WEBVTT - Here's Why Companies Are Staying Private For Longer

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. I'm Stephen Carroll, and

0:00:09.560 --> 0:00:11.960
<v Speaker 1>this is Here's Why, where we take one new story

0:00:12.000 --> 0:00:13.840
<v Speaker 1>and explain it in just a few minutes with our

0:00:13.880 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>experts here at Bloomberg. The legendary investor Warren Buffett once wrote,

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:24.960
<v Speaker 1>if you aren't willing to own a stock for ten years,

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 1>don't even think about owning it for ten minutes. But

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>what if you can't buy the stock in the first place.

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 2>Some tech companies, maybe a lot of tech companies, go

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:36.200
<v Speaker 2>public a bit too early.

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Some of the world's most exciting companies are remaining in

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>private hands. Take the example of payments giants Stripe, valued

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>at about seventy billion dollars. The co founder and CEO

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:48.839
<v Speaker 1>John Collison says they're in no rush to go public.

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 2>We still see tons of opportunity to change and grow

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 2>the business quite a lot. You look at analysts following

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 2>public companies and obsessing over guidance and what'll be this

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 2>quarter and things like that. Culturally, we've ended up I

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 2>think in a bit more of a world where public

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 2>companies are suited for the extract stage of the sigmoid

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 2>curve rather than the expand stage.

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 1>And stripes not alone. SpaceX cemented its status as the

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:16.520
<v Speaker 1>world's most valuable private startup with a share sale that

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 1>valued it at about three hundred and fifty billion dollars,

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 1>and at open Aiy's last fundraising round, it was valued

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 1>at one hundred and fifty seven billion. So here's why

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>companies are staying private for longer. Joining me now to

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 1>discuss is the person at Bloomberg who specializes in covering

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>how companies go public, Bailey Lipschaltz. Billy, thanks for joining us.

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Does this mean you're out of a job? How widespread

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:43.200
<v Speaker 1>is this trend of companies staying private?

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:45.679
<v Speaker 3>So far, not out of a job, but it definitely

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 3>makes you want to find some other areas to write about.

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 3>But it is a widespread trend that has been really

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 3>taking place over the last two two and a half decades.

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 3>When you look at the US alone, the number of

0:01:55.880 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 3>publicly traded companies has been cut in half from about

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:00.920
<v Speaker 3>seventy five hundred to four thousand. So this is something

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 3>that has been a real ce shift that has been

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 3>taking place. Again really when you go back to the

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:09.680
<v Speaker 3>mid two thousands, with companies preferring to stay private after

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 3>the fallout of the dot com.

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Bubble, So why are they making this decision? Why are

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:16.400
<v Speaker 1>they chasing to stay privus.

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 3>Easier access to capital. We've seen such a big push

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:21.960
<v Speaker 3>from some of the biggest investors to wanting to get

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 3>a piece of some of these companies earlier. You also

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:27.399
<v Speaker 3>don't have to deal with activist investors, deal with journalists

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 3>kind of digging through filings and financial updates. And also

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 3>it costs a lot of money to be public. So

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 3>if you can be data Bricks who just raised ten

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars at a sixty two billion dollar valuation. You

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:41.239
<v Speaker 3>mentioned SpaceX, Open AI to a number of other companies,

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 3>they really, when you talk to management, an IPO could

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 3>be the path at some point, but they prefer to

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:50.799
<v Speaker 3>stay private just because they can continue to give investors,

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 3>early investors, employees access to liquidity, ability to sell some

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 3>of their shares, to actually turn paper profits into real cash,

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:00.520
<v Speaker 3>and they're not dealing with the headache that come with

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 3>being a public company.

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>But it seems like in a lot of cases these

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>companies are sort of keeping the option open that they

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:09.800
<v Speaker 1>could go public at some point down the line. Do

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 1>we have any idea of how much money is tied

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 1>up in these private companies that could, in theory list

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 1>if they wanted to.

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:18.919
<v Speaker 3>So we've seen data with private equity owned companies alone,

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 3>there's about two point nine trillion dollars worth of value

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:24.680
<v Speaker 3>that needs to be either sold through a sale or

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 3>brought public through an IPO, and you have a number

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 3>that's pretty similar on the venture capitalist side of things.

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:31.960
<v Speaker 3>So this is trillions of dollars in terms of companies

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:34.640
<v Speaker 3>that are tied up in these private investments. It's just

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 3>a question of when they would go public, what that

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 3>would look like, and whether valuations make sense for venture capitalists,

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 3>private equity firms, or if they want that branding event

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 3>where they're ringing the bell at the Stock Exchange here

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 3>in New York and have the ability to point to

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 3>a ticker that trades on the New York Stock Exchange

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:52.440
<v Speaker 3>or on the Nasdaq.

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>And we mentioned valuations there. How reliably can we value

0:03:56.680 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 1>a company that stays privates.

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 3>It's a hotly contested debate because when you look at

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 3>companies like open Ai being valued to one hundred and

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:08.640
<v Speaker 3>fifty seven billion dollars, that means they found enough investors

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 3>who thought that that was worth writing a check for.

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:13.560
<v Speaker 3>If you're publicly traded, you're getting kind of marked to

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:16.279
<v Speaker 3>market every second that a market is open for trading,

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:18.919
<v Speaker 3>So it's a bit opaque. It's a bit of a

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 3>black box in terms of how some of these valuations

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 3>end up. But presumably the investors, the thrive capitals of

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 3>the world, the venture capitalists of these private equity firms

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 3>who take these companies private, they have an expectation and

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 3>kind of a specialization that those numbers do make sense.

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 3>But the big debate we've been seeing and why we've

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 3>seen such a dearth of offerings and really the last

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:41.359
<v Speaker 3>three years partly has been companies were either taken private

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 3>by private equity or have remained private in venture capital,

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:46.240
<v Speaker 3>and they don't like what they would get if they

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 3>were to go public and sell shares to public investors

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:51.279
<v Speaker 3>and have to deal with being kind of re rated

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 3>on an ongoing quarterly basis.

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Are there regulatory concerns involved here as well? If we

0:04:57.320 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 1>have companies that are this valuable, talking about some that

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:02.719
<v Speaker 1>are hun ndreds of billions of dollars that aren't subject

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 1>to the same oversize that publicly listed firms are.

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't think so. The expectation it depends kind of

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 3>who your stakeholders are. Securities regulations are there to protect

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 3>unsophisticated investors, So you have to be an incredited investor,

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 3>you have to actually have access to buying a SpaceX,

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 3>and you have to kind of have the ability to

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:24.280
<v Speaker 3>get in the door with an open AI to actually

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:27.360
<v Speaker 3>write a check. So there are some regulatory walls put

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:29.800
<v Speaker 3>up in terms of investing in some of these companies.

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:33.360
<v Speaker 3>And just broadly speaking, as it relates to reporting, if

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 3>you're publicly listed, you obviously have to have earnings every

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 3>quarter and have to be kind of in the books

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 3>and have lawyers and consultants and other people on the payroll.

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:43.839
<v Speaker 3>If you're private, you can kind of operate at least

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 3>to some extent how you would like.

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:50.119
<v Speaker 1>Broadly speaking, is it a problem if these companies don't

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 1>ever go public? You know, we think about some of

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the really high profile ones like SpaceX or open AI.

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 3>It depends who you talk to if you are a company,

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 3>or if I talk to lawyers and investors. As long

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 3>as the earlier stage investors or employees have the ability

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 3>to take advantage of the equity they've built up in

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 3>the company, then there's really no reason to go public.

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 3>When I talk to advisors, the question when they're talking

0:06:13.000 --> 0:06:14.480
<v Speaker 3>to management teams are why do you want to go

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 3>to public? What do you gain from being publicly listed?

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 3>The downside, though, is if you don't have a strong

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 3>public markets, you don't have that transparency that you mentioned,

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 3>you don't have the ability to kind of hold some

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 3>companies accountable, and you also don't have the ability for

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:30.360
<v Speaker 3>people to actually buy some of these companies. So by

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:33.239
<v Speaker 3>the time open AI or to go public via IPO,

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 3>by the time SpaceX could go public or Starling could

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 3>go public, a lot of that valuation and kind of

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:40.600
<v Speaker 3>growth could be sapped out of the market. And now

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 3>you're bringing a company that already is one of the

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 3>biggest companies in the world straight to the public markets

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 3>and investors at least in the public markets who don't

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 3>have the ability to have access to it or can't

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 3>afford to pay someone for those private investments. Is joining

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 3>the party late?

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Is this becoming a question of prestige, Is it just

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 1>a sort of badge of honor to be a public company,

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 1>or is even that dwindling?

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 3>It feels like that is dwindling depending who you talk to. Obviously,

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 3>the exchanges want companies to continue listing. But if open

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 3>ai can be valued one hundred and fifty seven billion dollars,

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 3>if SpaceX can get its funding round, and employees, according

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 3>to Elon Musk, don't want to sell shares. Everyone knows

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 3>who some of these companies are. There is still a

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 3>branding event with being publicly listed. There is some validity

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 3>depending on the industry you operate in, where you can

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 3>talk to customers and clients and say, hey, we're publicly listed.

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 3>We trade on New York Stock Exchange. Here are our

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 3>quarterly results. But for some of these name brand companies,

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 3>some of the top kind of upper echelon firms, the

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 3>question really is what would be the reason to go public?

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 3>And if there's not a good business reason, then for

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 3>all intensive purposes, staying private makes a lot of sense.

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Bloomberg's Billy Lipshellz thanks very much for joining us.

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 1>For more explanations like this from our team of twenty

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 1>nine hundred journalists and analysts around the world. Search for

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 1>quick take on the Bloomberg website or Bloomberg Business app.

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Carol, this is here's why. I'll be back next

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:04.120
<v Speaker 1>week with more. Thanks for listening,