WEBVTT - Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Elon and Trump

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:10.879
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:16.919
<v Speaker 2>Well, Elon Musk gives now the richest person on the planet.

0:00:17.239 --> 0:00:20.120
<v Speaker 3>More than half the satellites in space are owned and

0:00:20.200 --> 0:00:22.040
<v Speaker 3>controlled by one man.

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, he's a legitimate super genius. I mean legitimate.

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>He says he's always voted for Democrats, but this year

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:30.200
<v Speaker 1>it will be different. He'll vote Republican.

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:32.879
<v Speaker 4>There is a reason the US government is still reliant

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:35.520
<v Speaker 4>on him. Elon Musk is a scam artist and he's

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 4>done nothing.

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:40.519
<v Speaker 2>Anything he does, he's fascinating people.

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to elan Ing, Bloomberg's weekly podcast about Elon Musk.

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 3>It's June fourth. I'm your host, David Papadopolis. This week,

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 3>with the US still reeling from Donald Trump's felony conviction,

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:07.319
<v Speaker 3>we have politics on the brain, particularly the strange on again,

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 3>off again alliance that has been brewing between Musk and Trump.

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:13.959
<v Speaker 3>There's been new reporting from US at Bloomberg and from

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:17.200
<v Speaker 3>the Wall Street Journal about their meetings, plus news that

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:20.320
<v Speaker 3>X will be hosting town hall events for Trump and

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:24.399
<v Speaker 3>separately for RFK Junior. Before we dig into all that, though,

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:27.399
<v Speaker 3>we'll do a rundown on some developments in Elon's seemingly

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:31.120
<v Speaker 3>never ending legal troubles. To break down the latest on

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:35.200
<v Speaker 3>a pair of X related lawsuits, were joined by BusinessWeek

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 3>senior writer and mister all around guy Clarksfield South High

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 3>School two thousand, Max.

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 5>Chafkins close, Thank you, great to be here, David, What

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:46.960
<v Speaker 5>I get wrong?

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 2>Clarksfield, Clarkstown, Everyone knows that.

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 3>And Kurt Wagner, author of Battle for the Bird and

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 3>a reporter for US covering social platforms at Bloomberg.

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 4>Kurt, David, how are you?

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 6>Thank you? Thank you.

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 3>Later on, we're going to be joined by Bloomberg national

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 3>political correspondent Nancy Cook. But let's get right into this

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:16.800
<v Speaker 3>suddenly seeming maze of lawsuits in legal troubles that Musk

0:02:16.880 --> 0:02:20.080
<v Speaker 3>is in again, Kurt, So bring us up to speed

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:22.080
<v Speaker 3>a little bit here, because it's been coming on the

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:24.079
<v Speaker 3>legal front fast and.

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:24.800
<v Speaker 6>Furious of late.

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, there's probably a dozen or more legal disputes that

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:32.360
<v Speaker 4>Elon and X are dealing with right now, but the

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 4>most prominent one is this SEC investigation into whether he

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 4>violated laws by purchasing the Twitter stock in the way

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 4>that he did back in early twenty twenty two. So

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:45.520
<v Speaker 4>to remind folks.

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 6>Prior to the takeover you meet.

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:49.960
<v Speaker 4>That's right before he actually acquired the company, he was

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 4>building a position in Twitter starting in late January of

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:57.160
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty two. The public didn't learn about that position,

0:02:57.440 --> 0:03:01.080
<v Speaker 4>that that stake that he'd acquired and to two months later,

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 4>and in those two months, Elon acquired more than nine

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 4>percent of Twitter stock without ever publicly disclosing this. Now,

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 4>the SEC's rules state that once you cross this five

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 4>percent ownership threshold, you're supposed to file paperwork. It then

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:17.920
<v Speaker 4>becomes public everyone knows. Okay, Elon Musk is, you know,

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:21.959
<v Speaker 4>a major shareholder in Twitter because he did not do that. Now,

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 4>the accusation is, did he keep the price of Twitter

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:28.919
<v Speaker 4>stock artificially low so that he was able to buy

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 4>more of it at a lower price? Right because the

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:33.080
<v Speaker 4>minute he says, hey, I'm buying Twitter stock, the price

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 4>just shoots up. So the longer he delays that, the

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 4>better deal he gets.

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 3>Just like when he says he's buying doge coin and

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 3>the price shoots up. Now, that's what the SEC is

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 3>looking into. And now there has also been a separate

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 3>lawsuit from investors more or less around the exact same issue.

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 6>Is that right, it is the same issue.

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and this is the wrote down the Oklahoma Firefighter's

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 4>pension and retirement system them, So basically the pension fund

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 4>for firefighters in Oklahoma are saying, hey, wait a minute,

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 4>we own stock in Twitter. They actually, I believe sold

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 4>stock in Twitter during this period. And their complaint is

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 4>because they didn't know that Elon was buying these shares,

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 4>they sold that at a lower price than they could have. Right,

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 4>And so this lawsuit's really interesting. They just issued an

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 4>updated version of the lawsuit last week which had all

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 4>kinds of juicy details about Elon and his business manager,

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 4>Jared Birchall.

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 6>And give us a couple of the best details.

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:36.719
<v Speaker 4>The biggest accusation in this lawsuit is that Elon was

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 4>ignoring advice from his bankers at Morgan Stanley to get

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 4>outside counsel as to when he should divulge these you know,

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:47.920
<v Speaker 4>these sale or these purchases excuse me of Twitter stock. Right,

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 4>so Morgan Stanley's helping him out. We have all these

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 4>emails that are Morgan Stanley bankers saying, just want to

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 4>be sure we're approaching the five percent threshold. Okay, we

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 4>just crossed the five percent threshold, Like are you going

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 4>to disclose this? Are you getting outside legal advice on

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 4>what to do here? And Jared Birchall basically responds, yes, yes, yes,

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 4>we're you know, don't worry about it. We're getting advice

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 4>all this stuff. And the lawsuit claims that was all false,

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:14.359
<v Speaker 4>that they were not speaking with outside counsel, they were

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 4>simply ignoring all of these warnings and essentially, you know,

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 4>blowing past the stop sign that the sec had put

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 4>up for them. And you know, it's a pretty damning

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 4>accusation in my opinion.

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:28.479
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean that's the interesting thing here to me, Max,

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 3>because going back a long long time in this country,

0:05:31.920 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 3>the rule is pretty simple, like if you go above

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 3>that threshold and stake in a company, thou shall declare

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:38.160
<v Speaker 3>your position.

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 5>I mean, there are few things that are sort of

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 5>fundamental to like Elon Musk's character. Like one is that

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:45.920
<v Speaker 5>he really likes to be funny, he likes to crack jokes.

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 5>Another is like he really cares about sustainable transportation. And

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:51.160
<v Speaker 5>like the third I'd say is that he does not

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:56.599
<v Speaker 5>respect securities laws. He has a long history of kind

0:05:56.600 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 5>of make of sort of ignoring or sidestepping or skirting

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 5>the line ever so carefully around basic SEC laws, rules

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:09.839
<v Speaker 5>and norms, which has led to essentially like a long

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 5>running dispute with the SEC.

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 3>And he does that because he just find he finds

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 3>them absurd, not where not worth his time.

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 5>I think, though, yeah, I think it's those two things

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 5>his whole attitude. Obviously it's not his fundamental nature, but

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 5>he does really believe that like you should reduce these

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:29.600
<v Speaker 5>rules that like that the way you get to it

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 5>comes up over and over again in that Isaacson book.

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:35.040
<v Speaker 5>You know anything, anything that's not physics is a suggestion,

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:37.680
<v Speaker 5>not a requirement, right, And I think for him, you know,

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:40.480
<v Speaker 5>all these SEC rules are just like these like ticki

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 5>tac bs, things that he views as more or less optional,

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 5>and that has that has led to a you know,

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 5>a year's long dispute with the SEC where we're honestly

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 5>like Musk, although he's settled at various times and he's

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 5>lost some judge, you know, he's basically gotten the better

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:59.279
<v Speaker 5>of the SEC. He's he's more or less continued to

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 5>behave the way he has always behaved, which is to

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 5>you know, basically ignore many many securities laws, or at

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:09.360
<v Speaker 5>least seem to ignore many securities laws. I should say

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:12.240
<v Speaker 5>Elon Musk has in all of these cases denied wrongdoing.

0:07:12.360 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 6>He constantly trash talks them.

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 5>No.

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, Now the he's gonna have to give a deposition

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 3>in front of the SEC for five hours. They set

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 3>a five pretty precise five hours. Why five hours, Max?

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:26.239
<v Speaker 3>Everyone gets hungry after that out.

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 6>Of the.

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I assume they just ask for a big

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 5>chunk of time and five hours, I don't know.

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:36.239
<v Speaker 2>It's like, sounds like a full day right now. Max.

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 3>While all this Twitter stuff in these Twitter lawsuits and

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 3>the SEC deposition were come up, another totally unrelated to Twitter,

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 3>another lawsuit dropped out of the blue.

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:47.520
<v Speaker 6>Tell us about this one.

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so this is a lawsuit from investors in Tesla.

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 2>The accusation here.

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 5>If you look back in twenty twenty two, Tesla's stock

0:07:56.320 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 5>price fell a lot during that year, and the company

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 5>went from having a very positive outlook with Elon Musk

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 5>in October of twenty twenty two is saying essentially there's

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 5>demand as far as I can see, you know, no

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 5>demand issues. And then at the very end of the

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 5>year or sorry, early January, Tesla has this very bad

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 5>quarter the stock drops. You know, that was essentially a

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:22.320
<v Speaker 5>low point for Elon Musk. He sold a bunch of stock,

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 5>I think a little over seven billion dollars worth of

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 5>Tesla's stock in December. And the allegation is from this

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 5>from these investors, that he had knowledge of how bad

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:34.320
<v Speaker 5>the quarter was going to be and that he was

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 5>trading on that knowledge. Now, this kind of case happens

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 5>a lot when you have big swings in the stock price.

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 5>And also we should say Musk was selling a lot

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 5>because he was buying Twitter. I mean, the acquisition had

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 5>already closed at that point, but a lot of the

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 5>share sales earlier in the year were I think related

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:56.719
<v Speaker 5>to like getting some cash for the Twitter acquisition. I

0:08:56.720 --> 0:08:58.840
<v Speaker 5>don't think Musk has responded to this. Must said he

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 5>needed dry powder, you know, he needed cash. That said, Like,

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 5>over the course of that year, Musk made several statements

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 5>that were like I'm done selling stock. He kept sort

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:12.240
<v Speaker 5>of promising that he was done selling stock and then

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 5>selling some more stock. So you can sort of understand

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 5>why investors are upset about it and why they might

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 5>have a case. Now again, like these cases I think

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 5>tend to be hard to prove so we'll see, Kurt.

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:28.559
<v Speaker 3>There is just in general, though, a long litany of

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 3>lawsuits backed up going you know, going back months and

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 3>months against Twitter since he took over.

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 4>Now a huge list. Yeah, you know, we talked about

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:39.080
<v Speaker 4>the two.

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 6>Do you have an Do we have a number more

0:09:41.240 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 6>or less? Let's see.

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:44.440
<v Speaker 4>I tried to write them down. I would say over

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:47.520
<v Speaker 4>a dozen that I'm aware of. We talked about the

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 4>two related to his stock purchases. I briefly mentioned this

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 4>arbitration case to actually is like thousands of arbitration cases.

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:58.720
<v Speaker 4>I believe there's more than two thousand employees that are

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 4>sort of signed up with this one lawyer for a

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:03.320
<v Speaker 4>mass arbitration. But I think they may have to do

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:07.199
<v Speaker 4>them all individually, which means you know, thousands of those.

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 4>There's a National Labor Relations Board case where they fired

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:13.679
<v Speaker 4>an employee at X who's now suing him. You may

0:10:13.679 --> 0:10:17.679
<v Speaker 4>recall that the C suite at Twitter was due more

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 4>than one hundred million dollars in golden parachutes when Elon

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:23.960
<v Speaker 4>took over and fired them, which he withheld. So the

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 4>C suite at Twitter's suing him. And then lastly, tons

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 4>of vendors, right, so a private Jet Company Law, a

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 4>law firm that did work for him. A lot of

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 4>the places where they just stopped paying rent at Twitter's offices,

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:41.079
<v Speaker 4>those people are all coming to collect as well. So

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 4>it's been a steady stream. The line to sue Elon

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 4>is out the door and around the block.

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 6>At this point.

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 3>Trump has a track record allegedly of not paying people,

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 3>so similar pattern here for Musk.

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think it's very similar, and I mean it's

0:10:57.280 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 5>there are a lot of aggressive business people who kind

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:02.559
<v Speaker 5>of do this in one way or another, and I

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 5>do think it's part of why, you know, we saw

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 5>after Trump was convicted in New York, Musk, you know,

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 5>sent out a flurry of replies essentially in support of

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:15.320
<v Speaker 5>Donald Trump. And I think part of that is just,

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 5>you know, general he's now basically an anti Biden. The

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 5>fact of Trump support. A part of this is just

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:22.840
<v Speaker 5>kind of political signaling. But I think part of it

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:27.079
<v Speaker 5>is like he genuinely believes that it is dangerous and

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 5>he may worry in fact personally because he, like President

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 5>Trump formed. President Trump has tangled with with the government

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 5>and there are DOJ investigations and so on. And when

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 5>you see, you know, a successful business person being prosecuted.

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 5>I think that affects people, and it can affet people

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 5>on an emotional level.

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:53.199
<v Speaker 3>All right, now we're gonna bring in our national political correspondent,

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:58.199
<v Speaker 3>Nancy Cook to talk about the on again, off again

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:01.440
<v Speaker 3>Trump and Musk relationship.

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:03.320
<v Speaker 6>Nancy, Hello, thanks for having me.

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:06.679
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Nancy, So, if the on again, off again relationship

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 3>is on again, what exactly does on look like?

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:14.560
<v Speaker 1>So on looks like at this point, Well, it looks

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty on, I have to be honest. You know, Trump

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 1>and Elon sort of had this relationship where they would

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:24.560
<v Speaker 1>fight with each other. But really the Trump campaign for

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:27.439
<v Speaker 1>the last several months has been on the hunt for donors.

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 1>They really want to close the fundraising gap between the

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 1>former president and President Biden, and so he has been

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:37.120
<v Speaker 1>having a lot of meetings and breakfasts with rich people.

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 1>That's just the easiest way to put it. And so

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 1>in March in Palm Beach, he had a meeting with

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of wealthy people at this donor's house in

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:50.079
<v Speaker 1>Palm Beach and Trump went there. It was a brunch

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:52.960
<v Speaker 1>and Elon Musk was there, and that's when they first

0:12:53.040 --> 0:12:56.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of started to speak again. I would say, behind

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the scenes, which was what was happening during then, is

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:02.440
<v Speaker 1>that Vivic Ramas, who as you remember, ran for president

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 1>in the Republican primary, had really started to broker this

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:07.199
<v Speaker 1>truce between.

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:07.520
<v Speaker 2>The two of them.

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Why why vivec Well, so Vivic is really auditioning to

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 1>be a vice president if Trump wins, or a cabinet member.

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 1>He is sucking up to Trump twenty four to seven.

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:20.840
<v Speaker 1>He's going on TV, he's going to campaign events with Trump,

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:24.079
<v Speaker 1>and so one key way to curry favor with the

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:25.959
<v Speaker 1>Trump people at this point is to bring them rich

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 1>people who are donors. And so Vivic really brokeer this

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:30.359
<v Speaker 1>cold war truce.

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 2>Between these because he knows Elon as well.

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:36.680
<v Speaker 1>He does know Elon as well. You know, Elon had

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:41.319
<v Speaker 1>expressed admiration and some support for Vivic during the Republican primary.

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 1>They had their own relationship, and so Vivic tried to

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:47.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of then steer that support around to Trump.

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so they find themselves in this same launch and

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 3>they spoke directly then, and they begun speaking more frequently since, Yeah.

0:13:59.880 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 1>They were at this donor breakfast with a bunch of

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 1>donors or a handful of them, and then after that

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 1>they really started talking directly more to one another. And

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 1>so Trump loves to just call people on the phone.

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 1>He is, you know, old school that way. He likes

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:16.640
<v Speaker 1>to you know, likes to pick up the phone. He's

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:18.719
<v Speaker 1>never liked to email or text. He doesn't like to

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 1>leave a paper trail. So he has this whole informal

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 1>kitchen cabinet of people who he calls on the phone,

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, rich people, economic people, TV hosts, Fox News people,

0:14:29.240 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 1>and he'll ask them their opinion on who he should

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:33.880
<v Speaker 1>pick for vice president, or what they think of inflation

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 1>or you know, did they see that hit on CNN

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 1>last night? And so Elon has sort of joined this

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 1>list of people who Trump calls now and my reporting

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 1>shows that they do speak to one another directly with

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>some frequency now.

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 3>Now, Nancy apparently among other things they've been talking about,

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 3>Donald and Elon are our crypto that Elon has been

0:14:57.800 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 3>giving Trump advice on crypto.

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 6>Tell us a little about that.

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 1>So the term campaign has started to think more about

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 1>crypto policy. I think in a bid to appeal to

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 1>younger voters, particularly young male voters, they're really going after

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 1>that demographic, and so they have really turned to you know,

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 1>silicon Valley and tech people much more for advice on this,

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and so they have asked Elon about it. Also, they've

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 1>asked just a bunch of Silicon Valley people who with

0:15:25.080 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 1>ties to Elon about it as well. And so it's

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of this like little orbit where they're not just

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 1>reaching out to him about it, but they're also reaching

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:33.760
<v Speaker 1>out to a bunch of his friends. And then his

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 1>friends are like, oh, you should talk to Elon about it.

0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 1>He's smart, and so I feel like I was told

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 1>that just sort of keeps reinforcing his influence.

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:44.720
<v Speaker 3>Now now Max, I think Mosk has denied having discussed it.

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, we should also say, like there's the possibility of

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:52.880
<v Speaker 5>like a crypto voter demographic. But I think another possible explanation,

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 5>and one that I would credit a little bit more,

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 5>is the idea that there's a lot of money in

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 5>crypto to spend the election. You know, there's this massive

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 5>political Action committee, you know, more than one hundred million dollars.

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 5>You have a bunch of big name venture capitalists pouring

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 5>money into politics right now because of they want to

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 5>influence crypto regulations. You also have a bunch of you know,

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 5>kind of prominent crypto figures who have like suddenly become

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 5>like big time maga people. So it feels like part

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 5>of what's happening anyways, like the Trump campaign has figured

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 5>out that crypto is a way to appeal to Silicon

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 5>Valley types, and not just Elon Musk, but you know,

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 5>David Sachs and a lot of these other guys, like

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 5>a lot of big name vcs have crypto investments.

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 3>Okay, And when we spoke about politics some last week,

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 3>the sense was from mister Chafkin and others was that

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 3>must still hadn't cut Trump a check. Does that remain

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 3>the case as we understand it.

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 1>As far as I know, we have not seen the

0:16:55.480 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Federal Election Commission report filing yet, which is what the

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Trump campaign has file with the federal government, which is

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:05.360
<v Speaker 1>basically like a verified list of donations. But I do

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:07.680
<v Speaker 1>think that if he did cut a check, the Trump

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:09.880
<v Speaker 1>people would be so excited that we would know about

0:17:09.920 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 1>it at this point. And you have to remember that

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the DeSantis campaign also were very confident that they would

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 1>get a check edit that never arrived. And so I'm

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 1>not really holding my breath as to whether or not

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:23.919
<v Speaker 1>Elon becomes a donor but even if he is a

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 1>supporter and sort of in the Trump orbit and giving advice,

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a pretty significant political development.

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I totally agree with that. You know, remember a

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 5>lot of people talk about Peter Teel and Trump. Teal

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:39.679
<v Speaker 5>actually gave that his million dollar check pretty late in

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:42.639
<v Speaker 5>the cycle and spoke at the Republican National Convention in

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 5>twenty sixteen, you know, before he donated any money or

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:46.879
<v Speaker 5>any significant money.

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:49.200
<v Speaker 2>You can imagine the same thing happening here, right.

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:52.680
<v Speaker 5>Like Elon Musk, for all all the ways he's like controversial,

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 5>he is a famous, rich and successful businessman, and Donald

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 5>Trump respects. Donald Trump supporters respect that like he brings

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:08.480
<v Speaker 5>even in his extremely red pilled ship posting persona, he

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:12.400
<v Speaker 5>brings a level of respectability to you know, the Trump

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:15.480
<v Speaker 5>campaign that is very valuable. Not only that, but he

0:18:15.640 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 5>has the potential to bring in other donors. You know,

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:20.680
<v Speaker 5>the there are all these other rich guys who really

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 5>care about Elon Musk. Just one thing I'm keeping an

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 5>eye on later this week. You know, David Sachs I

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 5>mentioned him earlier. He's a good friend of Elon Musk.

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:31.120
<v Speaker 5>I think he's probably the person in Silicon Valley, who

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 5>has Elon's ear in the most sustained way, is having

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:37.879
<v Speaker 5>a big fundraiser, you know, up to five hundred thousand

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 5>dollars per couple. That's the highest tier in San Francisco.

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:44.199
<v Speaker 5>We don't know who's going to be there, but it

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:46.639
<v Speaker 5>is possible that Elon Musk will show up and so

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:48.440
<v Speaker 5>like this, you know, by the end of the week,

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 5>we may have some serious developments.

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 2>He also may just post about it, which seems you know,

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:54.879
<v Speaker 2>i'd say a.

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:56.200
<v Speaker 6>New Sun and Kurt.

0:18:56.320 --> 0:19:01.160
<v Speaker 3>The way Musk has X tacking it's it's public posture

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:05.120
<v Speaker 3>has to be also has to square a bit with

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:07.359
<v Speaker 3>and get them more aligned with the Trump camp.

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 4>Now I think so, I mean, I think donation aside

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 4>what Elon's doing with X and the opportunities that he's

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 4>providing Trump, you know, with this upcoming town hall that

0:19:18.280 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 4>they're going to do with everything that Elon usually says

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 4>about Biden and pushing back on Biden's agenda, like that's

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:28.119
<v Speaker 4>more valuable, I would imagine, honestly than you know, some

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:29.920
<v Speaker 4>check that he's going to write to him anyway, because

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:34.199
<v Speaker 4>Elon's out here the setting the stage for Donald Trump

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 4>and this town hall is going to be a huge

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 4>moment only because it'll be you know, one, Elon's going

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:42.359
<v Speaker 4>to make sure that everybody on the service, you know,

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 4>basically sees it. And two, it's kind of a return

0:19:45.800 --> 0:19:48.520
<v Speaker 4>of sorts for Donald Trump to this platform that he

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:52.480
<v Speaker 4>really rode for four years as president. And so that

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:55.119
<v Speaker 4>moment is going to be so, in my opinion, so

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 4>big for President Trump that you know, I don't think

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:01.480
<v Speaker 4>the donation. I think that's a secondary thing, to be

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 4>honest with.

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 3>You, Curtin, Yeah, tell us a little bit more about

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:06.280
<v Speaker 3>those planned X town halls.

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so X is going to broadcast essentially a live

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:15.280
<v Speaker 4>town hall, one with Donald Trump and one with Robert F.

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:18.639
<v Speaker 4>Kennedy Junior. And these are separate town halls, but you

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:22.919
<v Speaker 4>know they'll be part of this new X video strategy

0:20:22.960 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 4>that they're trying to lean into this idea of like

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:28.960
<v Speaker 4>live newsy video, and they're partnering with News Nation, which

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:31.639
<v Speaker 4>is a TV network, to do this. But you know,

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:33.840
<v Speaker 4>I think the big thing here is, and I kind

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:36.159
<v Speaker 4>of alluded to this, this would be a return of

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:39.639
<v Speaker 4>sorts for Donald Trump to X. Right, he was so

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 4>prevalent on what was then Twitter for years. He got banned.

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 4>You'll remember in the days after the January sixth, right,

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 4>and he's only tweeted one time, one time since then,

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:53.919
<v Speaker 4>and that was his mugshot when he was booked in

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:58.479
<v Speaker 4>I believe, Georgia several months ago. And so you know,

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:00.920
<v Speaker 4>this would be a chance for him to come back.

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:04.640
<v Speaker 4>He has like eighty plus million followers there. He's obviously

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:08.359
<v Speaker 4>known to be a Twitter person. So for me, this

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 4>would be a homecoming of sorts, and I wonder if

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 4>it would be the beginning of him starting to tweet

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 4>and use that platform in that audience more regularly. I

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:17.120
<v Speaker 4>wouldn't be shocked.

0:21:17.520 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 3>But the risk there for him is he's got his

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 3>own social platform that is at a very lofty valuation.

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 3>The only scenario in which it makes even an iota

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:31.920
<v Speaker 3>of sense that valuation is if Trump sticks on true

0:21:31.920 --> 0:21:34.400
<v Speaker 3>Social never goes back to any other platform. He wins

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 3>the presidency, and suddenly a whole bunch of people are

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:39.119
<v Speaker 3>forced onto truth social because he's the president.

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:42.960
<v Speaker 6>You have to follow his post. If he's suddenly back.

0:21:42.760 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 3>On Twitter or X, I should say, well, then even

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:47.640
<v Speaker 3>that far fetched idea dies.

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:51.960
<v Speaker 5>You're right, But also, like the evaluation of truth Social,

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:54.119
<v Speaker 5>I mean, to my eye, is just based on the

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:55.879
<v Speaker 5>fact that a lot of people like Donald Trump, they

0:21:55.920 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 5>think he's going to be pre you know, like it's sort.

0:21:57.800 --> 0:21:58.639
<v Speaker 2>Of vibe based.

0:21:58.720 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 5>So you could imagine situation where he came back to

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:04.119
<v Speaker 5>Twitter in some way. Like the thing that I've been

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:07.639
<v Speaker 5>thinking about is, you know, he has supposedly has this

0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 5>deal where he's supposed to, you know, have his tweets

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:13.160
<v Speaker 5>on truth Social rather than Twitter. Now, what about spaces,

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 5>right these these audio calls, maybe that is a loophole.

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:19.920
<v Speaker 5>You know, audio is much bigger on Twitter. Elon Musk

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:23.440
<v Speaker 5>loves spaces. You know, you could imagine a situation where

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:26.240
<v Speaker 5>like Kurt's kind of hinting at you know, this News

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:30.120
<v Speaker 5>Nation X town Hall, which feels like a TV thing

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:32.679
<v Speaker 5>that's going to be broadcast, could lead to sort of

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 5>more what what we more think of as like native

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:39.679
<v Speaker 5>Twitter content and you know, spaces audio getting on X

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 5>you know a couple of times a month with Elon,

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 5>which you know you could totally see Trump doing.

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:52.480
<v Speaker 3>So, Nancy, So Trump goes to X spaces and Musk

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:56.680
<v Speaker 3>potentially goes to the Republican Convention and speaks there.

0:22:57.920 --> 0:23:00.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there is some discussion about having him speak at

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 1>their Republic invention. I mean, my reporting shows that that's

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:05.200
<v Speaker 1>not totally nailed down yet, but I think that there

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:08.480
<v Speaker 1>is interest from the Trump campaign and potentially having him

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 1>speak there.

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 5>They should look for a video of Elon Musk speaking anywhere,

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:15.880
<v Speaker 5>because like he never does, like I like, honestly, one

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:17.480
<v Speaker 5>thing they'll have to figure out is like, I don't

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:20.920
<v Speaker 5>think Elon Musk has ever I don't know, I mean.

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:23.879
<v Speaker 6>When he when he did SNL, I mean presumably there

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:24.680
<v Speaker 6>was a right, there.

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 5>Was SNL, but normally it's it's in the context of

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:30.160
<v Speaker 5>an interview, like he almost always is interviewed. He doesn't

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 5>give these kind of speeches, and so they would have

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 5>to figure out a way. I guess that, you know,

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:36.360
<v Speaker 5>they'll study the SNL.

0:23:36.080 --> 0:23:36.960
<v Speaker 6>Tape, right.

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:40.399
<v Speaker 3>And the other thing I'll just say is, uh, Teal

0:23:41.320 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 3>wasn't much of a public speaker before he spoke at

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:46.880
<v Speaker 3>the at the convention back in sixteen, right, I.

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 2>Mean, Teal had given some talks.

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 5>He's not a very I don't think he's you would

0:23:51.040 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 5>anyone call him like a polished public speaker. But it's

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 5>a little bit different than Elon, who I say, even

0:23:57.240 --> 0:24:00.640
<v Speaker 5>as unpolished if Peter teel as Elon is even more

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:02.920
<v Speaker 5>off the cup. You know, a lot of these appearances

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 5>in recent months have been like on zoom, He's like

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 5>holding the phone, Like you could imagine a universe of

0:24:09.840 --> 0:24:12.160
<v Speaker 5>this where Elon says like, oh, yeah, yeah, I'll speak

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 5>of the Republican Convention and then it turns out he's

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:16.720
<v Speaker 5>going to be like facetiming in from it would be

0:24:16.720 --> 0:24:17.440
<v Speaker 5>a real letdown.

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:20.480
<v Speaker 1>The reporting that I do have about the convention so far,

0:24:20.560 --> 0:24:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the convention planning, is that they are thinking about it

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 1>in a different way, do you know what I mean?

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:28.439
<v Speaker 1>Just because conventions have always sort of been handled a

0:24:28.480 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 1>certain way doesn't mean that the Trump campaign has to

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:33.399
<v Speaker 1>do it that way. And we saw that when Trump

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:35.879
<v Speaker 1>was president, like he blew up that last State of

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the Union and did it totally differently. He gave Rush

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:41.159
<v Speaker 1>Limbau the Medal of Freedom like in the middle of

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:43.679
<v Speaker 1>the State of the Union, Like it was like really

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:47.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of highly a high TV production, lots of surprises,

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 1>surprise guests, people popping up. I mean, I could see

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 1>them doing the same with the convention. And so rather

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 1>than having Elon come and just talk at a podium

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:57.960
<v Speaker 1>for like thirty minutes, which I agree might be weird.

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they do do an interview, maybe they video, maybe

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:03.359
<v Speaker 1>they record him talking ahead of time and then play

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:05.440
<v Speaker 1>it and it's only ten minutes. I mean, I think

0:25:05.440 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 1>they would love to have him, and so I could

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:11.359
<v Speaker 1>see them really being like, hey, you know, Trump did

0:25:11.359 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the Apprentice. Surely we can figure out like a kind

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 1>of cool TV way to do this for Elin.

0:25:15.880 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 3>It would be pretty cool if if they put Elin

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:20.479
<v Speaker 3>in a rocket ship and then they they blasted off

0:25:20.480 --> 0:25:21.960
<v Speaker 3>and they had him do it from like you know,

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 3>orbiting Earth or something that would it's there.

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:26.840
<v Speaker 2>It seemed like there are a lot of cool options.

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 3>Okay, now, Max, you're our feud guy here, mister feud.

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 6>Uh weren't these two feuding? Uh?

0:25:34.359 --> 0:25:37.439
<v Speaker 2>They had? I mean they had one of my favorite feuds.

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:39.159
<v Speaker 3>And in fact, you know, Donald Trump, do I have

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:40.639
<v Speaker 3>a ranking on it?

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 5>I mean, it never rose to the top five because,

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:46.919
<v Speaker 5>as Nancy says, there was kind of always a little

0:25:46.960 --> 0:25:48.160
<v Speaker 5>bit of a question of.

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:49.919
<v Speaker 2>Like how you know, how real is?

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:52.439
<v Speaker 5>But I have to say, you know, Trump obviously master

0:25:52.680 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 5>of kind of a put down, and he had I

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:58.640
<v Speaker 5>think one of the best all time you know, insults

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 5>Elon Musk, he called him a yes artist. In twenty

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 5>twenty two, around the time that that Elon Musk was,

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:07.480
<v Speaker 5>you know, trying to buy Twitter, and of course, you know,

0:26:07.560 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 5>Trump has had a competing service, so there there was

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:11.920
<v Speaker 5>a little bit of that. And then there was this

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:16.359
<v Speaker 5>like lengthy tweet with very colorful like he was begging

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 5>on his knees.

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 2>I guess, well, that's.

0:26:17.640 --> 0:26:19.840
<v Speaker 3>One of Trump's favorite lines. So and so came to

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:22.960
<v Speaker 3>me begging on their knees, asking for forgiveness or this

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:23.359
<v Speaker 3>or that thing.

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:26.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but it kind of cut it did It did.

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 5>Cut to certain things about Elon Musk because of course

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 5>he has been incredibly effective at getting you know, money

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:35.720
<v Speaker 5>from from government and the form of subsidies or attacks,

0:26:35.720 --> 0:26:38.359
<v Speaker 5>incentives and so on, and of course that's part of

0:26:38.400 --> 0:26:41.080
<v Speaker 5>what's going on here right Elon Musk is you know,

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 5>no doubt he's had some sort of political evolution. He's

0:26:44.040 --> 0:26:47.720
<v Speaker 5>he's much more conservative or far right or whatever than

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:51.560
<v Speaker 5>he was previously. But he is also making a calculation,

0:26:51.720 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 5>making a I think what is like a self conscious

0:26:53.960 --> 0:26:56.080
<v Speaker 5>bet on the person who he thinks is going to

0:26:56.080 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 5>be president. And that you know, matters to Tesla and

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:01.360
<v Speaker 5>space and really to.

0:27:01.480 --> 0:27:02.359
<v Speaker 6>About all his companies.

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:03.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly.

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 5>So I think there's a there's definitely like a self

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 5>interest component here, and he has almost like backed himself

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 5>into the corner a little bit where he's become so

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:15.199
<v Speaker 5>anti Biden and so you know, so opposed to the

0:27:15.200 --> 0:27:18.719
<v Speaker 5>Democrats and so unwilling. It seems anyway that bridge has

0:27:18.720 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 5>been burned that you know, he almost has no choice.

0:27:21.119 --> 0:27:24.159
<v Speaker 1>Max is right. Elon really understands something about Trump that

0:27:24.320 --> 0:27:27.440
<v Speaker 1>like a raft of lobbyists in DC are are sort

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:30.440
<v Speaker 1>of missing where you don't if you want to get

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:32.760
<v Speaker 1>to Trump and influence him, you don't like hire a

0:27:32.800 --> 0:27:35.439
<v Speaker 1>bunch of lobbyists who have been in DC forever who

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 1>work at law firms. What you do is like, if

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 1>you're a business person and you want to influence him,

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 1>you want to have his cell phone number and you

0:27:42.880 --> 0:27:45.600
<v Speaker 1>just want to reach out to him directly. And that

0:27:45.800 --> 0:27:49.359
<v Speaker 1>is basically what Elon is setting up in case Trump wins,

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and it could mean a lot for his business interests.

0:27:52.520 --> 0:27:54.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, if Trump wins, you know the White House

0:27:54.520 --> 0:27:57.160
<v Speaker 1>wants to do something in space. Elon can call Trump directly,

0:27:57.480 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 1>same thing with electric vehicles. He will call Trump directly.

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Trump does not like all these intermediaries and lobbyists and

0:28:04.400 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 1>lawyers and advisors and chiefs of staff. He just wants

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 1>to deal with the CEO directly. And that's what Elon

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:10.199
<v Speaker 1>has set up.

0:28:10.920 --> 0:28:11.280
<v Speaker 6>Nancy.

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:15.720
<v Speaker 3>Is there's no sort of explicit quid pro quo here

0:28:15.760 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 3>in the dealings between Musk and Trump.

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:19.600
<v Speaker 6>Is there no?

0:28:19.760 --> 0:28:22.199
<v Speaker 1>But I think that Trump is trying to position himself,

0:28:22.240 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 1>particularly after the trial, as someone who is scooping up support,

0:28:25.720 --> 0:28:28.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, among these different sort of donor groups. So

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, he has made a big play with oil executives,

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:34.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of trying to say, oh, look, they're all supporting me.

0:28:34.280 --> 0:28:36.040
<v Speaker 1>And I think he's trying to make that same play

0:28:36.040 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 1>with Silicon Valley. You know, Wall Street hasn't totally come

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 1>around him yet, although it seems like they're you know,

0:28:41.960 --> 0:28:44.440
<v Speaker 1>more people are real way little and so I think

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:46.840
<v Speaker 1>he's using Elon as sort of a proxy to help

0:28:46.880 --> 0:28:49.560
<v Speaker 1>to get to more tech people and they want to

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:52.440
<v Speaker 1>be able to say, oh, look, all these influential and

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:55.600
<v Speaker 1>rich different sectors of the economy are starting to support me,

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 1>and Elon is part of that.

0:28:58.120 --> 0:29:03.680
<v Speaker 3>Now, does or do these conversations in this growing dialogue

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 3>do they lead to an actual cabinet post. I've heard

0:29:09.240 --> 0:29:12.520
<v Speaker 3>and seen some reporting to that fact, or what exactly

0:29:12.560 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 3>are we talking about here? And if Trump is indeed

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:16.840
<v Speaker 3>the next president of this country.

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:20.200
<v Speaker 1>So Trump is really superstitious and does not like to

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 1>think about who will fill government posts before he wins.

0:29:24.440 --> 0:29:27.120
<v Speaker 1>There are people around him that are thinking about like who,

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, sort of spitballing ideas of like who could

0:29:29.400 --> 0:29:31.680
<v Speaker 1>fill the top economic jobs. But it is not at

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the level where like he is picking people because remember,

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 1>he just got out of many weeks of a trial

0:29:36.720 --> 0:29:38.800
<v Speaker 1>in New York. You know, he hasn't even sort of

0:29:38.960 --> 0:29:41.880
<v Speaker 1>focused on the VP stuff yet. What I was told

0:29:42.000 --> 0:29:45.360
<v Speaker 1>in my reporting was that there has been some discussion about,

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:49.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, Elon playing some advisory role if Trump wins

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the White House. So that could be on one of

0:29:51.040 --> 0:29:55.280
<v Speaker 1>these like you know, CEO advisory boards, or they could

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 1>make a special role for Elon. But again, like an

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:00.640
<v Speaker 1>advisory role, it wouldn't be a cabinet post where he

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 1>would have to give up his stakes and his companies

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:06.600
<v Speaker 1>because I don't think that. I think Trump Blake's having

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:09.440
<v Speaker 1>him out there and sort of influential, and I can't

0:30:09.480 --> 0:30:10.840
<v Speaker 1>imagine Elon really doing that.

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:12.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeah, I mean he's not going to be like

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:16.040
<v Speaker 5>under secretary for Technology, I mean whatever. He's not going

0:30:16.080 --> 0:30:19.040
<v Speaker 5>to have some mid level government job. But remember, like

0:30:19.120 --> 0:30:22.880
<v Speaker 5>during the first Trump administration, this is exactly how they

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:26.080
<v Speaker 5>tried to use him. And I think Elon was valuable

0:30:26.120 --> 0:30:29.480
<v Speaker 5>then for pretty much the same reasons he's valuable now,

0:30:29.520 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 5>except he's more famous, he's richer, and of course there

0:30:32.680 --> 0:30:35.320
<v Speaker 5>is I think more so than there was last time,

0:30:35.320 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 5>where Elon had this kind of centrist identity. There really

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:40.800
<v Speaker 5>is a chance that he could be more partisan, either

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:43.360
<v Speaker 5>in his statements or well, he's already being partisan in

0:30:43.400 --> 0:30:45.480
<v Speaker 5>his statements, but by writing a huge check.

0:30:49.600 --> 0:30:53.560
<v Speaker 3>All right, But let's pretend indeed that Trump wins and

0:30:53.880 --> 0:30:58.360
<v Speaker 3>he gives Mosque a cabinet seat. All right, Mac, I

0:30:58.400 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 3>need you to tell me what cabinet seat is it

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:02.520
<v Speaker 3>that Elon musk.

0:31:02.600 --> 0:31:05.240
<v Speaker 5>So I would guess that they will create a new

0:31:05.520 --> 0:31:06.360
<v Speaker 5>cabinet position.

0:31:07.960 --> 0:31:09.719
<v Speaker 2>What are cabinet secretaries? Are they?

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:14.400
<v Speaker 5>Secretaries may be Secretary of Romance, because Trump will come

0:31:14.440 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 5>around to the well, this is done serious Secretary of

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:22.280
<v Speaker 5>Romantary of procreation, and there will be a you know,

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 5>the Elon is very worried about the population christ We've

0:31:25.520 --> 0:31:28.040
<v Speaker 5>seen as in other countries, we see, you know, Vladimir Putin,

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:30.840
<v Speaker 5>when you know, other other world leaders have have become

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:34.200
<v Speaker 5>concerned about, you know, not having enough babies. I could

0:31:34.200 --> 0:31:36.520
<v Speaker 5>see Trump coming around to that point of view and

0:31:36.640 --> 0:31:39.120
<v Speaker 5>Elon Musk it's one of his interests and you know

0:31:39.360 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 5>who better.

0:31:41.360 --> 0:31:43.920
<v Speaker 3>All right, Uh, I don't know how you follow that.

0:31:44.040 --> 0:31:49.240
<v Speaker 3>But what post do you envision Musk getting in this scenario.

0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:53.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that it would be, you know, some sort

0:31:53.680 --> 0:32:00.000
<v Speaker 1>of advisory role on technology or electric vehicles, not appropriation. Yeah,

0:32:00.120 --> 0:32:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not I'm not going to touch that. I don't

0:32:03.000 --> 0:32:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I want no part of that.

0:32:04.560 --> 0:32:09.360
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg was separately Max, Okay, I was joking.

0:32:09.520 --> 0:32:11.719
<v Speaker 5>I don't think that's actually going to happen, And I

0:32:11.760 --> 0:32:13.640
<v Speaker 5>was hoping Nancy would also make it.

0:32:13.760 --> 0:32:17.640
<v Speaker 6>Give a joke answer, But Nancy, Nancy is a serious journalist.

0:32:18.000 --> 0:32:22.560
<v Speaker 5>I think more realistic is like the CEO Council's. Yeah,

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 5>I'll be on some some boring council.

0:32:25.840 --> 0:32:28.400
<v Speaker 2>He won't be telling us all to have more babies.

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:31.400
<v Speaker 3>Okay, all right, And so Nancy, you're sticking to the

0:32:31.440 --> 0:32:32.400
<v Speaker 3>advisory role.

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:33.920
<v Speaker 6>Kurt, what do you got for us?

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:39.120
<v Speaker 4>Is the is the head of Space Force a position?

0:32:39.160 --> 0:32:41.800
<v Speaker 3>See that is good because that's simultaneously a little fun

0:32:41.800 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 3>and clever and also almost could be a thing.

0:32:44.440 --> 0:32:46.720
<v Speaker 2>If you're like, don't you have to be a general

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:49.200
<v Speaker 2>to be the Space Force? Is like a branch.

0:32:49.040 --> 0:32:52.560
<v Speaker 4>Unless you musk, unless you're Elon Musk, in which kill.

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:55.120
<v Speaker 2>Trump will just give him like four or five stars.

0:32:55.200 --> 0:32:57.800
<v Speaker 3>All right, here we go, because Kurt, Kurt, because you

0:32:57.960 --> 0:33:01.120
<v Speaker 3>passed that test with flying colors. The last question in

0:33:01.120 --> 0:33:02.840
<v Speaker 3>the segment, I'm going to start with you and try

0:33:02.880 --> 0:33:05.000
<v Speaker 3>to set an example for the others. Here I am

0:33:05.040 --> 0:33:07.200
<v Speaker 3>setting in again in this scenario in which he does

0:33:07.280 --> 0:33:09.840
<v Speaker 3>now he is now a cabinet member. I am setting

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:13.240
<v Speaker 3>the over underline and how many days he stays in

0:33:13.280 --> 0:33:16.000
<v Speaker 3>that post between before he's either fired or quits at

0:33:16.160 --> 0:33:19.680
<v Speaker 3>sixty days? Do you take the over sixty or under sixty?

0:33:20.440 --> 0:33:21.479
<v Speaker 4>I would take under.

0:33:21.800 --> 0:33:22.520
<v Speaker 6>I would take under.

0:33:22.760 --> 0:33:23.920
<v Speaker 2>That's like five mooches.

0:33:23.960 --> 0:33:29.280
<v Speaker 3>I guess it's like five max over under sixty. I think, God,

0:33:29.320 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 3>this is not a difficult question.

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:34.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm can I take the line.

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:38.320
<v Speaker 6>I's cambling, I've never don it again.

0:33:38.360 --> 0:33:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Answer over over Nancy, under under it's.

0:33:44.360 --> 0:33:47.840
<v Speaker 3>Totally under by the way, Nancy's got that right.

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:51.560
<v Speaker 6>Nancy, thank you very much for joining us.

0:33:52.080 --> 0:33:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for having me. Good luck guys on that.

0:33:56.200 --> 0:33:58.720
<v Speaker 6>Max Kurt, thank you very much.

0:33:59.280 --> 0:34:00.000
<v Speaker 4>Thank you for having me.

0:34:00.600 --> 0:34:01.280
<v Speaker 2>Great to be here.

0:34:08.520 --> 0:34:11.920
<v Speaker 3>This episode was produced by Stacey Wong. Naomi Shaven and

0:34:11.960 --> 0:34:16.200
<v Speaker 3>Rayhan Harmansi are senior editors. The idea for this very

0:34:16.280 --> 0:34:20.279
<v Speaker 3>show also came from Rayhan. Blake Maples handles engineering, and

0:34:20.280 --> 0:34:23.960
<v Speaker 3>we get special editing assistants from Jeff Grocott and Antonio Muffarech.

0:34:24.440 --> 0:34:27.160
<v Speaker 3>Our supervising producer is Magnus Hendrickson.

0:34:27.640 --> 0:34:28.640
<v Speaker 6>The Elon Inc.

0:34:28.760 --> 0:34:32.680
<v Speaker 3>Theme has written and performed by Taka Yasuzawa and Alex Sugira.

0:34:33.280 --> 0:34:36.720
<v Speaker 3>Brendon Francis Newman is our executive producer, and Sage Bauman

0:34:36.800 --> 0:34:38.200
<v Speaker 3>is the head of Bloomberg Podcast.

0:34:38.800 --> 0:34:40.160
<v Speaker 6>I'm David Papadopoulos.

0:34:40.320 --> 0:34:42.880
<v Speaker 3>If you have a minute, rate and review our show,

0:34:43.080 --> 0:34:44.839
<v Speaker 3>it'll help other listeners find us.

0:34:45.080 --> 0:34:45.960
<v Speaker 6>See you next week.