WEBVTT - Cowboys & 49ers Recap, AFC North & Wright-Ins

0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by all State. Some

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>people just know they could save hundreds on car insurance

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>by checking all State first, Like you know, to check

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the date of the big game first before you accidentally

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>buy tickets on your twentieth wedding anniversary and have to

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>spend the next twenty years of your marriage making up

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>for it. Yeah, checking first is smart, So check all

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>State first for a quote that could save you hundreds.

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:26.600
<v Speaker 1>You're in good hands with All States Savings. Very terms

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:39.200
<v Speaker 1>apply All State Fire and Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates, Northbrook, Illinois.

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 2>Welcome in episode one eight four What's right with Nick Wright?

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:48.480
<v Speaker 2>Get right into it today. We had an awesome Week

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:51.199
<v Speaker 2>five in the nfls back to back weeks with a

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 2>London game, so back to back weeks of like fourteen

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 2>straight hours of football that we need to get to.

0:00:56.920 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 2>We will start, of course, as we always do, with

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 2>what missed. Justin Jefferson, the best wide receiver in the league,

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 2>headed to ir which could cause a sell off in Minnesota.

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:13.400
<v Speaker 2>You wonder if Danelle Hunter, You wonder if Marcus Davenport,

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 2>You wonder if Kirk Cousins all could be available. Miami

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:22.760
<v Speaker 2>does not kneel down, blows the game just indefensible by

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:26.560
<v Speaker 2>the Miami Hurricanes. My pal Mike Ryan and the Levatard

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:30.399
<v Speaker 2>Show still reeling about that. And then there is this

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:36.120
<v Speaker 2>theory from Demanse, who's now on screen, Demanse's lava shark theory,

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:39.319
<v Speaker 2>which was this to Demonse, I didn't put this in

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:41.120
<v Speaker 2>the show. I'm just letting you know. They put it

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 2>in there. Underwater volcano erupted and is releasing mutated sharks

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 2>that adapted to a very hot, acidic water. And then

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 2>Matt Ford tried to kind of, you know, cut the

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 2>mood in the room with a gambling question. Then Demanse said,

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 2>the lava sharks shark tend to agree. We also have

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 2>a NASA tweet about this very thing. You've heard of, sharknado.

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:10.359
<v Speaker 2>Now get ready for shark cano. The Kavachi volcano in

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 2>the Solomon Island is home to two species of sharks.

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 2>It's also the most active submarine volcanoes in the Pacific.

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 2>Scene here erupting underwater. So Demon's i'ven't really followed up

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 2>on this story. Can you explain this to me if

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:24.119
<v Speaker 2>you don't mind?

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 3>Uh, yeah, I mean, there's just a volcano in the

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:30.399
<v Speaker 3>Solomon Islands that erupt it. It erupts apparently like all

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 3>the time. And they've got a couple species of starks

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 3>over there. It's like Hammerhead and I don't know what

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 3>the other one is. But apparently the latest eruption has

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 3>caused them to be freed, and I think they're about

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:43.919
<v Speaker 3>to start branching out, taking their talents to other spots.

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 2>What do you mean freed? They were trapped? Where were

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 2>they trapped?

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 3>That's what it seemed like. They were like kind of

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 3>the volcano apparently opened something up and they're coming up

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:56.680
<v Speaker 3>out of it. This is like the exact plot to

0:02:56.919 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 3>a movie that I've seen, but it's actually happening.

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 2>Like I'm not okay, listens, folks. I think folks might

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 2>be right now chuckling a bit, you know at Demanse.

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 2>Let me tell you something. I don't know anyone that

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:18.360
<v Speaker 2>knows more about animals, like random facts about animals than Demanse.

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 2>We were at, uh, this thing in New York City.

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:25.800
<v Speaker 2>I forget what it's called. It's like, it's not the

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:28.679
<v Speaker 2>Westminster Dog Show, but I think it's in conjunction with that.

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 2>The American Kennel Club meet the breeds where at the

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 2>Javid Center there were like a thousand different dog breeds,

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 2>one or two of each breed that you could come

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:42.880
<v Speaker 2>through and meet. And Demanse went with me and his

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 2>baby sister Deanna, and there was this person who had

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 2>some type of Doberman.

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 3>It was it was it was it was an American Doberman,

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 3>is what she said. I thought it was a European Doberman.

0:03:56.880 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead, no, exactly right. And then and the lady

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 2>was like, no, no, there's no such thing as European

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 2>Doberman's or American Doberman's. They've been lying to you, Babba,

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 2>And Demanse is so hard to.

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:17.039
<v Speaker 2>And Demansee just straight googled it and checked her, like, actually,

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 2>you're wrong, that's not true. Now he didn't say that

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 2>to her, he said it to me after, but he

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 2>knew she was wrong. So I say all that to

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:29.920
<v Speaker 2>say this. If Demanse's saying that, you know, a few

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:33.600
<v Speaker 2>generations from now, we're gonna have some evolved sharks that

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:36.039
<v Speaker 2>can deal with super hot oceans that we're about to

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 2>have to deal with because of climate change, I'd listen

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:42.719
<v Speaker 2>to them. I would adjust your scuba diving plans accordingly,

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 2>all right, that's enough nonsense to start today's show. What

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 2>are we starting with Demanse?

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 3>We are starting with my guy Brock Perdy in the

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 3>forty nine ers, they obviously steamroll Dallas, steam roll Dallas

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 3>on Sunday. Of course, you're waiting for him to win

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:00.680
<v Speaker 3>the Super Bowl to give him his props. So what

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 3>is it gonna take for you to start believing in party?

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 3>I actually think that you said something about if he

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 3>won this game in Dallas, we were gonna come back

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 3>and like Bookmark or something, Bookmark something something like that

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:13.039
<v Speaker 3>took along those lines.

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:19.719
<v Speaker 2>So two separate things. Will I give brock Purty credit

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 2>for what he did Sunday? Absolutely, unequivocally, yes, I will.

0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:31.839
<v Speaker 2>I wanted to see him against a very good defense.

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 2>And I'm not gonna do the sports media thing where

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 2>I now act like, well, Dallas's defense isn't that good.

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:44.360
<v Speaker 2>That's unfair. I thought going now, going into the year,

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 2>I thought Dallas had the best defense in the NFL,

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:51.039
<v Speaker 2>the number one defense. I don't think that anymore, partially

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 2>because of the digs injury, but that is they obviously

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:59.160
<v Speaker 2>have a good to very good to at times great defense,

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 2>and he carved them up. The other thing I said

0:06:03.680 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 2>I wanted to see was him make more tight window,

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:11.800
<v Speaker 2>high level throws, and he made four of those, at

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:15.919
<v Speaker 2>least four of them. Sunday night. I asked everybody to

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 2>go to you know, to keep the running log wows

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 2>and yikes. I counted five wows and one yikes. So

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 2>I am going to be fair in evaluating his performance

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:34.919
<v Speaker 2>on Sunday. I thought he was excellent. Okay, Now the

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:38.359
<v Speaker 2>next question you asked, or the other question you asked,

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 2>is what will it take for me to believe he's

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 2>the real deal? What will it take for me to

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 2>believe that he is not the obvious weakest link of

0:06:49.720 --> 0:06:54.720
<v Speaker 2>the team. More So, I will give him credit for Sunday.

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:58.280
<v Speaker 2>But am I now going to say I'm a full

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 2>fledged rock purty Believe I'm not? That would be lying.

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:05.799
<v Speaker 2>So listen, you guys can get people can get upset

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:09.480
<v Speaker 2>with me, but they can't say I'm being dishonest. I

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 2>am giving him credit for Sunday while also saying I

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 2>still have my skepticism. I still have my skepticism that

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 2>the other shoe is not gonna drop.

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead, de manse, Who's got the best defense outside

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 3>of the Niners.

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 2>You think, well, I think I think Cleveland has a

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 2>case they might have the best defense in the NFL.

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead, they go if they obviously just played Dallas,

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 3>which is a high level defense, and now they're gonna

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 3>play Cleveland next. So so it's another chance to sponse.

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 2>It's San Francisco at Cleveland. Have you looked at the

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 2>lines for this week?

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 3>No, but it's probably what.

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 2>Do you think the line is?

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 3>Uh, San Francisco at Cleveland, san Francisco minus four and

0:07:56.360 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 3>a half? Maybe?

0:07:57.960 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 2>All right, you nailed that. That is a great job

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 2>by you. That is so before before Sunday Night football,

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 2>it was San Francis before that game kicked off. So

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 2>at eight pm Sunday, it was San Francisco minus two

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 2>and a half and you looked at that and you

0:08:17.240 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 2>were like, huh, they're only laying two and a half points. Now.

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 2>They were so dominant on Sunday Night Football that by

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 2>yesterday morning it was San Francisco minus four and I

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 2>believe at this point it's minus four and a half,

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 2>and in fact it's now moved to minus five. But

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:37.880
<v Speaker 2>it was two and a half Sunday night and now

0:08:37.880 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 2>it's minus five. Here is so two notes on that.

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 2>One is the NFL this year. I said this going

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:53.080
<v Speaker 2>into Bill's Jags is four for four on the hot

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 2>team getting humbled week one. Or you could even argue

0:08:58.400 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 2>five for five if we want to declude the Chiefs

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:05.680
<v Speaker 2>losing in week one, but that's but take that out.

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:09.200
<v Speaker 2>The team of the week Week one was the Lions

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 2>for beating the Chiefs. They then go home and lose

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:15.840
<v Speaker 2>to Seattle. The team of the week for week two

0:09:16.440 --> 0:09:21.199
<v Speaker 2>was the Cowboys for two thoroughly dominating victories forty to

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 2>nothing in thirty to ten. They then lose to Arizona.

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 2>The team of the Week Week three was Miami for

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 2>scoring seventy points in a football game. They then get

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 2>blown out by Buffalo. The team of the Week Week

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 2>four was Buffalo for beating Miami. They then go to

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:44.320
<v Speaker 2>London and get thoroughly dominated a game that was not

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:47.800
<v Speaker 2>as close as the score indicated by Jacksonville. Who's the

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:51.559
<v Speaker 2>team of the week right now, Demanse, that'd be the Niners.

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 2>Careful now, careful America. So that's a kind of a

0:09:55.840 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 2>bigger point, that's not really a rock party point. But

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 2>the Brown coming off a bye that the Niners, coming

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:10.719
<v Speaker 2>off the emotional high of we beat Dallas, we asserted ourselves.

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:14.960
<v Speaker 2>Now all of a suddenly they gotta go and they

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 2>really wanted to beat Dallas. Now they have to go

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:25.199
<v Speaker 2>cross country one o'clock game, not nationally televised, out of conference,

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 2>one of their quote less important games of the year,

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 2>against a rested, excellent defense. And to Shaun Watson, who

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:37.839
<v Speaker 2>gave himself two by weeks because he wasn't feeling quite

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 2>up to it last week, that could be a trap spot.

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:47.200
<v Speaker 2>And so listen the pretty stuff. People keep asking me

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 2>a version of this question, would my feeling of on

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:55.440
<v Speaker 2>brock Purty be different if he were a first round pick?

0:10:56.360 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 2>And the answer to that question is obviously yes, But

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 2>it is not just because Okay, so you're saying he

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 2>could be the exact same player and if he was

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:11.199
<v Speaker 2>the first round pick kind of, but not really, because

0:11:11.720 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 2>if he were a first round pick, it would also

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 2>mean he was a better collegiate player. He has a

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 2>longer track record of high level success. And this player

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:27.840
<v Speaker 2>he's turned into, this guy who never makes mistakes, is

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:31.320
<v Speaker 2>simply not who he was at Iowa State. He had

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:37.440
<v Speaker 2>at Iowa state a couple of the most cartoonish mistakes

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 2>you've ever seen. Did you you saw that clip going

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 2>around the internet this week Demanse where he did the

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:50.720
<v Speaker 2>Deshaun Watson throw it backwards against I think TCU and

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:53.240
<v Speaker 2>the one where his paskets batted down and then he

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:57.960
<v Speaker 2>bats it forward. I mean, it's the same guy. And

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 2>let me say one other thing about Rock Party that

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't think is unfair. Every time I watch last

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 2>night included Jimmy Garoppolo Go be Terrible. I am more

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:17.320
<v Speaker 2>skeptical of Rock Party because while we didn't see Jimmy,

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:21.840
<v Speaker 2>hold on, you're shaking your head. But let me let

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:28.839
<v Speaker 2>me ask. Let's set this situation. Okay, let's say Demanse

0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 2>that I'm trying to find. All right, I'm gonna use

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:37.200
<v Speaker 2>a totally unfair analogy. I'm saying this on the front end. Okay,

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 2>Let's say this podcast were one of the five most

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 2>popular in the world, and there were people arguing that,

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, Demanse's the key to this, Demanse's Demanse is

0:12:55.440 --> 0:12:58.719
<v Speaker 2>the reason for it. And there were other people than

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 2>arguing that, No, I think it's I think it's nick.

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 2>I think it's Nick, and that was a big debate,

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 2>and then you left and you got replaced by literally

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 2>a random person. You got replaced by Daniel the Nuggets fan,

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:22.480
<v Speaker 2>who produces the show, and the show actually started to

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 2>do a little bit better. And you started your own

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 2>podcast and it failed miserably, and then all of a sudden,

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:34.720
<v Speaker 2>people were like, you know what, I think Daniel's the

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:38.199
<v Speaker 2>greatest podcast for ever. And someone's like, hold on a second.

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 2>The common denominator's been Nick and demons, we can see him.

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 2>He's failing terribly. And then people were like, nope, Daniel

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 2>the Nuggets Fan is the greatest pod is you know

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:55.679
<v Speaker 2>what game? He might be the next Joe Rogan. And

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 2>it's like and there I think they were. Now conversely,

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:03.600
<v Speaker 2>let's say that exact same thing happened, but when you

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:06.679
<v Speaker 2>went on to do your pod it also was a

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 2>massive success. People then I think would start to question, like, oh,

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 2>maybe they did find another diamond in the rough and Daniel.

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:20.800
<v Speaker 2>And so people can say it's unfair that my opinion

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 2>of Brock Purdy is impacted by how Jimmy Garoppolo does.

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 2>But when I had this same argument about Jimmy Garoppolo

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 2>for years He then leaves the cocoon of Kyle Shanahan

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 2>and immediately leads the NFL on interceptions and looks terrible

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 2>immediately with Davante Adams and his former offensive coordinator as

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 2>his head coach, it makes me a little more skeptical. Now,

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 2>is that fair to purty? I don't know. It's just honest.

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 2>And I'm gonna say one other thing on this.

0:14:57.800 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 3>I think you started be fair.

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, I wanted to be fair. I'm trying to

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 2>be fair and honest, and at times they seem to

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:18.240
<v Speaker 2>be in common. Yes, yeah, exactly. I want to say

0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 2>one other thing. I am going to lose my mind

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 2>if people actually start to make the argument brock Parties

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:34.720
<v Speaker 2>the MVP of the league, I'm gonna go crazy. That's

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 2>that should be a bridge too far. Like I have

0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 2>come a decent amount of ways I have come from.

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't think the guy's any good. Two. I'm open

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 2>to the possibility you could be good. I need some

0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:55.200
<v Speaker 2>of the other folks to not all of a sudden

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 2>make the argument that a guy who if the Niners.

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 2>This is how I know he's not the m v

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 2>P of the league. Here's how I know it. If

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 2>the Niners demands a disbanded. If they were like the Niners,

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 2>you get the team death penalty.

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 3>All your players, nobody's going.

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm not saying nobody's gonna pick him up, but

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm saying seven of his No, what I'm saying is

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 2>seven of his teammates get drafted first. I'm simply asking

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:31.640
<v Speaker 2>that can we can we not have a guy named

0:16:31.920 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 2>the most valuable player in the NFL if no one

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 2>thinks he's the best or second or third or fourth

0:16:40.800 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 2>best player on his own team. That's all I'm asking.

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:47.520
<v Speaker 3>And that's you there. Are you a little afraid that

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 3>this take will go into your comically wrong category instead?

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 3>Because it's been a few weeks and it's not right yet,

0:16:57.320 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 3>and it's definitely eventually.

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 2>I guess we got it's on the board. It is

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:06.199
<v Speaker 2>on the board that we go back and play this

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:10.639
<v Speaker 2>when brock Perty's career record is thirty seven and three

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:16.399
<v Speaker 2>and he's won a Super Bowl, like now the ultimate karmik.

0:17:17.280 --> 0:17:22.360
<v Speaker 2>If people are rooting against me, the way this story

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 2>is supposed to end is with Brock Purty outdueling Patrick

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 2>Mahomes in the Super Bowl. That's That's the way it

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:35.359
<v Speaker 2>sounds like a heartache. This story is supposed to.

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 3>Talk about never a doubt. That'd be hilarious, dude.

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:43.640
<v Speaker 2>If the Niners are the team that goes undefeated. If

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:45.719
<v Speaker 2>the Niners of the team that goes undefeated and then

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 2>they beat the Chiefs. But so I am, I'm trying

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 2>not to be a hater. I'm also trying to be honest.

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:57.960
<v Speaker 2>All right, next, all right, by the way, hold im sorry, Tomanse, Sorry,

0:17:58.000 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 2>I meant to I tell the audience please don't forget.

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 2>You can put your questions in the YouTube comments and

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:05.160
<v Speaker 2>we'll get to them in the sea block. I've been

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:08.199
<v Speaker 2>forgetting to tell people that, and so the So if

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:10.400
<v Speaker 2>you guys want to ask questions to me or Demanse,

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:12.880
<v Speaker 2>who looks great today, By the way, you can put

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 2>those questions in the sea block, or you can put

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:16.639
<v Speaker 2>those questions in the chat. Now we'll get to them

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 2>in the sea block.

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:20.320
<v Speaker 3>All right, go ahead, all right, So I'm gonna add,

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 3>do you still think that the Cowboys can win the

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:25.680
<v Speaker 3>Super Bowl? Or like, are you abandoning that or how

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:27.639
<v Speaker 3>do we because I mean it's in the rundown and

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:30.680
<v Speaker 3>I just don't know if that's still your your thought process. O, yes,

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:31.240
<v Speaker 3>if it's not.

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 2>So, I never picked them to win the Super Bowl.

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:36.359
<v Speaker 2>I picked them to get to the Super Bowl. And

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 2>this is where I remind everyone that it's very early.

0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 2>It is very early and week five. Massive things change

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:52.639
<v Speaker 2>over the course of the year, and I think crossing

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:58.879
<v Speaker 2>the Cowboys out would be foolish. With that said, I

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 2>am less confident about them right now than at any point.

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:07.800
<v Speaker 2>And I didn't even really care about the Arizona loss.

0:19:08.160 --> 0:19:10.639
<v Speaker 2>And I think people thought, oh, Nick, is you know,

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 2>just trying to make excuses. No, I've just watched the

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 2>NFL for too long, too closely to overreact to a

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 2>team that I thought was great, overlooking a crummy opponent

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 2>and just getting got Last year, everybody tried to convince

0:19:30.600 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 2>me that the Chiefs loss to the Colts was some

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 2>something major. When I knew it wasn't, I was like, no,

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 2>I've seen I saw the Bucks lose in Week four,

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 2>the year they won the Super Bowl to the Chicago Bears.

0:19:43.040 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 2>The Chiefs lose to the Colts. I see, you know,

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:50.240
<v Speaker 2>the the good team overlooking bad team. Bad team gets

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:53.360
<v Speaker 2>off to a good start, ball starts rolling downhill. We

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 2>see that all the time. In this league, So I

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 2>didn't care so much about that loss. And had they

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:07.440
<v Speaker 2>played a good game against the Niners but lost, even

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 2>though they would be behind the eight ball from a

0:20:09.640 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 2>seating perspective and a record perspective, I could be like,

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:15.639
<v Speaker 2>all right, you know what I mean, you can not

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:22.679
<v Speaker 2>that big of a deal the Niners that I've watched,

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:29.160
<v Speaker 2>obviously every Cowboys game this year, the gap that we

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 2>saw demonse between the Cowboys and the Jets in that

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:39.440
<v Speaker 2>Week two game looked like the gap that we saw

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:47.199
<v Speaker 2>between the Niners and the Cowboys. That's horrifying. And it

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 2>wasn't like, oh, they muffed a punt like I'll go

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 2>back to that Chiefs Colts game, that Chiefs Colts game

0:20:57.040 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 2>from Week three last year. The Chiefs muff upon they

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:05.640
<v Speaker 2>then have another fumble, They end the game on a

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 2>sack and there's a roughing the passer call. The Colts

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:13.399
<v Speaker 2>hit up not a quite hail Mary, but kind of

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:15.480
<v Speaker 2>a hail Mary. They go for the winning said. It

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 2>was a lot of like weird stuff that happened. The

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 2>Niners just bullied the damn Cowboys, and Dak looked totally

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:29.480
<v Speaker 2>out of sorts. McCarthy did so many vintage bad McCarthy

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:33.040
<v Speaker 2>things that you're worried he's going to do come the postseason,

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:38.880
<v Speaker 2>and Tony Pollard could get nothing going. There was no

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:43.200
<v Speaker 2>phase of the game where the Cowboys looked like they

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 2>were in the Niners league. Now, I go back to

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:52.919
<v Speaker 2>long season and things can evolve as the year goes on.

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:57.879
<v Speaker 2>And I will also be fair in this regard. Had

0:21:58.000 --> 0:22:04.000
<v Speaker 2>the Cowboys won, everyone would be saying, well, good for them,

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 2>but prove you can do it in the playoffs, because

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:09.720
<v Speaker 2>they've lost the Niners in the playoffs back to back years.

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 2>But it is concerning that the Niners, that Dak has

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 2>not played well against this version of the Niners. Ever,

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:23.600
<v Speaker 2>that the Niners mollywopped them the way they did, pardon me,

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 2>all of that is greatly concerning. I also will say this,

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't think the NFC is a two team race.

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a five team race. I think the

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Niners and Eagles have earned the benefit of the doubt

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 2>to be considered the cream of the crop. They were

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:49.240
<v Speaker 2>both excellent last year, they're both undefeated this year. But

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:56.480
<v Speaker 2>I think Detroit and Seattle are also viable contenders. And

0:22:56.520 --> 0:23:01.480
<v Speaker 2>then there's Dallas, right now this moment that five team race,

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 2>Dallas is in last place, not just by record, but

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 2>by eye test. Dallas doesn't. So all the other teams

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 2>like Philly doesn't necessarily have a marquee win, but they're undefeated.

0:23:18.280 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 2>The Niners have a marquee win over Dallas. Seattle's got

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:25.880
<v Speaker 2>a marque win over Detroit. Detroit's got a marque win

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 2>over Kansas City. Dallas's three wins have come against the

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 2>three worst offenses in football, Daniel Jones, Zach Wilson, and

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 2>Mac Jones. And so there are real concerns for the

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 2>Dallas Cowboys right now. I'm not writing them off, but

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:50.240
<v Speaker 2>through five weeks, it's wildly disappointing.

0:23:50.359 --> 0:23:50.679
<v Speaker 4>Next.

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:54.560
<v Speaker 3>All right, so last week you said that the Bengals

0:23:54.560 --> 0:23:56.439
<v Speaker 3>were cooked. That was one of your takes that you

0:23:56.680 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 3>planted your flag on. Actually, the offenses showing signs of life.

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:03.639
<v Speaker 3>I warned you about this. Actually, well, the rest of

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:06.480
<v Speaker 3>the AFC North and shambles. Are you ready to be

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:09.400
<v Speaker 3>back in on Sin Seattle? I don't know if everything's

0:24:09.440 --> 0:24:12.440
<v Speaker 3>in shambles over there, but the Chancer, Well.

0:24:12.320 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 2>The tough game for your Ravens, let's be honest, tough game. Yeah,

0:24:16.480 --> 0:24:19.919
<v Speaker 2>tough game, but no business losing that game. And of

0:24:20.040 --> 0:24:23.360
<v Speaker 2>course when I abandon the Steelers as after picking them

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:25.159
<v Speaker 2>each week, they win as five point dogs.

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 2>No, I think the Bengals are still cooked, and here's

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 2>why the Ravens are going to bounce back and go

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 2>beat Tennessee. I believe Cincinnati is going to lose at

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:43.400
<v Speaker 2>home this week to Seattle. A Seattle team that had

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:47.680
<v Speaker 2>been dealing with injuries is getting guys back now, has

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:52.959
<v Speaker 2>is coming off a bye, has two awesome corners in

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Weatherspoon and Wrek Woolen. Higgins is dinged up with the Ribs,

0:24:58.040 --> 0:25:00.399
<v Speaker 2>so they'll be I think that if any team is

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:03.400
<v Speaker 2>set up to be able to handle Jamar Chase, it's

0:25:03.440 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 2>a team with two number one corners. You can put

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:09.960
<v Speaker 2>one on him and still double him. And so all

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 2>of a sudden, I think after Sunday Cincinnati is gonna

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 2>be two and four, with their next two games being

0:25:18.000 --> 0:25:21.879
<v Speaker 2>the Niners in the Bills. So no, I think the

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 2>and I where I will give Cincinnati credit is Joe

0:25:26.880 --> 0:25:31.200
<v Speaker 2>did look better this week and the numbers were far better,

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:36.120
<v Speaker 2>but he's still it's he can't because of that calf.

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:38.919
<v Speaker 2>He's not throwing the ball well down the field. He

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 2>had the one bomb to chase, but aside front he

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:44.719
<v Speaker 2>was one for four of balls traveling more than fifteen

0:25:44.760 --> 0:25:48.359
<v Speaker 2>yards through the air. He doesn't quite look right, So no,

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:54.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't. Cincinnati has so they're one in I'm sorry,

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 2>two and three, so they have twelve games remaining. Here

0:25:58.600 --> 0:26:04.119
<v Speaker 2>are some of those games. Home for Seattle at the Niners,

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:09.480
<v Speaker 2>home for the Bills at the Ravens, two against Pittsburgh

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 2>home one road at the Chiefs, and in the final

0:26:13.840 --> 0:26:15.919
<v Speaker 2>week of the year home for the Browns. And the

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:21.479
<v Speaker 2>Browns always beat them. Their only quote easy unquote games

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 2>left are the Texans, who are frisky, the Colts, and

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:31.879
<v Speaker 2>the Vikings. So let's say they win all three of

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:37.119
<v Speaker 2>those easy games, and that's five wins. You gotta find

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:41.320
<v Speaker 2>another five wins, probably, I think that's tough, all right.

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:44.879
<v Speaker 3>Next, all right, the Patriots have been blown out seventy

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:47.120
<v Speaker 3>two to three in the last couple of games. Mac

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:50.119
<v Speaker 3>Jones has gotten benched in back to back games as well.

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:52.199
<v Speaker 3>Do you think the Patriots are the New Jets of

0:26:52.240 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 3>the NFL?

0:26:54.440 --> 0:26:56.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, I don't know the New Jets, but I do

0:26:56.400 --> 0:27:01.240
<v Speaker 2>think they have the least talented roster. These talented offense

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:05.960
<v Speaker 2>in the league by far, they're so boring, They're poorly coached.

0:27:06.560 --> 0:27:12.119
<v Speaker 2>There's it has been an institutional failure by Belichick on

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 2>talent acquisition and evaluation. And mac Jones is terrible. And

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 2>I was the I It is not the same as

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:28.239
<v Speaker 2>the Purty thing, I promise you. But I had to

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:35.280
<v Speaker 2>listen mac Jones's rookie year to people telling me, Nick,

0:27:35.359 --> 0:27:37.680
<v Speaker 2>you won't give him credit? What more do you want

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 2>him to do? Look at his numbers versus Trevor Lawrence's

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:43.600
<v Speaker 2>why won't you acknowledge you were wrong about him? And

0:27:43.640 --> 0:27:50.240
<v Speaker 2>I said, no, I will not. Now, obviously Purty is

0:27:50.280 --> 0:27:53.639
<v Speaker 2>better than Mac. I'm not denying that, But what I

0:27:53.680 --> 0:27:58.480
<v Speaker 2>will say is this, Honestly, if mac Jones were the

0:27:58.520 --> 0:28:00.800
<v Speaker 2>quarterback of the Niners, I think they're five and zero.

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:04.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't think their records different, do you? I don't

0:28:04.840 --> 0:28:08.600
<v Speaker 2>think you do. I don't think that. I And also

0:28:08.760 --> 0:28:13.200
<v Speaker 2>remember Kyle Shannan reportedly wanted to draft mac Jones when

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:16.959
<v Speaker 2>they ended up drafting Trey Lance. So I'm not I

0:28:17.080 --> 0:28:21.720
<v Speaker 2>do think the Patriots would be better with Brock Perdy

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 2>than mac Jones, obviously, but I don't think the Niners

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:30.919
<v Speaker 2>record would be worse with mac Jones. Now, how the

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:35.200
<v Speaker 2>how they look all the least one loss? What game

0:28:35.240 --> 0:28:39.240
<v Speaker 2>could they have lost? They they've they've been blowing people out.

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:41.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's gonna be hard to find the law

0:28:41.880 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 2>they won forty two to ten.

0:28:44.120 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 3>They lost that Ram game. They could have lost that

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 3>Rams game.

0:28:48.480 --> 0:28:53.200
<v Speaker 2>Maybe the RAM but did I mean, it's hard to

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:56.880
<v Speaker 2>find in that Rams game. By the way, though, Purdy

0:28:57.080 --> 0:29:00.200
<v Speaker 2>was seventeen of twenty five for two hundred yards, no touchdown,

0:29:00.560 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 2>Like that was maybe his worst game of the year.

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 2>So I don't know. The Patriots stink is the long

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 2>and short of it. And Belichick's not gonna get Shula's

0:29:12.840 --> 0:29:15.200
<v Speaker 2>record in New England. That's not gonna happen.

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:18.440
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead, a little conspiracy theory here. Do you think

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 3>Belichick is keeping mac Jones in on purpose to tank

0:29:21.400 --> 0:29:24.400
<v Speaker 3>so he can get Caleb Williams and like strategically taking

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:26.520
<v Speaker 3>him out as if he's a little pissed off, you know,

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 3>to make it seem a little bit more believable.

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:33.960
<v Speaker 2>Here is the thing that is interesting about that. I

0:29:34.000 --> 0:29:36.320
<v Speaker 2>don't think that's the case, because if they were to

0:29:36.320 --> 0:29:38.640
<v Speaker 2>get the number one pick. I don't think Kraft would

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 2>let Belichick stay on as coach so he'd be getting

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 2>Caleb Williams for the next team or for the next coach.

0:29:45.440 --> 0:29:49.280
<v Speaker 2>Pardon me, but I am now to the point with

0:29:50.240 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 2>some of these teams that thought they were playoff contenders

0:29:55.520 --> 0:30:01.480
<v Speaker 2>this year in the AFC that I am now rooting

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:06.680
<v Speaker 2>for them to win games because I don't want them

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:09.960
<v Speaker 2>to be able to get Caleb. Like last night, I

0:30:10.160 --> 0:30:15.200
<v Speaker 2>was watching Raiders Packers, and traditionally, if you're a Chiefs

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:18.800
<v Speaker 2>fan and you have a team in your division playing

0:30:18.840 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 2>a team in the NFC, you're rooting for the NFC team,

0:30:23.800 --> 0:30:25.320
<v Speaker 2>you know what I mean, to make your path to

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 2>a divisional title easier. I was rooting like crazy for

0:30:29.320 --> 0:30:32.479
<v Speaker 2>the Raiders last night because I need them to stack

0:30:32.520 --> 0:30:37.040
<v Speaker 2>a few wins. I am now legit worried that the

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 2>Broncos are getting up with Caleb Williams. For real, They're

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:47.280
<v Speaker 2>so bad and so like the Chiefs play the Broncos

0:30:47.360 --> 0:30:50.720
<v Speaker 2>twice in the next sixteen or in the next twenty days,

0:30:51.600 --> 0:30:55.080
<v Speaker 2>I am I am or less than that. What in

0:30:55.080 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 2>the next three weeks? I am upset that the Chiefs

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:04.040
<v Speaker 2>don't have a late late season game against Denver when

0:31:04.040 --> 0:31:06.400
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs have everything locked up that they can just

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:10.200
<v Speaker 2>throw it to make sure Denver doesn't get Caleb Williams.

0:31:10.600 --> 0:31:14.480
<v Speaker 2>Because I'm looking at Denver's schedule the rest of the

0:31:14.480 --> 0:31:18.760
<v Speaker 2>way and I'm trying to so like, I really need

0:31:18.800 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 2>the Packers to keep helping out the AFC West by

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 2>losing to these AFC West teams. Because Denver goes at

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:29.840
<v Speaker 2>KC home for the Packers, home for KC, Like, I

0:31:29.880 --> 0:31:33.120
<v Speaker 2>need Denver to win that Packers game. They have a

0:31:33.160 --> 0:31:36.480
<v Speaker 2>game against the Vikings. I need them to win because

0:31:36.480 --> 0:31:38.600
<v Speaker 2>they don't have a lot of wins left on the schedule.

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 2>New England. They have the Jets again. Belichick always beats

0:31:43.440 --> 0:31:46.719
<v Speaker 2>the Jets. They're at the Raiders this week, the Raiders

0:31:46.760 --> 0:31:49.520
<v Speaker 2>on a short week. Maybe they can win that. They

0:31:49.560 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 2>have the Commanders and Colts at home or no, the

0:31:52.280 --> 0:31:58.040
<v Speaker 2>Colts games in Germany or something. Every every game. They're

0:31:58.120 --> 0:32:01.719
<v Speaker 2>so pathetic, man, And if they end up with Caleb Williams,

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:05.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna be so upset. I am just dead set

0:32:06.120 --> 0:32:11.040
<v Speaker 2>on the Panthers continuing to be awful because that pick

0:32:11.120 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 2>goes to Chicago and then Caleb's in the NFC. A

0:32:14.960 --> 0:32:18.840
<v Speaker 2>sneaky team that's still viable for the number one pick

0:32:19.040 --> 0:32:24.200
<v Speaker 2>is the Cardinals. Like they've been pardon me, in a

0:32:24.240 --> 0:32:27.360
<v Speaker 2>lot of these games, but their only win is against

0:32:27.480 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 2>Dallas and they are the Cardinals. Next four is at

0:32:33.120 --> 0:32:36.040
<v Speaker 2>the Rams, at the Seahawks home for the Ravens at

0:32:36.080 --> 0:32:38.960
<v Speaker 2>the Browns. So the Cardinals all of a sudden could

0:32:39.000 --> 0:32:41.600
<v Speaker 2>be one to eight and right there in the Caleb

0:32:41.600 --> 0:32:46.240
<v Speaker 2>Williams pole position, as was the plan. But I do

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:48.760
<v Speaker 2>not need and the NFL doesn't need Caleb in the

0:32:49.120 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 2>AFC because if we're by the way, this quarterback class,

0:32:53.240 --> 0:32:55.440
<v Speaker 2>Bryce looks like the worst of them. Who could have

0:32:55.480 --> 0:33:01.160
<v Speaker 2>seen that coming? Guys, your sister's height and crowd looks awesome,

0:33:01.760 --> 0:33:06.160
<v Speaker 2>and is shroud looks awesome and he's in the afcree

0:33:06.640 --> 0:33:08.440
<v Speaker 2>and he looks great.

0:33:08.520 --> 0:33:08.720
<v Speaker 3>Bro.

0:33:09.440 --> 0:33:12.000
<v Speaker 2>All right, Remember you guys can put in your questions

0:33:12.000 --> 0:33:14.120
<v Speaker 2>in the chat, take quick break, come back, what's right?

0:33:20.320 --> 0:33:23.080
<v Speaker 4>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable. Discover the

0:33:23.120 --> 0:33:26.480
<v Speaker 4>inspiring true story about Anthony Roblast, who defined every expectation

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:29.440
<v Speaker 4>to become a national wrestling champion and Unstoppable, a new

0:33:29.480 --> 0:33:33.080
<v Speaker 4>original movie from Amazon MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg,

0:33:33.160 --> 0:33:36.320
<v Speaker 4>evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:33:36.360 --> 0:33:39.760
<v Speaker 4>thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast,

0:33:39.840 --> 0:33:43.360
<v Speaker 4>including Duel Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Panya, and

0:33:43.360 --> 0:33:47.600
<v Speaker 4>Bobby Canavali. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:33:48.600 --> 0:33:50.400
<v Speaker 2>All right, welcome back in What's Right with the Right

0:33:50.440 --> 0:33:54.000
<v Speaker 2>Episode one eighty four. Don't forget to put your questions

0:33:54.080 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 2>in the chat. We'll get to them shortly. Demon's what

0:33:57.880 --> 0:33:59.560
<v Speaker 2>are we doing now before we play?

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:03.360
<v Speaker 3>Right in? On Thursday's pod? You were last Thursday's pod.

0:34:03.400 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 3>You channeled your intern Nixtra Damis and called the Jags

0:34:06.240 --> 0:34:09.359
<v Speaker 3>upset over the Bills. What was the bigger win for you?

0:34:09.800 --> 0:34:11.880
<v Speaker 3>The Bills blowing it in front of the whole world

0:34:12.120 --> 0:34:15.040
<v Speaker 3>or Trevor locking up the title for best international player

0:34:15.080 --> 0:34:15.880
<v Speaker 3>in NFL history?

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:19.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, the Prince that was promised? What is the best

0:34:19.160 --> 0:34:22.680
<v Speaker 2>international player in history? That's not even debatable. But by

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:27.040
<v Speaker 2>the way, did you see what? Before I even answer

0:34:27.120 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 2>this question, did you see what Ben Solak, who I

0:34:32.080 --> 0:34:36.160
<v Speaker 2>like a lot, great podcaster, great writer for The Ringer,

0:34:36.600 --> 0:34:41.319
<v Speaker 2>what he wrote about Brock Purty, No, I'm gonna read

0:34:41.320 --> 0:34:43.000
<v Speaker 2>it to you. Good things, Okay.

0:34:43.120 --> 0:34:43.400
<v Speaker 3>See.

0:34:44.000 --> 0:34:46.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, so here's the thing, because he was talking about

0:34:46.640 --> 0:34:50.479
<v Speaker 2>the fact that the Niners are now the fifth team

0:34:50.600 --> 0:34:53.920
<v Speaker 2>in the last twenty years to score thirty plus in

0:34:54.120 --> 0:34:56.960
<v Speaker 2>every in each of their first five games of the year,

0:34:57.360 --> 0:35:00.560
<v Speaker 2>and the other four teams quarterbacked by Pate and Manning

0:35:00.600 --> 0:35:03.680
<v Speaker 2>and Tom Brady, and all four of those teams, by

0:35:03.680 --> 0:35:05.680
<v Speaker 2>the way, made the Super Bowl. They all lost in

0:35:05.719 --> 0:35:08.960
<v Speaker 2>the Super Bowl. By the way, this is what he wrote.

0:35:10.880 --> 0:35:13.920
<v Speaker 2>The very fact that Peyton, Manning and Tom Brady before

0:35:14.000 --> 0:35:17.319
<v Speaker 2>him failed, meaning lost Super Bowl, makes me feel all

0:35:17.360 --> 0:35:21.000
<v Speaker 2>the more certain that Purdy is the chosen one, the

0:35:21.080 --> 0:35:26.279
<v Speaker 2>boy who lived, Chris SATs Hot Rock, the Prince that

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:37.080
<v Speaker 2>was promised. Oh that about Brock Perdy, Ben Solak, you're unnoticed.

0:35:38.000 --> 0:35:43.600
<v Speaker 2>Somebody send this to Ben him. If you go, if

0:35:43.640 --> 0:35:48.479
<v Speaker 2>you type in Trevor Lawrence Football Reference and you click there.

0:35:49.680 --> 0:35:52.280
<v Speaker 2>When you go there, you know what it says, right

0:35:52.320 --> 0:35:56.200
<v Speaker 2>next to his glowing, beautiful blonde locks and the name

0:35:56.280 --> 0:36:00.720
<v Speaker 2>William Trevor Lawrence. It then says, in parentheses, the Prince

0:36:00.760 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 2>who was promised on his official Pro Football reference page

0:36:05.480 --> 0:36:10.480
<v Speaker 2>to call brock Purty that Benjamin is an outrage and

0:36:10.560 --> 0:36:15.160
<v Speaker 2>it will not stand. Now to your question, we saw

0:36:15.200 --> 0:36:18.360
<v Speaker 2>that Jags wind coming, see that coming from a mile away,

0:36:18.680 --> 0:36:24.000
<v Speaker 2>and everybody thinks I'm some massive hater on the Buffalo bills,

0:36:24.320 --> 0:36:27.560
<v Speaker 2>when all I am is a truth teller that you

0:36:27.600 --> 0:36:30.840
<v Speaker 2>can set your watch to it. That as when things

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:33.520
<v Speaker 2>are going great, they are going to all of a

0:36:33.600 --> 0:36:37.880
<v Speaker 2>sudden spit the bit and people have the audacity to

0:36:38.120 --> 0:36:42.319
<v Speaker 2>blame it on the jet lag. Now I said, I

0:36:42.320 --> 0:36:45.120
<v Speaker 2>did think Jacksonville was gonna have an edge in that category,

0:36:45.440 --> 0:36:47.480
<v Speaker 2>waiting to say, what.

0:36:47.400 --> 0:36:49.040
<v Speaker 3>Do you mean, what do you mean? They gave that

0:36:49.080 --> 0:36:52.120
<v Speaker 3>they they blamed it on the trap. Isn't the travel

0:36:52.160 --> 0:36:55.920
<v Speaker 3>the main thing You're always saying it's like a big factory.

0:36:57.360 --> 0:37:02.719
<v Speaker 2>It is a big factor, of course, and grown up teams,

0:37:03.400 --> 0:37:08.360
<v Speaker 2>teams that have a level of consistency and emotional maturity,

0:37:08.840 --> 0:37:11.600
<v Speaker 2>they either understand how to deal with it or they

0:37:11.600 --> 0:37:15.279
<v Speaker 2>don't fly to London on Friday. Why did you do that?

0:37:15.760 --> 0:37:20.160
<v Speaker 2>Why did you fly there on Friday for a Sunday

0:37:20.200 --> 0:37:24.440
<v Speaker 2>morning game. Now here's the other thing that the conversation

0:37:24.640 --> 0:37:31.080
<v Speaker 2>no one wants to have last sixteen games demonse playoffs

0:37:31.160 --> 0:37:36.040
<v Speaker 2>and included if you're a quarterback wins person. Trevor's record

0:37:36.040 --> 0:37:40.000
<v Speaker 2>the last sixteen eleven and five. Leave demonse on the screen,

0:37:40.040 --> 0:37:44.319
<v Speaker 2>please Josh's record eleven and five. And by the way,

0:37:44.400 --> 0:37:47.120
<v Speaker 2>Trevor in the last sixteen has had to play Kansas

0:37:47.160 --> 0:37:51.080
<v Speaker 2>City three times, zero to three against the Chiefs, eleven

0:37:51.080 --> 0:37:55.240
<v Speaker 2>and two against everyone else. That's true. Last sixteen games.

0:37:55.520 --> 0:38:00.640
<v Speaker 2>Trevor completing sixty eight percent of his passes, Josh sixty

0:38:00.719 --> 0:38:04.759
<v Speaker 2>five percent last sixteen games, so since November first to

0:38:04.840 --> 0:38:08.760
<v Speaker 2>right now Trevor two hundred and fifty yards per game passing,

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:12.200
<v Speaker 2>Josh two hundred and fifty five yards per game passing

0:38:12.280 --> 0:38:17.759
<v Speaker 2>check mark Josh barely last sixteen games. Trevor twenty five

0:38:17.880 --> 0:38:22.200
<v Speaker 2>touchdowns to nine interceptions, a nearly three to one touchdown

0:38:22.200 --> 0:38:28.480
<v Speaker 2>interception ratio. Josh thirty touchdowns to sixteen interceptions are worse

0:38:28.520 --> 0:38:32.040
<v Speaker 2>than two to one touchdown interception ratio. Last sixteen games.

0:38:32.239 --> 0:38:36.680
<v Speaker 2>Trevor a ninety six passer rating, Josh a ninety three

0:38:36.760 --> 0:38:41.280
<v Speaker 2>passer rating. We ready to have the conversation yet or no?

0:38:41.640 --> 0:38:46.040
<v Speaker 2>Everybody let me know when we can listen. Perties has

0:38:46.480 --> 0:38:49.600
<v Speaker 2>got everybody beat over the last twelve games. Whatever, his

0:38:49.680 --> 0:38:53.439
<v Speaker 2>career is eleven games. If we tell me when we're

0:38:53.480 --> 0:38:59.800
<v Speaker 2>ready to have the conversation about who is actually because

0:38:59.840 --> 0:39:03.400
<v Speaker 2>his anyone gonna argue, Oh, Trevor's got more weapons. No,

0:39:04.000 --> 0:39:08.520
<v Speaker 2>Trevor's Calvin Ridley now for the last five games, didn't

0:39:08.560 --> 0:39:12.279
<v Speaker 2>before Josh had Stefan Diggs's whole time. Stefan Diggs, by

0:39:12.320 --> 0:39:14.920
<v Speaker 2>the way, who gave Trevor quite the hug at the

0:39:15.000 --> 0:39:16.879
<v Speaker 2>end of the game, might have whispered in a zer

0:39:16.960 --> 0:39:19.120
<v Speaker 2>get me out of here, bro, come on, bring me

0:39:19.160 --> 0:39:21.759
<v Speaker 2>down to that warm weather. I don't know. All I'm

0:39:21.800 --> 0:39:26.239
<v Speaker 2>saying is now, what do I think this week? I

0:39:26.280 --> 0:39:30.839
<v Speaker 2>think Josh will look phenomenal this week and everyone will

0:39:30.920 --> 0:39:35.440
<v Speaker 2>once again. Here's the thing about the Bills, the September champs.

0:39:36.600 --> 0:39:39.320
<v Speaker 2>They're a half game up on the Jets.

0:39:39.800 --> 0:39:40.200
<v Speaker 3>That's it.

0:39:41.080 --> 0:39:43.480
<v Speaker 2>A half game up on the Jets. The Jets are

0:39:43.480 --> 0:39:46.000
<v Speaker 2>two and three, having beaten the Bills. The Bills are

0:39:46.000 --> 0:39:48.640
<v Speaker 2>three and two. The Bills, the team everyone said, oh

0:39:48.719 --> 0:39:53.040
<v Speaker 2>Nick you're afraid of right now, are in seventh place

0:39:53.440 --> 0:39:59.200
<v Speaker 2>in the AFC. Seventh Now when they're rolling, they look unbelievable,

0:39:59.800 --> 0:40:03.680
<v Speaker 2>But but they are not a consistent team because they

0:40:03.760 --> 0:40:07.520
<v Speaker 2>do not have a consistent quarterback. He's great when he's great,

0:40:07.960 --> 0:40:12.760
<v Speaker 2>and in this London game, twice Diggs was wide open

0:40:13.480 --> 0:40:18.680
<v Speaker 2>deep down the field. The first time Josh underthrew him

0:40:19.040 --> 0:40:22.480
<v Speaker 2>and they connected, but they ended up getting zero points

0:40:22.480 --> 0:40:25.120
<v Speaker 2>on what would have been a touchdown. The zero points

0:40:25.160 --> 0:40:28.200
<v Speaker 2>on that drive, and the second time it got picked off.

0:40:28.880 --> 0:40:31.719
<v Speaker 2>Both times he was open and he missed him. And

0:40:31.760 --> 0:40:37.120
<v Speaker 2>while Josh's numbers for the game look good, the Bills

0:40:37.160 --> 0:40:39.680
<v Speaker 2>had seven points with four and a half minutes left

0:40:39.719 --> 0:40:43.000
<v Speaker 2>in this football game. Those are just the facts, ladies

0:40:43.000 --> 0:40:46.360
<v Speaker 2>and gentlemen. We can and I are the you know,

0:40:46.440 --> 0:40:50.040
<v Speaker 2>we can move on now. But I expect the Bills

0:40:50.040 --> 0:40:52.799
<v Speaker 2>to be awesome this week. I do. But one other

0:40:52.880 --> 0:40:57.600
<v Speaker 2>thing for the Bills, in all seriousness, the Milano injuries brutal.

0:40:58.239 --> 0:41:01.840
<v Speaker 2>They've now lost Trey White and Matt Malone for the season.

0:41:02.120 --> 0:41:05.000
<v Speaker 2>They also lost a critical d tackle, maybe not for

0:41:05.040 --> 0:41:06.920
<v Speaker 2>the season, but for at least a month or so.

0:41:07.600 --> 0:41:10.920
<v Speaker 2>The injuries are piling up for Buffalo, which sucks, but

0:41:11.120 --> 0:41:14.040
<v Speaker 2>it's has not been a great opening quarter of the

0:41:14.080 --> 0:41:17.200
<v Speaker 2>season for them. All right, next, all right, ladies and gentlemen,

0:41:17.239 --> 0:41:20.319
<v Speaker 2>it's time for writ ends. We're gonna we haven't done

0:41:20.320 --> 0:41:23.640
<v Speaker 2>this in a while. Uh you right in the answer,

0:41:23.719 --> 0:41:25.759
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna read the question. We're gonna put the put

0:41:25.800 --> 0:41:27.520
<v Speaker 2>the answer on the paper if you guys don't know

0:41:27.520 --> 0:41:30.480
<v Speaker 2>what except I'm not actually writing because I didn't bring

0:41:30.520 --> 0:41:33.320
<v Speaker 2>the whiteboard today. So that's my best. I'm just gonna

0:41:33.320 --> 0:41:33.600
<v Speaker 2>say it.

0:41:34.480 --> 0:41:37.200
<v Speaker 3>Monday. That football. So Packers fans were not too thrilled

0:41:37.200 --> 0:41:40.799
<v Speaker 3>with Jordan Love after his three interception game, including the

0:41:40.840 --> 0:41:44.720
<v Speaker 3>game seiler. The Packers ceiling with Jordan Love is blank

0:41:45.719 --> 0:41:46.280
<v Speaker 3>right now.

0:41:46.360 --> 0:41:48.719
<v Speaker 2>I mean not as high as I thought. I thought

0:41:48.760 --> 0:41:51.120
<v Speaker 2>they could win the division. He's been brutal on any

0:41:51.160 --> 0:41:55.000
<v Speaker 2>passes going down the field more than five yards, so

0:41:55.080 --> 0:41:58.879
<v Speaker 2>I mean probably nine wins. I do though. We don't

0:41:58.880 --> 0:42:01.040
<v Speaker 2>have to write in for this one, and you can demonse.

0:42:01.239 --> 0:42:03.120
<v Speaker 2>You can go ahead and say what your answer is.

0:42:03.160 --> 0:42:05.800
<v Speaker 2>You can show it. What did you write for your answer?

0:42:05.880 --> 0:42:08.120
<v Speaker 3>I think it's like a it looks like MEO. But

0:42:08.160 --> 0:42:09.600
<v Speaker 3>that looks like MEO.

0:42:10.440 --> 0:42:11.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, that's fine, don't worry about it.

0:42:12.040 --> 0:42:13.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I don't think it's super high. I don't think

0:42:13.640 --> 0:42:15.239
<v Speaker 3>it's super low. I think it's like a mid rise

0:42:15.239 --> 0:42:15.720
<v Speaker 3>of ceiling.

0:42:16.200 --> 0:42:17.759
<v Speaker 2>I think, yeah, I think that's right.

0:42:18.040 --> 0:42:18.239
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:42:18.960 --> 0:42:21.560
<v Speaker 2>The most outrageous part of that game was the field

0:42:21.560 --> 0:42:25.880
<v Speaker 2>goal Josh McDaniels kicked. And I cannot abide this anymore

0:42:26.160 --> 0:42:32.480
<v Speaker 2>with these coaches. I listen, some of these things that

0:42:32.560 --> 0:42:38.920
<v Speaker 2>we see from NFL coaches that people just accept would be, honestly,

0:42:39.160 --> 0:42:42.560
<v Speaker 2>as if a third of the starting quarterbacks in the

0:42:42.640 --> 0:42:47.760
<v Speaker 2>league just occasionally took the snap and ran backwards fifteen

0:42:47.840 --> 0:42:51.000
<v Speaker 2>yards and then took a knee, and they were like, oh, well,

0:42:51.000 --> 0:42:53.280
<v Speaker 2>what are you gonna do? I mean, he just forgot

0:42:53.320 --> 0:42:59.120
<v Speaker 2>what his job was. Randomly, Okay, with two minutes left

0:42:59.120 --> 0:43:04.360
<v Speaker 2>in this football game and the Raiders up four, Josh

0:43:04.400 --> 0:43:09.239
<v Speaker 2>McDaniel had a fourth and one from the thirty five

0:43:09.360 --> 0:43:14.080
<v Speaker 2>yard line. He then that is a choice. That is

0:43:14.120 --> 0:43:18.480
<v Speaker 2>not a choice. Here is why that was so galling. Demonse.

0:43:20.560 --> 0:43:24.520
<v Speaker 2>If the odds of picking up the fourth and one

0:43:25.760 --> 0:43:29.560
<v Speaker 2>are about the same as Carlson making a fifty two

0:43:29.640 --> 0:43:33.359
<v Speaker 2>yard field goal, according to the numbers people, they're both

0:43:33.400 --> 0:43:38.720
<v Speaker 2>about sixty percent. I argue that's understating the Raiders' chances

0:43:38.760 --> 0:43:41.840
<v Speaker 2>of picking up the fourth and one, But regardless, so

0:43:42.400 --> 0:43:44.680
<v Speaker 2>kick a field goal, go for it on fourth down,

0:43:45.239 --> 0:43:49.560
<v Speaker 2>your success, according to the numbers, is equal. But the

0:43:49.600 --> 0:43:56.319
<v Speaker 2>result is one wins you the ficking game, and the

0:43:56.400 --> 0:44:02.320
<v Speaker 2>other you're just up seven with two minutes left. So okay, Demonse,

0:44:03.680 --> 0:44:08.960
<v Speaker 2>you get it. I couldn't believe it. You have two choices,

0:44:09.400 --> 0:44:14.360
<v Speaker 2>your odds of succeeding are identical. One wins you the game.

0:44:14.640 --> 0:44:18.160
<v Speaker 2>The other might win you the game, might not. And

0:44:18.200 --> 0:44:22.720
<v Speaker 2>he went with that one. It's so indefensible, it's so bad.

0:44:23.239 --> 0:44:29.560
<v Speaker 2>It's just and I don't understand how some of these

0:44:29.600 --> 0:44:33.680
<v Speaker 2>coaches are so bad at this stuff. You just you can't.

0:44:34.080 --> 0:44:37.799
<v Speaker 2>If you maybe you could make the argument if they

0:44:37.840 --> 0:44:41.680
<v Speaker 2>were up six, that there was a reason to do it,

0:44:41.760 --> 0:44:45.000
<v Speaker 2>because then the field goal or the first down win

0:44:45.080 --> 0:44:50.600
<v Speaker 2>you the game. Same thing, right, but up for making

0:44:50.640 --> 0:44:53.600
<v Speaker 2>the field goal wins you nothing. It just means the

0:44:53.600 --> 0:44:56.160
<v Speaker 2>Packers get the ball back down seven with two minutes left.

0:44:56.680 --> 0:44:59.479
<v Speaker 2>Why the first down you're taking knees unless you're Mario

0:44:59.600 --> 0:45:01.000
<v Speaker 2>Crystal next.

0:45:02.440 --> 0:45:05.000
<v Speaker 3>All right, So Kelsey went down with a non contact

0:45:05.000 --> 0:45:07.480
<v Speaker 3>injury early in the game, looked like he could be

0:45:07.480 --> 0:45:10.480
<v Speaker 3>done for a really long time, but he came back

0:45:10.520 --> 0:45:14.480
<v Speaker 3>and scored a touchdown. Your honest reaction to the Kelsey injury.

0:45:15.680 --> 0:45:18.800
<v Speaker 2>Honestly, and I can prove it to you. I Nope.

0:45:19.000 --> 0:45:22.640
<v Speaker 2>My honest reaction was I bet the Chief's huge minus

0:45:22.640 --> 0:45:27.600
<v Speaker 2>two and a half. Because here's why I thought. I

0:45:27.640 --> 0:45:33.480
<v Speaker 2>thought Romo and Nance more Romo than Nance. And everyone

0:45:33.560 --> 0:45:39.239
<v Speaker 2>watching on Twitter was just dead wrong on it. Everybody

0:45:39.400 --> 0:45:43.960
<v Speaker 2>seemed to be implying or talking around that it was

0:45:44.000 --> 0:45:47.600
<v Speaker 2>an achilles, but it, to me so clearly was not.

0:45:48.239 --> 0:45:51.960
<v Speaker 2>First of all, he walked off the field, he walked

0:45:52.040 --> 0:45:55.600
<v Speaker 2>himself to the locker room. Second of all, you saw

0:45:55.680 --> 0:45:59.600
<v Speaker 2>him turn his ankle. And here is the thing people

0:45:59.680 --> 0:46:03.400
<v Speaker 2>don't understand about the two different ankle sprains, high ankle sprain,

0:46:03.840 --> 0:46:08.280
<v Speaker 2>which is devastating, and a regular ankle sprain. The regular

0:46:08.360 --> 0:46:12.239
<v Speaker 2>ankle sprain is the one you suffer playing basketball all

0:46:12.280 --> 0:46:16.760
<v Speaker 2>the time. That's when you're the outside of your foot

0:46:16.920 --> 0:46:19.160
<v Speaker 2>goes under. I wish I could, can I show it.

0:46:19.640 --> 0:46:23.480
<v Speaker 2>That's this this movement, like you know what I mean,

0:46:23.520 --> 0:46:26.800
<v Speaker 2>when you're playing basketball and you turn your ankle, that's

0:46:26.920 --> 0:46:28.640
<v Speaker 2>the Did I say that's the high ankle sprain? If

0:46:28.680 --> 0:46:32.320
<v Speaker 2>I did, I saw about that's the low correct a

0:46:32.360 --> 0:46:36.000
<v Speaker 2>right good, that's the regular ankle sprain. That's the one

0:46:36.400 --> 0:46:40.959
<v Speaker 2>that every athlete has suffered hundreds of times. You tape

0:46:41.000 --> 0:46:44.480
<v Speaker 2>it up and you move on. The devastating one, the

0:46:44.480 --> 0:46:47.239
<v Speaker 2>one that Mahomes suffered, the one that can knock you

0:46:47.320 --> 0:46:51.040
<v Speaker 2>out for a month, is the opposite. That's when the

0:46:51.080 --> 0:46:54.359
<v Speaker 2>inside of your foot goes. I can't I'm not flexible enough.

0:46:54.600 --> 0:46:57.960
<v Speaker 2>But that's where the inside of your foot goes towards

0:46:58.000 --> 0:47:02.560
<v Speaker 2>the ground. And that is actual, like a lower leg injury.

0:47:03.160 --> 0:47:06.080
<v Speaker 2>So you saw the type of ankle sprain. It was

0:47:06.080 --> 0:47:13.480
<v Speaker 2>from Kelsey because everybody, the the sports medicine guys, the

0:47:13.520 --> 0:47:15.839
<v Speaker 2>doctors that watched the games, like David Chow all those

0:47:15.840 --> 0:47:20.280
<v Speaker 2>guys said inversion ankle sprain, tape it up and play.

0:47:20.760 --> 0:47:24.200
<v Speaker 2>Everyone else was like, oh my god, Achilles, oh the turf,

0:47:24.600 --> 0:47:27.880
<v Speaker 2>all these things. He reached for his ankle, all this nonsense.

0:47:29.840 --> 0:47:33.640
<v Speaker 2>And so because of that, the Chiefs at halftime were

0:47:33.680 --> 0:47:37.560
<v Speaker 2>only minus two and a half. So I wasn't worried.

0:47:38.200 --> 0:47:41.040
<v Speaker 2>Maybe I should have been. Now, was I one hundred

0:47:41.040 --> 0:47:44.319
<v Speaker 2>percent company Who's gonna come back in the game? No,

0:47:44.400 --> 0:47:48.520
<v Speaker 2>But I I I liked the Chiefs in that spot

0:47:48.760 --> 0:47:52.640
<v Speaker 2>even without Kelsey, and I thought he was gonna be fine.

0:47:52.880 --> 0:47:59.359
<v Speaker 2>Because the guy suffered a hyper extended knee in the preseason.

0:47:59.360 --> 0:48:01.000
<v Speaker 2>They're acting like he has him in one of the

0:48:01.040 --> 0:48:04.800
<v Speaker 2>most durable tight ends in NFL history. So I wasn't

0:48:04.800 --> 0:48:07.240
<v Speaker 2>that concerned. And go ahead.

0:48:07.239 --> 0:48:10.000
<v Speaker 3>It looked like there's a little bug coming on a

0:48:10.040 --> 0:48:10.440
<v Speaker 3>little bit.

0:48:10.560 --> 0:48:12.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, I don't know, he's turned his ankle. He missed

0:48:12.960 --> 0:48:17.200
<v Speaker 2>one drive. He was fine, He's fine, Chiefs are fine. Next.

0:48:17.520 --> 0:48:19.759
<v Speaker 2>I bet he did check the tape. I bet he

0:48:19.760 --> 0:48:22.840
<v Speaker 2>did turn his ankle last year. Go ahead, nat.

0:48:22.800 --> 0:48:24.719
<v Speaker 3>Heck he got the last laugh as the Jets beat

0:48:24.719 --> 0:48:28.000
<v Speaker 3>the Broncos and Sean Payton. But the Jets treated a

0:48:28.000 --> 0:48:30.200
<v Speaker 3>game against a one wins team as their Super Bowl

0:48:30.400 --> 0:48:33.400
<v Speaker 3>and made fun of Peyton on Twitter. The more embarrassing

0:48:33.440 --> 0:48:35.440
<v Speaker 3>team is, dude.

0:48:35.239 --> 0:48:38.440
<v Speaker 2>Oh the Broncos. Yeah, of course, this isn't even the question.

0:48:39.440 --> 0:48:43.320
<v Speaker 2>The Bronco demanse. The Broncos have given up in the

0:48:43.440 --> 0:48:48.440
<v Speaker 2>last four weeks eight hundred and seventy seven yards rushing

0:48:48.760 --> 0:48:53.720
<v Speaker 2>in four games. They're giving up one hundred. They're giving

0:48:53.800 --> 0:48:58.440
<v Speaker 2>up two hundred and twenty yards per game on the ground.

0:48:59.600 --> 0:49:03.400
<v Speaker 2>They allowed the Jets to run for one fifty in

0:49:03.480 --> 0:49:10.000
<v Speaker 2>the second half. I I the the Broncos are gotta

0:49:10.040 --> 0:49:12.360
<v Speaker 2>be a total teardown, total teardown.

0:49:13.239 --> 0:49:17.200
<v Speaker 3>It's dude, Sean Payton, man, that's uh, that's crazy like

0:49:17.320 --> 0:49:20.319
<v Speaker 3>that Hackett got fired. If I'm not mistaken, he got

0:49:20.360 --> 0:49:24.520
<v Speaker 3>fired what two games before the season ended last year? Yeah,

0:49:24.680 --> 0:49:27.040
<v Speaker 3>Sean Payton was on He's on record obviously saying that

0:49:27.080 --> 0:49:29.359
<v Speaker 3>it was the worst coaching job ever. Well, he's on

0:49:29.400 --> 0:49:32.000
<v Speaker 3>pace to do a little bit less than way worse.

0:49:32.000 --> 0:49:37.600
<v Speaker 2>He's on worse. The Broncos last year started two and

0:49:37.760 --> 0:49:42.280
<v Speaker 2>three and of the three losses, one was by nine points,

0:49:42.320 --> 0:49:45.560
<v Speaker 2>one was by one point, one was in overtime. The

0:49:45.600 --> 0:49:48.280
<v Speaker 2>Broncos this year are one and four and have gotten

0:49:48.520 --> 0:49:53.200
<v Speaker 2>enrolled in a couple of these games. They're allowing thirty

0:49:53.360 --> 0:49:56.280
<v Speaker 2>six point thirty two points per game. It's pathetic.

0:49:56.320 --> 0:49:59.120
<v Speaker 3>All right, next, all right, you called for the touch

0:49:59.160 --> 0:50:02.080
<v Speaker 3>supposed to be banned before everybody else. It's only gotten

0:50:02.120 --> 0:50:05.960
<v Speaker 3>worse since other teams have suffered injuries trying it, and

0:50:06.040 --> 0:50:08.600
<v Speaker 3>even Aaron Donald isn't able to stop it. Without the

0:50:08.680 --> 0:50:10.640
<v Speaker 3>touch push, the equals record would be.

0:50:11.280 --> 0:50:14.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, they'd have a loss or two. I mean, listen,

0:50:14.960 --> 0:50:19.560
<v Speaker 2>it is the the fact that no one else can

0:50:19.640 --> 0:50:23.840
<v Speaker 2>do it makes it actually less likely that the NFL

0:50:23.960 --> 0:50:29.560
<v Speaker 2>bans it. Uh and what do you think their record

0:50:29.560 --> 0:50:31.359
<v Speaker 2>would beat them? ONSEA, you can put it up. Sorry,

0:50:31.360 --> 0:50:34.040
<v Speaker 2>I forgot was supposed to right? Oh no, it wouldn't

0:50:34.080 --> 0:50:38.759
<v Speaker 2>be the fact that they're just unstoppable on when it's

0:50:38.880 --> 0:50:40.839
<v Speaker 2>third or fourth, third and one or fourth and one.

0:50:41.120 --> 0:50:44.560
<v Speaker 2>It also opens up the play calling entirely. I don't

0:50:44.600 --> 0:50:47.719
<v Speaker 2>want to I find the play to be.

0:50:51.760 --> 0:50:54.200
<v Speaker 3>It sounds like you're jumping back on it a little bit, though,

0:50:55.239 --> 0:50:57.200
<v Speaker 3>like you sound a little defeated, and you sound like

0:50:57.239 --> 0:50:59.040
<v Speaker 3>it's like it's a thing.

0:50:59.400 --> 0:51:04.640
<v Speaker 2>I'd hear that. But I do think again, I always

0:51:04.719 --> 0:51:08.440
<v Speaker 2>just try to be fair. I do think the fact

0:51:08.640 --> 0:51:12.640
<v Speaker 2>that other teams don't execute it well and they're not

0:51:13.280 --> 0:51:16.440
<v Speaker 2>they're not successful with it is a mark in the

0:51:16.560 --> 0:51:22.360
<v Speaker 2>Eagles favor that it's not this unstoppable play. We have

0:51:22.640 --> 0:51:28.839
<v Speaker 2>just made it unstoppable. My argument against against well, no,

0:51:28.960 --> 0:51:31.799
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't screw my argument, but I think it. I

0:51:31.840 --> 0:51:34.720
<v Speaker 2>think it makes the Eagles argument stronger. My argument against

0:51:34.719 --> 0:51:37.880
<v Speaker 2>it is it's just terrible, it's just ugly. It's just

0:51:41.560 --> 0:51:44.719
<v Speaker 2>I Also, my other argument against it is I think

0:51:44.760 --> 0:51:48.040
<v Speaker 2>they're gonna get somebody Hurt. If I were jailing Hurts,

0:51:48.080 --> 0:51:50.440
<v Speaker 2>I'd be like, all right, guys, can we like just

0:51:50.560 --> 0:51:54.480
<v Speaker 2>save this? Can we run normal offense? We know we

0:51:54.600 --> 0:51:58.560
<v Speaker 2>have this thing. Can we maybe not do it in

0:51:58.640 --> 0:52:02.359
<v Speaker 2>the first quarter of a against the Rams. Can we

0:52:02.440 --> 0:52:05.560
<v Speaker 2>like try to save it for like late in the

0:52:05.680 --> 0:52:09.680
<v Speaker 2>year or the playoffs? Because and I understand people are like, oh,

0:52:09.680 --> 0:52:12.160
<v Speaker 2>you can squat six hundred pounds. I get it. But

0:52:12.200 --> 0:52:14.920
<v Speaker 2>the their center is a Hall of Famer Jason Kelsey.

0:52:15.360 --> 0:52:19.279
<v Speaker 2>He was considered he's old, he was considering retirement, and

0:52:20.320 --> 0:52:23.600
<v Speaker 2>it just feels like you're you're kind of flirting with

0:52:23.640 --> 0:52:25.799
<v Speaker 2>a lot of danger here. Now, I will say one

0:52:25.840 --> 0:52:31.360
<v Speaker 2>other thing about this play. Their left guard is false

0:52:31.360 --> 0:52:37.200
<v Speaker 2>starting every time every time he's firing off before, and

0:52:37.239 --> 0:52:41.000
<v Speaker 2>that if they are gonna have this play that's so unstoppable,

0:52:41.960 --> 0:52:44.560
<v Speaker 2>the reps need to make sure that they're not getting

0:52:44.560 --> 0:52:49.640
<v Speaker 2>an even further edge on it. But I just if

0:52:49.680 --> 0:52:53.319
<v Speaker 2>I were jailing Hurts, I would be I don't know

0:52:54.239 --> 0:53:01.479
<v Speaker 2>which is not embarrassed, but embarrassed is not I joked about.

0:53:04.440 --> 0:53:08.120
<v Speaker 2>But that's the that's well, that's the thing. It it does.

0:53:08.480 --> 0:53:12.960
<v Speaker 2>There's a level of Now they did just pay him

0:53:13.000 --> 0:53:15.359
<v Speaker 2>so it's not like the you know, he has that

0:53:15.480 --> 0:53:18.080
<v Speaker 2>part of risk, but it would be preserve me a

0:53:18.120 --> 0:53:19.880
<v Speaker 2>little bit. We know we're not gonna all of a

0:53:19.920 --> 0:53:21.200
<v Speaker 2>sudden get bad at this.

0:53:21.719 --> 0:53:21.879
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:53:21.960 --> 0:53:25.239
<v Speaker 2>Wild's had a great take on this, a great take

0:53:25.800 --> 0:53:29.000
<v Speaker 2>which was that in a game the Eagles are blowing

0:53:29.040 --> 0:53:32.080
<v Speaker 2>someone out, they should do it a couple of times

0:53:32.200 --> 0:53:37.120
<v Speaker 2>and intentionally fail. So the NFL doesn't ban it, that

0:53:37.120 --> 0:53:40.399
<v Speaker 2>they should make it appear like that. They should make

0:53:40.440 --> 0:53:42.360
<v Speaker 2>it appear like it can be stopped.

0:53:42.400 --> 0:53:49.480
<v Speaker 3>All right, next, uh So, Mike Miami's Miami has statistically

0:53:49.480 --> 0:53:51.600
<v Speaker 3>been the best offense to start the season ever, to

0:53:51.640 --> 0:53:54.200
<v Speaker 3>start a season ever, as we know. When asked about it,

0:53:54.239 --> 0:53:57.280
<v Speaker 3>Mike McDaniel said, our whole goal of this entire offseason

0:53:57.320 --> 0:54:01.480
<v Speaker 3>was statistically statistical output through five games. You would describe

0:54:01.520 --> 0:54:04.600
<v Speaker 3>Mike McDaniel as, I think he's funny.

0:54:04.640 --> 0:54:08.680
<v Speaker 2>I think he's quirky. I like him. I think he's cool.

0:54:09.239 --> 0:54:11.840
<v Speaker 2>I saw him on with my buddy Ryan Clark on

0:54:11.880 --> 0:54:15.840
<v Speaker 2>the pivot. Have you seen the watch he wears on

0:54:15.920 --> 0:54:22.640
<v Speaker 2>the sideline. It's a brightling that probably cost not trying

0:54:22.680 --> 0:54:24.800
<v Speaker 2>to pocket watch him, but I think it probably costs

0:54:24.880 --> 0:54:27.799
<v Speaker 2>at least twenty five and maybe fifty grand. I think

0:54:27.840 --> 0:54:33.080
<v Speaker 2>it's a solid gold. It's a statement piece. And Ryan

0:54:33.120 --> 0:54:35.839
<v Speaker 2>Clark asked him about it, and he was like, oh,

0:54:35.880 --> 0:54:39.360
<v Speaker 2>there's actually a great story here. He said, when I

0:54:39.440 --> 0:54:44.400
<v Speaker 2>got the Dolphins job, in the first meeting, I told

0:54:44.440 --> 0:54:48.279
<v Speaker 2>the guys, I'm going to go out today and do

0:54:48.360 --> 0:54:53.160
<v Speaker 2>something incredibly reckless. And he went out and bought the

0:54:53.200 --> 0:54:56.520
<v Speaker 2>most expensive watch he could find, and then he came

0:54:56.600 --> 0:54:59.480
<v Speaker 2>back and he showed the team. He's like, all right, guys,

0:55:00.640 --> 0:55:03.480
<v Speaker 2>there's a chance in a year, I look like a

0:55:03.600 --> 0:55:08.600
<v Speaker 2>total idiot for this because I fail and I'm fired

0:55:09.080 --> 0:55:11.840
<v Speaker 2>and I'm not making this type of money ever again.

0:55:12.560 --> 0:55:14.920
<v Speaker 2>And I look and I and it's a day in

0:55:15.600 --> 0:55:19.160
<v Speaker 2>you know what I mean, I bought something that is irresponsible.

0:55:19.760 --> 0:55:25.160
<v Speaker 2>He's like, or we succeed and this doesn't you know

0:55:25.200 --> 0:55:27.800
<v Speaker 2>what I mean? Is doesn't matter. And I just thought,

0:55:28.239 --> 0:55:32.000
<v Speaker 2>I think there's a lot of really cool kind of

0:55:32.920 --> 0:55:37.040
<v Speaker 2>I think it is tough for a guy. I want

0:55:37.040 --> 0:55:39.319
<v Speaker 2>to make sure I'm right on this. I'm gonna check

0:55:39.360 --> 0:55:43.640
<v Speaker 2>real quick. I don't think he played football at any

0:55:43.760 --> 0:55:48.759
<v Speaker 2>type of high level. Okay, well, you know what. To

0:55:48.800 --> 0:55:53.040
<v Speaker 2>his credit, he did play college football I didn't realize it, evidently,

0:55:53.560 --> 0:55:56.720
<v Speaker 2>and this is so perfect. He was a wide receiver

0:55:57.440 --> 0:55:59.640
<v Speaker 2>and guess where he's five to nine. The reason I

0:55:59.640 --> 0:56:02.279
<v Speaker 2>anythinglayed football high levels because he's five to nine. But

0:56:02.600 --> 0:56:05.359
<v Speaker 2>guess what demanse if you were to if I were

0:56:05.400 --> 0:56:08.200
<v Speaker 2>to tell you, Okay, a guy played college football but

0:56:08.280 --> 0:56:11.160
<v Speaker 2>he's actually a total nerd, where would you think he

0:56:11.200 --> 0:56:13.600
<v Speaker 2>went to college where he played college football?

0:56:16.320 --> 0:56:18.600
<v Speaker 3>What is the school? Maybe?

0:56:18.800 --> 0:56:19.280
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead?

0:56:19.440 --> 0:56:21.200
<v Speaker 3>What is it? It's definitely is it one of those

0:56:21.280 --> 0:56:22.960
<v Speaker 3>army schools of the Armies?

0:56:23.080 --> 0:56:26.840
<v Speaker 2>No, no, no, not an army school, but in high league Yale.

0:56:27.160 --> 0:56:30.520
<v Speaker 2>He played wide receiver at Yale and which is actually

0:56:30.560 --> 0:56:35.000
<v Speaker 2>funnier than Harvard. But so I think he has a

0:56:35.040 --> 0:56:39.320
<v Speaker 2>really cool way of finding ways to relate to his players.

0:56:39.800 --> 0:56:44.080
<v Speaker 2>I think some of his sideline interaction stuff is like

0:56:44.200 --> 0:56:46.359
<v Speaker 2>when I forget who it was. He was playing, oh,

0:56:46.560 --> 0:56:49.480
<v Speaker 2>justin Fields last year and Fields kept running and he

0:56:49.560 --> 0:56:51.600
<v Speaker 2>ended up on the sideline front of Mike McDaniel, and

0:56:51.640 --> 0:56:54.520
<v Speaker 2>Mike McDaniel just says to him, stop it, man, Honestly,

0:56:54.560 --> 0:56:57.959
<v Speaker 2>you got to stop it. You gotta stop it. When

0:56:58.040 --> 0:57:00.520
<v Speaker 2>he said to Tua last year. I would was watching

0:57:00.560 --> 0:57:02.759
<v Speaker 2>some of your high school tape last night you were

0:57:02.920 --> 0:57:06.360
<v Speaker 2>you sucked, like, what was wrong with you? You were no good?

0:57:06.719 --> 0:57:10.000
<v Speaker 2>I like him, I and I think he's super sharp.

0:57:10.400 --> 0:57:12.680
<v Speaker 2>I think he's super sharp and fun. I like him

0:57:12.719 --> 0:57:13.040
<v Speaker 2>a lot.

0:57:14.080 --> 0:57:16.720
<v Speaker 3>The players I feel like really liking respect him as well.

0:57:17.480 --> 0:57:19.320
<v Speaker 2>And that and I think that is tough. I think

0:57:19.560 --> 0:57:22.920
<v Speaker 2>I think there is. I think when you're super young

0:57:23.480 --> 0:57:25.600
<v Speaker 2>and you didn't play at a high level, I think

0:57:25.640 --> 0:57:28.400
<v Speaker 2>earning the respect of your players is tough. And I

0:57:28.400 --> 0:57:31.919
<v Speaker 2>think he's done that, all right. I don't I don't

0:57:31.920 --> 0:57:34.000
<v Speaker 2>even really care about the George kittle T shirt. We

0:57:34.040 --> 0:57:36.720
<v Speaker 2>can move on. Take quick break. Answer your questions in

0:57:36.760 --> 0:57:43.520
<v Speaker 2>the chat next What's right? All right? Welcome back. In

0:57:43.560 --> 0:57:45.640
<v Speaker 2>episode one eighty four, what's right with Nick? Wright t

0:57:45.800 --> 0:57:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Bone says Sweet Kansity Monarch's jacket, Nick, thank you. This

0:57:49.040 --> 0:57:51.160
<v Speaker 2>is a gift for my buddy slim Fest from the

0:57:51.240 --> 0:57:53.240
<v Speaker 2>Church of l Aaslo in Kansas City. He sent me

0:57:53.280 --> 0:57:56.600
<v Speaker 2>this a long time ago. I love this jacket, all right. Uh.

0:57:56.760 --> 0:58:00.720
<v Speaker 2>Connor mcqueeney has a question for you to Monsey. He says,

0:58:00.760 --> 0:58:05.240
<v Speaker 2>tell me an interesting fact about an animal. They's putting

0:58:05.240 --> 0:58:08.440
<v Speaker 2>you on the spot. A random interesting animal factors just.

0:58:08.400 --> 0:58:11.200
<v Speaker 3>Put me on the spot. Well, otters eat their babies

0:58:11.400 --> 0:58:14.200
<v Speaker 3>and like they'll uh, they'll like they don't eat their

0:58:14.240 --> 0:58:16.960
<v Speaker 3>own babies, but like some otters will kidnap other otters

0:58:17.240 --> 0:58:20.680
<v Speaker 3>and like hold them for ransom, uh and like hide

0:58:20.680 --> 0:58:25.880
<v Speaker 3>them from their moms. Yeah, dude, otters get down really dirty. Uh.

0:58:25.960 --> 0:58:28.760
<v Speaker 3>They they eat there, they eat other people's young and

0:58:28.800 --> 0:58:30.480
<v Speaker 3>they're like little families.

0:58:31.560 --> 0:58:38.520
<v Speaker 2>Really like they eat baby seals. Do they eat baby

0:58:38.560 --> 0:58:41.120
<v Speaker 2>they eat baby seals or like baby otters.

0:58:40.840 --> 0:58:45.560
<v Speaker 3>They eat other baby otters like they'll no, I just.

0:58:45.560 --> 0:58:47.640
<v Speaker 2>Googled it right when you said it, and they seems

0:58:47.640 --> 0:58:49.959
<v Speaker 2>like they do some really bad things to seals too.

0:58:50.520 --> 0:58:54.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah right, Yeah that got dark pretty quick, all right, buddy, Yeah.

0:58:54.640 --> 0:58:57.520
<v Speaker 3>Should have give it out. Ball pythons they the scales

0:58:57.560 --> 0:59:00.000
<v Speaker 3>you can rub them both ways instead of.

0:59:00.160 --> 0:59:01.000
<v Speaker 2>I actually knew that.

0:59:01.800 --> 0:59:05.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, that's what I knew that. Like smooth all around.

0:59:06.640 --> 0:59:09.280
<v Speaker 2>Okay, all right, next, Cold Draper.

0:59:09.800 --> 0:59:13.520
<v Speaker 3>My favorite Nick. My favorite Nick is coach consultant is Nick?

0:59:14.520 --> 0:59:17.200
<v Speaker 3>My favorite Nick is coach consultant. Nick. Can we start

0:59:17.240 --> 0:59:19.760
<v Speaker 3>an outreach program to help these guys that struggle with

0:59:19.840 --> 0:59:20.920
<v Speaker 3>simple decision making?

0:59:21.960 --> 0:59:26.240
<v Speaker 2>I listen and I'm not lying here. I've talked with

0:59:26.520 --> 0:59:30.520
<v Speaker 2>Manginie about doing like one of those you know how

0:59:30.600 --> 0:59:35.200
<v Speaker 2>a Keeme like charges fifty grand for people to come

0:59:35.240 --> 0:59:37.240
<v Speaker 2>for a week and work on footwork worth them with

0:59:37.320 --> 0:59:40.520
<v Speaker 2>kim Olajuan Yoda, You're about to be I can tell

0:59:40.560 --> 0:59:42.880
<v Speaker 2>the look on your face. You're so disgusted with what

0:59:42.880 --> 0:59:45.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm about to say here. But I've talked to coach

0:59:45.320 --> 0:59:50.640
<v Speaker 2>Manginie about doing like an annual weekend seminar for NFL

0:59:50.720 --> 0:59:53.920
<v Speaker 2>coaches where I'm like, guys, there are a few things

0:59:53.920 --> 0:59:55.760
<v Speaker 2>that are just black and white that you just have

0:59:55.840 --> 0:59:58.120
<v Speaker 2>to get right. I'll put them on a sheet of paper,

0:59:58.320 --> 1:00:00.960
<v Speaker 2>we'll drill you on them. And I I am not that.

1:00:01.040 --> 1:00:03.200
<v Speaker 2>Bill Simmons used to say this, and he's one hundred

1:00:03.200 --> 1:00:07.480
<v Speaker 2>percent correct. If I owned an NFL team, one of

1:00:07.480 --> 1:00:11.320
<v Speaker 2>my first steps of any head coach interview would be,

1:00:11.360 --> 1:00:13.600
<v Speaker 2>all right, man, we're gonna play blackjack together for an

1:00:13.600 --> 1:00:16.640
<v Speaker 2>hour for real money, and I need to see you play.

1:00:17.240 --> 1:00:20.240
<v Speaker 2>I need to see if you can, in real time

1:00:21.120 --> 1:00:27.360
<v Speaker 2>quickly understand the most basic dues and don'ts, because if

1:00:27.360 --> 1:00:31.440
<v Speaker 2>you can, we can translate that to the some of

1:00:31.480 --> 1:00:35.480
<v Speaker 2>these decisions If you can't, you can't be my head coach.

1:00:36.040 --> 1:00:40.320
<v Speaker 3>All right, next, all right, Marc Is Bryant. Question, why

1:00:40.440 --> 1:00:42.920
<v Speaker 3>is Nikopos to Chicago trading the number one pick? If

1:00:43.000 --> 1:00:47.240
<v Speaker 3>Justin keeps ball, if Justin keeps bawling, generational type of haul?

1:00:49.760 --> 1:00:56.120
<v Speaker 2>What would you trade Patrick Mahomes for nothing? And Caleb's Well, no,

1:00:56.200 --> 1:00:59.840
<v Speaker 2>you wouldn't, Caleb. I'm not saying Caleb's Patrick. But what

1:00:59.880 --> 1:01:04.040
<v Speaker 2>i I'm saying is that if you have the opportunity

1:01:04.040 --> 1:01:07.120
<v Speaker 2>to draft here's the thing. If you have the opportunity

1:01:07.160 --> 1:01:11.400
<v Speaker 2>to draft Caleb, and let's just say it's from the

1:01:11.440 --> 1:01:15.120
<v Speaker 2>Panthers pick. Okay that let's say the Bears don't have

1:01:15.120 --> 1:01:19.400
<v Speaker 2>a high enough pick. So let's just follow those decision trees.

1:01:20.080 --> 1:01:25.920
<v Speaker 2>If Justin is mediocre, then it's an easy decision, he says.

1:01:25.920 --> 1:01:31.000
<v Speaker 2>If Justin keeps bawling, if Justin keeps balling, then you

1:01:31.040 --> 1:01:34.040
<v Speaker 2>should be able to get an awesome haul for Justin.

1:01:34.880 --> 1:01:38.200
<v Speaker 2>Someone will give you a lot for Justin and you

1:01:38.240 --> 1:01:41.520
<v Speaker 2>have your own pick, and then you draft Caleb with

1:01:41.640 --> 1:01:46.520
<v Speaker 2>the Panthers pick. And even if Justin is so excellent

1:01:47.200 --> 1:01:50.360
<v Speaker 2>that you're like, oh my god, he might be as

1:01:50.400 --> 1:01:55.440
<v Speaker 2>good as Caleb, you start the rookie contract clock over.

1:01:56.280 --> 1:02:00.840
<v Speaker 2>Like the thing with Justin is you've squandered these first

1:02:00.960 --> 1:02:04.320
<v Speaker 2>three years, and so even if he ends up being awesome,

1:02:04.360 --> 1:02:07.760
<v Speaker 2>you gotta pay him this offseason. And so there, if

1:02:07.760 --> 1:02:10.200
<v Speaker 2>you have the number one pick, you must have Caleb Williams.

1:02:10.240 --> 1:02:13.000
<v Speaker 2>You cannot trade it unless someone unless the Chiefs were

1:02:13.040 --> 1:02:15.320
<v Speaker 2>off for you. Mahomes for it, and they're not going to,

1:02:16.040 --> 1:02:16.920
<v Speaker 2>so you just can't.

1:02:16.960 --> 1:02:21.600
<v Speaker 3>All right, next, Nico Dragonish, as you said on TV,

1:02:21.920 --> 1:02:24.760
<v Speaker 3>the Chiefs are practicing while winning games. Do you think

1:02:24.760 --> 1:02:27.440
<v Speaker 3>it's possible that Philly is doing the same, not showing

1:02:27.440 --> 1:02:29.440
<v Speaker 3>their full force while making sure they still win.

1:02:30.640 --> 1:02:35.600
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I do offensively. Defensively, I think they have some

1:02:35.640 --> 1:02:38.320
<v Speaker 2>real problems on the back end. I don't think that's

1:02:38.360 --> 1:02:42.240
<v Speaker 2>about practice. I think that's about personnel. But holy Jalen

1:02:42.280 --> 1:02:47.760
<v Speaker 2>Carter's been unbelievable. Jalen Carter has been unbelievable. He's not

1:02:47.920 --> 1:02:51.160
<v Speaker 2>been the best D tackle rookie. I mean he has been,

1:02:51.480 --> 1:02:53.920
<v Speaker 2>but he's also just been one of the best D

1:02:54.040 --> 1:02:56.520
<v Speaker 2>tackles and then being able to get them going to

1:02:56.560 --> 1:02:59.520
<v Speaker 2>the Super Bowl and then getting Jalen Carter's just unbelievable.

1:02:59.800 --> 1:03:01.640
<v Speaker 2>It's really unbelievable. All right.

1:03:01.720 --> 1:03:05.320
<v Speaker 3>Next, Joe asked, did either of you catch the Wimby

1:03:05.400 --> 1:03:07.840
<v Speaker 3>Chet battle. I saw the head but I did.

1:03:08.880 --> 1:03:11.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So here's the listen. I Wimby looked pretty good.

1:03:12.040 --> 1:03:14.680
<v Speaker 2>Chet looked pretty good. I give him both credit. Here's

1:03:14.720 --> 1:03:19.920
<v Speaker 2>what I find interesting about the head butt. So everybody

1:03:19.960 --> 1:03:22.760
<v Speaker 2>put up the highlight of Wimby taking Chet to the whole.

1:03:23.520 --> 1:03:27.760
<v Speaker 2>Chet retweeted it and wrote, He's got an unstoppable head

1:03:27.760 --> 1:03:31.960
<v Speaker 2>butt for show. That's what he wrote. He then edited

1:03:32.000 --> 1:03:37.480
<v Speaker 2>it to add to laughing emojis and a handshake emoji

1:03:37.760 --> 1:03:41.880
<v Speaker 2>on the end of it. He had the first tweet,

1:03:42.280 --> 1:03:46.840
<v Speaker 2>then he softened it with the laughing emojis and the

1:03:46.880 --> 1:03:51.920
<v Speaker 2>handshake emoji. I liked the first tweet more. I didn't

1:03:52.040 --> 1:03:53.800
<v Speaker 2>you know what, Chet, you didn't have to do this.

1:03:53.960 --> 1:03:55.840
<v Speaker 3>More neutral, trying to be more neutral.

1:03:56.600 --> 1:03:59.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but like this is, you're gonna you gotta go

1:03:59.160 --> 1:04:03.120
<v Speaker 2>up against this guy, right, you're kind too sweet these things.

1:04:03.480 --> 1:04:04.280
<v Speaker 3>Take those emojis?

1:04:05.520 --> 1:04:06.240
<v Speaker 2>Okay? All right?

1:04:06.320 --> 1:04:10.840
<v Speaker 3>Last one, UH producer asked thoughts on NB playing for

1:04:10.960 --> 1:04:12.800
<v Speaker 3>USA in the Olympics.

1:04:13.360 --> 1:04:17.720
<v Speaker 2>Love it, We're in a role. Everyone listen nobody underestimate

1:04:17.800 --> 1:04:23.480
<v Speaker 2>the power of Lebron. Y'all the Lebron says wait, go ahead, no.

1:04:23.560 --> 1:04:25.919
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead, because she's like the Steph Curry interview where

1:04:25.960 --> 1:04:29.000
<v Speaker 3>he he started to say, I've been talking to some

1:04:29.520 --> 1:04:32.080
<v Speaker 3>and then I've been talking to people like they were

1:04:32.120 --> 1:04:34.280
<v Speaker 3>saying that. He didn't want people to know that Lebron

1:04:34.400 --> 1:04:38.120
<v Speaker 3>was really orchestrating at all. He didn't like that. I

1:04:38.200 --> 1:04:41.160
<v Speaker 3>thought that was I don't know, because he started he

1:04:41.240 --> 1:04:43.320
<v Speaker 3>definitely started to say, Bron, but go ahead.

1:04:44.600 --> 1:04:46.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I just know that Lebron said I want

1:04:46.880 --> 1:04:50.400
<v Speaker 2>to play. You know, Lebron's going to be going into

1:04:50.560 --> 1:04:53.000
<v Speaker 2>forty years old, coming off his twenty first season in

1:04:53.000 --> 1:04:54.280
<v Speaker 2>the league, and he's like, yeah, I want to play

1:04:54.320 --> 1:04:57.760
<v Speaker 2>more basketball. I want to play in the Olympics and

1:04:58.040 --> 1:05:02.760
<v Speaker 2>to have Durant and and embiid. I love it. I

1:05:02.760 --> 1:05:05.200
<v Speaker 2>think it's so cool for a team USA. I think

1:05:05.240 --> 1:05:07.360
<v Speaker 2>the whole thing's awesome. All right, this is a great show.

1:05:07.400 --> 1:05:10.560
<v Speaker 2>Great job demands, great job all the producers. We will

1:05:10.600 --> 1:05:13.400
<v Speaker 2>see you guys on Thursday. I'm gonna be on with

1:05:13.480 --> 1:05:16.320
<v Speaker 2>Colin in about ninety minutes and then the TV show

1:05:16.320 --> 1:05:18.640
<v Speaker 2>today at three mahomes Mountain at four o'clock. See you

1:05:18.680 --> 1:05:19.080
<v Speaker 2>guys there.

1:05:19.080 --> 1:05:19.520
<v Speaker 3>What's right,