WEBVTT - Beating The Book: 2020 NFL MegaPod Week 9 Preview

0:00:03.640 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Check it on Man No down many check it on

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Thursday morning, November. It's the Meeting the Book podcast live

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 1>from the D in beautiful downtown Las Vegas. Not at

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Cercy yet, they're working at the Kinks. I'm not gonna

0:00:26.040 --> 0:00:28.000
<v Speaker 1>lie to you, but we love the D. It's our

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:32.080
<v Speaker 1>whole little nook and cranny rolled into one. Uh live

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 1>here in front of a packed crowd. Mikey, I mean there, ah,

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:39.520
<v Speaker 1>why there is standing room only? Well, the last person

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 1>to leave Bar Canada please turn out the lights. I mean,

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:45.479
<v Speaker 1>but I mean but the Sunday before Circle Open, we

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 1>had a hundred and fifty people in this area. And

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 1>last Sunday I called over. They said we've got three customers.

0:00:51.080 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>So well, we still love over. It's COVID safe, it's safe.

0:00:57.040 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of distancing. That's the voice of Mike Palm,

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the vice president of operations at Circuit Sports. And that's

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the voice of Todd wishnep know what. And here's the thing.

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:10.319
<v Speaker 1>He got so upset at me calling his his attic

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 1>a cork addict that now he has given us a

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>virtual background. Todd, please explain your background. For those who

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>will watch the video of this well, you know, as

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:21.320
<v Speaker 1>as you know, I like to talk about models and

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>and how if you put bad things and models, they

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:25.320
<v Speaker 1>come out bad, and if you put good things and

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:27.760
<v Speaker 1>model they come out good. That's why I call a

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 1>real good model a Google Loosh model. Some data some

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:34.400
<v Speaker 1>eyes see with your eyes. And that's my guy back

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 1>there who runs my Goolosh model. There. It is Todd

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Wish to everybody, and our rotating guest today, who has

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:42.760
<v Speaker 1>been on the show many times before. We're happy to

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:45.480
<v Speaker 1>have him back this week from the Power Rank, the

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>creator of The Power Rank, and of course the host

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 1>and co host of more than one podcast, including his

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:54.440
<v Speaker 1>own football analytics podcast and one that he does with

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 1>his buddy Jim Sunnis. Uh, fan duel, It's PhD from

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Stanford and Fang. How you doing it? I'm doing great, kill,

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much for having me on. Intro? Was all

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:09.519
<v Speaker 1>that accurate? I believe that was all accurate. I think

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 1>my PhD somewhere around this room. Uh, but I don't

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 1>know if I could find the proof. But yeah, I

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 1>believe that to be accurate. Can you tell people I

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 1>love it? I know you probably hate that I do

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:21.840
<v Speaker 1>this all the time. Can you tell people the subject

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:24.680
<v Speaker 1>of your PhD just because I think it's awesome just

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:27.639
<v Speaker 1>to hear it. Yeah, so I did my PhD and

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:30.360
<v Speaker 1>statistical mechanics. So it's a branch of physics where you

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 1>try to understand the bulk properties of matter from the

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:36.360
<v Speaker 1>fact that it's made up of atoms, and so you

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of noise. I love quantum physics, and yeah,

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 1>a new ton of physics is awesome. So so anyways,

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>when you think about things on the atomic level, there's

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of noise. Things jiggle around, right, And though

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>that type of noise ends up being looking exactly like

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:55.360
<v Speaker 1>what we see in sports. So it ended up being

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:58.920
<v Speaker 1>a perfect background to to get into sports and understanding

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 1>what happens when the randomness and football and basketball and

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of other sports. God, do you feel bad

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 1>about your ghoulash model? Now here's the thing, quantum mechanics

0:03:09.480 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>and um and what was that? What was the other thing? Oh,

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Mike's belly and your belly are very similar. A lot

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:18.360
<v Speaker 1>of things jiggle around a lot. You heard, I threw

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 1>my belly into it. This guy loses a few pounds,

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and all of a sudden, it's other people's bellies to

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Todd was very close to getting a PhD in in

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 1>in quantum physics as well, but he focused on his

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:33.680
<v Speaker 1>career as a D three basketball player. Right as a

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>converted Orthodox Jude D three baller, I don't mind our

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>kindergarten antics over here, but I do love what did

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 1>you say it? Oh, I'd rather be a D three

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>basketball player, man ship, Oh yeah, hell yeah? And anyways,

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:51.920
<v Speaker 1>you plays I didn't play Division three. I would have claimed,

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 1>He claims he would have been a legend at Division

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>three basketball. The problem is that I got brainwashed into

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>a rabbinical seminary in Jerusalem, learning Talmud ten hours a day,

0:04:04.520 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 1>and then that ruined my basketball career. But I was

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 1>quite good. I probably could have played even Division two.

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>But uh, you know whatever, you could have been a regular.

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Who was that kid in Baltimore that were the Yama

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:17.719
<v Speaker 1>cut that was like a big he? Actually, you know,

0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Tamir Goodman went to the high school I went to

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:23.920
<v Speaker 1>in Pittsburgh, and I was the superstar before him. Tam Goodman. Well,

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:25.480
<v Speaker 1>growing up in d C. There all of a sudden

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 1>there was this kid Tamir Goodman in Baltimore. Yeah, Jewish Jordan.

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 1>They called him. He was supposed to be like the

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 1>next big thing. What happened and nothing happened? Maryland. Maryland

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 1>was supposedly recruiting him, but he really wasn't that good

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and he ended up but he still played Division one.

0:04:41.560 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 1>That's still pretty good. Yeah, give him that. All right,

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 1>it's week nine in the National Football League. Todd, did

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>you want to update records? I think this is what

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:55.040
<v Speaker 1>starts the show now. Sure. Gilly the Iceman had a

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:58.599
<v Speaker 1>huge week last week. I believe it's three and nada

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:01.360
<v Speaker 1>to put him from n in eleven one to twelve

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:05.040
<v Speaker 1>eleven and one. He gets over the five hundred mark. Unfortunately,

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 1>he loses his first teaser in a while and goes

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 1>to six and two. Mikey had a poor week from

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 1>one and two. He went to thirteen ten and one.

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Still a very solid season, but from Circa and I

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 1>also had a good week of two and one to

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 1>move to eleven and thirteen. Me and Mikey both lost

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:25.280
<v Speaker 1>our teasers, so all three of us are six and

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:28.760
<v Speaker 1>two on teasers. Still extremely respectable and Mikey the the

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Circa Survivor update is amazing. Still week after week, Yeah,

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:38.359
<v Speaker 1>we were at three fifty going into week eight, three

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 1>entries did not did not get submitted again. So that

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 1>makes all eight weeks that we've had in one or

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:47.559
<v Speaker 1>more Survivor entries not get submitted. Is that the same person?

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 1>It was the one? This time it was a singular

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 1>person who had three. I feel bad for the guy.

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he gets to Thanksgiving with three, that's a

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:55.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty good spot. I think you're gonna have to when

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:58.599
<v Speaker 1>you get to Thanksgiving to Derek's double option where you

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:01.280
<v Speaker 1>pick both sides of the Lions Texans or if you've

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>got to, I mean, if you've got to, A lot

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:05.279
<v Speaker 1>of people have already used Baltimore in Pittsburgh and don't.

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:08.040
<v Speaker 1>They won't have that game available on Thanksgiving. So that's

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 1>a big strategical decision this week. Where did you did

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 1>you think at the start of the year, when you

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 1>entered Survivor Gil and you're still alive, correct, that you

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:19.720
<v Speaker 1>would be holding out the football team for Thanksgiving? That's

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the best pet you know, it's it's it's a huge consideration.

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:27.480
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, they might be a consideration this

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 1>week too, right, but there's a few of them right Houston,

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 1>because Jake Gluton is starting for Jacksonville, Washington. Um, obviously

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 1>what you just mentioned in Pittsburgh is a consideration. We

0:06:38.640 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know if Matthew Stafford is playing this week. So

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 1>they're their teams that you know that don't ee that

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:47.599
<v Speaker 1>we don't know from week to week what what's going

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to happen with them, So you know, do you play

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 1>against Detroit anyway? Detroit plays on Thanks again, but that's

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:55.720
<v Speaker 1>not the same thing. Those first three teams are considerations,

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 1>so I don't know. Three thirty one now, so we lost,

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 1>uh yeah, lost nineteen um nine of them I believe

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:08.279
<v Speaker 1>lost with the with the pack or no, the Bengals,

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 1>and then a seven with the Packers and then another

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 1>three to lose nineteen to go from three fifty and

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 1>what one circle? Quarterly? What was the record? Um seventeen

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and three? I believe split four ways. If Tampa Bay

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 1>would have covered on Monday night, it would have been

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 1>split seven ways. It was pretty interesting. Wow, people, some

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 1>people took out credit lines to hedge. Oh I'm sure

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 1>they hedged. They hedged with the Giants and won the

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 1>straight bet because if if Tampa would have covered, they

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 1>would have got a seventh of the pool. So I

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 1>mean they must have hated to make that bet, and

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 1>then the end must have just been thrilled. Yeah. Wow, alright,

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>well new quarterly starts now, right, starts this week twelve,

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 1>and then you do five weeks at the five weeks

0:07:56.080 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 1>for the last through seventeen see and of course survivor

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:01.119
<v Speaker 1>the cork being that thanks Giving is its own day.

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 1>So we are through eight weeks next week. If you

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 1>get through your you're through half, but you're not really

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 1>through half because Thanksgivings. Thanksgiving us the big roadblock for

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people. But the debate, the great debate

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 1>this week now where we only lost nineteen and we

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 1>still have three thirty one, is do you think there

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 1>will be someone or multiple people that go eighteen and

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 1>oh and and it's been a pretty good debate. I

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 1>think there's gonna be a lot of people that go,

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 1>you know why, because there's some teams that are just

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>so bad in this NFL. They can't beat anybody, and

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 1>you can pick against them. I said this on Erica,

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 1>and I said, I haven't had a chance to talk

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 1>to Mike about this, but if you hadn't included the

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Thanksgiving anomaly, you would have had maybe a hundred people

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 1>end up going the whole way. I'm all shaw Um

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 1>who is a bit player at Vesta, and uh texted

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 1>me this week. He's so mad he only bought one

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:55.560
<v Speaker 1>survivor he's still alive, like you are. I think you

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:58.439
<v Speaker 1>bought two, bought one, he said. If I had it

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:00.680
<v Speaker 1>to do over again, I'd have bought five because I

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 1>needed them to go into Thanksgiving and sacrifice a couple

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 1>of them to move on. He's right, He's right. I

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 1>lost my first one the very first week, and I've

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 1>had these second one the whole way through. Okay, let's

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 1>talk week nine before we, uh, we get into our

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 1>best bets. Let's talk about the Thursday night game. Maybe

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 1>this is somebody's best bet and this has been the

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 1>strangest Thursday Night game of them all. Uh. It was

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 1>a line that was on the board, then off the board,

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 1>then on the board, then off the board, then back

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 1>on the board. The reason for that A J. Dillon

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 1>of the Packers tested positive and that ended up creating

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 1>a situation where the Packers where you didn't know if

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Jones was gonna play anyway. By the way, Aaron

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Jones questionable tonight, they say if he suited up, don't

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 1>expect the full workload even if it does, even if

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>he does play, um and so the Packers are gonna

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 1>be depleted there Um Jamal They're already without Jamal Williams,

0:09:51.520 --> 0:09:55.320
<v Speaker 1>so it'll be Tyler Irvin and Dexter Williams household names

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 1>in the backfield, whether Jones plays or not. Uh. Then

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:01.440
<v Speaker 1>there was the Niners. They already have the Garoppolo injury

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 1>and the and the more importantly the Kittle injury from

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 1>this past weekend. Kittle's gone for basically the rest of

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the regular season. Garoppolo will be gone from multiple weeks,

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 1>whether you think that's the downgraded Nick Mullins or not.

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:17.199
<v Speaker 1>Then they had a Kendrick Born positive test and because

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 1>of tracing. Then last night we hear, well, here's the deal.

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 1>They're also gonna have a bunch of guys that are

0:10:23.160 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>on the COVID nineteen reserve list, including Brandon aiyuk uh,

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>including Deebo Samuel who already had an injury anyway, So

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 1>the Niners will not have a single player tonight who

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>played a down in the NFC Championship, and they will

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:40.200
<v Speaker 1>have players with the names of Trent Taylor and Richie

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 1>James out on offense tonight. Maybe a Kevin White signing.

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 1>That might be one name you remember, Chicago Bears first

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 1>round draft pick. But they're gonna have to think of

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 1>calling players up like River Craik Aft or Chris Finkey.

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:53.839
<v Speaker 1>I don't know who they'll end up in the end,

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 1>but that's the story. And so the line has crept

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 1>up all week long. I crept up, has just zoomed upward.

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 1>And this morning it had gone past the seven to

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half right now, Todd, you tell me

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:06.960
<v Speaker 1>if if this is right, I'm seeing more sevens than

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half. So what are you saying I'm seeing? Uh? Yeah, yeah,

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I would say I would say it's like seven, yeah,

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>close to seven, closer to seven right now. But I

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:20.680
<v Speaker 1>did see it was It was seven and a half

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 1>this morning for sure. And there's some spots words seven

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 1>a half. Anyway, does anybody have a play given that

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 1>whole backdrop, ed will start with you anything on tonight's

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Thursday night game at all? Well, it kind of depends

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:32.560
<v Speaker 1>on what Todd is gonna suit off for wide receiver

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 1>for the for the Niners tonight. With this with his

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 1>with his basketball skills, So, um, injury can't I'm injured,

0:11:40.280 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm out, alright, alright, Well, that that definitely changes my mind.

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 1>The thing that's really interesting to me about San Francisco

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 1>is that, you know, they've been really good despite all

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:52.320
<v Speaker 1>their defensive injuries this year. My numbers have liked them.

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 1>My numbers would have actually predicted that movement from Seattle

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 1>being a three point favorite to one point favorite last week.

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 1>But you know, the injuries are piling up, and when

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:02.680
<v Speaker 1>you have no wide receivers and you and you're missing

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:07.200
<v Speaker 1>a difference maker like George Kittle, Um, it's hard to

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:09.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's hard for me to quantify what those

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:14.080
<v Speaker 1>cluster injuries means. So uh, it's a past for me. Um,

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:16.079
<v Speaker 1>although I do think seven and seven seven and a

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:20.080
<v Speaker 1>half for for Green Bay on the road is a lot. Yeah,

0:12:20.080 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>that that it definitely met resistance initially at seven, that

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 1>it did get through to seven half. I'm seeing six

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and a half in some spots now too. Mikey, anything

0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 1>is Jimmy g playing, He's done, it's Nick mullins. I Uh,

0:12:34.559 --> 0:12:38.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not an official play, um, but in real life,

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 1>I've I've got plus seven. I just I can't get

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 1>over in my mind the Packers two performances in California

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 1>last year, both when they went to play the Chargers

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 1>in Carson and got completely dominated, and then and then

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:56.439
<v Speaker 1>the NFC Championship games. So it's tough to lay seven

0:12:56.480 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 1>on the road. And let's face it, their offense has

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 1>gone dormant for stretches now. Um, they scored ten early

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 1>in Tampa Bay and then and then nothing, and then

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 1>last week a Vikings team that's still depleted and young defense,

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:11.560
<v Speaker 1>and I know Zimmer's coaching them up and they're going

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 1>to get better as the year goes along. But I mean,

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:15.840
<v Speaker 1>they couldn't put points on the board in the second

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 1>half of that game either. So I like the points tonight,

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:21.320
<v Speaker 1>taking the points, but not an official bet Todd anything.

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I leaned the opposite way. I I saw a thing

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:27.360
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter that showed all the people that we're in

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the starting lineup for San Francisco's offense and like everybody's out,

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 1>basically just like you just gave even Lineman everybody. It's

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:38.839
<v Speaker 1>just ridiculous. And have you had enough of the Nick

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:42.199
<v Speaker 1>Mullins and Bobby Bethard experience? Is you know? I mean

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:50.720
<v Speaker 1>it's ridiculous. Who is the guy's name, CJ. Grandson, his grandson,

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:54.840
<v Speaker 1>just like Dwayne Haskins is Clem Haskins. I call c J. Bethard,

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Bobby Bethord, so so c J. Bethord and uh and

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Mullins experience is ridic lists and not worthy. Plus the

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Packers got smoked last week against Minnesota. I think you're

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 1>you're going to run into a buzz saw here the Niners.

0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 1>This is not their year. It's it's a check please

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 1>for the Niners. This year it is through no fault

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 1>of their own. Man. They I mean, it's incredible, It's right,

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 1>it's incredible what they've been able to do. The running

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 1>back position has been a turnstyle. By the way, Trent

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Williams their standout, you know, multiple year Pro bowler with Washington,

0:14:25.640 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>who's now with the Niners. He's on the COVID nineteen

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 1>reserve list. You're right there. Their offensive lineup tonight is

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 1>like a baseball lineup on like a random getaway day

0:14:35.160 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of July where they're just throwing in everybody.

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 1>It's like Tau Schman and Kick, Cairo Estrada and Mike

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Ford and you know, it's the it's it's ridiculous. I

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 1>believe that's pronounced Teloman by the way. Yeah, alright, so

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 1>no official plays then for anybody, I will say, I'll

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>probably I do think by game time I will probably

0:14:57.040 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 1>talk myself into a Green Bay teaser leg. That's not sad.

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 1>That's probably going to be in our teaser here, might

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I think? So? Now, what about with this take on

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the forty Niners offense? This is still a pretty high total,

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 1>forty eight and a half if one team is so depleted, um,

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>and it's come down from from north of fifty. But yeah,

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 1>so I know people, I know people that teased Packers

0:15:22.840 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 1>and the under Tonighters and unders. So down to one

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and and under fifty four and a half would very

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 1>well be a play for me on Primetime Action tonight

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 1>on the MSG plus Live from the South Point. All right,

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Uh okay, best bets AD Number one for you, sir

0:15:42.320 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 1>is Yeah. So the number one game I kind of

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 1>like this week is New Orleans with the points at

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay. I think this is gonna be incredible match

0:15:51.440 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 1>up with with what New Orleans to be able to

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 1>do with their offense without Michael Thomas for most of

0:15:56.920 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 1>the year very high. My efficiency numbers. Third, I look

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 1>at a Justice success rate. Um, we'll see what happens

0:16:03.880 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 1>with Antonio Brown. But uh, and they faced Tampa Bay

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 1>that's got one of the best defenses in the league.

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 1>So I feel like that's an excellent matchup. Um. When

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I run the numbers for this game, it's hard for

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:19.480
<v Speaker 1>me to make a line that's as big as four

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 1>or I actually bet this at five earlier in this week. Um,

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:25.640
<v Speaker 1>when you just look at the data from this year,

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 1>including you know how New orleans Is defense has kind

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 1>of struggled. Um, I mean the most I can make

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 1>this is is uh is Tampa Baby by by two

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and a half points. So I definitely think there's value

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 1>on the New Orleans side. I think this is a

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 1>key for I mean, I think, you know, we could

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 1>definitely see these teams, uh, you know, meeting in the playoffs.

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 1>I think the to the primary Super Bowl contenders in

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the league, along with Seattle. But I'll take New Orleans

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:53.040
<v Speaker 1>in the points. Aaron Shots is number one team in

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 1>d v o A at this point in the season,

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. But New Orleans has uh definitely

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:02.640
<v Speaker 1>not had a intact lineup, Michael Thomas in and out

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 1>of the lineup, and Drew Brees. Though this year this

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:10.200
<v Speaker 1>is an amazing stat. Drew Brees last week one pass

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 1>beyond twenty yards in the air. One for the season. Six.

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:18.879
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot for him. I think a lot of

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 1>those six passes came against Detroit and maybe five, is

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:26.160
<v Speaker 1>that right. I didn't know that because everyone was complaining

0:17:26.200 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>about his A dot average death to target on the

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:32.159
<v Speaker 1>I think it was the Sunday night game before. I

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 1>think they were playing Green Bay and then I actually

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>had New Orleans, uh, you know, covering the points in Detroit,

0:17:38.680 --> 0:17:41.720
<v Speaker 1>and he was airing it out. He was whipping him downfield.

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I think he's capable of doing it, but I don't know.

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know whether it's the game plan or what not. Um,

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:53.160
<v Speaker 1>but just didn't get to Kamara and let him beat

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:56.920
<v Speaker 1>fourteen guys for a first down every time. So don't

0:17:57.000 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 1>fix it. And you know, I'm sorry. I keep going,

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, No, no, no no, no, I think that's exactly

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of done. I mean, I think, I mean,

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:06.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we'll see what happens with Antonio Brown. We'll

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:08.400
<v Speaker 1>see what happens when Michael Thomas gets back. I think

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:12.399
<v Speaker 1>he's still capable. Um. So, I I know people like

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:14.160
<v Speaker 1>to make a lot of what he's doing in terms

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:16.119
<v Speaker 1>of how far he's doing in the ball downfield. But

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:18.399
<v Speaker 1>even though he isn't, they've still been very efficient on

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the offensive side of the ball. Uh. And they'll they'll

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:23.480
<v Speaker 1>they'll get one of the toughest tests in this game.

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 1>And you're right, Antonio Brown makes his debut for the Buccaneers. Todd,

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 1>You're right, that is that does seem to be their

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:31.280
<v Speaker 1>game plan throughout three yards to Camara and haven't beat

0:18:31.280 --> 0:18:34.560
<v Speaker 1>I think you said fourteen guys. Uh, Mikey, I've come.

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:37.880
<v Speaker 1>I've talked about your a dot all all year long.

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 1>And also I've never heard of that. Heard of eight

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 1>gaps holes but not eight dots is a dump average

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:50.200
<v Speaker 1>depth of belly twice now in the first ten minutes.

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 1>It's a little over the top. It's a little over

0:18:56.040 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the top, dot, um, But this Camara to speak to Camara,

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what what is the stat He's got five

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:06.560
<v Speaker 1>seventy receiving yards and five forty are yak? I mean

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 1>it's incredible. Everything's behind the line of scrimmage. Think about

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 1>for I didn't play fantasy this year. I think about

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:14.159
<v Speaker 1>for fantasy football players who like. The three guys they

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 1>were drafting at the top were Zeke, you know, uh,

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 1>McCaffrey done for a huge stretch, he's coming back this week.

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:23.400
<v Speaker 1>And then the other one was Kwan, who had gone

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:25.360
<v Speaker 1>for the year. So if you ended up with Camara

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:31.119
<v Speaker 1>at four, you like won the lottery. Zeke has character issues.

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Pollard looks better than I like it. Yeah, he's Pollard

0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 1>has more energy than Zeke doesn't. If you're watching, yes, yes,

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:43.680
<v Speaker 1>did you want to interrupt? Go ahead, go ahead and

0:19:43.800 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 1>want to interrupt? I waited patiently. You didn't. I did, Actually,

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 1>I said, whild talking. I agreed with the Pollard. It

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:57.400
<v Speaker 1>was a good point. Zeke has no energy. I agree. Now.

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if this bothers you guys, but I

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:04.880
<v Speaker 1>can't stand when they get on ESPN or Fox Sports

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:08.120
<v Speaker 1>and the narrative becomes Drew Brees doesn't throw the ball

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 1>down the field. We know Drew Brees doesn't throw the

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 1>ball down the field. Let's not go overboard. They still

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 1>move the football, folks. Okay, so this is I think

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:20.880
<v Speaker 1>that there's there's like these narratives like last year, Oh Miami,

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 1>dol often stink. Ryan Fitzpatrick stinks, what are you talking about?

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Or here's another narrative, Trump's outperforming, it's over, it's done.

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 1>The whole thing's over. Trump minus seven hundred, it's all done.

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Slow your role, folks, Slow your role. We know Drew

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Brees can't throw the football down the field, but as

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Ed has very ably pointed out, they still move the

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 1>football and that's part of the game, moving the football.

0:20:46.080 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Am I wrong? Gil, You're not You're not incorrect, Todd

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 1>wish you're not incorrect, and and Todd I agree with

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:53.600
<v Speaker 1>you because I feel like you see the flip side

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 1>of that argument to be like, look at this guy

0:20:55.800 --> 0:21:00.240
<v Speaker 1>in his cannon arm right, Like that's gonna like propel

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:05.639
<v Speaker 1>Drew Lock. Drew Lock's got a cannon. Yeah, but count

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:09.119
<v Speaker 1>to seven. I still have New Orleans. I still have

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans at full strength. Is one of the five

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 1>best teams in football. I still believe. You want to

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:17.679
<v Speaker 1>say something, Mikey, I first pick, just to get it

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:21.399
<v Speaker 1>back on the rails, thank you. I I regretted that

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I didn't take the football team against the Cowboys because

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:26.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, for four weeks in a row, I was

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 1>against the Cowboys, right, four weeks in a row on

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 1>this on this megapod, And in the last two weeks

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 1>I didn't aren't number are number one picks are about

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 1>to be the same? You? You? You know, I think

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 1>so you You actually are lucky probably if you had

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Philly last week and you covered them. Remember I said,

0:21:41.640 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 1>if the number was out at late ten and I

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:46.199
<v Speaker 1>and and I did, and I didn't feel good about it.

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:51.640
<v Speaker 1>How How is that touchdown, that final touchdown not reverse?

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:55.680
<v Speaker 1>How that's as bad as the East Carolina game at

0:21:55.680 --> 0:21:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Tulsa with all those calls. I would we were talking

0:21:57.720 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 1>about this morning, we've done the Todd Wright theory and

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 1>pulled him off the field, the the h the Philadelphia

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 1>touchdown that was not reversed. When all of a sudden,

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 1>we looked up in Jalen Hurts was running a two

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 1>point conversion. Uh. The Bears being given forward progress on

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:13.399
<v Speaker 1>what ended up being a game tying drive when there

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:15.480
<v Speaker 1>was no whistleblown, and the rest were like, oh, yeah, well,

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I know the fumble happened, but let's just give him

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:20.880
<v Speaker 1>forward progress. Uh. Russell Wilson fake sliding and then inducing

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:23.119
<v Speaker 1>a flag and then four different things at the end

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:26.160
<v Speaker 1>of that Tampa game. I'm sorry, go ahead, but this

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Dallas team, I mean this this team, and nobody believed

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning that they were the worst team in football,

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 1>right that the public would not allow the number to

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:37.200
<v Speaker 1>get high enough and still made him favorite on Monday

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Night against Arizona. Okay, that was when they still had

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Dac and Dalton and now they have nothing. And now

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 1>they have I don't know who they'll play at quarterback.

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Mike McCarthy doesn't want you to know till the game time.

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:53.760
<v Speaker 1>If it's Cooper Rusher, Garrett Gilbert. I mean, it's just unbelievable.

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:57.959
<v Speaker 1>And the defense only Philadelphia could not perform because you know,

0:22:58.359 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 1>teach me how to Doug. You won't run the foot,

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:02.760
<v Speaker 1>all right, he's insisted. He insists, to drop back and

0:23:02.840 --> 0:23:05.199
<v Speaker 1>throw the football sixty times again. All you have to

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 1>do is run the ball against Dallas. They cannot stop

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the run. I'm gonna lay thirteen and a half with Pittsburgh.

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:13.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that Dallas. I don't know that Dallas

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 1>is gonna score. Will you late fourteen? I don't know.

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:20.920
<v Speaker 1>I'd like thirteen and a half, Todd. It's not even close, Mike.

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:23.119
<v Speaker 1>I see a lot of thirteen and a half. I

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 1>got four. I got fourteen across the board. It's across

0:23:26.880 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the board, fourteen, Mikey. You come on here, a giant

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 1>corporation looking right here at the top sports book in

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the world's number. Look at the number. Look at the number.

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:42.720
<v Speaker 1>To build the gigantic resort in Las Vegas, one of

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the most gorgeous resorts of all time. The least you

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 1>can do is know what the widespread number is going.

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:52.119
<v Speaker 1>I can't. I can't delve in those offshore places, and

0:23:52.600 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 1>you know I can't do that. I only have to

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 1>look at what is a legal line for me to

0:23:56.960 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 1>bet in the state of Nevada and betted circule. But

0:24:02.840 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 1>that's a legal line in the state of Nevada. So

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:07.200
<v Speaker 1>here's what I'll do. I'll lay fourteen with the Steelers.

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:10.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't care Dallas. This game is. If I had

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:12.720
<v Speaker 1>to predict the final score in this game, I would

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:16.200
<v Speaker 1>say thirty eight to six because mccarthyel kick a couple

0:24:16.200 --> 0:24:18.680
<v Speaker 1>of field goals down four touchdowns. Maybe at some point

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:21.439
<v Speaker 1>this is just I mean, the team is quit, all right,

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:25.120
<v Speaker 1>everybody's quit on McCarthy. The coaches are unprepared, he brings

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Nolan and I mean, it's just it's it's awful. It's

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:31.240
<v Speaker 1>awful what's going on in Dallas. And nobody gets that.

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 1>They're worse than Jacksonville. Their worst. They're the worst team.

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:36.360
<v Speaker 1>We we went through our mid season. Who are best

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 1>five teams? Who are worst five teams? Yesterday on Prime

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Time Action, every one of us had Dallas in the

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 1>bottom five, not even close. Spending new Chie poor guy,

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 1>he he is not an NFL quarterback. That was not fair.

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:51.439
<v Speaker 1>He wasn't a Division one quarterback. I'm gonna transfer from

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:55.160
<v Speaker 1>it to James Madison and see how that goes. Uh, Todd,

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 1>your first bet, by the way, our first bet was

0:24:56.640 --> 0:24:59.920
<v Speaker 1>not the same, Todd. My first bet is. You know,

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:03.119
<v Speaker 1>most of these games are impossible to pick pregame. You know,

0:25:03.280 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 1>just quick diet tribe. Don't bet pregame, Folks bet in game.

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Y'all know why. I'm not gonna go over a million

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:12.399
<v Speaker 1>times more times. But okay, Uh, there's one game that

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 1>is leaping off the page to me, leaping off the

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:19.359
<v Speaker 1>page to me, and that's the Baltimore Ravens. Baby. The

0:25:19.480 --> 0:25:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore Ravens won the football game against my beloved Yenser's

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:27.119
<v Speaker 1>last week. Now, I know on the final on the

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:33.040
<v Speaker 1>final score, it showed Pittsburgh Stars more than Baltimore Ravens

0:25:33.119 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and that, But the bottom line is Distillers were outgained

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 1>by a gazillion and the only reason that they won

0:25:41.400 --> 0:25:43.439
<v Speaker 1>that game is because Lamar gave it to them. Now

0:25:43.520 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 1>we know Lamar is not great in the big games.

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 1>We know that he's not great in the big games.

0:25:49.320 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 1>But as Philip Rivers Indie Colts a big game, I

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 1>think not. So now you're gonna tell me I get

0:25:56.359 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 1>to go. Now, remember another thing, Baltimore's got a nice defense.

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:02.679
<v Speaker 1>If they can hold the Pittsburgh Steelers down, what they

0:26:02.720 --> 0:26:05.760
<v Speaker 1>can't hold the statue of Philip Rivers down. Plus, I

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:08.360
<v Speaker 1>get to bed against Philip Rivers, which is the most

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:11.200
<v Speaker 1>fun feeling in the world. After all the times he

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:16.000
<v Speaker 1>has so crushingly killed me, so crushingly killed me time

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and time again inside the ten yard line when I

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 1>just need a couple of points fail, I get to

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:24.199
<v Speaker 1>go against this asshole. So give me the Ravens minus

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 1>to I hate Phil Rover. You can't even say the

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:32.000
<v Speaker 1>name of the anoj H. This was I was considering

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:34.159
<v Speaker 1>making this either my number two or my number one pick,

0:26:34.240 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 1>but since you've gone on it, I'm just gonna make

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:38.440
<v Speaker 1>it my number one too. It's Baltimore for me as well.

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 1>For all the reasons Todd stated, let me just back

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 1>them up with some numbers. Ravens two hundred sixty five

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:47.440
<v Speaker 1>yards rushing last week against the Steelers defense. Uh, that

0:26:47.640 --> 0:26:52.600
<v Speaker 1>is the most rushing yards in a loss in Ravens

0:26:52.720 --> 0:26:56.200
<v Speaker 1>franchise history. They had seventy nine total place to the

0:26:56.200 --> 0:27:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Steelers fifty. They outpossessed the Steelers to eight, but they

0:27:01.040 --> 0:27:03.320
<v Speaker 1>were minus three in turnovers. They were nine penalties for

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:06.600
<v Speaker 1>a hundred ten yards. Basically, it was Alex Highsmith's pick

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:11.399
<v Speaker 1>six and then another terrible pass from Lamar that was

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:13.720
<v Speaker 1>picked off. Actually the first one was Robert Splaine on

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the pick six parton me, and then the second one

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:17.840
<v Speaker 1>was an Alex Highsmith pick which gave them another twenty

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:20.639
<v Speaker 1>one yard short field. So really the defense staked the

0:27:20.680 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Steelers fourteen points. That's why they were able to win

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:24.880
<v Speaker 1>in the end. But even then, Baltimore had a chance

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 1>to win. At the end of that football game, Um

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:31.359
<v Speaker 1>They're the better team by far. This number has come down,

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:35.240
<v Speaker 1>and I can't believe that. I'm all over Baltimore, who

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:37.919
<v Speaker 1>again didn't doing our top five and bottom five yesterday.

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore is in the top five best teams in the NFL.

0:27:39.840 --> 0:27:42.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you on that last point. I any chance

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:45.360
<v Speaker 1>I get to bet against Philip Rivers. Philip Rivers, after

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:47.360
<v Speaker 1>all the harm he's done us in the past, it's

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:50.640
<v Speaker 1>a comfortable position to be in Baltimore my first bet too.

0:27:50.840 --> 0:27:53.199
<v Speaker 1>You know the stats in that game where ludicrous seventy

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:56.440
<v Speaker 1>five plays to fifty thirty six minutes to twenty four,

0:27:57.160 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 1>you know. And I had a great debate on the

0:27:59.640 --> 0:28:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Lambar party line with with Todd's good friend Michael Lombardi.

0:28:06.200 --> 0:28:08.600
<v Speaker 1>What's the first time it's happened since Matt Humans left

0:28:08.640 --> 0:28:11.439
<v Speaker 1>the show and Patrick maher came on. Usually everything is acquiesced.

0:28:11.520 --> 0:28:14.600
<v Speaker 1>But his top play was Pittsburgh last week. My top

0:28:14.640 --> 0:28:17.040
<v Speaker 1>play was Baltimore, and our whole theory of the game

0:28:17.119 --> 0:28:19.280
<v Speaker 1>was I thought Baltimore could rush the ball effectively, and

0:28:19.359 --> 0:28:21.640
<v Speaker 1>he thought the Steelers would force him to get behind

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the chains and Lamar would have to be a drop

0:28:23.680 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 1>back pass her. I said you had a wrong reason, winner, Michael,

0:28:26.680 --> 0:28:31.240
<v Speaker 1>you were right. Pittsburgh did not force him. Greg Roman

0:28:31.320 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 1>forced him to become a drop back passer. You know

0:28:33.800 --> 0:28:37.199
<v Speaker 1>Greg Roman from Ventnor, New Jersey. He might he might

0:28:37.240 --> 0:28:39.239
<v Speaker 1>be back at a Holy Spirit up seeking soon if

0:28:39.240 --> 0:28:41.320
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't understand he needs to run the ball and

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 1>stop having Lamar Jackson passed from deep in his own territory.

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I didn't understand. Ludicrous, uh the only but a quick question,

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 1>please please, of course you know how Mike Mike does

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:55.280
<v Speaker 1>his ow. Can I ask the guests a question thing?

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 1>I would like to do that right now. This is

0:28:57.720 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a serious question because it seems like you're very math,

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:04.000
<v Speaker 1>medical and model based. How do you I feel like

0:29:04.080 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 1>in the in the in football, there's more crap numbers

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:09.720
<v Speaker 1>in there because so much of the game has to

0:29:09.800 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 1>do with what's the score of the game, what time

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:14.040
<v Speaker 1>of the game. You know, in the late third quarters,

0:29:14.360 --> 0:29:16.080
<v Speaker 1>good teams that are up a lot are not really

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 1>trying the same way, and that leads to filthy numbers

0:29:20.000 --> 0:29:22.880
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to in other sports. There's filthy numbers, but

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 1>they're not as bad because in baseball people are still

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:27.040
<v Speaker 1>trying to get a hit. In the ninth thingning, you

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean, Whereas in football so much a

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:33.160
<v Speaker 1>situational how do you clean up the debris so to speak?

0:29:33.200 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Excellent question? Yeah, I mean in some stimes, I don't.

0:29:37.680 --> 0:29:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean with NFL, the scores are so tight that

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 1>that I usually assume that, Like I use all the

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:44.880
<v Speaker 1>data and and so you know, one of the things

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:48.760
<v Speaker 1>that I've started using is success rate, which, um, you know,

0:29:48.840 --> 0:29:50.440
<v Speaker 1>plays a success if you get half of the yards

0:29:50.520 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 1>on first down on second and all on third and

0:29:54.280 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 1>fourth down. So metrics like that are supposed to account

0:29:56.640 --> 0:29:59.280
<v Speaker 1>for the situation in which ways, like you know, yours

0:29:59.320 --> 0:30:03.480
<v Speaker 1>for play doesn't necessarily do that. Um. Yes, So contact

0:30:03.560 --> 0:30:07.360
<v Speaker 1>is really important in football, and I completely agree with that. Um,

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:10.000
<v Speaker 1>you know I would say that. I mean, of course

0:30:10.040 --> 0:30:12.360
<v Speaker 1>I trust my numbers, but I I will always um

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 1>add the the element of watching football games to to

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:20.600
<v Speaker 1>adjust for those types of things. And um yeah, I

0:30:20.600 --> 0:30:22.880
<v Speaker 1>mean I try to combine both of those when I'm

0:30:23.080 --> 0:30:25.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm making my bets. You know, our friend Bob stole

0:30:25.400 --> 0:30:27.000
<v Speaker 1>ed you know what he used to answer to that question.

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 1>He would manually go back and just erase certain parts

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:36.120
<v Speaker 1>of games, tip typically the very end right with the

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 1>reneal downs. That's the most dark example, but just you know,

0:30:40.080 --> 0:30:44.000
<v Speaker 1>drives that were meaningless and not as part, as you say, Todd,

0:30:44.040 --> 0:30:47.320
<v Speaker 1>of the actual game script of winning it right when

0:30:47.360 --> 0:30:49.240
<v Speaker 1>that was beyond that portion of the game. So he

0:30:49.240 --> 0:30:51.400
<v Speaker 1>would actually have to go back and manually raise because

0:30:51.400 --> 0:30:53.480
<v Speaker 1>he felt that that would pollute his data otherwise if

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:55.680
<v Speaker 1>he didn't do that. So I think that's the answer

0:30:55.680 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 1>to your question. By the way, Tennis is rife with

0:30:57.440 --> 0:31:00.200
<v Speaker 1>that stuff, right, because if I'm up on you, Todd,

0:31:00.840 --> 0:31:03.520
<v Speaker 1>two sets to one. You remember those days if I'm

0:31:03.600 --> 0:31:06.000
<v Speaker 1>up on you two sets to one, were you ever

0:31:07.080 --> 0:31:10.000
<v Speaker 1>getting them? Joking? It's a joke, Todd. If if a

0:31:10.120 --> 0:31:12.440
<v Speaker 1>tennis player is up on another tennis player two sets

0:31:12.480 --> 0:31:14.960
<v Speaker 1>to one in a five setter, right, but then the

0:31:15.080 --> 0:31:17.720
<v Speaker 1>person who the player who's down two sets to one

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:21.200
<v Speaker 1>is up a break. The person up two to one

0:31:21.360 --> 0:31:23.600
<v Speaker 1>oftentimes will just take the rest of the set off.

0:31:24.240 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 1>And so that's kind of like the tennis equivalent. It's

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:30.360
<v Speaker 1>it's yea to conserve energy for the fifth Set's correct?

0:31:31.000 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting. Yeah, So it's very difficult to sort of

0:31:33.400 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 1>weed out that versus someone actually tanking. That sort of thing.

0:31:36.160 --> 0:31:39.320
<v Speaker 1>But did you notice what Ed said? Ed's said the

0:31:39.400 --> 0:31:41.840
<v Speaker 1>goo losh model is the way to do. You have

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:45.360
<v Speaker 1>to have a watching of football games to know what

0:31:45.640 --> 0:31:48.400
<v Speaker 1>stats are important, numbers wise, and which you're not so

0:31:48.560 --> 0:31:51.160
<v Speaker 1>all of you, you know, nerd crunchers who just think

0:31:51.280 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 1>numbers are the only thing, and you can't. You know,

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:55.400
<v Speaker 1>you have to go to Circle and watch all the games.

0:31:55.760 --> 0:31:57.960
<v Speaker 1>You have to go to Circer. Now, is there smoking

0:31:58.040 --> 0:32:00.760
<v Speaker 1>at Circle mic because I can't handle smoke, in which

0:32:00.800 --> 0:32:03.120
<v Speaker 1>case I'm gonna need to go to stadium swim outdoors

0:32:03.280 --> 0:32:05.400
<v Speaker 1>and I'm gonna need a free pass because of all

0:32:05.440 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the popcorn I bought you at the South Point. Please

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:10.960
<v Speaker 1>publicly say that I will get a free pass to

0:32:11.080 --> 0:32:13.480
<v Speaker 1>stadium swim whenever I ever get back to Vegas. Pod

0:32:13.560 --> 0:32:15.760
<v Speaker 1>you will get a free pass to stadium swim if

0:32:15.960 --> 0:32:18.720
<v Speaker 1>you ever get back to Vegas. There is smoking aloud,

0:32:18.880 --> 0:32:22.320
<v Speaker 1>although with the mask rules you can smoke. You can

0:32:22.440 --> 0:32:24.360
<v Speaker 1>take a puff, but then you must put the mass

0:32:24.440 --> 0:32:27.720
<v Speaker 1>back up it. You have to be actively smoking. You

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:29.840
<v Speaker 1>don't get you just take your mask down because you

0:32:29.920 --> 0:32:32.640
<v Speaker 1>have a cigarette sitting there in the ashtray. Okay, so

0:32:32.720 --> 0:32:34.600
<v Speaker 1>we enforced that. So it's a little bit of a

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:37.320
<v Speaker 1>deterrent to smoking that in the tier that it puts

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:39.840
<v Speaker 1>in your lungs. By the way, Ed did not actually

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:42.280
<v Speaker 1>use the words coolash model. Just want to point that.

0:32:42.360 --> 0:32:46.200
<v Speaker 1>But but Gil, it's kind of what he said. Carefully.

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:49.880
<v Speaker 1>I want to say one other things. Stanford took a

0:32:49.920 --> 0:32:52.200
<v Speaker 1>big hit with me in the last couple of weeks.

0:32:52.240 --> 0:32:54.760
<v Speaker 1>I used to really be impressed with people from Stanford,

0:32:55.000 --> 0:32:57.680
<v Speaker 1>but um, Ed, we have a friend who's from Stanford

0:32:57.720 --> 0:33:01.040
<v Speaker 1>who's not that intelligence. Sometimes he's actually an intelligent guy,

0:33:01.280 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 1>but he says some things that are just ridiculous and

0:33:03.280 --> 0:33:05.720
<v Speaker 1>so but I just had that's an inside joke with

0:33:05.760 --> 0:33:07.600
<v Speaker 1>me and Gil head is nothing to do with you. Sorry. Well,

0:33:07.920 --> 0:33:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean a Stanford degree is like you know, like

0:33:11.160 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 1>like like a fruit being called organic. Right, It's nice

0:33:14.120 --> 0:33:16.480
<v Speaker 1>to have the label, but it doesn't guarantee the quality inside.

0:33:17.480 --> 0:33:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Ed pick number two, alright, So pick number two. I

0:33:21.520 --> 0:33:28.160
<v Speaker 1>am going with the Houston Texans against uh, the Houston

0:33:28.200 --> 0:33:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Texas against the Jacksonville Jaguars. So I bet this a

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:34.280
<v Speaker 1>minus six and a half. Um. The thinking here is

0:33:34.360 --> 0:33:38.000
<v Speaker 1>that I love Deshaun Watson. I was on my my

0:33:38.120 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 1>other podcast and and our guests described as Shaun Watson

0:33:41.600 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 1>as the most underrated as an underrated quarterback, which I

0:33:45.400 --> 0:33:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I find interesting. I mean, I don't know how you

0:33:47.280 --> 0:33:49.720
<v Speaker 1>can watch that guy play with the talent he has

0:33:49.800 --> 0:33:53.320
<v Speaker 1>and will Fuller and possibly think he's underrated. Obviously, there's

0:33:53.320 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 1>circumstances with how they have not had success on the

0:33:56.080 --> 0:33:58.680
<v Speaker 1>football field. Part of that as a schedule. Part of

0:33:58.720 --> 0:34:01.800
<v Speaker 1>that is that the defense is awful. But in general

0:34:01.960 --> 0:34:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I like betting on Deshaun Watson because he's an incredible quarterback.

0:34:05.960 --> 0:34:07.960
<v Speaker 1>The other thing that's going on with this game is

0:34:08.040 --> 0:34:11.719
<v Speaker 1>that Gardner Minshew is not playing football for for the

0:34:11.840 --> 0:34:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Jacksonville Jaguars. Um they they weren't particularly good under Minshew.

0:34:17.600 --> 0:34:19.440
<v Speaker 1>So they're actually twenty six when I look at my

0:34:19.440 --> 0:34:22.279
<v Speaker 1>adjusted passing success rate, so so not good. But I

0:34:22.360 --> 0:34:24.200
<v Speaker 1>do expect to drop off when they go to a

0:34:24.280 --> 0:34:27.320
<v Speaker 1>six round draft pick in rookie Jake Jake Lutton. Lutton

0:34:27.360 --> 0:34:39.160
<v Speaker 1>am I saying that Luton? Oh? I remember him? Go ahead?

0:34:40.600 --> 0:34:42.919
<v Speaker 1>So so anyways, I mean I do like this game

0:34:43.000 --> 0:34:45.080
<v Speaker 1>because of the quarterback back matchup. I think you're taking

0:34:45.120 --> 0:34:47.319
<v Speaker 1>a top five quarterback in the NFL with a guy

0:34:47.440 --> 0:34:52.319
<v Speaker 1>who has never done it in an NFL game yet, Um,

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:55.400
<v Speaker 1>I think Houston is hungry for some wins because they

0:34:55.480 --> 0:34:58.560
<v Speaker 1>don't have that many of them this year. And you

0:34:58.640 --> 0:35:01.440
<v Speaker 1>know Houston's defense is bad, right, I mean, you know

0:35:01.480 --> 0:35:03.120
<v Speaker 1>when I look at past defense in terms of my

0:35:03.120 --> 0:35:06.960
<v Speaker 1>adjusted passing success right there. Um, And it might be

0:35:07.080 --> 0:35:11.040
<v Speaker 1>without their best cornerback in Bradley Roby. But uh, I

0:35:11.160 --> 0:35:13.360
<v Speaker 1>like to Shawn Watson, I like Houston. Uh, And I

0:35:13.360 --> 0:35:17.880
<v Speaker 1>will lay the points here. But way, Houston spank Jacksonville

0:35:17.960 --> 0:35:20.360
<v Speaker 1>in that early game and Jacksonville did not move the

0:35:20.440 --> 0:35:22.840
<v Speaker 1>ball on them with Minshoe, So I agree with you.

0:35:22.920 --> 0:35:24.880
<v Speaker 1>I think I think it could be a big spank

0:35:24.960 --> 0:35:29.400
<v Speaker 1>down Houston against them. Here's the thing. Houston is a

0:35:29.480 --> 0:35:32.640
<v Speaker 1>potential survivor pick because of the quarter but not not

0:35:32.760 --> 0:35:35.920
<v Speaker 1>necessarily because of the quarterback change. But certainly doesn't dissuade

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:38.759
<v Speaker 1>one with the quarterback change. If anything, it's a it's

0:35:39.200 --> 0:35:43.520
<v Speaker 1>a check in the positive mark positive column. But first

0:35:43.520 --> 0:35:46.120
<v Speaker 1>of all, the Thanksgiving implications because Houston's and Thanksgiving team.

0:35:46.719 --> 0:35:50.279
<v Speaker 1>I just the self loathing that would go on if

0:35:50.400 --> 0:35:54.160
<v Speaker 1>I picked Houston and lost on Houston would be off

0:35:54.280 --> 0:35:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the charts. I would just hate myself to lose on

0:35:58.640 --> 0:36:01.960
<v Speaker 1>that team. But I totally or everything you're saying. Um, Mikey,

0:36:02.440 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 1>who's conducting business. You're the busiest dude ever Right now,

0:36:05.160 --> 0:36:09.200
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I'm gonna go against Anthony Lynn and

0:36:09.239 --> 0:36:14.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna take the Raiders. The Raiders, I was impressed.

0:36:14.560 --> 0:36:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I thought they played a complete game in all facets

0:36:17.200 --> 0:36:20.400
<v Speaker 1>for the first time last week at Cleveland and is

0:36:21.760 --> 0:36:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what the psyche can be with the

0:36:24.120 --> 0:36:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Chargers after they've blown leads of eleven, seventeen, seventeen, sixteen,

0:36:30.200 --> 0:36:32.200
<v Speaker 1>and now twenty one. I mean this was the the

0:36:32.440 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 1>icing on the cake last week. I mean they're up

0:36:35.160 --> 0:36:37.560
<v Speaker 1>three touchdowns and Drew Lock can't even get a pass off.

0:36:37.600 --> 0:36:39.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean they're sacking him every other play. They were

0:36:40.040 --> 0:36:43.920
<v Speaker 1>booing him at Mile High and they somehow lose that game. Um,

0:36:44.280 --> 0:36:46.799
<v Speaker 1>have blown four leads of sixteen plus this year. What's

0:36:46.840 --> 0:36:48.719
<v Speaker 1>the scenario that they can win and they have to

0:36:48.920 --> 0:36:51.640
<v Speaker 1>they have to come from way behind. I mean, if

0:36:51.719 --> 0:36:53.799
<v Speaker 1>that's that's that's where they get. Okay. I'm I'm happy

0:36:53.840 --> 0:36:55.719
<v Speaker 1>with the Raiders being up a couple of scores. I

0:36:55.880 --> 0:36:58.239
<v Speaker 1>just I don't know whether they can go with this

0:36:58.320 --> 0:37:01.279
<v Speaker 1>guy Lynn, I mean, he's a nice man, done a

0:37:01.360 --> 0:37:03.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of charity where he should be coaching the unit

0:37:03.520 --> 0:37:06.120
<v Speaker 1>set football team, not not in the NFL. I in

0:37:06.320 --> 0:37:09.279
<v Speaker 1>game undered the hell out of that game, though it

0:37:09.400 --> 0:37:11.719
<v Speaker 1>was it was the whole week was about weather in

0:37:11.920 --> 0:37:16.600
<v Speaker 1>five cities in the NFL, uh potentially being really a

0:37:16.719 --> 0:37:19.799
<v Speaker 1>factor Green Bay, Cleveland, Buffalo sincident in Chicago. I missed

0:37:19.840 --> 0:37:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the initial number chance the middle, so I decided I'm

0:37:22.160 --> 0:37:25.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna watch the actual game and see where it really

0:37:25.719 --> 0:37:28.920
<v Speaker 1>is affecting affecting play. And when that field goal in

0:37:29.000 --> 0:37:31.560
<v Speaker 1>that game was going dead's down the center and then

0:37:31.640 --> 0:37:34.719
<v Speaker 1>took a hard left, I was like, that's the game.

0:37:35.040 --> 0:37:36.960
<v Speaker 1>So I I in game undered it. I just wanna

0:37:37.480 --> 0:37:41.880
<v Speaker 1>just to be accurate here, know the the Cleveland Raiders

0:37:41.960 --> 0:37:45.040
<v Speaker 1>game forty four, forty four and a half, forty three

0:37:45.040 --> 0:37:46.640
<v Speaker 1>and a half, forty one and a half, thirty nine

0:37:46.680 --> 0:37:50.319
<v Speaker 1>and a half, and thirty seven. I got it at

0:37:50.360 --> 0:37:52.359
<v Speaker 1>thirty nine and a half and thirty seven and a half.

0:37:52.440 --> 0:37:54.279
<v Speaker 1>Those were the two bets I mean, And that was

0:37:55.520 --> 0:37:57.400
<v Speaker 1>it was a little bit after I didn't know about it.

0:37:58.280 --> 0:38:01.239
<v Speaker 1>I was sitting at stadium swim with Mitch and Paul

0:38:01.320 --> 0:38:03.960
<v Speaker 1>text me and said, did you see the Brown's first

0:38:04.040 --> 0:38:06.040
<v Speaker 1>field goal? And I said no. He said, it was

0:38:06.160 --> 0:38:08.879
<v Speaker 1>both wide right and right wide left in the same kick.

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:12.040
<v Speaker 1>It was right down the middle. It was right down

0:38:12.120 --> 0:38:15.319
<v Speaker 1>the middle and wide left. That's a great call by him. Yeah,

0:38:15.360 --> 0:38:17.319
<v Speaker 1>And so I wasn't really paying attention to the game,

0:38:17.360 --> 0:38:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and so I said, so then then then I had

0:38:18.960 --> 0:38:20.640
<v Speaker 1>a couple of games. That was the only way to

0:38:20.680 --> 0:38:23.160
<v Speaker 1>play the weather, I thought. Um, speaking of which, did

0:38:23.239 --> 0:38:25.240
<v Speaker 1>you guys see the field goal from like a million

0:38:25.320 --> 0:38:27.880
<v Speaker 1>yards that has Sham had to make go in against me?

0:38:28.280 --> 0:38:30.480
<v Speaker 1>The guy who at the line drive field goal that

0:38:30.680 --> 0:38:33.759
<v Speaker 1>was like literally four ft off the ground at the

0:38:33.880 --> 0:38:38.160
<v Speaker 1>end of the half. Only that could only happen to me.

0:38:38.200 --> 0:38:40.359
<v Speaker 1>I still and watching it. I wasn't sure it even

0:38:40.400 --> 0:38:43.120
<v Speaker 1>went in, you know, because it just duck tailed. It

0:38:43.239 --> 0:38:44.840
<v Speaker 1>was so low. I didn't have any idea. And then

0:38:45.080 --> 0:38:48.279
<v Speaker 1>the officials looked at each other. So I think that

0:38:48.400 --> 0:38:53.160
<v Speaker 1>went in, didn't Um? Alright, Todd? Number two? Okay, my

0:38:53.360 --> 0:38:58.360
<v Speaker 1>number two is gonna be the under under the total

0:38:58.600 --> 0:39:03.440
<v Speaker 1>in the Miami Dolphin in Arizona Cardinals game. And that

0:39:03.719 --> 0:39:07.040
<v Speaker 1>is what number do you have forty eight and a half. Yeah,

0:39:07.360 --> 0:39:09.960
<v Speaker 1>you missed the hit it. By the way, I'll get

0:39:10.000 --> 0:39:14.920
<v Speaker 1>to Miami, Dolph for I have forty eight and a half.

0:39:15.280 --> 0:39:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Look again, Gilly, it's forty eight and a half. One

0:39:18.480 --> 0:39:20.719
<v Speaker 1>of the things you need to know to a can't

0:39:20.800 --> 0:39:25.640
<v Speaker 1>run this offense. You better get Mr Fitzpatrick back because

0:39:25.840 --> 0:39:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Miami can go to the playoffs. What are you doing, Miami? Okay,

0:39:29.880 --> 0:39:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna take the under in this football game. And

0:39:32.000 --> 0:39:36.840
<v Speaker 1>here's why Miami. Miami cannot move the football. Did you

0:39:36.920 --> 0:39:39.480
<v Speaker 1>watch the game last week against the Rams. They scored

0:39:39.520 --> 0:39:43.640
<v Speaker 1>all them points because Jared A hundred and fourteen million

0:39:43.719 --> 0:39:47.759
<v Speaker 1>dollar golf gave them eighteen hundred turnovers. And every five

0:39:47.880 --> 0:39:51.160
<v Speaker 1>seconds I turned around and and Miami's defense is running

0:39:51.200 --> 0:39:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the other way with another interception, touchdown or a fine

0:39:53.560 --> 0:39:57.480
<v Speaker 1>with darn touchdown or a fumble. It was unbelievable. Ta

0:39:57.960 --> 0:40:00.880
<v Speaker 1>is not ready Okay now, Matt maybe two will be

0:40:00.960 --> 0:40:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the next Jesus Joe Burrow. Maybe maybe it's possible. I

0:40:05.040 --> 0:40:06.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't see it last week. I don't know if you

0:40:06.760 --> 0:40:08.720
<v Speaker 1>guys saw it, but I didn't see anything from Tuah

0:40:08.960 --> 0:40:10.880
<v Speaker 1>that made me think he was even better than fits

0:40:11.000 --> 0:40:14.399
<v Speaker 1>right now. So to me, how's Miami gonna be moving

0:40:14.440 --> 0:40:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the football up and down the field. They'll probably get

0:40:16.680 --> 0:40:19.040
<v Speaker 1>some points, but forty eight and a half connotes a

0:40:19.160 --> 0:40:24.160
<v Speaker 1>decent sized total. Conversely, their defense is fantastic. Their defense

0:40:24.320 --> 0:40:27.319
<v Speaker 1>is all over. Mr Jared Goff. He was averaging four

0:40:27.400 --> 0:40:29.960
<v Speaker 1>point four yards of play at halftime. I love looking

0:40:30.000 --> 0:40:32.360
<v Speaker 1>at the yards per play at halftime. They could not

0:40:32.560 --> 0:40:37.040
<v Speaker 1>move the ball against Miami, you know, very consistently. Miami's

0:40:37.120 --> 0:40:39.759
<v Speaker 1>defense is pretty good, folks. I know it's hard for

0:40:39.840 --> 0:40:43.120
<v Speaker 1>me to I love that coach that Miami coaches really

0:40:43.280 --> 0:40:46.399
<v Speaker 1>really good. He's got that team playing a tight brand

0:40:46.480 --> 0:40:48.560
<v Speaker 1>of football. Now they're gonna blow it because they have

0:40:48.680 --> 0:40:50.319
<v Speaker 1>to give the money. They have to give the playing

0:40:50.360 --> 0:40:52.560
<v Speaker 1>time to Tuah. You know, to Ah, he's the great,

0:40:52.680 --> 0:40:55.000
<v Speaker 1>He's Jesus. You gotta get too on the field. You

0:40:55.080 --> 0:40:57.319
<v Speaker 1>know what, Miami could be a playoff team, folks, if

0:40:57.360 --> 0:40:59.760
<v Speaker 1>they would just let Fitzpatrick stay on the football field.

0:41:00.040 --> 0:41:03.040
<v Speaker 1>But okay, that being said, let's take the under. Miami

0:41:03.160 --> 0:41:05.759
<v Speaker 1>is gonna keep their scoring down. Miami's defense is gonna

0:41:05.800 --> 0:41:08.000
<v Speaker 1>keep the other team scoring down. Give me the under

0:41:08.080 --> 0:41:10.080
<v Speaker 1>forty eight and a half, am I wrong you are

0:41:10.080 --> 0:41:16.400
<v Speaker 1>because it's forty eight look all olf, but okay, um,

0:41:16.840 --> 0:41:19.640
<v Speaker 1>by the way, UH, don't sell Jared golf short. It's

0:41:19.640 --> 0:41:22.439
<v Speaker 1>a hundred twenty eight million dollars, one fourteen of which

0:41:22.520 --> 0:41:25.520
<v Speaker 1>is guaranteed. Uh and the only three pre flop bets

0:41:25.520 --> 0:41:28.279
<v Speaker 1>I made this. I made the season Patriots under nine

0:41:28.320 --> 0:41:30.480
<v Speaker 1>and a half because of all the opt outs, Dolphins

0:41:30.560 --> 0:41:33.120
<v Speaker 1>over six Dolphins to win the division at plus eleven fifty.

0:41:33.160 --> 0:41:35.319
<v Speaker 1>Everything is live. But you're right. It worries me. That's two.

0:41:35.440 --> 0:41:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Now your numbers coming down? I mean you've got a

0:41:37.640 --> 0:41:41.160
<v Speaker 1>good number, because what is now six dollars? Six dollars? Uh.

0:41:41.360 --> 0:41:44.080
<v Speaker 1>That Miami Arizona box score. Though we thought Baltimore and

0:41:44.520 --> 0:41:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh was a weird box score, this Miami Arizona box

0:41:47.160 --> 0:41:50.120
<v Speaker 1>score from last week was maybe the oddest box score

0:41:50.160 --> 0:41:54.000
<v Speaker 1>you'll ever see in your life. Um on Arizona, say Miami,

0:41:54.480 --> 0:41:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Miami Rams. Oh, Miami Rams for last week. I'm sorry

0:41:56.560 --> 0:42:00.960
<v Speaker 1>they playing Fami Arizona this week? Right, Miami Rams, Miami

0:42:01.040 --> 0:42:04.000
<v Speaker 1>excuse me? The Rams thirty one first downs the Dolphins

0:42:04.120 --> 0:42:09.320
<v Speaker 1>eight uh four seventy one yards total offense for the Rams,

0:42:09.400 --> 0:42:12.640
<v Speaker 1>one five for the Dolphins nine two plays for the

0:42:12.760 --> 0:42:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Rams forty eight. There's that forty for the Dolphins, thirty

0:42:20.040 --> 0:42:23.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty one in time of possession, basically two short fields

0:42:23.719 --> 0:42:26.560
<v Speaker 1>uh for the Dolphins thirty three yards in one yard

0:42:26.719 --> 0:42:30.399
<v Speaker 1>Christian Wilkins interception, Kyle van Noy fumble return, one strip,

0:42:30.440 --> 0:42:33.080
<v Speaker 1>sack return for a touchdown, Emmanuel Agua with the sack

0:42:33.520 --> 0:42:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Van Ginkle to the house, and then a punt

0:42:35.640 --> 0:42:37.560
<v Speaker 1>return for a touchdown j King Grant eighty eight yards.

0:42:37.800 --> 0:42:39.879
<v Speaker 1>The flip side of that is you could argue, based

0:42:39.920 --> 0:42:42.600
<v Speaker 1>on game script, Miami didn't have to do anything after that, right,

0:42:43.120 --> 0:42:45.400
<v Speaker 1>But we'll see miss the field goal that cost me

0:42:45.440 --> 0:42:48.200
<v Speaker 1>plus nine and a half. How I lost plus nine

0:42:48.239 --> 0:42:50.320
<v Speaker 1>and a half in game on the Rams on that

0:42:50.520 --> 0:42:55.000
<v Speaker 1>game is only Hashem in Miami. They miss a field

0:42:55.080 --> 0:42:59.480
<v Speaker 1>goal down eleven to cut it to eight. It was unbelievable.

0:42:59.640 --> 0:43:01.520
<v Speaker 1>But then ways that being said, ed, what do you

0:43:01.600 --> 0:43:05.600
<v Speaker 1>think about to come on seriously, Well, I don't know,

0:43:05.640 --> 0:43:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I mean, yeah, he didn't exactly have the

0:43:07.360 --> 0:43:11.160
<v Speaker 1>greatest performance in that game. Um, from what I've seen

0:43:11.200 --> 0:43:12.759
<v Speaker 1>in college, Yeah, I mean, I think he's got all

0:43:12.760 --> 0:43:14.359
<v Speaker 1>the potential in the world to be great. I mean,

0:43:14.520 --> 0:43:17.279
<v Speaker 1>does he have the talent around into Miami. I don't know.

0:43:18.160 --> 0:43:22.160
<v Speaker 1>We'll see, but we don't know yet. In any Alabama

0:43:22.239 --> 0:43:24.680
<v Speaker 1>quarterback that comes to the pros has a downgrade in

0:43:24.760 --> 0:43:30.440
<v Speaker 1>his receiving corps. Right, guys that Mac Jones is thrown to.

0:43:30.600 --> 0:43:33.560
<v Speaker 1>This year, Jones has been great and I think he's

0:43:33.560 --> 0:43:36.120
<v Speaker 1>going to be a first round pick in this next draft.

0:43:36.600 --> 0:43:39.400
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, he's got two first rounders that he's thrown too.

0:43:39.520 --> 0:43:41.560
<v Speaker 1>And it's and it's kind of it's kind of incredible.

0:43:41.640 --> 0:43:45.440
<v Speaker 1>And that's without Jay Little Waddle exactly. Well, I mean,

0:43:45.560 --> 0:43:55.240
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't run through the end. Yeah, yes, I'm not saying

0:43:55.280 --> 0:43:58.240
<v Speaker 1>two is gonna be bad. I'm just saying you haven't

0:43:58.280 --> 0:44:01.120
<v Speaker 1>proven anything yet. And don't give me. They won the

0:44:01.160 --> 0:44:03.799
<v Speaker 1>football game, but he didn't do anything. Okay, play one game,

0:44:03.960 --> 0:44:07.640
<v Speaker 1>all right? One game? Yeah? Nick, Nick Saban, that just

0:44:07.680 --> 0:44:10.000
<v Speaker 1>couldn't keep his mouth shut. Well he shouldn't, you know,

0:44:10.040 --> 0:44:11.640
<v Speaker 1>that's tough. He shouldn't take that ball out of it.

0:44:11.680 --> 0:44:12.920
<v Speaker 1>That's what happens when you take the ball on the

0:44:13.040 --> 0:44:16.040
<v Speaker 1>back and shut up, Nick, Just it's poor kids injured

0:44:16.080 --> 0:44:18.040
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of the year. Shut up, Nick Saban.

0:44:18.360 --> 0:44:21.359
<v Speaker 1>Couldn't help himself. My number two pick. By the way,

0:44:21.400 --> 0:44:23.359
<v Speaker 1>Hasham and I have to explain this to the guest

0:44:23.440 --> 0:44:26.920
<v Speaker 1>every week, is Orthodox jew for God. I just want

0:44:26.960 --> 0:44:30.760
<v Speaker 1>to point that out, alright. And what I'm basically saying

0:44:30.920 --> 0:44:33.720
<v Speaker 1>is God will always kill me with field goal kickers,

0:44:33.760 --> 0:44:36.200
<v Speaker 1>whether in college, whether in pros. If I need him

0:44:36.239 --> 0:44:38.440
<v Speaker 1>to make it, they will always miss it. If I

0:44:38.520 --> 0:44:40.400
<v Speaker 1>need him to miss it, they will always make it.

0:44:40.760 --> 0:44:43.799
<v Speaker 1>This can only be experienced either in quantum physics by

0:44:43.840 --> 0:44:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Schrodinger chat or it's Hashem. It's the Hashem factor. A

0:44:48.520 --> 0:44:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Jem hates me alright because we're behind schedule, We're behind

0:44:52.120 --> 0:44:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the chains here. We'll move on pick number two. I

0:44:54.680 --> 0:44:58.080
<v Speaker 1>am on the Washington football team, giving two and a

0:44:58.120 --> 0:45:02.080
<v Speaker 1>half against the New York Giants. I actually think Washington

0:45:02.239 --> 0:45:05.640
<v Speaker 1>is live to win the NFC East, which is almost

0:45:05.680 --> 0:45:08.799
<v Speaker 1>impossible to say. Uh. The Eagles lead that division three

0:45:08.880 --> 0:45:10.040
<v Speaker 1>four and one. But by the way, I think the

0:45:10.080 --> 0:45:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Eagles are horrific. But I like Washington with their front seven,

0:45:15.120 --> 0:45:18.120
<v Speaker 1>solid front seven. They should have beaten the Giants the

0:45:18.239 --> 0:45:20.839
<v Speaker 1>first time they played. There was a bad turnover from

0:45:20.920 --> 0:45:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Allen late in that game that put the Giants up,

0:45:24.000 --> 0:45:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and still Washington had a chance to win it, but

0:45:26.040 --> 0:45:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Riverboat Roun decided to uh, you know, said to himself,

0:45:29.320 --> 0:45:31.560
<v Speaker 1>oh my nicknames riverboat run, I better go for two here.

0:45:31.880 --> 0:45:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Uh they shouldn't have. If they didn't get it, they

0:45:33.520 --> 0:45:35.839
<v Speaker 1>lose to the Giants. Uh two and a half. I'm

0:45:35.920 --> 0:45:39.600
<v Speaker 1>surprised this is lower than three. I guess three and

0:45:39.640 --> 0:45:42.320
<v Speaker 1>a half or four on guessing lines this week. I

0:45:42.640 --> 0:45:46.759
<v Speaker 1>really like Washington to the point that I'm almost considering

0:45:46.800 --> 0:45:48.640
<v Speaker 1>them as a sneaky I don't know what I'm doing

0:45:48.680 --> 0:45:50.640
<v Speaker 1>in Survivor. Let me just say that right now. I

0:45:50.760 --> 0:45:53.080
<v Speaker 1>have no idea what I'm picking in Survivor yet this week.

0:45:53.320 --> 0:45:57.919
<v Speaker 1>But Washington's actually in consideration, even though they too play

0:45:58.000 --> 0:46:00.840
<v Speaker 1>on Thanksgiving. So for me, it's washing. And this is

0:46:00.960 --> 0:46:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the last thing about this, a very tricky thing the

0:46:04.640 --> 0:46:07.759
<v Speaker 1>NFL schedulers did here to the Giants. The Giants aren't

0:46:07.800 --> 0:46:11.279
<v Speaker 1>a short week and Washington is off a bye, so

0:46:11.360 --> 0:46:13.879
<v Speaker 1>it's one of these situations where the Giants just get

0:46:14.120 --> 0:46:18.480
<v Speaker 1>royally hosed from a scheduling standpoint. So Washington for me

0:46:18.680 --> 0:46:21.239
<v Speaker 1>minus two and a half. You know that came into

0:46:21.320 --> 0:46:24.640
<v Speaker 1>effect in the playoffs last year when Minnesota went and

0:46:24.719 --> 0:46:27.080
<v Speaker 1>beat New Orleans in the first round in the wild

0:46:27.160 --> 0:46:29.920
<v Speaker 1>card game on a Sunday and then had to come

0:46:29.960 --> 0:46:32.120
<v Speaker 1>back and play at San Francisco Saturday. They had a

0:46:32.160 --> 0:46:34.720
<v Speaker 1>short week verst a bye weekend. Everybody loved that spot

0:46:34.800 --> 0:46:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and and the Niners killed him that they weren't a

0:46:37.200 --> 0:46:40.120
<v Speaker 1>better team. But it's you're right, It very rarely happens

0:46:40.160 --> 0:46:42.440
<v Speaker 1>that kind of a scheduling spot. That's very good memory

0:46:42.480 --> 0:46:47.719
<v Speaker 1>on that stuff. Okay, ed number three, number three, Let's

0:46:47.760 --> 0:46:52.239
<v Speaker 1>go to uh, Pittsburgh and Dallas and Uh, I'm gonna

0:46:52.239 --> 0:46:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna take the under in this game. I think

0:46:54.560 --> 0:46:56.520
<v Speaker 1>we've already discussed about how Dallas is not going to

0:46:56.600 --> 0:46:58.759
<v Speaker 1>score a lot of points against one of the best

0:46:59.160 --> 0:47:04.279
<v Speaker 1>defenses um in the NFL, and I completely agree with that,

0:47:05.040 --> 0:47:06.920
<v Speaker 1>but let's let's actually talk about the other side. So

0:47:07.000 --> 0:47:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh's offense um doesn't look particularly good by my numbers.

0:47:11.560 --> 0:47:13.759
<v Speaker 1>So when we look at success rate and adjust for

0:47:13.800 --> 0:47:17.880
<v Speaker 1>who you play, they're actually in the NFL, and Dallas's

0:47:17.920 --> 0:47:20.600
<v Speaker 1>defense rates out pretty well. I know that's hard to see,

0:47:20.680 --> 0:47:23.799
<v Speaker 1>but I think there's all it's not gonna show up

0:47:23.800 --> 0:47:25.480
<v Speaker 1>in other metrics, but their eleventh when I look at

0:47:25.480 --> 0:47:30.120
<v Speaker 1>adjusted success rate. Obviously Pittsburgh's gonna score points if turns

0:47:30.160 --> 0:47:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the ball over to him a lot of times. Um.

0:47:32.320 --> 0:47:35.560
<v Speaker 1>You know Lamar gifted them that pick six last week. Um,

0:47:36.440 --> 0:47:39.720
<v Speaker 1>but this is an ugly game that it's really hard. Uh.

0:47:40.320 --> 0:47:41.880
<v Speaker 1>It's really hard for me as the numbers guy, to

0:47:42.000 --> 0:47:43.919
<v Speaker 1>to use my numbers in this. So I'm just gonna

0:47:43.960 --> 0:47:47.319
<v Speaker 1>go with with um the fact that I just don't

0:47:47.360 --> 0:47:49.560
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of points in this game. I think

0:47:49.560 --> 0:47:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh has scored a lot of points, but the underlying

0:47:51.560 --> 0:47:53.640
<v Speaker 1>metrics are not good for them. I don't think Dallas

0:47:53.719 --> 0:47:55.799
<v Speaker 1>is gonna score I can see this. I can see

0:47:55.840 --> 0:47:57.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot not a lot of points happening in the

0:47:57.440 --> 0:48:00.799
<v Speaker 1>second half is when Pittsburgh's up like fourteen nothing uh

0:48:01.280 --> 0:48:03.920
<v Speaker 1>at halftime, So give me under forty one. I think

0:48:03.920 --> 0:48:05.600
<v Speaker 1>it's forty one and a half. That's what I'm seeing,

0:48:05.760 --> 0:48:10.000
<v Speaker 1>or at least about an hour ago when I looked. Uh, Actually,

0:48:10.040 --> 0:48:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I see as many forty two and a half as

0:48:12.600 --> 0:48:14.879
<v Speaker 1>I do forty one and a half, and barely any

0:48:14.960 --> 0:48:17.279
<v Speaker 1>forty twos. What do you see, Todd? I see a

0:48:17.320 --> 0:48:18.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of forty one and a half, but if you

0:48:18.640 --> 0:48:21.279
<v Speaker 1>want to give and then I think there's more forty

0:48:21.320 --> 0:48:24.640
<v Speaker 1>one and a half though, Yeah, well whatever whatever you

0:48:24.680 --> 0:48:26.000
<v Speaker 1>want to give me. I mean, I see this as

0:48:26.040 --> 0:48:30.279
<v Speaker 1>a very low scoring game. Um. And I think Pittsburgh's

0:48:30.280 --> 0:48:32.719
<v Speaker 1>defense is awesome, but I think they may be a

0:48:32.760 --> 0:48:35.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit overrated as a Super Bowl contender because of

0:48:35.320 --> 0:48:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the underlying metrics on offense. Um. Okay, I see forty

0:48:39.239 --> 0:48:41.000
<v Speaker 1>one and a half across the board. I was actually

0:48:41.040 --> 0:48:43.000
<v Speaker 1>looking at the wrong game. Forty one and a half

0:48:43.320 --> 0:48:48.120
<v Speaker 1>across the board. Dang yeah, sorry about yeah, I was

0:48:48.160 --> 0:48:51.720
<v Speaker 1>looking at the Monday night gave my mad um mikey

0:48:51.880 --> 0:48:55.560
<v Speaker 1>number three. I always try to come up with an over,

0:48:56.520 --> 0:49:00.279
<v Speaker 1>um because I just think that we still have caught

0:49:00.360 --> 0:49:04.360
<v Speaker 1>up with the trend with without crowd noise, without offensive

0:49:04.400 --> 0:49:07.520
<v Speaker 1>holding calls. I think these games still lean so far

0:49:07.920 --> 0:49:13.839
<v Speaker 1>far over. Um. I'm very tempted on this Titans game

0:49:13.920 --> 0:49:16.400
<v Speaker 1>to go over. I just I'm not a huge believer

0:49:16.560 --> 0:49:19.840
<v Speaker 1>in the Titans defense, but the Bears defense is pretty

0:49:20.120 --> 0:49:26.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. I don't know a study, Yeah, go ahead, yeah,

0:49:26.640 --> 0:49:30.200
<v Speaker 1>go ahead. That awayhead Todd just to help Mike out

0:49:30.280 --> 0:49:33.080
<v Speaker 1>give him had a tough week this week. There's been

0:49:33.080 --> 0:49:36.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot on his play. I would like to take

0:49:36.040 --> 0:49:38.919
<v Speaker 1>it over. I agree with Mike everything Mikey just said,

0:49:39.520 --> 0:49:42.239
<v Speaker 1>and I would like to take this year's Tampa Bay Bucks.

0:49:42.239 --> 0:49:43.920
<v Speaker 1>If you guys remember from last year, I was on

0:49:44.000 --> 0:49:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the over every single week with the Tampa Bay Bucks

0:49:46.200 --> 0:49:49.160
<v Speaker 1>because they will couldn't stop anyone, and they could score,

0:49:49.280 --> 0:49:51.880
<v Speaker 1>and Jamis gave you some extra bonus up pick sixes

0:49:51.920 --> 0:49:55.680
<v Speaker 1>as well. This year, my really nice over team, a

0:49:55.800 --> 0:49:59.680
<v Speaker 1>team that can never stop anyone and cannot be stopped themselves,

0:50:00.000 --> 0:50:04.600
<v Speaker 1>are the Russell Wilson led Seattle Seahawks. If you've noticed,

0:50:04.640 --> 0:50:07.040
<v Speaker 1>they are five and two to the over this year,

0:50:07.320 --> 0:50:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and the two games that didn't go over missed it

0:50:10.000 --> 0:50:13.920
<v Speaker 1>by a point twenty seven to twenty six in the

0:50:14.000 --> 0:50:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota game under fifty four by a point, and thirty

0:50:17.560 --> 0:50:20.239
<v Speaker 1>four twenty three in the Miami game under fifty five

0:50:20.360 --> 0:50:22.400
<v Speaker 1>by a point. Every other game has been over, and

0:50:22.480 --> 0:50:26.120
<v Speaker 1>these are going over in fifty games line fifty five,

0:50:26.239 --> 0:50:30.160
<v Speaker 1>fifty seven, fifty five, fifty four, crazy asked numbers, and

0:50:30.239 --> 0:50:33.120
<v Speaker 1>they still go over. Why do they go over? Because

0:50:33.239 --> 0:50:37.440
<v Speaker 1>DK metcalf is a based Russell Wilson is a beast.

0:50:37.560 --> 0:50:41.279
<v Speaker 1>You cannot stop these people. These people will score on

0:50:41.440 --> 0:50:45.160
<v Speaker 1>you from now until whenever two thousand twenty four til

0:50:45.239 --> 0:50:49.400
<v Speaker 1>next elector. I don't know. You cannot stop this football team. Conversely,

0:50:49.520 --> 0:50:52.040
<v Speaker 1>they can't stop anybody else. I don't know, if you watch.

0:50:52.160 --> 0:50:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they were pretty good, you know, while the

0:50:54.440 --> 0:50:56.680
<v Speaker 1>game was still in hand against San Francisco. But once

0:50:56.760 --> 0:50:58.960
<v Speaker 1>they got ahead by enough, they just stopped playing defense

0:50:59.000 --> 0:51:01.480
<v Speaker 1>as well, and they gave Nick Mullins or whoever that

0:51:01.719 --> 0:51:05.680
<v Speaker 1>was touchdowns at the end. Buffalo can move the football, folks.

0:51:05.960 --> 0:51:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo is not a terrible offensive team. I would put them,

0:51:10.160 --> 0:51:13.839
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, percentile to the top as far as

0:51:13.920 --> 0:51:16.800
<v Speaker 1>offense goes. I think Buffalo can move the football, and

0:51:16.840 --> 0:51:20.000
<v Speaker 1>against the paltry Seattle defense, they will move the football

0:51:20.239 --> 0:51:23.040
<v Speaker 1>and they will not stop Seattle. No one stops Seattle.

0:51:23.200 --> 0:51:25.680
<v Speaker 1>One other thing, I checked the weather. It's gonna be

0:51:25.840 --> 0:51:29.600
<v Speaker 1>mild and Buffalo about six and slightly sunny. Now whether

0:51:29.680 --> 0:51:32.240
<v Speaker 1>they will be wind or not, check your local listings.

0:51:32.480 --> 0:51:36.480
<v Speaker 1>But I still do think it will be very difficult

0:51:36.760 --> 0:51:39.319
<v Speaker 1>for this football game to stay under because both teams

0:51:39.320 --> 0:51:41.000
<v Speaker 1>are going to score the football. And by the way,

0:51:41.080 --> 0:51:43.640
<v Speaker 1>did I say DK metcalf is a beast. That guy

0:51:43.960 --> 0:51:47.920
<v Speaker 1>is incredible. I mean, that guy is unbelievable. There was

0:51:47.960 --> 0:51:50.799
<v Speaker 1>somebody who's asking, would you rather be run over by

0:51:50.960 --> 0:51:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Derrick Henry or be chased from behind? Chased down from

0:51:55.040 --> 0:51:58.880
<v Speaker 1>behind by DK Metcalf? What would you rather? I'd rather

0:51:59.000 --> 0:52:01.320
<v Speaker 1>be chased down by came Metcalf. What I mean? I

0:52:01.560 --> 0:52:03.440
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I'd be worried that I'd get tangled and

0:52:03.760 --> 0:52:07.160
<v Speaker 1>have another leg injury. So I'd rather just get That's

0:52:07.200 --> 0:52:10.040
<v Speaker 1>like two fifty pounds of Derrick Henry going right into you.

0:52:10.600 --> 0:52:12.440
<v Speaker 1>But you know what, I'll live to tell the tale.

0:52:13.000 --> 0:52:17.320
<v Speaker 1>The other one, man, I'm staid. Anyways, what's my number

0:52:17.400 --> 0:52:21.160
<v Speaker 1>on this Seattle? I'm going with you're over fifty five.

0:52:22.200 --> 0:52:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Over fifty five. That's the highest total on the board

0:52:25.120 --> 0:52:27.160
<v Speaker 1>this weekend in the NFL. Alright, Mike's let's go to

0:52:27.280 --> 0:52:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the Dome game in Atlanta Bronco's Falcons. What do you

0:52:30.560 --> 0:52:33.040
<v Speaker 1>got forty nine and a half or fifty fifty fifty?

0:52:33.120 --> 0:52:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I'll go over fifty there. Uh. You know the Denver

0:52:37.680 --> 0:52:40.120
<v Speaker 1>defense when it plays a quarterback that can throw the

0:52:40.160 --> 0:52:44.280
<v Speaker 1>ball forward other than Cam Newton, um I thought Fangio's

0:52:44.280 --> 0:52:46.960
<v Speaker 1>defense would be better this year. They're not great. Um,

0:52:47.360 --> 0:52:50.040
<v Speaker 1>you know twenty seven by the Chargers through uh through

0:52:50.160 --> 0:52:52.000
<v Speaker 1>really through two and a half quarters and then of

0:52:52.080 --> 0:52:55.320
<v Speaker 1>course Lynne stops playing. Uh, and you know Atlanta is

0:52:55.320 --> 0:52:56.880
<v Speaker 1>going to put points on the board and give them up.

0:52:56.920 --> 0:52:59.000
<v Speaker 1>So that's my play, all right? You are you concerned?

0:52:59.040 --> 0:53:02.600
<v Speaker 1>It all by the fact I have noticed a surprising

0:53:02.840 --> 0:53:06.400
<v Speaker 1>trend to Atlanta starting to actually play a little defense

0:53:06.480 --> 0:53:10.399
<v Speaker 1>for a change. Well, when you get Raheem Morris, Uh

0:53:11.040 --> 0:53:13.440
<v Speaker 1>that it also happened last year too when he got

0:53:13.520 --> 0:53:17.760
<v Speaker 1>promoted from when he got promoted from UM defensive backs

0:53:17.840 --> 0:53:20.640
<v Speaker 1>coach to coordinator and now to the head position. They

0:53:20.680 --> 0:53:22.440
<v Speaker 1>have a little bit more you know, of a focus

0:53:22.560 --> 0:53:26.200
<v Speaker 1>each time he gets more responsibility on the team. So yeah,

0:53:26.440 --> 0:53:28.760
<v Speaker 1>it's true. But they also that was a horrific effort

0:53:28.800 --> 0:53:31.920
<v Speaker 1>against but the Carolina the Carolina game, that was just

0:53:32.239 --> 0:53:34.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Matt Rule eliminated himself from Coach of the

0:53:34.719 --> 0:53:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Year consideration in one game. I thought last Thursday, UM,

0:53:39.200 --> 0:53:41.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't listen to the first two picks. I loved

0:53:41.800 --> 0:53:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore Washington. Uh, it's tough, I'll be honest, coming and

0:53:45.440 --> 0:53:47.640
<v Speaker 1>stepping down from that to three four and five in

0:53:47.680 --> 0:53:50.279
<v Speaker 1>a contest. But three is difficult enough as it is

0:53:50.400 --> 0:53:52.080
<v Speaker 1>right here. But I think I'm going to settle for

0:53:52.200 --> 0:53:57.640
<v Speaker 1>you ready for this the New York Jets. Wow, whoa

0:53:59.640 --> 0:54:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Oneday night, New York Jets? Because it's seven and a hook. Uh.

0:54:03.960 --> 0:54:06.120
<v Speaker 1>There is no other rhymor there. There's no rhymor reason

0:54:06.200 --> 0:54:10.680
<v Speaker 1>to this other than I believe this is the one

0:54:11.320 --> 0:54:14.200
<v Speaker 1>of two, the other one being Week seventeen, when it

0:54:14.239 --> 0:54:16.399
<v Speaker 1>could get squirrely and the Patriots have nothing to play

0:54:16.440 --> 0:54:18.239
<v Speaker 1>for against the Jets. I think this is one of

0:54:18.320 --> 0:54:20.520
<v Speaker 1>two games the Jets have a legit shot of winning

0:54:20.560 --> 0:54:26.480
<v Speaker 1>this year, and this is the quintessential Monday night standalone

0:54:26.600 --> 0:54:29.480
<v Speaker 1>game where those guys are like, you know what, We're

0:54:29.520 --> 0:54:32.440
<v Speaker 1>on national TV. This is our shot in the spotlight.

0:54:32.760 --> 0:54:35.279
<v Speaker 1>Let's play some football. And I think New England now

0:54:35.280 --> 0:54:37.439
<v Speaker 1>I realized they didn't have Edelman and Harry last week,

0:54:37.680 --> 0:54:40.680
<v Speaker 1>and that was obviously a huge downgrade for those guys.

0:54:41.320 --> 0:54:44.799
<v Speaker 1>Um checking on their status right now, I think they

0:54:44.840 --> 0:54:48.359
<v Speaker 1>are both playing Either way, I do not have any

0:54:48.440 --> 0:54:54.440
<v Speaker 1>confidence in Cam Newton being able to to actually get

0:54:54.560 --> 0:54:57.640
<v Speaker 1>this done. They'll win, I think in the end, the Patriots.

0:54:58.000 --> 0:54:59.920
<v Speaker 1>But seven and a half on the road on a

0:55:00.040 --> 0:55:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Monday night. It's Belichick versus Gaze everybody, and I'm taking

0:55:04.400 --> 0:55:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Gaze with the points silence on the set. I mean,

0:55:10.640 --> 0:55:14.480
<v Speaker 1>you could cover seven nothing final seven nothing final? You cover?

0:55:15.640 --> 0:55:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. To me, I don't like, I don't

0:55:18.040 --> 0:55:20.520
<v Speaker 1>love anything else. That's the one that I point to

0:55:20.560 --> 0:55:23.120
<v Speaker 1>where I can actually come up with the you know,

0:55:23.200 --> 0:55:25.799
<v Speaker 1>the reasoning. Again, I just think that that's the night

0:55:25.960 --> 0:55:28.400
<v Speaker 1>where these guys shine for the New York Jets. And

0:55:28.400 --> 0:55:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying they're winning. But if you give me

0:55:30.040 --> 0:55:32.000
<v Speaker 1>seven in the hook, which is what it is, I'm

0:55:32.040 --> 0:55:35.040
<v Speaker 1>all about it. That's my number three pick. I know

0:55:35.400 --> 0:55:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I might be sacrificing a pick, but that's the one

0:55:38.200 --> 0:55:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I like best. All Right, this is the Survivor time.

0:55:41.080 --> 0:55:44.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm the only one left here. No first teasers, guid teasers,

0:55:44.880 --> 0:55:48.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, teasers. We're all six and two. Ed. If

0:55:48.239 --> 0:55:52.719
<v Speaker 1>you had a two leg six point teaser of the week,

0:55:52.920 --> 0:55:56.480
<v Speaker 1>what would it be? Yeah, So, I mean I'll tease

0:55:57.080 --> 0:56:01.719
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore against Indie taking those points, and then I'll add

0:56:01.760 --> 0:56:04.480
<v Speaker 1>that New Orleans game that I talked in earlier. I'll

0:56:04.520 --> 0:56:08.400
<v Speaker 1>take New Orleans. So um, I agree, I think Baltimore

0:56:08.400 --> 0:56:09.960
<v Speaker 1>is a little undervalue here. I agree with what you

0:56:10.040 --> 0:56:13.000
<v Speaker 1>guys said earlier. I'm a little concerned about the Ronnie

0:56:13.000 --> 0:56:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Stanley injury. Um. And then I talked about the New

0:56:15.760 --> 0:56:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Orleans game earlier. So that'll be my two game teaser Baltimore,

0:56:19.960 --> 0:56:25.800
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans. What does what does Baltimore become Baltimore? No? No, no,

0:56:26.560 --> 0:56:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the other through the zero and Ed doesn't care about

0:56:30.040 --> 0:56:32.239
<v Speaker 1>teasing through the zero you did last week. No, I

0:56:32.239 --> 0:56:34.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't tease the zero. I thought you did in life.

0:56:35.239 --> 0:56:37.080
<v Speaker 1>In life. I thought I heard that you said you've

0:56:37.120 --> 0:56:39.160
<v Speaker 1>teased through the zero and the Saints in real life.

0:56:39.480 --> 0:56:42.560
<v Speaker 1>In real life. Yeah, that's what I mean in real life.

0:56:42.640 --> 0:56:46.000
<v Speaker 1>That's correct. I did, and it worked out. It's going

0:56:46.080 --> 0:56:48.520
<v Speaker 1>to Ed's going to Baltimore plus four in New Orleans

0:56:48.600 --> 0:56:50.480
<v Speaker 1>plus ten. Yeah. It wasn't my pick though, but yes

0:56:50.560 --> 0:56:55.080
<v Speaker 1>I did. Alright, So Baltimore and New Orleans for young

0:56:55.280 --> 0:57:01.279
<v Speaker 1>Ed Fang Mikey. I'm gonna take the Chiefs down, uh

0:57:01.640 --> 0:57:03.160
<v Speaker 1>to four and a half? Is that? What is it?

0:57:03.320 --> 0:57:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Ten and a half? Four and a half. I'm gonna

0:57:05.040 --> 0:57:08.000
<v Speaker 1>take the Chiefs down, and I'm gonna tease the Razors

0:57:08.120 --> 0:57:10.239
<v Speaker 1>Raiders up to plus six. I thought we were gonna

0:57:10.239 --> 0:57:15.640
<v Speaker 1>have the same one. Okay, Raiders and Chiefs or Mike Todd.

0:57:17.200 --> 0:57:21.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna take the green Bay Packers to beat the

0:57:22.200 --> 0:57:26.440
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco whoever is playing, Bobby Bethard or whoever's grandson

0:57:26.560 --> 0:57:28.800
<v Speaker 1>is playing. I don't know who's playing, but I'm gonna

0:57:28.840 --> 0:57:31.080
<v Speaker 1>to take green Bay. Just give me the win, green Bay,

0:57:31.120 --> 0:57:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and I'm gonna go with Ed's Houston team to win.

0:57:34.920 --> 0:57:37.400
<v Speaker 1>And I think I have to lay in Houston because

0:57:37.640 --> 0:57:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Ed was laying what was Ed laying on that game?

0:57:40.520 --> 0:57:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Six and a half? Right? I take Houston down to

0:57:43.880 --> 0:57:47.400
<v Speaker 1>point five. Houston just has to win me the football game.

0:57:47.520 --> 0:57:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay just has to win me the football game

0:57:50.040 --> 0:57:52.600
<v Speaker 1>by more than point five of a point, which I

0:57:52.680 --> 0:57:56.200
<v Speaker 1>think is possible. And that's what I'll take Green Bay.

0:57:56.240 --> 0:57:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking one of years and one of yours green

0:57:57.840 --> 0:58:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Bay in Kansas City for me, green Bay kadsay green

0:58:00.840 --> 0:58:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Bay to essentially win Kansas City down to four and

0:58:03.400 --> 0:58:05.400
<v Speaker 1>a half against Carolina. I don't like the tennant half,

0:58:05.440 --> 0:58:07.160
<v Speaker 1>but I sure like the four and a half. All right,

0:58:07.240 --> 0:58:09.800
<v Speaker 1>A survivor want me to give you the list of

0:58:09.840 --> 0:58:11.640
<v Speaker 1>who you've taken so far. I mean, I remember, but

0:58:11.680 --> 0:58:13.480
<v Speaker 1>if you want to say it just for a public consumption,

0:58:13.560 --> 0:58:18.360
<v Speaker 1>go ahead. If people care. GIL so far has used Tennessee, Cleveland,

0:58:18.440 --> 0:58:22.320
<v Speaker 1>New England, Tampa Bay, Arizona, Miami, Buffalo, and Kansas City

0:58:22.400 --> 0:58:24.320
<v Speaker 1>last week. This is going to be a GIL. I

0:58:24.400 --> 0:58:26.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know, and that's the honest. This is the first

0:58:26.840 --> 0:58:28.880
<v Speaker 1>week where I'm not really sure because there are Thanksgiving

0:58:28.920 --> 0:58:32.480
<v Speaker 1>considerations with the circle rules, and I don't know my

0:58:32.640 --> 0:58:35.000
<v Speaker 1>my I can't you know, I can't use Green Bay.

0:58:35.240 --> 0:58:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I can, but I won't because I have them earmarked

0:58:38.800 --> 0:58:42.040
<v Speaker 1>for a subsequent week. But the choices then for me

0:58:42.360 --> 0:58:47.120
<v Speaker 1>become Washington because I just feel good about them, even

0:58:47.120 --> 0:58:49.160
<v Speaker 1>though that doesn't have anything to do with the spread

0:58:49.480 --> 0:58:51.760
<v Speaker 1>about Pittsburgh could use. I just get through the list

0:58:51.800 --> 0:58:52.880
<v Speaker 1>and then I can tell you all of them. Then

0:58:52.920 --> 0:58:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you can come Washington. Houston is a possibility against Jake

0:58:58.080 --> 0:59:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Luton again and the Jacksonville Jaguy years, but again the

0:59:00.800 --> 0:59:02.840
<v Speaker 1>self loathing if I lose on Houston will be off

0:59:02.880 --> 0:59:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the charts, and I don't want to feel that way

0:59:04.160 --> 0:59:08.760
<v Speaker 1>about myself. UM. Pittsburgh obviously is the is the most

0:59:08.800 --> 0:59:11.680
<v Speaker 1>obvious choice to touchdown favorites against either Cooper Rusher Garrett

0:59:11.680 --> 0:59:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Gilbert of the Cowboys. Pittsburgh has Thanksgiving implications as well,

0:59:15.040 --> 0:59:19.560
<v Speaker 1>because they play on Thanksgiving. Uh, and then uh, I

0:59:19.640 --> 0:59:22.160
<v Speaker 1>think that's Oh, then it's it's I gotta watch for

0:59:22.280 --> 0:59:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Matthew Stafford. Is Matthew Stafford going to play or not?

0:59:26.000 --> 0:59:29.880
<v Speaker 1>The thing is the deadline of Survivor maybe before I

0:59:30.000 --> 0:59:33.640
<v Speaker 1>have that information, but Minnesota might be. If I knew

0:59:33.680 --> 0:59:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Stafford wasn't playing, I might take the Vikings. So the

0:59:37.640 --> 0:59:41.160
<v Speaker 1>problem again, the problem with Survivor is Thanksgiving implications. And

0:59:41.640 --> 0:59:44.600
<v Speaker 1>it's so tough to make a map that those of

0:59:44.680 --> 0:59:46.800
<v Speaker 1>us who have played Survivor for years always do map

0:59:46.800 --> 0:59:48.400
<v Speaker 1>out who you're gonna play from week to week because

0:59:48.400 --> 0:59:51.840
<v Speaker 1>there's just COVID considerations, there's all kinds of things going

0:59:51.880 --> 0:59:53.720
<v Speaker 1>on until you have your big chart. Did you make

0:59:53.760 --> 0:59:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the big chart? Not? The first six weeks I didn't.

0:59:56.240 --> 0:59:57.920
<v Speaker 1>But then after the first six weeks I tried. I

0:59:58.040 --> 1:00:00.240
<v Speaker 1>was like, Okay, here's what I'm doing. And then you

1:00:00.320 --> 1:00:02.840
<v Speaker 1>just realized, like I wouldn't have considered Minnesota. I wouldn't

1:00:02.840 --> 1:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>have considered Houston. Who's playing if Stafford doesn't? Is it Blower,

1:00:06.360 --> 1:00:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Chase Dan Chase, Jase Daniel. I think it's Chase Daniel.

1:00:13.200 --> 1:00:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Different different of course. Alright, final two questions, are we there? Yeah?

1:00:16.600 --> 1:00:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Final two questions? All right? Of the big favorites on

1:00:18.960 --> 1:00:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the board. Wait, so you're not telling us who you're

1:00:20.680 --> 1:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>taking it. You're just gonna just pass. There's I don't

1:00:23.600 --> 1:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know the answer to the quick He'll he'll

1:00:25.160 --> 1:00:29.520
<v Speaker 1>tweet it. He'll tweet it for the followers, for the records,

1:00:29.800 --> 1:00:32.160
<v Speaker 1>he will, he will know. I'm not gonna keep it

1:00:32.280 --> 1:00:34.560
<v Speaker 1>done that before where he wasn't sure on Thursday. Oh wait,

1:00:34.600 --> 1:00:36.120
<v Speaker 1>what happens when I'm like in the if let's say

1:00:36.120 --> 1:00:38.200
<v Speaker 1>I got to the final ten and then everybody else

1:00:38.280 --> 1:00:39.920
<v Speaker 1>knows my pick, Like, you can't do it. No, you

1:00:40.000 --> 1:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>can't do Yeah, you can tweet it out at three

1:00:41.720 --> 1:00:44.520
<v Speaker 1>o'clock once the picks are all right. Uh, these are

1:00:44.520 --> 1:00:46.400
<v Speaker 1>the big favorites. Who's the most likely to lose outright?

1:00:46.480 --> 1:00:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay seven point favorites tonight against San Francisco depleted

1:00:49.800 --> 1:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Niners team. Um, should I include Tennessee? No, that might

1:00:53.800 --> 1:00:56.320
<v Speaker 1>be too easy. Ten and a half, Kansas City over

1:00:56.440 --> 1:00:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Carolina Houston six and a half or seven point favorites.

1:01:00.040 --> 1:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Call it six ahead. Let's call it six and a

1:01:01.560 --> 1:01:07.600
<v Speaker 1>half at Jacksonville and Luton UM Pittsburgh fourteen point favorites

1:01:07.640 --> 1:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>at Dallas, and then New England seven and a half

1:01:10.480 --> 1:01:12.400
<v Speaker 1>point favorites at the Jets. Who's the mic most likely

1:01:12.440 --> 1:01:15.640
<v Speaker 1>to lose that, right? Ed? Oh, definitely green Bay. I

1:01:15.680 --> 1:01:17.400
<v Speaker 1>mean I can see a scenario where they go into

1:01:17.440 --> 1:01:20.360
<v Speaker 1>this game tonight. H San Francisco's defense has been good

1:01:20.440 --> 1:01:23.560
<v Speaker 1>despite the injuries, and they just kind of crammed the

1:01:23.680 --> 1:01:26.760
<v Speaker 1>ball down Green Bay's throat and Mike Petton doesn't adjust.

1:01:27.640 --> 1:01:30.720
<v Speaker 1>So probably not gonna happen, but I can I can

1:01:30.760 --> 1:01:36.040
<v Speaker 1>definitely see a scenario where that game goes that way. Yeah, great,

1:01:37.200 --> 1:01:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't want to agree with that. I

1:01:39.040 --> 1:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>think that's why you won't agree, But I don't. I don't.

1:01:43.040 --> 1:01:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I think he's making excellent points, and I actually could see,

1:01:46.040 --> 1:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I could, I could envision exactly what he's saying right now,

1:01:49.080 --> 1:01:51.920
<v Speaker 1>because I'm probably gonna play that Packers tease for in

1:01:52.000 --> 1:01:54.720
<v Speaker 1>real life too, So I'm gonna I'm gonna cry and

1:01:54.800 --> 1:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna be a big baby when it does happen,

1:01:57.000 --> 1:01:59.240
<v Speaker 1>And I hope you're wrong, but I could sort of

1:01:59.320 --> 1:02:01.400
<v Speaker 1>see it. How at the Bears. Can't the Bears beat

1:02:01.440 --> 1:02:03.360
<v Speaker 1>the Titans? Well that way, I didn't include that on

1:02:03.400 --> 1:02:05.480
<v Speaker 1>purpose because I knew every I think everybody would pick that.

1:02:09.800 --> 1:02:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Then maybe I'll say Jets. Maybe I don't know, can

1:02:14.440 --> 1:02:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the Jets win a game? Come on, that's what I'm

1:02:17.000 --> 1:02:19.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna say. I'm gonna say New England, which out goes

1:02:20.040 --> 1:02:22.120
<v Speaker 1>with my plus seven and a half to some degree.

1:02:22.320 --> 1:02:25.360
<v Speaker 1>All right, last question. We live in a bizarro world again.

1:02:25.440 --> 1:02:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Four teams on byes here, the four teams that are

1:02:28.160 --> 1:02:32.320
<v Speaker 1>on the by are pardon me, pardon me. Four teams

1:02:32.320 --> 1:02:38.200
<v Speaker 1>on the bye would be the uh Cleveland Brown, Cincinnati Bengals,

1:02:38.320 --> 1:02:41.240
<v Speaker 1>l A Rams, and Philadelphia Eagles. We're spared from another

1:02:41.280 --> 1:02:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Eagle's tobacle. If you had to pick a side in

1:02:44.720 --> 1:02:47.360
<v Speaker 1>each of these remaining fourteen games, but you've got one

1:02:47.600 --> 1:02:49.960
<v Speaker 1>free passed, what does the game you want no part of?

1:02:50.040 --> 1:02:54.280
<v Speaker 1>On the side you know I'm gonna pass on Pittsburgh Dallas.

1:02:54.320 --> 1:02:56.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is a game for the way I

1:02:56.160 --> 1:02:59.080
<v Speaker 1>think about, how to account for whoever the heck Dallas

1:02:59.160 --> 1:03:02.160
<v Speaker 1>is going to put in at the quarterback position. I've

1:03:02.200 --> 1:03:05.280
<v Speaker 1>talked about how I don't necessarily believe with Pittsburgh on

1:03:05.360 --> 1:03:08.040
<v Speaker 1>offense and what Dallas is doing. I think that was

1:03:08.160 --> 1:03:10.760
<v Speaker 1>doing some decent things with the underlying metro on defense.

1:03:10.800 --> 1:03:13.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna pass on that game, Mike. You know I

1:03:13.960 --> 1:03:17.080
<v Speaker 1>will pass on the Dolphins Cardinals. We always picked the

1:03:17.160 --> 1:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>same game, and only because we've the sample size with

1:03:20.360 --> 1:03:23.280
<v Speaker 1>two is so short. I'm not willing to make a

1:03:23.400 --> 1:03:26.520
<v Speaker 1>King David like pronouncement. Is Todd that about his effectiveness

1:03:26.560 --> 1:03:28.360
<v Speaker 1>at this point. So I'm gonna pass on that kid.

1:03:28.480 --> 1:03:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I didn't, Mike. All I said is let's not jump,

1:03:31.320 --> 1:03:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's not get excited. This is what I don't like

1:03:34.040 --> 1:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>when these talking heads anoint people after nothing, you know,

1:03:38.440 --> 1:03:40.600
<v Speaker 1>so let's just relax. Maybe two is going to be

1:03:40.720 --> 1:03:43.400
<v Speaker 1>freaking amazing, but he didn't show it last week. That's

1:03:43.440 --> 1:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>for god darn sure. And I think that's a sane,

1:03:46.360 --> 1:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>rational opinion, which you agree with me when I'm giving

1:03:49.440 --> 1:03:52.640
<v Speaker 1>sane rational opinions in the South Point Sports book over

1:03:52.760 --> 1:03:55.240
<v Speaker 1>and over to the dunderheads over there, and you know

1:03:55.440 --> 1:03:57.600
<v Speaker 1>you agree with He's just winding you up, Todd. That's

1:03:57.600 --> 1:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>what you don't shy Trump voter. That's the shy Trump

1:04:01.560 --> 1:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>voter that you don't get me started. Don't get me

1:04:04.160 --> 1:04:07.760
<v Speaker 1>started with the shy Trump voter. Uh, that's the same

1:04:07.840 --> 1:04:10.680
<v Speaker 1>game I picked. By the way, Miami Arizona. I could

1:04:10.720 --> 1:04:12.400
<v Speaker 1>see this going if you told me again, if you

1:04:12.480 --> 1:04:14.320
<v Speaker 1>told me after the fact now that Miami won this

1:04:14.440 --> 1:04:16.560
<v Speaker 1>game by double digits, if you told me Arizona did,

1:04:16.880 --> 1:04:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I would be equally unsurprised. Todd, Just so everyone knows,

1:04:22.040 --> 1:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>I was not making a political statement earlier. I was

1:04:24.440 --> 1:04:27.640
<v Speaker 1>just making a comment about the fact that me and

1:04:27.760 --> 1:04:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Mikey were texting on election night and it looked and

1:04:31.040 --> 1:04:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Trump went from like plus one eighty to all of

1:04:33.720 --> 1:04:36.640
<v Speaker 1>a sudden like minus four hundred or something ridiculous. And

1:04:36.760 --> 1:04:39.280
<v Speaker 1>I just said to Mike, Okay, maybe Trump won, Mikey,

1:04:39.360 --> 1:04:42.400
<v Speaker 1>but I didn't see any news about Michigan or or

1:04:42.440 --> 1:04:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Wisconsin or Pennsylvania. So why is everyone immediately jumping to

1:04:45.960 --> 1:04:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the conclusion that Trump already won. This is just for

1:04:48.880 --> 1:04:51.400
<v Speaker 1>betting purposes. I'm not talking about topical because I could

1:04:51.440 --> 1:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>go on and on for forever about political dodger speaking

1:04:54.040 --> 1:04:56.760
<v Speaker 1>my language. Uh. Gil did a two hour show on

1:04:56.920 --> 1:04:59.120
<v Speaker 1>this this morning. I did a one hour show on it.

1:04:59.560 --> 1:05:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I did a I did a forty five minute thing

1:05:01.720 --> 1:05:06.480
<v Speaker 1>on it election day, and then a PostScript autopsy on

1:05:06.600 --> 1:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>it yesterday. But I was in uh. Andrew Gryfe, who

1:05:10.000 --> 1:05:11.960
<v Speaker 1>rights for the l A Times, was kind enough to

1:05:12.040 --> 1:05:15.480
<v Speaker 1>have me in a piece about the election, and I

1:05:15.680 --> 1:05:18.040
<v Speaker 1>said I, and I said it yesterday to you guys

1:05:18.120 --> 1:05:22.240
<v Speaker 1>via text too, Like Mayweather McGregor, I think we will

1:05:22.320 --> 1:05:25.280
<v Speaker 1>look back on this election as one of the big

1:05:25.400 --> 1:05:29.920
<v Speaker 1>betting anomalies of our lifetime because the pre flop numbers

1:05:31.000 --> 1:05:33.600
<v Speaker 1>were what they were, and by the way, unless Biden

1:05:33.800 --> 1:05:36.120
<v Speaker 1>turns Georgia, we're doing this Thursday morning, so we don't

1:05:36.160 --> 1:05:39.960
<v Speaker 1>know yet. Unless he turns Georgia, Arizona was minus one

1:05:40.360 --> 1:05:42.440
<v Speaker 1>minus one fifteen, So let's throw that one out. The

1:05:42.600 --> 1:05:46.160
<v Speaker 1>pre flop state by state numbers and the general election numbers,

1:05:46.640 --> 1:05:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the state by state will have gone forty nine and

1:05:48.840 --> 1:05:53.400
<v Speaker 1>oh favorites and the general election would then fall to

1:05:53.480 --> 1:05:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden. But my point was is that the live

1:05:57.000 --> 1:06:02.120
<v Speaker 1>betting of the election was the most irrational market we

1:06:02.320 --> 1:06:05.080
<v Speaker 1>have ever seen. So for those of us who always

1:06:05.120 --> 1:06:09.440
<v Speaker 1>believed in betting markets right, this was a anomaly for

1:06:09.600 --> 1:06:13.160
<v Speaker 1>the ages where people who are supposedly sharp betters and

1:06:13.200 --> 1:06:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the most shart betters in the world bet elections. They

1:06:16.480 --> 1:06:19.800
<v Speaker 1>lost their minds. They lost their minds. It's like they

1:06:19.920 --> 1:06:23.720
<v Speaker 1>bet their heart. And of course, pardon parcel with that

1:06:23.920 --> 1:06:27.360
<v Speaker 1>is they had the muscle memory from sixteen that polluted

1:06:27.400 --> 1:06:31.880
<v Speaker 1>their thinking. So they immediately thought to themselves, wait a minute, Uh,

1:06:32.280 --> 1:06:36.479
<v Speaker 1>here's what happened four years ago. Uh the poll said

1:06:36.560 --> 1:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>one thing. Florida turned. Oh my god, it's happening all

1:06:40.040 --> 1:06:44.320
<v Speaker 1>over again. Completely different scenario in reality, because then it

1:06:44.600 --> 1:06:47.960
<v Speaker 1>was rational because we only had the polls to to

1:06:48.080 --> 1:06:50.439
<v Speaker 1>tell us otherwise. And Florida and all the Rust Belt

1:06:50.480 --> 1:06:53.520
<v Speaker 1>states turned towards Trump all at the same time. This year, though,

1:06:53.560 --> 1:06:55.680
<v Speaker 1>it's as if my buddy Joe Peter put it this way,

1:06:55.840 --> 1:06:58.240
<v Speaker 1>because he agrees with me entirely. He said, it's as

1:06:58.320 --> 1:07:01.760
<v Speaker 1>if people were lie, I'm betting a a sixty minute

1:07:01.840 --> 1:07:06.680
<v Speaker 1>football game. Um after the game. The game had already

1:07:06.720 --> 1:07:09.000
<v Speaker 1>been played, but they were bet they were live betting it,

1:07:09.520 --> 1:07:12.440
<v Speaker 1>and they were being given five minute chunks, and they

1:07:12.480 --> 1:07:15.160
<v Speaker 1>were betting it one way. Had they rearranged those five

1:07:15.240 --> 1:07:18.920
<v Speaker 1>minutes snippets, the entire betting experience would have been totally different.

1:07:19.560 --> 1:07:22.520
<v Speaker 1>And it also no, no one's and so yesterday. But

1:07:22.640 --> 1:07:24.920
<v Speaker 1>by the way, we have a mutual friend who who

1:07:24.960 --> 1:07:26.960
<v Speaker 1>seems to think he knows everything about such things, and

1:07:27.000 --> 1:07:32.280
<v Speaker 1>he couldn't be more wrong, couldn't be more wrong anyways. No,

1:07:32.440 --> 1:07:34.920
<v Speaker 1>but I just want to say that they didn't It

1:07:35.040 --> 1:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>was rational. Their craziness was rational because the polls were

1:07:38.520 --> 1:07:41.400
<v Speaker 1>wrong last time and moved it safe from plus four

1:07:41.520 --> 1:07:44.840
<v Speaker 1>to Trump barely winning. This time, the polls wrong again

1:07:44.960 --> 1:07:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the same amount, but it wasn't enough. But no, it's

1:07:49.000 --> 1:07:51.880
<v Speaker 1>irrational in the sense that all the pre flops went

1:07:52.000 --> 1:07:55.840
<v Speaker 1>forty nine and oh and they knew those numbers. And

1:07:55.960 --> 1:07:58.160
<v Speaker 1>that's that's my point. It's like and by the way,

1:07:58.240 --> 1:08:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Rex Buyers, who works at the West Game, he's still

1:08:00.920 --> 1:08:02.640
<v Speaker 1>work there, and I don't know, I don't know. It

1:08:02.720 --> 1:08:05.240
<v Speaker 1>may be different this week. I don't know. But you

1:08:05.320 --> 1:08:09.360
<v Speaker 1>know he's he's done these elections offshore. He knows better

1:08:09.400 --> 1:08:11.680
<v Speaker 1>than anybody. He says the same thing. I am the

1:08:11.920 --> 1:08:15.560
<v Speaker 1>sharpest betters in the world. It's like they lost their minds.

1:08:16.240 --> 1:08:18.840
<v Speaker 1>It is the It's the most fascinating thing I've ever seen.

1:08:19.560 --> 1:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>But Gil, I do want to point out that, like

1:08:22.120 --> 1:08:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you, right, Like, I think we should

1:08:24.000 --> 1:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>recognize how good the pre flop markets were, especially compared

1:08:27.120 --> 1:08:29.760
<v Speaker 1>to all the models, um, which you know makes a

1:08:29.840 --> 1:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>model or like me, unhappy. But that's beside the point.

1:08:32.560 --> 1:08:35.479
<v Speaker 1>The other thing that should be recognized about what happened

1:08:35.520 --> 1:08:37.840
<v Speaker 1>with the craziness of those models is that Trump was

1:08:37.920 --> 1:08:40.160
<v Speaker 1>up pretty big and and I don't know about big,

1:08:40.280 --> 1:08:42.680
<v Speaker 1>but he was up in Wisconsin and Michigan and and

1:08:43.040 --> 1:08:45.400
<v Speaker 1>and and he's still up in Pennsylvania. Right. So, like

1:08:45.680 --> 1:08:48.920
<v Speaker 1>you had that kind of bias data set where you

1:08:49.000 --> 1:08:50.800
<v Speaker 1>were getting more of the voters that we're going to

1:08:50.920 --> 1:08:52.840
<v Speaker 1>vote for him because they, you know, went to the

1:08:52.880 --> 1:08:55.920
<v Speaker 1>polls on Pole Day, and you had this extra factor

1:08:56.000 --> 1:08:58.160
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of the votes that we're going to

1:08:58.200 --> 1:09:00.920
<v Speaker 1>be for Biden we're coming in mail being counted later

1:09:01.000 --> 1:09:03.559
<v Speaker 1>in those states because you know, those states couldn't count

1:09:04.080 --> 1:09:07.080
<v Speaker 1>those votes. You're right it, but that that's what Joe

1:09:07.200 --> 1:09:09.479
<v Speaker 1>was talking about when he talks about the five minutes snippets.

1:09:09.520 --> 1:09:11.599
<v Speaker 1>And if you had rearranged them, Let's say the counties

1:09:11.680 --> 1:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>that hadn't been cast right had been cast earlier, or

1:09:14.320 --> 1:09:16.439
<v Speaker 1>the mail ins if it was just in reverse order,

1:09:16.800 --> 1:09:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the entire behavior would have shifted, and so for them

1:09:20.200 --> 1:09:22.600
<v Speaker 1>not to know or to do any research into what

1:09:22.840 --> 1:09:27.800
<v Speaker 1>counties had not yet been cast is completely mishukas well.

1:09:27.880 --> 1:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>I I think there's a lot to that because the

1:09:30.400 --> 1:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>results of Florida were shocking, both in terms of what

1:09:34.240 --> 1:09:36.760
<v Speaker 1>was projected by the polls beforehand, and that was also

1:09:36.800 --> 1:09:39.280
<v Speaker 1>another state where the markets were right on that Trump

1:09:39.320 --> 1:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>should have been the favorite, and the margin was kind

1:09:41.400 --> 1:09:45.320
<v Speaker 1>of shocking. But I also think like just not understanding

1:09:45.479 --> 1:09:47.160
<v Speaker 1>that the mail and votes were going to come in

1:09:47.280 --> 1:09:49.640
<v Speaker 1>later and that it was far from over in the

1:09:49.760 --> 1:09:52.560
<v Speaker 1>three keys Midwest states. I think that has to be

1:09:52.600 --> 1:09:55.160
<v Speaker 1>at least a little bit of what happened late on

1:09:55.240 --> 1:09:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday night, right. But it's still for me, still falls

1:09:58.320 --> 1:10:01.719
<v Speaker 1>under the general category of people who are otherwise really

1:10:01.960 --> 1:10:08.160
<v Speaker 1>smart betters not figuring that out. Is there's and maybe

1:10:08.280 --> 1:10:10.680
<v Speaker 1>that's a Donald Trump effect, maybe you know, I don't know.

1:10:10.760 --> 1:10:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that's just a historical anomaly that will not exist

1:10:14.200 --> 1:10:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the next time. I don't know, but it's perspective. It

1:10:17.160 --> 1:10:20.560
<v Speaker 1>was incredible. The only thing it reminded me of the

1:10:20.720 --> 1:10:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Colts Steelers playoff game back with Peyton Manning in two

1:10:24.400 --> 1:10:27.280
<v Speaker 1>thousand and six Stealers were up about fourteen three or

1:10:27.360 --> 1:10:31.639
<v Speaker 1>twenty one three, and um Paula Malu intercepted and jumped

1:10:31.720 --> 1:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>up and didn't get touched down. Do you remember that game?

1:10:34.280 --> 1:10:37.280
<v Speaker 1>And then Big Ben Fumble gave the ball to Bettest

1:10:37.400 --> 1:10:39.439
<v Speaker 1>to end the game at the two yard line, and

1:10:39.520 --> 1:10:42.040
<v Speaker 1>he fumbled the ball, and then the Colts guy starts

1:10:42.080 --> 1:10:44.840
<v Speaker 1>running the other way and Ben makes a miracle tackle

1:10:45.080 --> 1:10:48.240
<v Speaker 1>in the playoff game. You remember this? And then Vanderjack

1:10:48.320 --> 1:10:50.559
<v Speaker 1>missed the field goal. It was that was the only

1:10:50.680 --> 1:10:54.040
<v Speaker 1>thing I could even compare it to. Slightly. The Steelers

1:10:54.080 --> 1:10:57.040
<v Speaker 1>were like minus eight hundred and then went to plus

1:10:57.120 --> 1:11:00.760
<v Speaker 1>one seventy about ten minutes later in the most incredible,

1:11:01.000 --> 1:11:03.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, turnaround game of all time. You don't remember

1:11:03.439 --> 1:11:05.719
<v Speaker 1>that game? Deal, I don't know. I just don't understand.

1:11:05.720 --> 1:11:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand why of all games, that one is

1:11:08.160 --> 1:11:11.840
<v Speaker 1>interesting because which money line It switched money lines so

1:11:12.479 --> 1:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>drastically it's such a short period of time. But again

1:11:15.479 --> 1:11:17.639
<v Speaker 1>that's not that's not the point. I mean, tennis matches

1:11:17.760 --> 1:11:20.560
<v Speaker 1>money line switched drastically all the time. The point is.

1:11:20.840 --> 1:11:23.560
<v Speaker 1>The point is the difference between the pre flop and

1:11:23.680 --> 1:11:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the live betting. That is the most bizarre thing. This

1:11:28.080 --> 1:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>would This would be like a football team was up,

1:11:32.240 --> 1:11:35.280
<v Speaker 1>was it was favored by a dollar eighty favorite, and

1:11:35.360 --> 1:11:37.120
<v Speaker 1>they took the opening kick and went down and kicked

1:11:37.160 --> 1:11:38.439
<v Speaker 1>the field goal, and all of a sudden the other

1:11:38.479 --> 1:11:40.960
<v Speaker 1>team became minus four dollars. I mean, then nothing happened

1:11:41.000 --> 1:11:43.479
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't expected to your point, except that the game,

1:11:44.520 --> 1:11:49.000
<v Speaker 1>except that the Joe p It's like, but the Joe Peter.

1:11:49.080 --> 1:11:51.160
<v Speaker 1>The thing is, it's it's different than a sporting event, right,

1:11:51.200 --> 1:11:54.240
<v Speaker 1>because this was like the sporting event had already been played.

1:11:54.920 --> 1:11:58.080
<v Speaker 1>They ignored the pre flop number, they were fed information

1:11:58.160 --> 1:12:00.120
<v Speaker 1>in a certain order. It's just like, it's unlike the

1:12:00.200 --> 1:12:03.160
<v Speaker 1>sequencing what this was all about the sequencing of the count.

1:12:03.600 --> 1:12:06.639
<v Speaker 1>And but it wasn't as if every network wasn't explaining

1:12:06.680 --> 1:12:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the sequencing of the count and how all the later

1:12:09.360 --> 1:12:12.800
<v Speaker 1>numbers would favor Biden exactly exactly. It's not like the

1:12:12.920 --> 1:12:17.639
<v Speaker 1>information wasn't there. That's what so bizarre. Anyway, what game

1:12:17.680 --> 1:12:21.160
<v Speaker 1>do you want? No part of Todd? I don't know,

1:12:21.320 --> 1:12:26.439
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City. Okay, there you go. Great stuff. Well this

1:12:26.600 --> 1:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>was fun. This was just great. Yeah, I'm sorry. Something

1:12:29.360 --> 1:12:32.120
<v Speaker 1>had to be said about the most incredible election betting.

1:12:32.920 --> 1:12:34.400
<v Speaker 1>I sure it did, but it had to be done

1:12:34.439 --> 1:12:38.840
<v Speaker 1>in a politically critical kind of way. It's going to

1:12:38.880 --> 1:12:42.840
<v Speaker 1>be the craziest election thing wherever gonna see. And I

1:12:42.880 --> 1:12:45.519
<v Speaker 1>will know because I will only point to the fact

1:12:45.600 --> 1:12:49.160
<v Speaker 1>that at one point in the in March, you could

1:12:49.200 --> 1:12:51.519
<v Speaker 1>have gotten Biden at like ten to twelve to one

1:12:51.680 --> 1:12:55.040
<v Speaker 1>to become the Democratic nominee. Do you guys remember when

1:12:55.080 --> 1:12:58.000
<v Speaker 1>he was dead like he was dead, yes, like he

1:12:58.040 --> 1:13:01.920
<v Speaker 1>hadn't even he hadn't showed in the first three states,

1:13:02.600 --> 1:13:06.599
<v Speaker 1>and this was before South Carolina voted. I don't disagree

1:13:06.640 --> 1:13:09.240
<v Speaker 1>with I don't disagree with an arc over the course

1:13:09.280 --> 1:13:11.360
<v Speaker 1>of a campaign. I mean, I had Biden from earlier

1:13:11.439 --> 1:13:14.920
<v Speaker 1>this year plus money, you know too, I don't disagree

1:13:14.960 --> 1:13:16.840
<v Speaker 1>with that. We'll see that again. I just don't know

1:13:16.960 --> 1:13:19.760
<v Speaker 1>that we'll see what happened on the day itself be

1:13:20.040 --> 1:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>so distanced from reality, I don't know. I feel like

1:13:26.200 --> 1:13:28.320
<v Speaker 1>if anything is going to be so distanced from reality,

1:13:28.400 --> 1:13:31.479
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a political market. Well, okay, maybe,

1:13:31.560 --> 1:13:33.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean maybe that's and that's I think the distinction

1:13:34.120 --> 1:13:36.960
<v Speaker 1>that sports bettors need to make. Sports bettors who who

1:13:37.000 --> 1:13:40.920
<v Speaker 1>show fealty to betting markets as the king need to

1:13:41.160 --> 1:13:44.960
<v Speaker 1>finally realize that this is not that you know, that's

1:13:45.080 --> 1:13:47.519
<v Speaker 1>that's what's interesting about it. Yeah, yeah, but some of

1:13:47.800 --> 1:13:50.720
<v Speaker 1>yet some of it was so good, right right, It's yeah,

1:13:50.800 --> 1:13:52.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a really interesting thing to pars out,

1:13:53.280 --> 1:13:57.080
<v Speaker 1>especially as like I'm continuing, like reloading predicted to see

1:13:57.120 --> 1:13:59.200
<v Speaker 1>what that market is saying about these last four states.

1:14:00.120 --> 1:14:01.439
<v Speaker 1>By the way, what is it as we as we

1:14:01.800 --> 1:14:04.000
<v Speaker 1>sit here right now, Gil, Do you agree with me

1:14:04.080 --> 1:14:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Gil though that the overreaction was a response to Miami

1:14:07.080 --> 1:14:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Dade County or no, I don't know all I maybe

1:14:11.680 --> 1:14:14.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe it was, Maybe it wasn't it was. Certainly it

1:14:14.479 --> 1:14:17.400
<v Speaker 1>was certainly again I believe it's muscle memory from right.

1:14:17.439 --> 1:14:20.160
<v Speaker 1>All of that was in the Ghoulash, as you would say, Todd,

1:14:20.640 --> 1:14:23.479
<v Speaker 1>that there was like, oh, this is happening again. And

1:14:24.040 --> 1:14:26.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think people were I don't think people were

1:14:26.200 --> 1:14:28.880
<v Speaker 1>using their heads. I really don't. I agree with you, Todd,

1:14:28.960 --> 1:14:33.080
<v Speaker 1>and that people extrapolated how well he did in Dade

1:14:33.120 --> 1:14:36.040
<v Speaker 1>County with a largely Cuban vote to say, oh my god,

1:14:36.120 --> 1:14:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the polls were all wrong again in every state in

1:14:38.080 --> 1:14:40.679
<v Speaker 1>the Union. And by the way, the polls were wrong,

1:14:40.840 --> 1:14:44.880
<v Speaker 1>but the problem was Biden was up too much. Ed

1:14:45.000 --> 1:14:47.120
<v Speaker 1>you were going to say, well, I'm just saying, like

1:14:47.200 --> 1:14:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the polls were pretty often Texas, UM, right, Like Trump

1:14:51.160 --> 1:14:53.720
<v Speaker 1>ended up winning by eight points, where the polls that

1:14:53.800 --> 1:14:56.599
<v Speaker 1>he went by two. You know, like I think Biden

1:14:56.720 --> 1:15:02.519
<v Speaker 1>was ahead in UM, North Carolina, you know, states like

1:15:02.600 --> 1:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>that too. So like I think, I mean, I think,

1:15:05.080 --> 1:15:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I think there was enough wrong with the polls that, like,

1:15:07.720 --> 1:15:10.679
<v Speaker 1>I understand why some veddors would think, oh, this happened

1:15:10.680 --> 1:15:14.360
<v Speaker 1>in Florida, this happened in Miami Dade County. The polls

1:15:14.400 --> 1:15:16.479
<v Speaker 1>were off as much as they were in two thousand sixteen.

1:15:17.880 --> 1:15:19.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to forget about the fact that the late

1:15:19.680 --> 1:15:22.280
<v Speaker 1>coming votes are Biden in the Midwest, the states that

1:15:22.360 --> 1:15:25.200
<v Speaker 1>had counted, and and go crazy, We're kind of saying

1:15:26.840 --> 1:15:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Poles were off as much as well. We're all I mean,

1:15:31.120 --> 1:15:33.720
<v Speaker 1>that's I'm not saying that I agree with that. I

1:15:33.800 --> 1:15:36.280
<v Speaker 1>think just wrapping it up, I think that that's what

1:15:36.479 --> 1:15:39.000
<v Speaker 1>makes this so interesting. The polls were way off, like

1:15:39.240 --> 1:15:41.920
<v Speaker 1>r I P polls right, at least at least with

1:15:42.080 --> 1:15:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Trump elections. R I P. Poles Um, maybe it's a

1:15:45.200 --> 1:15:48.360
<v Speaker 1>specific dynamic to him, the mischiu goss of the of

1:15:48.479 --> 1:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the live betting market. The fact that we probably need

1:15:51.720 --> 1:15:54.479
<v Speaker 1>to have a conversation no matter who wins this election ultimately,

1:15:54.520 --> 1:15:56.680
<v Speaker 1>because we're here on Thursday morning on the doorstep, but

1:15:56.720 --> 1:15:58.760
<v Speaker 1>we don't have an official winner yet. The fact that

1:15:58.840 --> 1:16:01.080
<v Speaker 1>we need to have a conversation about the electoral college

1:16:01.120 --> 1:16:04.400
<v Speaker 1>in this country. Right, you can't have three elections of six.

1:16:04.840 --> 1:16:06.960
<v Speaker 1>If if Trump were to win this, it would be

1:16:07.000 --> 1:16:09.759
<v Speaker 1>the third election in six where the popular vote winner loses.

1:16:10.280 --> 1:16:13.120
<v Speaker 1>We can't have that happen fifty percent of the time.

1:16:13.560 --> 1:16:17.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think people can disagree. Um, and political what's

1:16:17.920 --> 1:16:21.360
<v Speaker 1>that That sounds like an awfully political statement. No, it's not, No,

1:16:21.439 --> 1:16:24.400
<v Speaker 1>it's not. That's I believe that's a structure of the

1:16:24.479 --> 1:16:28.600
<v Speaker 1>nation that's not political. And more and yeah, and the

1:16:28.680 --> 1:16:31.519
<v Speaker 1>fourth thing is I think the interesting other thing is

1:16:31.640 --> 1:16:36.000
<v Speaker 1>some networks projected things quicker than others. Right, So Fox

1:16:36.320 --> 1:16:40.559
<v Speaker 1>actually gave by Arizona like the AP did. CNN still hasn't.

1:16:40.600 --> 1:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>As we do this on Thursday morning, people could have

1:16:43.080 --> 1:16:45.360
<v Speaker 1>been watching one and not the other, and it still

1:16:45.439 --> 1:16:48.519
<v Speaker 1>hasn't given him. Ohio I mean, Anna is very reticent

1:16:48.600 --> 1:16:50.800
<v Speaker 1>to declare anything. You know, Todd, it should be noted

1:16:50.880 --> 1:16:54.160
<v Speaker 1>because you often bring up Iowa the poll that's right

1:16:54.240 --> 1:16:57.920
<v Speaker 1>every one of these presidential elections. Yes, that's the best poll.

1:16:58.000 --> 1:17:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Every other poll had Iowa a pick or one way

1:17:01.200 --> 1:17:03.120
<v Speaker 1>or the other. They had Trump eight. They were right,

1:17:03.160 --> 1:17:05.479
<v Speaker 1>and they do this every other They're the most accurate

1:17:05.520 --> 1:17:08.600
<v Speaker 1>poll in every election. I've heard a lot about the

1:17:08.680 --> 1:17:11.680
<v Speaker 1>more and I couldn't agree with you more on that one. Ed.

1:17:12.040 --> 1:17:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry we got more than we bargained for here

1:17:13.840 --> 1:17:16.240
<v Speaker 1>on today's show. I hope you didn't mind our election talk.

1:17:17.360 --> 1:17:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I think I think what happened with the betting markets

1:17:20.439 --> 1:17:22.639
<v Speaker 1>in the elections is one of the most fascinating things.

1:17:22.760 --> 1:17:24.479
<v Speaker 1>And if you bet on sports, how can you not

1:17:24.680 --> 1:17:28.080
<v Speaker 1>be interested in that? Thank you right, thank you? Just

1:17:28.280 --> 1:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>why I brought it up. You'd be amazed at how

1:17:30.120 --> 1:17:32.840
<v Speaker 1>many people who claim to be sports bettters take the

1:17:32.920 --> 1:17:38.680
<v Speaker 1>position otherwise cracks me up, or sports networks they think

1:17:38.720 --> 1:17:41.360
<v Speaker 1>they think sticking to sports is the way to go,

1:17:41.479 --> 1:17:43.559
<v Speaker 1>and I just disagree with I think there's nothing, there's

1:17:43.680 --> 1:17:46.080
<v Speaker 1>nothing more fascinating than what we just witnessed this year.

1:17:46.600 --> 1:17:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I agree with that. If there was, they were betting

1:17:49.000 --> 1:17:52.679
<v Speaker 1>on simulations of Madden. Okay, when there was no sports,

1:17:52.720 --> 1:17:56.679
<v Speaker 1>they were betting on simulations of a computer football game. Okay,

1:17:57.000 --> 1:18:00.160
<v Speaker 1>now that are you kidding me? They're getting there. They're

1:18:00.160 --> 1:18:03.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna they're gonna criticize because of politics they're betting on Madden.

1:18:04.240 --> 1:18:05.599
<v Speaker 1>I do. I mean, I don't know who you're talking

1:18:05.600 --> 1:18:09.080
<v Speaker 1>about specifically, but meaning sports betters are going to give

1:18:09.080 --> 1:18:13.639
<v Speaker 1>you ship for for talking political betting when they when

1:18:13.680 --> 1:18:15.400
<v Speaker 1>there was no sports, they were willing to bet on

1:18:15.439 --> 1:18:18.240
<v Speaker 1>a computerized football. So my yeah, my point is the

1:18:18.280 --> 1:18:20.280
<v Speaker 1>sports bettors. I hang out with all of them. That's

1:18:20.320 --> 1:18:22.680
<v Speaker 1>all we talked about. What's political betting? All year long?

1:18:22.880 --> 1:18:27.160
<v Speaker 1>That's all we talked about, just because sociologically betting market wise,

1:18:27.240 --> 1:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>just fascinating sort of case study. Um, all right, more

1:18:31.160 --> 1:18:33.320
<v Speaker 1>than something wanted bargain for. I hope you didn't mind

1:18:33.320 --> 1:18:38.000
<v Speaker 1>our our foray into election talk. Fascinating to me, fascinating

1:18:38.280 --> 1:18:40.599
<v Speaker 1>ed that's all that we uh. When do I get

1:18:40.640 --> 1:18:43.920
<v Speaker 1>to talk quantum physics with you and the illusionary nature

1:18:44.000 --> 1:18:48.080
<v Speaker 1>illusory nature of reality? Who you want? Man? You know

1:18:48.120 --> 1:18:50.880
<v Speaker 1>where to find me? Okay, I have to get your

1:18:51.000 --> 1:18:53.439
<v Speaker 1>your your info from Gil because you sound like an

1:18:53.479 --> 1:18:55.479
<v Speaker 1>interesting kind of I think we're I think we're connected

1:18:55.520 --> 1:18:59.639
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, so hit me up whenever. Alright. For Mike Palm,

1:18:59.720 --> 1:19:01.679
<v Speaker 1>I had to explain it to Gil, but he doesn't

1:19:01.720 --> 1:19:04.360
<v Speaker 1>get it. It's over God. Here we go from Mike

1:19:04.479 --> 1:19:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Palm for Todd wishnem and our and our guest, Ed.

1:19:06.920 --> 1:19:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much, man, appreciate the time. Hey, thanks

1:19:10.040 --> 1:19:12.880
<v Speaker 1>so much for having me. Thank you so much. Ed

1:19:12.960 --> 1:19:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Fang from the Power Rank and I buried the headline

1:19:15.439 --> 1:19:18.679
<v Speaker 1>with Ed and the father of lovely kids, the oldest

1:19:18.720 --> 1:19:21.200
<v Speaker 1>of which Eli is a said his name is that

1:19:21.240 --> 1:19:23.120
<v Speaker 1>okay if I said his name? Oh yeah, that's fine,

1:19:23.120 --> 1:19:28.000
<v Speaker 1>all right, burgeoning star, greatest looking kid, smartest kid you'll

1:19:28.040 --> 1:19:30.800
<v Speaker 1>ever find. So, Ed, you're doing well there. Congratulations to

1:19:30.840 --> 1:19:33.160
<v Speaker 1>you and your wife. Thank you all for listening. Good

1:19:33.240 --> 1:19:35.600
<v Speaker 1>luck with all your picks this week. Week nine in

1:19:35.720 --> 1:19:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. Thanks so much,