1 00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:07,040 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. 2 00:00:10,800 --> 00:00:14,240 Speaker 2: Welcome to the Bloomberg day Break Asia podcast. I'm Doug Chrisner, 3 00:00:14,480 --> 00:00:17,959 Speaker 2: and we begin with tariffs. On Monday, President Trump is 4 00:00:17,960 --> 00:00:22,079 Speaker 2: planning to announce levies of twenty five percent on imported 5 00:00:22,120 --> 00:00:24,919 Speaker 2: steel and aluminum. Joining me now for a closer look 6 00:00:25,000 --> 00:00:28,560 Speaker 2: is Brian Fowler. He is senior editor for Bloomberg's North 7 00:00:28,640 --> 00:00:31,560 Speaker 2: Asia Eco GUV team. He joins us from our studios 8 00:00:31,760 --> 00:00:33,879 Speaker 2: in Tokyo. Thanks for making time. I'm sure it's a 9 00:00:33,920 --> 00:00:37,280 Speaker 2: busy day where you are. So we know, Brian, that Japan, 10 00:00:37,400 --> 00:00:42,640 Speaker 2: South Korea, and Taiwan are Asia's biggest steel exporters to 11 00:00:42,720 --> 00:00:45,800 Speaker 2: the US. I think Australia also exports some steel and 12 00:00:45,880 --> 00:00:48,520 Speaker 2: aluminum to the US. Do you have a sense of 13 00:00:48,720 --> 00:00:50,320 Speaker 2: how these tariffs will bite. 14 00:00:50,760 --> 00:00:53,479 Speaker 1: Yeah, and I would also just I would add Vietnam 15 00:00:53,600 --> 00:00:56,320 Speaker 1: to that lift. So we don't know exactly. I mean, 16 00:00:56,400 --> 00:01:00,600 Speaker 1: there's always the possibility that we'll see some exemptions coclusions 17 00:01:00,640 --> 00:01:04,200 Speaker 1: that kick in. I think Trump's general strategies to start 18 00:01:04,240 --> 00:01:07,040 Speaker 1: with the big sweeping gesture and then see how that 19 00:01:07,160 --> 00:01:10,800 Speaker 1: gets each country to kind of react and what he 20 00:01:10,840 --> 00:01:14,080 Speaker 1: can get from them in order to maybe mitigate some 21 00:01:14,120 --> 00:01:17,559 Speaker 1: of that impact, but we've seen share prices fall across 22 00:01:17,600 --> 00:01:20,720 Speaker 1: the board. Pasco and Korea was down four percent at 23 00:01:20,720 --> 00:01:23,320 Speaker 1: the open. Nippon Steel was down more than two and 24 00:01:23,360 --> 00:01:27,720 Speaker 1: a half percent here in Tokyo. So it's definitely bad 25 00:01:27,760 --> 00:01:31,880 Speaker 1: news for all these suppliers of steel and aluminum in Asia, 26 00:01:32,040 --> 00:01:35,280 Speaker 1: and of course Canada and Mexico and Brazil as well. 27 00:01:35,360 --> 00:01:38,160 Speaker 2: I think the timing here is very interesting, particularly in 28 00:01:38,240 --> 00:01:40,959 Speaker 2: light of the fact that just last week Prime Minister 29 00:01:41,000 --> 00:01:43,880 Speaker 2: Ishiba was at the White House and Nipon Steel came 30 00:01:43,959 --> 00:01:46,440 Speaker 2: up as a part of the discussions. One of the 31 00:01:46,480 --> 00:01:50,560 Speaker 2: takeaways here, at least from President Trump's viewpoint, is that 32 00:01:50,720 --> 00:01:54,640 Speaker 2: Nipon will now invest heavily in US Steel rather than 33 00:01:54,680 --> 00:01:57,400 Speaker 2: a full blown acquisition of the company. Give me your 34 00:01:57,440 --> 00:01:59,559 Speaker 2: take on that before we talk a little bit about 35 00:01:59,640 --> 00:02:01,640 Speaker 2: the pact that Ishiba's visit had. 36 00:02:02,120 --> 00:02:05,000 Speaker 1: Yeah, so that was a big question going into Ishuba's visit. 37 00:02:05,840 --> 00:02:08,200 Speaker 1: We kind of knew that Trump was not in favor 38 00:02:08,280 --> 00:02:12,839 Speaker 1: of an outright acquisition. We didn't know exactly how far 39 00:02:13,400 --> 00:02:15,680 Speaker 1: or how hard Ishiba would push for it. The companies, 40 00:02:15,720 --> 00:02:19,320 Speaker 1: of course, are still trying to push for an actual 41 00:02:19,360 --> 00:02:22,440 Speaker 1: deal an acquisition deal. But that seems that the two 42 00:02:22,520 --> 00:02:26,799 Speaker 1: leaders did agree that if that's maybe a bridge too far, 43 00:02:27,200 --> 00:02:30,080 Speaker 1: that a big investment from the pone steal and US 44 00:02:30,120 --> 00:02:33,680 Speaker 1: Steel would be another way to go. Ishiba came back 45 00:02:33,800 --> 00:02:36,560 Speaker 1: from the trip and on Sunday he was on TV 46 00:02:36,639 --> 00:02:40,280 Speaker 1: in Japan talking about it, and he voiced support for 47 00:02:40,320 --> 00:02:45,280 Speaker 1: the idea of an investment, citing Trump's sort of emphasis 48 00:02:45,320 --> 00:02:49,200 Speaker 1: on not letting that US deal asset be controlled by 49 00:02:49,240 --> 00:02:51,959 Speaker 1: a foreign entity. So it seems that the two leaders 50 00:02:52,000 --> 00:02:54,120 Speaker 1: are on board with that. We'll have to see how 51 00:02:54,160 --> 00:02:56,239 Speaker 1: the companies react later today. 52 00:02:56,360 --> 00:02:59,880 Speaker 2: From what I've read according to Bloomberg's reporting is that 53 00:03:00,200 --> 00:03:03,520 Speaker 2: Ishiba had an easy win when it came to energy policy. 54 00:03:03,560 --> 00:03:04,280 Speaker 2: What happened here? 55 00:03:04,560 --> 00:03:06,960 Speaker 1: Yeah, So first of all, I mean the trip was 56 00:03:07,040 --> 00:03:09,000 Speaker 1: kind of a gamble on the part of Ishiva. I mean, 57 00:03:09,040 --> 00:03:12,000 Speaker 1: we really did not know how he was going to do. 58 00:03:12,080 --> 00:03:15,640 Speaker 1: We knew, you know, Abe Shinzo Abe and Trump forged 59 00:03:15,680 --> 00:03:20,720 Speaker 1: a really fond close relationship that was genuine, and Ishiba 60 00:03:20,840 --> 00:03:25,040 Speaker 1: is a little bit more you know, soft, soft, muted. 61 00:03:25,480 --> 00:03:27,400 Speaker 1: He's a little bit introverted, and we didn't think he 62 00:03:27,440 --> 00:03:29,400 Speaker 1: would do that well. But it turns out that he 63 00:03:29,480 --> 00:03:34,400 Speaker 1: got there, and he managed to combine flattery with an 64 00:03:34,440 --> 00:03:37,200 Speaker 1: emphasis on all the investment that Japanese companies are going 65 00:03:37,240 --> 00:03:39,680 Speaker 1: to make in the US to set a positive tone 66 00:03:39,720 --> 00:03:43,360 Speaker 1: for those talks. And Trump did say, well, you know, 67 00:03:43,360 --> 00:03:45,240 Speaker 1: I do want you to help help us reduce the 68 00:03:45,320 --> 00:03:49,720 Speaker 1: US trade deficit of Japan. But that's a relatively tame push, 69 00:03:49,880 --> 00:03:54,800 Speaker 1: and there was no direct thread of tariffs against Japanese 70 00:03:54,800 --> 00:03:58,560 Speaker 1: cars or pharmaceuticals, so it really looked like a big 71 00:03:58,600 --> 00:04:01,360 Speaker 1: win for Ishiba. But then, of course, you know, hours 72 00:04:01,440 --> 00:04:04,600 Speaker 1: later we had not only the steel and aluminum terariffs, 73 00:04:04,640 --> 00:04:09,240 Speaker 1: but talk of reciprocal tariffs. So obviously trade remains a 74 00:04:09,320 --> 00:04:12,520 Speaker 1: huge sort of point of concern and uncertainty for the 75 00:04:12,560 --> 00:04:13,040 Speaker 1: whole world. 76 00:04:13,160 --> 00:04:16,080 Speaker 2: As you know, well, Japan imports nearly all of its energy, 77 00:04:16,120 --> 00:04:18,479 Speaker 2: and I think there's a deal now for Japan to 78 00:04:18,520 --> 00:04:20,560 Speaker 2: take a little bit more LNG from the US. 79 00:04:20,680 --> 00:04:22,880 Speaker 1: Is that right? Yeah? And that was a big plus. 80 00:04:22,920 --> 00:04:24,560 Speaker 1: I think it was kind of a win win for 81 00:04:24,600 --> 00:04:27,360 Speaker 1: both sides because, as you say, Japan needs that energy 82 00:04:27,400 --> 00:04:32,080 Speaker 1: and Trump wants pledges for purchasing that. Japan also talked 83 00:04:32,080 --> 00:04:37,719 Speaker 1: about possibly investing and contributing to the pipeline project in Alaska. 84 00:04:37,760 --> 00:04:41,000 Speaker 1: That's for gas and oil. That's another thing that Trump 85 00:04:41,080 --> 00:04:44,040 Speaker 1: was looking for and probably kind of an easy win 86 00:04:44,080 --> 00:04:48,279 Speaker 1: for Ishiba to suggest because it's in Japan's interest as well. 87 00:04:48,400 --> 00:04:51,480 Speaker 2: What about the security alliance between these two countries their 88 00:04:51,480 --> 00:04:52,640 Speaker 2: allies after all. 89 00:04:52,800 --> 00:04:56,400 Speaker 1: Yeah, their allies, And let's be clear, being allies hasn't 90 00:04:56,400 --> 00:05:01,279 Speaker 1: really helped everyone, you know, Canada and Mexico or allies. 91 00:05:01,320 --> 00:05:04,360 Speaker 1: But Japan, of course is not involved in any kind 92 00:05:04,400 --> 00:05:08,800 Speaker 1: of fentanyl or drug trade. No one accuses Japan of 93 00:05:08,880 --> 00:05:11,440 Speaker 1: being in that area, and it doesn't share a border 94 00:05:11,440 --> 00:05:15,080 Speaker 1: with the US, so there's no complaints about immigrants or 95 00:05:15,080 --> 00:05:18,560 Speaker 1: anything like that. And instead, in place of that, Japan 96 00:05:18,640 --> 00:05:23,880 Speaker 1: remains the bulwark for democracy and US security interests in Asia. 97 00:05:24,000 --> 00:05:26,320 Speaker 1: So I think that played into the hands of Ishiba 98 00:05:26,920 --> 00:05:30,200 Speaker 1: and helped create a very friendly atmosphere for those talks. 99 00:05:30,320 --> 00:05:32,680 Speaker 2: One of the things that happened during the Biden administration, 100 00:05:33,040 --> 00:05:37,719 Speaker 2: the administration then was effectively able to enlist Japan with 101 00:05:37,800 --> 00:05:41,000 Speaker 2: a lot of export controls targeting China. Do you expect 102 00:05:41,000 --> 00:05:44,320 Speaker 2: there to be a continuation of that type of policy 103 00:05:44,520 --> 00:05:46,360 Speaker 2: now that mister Trump is in the office. 104 00:05:46,839 --> 00:05:49,240 Speaker 1: It's going to be very interesting to watch and see 105 00:05:49,240 --> 00:05:54,080 Speaker 1: how that plays out. Ishiba has not been particularly tough 106 00:05:54,080 --> 00:05:57,599 Speaker 1: on China to date since taking over the premiership, but 107 00:05:57,720 --> 00:06:01,720 Speaker 1: I think he's definitely whey of the security threats, and 108 00:06:02,320 --> 00:06:05,839 Speaker 1: Japan is very interested in protecting its regional assets in 109 00:06:06,080 --> 00:06:09,679 Speaker 1: the san Kakus, for example, and so I think maybe 110 00:06:09,680 --> 00:06:14,760 Speaker 1: with the relationship forged over the weekend, Japan probably would 111 00:06:14,760 --> 00:06:17,640 Speaker 1: be very likely to go along with what the US 112 00:06:17,640 --> 00:06:19,080 Speaker 1: requests in this part of the world. 113 00:06:19,160 --> 00:06:21,520 Speaker 2: Brian, before I let you go, the Bank of Japan 114 00:06:21,880 --> 00:06:24,839 Speaker 2: is on many people's minds in terms of tightening a 115 00:06:24,839 --> 00:06:28,560 Speaker 2: little bit here as Japan deals with more robust inflation. 116 00:06:28,640 --> 00:06:31,919 Speaker 2: Do we have a sense of how well inflation is 117 00:06:32,080 --> 00:06:34,640 Speaker 2: under control in Japan right now or is there an 118 00:06:34,720 --> 00:06:38,640 Speaker 2: upward push that may cause the BOJ maybe to raise 119 00:06:38,760 --> 00:06:39,919 Speaker 2: rates as soon as March. 120 00:06:40,560 --> 00:06:43,080 Speaker 1: Yeah, that's an excellent question. I'm glad you asked. So 121 00:06:43,839 --> 00:06:47,240 Speaker 1: the consensus is analysts are looking for the next hike 122 00:06:47,320 --> 00:06:51,200 Speaker 1: to come in summer in July, but I would say no, 123 00:06:51,279 --> 00:06:52,960 Speaker 1: I think it could come earlier than that. We're going 124 00:06:53,040 --> 00:06:55,120 Speaker 1: to see not only inflation which has been at the 125 00:06:55,200 --> 00:06:58,960 Speaker 1: boj's target for about three years, at or above that target, 126 00:06:58,960 --> 00:07:00,960 Speaker 1: for three years. But we're also going to see the 127 00:07:01,000 --> 00:07:05,719 Speaker 1: culmination of annual wage negotiations in March, and it's looking 128 00:07:05,800 --> 00:07:08,799 Speaker 1: like we're going to see it robust pledges for wage 129 00:07:08,839 --> 00:07:12,560 Speaker 1: increases this year, which would feed into the whole cycle 130 00:07:12,600 --> 00:07:16,000 Speaker 1: that the BOJ wants to see of wages boosting consumption 131 00:07:16,120 --> 00:07:18,840 Speaker 1: boosting prices. So I think there's a pretty good case 132 00:07:18,840 --> 00:07:22,160 Speaker 1: to be made for Actually, I would say April, late April, 133 00:07:22,240 --> 00:07:25,760 Speaker 1: early May. The next meeting that I'm looking at is 134 00:07:26,000 --> 00:07:28,440 Speaker 1: a two day meeting that kind of is over that 135 00:07:29,000 --> 00:07:31,520 Speaker 1: late end of April, top beginning of May. 136 00:07:31,600 --> 00:07:33,600 Speaker 2: All right, we'll leave it there, Brian, Thank you so much, 137 00:07:33,920 --> 00:07:37,680 Speaker 2: great stuff. Brian Fowler, senior editor for Bloomberg's North Asia 138 00:07:37,720 --> 00:07:40,680 Speaker 2: Eco Gov team, joining us from Tokyo here on the 139 00:07:40,720 --> 00:07:51,440 Speaker 2: Daybreak Asia podcast. Welcome back to the Daybreak Asia podcast 140 00:07:51,480 --> 00:07:54,240 Speaker 2: Time Doug Chrisner. A key data point and the week 141 00:07:54,240 --> 00:07:57,280 Speaker 2: ahead will be the report on US retail inflation. It 142 00:07:57,400 --> 00:08:00,680 Speaker 2: is due on Wednesday. Now, it seems as though the 143 00:08:00,720 --> 00:08:05,400 Speaker 2: progress toward further disinflation has essentially stalled, just as the 144 00:08:05,480 --> 00:08:08,080 Speaker 2: job market revvved up late last year. You might recall 145 00:08:08,160 --> 00:08:11,040 Speaker 2: it last Friday in the States, the government reported that 146 00:08:11,120 --> 00:08:15,360 Speaker 2: employment growth showed kind of moderation, but still a very 147 00:08:15,440 --> 00:08:18,040 Speaker 2: healthy labor market. Joining me now for a closer look 148 00:08:18,080 --> 00:08:21,080 Speaker 2: at Shem's of Zaul. He is managing director at the 149 00:08:21,080 --> 00:08:25,960 Speaker 2: Carnegie Investment Council. Joining from Toledo, Ohio, Shams, thank you 150 00:08:26,000 --> 00:08:28,440 Speaker 2: so much for making time to chat with us. Talk 151 00:08:28,480 --> 00:08:30,240 Speaker 2: to me a little bit about how you see the 152 00:08:30,320 --> 00:08:34,480 Speaker 2: progress on inflation right now and whether there is the 153 00:08:34,600 --> 00:08:37,520 Speaker 2: risk that it could prove perhaps a little more sticky 154 00:08:37,520 --> 00:08:40,040 Speaker 2: than the market is braced for, and whether that could 155 00:08:40,080 --> 00:08:41,880 Speaker 2: lead to higher for longer rates. 156 00:08:42,600 --> 00:08:46,760 Speaker 3: Yes, I think the dynamics today obviously are taking into 157 00:08:46,800 --> 00:08:50,480 Speaker 3: consideration the unknowns from the tariffront, and so you know, 158 00:08:51,080 --> 00:08:54,240 Speaker 3: three months ago we may have expected two to three 159 00:08:54,320 --> 00:08:57,080 Speaker 3: rate cuts and now most people are thinking maybe one 160 00:08:57,160 --> 00:09:00,120 Speaker 3: to two. So that has been in minor adjustment there. 161 00:09:00,160 --> 00:09:02,959 Speaker 3: It could end up becoming only one if it ends 162 00:09:03,040 --> 00:09:05,360 Speaker 3: up being that, you know, Mexico and Canada are back 163 00:09:05,400 --> 00:09:09,360 Speaker 3: on at the twenty five percent tariff level, so certainly 164 00:09:09,360 --> 00:09:11,640 Speaker 3: a lot of uncertainty there, and we're looking at the 165 00:09:11,720 --> 00:09:15,280 Speaker 3: markets also sort of reacting to this. When you see 166 00:09:15,280 --> 00:09:18,760 Speaker 3: some days when the market takes to dive then but 167 00:09:18,840 --> 00:09:20,800 Speaker 3: the yield goes up, and then there are other days 168 00:09:20,840 --> 00:09:24,959 Speaker 3: markets sell off and the yields don't go down. And 169 00:09:25,520 --> 00:09:28,640 Speaker 3: generally speaking, we're only seeing any improvement on the ten 170 00:09:28,720 --> 00:09:32,440 Speaker 3: year yield when there's an actual growth scare. Without the 171 00:09:32,480 --> 00:09:36,120 Speaker 3: growth scare, we're not seeing the yield's budge. And when 172 00:09:36,120 --> 00:09:40,000 Speaker 3: we think about inflation, the housing component of inflation, still 173 00:09:40,040 --> 00:09:43,280 Speaker 3: being about one third of it, is becoming one of 174 00:09:43,320 --> 00:09:46,360 Speaker 3: the stickiest pieces of the puzzle. So it's a chicken 175 00:09:46,440 --> 00:09:49,800 Speaker 3: and egg kind of problem where you want inflation to 176 00:09:49,880 --> 00:09:52,600 Speaker 3: go down, but the housing component is not going down, 177 00:09:52,880 --> 00:09:55,240 Speaker 3: but you need the rates to go down before housing 178 00:09:55,600 --> 00:09:58,920 Speaker 3: inflation goes down. So which one happens first remains to 179 00:09:58,960 --> 00:09:59,320 Speaker 3: be seen. 180 00:09:59,400 --> 00:10:01,719 Speaker 2: I mentioned that jobs data on Friday, but the other 181 00:10:01,760 --> 00:10:05,040 Speaker 2: report that we got that I think is especially significant, 182 00:10:05,400 --> 00:10:08,160 Speaker 2: the University of Missing a data on consumers sentiment. We 183 00:10:08,200 --> 00:10:12,400 Speaker 2: saw a deterioration in early February. I think that metric 184 00:10:12,559 --> 00:10:16,120 Speaker 2: fell to a seven month low, consumers expressing a lot 185 00:10:16,120 --> 00:10:19,040 Speaker 2: of concern about rising inflation going forward. I think the 186 00:10:19,080 --> 00:10:22,840 Speaker 2: prediction here consumers seeing an annual rate of around four 187 00:10:22,880 --> 00:10:25,840 Speaker 2: point three percent, that in and of itself has to 188 00:10:25,840 --> 00:10:28,559 Speaker 2: be troubling, and I would imagine that consumers are making 189 00:10:28,600 --> 00:10:30,960 Speaker 2: the direct connection to the thread of tariffs. 190 00:10:31,600 --> 00:10:34,160 Speaker 3: Absolutely. I think there was a deeper dive into the 191 00:10:34,200 --> 00:10:37,719 Speaker 3: cross tabs, if you will, of that survey, and what 192 00:10:38,040 --> 00:10:41,800 Speaker 3: the survey is showing is the partiesivean divide in terms 193 00:10:41,800 --> 00:10:45,000 Speaker 3: of how half the country was looking at inflation the 194 00:10:45,080 --> 00:10:48,240 Speaker 3: last four years versus the other half looking at inflation 195 00:10:48,360 --> 00:10:50,920 Speaker 3: this time around. And there's a bit of a political 196 00:10:50,960 --> 00:10:53,040 Speaker 3: bias there, so I think we need to take that 197 00:10:53,440 --> 00:10:58,199 Speaker 3: into consideration. But I think overall, the expectations are that 198 00:10:58,840 --> 00:11:01,760 Speaker 3: from the first term he did see prices domestically go 199 00:11:01,960 --> 00:11:05,240 Speaker 3: up because when steel tariffs were announced back in twenty eighteen, 200 00:11:06,040 --> 00:11:11,280 Speaker 3: domestic producers actually matched the price increases to remain at 201 00:11:11,280 --> 00:11:14,840 Speaker 3: the same price discrepancy, so that there is no price 202 00:11:15,280 --> 00:11:18,679 Speaker 3: arbitrage remaining. And if the same thing actually shows up 203 00:11:18,720 --> 00:11:21,880 Speaker 3: this year, then you have to expect the goods component 204 00:11:22,000 --> 00:11:25,480 Speaker 3: of inflation will remain very much elevated, and that becomes 205 00:11:25,600 --> 00:11:28,679 Speaker 3: quite a big, quite a bit of a risk for 206 00:11:28,760 --> 00:11:31,599 Speaker 3: those of us wanting to see five percent thirty year mortgages, 207 00:11:32,000 --> 00:11:33,880 Speaker 3: you know, show up at any point this year. 208 00:11:34,160 --> 00:11:36,679 Speaker 2: We will also hear from Fetcher J. Powell In the 209 00:11:36,679 --> 00:11:39,600 Speaker 2: week ahead, he has two days of testimony before Congress, 210 00:11:39,640 --> 00:11:43,360 Speaker 2: the Senate first on Tuesday, then the House Financial Service 211 00:11:43,360 --> 00:11:48,199 Speaker 2: Committee on Wednesday. Does he have a particularly tough job 212 00:11:48,280 --> 00:11:51,400 Speaker 2: right now? Yes, the economy seems to be resilient, but 213 00:11:51,440 --> 00:11:54,520 Speaker 2: there is so much unknown when it comes to the 214 00:11:54,559 --> 00:11:56,319 Speaker 2: policies of the new administration. 215 00:11:57,000 --> 00:11:59,840 Speaker 3: Absolutely, I think he probably caught a bit of a break. 216 00:12:00,200 --> 00:12:03,280 Speaker 3: Was the most surprising I think aspect of last week, 217 00:12:03,360 --> 00:12:06,880 Speaker 3: which is when Treasury Secretary Scott Besson came out and 218 00:12:06,920 --> 00:12:09,360 Speaker 3: said that they're going to be hyper focused on the 219 00:12:09,400 --> 00:12:13,360 Speaker 3: ten year yield and how they could bring about dysflationary 220 00:12:13,760 --> 00:12:18,000 Speaker 3: disinflationary aspects of you know, supply side economics to bear 221 00:12:18,400 --> 00:12:21,960 Speaker 3: rather than put the pressure on Chairman Powell as they 222 00:12:22,000 --> 00:12:24,800 Speaker 3: did the first term. So that was benefit relief. So 223 00:12:24,840 --> 00:12:27,199 Speaker 3: I think, you know, we may not see that much 224 00:12:27,200 --> 00:12:31,600 Speaker 3: of a contentious, contentious relationship this time around, but how 225 00:12:32,120 --> 00:12:35,880 Speaker 3: Powell speaks to the uncertainties of the you know, sort 226 00:12:35,920 --> 00:12:38,760 Speaker 3: of the ted for tat of the tariff wars will 227 00:12:38,800 --> 00:12:42,480 Speaker 3: be eliminating in terms of how they're making policy decisions. 228 00:12:42,520 --> 00:12:45,440 Speaker 3: As a result of you know, the very early you 229 00:12:45,480 --> 00:12:46,920 Speaker 3: know months of the Trump. 230 00:12:46,760 --> 00:12:50,040 Speaker 2: Administration, so I hear what Treasury Secretary Besont was saying 231 00:12:50,080 --> 00:12:53,599 Speaker 2: about short term FED policy the FED funds rate. But 232 00:12:53,679 --> 00:12:57,040 Speaker 2: I'm wondering whether there is a risk that at some point, 233 00:12:57,400 --> 00:13:00,120 Speaker 2: if the ten year yield does not come down, that 234 00:13:00,320 --> 00:13:02,840 Speaker 2: the administration could put a little bit of pressure on 235 00:13:02,880 --> 00:13:06,400 Speaker 2: the Fed to use something like quantitative easing as a 236 00:13:06,400 --> 00:13:08,719 Speaker 2: way of bringing yields in. Do you think that's a 237 00:13:08,840 --> 00:13:09,720 Speaker 2: risk at all. 238 00:13:09,840 --> 00:13:14,400 Speaker 3: Well, the administration wanting to put them on the scale 239 00:13:15,080 --> 00:13:18,040 Speaker 3: in itself is not a risk. How the Fed deals 240 00:13:18,080 --> 00:13:22,439 Speaker 3: with that, you know, remains to be seen. My feeling 241 00:13:22,559 --> 00:13:26,120 Speaker 3: is that the treasury, the ten year treasury rather, has 242 00:13:26,160 --> 00:13:28,960 Speaker 3: had a high correlation over the last two years with 243 00:13:29,080 --> 00:13:32,240 Speaker 3: the US dollar. So if the threat of tariffs actually 244 00:13:32,360 --> 00:13:35,120 Speaker 3: take a back seat, I think so will the yields. 245 00:13:35,320 --> 00:13:38,040 Speaker 3: So regardless of whether we get two rate cuts or 246 00:13:38,040 --> 00:13:41,360 Speaker 3: more than that, if the yield follows the US dollar, 247 00:13:41,720 --> 00:13:43,040 Speaker 3: then we should be quite okay. 248 00:13:43,360 --> 00:13:45,520 Speaker 2: Are we going to have to just accept that there's 249 00:13:45,640 --> 00:13:48,199 Speaker 2: just going to be so much more volatility in markets, 250 00:13:48,240 --> 00:13:50,559 Speaker 2: particularly on the equity side. 251 00:13:50,360 --> 00:13:53,600 Speaker 3: Well, that's I think very much a given at this point. Generally, 252 00:13:53,600 --> 00:13:56,920 Speaker 3: the first term of an incoming president is not that 253 00:13:57,080 --> 00:13:59,760 Speaker 3: volatile because you know, you have quite a lot of 254 00:14:00,320 --> 00:14:03,680 Speaker 3: of you know, expansionary policy, and markets tend to like that. 255 00:14:04,160 --> 00:14:06,760 Speaker 3: But this time around, with the DOGE and everything else, 256 00:14:06,800 --> 00:14:09,520 Speaker 3: that has sort of added to the mix, you know, 257 00:14:09,679 --> 00:14:13,240 Speaker 3: you have to brace for much higher levels of volatility 258 00:14:13,280 --> 00:14:16,040 Speaker 3: than the mid teens. You know, VIX reading that we're 259 00:14:16,080 --> 00:14:17,640 Speaker 3: getting so far into February. 260 00:14:17,679 --> 00:14:21,640 Speaker 2: What about leadership? Last year the story was about megacap technology, 261 00:14:21,640 --> 00:14:26,760 Speaker 2: particularly as it relates to artificial intelligence. Will that continue 262 00:14:26,760 --> 00:14:29,240 Speaker 2: to be kind of the driving theme this year? 263 00:14:29,840 --> 00:14:33,960 Speaker 3: Well, from the very early readings from the quarter four 264 00:14:34,000 --> 00:14:37,240 Speaker 3: earning scores that we have seen from Google, Microsoft, Amazon, 265 00:14:37,280 --> 00:14:40,200 Speaker 3: et cetera, that if you felt that one hundred and 266 00:14:40,200 --> 00:14:43,320 Speaker 3: eighty five billion dollars worth of capital expenditures from five 267 00:14:43,440 --> 00:14:47,960 Speaker 3: names alone in technology was going to be, you know, 268 00:14:48,000 --> 00:14:50,360 Speaker 3: a high water mark. I think many of them are 269 00:14:50,400 --> 00:14:53,800 Speaker 3: basically doubling down. And we're looking at more than one 270 00:14:53,880 --> 00:14:58,120 Speaker 3: percent of US GDP worth of capital expenditures coming from 271 00:14:58,240 --> 00:15:02,760 Speaker 3: four names alone in this space. So I think the 272 00:15:03,200 --> 00:15:07,600 Speaker 3: growth scare aspect of the market volatility is probably overdone. 273 00:15:07,640 --> 00:15:12,160 Speaker 3: We don't see recession in the horizon anytime soon. The 274 00:15:12,240 --> 00:15:15,640 Speaker 3: challenge ends up becoming you know that the expansionary policy 275 00:15:15,760 --> 00:15:19,840 Speaker 3: remains in place, and therefore, you know, any further improvement 276 00:15:19,920 --> 00:15:24,120 Speaker 3: on the yield curve, you know, remains pushed back, perhaps 277 00:15:24,200 --> 00:15:26,760 Speaker 3: into late twenty twenty five or even twenty twenty six. 278 00:15:26,920 --> 00:15:30,920 Speaker 2: To what extent has the thesis on artificial intelligence in 279 00:15:30,960 --> 00:15:35,600 Speaker 2: the US been disrupted by the story on China's Deep Seek, Well, I. 280 00:15:35,560 --> 00:15:39,040 Speaker 3: Think, you know, it's gone through multiple phases over the weekend, 281 00:15:39,160 --> 00:15:42,360 Speaker 3: maybe a weekend ago, or perhaps two weekends. At this 282 00:15:42,440 --> 00:15:45,800 Speaker 3: point it was all about, okay, you know, maybe the 283 00:15:46,000 --> 00:15:50,960 Speaker 3: stranglehold that the MAC seven have on AI is going 284 00:15:51,000 --> 00:15:53,200 Speaker 3: to be no longer. But as we have dug into 285 00:15:53,760 --> 00:15:56,720 Speaker 3: really the output from Deep Seak, it's appearing to be 286 00:15:57,200 --> 00:15:59,880 Speaker 3: that a lot of the output is very derivative in 287 00:16:00,160 --> 00:16:03,680 Speaker 3: terms of perhaps the model was trained on the output 288 00:16:03,760 --> 00:16:07,080 Speaker 3: of chat GBT itself. Right. But I think there's some 289 00:16:07,120 --> 00:16:10,800 Speaker 3: significant breakthroughs that the Chinese have achieved, especially when it 290 00:16:10,800 --> 00:16:14,680 Speaker 3: comes to assembly language efficiency, which I think our engineers 291 00:16:15,320 --> 00:16:18,840 Speaker 3: probably can learn from and can adapt to. But I 292 00:16:18,880 --> 00:16:22,880 Speaker 3: think some of the fears have subsided because people are 293 00:16:22,920 --> 00:16:25,440 Speaker 3: realizing that some of the breakthroughs that Deep Seek has 294 00:16:25,480 --> 00:16:29,320 Speaker 3: brought to bear can be easily replicated, and again the 295 00:16:29,400 --> 00:16:33,120 Speaker 3: US will still have the treasure trove of the data 296 00:16:33,200 --> 00:16:35,760 Speaker 3: that future models are going to be trained upon. So 297 00:16:35,800 --> 00:16:39,720 Speaker 3: the long term AI leadership doesn't really change in my eyes, 298 00:16:40,000 --> 00:16:42,960 Speaker 3: but I think we have a competitor to take seriously 299 00:16:43,000 --> 00:16:44,040 Speaker 3: at this point for sure. 300 00:16:44,160 --> 00:16:47,200 Speaker 2: So Sham's in terms of an investment strategy for the 301 00:16:47,280 --> 00:16:50,400 Speaker 2: year ahead, I'm hearing strong dollar that may be a 302 00:16:50,480 --> 00:16:55,080 Speaker 2: headwind for US multinationals and maybe you just don't have 303 00:16:55,160 --> 00:16:57,360 Speaker 2: enough in terms of economic growth here in the US 304 00:16:57,440 --> 00:16:59,440 Speaker 2: to justify a big bed on some of the small 305 00:16:59,480 --> 00:17:02,200 Speaker 2: cap names. I'm wondering whether you want to be more 306 00:17:02,240 --> 00:17:06,200 Speaker 2: exposed in the days ahead to kind of MidCap companies. 307 00:17:06,240 --> 00:17:12,359 Speaker 3: Well MidCap unless you know you're picking individual names. You know, 308 00:17:12,840 --> 00:17:15,560 Speaker 3: making a bed on Russell one thousands of the world 309 00:17:16,119 --> 00:17:18,520 Speaker 3: does end up bringing a lot of regional banks in 310 00:17:18,560 --> 00:17:20,879 Speaker 3: the mix, a lot of mortgage companies in the mix, 311 00:17:21,280 --> 00:17:23,919 Speaker 3: So that may not be an ideal solution. We are 312 00:17:24,000 --> 00:17:26,520 Speaker 3: thinking that, you know, when you look across maybe the 313 00:17:26,600 --> 00:17:31,320 Speaker 3: large caps and look into MechTech space within healthcare that 314 00:17:31,359 --> 00:17:34,640 Speaker 3: does not have, you know, seem to be caught into 315 00:17:34,640 --> 00:17:36,920 Speaker 3: the tit for tat when it comes to the trade wars. 316 00:17:37,359 --> 00:17:39,840 Speaker 3: I think that's probably a reasonable place to look at 317 00:17:40,160 --> 00:17:42,600 Speaker 3: some of the pharmaceutical names that have taken a massive 318 00:17:42,640 --> 00:17:44,960 Speaker 3: hit as a result of some of the fears from 319 00:17:45,080 --> 00:17:49,240 Speaker 3: RFK Junior's you know, nomination announcement. We start to see 320 00:17:49,240 --> 00:17:52,280 Speaker 3: that maybe there's some value there as well. And certainly 321 00:17:52,320 --> 00:17:54,040 Speaker 3: we don't think Max seven is going to give up 322 00:17:54,040 --> 00:17:57,480 Speaker 3: the leadership anytime soon. But I think within the large 323 00:17:57,480 --> 00:18:01,320 Speaker 3: cap space is where we would recommend more want investors 324 00:18:01,320 --> 00:18:04,480 Speaker 3: to remain in place, unless you know, we start to 325 00:18:04,480 --> 00:18:08,240 Speaker 3: see a growth scare and maybe a faster curbing of 326 00:18:08,320 --> 00:18:10,760 Speaker 3: the you know, yield on the ten year, that might 327 00:18:10,840 --> 00:18:14,159 Speaker 3: change the equation, But for now we suggest that, you know, 328 00:18:14,200 --> 00:18:15,359 Speaker 3: stick to the large caps. 329 00:18:15,760 --> 00:18:18,840 Speaker 2: Shams will leave it there. Shams Azal is Managing director 330 00:18:18,840 --> 00:18:22,760 Speaker 2: at the Carnegie Investment Council, joining us from Toledo, Ohio. 331 00:18:23,040 --> 00:18:28,360 Speaker 2: Here on the Daybreak Asia Podcast. Thanks for listening to 332 00:18:28,359 --> 00:18:33,320 Speaker 2: today's episode of the Bloomberg Daybreak Asia Edition podcast. Each weekday, 333 00:18:33,359 --> 00:18:37,280 Speaker 2: we look at the story shaping markets, finance, and geopolitics 334 00:18:37,320 --> 00:18:40,600 Speaker 2: in the Asia Pacific. You can find us on Apple, Spotify, 335 00:18:40,720 --> 00:18:44,200 Speaker 2: the Bloomberg Podcast YouTube channel, or anywhere else you listen. 336 00:18:44,640 --> 00:18:47,560 Speaker 2: Join US again tomorrow for insight on the market moves 337 00:18:47,600 --> 00:18:52,160 Speaker 2: from Hong Kong to Singapore and Australia. I'm Doug Risner 338 00:18:52,280 --> 00:18:53,680 Speaker 2: and this is Bloomberg