WEBVTT - Jamie Dimon's Crypto Flip Flop

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:02.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, welcome back. You are listening to another episode

0:00:02.880 --> 0:00:05.120
<v Speaker 1>of the Markmas Show where we talk about bitcoin, we

0:00:05.160 --> 0:00:09.039
<v Speaker 1>talk about the decentralized revolution, and we talk about politics,

0:00:09.200 --> 0:00:12.600
<v Speaker 1>technology and finance in the context of those. So just

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:14.880
<v Speaker 1>as we can have a better understanding of what is

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 1>going on in the world, how it's changing, and more importantly,

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:21.279
<v Speaker 1>how we can personally navigate that, so we can survive

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:24.479
<v Speaker 1>and thrive as this is changing. Now, one thing about

0:00:24.520 --> 0:00:26.119
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin that's very difficult for a lot of people to

0:00:26.200 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>understand is that it's a lot of things. It's a

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:31.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of things, and it's going to be more things

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 1>than what we know it is. It's a new technology,

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and so as humans we try to understand it by

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:38.279
<v Speaker 1>comparing to something else that we know. It's sort of

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:41.879
<v Speaker 1>like this, sort of like when electricity came out. The

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:45.559
<v Speaker 1>first application of electricity was the light bulb. So then

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 1>you would say, well, what is this electricity thing? And

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>you would say, well, it's sort of like a digital candle.

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:54.040
<v Speaker 1>But what do we need that for. Candles have been

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:56.279
<v Speaker 1>light for five thousand years and they work pretty good.

0:00:56.320 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>And look, it's portable. I don't need all this these

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 1>wires and all this stuff. Right, So, um, bitcoin is

0:01:01.080 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>like digital cash. Yes, it's like that, it's like digital gold. Sure,

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 1>it's like that, but it's gonna be so many more

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:08.760
<v Speaker 1>things and so it's hard to understand that, and so

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I like to look at that. But really, um, it's

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 1>fixing a lot of things. And when you're looking at

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:15.760
<v Speaker 1>something new, like a new technology like this, one of

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the least important things to look at is the price

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:24.919
<v Speaker 1>of it. What's more important is the problems that it's solving.

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:26.560
<v Speaker 1>You're trying to predict where it's going to go in

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the future, and looking at the daily price of the

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:32.120
<v Speaker 1>weeklier monthly price is just a distraction in my opinion. Now,

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I do like to say that the price is like

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the ultimate bait and switch. It sucks people in for

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:40.840
<v Speaker 1>the money, for the number go up technology, and then

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 1>it switches them into freedom mindset, long term mindset. But

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, like I said, it is it is the

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 1>bait and switch, and so people are coming into it

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 1>for the money. And when you look at it from

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the money standpoint, you think about the the adoption of it,

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and you look at Wall Street coming into it, the

0:01:57.440 --> 0:02:00.559
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds coming into it, etcetera. And one of well,

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the biggest bank in the United States, JP Morgan Chase

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 1>head up by Jamie Diamond. Um, you know you would

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:09.520
<v Speaker 1>think that being one of the biggest banks, and Jamie

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Diamond arguably being one of the most powerful and influential

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 1>people in the United States and in the world because

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 1>of running the bank, he's been a giant opponent of bitcoin.

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it was seen he fight famously kind of

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 1>came out and said that you know, it's a fraud,

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:27.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a scam. He said, if anybody at JP Morgan

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 1>even traded, if they would be fired. Um, he's been

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:34.600
<v Speaker 1>very vocal against it. And and of course it makes sense, right,

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:37.079
<v Speaker 1>I mean, running the biggest bank, you don't want something

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:39.640
<v Speaker 1>to come compete for you. However, you know the old saying,

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 1>if you can't beat them, join them, so to speak.

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>And of course we've seen all the big banks, including

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 1>JP Morgan, getting in on the bitcoin action. And this

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 1>week we saw an article come out from the research

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 1>team that was pretty amazing. Banking giant JP Morgan said

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:56.519
<v Speaker 1>in a note Wednesday that bitcoin and cryptocurrencies are now

0:02:56.600 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 1>among its preferred quote alternative investments. So wow, what a difference, right,

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 1>went from Jamie Diamond saying if anybody even traded it,

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:10.800
<v Speaker 1>they'd be fired. To now the banks saying it's in

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 1>their preferred alternative investments. So what does that mean. Well,

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:17.360
<v Speaker 1>let's let's break this down a little bit. So it

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 1>says that bitcoin's steep sell off. So what does that mean?

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:22.919
<v Speaker 1>The the bitcoins steep sell off? So the price of

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin is down? Okay, let's down. I don't think that's

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a big surprise to anybody. It had reached a previous

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 1>UM high of about sixty in November one, and since

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 1>then it's been sliding down. I'm gonna talk about how

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 1>far it's down, especially in relation to some of the

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 1>other tech darlins. But in bitcoin, steep sell off as

0:03:43.320 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 1>well as that of other cryptocurrencies has been profound, and

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 1>there's been more profound than other alternative investments such as

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>private equity, private debt, and real estate. A couple of

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>things I'd say about that private equity. Private equity, that's

0:03:56.760 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 1>not a liquid market, it's not marked to market. What

0:03:59.200 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>does that mean? It's not really we don't know the

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 1>price of that every day. UM. A lot of private equity,

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 1>especially when it comes to like venture type deals. You

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 1>may not know how that shapes out for seven to

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 1>ten years. UM. Private debt, again, that's not marked to market,

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 1>there's no liquid event. Real estate it's not marked to

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 1>market either, and so um, of course it's much more volatile,

0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:20.960
<v Speaker 1>it's much more profound. In their words, but it said therefore,

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 1>the Bank envisions more room for a rebound in the

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 1>digital assets class than in other alternative classes. So what

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:31.360
<v Speaker 1>they're saying is that because bitcoin has sold off more

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>than equity, private debt, and real estate, they expect there

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 1>to be more of a rebound. So notice they didn't

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:40.360
<v Speaker 1>say they think it's going to zero and it's going

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>to crash. What they're saying is, no, it's going to rebound,

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's going to rebound even faster than those other

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:51.479
<v Speaker 1>alternative classes. Quote here it says we quote we thus

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 1>replace real estate with digital assets as are preferred alternative

0:04:57.279 --> 0:05:01.159
<v Speaker 1>asset class along with hedge funds. That's what they wrote

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:04.279
<v Speaker 1>for the Strategist. So now they're saying that we think

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:07.719
<v Speaker 1>that bitcoin is better than real estate. That's what they're saying.

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 1>I guess what they're saying is they think that over

0:05:10.800 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the next you know, near term, that bitcoin will rebound

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:18.480
<v Speaker 1>faster and higher than real estate, and it's their preferral

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:24.280
<v Speaker 1>turn of asset class. JP Morgan strategists reportedly said um

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 1>that they're sticking with their view that thirty eight thousand

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:31.360
<v Speaker 1>dollars was a fair price for bitcoin. It's about twenty

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:35.160
<v Speaker 1>seven point five percent higher than its current price of

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:39.280
<v Speaker 1>about twenty nine thirty thousand dollars right now. So a

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of times people want to know, is it a

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 1>good price? Is it dog? Should I buy? Should I?

0:05:42.560 --> 0:05:44.359
<v Speaker 1>Should I not buy? They say that they think the

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:48.720
<v Speaker 1>fair market prices thirty eight thousand, which is higher than

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 1>where it is today. So what does that mean? Does

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>that mean that it's going straight up to thirty No,

0:05:55.960 --> 0:05:58.279
<v Speaker 1>it definitely doesn't mean. That doesn't mean that it can't

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 1>drop lower than here. No, it doesn't mean that either.

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 1>But what it does mean is that they're they're they're

0:06:04.000 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>projecting what they think to be a fair market valuation

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 1>today of about thirty thousand dollars now. As an investor,

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the goal is to buy low and sell high. Right,

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>That's easy, Well, it's easier said than done anyway. Uh,

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 1>it's so easy to buy low, But how do you

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 1>know when it's low? And how do you know if

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna go high. Well, you're trying to figure out

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>what these fair market valuations are, and so I think, Um,

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:31.479
<v Speaker 1>what they're saying is that they think the fair market

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:33.919
<v Speaker 1>bios thirty eight thousand. So anytime you can buy below

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:38.240
<v Speaker 1>that value, that would be considered a bargain. Now, that

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:40.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that fair market value won't continue to go up,

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 1>which of course it will. JP Morgan and City Bank

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 1>have also put out guidance. They think that bitcoin will

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 1>overtake gold Well Gold about a twelve trillion dollar asset,

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:53.599
<v Speaker 1>which gives us about a twenty x upside from here

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 1>just from that alone. You know, when you're looking at

0:06:57.000 --> 0:07:00.720
<v Speaker 1>venture type deals, well, you're trying typically trying to do

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:02.920
<v Speaker 1>is trying to invest into a company that's going to

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:05.680
<v Speaker 1>create a new category. So for example, Uber of us

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:08.279
<v Speaker 1>an example before. But with Uber, let's say that you know,

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>you're in Silicon Valley getting pitched Uber and they're like, hey,

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 1>I have this app and it's gonna help you ride

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>chairs and people can be able to call cars from

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 1>their phone. And you're like, well that's stupid. I've never

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 1>heard of that before. Um, how much do you think

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 1>it's worth and they're like, oh, it's worth a hundred

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:23.840
<v Speaker 1>million dollars, Like, well, I never even heard of this before.

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 1>How that did come up with a hundred million dollars.

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 1>That's that's a ridiculous evaluation. Well, um, you know, the

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 1>taxi industry is this big, and the limon industry is

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 1>this big, and the van chair rideshare industry is this big,

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 1>and if we can get five percent of each of those,

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 1>then we can get to a hundred million. Right, So

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 1>something like that. And you would also look at the

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 1>same with bitcoin, if it can overtake gold per City

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Bank and JP Morgan's guidance, Well, that's a like I said,

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>t X right there. Okay, what else, Well, it's kind

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 1>of like having a Swiss bank account in your pocket.

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Swiss bank accounts have always been the best place to

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 1>park money offshore, but not so much anymore now these

0:07:56.160 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 1>rush ridges and oligarcs are getting their accounts frozen. However,

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the rich still put their money into offshore bank accounts

0:08:02.000 --> 0:08:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to protect it. And there's about forty trillion sitting in

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 1>offshore bank accounts. Could to get ten percent of that, well,

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>there's another four trillion there. There's twenty trillion dollars in

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 1>negative yielding bonds could have take five or tempercent of that. Okay,

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 1>there's another two two to four trillion dollars and very

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 1>quickly you can see how fast that can start adding up.

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 1>So while they say that they think the fair market

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 1>value today is thirty, doesn't mean that's where the cap is.

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:27.680
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't mean where it's going to go. And it

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 1>depends on obviously what time frame you're looking at. I

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 1>like to think if you're gonna hold bitcoin for at

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>least three years, you don't really need to worry about it.

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 1>And I say three years because there's never been a

0:08:37.880 --> 0:08:41.319
<v Speaker 1>point that you could have bought and been underwater three

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 1>years later. If you would have bought at the peak

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:47.720
<v Speaker 1>in twenty dollars took about three years to get back

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 1>to a new new all time high. Um. But it's

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:53.439
<v Speaker 1>not just that there's a new report here that I

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about says that bitcoin is better than

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:59.559
<v Speaker 1>the NASDAK. Now NASDAC is all the tech heavy stocks,

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the fay, Facebook, Apple, Netflix, Google, et cetera. And I

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 1>want to show you that you know, bitcoin is too

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:09.080
<v Speaker 1>volatile supposedly, but is it Is it doing better than

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the fan stocks. I want to talk about that and more.

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 1>I got I got some numbers in front of me

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and it is going to shock. You're gonna be blown

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 1>away here, um, and I got some stuff coming out

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 1>of the bankers and you'll be surprised what they said.

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the markma Show. We're talking about bitcoin, cryptocurrencies,

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the decentralized Revolution, breaking it down for you play by

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 1>play so you can navigate this correctly and more. I'm

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna be back with all that in a second, so

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 1>don't go away, all right, Welcome back. You are listening

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 1>to the Mark Moa Show. We're talking about bitcoin, We're

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about the decentralized Revolution, and we are narrating it.

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 1>We're navigating it for you so you can take advantage

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 1>of it, not be left behind. Now, before the break,

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 1>I was talking about JP Morgan changing their story. You know,

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>if you can't beat them, join them kind of thing.

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Or maybe it's the Gandhi quote which is first they

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:57.320
<v Speaker 1>laugh at you, then they fight you, and then they

0:09:57.400 --> 0:09:59.439
<v Speaker 1>join you kind of a thing. But Jimmy Diamond JP

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Morgan has been way outspoken against bitcoin, saying they would

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>fire anybody who even traded it. And here they are

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 1>now saying that they think it's gonna overtake gold, and

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:13.560
<v Speaker 1>they think that there's a upside on bitcoin right now

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:17.200
<v Speaker 1>today based off what they consider the fair market valuation,

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 1>which is pretty amazing. Um. Now that's their guidance. I

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know if that's not necessarily my opinion. Um. Another

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>analyst that I follow a good friend, Nick Bottia. He's

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 1>been on the show before. UM. He put out some

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 1>some reports this week showing based off of about five

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:34.560
<v Speaker 1>different metrics that he put out that he thinks maybe

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:37.960
<v Speaker 1>it's more around Um, the bottom, I should say is

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>around twenty to twenty, about twenty two thousand and so

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:43.720
<v Speaker 1>what do I mean by that? The bottom meaning he

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:46.440
<v Speaker 1>thinks that if if, if it did, if it could

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 1>get pushed down that far. And I'm not saying it

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:51.080
<v Speaker 1>will and probably not JP morgansond is gonna go up.

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 1>But even if it did, if some if some of

0:10:53.960 --> 0:10:57.560
<v Speaker 1>these hedge funds attacked it, you know, um, you know, whatever,

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the markets crashed and people rush for liquidity. He thinks

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 1>that even if it got down there, that would be

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the absolute bottom and people would buy it back up

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 1>from there. UM. And so you know, we'll have to

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>wait and see. So if the bottom is somewhere around

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:13.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty and then the current fair market values UM forty,

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 1>that means you're risk to reward ratio is pretty good.

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I think, I said, if it just overtakes gold, I

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:22.959
<v Speaker 1>mean that's a twenty x upside. So I have a

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty x upside with a you know, zero point two

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 1>percent downside. Like I like those odds. Those are pretty

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 1>good odds and you should too. Now, the the stock

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:37.960
<v Speaker 1>market and really the economy United States has been driven

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 1>by the tech stocks over the last twenty years, of course,

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 1>and over the last decades specifically, it's been driven by

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 1>internet stocks. We talked about the fangs. The fangs are Facebook, Apple, Netflix, Google, Right,

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 1>those kind of lead lead it, and all the tech

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:53.320
<v Speaker 1>stocks are are Most of these tech stocks are in

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the Nasdaq INDEXI, of the SMP five, of the nasdacum

0:11:57.360 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. And so the NASDAC has been the place

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 1>to be in So financial advisors they like to talk

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 1>about how, um, how bitcoin is, uh, you know, it's

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 1>a new asset. It's maybe it's like a tech stock.

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 1>It's been kind of trading along with the NASTAC sort

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 1>of like it's been treated like that, and because it's

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 1>trading along with that, it's it's got a lot of

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 1>high correlation, so meaning they're correlated moving together up and down,

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:22.560
<v Speaker 1>which they are. And I think what that demonstrates really

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 1>mostly is just that a lot of these tech investors

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 1>are also invested in the bitcoin right now, and so

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:31.440
<v Speaker 1>they just treat it like everything else in their portfolio. Now,

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:34.480
<v Speaker 1>everything is correlated until it's not, and so it doesn't

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 1>mean it always will be that way. But I think

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:40.200
<v Speaker 1>that if we if we look at this, if we

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:41.719
<v Speaker 1>if we looked at you know, a lot of a

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:44.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of these tech investors look at bitcoin as another

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:48.320
<v Speaker 1>tech play. So could bitcoin be like the next Amazon,

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Not in a sense of what it does or the

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:53.440
<v Speaker 1>use case of it, but just in how um the

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 1>valuation could grow? Things like that, Um could it be

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the next Bitcoin? Could it be like the next Apple, Facebook, etcetera.

0:13:00.200 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 1>But I think that, um, if you look at it

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:07.320
<v Speaker 1>that way, it's way too small, it's way too limiting.

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:11.439
<v Speaker 1>I think a much better analogy would be to look

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 1>at um bitcoin as the nasdack. Not one of the

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 1>companies in the NASTACK, but as the NASTACK because what

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:22.440
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing is we're seeing all of these companies now

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 1>being built on bitcoin, just like all these other companies

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 1>are on the NASDAC listed on the NASDAC. Now all

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 1>these other companies are being built on bitcoin. We're gonna

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:34.680
<v Speaker 1>talk about some of this new technology that's being built

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 1>on bitcoin in a minute. But if we look at

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:40.199
<v Speaker 1>this like I said, these, you know, most of the

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 1>tech investors, most of the stock investors, really most of

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the wealth that's been created in the stock market has

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 1>come from this tech sector. The top seven companies in

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the index are Apple, Microsoft, Google, alphabet Um, Amazon, Tesla

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and Video and Facebook or Meta as it's called, which

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:03.680
<v Speaker 1>have generated in trillion dollars worth of wealth in the

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 1>last decade alone, which is pretty big. But they're not

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:10.160
<v Speaker 1>quite the darlings that they have always been. And so

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 1>what we've seen for a couple of things. One well

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 1>we really saw through the election process in is that

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of regulatory risk that's been coming to

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 1>these tech stocks. So um, everyone talks about we'll just

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 1>wait until they regulate bitcoin, which I would respond with, well,

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin is already regulated. As a matter of fact, is

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>probably the most regulated asset in the world. Every financial

0:14:35.040 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 1>or every regulation is in entity in the United States

0:14:38.480 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 1>already regulates it, with the I r S, the SEC,

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the c f TC, we got FNS in I mean,

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 1>you name it. Everybody has put regulations on top of bitcoin,

0:14:49.520 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and they don't all chime in on other types of assets,

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 1>and so it's already there. But what we're seeing is

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>increased regulations against these um text stocks and so um.

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:00.200
<v Speaker 1>You know with President Trump, you saw you get off

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:02.200
<v Speaker 1>of Twitter, but before he got kicked off of Twitter,

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 1>they were talking about I'm repealing this protection this section

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 1>two oh three um that they have. I'm not going

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 1>to get deep into that right now, but you know,

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 1>there's allegations of monopolies being built, of manipulation alex and Tampa, Tampa, tampering,

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 1>of you know, censoring, things like that, and I think

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:24.480
<v Speaker 1>more and more people are starting to wake up and

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 1>see this. The regulators are, the politicians are starting to

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 1>see this as well, and there's there's a lot of

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>regulatory risk there and I think the future of tech

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 1>stocks is greatly diminished because of that. I think we've

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 1>seen all this growth, but in this environment that we're

0:15:40.360 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 1>in all the money in the markets is rotating from

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>tech and growth and moving into value commodities, things like

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 1>that UM with less liquidity, without the ability to borrow

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of money, it's gonna make it harder for

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 1>them to grow. And I don't see them repeating the

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 1>tech X return over the next decade. That's where bitcoin

0:15:59.520 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 1>comes in. I think bitcoin can outperform that. Now. A

0:16:01.640 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of people say that bitcoin is two volatile. It's

0:16:03.880 --> 0:16:06.960
<v Speaker 1>two volatil. Right, let's take a look at that. So

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 1>year to date from January one to today, Bitcoin is

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 1>down thirty seven it's a big drop. I'm not gonna

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 1>lie seven percent. But you know else is down thirty

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 1>percent year to date. Tesla. Tesla's down thirty seven percent

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 1>year to date. Amazon It's down thirty four percent year

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 1>to date, about the same. Netflix is down sixty eight

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:31.240
<v Speaker 1>percent year to date, almost double whipitcoins down. Shopify is

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 1>down seventy five percent year to date. Meta Facebook is

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:40.360
<v Speaker 1>down forty four percent. So when you look at the

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 1>tech stocks Tesla, Amazon, Netflix, Shopify, Facebook, Bitcoin is doing better. So, yes,

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>it's down, I'm not gonna say it's not. I'm not

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna lie to you it's down, but not as much

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 1>as Tesla, Amazon, Netflix, Shopify, Meta, Googles down. So not

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 1>quite as bad and so big. As I said, bitcoin

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 1>is is being looked at as like a tech stock.

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:06.760
<v Speaker 1>It's trading along with the NASDAC. There's a high correlation

0:17:06.800 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 1>there now. Doesn't mean there will always be there, but

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:12.719
<v Speaker 1>it is there now. But it seems to be holding

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:17.159
<v Speaker 1>up better than Tesla, Amazon, Netflix, Shopify, and Facebook Meta.

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:20.800
<v Speaker 1>So is it too volatile? Well, if you think that's

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:22.919
<v Speaker 1>too volatile, then you also have to think all of

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:27.680
<v Speaker 1>those are too volatile as well. Now, volatility is also

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 1>a good thing, right. Volatility works both ways. It goes

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 1>up and down. How does an asset like bitcoin go

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 1>from zero to being worth thirty thousand dollars today without volatility?

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 1>The answer is it doesn't. If it wasn't volatile at

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 1>alogyy stuck at zero forever. And so you want volatility,

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 1>you want prices to go up and down, and that's

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 1>what's happening. Now you're listening to the Markmas show. We're

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:52.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about, of course bitcoin, we're talking about um this

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:54.720
<v Speaker 1>decentralized revolution that the world is going through, and we

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 1>do that by looking at finance which we're doing right now.

0:17:57.359 --> 0:17:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Of course we do that through looking at politics, which

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 1>affects the finance, and of course how technology reshapes the world.

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:05.879
<v Speaker 1>I have a lot more to cover. I want to

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 1>talk about what some of these people at World That

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Comic Forms said about Swift. I want to talk about

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:13.439
<v Speaker 1>the FED chair, talking about cb d c S, I

0:18:13.440 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about what's happening with the central bankers,

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and so much more. Don't go away, all right, welcome back.

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:20.639
<v Speaker 1>You are listening to the Mark Moa show where we

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:23.280
<v Speaker 1>talk about bitcoin. We talked about cryptocurrencies, and we talk

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:27.640
<v Speaker 1>about the decentralized revolution, and I was talking about before

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the break, how we're seeing this massive shift going on

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 1>right before our very eyes. Of course in more ways

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:35.400
<v Speaker 1>than we can count, one of which is a capitulation

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:38.160
<v Speaker 1>by some of these Wall Street banker types. I'm talking

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:39.960
<v Speaker 1>about Jamie Diamond, head of the biggest bank in the

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:43.959
<v Speaker 1>United States, maybe the world. JP Morgan, and how he

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 1>went from Bitcoin's the biggest fraud scam thing in the

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:50.679
<v Speaker 1>world to um and if anybody at JP Morgan ever

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 1>traded it on fire, him too. Now JP Morgan putting

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 1>out guidance saying it's gonna overtake bitcoin and how they

0:18:56.720 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 1>think it's um has upside today from where they consider

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:05.760
<v Speaker 1>its fair market value. Pretty amazing, pretty big about face

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:09.120
<v Speaker 1>if you will, UM. And we're seeing it all over

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:11.239
<v Speaker 1>the place. I mean it, it is, it's all over

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:14.399
<v Speaker 1>the place. We saw this week that at the Federal

0:19:14.440 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Reserve UM the FED Vice chair Lele Brainerd. She was

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 1>being questioned by the House Committee on Financial Services asking

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 1>about um C b d C s UM, which stands

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:31.880
<v Speaker 1>for central bank digital Currencies, and being asked specifically if

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 1>a cb d C could coexist with stable coins? So

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:38.119
<v Speaker 1>what does that mean? And what does that have to

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 1>do with bitcoin? What does that do with the financial system?

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Well a lot, so, the US Federal Reserved Vice Chair

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Litle Brainard said that a central bank digital currency s

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 1>CBDC could, in fact, it could exist alongside stable coins

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and provide a measure of safety. Why would it exist

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 1>provide a measure of safety? Well, let's talk about that. So,

0:19:57.880 --> 0:20:01.479
<v Speaker 1>she says, CBDCs could coexist with be complementary to stable

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 1>coins and commercial bank money by providing a safe central

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 1>bank liability in the digital financial ecosystem, much like cash

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:15.639
<v Speaker 1>currently coexists with commercial bank money. So currently we have

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 1>stable coins. If you're not aware of what they are,

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:21.200
<v Speaker 1>a stable coin is basically a token that represents a dollar.

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 1>So if I give you a dollar, if I give

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:25.880
<v Speaker 1>a company a dollar, they give me back a token

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:30.160
<v Speaker 1>that represents that dollar, and it's stable. It's a stable coin.

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 1>It's stable with a dollar. That token is always supposed

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:36.920
<v Speaker 1>to be worth a dollar. And and it really got

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 1>um popular and famous, with a tether being the first one,

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 1>because it made it very easy to trade bitcoin and

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:46.119
<v Speaker 1>other cryptocurrencies to go in and out of dollars because

0:20:46.400 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 1>in the beginning days, UH crypto exchanges didn't accept any

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>form of dollars, and so if I wanted to get

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:55.120
<v Speaker 1>out of my position, I could go to a stable

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:58.440
<v Speaker 1>coin token um whereas today a lot of exchanges now

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 1>do operate in US dollars, so that's kind of taken

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:03.359
<v Speaker 1>away some of that. But we have all these stable coins,

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and there's lots of them out there now and they're

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:07.879
<v Speaker 1>really getting out around the world, which, um, you know,

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:11.440
<v Speaker 1>from a central bank, especially from a Federal Reserve US

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:13.960
<v Speaker 1>centric viewpoint of central bank, that's a good thing because

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:15.960
<v Speaker 1>there's more dollars going out to the rest of the world.

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:20.399
<v Speaker 1>More people are using dollars now, I've I think it

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 1>was a week or two ago I was talking about

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:25.160
<v Speaker 1>this whole meltdown of this Luna Tera stable coin token.

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to go super deep into that again, um,

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 1>but that was one form of a stable coin, and

0:21:30.960 --> 0:21:34.399
<v Speaker 1>that was this algorithmically controlled stable coin where they were

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:39.200
<v Speaker 1>trying to create this fancy complicated algorithm that the stable coin,

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:42.399
<v Speaker 1>when you give him the dollar, that dollar token that

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 1>you now received would be redeemable not for a dollar,

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 1>but redeemable for a token that a Terra Luna token,

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:53.000
<v Speaker 1>that you would get a dollar's worth of it. But

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 1>what happened was the valuation of those Tera Luna tokens

0:21:56.520 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 1>went from about fifty billion down to zero, so there

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 1>was no dollars worth of those tokens left to get.

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 1>So that's a big problem. I broke all that down

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 1>for you. So when you're looking at stable coins, you

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>have a couple of different ones. And so what I warned,

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:12.919
<v Speaker 1>and I would continue to pound the table on warning,

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:18.439
<v Speaker 1>is that any stable coin token that's not backed or

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 1>I should say fully reserved with dollars is going to

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:24.720
<v Speaker 1>be a problem. And why do why do I say

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:27.119
<v Speaker 1>with dollars. Well, what a lot of these stable coins

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:30.359
<v Speaker 1>like Tether have done is they say they're quote fully reserved,

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 1>But what are they reserved with. That's the question. If

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:39.400
<v Speaker 1>they're reserved with terror Luna tokens that become worthless, then

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 1>there is no there's no reserve, right, there's no value there.

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 1>And what happens is it creates these runs on the bank.

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:48.399
<v Speaker 1>So if if I'm holding these tokens, you're holding these tokens,

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and we start to think that maybe there's a chance

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:52.679
<v Speaker 1>we don't get our money back, then we'll all quickly

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 1>go to redeem those tokens and there won't be enough

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 1>money left because they're fractionally reserved. They don't have all

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:00.959
<v Speaker 1>the reserves. So I think it's important understand that. And

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 1>as far as I know, there's two different stable coins

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:07.200
<v Speaker 1>that are fully reserved with dollars. That's U s d

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:10.920
<v Speaker 1>C and that's U g U s D So those

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:12.560
<v Speaker 1>are only two that are fully reserved. The other ones

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I'd be watching out for. But she's talking about and

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 1>so okay. So then um I made the case in

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:21.880
<v Speaker 1>this other radio show podcast, is that these stable coin

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 1>companies that are doing this like Tera Loot and all

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 1>these other ones. It's sort of like this free banking

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 1>period that the United States had back in the late

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 1>eighteen hundreds, where a bank would open up, they'd create

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 1>their own currency, and they all have their own different

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 1>risks and rewards and paid out their own interest, and

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 1>many of them blew up. This was the reason why

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 1>they gave us for creation of the Central Bank. And

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 1>they said, all these banks are blowing up, and all

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 1>these people are losing their life savings, and so we

0:23:47.119 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 1>should create a central bank, the Federal Reserve, to backstop

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 1>all of these other banks. And so if one of

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 1>these banks fails, then we'll put the money in so

0:23:57.640 --> 0:24:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the people don't lose their deposits. Which you know, sounds

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:03.159
<v Speaker 1>like a pretty good idea right off the bat. A

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:06.200
<v Speaker 1>couple of things that are wrong with that one um

0:24:06.240 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 1>that takes away competition. So banks should survive and fail

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 1>based off of how good they are, the decisions they make, etcetera.

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I have the choice, like with stable coins, I could

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:19.359
<v Speaker 1>choose to use terror Luna and I could stake it

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:22.720
<v Speaker 1>to earn, but I have to know that there's enormous

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:24.480
<v Speaker 1>risk with that, and I could choose to take that

0:24:24.600 --> 0:24:27.400
<v Speaker 1>risk if I want, or I could choose to use

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 1>one that are fully reserved like us d C or

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 1>g U s D that offer no yield, and then

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I would say, well, that is no risk and there's

0:24:34.840 --> 0:24:36.359
<v Speaker 1>no yield. Or I can take twenty yield and I

0:24:36.359 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 1>can take the risk and it's up to me, and

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:41.120
<v Speaker 1>if that fails, that's on me. I took the risk.

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:43.720
<v Speaker 1>But what it does it allows competition, It allows innovation,

0:24:43.760 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 1>allows new things to be tried, That allows me to

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:48.680
<v Speaker 1>choose what I want to do UM. But what what

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:50.920
<v Speaker 1>she's talking about here is creating the central bank digital

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 1>currency that could then backstop these UM stable coins. That's

0:24:57.280 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying. They could protect them, which is no mobile.

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 1>But the problem is that it leads to the central

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 1>banks creating a bunch of money, and when they create

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of money, they create lots of problems and

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 1>distortions in there UM. She also wrote that thoughtful regulation

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:15.159
<v Speaker 1>is necessary given the recent collapse of Terra, USD and Luna.

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:18.119
<v Speaker 1>The rapid ongoing evolution of the digital financial system at

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:20.639
<v Speaker 1>the national, international level should lead us to frame the

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:24.000
<v Speaker 1>question not as whether there is a need for essential

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 1>bank issue digital dollar today, but rather whether there may

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:30.720
<v Speaker 1>be conditions in the future that may give rise to

0:25:30.960 --> 0:25:36.159
<v Speaker 1>such a need. So she's basically saying, look, um, we

0:25:36.200 --> 0:25:39.199
<v Speaker 1>need thoughtful regulation because look like this Terra Luna, it

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:42.159
<v Speaker 1>blew up, and um, there may be more problems in

0:25:42.200 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the future, and so we should probably build this out

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:47.639
<v Speaker 1>now so that when these problems do come in the future,

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 1>we're able to handle that. And what I would say

0:25:50.359 --> 0:25:52.399
<v Speaker 1>is back to actually what I said before, which is

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:56.240
<v Speaker 1>these companies should be allowed to innovate. These companies should

0:25:56.240 --> 0:25:58.439
<v Speaker 1>be allowed to try new things, and it should be

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 1>up to me to decide if I want to work

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:04.680
<v Speaker 1>with them or not. Now, what I might like to see,

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and I was interviewed about this, uh just earlier, what

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:09.919
<v Speaker 1>I would like to see is maybe a requirement for

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:13.119
<v Speaker 1>more transparency. What I would like to see is, you know,

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:16.160
<v Speaker 1>more transparency so I can make informed decisions. But again

0:26:16.200 --> 0:26:19.119
<v Speaker 1>that's on me. So I was recently meeting with some

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:20.719
<v Speaker 1>of the people. I'm not going to name the name

0:26:20.720 --> 0:26:22.520
<v Speaker 1>of the company, but I told them straight up, I said, look,

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:25.360
<v Speaker 1>you need to have more transparency, because for me, I

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 1>can't work with your company because without that transparency I

0:26:28.119 --> 0:26:30.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know what my risk is and if I don't,

0:26:30.600 --> 0:26:32.800
<v Speaker 1>if I can't quantify my risk, I can't move forward

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 1>with you. And so UM, I think the market will

0:26:35.080 --> 0:26:36.880
<v Speaker 1>demand that. I would like to see that. I mean,

0:26:36.920 --> 0:26:39.439
<v Speaker 1>if if the regulators want to demand and regulate, they

0:26:39.440 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 1>come up with more transparency, I think they could be

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:42.560
<v Speaker 1>a good thing. But I don't think they should take

0:26:42.600 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 1>away their ability to innovate. I want to continue to

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:49.040
<v Speaker 1>see innovation. I want to continue to see UM people

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:52.359
<v Speaker 1>trying new things, progress, et cetera. And I understand it's

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:54.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna be risky, but it's up to me to decide

0:26:54.560 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 1>if I want to do that now smooth. He has

0:26:56.320 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 1>never made a skilled sailor, so if I lose my money,

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 1>that's on me. And guess what, I probably won't do

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:03.639
<v Speaker 1>that again. And if I do do it again, then

0:27:03.680 --> 0:27:05.440
<v Speaker 1>I probably shouldn't have the money in the first place.

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:07.840
<v Speaker 1>And I know that's a harsh reality, but that is

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the truth. That's the way it goes. You're listening to

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:13.360
<v Speaker 1>the Marks Show. We're talking about bitcoin and cryptocurrencies, UM

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:18.240
<v Speaker 1>and so much more because it is so exciting. UM

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 1>and bitcoin is is the fastest growing asset over the

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 1>last twelve years, and JP Morgan says it is an

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 1>undervalued asset by about just now today you listen to

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the Mark Moa Show talking about bitcoin and cryptocurrencies. We'll

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 1>be back with a lot more. So don't go away,

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:36.720
<v Speaker 1>all right, welcome back. You are listening to the Mark

0:27:36.800 --> 0:27:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Moa Show. We're talking about bitcoin, We're talking about cryptocurrencies

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:46.200
<v Speaker 1>and the decentralized revolution, and we were talking about um

0:27:46.400 --> 0:27:53.640
<v Speaker 1>stable coins CBDCs. How the Federal Reserve chair Lele Brainerd

0:27:53.720 --> 0:27:56.240
<v Speaker 1>says that they think that they should have CBDCs to

0:27:56.840 --> 0:28:01.040
<v Speaker 1>backstop stable coins. Pretty interesting. But talking about central banks,

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:04.639
<v Speaker 1>we also saw this week something really big, which was

0:28:04.840 --> 0:28:07.800
<v Speaker 1>a convention of central bankers. And it's not the first

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:10.359
<v Speaker 1>time this happened. We have these central bankers that get together.

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Of course, um, almost not every but almost every nation

0:28:14.720 --> 0:28:16.680
<v Speaker 1>has their own central bank. Of course, the United States,

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:19.640
<v Speaker 1>that's the Federal Reserve. In Europe it's the ECB European

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Central Bank. In Japan it is the Bank of Japan

0:28:22.600 --> 0:28:26.360
<v Speaker 1>boj etcetera. And of course smaller nations have their own

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:29.480
<v Speaker 1>central banks as well. Now fun fact um in the

0:28:29.760 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Communist Manifesto written by Karl Marx in the late eighteen hundreds.

0:28:35.520 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 1>He gave a ten ten points of what needs to

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 1>happen in order to get this Marxism, the socialism communism

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:46.600
<v Speaker 1>into play. Point number five is that each nation should

0:28:47.120 --> 0:28:51.880
<v Speaker 1>establish a central bank. So central banks are part of

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the Marxist plan. Central banks are communists in Nature's number

0:28:55.960 --> 0:28:58.800
<v Speaker 1>five in this ten point plan. Now, also fun fact,

0:28:58.920 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 1>I wrote a book called the Uncommunist Manifesto, which basically

0:29:03.240 --> 0:29:06.480
<v Speaker 1>took the same format, same four chapter, same length, and

0:29:06.520 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I just rewrote it, and I gave my own ten points.

0:29:09.040 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 1>And of course I said that we should abolish all

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 1>central banks. I'm not a big fan, because nobody should

0:29:15.520 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 1>be creating money from thin air, forcing us to use

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:21.240
<v Speaker 1>it and enriching themselves. Nobody should do that. It's not

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 1>about taking it from one group of people that are

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:24.560
<v Speaker 1>bad and given it to another group of people that

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:27.360
<v Speaker 1>are good. It's about nobody should be able to control it.

0:29:27.400 --> 0:29:30.800
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, back to the conversation here, and so these uh,

0:29:31.000 --> 0:29:36.520
<v Speaker 1>these forty four different countries, set representatives from thirty two

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 1>central banks and twelve other financial institutions, and they all

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:46.640
<v Speaker 1>got together in El Salvador to learn strategies about financial inclusion.

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Participants in this financial form are members of the Alliance

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:54.840
<v Speaker 1>for Financial Inclusion or a FI, an organization that promotes

0:29:54.880 --> 0:29:58.120
<v Speaker 1>and develops economic policies to help improve the lives of

0:29:58.240 --> 0:30:05.720
<v Speaker 1>poor and unbanged populations. So Alliance for Financial Inclusion. If

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I now, why why do they need an Alliance for

0:30:09.280 --> 0:30:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Financial Inclusion? Think about this for a second. Now, I

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:16.960
<v Speaker 1>believe that this, uh, this smartphone I have in my

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:20.640
<v Speaker 1>hand right here is the great equalizer. With this phone,

0:30:21.000 --> 0:30:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I could learn anything. I can go on YouTube, I

0:30:23.200 --> 0:30:26.720
<v Speaker 1>can learn anything, I could meet anybody on social media.

0:30:26.920 --> 0:30:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I could do almost anything with this. You have kids,

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:33.240
<v Speaker 1>teenagers anywhere in the world with Instagram account that could

0:30:33.280 --> 0:30:36.720
<v Speaker 1>make a hundred thousand dollars a year or more. It's

0:30:36.760 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 1>a great equalizer, except what if I'm not allowed to

0:30:41.840 --> 0:30:44.480
<v Speaker 1>be in the financial system? So how could I earn

0:30:44.520 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 1>a hundred thousand dollars? Now you might say, well, what

0:30:49.040 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 1>do you mean who's not able to be in the

0:30:51.080 --> 0:30:56.240
<v Speaker 1>financial system? And I would say that over two billion adults,

0:30:56.240 --> 0:31:00.640
<v Speaker 1>about half the adults in the world today are not

0:31:00.960 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 1>in the financial system. Why why do they have this

0:31:06.840 --> 0:31:09.680
<v Speaker 1>a f I financial inclusion? Why about half of the

0:31:09.680 --> 0:31:13.680
<v Speaker 1>adults in the world today don't have access. The answer

0:31:14.600 --> 0:31:18.840
<v Speaker 1>is mostly permission. They don't have permission. So if I'm

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:21.520
<v Speaker 1>a fifteen year old kid growing up in Iran, for example,

0:31:22.600 --> 0:31:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not allowed to join the financial system that don't

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 1>allow me. I don't have permission. Also, it's a cost prohibitive.

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:31.840
<v Speaker 1>So if you're an al Savador, for example, it might

0:31:31.880 --> 0:31:34.960
<v Speaker 1>cost you fifty a month to have a bank account,

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:36.800
<v Speaker 1>but when you only make a couple hundred bucks a

0:31:36.800 --> 0:31:38.360
<v Speaker 1>month and you can't afford fifty bucks a month for

0:31:38.360 --> 0:31:41.360
<v Speaker 1>a bank account, so they don't have them. Um, if

0:31:41.400 --> 0:31:44.800
<v Speaker 1>I run a small little roadside stand selling papoosas or

0:31:44.840 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 1>some food or coconuts or whatever, well I need about

0:31:48.480 --> 0:31:51.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, twenty dollars a month of revenue in order

0:31:51.920 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 1>to afford a merchant account of credit card processor. But

0:31:54.920 --> 0:31:56.520
<v Speaker 1>if I don't do that much revenue, which they don't,

0:31:56.800 --> 0:31:59.160
<v Speaker 1>I can't do that, so I have to take cash.

0:31:59.240 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I can't be in the financial systems and system So

0:32:01.840 --> 0:32:05.080
<v Speaker 1>there's this inclusion that's not they're mostly because of permission,

0:32:05.080 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 1>which of course bitcoin is permission lists, meaning anybody can

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:12.320
<v Speaker 1>grab their smartphone, whether you're here in the United States,

0:32:12.520 --> 0:32:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Developed world, or any of these third world countries. You

0:32:15.160 --> 0:32:18.920
<v Speaker 1>can download an app, a bitcoin app, and you can

0:32:19.040 --> 0:32:21.240
<v Speaker 1>have your own bank account in your own pocket, and

0:32:21.240 --> 0:32:24.480
<v Speaker 1>you can instantly be in the global financial system, where

0:32:25.120 --> 0:32:27.600
<v Speaker 1>me sitting here in the United States can instantly send

0:32:27.600 --> 0:32:30.680
<v Speaker 1>money to somebody in Al Savador in literally like a

0:32:30.720 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 1>fraction of a second for almost free. But anyway, so

0:32:34.040 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 1>they all met here um UM it's an organization that

0:32:37.040 --> 0:32:40.640
<v Speaker 1>promotes and develops economic policies that help improve the lives

0:32:40.680 --> 0:32:46.120
<v Speaker 1>of poor and unbanked populations, which sounds great again, how

0:32:46.160 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 1>can we have equality if people aren't allowed to join

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the financial system? Now UM Al Savadre has been a

0:32:54.400 --> 0:32:56.800
<v Speaker 1>member since two thousand twelve. They've been hosting the latest

0:32:56.880 --> 0:32:58.920
<v Speaker 1>rounds of meetings for a f I S Digital Finance

0:32:58.960 --> 0:33:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Services working Group and the Small Medium Enterprise Services Working

0:33:03.520 --> 0:33:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Group and according to El Salvador's president, Naya Bukeley Um,

0:33:08.800 --> 0:33:14.360
<v Speaker 1>he said, the gathering focused on financial inclusion, digital economy, banking,

0:33:14.400 --> 0:33:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the end banked, the big end, and the bitcoin rollout

0:33:18.320 --> 0:33:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and its benefits. Now, this was not a bitcoin conference.

0:33:22.400 --> 0:33:24.240
<v Speaker 1>This is just the bankers around the world. This a

0:33:24.360 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 1>f I for Financial Inclusion getting together. Now, they did

0:33:26.760 --> 0:33:29.280
<v Speaker 1>happen to get together in El Salvador, which, in case

0:33:29.280 --> 0:33:32.160
<v Speaker 1>you've been living under a rock, then you already know

0:33:32.200 --> 0:33:33.840
<v Speaker 1>that El Salvador was the first nation in the world

0:33:33.880 --> 0:33:37.480
<v Speaker 1>to make bitcoin legal tender. They have it on their books,

0:33:37.520 --> 0:33:40.120
<v Speaker 1>on the reserves, and they're working on rolling out a bond,

0:33:40.280 --> 0:33:45.080
<v Speaker 1>a bitcoin bond as well. But it is UH. It's

0:33:45.080 --> 0:33:48.920
<v Speaker 1>specifically mentioned here that this was not a bitcoin conference.

0:33:48.920 --> 0:33:50.840
<v Speaker 1>So we saw in an interview with the Salvador and

0:33:50.880 --> 0:33:54.640
<v Speaker 1>State News Media Bongi Malabo, a representative from the zam

0:33:54.960 --> 0:33:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Zambian delegation in Africa um AND, in reference to the

0:33:59.200 --> 0:34:01.680
<v Speaker 1>adoption of bitcoin, he said, quote, it's a progressive move.

0:34:01.720 --> 0:34:04.160
<v Speaker 1>It's the evolution of money and the rest of us

0:34:04.280 --> 0:34:07.360
<v Speaker 1>need to catch up. So he sees it. He sees

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:10.800
<v Speaker 1>it's happening. UM. Of course, the UM Central Republic of

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Africa just made it legal tender as well, so it's

0:34:12.960 --> 0:34:15.239
<v Speaker 1>over in Africa. UM, we're starting to see that. But

0:34:15.280 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 1>it says some countries are just not ready for bitcoin,

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:22.040
<v Speaker 1>um and, so Paraguay Central Bank UM released a statement

0:34:22.080 --> 0:34:25.360
<v Speaker 1>saying the country's population, UM, we're not about the adoption

0:34:25.400 --> 0:34:29.800
<v Speaker 1>of cryptocurrencies. Um and has said that right now because

0:34:29.840 --> 0:34:34.759
<v Speaker 1>the central bank doesn't issue them that they're not legal tender. Um,

0:34:34.920 --> 0:34:37.080
<v Speaker 1>so it wasn't a bitcoin conference. But they're there for

0:34:37.120 --> 0:34:39.279
<v Speaker 1>financial inclusion, and of course they're in El Salvador where

0:34:39.280 --> 0:34:42.799
<v Speaker 1>they're using bitcoin for financial inclusion, and I'm sure they're

0:34:42.840 --> 0:34:45.440
<v Speaker 1>all taking notice, which is why they're there. They went

0:34:45.480 --> 0:34:48.399
<v Speaker 1>on to say that quote the majority of attendees are

0:34:48.440 --> 0:34:52.640
<v Speaker 1>not low level bureaucrats. So the attendees were not just

0:34:52.680 --> 0:34:55.520
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of low level people, but they were central

0:34:55.640 --> 0:35:00.520
<v Speaker 1>bankers and decision makers and their decisions will impact their

0:35:00.560 --> 0:35:04.480
<v Speaker 1>home countries, which is pretty big. So El Salvador is

0:35:04.480 --> 0:35:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the bitcoin model. Eight months ago they you know, they

0:35:07.920 --> 0:35:10.279
<v Speaker 1>adopted it. They made it legal tender. Like I said,

0:35:10.280 --> 0:35:12.879
<v Speaker 1>they've put on their books. What they've seen is that

0:35:14.200 --> 0:35:15.440
<v Speaker 1>I didn't look up this number of the top of

0:35:15.440 --> 0:35:18.320
<v Speaker 1>my head. I think it was the amount of capital

0:35:18.560 --> 0:35:22.120
<v Speaker 1>that's flowed into El Salvador since they announced this is

0:35:22.160 --> 0:35:25.719
<v Speaker 1>like up, I want to say, And so what do

0:35:25.800 --> 0:35:28.719
<v Speaker 1>other countries notice where they go? Will shoot? If they

0:35:28.800 --> 0:35:33.160
<v Speaker 1>got more investment into their country, then maybe I could

0:35:33.160 --> 0:35:37.560
<v Speaker 1>adopt it and I could also get investment into my country. Right,

0:35:38.080 --> 0:35:40.360
<v Speaker 1>so they see what happened. They see what the result

0:35:40.440 --> 0:35:43.359
<v Speaker 1>is and they want more of that. They see that again,

0:35:43.400 --> 0:35:46.240
<v Speaker 1>this financial inclusion. So all these people in El Salvadore

0:35:46.280 --> 0:35:48.759
<v Speaker 1>that haven't been able to get a bank account. If

0:35:48.800 --> 0:35:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to send somebody money in El Salvador, I

0:35:51.080 --> 0:35:53.080
<v Speaker 1>have to go to Western Union. They have to get

0:35:53.080 --> 0:35:55.520
<v Speaker 1>on a bus, go to San Salvador or wherever they're

0:35:55.520 --> 0:35:57.680
<v Speaker 1>app go to right a bus an hour or two,

0:35:57.960 --> 0:35:59.719
<v Speaker 1>get the cash right back on the bus an hour

0:35:59.760 --> 0:36:02.279
<v Speaker 1>or two. Maybe get robbed, you know, hopefully not um

0:36:02.320 --> 0:36:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and they lose depends on the amount because it's like

0:36:04.480 --> 0:36:07.240
<v Speaker 1>a dollar percentage, but maybe they lose up to thirty

0:36:07.280 --> 0:36:12.360
<v Speaker 1>percent of their money gets taken up in fees. I

0:36:12.400 --> 0:36:13.799
<v Speaker 1>don't remember all the numbers off the top of my head.

0:36:13.840 --> 0:36:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Up Ben del salvad are working with them, but um,

0:36:16.800 --> 0:36:20.360
<v Speaker 1>imagine if they could get money sent to them instantly

0:36:20.680 --> 0:36:22.720
<v Speaker 1>and free, If I could send it from my bedroom

0:36:22.719 --> 0:36:24.440
<v Speaker 1>in my underwear, they could get in their bedroom and

0:36:24.480 --> 0:36:30.279
<v Speaker 1>their underwear and that taken in fees aren't taken Imagine

0:36:30.400 --> 0:36:33.000
<v Speaker 1>if all that I think it was, I don't know

0:36:34.000 --> 0:36:36.520
<v Speaker 1>of their gdp AS remittances. Forgive me if I'm wrong

0:36:36.520 --> 0:36:40.759
<v Speaker 1>on that number. But imagine if other GDP they could

0:36:40.760 --> 0:36:43.080
<v Speaker 1>increase it by thirty percent, because that's what we can

0:36:43.160 --> 0:36:45.799
<v Speaker 1>getting eaten by fees. And that's exactly what's happening. And

0:36:45.840 --> 0:36:47.759
<v Speaker 1>now that money can be used to be spent in

0:36:47.800 --> 0:36:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the nation on other more productive things instead of going

0:36:50.239 --> 0:36:53.920
<v Speaker 1>to someone like m Western Union. UM, it's amazing what's happening. Now.

0:36:53.960 --> 0:36:56.799
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot more to talk about, UM, but that

0:36:56.960 --> 0:37:00.799
<v Speaker 1>is the big news. UM, it's changing and it's changing fast.

0:37:00.880 --> 0:37:02.719
<v Speaker 1>Don't be sleeping on this information. You're listening to the

0:37:02.760 --> 0:37:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Markma Show talking about bitcoin and cryptocurrencies and the decentralized revolution.

0:37:06.719 --> 0:37:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening.