WEBVTT - Surveillance: Vaccine Rollout With Dr. Cacchione

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>jay Ley. We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg Patty

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:29.159
<v Speaker 1>Chad joins us. Now, I kind of a security has

0:00:29.160 --> 0:00:32.080
<v Speaker 1>had a macro strategy. Pizza. What a couple of weeks

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>this has been. Are you leaning into this, leaning into

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:37.520
<v Speaker 1>some of the euphoria that we can all fail. Yeah,

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:39.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little bit cautious. I think we have to

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:42.080
<v Speaker 1>make it through Testa's inclusion. I think a lot of

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:45.160
<v Speaker 1>this band aid stimulus has already been priced in, So

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm leaning into a little bit and I still really

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:50.800
<v Speaker 1>expect a big rotation where they have not stocks do well,

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:53.479
<v Speaker 1>because next year I expect stimulus, but I expect, you know,

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 1>proper stimulus where we really focus on job creation, where

0:00:57.320 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get a big bang for the buck, may

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>be involved in a structure bank at public private. So

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I view this current stimulus it's nice, but it's nowhere

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 1>near sufficient for what we need to get real economic growth. Well,

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:10.959
<v Speaker 1>let's get the policy coal right first, and then we

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 1>can get to the market code. The policy code this

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:15.040
<v Speaker 1>year has just been the only code to get right,

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:17.479
<v Speaker 1>and then you've absolutely now the rest of it lated

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:20.559
<v Speaker 1>to risk. The policy call. You called this an aid,

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:24.679
<v Speaker 1>band aid patriots n night billion. What's on offer today?

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Is that a band aid? These days? Unfortunately it is.

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 1>As we're shutting down more and more businesses, I think

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:32.039
<v Speaker 1>you have to make sure those people receive some sort

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 1>of compensation. So this is more just to keep things going.

0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:38.120
<v Speaker 1>And as I see it, and we're not seeing true

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:40.400
<v Speaker 1>economic spending where we're going to get real growth. We're

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 1>not seeing enough spending towards rebuilding, manufacturing, fixing some of

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 1>our infrastructure, making sure we catch up and surpass other

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 1>countries on five G technology. So that's what I expect

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 1>to happen next year, and that's where we'll get the

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 1>real boost. This for now, I think is really just

0:01:55.960 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 1>covering up the problems that are coming from this resurgence

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 1>and COVID cases. Covering put the problems. Is that enough

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 1>to justify the rally that we've seen on the heels

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 1>of expected support financially from Washington, d C and potentially

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the end of the pandemic at some point next year. Yeah,

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 1>I think we're reasonably priced. I think the market's kind

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 1>of figured out the pandemic. We have to make it

0:02:15.200 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>through this struggle right now, but ultimately, with vaccines and

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>treatments and everything improving, we will get through. At some

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 1>point next year, the economis will look very good. And

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>that's why again, even today, you're starting to see some

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 1>of the you know, small caps value stocks continue to

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>outperform big tech as this belief sinks in that, hey,

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:35.959
<v Speaker 1>we will have something that resembles a normal economy. It

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 1>won't be worked from home necessarily, it won't be going

0:02:38.200 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 1>back to the office. But there's a lot going on.

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of reason for optimism. There will be

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:45.960
<v Speaker 1>ongoing Central Bank support. I think the Treasury Department will

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 1>work well with the Fed. So I don't think we're

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>miss priced. I just think we're doing for a little

0:02:49.760 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 1>pull back, especially surrounding this Tesla inclusion in the SMP,

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>which occurs at the closed Friday. Okay, so we'll get

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 1>to Tesla perhaps, But I'm wondering about Airbnb and door

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Dad and some of these other I p o s

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>that are coming out with valuations that are reminiscent of

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the tech bubble. I mean, the idea that they doubled

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:10.240
<v Speaker 1>in price. Does it give you a feeling of froth

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:13.919
<v Speaker 1>or is this also reasonably valued? You know? I think

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 1>that's typical for these sorts of very hot I p

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>o s where you don't necessarily want to squeeze every

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:22.359
<v Speaker 1>last sign out. You're only releasing a small number of shares,

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:24.959
<v Speaker 1>so it sounds like the company maybe left money on

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:26.959
<v Speaker 1>the table, but the bulk of their shares are still

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of held in reserve that they can issue going forward.

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:32.080
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not worried about that. I think there's been

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of you know, hyperactive trading. We do see

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these small accounts participating. Whether these prices

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>all last or not, it's a little bit you know,

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 1>up in the air. Um Again, I think this is

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 1>really going to depend on what we get in terms

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>of policy next year, and partly what we haven't talked

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>about is the negative potential or policy. Does do we

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 1>see tax increases again, especially at the corporate level, and

0:03:56.200 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>then some of these valuations might look a little bit

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>more frothy. Pitch think that comes on the type of

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 1>that conversation at some point twenty one. You know, we've

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 1>been looking at this market as we think Congress and

0:04:08.120 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the Senate and the President are going to try and

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 1>address the you know, everyone's been talking about this K

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 1>shape recovery, that downward slope with a K. I think

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:18.360
<v Speaker 1>that gets addressed, right, and that's all good. That's the positive,

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:20.920
<v Speaker 1>that's the stimulus. The question is that upward slope with

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 1>a K. Do they do something to punish that? Do

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 1>they say, hey, you've been really successful, so we want

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 1>to take something away from you, or do they let

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:31.279
<v Speaker 1>that slide. I think for the economy it's probably indifferent

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:33.280
<v Speaker 1>From markets, it's much better if they let it slide.

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot will hinge on that Georgia election

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 1>January five, paid it for you. Is that when you

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:43.040
<v Speaker 1>start to establish what your year out look really looks

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 1>like after that event? Yeah. I think right now we've

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:48.040
<v Speaker 1>got a base case of we're gonna get some decent

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:50.479
<v Speaker 1>amount of stimulus because I think the Republicans are on board.

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 1>They kind of failed to get any sort of stimulus done, which,

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, of all the things I would have expected

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 1>President Trump to be good at, it was building things

0:04:58.080 --> 0:05:00.360
<v Speaker 1>we did not get any infrastructure done. So I think

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:03.239
<v Speaker 1>some level that's gonna be done regardless of the outcome.

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:05.359
<v Speaker 1>I think the outcome is gonna switch how much so

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:08.239
<v Speaker 1>if the Democrats one was the more spending, I also

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 1>expected to switch the mix. So we'll see a much

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:15.920
<v Speaker 1>bigger environmental and sustainability focus if the Democrats win the Senate,

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:18.839
<v Speaker 1>I think less so if the Republicans retain the Senate. So,

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 1>given all this fiscal support that you're expecting and fiscal

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 1>stimulus actual stimulus next year, treasury yields, are we going

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 1>to see them above one percent? How high can they

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:31.720
<v Speaker 1>possibly get? No, I think we get them above one

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 1>percent fairly quickly. I'm kind of in the near term

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 1>called the next few weeks, thinking we're between one and

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>one and a quarter. I think it's hard to get

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:42.279
<v Speaker 1>much above even one fifty. I think the Federal Reserve

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:45.040
<v Speaker 1>will work very closely with the Treasury Department to control

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 1>any rise. And again, markets I think will be fine

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 1>if we see a rising treasury yield, so just as

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>long as it's not a rapidly rising treasury yield. So again,

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:57.599
<v Speaker 1>to me, that would really help these small economies, those cyclicals,

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 1>and probably less helpful for some of the big large

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:03.919
<v Speaker 1>tech fowls. Yelling and pal work in hand in hand

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>PA a chair granted catch ups, pitt a chair of

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Academy Securities pay their thanks for everything each year as well,

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:11.920
<v Speaker 1>have a fantastic Christmas. If we don't talk again, put

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 1>a chair their Meconomy Securities on this market. Bran Weinstein

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:23.039
<v Speaker 1>joined us now Morgan Stanley had a global fixed income. Brian,

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:24.920
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about the other event of the week. I'm

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>not even sure that Brexit is the top of the

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:29.839
<v Speaker 1>list for many people. This Wednesday is the Federal Reserve decision.

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>What are you looking for from the feed this Wednesday? Yeah,

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:36.480
<v Speaker 1>good morning, Jonathan, and good move on on breakfit rather

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 1>not talking about that, so that will be interesting. I mean,

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:42.039
<v Speaker 1>we think it's a real close call, um, you know,

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 1>fifty fifty, which is not I know it times we

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 1>get caught out. But at the end of the day

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 1>we think they probably won't go for for moving the

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:52.839
<v Speaker 1>the extension of the buying um, better to savor for later.

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:56.040
<v Speaker 1>If breads rise, better to savor for dry powder took

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:58.360
<v Speaker 1>to the world. We'll probably get some stimulus the equally

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>markets doing great break evenings are keeping higher. I think

0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 1>they'll give us some language. I think they're going to

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:07.559
<v Speaker 1>try to link more closely um to the average inflation target,

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>remind us they're not going to raise rates. There's a

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:11.280
<v Speaker 1>couple of things that they could do to tell us

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe when they'll look at this extension of of of

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the buying, the average maturity of the buying. But it's

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 1>a close call. They could do it. I don't think

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a huge deal if they don't, as long as

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 1>they give us some language and rates probably keep creeping higher. Well, Brian,

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned Brake Eaven's inflation expectations creeping higher. Do you

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 1>think that could be the green light phenomenal yields to

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 1>start to pick up through one percent, maybe towards your

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 1>targets through twenty one? Yeah, yeah, I think I think

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>that they could move higher. I mean three. Yeah, the

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>three seems a while away, um, but getting tenure notes

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 1>into the one percent range I think is a very

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 1>likely outcome. Do you look across the world of Australia

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 1>New Zealand, for example, We've seen raids start to creep

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 1>higher there even though the central banks have stayed dubbish. Um,

0:07:57.160 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 1>it just at some point isn't enough anymore and the

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>markets get rested us when you see growth, when you

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 1>see break evens. I think stimulus would be the last

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 1>piece of that in the US. Remember, we need stimulus, right,

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the output gap is still big. We still need growth

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 1>in twenty two to upset the lack of growth this year.

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Um So stimulus would be a big piece of getting

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 1>rates higher, along with the stead not being aggressive on

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:21.920
<v Speaker 1>extending their purchases. So let's talk about the consequences of

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 1>additional quantitative easing purchases, additional purchases by the Federal Reserve

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 1>of Treasuries and other central banks around the world. I

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 1>know Morgan Stanley has a forecast about two point eight

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars of bond purchases or as a purchases by

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the major central banks next year. How much of that

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:42.200
<v Speaker 1>has already been priced into riskier debt versus yet to

0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:46.200
<v Speaker 1>be really factored in. That's a great question, and one

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and one that we struggled with a lot. There's no

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 1>question that a lot of has been priced in, right,

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 1>we've we've I mean, how is stimulus not priced in?

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:54.199
<v Speaker 1>How is the vaccine not priced in? But the market

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 1>still enjoys when the when these events happen UM and lesten,

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it's done well and we do get the growth.

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 1>There's a reason to believe that this can continue. So

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:04.439
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to look at risk assets and said that

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:06.560
<v Speaker 1>none of this is known. The question I think is

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:09.200
<v Speaker 1>which risk assets does this help the most? And so

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 1>when you look at treasuries and you look at investment

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:14.440
<v Speaker 1>grade credit where the most help was given, that's probably

0:09:14.440 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 1>where the least upside is. When you look at the

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:19.559
<v Speaker 1>high old markets, the loan markets, the equity market UM,

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 1>some of the emerging markets on anything that benefage more

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:24.839
<v Speaker 1>weaker dollar UM. There are many many things that that

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>you can still have great outcomes in UM. You just

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:30.600
<v Speaker 1>have to have some of these actual actually come to fruition.

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of investment managers come on the show

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 1>and they say, well, it's time to pick particular bonds

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 1>and not necessarily indexes. And other people will say they're

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 1>talking their book because their active managers. Is this going

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:45.440
<v Speaker 1>to be a specific bond, specific company story where you

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 1>end up with certain defaults and others that do just fine,

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>or is this still an index story still a big

0:09:52.160 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 1>macro beta play on just more QUEUEI and more risk on.

0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:00.319
<v Speaker 1>As an active manager, we do like picking on and

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 1>certainly this has been a good year for for industries.

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Although listen, it's been a great year for for some

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:07.680
<v Speaker 1>stock pickers, right, some of those certain UM tech stocks

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and things like that advent tremendously well away from the

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 1>industries UM. But yes, I think if you stay in

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:14.960
<v Speaker 1>this world, whereas I said, treasuries and investment great credit

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:17.559
<v Speaker 1>have done the heavy lifting UM, and you're going to

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 1>go into these markets. Now, it's harder to buy an

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:21.679
<v Speaker 1>e M index. It's it's not as smart to buy

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 1>a high yield index. There are lots of active things

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:25.840
<v Speaker 1>that you should be doing in sectors that you should

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 1>be avoiding UM. So you know, the data play is

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:31.720
<v Speaker 1>probably UM towards the tail, and now some of the

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 1>bigger winners here will be more actively selected based on

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the outcomes of where the stimulus goes UM, Which EM

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 1>countries are stronger, which EM corporative that are balance sheets,

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:42.839
<v Speaker 1>Those things should matter more now that the data rally

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 1>is is at least mostly played out. Bran, let's just

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:48.200
<v Speaker 1>wrap things up there. I think it's really important to

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 1>that word avoid that you just used a lot of

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 1>people come on shows like this at the moment talking

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 1>about embracing cyclicality, any cyclicality, any cyclical aitiaes of this

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 1>market brand that you would avoid, you know, big thing.

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 1>To me, it's a lot harder because the cyclical nature.

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 1>It's just it's just a bit less cyclical. Um. I

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>think when I want, when I stay avoid some of

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 1>the things in data. When we look at the at

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the high high yield markets, we think there's still be

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 1>plenty of default right. We still have the energy problems

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 1>working through the system in a m there are still

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 1>plenty of countries um where where that matters and where

0:11:21.640 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 1>where stimulus is not getting to those countries and they

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:26.440
<v Speaker 1>can't do it because of their balance sheet. So I think, no,

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's anything in BIX income as a

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 1>as a sector that you need to avoid. I do

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 1>think it's much more micro, which makes it a little

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 1>bit harder to to go into in detail. Brown putting

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 1>into hear from you as always Brown Wainstein their moment, Stanley,

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:43.679
<v Speaker 1>thank you sir. The vaccinations begin this week. It is

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 1>a massive moment in the United States and joining us

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 1>now is Dr Joseph Catcher ascensioned Chief Medical Officer, Doctor,

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:53.080
<v Speaker 1>fantastic to get you with us on the program. Let's

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>just start first up, have you got the vaccine in house?

0:11:56.440 --> 0:12:00.120
<v Speaker 1>And talk me through how big this week is? Is

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 1>a big week nine months of of what we've been

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:05.679
<v Speaker 1>dealing with and what the public has been dealing with it.

0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>We're very excited our of the vaccines, how are arriving

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:13.719
<v Speaker 1>today on our many of our hospitals. We have a

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:17.719
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty hospitals across twenty states and are we

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 1>and just state vaccine deliveries today And we've been preparing

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>for that for the last eight weeks. We've had teams

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 1>working every day on the logistics and um and delivery

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:34.079
<v Speaker 1>of the vaccine. So we're really excited about this. We

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 1>feel this is the way to get us on the

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 1>other side of the pandemic. Well, how that's the case? Doctor,

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 1>When you look at the rollout, it's pretty clear to

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 1>everyone frontline workers the most at risk in society. First,

0:12:45.720 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the decisions on who to give it to in house

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:51.680
<v Speaker 1>first doctor, in the initial rollout the first few weeks,

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:53.719
<v Speaker 1>is that difficult? How do you come around making those

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:57.959
<v Speaker 1>kind of calls? You know, we we really have strongly

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 1>encouraged our employees to UM to get the vaccine UM,

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and our employees are stepping up just like they have

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>through the entire pandemic and are volunteering. We obviously can't

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:13.320
<v Speaker 1>vaccinate everybody in a single unit in the same day,

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 1>so frankly, we're just asking people to schedule their vaccine

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 1>with us, and we are managing that scheduling process just

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:26.600
<v Speaker 1>like we want any other appointment. Our frontline workers are

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:32.080
<v Speaker 1>really the hospital workers. Both nurses are, respiratory therapist, patient

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 1>care text. Those are the people that were prioritizing, and

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:39.160
<v Speaker 1>critical care nurses in particular, which really have bear a

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:41.560
<v Speaker 1>huge part of the brunt of this, as well as

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the respiratory therapists and patient care text We we really

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:48.680
<v Speaker 1>want to get them vaccinated early UM, and so we're

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 1>prioritizing that group. Our frontline physicians are also very important.

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:56.559
<v Speaker 1>Our critical care specialists are infectious disease specialists or polenologists.

0:13:56.840 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 1>We were just we're very excited for ways and really

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:04.079
<v Speaker 1>strongly encouraging them to get the vaccines. Dr Coketona, It's

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 1>interesting how the initial rollout will be viewed as a

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 1>template for the further and more extensive rollout that is

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:13.840
<v Speaker 1>expected perhaps in the first half of next year. How

0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 1>complicated is it logistically given the cold temperatures that you

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 1>have to keep the vaccine in addition to some of

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the other just typical vaccine logistical issues. You know, it's

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 1>um it is a challenge. You know, we have to

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 1>store between minus sixty and minus a d degrees. We

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 1>have to be prepared to receive the vaccines cold from Viser. UM.

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 1>I will say that Fiser. I've been on logistics calls

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 1>with the Visor folks. They've done an incredible job orchestrating

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 1>this since I'm very uh impressed at the way Fiser

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 1>has approached us. It has, uh it has posed a problem.

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:53.600
<v Speaker 1>We've had to go out and get a bunch of freezers,

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 1>some of those where we can't get freezers. Visor has

0:14:57.080 --> 0:15:00.240
<v Speaker 1>made it so that the shipping boxes that they come

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and can be recharged with dry ice and we can

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 1>store them in the shipping containers. So I think they

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 1>have done an incredible job doing that and providing us

0:15:11.800 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 1>backup plans in case freezer uh freezers were unavailable. As

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 1>you can imagine, it was hard to the number of

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 1>freezers that we need for health system our size. We're

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 1>getting there, but we're not quite there yet, which raises

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>a question about who pays for all of the extra

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 1>equipment that's required in order to roll this out in

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 1>effective way. I know there has been some money appropriated

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 1>that has not yet been passed in Washington, d C.

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Beyond your particular organization, a sense in hospitals and health

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 1>care facilities, is this going to be expensive? Who is

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 1>going to pay for it at the end of the day,

0:15:48.120 --> 0:15:50.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, as part of our health system. You know,

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 1>our CEO told us at the beginning, take care of

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 1>our associates, take care of our patients, and worry less

0:15:56.560 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 1>about the economics. Uh and a global pandemic like this,

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 1>with the number of people that have been affected by

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:06.520
<v Speaker 1>this and the number of lives lost, we have put

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:10.760
<v Speaker 1>our our patients and our associates first. And as for

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 1>that reason, UM, we haven't thought about that as much.

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 1>It is something that weighs on our mind over the

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:20.160
<v Speaker 1>long haul, but for the short term, we're really focused

0:16:20.160 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>on delivering this vaccine and UM and for us, we're

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 1>paying for it. You know, the government has provided us

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Care to Act funding, but we are paying for it

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 1>out of ascension and this is part of a a normal

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 1>business for us. Their technologies to come up all the

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 1>time that we have to pay for before somebody actually

0:16:38.440 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 1>reimburses us. So this is just part of a normal

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 1>business for us. And um, you know, our commitment to

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 1>this is overwhelming, to say the least. So just before

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 1>we let you run, I think a massive issue over

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the last nine months, you know, has been compliance around

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>social distancing, mosque wearing, et cetera. It's not just about

0:16:56.960 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the first vaccination. You've got to get to come back.

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 1>They've got to come back for the second, the second hit.

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:04.359
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be hard enough to get people to

0:17:04.359 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 1>step up for the first one. Can you walk me

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 1>through the kind of techniques the marketing around this that

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>you think is effective that you'd like to say in

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the coming months. Yeah, it's really about education, education, education,

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:20.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, and we have significant issues in um, some

0:17:20.840 --> 0:17:24.119
<v Speaker 1>of our populations that have trust issues. UM, you know,

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 1>we have the Black African American population, Hispanic population that

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:30.520
<v Speaker 1>have trust issues with the medical community. We have to

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:33.639
<v Speaker 1>continue to educate, we have to be culturally sensitive, we

0:17:33.720 --> 0:17:36.359
<v Speaker 1>have to use our leaders are our Hispanic leaders and

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 1>our Black African American leaders to actually help educate those

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 1>populations to give them the trust to get this vaccine,

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:46.600
<v Speaker 1>because it's a very important The more vulnerable you are

0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:50.960
<v Speaker 1>to illness, the more the sicker you are um, the

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 1>more likely this vaccine is to help you. Uh, And

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 1>so we have to get that message out. It's going

0:17:55.880 --> 0:17:59.920
<v Speaker 1>to be about education, education, education, And I just want

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:02.359
<v Speaker 1>emphasize one of the things, you know, as part of

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 1>this whole thing we've been we've been absorbed with with COVID,

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:08.640
<v Speaker 1>but there is a secondary pandemic that's out there right now,

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:11.399
<v Speaker 1>and that is people are avoiding care, avoiding coming to

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 1>our hospital. We're strongly encouraging people only to seek the vaccine,

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 1>but also to continue to seek care for other medical donta.

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 1>We would love to continue the conversation with you through

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 1>the next couple of weeks and the next several months

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:26.199
<v Speaker 1>this rollout and really picks up to catch on that.

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much joining us now as low to

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:35.640
<v Speaker 1>rite FS Investments chief economist Allow, right, if you could

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 1>build on that, that that would be fantastic what you're looking

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:41.440
<v Speaker 1>for this Wednesday. Yeah, you know, so, I agree. I

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 1>think you know they've talked about wanting to do something

0:18:43.320 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 1>fairly soon. I think they are going to try to

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:48.919
<v Speaker 1>be more specific about locking in those forward expectations and

0:18:49.240 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 1>continued financial market support and economic support. I think something

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 1>that we really forget is if we look back at

0:18:56.640 --> 0:19:00.400
<v Speaker 1>prior expansions. We don't know when this recession is going

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 1>to end, but if you kind of look back ann

0:19:02.119 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 1>and they one two thousand one, the FED was actively

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:10.119
<v Speaker 1>cutting interest rates in the first eighteen months of those expansions,

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Like they are really used to actively supporting an economy

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:15.360
<v Speaker 1>as we're coming out of a recession. And I don't

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 1>think it's a it's a you know, it's not a coincidence.

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 1>If you look back in two thousand and nine, interest

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 1>rates towards zero, you know, puts them in a sticky

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:27.960
<v Speaker 1>spot where they can't really you know, do that traditional support.

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 1>So the most active quantitative easy that we really got

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:34.359
<v Speaker 1>was two thousand eleven and two thousand thirteen, Like that

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:37.399
<v Speaker 1>is just a sign of how, you know, years into

0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the expansion, they were still having to support our economy.

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 1>So I really think obviously very different recessions, very different

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:49.640
<v Speaker 1>expansions I would expect, But the point is that they

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:52.679
<v Speaker 1>are really gearing markets up for the idea that they

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 1>are going to have to be accommodating them for years

0:19:55.600 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 1>to come. And I think Mike's point is important. Markets

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 1>love to look for a change, They to be forward looking,

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:05.719
<v Speaker 1>and you know, they're not worried about changing expectations right

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 1>now the rate hike. They're worried about those five year

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:10.960
<v Speaker 1>forward expectations and any kind of YO curb st deepening.

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:13.359
<v Speaker 1>They want to make sure to sit on that. Laura,

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:15.439
<v Speaker 1>this is a really important point, the idea that the

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 1>FED is run out of a lot of ammunition, given

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 1>where rates are, given how much money has already been

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 1>pumped into the system by their monetary policies. Are you

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:27.400
<v Speaker 1>suggesting that based on where they are, based on their ammunition,

0:20:27.840 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 1>they're not being easy enough that they're not necessarily increased

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 1>their increasing their purchases enough to support the expansion as

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:39.119
<v Speaker 1>they have in the past, just based on where we

0:20:39.200 --> 0:20:42.120
<v Speaker 1>are and how receptive the market is to their measures

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 1>at Lisa, That's that's a tricky question because it goes

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:47.920
<v Speaker 1>both ways, like what more can they do? I mean,

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I think they have actively said now they're they're all

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 1>really squawking when Venusians trying to shut down the main

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 1>street lending facility. You know, I think they would acknowledge

0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:01.920
<v Speaker 1>that they want to do more and that they really

0:21:02.480 --> 0:21:06.119
<v Speaker 1>are upset that some of those pathways to impact the

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 1>economy directly might be taken away. You know, I think

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 1>they feel very comfortable that they can help financial conditions.

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:18.880
<v Speaker 1>The question is what that's really doing for the main

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:22.919
<v Speaker 1>street economy. So um that I think that's really the issue.

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:26.680
<v Speaker 1>But absolutely I think they will argue that they need

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 1>to be doing more, They want to be doing more,

0:21:29.200 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 1>and that you know, as to your point, they kind

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:35.680
<v Speaker 1>of run out of traditional mechanisms, so you know, how

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:37.920
<v Speaker 1>creative can they get? They are really pushing the envelope.

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:41.159
<v Speaker 1>In the meantime, you're flicking at the economy and the

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 1>hurt that's currently out there. We're gonna be getting retail

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:45.359
<v Speaker 1>sales later this week, as John was talking about in

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the unemployment UH filings as well on Thursday. What are

0:21:50.040 --> 0:21:53.040
<v Speaker 1>you looking for? How close our way to a double

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:56.360
<v Speaker 1>dip versus the expansion that people are already pricing in.

0:21:57.560 --> 0:22:00.159
<v Speaker 1>I think we're pretty close. Uh. And again that's a

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:04.159
<v Speaker 1>typical during you know, longer downturns that we get you know,

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:06.440
<v Speaker 1>sub quarters the rise sub quarters fall as certainly don't

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:08.879
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to be another que two. But you know,

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:11.160
<v Speaker 1>think about you know, we were so used to looking

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:13.399
<v Speaker 1>at seasonally adjusted data, we forget that when it's not

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:18.439
<v Speaker 1>seasonally just in so much spending activity and hiring takes

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 1>place in this holiday period, so we're already seeing claims

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:24.879
<v Speaker 1>move in the other direction. We're seeing, um, you know,

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:27.919
<v Speaker 1>we've already seen auto sales down in November, so I

0:22:27.920 --> 0:22:31.400
<v Speaker 1>think we're gonna see a decline in November retail sales

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 1>and December. I think, you know, you can really get

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:39.200
<v Speaker 1>some pain just inflicted upon the fact that normally seasonal

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 1>hiring is you know, plus five million in December when

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:47.640
<v Speaker 1>it comes to you know, retail facilities and holiday shopping.

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:52.400
<v Speaker 1>So the December numbers could, just because of technical reasons,

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 1>look pretty ugly. So I think it's you know, whether

0:22:57.280 --> 0:23:00.439
<v Speaker 1>quarterly GDP you end up splitting it across to orders,

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 1>you don't actually get into negative territory. We have a

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>resilient consumer, resilient businesses. Those are that's the best that

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:08.800
<v Speaker 1>we can hope for to power us through when I

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:11.880
<v Speaker 1>think it's really a tricky time for the economy. But

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 1>when you look at hiring. You know you're seeing those

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 1>permanent layoffs increase. I think that's a that's going to

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:21.880
<v Speaker 1>be a concern going forward, Laurie, I mentioned retail salves.

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 1>A negative print may be on Wednesday. A lot of

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 1>people agree with you. We're looking for negative zero point

0:23:26.400 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 1>three month on month on the headline number claims the

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 1>day after you mentioned claims as well. Claims have been

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:34.680
<v Speaker 1>moving in the wrong direction the last couple of weeks,

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:38.439
<v Speaker 1>As you say, Laura, claims haven't exactly given you a

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:41.359
<v Speaker 1>clear read on where payrolls might go because there's just

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 1>been this massive churn in the U. S economy. How

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:45.919
<v Speaker 1>useful do you think that is as an indicator for

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 1>what's happening in this economy right now? I think you know,

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:53.399
<v Speaker 1>I always call it in your claims the canary in

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the full line. I feel like the direction that it takes,

0:23:56.200 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 1>how fast it moves, really has enormous predictive hour. But

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 1>it has been very hard and it's really stymied a

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:07.639
<v Speaker 1>lot of us because you can't draw the claims in

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:10.480
<v Speaker 1>terms of just plugging in as an exogenous factor into

0:24:10.560 --> 0:24:14.160
<v Speaker 1>your model to get the employment number. Has really weakened

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:17.440
<v Speaker 1>in that regard, So I still think it's important to

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 1>watch claims. That number last week really confirmed what we expect,

0:24:21.040 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 1>which is that, you know, we've seen the mobility data

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 1>shrinking a little bit, whether or not communities are imposing

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:31.040
<v Speaker 1>lockdowns or whether people are just selecting to be uh

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 1>to stay at home, or either way, you know, we're

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:37.360
<v Speaker 1>seeing some slowdown and economic activity, you know, in November

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 1>and most likely in December. So I think claims are

0:24:40.800 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 1>still a critical indicator. But it's just to your point,

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:47.640
<v Speaker 1>it's making that that monthly payroll forecasts a lot more

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:49.720
<v Speaker 1>tricky because we're used to using that as a strong

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:52.119
<v Speaker 1>input and it's kind of been all over there. A

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:53.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of great to catch up to get your thoughts.

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Always appreciate your time, a lot of right meth Fs Investments,

0:24:56.800 --> 0:25:01.119
<v Speaker 1>Chief Economist. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast.

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:06.399
<v Speaker 1>Subscribe and listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or

0:25:06.560 --> 0:25:10.879
<v Speaker 1>whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Keane before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide.

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:16.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bloomberg Radio