WEBVTT - Candace Owens' Hollywood Tabloid Pivot feat. Bridget Todd

0:00:01.720 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Cool Media. Welcome to it could happen here, the show

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:11.240
<v Speaker 1>about Things Falling Apart. I'm Garrison Davis and I'm joined

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:15.400
<v Speaker 1>today by a special guest host, Richard's Todd. Welcome back

0:00:15.400 --> 0:00:15.880
<v Speaker 1>to the show.

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:18.160
<v Speaker 2>Ah, thank you so much for having me. I am

0:00:18.320 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 2>completely excited to be here. I am a listener of

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 2>the show, so it feels like getting to be on

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 2>a show that I actually freak out too often.

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>And I'm very excited for you to be here because

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>you have a special report on one of the people

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:38.240
<v Speaker 1>who I've been cyberstalking for years, and I'm very excited

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>to hear the details of what she's been up to

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 1>these past few weeks. I kind of know the rough

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 1>overview because again because of my cyberstalking, but I've not

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>done a deep dive the way you have, so I'm

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>very excited to hear an update on this on this character.

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 2>So it sounds like we are in a similar place

0:00:55.200 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to this person, and this person is

0:00:57.000 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 2>none other than Candice Owens. First of all, what are

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 2>her thoughts on her? Because I am low key fascinated

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 2>with her. I follow her on social media, I watch

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:07.639
<v Speaker 2>her videos like I am.

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 3>Like weirdly captivated by her.

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean I've I've covered her mostly through her involvement

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 1>with Daily Wire. I've talked a little bit about kind

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:19.839
<v Speaker 1>of how that'll fell apart, you know, like a year

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 1>and a half ago or so. I've talked a little

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:25.040
<v Speaker 1>bit about her involvement in Turning Point USA with Charlie Kirk.

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>And she's just kind of been one of like these

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 1>like randomly, you know, like like orbiters of like the

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:34.039
<v Speaker 1>online like right wing content sphere for like I don't know,

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the past six years at least, and I typically focus

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:39.319
<v Speaker 1>more on like you know, like the Ben Shapiro's, the

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Matt Walsh's, you know, back in the day, the Stephen

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Crowders and stuff. But Cannis was always just like around

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 1>and like she definitely like went after a different demographic

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 1>than what like my usual focuses, right, Like I'm focused

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 1>on like what's going on with straight white men, Like

0:01:55.040 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 1>why why are they like this? And who who is

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 1>targeting them? You know, and that's you know, that's like

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the Matt Walsh, Stephen Crowder kind of angle. Like Candace

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Owens has like a kind of a broader net that

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>she targets with her content, So like she's always kind

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 1>of come up as like a side character. I don't

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 1>think I've ever done like a distinct focus on her

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:16.680
<v Speaker 1>before besides just you know whatever kind of crazy post

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 1>or like you know, anti trans or like very like

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 1>weird like racist rank that she goes on like every

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:22.240
<v Speaker 1>once in a while.

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 2>Yes, so there is so much to talk about when

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 2>it comes to Candace Owens. I'm sort of like you,

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:30.079
<v Speaker 2>like I sort of saw her as a side character,

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 2>but only recently have I realized, like, oh, people in

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 2>my life are listening to Candace Owens and citing Candace

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 2>Owens and they have no idea any about her, anything

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:41.079
<v Speaker 2>about her backstory.

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, all the stuff that you that you were just

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:43.240
<v Speaker 3>talking about.

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>She's like reinvented herself like multiple times. And you know,

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 1>some people who mainly come at this from like the

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 1>anti fascist research perspective might not be aware of her

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:54.520
<v Speaker 1>like latest rebrand, which is what I'm excited to hear

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:57.800
<v Speaker 1>about today. Yes, I just remembered how she had that

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>whole event with Kanye when she did to her like

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 1>BLM documentary that was a whole other Candace era. Yeah

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 1>so much, My.

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 2>God, I have to say I was like low key

0:03:08.600 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 2>embarrassed for her because like during her Kanye West era,

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 2>she was like, Kanye West designed the Katore outfits for

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 2>my Blexit movement, and Kanye West was like, no, I

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:21.800
<v Speaker 2>fucking didn't, And like I was like, Oh, They're so

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 2>embarrassing that you like that, you like publicly aligned yourself

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:29.800
<v Speaker 2>with Kanye West, only for him to basically like diss

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:32.720
<v Speaker 2>you publicly right after yeah.

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 1>And then come out as like an explicit neo Nazi

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 1>like two weeks later.

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 3>Yes, yes, uh, Candace girl.

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 2>So I want to talk about her, like, I don't

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 2>want to spend too much time on her background, but

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 2>there are some pieces that I think like are good

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 2>for understanding kind of who she is, this chameleon figure

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 2>that she's been totally If there is not like a

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 2>behind the bastard's on her, do you know, if there is,

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 2>there should be If there's not not.

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Yet, Like similarly on Bastards, she's been one of one

0:03:57.120 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 1>of these like recurring characters. Oh my god, but she

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 1>she is had a distinct focus.

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 2>Robert Evans, get on it, because we need the Candace

0:04:04.520 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Owens behind the bastard. So Candicce grew up in Stanford, Connecticut.

0:04:08.120 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 2>While she was a student there, she went through this

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 2>horrible sounding racial harassment. A classmate left her like this

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 2>racist death threat on her voicemail. That turned into like

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 2>a pretty serious local scandal because it turned out the

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:25.160
<v Speaker 2>student who made that threat via voicemail.

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 3>Did so in a car with a group of.

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:30.800
<v Speaker 2>Students that included the sun of the then mayor and

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 2>then future Democratic governor of Connecticut, Daniel molloy. So she

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:37.840
<v Speaker 2>got tons of support from the local chapter of the NAACP,

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 2>and her family ended up suing the Stamford Board of

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 2>Education in federal court for failing to protect her rights,

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 2>resulting in a thirty seven thousand, five hundred dollars settlement.

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:49.159
<v Speaker 2>She went on the studied journalism at University of Rhode

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 2>Island before dropping out.

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:53.160
<v Speaker 1>This is like the early two thousands.

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:57.479
<v Speaker 2>Yes, this was like young like baby Candace high school

0:04:57.480 --> 0:05:00.040
<v Speaker 2>Candace before she was the Candace Owen that we you

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:04.040
<v Speaker 2>know today. Yeah, so I sort of like almost see

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of myself and where she got her

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:09.920
<v Speaker 2>start like me. She was an early adopter of using

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 2>the Internet to talk about things like race and politics

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 2>like me. That also seemed to sort of manifest in

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 2>a lot of like low hanging fruit shit posts on

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 2>the early days of blogging, Like in twenty fifteen, she

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 2>was writing blogs making fun of Trump's penis size.

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:27.479
<v Speaker 1>Sure, many such cases.

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:28.600
<v Speaker 3>Yes, many such cases.

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:32.479
<v Speaker 2>So in twenty fifteen, Owens is running a blog called

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 2>Degree one eighty where she wrote pieces criticizing conservative Republicans,

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 2>writing about the quote that shit crazy antics of the

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 2>Republican tea Party. The good news is they will eventually

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 2>die off peacefully and in their sleep, we hope, and

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 2>then we can get right on with the obvious social

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 2>change that needs to happen immediately, she wrote on her blog.

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:54.919
<v Speaker 2>So back then she was really someone who had like

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 2>a progressive point of view and was doing a lot

0:05:57.600 --> 0:06:01.159
<v Speaker 2>of public writing about what she was saying and experiencing

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 2>in politics at the time. Yeah.

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 1>No, this is something that I guess some people might

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 1>not know if they've only like become aware of her

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 1>through daily wires. Yeah, Like in the pre twenty sixteen

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:15.159
<v Speaker 1>like BuzzFeed internet kind of sphere, she was just like

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:17.040
<v Speaker 1>one of like these people who would yeah, have like

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 1>like you know, progressive like ish takes, criticize embarrassing like politicians,

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:27.239
<v Speaker 1>and like overtly racist stuff happening, and then the degree

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 1>to which this this like heel turn happens is like

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:32.479
<v Speaker 1>one of the most stark examples I've seen in like

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 1>a I don't know, I'm trying to think of it.

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 1>If there's like any like exact parallel, I don't know,

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Like there's like certainly some like detransition, like a grifters.

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 1>There used to be like ex gay influencers or you

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>know this like like proto influencers kind of before influencers

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 1>were a thing, like ex gay speakers. But yeah, the

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 1>switch around on Candace from these blog posts is so concentrated.

0:06:56.839 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 2>So in her own words she describes it as happening,

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 2>Oh there you go.

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:04.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, how it happened is like fascinating to me.

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 2>So in twenty sixteen, when Gamergate was in full swing,

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:11.280
<v Speaker 2>Owen's launched a Kickstarter for a project called Social Autopsy,

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 2>which she described as a way to catalog the abuses

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 2>of trolls and cyberbullies. Fun fact that Kickstarter is still

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 2>up today. It is such a weird time capsule of

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 2>a different time. There's like a video of her speaking

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 2>earnestly about the need to like have the internet be

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 2>a like safer, more equitable landscape.

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 3>It is nuts, like.

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:33.160
<v Speaker 2>People should go listen to her speaking about this project.

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 2>So the plan for this project was essentially that she

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 2>would create a way to de anonymize online commentators and

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 2>then connect them with like their real names and their

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 2>real life employers. And what's so funny is that, like

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 2>that is the very same argument that a lot of

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 2>people use, people who like want to restrict the open

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Internet still use today that like problems on the Internet

0:07:57.320 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 2>online harassment and abuse would all be improved if only

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 2>everybody had to use their government idea and government names

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 2>to access the Internet. And so like it's very funny

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 2>that that idea it was bad then, and it didn't

0:08:09.320 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 2>really die, it was just recycled into today.

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, like there's a version of this that happens,

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 1>or at least it kind of used to happen more

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 1>in regards to like anti fascist research, where like you're

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 1>like identify specific like extremely racist accounts or like explicit

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 1>neo Nazis and contact their employer in an attempt to

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 1>get to get them fired so they can focus on

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:32.440
<v Speaker 1>getting a new job and supporting themselves rather than doing

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 1>racism online and in person, if especially if he's like,

0:08:36.280 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, a member of like a group, whether that

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:41.560
<v Speaker 1>be you know, the Proud Boys back in the day

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 1>or many many other groups, Patriot Prayer now, Patriot Front,

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 1>that sort of thing. It's funny how hated this tactic

0:08:48.240 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 1>is soon to be by people like Candice and the

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:54.839
<v Speaker 1>Daily Wire people. But here she's advocating it herself exactly,

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 1>and they just like post Anita Sarkisian kind of content

0:08:58.240 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 1>like world.

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so pretty much everybody thought this was a bad idea,

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:07.040
<v Speaker 2>including video game developer Zoe Quinn, who folks might remember

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 2>was kind of at the center of Gamergate and was

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 2>like viciously attacked. Owens was subsequently harassed and docs and

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 2>she blamed Zoe Quinn and other feminists for this and

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 2>said so publicly as you can probably guess, like people

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 2>like Milo Gyanopolis loved this.

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 3>People who were promoters of.

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 2>Gamergate really hyped up Owens's claims that like, yes, feminists

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 2>were actually the ones doing all the online harassing.

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I can see where this is going.

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 2>So this event is what Owen's credits with her turn

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:43.079
<v Speaker 2>from progressive to quote becoming a red pilled radical. She says,

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 2>I became a conservative overnight. I realized that liberals were

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:50.720
<v Speaker 2>actually the racists. Liberals were actually the trolls. She starts

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:54.320
<v Speaker 2>promoting right wing viewpoints on her YouTube channel, calling herself

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 2>quote red pilled black, which I gotta say is like

0:09:57.600 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 2>pretty good branding.

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 3>Like I'm I'm mad at the branding there.

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 2>I was like, Okay, black woman talking about like right

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 2>wing stuff, red pill black.

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:05.560
<v Speaker 3>I get it. I get it.

0:10:05.800 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm interested to see how much how much the

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 1>checkbook was a consideration here? Oh yes, how much her

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Kickstarter god versus how much she realized she could get

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:18.079
<v Speaker 1>if she jumped on the other side of the content churn.

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:22.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, she almost instantly gets noticed by Charlie Kirk, founder

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 2>of Turning Points USA Right, and he hires her almost immediately.

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:30.720
<v Speaker 2>She starts cranking out these videos that really perform quite well,

0:10:30.720 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 2>that her videos really go viral. Videos where she's doing

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 2>things like dismissing the twenty seventeen White supremacist Unite the

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:41.960
<v Speaker 2>Right rally in Charlottesville. Alex Jones gets her to co

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:44.480
<v Speaker 2>host some of his info war shows. She's doing stints

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:47.720
<v Speaker 2>on Fox News as a paid commentator, like business is

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 2>booming for Candice Owens from this turn.

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:52.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this is around when I became aware of her.

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:55.959
<v Speaker 2>Yes, in twenty twenty one, she joins up with the

0:10:56.080 --> 0:11:00.600
<v Speaker 2>Daily Wire. There was so much fanfare around them higher Candace,

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 2>like it was a big deal she moved to Nashville. Yeah,

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 2>fun fact, there was even a House joint resolution House

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:10.079
<v Speaker 2>Joint Resolution three fifty, a resolution in the Tennessee government

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 2>to congratulate Candace Owens are relocating to Tennessee and for

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:18.080
<v Speaker 2>her work at Daily Wired. That reads whereas Miss Owens

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 2>has earned the admiration and respect of millions of Americans

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 2>through her activism in support of President Trump as a

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 2>black woman and her perceptive criticism of creeping socialism and

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 2>leftist political tyranny.

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Very cool stuff.

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:36.199
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, imagine it being like a joint resolution in your

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:38.319
<v Speaker 2>local government when you move someplace.

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 1>The Governor of Tennessee was like super excited when the

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Daily Wire relocated their headquarters to Tennessee and brought in

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>all these people. Like there was there was like so

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:50.440
<v Speaker 1>many like private dinners meetings. There was like a like

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 1>a number of resolutions welcoming the Daily Wire to Tennessee.

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 1>In this like twenty twenty one period as they were

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>just starting to like launch their own extreming service website,

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 1>which is why they recruited Candace is because they were

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:05.959
<v Speaker 1>looking for content creators to fill out their slate.

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 2>So you would think that this should be like a

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 2>match made in heaven, right, smooth sailing. They need insidiary

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:15.840
<v Speaker 2>content creators. She's an insidiary content creator. Should be a

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 2>match made in heaven. Perfect Not quite, because things end

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 2>in like this really messy public fallout just a few

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:27.599
<v Speaker 2>years later. So I know that you've done episodes on

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 2>this from my perspective, and I would love to know

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 2>what you think. It's not one hundred percent clear what

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:36.960
<v Speaker 2>went down, but the public friction between Candace Owens and

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 2>Ben Shapiro, one of the founders of Daily Wire, it

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:44.319
<v Speaker 2>seemed to be like related to reactions around the situation

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:44.959
<v Speaker 2>in Gaza.

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, totally so.

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 2>Ben Shapiro is Jewish and Owens, as we said, has

0:12:50.280 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 2>said and done like a lot of anti Semitic stuff,

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:54.080
<v Speaker 2>like a lot and.

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Like actual Adesemitic stuff like that people use that as

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 1>a way to like shut down like very very admirable,

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 1>like like like Propelstinian like activism. No, like Canda owns

0:13:07.559 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 1>just is anti semitic, and this it's like the same

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>thing with like Jackson Hinkel, and she made it like

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 1>an escalating series of anti semitic claims after October seventh,

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 1>which which slowly kind of like broke with the company

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:23.319
<v Speaker 1>and ben like more and more and more of over

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 1>series of a few months. Yes, and it's it's it's

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:29.320
<v Speaker 1>funny because like it also kind of mirrors this like

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 1>online fight she had with Stephen Crowder like a year

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 1>or so prior when Daily Wire was trying to recruit him,

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 1>and then she got informed about like how like abusive

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:40.640
<v Speaker 1>he was to his wife, and then she went on

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:43.320
<v Speaker 1>like a media blitz like against him as like as

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 1>he was in negotiations like with the Daily Wire. She's

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:49.840
<v Speaker 1>like very willing to like stir shit up, like even

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 1>if it like goes against her own interests or the

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 1>interests of like whatever company she works for, Like she

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 1>is she is absolutely willing to like make like some

0:13:56.679 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of like chaotic spectacle regardless of her own like

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, financial security.

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 2>I guess yes, like she I'm so glad that you

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 2>mentioned that she is not afraid to get down and

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 2>dirty in public and I do think, like, you know,

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 2>as a black woman who works with a lot of

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:15.679
<v Speaker 2>white men, I would imagine that she's probably thinking, like,

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:18.679
<v Speaker 2>I have to have some kind of decorum. I don't

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 2>want anyone to say that I'm being a crazy black

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 2>woman or whatever.

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 3>She's it seems like she has no such qualms.

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 2>Like she is like I will, I will make this

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 2>a public, messy fight, and I am not afraid to

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 2>make a genuine spectacle of myself. Yeah, and so it

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 2>is really important to note that, like, as you said,

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 2>she wasn't just like criticizing the Israeli States. She was

0:14:39.440 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 2>like getting into like blood lible and like deep conspiracy theories.

0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, it was. There was some really nasty posts.

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Like one of the things that she said, she's

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 2>claimed that Judaism was quote a pedophile centric religion that

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:56.120
<v Speaker 2>believes in demons and child sacrifice, and that she was

0:14:56.200 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 2>waking people up to the fact that pedophiles are in power, like.

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:00.120
<v Speaker 3>Stuff like that.

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Not great, not good, not good.

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 2>So, as you said, like this starts to become like

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:10.120
<v Speaker 2>a public feud toward her employer. She wrote on Twitter,

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 2>no one can serve two masters, and ended her post

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 2>writing you cannot serve both God and money, which Ben Shapiro,

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 2>her boss, tweets like quote tweeted, oh my god, Like, Candice,

0:15:21.480 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 2>if you feel that taking money from the Daily Wire

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 2>somehow that comes between you and God, by all means quit,

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:27.360
<v Speaker 2>Like messy is there.

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 1>It's crazy that instead of having like a company meeting,

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>they were just doing this on Twitter dot com.

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god, and my messy ass was eating it up.

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 2>I was like, keep fighting, let him fight.

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, no, absolutely, I'm totally willing to like watch this,

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 1>watch this go down.

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 3>I do not want to get involved, right right right.

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 2>Owens like went on Tuck Her Carlson Show and said

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 2>that Ben Shapiro was quote acting unprofessional and emotionally unhinged

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 2>for weeks now. She said that Shapiro quote crossed a

0:15:56.320 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 2>certain line. When you come for scripture and read yourself

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 2>into it, I will not talk it.

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Very cool.

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So, at one point, Owen's tweets that she wants

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 2>Ben Shapiro to have a public like debate with her,

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 2>moderated by podcaster Patrick Bett Davide.

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 3>Ben Shapiro was having none of this.

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 2>He tweets, Candice, I can see why you'd want to

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 2>hide behind a moderator, particularly one who said we should

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 2>rename our company quote Daily Jewish Wire just yesterday, No

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 2>Jesus one on one Monday at five, we can sit

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 2>down and have a healthy debate like adult and will

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 2>live stream it on x and YouTube. Take it or

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 2>leave it as to the true reason why you didn't

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 2>respond to my offer to sit down with you and

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 2>discuss these issues publicly or privately back in February, I

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 2>have no idea what the hell you're talking about.

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 3>Like, this is employer employee going at it on Twitter.

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 1>I can't believe I'm taking Ben Shapiro's side here, not

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 1>just because he's Ben Shapiro, but also because he's an employer.

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>But it's a really it's a really tough situation here.

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I feel the same way, because, like, it's just

0:16:55.800 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 2>not a great look to have somebody that you just

0:16:57.880 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 2>hired to all this fanfare come actually like this on Twitter,

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 2>like and I think, I mean, this is just my opinion,

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 2>so like take that for what it's worth, just as

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 2>somebody who has worked in media and been around the block.

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:10.719
<v Speaker 2>The reason why I'm not comfortable saying like their feud

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:15.480
<v Speaker 2>was entirely based on Owens's anti Semitic comments and behavior

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:19.200
<v Speaker 2>is that she just went so hard and so public

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:21.639
<v Speaker 2>that something to me, I almost wonder if there was

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:24.919
<v Speaker 2>like a contract dispute here, but like she was like, oh,

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 2>I can make more money on my own, totally gotta

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:29.199
<v Speaker 2>get out of this contract or something, because like it

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 2>just doesn't smell right.

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:32.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yeah, if she had like an inclination that

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 1>she could afford to lose his job because she might

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:37.119
<v Speaker 1>make more money on her own, then yeah, absolutely that

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:39.400
<v Speaker 1>would that would allow her to push this further than

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:41.959
<v Speaker 1>what she might otherwise might. Like there's been a lot

0:17:42.040 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of discussion in the right wing contents

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:47.679
<v Speaker 1>fear about like the Daily Wires fairly restrictive contracts despite

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 1>still getting paid like tens of millions of dollars, there

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 1>is like restrictions on like what happens when you lose

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 1>monetization because the Daily Wires like a company trying to

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:58.640
<v Speaker 1>make a profit, So totally, I think there could absolutely

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 1>be other financial stuff going on here. I think it's

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:04.119
<v Speaker 1>more like an interlocking series of issues rather than just

0:18:04.119 --> 0:18:05.119
<v Speaker 1>one thing or another.

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:10.919
<v Speaker 2>Yes, So after Rabbi Shmooley Boteach criticized Owens for her

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:14.680
<v Speaker 2>defenses of Kanye West. Owens liked to tweet asking Boteach

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:18.200
<v Speaker 2>if he was quote drunk on Christian blood again.

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:21.119
<v Speaker 3>And I guess that was the final straw.

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:23.880
<v Speaker 2>A few days later, Daily Wire and Candace Owens ended

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:27.879
<v Speaker 2>their relationship, with Owen's tweeting the rumors are true, I

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:40.120
<v Speaker 2>am finally free.

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:18:42.960 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 2>So that's what happened with her and Daily Wire. So

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 2>where is she now? Well, this is where the story

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 2>gets interesting because I had not heard from Candace Owens

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:54.920
<v Speaker 2>in a minute, and my reintroduction to her happened recently,

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 2>and when I was trying to make sense of the

0:18:56.320 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 2>dispute between two Hollywood A listers, Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni.

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 2>So the issue between Blake and Justin it's a little

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 2>bit complicated and ongoing, but it's actually a pretty interesting

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:09.440
<v Speaker 2>story that includes a lot of things that I enjoy,

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 2>like how celebrities use media and how social media platforms

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:17.080
<v Speaker 2>can be weaponized for or against specific people. Email correspondence

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:20.120
<v Speaker 2>where people make themselves look terrible in writing because they

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:22.680
<v Speaker 2>do not expect those emails to be in a deposition

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 2>later like that is my favorite thing in the world, like,

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:27.359
<v Speaker 2>please continue to put your wrongdoing in writing so that

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 2>my nosey ask can read it later and be like,

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:34.480
<v Speaker 2>ooh messy. So I do encourage like folks to read

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 2>up on it because it does go beyond just like

0:19:36.640 --> 0:19:39.399
<v Speaker 2>two celebrities having a feud, but you don't really need

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:42.080
<v Speaker 2>to know the specifics for our purposes. The quick and

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 2>dirty version is that Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni were

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 2>in a movie adaptation of the very popular novel by

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:51.679
<v Speaker 2>Colleen Hoover called It Starts with Us. In December, Lively

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 2>filed a legal complaint against Baldoni, accusing him of sexual

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:58.320
<v Speaker 2>harassment and starting a smear campaign against her. Baldoni strongly

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:01.359
<v Speaker 2>denies that and has sued her and response, both camps

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 2>have released information like emails, text messages, and video that

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:06.440
<v Speaker 2>attempting to make the other look bad.

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 3>So it has kind of.

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:11.639
<v Speaker 2>Turned into one of those ink blot tests that changes

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:14.639
<v Speaker 2>depending on whose version you buy. Version one is that

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Blake Lively was being sexually harassed on set by a

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:22.119
<v Speaker 2>fake feminist ally who is actually an abusive man, or

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 2>version two that Blake Lively is an egomaniac who was

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:29.399
<v Speaker 2>using her star power and a list celebrity network like

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 2>her husband Ryan Reynolds from Deadpool, to control the narrative

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 2>around her being a nightmare on set and steamrolling everybody

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:40.919
<v Speaker 2>on this project. Cool, yes, and so it's what's interesting

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:42.760
<v Speaker 2>about this to me is that it's one of those

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 2>stories where algorithmically it depends on what silo or what

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 2>pocket of the Internet you're at sure to determine, like,

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 2>what version of this story you're getting, Like much like

0:20:52.680 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 2>Johnny Dep's deformation Losses.

0:20:54.320 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Sounds too much like the thing, Yeah.

0:20:56.440 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 2>Exactly exactly, and so like for whatever reason, TikTok thinks

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:04.919
<v Speaker 2>I hate Blake Lively and want to pour over every

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:07.439
<v Speaker 2>nuance of how she is a fraud, right, like, but

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:11.159
<v Speaker 2>someone else's TikTok might be like, no, Blake Lively, we

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:13.240
<v Speaker 2>should be supporting her. Like. It's one of those situations

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 2>where just depending on where you are on the Internet,

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:18.120
<v Speaker 2>you might get a very different impression of the public

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:19.919
<v Speaker 2>sentiment leaning one brayer or another.

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:22.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, this is all the types of things I

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:25.880
<v Speaker 1>try to avoid learning about at almost all costs. So

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 1>I guess I need not you, you know.

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 2>So I was trying to get to the bottom of

0:21:31.680 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 2>it because I kept hearing about it, like everyone was

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 2>talking about it. So I'm talking to my cousins, who

0:21:36.359 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 2>I would lovingly describe as normies, and that they are

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:40.639
<v Speaker 2>not super online.

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 3>It's like they're not like you and me. They're not

0:21:42.640 --> 0:21:45.400
<v Speaker 3>like deep into the depths of extremism or anything like that.

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 1>No, they're not watching like the Daily Wire for fun

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:51.400
<v Speaker 1>slash four works, yes, yea.

0:21:51.760 --> 0:21:53.960
<v Speaker 2>And my cousins are like, oh my god, there is

0:21:54.000 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 2>this black girl journalist who has been following everything and

0:21:56.880 --> 0:21:59.399
<v Speaker 2>breaking it down. She has all the tea will tag you.

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 2>That journalist was Candace Owens. Okay, so all right, you

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 2>know Candace has been making so many videos off of this,

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 2>and like her coverage, if you, coverage in quotes, has

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:15.399
<v Speaker 2>really taken off online. As The Cut put it in

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 2>a piece called Candace Owens has gone mainstream. They write,

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 2>the right wing commentator's coverage of the Blake Lively justin

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 2>Boldannie case has reached millions of viewers. Owen's podcast was

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:28.679
<v Speaker 2>hours and hours of analysis of the case, deep dives

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 2>into court filings, tabloid news stories, even Ryan Reynolds's recent

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:34.480
<v Speaker 2>SNL Fifthist anniversary special appearance.

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 3>One listener said, she's really been.

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 2>Able to go in and pinpoint discrepancies and some of

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 2>the things Blake Lively ha said, rather than us having

0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:42.280
<v Speaker 2>to go through it on our own.

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Ah. Of course it's the woman who's lying about being

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:47.200
<v Speaker 1>sexually harassed. Of course.

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:50.960
<v Speaker 2>One listener of her podcast says she recognizes that Owens

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:53.919
<v Speaker 2>seems to have a pro Boldanni bias, but she doesn't

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 2>care because quote, she's urging us to look past the

0:22:56.560 --> 0:22:58.400
<v Speaker 2>fact that this is not a feminist issue at all,

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:01.360
<v Speaker 2>that it's about getting justice or whoever is being wronged here.

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 3>She's uniting the left and the right. The right wing Women's.

0:23:05.440 --> 0:23:09.200
<v Speaker 2>Magazine also published a headline about this, saying how Candice

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:12.160
<v Speaker 2>Owens is uniting conservatives and liberal with her it ends

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 2>with US coverage. So her coverage of this dispute has

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:19.399
<v Speaker 2>really allowed her to attract a lot more viewers beyond

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 2>her like normal right wing extremist base, which has generally

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:26.440
<v Speaker 2>been like a lot of white men like that who

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 2>was really listening to her content before when she was

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 2>with Daily Wire. Now she has really branched out. So

0:23:32.640 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 2>like normies like my cousins who have no idea who

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:39.199
<v Speaker 2>Owens is, have no idea her background, her past, the

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:41.240
<v Speaker 2>work that she has done, and just think like, oh,

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 2>she's a normal entertainment journalist, like digging and getting the dirt.

0:23:44.680 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I know she's doing this like on her podcast. I

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:48.639
<v Speaker 1>assume YouTube as well. She also just like trying to

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 1>like flood TikTok, trying to flood like Instagram reaches. Is

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:54.200
<v Speaker 1>this kind of part of how she's trying to like

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:55.200
<v Speaker 1>expand her reach.

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 3>It is like she's everywhere.

0:23:57.640 --> 0:24:00.639
<v Speaker 2>And then she has her longer form podcast YouTube, but

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:03.919
<v Speaker 2>then clips of her like you know, breaking down the

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 2>top lies or top inaccuracies and things that Blake Lively

0:24:07.560 --> 0:24:11.119
<v Speaker 2>has said. Those go super viral on social media. The

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 2>short clips yeah okay, and all of this has been

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:17.960
<v Speaker 2>just gangbusters for her growth and engagement.

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 3>Here's how A cut put it.

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:23.160
<v Speaker 2>Since Owens started covering the Lively Baldani case, her YouTube

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 2>channel has exploded in popularity, allowing her to attract a

0:24:26.600 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 2>much larger fan base than the audience of hardcore conservatives

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 2>she is amassed over the years. Each episode about Lively

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 2>racks up at least one point five million views. In

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:38.200
<v Speaker 2>the past month alone, Owen's has a masked more than

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:40.919
<v Speaker 2>four hundred and fifty thousand new subscribers on YouTube, and

0:24:40.960 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 2>her total video views have quadrupled since this time last year.

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 2>This is according to data from the platforms Social Blade,

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 2>oh No. Over the past three months, her audience on

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:54.119
<v Speaker 2>YouTube has almost started skewing sixty five percent female, according

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:57.040
<v Speaker 2>to data provided by a spokesperson, a market shift from

0:24:57.080 --> 0:24:58.200
<v Speaker 2>her past fan base.

0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, she's loading in popularity.

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 2>She's everywhere, and now she's attracting like normy women who

0:25:05.119 --> 0:25:07.399
<v Speaker 2>are just coming in for this celebrity dispute.

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's probably not gonna end well huh.

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, I don't think it will end well.

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 2>You know, I was like racking my brain trying to

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 2>figure out, like, why has this story taken off so

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:19.760
<v Speaker 2>much for Owen's And there are a couple of reasons.

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:21.960
<v Speaker 3>I think this is like working for her. One.

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 2>I hate to say it, but she is actually genuinely

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:29.760
<v Speaker 2>interesting to listen to. You know, when she was a

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:33.199
<v Speaker 2>progressive voice online, she definitely was somebody who had a

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 2>point of view and a clear voice and a perspective,

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 2>and that really comes through when she's breaking down Blake

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 2>Lively in these videos. She has a way of speaking

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 2>that really makes you pay attention and signals to the listener,

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 2>like this person is really breaking it down. It's the

0:25:48.000 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 2>same reason why on TikTok or social media when someone

0:25:51.359 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 2>is like story time, we're like I'm about to tell

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:57.639
<v Speaker 2>you all the details of something. Those videos always perform

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:00.000
<v Speaker 2>very well on social media. And I think that Owens

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:02.879
<v Speaker 2>is just very good at knowing how to hold somebody's

0:26:02.880 --> 0:26:03.639
<v Speaker 2>attention online.

0:26:03.640 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 3>Like I have to say it, sure.

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean she's been doing the content churn for almost

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 1>a decade now, Like, yeah, you you do get good

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:15.200
<v Speaker 1>at it on like a technical proficiency level.

0:26:15.440 --> 0:26:15.680
<v Speaker 3>Yes.

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:20.840
<v Speaker 2>Also, you know, we just love good old fashioned misogyny.

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:23.639
<v Speaker 2>And if that misogyny can be laced with like a

0:26:23.680 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 2>conspiracy theory, oh, I.

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:26.800
<v Speaker 3>Think that's it's even better.

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 2>So, like I think that part of this is just

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:33.440
<v Speaker 2>like social media platforms are always going to amplify misogyny.

0:26:34.119 --> 0:26:36.920
<v Speaker 2>I would argue that things like misogyny, transphobia, massage, noire,

0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:39.399
<v Speaker 2>or racism, all of that is like baked into the

0:26:39.440 --> 0:26:42.440
<v Speaker 2>experience of showing up online as a feature, not a bug.

0:26:42.760 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 2>And I think that Omens takes it even further because

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:50.359
<v Speaker 2>she is breaking it down, like she's uncovering some conspiracy.

0:26:50.440 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 2>Like it's not just let's talk about about Blake Lively,

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 2>it's I'm uncovering the web of lies and I'm gonna

0:26:57.040 --> 0:27:00.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna expose Blake Lively's dark truth, right, and so

0:27:01.119 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 2>like of course that's gonna take off.

0:27:02.720 --> 0:27:06.480
<v Speaker 1>And she does gain this element of authority because she's

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:09.440
<v Speaker 1>a woman talking about this. It makes men feel better

0:27:09.440 --> 0:27:12.280
<v Speaker 1>about being misogynistic because a woman's telling them it's okay

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:14.240
<v Speaker 1>to I mean, this is this is the same thing

0:27:14.280 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>that she was able to weaponize for all of her,

0:27:16.840 --> 0:27:18.680
<v Speaker 1>like like you know, anti Black Lives Matter stuff for

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:21.479
<v Speaker 1>all of her, like like racism isn't real things. She

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:24.880
<v Speaker 1>tries to use that to her advantage, mostly to make

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 1>like white members of her audience like feel good about

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:31.480
<v Speaker 1>their own racism because a black woman told them it's

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:34.359
<v Speaker 1>actually okay and like that that's been like a big

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:37.560
<v Speaker 1>part of her career the past few years exactly that.

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 2>And I think like she really understands that the inviting

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 2>power of taking what you might think of as like

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:47.920
<v Speaker 2>a contrarian stance on something like yeah, totally, like after

0:27:47.960 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 2>the Me Too movement, how many women got engagement by

0:27:50.720 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 2>taking a contrarian stance right, Like, I think going against

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:56.639
<v Speaker 2>the conventional attitude that says like, oh, we have to

0:27:56.640 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 2>automatically support the woman in this in this dispute probably

0:27:59.800 --> 0:28:03.600
<v Speaker 2>make people tuning into Omens's breakdowns feel like they're like

0:28:03.960 --> 0:28:06.679
<v Speaker 2>free thinkers who are going against the grain, you know,

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:09.840
<v Speaker 2>by taking an unpopular opinion, which I do think connects

0:28:09.840 --> 0:28:12.879
<v Speaker 2>to her more odious stances on things like trans people

0:28:12.880 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 2>and women and Jewish people.

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:14.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:16.080
<v Speaker 1>No, I mean, like you see the same thing with

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:18.960
<v Speaker 1>like you know, like the gaze against groomers thing right

0:28:19.000 --> 0:28:23.320
<v Speaker 1>wing trans influencers de trans influencers. It's the same, like gambit,

0:28:23.960 --> 0:28:26.359
<v Speaker 1>and certainly I think like, yeah, like your identification of

0:28:26.400 --> 0:28:30.280
<v Speaker 1>her as like a professional contrarian is like very very

0:28:30.359 --> 0:28:32.440
<v Speaker 1>key to her success exactly.

0:28:32.920 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 2>I also think like part of the reason why people

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 2>are attracted to conspiracy theories is that it allows for

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:41.880
<v Speaker 2>like fantasy world building. And I mean I really see

0:28:41.960 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 2>the ways that she injects that into her coverage, even

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:47.000
<v Speaker 2>the word coverage I put that in worlds because like

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 2>she is like a wild person to her coverage is

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:53.600
<v Speaker 2>like also wild. She does not adhere to, as she

0:28:53.680 --> 0:28:55.800
<v Speaker 2>puts it, quote a traditional style.

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Of reporting, you know, I'll take her word for that one,

0:28:57.960 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I'll believe her on that single point.

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:04.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I believe her. I believe that. You know, she

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:07.960
<v Speaker 3>amplifies rumors. And even once.

0:29:07.760 --> 0:29:10.080
<v Speaker 2>She read a letter that she said that she got

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:13.760
<v Speaker 2>from Blake Lively's husband, Ryan Reynolds, his acting coach when

0:29:13.800 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 2>he was twelve, and Tone Owens, his acting coach, said

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 2>that Ryan Reynolds was an obnoxious kid.

0:29:20.440 --> 0:29:21.880
<v Speaker 1>You know what, I also believe it.

0:29:21.960 --> 0:29:25.800
<v Speaker 3>I Oh, I have no trouble believing that. But like

0:29:26.120 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 3>her coverage, it includes like side.

0:29:28.400 --> 0:29:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Characters, Yeah, things that have no bearing on this whatsoever.

0:29:31.000 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yeah, I feel like this, this focus on

0:29:33.080 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 1>like this, like conspiratorial ben is the same. She's using

0:29:36.640 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the same tactics she did for her Black Lives Matter

0:29:39.160 --> 0:29:41.720
<v Speaker 1>documentary for like most of her political work. Like it.

0:29:41.800 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 1>It's she's using the same tactics over and over again,

0:29:44.960 --> 0:29:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and eventually she like reaches this like stress point or

0:29:48.040 --> 0:29:50.880
<v Speaker 1>this like threshold where she cannot see a path forward

0:29:50.960 --> 0:29:52.520
<v Speaker 1>or she can't see a way to surpass it, and

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:55.360
<v Speaker 1>then she does a pivot. This happened with her progressive blog,

0:29:55.760 --> 0:29:58.240
<v Speaker 1>this happened even at the Daily Wire. She does not

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:00.760
<v Speaker 1>she doesn't work with turning point us Sadie more and

0:30:00.920 --> 0:30:03.360
<v Speaker 1>like this this new pivot is learning. Hey, it's sup

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:08.120
<v Speaker 1>super lucrative to be like a tabloid entertainment quote unquote journalist.

0:30:08.640 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Very easy, super lucrative. And all of the tactics you

0:30:11.280 --> 0:30:13.960
<v Speaker 1>learned on the right wing media sphere work great here,

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:17.479
<v Speaker 1>like all of this, like conspiratorial thinking really uh, a

0:30:17.520 --> 0:30:20.680
<v Speaker 1>disregard for like like facts and evidence works perfect for

0:30:20.760 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 1>this sort of like rumor based reporting, and it spreads

0:30:25.080 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 1>like crazy, And yeah, it spreads across political lines. You

0:30:28.560 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 1>don't you aren't just targeting the mega people or like

0:30:31.960 --> 0:30:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the far right. This this can be so much more

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:36.120
<v Speaker 1>broad to like the giant audience of like you know,

0:30:36.280 --> 0:30:39.040
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote, like a political people go to these platforms

0:30:39.120 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 1>for a form of like of like escapism and entertainment

0:30:42.520 --> 0:30:46.280
<v Speaker 1>rather than just hearing about politics. Yet again, because that's

0:30:46.320 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, very very tiring.

0:30:49.320 --> 0:30:52.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I think in my mind all of it

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:56.200
<v Speaker 2>is sort of sort of connected. Like Ben Shapiro, nobody

0:30:56.360 --> 0:30:59.440
<v Speaker 2>cared more about celebrities or talked more about celebrities than

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:01.760
<v Speaker 2>Ben Shapiro. He would love to be like, I don't

0:31:01.800 --> 0:31:04.600
<v Speaker 2>care what Hollywood is doing but he was obsessed with

0:31:04.640 --> 0:31:07.360
<v Speaker 2>like Beyonce and Meg the Stallion, Like it was just

0:31:07.440 --> 0:31:08.680
<v Speaker 2>like a negative obsession.

0:31:08.800 --> 0:31:12.000
<v Speaker 3>Like yeah, you know, anti fandom is still fandom.

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:14.120
<v Speaker 2>When you make video after video about how much you

0:31:14.120 --> 0:31:16.080
<v Speaker 2>don't like Meg thea Stallion in a kind of way,

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:18.880
<v Speaker 2>you are a fan, just in the opposite direction. And

0:31:18.920 --> 0:31:22.239
<v Speaker 2>so I think that Candace Owens really took that and

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:24.640
<v Speaker 2>learned how to perfect it because she is much I

0:31:24.680 --> 0:31:26.239
<v Speaker 2>think that she is much better at this than Ben

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 2>Shapiro is.

0:31:26.880 --> 0:31:28.840
<v Speaker 3>Like the evidence being that, like.

0:31:28.760 --> 0:31:32.160
<v Speaker 2>Her YouTube channel is exploding with people who probably would

0:31:32.200 --> 0:31:34.440
<v Speaker 2>never watch any any of Ben Shapiro's content.

0:31:34.960 --> 0:31:38.240
<v Speaker 1>The big bummer for me is that the Daily Wires

0:31:38.320 --> 0:31:42.480
<v Speaker 1>first film, Lady Ballers left us on a cliffhanger with

0:31:42.680 --> 0:31:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Candace Owns and Matt Walsh sitting in a car talking

0:31:45.200 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 1>about how Matt Walsh planned this entire like plot of

0:31:49.120 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 1>the film as like as like some kind of scheme

0:31:51.840 --> 0:31:55.680
<v Speaker 1>or like social experiment, and you know, it was implied

0:31:55.760 --> 0:31:57.040
<v Speaker 1>there would be more, you know, it was like a

0:31:57.160 --> 0:32:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, like Avengers Nick Fury type post credits scene,

0:32:00.640 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 1>and now we're never gonna learn what Candice Owans and

0:32:03.920 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Matt Walsh get up to now because she's left the company.

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 1>She's now doing her own thing. So now we just

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:12.080
<v Speaker 1>have this dangling plot thread that's just gonna bug me forever,

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Like what does the candae Owan's character at the end

0:32:14.320 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 1>of Lady Ballers do next. I'm gonna be thinking about

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:18.200
<v Speaker 1>this for like years.

0:32:18.440 --> 0:32:21.960
<v Speaker 2>America deserves closure, we deserve to know. Just putting that

0:32:22.000 --> 0:32:24.720
<v Speaker 2>out there, I think we do deserve closure.

0:32:25.080 --> 0:32:27.120
<v Speaker 3>I just think my closure is gonna be a little bit different.

0:32:28.120 --> 0:32:28.440
<v Speaker 3>I am.

0:32:28.600 --> 0:32:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm very fine having all of these plot threads wrapped

0:32:31.760 --> 0:32:34.160
<v Speaker 1>up quite quickly, but I do not see that in

0:32:34.240 --> 0:32:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the cards immediately.

0:32:45.880 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 2>So in terms of where she's at now, like you know,

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:53.240
<v Speaker 2>my question is like, has Owens has this kind of

0:32:53.280 --> 0:32:55.680
<v Speaker 2>like mainstream audience that she's been able to amass.

0:32:56.120 --> 0:32:59.120
<v Speaker 3>Has she changed her views? She is she trying to

0:32:59.120 --> 0:33:00.200
<v Speaker 3>do a rebrand or a pay it.

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:02.840
<v Speaker 2>In an interview, she said, in terms of my perspective,

0:33:02.880 --> 0:33:06.560
<v Speaker 2>I haven't changed anything. I've been anti METO since long

0:33:06.600 --> 0:33:07.440
<v Speaker 2>before it was cool.

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Sure, I mean that can be true. It's also true

0:33:10.960 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 1>that she is getting better at propaganda and widening her footprint, which, yeah,

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:18.240
<v Speaker 1>then once her audience gets bigger, she might be able

0:33:18.280 --> 0:33:20.200
<v Speaker 1>to slip in more things that I would find on

0:33:20.240 --> 0:33:23.600
<v Speaker 1>savory to a larger audience over time. But she also

0:33:23.720 --> 0:33:27.720
<v Speaker 1>might be content to keep growing that and be slightly

0:33:27.800 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 1>less off putting in the meantime. But no, like there's

0:33:30.840 --> 0:33:33.280
<v Speaker 1>also just a huge audience for like the anti woke backlash,

0:33:33.280 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 1>anti metwo stuff right now. Like that's kind of that's

0:33:35.960 --> 0:33:38.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of like the new mainstream Frankly, so I am

0:33:38.840 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 1>certain that she's going to try to continue to like

0:33:40.800 --> 0:33:43.520
<v Speaker 1>flex that and grow that in the in the next

0:33:43.520 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 1>few months years.

0:33:45.800 --> 0:33:49.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so I agree with you. I believe Owens when

0:33:49.160 --> 0:33:52.320
<v Speaker 2>she says that, like her stances have not changed much. Yeah,

0:33:52.440 --> 0:33:55.040
<v Speaker 2>easy to be like, oh, well, she's pivoting to go

0:33:55.160 --> 0:33:57.520
<v Speaker 2>mainstream now that she has these like women in her

0:33:57.560 --> 0:34:00.800
<v Speaker 2>audience who are interested in celebrity. And honestly, you can

0:34:00.880 --> 0:34:03.000
<v Speaker 2>sort of see some of this in changes to her

0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:05.640
<v Speaker 2>physical appearance, Like she was sort of known for having

0:34:06.280 --> 0:34:10.360
<v Speaker 2>very severe hair, the joke being that she had alienated

0:34:10.440 --> 0:34:12.680
<v Speaker 2>herself so much from her fellow black people that like,

0:34:13.040 --> 0:34:14.680
<v Speaker 2>no black person was going to do her hair and

0:34:14.680 --> 0:34:17.840
<v Speaker 2>that's why it looks that way. But lately you've really

0:34:17.880 --> 0:34:20.120
<v Speaker 2>seen this like softening she's kind of going for like

0:34:20.160 --> 0:34:22.200
<v Speaker 2>a softer public look.

0:34:22.800 --> 0:34:24.880
<v Speaker 3>She is pivoting to different kinds of programming.

0:34:24.960 --> 0:34:27.719
<v Speaker 2>She's branched out into doing a book club for paying

0:34:27.719 --> 0:34:30.440
<v Speaker 2>subscribers and some kind of a fitness program.

0:34:30.120 --> 0:34:33.840
<v Speaker 1>That makes sense. Yeah, totally, like the health Guru fitness

0:34:33.960 --> 0:34:36.080
<v Speaker 1>entertainment bubble. Yeah that's huge.

0:34:36.440 --> 0:34:38.560
<v Speaker 3>That's such a good grift. She's gonna make so much money.

0:34:38.640 --> 0:34:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, she is.

0:34:41.400 --> 0:34:42.440
<v Speaker 3>But I really.

0:34:42.239 --> 0:34:45.440
<v Speaker 2>Agree with you, gaire that, like, I think that these

0:34:45.640 --> 0:34:49.120
<v Speaker 2>new followers are certainly going to be walked down a

0:34:49.160 --> 0:34:53.760
<v Speaker 2>pipeline that includes her extremist attitude just using celebrity scandal

0:34:53.760 --> 0:34:57.200
<v Speaker 2>as a hook, because, like as you said, celebrity scandals

0:34:57.200 --> 0:34:59.800
<v Speaker 2>and celebrity stories are disconsidered fluff for a lot of people,

0:35:00.080 --> 0:35:03.440
<v Speaker 2>Like people who care about extremist content and ideology are

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:05.640
<v Speaker 2>maybe not seeing that as a space that they need

0:35:05.680 --> 0:35:08.960
<v Speaker 2>to pay too close of attention to about these stories

0:35:09.000 --> 0:35:10.720
<v Speaker 2>that you might see on the cover of an US weekly.

0:35:11.080 --> 0:35:12.960
<v Speaker 3>But these stories actually.

0:35:12.600 --> 0:35:15.680
<v Speaker 2>Can be used to tap into extremist ideologies and unleash

0:35:15.719 --> 0:35:17.520
<v Speaker 2>them in a whole new audience. I'm like, yeah, like

0:35:17.600 --> 0:35:20.560
<v Speaker 2>you were saying, if you are just like watching a

0:35:20.600 --> 0:35:23.680
<v Speaker 2>podcast because you're want to be entertained about a story

0:35:23.719 --> 0:35:27.200
<v Speaker 2>about two celebrities, you might not have your like bullshit

0:35:27.239 --> 0:35:30.200
<v Speaker 2>detector up to be like, wait, is this extremist content

0:35:30.239 --> 0:35:33.520
<v Speaker 2>because it's it's seen and treated as a less charge space,

0:35:33.560 --> 0:35:35.839
<v Speaker 2>and so you know that line of thinking that says

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:38.520
<v Speaker 2>that you know, this is just fluff. It doesn't really matter.

0:35:38.560 --> 0:35:41.240
<v Speaker 2>What happens in celebrity news is not that it's incorrect.

0:35:41.280 --> 0:35:43.520
<v Speaker 2>It is dangerous because it lends itself to people being

0:35:43.560 --> 0:35:47.440
<v Speaker 2>more susceptible to it when extremist content is slipped in

0:35:47.640 --> 0:35:49.080
<v Speaker 2>without even really realizing it.

0:35:49.160 --> 0:35:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and like that relates even to like the

0:35:51.520 --> 0:35:54.960
<v Speaker 1>originator of this gamer gate stuff and the whole like

0:35:55.440 --> 0:36:00.360
<v Speaker 1>anti woke like media fandom content sphere right where so

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:02.480
<v Speaker 1>much of like the anti book backlash has been built

0:36:02.480 --> 0:36:05.160
<v Speaker 1>on people complaining that Star Wars is two woke. Now,

0:36:05.200 --> 0:36:08.600
<v Speaker 1>there's too many women in movies, there's too many black

0:36:08.640 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 1>people in commercials, where do all the white people go,

0:36:10.719 --> 0:36:12.839
<v Speaker 1>There's too many gay people in TV, there's too many

0:36:13.080 --> 0:36:16.719
<v Speaker 1>trans people in TV, and like that is it is

0:36:16.719 --> 0:36:19.520
<v Speaker 1>definitely focused on by the rest of the Daily Wire goons,

0:36:20.239 --> 0:36:23.279
<v Speaker 1>and you can very easily pivot back to that sort

0:36:23.320 --> 0:36:27.160
<v Speaker 1>of cultural commentary after you're done talking about Blake Lively,

0:36:27.239 --> 0:36:29.719
<v Speaker 1>like this is this is a very small jump where

0:36:29.760 --> 0:36:32.560
<v Speaker 1>you're still talking about the entertainment industry, but with this

0:36:32.640 --> 0:36:35.160
<v Speaker 1>like anti woke framing of like, you know, why is

0:36:35.200 --> 0:36:39.160
<v Speaker 1>all these minorities here, why are they pushing transgenderism on kids?

0:36:39.680 --> 0:36:41.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, whether that be talking about you know, transactors

0:36:41.960 --> 0:36:45.040
<v Speaker 1>in the business, whether you be talking about you know,

0:36:45.120 --> 0:36:48.719
<v Speaker 1>like female lead or like diversity casting, like all all

0:36:48.760 --> 0:36:51.319
<v Speaker 1>that kind of stuff that especially Candice can use her

0:36:51.400 --> 0:36:55.120
<v Speaker 1>like contrarian position to speak on authority about talking about

0:36:55.239 --> 0:36:57.879
<v Speaker 1>why are you recasting these legacy characters to be people

0:36:57.920 --> 0:37:01.480
<v Speaker 1>of color? Or why is of a woman the lead

0:37:01.560 --> 0:37:03.439
<v Speaker 1>of this thing when it should be actually a man?

0:37:03.520 --> 0:37:06.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, just like very very basic stuff that's been

0:37:06.040 --> 0:37:09.440
<v Speaker 1>a part of like the YouTube slop for a decade now,

0:37:09.880 --> 0:37:12.399
<v Speaker 1>but it's still like still takes in a lot of

0:37:12.719 --> 0:37:14.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of clips and it is it is a

0:37:14.960 --> 0:37:17.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of like the Daily Wire and like right wing

0:37:17.840 --> 0:37:21.680
<v Speaker 1>content still still does it's all this like weird like

0:37:21.800 --> 0:37:25.520
<v Speaker 1>culture war stuff. It's very very tightened with Hollywood. Like

0:37:25.560 --> 0:37:27.719
<v Speaker 1>you were saying about how like Ben Shapiro claims to

0:37:27.719 --> 0:37:29.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, like hate Hollywood. He's trying to build his

0:37:29.840 --> 0:37:32.319
<v Speaker 1>own alternative to it, but he can't stop talking about it,

0:37:32.360 --> 0:37:35.719
<v Speaker 1>like he can't stop complaining about Disney's snow White. And

0:37:35.800 --> 0:37:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I can see Candice doing like the exact same thing,

0:37:38.160 --> 0:37:41.360
<v Speaker 1>but now with like an honestly like a bigger, a bigger,

0:37:41.440 --> 0:37:44.400
<v Speaker 1>more like a political audience that's much more malleable and

0:37:44.480 --> 0:37:47.279
<v Speaker 1>can be shaped around these like larger cultural trends. When

0:37:47.320 --> 0:37:51.919
<v Speaker 1>you think about this like perception of this backlash against wokeness.

0:37:51.440 --> 0:37:53.440
<v Speaker 3>I absolutely think that's what we're gonna see.

0:37:53.480 --> 0:37:56.200
<v Speaker 2>And I can tell you we can finish by I

0:37:56.200 --> 0:37:59.960
<v Speaker 2>can tell you about her next big pet issue, which is, yeah,

0:38:00.880 --> 0:38:04.600
<v Speaker 2>championing Harvey Weinstein, who she is no.

0:38:04.120 --> 0:38:07.320
<v Speaker 1>No, no, So.

0:38:06.520 --> 0:38:09.600
<v Speaker 2>She's been interviewing him since twenty twenty two, according to

0:38:09.719 --> 0:38:13.480
<v Speaker 2>The Hollywood Reporter. She explains, while he is quote an

0:38:13.560 --> 0:38:15.120
<v Speaker 2>immoral man, he is also.

0:38:14.960 --> 0:38:17.720
<v Speaker 3>Am a justice system, a victim, sure.

0:38:17.800 --> 0:38:20.400
<v Speaker 2>Victim, And she says, I've always had faith in our

0:38:20.400 --> 0:38:22.680
<v Speaker 2>court system, and now it's beginning to change. Now I'm

0:38:22.719 --> 0:38:25.719
<v Speaker 2>beginning to wonder if our courtrooms have been politicized. And

0:38:25.760 --> 0:38:27.600
<v Speaker 2>the thing that's made her think this is Harvey.

0:38:27.280 --> 0:38:30.080
<v Speaker 3>Weinstein it's wild.

0:38:30.120 --> 0:38:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like Ben Shapiro is starting his own campaign

0:38:32.640 --> 0:38:34.960
<v Speaker 1>to free Derek Chauvin. I think there's gonna be a

0:38:34.960 --> 0:38:36.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of pressure on the courts right now. I mean

0:38:36.920 --> 0:38:38.760
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing that from like Elon and Trump as well.

0:38:39.000 --> 0:38:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I think undermining the authority of the court I think

0:38:41.280 --> 0:38:44.040
<v Speaker 1>is actually kind of part of this larger concerted issue

0:38:44.280 --> 0:38:47.000
<v Speaker 1>amongst the entirety of the right right now, because this

0:38:47.120 --> 0:38:51.120
<v Speaker 1>is like their biggest remaining roadblock to achieving their right

0:38:51.160 --> 0:38:55.480
<v Speaker 1>wing utopia is the court system. And I you know,

0:38:55.600 --> 0:38:59.200
<v Speaker 1>this may not be intentional on every person's part, like

0:38:59.200 --> 0:39:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Ben Shapiro and the zones aren't aren't like intentionally collaborating

0:39:02.560 --> 0:39:05.200
<v Speaker 1>on this, but they may be copying each other's trends.

0:39:05.440 --> 0:39:08.759
<v Speaker 1>And if they're seeing this this wider push across a

0:39:08.840 --> 0:39:10.920
<v Speaker 1>large amount of like the right wing content people to

0:39:10.960 --> 0:39:14.520
<v Speaker 1>put pressure on various aspects of the courts, including by

0:39:14.600 --> 0:39:18.200
<v Speaker 1>using like high profile cases like Harvey Weinstein or Derek Shulvin,

0:39:18.560 --> 0:39:21.080
<v Speaker 1>that's that's not a great sign. And I can I

0:39:21.080 --> 0:39:23.600
<v Speaker 1>can definitely see them trying to trying to do that

0:39:23.960 --> 0:39:25.799
<v Speaker 1>in conjunction. I guess yeah.

0:39:25.840 --> 0:39:27.440
<v Speaker 2>I think we're going to see a lot more of it.

0:39:27.560 --> 0:39:31.239
<v Speaker 2>Candice has a series coming out called Harvey Speaks that

0:39:31.320 --> 0:39:34.319
<v Speaker 2>apparently tells his side of the story, So look out

0:39:34.360 --> 0:39:36.600
<v Speaker 2>for that. And I think that's the thing, like I

0:39:36.640 --> 0:39:39.799
<v Speaker 2>think with her content, Like when asked why it was

0:39:40.480 --> 0:39:44.040
<v Speaker 2>she thought that her Blake Lively stuff was really taking off,

0:39:44.440 --> 0:39:47.279
<v Speaker 2>she says that she believes her new fans on the

0:39:47.360 --> 0:39:49.640
<v Speaker 2>left quote have just kind of gotten whise to the

0:39:49.680 --> 0:39:52.560
<v Speaker 2>fact that maybe women lie just like men. And so

0:39:52.960 --> 0:39:55.879
<v Speaker 2>I just implore folks that, like, even if you think

0:39:55.880 --> 0:39:58.160
<v Speaker 2>that you're just like retaking in this content because you're

0:39:58.160 --> 0:40:01.800
<v Speaker 2>following fluffy celebrity news or whatever, it is so easy

0:40:01.840 --> 0:40:05.279
<v Speaker 2>to go from maybe women lie to maybe women can't

0:40:05.320 --> 0:40:07.880
<v Speaker 2>be trusted, or maybe women shouldn't work and have jobs,

0:40:07.920 --> 0:40:10.960
<v Speaker 2>a stance at Candace herself is actually advocated for, despite

0:40:11.120 --> 0:40:14.439
<v Speaker 2>very obviously being a working woman. And so I don't

0:40:14.480 --> 0:40:16.839
<v Speaker 2>think we should trust Candace Owens even if she does

0:40:16.880 --> 0:40:19.839
<v Speaker 2>this rebrand, Like, no, don't let her rebrand herself as

0:40:19.880 --> 0:40:22.080
<v Speaker 2>like just a celebrity investigative journalist.

0:40:22.320 --> 0:40:25.040
<v Speaker 3>Like she put all of these odious views.

0:40:24.760 --> 0:40:26.640
<v Speaker 2>Out into the world, and I don't want her to

0:40:26.640 --> 0:40:30.400
<v Speaker 2>be able to like soften it or you know, soften

0:40:30.520 --> 0:40:32.160
<v Speaker 2>what it is that she advocates for, what it is

0:40:32.200 --> 0:40:34.120
<v Speaker 2>that she believes in, if that is truly what she's

0:40:34.160 --> 0:40:35.960
<v Speaker 2>trying to do to just sort of like a mass

0:40:35.960 --> 0:40:37.040
<v Speaker 2>of more mainstream audience.

0:40:37.080 --> 0:40:38.359
<v Speaker 3>So don't fall for it.

0:40:38.400 --> 0:40:41.240
<v Speaker 2>If you're if you're getting tagged in Candace Owens videos,

0:40:41.800 --> 0:40:43.680
<v Speaker 2>just know what she actually is about.

0:40:43.880 --> 0:40:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yeah, I think I think for our audience,

0:40:45.960 --> 0:40:48.960
<v Speaker 1>it's it's more likely that you'll have like family members

0:40:49.040 --> 0:40:51.560
<v Speaker 1>who are going to be finding this stuff. And you

0:40:51.600 --> 0:40:55.600
<v Speaker 1>should find a list of sources. Maybe this episode included,

0:40:55.600 --> 0:40:57.160
<v Speaker 1>but probably you know, you can find some articles as

0:40:57.200 --> 0:41:01.200
<v Speaker 1>well that think of some background on Candace's history and

0:41:01.960 --> 0:41:04.640
<v Speaker 1>previous beliefs, can pick and choose some of her most

0:41:04.640 --> 0:41:08.120
<v Speaker 1>like outrageous claims. So when your aunt sends you a

0:41:08.200 --> 0:41:11.200
<v Speaker 1>video about how Ryan Reynolds and Blake Lively are kidnapping

0:41:11.280 --> 0:41:17.520
<v Speaker 1>children or something, you can you can maybe inform Aunt

0:41:17.560 --> 0:41:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Judy that maybe you shouldn't listen to everything this Candice

0:41:21.080 --> 0:41:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Owan's character is saying.

0:41:22.560 --> 0:41:24.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this Candice Owans might not be on the money,

0:41:24.920 --> 0:41:28.920
<v Speaker 2>might not be on the level. No, yeah, inform an

0:41:28.920 --> 0:41:32.879
<v Speaker 2>Auntie today, Yes that's right, and that's all I got.

0:41:32.960 --> 0:41:36.440
<v Speaker 3>That's it. I don't know how. You usually end these episodes.

0:41:36.160 --> 0:41:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Usually by getting sad, but I don't know. This has

0:41:40.160 --> 0:41:43.640
<v Speaker 1>been been an an interesting dive into the life of

0:41:43.800 --> 0:41:50.399
<v Speaker 1>a woman with many, many careers, many a chameleon, many personalities,

0:41:50.440 --> 0:41:53.800
<v Speaker 1>a chameleon, a chameleon of contrarianism.

0:41:54.160 --> 0:41:56.279
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I like that. If I ever write a book

0:41:56.280 --> 0:41:57.480
<v Speaker 3>about her, that'll be the title.

0:41:57.880 --> 0:42:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Jesus Christ. Oh what a nightmare that would be. Man

0:42:02.800 --> 0:42:05.719
<v Speaker 1>scary Bridget Where can people find you online?

0:42:05.800 --> 0:42:08.080
<v Speaker 2>You can find me on my podcast. There are our

0:42:08.120 --> 0:42:10.839
<v Speaker 2>girls on the internet on this network. iHeartRadio. I mean,

0:42:11.080 --> 0:42:13.359
<v Speaker 2>you can find me on Instagram at bridget Ran DC

0:42:13.680 --> 0:42:15.439
<v Speaker 2>or on Blue Sky at bridget Time.

0:42:15.600 --> 0:42:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, thank you so much, good luck in d C.

0:42:18.440 --> 0:42:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for holding holding the line out there as Elon

0:42:22.520 --> 0:42:25.240
<v Speaker 1>puts a kildozer through your entire city.

0:42:25.320 --> 0:42:26.440
<v Speaker 3>We're doing our best.

0:42:26.680 --> 0:42:30.360
<v Speaker 1>I would would love to talk again about a DC update.

0:42:30.440 --> 0:42:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Maybe maybe next time you come on the show. My God, yes, please,

0:42:33.640 --> 0:42:38.200
<v Speaker 1>there we go, Well we will, we will talk then goodbye, everybody.

0:42:41.200 --> 0:42:41.840
<v Speaker 3>It could happen.

0:42:41.880 --> 0:42:44.239
<v Speaker 1>Here is a production of cool Zone Media. For more

0:42:44.280 --> 0:42:48.040
<v Speaker 1>podcasts from cool Zone Media, visit our website Coolzonemedia dot

0:42:48.080 --> 0:42:51.759
<v Speaker 1>com or check us out on the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcasts,

0:42:51.880 --> 0:42:52.760
<v Speaker 1>or wherever.

0:42:52.400 --> 0:42:55.319
<v Speaker 2>You listen to podcasts can now find sources for it

0:42:55.320 --> 0:42:57.799
<v Speaker 2>could happen here, listed directly in episode descriptions.

0:42:58.120 --> 0:42:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening.