that he's been a consultant to governments from Canada, Germany, Luxembourg, Jamaica, Malta, Mexico,

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 1>uh Uruguay, really almost every place except the US when

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:26.599
<v Speaker 1>it comes to legalizing cannabis. It means he's been a

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:29.920
<v Speaker 1>recent advisor to the Petro government in Colombia on their

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 1>proposals for legalizing coca cocaine. He's been dealing with the

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Dutch on the issues of legally regulating M d M A.

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, Steve, thank you ever so much for joining

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:45.479
<v Speaker 1>me on the last episode of season two of Psychoactives.

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 1>That's my pleasure, Ethan, It's great to be him. Well. So,

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>we have so much to talk about, from models of

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 1>legalization to the actual realities of legalization. But let me

0:05:56.960 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 1>just begin um by by asking you. I mean, you know,

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I think some of our listeners will know. I've been

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:06.719
<v Speaker 1>involved in this issue since the late nineteen eighties. Now, Steve,

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 1>you've jumped into this about a decade later, in the

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:12.720
<v Speaker 1>mid to late nineteen nineties. But when you look at

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:16.920
<v Speaker 1>this evolution in the twenty years you've been involved in this,

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 1>what most jumps out at you, Well, I mean, I guess,

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:25.799
<v Speaker 1>like like you, Ethan, it's been a remarkable, fascinating journey

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:30.160
<v Speaker 1>because what what started, as you know, discussions amongst reform

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 1>advocates like us, has moved from the sort of theoretical

0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:39.040
<v Speaker 1>space into the real world, and things which were seen

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:44.479
<v Speaker 1>as outrageous, sort of extreme heretical views, um when when

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 1>we started are now very much mainstream political views and

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:54.039
<v Speaker 1>supported by a majority of the public um. And you know,

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:56.799
<v Speaker 1>they are happening on the ground on every continent on Earth.

0:06:56.839 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 1>So things which were impossible, not not even twenty five

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:01.960
<v Speaker 1>years ago, even ten years ago. You know, if you

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>think about it, Colorado and Washington and Uruguay, that that

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 1>all happened in two thousand and twelve, So that was

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:13.560
<v Speaker 1>only just really ten years ago. Um. And before that

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 1>it was just still all theoretical. It was things that

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 1>we were hoping for, I mean, there were some things

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>happening with medical cannabis and so on, but when you

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 1>get into the non medical recreational drug legalization regulation, it's

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 1>really very much you know, modern history. UM. And So

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 1>for a long time, we were you know, making the case,

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 1>we were writing our reports, we were developing proposals, UM,

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 1>we were advocating, we were trying to change the framing

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 1>of the debate and try and influence key political discourses

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 1>in the media and in in in in professional forums

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 1>and in political forums. And sometimes it didn't feel like

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>we were getting anywhere, um, But clearly we were, because

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 1>at some point a threshold was passed and reform became

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 1>not just a possibility but a reality. And since those

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 1>since two thousand and twelve, there's been a kind of um,

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 1>cascading domino effect. Uh. And and you know, from from

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 1>two states in the US to now twenty one from

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 1>from just Uruguay, we're seeing cannabis reforms for nomenical cannabis

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:24.720
<v Speaker 1>on on every continent now except maybe the Arctic. And

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 1>and and we're seeing, as you've already said, we've seen

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the debate move beyond cannabis into psychedelics and and cocaine

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:33.200
<v Speaker 1>and coca and m D m A and other stimulates

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 1>and other drugs, and so the things that we you know,

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the things that we have been advocating all of this time,

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 1>are becoming a reality. And that is both interesting and

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>fascinating and historical view, but also you know, satisfying from

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:48.559
<v Speaker 1>professional view to sort of things that we were convinced

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that we were right, but everyone was telling us we

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 1>were mad. It turns out that actually we were right

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 1>because we've been vindicated by history, and you know, the

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 1>evidence is coming in and showing showing that we were

0:08:58.800 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 1>what we were saying was essentially right, and you know,

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>here we are. We're still a long way to go,

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:09.440
<v Speaker 1>but I feel, yeah, satisfied that that we have you know,

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 1>we haven't. We weren't just some cranky kind of tinfoil

0:09:13.080 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 1>hat nutters and heretics and that you know, history, we

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 1>are on the right side of history. M hm no,

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Steve, I'll tell you. Part of what kept

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 1>me going all those decades of being involved in the advocacy,

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and you know, when people would think this was just

0:09:27.960 --> 0:09:31.440
<v Speaker 1>a quixonic enterprise, was the sense that we were right

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 1>in policy terms, We were right from a justice perspective,

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 1>we were right from a perspectives of individual and broader morality,

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>and that it just seemed inevitable that somehow this but

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:44.600
<v Speaker 1>that on some level, this bubble of a kind of

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:48.959
<v Speaker 1>um prohibition, this policy, the notion that you could somehow

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 1>control global illicit commodities markets through policies of repression repression

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:57.720
<v Speaker 1>was somehow gonna work. But I want to ask you this.

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:02.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, I've oftentimes made the point that if you

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 1>ask the question, how and why was it that the

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 1>United States, which for almost a century, really from the

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 1>early twentieth century until basically the second term of the

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Obama administration, really was the global champion of the war

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:23.840
<v Speaker 1>on drugs, right exporting and modeling and coercing other governments

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 1>to adopt, you know, fairly punitive prohibitionist policies. How was

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>it that we nonetheless became the leader when it came

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 1>to the legal regulation of cannabis. And I've answered that

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:38.720
<v Speaker 1>question the US context by saying it really goes back

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 1>to medical marijuana, goes back to that first medical marijuana

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:46.200
<v Speaker 1>ballot initiative victory in California six It was the one

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:50.079
<v Speaker 1>that afforded the first opportunity to bring marijuana markets above

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 1>ground with the medical marijuana dispensaries. It was the one

0:10:52.800 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 1>that gave people an opportunity to feel like what regulating

0:10:55.800 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 1>marijuana would be like? Right, and it helped, you know,

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 1>in every set, transformed that dialogue in a way that

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 1>opened up the door, shifted public opinion, shifted government thinking

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 1>to imagining a world in which the legalization of marijuana

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:12.719
<v Speaker 1>not just for medicinal purposes, but more broadly for all

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:16.319
<v Speaker 1>at us was possible. But the question is for you

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:19.520
<v Speaker 1>in the UK, and looking at this globally, to what

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>extent was that the model elsewhere? First? Secondly, to what

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:26.839
<v Speaker 1>extent was what happened in the US kind of the

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 1>inspiration or the instigation without which reform would not have

0:11:30.480 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 1>happened elsewhere, Because we always look at the Dutch coffee

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:35.600
<v Speaker 1>shop system is being you know, one of the actually

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 1>pre models to the US medical marijuana model. And to

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 1>what extent has this happened in some countries actually totally

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 1>independently of medical marijuana being the stepping still, I mean,

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 1>that's a great question. Um Uh, there's certainly. Um I

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 1>think the fact that the US, for the reasons you've

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 1>you've you've you've touched on the fact that the US

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 1>did go first, snificantly went first. I mean, I don't

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 1>want to you know, erased Uruguay from history here, because

0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Uruguay was the first member state and kind of happened

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 1>around the same time as Colorado and Washington. But well

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:14.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of right because in a way, Uruguay legalizes as

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the end of twenty thirteen, so a year after all

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 1>after Colorado Washington. In fact, I've sometimes wondered whether or

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:24.559
<v Speaker 1>not Uruguay would have happened in Colorado and Washington, and

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:27.679
<v Speaker 1>that kind of for sure. But the process was unfolding

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 1>from about two thousand and eleven, and there were bills

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 1>being tabled, and it was a very active public debate.

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:35.840
<v Speaker 1>There were expert consultations going on in two thousand, two

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:39.199
<v Speaker 1>thousand and twelve that TRANSFORM and myself and others UM

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 1>were involved in. But I think the thing that was

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:45.200
<v Speaker 1>very significant in terms of the US for the global

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 1>debate was really what you say, I mean, the fact

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:50.720
<v Speaker 1>that the US had been the kind of drug war

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of bully of the world for for all these decades,

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 1>going all the way back to you know, um the

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:00.880
<v Speaker 1>drafting of the the you know U Single Convention in

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:03.079
<v Speaker 1>the forties and fifties and Harry Ainsling and all that,

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:08.719
<v Speaker 1>all that ghastly history. Um. The fact that they then

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>did become these world leaders in the cannabis legalization regulation,

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 1>it did create space for the debate to blossom elsewhere

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 1>in the world. Just because of the US is hackmonic

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 1>role in geopolitics generally and in drug policy specifically. Um,

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 1>they kind of lost their authority to bully other countries

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 1>on cannabis regulation when US states started legalizing. And you know,

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:39.080
<v Speaker 1>when when the US does stuff, it becomes okay to

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 1>talk about it in other places in the world. And

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 1>you can look at other things like equal marriage. For example,

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:48.840
<v Speaker 1>when the equal marriage stuff happened under Obama in the US,

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 1>suddenly that debate, which had been completely off the table

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:54.960
<v Speaker 1>really in the UK, suddenly that debate opened up and

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 1>within a year or two we'd we'd we'd legalized equal

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:02.440
<v Speaker 1>marriage as well. Um, just because it's sort of somehow

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:06.560
<v Speaker 1>made it okay, uh to talk about it, kind of

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 1>normalized the debate. So what happened in the US has

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:13.440
<v Speaker 1>been immensely important, and they've you know that the models

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:15.440
<v Speaker 1>that have been adopted have been quite different in many

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 1>of the states, so that there is also this interesting

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 1>laboratory of change in the US that you have all

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>these different models and we can look at what's working

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and what's not working. And other countries have looked at that,

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 1>and they've looked at the successes and failings of US

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 1>legalization and learned from it and developed that move move forward.

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 1>But I think the political power of the US doing something,

0:14:38.480 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 1>even though it didn't happen at a federal level, it

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 1>still created a political environment in which it became okay

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 1>for other countries and other political forums to to start

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 1>discussing this, and it became more difficult for the US

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 1>to sort of try and stomp on other reformers because

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 1>you go back a few years before Colorado and Washington

0:14:56.960 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and the US was, you know, giving uh, the Dutch

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 1>a hard time about the coffee shops for decades, and

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 1>then suddenly the US is doing it themselves, and it's

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of like, wow, that's that's a real change. And

0:15:08.040 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I suspect the things that are happening with psychedelics, with

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 1>magic mushrooms and psychedelic plants in Oregon and Colorado and elsewhere,

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and things that are happening with krat Tom and so on.

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that will probably help open up the debate

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 1>for psychedelic regulation around the world as well, because it's

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of just becomes okay to talk about it. The US,

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:31.840
<v Speaker 1>their historical historical position, their hegemonic position in geopolitics. It

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:35.480
<v Speaker 1>just creates a sort of safe space for other nation

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 1>states to engage in those debates, which just simply wasn't

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 1>there before. Yeah, No, I think I think that makes sense.

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 1>But I'll tell you it's funny when you we talked

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 1>about Uruguay, right, Um, you know, when when President Mohican

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Uruguay sort of proposes and as you said, there have

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 1>been conversations going on, and folks in the US have

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 1>been engaging, and then you have you know, not just

0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:58.520
<v Speaker 1>transformed but also i DPC International Drug Policy Consortion. So

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 1>there are conversations had um. But what I oftimes think

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 1>about Uruguay is that it was a country where the

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 1>medical marijuana thing had not really developed separately in the

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 1>way ahead in the US. Right So the US opening

0:16:11.680 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 1>on medical marijuana, you know, beginning in ninety six, and

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 1>then Colorado, Washington obviously opened up space. But Uruguay was

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 1>an example of a place which moved forward without having

0:16:22.440 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 1>ever done that intermediate medical marijuana step. As far as

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I know, yeah, that's true. I think. I think that

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the one of the differences between reform in Latin America

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:35.360
<v Speaker 1>and in Europe and North America is the key driver

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 1>UM of the reform narrative in Latin America has generally

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 1>been security issues, so it's much been more been about

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the cartels and violence and insecurity. UM and President Mohica

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 1>of Uruguay his his sort of discourse around the need

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 1>for cannabis reform, but his discourse was very much around security.

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he didn't want to see what he called

0:16:57.240 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the columbian Ization of Uruguay. Didn't want to see Uruguay

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:04.879
<v Speaker 1>become a kind of you know, moved towards narco state

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 1>type status. So he drove what I mean, you know,

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:12.440
<v Speaker 1>how much organized crime activity was involved in the domestic

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 1>cannabis industry in Uruguay is moved, but that that was

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:20.360
<v Speaker 1>still his driving force rather than um, you know, economic

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:23.920
<v Speaker 1>opportunities or social justice or public health. I mean, those

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 1>things all came into it, but the driver and the driver.

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I think similarly for the Coca cocaine regulation debate in

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Colombia now and the Petro is is very similar. It's

0:17:35.800 --> 0:17:39.880
<v Speaker 1>it's driven not by you know, and the overdose crisis

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:44.399
<v Speaker 1>or by over and you know, mass incarceration and social

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 1>justice stuff. It's driven more by issues around security and

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 1>cartel activity and undermining institutions and you know violence. That

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:57.360
<v Speaker 1>dynamic is all now beginning to unravel, you know, as

0:17:57.400 --> 0:18:02.680
<v Speaker 1>as the global South is becoming more potent politically, more

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 1>confident on geopolitical stage, more willing to stand up to

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 1>the US and some of the kind of hegemonic powers

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 1>of the of the global North, we're seeing a great

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:18.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot more confidence um in those countries like Colombia,

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:20.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, and and and like Uruguay to say no,

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 1>we're not We're not going to play this game anymore.

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna we're gonna plow our own foreign and do

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>our own thing because the war on drugs just has

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 1>not worked for us. We've been fighting your war on

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 1>drugs for generations and all it's brought to us is

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:36.479
<v Speaker 1>misery and degradation and and and violence and death. And

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 1>we're just not going to do it anymore. Let me

0:18:38.320 --> 0:18:40.239
<v Speaker 1>stop you right there, because before I want to go

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:42.440
<v Speaker 1>back to the Uruguay thing and some of the Latin

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 1>American context and I both want to Although I agree

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:45.879
<v Speaker 1>with most of what you said, I do want to

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 1>challenge you in a few things and also provides some

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 1>context for our audience. So when we're talking about the

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 1>former president of Uruguay, President Mohica, you know he was

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 1>at all leftist Gorilla Tomorrow guerrillas back in the seventies

0:18:56.800 --> 0:18:59.639
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, who became this one term president. Part of

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:02.680
<v Speaker 1>what at him successful, of course, was that Uruguay they

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:05.200
<v Speaker 1>never had more than forty of the public supporting the

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:08.399
<v Speaker 1>legalization of cannabis, but they had a leadership, as you

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:11.640
<v Speaker 1>pointed out by President Mohika, and a very strong tradition

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:15.359
<v Speaker 1>of party discipline which enabled this to happen, for Uruguay

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 1>to pass a law legalizing cannabis a year after Colorado

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and Washington had done it. Now you talk about securitization,

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I think they're The big issue was that Uruguay was

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 1>importing most of its cannabis from I think Paraguay, which

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 1>is the leading producer of cannabis um in the southern

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:36.240
<v Speaker 1>part of South America and where organized crime is inevitably involved.

0:19:36.640 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 1>But just to complicate it a bit. I mean, I

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:42.200
<v Speaker 1>think if we look obviously talking about the bigger issues

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 1>around coca cocaine or heroin, opium in other places, security

0:19:45.760 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 1>is a big issue. But if you look elsewhere in

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:52.359
<v Speaker 1>Latin America, I remember, we were perpetually frustrated at you know,

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:55.880
<v Speaker 1>more and more people Latin American especially that American elites

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 1>understood the extent to which US inspired you know, drug

0:19:59.800 --> 0:20:04.679
<v Speaker 1>war policies, drug war pressures, prohibitionist frameworks were absolutely disaster

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:07.440
<v Speaker 1>for their country, sort of like you know America during

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 1>alcohol prohibition times fifty or times a hundred in terms

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 1>of creating you know, violence, crime, corruption, all that sort

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:16.520
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. But we also saw virtually nothing in the

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 1>way of progress on that front in response to the

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:23.919
<v Speaker 1>security issue. And where the progress did happen in recent years,

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:28.840
<v Speaker 1>for example, in countries like Columbia or in Mexico or

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 1>even elsewhere, it was typically medical marijuana sort of sticking

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 1>its nose under the tent. Right in Mexico and Colombia,

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:40.160
<v Speaker 1>you have these mothers, these parents of you know, of

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 1>infants and children, are that terrible Dravette syndrome, that epileptic syndrome,

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 1>that you know, where cannabis is the only thing that

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 1>really helps to reduce seizures, and they become this kind

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:51.440
<v Speaker 1>of inspirational force in a way. So much similar woul

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 1>happened the United States. So it seems that even in

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:57.240
<v Speaker 1>that Latin American context, where security is such a major

0:20:57.280 --> 0:20:59.920
<v Speaker 1>issue and organized crime and the violence and corruption of

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:04.000
<v Speaker 1>such a major issue, that nonetheless, apart from Uruguay, it

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:08.640
<v Speaker 1>did seem like medical marijuana was the key elements sort

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:13.719
<v Speaker 1>of opening things up. Yeah, I think I think I

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:18.159
<v Speaker 1>agree with you on that medical cannabis has you know it,

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:22.400
<v Speaker 1>as you say, it does help normalize, um, the concept

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 1>of a regulated cannabis market, and it does kind of

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 1>detoxify the idea of cannabis as this as this as deadly,

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 1>this deadly drug in the in the public perception that

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:35.040
<v Speaker 1>certainly has played out um in most countries, and it's

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:40.720
<v Speaker 1>happening in Europe now. Um. I think the thing with Uruguay,

0:21:40.800 --> 0:21:42.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, one of the things is that cannabis was

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 1>never really criminalized in Urugua any In fact, drugs possession

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:51.440
<v Speaker 1>generally was never criminalized in Uruguay. So right, and as

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 1>we forget and we talk about Portugal, and you know

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 1>with its decrem model that it brought in about twenty

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 1>years ago, and we think of them as the pioneer,

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 1>and in many of the sects they were. But from

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:05.080
<v Speaker 1>a legal perspective, Uruguay already had something of the Portugal

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 1>model for decades. Yes, and they were they were clearly, um,

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 1>quite pragmatic. I mean, I actually I met Mohika when

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 1>we were working there. Because it's quite a small country,

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:20.080
<v Speaker 1>so your access to the politicians is a lot easier

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:22.200
<v Speaker 1>than if you're in a huge country like the US.

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 1>You can just get to meet the president and so

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 1>we we went and met him and it was quite

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:30.359
<v Speaker 1>an amusing meeting UM. But I sort of asked him,

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I said, are you worried about you know, America breathing

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:36.639
<v Speaker 1>Danian neck and giving you heat for legalizing cannabis? I mean,

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 1>are they gonna are you wired? They're going to come

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 1>down on your hard And he was like, he was like, look,

0:22:41.119 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I was imprisoned down a well for three years and

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the tortured. Um, I don't he basically that I don't

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 1>give a shit about the US, and and it was

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 1>it was just so refreshing to see just someone literally

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:56.000
<v Speaker 1>doing leads because it wasn't just cannabis. I mean, this

0:22:56.080 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 1>is a guy who also legalized gay marriage and abortion, which,

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:04.879
<v Speaker 1>like cannabis, none of them had a popular mandate. He

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 1>just thought they were the right thing to do. Um

0:23:07.840 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 1>And you know, he got away with it because the

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:13.160
<v Speaker 1>public respected his leadership even though he didn't he didn't

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:15.119
<v Speaker 1>have a popular mandate for any of those issues. But

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:20.000
<v Speaker 1>you know that was just genuine leadership. I mean, that's trusty.

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I'll also say, you know they had

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and I remember, you know, he had a right hand guy,

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:27.239
<v Speaker 1>Diego can Yet. I think, who was, you know, one

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 1>of our key liaisons. And I remember talking with him

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:32.920
<v Speaker 1>when he had come to the US, and I think

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:35.280
<v Speaker 1>some of the story can be told now, but they

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 1>were to some extent concerned how the US respond because

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the US in the past had been so you know,

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 1>beating up on Canada if they talked about doing harm reduction,

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 1>or beating up in Australia, if they thought if they

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 1>were going to you know, or you know, Netherlands or

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:52.640
<v Speaker 1>whatever country wanted to move forward. And what he told

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 1>me it was that there had been a discussion with

0:23:54.880 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 1>folks in the White House and he he wasn't precise

0:23:58.040 --> 0:24:00.239
<v Speaker 1>who it was. I speculated that it might have been

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Vice President Biden, but who had essentially said at that

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:09.320
<v Speaker 1>point that listen, um, so long as this is entirely

0:24:09.480 --> 0:24:13.639
<v Speaker 1>a domestic issue in Uruguay, so long as you're not

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:17.440
<v Speaker 1>exporting this stuff to the US, so long as you're

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 1>not talking about legalizing drugs other than cannabis, then we

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:25.200
<v Speaker 1>don't have to see this as affecting American national security

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:28.000
<v Speaker 1>or other political interests whatsoever. In other words, it was

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 1>a kind of tacit qualified green light to saying we're

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:33.879
<v Speaker 1>not going to respond to you the way we have

0:24:33.960 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 1>in the past. And I think the U. S Ambassador,

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, follow that line. And then there was a

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 1>very another pivotal moment. There was an Assistant Secretary of

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:46.680
<v Speaker 1>State for International Arcotics International i n L the State

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Department Arcotics and Law Enforcement Office, and he was a

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 1>highly respected diplomat, William Brownfield, and he was something of

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 1>an old drug warrior, but he had been a very

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:59.919
<v Speaker 1>respected former ambassador to Chile and Venezuela, Colombia. He'd become

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:02.159
<v Speaker 1>the head of the Narcotics and Law Enforcement Office in

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty eleven. Then Uruguay and Washington legalized in twelve, and

0:25:07.359 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the Obama administration is in a bind, like what do

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:12.880
<v Speaker 1>they do about Washington? And Colorado's is in clear violation

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 1>of the federal law, and clear violation in seventy Control

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Substance Act, and clear violation of the U N Conventions,

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 1>And they kind of toss and turn and finally, and

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I think the summer Fall often come out with what

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:29.760
<v Speaker 1>becomes known as the quote unquote brown Field doctrine. And

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:35.159
<v Speaker 1>that Brownfield doctrine essentially reverses um, you know, almost a

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 1>century of US kind of mono prohibitionist policy. It basically says,

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 1>we are no longer going to be intolerant of diversity.

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:47.720
<v Speaker 1>We are going to be open to other possibilities and

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:51.280
<v Speaker 1>debates so long as countries keep collaborating on the basic

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:53.879
<v Speaker 1>efforts to crack down around drug later organized crime and

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:56.880
<v Speaker 1>trafficking and all this sort of stuff. Right. So, I mean,

0:25:57.040 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 1>as an American, I saw that, you know, Colorad Washington

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:02.400
<v Speaker 1>lead to the Obio administration have to rethink how they're

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:04.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to deal with this domestically, and that inevitably

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>leads to some rethinking of how to deal with this

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 1>stuff internationally. Now, how did all this look from where

0:26:10.800 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 1>you're sitting, you know, advising government sitting in the UK

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 1>looking at this from outside the US perspective? Well, I

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 1>mean the Brownfield statement was was huge. I mean it

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 1>was you know, it was huge within drug policy circles.

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 1>It didn't I mean, it got some media coverage, It

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:31.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't particularly reverberate around the world outside of drug policy circles.

0:26:31.480 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 1>But you know, it's you know, it's still being quoted today,

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 1>and I think you're absolutely right it was. It was

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 1>a pivotal moment because it was basically the US acknowledging

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:43.280
<v Speaker 1>that the global consensus on on prohibition of all drugs

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:46.919
<v Speaker 1>was you know, crumbling um and they needed to be

0:26:47.000 --> 0:26:49.960
<v Speaker 1>tolerant of because the brown Field wasn't. He didn't just

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 1>talk about cannabis as well. He talked about the legalization

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 1>of of all drugs or or other drugs jet drugs only.

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:58.119
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember the exact wording that he used, but

0:26:58.200 --> 0:27:00.320
<v Speaker 1>that was really really significant too, and it create did

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the context. I think the debate that has unfolded subsequently.

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's going to be really interesting to see

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:10.080
<v Speaker 1>how the what's going on in Columbia, with the debate

0:27:10.119 --> 0:27:13.919
<v Speaker 1>around coca leaf and cocaine regulation, is going to stress

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:17.760
<v Speaker 1>test that. You know, how how far can countries like

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:21.119
<v Speaker 1>Columbia push things before the US. That starts to get

0:27:21.680 --> 0:27:27.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty jumpy. And I suspect um, since Petro's election, they

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:29.960
<v Speaker 1>have been going or hang on a sec this this

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 1>this guy, this new president Columbia is actually talking about

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 1>legalizing cocaine. And you know, I've been working on this

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 1>bill that you mentioned in your introduction around the regulation

0:27:40.600 --> 0:27:44.399
<v Speaker 1>of coca leaf that includes a pilot for a legally

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:48.040
<v Speaker 1>regulated cocaine market for for non medical youth, very strictly

0:27:48.040 --> 0:27:50.879
<v Speaker 1>regulated and go to the details if you want, but

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:53.720
<v Speaker 1>it's in that bill. And one of the people who

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 1>was on the committee that worked on that that that

0:27:55.600 --> 0:27:59.200
<v Speaker 1>worked on that bill was Petro and he is now president.

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 1>So he's spoken favorite, it's a favor of it's on

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:04.120
<v Speaker 1>the record, he's voted for it. Um, it's all on

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the record. And you know when The Economist did there

0:28:08.320 --> 0:28:11.560
<v Speaker 1>a feature on cocaine regulation back in November, he then

0:28:11.600 --> 0:28:15.240
<v Speaker 1>tweeted it. Um. You know the screen grab at the

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:18.679
<v Speaker 1>full the full editorial that was saying, you know, Biden

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 1>should legalize cocaine. They need to go further than just

0:28:21.160 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 1>partnering a few people for for cannabis. So it's going

0:28:24.840 --> 0:28:28.159
<v Speaker 1>to be interesting to see how the US actually reacts

0:28:28.160 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 1>to that. But um, you know, if there was, if

0:28:31.000 --> 0:28:33.000
<v Speaker 1>there was a stress test of the Brownfield doctrine, I

0:28:33.000 --> 0:28:34.720
<v Speaker 1>think what's happening in Colombia is going to be it.

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:36.439
<v Speaker 1>And it's gonna be really fascinating to see how that

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:39.640
<v Speaker 1>plays out. So, you know, I should tell our listeners

0:28:39.680 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 1>that that Steve has been the lead author on a

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:46.320
<v Speaker 1>number of very important publications. The first one that they wrote,

0:28:46.320 --> 0:28:49.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe almost fifteen years ago, was basically a blueprint for

0:28:49.320 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 1>legal regulation of drugs called Blueprint for Regulation. But he's

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:55.600
<v Speaker 1>also been the lead author on a volume called How

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:58.880
<v Speaker 1>to Regulate Cannabis, which is now in its third edition.

0:28:59.760 --> 0:29:01.840
<v Speaker 1>More recently, a couple of years ago, they published How

0:29:01.880 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 1>to Regulate Stimulants, which included this issue that Steve's talking

0:29:05.160 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 1>about now, around cocaine, cocaine and around emphetamine and I

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 1>think as M D M A. And they're currently fundraising

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:14.760
<v Speaker 1>to produce a volume about how to regulate psychedelics. Now

0:29:15.040 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 1>this Steve, what I want to go on this coca

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 1>cocaine thing. I mean, obviously, coca has been legally produced

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:24.480
<v Speaker 1>in Bolivia and Peru for many decades, right, there was

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:28.000
<v Speaker 1>always an exception within the UN conventions on that allowing

0:29:28.040 --> 0:29:31.040
<v Speaker 1>them to produce it for you know, local purposes, but

0:29:31.200 --> 0:29:35.280
<v Speaker 1>never allowed to export any cocaine except for the kind

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 1>of decocon allized coca leaf that's used as part of

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Coca Cola's flavoring and such and some and some tiny

0:29:41.640 --> 0:29:44.520
<v Speaker 1>bit that's used for pharmaceutical purposes, because cocaine still does

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 1>have limited medicinal pharmaceutical purposes. But when we look at

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:52.640
<v Speaker 1>what's going on now, right, I mean, there's obviously the

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:57.320
<v Speaker 1>issue domestically about how do you regulate this um. But

0:29:57.440 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 1>before we get into that, one of the big elephants

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:05.480
<v Speaker 1>in the room always is the United Nations, right, the

0:30:05.560 --> 0:30:09.160
<v Speaker 1>United Nations the anti Drug conventions going back, you know,

0:30:09.240 --> 0:30:11.720
<v Speaker 1>not just to the Opium Conventions the early twentieth century,

0:30:11.720 --> 0:30:14.240
<v Speaker 1>over a hundred years ago, but to the ninety six

0:30:14.280 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Control Convention, the sixty one Single Convention, the subsequent ones

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:21.960
<v Speaker 1>in sight eight um. That was always seen as a

0:30:22.000 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 1>barrier to any form of states legalizing markets beyond the

0:30:27.600 --> 0:30:32.520
<v Speaker 1>research are strictly medical. Now to go back to Uruguay,

0:30:32.560 --> 0:30:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously, when Uruguay does this, the United Nations

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 1>about un we should specify there's two major there's three

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:41.920
<v Speaker 1>major U n. Drug agencies. Right, There's the U n

0:30:42.080 --> 0:30:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Office on Drugs and Crime un O d C, which

0:30:44.640 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of funds programs around the world and whose head

0:30:47.200 --> 0:30:50.600
<v Speaker 1>is a semi public figure on drug control. There's the

0:30:50.680 --> 0:30:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Commission on Narcotic Drugs, which is a grouping of all

0:30:54.560 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the various governments that meets, you know, periodically in every

0:30:57.640 --> 0:31:00.920
<v Speaker 1>spring in Vienna. And then there's the i n c B,

0:31:01.240 --> 0:31:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the International Our Cartage Control Board, which has sort of

0:31:04.040 --> 0:31:08.040
<v Speaker 1>been a watchdog of the conventions. Now when Uruguay is

0:31:08.080 --> 0:31:10.280
<v Speaker 1>moving forward and Mohicas saying we're going to do this

0:31:10.360 --> 0:31:12.360
<v Speaker 1>and we don't give it damn and the i n

0:31:12.400 --> 0:31:15.560
<v Speaker 1>c B reportedly sends a nasty letter to Mochica saying

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:19.160
<v Speaker 1>you can't do this. Well, what happened there? I mean,

0:31:19.280 --> 0:31:23.719
<v Speaker 1>obviously they just did it. Anyway. The thing about the

0:31:23.800 --> 0:31:26.160
<v Speaker 1>i n c B, which is, you know, like like

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 1>you say, they're the kind of they're kind of watchdog

0:31:29.040 --> 0:31:33.120
<v Speaker 1>of on compliance to these prohibitionist tenants within the within

0:31:33.160 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 1>the treat with the within the three treaties that you mentioned,

0:31:36.080 --> 0:31:39.520
<v Speaker 1>is that their their enforcement power is quite limited. I mean,

0:31:39.560 --> 0:31:44.800
<v Speaker 1>they can in theory make recommendations two more senior bodies

0:31:44.840 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 1>within the within the U N and that could ultimately

0:31:49.840 --> 0:31:53.640
<v Speaker 1>result in sanctions or some some other kind of uh,

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:57.440
<v Speaker 1>punitive intervention. But that's never actually happened. I guess one

0:31:57.440 --> 0:31:59.320
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons that never actually happened is because until

0:31:59.320 --> 0:32:02.880
<v Speaker 1>you're agin country it ever, you know across that line

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:06.360
<v Speaker 1>in the sand. You know, Uruguay was the first country

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:11.000
<v Speaker 1>essentially to make a kind of hard defection from the treatise.

0:32:11.040 --> 0:32:14.680
<v Speaker 1>You know that the consensus around global prohibition, including cannabis prohibition,

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:18.440
<v Speaker 1>had held for a long time, and the strength of

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the treatise is essentially based it's rooted in the fact

0:32:23.600 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 1>that member states agree to to abide by them. You know,

0:32:27.920 --> 0:32:32.800
<v Speaker 1>these that they're they're quite difficult to enforce against non

0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:38.240
<v Speaker 1>compliance or breaches in in treaty commitments. And when Uruguay

0:32:38.480 --> 0:32:41.480
<v Speaker 1>moved forward with this, it's true the the I n

0:32:41.520 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 1>c B did did send them sort of snarky letters

0:32:45.480 --> 0:32:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and that the head of the then I n t

0:32:47.000 --> 0:32:51.280
<v Speaker 1>B actually referred to Uruguay as pirates, which was incredibly undiplomatic,

0:32:51.720 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 1>an inappropriate language for a UN agency to be referring

0:32:54.640 --> 0:32:58.200
<v Speaker 1>to to a member state ads UM. But they they

0:32:58.240 --> 0:33:02.840
<v Speaker 1>made an argument that uh, they were make doing the

0:33:02.880 --> 0:33:07.600
<v Speaker 1>reforms in pursuit of the human rights and public health

0:33:08.080 --> 0:33:13.440
<v Speaker 1>of the citizens of Uruguay, and their commitments to those goals,

0:33:13.560 --> 0:33:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the higher goals of the u N Charter Um superseded

0:33:18.280 --> 0:33:22.240
<v Speaker 1>technical compliance to you know, one or two articles in

0:33:22.280 --> 0:33:25.640
<v Speaker 1>these in these creaky old drug treaties. That's you know,

0:33:25.680 --> 0:33:29.560
<v Speaker 1>it's worth reminding people the treaty which it's sixty one.

0:33:29.560 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, this is this is like more than sixty

0:33:32.480 --> 0:33:35.640
<v Speaker 1>years old now and was being drafted in the nineteen

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:42.680
<v Speaker 1>forties and nineteen fifties, an era which is completely different political, economic,

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:45.280
<v Speaker 1>social and cultural landscape to the one we live in now,

0:33:45.680 --> 0:33:48.320
<v Speaker 1>particularly around drug use. I mean, you know that the

0:33:48.360 --> 0:33:52.520
<v Speaker 1>sixties hadn't happened, and you know in the al Capoma

0:33:52.560 --> 0:33:57.200
<v Speaker 1>was still alive. This is when those the foundational bedrock

0:33:57.320 --> 0:34:00.840
<v Speaker 1>of global prohibition was being drafted and the urguins based

0:34:00.880 --> 0:34:04.320
<v Speaker 1>similk this creakial treaty. It's no longer relevant. We think

0:34:04.360 --> 0:34:09.879
<v Speaker 1>that the our commitments to peace and security and health

0:34:09.880 --> 0:34:13.319
<v Speaker 1>and well being a mankind that are enshrined in the

0:34:13.320 --> 0:34:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the overarching U N Charter are more important than technical

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:19.960
<v Speaker 1>appliance to these creakial treaties, and we are going to essentially,

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:22.799
<v Speaker 1>they said, we're just going to ignore them, um and

0:34:22.840 --> 0:34:25.560
<v Speaker 1>we we will engage in a constructive debate how to

0:34:25.600 --> 0:34:29.520
<v Speaker 1>resolve these tensions. And that kind of created the blueprint

0:34:29.600 --> 0:34:33.760
<v Speaker 1>which Canada followed. I think the difference between Canada and Uruguay,

0:34:33.760 --> 0:34:37.760
<v Speaker 1>because Canada became the second country to formally the second

0:34:37.800 --> 0:34:40.720
<v Speaker 1>member state to formally legalized cannabis and no medical uses,

0:34:41.760 --> 0:34:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Canada was a bit more bold. They actually acknowledged that

0:34:45.080 --> 0:34:47.879
<v Speaker 1>what they were doing was in non compliance, but and

0:34:47.920 --> 0:34:50.120
<v Speaker 1>they essentially made the same argument. They said, look, this

0:34:50.200 --> 0:34:52.880
<v Speaker 1>is in the interest of our citizens. You know, we

0:34:52.960 --> 0:34:55.719
<v Speaker 1>are following the guidance of the UN Charter in terms

0:34:55.760 --> 0:34:57.960
<v Speaker 1>of peace and security and health and well well being

0:34:57.960 --> 0:35:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of our citizens, and we will engage in a constructive

0:35:02.040 --> 0:35:05.240
<v Speaker 1>debate in the relevant forums to try and resolve these tensions.

0:35:05.440 --> 0:35:07.840
<v Speaker 1>And they kind of left it there, and now NTB

0:35:08.040 --> 0:35:10.640
<v Speaker 1>got a bit pissy and sent a few snarky letters.

0:35:10.719 --> 0:35:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Both Uruguay and Canada and other countries now that are

0:35:13.320 --> 0:35:17.760
<v Speaker 1>following their footsteps. But essentially there wasn't a great deal

0:35:18.320 --> 0:35:20.960
<v Speaker 1>that the I n t B could do apart from

0:35:21.000 --> 0:35:22.799
<v Speaker 1>kind of a bit of finger wagging and kind of

0:35:22.840 --> 0:35:25.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, naughty noughty and and give them a bit

0:35:25.600 --> 0:35:27.920
<v Speaker 1>of a telling off in their annual report. You know,

0:35:27.960 --> 0:35:30.480
<v Speaker 1>in many ways that can that prohibitions. Consensus and the

0:35:30.480 --> 0:35:36.319
<v Speaker 1>treaties have been remarkably effective at maintaining global prohibition. But

0:35:36.440 --> 0:35:40.480
<v Speaker 1>now the cracks are there, the first cracks in the dam.

0:35:40.520 --> 0:35:42.640
<v Speaker 1>It's starting to turn into a flood. And now we're

0:35:42.640 --> 0:35:45.360
<v Speaker 1>having five or six countries in Europe with seeing Thailand,

0:35:45.719 --> 0:35:48.959
<v Speaker 1>South Africa, Mexico and all these other countries. So once

0:35:49.000 --> 0:35:52.440
<v Speaker 1>you have multiple countries defecting, then the whole system starts

0:35:52.480 --> 0:35:55.120
<v Speaker 1>to to collapse in its own internal connections and something

0:35:55.200 --> 0:35:57.640
<v Speaker 1>has to change, you know, either you get a new convention,

0:35:57.800 --> 0:36:01.759
<v Speaker 1>or conventions are repealed or the cons amended. Something has

0:36:01.800 --> 0:36:03.799
<v Speaker 1>to give, and I think that's the stage right now,

0:36:03.840 --> 0:36:07.839
<v Speaker 1>particularly with kind of as issue. We'll be talking more

0:36:08.000 --> 0:36:24.879
<v Speaker 1>after we hear this ad see. I mean, Steve, you're

0:36:24.880 --> 0:36:27.120
<v Speaker 1>reminding me that you know, back in the old days

0:36:27.200 --> 0:36:29.640
<v Speaker 1>when I was first speaking out in the late eighties,

0:36:29.840 --> 0:36:34.080
<v Speaker 1>and one of our leading antagonists was the chairman of

0:36:34.120 --> 0:36:37.719
<v Speaker 1>those US Congress Select Committee and Arcotics, Charlie Wrangel, very

0:36:37.800 --> 0:36:41.440
<v Speaker 1>prominent black politician out of Harlem, and he was when

0:36:41.480 --> 0:36:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I was debating on national television all this stuff, and

0:36:44.000 --> 0:36:46.680
<v Speaker 1>he does, he does a hearing, and part of his

0:36:46.800 --> 0:36:50.000
<v Speaker 1>rhetorical thing is, well, what's your plan? What are you

0:36:50.040 --> 0:36:52.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna do? How are you gonna sell it? How are

0:36:52.000 --> 0:36:54.440
<v Speaker 1>you gonna I'm kind of imitating his kind of voice

0:36:54.480 --> 0:36:57.560
<v Speaker 1>that he had um back back then, right, And I

0:36:57.600 --> 0:37:00.840
<v Speaker 1>remember thinking, you know, he is he actually really serious

0:37:00.920 --> 0:37:03.920
<v Speaker 1>about wanting to hear proposals? And I don't think he was.

0:37:04.040 --> 0:37:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I sort of took the opportunity, I think,

0:37:06.000 --> 0:37:07.880
<v Speaker 1>as you know, you know, back when I was teaching

0:37:07.880 --> 0:37:11.200
<v Speaker 1>at Princeton, I put together a Princeton Working Group on

0:37:11.239 --> 0:37:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the Future of Drug Use and Alternatives to Drug Prohibition,

0:37:14.160 --> 0:37:17.560
<v Speaker 1>had eighteen distinguished academics from about a dozen different disciplines

0:37:17.800 --> 0:37:19.759
<v Speaker 1>to try to come up with a basic model of

0:37:19.800 --> 0:37:22.759
<v Speaker 1>how do you think about legally regulating drugs? How do

0:37:22.840 --> 0:37:27.760
<v Speaker 1>you find the right compromise between individual rights and community rights,

0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:30.799
<v Speaker 1>the right compromise between putting a stake through the heart

0:37:30.840 --> 0:37:33.279
<v Speaker 1>of the black market organized crime and at the same

0:37:33.320 --> 0:37:36.239
<v Speaker 1>time having a non free market public health approach. How

0:37:36.280 --> 0:37:38.440
<v Speaker 1>do you balance all of that? But we didn't have

0:37:38.600 --> 0:37:40.759
<v Speaker 1>that many models to go on. I mean, we could

0:37:40.760 --> 0:37:43.360
<v Speaker 1>look at alcohol in to bacco to some extent, but

0:37:43.520 --> 0:37:46.239
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't all that developed. But what I found was

0:37:46.320 --> 0:37:49.360
<v Speaker 1>that when we put out our recommendations from the Princeton

0:37:49.400 --> 0:37:52.479
<v Speaker 1>Working Group in an article I published in Dentalists thirty

0:37:52.560 --> 0:37:56.640
<v Speaker 1>years ago, there was really no market for that. And

0:37:56.680 --> 0:38:00.560
<v Speaker 1>what you did with Transform beginning about fifteen years ago

0:38:01.040 --> 0:38:03.440
<v Speaker 1>was really one was you put this out with a

0:38:03.560 --> 0:38:07.400
<v Speaker 1>level of sophistication and a level of depth that really

0:38:07.480 --> 0:38:12.000
<v Speaker 1>nobody had done before. And secondly, in terms of the timing,

0:38:12.280 --> 0:38:15.000
<v Speaker 1>there was the beginnings of a market for this. I

0:38:15.040 --> 0:38:17.680
<v Speaker 1>mean when you wrote the first blueprint for regulation that

0:38:17.800 --> 0:38:21.160
<v Speaker 1>was almost before that time, but you laid the groundwork,

0:38:21.400 --> 0:38:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and obviously your volumes on regulating cannabis and stimulants are

0:38:25.080 --> 0:38:28.319
<v Speaker 1>are ever more timely in this front. Now, all of

0:38:28.360 --> 0:38:31.760
<v Speaker 1>this goes to say that background issue of the United Nations.

0:38:31.840 --> 0:38:34.720
<v Speaker 1>What I remember, that's all I want to ask you about,

0:38:35.120 --> 0:38:38.839
<v Speaker 1>is five six, seven years ago there was this vigorous

0:38:38.880 --> 0:38:43.200
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes almost personal debate happening within the international drug

0:38:43.239 --> 0:38:47.719
<v Speaker 1>reform community about how we should think about the conventions.

0:38:48.160 --> 0:38:49.840
<v Speaker 1>And I remember there are people saying we have to

0:38:49.880 --> 0:38:53.160
<v Speaker 1>focus just on getting rid of the conventions entirely and

0:38:53.200 --> 0:38:56.040
<v Speaker 1>replacing them with something like maybe the w h O

0:38:56.200 --> 0:38:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Framework of tobacco control. And others would say that's a

0:38:58.920 --> 0:39:03.280
<v Speaker 1>realistic let's focus on revising the conventions and removing cannabis

0:39:03.280 --> 0:39:06.400
<v Speaker 1>and maybe coca from the conventions. And THEOS would say, no,

0:39:06.480 --> 0:39:08.879
<v Speaker 1>just let's just do what the President of Olivia Able

0:39:08.920 --> 0:39:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Morales did, were they withdrew from the conventions and then

0:39:11.640 --> 0:39:14.320
<v Speaker 1>rejoined making an exception. And the others say, let's just

0:39:14.320 --> 0:39:16.719
<v Speaker 1>do it. Mohican did, let's just let's just ignore the

0:39:16.760 --> 0:39:20.920
<v Speaker 1>conventions essentially. But what's your take of years after the

0:39:21.000 --> 0:39:24.040
<v Speaker 1>fact now and that whole debate among the reformers and

0:39:24.040 --> 0:39:26.920
<v Speaker 1>whether it was a productive debate or whether it really

0:39:27.000 --> 0:39:30.400
<v Speaker 1>actually resulted in something concrete. Well, I mean, I think

0:39:30.440 --> 0:39:32.399
<v Speaker 1>the first thing to say is that it was really

0:39:32.400 --> 0:39:34.480
<v Speaker 1>important to be having that debate, and it was to

0:39:34.800 --> 0:39:39.000
<v Speaker 1>be to laying out these different potential pathways for reform

0:39:39.040 --> 0:39:43.360
<v Speaker 1>of the u N system. Um, you know, nothing really

0:39:43.520 --> 0:39:47.439
<v Speaker 1>has significantly changed at the u N. It's since Young

0:39:47.480 --> 0:39:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Gas in terms of the actual you know, the legal foundations,

0:39:51.280 --> 0:39:53.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the treaties are all still in place. There's

0:39:53.480 --> 0:39:58.160
<v Speaker 1>been one minor tweak too, uh, scheduling of cannabis, which

0:39:58.200 --> 0:40:01.160
<v Speaker 1>is now acknowledged to have some medical uses. But that's

0:40:01.200 --> 0:40:04.560
<v Speaker 1>basically the only thing that's happened. But what has changed

0:40:05.160 --> 0:40:09.880
<v Speaker 1>is that more and more states are saying publicly and

0:40:09.920 --> 0:40:12.600
<v Speaker 1>if you publicly, in the u N forum. So these

0:40:12.600 --> 0:40:16.040
<v Speaker 1>are things that would only have been said by Uruguay

0:40:16.160 --> 0:40:20.240
<v Speaker 1>ten years ago, but now you're getting a ten fifteen

0:40:20.239 --> 0:40:25.439
<v Speaker 1>countries standing up and saying these treaties are no longer

0:40:25.480 --> 0:40:28.640
<v Speaker 1>fit for purpose, they are not meeting our needs and

0:40:28.880 --> 0:40:31.840
<v Speaker 1>they need to be reformed. And more and more countries

0:40:31.880 --> 0:40:34.279
<v Speaker 1>are not just saying there is a need for change

0:40:34.280 --> 0:40:37.200
<v Speaker 1>at u N level, but they are actually just making reforms,

0:40:37.960 --> 0:40:42.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, essentially in breach of their technical obligations under

0:40:42.400 --> 0:40:45.839
<v Speaker 1>the treaties. So the water is building behind the dam

0:40:45.920 --> 0:40:48.920
<v Speaker 1>and at some point something has to give. Now exactly

0:40:49.000 --> 0:40:54.520
<v Speaker 1>what the mechanism of that reform will be is unclear,

0:40:54.600 --> 0:40:58.200
<v Speaker 1>but a tipping point will be reached and I think

0:40:58.200 --> 0:41:00.920
<v Speaker 1>we're approaching it fairly soon, particul lee with cannabis, but

0:41:00.960 --> 0:41:04.520
<v Speaker 1>perhaps with the whole treaty framework more broadly, where there

0:41:04.600 --> 0:41:08.520
<v Speaker 1>is just an acknowledgement that the system is no longer

0:41:09.320 --> 0:41:12.200
<v Speaker 1>working and more and more and if it doesn't reform,

0:41:12.239 --> 0:41:15.719
<v Speaker 1>it will simply collapse. And it's the treat system. It's

0:41:15.719 --> 0:41:18.279
<v Speaker 1>important to remind people that it doesn't just you know,

0:41:18.440 --> 0:41:24.920
<v Speaker 1>enforced prohibition. It also regulates controlled medicines globally, so you

0:41:24.960 --> 0:41:26.799
<v Speaker 1>know that the use of opioids and the use of

0:41:27.440 --> 0:41:32.760
<v Speaker 1>um various drugs which which can be misused non medically,

0:41:33.480 --> 0:41:35.560
<v Speaker 1>are also regulated by the treatise and that it does

0:41:35.600 --> 0:41:38.680
<v Speaker 1>so it does have an important function that we generally

0:41:38.719 --> 0:41:41.719
<v Speaker 1>seek to maintain as well. Steve, there was one other

0:41:41.800 --> 0:41:43.960
<v Speaker 1>historical thing where we're obviously talking and will go more

0:41:43.960 --> 0:41:46.560
<v Speaker 1>into this around cannabis and also was happening now in

0:41:46.600 --> 0:41:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Columbia around cooking cocaine. But there was also this little

0:41:50.560 --> 0:41:55.000
<v Speaker 1>fascinating story that happened in New Zealand some years ago,

0:41:55.320 --> 0:41:58.400
<v Speaker 1>right maybe seventy years ago, right where they were struggling

0:41:58.800 --> 0:42:02.400
<v Speaker 1>with what to do about the almost synthetic cannabis, and

0:42:02.400 --> 0:42:06.040
<v Speaker 1>where two of the biggest producers of synthetic cannabis essentially

0:42:06.040 --> 0:42:08.960
<v Speaker 1>approached the government said, look, we have a mutual interest

0:42:09.040 --> 0:42:12.840
<v Speaker 1>in your regulating synthetic cannabinoids. We know that our products

0:42:12.840 --> 0:42:15.520
<v Speaker 1>are relatively safe. We don't like all these other you know,

0:42:15.600 --> 0:42:17.920
<v Speaker 1>fly by night operations. Putting out these products can be

0:42:18.000 --> 0:42:21.400
<v Speaker 1>quite dangerous. And the result was in New Zealand Parliament

0:42:21.480 --> 0:42:25.000
<v Speaker 1>passing by like a hundred to one margin a law

0:42:25.200 --> 0:42:29.279
<v Speaker 1>essentially creating a domestic kind of like FDA Food and

0:42:29.320 --> 0:42:33.399
<v Speaker 1>Drug Administration to regulate drugs that could be sold not

0:42:33.640 --> 0:42:37.279
<v Speaker 1>for medical purposes. And there is giving producers corporations the

0:42:37.280 --> 0:42:39.759
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to say, we have a product, we want to

0:42:39.760 --> 0:42:42.839
<v Speaker 1>put it on the market for recreational purposes, and if

0:42:42.920 --> 0:42:45.920
<v Speaker 1>we can prove that it's basically got a high margin

0:42:46.000 --> 0:42:48.560
<v Speaker 1>of safety, the government will allow us to do so.

0:42:48.560 --> 0:42:51.320
<v Speaker 1>So New Zealand moves forward with this thing. They passed

0:42:51.400 --> 0:42:55.480
<v Speaker 1>this law. Unfortunately it never gets implemented. But between the

0:42:55.520 --> 0:42:59.319
<v Speaker 1>time it gets passed and and enacted and the time

0:42:59.320 --> 0:43:01.960
<v Speaker 1>it never gets him plamented, there must have been some

0:43:02.040 --> 0:43:06.360
<v Speaker 1>reaction in Vienna, in the headquarters of the United Nations.

0:43:06.400 --> 0:43:09.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, narcotic system and you were going to these meetings.

0:43:09.880 --> 0:43:11.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean every year, I think you and many others

0:43:11.560 --> 0:43:13.760
<v Speaker 1>were going to the meetings in Vienna than the Commission

0:43:13.800 --> 0:43:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Narcotic Drugs. What was the reaction I mean at that level,

0:43:17.560 --> 0:43:20.640
<v Speaker 1>because that was potentially a model for broader and I mean,

0:43:20.640 --> 0:43:24.280
<v Speaker 1>it's it's interesting that the reaction was incredibly muted because

0:43:24.480 --> 0:43:28.840
<v Speaker 1>those synthetic cannabis drugs at the time, we're not controlled

0:43:28.880 --> 0:43:31.000
<v Speaker 1>under the UN conventions. I mean, we we have the

0:43:31.040 --> 0:43:36.120
<v Speaker 1>same There was the same issue, um that countries have domestically,

0:43:36.239 --> 0:43:38.640
<v Speaker 1>which is, you know, as as these novel psychots of

0:43:38.760 --> 0:43:43.960
<v Speaker 1>substances are invented, they have to then get uh you know,

0:43:44.080 --> 0:43:45.600
<v Speaker 1>essentially they have to get banned, they have to get

0:43:45.640 --> 0:43:49.759
<v Speaker 1>scheduled or added added to your the prohibitionist list. And

0:43:49.800 --> 0:43:51.719
<v Speaker 1>that that that does happen at the seat at the

0:43:51.760 --> 0:43:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Commission Narcotic Drugs. Every year a whole bunch of drugs

0:43:54.200 --> 0:43:55.719
<v Speaker 1>are kind of read out and there's votes and they

0:43:55.760 --> 0:43:58.760
<v Speaker 1>all get banned. Um. But at the time they weren't illegal,

0:43:58.800 --> 0:44:01.879
<v Speaker 1>those New Zealand synthetic caind of annoids, and so there

0:44:01.960 --> 0:44:05.440
<v Speaker 1>wasn't really any engagement and and also the UN doesn't

0:44:05.480 --> 0:44:09.360
<v Speaker 1>really didn't really have a mandate to to do anything

0:44:09.400 --> 0:44:13.400
<v Speaker 1>about it until they were um scheduled, and to be scheduled,

0:44:13.400 --> 0:44:14.920
<v Speaker 1>countries have to report them and they have to go

0:44:14.960 --> 0:44:16.880
<v Speaker 1>through this process and the w h O has to

0:44:16.880 --> 0:44:19.080
<v Speaker 1>produce a report and it all takes quite a long time.

0:44:19.560 --> 0:44:21.919
<v Speaker 1>All of those drugs have subsequently been banned, I should

0:44:21.960 --> 0:44:25.480
<v Speaker 1>add now, but by that time what was proposing New

0:44:25.560 --> 0:44:29.319
<v Speaker 1>Zealand had already kind of fallen to be some I mean,

0:44:29.400 --> 0:44:32.080
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting that law did pass in New Zealand and

0:44:32.120 --> 0:44:34.239
<v Speaker 1>they do have this it's still there, it's still on

0:44:34.280 --> 0:44:38.880
<v Speaker 1>the books. They do have this um really quite good

0:44:39.000 --> 0:44:42.759
<v Speaker 1>sophisticated regulatory framework, and I did some work on it

0:44:43.320 --> 0:44:47.520
<v Speaker 1>um which it was very welcome in many ways, but

0:44:47.560 --> 0:44:49.440
<v Speaker 1>no drugs ever made it into it. So it's like

0:44:49.440 --> 0:44:52.359
<v Speaker 1>it's like this empty shell of a legislation. And one

0:44:52.400 --> 0:44:54.279
<v Speaker 1>of them it was kind of a daft reason in

0:44:54.320 --> 0:44:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the end, because they there to get the toxicology to

0:44:58.719 --> 0:45:01.480
<v Speaker 1>establish the safety limits, you had to do animal testing,

0:45:01.800 --> 0:45:04.040
<v Speaker 1>and they also had another law that said you can't

0:45:04.040 --> 0:45:07.160
<v Speaker 1>do animal testing on on these drugs, so they kind

0:45:07.160 --> 0:45:10.040
<v Speaker 1>of that they just got caught in this sort of

0:45:10.120 --> 0:45:12.720
<v Speaker 1>legislative catch catch twenty two. And you know, I wouldn't

0:45:12.719 --> 0:45:15.839
<v Speaker 1>want to see animal testing done on novel psychoaches substances either,

0:45:15.880 --> 0:45:17.000
<v Speaker 1>but it was a bit of a shame that there

0:45:17.040 --> 0:45:20.360
<v Speaker 1>wasn't an alternative route. But interestingly, in New Zealand, even

0:45:20.440 --> 0:45:24.040
<v Speaker 1>before the Psychoactive Substances Act in I think it was,

0:45:24.600 --> 0:45:27.640
<v Speaker 1>they did actually have a system put in place a

0:45:27.680 --> 0:45:29.880
<v Speaker 1>few years before that, back in the two thousands, I

0:45:29.880 --> 0:45:32.759
<v Speaker 1>think around two thousand and eight, they actually developed a

0:45:32.800 --> 0:45:36.080
<v Speaker 1>regulatory framework for a specific drug called b z p

0:45:36.320 --> 0:45:39.200
<v Speaker 1>which was a kind of kind of crappy, low rent

0:45:40.040 --> 0:45:43.640
<v Speaker 1>stimulant drug, you know, and it was being widely sold

0:45:43.680 --> 0:45:45.440
<v Speaker 1>as one of these legal highs, you know, as one

0:45:45.480 --> 0:45:48.799
<v Speaker 1>of these novel psychatist substances that wasn't covered by the law.

0:45:49.640 --> 0:45:53.520
<v Speaker 1>It became really quite popular in New Zealand, and they

0:45:53.520 --> 0:45:57.480
<v Speaker 1>did actually put a regulatory framework and in their legal

0:45:57.520 --> 0:46:02.240
<v Speaker 1>system thought for the regulation of this one specific drug.

0:46:02.560 --> 0:46:05.120
<v Speaker 1>So for a couple of years in New Zealand, and

0:46:05.160 --> 0:46:08.080
<v Speaker 1>this was years before the Psychiatrist substant they did actually

0:46:08.080 --> 0:46:12.040
<v Speaker 1>have a regular framework for the sale of this this

0:46:12.160 --> 0:46:16.040
<v Speaker 1>crappy similant called called b z p um and you know,

0:46:16.120 --> 0:46:18.480
<v Speaker 1>it was sold legally and there was, there was there

0:46:18.560 --> 0:46:20.480
<v Speaker 1>was you know, quality control, and you had to have

0:46:20.520 --> 0:46:22.200
<v Speaker 1>dosage put on the packaging and a lot of the

0:46:22.200 --> 0:46:24.600
<v Speaker 1>things that we'd like to see. It wasn't brilliant, but

0:46:24.680 --> 0:46:27.080
<v Speaker 1>it was all right, um. And it was actually the

0:46:27.120 --> 0:46:31.400
<v Speaker 1>first that I'm aware of, the first legal regulatory framework

0:46:31.440 --> 0:46:34.719
<v Speaker 1>anywhere in the world for a drug outside of the Conventions,

0:46:35.320 --> 0:46:38.160
<v Speaker 1>there was a still a synthetic stimulant drug. So that

0:46:38.160 --> 0:46:40.400
<v Speaker 1>that happened. It then fell foul of some sort of

0:46:40.400 --> 0:46:44.360
<v Speaker 1>political shenanigans and was eventually repealed and and and banned

0:46:44.360 --> 0:46:47.359
<v Speaker 1>along with everything else. But New Zealand does have this

0:46:47.440 --> 0:46:50.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of interesting history. And they, of course it was

0:46:50.560 --> 0:46:54.640
<v Speaker 1>only like two years ago they narrowly missed um legalizing

0:46:54.680 --> 0:46:58.560
<v Speaker 1>cannabis by in a national referendum by about you know,

0:46:58.760 --> 0:47:00.719
<v Speaker 1>hand a handful of so I think it was about

0:47:00.719 --> 0:47:04.759
<v Speaker 1>half a percentage point that their natural referendum. Sadly they

0:47:04.920 --> 0:47:09.040
<v Speaker 1>just failed on that. So we're obviously kindabis leg legalization

0:47:09.040 --> 0:47:11.279
<v Speaker 1>New Zealand. Not for a few years anyway, but I'm

0:47:11.280 --> 0:47:14.080
<v Speaker 1>sure it will happen some days some day. That was

0:47:14.160 --> 0:47:16.680
<v Speaker 1>one with the Prime Minister once say which way she

0:47:16.880 --> 0:47:19.000
<v Speaker 1>would We wouldn't say whether she was forward or against it,

0:47:19.239 --> 0:47:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and then afterwards said, oh, I voted for it, but

0:47:21.040 --> 0:47:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to buy it, and I wish I

0:47:22.560 --> 0:47:24.839
<v Speaker 1>wish she'd just said. If she'd said that, probably would

0:47:24.840 --> 0:47:27.680
<v Speaker 1>have swung it. But I think it was about sixty votes.

0:47:27.719 --> 0:47:30.160
<v Speaker 1>In the end, they just narrowly lost. But you know,

0:47:30.200 --> 0:47:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the fact that it even made it to a referendum,

0:47:32.080 --> 0:47:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that it was that close, um, just

0:47:35.040 --> 0:47:36.879
<v Speaker 1>just goes to show how, you know, how far we've

0:47:36.920 --> 0:47:39.120
<v Speaker 1>come to Let me just let me just interject, Let

0:47:39.120 --> 0:47:41.200
<v Speaker 1>me just interject to say that toughs. When people ask

0:47:41.280 --> 0:47:43.880
<v Speaker 1>me about legal legalization, how do I define it? How

0:47:43.880 --> 0:47:47.359
<v Speaker 1>do I distinguish from decriminalization? I say, you know, legalization

0:47:47.480 --> 0:47:50.839
<v Speaker 1>essentially means the legal regulation of this market, like we

0:47:50.880 --> 0:47:53.799
<v Speaker 1>have with alcohol and tobacco products, and so in a way,

0:47:53.800 --> 0:47:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I look at Mexico and South Africans say, well, okay,

0:47:56.960 --> 0:48:00.239
<v Speaker 1>the courts ruled that way. Um, but until you stually

0:48:00.239 --> 0:48:03.960
<v Speaker 1>have the government legally regulating shops, or at least stores

0:48:04.080 --> 0:48:07.680
<v Speaker 1>being up and selling without being even if they're not regulated,

0:48:07.880 --> 0:48:10.680
<v Speaker 1>then being up and selling openly without the police having

0:48:10.719 --> 0:48:13.799
<v Speaker 1>any basis to crack down on them. In Mexico and

0:48:13.960 --> 0:48:18.200
<v Speaker 1>South Africa, you still don't have stores popping up openly

0:48:18.280 --> 0:48:22.880
<v Speaker 1>selling cannabis products um without fear of any prosecution or arrest,

0:48:24.840 --> 0:48:29.160
<v Speaker 1>legal transition state in those limbo but but basically Malta,

0:48:29.400 --> 0:48:33.880
<v Speaker 1>in Malta legally regulated shops quite not quite so, So

0:48:33.960 --> 0:48:37.160
<v Speaker 1>what they did in Malta is interesting in that they

0:48:37.160 --> 0:48:41.840
<v Speaker 1>have they have legalized home growing within certain parameters a

0:48:41.880 --> 0:48:45.919
<v Speaker 1>certain number of plants if you follow certain rules, UM,

0:48:46.040 --> 0:48:50.080
<v Speaker 1>and they've legalized um what in Spain is kind of

0:48:50.120 --> 0:48:53.600
<v Speaker 1>called cannabis social club, so not for profit cooperatives that

0:48:53.680 --> 0:48:57.240
<v Speaker 1>are membership based, So you can join a membership based

0:48:57.239 --> 0:49:03.160
<v Speaker 1>cooperative and then that that there will be UM specific

0:49:03.239 --> 0:49:06.319
<v Speaker 1>cannabis grown for that cooperative to be supplied to the

0:49:06.400 --> 0:49:09.040
<v Speaker 1>members of that cooperative on a not for profit basis.

0:49:09.320 --> 0:49:12.200
<v Speaker 1>But they have not actually opened yet, so they're only

0:49:12.200 --> 0:49:17.799
<v Speaker 1>opening for license applications for these nonprofit associations next month,

0:49:18.560 --> 0:49:21.000
<v Speaker 1>so that that you can't yet actually go and buy

0:49:21.040 --> 0:49:23.920
<v Speaker 1>cannabis anywhere, and even if you wanted to, you'd have

0:49:23.960 --> 0:49:25.840
<v Speaker 1>to be a resident of Malta and you'd have to

0:49:25.880 --> 0:49:28.560
<v Speaker 1>join one of these associations and then you would be

0:49:28.600 --> 0:49:31.080
<v Speaker 1>able to have access to legal cannabis via that route

0:49:31.400 --> 0:49:33.560
<v Speaker 1>unless you were growing your own at home. So they're

0:49:33.560 --> 0:49:37.879
<v Speaker 1>not going to have any actual retail commercial market as

0:49:37.880 --> 0:49:41.720
<v Speaker 1>such a tool and on only these non nonprofit cannabis associations.

0:49:41.920 --> 0:49:45.160
<v Speaker 1>So it's kind of an interesting a model, you know.

0:49:45.200 --> 0:49:48.920
<v Speaker 1>It's this is a fascinating time for for drug policy folks,

0:49:48.960 --> 0:49:52.600
<v Speaker 1>because you're seeing these more commercial models in the US.

0:49:52.640 --> 0:49:55.360
<v Speaker 1>You're seeing kind of these state models in state control

0:49:55.440 --> 0:49:59.520
<v Speaker 1>models like in Uruguay and certain and state control retailing

0:49:59.520 --> 0:50:02.160
<v Speaker 1>in places like Quebec in Canada. But now you're seeing

0:50:02.160 --> 0:50:05.520
<v Speaker 1>these European models emerging and this interesting one in Malta

0:50:05.560 --> 0:50:07.520
<v Speaker 1>whether it isn't going to be a commercial retail market

0:50:07.560 --> 0:50:13.120
<v Speaker 1>at all, only homegrowing and not profit association. So we're

0:50:13.160 --> 0:50:15.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna just give me really interesting to see see what

0:50:15.280 --> 0:50:17.440
<v Speaker 1>works and what doesn't work with with these models. With

0:50:17.600 --> 0:50:20.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, what can we learn from the countries that

0:50:20.320 --> 0:50:23.880
<v Speaker 1>follow in their footsteps. Well, No, Uruguay was kind of interesting,

0:50:23.960 --> 0:50:26.719
<v Speaker 1>right because they did is basically a tripartite model right

0:50:26.719 --> 0:50:29.160
<v Speaker 1>where they said basically you can grow your own up

0:50:29.200 --> 0:50:31.200
<v Speaker 1>to a certain point, which is a core element of

0:50:31.360 --> 0:50:33.600
<v Speaker 1>what's going on in the US. Then they did some

0:50:33.680 --> 0:50:37.479
<v Speaker 1>of the Spanish Canada's social club model, so people could

0:50:37.480 --> 0:50:40.760
<v Speaker 1>have a kind of cooperative where people remember and somebody

0:50:40.760 --> 0:50:42.440
<v Speaker 1>would grow for the group. And then they did a

0:50:42.480 --> 0:50:46.080
<v Speaker 1>pharmacy sort of distribution model. And now that's been going

0:50:46.120 --> 0:50:50.879
<v Speaker 1>on for about almost at seven eight years now, Um,

0:50:51.200 --> 0:50:54.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how is it working out? And and are

0:50:54.120 --> 0:50:56.240
<v Speaker 1>we seeing a lot of I mean, is the pharmacy

0:50:56.280 --> 0:50:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the principal source? What's happened with the black market there?

0:50:59.840 --> 0:51:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean the black market that the illegal market is

0:51:02.000 --> 0:51:09.200
<v Speaker 1>certainly contracted, but interestingly the pharmacy sales, which were probably

0:51:09.280 --> 0:51:11.719
<v Speaker 1>too restrictive, and they have not actually turned out to

0:51:11.760 --> 0:51:16.520
<v Speaker 1>be the predominant supply model. So far more people obtain

0:51:16.600 --> 0:51:20.719
<v Speaker 1>their cannabis through home growing or through the not for

0:51:20.800 --> 0:51:24.480
<v Speaker 1>profit social clubs done via the pharmacies. And I think

0:51:24.520 --> 0:51:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the problem really with the pharmacies was that they were

0:51:29.200 --> 0:51:33.520
<v Speaker 1>just too restrictive. You have to register as a registered

0:51:33.520 --> 0:51:38.600
<v Speaker 1>buyer to get a kind of like you know, digital

0:51:39.680 --> 0:51:42.040
<v Speaker 1>pass code things so that you can act you can

0:51:42.080 --> 0:51:45.440
<v Speaker 1>buy a certain amount each month, and the cannabis that

0:51:45.480 --> 0:51:49.520
<v Speaker 1>they sell is quite low potency, certainly by American standards.

0:51:49.520 --> 0:51:53.239
<v Speaker 1>I think you can get seven percent and nine th HC,

0:51:53.440 --> 0:51:55.959
<v Speaker 1>which a lot of people would regard as too low

0:51:56.160 --> 0:51:59.359
<v Speaker 1>or that if you're used to K plus t HC cannabis,

0:51:59.400 --> 0:52:01.759
<v Speaker 1>you probably guard that is too weak. I think they're

0:52:01.760 --> 0:52:06.799
<v Speaker 1>looking to now introduce a stronger strain of around fift um.

0:52:06.840 --> 0:52:09.120
<v Speaker 1>But it was non branded. There was only these two

0:52:09.200 --> 0:52:12.000
<v Speaker 1>varieties you could get to these two potencies, and you

0:52:12.000 --> 0:52:14.400
<v Speaker 1>could only get it from a relatively small number of

0:52:14.440 --> 0:52:17.279
<v Speaker 1>pharmacies um and you had to buy in person, so

0:52:17.400 --> 0:52:19.839
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't do mail order delivery. So for people who

0:52:19.920 --> 0:52:22.839
<v Speaker 1>weren't near one of these pharmacies, it was actually pretty inaccessible,

0:52:23.120 --> 0:52:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of people were turned off from using this.

0:52:25.320 --> 0:52:26.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, they didn't want to register with the government

0:52:27.000 --> 0:52:31.120
<v Speaker 1>as someone who uses cannabis, but kind of unsurprising obvious

0:52:31.160 --> 0:52:34.200
<v Speaker 1>reasons people don't want to be on a government database

0:52:34.239 --> 0:52:36.960
<v Speaker 1>as people who use cannabis, given given you know, the

0:52:37.360 --> 0:52:40.680
<v Speaker 1>history of the War on drugs and persecution of cannabis users.

0:52:40.719 --> 0:52:45.560
<v Speaker 1>So actually about ten times more cannabis is consumed from

0:52:45.560 --> 0:52:49.600
<v Speaker 1>homegrow and the social clubs than actually the pharmacy sales model,

0:52:49.760 --> 0:52:51.880
<v Speaker 1>which suggests to me that the pharmacy sales model was

0:52:51.960 --> 0:52:54.560
<v Speaker 1>too restrictive. I think you probably. You know, even for

0:52:54.640 --> 0:52:57.160
<v Speaker 1>someone like me who I know Ethan, you're always teasing

0:52:57.200 --> 0:53:00.560
<v Speaker 1>me about being a hyper regulator. Um, I think overcooked it.

0:53:00.640 --> 0:53:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I was involved in making proposals and helping

0:53:03.840 --> 0:53:06.520
<v Speaker 1>design some of this, but you know, we were arguing.

0:53:06.560 --> 0:53:08.480
<v Speaker 1>I was down there with Lisa Sanchez, who's now the

0:53:08.520 --> 0:53:12.839
<v Speaker 1>director of um muc D in Mexico, and we were saying, look,

0:53:12.880 --> 0:53:15.640
<v Speaker 1>that's just too it's too restrictive. You know, if you're

0:53:15.680 --> 0:53:18.759
<v Speaker 1>having a registry of buyers, people aren't just aren't going

0:53:18.760 --> 0:53:20.480
<v Speaker 1>to be into it. And I think we were proved

0:53:20.520 --> 0:53:23.160
<v Speaker 1>right because it just hasn't proved as popular, I think

0:53:23.200 --> 0:53:25.600
<v Speaker 1>as they're expecting, and people were much more drawn to

0:53:25.640 --> 0:53:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the idea of these um social clubs and homegrown models

0:53:29.000 --> 0:53:30.960
<v Speaker 1>because they don't. They don't. They just didn't want to

0:53:31.000 --> 0:53:33.080
<v Speaker 1>be in the system. They didn't want that. They were

0:53:33.120 --> 0:53:36.480
<v Speaker 1>worried about surveillance and private But it does seem though

0:53:36.719 --> 0:53:39.640
<v Speaker 1>there there, for example, the the import from Paraguay had

0:53:39.719 --> 0:53:42.320
<v Speaker 1>dropped rammatically though that people are getting if they're getting

0:53:42.320 --> 0:53:44.520
<v Speaker 1>it illusively, they're getting it diverted. They're getting it from

0:53:44.560 --> 0:53:47.239
<v Speaker 1>home growths, from friends, or from social clubs or what

0:53:47.400 --> 0:53:50.200
<v Speaker 1>have you understand that the stuff that was coming in

0:53:50.760 --> 0:53:54.600
<v Speaker 1>from Paraguay was pretty terrible quality staff lots of sticks

0:53:54.600 --> 0:53:56.680
<v Speaker 1>and seeds, and it was very low potency, and it

0:53:56.760 --> 0:53:59.440
<v Speaker 1>often had pesticides on it. It It was it was pretty

0:53:59.520 --> 0:54:02.160
<v Speaker 1>crappy weed, really, And so the stuff that was being produced,

0:54:02.320 --> 0:54:05.880
<v Speaker 1>even the low poesy pharmacy stuff UM, and certainly the

0:54:05.880 --> 0:54:08.680
<v Speaker 1>stuff from the social clubs was just far far better

0:54:09.200 --> 0:54:11.239
<v Speaker 1>and it but it was coming in at kind of

0:54:11.280 --> 0:54:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the same price. So the Paraguay imports um and that

0:54:15.080 --> 0:54:19.440
<v Speaker 1>whole market yet collapse, and that that's an undoubted positive

0:54:19.480 --> 0:54:23.160
<v Speaker 1>in terms of reducing the scale of that the illegal market. Said,

0:54:23.200 --> 0:54:25.160
<v Speaker 1>to that extent, it's been a success. I think in

0:54:25.200 --> 0:54:29.040
<v Speaker 1>public health terms, it's been regarded as success. Youth use,

0:54:29.520 --> 0:54:32.879
<v Speaker 1>which is obviously always a focus of these debates, has

0:54:33.000 --> 0:54:35.720
<v Speaker 1>has you know, either stayed level or in many cases

0:54:35.800 --> 0:54:38.040
<v Speaker 1>gone down. There certainly hasn't been a jump in levels

0:54:38.080 --> 0:54:41.440
<v Speaker 1>of use. Adult use has gone up a bit, a

0:54:41.440 --> 0:54:44.359
<v Speaker 1>bit like it has in some other legalization places. But

0:54:44.640 --> 0:54:47.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, the the the much dreaded explosion in cannabis use,

0:54:48.000 --> 0:54:52.120
<v Speaker 1>and you know, armies of child cannabis zombies walking streets.

0:54:52.160 --> 0:54:56.359
<v Speaker 1>None of that none of that stuff happened. Let's take

0:54:56.360 --> 0:55:11.759
<v Speaker 1>a break here and go to an egg. So Steve,

0:55:11.840 --> 0:55:13.799
<v Speaker 1>we've been friends for twenty years. When it comes to

0:55:13.840 --> 0:55:17.880
<v Speaker 1>thinking about legal regulation, we're actually pretty on the big picture.

0:55:17.880 --> 0:55:20.040
<v Speaker 1>We're pretty much on the same page that you have

0:55:20.160 --> 0:55:23.240
<v Speaker 1>to find ways of balancing public health and public safety

0:55:23.360 --> 0:55:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and maximizing tax revenue but protecting young people, and you know,

0:55:27.960 --> 0:55:30.439
<v Speaker 1>respecting what communities want to do in terms of where

0:55:30.440 --> 0:55:33.680
<v Speaker 1>things can be sold and limiting advertising and all this

0:55:33.760 --> 0:55:36.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of stuff. But when it push comes to shove,

0:55:36.280 --> 0:55:38.480
<v Speaker 1>we also get into it. And Steve likes to tease

0:55:38.560 --> 0:55:41.560
<v Speaker 1>me calling me a libertarian, which of course I am not.

0:55:41.600 --> 0:55:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm a civil libertarian, but I'm certainly my politics lean

0:55:44.760 --> 0:55:47.320
<v Speaker 1>left of center. And I like to tease him about

0:55:47.360 --> 0:55:50.000
<v Speaker 1>being a hyper regulating socialist, which of course is probably

0:55:50.040 --> 0:55:52.719
<v Speaker 1>more true than anything accuses me of being. UM. But

0:55:52.840 --> 0:55:56.160
<v Speaker 1>that's it. Steve and I were recently in late two

0:55:56.320 --> 0:55:59.279
<v Speaker 1>at a gathering in the US UM that was very

0:55:59.320 --> 0:56:03.120
<v Speaker 1>focused on issues of social equity and racial equity and

0:56:03.160 --> 0:56:07.279
<v Speaker 1>how to prevent the growing concentration UM in the marijuana

0:56:07.280 --> 0:56:09.560
<v Speaker 1>in the cannabis industry in the U s and elsewhere.

0:56:09.920 --> 0:56:11.960
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, Steve, remember I remember teasing you at

0:56:12.000 --> 0:56:14.520
<v Speaker 1>this thing, because a couple of interesting things were coming

0:56:14.560 --> 0:56:16.200
<v Speaker 1>out of this. One is there were people not just

0:56:16.239 --> 0:56:18.640
<v Speaker 1>from the U S there, but from about a dozen countries,

0:56:18.640 --> 0:56:21.840
<v Speaker 1>and not just you know, Europe, but the Africa, the Caribbean,

0:56:21.880 --> 0:56:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Latin America. And the first kind of you know, kind

0:56:25.560 --> 0:56:30.280
<v Speaker 1>of realization that hit that the people coming from Caribbean, Africa,

0:56:30.360 --> 0:56:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Latin America, it suddenly occurred to them that they were

0:56:34.239 --> 0:56:37.200
<v Speaker 1>looking at the US as a potential market for them

0:56:37.239 --> 0:56:40.120
<v Speaker 1>to be exploring their cannabis too, but that all the

0:56:40.160 --> 0:56:42.320
<v Speaker 1>folks in the US were going, well, wait a second,

0:56:42.360 --> 0:56:44.239
<v Speaker 1>we don't want any exports. We want this to be

0:56:44.280 --> 0:56:47.520
<v Speaker 1>all domestic driven. We want to help our small growers.

0:56:47.920 --> 0:56:51.280
<v Speaker 1>And the second thing that was interesting was that some

0:56:51.560 --> 0:56:55.920
<v Speaker 1>of the activists and small cannabis business owners there, you know,

0:56:56.000 --> 0:56:59.919
<v Speaker 1>people of color running small marijuana businesses. If you close

0:57:00.080 --> 0:57:02.520
<v Speaker 1>with your eyes and listen to them talking about the

0:57:02.600 --> 0:57:07.439
<v Speaker 1>challenges they confronted, what jumped out at me was that

0:57:07.719 --> 0:57:12.760
<v Speaker 1>here were women of color running small businesses, caring about equity.

0:57:12.800 --> 0:57:15.120
<v Speaker 1>But for the first six key percent of their comments,

0:57:15.200 --> 0:57:20.160
<v Speaker 1>they could have been a Trump loving small businessman Republican

0:57:20.760 --> 0:57:24.920
<v Speaker 1>right complaining about over taxation, over regulation and realizing that

0:57:24.960 --> 0:57:27.080
<v Speaker 1>what was killing not you know, you can hear the

0:57:27.120 --> 0:57:29.600
<v Speaker 1>big eyes, the multi state operators, what we call the

0:57:29.880 --> 0:57:33.360
<v Speaker 1>bigger cannabis organizations that have operations and lots of states,

0:57:33.400 --> 0:57:36.440
<v Speaker 1>complaining about over taxation, over regulation, but to hear the

0:57:36.560 --> 0:57:39.760
<v Speaker 1>little guys saying it and sounding like even if our

0:57:39.800 --> 0:57:42.200
<v Speaker 1>politics on the left and we care about equity, this

0:57:42.280 --> 0:57:45.240
<v Speaker 1>is a major problem. And I wonder Steve in that meeting,

0:57:45.280 --> 0:57:47.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I mean, you know, you've been a big

0:57:47.400 --> 0:57:51.000
<v Speaker 1>advocate for high levels of regulation, taxation and all this

0:57:51.080 --> 0:57:54.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of stuff. I mean, was there an aha moment

0:57:54.280 --> 0:57:57.320
<v Speaker 1>for you there or anything surprising that jumped out at

0:57:57.320 --> 0:58:00.680
<v Speaker 1>you there? Yeah. I mean, well, one of the other

0:58:00.720 --> 0:58:02.080
<v Speaker 1>things that came out was that there was a lot

0:58:02.120 --> 0:58:05.800
<v Speaker 1>of fear of federal regulation, a federal legalization, which I

0:58:05.840 --> 0:58:08.120
<v Speaker 1>was I was kind of surprised at, but I think

0:58:08.400 --> 0:58:10.160
<v Speaker 1>there was a I mean, one of the interesting things

0:58:10.200 --> 0:58:12.480
<v Speaker 1>I think about the US, the way it's unfolded in

0:58:12.520 --> 0:58:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the US, is that because um regulation of cannabis is

0:58:17.800 --> 0:58:21.360
<v Speaker 1>operated within states. I mean, you can't have trade between states,

0:58:21.360 --> 0:58:23.680
<v Speaker 1>you can have multi state operators, but they have to operate,

0:58:24.400 --> 0:58:26.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, within each state. So you've had these kind

0:58:26.920 --> 0:58:30.840
<v Speaker 1>of now twenty one, I think it is small scale,

0:58:31.080 --> 0:58:32.720
<v Speaker 1>not small scales. Some of them are quite big scale.

0:58:32.720 --> 0:58:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously California is huge, but you've had these

0:58:35.080 --> 0:58:40.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of like islands of island industries that they can't

0:58:40.240 --> 0:58:43.680
<v Speaker 1>trade with each other. But if if federal legalization opens

0:58:43.720 --> 0:58:45.640
<v Speaker 1>that up, I think there was a lot of fear

0:58:45.760 --> 0:58:49.320
<v Speaker 1>of kind of um corporate consolidation and you would get

0:58:49.360 --> 0:58:52.560
<v Speaker 1>these big kind of corporate players and the and the

0:58:52.560 --> 0:58:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the smaller medium sized market actors wouldn't be able to

0:58:56.120 --> 0:58:59.480
<v Speaker 1>compete with them um on in a national or in

0:58:59.520 --> 0:59:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the future international market and they would just get gobbled

0:59:02.200 --> 0:59:05.240
<v Speaker 1>up or kind of brushed aside. And I think there

0:59:05.320 --> 0:59:08.760
<v Speaker 1>is there was a very legitimate concern about that UM

0:59:08.960 --> 0:59:12.240
<v Speaker 1>and didn't really come up with that many answers at

0:59:12.280 --> 0:59:15.520
<v Speaker 1>anythink because it's quite difficult. I mean, I think that

0:59:15.640 --> 0:59:18.040
<v Speaker 1>there there are potential answers, but it would be it's

0:59:18.080 --> 0:59:21.760
<v Speaker 1>important to try and protect the interests of the smaller

0:59:21.760 --> 0:59:25.760
<v Speaker 1>and smaller medium sized businesses to prevent the emergence of

0:59:25.760 --> 0:59:29.880
<v Speaker 1>oligopolies and monopolies who could sort of distort the market

0:59:30.040 --> 0:59:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and consolidate the market in ways that I think would

0:59:34.040 --> 0:59:38.240
<v Speaker 1>reduce diversity and reduce social social equity. But there was

0:59:38.280 --> 0:59:42.160
<v Speaker 1>also concerns that there was about legal legal federal legalization

0:59:42.560 --> 0:59:45.000
<v Speaker 1>having an impact on some of the really cool social

0:59:45.040 --> 0:59:47.360
<v Speaker 1>equity programs that have been set up at state level

0:59:47.800 --> 0:59:50.160
<v Speaker 1>and that that you know, we are seeing these things

0:59:50.160 --> 0:59:52.560
<v Speaker 1>in Massachusetts and now New York and New Jersey and

0:59:52.600 --> 0:59:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Illinois and a number of other states, really incredible social

0:59:57.320 --> 1:00:00.640
<v Speaker 1>lexuity programs that would you know, give licensing reference to

1:00:00.920 --> 1:00:04.720
<v Speaker 1>social equity candidates from impact to communities, that would provide

1:00:04.760 --> 1:00:08.640
<v Speaker 1>grants and support um that would you know, could could

1:00:08.640 --> 1:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>really help h build and and support people who from

1:00:13.640 --> 1:00:16.320
<v Speaker 1>impact to communities to participate in these markets in a meaningful,

1:00:16.400 --> 1:00:20.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of equal way. That the federal legalization could kind

1:00:20.800 --> 1:00:23.360
<v Speaker 1>of undermine a lot of those efforts if it's not

1:00:23.800 --> 1:00:26.480
<v Speaker 1>done in a in a thoughtful way that respects the

1:00:26.520 --> 1:00:29.440
<v Speaker 1>interests of some these states state social equity programs. So

1:00:29.480 --> 1:00:31.360
<v Speaker 1>I was very struck by that. But I think the

1:00:31.400 --> 1:00:34.840
<v Speaker 1>point you made Ethan about the international markets, I think

1:00:34.840 --> 1:00:37.280
<v Speaker 1>that's that was really important because even the people who

1:00:37.360 --> 1:00:40.120
<v Speaker 1>well actually steve before we get into the international market thing.

1:00:40.200 --> 1:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I just want to say, you know, since I and

1:00:41.760 --> 1:00:44.880
<v Speaker 1>my callings were deeply involved in the drafting of many

1:00:44.920 --> 1:00:47.640
<v Speaker 1>of the medical merial one in the mirror Metroan legalization,

1:00:48.040 --> 1:00:49.720
<v Speaker 1>you know statutes, we look at what you know, what

1:00:49.760 --> 1:00:54.240
<v Speaker 1>we were involved in California are again I mean, obviously

1:00:54.280 --> 1:00:57.000
<v Speaker 1>we're learning a lot from that. You see in California

1:00:57.160 --> 1:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>vast or illicit market. They continues, you know, because of

1:01:00.800 --> 1:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>over taxation, over regulation, and a host of other variables.

1:01:04.920 --> 1:01:07.320
<v Speaker 1>So the question about when I look at some of

1:01:07.320 --> 1:01:10.120
<v Speaker 1>your writing and your blueprints, right, they still have a

1:01:10.160 --> 1:01:14.760
<v Speaker 1>strong regulatory on you know, a strong relatory thing and

1:01:14.840 --> 1:01:16.880
<v Speaker 1>tax and all this. Do you think that when you

1:01:16.960 --> 1:01:20.560
<v Speaker 1>come out with your you know, fourth edition of regulating cannabis,

1:01:20.880 --> 1:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>how do you think it will be different in terms

1:01:22.720 --> 1:01:26.479
<v Speaker 1>of what you see happening on the ground in many

1:01:26.480 --> 1:01:29.160
<v Speaker 1>of these estates and countries. You know, if you if you,

1:01:29.600 --> 1:01:32.479
<v Speaker 1>if you if you read what we've we we've we've

1:01:32.640 --> 1:01:34.920
<v Speaker 1>said ethan and I know you have done it. It's

1:01:35.000 --> 1:01:36.960
<v Speaker 1>it's I hope it's a bit more nuance. I mean,

1:01:37.320 --> 1:01:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I would prefer to have um, you know, localized or

1:01:41.480 --> 1:01:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and social controls and social norms dictating a lot of

1:01:45.000 --> 1:01:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the things that we that we we talk about, But

1:01:48.080 --> 1:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>what we've said is we think that as a starting point,

1:01:52.000 --> 1:01:54.560
<v Speaker 1>you should err on the side of a more restrictive,

1:01:54.840 --> 1:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>more heavily regulated model, and then over time, as things

1:01:59.360 --> 1:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>are shown to be working okay, which bits are working,

1:02:02.840 --> 1:02:05.760
<v Speaker 1>which bits aren't, you can then relax things. What I

1:02:05.800 --> 1:02:08.280
<v Speaker 1>think is problematic is if you start with a very

1:02:08.400 --> 1:02:13.520
<v Speaker 1>open market, a very maybe unregulated or underregulated market, it

1:02:13.680 --> 1:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>becomes it's much harder than to impose restrictions or regulations

1:02:18.560 --> 1:02:21.240
<v Speaker 1>if things aren't if things aren't working, And we've seen

1:02:21.280 --> 1:02:23.120
<v Speaker 1>that without con tobacco. I mean, you know, you look

1:02:23.120 --> 1:02:26.920
<v Speaker 1>at tobacco now, particularly in Europe, but also in the US.

1:02:27.000 --> 1:02:29.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's it's been a decades long battle to

1:02:29.360 --> 1:02:32.840
<v Speaker 1>try and impose better regulation on tobacco in terms of

1:02:32.880 --> 1:02:36.160
<v Speaker 1>marketing controls and in terms of information on packaging, and

1:02:36.160 --> 1:02:39.840
<v Speaker 1>in terms of you know, smoking in public spaces and

1:02:39.840 --> 1:02:42.520
<v Speaker 1>so on. When you've got when you've got a multibillion

1:02:42.600 --> 1:02:48.080
<v Speaker 1>dollar entrenched industry lobbying against regulation, it's much harder to

1:02:48.560 --> 1:02:51.959
<v Speaker 1>pursue public health goals in that context. So our view

1:02:52.040 --> 1:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>is that you you you start with a sort of

1:02:54.840 --> 1:02:58.720
<v Speaker 1>public health regulation model, um and and and try and

1:02:58.800 --> 1:03:01.600
<v Speaker 1>learn lessons from some of the failings about con tobacco,

1:03:01.680 --> 1:03:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and if things are shown to be working, then you

1:03:03.840 --> 1:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>relax it afterwards rather than trying to do it the

1:03:05.880 --> 1:03:09.360
<v Speaker 1>other way around. So I'm not I'm not think of it.

1:03:09.400 --> 1:03:11.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a hyper regulator just because I just love

1:03:11.440 --> 1:03:15.640
<v Speaker 1>regulating stuff. I get it. But and I basically agree

1:03:15.680 --> 1:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>and and the issue about corporate capture when big alpha

1:03:18.680 --> 1:03:21.000
<v Speaker 1>big tobacco, can you know, keep the taxes low and

1:03:21.000 --> 1:03:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the regulations low for a long period of time. But

1:03:23.360 --> 1:03:26.720
<v Speaker 1>to play devil's advocate on this stuff, right, It's also

1:03:26.840 --> 1:03:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the case that if what you're trying to do to

1:03:29.160 --> 1:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>some extent is transition quickly from the illicit market, from

1:03:32.880 --> 1:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the majority of the industry being illicit to being legally regulated,

1:03:37.120 --> 1:03:39.920
<v Speaker 1>you want to have a low taxation policy, right. You

1:03:39.960 --> 1:03:42.920
<v Speaker 1>want to find ways to induce people, you know, to

1:03:43.000 --> 1:03:46.840
<v Speaker 1>shift from both consumers and producers to shift into different

1:03:47.160 --> 1:03:50.560
<v Speaker 1>It comes back to what you were this idea of balance.

1:03:50.600 --> 1:03:52.560
<v Speaker 1>And one of the issue one of the challenges we

1:03:52.600 --> 1:03:54.960
<v Speaker 1>have when we have these policy debates, when we're designing

1:03:55.000 --> 1:03:58.040
<v Speaker 1>regulatory frameworks is that you have a range of different

1:03:58.040 --> 1:04:02.000
<v Speaker 1>stakeholders who have different priorities ease, and sometimes those priorities

1:04:02.000 --> 1:04:04.440
<v Speaker 1>are in confit of each other. And public health people generally,

1:04:04.480 --> 1:04:07.160
<v Speaker 1>and tobacco tax is a good example of this. Public

1:04:07.200 --> 1:04:09.760
<v Speaker 1>health people generally want to have lots of tax keep

1:04:09.800 --> 1:04:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the prices of these things high, because most economic analysis

1:04:13.000 --> 1:04:15.680
<v Speaker 1>shows if you put the price up, people will consume less.

1:04:15.680 --> 1:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>And we've certainly seen that with tobacco. As you as

1:04:17.880 --> 1:04:21.920
<v Speaker 1>you ramp up the tobacco taxes, use generally goes down.

1:04:22.240 --> 1:04:26.800
<v Speaker 1>But what it also does is it incentivizes illegal market activity.

1:04:26.840 --> 1:04:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Now with tobacco, that's generally smuggling from lower tax regimes

1:04:31.120 --> 1:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>and selling it in high tax regimes, but some counterfeiting.

1:04:34.560 --> 1:04:36.600
<v Speaker 1>But with cannabis, it means that you have a parallel

1:04:36.640 --> 1:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>legal market that will seek to undercut the higher price,

1:04:40.320 --> 1:04:44.600
<v Speaker 1>higher taxed um cannabis products. And you know there's a

1:04:44.640 --> 1:04:47.120
<v Speaker 1>tension there. You have a tension between the need to

1:04:47.600 --> 1:04:52.440
<v Speaker 1>a desire or a priority to dissuade use or certainly

1:04:52.440 --> 1:04:54.800
<v Speaker 1>not encourage used by having low prices and dissuade us

1:04:54.840 --> 1:04:58.360
<v Speaker 1>by having high prices, versus a desire from people who

1:04:58.400 --> 1:05:02.600
<v Speaker 1>prioritize criminal justice outcome to minimize the illegal market. And

1:05:02.960 --> 1:05:04.960
<v Speaker 1>there's no perfect answer to that. We just have to

1:05:04.960 --> 1:05:07.160
<v Speaker 1>decide what our priorities are and try and strike the

1:05:07.240 --> 1:05:10.400
<v Speaker 1>right balance, acknowledging that you know, you can't you can't

1:05:10.480 --> 1:05:14.439
<v Speaker 1>have it all. Different stakeholders have different priorities, and that

1:05:14.440 --> 1:05:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the problem, I think is, and you've touched on this

1:05:16.600 --> 1:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>with the corporate captive thing, is that you know, corporate

1:05:19.320 --> 1:05:24.440
<v Speaker 1>actors and commercial actors whose primary goal is essentially profit generation,

1:05:24.880 --> 1:05:28.760
<v Speaker 1>they all have a series of um, you know, regulatory

1:05:28.800 --> 1:05:31.760
<v Speaker 1>goals that may be out odds with the public health goals.

1:05:32.040 --> 1:05:34.840
<v Speaker 1>You know that they are seeking to make money and

1:05:34.960 --> 1:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>not to protect public health. I'm not saying all corporate

1:05:38.120 --> 1:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>actors are totally uninterested in public health and and other

1:05:41.040 --> 1:05:44.400
<v Speaker 1>things like sustainability and social justice, but generally speaking, they

1:05:44.440 --> 1:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>will prioritize, you know, corporate profits over those other social

1:05:49.760 --> 1:05:53.800
<v Speaker 1>health and you know, sustainability goals, and there you have attention.

1:05:53.840 --> 1:05:56.200
<v Speaker 1>And if they become very powerful, and if you do

1:05:56.320 --> 1:05:59.040
<v Speaker 1>get consolidation, and if you do have these billion dollar

1:05:59.120 --> 1:06:03.440
<v Speaker 1>corporations you know, flooding the hill with their lobbyists and

1:06:03.440 --> 1:06:06.280
<v Speaker 1>all the rest of it, it becomes very difficult for

1:06:06.760 --> 1:06:09.440
<v Speaker 1>social justice advocates who don't have the same access to

1:06:09.520 --> 1:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>that kind of political and media and sort of publicity

1:06:12.160 --> 1:06:15.640
<v Speaker 1>capital and lobby and capital, and you know, pr budgets

1:06:15.880 --> 1:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>to compete with them and it becomes very difficult. And

1:06:17.760 --> 1:06:23.160
<v Speaker 1>I actually think it's huge credit to the non government

1:06:23.200 --> 1:06:26.800
<v Speaker 1>organizations that they have been able to you know, hold

1:06:26.840 --> 1:06:30.040
<v Speaker 1>their own against some of these corporate voices on the market.

1:06:30.040 --> 1:06:32.080
<v Speaker 1>You know that whether it's a Drug Policy Alliance or

1:06:32.120 --> 1:06:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Transform or people like Sharlie Title at the Parabolus Center, UM,

1:06:36.640 --> 1:06:40.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, who are making the argument, you know, critical

1:06:40.200 --> 1:06:42.640
<v Speaker 1>of of of corporate capture and critical of some of

1:06:42.680 --> 1:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the kind of over commercialization UM, that they are able

1:06:46.920 --> 1:06:49.720
<v Speaker 1>to hold their own against these corporations that have these

1:06:50.080 --> 1:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>gigantic budgets, and you know they are actually funding front

1:06:54.120 --> 1:06:56.760
<v Speaker 1>organizations like cep here. I can't even want cep here

1:06:56.760 --> 1:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>as an anagram for cannabis. It's got you know, basic,

1:07:00.120 --> 1:07:02.840
<v Speaker 1>it's it's funded by the alcohol and tobacco industry as

1:07:02.920 --> 1:07:07.120
<v Speaker 1>to promote cannabis legalization that is shaped in in the

1:07:07.200 --> 1:07:11.040
<v Speaker 1>interests of the ALCN tobacco industry who want to you know,

1:07:11.200 --> 1:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>move in and profit on on that new industry, and

1:07:14.240 --> 1:07:16.320
<v Speaker 1>it's really important that we pushed back against that because

1:07:16.320 --> 1:07:19.720
<v Speaker 1>if you have Alcohn tobacco industry money and big corporate

1:07:19.720 --> 1:07:24.840
<v Speaker 1>money guiding the legislation at this early stage, at federal

1:07:24.880 --> 1:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>legislation and state legislation, it will be made in their interests,

1:07:28.880 --> 1:07:31.240
<v Speaker 1>in the interests of corporate profits, and not in the interests,

1:07:31.560 --> 1:07:34.160
<v Speaker 1>to quote the U entreaties of the health and well

1:07:34.200 --> 1:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>being of of you know, humankind. And that's a big concern,

1:07:38.520 --> 1:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's something I have to say. It is complicated,

1:07:42.640 --> 1:07:44.720
<v Speaker 1>remember as this meaning that you're ira both there and

1:07:44.720 --> 1:07:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm asking, so what are the models? Has More and

1:07:46.520 --> 1:07:49.200
<v Speaker 1>more states are embracing more of a you know, trying

1:07:49.240 --> 1:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>to give a headstart and a leg up and assistance

1:07:52.360 --> 1:07:55.760
<v Speaker 1>to the nine big players, you know, especially to people

1:07:55.800 --> 1:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>of color, to veterans, to women, two people who have

1:08:00.080 --> 1:08:02.360
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, remarkably people who have had a marijuana

1:08:02.400 --> 1:08:05.680
<v Speaker 1>conviction getting getting a head start on getting an opportunity

1:08:05.680 --> 1:08:07.720
<v Speaker 1>to get a license. And if you ask, well, so

1:08:07.760 --> 1:08:09.960
<v Speaker 1>what are the best models out there right now? And

1:08:10.040 --> 1:08:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the sense I god for some of the conversations was

1:08:12.640 --> 1:08:14.720
<v Speaker 1>that there were two models out there. One was a

1:08:14.760 --> 1:08:18.000
<v Speaker 1>limited one in Oakland, California with a fairly progressive government

1:08:18.240 --> 1:08:21.200
<v Speaker 1>that seems to have found some way to provide you know,

1:08:21.280 --> 1:08:27.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of equity preferences. But the other one, fascinatingly was Oklahoma, right,

1:08:27.080 --> 1:08:30.200
<v Speaker 1>one of the reddest states in America, which is legalized

1:08:30.200 --> 1:08:33.639
<v Speaker 1>medical marijuana, and it's now a wild West out there

1:08:33.680 --> 1:08:38.160
<v Speaker 1>with almost no regulation. People growers from California moving to Oklahoma,

1:08:38.200 --> 1:08:41.559
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma illegally supplying you know, beginning to supply the rest

1:08:41.600 --> 1:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>of the country. But what's the case there is it's

1:08:44.120 --> 1:08:47.040
<v Speaker 1>probably one of the least regulated states in the country.

1:08:47.439 --> 1:08:50.200
<v Speaker 1>One result of which is that anybody can spend like

1:08:50.400 --> 1:08:52.639
<v Speaker 1>two grand or something to get a license, can open

1:08:52.760 --> 1:08:55.240
<v Speaker 1>up a medical cannabis shop, and it's very easy to

1:08:55.280 --> 1:08:58.719
<v Speaker 1>get a medical cannabis I date. But the result is

1:08:58.720 --> 1:09:01.080
<v Speaker 1>is if if you go I'm told, if you go

1:09:01.120 --> 1:09:04.920
<v Speaker 1>into a black neighborhood, IDEs are pretty good there's gonna

1:09:05.000 --> 1:09:08.120
<v Speaker 1>be some black guy from the community who's got the

1:09:08.160 --> 1:09:10.760
<v Speaker 1>local dispensary. Right, So there are ways in which the

1:09:10.880 --> 1:09:15.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of very low regulation sometimes can advantage to small

1:09:15.200 --> 1:09:17.200
<v Speaker 1>guys as well, at least so long as we don't

1:09:17.240 --> 1:09:20.840
<v Speaker 1>have federal legalization. I mean, you know, I'm not looking

1:09:20.880 --> 1:09:25.320
<v Speaker 1>at that generally. I I frown on that levels of

1:09:25.680 --> 1:09:28.639
<v Speaker 1>regulation like that, But that's not that I don't want, um,

1:09:28.680 --> 1:09:31.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, people who don't have access to significant amounts

1:09:31.600 --> 1:09:33.800
<v Speaker 1>of capital to be able to participate in the market,

1:09:33.800 --> 1:09:36.320
<v Speaker 1>I really do. I just think you have to use

1:09:36.360 --> 1:09:39.360
<v Speaker 1>your equity models to support them. So you have other

1:09:39.400 --> 1:09:43.000
<v Speaker 1>other states have grant programs and you know, interest free

1:09:43.000 --> 1:09:47.439
<v Speaker 1>loan programs and training programs to help people, you know,

1:09:47.800 --> 1:09:50.960
<v Speaker 1>enable them to compete on a more even playing field

1:09:51.280 --> 1:09:53.640
<v Speaker 1>with some of the more established actors. And you know

1:09:53.680 --> 1:09:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the New York. New York just issued its first thirty

1:09:57.200 --> 1:10:00.400
<v Speaker 1>eight or thirty six, thirty eight licenses I think last months,

1:10:01.000 --> 1:10:03.760
<v Speaker 1>and they all to social equity candidates. Eight of them

1:10:03.760 --> 1:10:07.240
<v Speaker 1>were to nonprofit actors, which I just think is absolutely amazing.

1:10:07.240 --> 1:10:12.200
<v Speaker 1>And of the tax revenue from the new legal cannabis

1:10:12.200 --> 1:10:14.599
<v Speaker 1>market in New York is going to go back into

1:10:14.960 --> 1:10:18.200
<v Speaker 1>impacted communities in terms of social programs, which I also

1:10:18.200 --> 1:10:23.439
<v Speaker 1>think is amazing. In in New Jersey, it's see, the

1:10:23.479 --> 1:10:26.760
<v Speaker 1>tax revenue is going to be reinvested in impacted communities. Now,

1:10:26.760 --> 1:10:29.320
<v Speaker 1>if you think about it, that is really amazing. That's

1:10:29.360 --> 1:10:33.200
<v Speaker 1>really amazing. In the US to have seventy of the

1:10:33.200 --> 1:10:38.479
<v Speaker 1>tax revenue in in an emerging market be reinvested in

1:10:38.040 --> 1:10:41.160
<v Speaker 1>UH communities that have been disproportionately impacted by the War

1:10:41.200 --> 1:10:43.800
<v Speaker 1>on drugs. I think that's absolutely remarkable. It it it does

1:10:43.920 --> 1:10:49.400
<v Speaker 1>bring up some real challenges of capitalism and how how

1:10:49.560 --> 1:10:53.439
<v Speaker 1>how states will I mean look, and I also have

1:10:53.520 --> 1:10:55.960
<v Speaker 1>a kind of a whole panoply of views on this

1:10:56.040 --> 1:10:58.880
<v Speaker 1>under went and very proud. I mean, California, which we

1:10:58.960 --> 1:11:01.559
<v Speaker 1>played a major role into acting in twenties sixteen, has

1:11:01.720 --> 1:11:04.840
<v Speaker 1>not really pioneered some of these provisions about directing tax

1:11:04.880 --> 1:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>revenue to the communities that have been most harmed, about

1:11:07.400 --> 1:11:11.080
<v Speaker 1>giving certain assistance to you know, basically equity actors to

1:11:11.120 --> 1:11:13.600
<v Speaker 1>get involved in this industry. And you know, obviously it

1:11:13.680 --> 1:11:16.040
<v Speaker 1>was my success as a drug policy Alliance who drove

1:11:16.080 --> 1:11:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the New York legalization model. So in that sense, it's

1:11:19.080 --> 1:11:21.519
<v Speaker 1>very you know, I feel quite proud of what's happened.

1:11:21.880 --> 1:11:24.880
<v Speaker 1>But then I asked myself, m if your number one

1:11:24.920 --> 1:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>objective is increasing the amount of tax revenue that's going

1:11:27.800 --> 1:11:30.320
<v Speaker 1>to go to communities that were harmed, you want this

1:11:30.400 --> 1:11:33.840
<v Speaker 1>industry to grow quickly, right, But the slower you roll

1:11:33.880 --> 1:11:36.960
<v Speaker 1>it out, the less tax revenue that there's going to

1:11:37.080 --> 1:11:41.160
<v Speaker 1>be that. Secondly, the more regulation you have, the harder

1:11:41.160 --> 1:11:43.560
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be. I mean, one thing that advantages

1:11:43.640 --> 1:11:45.479
<v Speaker 1>the big players and all of this is that they

1:11:45.479 --> 1:11:48.759
<v Speaker 1>have expertise in dealing with government regular relation, They have lawyers,

1:11:48.800 --> 1:11:51.200
<v Speaker 1>they've often come from other industries where they've been involved

1:11:51.200 --> 1:11:54.000
<v Speaker 1>in this, whereas if you're starting up or you've previously

1:11:54.000 --> 1:11:56.200
<v Speaker 1>been involved in the illegal side of the industry and

1:11:56.280 --> 1:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>not had you know, any any interaction with government regulators,

1:12:00.880 --> 1:12:04.280
<v Speaker 1>right then basically these are all barriers to the small

1:12:04.360 --> 1:12:07.040
<v Speaker 1>guys getting better, and it depends on the regulation model.

1:12:07.800 --> 1:12:09.760
<v Speaker 1>So you know, you that this is one of the

1:12:09.960 --> 1:12:14.320
<v Speaker 1>really beautiful and exciting things about cannabis legalization. Regulation is that,

1:12:14.640 --> 1:12:18.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, we get to design the market structure from scratch,

1:12:18.880 --> 1:12:23.920
<v Speaker 1>and we can make decisions around who participates, how and when,

1:12:24.040 --> 1:12:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and you can preference smaller actors. You can restrict participation

1:12:28.640 --> 1:12:32.600
<v Speaker 1>of bigger actors. You can prevent you know, um emergence.

1:12:33.160 --> 1:12:35.200
<v Speaker 1>You can limit the number of licenses that anyone actor

1:12:35.240 --> 1:12:39.120
<v Speaker 1>can have. You can support and do preferential licensing for

1:12:39.160 --> 1:12:43.240
<v Speaker 1>particular communities or participants. You can make these decisions, and

1:12:43.240 --> 1:12:46.200
<v Speaker 1>you can reshape the markets in all kinds of interesting ways.

1:12:46.240 --> 1:12:49.960
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I genuinely think that it may have

1:12:50.160 --> 1:12:53.599
<v Speaker 1>impact on other markets and nothing to do with cannabis,

1:12:53.640 --> 1:12:56.559
<v Speaker 1>because you know, imagine if you had sev the tax

1:12:56.600 --> 1:13:02.160
<v Speaker 1>revenue from I don't know oil being directed into environmental

1:13:02.920 --> 1:13:07.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, cause, environmental sustainability. This is you know, I

1:13:07.160 --> 1:13:08.519
<v Speaker 1>don't want to I don't want to be sort of

1:13:08.760 --> 1:13:13.080
<v Speaker 1>ridiculously evangelic and idealistic about this, but these things do

1:13:13.560 --> 1:13:17.879
<v Speaker 1>have the potential to help reshape how we think about markets,

1:13:18.760 --> 1:13:24.200
<v Speaker 1>um and commerce and entrepreneurship and you know, community participation

1:13:24.560 --> 1:13:26.880
<v Speaker 1>in a in a much broader way. I'd love to

1:13:26.920 --> 1:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>see some of these really innovative, amazing cannabis reforms having

1:13:31.160 --> 1:13:35.280
<v Speaker 1>a kind of ripple knock on effect far beyond drug markets.

1:13:35.479 --> 1:13:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Well we'll see. I mean, I would like to see

1:13:37.200 --> 1:13:39.759
<v Speaker 1>that happened too. There's also a major difference though, between

1:13:39.800 --> 1:13:42.280
<v Speaker 1>talking about where the tax revenue is directed to on

1:13:42.320 --> 1:13:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the one hand, and how one is going to regulate

1:13:45.600 --> 1:13:47.800
<v Speaker 1>or create opportunities and the interest on the other, And

1:13:47.840 --> 1:13:50.240
<v Speaker 1>to some extents there can even be a conflict between

1:13:50.280 --> 1:13:53.080
<v Speaker 1>those two things. It's nice to think that this could

1:13:53.080 --> 1:13:55.120
<v Speaker 1>become a model for the future, and that it could

1:13:55.120 --> 1:13:58.559
<v Speaker 1>even survive federal legalization. On the other hand, we do

1:13:58.720 --> 1:14:01.880
<v Speaker 1>know that there is an overall whelming force behind basically

1:14:01.880 --> 1:14:05.639
<v Speaker 1>the basic nature of capitalism, right capitalism, you know especially,

1:14:05.680 --> 1:14:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, even we look about, you know, the

1:14:07.840 --> 1:14:11.080
<v Speaker 1>illegal markets, those are kind of capitalism and its rowst form.

1:14:11.120 --> 1:14:13.679
<v Speaker 1>But when we look at legal capitalism and the different

1:14:13.760 --> 1:14:19.200
<v Speaker 1>varieties of capitalism, some social welfare capitalism to chrony capitalism,

1:14:19.200 --> 1:14:22.360
<v Speaker 1>to free market capitalism to kleptocratic capitalism, I mean, most

1:14:22.360 --> 1:14:25.040
<v Speaker 1>of the world is essentially capitalists. And we also tend

1:14:25.080 --> 1:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>to see that some movement towards concentration inevitably happens in

1:14:29.280 --> 1:14:31.880
<v Speaker 1>most industries. So let me bring this down to a

1:14:32.000 --> 1:14:35.120
<v Speaker 1>very concrete example. You are an advisor and you've played

1:14:35.120 --> 1:14:38.320
<v Speaker 1>a role in Canada. Now, Canada doesn't have the types

1:14:38.360 --> 1:14:40.320
<v Speaker 1>of state controls I mean in the same way of

1:14:40.439 --> 1:14:43.120
<v Speaker 1>limitations that we have in the US. You do have

1:14:43.200 --> 1:14:46.240
<v Speaker 1>more of a national model in Canada. And what's your

1:14:46.280 --> 1:14:49.599
<v Speaker 1>take about how Canada is evolving and what lessons can

1:14:49.640 --> 1:14:52.439
<v Speaker 1>be learned for better or words from what's happened in Canada. Well,

1:14:52.479 --> 1:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean that that the state controls are over supply

1:14:56.240 --> 1:15:00.639
<v Speaker 1>and trade. The individual provinces the princial controls. I should

1:15:00.640 --> 1:15:05.320
<v Speaker 1>say that the individual provinces, um, they they regulate retail.

1:15:05.439 --> 1:15:09.200
<v Speaker 1>And you do have this quite interesting variation between the

1:15:09.200 --> 1:15:13.200
<v Speaker 1>provinces in terms of several of the provinces have government

1:15:13.280 --> 1:15:16.679
<v Speaker 1>monopolies on the retail. So Quebec perhaps most high profile,

1:15:16.720 --> 1:15:18.679
<v Speaker 1>I think, I can't remember the other one in New Brunswick,

1:15:18.680 --> 1:15:20.599
<v Speaker 1>I think, and a couple of them have a mix

1:15:20.680 --> 1:15:26.840
<v Speaker 1>of government stores and you know, conventional commercial stores, and

1:15:27.160 --> 1:15:29.759
<v Speaker 1>so there is actually quite an interesting amount of variations.

1:15:29.760 --> 1:15:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Some of them have different age access um, and some

1:15:33.320 --> 1:15:37.280
<v Speaker 1>of them, like in Quebec, also they don't allow certain edibles.

1:15:37.280 --> 1:15:42.120
<v Speaker 1>They don't allow the gummies and candy based edibles. So

1:15:42.400 --> 1:15:45.519
<v Speaker 1>again we have this quite fascinating sort of laboratory of

1:15:45.680 --> 1:15:48.040
<v Speaker 1>change where you can look at you, okay, what's working

1:15:48.040 --> 1:15:49.960
<v Speaker 1>in in each one. I mean, I think if you

1:15:49.960 --> 1:15:53.519
<v Speaker 1>look at the Canada, generally, I would say generally it's

1:15:53.520 --> 1:15:55.719
<v Speaker 1>been a reasonable success if you look at the public

1:15:55.720 --> 1:15:58.439
<v Speaker 1>health outcomes, if you look at the tax revenue. UM,

1:15:59.080 --> 1:16:01.559
<v Speaker 1>I think there was certainly a problem with the big

1:16:01.640 --> 1:16:06.240
<v Speaker 1>corporate corporate corporates have kind of collapsed in value. There

1:16:06.280 --> 1:16:09.360
<v Speaker 1>was probably a bit of a bubble into an investor bubble,

1:16:09.400 --> 1:16:14.320
<v Speaker 1>which then collapsed um and the corporatization. I was very

1:16:14.360 --> 1:16:17.080
<v Speaker 1>worried that we were moving towards a sort of oligopoly situation.

1:16:17.120 --> 1:16:20.439
<v Speaker 1>And then there was a point early on where I

1:16:20.439 --> 1:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>think the big five companies they were all measured in

1:16:24.160 --> 1:16:28.519
<v Speaker 1>the billions, valid in the billions, and they were more

1:16:28.560 --> 1:16:32.000
<v Speaker 1>than half of the total market. But interestingly that is

1:16:32.040 --> 1:16:34.719
<v Speaker 1>actually shrunk. A lot of them have kind of collapsed

1:16:34.720 --> 1:16:36.680
<v Speaker 1>to a certain extent. You're till raise and yeah, I

1:16:36.720 --> 1:16:39.519
<v Speaker 1>can't remember what they're all called, but they're they're now

1:16:39.680 --> 1:16:43.800
<v Speaker 1>they're like most Let me interupt you on two issues. Then.

1:16:43.960 --> 1:16:47.439
<v Speaker 1>One is when it comes to cultivation, can you have

1:16:47.640 --> 1:16:51.080
<v Speaker 1>mega cultivation facilities in one province exploring to the rest

1:16:51.080 --> 1:16:55.880
<v Speaker 1>of the country. And secondly, and so that seems to

1:16:55.920 --> 1:16:59.040
<v Speaker 1>me very different what's going on the US right now,

1:16:59.080 --> 1:17:02.120
<v Speaker 1>and that means that you would potentially have major concentration

1:17:02.160 --> 1:17:04.519
<v Speaker 1>were something like we've had, you know, we're people envision

1:17:04.560 --> 1:17:07.000
<v Speaker 1>if you're under federal legalization, that the Central Valley in

1:17:07.040 --> 1:17:09.519
<v Speaker 1>California could be exporting too much of them, but we

1:17:09.520 --> 1:17:12.600
<v Speaker 1>could we could make the rules. If you're writing the legislation,

1:17:12.880 --> 1:17:14.760
<v Speaker 1>you get to make the rules. And if you say

1:17:15.120 --> 1:17:19.440
<v Speaker 1>no one company can cultivate more than ex hectares of cannabis,

1:17:19.520 --> 1:17:22.280
<v Speaker 1>then that is then the law and so it. But

1:17:22.360 --> 1:17:25.120
<v Speaker 1>has Canada done that? They haven't. I mean I actually

1:17:25.200 --> 1:17:27.240
<v Speaker 1>wish that they did. I recommended that they did, and

1:17:27.280 --> 1:17:32.080
<v Speaker 1>they didn't. You know, I work with the Federal Task Force.

1:17:32.200 --> 1:17:35.720
<v Speaker 1>I didn't actually draft the law. I understand and what

1:17:35.960 --> 1:17:38.519
<v Speaker 1>and what about in terms of corporate you know, corporate

1:17:38.600 --> 1:17:42.040
<v Speaker 1>concentration And obviously a lot of these companies grew too fast,

1:17:42.160 --> 1:17:45.040
<v Speaker 1>they were too full of themselves. They collapsed. But what

1:17:45.240 --> 1:17:50.040
<v Speaker 1>prevents corporate concentration. It's another thing that I think that

1:17:50.080 --> 1:17:53.720
<v Speaker 1>they didn't do enough. On UM. There has been a

1:17:53.720 --> 1:17:57.280
<v Speaker 1>consolidation and corporate corporate capture up to a point. But

1:17:57.320 --> 1:18:00.400
<v Speaker 1>as the point I was just making was actually UM

1:18:00.400 --> 1:18:02.640
<v Speaker 1>that system, it seems that the market seems to have

1:18:02.640 --> 1:18:05.120
<v Speaker 1>actually in the last couple of years become more diverse

1:18:05.600 --> 1:18:08.120
<v Speaker 1>and not less, which kind of has surprised me. But

1:18:08.200 --> 1:18:12.200
<v Speaker 1>that's what the data suggests. UM. I think I think

1:18:12.240 --> 1:18:14.200
<v Speaker 1>some of the points you were making earlier, that you know,

1:18:14.360 --> 1:18:16.519
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that Canada didn't do well. Was

1:18:16.560 --> 1:18:19.719
<v Speaker 1>the was the social equity piece? They really didn't. They've

1:18:19.720 --> 1:18:22.720
<v Speaker 1>they've had to kind of retrospectively try and introduce some

1:18:22.800 --> 1:18:27.960
<v Speaker 1>social equity stuff, particularly related to participation in indigenous groups.

1:18:28.640 --> 1:18:31.479
<v Speaker 1>And you know, the regulatory bars to entry to the

1:18:31.560 --> 1:18:34.600
<v Speaker 1>market were way too high even for their kind of

1:18:34.920 --> 1:18:39.200
<v Speaker 1>micro cultivation. Um you you needed to have literally hundreds

1:18:39.200 --> 1:18:41.599
<v Speaker 1>of thousands of dollars um you had to build your

1:18:41.640 --> 1:18:44.679
<v Speaker 1>facility before you could even apply for a license, which

1:18:44.720 --> 1:18:48.720
<v Speaker 1>was crazy. So I think they didn't do some of

1:18:48.720 --> 1:18:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the stuff around social equity at all well. But I

1:18:51.680 --> 1:18:53.880
<v Speaker 1>get the sense that they've they acknowledged some of those

1:18:53.880 --> 1:18:57.800
<v Speaker 1>shortcomings and are trying to kind of retrospectively kind of

1:18:57.840 --> 1:19:01.600
<v Speaker 1>engineering some more social justice staff and more social equity programs,

1:19:02.120 --> 1:19:05.680
<v Speaker 1>particularly around indigenous participation and micro cultivation. But you know,

1:19:05.720 --> 1:19:08.400
<v Speaker 1>other countries can see it, can look at what's happened

1:19:08.400 --> 1:19:10.120
<v Speaker 1>in the US States, they can look at what's happened

1:19:10.120 --> 1:19:13.639
<v Speaker 1>in Canada nationally and at the provincial level, and learned

1:19:13.640 --> 1:19:15.519
<v Speaker 1>from that and goal, look, they did this really well.

1:19:15.960 --> 1:19:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean things like you know, quality control inspections, packaging

1:19:21.120 --> 1:19:23.559
<v Speaker 1>REGs and so on. Generally, I think all of that stuff,

1:19:23.600 --> 1:19:27.360
<v Speaker 1>health warnings and UM tax tax controls. I think generally

1:19:27.479 --> 1:19:30.240
<v Speaker 1>was pretty good. And you're seeing about sixty of the

1:19:30.280 --> 1:19:34.479
<v Speaker 1>market is now tax and regulated in Canada after four

1:19:34.560 --> 1:19:37.519
<v Speaker 1>years five years, sorry um, And you know it's been

1:19:37.560 --> 1:19:39.400
<v Speaker 1>it's been creeping up. It was thirty years, or it

1:19:39.439 --> 1:19:42.479
<v Speaker 1>was after one year, and then after like two or

1:19:42.520 --> 1:19:45.000
<v Speaker 1>three years, and now it's about six and it's still

1:19:45.040 --> 1:19:47.720
<v Speaker 1>going up now sixty. You know, it would be a

1:19:47.760 --> 1:19:50.360
<v Speaker 1>lot better if that was eight, but that's six still

1:19:50.400 --> 1:19:55.960
<v Speaker 1>sixty pc tax and regulated as opposed to illegal, untaxed

1:19:55.960 --> 1:19:59.599
<v Speaker 1>and unregulated, which is what it was before. So it's

1:19:59.640 --> 1:20:02.960
<v Speaker 1>still those age programs. I think generally they've done a

1:20:02.960 --> 1:20:05.640
<v Speaker 1>good job, but there were shortcomings. The question you and

1:20:05.680 --> 1:20:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I are both mutually interested in, is there any way

1:20:09.240 --> 1:20:11.599
<v Speaker 1>to kind of get to the point of diversity and

1:20:11.640 --> 1:20:15.280
<v Speaker 1>diversification and avoiding the conglomeration of wealth and the album

1:20:15.280 --> 1:20:19.479
<v Speaker 1>oligopoli phenomenon, you know, you know, without having the big

1:20:19.479 --> 1:20:22.040
<v Speaker 1>guys take over in the first place. And the question

1:20:22.120 --> 1:20:25.240
<v Speaker 1>is can that realistically happen? Can it? Can it? Can

1:20:25.280 --> 1:20:29.200
<v Speaker 1>it really happen? Given the power of economics in all

1:20:29.240 --> 1:20:31.960
<v Speaker 1>of this, and given the realities of politics and all

1:20:32.000 --> 1:20:33.920
<v Speaker 1>of this, and given the fact that you know, a

1:20:33.920 --> 1:20:35.559
<v Speaker 1>big part of the U. S. Government is controlled by

1:20:35.560 --> 1:20:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Republicans who don't care about a lot of this type

1:20:38.080 --> 1:20:40.240
<v Speaker 1>of thing that you and I are talking about, right

1:20:40.520 --> 1:20:42.439
<v Speaker 1>And as you say when you talk about NAPTON, w

1:20:42.640 --> 1:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>t O and all these other sorts of variables. So

1:20:45.320 --> 1:20:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the question is, is is can in fact that happen? And

1:20:48.160 --> 1:20:50.439
<v Speaker 1>one of the things I find myself saying people who

1:20:50.439 --> 1:20:54.479
<v Speaker 1>are pursuing equity objectives, especially at the governmental level, is

1:20:54.600 --> 1:20:57.599
<v Speaker 1>try to think forward five or ten years. Take everything

1:20:57.680 --> 1:21:02.120
<v Speaker 1>we know about the forces that lead to concentration and

1:21:02.160 --> 1:21:06.040
<v Speaker 1>to oligopoli takeover, and try to figure out what are

1:21:06.080 --> 1:21:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the things that can effectively be blocked. How do you

1:21:10.760 --> 1:21:13.679
<v Speaker 1>take a stand in certain areas where you can preserve

1:21:13.840 --> 1:21:15.960
<v Speaker 1>things that are meaningful? And I think we need to

1:21:16.000 --> 1:21:18.800
<v Speaker 1>look at the lessons um from other industries. I mean,

1:21:19.080 --> 1:21:20.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you look at alcohol. I was just

1:21:20.600 --> 1:21:24.519
<v Speaker 1>looking the other day, Steve at which states allow liquor

1:21:24.600 --> 1:21:27.240
<v Speaker 1>to be sold in supermarkets, and I think like a

1:21:27.400 --> 1:21:30.320
<v Speaker 1>third third to a half of all U S states

1:21:30.360 --> 1:21:33.000
<v Speaker 1>now allow liquor to be sold in supermarkets, and they

1:21:33.080 --> 1:21:36.080
<v Speaker 1>vary from you know, conservative states to moderate states to

1:21:36.200 --> 1:21:38.680
<v Speaker 1>liberal states all around the country. There's no kind of

1:21:38.760 --> 1:21:41.240
<v Speaker 1>rhyme or reason to that. And I think that in

1:21:41.280 --> 1:21:43.760
<v Speaker 1>those states where liquor can be sold in supermarkets, you're

1:21:43.800 --> 1:21:47.160
<v Speaker 1>less likely to have small liquor stores, right, small wine

1:21:47.200 --> 1:21:50.760
<v Speaker 1>stores and things like that. So I'm curious how much

1:21:50.800 --> 1:21:53.799
<v Speaker 1>of you and others are they looking at the viable

1:21:53.960 --> 1:21:58.360
<v Speaker 1>models from alcohol control um that makes sense, or if

1:21:58.360 --> 1:22:01.639
<v Speaker 1>we're looking in the global context looking at the models first,

1:22:01.640 --> 1:22:05.200
<v Speaker 1>say coffee production or cocao production, the ones that have

1:22:05.280 --> 1:22:09.840
<v Speaker 1>been successful in retaining you know, a real diversity of

1:22:09.960 --> 1:22:14.879
<v Speaker 1>participation on the cultivation and the distribution side as opposed

1:22:14.920 --> 1:22:18.920
<v Speaker 1>to having oligopoly takeover. Which elements of industry are the

1:22:18.920 --> 1:22:22.280
<v Speaker 1>ones where you can best resist oligopoly, whereas which elements

1:22:22.280 --> 1:22:24.639
<v Speaker 1>of industry are the ones where it's inevitable, and therefore

1:22:24.680 --> 1:22:27.600
<v Speaker 1>you figure out how to kind of catalyze, how to

1:22:27.760 --> 1:22:30.200
<v Speaker 1>direct that stuff so you can protect the small guys

1:22:30.240 --> 1:22:32.800
<v Speaker 1>without ever thinking you can ultimately block it. But in

1:22:32.920 --> 1:22:36.240
<v Speaker 1>terms of going forward, and as we think not just

1:22:36.320 --> 1:22:39.719
<v Speaker 1>about cannabis, as we think about the legal regulation of cocaine,

1:22:39.760 --> 1:22:42.160
<v Speaker 1>hopefully cocaine, as we think about m d m A.

1:22:42.240 --> 1:22:45.479
<v Speaker 1>Things like how much do you know about people looking

1:22:45.520 --> 1:22:48.840
<v Speaker 1>at these other models, whether the alcohol field or the

1:22:48.880 --> 1:22:51.880
<v Speaker 1>cacao and coffee field on the production side, is that

1:22:51.960 --> 1:22:55.200
<v Speaker 1>thinking happening or not? And if not, one I think

1:22:55.200 --> 1:22:57.479
<v Speaker 1>it is. I mean we we've been trying to get

1:22:58.160 --> 1:23:01.719
<v Speaker 1>people in the sustainable to element and social and sustainable

1:23:01.760 --> 1:23:05.120
<v Speaker 1>of element goals, people in the development field UM engaged

1:23:05.160 --> 1:23:08.520
<v Speaker 1>in the drug quality debate specifically around you know, alternative

1:23:08.560 --> 1:23:10.559
<v Speaker 1>to prohibition and what legal markets are some of these

1:23:10.640 --> 1:23:15.160
<v Speaker 1>drug drug drug plant crops would look like, and how

1:23:15.280 --> 1:23:20.679
<v Speaker 1>we can build in things like sustainable development and fair

1:23:20.720 --> 1:23:26.720
<v Speaker 1>trade principles and you know, protecting traditional growers. A lot

1:23:26.720 --> 1:23:30.800
<v Speaker 1>of these concepts UM have been thought about. You know,

1:23:31.320 --> 1:23:33.920
<v Speaker 1>organizations like the Transational Institute the Netherlands has done a

1:23:33.920 --> 1:23:36.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of work, Health Poverty Action in the UK have

1:23:36.280 --> 1:23:38.200
<v Speaker 1>done a lot of work. Transform We've been pushing it

1:23:39.040 --> 1:23:41.800
<v Speaker 1>UM and a lot of the things that you've already

1:23:41.800 --> 1:23:45.600
<v Speaker 1>you've already touched upon, you know, learning lessons from successful

1:23:45.640 --> 1:23:50.840
<v Speaker 1>fair trade approaches to other agricultural products. But you know,

1:23:51.160 --> 1:23:54.360
<v Speaker 1>at a domestic level, I think you can do anti

1:23:54.360 --> 1:23:59.080
<v Speaker 1>monopoly legislation, you can do an awful lot with licensing controls.

1:23:59.120 --> 1:24:02.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, you can say no individual economic actor can

1:24:03.160 --> 1:24:06.880
<v Speaker 1>can take more than X number of licenses, and you

1:24:06.880 --> 1:24:09.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, you aren't allowed to have vertical integration, you

1:24:09.640 --> 1:24:13.679
<v Speaker 1>can't own production and retail facilities. You can actually do

1:24:14.160 --> 1:24:18.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot to prevent those things at the initial legislative

1:24:18.320 --> 1:24:21.920
<v Speaker 1>slate stage. And if it's if it's if it's hardwired

1:24:21.920 --> 1:24:25.479
<v Speaker 1>into the legislation at the outset, it's not something that

1:24:25.520 --> 1:24:29.080
<v Speaker 1>will necessarily just get eroded um in time. And of

1:24:29.120 --> 1:24:32.800
<v Speaker 1>course legislation can be amended or superseded um. But if

1:24:32.840 --> 1:24:36.440
<v Speaker 1>you don't allow the emergence of these you know, ultra powerful,

1:24:36.800 --> 1:24:41.479
<v Speaker 1>multi billion pound corporations in the first instance, um, then

1:24:41.640 --> 1:24:45.959
<v Speaker 1>you know those those power blocks of of of lobbying

1:24:46.160 --> 1:24:49.960
<v Speaker 1>and political influence don't emerge either. So you don't have

1:24:50.000 --> 1:24:54.639
<v Speaker 1>to then try and retroactively impose responsible regulation and control

1:24:54.720 --> 1:24:56.639
<v Speaker 1>like we've had to do with our Cohn tobacco. We've

1:24:56.640 --> 1:24:59.439
<v Speaker 1>done successfully to back up to some degree, but we

1:24:59.479 --> 1:25:02.120
<v Speaker 1>haven't really done with alcohol yet, which is why I

1:25:02.160 --> 1:25:06.320
<v Speaker 1>would argue that alcohol is critically underregulated in many ways,

1:25:06.360 --> 1:25:10.040
<v Speaker 1>particularly around retail and marketing and corporate sponsorship and so on.

1:25:10.560 --> 1:25:12.840
<v Speaker 1>But I just think there's there's a lot we can do.

1:25:13.360 --> 1:25:16.160
<v Speaker 1>And if you are actually in the position of making

1:25:16.200 --> 1:25:19.679
<v Speaker 1>the reforms and drafting the legislations which shape the nature

1:25:19.960 --> 1:25:23.360
<v Speaker 1>of the market from the outset, you have the power

1:25:23.400 --> 1:25:25.960
<v Speaker 1>to do things very differently. And that's why you do

1:25:26.120 --> 1:25:29.560
<v Speaker 1>have the possibility of social ecuty programs that restrict licensing

1:25:29.720 --> 1:25:34.120
<v Speaker 1>or preference licensing for for impact to communities, and you

1:25:34.200 --> 1:25:38.920
<v Speaker 1>are able to legislate that tax revenue is redirected into

1:25:39.280 --> 1:25:42.680
<v Speaker 1>impact to communities, and you can put in place controls

1:25:42.960 --> 1:25:48.200
<v Speaker 1>that prevent certain actors from participating. You can actually do it.

1:25:48.240 --> 1:25:51.320
<v Speaker 1>You can design and and and have markets operate in

1:25:51.320 --> 1:25:54.799
<v Speaker 1>a different way at a legislative level from the outset.

1:25:55.120 --> 1:25:58.280
<v Speaker 1>And of course then there are also options like state monopolies.

1:25:58.400 --> 1:26:01.160
<v Speaker 1>So in a number of as I've already said, in

1:26:01.160 --> 1:26:04.080
<v Speaker 1>a number of Canadian provinces, you do have state monopolies

1:26:04.080 --> 1:26:06.920
<v Speaker 1>on retail. In Quebec, all of the cannabis shops are

1:26:07.120 --> 1:26:11.840
<v Speaker 1>run by the provincial government of Quebec um and and

1:26:11.880 --> 1:26:13.600
<v Speaker 1>this it's a bit like the alcohol model in some

1:26:13.680 --> 1:26:16.839
<v Speaker 1>Nordic countries, which in Sweden, for example, all alcohol retailing

1:26:17.200 --> 1:26:20.080
<v Speaker 1>is run but as a state monopoly of the Swedish

1:26:20.080 --> 1:26:23.880
<v Speaker 1>government um. Or you can have a very strictly regulated,

1:26:23.920 --> 1:26:27.160
<v Speaker 1>effectively a state monopoly model on production as well um

1:26:27.280 --> 1:26:30.360
<v Speaker 1>as they've done in Uruguay. Or you can have nonprofit

1:26:30.400 --> 1:26:33.360
<v Speaker 1>and homegrowing only, as they've done in Malta. So there

1:26:33.400 --> 1:26:36.479
<v Speaker 1>are alternatives, there are different ways of doing this. We

1:26:36.560 --> 1:26:40.400
<v Speaker 1>don't have to go down um an alcohol tobacco model.

1:26:40.720 --> 1:26:42.720
<v Speaker 1>And it used to Ethan. He used to annoy me

1:26:42.720 --> 1:26:44.360
<v Speaker 1>when you would. You would talk about, you know, let's

1:26:44.640 --> 1:26:48.519
<v Speaker 1>let's legalize and regulate cannabis like we do alcohol, and

1:26:48.880 --> 1:26:51.439
<v Speaker 1>let's tax and regulate cannabis like alcohol. And I go, no, no,

1:26:51.560 --> 1:26:53.639
<v Speaker 1>let's do it. Let's do it better than that. Don't

1:26:53.720 --> 1:26:55.200
<v Speaker 1>keep saying that either let's do it, let's do it

1:26:55.240 --> 1:26:57.479
<v Speaker 1>better than that. Let's let's learn from all the crappy

1:26:57.600 --> 1:27:01.120
<v Speaker 1>stuff we've done with alcohol regulation and not do that

1:27:01.280 --> 1:27:03.799
<v Speaker 1>and do it better. And let's let's use cannabis regulations

1:27:03.840 --> 1:27:07.320
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity to show how drugs can be regulated and

1:27:07.320 --> 1:27:10.559
<v Speaker 1>how markets can be regulated in the interests of the

1:27:10.560 --> 1:27:14.640
<v Speaker 1>communities in which those markets exist, because rather than in

1:27:14.760 --> 1:27:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the in the narrow interests of governments or in the

1:27:17.400 --> 1:27:20.040
<v Speaker 1>narrow interests of corporate profits, which is the way that

1:27:20.040 --> 1:27:23.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of markets have gone um up to now,

1:27:23.360 --> 1:27:25.559
<v Speaker 1>and that operates at a local level, that operates at

1:27:25.560 --> 1:27:27.920
<v Speaker 1>a state level, at a national level, at a regional level,

1:27:28.040 --> 1:27:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and at an international level. So we have to be

1:27:30.080 --> 1:27:35.960
<v Speaker 1>thinking about these intersecting issues that operate at different scales

1:27:36.120 --> 1:27:38.519
<v Speaker 1>as well as the issues themselves as social justice and

1:27:38.560 --> 1:27:41.840
<v Speaker 1>social equity, is and fair trade or important principles, but

1:27:41.920 --> 1:27:44.599
<v Speaker 1>they operate at all different scales, and some of them

1:27:44.640 --> 1:27:48.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe tensions between you know, local level initiatives, national evaluatives,

1:27:49.080 --> 1:27:52.920
<v Speaker 1>and an international initiatives. This stuff is complicated. You know

1:27:53.360 --> 1:27:55.719
<v Speaker 1>that there's a lot of work to be done, even

1:27:55.720 --> 1:27:58.240
<v Speaker 1>if we get the principles in place, and even if

1:27:58.280 --> 1:28:02.559
<v Speaker 1>the political will and intent is there actually delivering these

1:28:02.560 --> 1:28:06.559
<v Speaker 1>things effectively UM in ways that can last. You know,

1:28:06.600 --> 1:28:08.479
<v Speaker 1>as you say, a lot of these things may be vulnerable.

1:28:08.479 --> 1:28:10.960
<v Speaker 1>We can have all these good intentions and then a

1:28:11.000 --> 1:28:13.599
<v Speaker 1>few years down the road, you know, corporate capture and

1:28:14.040 --> 1:28:16.760
<v Speaker 1>corporate consolidation has eroded a lot of this stuff. We

1:28:16.760 --> 1:28:20.200
<v Speaker 1>have to put in place solid legislation that can stand

1:28:20.200 --> 1:28:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the test of time, deliver stuff that deliver outcomes that

1:28:24.000 --> 1:28:28.640
<v Speaker 1>communities want to see and therefore communities and the politicians

1:28:28.680 --> 1:28:31.639
<v Speaker 1>that serve that will be supportive of these these initiatives

1:28:31.640 --> 1:28:35.200
<v Speaker 1>in the longer term. I mean, I genuinely believe it's doable,

1:28:35.400 --> 1:28:37.080
<v Speaker 1>and I think a lot of the examples that are

1:28:37.080 --> 1:28:40.160
<v Speaker 1>emerging already, whether it's in Uruguay, whether it's in Malta,

1:28:40.200 --> 1:28:43.160
<v Speaker 1>whether it's in some of the better models that have

1:28:43.240 --> 1:28:47.080
<v Speaker 1>emerged in US states and Canadian provinces, we're doing that already.

1:28:47.120 --> 1:28:50.640
<v Speaker 1>We're showing how things can be done better. Because legalization

1:28:50.840 --> 1:28:53.559
<v Speaker 1>is a process. Regulation is the end point, but there

1:28:53.640 --> 1:28:55.320
<v Speaker 1>is more than one way to do it. You can

1:28:55.320 --> 1:28:57.559
<v Speaker 1>do it well or you can do it badly. And

1:28:57.600 --> 1:29:00.040
<v Speaker 1>I think advocates such as US you've been pushed in

1:29:00.120 --> 1:29:02.400
<v Speaker 1>for a form all these years, we need to be

1:29:02.600 --> 1:29:06.640
<v Speaker 1>advocating for for legalization regulation to be done right. And

1:29:06.680 --> 1:29:08.439
<v Speaker 1>when it's not done right, I think we have to

1:29:08.439 --> 1:29:12.080
<v Speaker 1>speak up against it. And it pains me sometimes to

1:29:12.080 --> 1:29:15.280
<v Speaker 1>be critical of some of the legalization models that are emerging,

1:29:15.320 --> 1:29:17.240
<v Speaker 1>but I think it was it was it in Ohio

1:29:17.320 --> 1:29:21.040
<v Speaker 1>where they had this awful model with um well, basically

1:29:21.040 --> 1:29:24.960
<v Speaker 1>they were having a constitutional monopoly for the people who

1:29:25.040 --> 1:29:28.639
<v Speaker 1>funded the ballot initiative where these ten named people would

1:29:28.640 --> 1:29:31.280
<v Speaker 1>then get basically a monopoly on the on the legal

1:29:31.320 --> 1:29:33.280
<v Speaker 1>cannabis market. And you know, I had to come out

1:29:33.320 --> 1:29:35.680
<v Speaker 1>against it, but Stevens said, I did. I did want

1:29:35.680 --> 1:29:37.759
<v Speaker 1>to give you the last word on this. But quite funny,

1:29:37.800 --> 1:29:41.080
<v Speaker 1>that was a wonderful sonation that you just presented, and

1:29:41.120 --> 1:29:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I overwhelmingly of course in the end. You know, I've

1:29:44.160 --> 1:29:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I've been on record for a long time as saying

1:29:46.040 --> 1:29:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not in this for the bud wise irization or

1:29:48.560 --> 1:29:52.839
<v Speaker 1>marlboritization of marijuana. I really believe in the smallest beautiful

1:29:52.880 --> 1:29:55.280
<v Speaker 1>model and I'd like to see that work, and I

1:29:55.360 --> 1:29:59.439
<v Speaker 1>hope that we can actually make that. You know, that's

1:29:59.439 --> 1:30:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the next five know we've we've won the first, we've

1:30:01.880 --> 1:30:05.680
<v Speaker 1>won the argument against prohibition. That the next battle is

1:30:05.800 --> 1:30:08.679
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that the regulation and the legalization regulation

1:30:08.800 --> 1:30:10.880
<v Speaker 1>is done in the right way that you know, it's

1:30:10.920 --> 1:30:17.720
<v Speaker 1>a supports the principles that on that very optimistic and

1:30:17.760 --> 1:30:20.600
<v Speaker 1>promising note, I want to bring our extended conversation to

1:30:20.800 --> 1:30:23.320
<v Speaker 1>a halt. I want to thank you, Steve for being

1:30:23.439 --> 1:30:27.639
<v Speaker 1>such a wonderful ally throughout many decades and continuing into

1:30:27.680 --> 1:30:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the future, and a good friend, and for being a

1:30:30.320 --> 1:30:32.920
<v Speaker 1>real thought leader, and not just a thought leader, but

1:30:33.000 --> 1:30:35.120
<v Speaker 1>somebody who has had an impact on the way government

1:30:35.160 --> 1:30:38.559
<v Speaker 1>shapes these policies and bringing the right set of values

1:30:38.600 --> 1:30:40.840
<v Speaker 1>to thinking about all of this. And also thank you

1:30:41.200 --> 1:30:45.000
<v Speaker 1>for being you know, episode number eighties to conclude season

1:30:45.080 --> 1:30:47.640
<v Speaker 1>two of Psychoactive, and hopefully it will not be the

1:30:47.720 --> 1:30:51.040
<v Speaker 1>last episode of Psychoactive ever. Um, but I'm very glad

1:30:51.080 --> 1:30:53.519
<v Speaker 1>that you've got to be the final guest that we've

1:30:53.520 --> 1:30:56.920
<v Speaker 1>had in this current incarnation of psychoactis. Thank you then,

1:30:56.920 --> 1:30:59.120
<v Speaker 1>it's been it's been a privilege to work with you

1:30:59.200 --> 1:31:01.240
<v Speaker 1>over all these years, and it's been a it's been

1:31:01.320 --> 1:31:03.080
<v Speaker 1>fun coming on the show. And I hope it isn't

1:31:03.080 --> 1:31:05.719
<v Speaker 1>the last one. I hope so too. Okay, Steve, thanks

1:31:05.760 --> 1:31:13.559
<v Speaker 1>so much pleasure. If you're enjoying Psychoactive, please tell your

1:31:13.560 --> 1:31:15.759
<v Speaker 1>friends about it, or you can write us a review

1:31:15.800 --> 1:31:19.040
<v Speaker 1>at Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts. We

1:31:19.160 --> 1:31:21.600
<v Speaker 1>love to hear from our listeners. If you'd like to

1:31:21.640 --> 1:31:24.559
<v Speaker 1>share your own stories, comments, and ideas, then leave us

1:31:24.600 --> 1:31:28.759
<v Speaker 1>a message at one eight three three seven seven nine

1:31:29.880 --> 1:31:34.599
<v Speaker 1>sixty that's eight three three Psycho zero, or you can

1:31:34.640 --> 1:31:38.400
<v Speaker 1>email us at Psychoactive at protozoa dot com or find

1:31:38.400 --> 1:31:41.599
<v Speaker 1>me on Twitter at Ethan Natalman. You can also find

1:31:41.600 --> 1:31:45.799
<v Speaker 1>contact information in our show notes. Psychoactive is a production

1:31:45.840 --> 1:31:49.360
<v Speaker 1>of I Heart Radio and Protozoa Pictures. It's hosted by

1:31:49.360 --> 1:31:53.679
<v Speaker 1>me Ethan Naedelman. It's produced by noa'm osband and Josh Stain.

1:31:54.000 --> 1:31:58.479
<v Speaker 1>The executive producers are Dylan Golden, Ari Handel, Elizabeth Geesus

1:31:58.479 --> 1:32:01.800
<v Speaker 1>and Darren Aronotsky from proto Zilla Pictures, Alex Williams and

1:32:01.800 --> 1:32:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Matt Frederick from my Heart Radio, and me Ethan Edelman.

1:32:05.360 --> 1:32:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Our music is by Ari Blucien and a special thanks

1:32:09.240 --> 1:32:14.840
<v Speaker 1>to Avi Vi Brioseph Bianca Grimshaw and Robert deep H