WEBVTT - A Breakdown of CPI and Outlook for Rates

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:11.960 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene along

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.960
<v Speaker 2>with Paul Sweeney. Join us each day for insight from

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:23.160
<v Speaker 2>the best in economics, finance, investment, and international relations. You

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 2>can also watch the show live on YouTube. Visit the

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Podcast channel on YouTube to see the show weekday

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 2>mornings from seven to ten am Eastern from our global

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 2>headquarters in New York City. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify,

0:00:39.360 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 2>or anywhere else you listen, and always I'm Bloomberg Radio,

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg Terminal, and the Bloomberg Business App and inflation

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:50.800
<v Speaker 2>Report coming to you right now from across America. I'm

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 2>waiting for the data, particularly on that critical three tenths

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 2>of a percent data, and it comes in a little

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:01.280
<v Speaker 2>elevated away from the free lunch people were talking about.

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 2>Instead of zero point three, it's zero point four year

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 2>over year, not three point four. It's a lofty three

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 2>point five. And the big one, the wildser to meet

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 2>Paul Sweeney, is three point seven. Core year over year

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 2>comes out at three point eight with a spirited real

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:26.759
<v Speaker 2>average hourly earnings, The markets react.

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:29.560
<v Speaker 3>S and p five hundred just ticks down pretty solidy

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 3>down seven tens to one percent. The nastac off about

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 3>nine tens a one percent rate on this data. Go

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:36.480
<v Speaker 3>to the yield space, Tom. The two year treasury, the

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:39.639
<v Speaker 3>one that's really tied to short term rates, up eleven

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 3>basis points, just in a couple of ticks. Here, the

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 3>ten years up nine basis points four point four in.

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 2>The real yield explodes out ten basis points a higher

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 2>inflation adjusting yield two point zero nine percent. I'm taking

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 2>some time here, folks, so I reckon digest this market

0:01:55.440 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 2>moving data curve spread a little bit of disinversion, but

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 2>the real dynamic is just simply in level. I'm not

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 2>going to mince words. I said this on Monday. I

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 2>was just guessing. Now I'm not guessing. We are on

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:12.920
<v Speaker 2>the five percent watch for the US full faith and

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 2>credit two year yield four point eighty seven percent rounded

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 2>up twelve full bas points of movement a ten year

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 2>four point four to six. There's prosaic ideas, like what

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 2>does this do to a thirty year mortgage? Is one idea?

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 2>What does this do to money market funds? Paul? What

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 2>do we start doing? Is it another half a trillion

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 2>dollars this week and the money mark.

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 4>It's interesting time.

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm just looking at the top live on the reporting

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 3>on the Bloomberg terminal, Chris Ancy, senior editor for Bloomberg,

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 3>who says, this is going to really question the feasibility

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:48.639
<v Speaker 3>of a June FED great cut, that's the bottom line.

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 2>He's had time to look at his studios in Princeton

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 2>with Bloomberg Intelligence Ira Jersey and will have Neil Dudda

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:56.960
<v Speaker 2>with us in moments as they both digest the data.

0:02:57.400 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 2>I right, I guess I got to go to the

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 2>FED chit chat. This is about as no June cut

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 2>as we've ever seen.

0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 5>Uh, no June cutting. We're gonna start pricing out July

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 5>in a hurry as well here Tom, So you know

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:12.920
<v Speaker 5>it very likely when you keep on this was not

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:14.920
<v Speaker 5>the worst data obviously that we could seen right off.

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 5>Zero point five would have been worse, for sure. But

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 5>it just shows you that the the disinflationary environment is

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 5>is is lagging now. So the you know, the the

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:27.800
<v Speaker 5>idea that we were going to continue to have a

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 5>slow decline of inflation just hasn't happened. And now we're

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:33.639
<v Speaker 5>we're starting to see a leveling off, and because of that,

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 5>it's going to be harder and harder for the Fed

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 5>Reserve to start cutting interest rates, like even make the

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:41.800
<v Speaker 5>case that they need to start start cutting interest rates

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 5>and and calibrate their uh, calibrate what they're doing. So

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 5>so it wouldn't surprise me at this point if if

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 5>the majority of the market started the price for the

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 5>first full cut to be in November at some point

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 5>in the next couple of next couple of days, because

0:03:57.280 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 5>you know, if they don't cut in July, then then

0:03:59.080 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 5>I think that they would just prefer to wait instead of,

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 5>you know, making a first cut in September. They'll say

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 5>that they would. Every meeting's live. Yeah, quite frankly, they've

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 5>never actually cut within a month of the election, so

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 5>I suspect that they'll they'll skip in September and then

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 5>go to November.

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 2>It's like saying Arsenal list and Villa is a snooze fest.

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 2>It's it's live. The Vicks fifteen point seven zero of

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:23.280
<v Speaker 2>point seven to two down futures negative three hundred SMP

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 2>futures negative forty six. Paul, let me lay out the

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:31.159
<v Speaker 2>FED meetings May one June twelve July thirty one, and

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 2>the one I've been watching, which is September eighteenth. Forget

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 2>about the politics, forget about the election. They're going to

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:39.479
<v Speaker 2>have a lot more data into the Q three.

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 3>Season YEP end of current from a Bloomberg economy saying

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 3>no surprises here. Shelter and gas prices are fingered by

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 3>the BLS as the main culprits here in the higher

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 3>inflation print here. So I mean, IRA is the Fed

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 3>just saying again, we're data dependent. We're seeing a little

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:58.919
<v Speaker 3>bit of stickiness here, a little bit of a resurgence

0:04:59.040 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 3>here in core inflation.

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:01.360
<v Speaker 4>So it's okay.

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 3>Wait, is that kind of how you think they're going

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:04.279
<v Speaker 3>to message it?

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think they almost have to mention it that way.

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 5>And you know, we get the minutes today and you're

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 5>not going to revise the minutes because of this number.

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:14.479
<v Speaker 5>But I think as we get into and you hear

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:16.799
<v Speaker 5>some of the Fed speak going into the quiet period

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:19.880
<v Speaker 5>before that that may meeting that Tom just mentioned, you know,

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 5>one of the things that you're going to look at

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 5>is the shorter term. Right. You've heard Governor Waller and

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 5>as well as other members of the Federal Reserve talk

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:29.920
<v Speaker 5>about the kind of the shorter term momentum of inflation.

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:33.040
<v Speaker 5>And when you look at the three month annualized core

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:36.039
<v Speaker 5>inflation rate right now, it's at four point five percent.

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 5>It was at four percent back in January, So that's accelerating, right,

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:42.720
<v Speaker 5>So that's a that's not a good sign.

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 5>Granted, seasonally this tends to be a time when inflation's

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 5>a little bit higher anyway, so you have to get

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 5>with a little bit of a grain of salt. But

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:51.039
<v Speaker 5>it's still moving in the wrong direction, right, And I

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 5>think that that's one of the keys that you can

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 5>take away from this report is that yes, people will

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:58.479
<v Speaker 5>nuance this and say, oh, well, it's housing lagging. There's

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:02.840
<v Speaker 5>all these other indicators. Prices obviously, you know, feed into

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 5>at least some of this report today. But nonetheless, like

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:09.839
<v Speaker 5>in aggregate, you're still looking at an economy that doesn't

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 5>have stable inflation quite yet.

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 2>We're we're gonna rep up the script here. We're with

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:16.480
<v Speaker 2>Ira Jersey. He will continue with us, and Neil Dutta

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:18.560
<v Speaker 2>will join us in a moment commercial free to you

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:23.040
<v Speaker 2>across America until the nine zero zero hour with the

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 2>support of Commonwealth. We thank them for their work with

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:30.040
<v Speaker 2>our Economics Commonwealth, supporting more than two thousand independent financial

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:34.279
<v Speaker 2>advisors with the solutions they need to grow a thriving business.

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 2>Commonwealth go where you grow. Visit Commonwealth dot com to

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 2>learn more. We're thrilled. Also tell you schedule Tracy Alloway

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:44.360
<v Speaker 2>and Joe Wisenthal will rip up the script there as

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 2>well and talk to mister Wisenthal and miss Alloway about

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:53.040
<v Speaker 2>this important inflation report. Down negative three point fifty SPX

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:55.920
<v Speaker 2>futures at negative fifty five to VIX out at fifteen

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 2>point eighty seven. As Paul mentioned, the two year yield

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 2>four point eight nine percent now a fifteen basis point

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 2>higher yield, lower price on the two year yield. Ivery Jersey,

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 2>please please stay with us if you can. Neil Dudda

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:16.080
<v Speaker 2>joins now from Renaissance Macro. Neil. This goes right to

0:07:16.120 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 2>the ambiguity, which you think is constructive. If we have

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 2>a little inflation, I guess we're gonna get a little

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 2>bit of nominal GDP. Does inflation adjusted GDP get crushed?

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 2>Are you in like some two percent doom and gloom

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 2>crew with real GDP?

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 6>Well, well I'm not dooming gloom on on real growth.

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 6>But you know, I think I agree with Ira that

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 6>you know, today's inflation number does push out the timing,

0:07:45.200 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 6>and I think you know, what's important for I think

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 6>investors to kind of think about here is just how

0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 6>path dependent is that first cut. I mean, you know,

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 6>if it's not July, then are they are they not

0:07:57.640 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 6>going to ease right before the election? I mean, how

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 6>much of that to enter their thinking. It's something to

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 6>think about. The one thing I would say is that

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 6>you know, much of the upside surprise and in the

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 6>core CPI number this morning was driven by medical care

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 6>services inflation, and it's important to keep in mind that,

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 6>you know, there are differences of scope between the CPI

0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 6>data and the pc data, and the CPI data is running,

0:08:20.400 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 6>you know, over a full percentage point higher than PCEE.

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 6>That's about twice almost three times what's normal, and so

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 6>you know, in some respects, I do think the margin

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:33.200
<v Speaker 6>might be for stating how important CPI is for the

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 6>FEDS reaction function. But you know, it's a bad number

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 6>and at the margin that pushes the timing out.

0:08:40.840 --> 0:08:43.200
<v Speaker 2>Pausing to jump in here, Marcus to tier eight negative

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 2>seventy on SPX futures down features negative four fifty.

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 3>And Tom just on the currency front, dollar yen breaches

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 3>one fifty two, you're yeah, one six four spot three seven,

0:08:57.200 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 3>So a little bit of weakness there. So, Neil, where's

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 3>inflation coming from?

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I don't know.

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 3>I guess we always thought that this, you know, last

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:10.080
<v Speaker 3>hundred basis points or so of reducing inflation would probably

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 3>be the toughest.

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 4>Where are we seeing inflation these days?

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:16.960
<v Speaker 6>Well, you're seeing it. I mean you're seeing it in

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:20.120
<v Speaker 6>motor vehicle insurance. That was a big driver for inflation

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 6>last month. You also saw it in apparel, so a

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:28.559
<v Speaker 6>parallel prices rose quite sharply. You know. Keep in mind, though,

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 6>I mean what I would just say is that you

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 6>look at apparel prices, they rose I think seven tenths

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 6>of one percent in March, and that's following a big

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 6>increase in February. But taking a step back, people are

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:43.839
<v Speaker 6>already making a trade off, right, So if you look

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 6>at real consumption of clothing, it's already declining. So in

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:51.080
<v Speaker 6>some respects, that is not the kind of inflation that

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:53.599
<v Speaker 6>should be worried about. I mean, that's not demander of

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 6>an inflation. If people are cutting back in the areas

0:09:55.800 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 6>that are going up in prices. That suggests that people

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 6>are making a trade off already and there's somewhat resistance

0:10:03.080 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 6>to higher prices, which then raises the question about how

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:10.320
<v Speaker 6>long those price increases can stick. You know, motor vehicle insurance,

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:12.840
<v Speaker 6>you know, it was going in the right direction. It

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 6>was still very elevated, but it was going in the

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 6>right direction for the last few months, and now it's

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 6>right reversing, you know, but we did see things like

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 6>car prices come down, so I'm not really sure what

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 6>to make that. And ultimately, if the underlying value of

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 6>the asset itself, which is cars, right's going under price,

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:30.680
<v Speaker 6>you'd expect, you know, the insurance cars.

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:32.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I want to go to Ira right now, and

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 2>then Neil Dudda with the same question. We're going to

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 2>go Mafi here because Duda won't come on unless we

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:40.320
<v Speaker 2>go mathe Ira. It's real simple. The ten year reel

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 2>yield is now out over two standard deviations up to

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:48.239
<v Speaker 2>two point zero nine percent. It did it in February

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 2>Valentine's Day when we all had to buy Lisa chocolate

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 2>killed us. And then from December it's been a lift

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 2>from one point seven zero up to two point zero

0:10:57.720 --> 0:11:00.559
<v Speaker 2>nine Ira Jersey Are we had a critic a point

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:01.959
<v Speaker 2>for the real yield.

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 5>I don't think so. You know, the real yield is

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 5>so to the way that we look at the real

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 5>yield that basically two components describe most of why we're

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 5>pricing where we are two percentage for ten year really yields.

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 5>So first is just volatility in the market, right, so

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 5>you're going to do when when the market volatility is high,

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:22.839
<v Speaker 5>you're going to demand a higher really yield and number one.

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 5>And then secondly, and I think that this is important

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 5>and one of the reasons you're seeing the big sell

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 5>off today there, and that's monetary policy. So so you know,

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:33.840
<v Speaker 5>if if if the difference between the Fed Fund rate

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:37.679
<v Speaker 5>and uh and and CPI or PC whatever inflation measure

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:41.720
<v Speaker 5>you have you want to use, is relatively high, and then certainly,

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 5>you know tips yields, you have to price that in

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 5>as well. So so so those two factors tend to

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:48.840
<v Speaker 5>tend to drive this. And the fact that now that

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:51.200
<v Speaker 5>the market's starting to price out some of the early

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 5>cuts and starting to price out some you know, that

0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 5>terminal floor that we were talking about earlier now the

0:11:56.720 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 5>terminal rate floor is moving up as well. You'd expect

0:11:59.800 --> 0:12:02.559
<v Speaker 5>this see somewhat higher real yield, and you're seeing that now.

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:03.440
<v Speaker 6>No, it's not.

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 5>I mean, it's not unattractive quite frankly, Tom, you know,

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 5>two percent plus inflation is an interesting I think is

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:15.320
<v Speaker 5>our interesting levels to think about for for tips versus

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 5>versus nominal treasury done.

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 2>I look at the five year inflation adjusted yield and

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:24.560
<v Speaker 2>we're back to a November almost pre Thanksgiving pricing here

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 2>four point five three percent. What does a four point

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 2>five to three percent five year real yield due to

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 2>American business?

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 6>I mean, I think at the margin it you know,

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 6>I mean, obviously it raises the cost of financing. I

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 6>think what it does, I think it you know, frankly,

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 6>what it makes look more ridiculous is the FEDS longer

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 6>run expectations for where neutral rates are. I mean, clearly,

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:48.839
<v Speaker 6>you know this is an economy that can still work

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:52.439
<v Speaker 6>at high rates at these rates. I mean I think

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 6>that much is clear. But you know, I think what

0:12:56.160 --> 0:13:00.319
<v Speaker 6>it does suggests is that you know, the FEDS expectations

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 6>for where neutral well be is just frankly too low.

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 6>And I think, you know, every month that goes by

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 6>where you get a combination of strong jobs growth and

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 6>higher inflation. I mean, I think that that kind of

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 6>basically cements that case.

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:17.240
<v Speaker 3>Boy, I'm looking at just a couple of categories here, Tom.

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 3>Car insurance was up twenty two from a year ago.

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 4>That's so much.

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 2>Show you what's going on the show right now. I mean,

0:13:23.559 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry, this is a fixed cost? Can I say that?

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:28.200
<v Speaker 4>I think?

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 1>So?

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I got to pay it every every month. I mean,

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 4>I know, you know, you know, you've got the Bentley

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 4>and everything. But for those of us, I mean you.

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 2>Say car insurance, except that's like breathing air. You have

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 2>to pay car insurance, right, you have.

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:44.679
<v Speaker 6>To pay it. I mean, but as I say, I mean,

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 6>it's it's it's interesting because it's it's interesting because it

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:50.480
<v Speaker 6>hasn't moderated yet when you look. I mean, ultimately, these

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 6>things should follow the underlying value. I mean, what are

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 6>you ensuring? Right, you're insuring a car? What do we

0:13:56.280 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 6>know about the price of cars? The price of cars

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:00.560
<v Speaker 6>is actually going down. That's why poor commandit a CPI

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 6>in this number was you know on the software side,

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 6>so you know there is you know, there is some

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 6>of that going on. I mean, could just be timing,

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:12.439
<v Speaker 6>but you know, you have to take these numbers as

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:14.760
<v Speaker 6>they come to you. Given the uncertainty that Fed's been

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 6>talking about, and I think, you know, at the margin

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 6>that kind of it should push them to err on

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 6>the side of waiting.

0:14:21.200 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 3>Hey, Ira, you know, looking at the ten year treasury here,

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:26.920
<v Speaker 3>we're almost fourteen basis points pushing up four point five zero.

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 3>You know, I have I know nothing about the bond market,

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 3>and I say that proudly four to four and a

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 3>half percent was kind of my range for the ten year.

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 4>Do I have to rethink that.

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 5>Well, four fifty one is a very important technical level

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 5>on the charts. We've been highlighting that level now for

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 5>about ten days. You break there and we can certainly

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 5>get back toward four point seven percent pretty quickly. I

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 5>would like to say something that you just comment on,

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 5>something that Neil just said, and that's that higher terminal,

0:14:56.080 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 5>the terminal floor. Right, So the idea that you know

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 5>two and a half percent is no longer or the

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 5>kind of the base case. I think there's there's a

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 5>recency bias that a lot of investors have, and certainly

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 5>members of the Federal Reserve and the FED staff have

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 5>and that's that you know, we we've come down and

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 5>that the that terminal rates, that that the that our

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 5>star is basically much lower than it was, say in

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 5>the nineteen nineties or nineteen eighties or seventies. You know,

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 5>I don't think we're going back to the nineteen seventies

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 5>or eighties, but certainly, you know, our star the real

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 5>funds rates, so the real neutral rate has to be

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 5>higher than it was, you know, prior to prior to

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 5>to COVID, because because there's a lot of there's a

0:15:34.280 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 5>lot of structural issues that have shifted pretty significantly since COVID.

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:40.640
<v Speaker 5>We've talked about all of them, right, whether it's immigration,

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 5>work from home, like, there's a whole bunch of things

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 5>to think about that way. But the idea that that

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 5>our star and that the real rate is higher, I

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 5>think is something that's that's underappreciated by a lot of

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 5>policy makers, and I think that that that's going to

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 5>take some time for them to get it into their psychology.

0:15:56.680 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 5>That yes, you know, maybe three percent is the new

0:15:59.040 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 5>two percent.

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 2>One final question, you guys, you've got to go to

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 2>our other esteem guests here. Neil dot As simple as

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:08.360
<v Speaker 2>I can, is America oppressed by inflation? Now?

0:16:09.360 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 6>I wouldn't say that America is oppressed by inflation. I

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 6>mean if you ask, if you ask consumers about their

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 6>short run inflation expectations, they've actually been going down, even

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 6>though we've been seeing these upside surprises on inflation. And

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 6>you know, I mean so I think that to me,

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 6>that disconnect, frankly, is quite interesting. The fact that inflation

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 6>expectations have been moderating. I mean, we just saw that

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 6>this week with the New York Fred Right consumer expectations data.

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 6>I think that, to me is one reason why I'm

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 6>a little bit skeptical that what we're seeing so far

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 6>this year is kind of the underlying trend for where

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 6>inflation is. But the data are with the data are

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 6>as I mentioned. But you always have to kind of

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 6>go back to first principles, Tom, I mean, ultimately, unit

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 6>labor costs are are are we? I mean, where's the

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 6>inflation really, you know, coming from? You have to start

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 6>worrying about it. You know, at some point soon if

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:05.399
<v Speaker 6>inflation continues to surprise in this fashion, you have to

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 6>worry a little bit about, you know, declines in real

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 6>wage growth weighing on consumer spending at some point later.

0:17:11.320 --> 0:17:13.160
<v Speaker 6>So I do think that that's something that should begin

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 6>to enter the conversation if this continues.

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 2>Somebody just sent it in a lovech YouTube. What am

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:20.879
<v Speaker 2>I going to be looking at? I'm going to look

0:17:20.920 --> 0:17:23.880
<v Speaker 2>at Jason Firman up at Harvard who does a wonderful

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 2>annualized inflation series. I'm sure I'll get that out on

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:30.520
<v Speaker 2>Twitter here in a moment. Future is negative sixty four

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 2>down features at negative four hundred. Thank you Ira Jersey

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:38.119
<v Speaker 2>of Bloomberg Intelligence. Thank you Neil Dudda of Renaissance Macro

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 2>with a real market moving that report today. We are

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:55.000
<v Speaker 2>fortunate and that we're going to talk about their show

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 2>Oddlines is just genormous Apple podcasts where you see it,

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:02.119
<v Speaker 2>you know, you look, you got a charitable you know,

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:05.639
<v Speaker 2>and there's a Joe and Tracy the Tracy and Joe Show.

0:18:05.400 --> 0:18:06.440
<v Speaker 4>And yeah, all that.

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:08.639
<v Speaker 2>We'll talk about Oddlets, but we're going to open up

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 2>the conversation with Tracy Alloway and Joseph Weisenthal here just

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:18.440
<v Speaker 2>about inflation. Tracy, where are you seeing inflation? We've been

0:18:18.480 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 2>making jokes about it, except it's not funny.

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, my personal basket of inflation is all mayonnaise, so

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 1>that's how I measure it. I haven't looked at up

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the component change in the in the Mayo index just

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 1>yet this morning, but I plan to right after this interview. Look,

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I think most of the unexpected rise seems to have

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:38.880
<v Speaker 1>come out of shelter costs and gasoline, or at least

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:41.400
<v Speaker 1>that's what the BLS said. I think the really interesting

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:45.359
<v Speaker 1>thing here is, and Neil and Ira, we're kind of

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 1>touching on this. You know, we can talk about the

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:50.440
<v Speaker 1>neutral rate, our star, the natural rate of interest all

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:53.879
<v Speaker 1>we want, but the inflation data doesn't seem to be

0:18:53.880 --> 0:18:57.120
<v Speaker 1>bearing out that entire thesis. And in fact, I thought

0:18:57.119 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 1>it was really interesting last week it kind of flew

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:02.360
<v Speaker 1>under the radar, but the Bank for International Settlements published

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:05.680
<v Speaker 1>a paper where they basically said, like, our star is

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:08.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of useless and we should probably just be looking

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:13.200
<v Speaker 1>at observed inflation instead of trying to observe this unknowable

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 1>neutral world that's.

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 2>Called the gospel. According to Tom King, Joe, what's your

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:21.720
<v Speaker 2>insight here right now? Inflation's oppressive. I just quoted Argentina

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 2>with two hundred and seventy six percent annual inflation that's oppressive,

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 2>that's oppressed crust.

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 7>Well, we still have real wage growth, as Neil was

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 7>talking about. As Neil mentioned, even consumer's own expectations for

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 7>inflations via various surveys have come down. So I think

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 7>there's an argument that we're not being pressed oppressed by inflation.

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:45.359
<v Speaker 4>It's still bad.

0:19:45.760 --> 0:19:45.960
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 7>There's two things that I'm thinking about, which is that

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:52.160
<v Speaker 7>there is this view among many, the sort of Powell

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 7>Waller Bullard camp I would say that policy is tight

0:19:57.359 --> 0:19:59.680
<v Speaker 7>right now and on some level you and this goes

0:19:59.680 --> 0:20:02.679
<v Speaker 7>to tree point about the unknowability of neutral. It's like,

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 7>if inflation keeps surprising to the upside and maybe accelerating

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 7>a little bit since the last year, what are these

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 7>words tight even mean in the context of the observed

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:15.159
<v Speaker 7>reality that inflation is drifting up. The other thing I

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 7>keep thinking about, you know, we have futures down today currently,

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 7>S and P futures down one point two percent. The story,

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:25.679
<v Speaker 7>the story of twenty twenty four has been hotter than expect,

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:28.679
<v Speaker 7>inflation prints and a red hot stock market. Nonetheless, so

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 7>in the short term, yes, this is certainly a bump.

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 7>But it has been interesting that those that first cut

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 7>keeps getting priced out further and further into the future.

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:38.919
<v Speaker 7>Now just fifty cuts, fifty bases points priced in, and

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:42.080
<v Speaker 7>by and large, the stock market, by any outside of today,

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:43.520
<v Speaker 7>still doing phenomenally well.

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 3>Exactly, And Tracy, I'm just looking, you know, for context,

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:50.640
<v Speaker 3>seeing Bloomberg reporting here sheltering gas combined contributed over half

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:52.880
<v Speaker 3>of the overall monthly increase.

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 4>That's kind of what.

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:56.439
<v Speaker 3>People feel month to month, day to day. This is

0:20:56.480 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 3>a you know, I was I put in our internal chat,

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 3>this is a problem for President Joe Biden.

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 4>I mean inflation. You don't want to see that thing

0:21:04.359 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 4>coming back.

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, I guess there's two there things we're kind of

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 1>learning here, which is one, a lot more people seem

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 1>to care about how much things cost than the actual

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 1>employment rate, right, Like, the number of people buying stuff

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:18.840
<v Speaker 1>is just always going to be bigger than the number

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 1>of people who are actually unemployed. So I think, you know,

0:21:21.520 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 1>it's great that the Fed can go out and say, well,

0:21:23.680 --> 0:21:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the labor you know, the unemployment rate is at decades low,

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:29.639
<v Speaker 1>But the thing people see the most in their day

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:32.440
<v Speaker 1>to day lives is the grocery price or the price

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:35.200
<v Speaker 1>of gas or whatever. So that's one thing, and then

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:38.639
<v Speaker 1>the other thing I would say is, you know, I

0:21:38.680 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 1>think Biden has been tackling this issue in some new

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:46.359
<v Speaker 1>and slightly innovative ways, including talking about price gouging, talking

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 1>about profit margins, and again, the rate of inflation on

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the stuff that is a daily need for people is

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 1>where we see the most impact. Right, So people have

0:21:57.359 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 1>to buy food, they have to gas up their cars, whatever.

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 1>They don't have a lot of, like Drew, competition in

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 1>that market.

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:05.159
<v Speaker 2>Paul and I don't have a real life. We don't travel.

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:08.359
<v Speaker 2>You guys are like jetting around, you know, the golf

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 2>stream and usual. The rest of the country. Are they

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:16.160
<v Speaker 2>in I guess Arkansas or Texas? Are they in disinflation

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:18.640
<v Speaker 2>while we're oppressed here in New York.

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 4>I mean I don't think so.

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:21.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean I don't think so at all.

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:23.440
<v Speaker 1>You can see the regional CPI number.

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:26.119
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, And I don't think there is some pocket of

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:27.439
<v Speaker 7>the country that's escaping it.

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 2>And in fact, I think.

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:31.639
<v Speaker 7>In a lot of these markets you see hotter than

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 7>expected inflation in part because there's just been so much

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:38.680
<v Speaker 7>rapid growth and so much strain on the local resources

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 7>due to the influx of population, which kind of maybe

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:42.719
<v Speaker 7>negates other advantage.

0:22:42.760 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm got to talk about out lots or when

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 2>we put put in the time out here, they're handlers,

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 2>they get upset. Yeah, a writer, you go off, go

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 2>off the thing. I mean, if you're in Calverton, New York,

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:54.919
<v Speaker 2>out by the Hamptons on a given weekend and you

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 2>gotta figure out what to do with acreagew you weigh

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:02.560
<v Speaker 2>in with attractors, apply cup cadet fifty four inch, twenty

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 2>four horse power riding lawnmower. That's what you Tracy as too.

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 2>You guys talk to Well, she's got the man's mode

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 2>out for the dog. I mean the dog. The dog

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:16.119
<v Speaker 2>needs exercise. But what did you learn? I mean this

0:23:16.240 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 2>is like classic odd lots. Yeah, you're talking to tractors supply.

0:23:20.400 --> 0:23:20.920
<v Speaker 2>What you learn?

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:23.679
<v Speaker 7>So we had the CEO out tomorrow. It comes out

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 7>tomorrow and we're gonna learn why Tracy keeps having to

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 7>spend more and more money.

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I on the modal tractor supply customer.

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:34.440
<v Speaker 7>But the other interesting, the really interesting thing economically with them,

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:36.360
<v Speaker 7>and it even speaks to what you were talking about

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:38.919
<v Speaker 7>with Texas and Arkansas. All that is that there are

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 7>some COVID booms that happened in un reversed peloton Zoom,

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:43.639
<v Speaker 7>et cetera, and then we sort of went back to normal.

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:48.200
<v Speaker 7>This move out of the cities has not really negated,

0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 7>and people are moving further and further and further apart.

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:53.320
<v Speaker 7>This was not just a one off shot, and so

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:56.000
<v Speaker 7>it benefits their sort of strategy which they sort of

0:23:56.040 --> 0:23:59.159
<v Speaker 7>proudly say, we don't have anything near New York, but

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:01.720
<v Speaker 7>we have three stores Neurodeska Texas.

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 2>Paul, you're living this and Joe and Tracy I don't

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 2>have a life. But the bottom line is Joe is

0:24:08.320 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 2>one hund I saw you just today with the eclipse

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:17.200
<v Speaker 2>Monday Tuesday into this Wednesday. I'm sorry, they're out in

0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:20.439
<v Speaker 2>Calverton interrupt I know. I mean, that's all there is

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:21.200
<v Speaker 2>to it. You guys.

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:25.640
<v Speaker 3>Also had a recent interview with about US Mexico Freight.

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:28.920
<v Speaker 3>I got to think that is a great growth story.

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:31.399
<v Speaker 3>I think about the with the Canadian Pacific bought that

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 3>railroad dow thing from Canada all the way down to Mexico.

0:24:33.960 --> 0:24:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So we spoke with Matt Silver, who's the co

0:24:36.760 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 1>founder of this new company which is building technology basically

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:43.960
<v Speaker 1>to facilitate cross border trade between the US and Mexico,

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:46.240
<v Speaker 1>and he's been talking about how it's booming. You know,

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:50.360
<v Speaker 1>there was always auto production manufacturing in Mexico, so that's

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 1>really picked up. And the one the point that he made,

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 1>which seems kind of obvious, but I guess I hadn't

0:24:56.359 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 1>internalized it, was the idea of Mexico having a competitive

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>advantage just because of its geographic location next to the

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:06.240
<v Speaker 1>US and the fact that it's in the same time zone.

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:08.960
<v Speaker 1>You can go down to Mexico, drink tequila with a

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:12.399
<v Speaker 1>potential business partner, and fly back to the US in

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:17.040
<v Speaker 1>a day. Right, try to yeah that too. You need

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:18.120
<v Speaker 1>recovery built in.

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:22.680
<v Speaker 2>Guys, Thank you, thank you. Alots out on Apple podcasts.

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:25.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm spending a lot of time looking at the podcasts

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:29.719
<v Speaker 2>and odd lots leading away from Bloomberg with some intelligent conversation,

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:34.000
<v Speaker 2>really interested in tractor supply. As Tracy looks at the

0:25:34.800 --> 0:25:36.239
<v Speaker 2>cub cadet.

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:37.680
<v Speaker 1>You got to go, Tom. They have the baby chickens

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:38.919
<v Speaker 1>right now. They're very cute.

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:42.440
<v Speaker 2>Oh good, that would be good. The baby chickens with

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:49.439
<v Speaker 2>that little kennel feet, that would just be I can't imagine.

0:25:51.560 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 2>Stephen Rashudo We're like, yeah, rashudo econ, we're econned out.

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 2>Except wow, what a report with miszoo. Good morning, sir.

0:25:59.080 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 2>Did you expect this.

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:02.760
<v Speaker 8>We're not as bad as these numbers, that's for sure.

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 8>The reality is, though we have been in the camp

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:08.639
<v Speaker 8>that basically the data was going to keep the Federal

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 8>Reserve from doing what the Fed wants to do, which

0:26:11.600 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 8>is cut interest rates, and that the economy fundamentally is

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:17.600
<v Speaker 8>healthier than a lot of people anticipate, not surprised by

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:19.719
<v Speaker 8>it in that regard, but surprised on the month over

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:20.359
<v Speaker 8>month changes.

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 2>What about fixed inflation costs? At the ECHOS building when

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 2>they sit around the table, are they going to talk

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:31.199
<v Speaker 2>about we have to eat, we have to pay car insurance,

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 2>we have to pay rent or a mortgage averaging out

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 2>now at whatever it is, five to six percent up

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:40.040
<v Speaker 2>to the seven point three percent. Do they talk about

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:44.760
<v Speaker 2>required inflation costs versus luxury inflation?

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:47.360
<v Speaker 8>Well, they really should, because at the end of the day,

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:50.919
<v Speaker 8>they're trying to maximize social welfare, and their concept behind

0:26:51.119 --> 0:26:53.199
<v Speaker 8>keeping the labor market as tight as it is is

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:56.119
<v Speaker 8>to try to drive up wages. The problem is by

0:26:56.200 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 8>keeping the labor market tight in an environment where all

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 8>the excess capacity is used up in the system is

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 8>it creates inflation. And that's when you get into the situation,

0:27:04.400 --> 0:27:06.760
<v Speaker 8>as you indicated a few seconds ago, in terms.

0:27:06.480 --> 0:27:07.840
<v Speaker 4>Of negative real wages.

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:11.639
<v Speaker 8>So your attempt to try to maximize social welfare by

0:27:11.680 --> 0:27:14.640
<v Speaker 8>keeping a labor market tight could go against you if

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:17.680
<v Speaker 8>CEOs and companies feel they have pricing power. And after

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 8>seeing this kind of improvement in the data, you're starting

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 8>to see that that's a broad based improvement in the

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:26.679
<v Speaker 8>inflation numbers. Arise in the inflation numbers is telling you

0:27:26.720 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 8>that more and more people feel they do have some

0:27:28.600 --> 0:27:31.720
<v Speaker 8>pricing power left, and that's why it's working at the

0:27:31.760 --> 0:27:35.520
<v Speaker 8>detriment of their desire to maximize social welfare.

0:27:35.880 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 3>So, Steve, I think the initial round of inflation that

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:40.480
<v Speaker 3>we saw from a pandemic, a lot of folks saying, hey,

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:44.040
<v Speaker 3>this is supply side driven, it'll play out.

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:46.119
<v Speaker 4>Is that still the case?

0:27:46.400 --> 0:27:49.160
<v Speaker 8>Well, it did play out, and the reason why fear

0:27:49.200 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 8>people all the time. AH, inflation was up at nine percent,

0:27:51.880 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 8>now it's at three. All this is happening because of

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:55.679
<v Speaker 8>the FED. It's not happening before the FED. It was

0:27:55.680 --> 0:27:57.760
<v Speaker 8>happened as a result of the supply side and the

0:27:57.800 --> 0:28:00.639
<v Speaker 8>fact that even though monetary fiscal policy he's still very

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 8>very accommodative, it's not as accommodative as it was. So

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:06.399
<v Speaker 8>between those two factors, you've taken inflation down to the

0:28:06.440 --> 0:28:09.040
<v Speaker 8>three plus percentage points. Getting it from three to two

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:11.320
<v Speaker 8>is a very different story. This is where the FED

0:28:11.400 --> 0:28:13.400
<v Speaker 8>has to get involved, and the FED has been telling

0:28:13.440 --> 0:28:15.480
<v Speaker 8>you over and over again, we want to cut rates,

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 8>and it's been damaging their ability to create a better

0:28:19.040 --> 0:28:20.080
<v Speaker 8>inflationary environment.

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:23.040
<v Speaker 3>When you see inflation at maybe just the last three

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:25.160
<v Speaker 3>months ticking up a little bit, does that change your

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:28.679
<v Speaker 3>economic outlook as it relates to the consumer and the

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:30.760
<v Speaker 3>retail sales and all these types of things that probably

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:32.040
<v Speaker 3>go into your GDP model.

0:28:32.400 --> 0:28:35.440
<v Speaker 8>Well, I mean it reflects more what we've been saying.

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:38.000
<v Speaker 8>We've been in the camp that the labor market is

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:40.520
<v Speaker 8>tied and the Fed's not going to achieve its inflation target.

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:42.880
<v Speaker 8>So at some point, you know, the FED either just

0:28:42.880 --> 0:28:45.800
<v Speaker 8>walks away from its inflation target, which is a risk,

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:49.720
<v Speaker 8>but then that implies higher long term interest rates, and

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 8>that goes against the desire of the same people who

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:55.640
<v Speaker 8>want to cut rates because they want to see lower

0:28:55.680 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 8>mortgage rates. They want to see people be able to

0:28:57.560 --> 0:29:00.360
<v Speaker 8>afford to buy homes, and therefore they get the cells

0:29:00.400 --> 0:29:02.960
<v Speaker 8>into this catch twenty two and they haven't been able

0:29:03.000 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 8>to get themselves out of it because the economy is

0:29:04.800 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 8>fundamentally healthy.

0:29:05.880 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 3>And now they are just looking at the WRP function

0:29:09.200 --> 0:29:12.520
<v Speaker 3>pushing out maybe only fifty fifty basis points for the

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:15.719
<v Speaker 3>entire year this year and a big contrast to how

0:29:15.720 --> 0:29:19.400
<v Speaker 3>we started the year with a lot more cuts pract

0:29:19.440 --> 0:29:24.160
<v Speaker 3>factored into the market. Does the Fed wait till September?

0:29:24.200 --> 0:29:24.640
<v Speaker 4>I don't know.

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 8>Well, they certainly have another opportunity in June when they

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:30.440
<v Speaker 8>redo the dots again. I mean, my personal preference would

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:32.560
<v Speaker 8>be that next year when they do the review of

0:29:32.600 --> 0:29:34.440
<v Speaker 8>monetary policy, they eliminate the dots.

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:35.280
<v Speaker 2>I think the dot's cool.

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:37.640
<v Speaker 4>We have a function on the Bloomberg terminal, dots go yes.

0:29:37.720 --> 0:29:41.120
<v Speaker 2>I think that can go I would say, I would say,

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:44.680
<v Speaker 2>with great respect to mister Bloomberg, can the dots go

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:46.720
<v Speaker 2>go away? Yes? Please go away?

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 8>Thanks, And I think that would be a positive step

0:29:50.800 --> 0:29:53.480
<v Speaker 8>in the right direction for them. But you know, until

0:29:53.480 --> 0:29:55.760
<v Speaker 8>we get that, I think you're probably waiting to June.

0:29:55.760 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 8>I don't think you'll get any real messaging coming out

0:29:58.600 --> 0:29:59.960
<v Speaker 8>from the May FMC meeting.

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 2>I want to go political here, which is not you know,

0:30:02.480 --> 0:30:04.840
<v Speaker 2>it's not that you're not comfortable with that, Steve. You're

0:30:04.880 --> 0:30:08.920
<v Speaker 2>so able that you can answer this beautifully. I'm sorry,

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:11.400
<v Speaker 2>but inflation is the halves and they have nots. The

0:30:11.440 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 2>President's got to address this. This is now one two,

0:30:15.280 --> 0:30:18.400
<v Speaker 2>three months of persistent inflation. But to me, there's a

0:30:18.440 --> 0:30:22.160
<v Speaker 2>great separation in America. For example, Paul and I'm thinking

0:30:22.160 --> 0:30:26.560
<v Speaker 2>of the great Barry Hinckley from the iconic Hinkley ship family.

0:30:26.920 --> 0:30:32.920
<v Speaker 2>He's trotting out Martha Stewart Skyland's too Hinkley pictic boat.

0:30:33.200 --> 0:30:37.320
<v Speaker 2>And because he's helping Martha slide into a Hinckley picnic boat.

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 2>And this is popping like one point seven to two million.

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:44.000
<v Speaker 2>This is a this is like gorgeous. This is you know,

0:30:44.200 --> 0:30:46.520
<v Speaker 2>Purcelli takes us down the Hudson River to go over

0:30:46.560 --> 0:30:49.880
<v Speaker 2>to Pigum. Okay, you know, Steve shutdo, I'm sorry, there's

0:30:49.880 --> 0:30:54.800
<v Speaker 2>a halves and have nots to inflation. The fancy people

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:58.960
<v Speaker 2>that have Hinkley picnic boats, they're not worried about this report,

0:30:59.080 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 2>are they?

0:30:59.720 --> 0:30:59.840
<v Speaker 6>No?

0:31:00.760 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 2>But You're right.

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:03.560
<v Speaker 8>There is a real difference, and this comes down to

0:31:03.600 --> 0:31:07.000
<v Speaker 8>the maximized social welfare. The people that they supposedly say

0:31:07.000 --> 0:31:09.880
<v Speaker 8>they want to help, they're not helping with the policies

0:31:09.880 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 8>they're creating. And that's the underlying problem for this administration.

0:31:14.680 --> 0:31:17.480
<v Speaker 8>They have loaded the Federal Reserve with a bunch of doves,

0:31:17.800 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 8>and those doves really want to cut interest rates in

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:23.400
<v Speaker 8>an environment where the economy is telling them you shouldn't

0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 8>be cutting interest rates. And then there's this academic environment

0:31:27.360 --> 0:31:29.240
<v Speaker 8>that you get from a lot of Wall Street economists,

0:31:29.240 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 8>which way, well rach are just naturally too high. I

0:31:31.560 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 8>wish they would just come down and normalize. People don't

0:31:34.320 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 8>know what normal is.

0:31:35.400 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but it's Steve that those academic economists in the

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:42.520
<v Speaker 2>market economists are people that either have want or aspire

0:31:42.880 --> 0:31:46.760
<v Speaker 2>to a Hinkley Picnics. They do. They're not our listeners

0:31:46.800 --> 0:31:47.840
<v Speaker 2>out there living this.

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:50.440
<v Speaker 8>You're one hundred percent correct, and this is why the

0:31:50.480 --> 0:31:54.320
<v Speaker 8>mistakes the Fed are making is basically allowing this economy

0:31:54.360 --> 0:31:57.480
<v Speaker 8>to stay too height, that high, too tight, or too hot,

0:31:57.560 --> 0:32:00.960
<v Speaker 8>that you are actually creating pricing power for corporate America,

0:32:01.080 --> 0:32:04.800
<v Speaker 8>which then wants to create double digit returns, and that

0:32:04.880 --> 0:32:07.600
<v Speaker 8>double digit returns is what then drives at equity price.

0:32:07.640 --> 0:32:09.680
<v Speaker 8>And now equities are having a hitting year. But let's

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:11.280
<v Speaker 8>be honest, they had a hell of a great run

0:32:11.320 --> 0:32:11.960
<v Speaker 8>in the first quarter.

0:32:12.080 --> 0:32:15.360
<v Speaker 2>You know, Martha Stewart's picnic boat is Skyland's too. Do

0:32:15.360 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 2>you know what mine would be? Drama me drama on

0:32:19.800 --> 0:32:22.480
<v Speaker 2>the beg Steven Rashudo, thank you so much, Barry Hickley

0:32:22.480 --> 0:32:24.840
<v Speaker 2>and Martha Stewart, thank you so much as well for

0:32:24.880 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 2>giving us inflation perspective. Lisa Matero Report Bonds, Lisa Maateo,

0:32:40.960 --> 0:32:42.960
<v Speaker 2>there was almost too many choices this morning.

0:32:43.000 --> 0:32:44.840
<v Speaker 9>Here, there's a lot, There's a lot going on. There

0:32:44.880 --> 0:32:47.040
<v Speaker 9>were some good stories this one. I have to ask you.

0:32:47.520 --> 0:32:49.120
<v Speaker 9>If you're traveling on a plane, have you ever been

0:32:49.160 --> 0:32:50.240
<v Speaker 9>asked to change your seat?

0:32:50.360 --> 0:32:52.480
<v Speaker 3>Sure you have, Yeah, And this is the way I

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:55.480
<v Speaker 3>think about it. When I having four kids traveling back

0:32:55.480 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 3>and forth to San Francisco for twenty five years, many

0:32:58.080 --> 0:33:00.320
<v Speaker 3>times we ask people to kind of help out and

0:33:00.320 --> 0:33:02.720
<v Speaker 3>switch seats so it could be together. So now I'm

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:04.880
<v Speaker 3>on the flip side of that, and I try to

0:33:04.880 --> 0:33:07.520
<v Speaker 3>be as accommodating as I can. But if somebody asked

0:33:07.520 --> 0:33:09.480
<v Speaker 3>me to move from my aisle seat, which is my preference.

0:33:09.480 --> 0:33:12.400
<v Speaker 3>It's like a middle seat. I don't care even if

0:33:12.400 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 3>there are kids who want Somebody an.

0:33:15.240 --> 0:33:18.680
<v Speaker 2>Economy who has an aisle seat often is paying extra

0:33:18.840 --> 0:33:19.240
<v Speaker 2>for it.

0:33:19.320 --> 0:33:20.440
<v Speaker 4>And that's the new one.

0:33:20.840 --> 0:33:24.080
<v Speaker 9>This is the problems because people are paying extra for

0:33:24.200 --> 0:33:27.160
<v Speaker 9>seats now right Passengers are paying more for seats, and

0:33:27.240 --> 0:33:29.520
<v Speaker 9>then they don't want to pay more, so they just

0:33:29.600 --> 0:33:31.520
<v Speaker 9>use the option to just go wherever. But then when

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:33.600
<v Speaker 9>they get on the plane in the cabin, they're starting

0:33:33.600 --> 0:33:36.160
<v Speaker 9>to ask other people. You know what, I just switch

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:36.480
<v Speaker 9>with you.

0:33:36.640 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 2>I just sent afterthought to Edinburgh. Okay, it was outrageous.

0:33:41.400 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 2>It was like I thought it'd be seven hundred bucks

0:33:43.120 --> 0:33:45.200
<v Speaker 2>and it was twelve thirteen hundred bucks. And one of

0:33:45.240 --> 0:33:47.960
<v Speaker 2>the overlays was aisle seat or window seat, and the

0:33:48.000 --> 0:33:50.000
<v Speaker 2>second overlay was oxygen.

0:33:49.520 --> 0:33:51.200
<v Speaker 4>And I said, we'll pay.

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:54.600
<v Speaker 2>Up for oxygen yep as well. But is the answer

0:33:54.640 --> 0:33:56.200
<v Speaker 2>that people are being rooted down and nuts?

0:33:56.280 --> 0:33:58.680
<v Speaker 9>It's the answered is that it's causing a lot of

0:33:58.720 --> 0:34:00.640
<v Speaker 9>tension in the cabin, and there's so much tension and

0:34:00.680 --> 0:34:02.720
<v Speaker 9>travel to begin with. So the Wall Street Journal has

0:34:02.720 --> 0:34:04.960
<v Speaker 9>a really good look into this because you have the

0:34:04.960 --> 0:34:07.560
<v Speaker 9>passenger who was asking and they're like looked at as

0:34:07.600 --> 0:34:09.279
<v Speaker 9>like a cheap scape. Then you have the person sitting

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:11.200
<v Speaker 9>in the seat who looked at like a jerk if

0:34:11.239 --> 0:34:13.040
<v Speaker 9>they don't change the seed. And then you have the

0:34:13.080 --> 0:34:16.440
<v Speaker 9>airline stewardesses who were called the middle and they just

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:19.040
<v Speaker 9>want to sit there and say, not my problem. Yeah,

0:34:19.120 --> 0:34:21.719
<v Speaker 9>it's up to you guys. You bottle it out, all right.

0:34:22.160 --> 0:34:26.040
<v Speaker 9>Theater owners they're saying that blockbusters are not enough to

0:34:26.160 --> 0:34:28.920
<v Speaker 9>help them survive. They like the Barbinheimer, you know, that

0:34:29.000 --> 0:34:31.239
<v Speaker 9>whole trend of it, but they need more than two

0:34:31.719 --> 0:34:33.080
<v Speaker 9>movies to survive.

0:34:33.200 --> 0:34:36.120
<v Speaker 2>Paul start there. You had a one off, was Barbonheimer,

0:34:36.239 --> 0:34:37.520
<v Speaker 2>like just one lovely summer?

0:34:38.120 --> 0:34:39.840
<v Speaker 4>No, I mean there's a lot of stuff.

0:34:39.880 --> 0:34:41.920
<v Speaker 3>Twenty four is gonna be the summer of twenty four

0:34:41.960 --> 0:34:44.000
<v Speaker 3>is gonna be okay, twenty five and twenty six are

0:34:44.040 --> 0:34:45.000
<v Speaker 3>gonna be continue.

0:34:45.360 --> 0:34:45.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:34:45.600 --> 0:34:47.400
<v Speaker 9>No, And it's a probably because you've had like, you know,

0:34:47.440 --> 0:34:49.480
<v Speaker 9>big hits like barbon Higher, but then you had the

0:34:49.480 --> 0:34:51.600
<v Speaker 9>sleeper hits. You had the Five Nights and Freddy's. You've

0:34:51.600 --> 0:34:52.520
<v Speaker 9>had that one.

0:34:52.360 --> 0:34:53.560
<v Speaker 2>Five I love it.

0:34:53.640 --> 0:34:57.200
<v Speaker 9>You didn't see the Five Nights Freddy I saw that one,

0:34:57.600 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 9>but it made so much money it was a sleeper.

0:35:00.239 --> 0:35:03.080
<v Speaker 9>Then you have the Taylor Swift, the Beyonce concert films

0:35:03.080 --> 0:35:05.000
<v Speaker 9>trying to pump in money. But then you have the

0:35:05.040 --> 0:35:08.160
<v Speaker 9>Hollywood strikes also that hurt. You have a competition from streaming,

0:35:08.200 --> 0:35:10.200
<v Speaker 9>and that's another issue that the theaters are dealing with.

0:35:10.239 --> 0:35:11.239
<v Speaker 9>So we'll see where it goes.

0:35:11.280 --> 0:35:13.799
<v Speaker 2>But do we still have movies that do like one

0:35:13.880 --> 0:35:17.640
<v Speaker 2>hundred million? Yes, yes, there's still blockbusters.

0:35:17.680 --> 0:35:20.279
<v Speaker 3>Sure, a blockbuster today really has to be like a

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:23.080
<v Speaker 3>billion global, global, global, And it's not.

0:35:23.080 --> 0:35:25.640
<v Speaker 9>The superhero ones, not as not as much of a

0:35:25.680 --> 0:35:26.799
<v Speaker 9>money maker as they used to be.

0:35:26.840 --> 0:35:29.920
<v Speaker 2>Interesting, I've been to the theater since time began. Oh no,

0:35:30.880 --> 0:35:31.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean.

0:35:31.760 --> 0:35:36.160
<v Speaker 4>It's support and that's some great, big old theaters.

0:35:36.000 --> 0:35:38.319
<v Speaker 2>What I remember. I know we got to continue here,

0:35:38.360 --> 0:35:40.800
<v Speaker 2>but I remember when the kids went all the time,

0:35:41.560 --> 0:35:43.680
<v Speaker 2>and then one day they just stopped and it was

0:35:43.719 --> 0:35:46.479
<v Speaker 2>because of streaming and Netflix. Yep, they just stopped going.

0:35:46.719 --> 0:35:48.360
<v Speaker 4>If that's my convenient.

0:35:48.080 --> 0:35:50.600
<v Speaker 9>Max, What do you track and field? This one is

0:35:50.680 --> 0:35:52.400
<v Speaker 9>interesting from the associated.

0:35:51.880 --> 0:35:54.680
<v Speaker 2>For med field.

0:35:54.960 --> 0:35:57.880
<v Speaker 9>It's going to become the first sport to introduce prize

0:35:58.040 --> 0:36:01.640
<v Speaker 9>money at the Olympics. The World Athletics. They're the governing

0:36:01.680 --> 0:36:04.360
<v Speaker 9>body of the of Athletics. They say they're going to

0:36:04.400 --> 0:36:09.319
<v Speaker 9>pay fifty thousand dollars to gold medalists in Paris. It

0:36:09.360 --> 0:36:11.880
<v Speaker 9>comes from this big pot of two point four million

0:36:11.960 --> 0:36:14.560
<v Speaker 9>dollars they're setting aside to pay them. There's forty eight

0:36:14.560 --> 0:36:16.319
<v Speaker 9>events in track and field, so that's how it's going

0:36:16.360 --> 0:36:18.319
<v Speaker 9>to break down. If you're on a relay team, you

0:36:18.400 --> 0:36:21.279
<v Speaker 9>have to break up the fifty thousand dollars. But it's

0:36:21.320 --> 0:36:24.440
<v Speaker 9>the start of something new. Paying these athletes to win

0:36:24.480 --> 0:36:24.880
<v Speaker 9>the time.

0:36:24.920 --> 0:36:27.480
<v Speaker 4>They were amateur. Doesn't that break the whole amateur thing?

0:36:27.680 --> 0:36:30.520
<v Speaker 9>Correct? But neilil cashish, you know, to go along with

0:36:30.560 --> 0:36:33.480
<v Speaker 9>it all right, and there's more to come. They're actually

0:36:33.480 --> 0:36:36.279
<v Speaker 9>thinking of payments for silver and bronze medalists. They're planned

0:36:36.320 --> 0:36:39.400
<v Speaker 9>to start from the twenty twenty eight Olympics in Los Angeles.

0:36:39.640 --> 0:36:42.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean to me, I've been wading lamand English. I

0:36:42.200 --> 0:36:45.520
<v Speaker 2>really recommended folks to the Laman, the great French newspaper, and

0:36:45.520 --> 0:36:48.520
<v Speaker 2>they have a very inexpensive all English site which I

0:36:48.600 --> 0:36:51.680
<v Speaker 2>find fascinating. And of course there's no other debate. Are

0:36:51.680 --> 0:36:53.880
<v Speaker 2>they going to get in the river and swim so

0:36:53.960 --> 0:36:55.359
<v Speaker 2>what do you do. You got to pay somebody ten

0:36:55.400 --> 0:36:58.000
<v Speaker 2>thousand bucks to get in the river. Exist it's not

0:36:58.160 --> 0:37:01.759
<v Speaker 2>it's not pretty. I mean it's not. You know, at

0:37:01.800 --> 0:37:03.480
<v Speaker 2>some point, if we get closer.

0:37:03.440 --> 0:37:05.840
<v Speaker 4>You've got his suite all set up in Paris for

0:37:05.840 --> 0:37:06.360
<v Speaker 4>the Olympics.

0:37:06.360 --> 0:37:08.280
<v Speaker 2>We do. You know, we're on the back side, away

0:37:08.280 --> 0:37:10.279
<v Speaker 2>from the street, and you know we're looking out and

0:37:10.400 --> 0:37:18.719
<v Speaker 2>they get the cigar you know, garden sure v r

0:37:19.000 --> 0:37:21.200
<v Speaker 2>X or whatever cigar bar.

0:37:21.320 --> 0:37:23.239
<v Speaker 4>All right, but you know we're all set up for

0:37:23.239 --> 0:37:23.560
<v Speaker 4>the summer.

0:37:23.920 --> 0:37:25.279
<v Speaker 2>I felt is going to be out with Gus in

0:37:25.320 --> 0:37:28.719
<v Speaker 2>the horses. Yep, just taking Gus the horse and they're

0:37:28.760 --> 0:37:30.440
<v Speaker 2>hanging out. I think it's out by Versailles.

0:37:30.560 --> 0:37:31.520
<v Speaker 4>Okay, very exciting.

0:37:31.880 --> 0:37:34.200
<v Speaker 9>Next, finally, if this we don't want to hear this

0:37:34.320 --> 0:37:36.120
<v Speaker 9>on the early morning shift when we come in, but

0:37:36.719 --> 0:37:40.440
<v Speaker 9>declf becoming the hottest thing in coffee right now. You know,

0:37:40.719 --> 0:37:44.319
<v Speaker 9>you have alcohol free cocktails, you have meat free hamburgers.

0:37:44.320 --> 0:37:46.640
<v Speaker 9>So now d calf is becoming the new thing.

0:37:47.280 --> 0:37:47.520
<v Speaker 4>Uh.

0:37:47.600 --> 0:37:50.920
<v Speaker 9>The reason why is become new techniques and caffeine removal.

0:37:51.440 --> 0:37:54.399
<v Speaker 9>They've started without using chemicals, so it's becoming a little

0:37:54.400 --> 0:37:56.320
<v Speaker 9>bit healthier, I guess.

0:37:57.719 --> 0:38:01.720
<v Speaker 3>People drink right cafe a coffee versus DCAF.

0:38:01.719 --> 0:38:03.280
<v Speaker 4>I don't know the percentage there, it's.

0:38:03.160 --> 0:38:06.400
<v Speaker 9>Not, but it's becoming this high thing because there's different competitions,

0:38:06.440 --> 0:38:10.160
<v Speaker 9>like these high class competitions and DCAF was actually won

0:38:10.239 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 9>a top prize for the first time in like this

0:38:12.719 --> 0:38:17.080
<v Speaker 9>competition's twenty year history. So it's starting to pick up

0:38:17.120 --> 0:38:17.600
<v Speaker 9>a little bit.

0:38:18.400 --> 0:38:20.680
<v Speaker 2>The tang here, and folks, I've been using tang zero.

0:38:21.320 --> 0:38:23.759
<v Speaker 2>You know, the sugar became a problem and tang zero's great,

0:38:24.239 --> 0:38:27.920
<v Speaker 2>but you guys deserve to walk by the DCAF excellence

0:38:28.880 --> 0:38:39.560
<v Speaker 2>of Senkall Senka was too. Yeah, I assume Senka is

0:38:39.600 --> 0:38:43.640
<v Speaker 2>still around. Lisa, thanks so much. That is Lisa Matteo

0:38:44.360 --> 0:38:48.800
<v Speaker 2>with the newspapers. This is a Bloomberg Surveillance podcast, bringing

0:38:48.840 --> 0:38:53.279
<v Speaker 2>you the best in economics, finance, investment, and international relations.

0:38:53.520 --> 0:38:56.880
<v Speaker 2>You can also watch the show live on YouTube. Visit

0:38:56.920 --> 0:39:01.000
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg Podcast channel on YouTube to see the show

0:39:01.280 --> 0:39:04.359
<v Speaker 2>weekday mornings from seven to ten am Eastern from our

0:39:04.400 --> 0:39:08.120
<v Speaker 2>global headquarters in New York City. Subscribe to the podcast

0:39:08.200 --> 0:39:12.240
<v Speaker 2>on Apple, Spotify, or anywhere else you listen, and always

0:39:12.400 --> 0:39:16.760
<v Speaker 2>on Bloomberg Radio. The Bloomberg Terminal and the Bloomberg Business app,