WEBVTT - Robinhood Lawsuits Face Uphill Battle

0:00:00.480 --> 0:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Law with June Grosso from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:06.559 --> 0:00:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Robin Hood is facing a barrage of lawsuits by customers

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>overclaims it unfairly blocked trading and shares of high flying

0:00:13.800 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>stocks like game Stop, whose share price surge after being

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:21.640
<v Speaker 1>touted on social media forums. Joining me as commercial trial lawyer.

0:00:21.720 --> 0:00:25.439
<v Speaker 1>David Bissinger, a partner at Bissinger Ashman and Williams are

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 1>these day traders on forums like the Reddit based Wall

0:00:28.960 --> 0:00:33.239
<v Speaker 1>Street bets changing the way the market works. I don't

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>know if it's changing the way markets work, but it's

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:37.959
<v Speaker 1>certainly opening up trading at a level that we've never

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:42.520
<v Speaker 1>seen before because robin Hood is a commission free UH

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:46.239
<v Speaker 1>platform in which Robin makes his money and what they

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 1>call payment for order flow UH. In other words, the

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 1>product is really the traders, and robin Hood makes money

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 1>off of the spread between with the buyer of the

0:00:56.920 --> 0:01:00.200
<v Speaker 1>stock pays versus what robin Hood has to pay to

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 1>fill the order UH. And so it's just part of

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:06.400
<v Speaker 1>an evolution that began, you know, really in the sixties

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:08.760
<v Speaker 1>and seventies with Charles Schwab and then the elimination of

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 1>fixed commissions and then just the continued reduction and trading

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:15.039
<v Speaker 1>cost which has characterized Wall Street really for the past

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:19.399
<v Speaker 1>fifty years. So is the story all about these day

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 1>traders banning together over social media platforms like Reddit's Wall

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Street bets if that's your following, Reddit, I think are

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 1>just part of the story. For example, according to Matt

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Levine on Bloomberg's Money Stuff column, really only a minority

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>of the purchases last week of Game Stock stock uh

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 1>were by retail investors. Certainly there's going to be other

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:47.040
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds uh, And I think it's not well indicated

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>or mentioned by the press. That is very likely that

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 1>other institutional traders are on the buy side, uh, Whereas

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the current media frenzy really focuses on the short selling

0:01:56.720 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 1>hedge fund especially Melvin Capital, which shorts old stock uh.

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, however many months ago. So why are the

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds in it? I think it's probably a mixed bag.

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, for example, the most famous hedge fund that

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>is long game Stop stock is Michael Burry, ironically famous

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:17.600
<v Speaker 1>for shorting the housing market, you know, more than a

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 1>decade ago, as documented by the Christian Bale character in

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the movie the big short UH in this situation, Michael

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Bury started buying game Stop stock I think in the

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:33.239
<v Speaker 1>third quarter of But what I suspect that once the

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:36.360
<v Speaker 1>best settled an investigation is conducted, you'll see plenty of

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 1>other hedge funds from to the present UH buying the

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:45.920
<v Speaker 1>stock as opposed to shorting the stock. Robin Hood has

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:50.360
<v Speaker 1>been criticized from all sides for restricting trading. So do

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 1>you buy their reason for restricting trading? You know, I

0:02:54.320 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 1>think there's a good case for it. You know, we

0:02:56.639 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 1>don't know all of the details. It's really a question

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 1>of whether their rationale that they stated is truthful. But

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:05.359
<v Speaker 1>there's a good case for it. And the rationale that

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:08.519
<v Speaker 1>robin Hood gave for stopping trading was they needed to

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:12.080
<v Speaker 1>ensure that they had adequate net capital. This gets into

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:17.360
<v Speaker 1>a somewhat esoteric but extremely important question for investors, because

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:20.840
<v Speaker 1>if robin Hood kept allowing people to drive the stock

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 1>up the Game Stop stock to say a thousand or

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:27.440
<v Speaker 1>poor more, what you would see is that the net

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:31.800
<v Speaker 1>capital of robin Hood itself would likely be UH so

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 1>a liquid that it would put robin Hood in jeopardy

0:03:36.160 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 1>of collapse. Much has happened with like Lehman Brothers and

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 1>other actors in the financial crisis, you know, twelve years ago.

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>And so what I think would be ironic would be

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 1>if robin Hood had allowed people to keep trading, and

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 1>then when the bubble inevitably burst, the traders in robin

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Hood buying game Stop stock suddenly would suffer the huge

0:03:56.680 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 1>losses and by the way, massive margin calls, ruining their lives.

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>And then we would see a populoust doubt cry, much

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>like the home buyers in the real estate bubble that

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 1>led to the financial crisis of two thousand and eight,

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>accusing banks and so forth the predatory lending. Don't forget

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>that robin Hood was extending margin to the redditors, the

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>supposed redditors trading and buying game stop stocks. So these

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 1>guys buying game Stop stock are not just buying it

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>with their own money. They're buying it, you know, on margin,

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:30.159
<v Speaker 1>with extensions of credit from robin Hood. And the problem is,

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 1>once the traders started accumulating a massive position in house money,

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the margin needs to be ratcheted way way down. And

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 1>so robin Hood certainly had a contractual right. Paragraph sixteen

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 1>of its customer agreement says it can stop trading in

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the stock at any time, and that contractual provision is

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:53.479
<v Speaker 1>absolutely necessary for any brokerage firm to operate because of

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:58.159
<v Speaker 1>extreme market volatility events just like this, and robin Hood

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:00.720
<v Speaker 1>at a certain level. Whether the truth or not here,

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 1>we don't know. There'll be an investigation and we'll find

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:06.479
<v Speaker 1>out did have to comply with the net capital requirements

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 1>of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the clearing houses

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 1>through which robin Hood trades. Remember that the buyers of

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:14.479
<v Speaker 1>game Stop stock at robin Hood aren't just buying the

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:17.919
<v Speaker 1>stock immediately from some other counterparty robin Hood. They're buying

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:21.839
<v Speaker 1>it through an intermediary called the Depository Trust Corporation d

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 1>t c C. It's a clearing endity, a clearing house,

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and d t c C requires robin Hood to maintain

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 1>adequate net capital, as does the Securities and Exchange Commission.

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:37.400
<v Speaker 1>So maybe robin Hood's reason for stopping was not truthful

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>or accurate, but there's a plausible explanation as to why

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 1>they did it. We'll find out. The SEC has said

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:47.719
<v Speaker 1>it's closely monitoring the situation. What kind of regulatory problem

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 1>would this be? What's the SEC looking for? Well, I

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:53.480
<v Speaker 1>think the first thing uh that comes to mind is

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 1>whether or not robin Hood was in fact truthful in

0:05:56.640 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 1>saying that it's a net capital was in jeopardy. But

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>when you look at the massive increase in the stock

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 1>price of game Stop and other of the similar shares

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:08.360
<v Speaker 1>the reditors were trading in, and the relative newness of

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 1>the platform of robin Hood, and the fact that robin

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Hood did in fact have to, you know, draw down

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:15.159
<v Speaker 1>from its lines of credit, which you wouldn't have wanted

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:18.600
<v Speaker 1>to do. I think that the sec will investigate, and

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:23.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm probably with congressional investigations as well to prepare detailed

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 1>reports whether or not that actually happened. Again, I tend

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 1>to think it did, at least at a certain level.

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:33.039
<v Speaker 1>Then there's discussion of, you know, how do you regulate

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:38.039
<v Speaker 1>these new online trading platforms like robin Hood that you know,

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 1>allow a lot more flexible trading than the you know,

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 1>old conventional commission based model. You know, I don't know

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 1>exactly what those regulations would be, but from what I

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>see as as securities litigator, I don't see anything here

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:57.360
<v Speaker 1>that cries out for a radical change in the securities

0:06:57.560 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 1>regulations we have and it has had for you know,

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 1>nearly a hundred years comparable securities regulations. I mean, even

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:09.679
<v Speaker 1>before the nine stock market crash, the New York Stock

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Exchange imposed various net capital requirements. They weren't as rigidly

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 1>enforced as after the Securities and Exchange at nineteen thirty four.

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 1>But you know, the wild West of stock trading really

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 1>was in the late nineteenth century, and you know, really

0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>came to an end well before any of us were born.

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 1>And or Elizabeth Warren called for a broader review by

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the SEC and said, broker dealers that invite individual investors

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 1>need to operate based on basic rules and to keep

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the playing field level. Do you think that's the problem here?

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:45.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm not even sure what that means. Because

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 1>if you're a trader, well just quite literally, if you

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 1>start out stay with you know, ten thousand dollar trading account,

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:55.160
<v Speaker 1>you're a small retail investor and you start buying game

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Stop stock. You know, if you started buying it, you know,

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>say three or four months ago when it was whatever

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the twenties, uh, and all of a sudden that converts

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 1>into hundreds of thousands of dollars because you've written this

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 1>huge wave and you've been doing that in part on margin. Um,

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that there's any fundamental right. In fact,

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure that uh, you know, once I think

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth one and and the others, and I would say

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 1>this applies equally to some of the right wing uh

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>populism on the issue, uh that once people really sit

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 1>down and realize trading in the stock exchange is an

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>incredible privilege and it is not something that just is

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:37.200
<v Speaker 1>it just doesn't happen. In other words, you need market

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:40.840
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure to allow for the safe training. And again, just

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 1>look back to the credit crisis when the regulations were

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 1>dropped and all of a sudden you have the democratization

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:50.720
<v Speaker 1>supposedly of real estate finance that led to horrible outcomes

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 1>for you know, small you know, low income and middle

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 1>income uh families, and so you know, I think it

0:08:57.240 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 1>was a very you know, the provocative issue. And it

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>is so much fun to see the big shots, you know,

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 1>get their noses bloodied and uh see the little guys

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 1>purportedly winning. I get that. It's great fun. You read

0:09:10.960 --> 0:09:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the I would invite all of the listeners to subscribe

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 1>to the Reddit sub account called our slash Wall Street

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:20.320
<v Speaker 1>bets because it's just funny. I mean, it's just silly

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:24.600
<v Speaker 1>and goofy. But to say that these traders, these retail traders,

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:27.960
<v Speaker 1>have a fundamental right to drive up the stock way

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 1>beyond any rational you know, corporate valuation of that stock.

0:09:33.240 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, really, I think mistakes. The purpose of the

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 1>stock market is warm, Buffett says. The stock market in

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 1>the short run is a voting machine. You can drive

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:43.720
<v Speaker 1>the price way up, But in the long run, it's

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 1>a weighing machine. It weighs the long term earnings, the

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 1>long term cash flows of the companies in which the

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 1>stocks are issued. And I don't think anyone seriously believes

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the Game Stop stock is going to sit at you know,

0:09:56.920 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 1>four hundred dollars for a long time. I mean this morning,

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:02.600
<v Speaker 1>at least last night checked it was down down, I

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 1>think in the two hundred range. And when you look

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:07.559
<v Speaker 1>at the company's cash flows and fundamentals, it's just hard

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 1>to believe that it's going to stay there. Maybe this

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:13.400
<v Speaker 1>short failing hedge fund, Melvin Capital gets wiped out. Uh,

0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe there's some yet, you know, come up and for

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 1>a certain small group of hedge funds traders in New

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 1>York or whatever. But I mean, I think it would

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 1>be a mistake to assume that the you know, longside,

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the purchasers of game Stop, are entirely these small investors.

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it's very much more likely that there's other

0:10:32.040 --> 0:10:35.600
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds quietly behind the scenes, letting the Reddit guys

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 1>take all the publicity while the hedge funds, uh, you know,

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 1>profit from Melvin's misery. Because hedge funds love beating each

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 1>other up, they tear their faces off every day. This

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>is just a public example of something that has been

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 1>going on since trading began. There are close to twenty

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 1>lawsuits by investors against robin Hood. What are the suits

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>based on? What do they have to prove? Well, the

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 1>lawsuit I have in front of me, it makes the

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 1>mistake of alleging breach of contract, in other words, that

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the investors supposedly had this contractual right to keep trading.

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 1>The lawsuit itself attaches the customer agreement I quoted earlier

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 1>with paragraphs sixteen that says that robin Hood can put

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 1>a trading halt on customer trading basically at its discretion.

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 1>And so it's hard for me to see as a

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:28.599
<v Speaker 1>commercial litigator, and especially someone who does a lot of

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:33.320
<v Speaker 1>securities litigation. How that constitutes a breach of contract when

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Robin Hood had the right to stop the trading, especially

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:38.599
<v Speaker 1>given the market fundamentals. Now, but it turns out that

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Robin Who has engaged in some chicanery. Okay, maybe, but

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean Robin Hood, I'm sure did not want to

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 1>stop trading. I mean, they do better by letting their

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:50.680
<v Speaker 1>customers actually trade. Maybe it's a cabal, Maybe there's a

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 1>secret tact with Robin Hood and Citadel and these other

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 1>people to shut down the small investors. But I think

0:11:57.160 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 1>that that's you know, gonna be viewed as implausible. People

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 1>step back and realize how the market system actually works. Again,

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>it's great fun, it's great, great fun to see these

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:09.199
<v Speaker 1>guys get beat up, but you've got to really step

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 1>back and look at the market infrastructure. So do you

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>think that these lawsuits then won't survive motions to dismiss Well,

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:20.319
<v Speaker 1>maybe we find out something provocative in that Robin Hood

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:23.959
<v Speaker 1>did something nefarious and underhanded. But if it's just simply

0:12:24.040 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 1>the allegation that Robin Hood breached this contract by you know,

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>not allowing people to continue to buy game stop, I

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:32.959
<v Speaker 1>mean the Temple Laws, which for example, says that deprived

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the customers of profitable trading opportunities. That to me seems

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 1>like a real stretch. It's going to be very difficult

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 1>for an investor to claim I had the right to

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 1>make another a hundred thousand dollars and drive game Stop

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:50.199
<v Speaker 1>stock all the way to five hundred when game Stop

0:12:50.280 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 1>can come in and say, now we had the right

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 1>to stop this, and by the way, we had a

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:56.839
<v Speaker 1>good reason for it. Again, maybe there's something out there

0:12:56.880 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>we haven't seen. Much of the facts, you know, by

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:04.440
<v Speaker 1>necessity haven't been fully ventilated. But I would I would

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 1>find that implausible again, barring some incredible revelations. Also, do

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the robin Hood investors have to submit to arbitration according

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:18.440
<v Speaker 1>to the contract? Yeah, the contract does include mandatory arbitration.

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Whether or not that actually occurs is going to be interesting,

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:24.560
<v Speaker 1>because it may well be robin Hood decides to take

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 1>the investors who filed lawsuits up on their desire to

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 1>be in court, which robin Hood would be allowed to do.

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 1>In other words, robin Hood would be able to waive

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the arbitration requirement, get all these cases consolidated in front

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 1>of a judicial panel. On the multi district litigation and

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:42.079
<v Speaker 1>maybe get rid of the cases that way, because individual

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 1>arbitrations in such a massive context as this might be difficult.

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:50.720
<v Speaker 1>You know. I think the Bloomberg piece Chris Dalmus wrote that,

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:54.080
<v Speaker 1>uh we you and I discussed indicates that these lawsuits

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:57.320
<v Speaker 1>are probably gonna be around for a while. Uh. My

0:13:57.480 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 1>sense of it is that they'll die slow and painful.

0:13:59.800 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 1>That why do you think it will be slow because

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 1>of the massive number of lawsuits that investors have filed

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 1>all over the country, which will trigger this multi district

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 1>litigation process. Uh at least that's I think, you know,

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 1>a one view of it. It. It's conceivable Robin Hood

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 1>decides to challenge to these lawsuits individually, uh, in in

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 1>court after court after court. But given the number of

0:14:25.640 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the lawsuits, it kind of makes sense that uh, they

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 1>would be consolidated for uh you know, pre trial treatment

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 1>before a multi district litigation channel. That's gonna be again

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 1>something we just have to see and how it plays out.

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Uhbin you could also compel these arbitrations. Are compel these

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 1>lawsuits to arbitration. That's another way to handle it. Um.

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 1>But um, you know, I think that the conventional wisdom,

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of the like law professors and so

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 1>forth and other experts are are probably right that'll will

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 1>be consolidated before the judicial channel and multi district litigation,

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and that just takes additional time. Just explain briefly why

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 1>companies usually prefer arbitration to trial. Well, the conventional wisdom

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 1>is that it avoids runaway juries. Uh and and you

0:15:14.200 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 1>know that's definitely true in many instances. I will say

0:15:18.320 --> 0:15:21.480
<v Speaker 1>that I'm a little bit more of an agnostic because

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:26.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of planets cases do better in arbitration if if,

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 1>for example, there's no depositions and no motion practice or

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:32.960
<v Speaker 1>at least not much motion practice, and the cases get

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 1>decided and then once they're decided, there's no appeal. Uh

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 1>So I think there's really kind of a you know,

0:15:40.680 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 1>pros and cons to arbitration versus court. But there's no

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 1>question that in most consumer contracts like this, they do

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 1>contain arbitration. That's very common in the brokerage industry. The

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>cases are typically heard by the UH financial industry regulatory

0:15:55.880 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 1>authorities arbitration UH subsidiary, and that that is viewed as

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 1>generally being favorable to defendants. But you know, there are cases,

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 1>and I've seen them one I've wanted them myself in

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 1>front of center artitrators. So it isn't just a guaranteed

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>victory for the defendants. Uh And in some cases there's

0:16:17.240 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 1>advantages to the planoff investors. Thanks for being on the

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Law Show, Dave. That's David Bissinger of Bissinger, Ashman

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 1>and Williams. The number of Americans getting divorce plummeted last year,

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and the marriage rate also dropped as thousands of weddings

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 1>were postponed or canceled due to the COVID nineteen pandemic.

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 1>This early look at COVID nineteen's effect on divorce and

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 1>marriage statistics comes from Bowling Green State University's Center for

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Family and Demographic Research. The data contradicts earlier predictions that

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen and the stresses of the quarantine would cause

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 1>divorce rates to surge. Joining me as family law attorney,

0:16:56.800 --> 0:17:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Dan lipschelds of Aaronson, Mayefski and Sloan me, how COVID

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:05.360
<v Speaker 1>affected your divorce practice. Well, I thought there would be

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:08.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, there was a lot of news around the country,

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 1>around the world that COVID would cause a significant increase

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 1>in divorces. Um. I have not now agur into the

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:23.639
<v Speaker 1>pandemic seen that obviously when the pandemic first is and

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:26.240
<v Speaker 1>being a practicier out in New York City, you know,

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 1>we went down in mid March ahead of other parts

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 1>of the country, and courts were closed, and with courts

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:36.920
<v Speaker 1>being closed and not having the ability to operate virtually

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:41.440
<v Speaker 1>at that time, things certainly came to a relatively grinding halt.

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:44.480
<v Speaker 1>But you know, there was talk, as we said at

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:46.760
<v Speaker 1>that time and over the course of the summer, that

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:50.399
<v Speaker 1>when things opened back up, there would be a major,

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:54.960
<v Speaker 1>major uptick in divorce rates. And I can't say that

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 1>that that's happened. I think that as things have opened

0:17:57.600 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 1>back up, yes, we've seen an inflow of new matters,

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:05.399
<v Speaker 1>but currently nothing that is significantly greater than prior to

0:18:05.400 --> 0:18:08.439
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic. And to some extent, I think there's a

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:11.879
<v Speaker 1>certain type of matter that we've seen and there are

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:14.679
<v Speaker 1>other types of matters that we have not seen, and

0:18:14.720 --> 0:18:18.359
<v Speaker 1>that deals with I think people in certain economic situations

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:21.679
<v Speaker 1>and socio economic stature of families. I think that you know,

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 1>a lower socioeconomic stature family or a family where one

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 1>or both spouts have lost job. I think the decisions

0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 1>to move forward with the divorce has become certainly a

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 1>harder one, given that divorces can involve complicated issues and

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:39.960
<v Speaker 1>can be expensive, and the you know, there is still

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 1>a significant backlog of cases, even the courts having been

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:48.199
<v Speaker 1>opened back up and and operating virtually, even some wealthy

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:53.199
<v Speaker 1>couples are facing some economic uncertainty at this time, and

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty you know about kids going to school, things like that.

0:18:57.080 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Does that affect a wealthy couple's decision to get a divorce?

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:04.480
<v Speaker 1>M I don't think the same extent that uh, it

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:09.399
<v Speaker 1>might affect a less wealthy tuckle um. I think that

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:13.360
<v Speaker 1>people who have access to resources, even where there might

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:16.639
<v Speaker 1>be a slight downturn, are still going to be in

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:20.800
<v Speaker 1>a position to make that decision. I think economic considerations

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 1>are always important in choosing whether you're going to be

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 1>moving forward with this divorce the separation. But I think

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 1>that the lower income household, that decision has become much

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 1>much harder than in a wealthy household. And there is also,

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 1>as I said, access to court resources or the ability

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:48.440
<v Speaker 1>to perhaps engage in some type of alternatives resolution, and

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:51.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, higher a private judge, which is something that

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:54.320
<v Speaker 1>I have certainly seen in the more affluent families that

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:58.439
<v Speaker 1>want to move forward with UM a divorce process that

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 1>might otherwise stalled or you know, significantly delayed because of

0:20:03.840 --> 0:20:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic. As far as getting a divorce case through

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the courts during COVID, were you able to do that

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:17.760
<v Speaker 1>or were divorces basically stopped for a while in New

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:22.920
<v Speaker 1>York State UM, and specifically New York City. Uh, they were,

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 1>they were stopped. UM who aren't even able to commence

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 1>an action for divorce for a number of months. I

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:33.959
<v Speaker 1>think given that the city or Manhattan the words UM

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 1>more of an epicenter than other parts of the state

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:40.399
<v Speaker 1>and certainly other parts of the country. UM, other parts

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:44.800
<v Speaker 1>of state began to open up sooner than New York City,

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:48.480
<v Speaker 1>and then again once things opened back up, UM, it

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't necessarily mean that there were in port in person

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:56.920
<v Speaker 1>court appearances. In my fielden matrimonial law in New York

0:20:56.920 --> 0:21:00.119
<v Speaker 1>County with his Manhattan, there are still no U in

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 1>person proceedings. That it's all virtual, and that has changed

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the manner in which we've been practicing law. You are

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 1>not appearing in court, you're appearing virtually. UM. The filing

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 1>has gone predominantly to electronic filing. And I think that

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:22.479
<v Speaker 1>has changed the case in which uh you have access

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 1>to the courthouse, UM, the pace in which cases move forward.

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 1>I you know that there are far less trials then

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 1>there were uh pre pandemic. I think we're still adjusting

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:41.399
<v Speaker 1>to it. UM. In Manhattan, there are you appear before

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:44.720
<v Speaker 1>a judge, but economic issues in the case can be

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:47.919
<v Speaker 1>referred out to a special referee, which is sort of

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 1>an under judge. And those childs have not been done yet. UM.

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 1>So you where there was a huge amount of economic

0:21:57.520 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 1>cases being sized by a with different referees. UM, those

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 1>have not really restarted yet. UM. And And in addition,

0:22:07.680 --> 0:22:11.840
<v Speaker 1>if you don't consent for there to be a trial electronically,

0:22:12.080 --> 0:22:14.680
<v Speaker 1>then you don't have to participate in one. And it

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:17.200
<v Speaker 1>can certainly so if there's not consent on both sides,

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:21.639
<v Speaker 1>it can cause further delay. Has COVID changed custody determinations

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 1>in any way? It's the same process, um, in terms

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:29.680
<v Speaker 1>of you know, how you would adjudicate or you would

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 1>litigate a custody case. UM. I can't say that there's

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:41.159
<v Speaker 1>been a significant change in how UH COVID has affected that.

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:46.200
<v Speaker 1>There are certainly, almost on a weekly basis, new issues

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:52.200
<v Speaker 1>that arise, and I think judges are consistently confronted with um.

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:55.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, the same type of issue would arise, and

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 1>most judges would do the same one over a course

0:22:57.600 --> 0:23:00.679
<v Speaker 1>of a certain period of time. For example, you know

0:23:00.720 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>what the pandemic UH started, there would be a divorced

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 1>family or even a family going through a divorce process,

0:23:08.880 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 1>and one pair wants to be inno vacation homes and

0:23:12.400 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 1>one parent is an essential work they're living in the

0:23:15.600 --> 0:23:18.679
<v Speaker 1>city and and would like the same access to their child.

0:23:19.200 --> 0:23:24.120
<v Speaker 1>But you have quarantine regulations and you see guidelines, and

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:27.679
<v Speaker 1>so you know, as the pandemic has evolved, there are

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:31.920
<v Speaker 1>new questions that arrived, but consistent that that you'll see

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:34.159
<v Speaker 1>judges having to tackle and having to deal with it.

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:37.639
<v Speaker 1>And it is interesting, which how can to deal with

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:41.200
<v Speaker 1>those issues because on one hand, you have a court order,

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:44.639
<v Speaker 1>perhaps a court order document. On the other you have

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 1>a you know, spec guidelines, or you have a recommendation

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:54.680
<v Speaker 1>from the governor. And certainly I've seen judges give effect

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 1>to their orders unless there is some type of executive

0:23:58.359 --> 0:24:00.920
<v Speaker 1>order or something that would trump that something coming out

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 1>of all THENY for example, I would say that a

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:06.200
<v Speaker 1>court should operate in this way given a certain set

0:24:06.240 --> 0:24:10.159
<v Speaker 1>of circumstances. But um, there have been a lot of

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 1>interesting UM custody issues because of the pandemic set of quarantining,

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:21.960
<v Speaker 1>because of families desiring to uh you know, divorce, families

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:26.119
<v Speaker 1>desiring to one parent with somewhere else, and you know

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the access child and how parenting time is because of

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 1>that you mentioned before private judges explain what that's about.

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:41.040
<v Speaker 1>So I was touching on sort of alternative dispute resolution, UM,

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:43.399
<v Speaker 1>which is, you know, it's different way that you can

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 1>approach a litigation. You can go to a mediation, you

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:50.200
<v Speaker 1>can go to an arbitration. The difference between you know,

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:52.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry if I'm sort of spoon feeding it, but

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the difference between the mediation and arbitration is you go

0:24:56.080 --> 0:24:58.200
<v Speaker 1>to a mediator who would make a recommendation, but it

0:24:58.200 --> 0:25:01.080
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be binding, and our a trader would be someone

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:04.959
<v Speaker 1>who would make a determination. UM that would be binding.

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Now how binding that is uh depends on the type

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 1>of arbitration you're in. But there has certainly been a

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:18.359
<v Speaker 1>move towards working with either retired judges, older professionals in

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:22.879
<v Speaker 1>our fields that are respected to assist in the adjudication

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 1>of cases, because, as I talked about before, you may

0:25:26.119 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 1>not have the same access to a trial, the same

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 1>access to a judge, the same ability to UH have

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:37.160
<v Speaker 1>a trial as you could if you were coordinating with

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the other side. UM both you know, both litiganst both

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:45.119
<v Speaker 1>spouses wanting to move forward with the resolution of the

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:49.720
<v Speaker 1>case and agreeing to utilize UH, you know, somebody that

0:25:49.760 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 1>you would pay privately to assist in the adjudication of

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:55.959
<v Speaker 1>your case. And that's what I was referring to, a

0:25:56.000 --> 0:25:59.439
<v Speaker 1>private judge to be somebody that you agree upon with

0:25:59.520 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the others, I too, basically appoint as an arbiter of

0:26:04.040 --> 0:26:07.359
<v Speaker 1>the issues in their case. And there's different considerations that

0:26:07.400 --> 0:26:10.400
<v Speaker 1>go into that choice as well as to that process.

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 1>And but I have certainly seen a move to that

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:19.040
<v Speaker 1>UH in the litigation that I'm involved in. UM. I

0:26:19.080 --> 0:26:21.399
<v Speaker 1>think that, you know, touching back to the point of

0:26:21.440 --> 0:26:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the economic UM considerations, people who are in a more

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 1>affluent and wealthy family, I think, have the ability to

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 1>choose to hire somebody like that, whereas somebody in a

0:26:35.320 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 1>lower socio economic class or a lower income family might

0:26:39.640 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 1>not have that choice. Um, And so there has been

0:26:45.160 --> 0:26:50.160
<v Speaker 1>a move in some cases to choosing to have your

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:54.480
<v Speaker 1>matter resolved by uh, somebody that both sides has confidence

0:26:54.520 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 1>in and connect with the judge. Did they used to

0:26:57.560 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 1>before COVID have sort of divorce clinics where people who

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:05.880
<v Speaker 1>have a low income can go and have their divorce

0:27:06.480 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 1>hashed out. Yes, through the court systems. They they do that. Um.

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:18.120
<v Speaker 1>There's certainly I think then, UM some delay in those

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 1>UM clinics as they get up to virtual speed um.

0:27:24.119 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 1>And used to simply be able to go to a

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 1>courthouse or for example, I used to participate in something

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:33.200
<v Speaker 1>called Monday Night Law, which was a program through the

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 1>New York City Bar where you would spend the evening UM.

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Whether it was judges or or referees are lawyers, and

0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:48.320
<v Speaker 1>people would be able to come and meet with, you know,

0:27:48.359 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 1>a professional that would help assist them or give them

0:27:51.040 --> 0:27:56.240
<v Speaker 1>some advice, um for free, how to approach a divorce,

0:27:56.280 --> 0:27:58.959
<v Speaker 1>how to deal with certain issues that might arise, and

0:27:59.640 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 1>that that has not been as quickly off the ground

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:06.159
<v Speaker 1>or continuing like awards pre pandemic. Thanks for being on

0:28:06.200 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Launch Show. That's Dan lip Schultz of Aaronson,

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Maajevski and Sloane And that's it for the edition of

0:28:12.800 --> 0:28:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Lawn Podcast. I'm June Grasso. Thanks so much

0:28:16.119 --> 0:28:18.840
<v Speaker 1>for listening, and remember you can always get the latest

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:21.960
<v Speaker 1>legal news on our Bloomberg Launch podcast. You can find

0:28:22.000 --> 0:28:25.440
<v Speaker 1>them on Apple Podcasts, Spotify and wherever you get your

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:30.399
<v Speaker 1>favorite podcasts. You're listening to Bloomberg h