WEBVTT - Top 10 NFL Week 15 Player Prop Picks & Predictions (Ep. 620)

0:00:01.080 --> 0:00:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in everybody to betting pros. It's time to place

0:00:03.480 --> 0:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>your bets. It's me Joey P joe Pisapia and this

0:00:06.680 --> 0:00:09.040
<v Speaker 1>is VP NFL. It's time to look ahead to the

0:00:09.080 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>props and look way past Thursday Night Football. Oh what

0:00:13.800 --> 0:00:17.079
<v Speaker 1>a punt fest. That was a lucky for me in

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:20.079
<v Speaker 1>one of my most important leagues. Ericson, I'm playing a

0:00:20.120 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>team that has Kien Williams and Cooper Cup and let's

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:24.640
<v Speaker 1>just say the point total was not what they expected.

0:00:24.680 --> 0:00:27.160
<v Speaker 1>So I think I'm very much alive fingers cross. Will

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>see how it goes. But we got a lot of

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 1>stuff to bet on this week, still a lot of props.

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:34.280
<v Speaker 1>I know. I'm gonna try not to ask Welshit all

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>about last night because he doesn't want to talk about it.

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 1>He's not in a good mood, and that's okay. I'm

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna let him. Just as Homer Simpson said, wallow in

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:43.960
<v Speaker 1>his own crapulence. That's what I'm gonna let you do.

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:47.279
<v Speaker 1>And Andrew Erickson, did you have any money on how

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 1>many punts were in Thursday Night Football? Just out of curiosity?

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:50.600
<v Speaker 2>No, I did not.

0:00:51.080 --> 0:00:53.560
<v Speaker 3>Had the Deebo Samuel first touchdown which he dropped, which

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 3>would have easily cashed and saved everything else that I

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 3>had bet on that game. The Grendel receiving yards, the

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 3>last thing I add to the car was actually the

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:03.720
<v Speaker 3>only good bet that came out of Thursday night football.

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 3>But guys, what this means is we're due do for

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:09.280
<v Speaker 3>a big week ration, for a big, big Sunday, big Monday.

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 3>So we're gonna bounce back because again, all the touchdowns

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:14.679
<v Speaker 3>are now gonna scored on Sunday because we got numb

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:17.199
<v Speaker 3>on Thursday night. You know, there's a limited amount, finite

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 3>amount of touchdowns are scored every single week, which mean

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:21.919
<v Speaker 3>the tuddies are coming in bunches on Sunday.

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 4>So get ready, Rickson, it's not bitcoin. Touchdowns are not bitcoin.

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 4>There's not a touchdown. Ye that made only a finite

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:29.679
<v Speaker 4>amount of touchdowns.

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Ericson's cock eyed optimism is exactly what this world needs.

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>And you need to take a little bit more of

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 1>it with you this weekend. That's what I say, take

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>it with you.

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 5>I don't need to hear anything from you right now.

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:40.560
<v Speaker 5>I don't know.

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:43.200
<v Speaker 4>I wish they had beat buttons on here now. That

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:46.320
<v Speaker 4>game was trash. I only had wished that. Did they

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 4>say it's the first game all season that didn't have

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 4>any touchdowns because that was, like I believe, so it

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 4>was like two twenty two to one or two twenty

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 4>to one. If you bet no touchdown in that game,

0:01:57.040 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 4>that was the only play.

0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 1>What who would do that? Especially Pook had been playing

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and Stafford all that suff Yeah, we're on the Cincinnati folks.

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 1>So let's move on. And don't forget when we're talking

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>about props. Were using the prop bet cheat sheet. You

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 1>can find it over at bettingpros dot com slash props

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:12.359
<v Speaker 1>or if you have the app, which you should download

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 1>it sink your sports books for free. Use the prop

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 1>bet cheat sheet to make all your prop bets. Welsh,

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>let's shake the dust off and let's talk about bo Nicks,

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the greatest quarterback in the history of the league. He's

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>been able to do some great things this year. All

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:26.640
<v Speaker 1>jokes aside, and it's a good matchup for him. They

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 1>are favorites. So how do you want to approach bow

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Knicks with a two thirty seven and a half passing

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 1>yards were going over or under this?

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we're gonna go over and unlike uh DeAndre Campbell

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 4>or Devondre Campbell or not gonna work here anymore, doesn't matter.

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 4>Just because I lost doesn't mean I'm going to step

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:46.360
<v Speaker 4>off the show and not come back and play.

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:49.839
<v Speaker 5>I'm a gamer, he's not. And we're going with bow Knicks.

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:53.799
<v Speaker 4>Passing yards over two point thirty seven on the over, Yes, sir.

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 4>He has hit this in three straight weeks. Colts have

0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:59.959
<v Speaker 4>given this up in five of the last six weeks,

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 4>coming off of a buye bo Nicks has Boonix just

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 4>in general, the completion percentage and how he's worked. He

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 4>has been this like low key, I like in their

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 4>offense to like how Patrick mahomes and they'll have these

0:03:11.720 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 4>rotational wide receivers keep moving throughout there. They've just like

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 4>put bo Nix in a situation where he doesn't have

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 4>to make these big, crazy plays. He can have just

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 4>like high leverage, high completion passes and that works really

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:27.359
<v Speaker 4>well for him. And this Colts matchup is pretty fantastic

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:29.680
<v Speaker 4>on the ground in the air, so I love bo

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 4>Nicks here. Projected numbers are quite a bit over this.

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 4>I think majority of them are over two fifty. So

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 4>coming off of the bye, that little bit of.

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 5>Rest and game planning. Just love it even more.

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 4>And as I think I said in the Prediction show

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 4>to Ericson, bo Nicks is the horse king and the

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 4>Colts will be the glue.

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, last week, Ericson, you were dogging your boy Bryce

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Young with the under and you were right now this

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 1>week different matchup their favorites against the Cowboys. What a

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:58.839
<v Speaker 1>fun time that is. This time you found an over

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 1>with Bryce Young. So it looks like maybe, just maybe

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 1>all your Carolina stuff is on track. Baby, it looks

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 1>like mister Panther is on a roll. So how are

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 1>we gonna make money on Bryce Young this week?

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 3>Let's get this straight. It's mister cardiac cat. The Panthers

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 3>in their underdogs. That's in their Panthers. They're they're kittens. No,

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 3>we've got the cardiac Cats coming out to play this

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 3>week against Dallas at home. So the prop that I

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:23.239
<v Speaker 3>like the most is the one probably on my favorites

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 3>this week is Bryce Young over his rushing yards at

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:28.360
<v Speaker 3>thirteen and a half. He's been over this in four

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:31.480
<v Speaker 3>straight games. He's at least seventeen rushing yards last four

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:34.600
<v Speaker 3>straight games. You look at Dallas, what do they offer

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 3>the best on defense? Is their pass rush. So if

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 3>they're going to get to Bryce Young, he's going to

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 3>be running around trying to scramble. And the reason why

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 3>is Dallas second and most rushing yards allowed to quarterbacks

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:47.720
<v Speaker 3>this season. So you've got the quarterback who's running a lot.

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 3>The matchup is there, Bryce Youung's playing well, So I

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:51.720
<v Speaker 3>feel really good about this one. So I'm gonna go

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 3>over on Bryce Young his rushing yards.

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Well for your second prop this week, we're gonna say,

0:04:56.400 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>in the same game, go with cdee Lamb. Now is

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:03.040
<v Speaker 1>a receiving prop this week is around sixty three and

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:05.719
<v Speaker 1>a half. He has gone over this number three of

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the last four weeks, so can he do it again

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:09.599
<v Speaker 1>this week? Welsh?

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:12.280
<v Speaker 4>Yes, and that is the play sticking into that game.

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:14.039
<v Speaker 4>I love this one, and I will tell you this

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:16.479
<v Speaker 4>one's actually gone down. This has gone down two yards

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 4>since the early market. He's had six or more receptions

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 4>in four of his last five games, as you mentioned,

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 4>by the way, including three games of eight or more.

0:05:26.920 --> 0:05:29.359
<v Speaker 4>He has hit this in three of his last four games.

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:32.040
<v Speaker 4>Highly graded, you know, like right near the top ten

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 4>of the wide receiver quarterback matchup metric that they put

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 4>on pff.

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 5>Which you like to see.

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 4>They're also dogs, so if they're behind, they're going to

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:40.839
<v Speaker 4>be throwing. And one thing that we know is Cooper

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:44.159
<v Speaker 4>Rush is going to continuously throw the ball to Ceedee Lamb.

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 4>So the question can be that there was one of

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 4>those games where it was like an absurd amount of

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:51.480
<v Speaker 4>receptions and the yards weren't there, But you're going to

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 4>be able to do that with the Panthers, And I'm

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:56.920
<v Speaker 4>not so sure that. I think because the Panthers are

0:05:56.960 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 4>a favorite, a lot of people feel like, oh man,

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:00.360
<v Speaker 4>this is going to be a blowout, is going to

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:01.919
<v Speaker 4>be crazy. It's like, no, I think the Cowboys are

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:04.680
<v Speaker 4>going to be competitive. Panthers give up the most fantasy

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:07.040
<v Speaker 4>yards to running backs. I know it's a betting show,

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 4>so that doesn't matter, but they're gonna be able to

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 4>The Cowboys are gonna be able to establish a running game,

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 4>which is going to help the passing game. And the

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:17.920
<v Speaker 4>passing game evolves around Ceedee Lamb. He is his own

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:21.039
<v Speaker 4>planet and everything else rotates around it. So this is

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 4>really low total. I really like it for Ceedee Lamb.

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:26.360
<v Speaker 4>The receptions, by the way, also are five point five,

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 4>but it's juice to Hell. So on a prediction side

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:33.840
<v Speaker 4>or projection side, it's around six receptions. So can I

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:38.040
<v Speaker 4>average over eleven yards per reception with CD lamb, Yes,

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 4>I think I can against the Carolina Panthers. So I

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 4>think this is a It's not my favorite favorite favorite

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:44.359
<v Speaker 4>of the week, but I think this one has a

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:45.239
<v Speaker 4>really nice floor.

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:46.040
<v Speaker 5>On the betting.

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:48.359
<v Speaker 1>Side, the last man's standing for the New Orleans Saints

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:50.280
<v Speaker 1>is Alvin Kamara, So a figure is going to get

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:53.839
<v Speaker 1>a lot of work. But Jake Canterer's playing quarterbacks, so

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe some three and outs could put that in jeopardy.

0:06:56.000 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>So when you're looking at New Orleans this week, in

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 1>this offense, and you're trying to evaluate Alvin can what

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 1>side do you come out on?

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 3>Undertaker, the under, the under on Alvin Kamara under sixty

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 3>eight and a half rushing yards. Look, he had the

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 3>smash spot last week. He had seventeen carries against the

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 3>Giants and got forty four yards two point six yards

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 3>percare against the freaking New York Giants to have one

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 3>of the worst run defenses in the NFL.

0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 2>So in a game.

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 3>Where the Saints are underdogs against the Commanders coming off

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 3>a bye week, with Jake Hayner making the start, I

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 3>don't know how much rushing yard Alvin Kamara is going

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 3>to accumulate in this spot sixty eight and a half rushing yards.

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 3>He's hit this number twice since Week four. It's week fifteen, guys,

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 3>It's week fifteen, and it's nowhere near Week four. So

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 3>I think that with Kendre Miller back. In the four

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 3>games with Kendry Miller played this year, Alvin Kamara has

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 3>gone under his rushing prop three of those games. Without

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 3>Derek Carr, He's three, and Ozho towards the under. So

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 3>I get why this number is what it is because

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 3>of what he's done all year long, but all the

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 3>other factors are at play in this matchup, no Derek Carr,

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:58.560
<v Speaker 3>tougher matchup, Kendrey Miller's hell healthy, I don't think he's

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 3>coming nowhere near close sixty eight half rushing yards. So

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 3>I think this number is going to continue to dip.

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 3>I think that actually opened closer to seventy seven and

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 3>a half rushing yards and it's been on a steady

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 3>decline since that. So hop on it now because I

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 3>think by the time this closes on Sunday, it's going

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 3>to be around sixty five, sixty four to sixty three,

0:08:14.120 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 3>and again he got he was under fifty yards against

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 3>the Giants last week, So I continue to poundy under Erickson.

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 4>I love this one too, you know, because I'm kind

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:25.560
<v Speaker 4>of on Candre Miller. They want you to press that

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 4>over their offer, at least on DK right now, it's

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:32.559
<v Speaker 4>plus money to go over. You don't usually see plus

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 4>money on rushing yard props, especially for running backs. So

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:38.960
<v Speaker 4>that's the play. Is this is steadily going down. Is

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:41.719
<v Speaker 4>they're wanting you to take that over, and I am

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 4>with you on that. I kind of believe that Hendre

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 4>Miller is going to be a little bit more involved.

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:47.720
<v Speaker 4>I almost took this one. I have like three running

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 4>backs that are just in my brain about unders. I

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 4>am is it the over today?

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 5>For sure?

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 4>But I tried, and I wanted and I've contemplated some unders,

0:08:56.360 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 4>So I love this one all right.

0:08:57.800 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Before we get to the next prop bet on the

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:01.440
<v Speaker 1>list for the boys. If you're looking for a way

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 1>to get cash back to load funds on your favorite

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 1>sports book or daily fantasy site, our partner edge Boost,

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the financial platform for smartbetters, allows you to do just that.

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Here's how it works. You go to bettingpros dot com

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:16.839
<v Speaker 1>slash Edge and enter your information to sign up for

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 1>their digital visa debit card. You'll link your Edge cash

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Back Visa card to any sportsbook, daily fantasy site, sweepsite,

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:27.720
<v Speaker 1>horse racing operator, I casino or land based casino digital

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:30.079
<v Speaker 1>wallet and for a limited time, you earn point five

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 1>zero percent cash back on all deposits with no limit.

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:35.120
<v Speaker 1>So some advantages of the Edge card. It will allow

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:38.079
<v Speaker 1>you to instantly load and withdraw funds to and from

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:40.439
<v Speaker 1>your favorite platforms, the more waiting period when trying to

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 1>transfer funds from one sportswok to another to catch that

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:45.600
<v Speaker 1>line that your I call before it's gone. Edge boost

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 1>pays you on every transaction for just using the card.

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:50.199
<v Speaker 1>Depending on how many times you would draw and redeposit,

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 1>you can earn thousands in cash back and there are

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 1>no minimums or costs to maintenance account. Edge only makes

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 1>money when you use the card and they pay. They

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 1>also pass through a significant portion of that cash back

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 1>out to you, and the card is backed with no fee,

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 1>no minimum FDIC insured dedicated betting bank accounts and also

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>meeting no frozen accounts or transaction reviews just a safe

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 1>place for which you to deposit and withdraw your money.

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 1>So head over to bettingpros dot com slash edge today

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 1>and find out a better way to make sure you

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:23.840
<v Speaker 1>are betting smarter. Let's get to the next prop here

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:26.440
<v Speaker 1>on the list here for these gentlemen, Welsh. I love

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 1>this one. I'm all in. I was talking up on

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the Thursday live stream on Fantasy Pros about Adam Thielen.

0:10:32.040 --> 0:10:33.680
<v Speaker 1>You were here with the fifty one and a half

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:37.080
<v Speaker 1>receiving yards. The guy has been great, the ageless wonder,

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Adam Thielen. It makes me feel good because it's an

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>older guy here. It's good to see when the old

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:43.680
<v Speaker 1>farts get out there and play football and do a

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 1>good job. So I'm in on this over. Why should

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:47.959
<v Speaker 1>everybody else be betting it along with us?

0:10:48.240 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 4>Well, by the way we're you and I are in

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:51.840
<v Speaker 4>the age where you look at like a thirty four

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 4>year old as an old farmer.

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:55.680
<v Speaker 1>That's right. Well, he's a old far for football standards.

0:10:55.760 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 1>That'd be for football for eric for.

0:10:57.160 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 5>Wide receivers too.

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, get closer closer to old fart for football standards,

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:04.080
<v Speaker 1>ever closer, every shout out.

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 4>To betting pros and the Meme department for last night,

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 4>using Ericson at one of the team meet up falls

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 4>whide receiver against our boy AJ. I don't think everybody

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 4>knew what it was, but it's one of the greatest

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 4>quarter I know, you're the quarterback there and our guy

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:23.839
<v Speaker 4>AJ's there and Ericson. Erickson, you look so tall in

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 4>that too. You look like you're going to have really

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 4>good Adam feeling like separation. Just sometimes the routes they

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 4>don't always run four with slippery.

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 3>That's one of the worst aesthetically like videos I've ever

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 3>seen my entire life of myself, just like.

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 2>A but just terrible.

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 4>It's pretty, it's pretty amazing. But onto Adam Thielen. I

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 4>love this number. I actually started on the receptions. I

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 4>know you guys always like yards more than receptions. I'll

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 4>get down with the receptions. But four and a half

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 4>was the receiving reception number, which I think is a smash.

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:58.440
<v Speaker 4>But you're getting better odds on the yards, and I

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:00.440
<v Speaker 4>told myself was I was going through because you know,

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:03.200
<v Speaker 4>he smashed this on receptions across the board, but it

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 4>was like around minus one thirty, said, if this is

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:08.200
<v Speaker 4>anything under sixty, think you got to smash the yards.

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:10.080
<v Speaker 4>And sure enough, fifty one and a half. He has

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 4>hit this in three straight games. He has had twenty

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 4>one targets and seventeen receptions over the last two games alone.

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 4>The Cowboys have given up this receiving yard number to

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:27.840
<v Speaker 4>a wide receiver against eight straight weeks. Eight straight weeks,

0:12:28.120 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 4>and Adam Thielen is the no doubt number one receiver

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 4>for the Carolina Panthers who are favored. So we are

0:12:35.880 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 4>now in the market. These three are like, I like

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 4>those two that I've already had. We're now in the

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:42.559
<v Speaker 4>market that I really love these next three, and this

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:44.680
<v Speaker 4>is one that I love. It's a low number for

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:47.439
<v Speaker 4>a number one receiver against a Cowboys team that gives

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 4>this up a bunch and a guy that is getting massive,

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 4>massive amounts of a target share and the favorite, so

0:12:53.400 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 4>Adam Thielen, I think yards is an absolute smash right now.

0:12:57.200 --> 0:13:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Robinson Junior over six and a half receiving yards

0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>is where we're going next. So not the rushing, but

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the receiving. So Andrew, let's talk about this one. I

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:07.440
<v Speaker 1>know Austin Eckler is gonna be out here again, So

0:13:07.559 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 1>he's probably not gonna when we're gonna get him back,

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:12.439
<v Speaker 1>if we're gonna get him back. But Robinson's role, especially

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:14.559
<v Speaker 1>coming off a buy, expects to be pretty large, and

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:16.200
<v Speaker 1>this seems like a pretty easy number to get. So

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 1>where are you going here?

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:18.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I just think it's really really low for a

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 3>player that, Yeah, you're not looking at Brian Robinson as

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 3>this player that's known for his receiving props per se.

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 3>But he's gone over this number in three of his

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:28.679
<v Speaker 3>last four. When I first got him's at five and

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 3>a half receiving yards. He's gone over that in four

0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 3>straight games. So he's had at least six receiving yards

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 3>in four straight games. So you're feeling pretty good if

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 3>you're taking the over at six and a half. And

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 3>part of the reason why I was drawn to this

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 3>is the projections just have him flying way over this number.

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 3>It's just way too low, and I don't think it's

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 3>accounting for the fact that, like you said, Austin Eckler's

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:47.000
<v Speaker 3>not part of this offense.

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:48.920
<v Speaker 2>Like he's on edge reserve, he's not coming back.

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 3>So even if Jerry m McNichols is playing in that

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:54.200
<v Speaker 3>Eckler role, I still think Robinson is good for at

0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 3>least one or two screen passes behind the line of scrimmage.

0:13:56.400 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 3>And what do we know about the Saints. They cannot tackle,

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 3>Like they're one of the worst tackling teams. In the end,

0:14:00.880 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 3>they'll still try to tackle Sean Tucker from Week five

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 3>or whatever, that monster game. So Brian Robinson again, he

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:07.559
<v Speaker 3>can get this on the first drive. You get this

0:14:07.640 --> 0:14:09.560
<v Speaker 3>on the first play they decide to like dial up

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 3>a screen pass form, which they do. Brian Robinson coming

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 3>out of Alabama not really known as a receiver, but

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 3>for some reason he'd always been kind of like overly

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 3>efficient in the receiving game. So I really just I

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 3>trust in the projections here. It's not just on VP.

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 3>NFL Pro has really good projections as well, and those

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 3>have him flying over this number. So without Eckler again,

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 3>he's been over six receiving yards in both games without

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 3>Eckler played this season. I think that gets this one

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 3>done pretty easily.

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 4>I want to throw out that I almost put this

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 4>on my card and I did bet it. So I

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 4>talked about like, oh I almost did the under. This

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 4>is one that I've got my own sheet, and I

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 4>you know these are the bets I'm gonna do, and

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:44.360
<v Speaker 4>here's the ones I put on the show.

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:46.160
<v Speaker 5>I bet this one. I'm with you.

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 4>I also got five and a half, which seems like

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 4>an absolute smash. So this is a definite co sign

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 4>here as one that is already on the betting pros

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 4>app under my name.

0:14:55.600 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I also put it together with him scoring anytime touchdown,

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 1>which is minus three already on the Jews pretty heavy

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 1>this week, which feels, you know, probably right. But we

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:06.960
<v Speaker 1>put that together with this number here, the six and

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 1>a half, you get plus one seventy. That's a pretty

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 1>good spot to live into. You get that into plus money.

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 1>That seems like a lock there for me. Let's get

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:15.720
<v Speaker 1>to to a tongue Yiloa next. I got a stat

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 1>for you, Welsh to his last four games, seventy five

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 1>percent completion percentage, thirteen hundred passing yards, eleven touchdowns, no picks,

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 1>and a passer rating of one eighteen point five. So,

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 1>taking on the Texans this week, how do you want

0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 1>to approach to a tongue of Biloa? Considering this run

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 1>he's been on.

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 4>We are going to take those touchdowns on all those

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 4>stats over those four games. Add one more stat he

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 4>has had two touchdowns or more in those four straight

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 4>games he has thrown. So we are going over one

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 4>point five on the passing touchdowns the Texans, they have

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 4>given up two or more touchdowns in four or five games.

0:15:51.440 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 4>You can't run against the Texans. The Dolphins can move.

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 4>They're definitely not that early season's Dolphins where every other

0:15:56.760 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 4>play is a run and we're like, what the hell

0:15:58.480 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 4>is going on?

0:15:59.120 --> 0:15:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Now?

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 4>They're getting the ball on the air more Tyreek Hill.

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 4>I'll tell you I have a Tyreek Hill bet. But

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 4>the line moved a little too much. I took him

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 4>off of the show. I was going to put the

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 4>receiving yards on this show, but I took it early,

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 4>and it's moved up three or four yards already. And

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 4>this is just a really great spot. So two is

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 4>hitting this from the passing department. You can pass against

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:18.960
<v Speaker 4>the Texans while not running, So I think that is

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:21.240
<v Speaker 4>what is going to happen. I think there are multiple

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 4>things that align in a great way where Two is

0:16:23.120 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 4>throwing touchdowns, the Texans are giving them up, the Jaalen

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 4>Waddle is finally reconnecting. So give me one point five

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:31.840
<v Speaker 4>over passing touchdowns for two of this week.

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:33.480
<v Speaker 3>I like this one a lot too well because I

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:35.880
<v Speaker 3>think too you look at the Texans, they give up

0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:38.720
<v Speaker 3>the highest percentage of passing touchdowns in the NFL. So

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 3>whenever Miami does ultimately score, it's probably going to be

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 3>through the air, even.

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 2>If it's a pass to eight Chan or Wattle or

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 2>Tyreek Kill. So this is a really good one.

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 4>Or John Oan overtime to screw up your your playoff run,

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 4>playoff runt.

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 1>No bitterness, none whatsoever. A big market game between the

0:16:57.640 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Bills and the Lions. And usually when you're talking about

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 1>running backs in the Lions catching the football, we're talking

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:05.240
<v Speaker 1>abou Jamir Gibbs. But instead we're gonna talk about David Montgomery.

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Here's a fun fact. Seven to last eight weeks, he's

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 1>gone over this number for receiving yards. Now, I didn't

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:13.119
<v Speaker 1>quite realize that. I know you got it fifteen and

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 1>a half. I see it on betting pros at sixteen.

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 1>So we're going over this. This is kind of sneaky

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 1>because I think everyone's perception of the Lions is all

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Manty just kind of runs the football and runs in

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, those touchdowns. But he's done a lot more

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 1>than that, and it clearly the stats bear that out.

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he's been kind of under the radar as the

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:35.680
<v Speaker 3>receiving back in this backfield. And shout out to the

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:38.120
<v Speaker 3>betting pros prop bet cheat sheet again. I'm looking through

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:41.120
<v Speaker 3>each of the matchups looking for the flame emojis, right,

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:43.199
<v Speaker 3>like who's up streak, like who can I back and

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:45.000
<v Speaker 3>to see Davi Montgomery seving guards and say this, like

0:17:45.000 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 3>this little flame like it's burning bright though, because like

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:50.440
<v Speaker 3>you said, I mean, he's been hitting this consistently week

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 3>in and week out, over fifteen and a half receiving

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:54.720
<v Speaker 3>yards in six straight games and ten of his thirteen

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 3>games played the season. That's almost eighty percent of the

0:17:56.720 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 3>time he's hitting this number. So him, by himself in

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:03.360
<v Speaker 3>a neutral matchup is going over this number in most

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:05.399
<v Speaker 3>of his games that he's played. And then you factor

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 3>in Buffalo's defense, one of the worst defense in terms

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:11.160
<v Speaker 3>of defending running backs in the passing game top three,

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 3>most yards, most catches, and targets to running backs this

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 3>season in the passing game. So in a script where hey,

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 3>you could actually see Detroit having to throw a little

0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 3>bit more love Dave Montgomery here going over as receiving

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:24.840
<v Speaker 3>arts brought because this is a game strip where you're

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:27.640
<v Speaker 3>actually expecting Jared Goff to probably drop back a little

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:29.639
<v Speaker 3>bit more than usual, where it's he dropped, he throws

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 3>twenty times and you just kind of hoping Montgomery rips off,

0:18:31.880 --> 0:18:34.720
<v Speaker 3>breaks a couple of tackles. So this one definitely another

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:36.160
<v Speaker 3>one of my favorites on the card this week.

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, Welsh, let's go to the Battle of Pennsylvania

0:18:38.560 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 1>for the last one. We're gonna start with here and

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:43.360
<v Speaker 1>then we'll get to the touchdown calls. So Russell Wilson

0:18:43.600 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 1>not passing stuff this week, but rushing is where you're going,

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 1>so let's talk about the why.

0:18:47.680 --> 0:18:49.719
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I ended up really loving this one, and like,

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 4>I don't bet a whole lot of Russ props or

0:18:52.840 --> 0:18:55.360
<v Speaker 4>anything like that, but just as I kept digging in

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:59.399
<v Speaker 4>seven point five rushing yards for us this week, and

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 4>I was like, Okay, this is interesting because it's a

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:04.640
<v Speaker 4>tough matchup against Philly, But what's like the one thing

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 4>that's in our face. No George Pickens, there's no chance

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 4>he's gonna play, and they cannot get the ball deep

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 4>and they want to Russ wants to and I think

0:19:13.680 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 4>without having Pickens, that's going to be a situation that's

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 4>going to end up having Russ take the ball down more.

0:19:19.119 --> 0:19:21.120
<v Speaker 5>Now seven point five rushing yards.

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:23.440
<v Speaker 4>He has hit this in two of his last three games,

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:28.960
<v Speaker 4>while never this season having less than three rushes per game.

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 4>So you've got a floor of three rushes per game.

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 4>You've also now got a deep game that is taken

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:36.159
<v Speaker 4>away from him. Let's throw the Eagles into this. The

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 4>Eagles have given up this rushing yard number two quarterbacks

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:43.639
<v Speaker 4>they've played against every single week of the season, starting

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 4>from Week four on. It doesn't matter the quarterback. Trevor

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:49.160
<v Speaker 4>Lawrence is in there, hit it, Joe Burrow's in there,

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:53.120
<v Speaker 4>hit it. Rushing quarterbacks, they hit it. Quarterbacks on average

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 4>against the Eagles are averaging four carries eighteen yards rushing.

0:19:57.960 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 4>I love this marker because you know us is getting

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:03.240
<v Speaker 4>at least three carries. The deep game is gone, the

0:20:03.320 --> 0:20:05.159
<v Speaker 4>pressure in I think is gonna move him up the

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:07.119
<v Speaker 4>field more. And the Eagles are giving this up. And

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:09.359
<v Speaker 4>like I said, every single game they've given up this

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 4>rushing yard total two quarterbacks since Week four. It ends

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 4>up weirdly being one of my favorite bets this week.

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:17.359
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a very interesting one. I mentioned to

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:19.359
<v Speaker 1>Ericson that I feel like at some point Field is

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:21.679
<v Speaker 1>going to get some work in this game, because when

0:20:21.720 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 1>you're down at a weapon like Pickens, you want to

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:25.879
<v Speaker 1>try to offset things a little bit. I've been searching everywhere.

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I can't get any justin Fields props. I'm even looking

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 1>for like an any time touchdown for him right now,

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:33.840
<v Speaker 1>and it's hard to find, which is a shame. But

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 1>if he if you get it, folks, if it pops

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 1>up in the next you know, twenty four hours, I'd

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 1>be all over it. Go ahead, Ericson.

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:42.840
<v Speaker 3>I can't wait to see like when Russ has his

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 3>eyes glow right and then he's like I'm gonna run.

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:46.439
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna run him. In my mind, I'm like, let

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:47.679
<v Speaker 3>Ross cook, let's go.

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:48.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I want him to run.

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:51.160
<v Speaker 4>I mean, by the way, like because I love this one.

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:53.639
<v Speaker 4>Like last week, as we're going four and one, just

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:55.159
<v Speaker 4>want to point that out. I'm very jaded right now

0:20:55.200 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 4>because of the Niners and losing my off from last night.

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:00.640
<v Speaker 4>But I was great last week on this show. But

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:02.639
<v Speaker 4>like one of my favorites was Bijon, and that was

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 4>only one that didn't hit. This will probably be the

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 4>one because the logic is there. I do want to

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 4>point out to you DraftKings has justin fields anytime touchdown

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:11.920
<v Speaker 4>at plus seven hundred, so seven to one.

0:21:12.040 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh so DK's got it, okay. I was looking on

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:16.159
<v Speaker 1>VANDU that couldn't find it there. I couldn't find on

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the app yet. So that's good. That's very good news.

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 1>All right. So, speaking of good process, I know you've

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:24.160
<v Speaker 1>been talking all weeks since Monday, you've been talking about

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Hurts in the same game Ericson. You've got some

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:29.040
<v Speaker 1>feelings about this one too. He had been very turnover

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 1>prone last year. This year it's been always a more

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 1>conservative offense, much to the chagrin of AJ Brown. But

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 1>that might change a little bit this week. And if

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:40.200
<v Speaker 1>it does, there's more room for error, and it looks

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:42.119
<v Speaker 1>like Andrew Erickson wants to take advantage of that.

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Jalen Hurts is going to throw an interception this week.

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:46.120
<v Speaker 2>It's going to happen. Because we're talking.

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 3>About the Steelers. We love the Steelers plus five and

0:21:48.280 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 3>a half. So how do they cover this game? Oh, well,

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:52.959
<v Speaker 3>they get an interception. I'm Jalen Hurts. Like it's pretty

0:21:52.960 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 3>intuitive to think, Okay, well they get a pick, they're

0:21:55.560 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 3>going to cover the five and a half point spread.

0:21:57.400 --> 0:21:59.359
<v Speaker 3>This game is going to go under the total because

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 3>it's going to be gritty, gonna go through the mud.

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:04.200
<v Speaker 3>And the thing with Hurts, right, the narrative all week

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 3>has been AJ Brown, this, AJ Brown's got to get

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:08.440
<v Speaker 3>his target's got to take the overs on AJ Brown.

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 3>But I'm kind of looking at it from like a

0:22:10.359 --> 0:22:13.560
<v Speaker 3>different perspective, where, Okay, now Jalen Hurts is gonna have

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:15.639
<v Speaker 3>to throw into more tight windows because they got to

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 3>get AJ Brown ten targets or else he's gonna be

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 3>upset and he's gonna go on Twitter again and complain.

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:22.480
<v Speaker 3>So I'm looking at it from a different respective thank

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:26.120
<v Speaker 3>instead of taking overs on AJ Brown, look at Jalen Hurts, Well, boy,

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 3>you're gonna get intercepted this time because start the year

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 3>he was throwing picks left and right, because he was

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:33.400
<v Speaker 3>forcing more throws. The last time he threw an interception

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:36.679
<v Speaker 3>was against Dallas, one of the tougher pass rushes they

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:41.200
<v Speaker 3>have faced this season. Pittsburgh's defense this year third interceptions first,

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:43.280
<v Speaker 3>and turnover margin. They have an interception in ten of

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 3>thirteen games played, including eight of their last nine games.

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 3>So he's way overdue to throw a pick. And if

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 3>they're gonna be dialing up more pass attempts, well arrest

0:22:53.640 --> 0:22:55.200
<v Speaker 3>my case he's getting intercepted this week.

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:57.680
<v Speaker 1>There you go, So I iNTS are coming for Jalen

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:00.359
<v Speaker 1>Hurts and hopefully some touchdowns as well well. And the

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:03.199
<v Speaker 1>Touchdown Score Report at bettingpros dot com slash touchdown is

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the way to get an edge on your touchdown bets.

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Our touchdown score report compares anytime touchdown stats to prop

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 1>bet odds and projections to help identify the best anytime

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 1>touchdown bets you're gonna find anywhere. It's head over right

0:23:15.119 --> 0:23:17.879
<v Speaker 1>now to bettingpros dot com slash touchdown for the latest

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:21.680
<v Speaker 1>touchdown prop analysis today. I've got my touchdowns ready to rock.

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's go going. Jerry Judy one of the best wide

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:26.880
<v Speaker 1>receivers in the league. When Jamis Winston is out there,

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:28.640
<v Speaker 1>so I know the weather might be tricky in that game,

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:30.640
<v Speaker 1>I still think we're gonna get Jerry Judy to find

0:23:30.640 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the end zone plus one sixty five and the squeaky

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 1>wheel gets the grease. I think Jalen Hurts might throw

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:38.880
<v Speaker 1>a pick, but I think at some point he's also

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:42.879
<v Speaker 1>gonna throw a touchdown to AJ Brown plus one forty five. Again,

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:45.880
<v Speaker 1>when you chirp, typically get the football, and I expect

0:23:45.880 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 1>that to happen this weekend. Good four o'clock games. So

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 1>you got that game, you got the Bills Detroit games,

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:54.199
<v Speaker 1>really fun stuff in that late window. Ericson, let's go

0:23:54.240 --> 0:23:56.360
<v Speaker 1>to you for your touchdowns this week. I know you've

0:23:56.359 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 1>got one that is a double dip as well that

0:23:59.880 --> 0:24:00.520
<v Speaker 1>you high on.

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, let's call it the Trey mcdouble.

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:05.480
<v Speaker 3>Right, Trey McBride's going to score two touties this week

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:07.879
<v Speaker 3>against the New England Patriots, like they're the worst defense

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:11.080
<v Speaker 3>in terms of EPA allowed per play to players in

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 3>pass catches that are aligned tight. And we all know

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:16.720
<v Speaker 3>the shtick with Trey McBride this year. Can't catch touchdown.

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:18.920
<v Speaker 3>He sees all these red zone targets, is on pace

0:24:18.960 --> 0:24:21.639
<v Speaker 3>to have the most receiving yards targets without a receiving touchdown.

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 2>YadA, YadA, YadA.

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:25.640
<v Speaker 3>Okay, this is where regression comes to head, right, this

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:28.000
<v Speaker 3>is where you have an explosion game in an exposable

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:30.639
<v Speaker 3>matchup we know that we're going to see Christian Gonzales

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:34.440
<v Speaker 3>cover of Marvin Harrison Junior. Patriot's defense is overall very bad,

0:24:34.440 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 3>and I don't think they have anyone that can really

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:38.880
<v Speaker 3>stop Trey McBride, who is a drowning in targets over

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:39.880
<v Speaker 3>the last couple of weeks.

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:41.479
<v Speaker 2>So I love McBride here. And it's funny.

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:44.000
<v Speaker 3>I mentioned this on the FP Show l this week,

0:24:44.000 --> 0:24:46.879
<v Speaker 3>but there's actually special on DraftKings because they're also aware

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 3>of the the Trey McBride lack of touchdowns. At plus

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 3>seven hundred, bet McBride to have nine receptions and not

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 3>score a touchdown and it's called Trey McBride's maid basically.

0:24:56.920 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 1>So I like that.

0:24:58.440 --> 0:25:00.920
<v Speaker 3>So it's an interesting if you want to go heavy

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:04.520
<v Speaker 3>on some of these multi touchdown approaches to the baby ride. Again,

0:25:04.560 --> 0:25:06.440
<v Speaker 3>he's probably gonna have a ton of catches in yards

0:25:06.440 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 3>in this game too, But that's just an interesting thing

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:10.000
<v Speaker 3>that I was looking at that I thought was kind

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:12.680
<v Speaker 3>of funny because the books are aware that Pride is

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 3>allergic to the end zone. So, uh yeah, trading Brad

0:25:15.359 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 3>scoring this week, okay?

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Uh And you've also got one for with a stone

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:20.440
<v Speaker 1>cold Steve Austin to get the end zone this week.

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:21.199
<v Speaker 1>Who is it? You got there?

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:21.399
<v Speaker 5>Oh?

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but uh, that's smarter, not harder, guys, Stone, I'm

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:29.399
<v Speaker 3>doing it for all the bits and the trade.

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:31.200
<v Speaker 2>That's smarter, not harder.

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Big double with cheese, So we go Stone Smart.

0:25:35.400 --> 0:25:35.640
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 3>Tight end for those aren't aware. Tight end for the

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:41.640
<v Speaker 3>Los Angeles Chargers. I think Joe, it's been a long season.

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:43.959
<v Speaker 3>I think I finally found my Donald Parhum that I've

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:45.720
<v Speaker 3>been looking for as.

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 1>A replacement all this time.

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 3>And I think again a uh, former wide receiver convert

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 3>Chargers tight end that is Stone Smart here. So I

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:57.480
<v Speaker 3>expect him to get the start this week. With Will

0:25:57.560 --> 0:26:00.119
<v Speaker 3>Disley out last week, in just the second half, he

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 3>had three targets fifty four yards twenty four yard grab.

0:26:02.880 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 3>And what I've noticed with Justin Herbert this year is

0:26:05.880 --> 0:26:07.480
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't matter who the titand has been like he

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 3>has hyper targeted that position. And you look at the matchup.

0:26:10.160 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 3>The Hit Bay Buccaneers are one of the worst defenses

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 3>in the NFL against guarding tight ends. So if they're

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:16.359
<v Speaker 3>going to be scoring, is it going to be Gus

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 3>Buss up the middle against the stack box I don't

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 3>think so. I think it's going to be Stone Smart

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 3>finding the end zone. So those are my tight end

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:25.960
<v Speaker 3>touchdowns on the call this week. I'm looking forward to.

0:26:26.119 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Here we go, one smart fellow, he felt smart. All right, Welsh,

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:32.800
<v Speaker 1>your turn. Let's blow this up here with some touchdown call.

0:26:32.920 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 5>Man Ericson loves those tight ends.

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 4>I mean, if we could have a percentage of how

0:26:39.320 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 4>many times you bet tight end touchdowns fifty percent I

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:45.440
<v Speaker 4>think on the year. But all right, my touchdown calls

0:26:45.720 --> 0:26:49.040
<v Speaker 4>this week, number one, we are going with a tight end.

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:50.320
<v Speaker 4>Would you look at that? I am going with a

0:26:50.359 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 4>tight end. I'm going with brock Bowers. It's interesting when

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 4>you look at the Falcons. The Falcons are getting demolished

0:26:56.640 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 4>from wide receivers. They don't really rank if you sort

0:26:59.840 --> 0:27:01.560
<v Speaker 4>by tight end, they don't really rank like you know,

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:03.639
<v Speaker 4>they're giving up a ton of fantasy points or touchdowns

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:06.239
<v Speaker 4>as far as wide receivers go. They're giving up the

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:09.480
<v Speaker 4>most receiving touchdowns in the NFL, the wide receivers right

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 4>now and on the last month, they're also giving up

0:27:12.840 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 4>the most touchdowns. Well, guess what brock Bower is not

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 4>just a tight end. Rock Bowers is everything. He's the

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 4>wide receiver of the tight end, the number one, the

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:22.320
<v Speaker 4>be all end all.

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 5>For the Raiders.

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 4>This is a great spot to a secondary. When they

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:29.760
<v Speaker 4>move Bowers out, I mean mayor Michael Mayer, they've end

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:32.200
<v Speaker 4>up putting in as a tight end spot who's played

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:34.920
<v Speaker 4>really well. Brock Bowers is going to score. It's plus

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 4>one sixty this week. It's a great matchup. My other

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:41.680
<v Speaker 4>touchdown call going with a quarterback going than anytime touchdown

0:27:41.960 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 4>Lamar Jackson. That one is sitting around plus one point eighty,

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 4>which I really like over on Lamar Jackson. The Giants

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:51.800
<v Speaker 4>have given up these seventh most rushing touchdowns to quarterbacks

0:27:51.840 --> 0:27:55.000
<v Speaker 4>so far this year. It is a ridiculous matchup across

0:27:55.040 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 4>the board. We're going to be hyper focused on Derreck

0:27:57.160 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 4>Henry Lamar is going to put one in at plus one.

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:03.160
<v Speaker 4>Also want to point out you had plus three twenty

0:28:03.160 --> 0:28:05.920
<v Speaker 4>on stone Smart plus three forty on DK for stone

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 4>Smart anytime touchdowns. So make sure to go to Betting

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:10.639
<v Speaker 4>Pros check out the tab of each player where you

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:13.120
<v Speaker 4>can analyze the bets and you can see the best

0:28:13.280 --> 0:28:16.160
<v Speaker 4>betting market across the land. If you like to shop

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:19.359
<v Speaker 4>around to the best odds for Stone Smart, Lamar Jackson,

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:22.640
<v Speaker 4>brock Bauers, or even multi touchdowns for Trey McBride.

0:28:23.119 --> 0:28:26.119
<v Speaker 1>Fun, fat, guys. I know you like fun facts. So

0:28:26.600 --> 0:28:30.280
<v Speaker 1>there's two games on the slate where there's any time

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:32.680
<v Speaker 1>touchdown scores that are all in the plus money. Do

0:28:32.680 --> 0:28:34.359
<v Speaker 1>you want to guess what those two games might be?

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:38.720
<v Speaker 1>So no minus, So there's no expectations. I feel like

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Vegas is silently telling us, maybe you should take the

0:28:42.040 --> 0:28:44.280
<v Speaker 1>unders in these games. I'm just saying I think it's

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of interesting. You rarely see that that, like one

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:49.160
<v Speaker 1>guy is not in the minus or at least even money,

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 1>they're all in the plus money. You want to take

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:51.640
<v Speaker 1>a guest.

0:28:51.480 --> 0:28:56.760
<v Speaker 5>Here, I am going to say, ooh, this is really tough.

0:28:56.960 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Just think it's fun. This is just fun at the

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:01.720
<v Speaker 1>end of the show, all right, Jaguars, Jets, Jaguars is

0:29:01.720 --> 0:29:05.720
<v Speaker 1>one of them. Jaguars plus one thirty DeVante Adams is

0:29:05.760 --> 0:29:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the best one you get. No, it's not the Broncos

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:10.239
<v Speaker 1>right now anyway as a record.

0:29:11.000 --> 0:29:15.200
<v Speaker 3>Not can't be, can't be Steel's Eagles, No, no.

0:29:15.200 --> 0:29:17.640
<v Speaker 5>Hey, Patriots, Cardinals, now Connor's.

0:29:17.520 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 1>No, No, it's actually Brown's and Kansas City Chiefs. Everybody's

0:29:22.920 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 1>in the plus money on that one. Interesting, So the

0:29:25.400 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 1>best one is Pacheco plus one twenty.

0:29:27.760 --> 0:29:29.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's really clear. Okay, that's the.

0:29:29.680 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Lowest of the of the I just thought that was

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:34.880
<v Speaker 1>really odd. Typically there's only always one guy and if

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 1>you get a game like that, Okay, maybe you get

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:39.240
<v Speaker 1>one game like that where everyone's a plus, but not too. Honestly,

0:29:39.280 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 1>it's typically an odd thing.

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, that seems uh fishy Verry sauce, very saus

0:29:45.320 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 3>So Travis kell is gonna score this week? Then I

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 3>guess he asked he has to score.

0:29:49.560 --> 0:29:53.680
<v Speaker 4>Need Andre Hopkins to go absolutely ballistic. Shout out to

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 4>Derek Brown who has me laddering DeAndre Hopkins this week.

0:29:56.920 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean weather, it could be an issue in

0:29:58.400 --> 0:30:01.480
<v Speaker 1>that one, so just pay attention before I bet it. Well,

0:30:01.560 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 1>you gotta sit your line alerts over on the Betting

0:30:03.280 --> 0:30:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Pros app and again download that bad boy, subscribe to

0:30:05.640 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the Betting Pros podcast wherever you get your pods and

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:10.200
<v Speaker 1>of course our YouTube channel as well. That's what you do,

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:12.120
<v Speaker 1>and drop your comments below. What are your favorite prop

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 1>bets for Week fifteen? That I'll do it for us

0:30:14.080 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 1>those are hours, but the story of the game goes

0:30:17.040 --> 0:30:19.040
<v Speaker 1>on for the Welsh and the Undertaker. I'm Joey P.

0:30:19.600 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 1>We'll see you next time. Kids. Thanks for listening to

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the Betting Pros podcast.

0:30:24.400 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 6>If you love the show, the best freeway to support

0:30:26.840 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 6>us is by leaving a positive review on.

0:30:28.840 --> 0:30:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts or Spotify.

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:33.400
<v Speaker 6>Follow us on x and TikTok at Betting Pros and

0:30:33.480 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 6>Instagram at Betting Pros NFL.

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:37.560
<v Speaker 5>Also subscribe to our YouTube channel

0:30:37.640 --> 0:30:45.360
<v Speaker 6>At YouTube dot com slash Betting Pros