WEBVTT - Why Fox Television Stations Have Embraced Trial and Error in Daytime

0:00:06.480 --> 0:00:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Strictly Business Varieties weekly podcast featuring conversations with

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>industry leaders about the business of media and entertainment. I'm

0:00:14.680 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Wallenstein, Varieties co editor in chief and co host

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>of this podcast with Cynthia Littleton, Variety Business Editor. Today's

0:00:22.880 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 1>guest is Frank Sica, Executive VP of Programming for Fox

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 1>TV Stations. Frank is a nearly thirty year veteran of Fox,

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:33.279
<v Speaker 1>and he has been calling the shots on programming for

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:35.559
<v Speaker 1>the O and O group for more than a decade.

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>In his conversation with Cynthia, Frank is characteristically blunt about

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the challenges that local TV stations face in the era

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:48.560
<v Speaker 1>of fragmentation, particularly in daytime. He explains Fox's strategy of

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:52.919
<v Speaker 1>conducting regional tests of prospective new syndicated shows and how

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>that's benefited the group. Frank also gives his perspective and

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 1>how life has changed that Fox since most of the

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 1>company was sold to is n Franks, executive vice president

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:09.559
<v Speaker 1>of Programming for Fox Television Stations, in a twenty eight

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:13.959
<v Speaker 1>year and counting Fox veteran, Thank you for stopping by.

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:16.679
<v Speaker 1>My pleasure, Thanks thanks for having me. Nice to be

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>back in New York Um. Nice to have a beautiful

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>view in this great new building. So thanks for thanks

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 1>for inviting us. Things are good here down in what

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>do they call it Midtown East these days? Here, Yeah,

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:30.000
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a little rainy and overcast, but it's nice.

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:32.039
<v Speaker 1>It's a beautiful fall in New York day. Let's talk

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:35.039
<v Speaker 1>about the programming that is coming out of Fox Television stations.

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 1>For the last couple of years, you've clearly been on

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:40.959
<v Speaker 1>a ramp up of doing a lot more in house development,

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of some very adventurous formats, trying to break

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the mold. You are known for being very candid in

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 1>your assessment of shows and what is needed, what kind

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 1>of fresh thinking and fresh ideas are needed in daytime,

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 1>which I think everybody would agree is a very challenging,

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>challenging day part to program to right now, with the

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>slice of the audience being so tiny and spread among

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 1>so many outlets, can you talk about sort of what

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:13.680
<v Speaker 1>what inspired you guys to really invest in your own

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>original content, original development and and this is something that

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:21.960
<v Speaker 1>started even before the company underwent the separation with Disney.

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 1>This started a couple of years ago at least, I

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>mean I think there always was. For a while, twenty

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Television you know, reported to us, and so there were

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:33.919
<v Speaker 1>always projects in development, development and being produced. I think, um,

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:37.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, we learned a long time ago that um,

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 1>he was important to produce some of our own stuff,

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>but be to also realized that we couldn't do it

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:46.640
<v Speaker 1>all ourselves, and that a balance was very very important.

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:48.840
<v Speaker 1>And I won't go through the list of projects that

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 1>had to fail before we realized we couldn't do it

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 1>all ourselves, but um, that is a fact. So you know,

0:02:56.360 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>as much as we're you know, doing our own programming, UM,

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:02.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, the partnerships we have with out side distributors

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 1>are more important than ever as well, because there's just

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 1>less of them, you know. And you know, again we

0:03:08.600 --> 0:03:11.119
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of shelf space to fill across two

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 1>stations and a lot of big markets. So you know,

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 1>that sort of balance between what we do ourselves and

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:18.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, what we bring in from the outside is

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 1>um is more important than ever, and as well as

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the idea that we need to do more and take

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:28.800
<v Speaker 1>more swings than ever. I mean, lest I would say,

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:31.359
<v Speaker 1>over the last decade or so, you know, we were

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 1>scratching our heads all the time, like why did why

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 1>do things only happen in September? Or why do you

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>know failed shows stay on for the year if not

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>two years? You know, we just didn't understand that. We

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 1>certainly think it contributed to a lot of our ratings erosion.

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Um And I think that's true with our competitors as well.

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 1>So the idea of trying to figure out new ways

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 1>to bring more shows to the table for whatever length

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>of time, three weeks, five weeks, and god knows these

0:03:57.160 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 1>days on cable, you know, the runs are six episodes,

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 1>eight episodes, you know, unheard of a decade ago, fifteen

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 1>years ago, it's now this this the standard. Even in broadcast,

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, you don't see as many full episode orders. Um,

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 1>So why should that be any different in what we do?

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 1>And I think in the end it comes down to

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 1>just having the right partners who are willing to think differently,

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 1>and that has been a challenge in certain circumstances. But um, overall,

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:28.039
<v Speaker 1>I think people are starting to see that it's better

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:31.919
<v Speaker 1>to take a look at more things and eureka, you know,

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 1>potentially lose less money by even doing that, um than

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 1>taking these gigantic swings and and you know, and really

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 1>hurting the bottom line and having stations you know, fail

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 1>and have time periods fail Now doesn't mean you can't

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:47.680
<v Speaker 1>have big swings. And we've seen enough of those in

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:49.839
<v Speaker 1>the last few years. And there's a couple now that

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 1>actually I think of doing, you know, sort of okay,

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 1>and that's great for the business, but I think we

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of start with this volume. We want to do

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 1>as many things we can and so twelve months a

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:04.679
<v Speaker 1>year we all have new stuff and and that's actually

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:09.600
<v Speaker 1>my goal, you know, Um, especially now without a syndication

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 1>company reporting to us, which has been true for a

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 1>few years. Um, you know, without that sort of how

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 1>are they doing idea? Um, you know, there's no other

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:24.840
<v Speaker 1>concerns other than trying to get as much first run

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:28.040
<v Speaker 1>stuff on as possible. At least for me, that's the

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 1>big deal. And you and Fox has been very much

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 1>pioneer in in in developing concepts and as you say,

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 1>putting them on for short runs three weeks, five weeks

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 1>and a couple of markets so you can just kind

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:43.039
<v Speaker 1>of test and get a sense of the pulse of

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:46.159
<v Speaker 1>the show and how people, how people respond to the talent,

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:50.359
<v Speaker 1>and you talk about are there difficult things in terms

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 1>of like structuring contracts and deals for a three week

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:56.479
<v Speaker 1>run a five week run. Is that kind of what

0:05:56.480 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 1>what you were saying, when you need partners that will

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 1>be more open up, like you know, they you know,

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:04.719
<v Speaker 1>the partners need to understand the endgame, and you know,

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the the end game is both of us have a hit.

0:06:07.440 --> 0:06:10.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, how we get there has sort of changed,

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 1>I think, And uh, you know, it's for years people said,

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:17.480
<v Speaker 1>well it's a one in twenty business. You know, you

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 1>known one out of twenty, you know goes to year

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:21.920
<v Speaker 1>two or year three. Well you know, well then let's

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:24.279
<v Speaker 1>do sixty of them, you know, and and you know,

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 1>and try to improve that batting average. But for sure,

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:32.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, structurally, uh, it can get challenging. But if

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 1>if both sides have the same sort of endgame, you

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 1>can get to it um And that's been really encouraging

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 1>over the last couple of years, especially where you know,

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Jerry O'Connell filled in within those wendy time periods for us,

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:49.479
<v Speaker 1>which was just terrific because that's a real test. Now

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 1>that's not me picking four markets saying, you know and

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>praying that this is sort of a real look at

0:06:56.560 --> 0:07:03.479
<v Speaker 1>a well produced television program across the country. Um, well,

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 1>that's a real test. And by the way, we all

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>got more first front programming as a result of it,

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 1>So right, and the Wendy Williams Show, which is kind

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 1>of the poster child for this process. That Wendy Williams

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 1>began as a limited test over the summer and then

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 1>clearly you saw, you know, the indications were very positive.

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 1>You went national and then this was in partnership with

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 1>lions Gate and deb Mar Mercury. You went national and

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 1>here ten years later, it's it's still very French. It

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>was fun. A couple of weeks ago, we had the

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 1>star dedication, you know, on the on the Hollywood Walk

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 1>of Fame and uh, um, you know, we're lucky enough

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 1>to be there for that, and that sort of was

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 1>fun to think about how the test was sort of

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 1>a chair and a camera, a couple of drapes behind her,

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:53.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, in a disco bawl. And uh, you know,

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 1>ten years later, she's she's on the Walk of Fame.

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 1>So we're we're happy and for her and proud of her.

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 1>What he works harder. Um, but when I think about

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 1>all the projects we've done, since then. It just goes

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:09.240
<v Speaker 1>to show how hard it is to do right, you

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 1>know it is it is. It is tough to do

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 1>what other than ratings. And I'm curious if there are

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>markets outside of the obvious New York at a Chicago

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>that you like to go to to kind of get

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 1>a representative sense of good question. I mean, it's it's

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 1>funny because, um, you know this, many years into doing this,

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 1>we realize there are certain stations we can put anything

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 1>on and it'll and it'll rate. You know, I don't

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't need to get specific about that, but you

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:41.680
<v Speaker 1>know there there we you know, are in our Dallas

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 1>station you know has never had a test that didn't

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 1>do good ratings. Detroit, you know there's a there's a

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:49.200
<v Speaker 1>whole handful of them. So you know, you you'll put

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 1>those on because you'll see if a lot of people

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 1>bail from whatever the leading might be. It's obvious maybe

0:08:56.640 --> 0:08:59.560
<v Speaker 1>there's an issue, but um, you know a lot of

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 1>what we want look at is to help help the

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 1>top markets. And and you know in New York, Uh,

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:10.199
<v Speaker 1>to me, is is the most important if you can,

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:12.320
<v Speaker 1>if you can, you know, make some hay there and

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 1>then after that Los Angeles. But again in l A

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 1>there's a so few rating points around that it's it's

0:09:17.440 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 1>harder to judge. Um New York, there are still platforms

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:23.200
<v Speaker 1>where you can put things and really judge, you know,

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:26.680
<v Speaker 1>without saying, you know, names of shows that failed. We

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:29.839
<v Speaker 1>had one where, you know, got a great lead in

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:35.679
<v Speaker 1>people ran, they didn't walk away from the set, they right,

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and then they came back, you know, and an hour later.

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>So as long as we can get those kind of

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:44.840
<v Speaker 1>reads in a in a big market like this in

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 1>New York, you know, we can get it real, a

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 1>real taste of it. And your savings in a test

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:53.559
<v Speaker 1>if you were too, if you were to have roll

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the dice on a national rollout, your savings in the

0:09:56.080 --> 0:10:01.160
<v Speaker 1>test can be measured in seven figures. Yes, so absolutely,

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 1>and and it's funny because we've been pitched shows that

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 1>we're supposed to be. If you asked the distributor national

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:09.719
<v Speaker 1>launches designed for national launchs, we refused to do that,

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 1>have done tests failed, and then said, boy, what a

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:18.200
<v Speaker 1>good thing. You're welcome exactly that that we didn't go

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 1>forward nationally with that. You know, there's a difference between

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 1>selling something because you can and selling something because it's

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the right project or that it fits in stations lineup

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:32.320
<v Speaker 1>so that the marketplace wants it, you know, So you know,

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 1>it's all a big learning process and that and that's

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, part of the fun of it. And you're

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:39.199
<v Speaker 1>one of your pritors. This fall has been the national

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:42.840
<v Speaker 1>rollout of Words or Less, a game show hosted by

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Meredith Vieira. It's a real kind of a unicorn in

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:49.319
<v Speaker 1>an original format. My god, in this day and age,

0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 1>that's a headline unto itself. And getting somebody like Meredith,

0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 1>who you know, incredibly accomplished, respected, well known TV personality,

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:00.160
<v Speaker 1>that's got to be, you know, kind of a kind

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 1>of a nice perfect storm for you, no question. And

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and I remember that test. I remember that pitch. I

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:12.320
<v Speaker 1>give Steven Brown and Jack Abernathy were perhaps more supportive

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:15.600
<v Speaker 1>of the actual idea than even I was, because I

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 1>think game show pitches play well in the room. That's

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:21.559
<v Speaker 1>sort of a new way to come and pitch. Game

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 1>shows is like set up a whole thing and play

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's great, But that doesn't mean anybody's gonna want

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:32.719
<v Speaker 1>to watch, you know, um, But we thought there was

0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:35.440
<v Speaker 1>enough there in the actual game Um, you know, it

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:38.320
<v Speaker 1>had its success as a board game, and you know

0:11:38.840 --> 0:11:42.560
<v Speaker 1>that was great, but UM really attaching mereth to it.

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 1>I give Steven credit for that. UM really sort of

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 1>up the antie on that. And I remember the list

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 1>of hosts that that they were sort of considering, and

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 1>there was some really good people in there. But she

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 1>she was a game changer as far as no pun intended. UM,

0:11:57.360 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 1>that was a big deal bringing her in and and

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, she was super professional with sort of a

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:05.800
<v Speaker 1>short runway to ramp up, you know, for the the

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>original test and uh. And it's been nothing but a

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:13.199
<v Speaker 1>pleasure to work with h on the show itself. Which interestingly,

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 1>another great thing about this format is you can wrap

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:17.680
<v Speaker 1>it in a couple of months for the year and

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:20.199
<v Speaker 1>and you know that keeps the costs in this hemisphere,

0:12:20.679 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 1>which is which is nice. UM. So we're real happy

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 1>with with the job. And in success, you'll own that format.

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 1>That format will be part of last Yeah. In fact,

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:33.760
<v Speaker 1>from what I'm told, there's interest in the format UM

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 1>in other countries, in a couple of other countries. So

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:38.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, any anything we could do to sort of

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:42.200
<v Speaker 1>bolster the situation would be terrific. But Yeah, that one's ours,

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 1>which we're happy about. Um. You talked about it a

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:50.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit. But you know, one of the hard things

0:12:50.720 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 1>about programming daytime is, as you said, what you know

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 1>is a point three cancelation and a point five is renewed.

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 1>The marketplace in daytime is so diffuse across so many

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 1>platforms that it's it's got to be so hard to

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 1>be it's gotta be so hard to program. Not that

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:10.200
<v Speaker 1>it was ever easy to program, but to get a

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 1>sense of what's working and what people are going to

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 1>respond to with the numbers being some microscript yeah, I mean,

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:18.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, and you know, unfortunately, the reality is a

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:22.679
<v Speaker 1>lot of its economics. Um. You know, there are certain

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:25.439
<v Speaker 1>rating levels that a distributor can make money at nationally,

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and there's certain ones that that there aren't. Um and

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 1>and that is that is the struggle. I think that

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the good news is over the last few years there

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 1>seems to be more projects being launched and and being attempted,

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:41.320
<v Speaker 1>which I mean, that's the hope. I mean that that's

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 1>what will save us, is is that idea that like

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 1>people continue to take swings, and you're right there there

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:52.560
<v Speaker 1>are It gets to a to a sort of a

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:54.440
<v Speaker 1>thin level. You're they are looking at a couple of

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 1>tents you know here are there particularly nationally? Um? And

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:01.320
<v Speaker 1>from there you have to disaw, you know, and what

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 1>you have to decide is, you know, why is this

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 1>going to get better? Because I think it's very easy

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:10.959
<v Speaker 1>for anybody to talk themselves into why something can stay on.

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 1>It's a good idea that I think we should keep

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 1>this on because we can. We should keep this on.

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:18.320
<v Speaker 1>But why would you do it if you didn't really

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 1>think it was going to get better? And why is

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 1>it going to get better? You know? What's the plan here? So? Um?

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 1>You know all that all of it plays in looks around.

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I I still love to go back to the show

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and does it fit in our lineup? We we did

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 1>one um recently where it just was something that just

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 1>did not fit in what we do and and it

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:42.760
<v Speaker 1>was clear, it was so clear, And what we learned

0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 1>from it is that yet we have to be broader.

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>We really have to pay attention to who's watching our stations.

0:14:47.000 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 1>It sounds obvious, but it doesn't always happen, um and

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>and program to those people and and uh, you know

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>which means for us anyway a little broader or a

0:14:57.200 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 1>lot broader is really what we have to look at.

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Do you differentiate regionally much? Because you have such a

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 1>large group covering so many markets, it's got to be

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 1>hard to find something that's gonna work in New York

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and also work in Dallas and also work in San Francisco. Yeah,

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean we don't. We don't sort of look that

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 1>way because the good shows will work everywhere, the hits

0:15:15.320 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 1>will work everywhere. But you have to you know, no,

0:15:21.160 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 1>I think you have to know that they can work

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 1>in a New York or in l A or San Francisco,

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 1>because you're not gonna be able to produce them into

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 1>a national show if you're not getting them in those

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of markets. I think, you know, a lot of

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 1>our competitors that don't have those big markets, the groups

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 1>that sort of you know, have gone into production and

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 1>done shows. This did well in Memphis and then, but

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 1>that's not gonna matter, you know, if you think you're

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:47.960
<v Speaker 1>going to go national, and so we really need to

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 1>know that. And uh, you know, I think we've done

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 1>some sort of regional things or teach some things up

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 1>for certain markets. Um years ago, we would do court

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 1>shows as tests in court blocks, and you know, New

0:16:01.640 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 1>York wasn't really doing that well at the time, and

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 1>so we didn't use New York. It was like, if

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 1>you could fit in a court block, though it should work.

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, I can't remember the last test we did.

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 1>It didn't include New York. Now, you know, I think

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 1>it's really important. And again the hits, you can go

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 1>back a hundred years. Little Seinfeld wasn't gonna work because

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a New York show, and you know, Judge Judy

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 1>is not gonna work in African American markets, and and

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, you hear all these things, but a good

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 1>show transcends all of it. We're just a couple of

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>months out from the traditional sort of pivot point of

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the syndication year, which is January. Obviously a little anachronistic

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 1>in the world that we live in, especially is for

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the reasons you were just saying, but it is nonetheless

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 1>it is it is sort of a time of year

0:16:44.360 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 1>when when we start to get a sense of what

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 1>is going to be coming for the fall and what

0:16:49.760 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, what may or may not be coming back

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:54.280
<v Speaker 1>that could be on the fence. This year we've seen,

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 1>to my mind, it seems like the the some of

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the larger distributors that are the First Run business have

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 1>a little more ambition this year. We've got some big

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 1>projects with Drew barrymore with Nick Cannon, some talk shows.

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:10.680
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing some different formats of cooking and different kinds

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 1>of games. What do you think, since you deal with

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:16.119
<v Speaker 1>all of the distributors, what do you think is accounting

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:20.199
<v Speaker 1>for what's driving this you know uptick, not a surge,

0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 1>but an uptick and interest in producing for First Run

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:25.600
<v Speaker 1>when we when we just talked about the markets pretty challenged. Sure,

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:28.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think part of it is this sort

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:30.680
<v Speaker 1>of a new chene on on the station business over

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the last few years, you know, between consolidation and acquisitions

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:39.520
<v Speaker 1>and you know, cord cutting, um, the importance of or

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 1>re emergence if you will, of local news at times

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 1>of disaster and things that have gone on. You know

0:17:45.960 --> 0:17:49.159
<v Speaker 1>what what I remember hearing fifteen years ago, you know

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 1>we were old media, you know, and then we heard

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 1>it again ten years ago. Um, you know, we're still

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:58.600
<v Speaker 1>here and and and still very profitable in many ways,

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:01.959
<v Speaker 1>and still the largest sort of news and information you know,

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:06.160
<v Speaker 1>for generals a week and every every survey will tell

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:09.639
<v Speaker 1>you that local newscasts still in the world of you know,

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 1>digital and you know, communications on in a nanosecond. It's

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty amazing that all the Pew research studies always say

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:20.960
<v Speaker 1>always still local and national, but that local news. You know,

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>you get up in the morning, you need to know

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:24.879
<v Speaker 1>what the weather is going to be. No, And and

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>looky myke. You know these days people will get it

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:31.200
<v Speaker 1>on their phone, but it's still maybe the local station

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 1>on your phone. You know, it's consumed differently, but the

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 1>information still carries a lot of wallop, you know. And

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:40.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, people would would ask you how do you

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:42.919
<v Speaker 1>compete with the streamers and say, well, you know, when

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:45.479
<v Speaker 1>when a hurricane happens, they don't go to Netflix, they

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 1>come to you know k R I V in Houston.

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, we hope um and you know that's you know,

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:55.439
<v Speaker 1>our future. I mean, that's we have to be. We

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>have to be number one in being that to people.

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 1>But I think overall again and the acquisitions, um, you know,

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the company consolidation. I mean we're now one of four

0:19:07.280 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 1>companies in Fox where we used to be one of.

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:16.360
<v Speaker 1>However many right now a much more diverse Yeah, so

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, now we're looked at a little differently as well,

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:21.399
<v Speaker 1>because we're sort of a bigger piece of the pie.

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:24.119
<v Speaker 1>But and you also have these big companies that have

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:27.960
<v Speaker 1>owned that own stations and they realize all the same

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:29.640
<v Speaker 1>things that we do in a lot of ways. So

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:32.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you're gonna thrive, you're gonna need shows,

0:19:33.640 --> 0:19:36.360
<v Speaker 1>you know. And you know, network models change. We've seen

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 1>soap operas go away and there's still some game shows on.

0:19:39.119 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 1>But um, get a hit in this business, you'd still

0:19:43.040 --> 0:19:46.200
<v Speaker 1>be okay. You know, everybody in media world is talking

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 1>about streaming and the audiences embrace of on demand platforms

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:53.680
<v Speaker 1>that are obviously different than the than the live televi

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, the live linear viewing that that we've all

0:19:56.240 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 1>grown up with. Um, what on the local level do

0:19:59.840 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 1>you see that is there demand? Is are the audiences

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:08.640
<v Speaker 1>for even for local programming trying to trying to move online?

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:11.199
<v Speaker 1>Do you feel like that your stations need to have

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 1>that have a streaming Yes, actually yeah, we do. We

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:16.719
<v Speaker 1>were we think that for sure. Um, we we need

0:20:16.760 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 1>to be able to be consumed how people are consuming

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and so yeah, we definitely need to be there. I

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:24.880
<v Speaker 1>think there's a question whether or not our five day

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:29.240
<v Speaker 1>a week programming, whether it's syndicated or local, is sort

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 1>of something that would work on a streamer because I

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 1>think people consume that differently. You know, they they're not

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 1>going there. I mean, I don't know how Jeopardy is

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 1>doing on Hulu or wherever they are. But you know,

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:42.919
<v Speaker 1>we've had shows that we put up on streamers and

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:46.919
<v Speaker 1>they just don't exist. So I don't know whether you

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 1>can take a hit syndicated show, even if it's first run,

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 1>put it on a streamer and and and have success

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:54.639
<v Speaker 1>because that's not how it's consumed. You know what. We

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:59.240
<v Speaker 1>do so much about habit, you know, um, so it

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:01.400
<v Speaker 1>remains to be seeing let me ask you on the

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 1>flip side of the first run question. UM, you know

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:08.919
<v Speaker 1>this is um. This has been an incredible time for

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:12.159
<v Speaker 1>media right now and big companies taking you know, ninety

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 1>degree turns in their business models, Disney, A, T and T,

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:21.720
<v Speaker 1>NBC going going big into the streaming platform business. All

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:24.359
<v Speaker 1>of that is going to add up to, you know,

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 1>big changes in the supply chain of programming. You know,

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:31.920
<v Speaker 1>off network shows, big hits, big hit off network shows

0:21:31.920 --> 0:21:34.359
<v Speaker 1>have been very important to the Fox TV station group.

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:38.639
<v Speaker 1>Are you concerned that the supply of successful off network

0:21:38.680 --> 0:21:42.720
<v Speaker 1>shows is gonna win in the coming years. No, no,

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think we sort of saw this common honestly

0:21:46.920 --> 0:21:50.240
<v Speaker 1>ten fifteen years ago when we when we started, I

0:21:50.240 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 1>mean obviously when they when they first started going to cable,

0:21:54.000 --> 0:21:57.640
<v Speaker 1>you knew things were changing. Um. True, when we bought

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Big Bang Theory, we knew there was a a concarrent

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:04.920
<v Speaker 1>cable window at least friends, you know, million years ago.

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 1>You had exclusive broadcast for a little while three years

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:09.680
<v Speaker 1>I think, and then it went to turn or whatever.

0:22:10.240 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 1>So this was already starting to get brewing some time ago.

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 1>And then you had DVDs. That was a big problem.

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:19.639
<v Speaker 1>I remember, with a big concern, I should say, with Seinfeld,

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:21.399
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, they're putting all out on DVD. What

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:25.040
<v Speaker 1>are we gonna do? You know? So then iTunes comes

0:22:25.080 --> 0:22:28.199
<v Speaker 1>out and they're selling the shows on their on the

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 1>iTunes library, you can watch them on your iPad, And

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 1>so this was sort of manifesting itself for a while.

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 1>We sort of saw that. Um, we saw that coming. Now,

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's sort of coincided to some degree with

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:49.119
<v Speaker 1>for some reason, studios producing less of them are the

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 1>certainly less of them that worked. But between all of

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:56.480
<v Speaker 1>those factors, you know, we we thought years ago that

0:22:56.840 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, sitting around waiting for the next you know,

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:01.399
<v Speaker 1>big go off net show was not going to be

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:04.119
<v Speaker 1>the way to uh to do it if one came great.

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I soon after we bought a Big Bang,

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I think are our thought was, the next Big Bang

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:12.879
<v Speaker 1>is going to go right to a streamer, you know,

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the next next Big Bang We're not even gonna get

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 1>a sniff at, you know. And and as we've acted

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of that way since then, and so would you

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:24.400
<v Speaker 1>say that off network programming is less has become less

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 1>important for us for the station question? Look at the

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 1>big Bank still makes a lot of money, and we

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:34.520
<v Speaker 1>were we're okay with the degree that we're in it,

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:39.960
<v Speaker 1>but we also know that, um, it's waning. And and again,

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:42.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, you look at the ratings in prime time.

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, we had a and when we had the studio,

0:23:44.600 --> 0:23:46.600
<v Speaker 1>we used to get pitched all of these shows, I

0:23:46.600 --> 0:23:50.120
<v Speaker 1>mean legions of them, and they would all come through.

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:51.960
<v Speaker 1>They would all come through where we would get because

0:23:51.960 --> 0:23:54.440
<v Speaker 1>they all have you know whatever three years in four

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:56.200
<v Speaker 1>years in I'm not gonna mention any of the shows,

0:23:56.240 --> 0:23:58.119
<v Speaker 1>but the conversations would be like, well, why don't you

0:23:58.119 --> 0:24:01.080
<v Speaker 1>want this? Well extra about how great the show is.

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:05.199
<v Speaker 1>It's a one rating in prime. That tells me it

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really matter much in prime to the viewers. What's

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:15.480
<v Speaker 1>it going to mean us even less? You know? Um?

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:17.280
<v Speaker 1>And then I think when you you started to get

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 1>projects that people would want to bring out, but then

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:21.960
<v Speaker 1>realize that if they put them out, they'd lose money,

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:24.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, given the ratings that they'd get some some

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 1>well rated, some decently rated and high quality programs. I

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:32.120
<v Speaker 1>remember when they had a pull um curb your Enthusiasm

0:24:32.160 --> 0:24:38.199
<v Speaker 1>and um uh the which McCall it the curb and

0:24:38.520 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 1>entourage out of syndication because they were losing it costs

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:48.480
<v Speaker 1>them money to actually put it out. That it just

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:50.720
<v Speaker 1>didn't make sense. So and there's been a few that

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't go because of that quality programs. And we're not

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about bad shows. It just, um, you know, when

0:24:57.840 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 1>you when when you generate that that kind of audience

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:03.359
<v Speaker 1>in your primary run and this was at the time,

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I'd be like, what's it gonna How could it possibly

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:08.960
<v Speaker 1>matter for us? And so how could we possibly pay

0:25:09.000 --> 0:25:12.119
<v Speaker 1>for it? You know? Now to put that little idea

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:13.879
<v Speaker 1>in with all the other things that were happening with

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 1>off net and library and everything else and again, and

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:22.440
<v Speaker 1>I think Jack coming from Fox News, you know, Live seven,

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:26.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, the the idea was, we can't sit around

0:25:26.200 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 1>and wait for for the next big bang, you know, um,

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:37.239
<v Speaker 1>especially now. Um, and that explains another reason for your

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 1>ramp up in your own no doubt, No no doubt.

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it's more about being live and first run

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:44.679
<v Speaker 1>as much as possible as it is us doing it.

0:25:44.760 --> 0:25:47.159
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we'll you know, we have Warner Brothers doing

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of those shows for us, you know. Der

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 1>So where it comes from, we can figure it out.

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:54.280
<v Speaker 1>But having it, I think it's the main thing, whether

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:56.920
<v Speaker 1>it comes from us or not. But certainly the news,

0:25:57.000 --> 0:25:58.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, doing a thousand hours and news a week

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 1>across our group. But that absolutely is a big part

0:26:02.320 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 1>of that. Um. You know, I bought all those off

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 1>that shows at one point or another, which is sort

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 1>of funny now because now they're going for two streamers

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 1>for bigger money than they ever saw. You know. It's

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 1>it's it's hysterical. But um, you have to evolve absolutely

0:26:21.640 --> 0:26:25.359
<v Speaker 1>DVR proof, As a wise man once said, change or

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 1>die right. UM, let me ask you about um we're

0:26:30.320 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 1>talking about you have you know, two stations in many

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:34.439
<v Speaker 1>markets to program and that is a that is more

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:36.400
<v Speaker 1>than a full time job. You also have a lot

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:39.960
<v Speaker 1>of multicast real estate, and if I'm not mistaken, you

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:43.439
<v Speaker 1>have arrangements with a number of third party providers that

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 1>have different niches. How is that business overall shaping up?

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:50.240
<v Speaker 1>It seems like it's been a good ten years that

0:26:50.440 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the various big groups have been experimenting. We haven't been

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:58.240
<v Speaker 1>in quite that long. Um. I think that's a good business,

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:00.920
<v Speaker 1>or it can be a good business. I think there

0:27:01.040 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 1>may be a sort of glood of channels. A dozen

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 1>years there's been you know, many more channels added to

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the mix or friends at wigal you know with me

0:27:11.800 --> 0:27:14.639
<v Speaker 1>TV and um, you know the movie channel they did

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 1>with MGM and originally which is this TV like for

0:27:16.640 --> 0:27:20.479
<v Speaker 1>the first guys in sort of I think, um, you know,

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:23.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of foresaw the future a little bit and got

0:27:23.400 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 1>in there and did it. But I think that there's

0:27:25.359 --> 0:27:28.639
<v Speaker 1>been some over the last few years that just you know,

0:27:29.000 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 1>just additive. But I don't know what they bring to

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the table as far as viewership. Um, you know the

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 1>names of them. I don't understand what they're even about. Um,

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's it's about you know, using spectrum

0:27:42.080 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's fine. Um, but I wonder what the long

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:47.879
<v Speaker 1>term play for viewers is going to be on some

0:27:47.960 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 1>of these things. I mean what I'm what I like

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:52.920
<v Speaker 1>to do. What we like to do is put stuff

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:58.119
<v Speaker 1>on these channels that we don't do on particularly on

0:27:58.160 --> 0:28:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the on the primary channels through alternative. Yeah, I mean

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:03.639
<v Speaker 1>I think that makes sense. We you know, we do

0:28:03.760 --> 0:28:06.600
<v Speaker 1>movies which is certainly that and H and I, which

0:28:06.640 --> 0:28:12.639
<v Speaker 1>is a classic television or our drama sort of UM channel,

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 1>which is fine, and then Buzzer which is a game

0:28:14.840 --> 0:28:17.479
<v Speaker 1>show channel, which is which is kind of cool. And

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 1>we've done some things with them that are sort of

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:22.640
<v Speaker 1>cross pollinated. The one that we most recently did UM

0:28:23.119 --> 0:28:27.120
<v Speaker 1>which is decades with Wigel. That one may be one

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 1>where we get in and you know, provide some content

0:28:31.160 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 1>for it, sort of a historical channel they do first

0:28:34.680 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 1>run with news personalities like Bill Curtis and they look

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:41.479
<v Speaker 1>back at history. And you know the fact is we

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:45.720
<v Speaker 1>have um, you know, sixteen markets with archives, you know,

0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:48.240
<v Speaker 1>and so there there's ways that things can be packaged

0:28:48.320 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 1>to be additive to that. Um. So even in our

0:28:53.000 --> 0:28:55.280
<v Speaker 1>own world, you know, the idea that we'd be producing

0:28:55.280 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 1>movies to put on movies, that wasn't gonna happen. But

0:28:58.680 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 1>for something like decades, I think it could be something

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:04.720
<v Speaker 1>we could we could enhance just given what our businesses

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:07.680
<v Speaker 1>on the primary stations. Would you say that that, you know,

0:29:07.760 --> 0:29:11.480
<v Speaker 1>developing the multicast real estate is a priority for the station.

0:29:11.560 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 1>It hasn't been, you know, it hasn't been. You know,

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 1>we we didn't know for a while, like what was

0:29:15.680 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna have the spectrum auction was going to chake out?

0:29:19.160 --> 0:29:21.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, right now we're doing the best we can

0:29:21.440 --> 0:29:24.640
<v Speaker 1>with it. Um. You know, whether that's the ultimate future

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 1>U for us, we'll we'll, we'll wait and see. But

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:30.680
<v Speaker 1>in the meantime, we have some some some channels that

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:32.960
<v Speaker 1>were proud of that. You know, we've gotten good feedback

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:35.640
<v Speaker 1>on that makes some money and uh, you know we're

0:29:35.640 --> 0:29:37.960
<v Speaker 1>going to continue in that manner. Which which of the

0:29:38.040 --> 0:29:41.560
<v Speaker 1>channels have been most successful for you? Um? You know,

0:29:41.600 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 1>again we're kind of more passive in it. You know,

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:48.560
<v Speaker 1>you don't but I mean probably, I mean that's the

0:29:48.560 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 1>one that's been on the longest Um, that's the one

0:29:51.240 --> 0:29:53.480
<v Speaker 1>that when it comes off or any amount of time,

0:29:53.520 --> 0:29:56.880
<v Speaker 1>we get hate mail, you know, just kind it might

0:29:56.880 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 1>be from the same guy. You know. I think that's

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:03.000
<v Speaker 1>probably correct. And you know, Buzzer is an interesting one too,

0:30:03.040 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 1>because you get you know, get quote, you get like

0:30:05.560 --> 0:30:08.000
<v Speaker 1>posts on Facebook. I think there's unfortunately people out there

0:30:08.040 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 1>that think that these shows are really on now. Um,

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 1>so you know, I'll leave that up to their therapists.

0:30:14.640 --> 0:30:19.040
<v Speaker 1>But but you get some interesting feedback on some of

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:20.840
<v Speaker 1>these channels. But I think Movies was the one that

0:30:20.920 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 1>was the first one we got in and we sort

0:30:22.200 --> 0:30:24.960
<v Speaker 1>of own that and have contracted with Wily sort of

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 1>run it for us. The other ones were not as active.

0:30:27.680 --> 0:30:31.560
<v Speaker 1>It's basically we're you know, they're leasing our signal. But

0:30:32.120 --> 0:30:34.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, we certainly want, you know, the programming to

0:30:34.960 --> 0:30:36.640
<v Speaker 1>be of quality, and the people that we've worked with

0:30:36.800 --> 0:30:40.280
<v Speaker 1>this far thus far have have certainly delivered that. So

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 1>but I think there's too many of them. I think

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:46.200
<v Speaker 1>something need to go away um overall, and and you know,

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:48.880
<v Speaker 1>we'll see how that develops. I think it's interesting to

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:53.960
<v Speaker 1>see what that real estate becomes for sure. Yeah, Well

0:30:54.320 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 1>there's there's there's no question. But it is interesting though

0:30:56.600 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 1>because if you you know, I'm not advocating gourd cutting necessarily,

0:31:00.160 --> 0:31:02.600
<v Speaker 1>but you know, if you certain markets, if you look

0:31:02.600 --> 0:31:06.720
<v Speaker 1>at what you can get over the air, um, seriously,

0:31:06.760 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 1>it looks like cable in the eighties, if you have

0:31:08.640 --> 0:31:11.720
<v Speaker 1>you have you had a national sports net on there,

0:31:11.720 --> 0:31:15.360
<v Speaker 1>you'd be like set, you know, And it's really interesting,

0:31:15.960 --> 0:31:18.080
<v Speaker 1>um the spectrum. You know, how the use of the

0:31:18.080 --> 0:31:21.160
<v Speaker 1>spectrum and how how varied some of these channels are

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:23.960
<v Speaker 1>along with your your big broadcast stations in each market.

0:31:24.040 --> 0:31:26.160
<v Speaker 1>So you can get by with that if you had to,

0:31:26.400 --> 0:31:31.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you had a good antenna. UM. But um,

0:31:31.240 --> 0:31:34.400
<v Speaker 1>I still think they're I think we've we've pushed it,

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:36.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, as far as the number of channels that

0:31:36.600 --> 0:31:38.960
<v Speaker 1>are there, and I think there's only so much dr

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:41.880
<v Speaker 1>money around that. You know, it certainly has taken taken

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:44.800
<v Speaker 1>some out of the syndication pocket. There's no question about that.

0:31:45.280 --> 0:31:47.480
<v Speaker 1>In terms of some of the lower end advert no question,

0:31:47.640 --> 0:31:50.240
<v Speaker 1>no question about it. And and I think you know,

0:31:50.640 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 1>stations that are fourth or fifth or sixth in the

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:54.960
<v Speaker 1>market have suffered too. For some of these stronger dig

0:31:55.080 --> 0:31:58.120
<v Speaker 1>nets and those are typically on the third party ones

0:31:58.200 --> 0:32:00.240
<v Speaker 1>that you are not that you just you say, at

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:04.600
<v Speaker 1>least the space, those are typically barter deals revenue. No,

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:08.560
<v Speaker 1>we we don't sell our on on our particular digit nets.

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:10.800
<v Speaker 1>We don't sell any of the add times. So it

0:32:10.840 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 1>gets sold and you know, we get a piece of

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:15.920
<v Speaker 1>that depending on what markets we're in, you know, et cetera.

0:32:16.680 --> 0:32:19.960
<v Speaker 1>So let's take a step back a little bit and

0:32:20.240 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 1>just I'd love to ask you, just in the big picture,

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:26.200
<v Speaker 1>how has your how has the world for the Fox

0:32:26.240 --> 0:32:30.840
<v Speaker 1>television stations changed from an operational basis, now that the

0:32:31.080 --> 0:32:34.680
<v Speaker 1>now that the that the separation from Century Fox, that

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:37.560
<v Speaker 1>that Disney deal is now lock stock and done. How

0:32:37.920 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 1>has your job changed? You know, it's interesting, I you know,

0:32:40.680 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 1>our day to day doesn't feel that much different, but

0:32:45.200 --> 0:32:48.640
<v Speaker 1>there certainly is a lot more collaboration, you know, having

0:32:48.680 --> 0:32:54.719
<v Speaker 1>four companies in this as part of this bigger company. Um,

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:57.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think his spurred you know that, and

0:32:57.160 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 1>coupled with us A bunch of us moved back to

0:32:59.000 --> 0:33:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the West coast, so we're also of in the same space.

0:33:01.920 --> 0:33:03.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, a lot of the time, I think it's

0:33:03.880 --> 0:33:07.600
<v Speaker 1>been really sparred. A lot of collaboration and and just

0:33:07.640 --> 0:33:10.520
<v Speaker 1>communication people and you know, are much more aware of

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:13.240
<v Speaker 1>what everybody else is doing. And there've been actual committees

0:33:13.240 --> 0:33:15.880
<v Speaker 1>set up between the network and the stations, between stations

0:33:15.880 --> 0:33:19.320
<v Speaker 1>and sports how do we best exploit the platforms that

0:33:19.400 --> 0:33:22.560
<v Speaker 1>we have and more importantly, the product that we have, um,

0:33:22.600 --> 0:33:25.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, across all of these areas. And and I

0:33:25.520 --> 0:33:30.239
<v Speaker 1>know um Lachlan Murdoch is laser focused on that, on

0:33:30.320 --> 0:33:34.840
<v Speaker 1>it being one company, which now is doable because it's

0:33:35.040 --> 0:33:39.880
<v Speaker 1>those four divisions essentially Fox News, Fox Sports, Fox Broadcast

0:33:39.920 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Co and Fox Television Stations. You can count them on

0:33:42.600 --> 0:33:45.080
<v Speaker 1>one hand, it you can. Yeah, you know, I don't

0:33:45.120 --> 0:33:47.560
<v Speaker 1>know how many hands you needed, you know before that,

0:33:47.760 --> 0:33:52.040
<v Speaker 1>but before it was like a company of plus people. Yeah,

0:33:52.080 --> 0:33:54.240
<v Speaker 1>and and but what's been really cool about it too

0:33:54.360 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 1>is you know we were sort of the division that

0:33:56.600 --> 0:33:59.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, it was run out of the East Coast,

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:02.240
<v Speaker 1>and you know, we were sort of here but being

0:34:02.280 --> 0:34:04.840
<v Speaker 1>out there, you know, we have a lot of folks

0:34:05.080 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 1>that work in these different areas saying, well, what so,

0:34:07.480 --> 0:34:09.200
<v Speaker 1>how did this happen? What did I see that you

0:34:09.280 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 1>just you guys just did And you know, they're much

0:34:12.200 --> 0:34:14.960
<v Speaker 1>more curious about how we do our day to day.

0:34:15.000 --> 0:34:18.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and everybody knew we made money, but um,

0:34:18.360 --> 0:34:21.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think that's really sort of exciting too.

0:34:21.560 --> 0:34:23.600
<v Speaker 1>And I'm meeting a lot of new people in a

0:34:23.680 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of these areas that I never met before, and

0:34:26.120 --> 0:34:29.279
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's been great from that standpoint too. You've

0:34:29.280 --> 0:34:32.440
<v Speaker 1>been in Fox, You've seen so a company that's always

0:34:32.440 --> 0:34:35.040
<v Speaker 1>been innovative and at the forefront, but it's very birth

0:34:35.080 --> 0:34:40.799
<v Speaker 1>as a network was disruptive. What do you and you've

0:34:40.800 --> 0:34:43.640
<v Speaker 1>been there for so long, what keeps you engaged in

0:34:43.680 --> 0:34:46.359
<v Speaker 1>the business. The idea that I have to say, it's

0:34:46.440 --> 0:34:50.120
<v Speaker 1>it's been incredible to work at a place where the

0:34:50.239 --> 0:34:53.640
<v Speaker 1>fear is never to fail. The fear is to not

0:34:53.800 --> 0:34:57.359
<v Speaker 1>think of new stuff. I don't think I can put

0:34:57.400 --> 0:35:00.239
<v Speaker 1>it anymore simple than that, because that that it has

0:35:00.280 --> 0:35:02.719
<v Speaker 1>been true since the day I drove on the Fox lot,

0:35:03.120 --> 0:35:09.760
<v Speaker 1>And there was always that idea that don't ever worry

0:35:09.760 --> 0:35:12.520
<v Speaker 1>about your crazy idea is not working, you know, worry

0:35:12.520 --> 0:35:16.120
<v Speaker 1>about not having crazy ideas, you know, um, and that

0:35:16.320 --> 0:35:18.160
<v Speaker 1>keeping things the same we're never was never going to

0:35:18.239 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 1>be good enough. And that was every boss I have

0:35:20.280 --> 0:35:25.880
<v Speaker 1>worked for in that company. That comes from the head down, yeah, question,

0:35:26.040 --> 0:35:27.960
<v Speaker 1>and that that was and that was real, and that

0:35:28.080 --> 0:35:30.759
<v Speaker 1>was you could you could feel it, you know, and

0:35:31.000 --> 0:35:33.880
<v Speaker 1>I was there, you know early, you know, the Fox

0:35:33.920 --> 0:35:37.000
<v Speaker 1>wasn't even seven nights yet as as a network. But

0:35:37.080 --> 0:35:39.799
<v Speaker 1>I remember sort of things like, you know, which I

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:42.200
<v Speaker 1>have nothing to do with, um, things like you know,

0:35:42.280 --> 0:35:46.799
<v Speaker 1>moving you know, Simpson's next to Cosby, Yeah, you know,

0:35:46.880 --> 0:35:49.839
<v Speaker 1>and then obviously the NFL and station acquisitions and all

0:35:49.880 --> 0:35:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the other gigantic things that the company did. But you

0:35:52.840 --> 0:35:55.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, there was always a sense of something cool

0:35:55.200 --> 0:35:57.359
<v Speaker 1>was right around the corner, you know. And I think

0:35:57.360 --> 0:36:01.440
<v Speaker 1>it's still true now, I really do, I really do so,

0:36:02.960 --> 0:36:05.319
<v Speaker 1>no question. No. Now it's a sunny front row seat

0:36:05.320 --> 0:36:08.439
<v Speaker 1>because we're back in Los Angeles, so it's uh, it's

0:36:08.480 --> 0:36:11.280
<v Speaker 1>it's terrific. Thank you, Frank Well, thank you for braving

0:36:11.280 --> 0:36:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the East again. And it's difficult, yes, but thank you

0:36:15.160 --> 0:36:20.040
<v Speaker 1>for having me very much. I appreciate it. Thanks for listening.

0:36:20.239 --> 0:36:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Be sure to tune in next week for another edition

0:36:22.560 --> 0:36:23.560
<v Speaker 1>of Strictly Business.