WEBVTT - Danger Is Building In Some Emerging Markets: Bill Rhodes

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. US

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 1>equities are heading deeper into the red, with the down

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Jones Industrial Index down eight tenths of one percent after

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:42.640
<v Speaker 1>President Trump said that he was calling off his summit

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:46.280
<v Speaker 1>with North Korean leader Kim Jong un. Here to talk

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:49.560
<v Speaker 1>about the implications of this is the Banker to the World.

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 1>He should know about what to expect from this, as

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 1>he has been in a lot of these types of negotiations.

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Bill Rhodes. He is the President, chief executive officer of

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>William Rhodes Global Eiser is also the author of the

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:04.479
<v Speaker 1>book Banker to the World Leadership Lessons from the front

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Lines of Global Finance. Bill Uh, I gather you weren't

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:12.840
<v Speaker 1>all that surprised that these have become some complicated discussions

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 1>between North Korea and UH the US, But what did

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:17.200
<v Speaker 1>you make of today's announcement. First of all, it's great

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 1>to be with you guys. Again, I'm not surprised because

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:22.319
<v Speaker 1>I know Korea quite well. I restructured their dead I

0:01:22.440 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 1>led to discussions on the chorus FDA, the Free trade

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Agreement UH. And the North always, whether it be the

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 1>grandfather who started the dynasty, Kim Il Song or his

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 1>son Kim Jong il has passed to this one, they

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 1>always agree to do things on the nucle disarmament and

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 1>then they back off on it as soon as they

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>get the goodies from US. Uh, you know, in the

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>sense of food, grain, whatever. And so UH I was

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 1>highly skeptical from the beginning that he would be willing

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 1>to give up the one thing he's got, which is

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, is nuclear weapon and missile capacity as a

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 1>as a chip uh and agree to do a Libya

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>type thing where you know, Cadafe gave up everything. The

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 1>question is where do we go from here? And UH,

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 1>we still have a big problem in Korea and what

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 1>are we gonna do about it? Uh? And so I

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 1>think what we have to do is lean on China

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 1>because remember on your show, I mentioned again and again

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the linkage between China UH and Korea and I've done

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:28.920
<v Speaker 1>our eds on it because of their energy comes in

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 1>from China. And so if we don't get the Chinese

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:36.680
<v Speaker 1>willing to do the sanctions, there's there's no push to

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:38.680
<v Speaker 1>go ahead with US. But the US has been pushing

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:40.799
<v Speaker 1>them to do this, and North Korea, as so far

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:43.359
<v Speaker 1>as I can tell, hasn't really gotten anything yet from

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the US, and China seems to be working and playing

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 1>ball with the US on trade negotiations. What broke down here? Why? Now?

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I think a couple of things. One you saw over

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the last few weeks, Uh Kim Kim jong loons made

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>to trips to China. The Chinese or orchestrating this to

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 1>a great degree, and the Chinese are using this as

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:09.080
<v Speaker 1>a pawn, the chip in the negotiations on trade with

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the US. UH. And I think we've been a little

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 1>naive in the administration thinking that we could get the

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:18.840
<v Speaker 1>boast the best out of both worlds because we're asking

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese to reverse their policy, longstanding policy of taking

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 1>advantage when the be intellectual property on trade. UH. And

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:29.799
<v Speaker 1>then expect, uh, you know, as we begin to push

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:33.120
<v Speaker 1>him as we should push them, then expect that uh,

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:36.839
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get Chi Jin pain to push Kim Jong

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 1>un to do a deal with us, So you really

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>can't break that link between the two. And I think

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 1>that if that was a view of the administration, and

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>some people think it was, it was naive. UH. The

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:50.880
<v Speaker 1>other thing is, I think when we deal with the Chinese,

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 1>we need a common front. And all the stories you're

0:03:54.040 --> 0:03:58.839
<v Speaker 1>picking up in Washington. You've got the minutein UH and

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the Larry Cudlow and discussions on one side wanting to,

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, be more favorable to China. And then you

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 1>you've got Leightheiser, who is the trade represent representative, tough

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:13.840
<v Speaker 1>guy on trade UH and Peter Navarro who always had

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:16.919
<v Speaker 1>a problem with China on the other side, with Wilbur Ross,

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Commerce Secretary in the middle, and UH. What we've got

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 1>to understand is that getting Kim Jong un to the

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:26.720
<v Speaker 1>table UH is important, but you've got to have some

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:29.719
<v Speaker 1>preconditions there on the basis of what is his view

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:32.800
<v Speaker 1>of denuclearization And from what I can pick up, his

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:35.480
<v Speaker 1>view is step by step, which is what the Chinese

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 1>have been advocating for years with the Six Party talks,

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 1>and we thought we would go in there. John Bolton

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>was saying we're going to get a Kadafi type deal

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:47.279
<v Speaker 1>where he just gives it up UH for uh, you know,

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 1>removal of sanctions. So I think we've got ourselves a

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:54.279
<v Speaker 1>difficult situation here, and with the trade with China is

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 1>key noting to the Chinese economy, but to our economy

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:01.040
<v Speaker 1>and the world economy. So I hope the administration can

0:05:01.080 --> 0:05:04.480
<v Speaker 1>get its act together on how they're gonna work on

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 1>both sides here, because there is that linkage between China

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:10.839
<v Speaker 1>and North Korea and you can't doubt it. The other

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>problem we have is you have a very nice person

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 1>who's president of South Korea, but his one goal in

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 1>life because I know him going back to when his

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 1>chief of staff of a former president, President Noe, that

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>his one goal in life is reconciliation with North Korea

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 1>and UH, so he'll virtually do anything to get that reconciliation.

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 1>So it's a very very difficult point where we're at.

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 1>And since we're talking about trade, I should mention that

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that I think we need to

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:43.840
<v Speaker 1>really move on. I was with President uh Prime Minister

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Trudeau last week. I sat with him in the diets

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 1>of the New York Economic Club and He was making

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>the point that you know they'll be flexible in Canada,

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>but also they got to be realistic. He says, they'll

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 1>be patient, but uh, we need a deal on after.

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:01.360
<v Speaker 1>And one of the things it troubles me is at

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the elections in Mexico or coming up July one, and

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:09.280
<v Speaker 1>you have a candidate there who basically says, if this

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 1>isn't done by the time he takes office in December,

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:14.919
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna want tougher conditions. The topics are a trade

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 1>political instability not only in Asia but also closer to

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 1>home between Mexico, Canada, the United States, ongoing renegotiations of NAFTA,

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>as well as deterioration in the Turkish Lera. Here to

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>help us understand more about this is Bill Rhodes. He

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>is Banker to the World. His book is called Banker

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 1>to the World Leadership Lessons from the front Lines of

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Global Finance. And Bill, I would just offer that your

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 1>book not only is about what you have done in

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the world of finance, but whom you have met, the

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:55.120
<v Speaker 1>people that you have met and interacted with, And I

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:59.160
<v Speaker 1>think that that's a key element to bring out because

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>most action is done by people it's not something that

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:04.920
<v Speaker 1>falls from the sky. And I'm wondering if you could

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 1>just describe for us what you believe is the sort

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 1>of issue when it relates to the Mexican economy and

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the upcoming Mexican presidential elections and the people involved. Well,

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 1>this is a big election year for Latin America. We

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 1>all we already had this the blackle down in Venezuela,

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 1>where you know, a dishonest election where less than half

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the people even showed up to vote. We have Mexico,

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned, we also have Columbia, and we have Brazil. UH.

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 1>This is the biggest election year in recent history in

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Latin America. So what happens here is key as far

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>as Mexico goes. Lopezo Brador, who's to the far left UH,

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:51.760
<v Speaker 1>is running ahead in the polls. UM. Now some of

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the candidates have have dropped out, and we'll have to

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>see what finally happens. But the election is is basically

0:07:57.360 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 1>almost a month away. It's it's July first, and he's

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>made statements that on two areas, one that UH that

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 1>he's going to look at the the oil contracts have

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 1>been given out by the pinion Yet of government which

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 1>has helped the Mexican economy grow, to see if they

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 1>were done fairly or in a corrupt way, which is

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, concerned people. And then the other thing is, uh,

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>since we don't seem to be able to reach an

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 1>agreement with Pinioneto and Trudeau in Canada, Uh, what will

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 1>happen with NAFTA and after's key to all three countries

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 1>and not only economically but security was and so it's

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>a very concerning situation. Uh. And uh, the Mexicans are concerned. Uh,

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>we should be concerned here and I know the Canadians

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 1>just having sat with with Prime Minister Trudeau uh on

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 1>the diets when he spoke last week. And by the way,

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 1>I think I was very much impressed because he says

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 1>he'll be patient, uh to get this thing done because

0:08:57.120 --> 0:09:01.560
<v Speaker 1>it's so important, but it's got to get done. So

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 1>you know we're talking about Maxo. I want to I

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 1>want to just shift in general to emerging markets. You

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>mentioned Venezuela also clearly there in a crisis of humanitarian, political,

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and economic proportions. The Turkish lira, meanwhile, is continuing to

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 1>fall out of bed, down about four percent today, even

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 1>after the emergency rate hike yesterday by the Turkish Central Bank. UM.

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:30.839
<v Speaker 1>Given your experience with restructuring debt and helping Brazil during

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the the e M crisis in the late nineteen nineties

0:09:34.600 --> 0:09:37.679
<v Speaker 1>and as vice chair of senior vice chair of City Group,

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 1>you know how significant is this? Are we heading toward

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:44.600
<v Speaker 1>another emerging markets crisis of that magnitude? I think it's

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:48.319
<v Speaker 1>a very good Uh, it's a very good question. I

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 1>was with Paul Krugman a week ago in Argentina at

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:53.640
<v Speaker 1>a conference and he and I were talking about it,

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 1>and I noticed he's come out with tweets since Yes,

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:58.679
<v Speaker 1>he has said that it is. It's actually resonate. Resonates

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 1>because he and I I on the private sector side,

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 1>he in academia, were the two who called the Asian

0:10:03.880 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 1>financial crisis UH, and mine came out in the Financial

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Times article. His came out with a paper or study.

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:16.319
<v Speaker 1>I would say there are similarities, but there are big differences.

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I think the similarities are as you get some of

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 1>this UH liquidity what's been slashing around now to get

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:25.560
<v Speaker 1>us out of the Great recession. I've said this on

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 1>your program before and Bloomberg Television. We're gonna see rates

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:31.719
<v Speaker 1>go up in the United States, which we are, the

0:10:31.800 --> 0:10:34.599
<v Speaker 1>quantitative easing is being ratchant back and some of this

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:36.720
<v Speaker 1>search and reach for yield is is going to come

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 1>back and hit us. And one of the groups that

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:42.320
<v Speaker 1>took advantage of this a number of countries in the

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets borrowed heavily in foreign currency, sometimes short term

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 1>as in the case of Turkey, in the case of Argentina,

0:10:50.040 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>longer term and UH. Those countries who have fiscal deficits

0:10:55.920 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 1>UH and aren't prepared to face this I think could

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 1>be in trouble, particularly if we see the FED continuing

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 1>to raise interest rates, which I think they will UH,

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 1>and the quantitative eas in going out. Just having come

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 1>back from Argentina, President Macari was very much the darling

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:17.959
<v Speaker 1>of the markets. But he has a program called Gradualismo,

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 1>which is gradual reform. And the problem is when you

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>get into difficult situations, you can't be gradually about it.

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:27.200
<v Speaker 1>You've got to be more upfront. And I think he

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 1>did the proper thing, although it was tough for him

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>to do, to call in the I m F to

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:33.719
<v Speaker 1>get some support so he can implement the rest of

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the reforms. So Argentina was the one over the last

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 1>few weeks where interest rates went up to they raised

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 1>them three times. UH. The I m F and we

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 1>came one week, which caught the imagination. But Turkey, and

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 1>something I said twice on Bloomberg Television over the last

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:53.320
<v Speaker 1>three months, Turkey has been hanging out there because their

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:56.840
<v Speaker 1>heavy borrow is a private sector short term and they

0:11:56.880 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 1>haven't moved interest rates up fast enough, and so you

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 1>have tremendous pressure on the Turkish lira. UH. And Urvan

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 1>keeps telling the central bank not to raise interest rates

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>because his view of the of the of of of

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:13.320
<v Speaker 1>economics is that central bank should have low interest rates

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 1>and then you won't have any inflation. Well, unfortunately, I

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 1>don't think Devon ever took a course in economics. But

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 1>that's another situation. And so I think that what you

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 1>have here is you have the possibility of those countries

0:12:27.320 --> 0:12:30.320
<v Speaker 1>UH that could have problems. And the other element to

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 1>throw in this is that if the price of oil

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 1>sticks in between seventy and eighty, that'll be big for

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the oil exporters, except as well where the production has collapsed,

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:48.200
<v Speaker 1>which I forecast in my early eighteen January oh ed.

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 1>But I think that what will happen is those countries

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 1>who are importers are going to be hit. So that's

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of a triple whammy. So we just have about

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 1>forty five seconds here. Who is the next shooter drop

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 1>which nation in developing markets? Not clear because it's going

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 1>to depend. Also if you have an ease up in

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 1>uh by Opec uh and the Russians are talking about

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:15.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe easing up somewhat to keep the price from going

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 1>too high in the South East. Han agreed. So it's

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not clear. But just in general, a lot of

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the African countries have barred very heavily in foreign currency,

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:27.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think that uh a number of them are

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:31.520
<v Speaker 1>oil importers, so they could have they could have problems.

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>So we have to see how this, you know, this

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty uh that we're facing unfolds, but it's something that

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 1>needs to be watched without a doubt. And uh, you know,

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I see people on on TV and radio and everything saying, oh,

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 1>this is not going to be a problem. I think

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 1>it could be a problem. It depends on how every

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>individual country handles. But if you told anyone even at

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of this year that Argentina would be asking

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 1>for a standby line, they'd have laughed at you because

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 1>they have just bought those hundred year bonds and they Yeah.

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Bill Rhodes unfortunately have to live it there. You could

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 1>continue for another hour. Bill Rhodes, President, chief executive officer

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>of William R. Rhodes Global Advisors, author of Banker to

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:17.199
<v Speaker 1>the World, also former Seatre, Vice chair of City Group,

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 1>has been in all of these negotiations. A wonderful voice

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 1>on this day. This is Bloomberg. Shares of General Motors

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 1>higher today as well as Ford Motor. General Motors up

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 1>about seven tenths of a percent. Forward Motor up nearly

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>one percent. This comes after the Trump administration is trying

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 1>to use national security laws to consider imposing new tariffs

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 1>on vehicle and automobile parts imports. Here to tell us

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 1>more about this is Alan Boum. He is principal of

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Boum and Associates and based in West Bloomfield, Michigan, and

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 1>he joins us now. Alan, thank you very much for

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 1>being with us. If these tariffs of as much as

0:15:10.200 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 1>on automobile imports, where do you put in place? What

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 1>would that do to US automobile manufacturers? Oh? Chaos, because

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 1>us automobile manufacturers is obviously a broad term, UM. And

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, let's take the clock back to the nineteen

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 1>eighties when the Japanese were importing huge amounts of products

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 1>into the US, and we had voluntary agreements which in

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 1>fact worked far better than even the people at the

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 1>time thought. And what I mean by that is Toyota

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:47.280
<v Speaker 1>and Nissan and Honda to start and others later established

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 1>production here in the US, and that it matters where

0:15:51.520 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the vehicles come from, because if you're producing here in

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the US, your supply is obviously much better than when

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to get products from Japan, where a lot

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 1>of other markets might be trying to do it. And

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 1>so the result was, UM that the Japanese UH had

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 1>tremendous products, they were very efficient, and UH really presented

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 1>presented huge problems for the Detroit Three. So, Allen, I'm

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 1>just wondering, I'm sure after the reports have come out now, UH,

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 1>that there will be a host of lobbyists that will

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:30.400
<v Speaker 1>head to President Trump's office and try to convince him

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 1>to either go through with the tariffs or to abandon

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 1>them all together. So I'm wondering General Motors and Ford,

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 1>for example, are they going to be for these or

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 1>against these? Well, obviously it depends upon uh, you know,

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 1>how they're put together. Uh. Just how Canada and Mexico

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 1>fit into all this. Um Ford, for example, brings in,

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:56.560
<v Speaker 1>uh the Eco Sport from Turkey. Uh. They're talking about

0:16:56.680 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 1>bringing in the Focus, which is now no longer produced

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 1>in Michigan from China. Um and GM brings in the

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Envision from China as well. UM. So all automakers are

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 1>global um and there it's not just their assembly footprint

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:20.439
<v Speaker 1>but their supplier footprint. And this could be very destructive

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:24.640
<v Speaker 1>to their relationships with their suppliers who are used to

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 1>a certain process. And that could mean higher prices for

0:17:28.359 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the automakers to buy from the suppliers, and obviously that

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 1>gets backed on. So alan who is actually arguing for

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 1>these I mean, who's lobbying President Trump saying this is

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 1>a fantastic idea. Uh that's interesting question because I think

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:47.959
<v Speaker 1>it's much more from the political side than it is

0:17:48.000 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the business side. Uh. You know, this is obviously some

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:56.920
<v Speaker 1>of the UH labor organizations might be comfortable with this,

0:17:57.359 --> 0:18:02.160
<v Speaker 1>but I say might because of the the unintended consequences,

0:18:02.480 --> 0:18:05.640
<v Speaker 1>and of course the other thing. Using this national security

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:10.400
<v Speaker 1>law as part of the justification creates a whole lot

0:18:10.440 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 1>of problems in terms of legal and trade policy. And

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>of course this is a cliche, but it's true. Business

0:18:19.359 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 1>hates uncertainty, and this is clearly uncertain Alan. Is it

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:28.120
<v Speaker 1>possible that this is also somehow entwined in the ongoing

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:33.439
<v Speaker 1>NAFTA negotiations? Oh sure, and uh, you know that is

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 1>uh for all of the automakers. That's a critical thing.

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:40.600
<v Speaker 1>You know. I was reading something this morning, uh, and

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:44.920
<v Speaker 1>it said that eight million vehicles are are imported into

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the US. And I looked at that and said, oh,

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:50.440
<v Speaker 1>that's crazy. And then I realized that they were talking

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 1>about Canada and Mexico, which were half of that. Um.

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:57.639
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we don't even think of those as imports.

0:18:57.800 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 1>NAFTA is obviously a fact of life. UM. And so yes,

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:06.880
<v Speaker 1>there are four million imports from outside DAFTA. But clearly

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:10.399
<v Speaker 1>the NAFTA processes is absolutely critical to the industry. And

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 1>again I go back to the supplier base where uh,

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, the automakers have said, if you want to

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:20.159
<v Speaker 1>supply US, we want the Mexico price or the China price,

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 1>and oftentimes that is meant suppliers have opened up new

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:29.159
<v Speaker 1>plans in low cost UH locations. So, Ellen, when you

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 1>head into Detroit and meet with people at the big

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:35.879
<v Speaker 1>US carmakers, is the feeling that this will all just

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 1>settle down and that it's mostly just a trade negotiation

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 1>tactic or is there real fear? Well, the you know,

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 1>there's so much uncertainty day to day in what the

0:19:47.920 --> 0:19:51.640
<v Speaker 1>policy is. And I go back to Mike Cliche, I mean,

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 1>look at the fuel economy is situation. The automakers want

0:19:55.800 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 1>some relief, but they didn't want relief that would get

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:04.919
<v Speaker 1>the hornets going in in California to get legislaed, to

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:08.960
<v Speaker 1>get the lawsuits going, and more uncertainty. And so now

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 1>they're saying, wait a minute, we really mean that we

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 1>just wanted a little little things on the edges here.

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Please don't don't don't draw the whole system into the

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:23.680
<v Speaker 1>correct Alan, and that's that's where we are Allan, thank

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:25.640
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us. It's always fun having

0:20:25.680 --> 0:20:30.160
<v Speaker 1>you on. Alan Baum is the principle of Baum and Associates,

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:33.639
<v Speaker 1>which is based in West Bloomfield, Michigan. Uh and is

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:37.440
<v Speaker 1>a firm that's focused on automotive research for the analysis

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:42.919
<v Speaker 1>of auto sales. Really interesting discussion and definitely uncertainty the

0:20:43.080 --> 0:21:00.240
<v Speaker 1>word of the day and the year, maybe the decade.

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump. President Donald Trump is set to as sign

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:13.480
<v Speaker 1>a revamp of Dodd Frank financial legislation. He has expected

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:15.399
<v Speaker 1>to sign that at the White House. We will of

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:18.879
<v Speaker 1>course bring that to live. Uh. The final vote in

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the House it was to fifty eight to one fifty

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 1>nine in favor. It was a bipartisan Senate crafted bill

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>and is designed to loosen regulations for many community banks

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and regional lenders, including custodian banks such as a State Street.

0:21:34.760 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Here to tell us more about this is our own

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:40.359
<v Speaker 1>Arnold Cucuda. He is our banking and credit analyst for

0:21:40.640 --> 0:21:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence. Arnold, thank you very much for being here.

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Maybe just tell people a little bit about I believe

0:21:46.920 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>there's sort of three areas that this is really going

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:53.360
<v Speaker 1>to effect. Yes, so this bill is actually it's it's

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 1>more about helping the regional banks. So anybody really under

0:21:56.560 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 1>two billion of assets? Right, So basically the systemically important

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:04.439
<v Speaker 1>financial institution threshold, which used to be a fifty billion,

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:08.600
<v Speaker 1>is now going up. So what up to Basically what

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 1>that means is less regulation for those banks that fall

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:15.679
<v Speaker 1>between this. Now for some of the bigger banks, like uh,

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:18.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, I look more at them, the US systemically

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 1>important banks. So in that area State Street and Bank

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:26.200
<v Speaker 1>in New York, they're going to get some capital relief

0:22:26.440 --> 0:22:29.440
<v Speaker 1>in terms of um, you know, not counting Central bank

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:31.680
<v Speaker 1>deposits at at the FED and the e c B

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 1>from their denominator of of a ratio, which basically it

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 1>will help boost that ratio for those banks. So definitely

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:42.720
<v Speaker 1>helped to some regional banks. And people have been saying

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 1>that we might see a consolidation in smaller banks as

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 1>a result of this. I want to shift gears a

0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 1>little bit because we are seeing uh the shareholder meeting

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:54.520
<v Speaker 1>of Deutsche Bank unfold and it shares down nearly five

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 1>percent in Germany. Uh, you know right now after announcing

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 1>that it would uh cut more than seven thousand people.

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I think one big question is what's its plan? I mean,

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:07.680
<v Speaker 1>what's its strategy? What does it want to be? Yes,

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:10.679
<v Speaker 1>we know it wants to cut costs. What next? Well,

0:23:10.760 --> 0:23:13.359
<v Speaker 1>so it's it's funny because it was supposed to be

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:15.959
<v Speaker 1>no more, no more crying, you know, faith and Christian.

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I guess. You know, even though investors

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:21.479
<v Speaker 1>got what they wanted, Uh, still you know, do what

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 1>do what they say? Still don't like it. So uh

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the strategy is UM. You know, today was kind of

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:29.160
<v Speaker 1>a reiteration and kind of filling in the blanks of hey,

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:31.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, the new CEO came on board and said, hey,

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna shift focus, you know, cut um our reliance

0:23:34.840 --> 0:23:37.359
<v Speaker 1>on the corporate investment bank. But it's it's only just

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:40.840
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, right, so they're currently seen they had

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:43.400
<v Speaker 1>about fifty percent revenue coming from the corporate investment bank.

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 1>That will be you know, uh sorry, uh they sent

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:50.360
<v Speaker 1>from non c IB that'll go to So it's really

0:23:50.359 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 1>only your small shift. And in terms of the cuts

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:56.760
<v Speaker 1>coming in equities of head count there that you know,

0:23:57.240 --> 0:23:59.160
<v Speaker 1>it kind of makes sense there because you know that's

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:03.000
<v Speaker 1>an area that they've act UM technology UM. I guess

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:06.119
<v Speaker 1>investments were lagging there UM And I think that carries

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 1>over into the whole firm where you're seeing leaks of

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 1>oh they had you know, posting collateral of of a couple,

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:14.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, dozen billions and stuff. While you know these

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:18.399
<v Speaker 1>for huge mistakes, they accidentally transferred millions in some cases

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 1>billions of dollars to other places mistakenly and had to

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:24.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, beg for it back. I mean they say

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:25.720
<v Speaker 1>they caught it in a few minutes. But you know,

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 1>just this kind of stuff happening is a little bit baffling,

0:24:29.560 --> 0:24:32.440
<v Speaker 1>to be honest. So, um, you know, it just goes

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:35.400
<v Speaker 1>underscore kind of the the investment in technology that has

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 1>been lacking. And you know, even as they're cutting back,

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 1>they still need to do this kind of stuff. Right,

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:43.120
<v Speaker 1>So even though maybe in cash equities where it makes

0:24:43.160 --> 0:24:45.119
<v Speaker 1>sense to pull back, you know, in other areas of

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:47.639
<v Speaker 1>the firms, they still need to continue this um technology

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:50.720
<v Speaker 1>investment just to keep up and comply with regulation. Right.

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:53.359
<v Speaker 1>So arnold, what kind of bank would Deutsche Bank b

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:57.920
<v Speaker 1>after they eliminate these seven thousand positions? Well, I mean,

0:24:58.080 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 1>so the thing is there there there ski ailing back

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:03.639
<v Speaker 1>to not be global everywhere, but they're still going to

0:25:03.720 --> 0:25:05.879
<v Speaker 1>have a big presence. So it's kind of like, you know,

0:25:05.920 --> 0:25:07.919
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to show, hey, we're doing something, but you

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:10.000
<v Speaker 1>know it's the sum. It may feel like it's not enough,

0:25:10.160 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 1>and and I guess you know, you see that today

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:15.639
<v Speaker 1>where the stock is down almost six percent, and um,

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:17.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, so so they are saying, hey, we are

0:25:17.160 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 1>cutting back, but you know what, are they doing this

0:25:20.640 --> 0:25:23.440
<v Speaker 1>for the shareholders or are they doing this because they

0:25:23.440 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 1>have an internal vision of what they really believe Deutsche

0:25:26.800 --> 0:25:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Bank can be in the next three to five years. Uh. Yeah,

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:33.200
<v Speaker 1>so they have to do this in terms of Um,

0:25:33.640 --> 0:25:36.119
<v Speaker 1>the problem with Crying, they said, is, hey, there was

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 1>a vision John cry In, the former chief executive. He's

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:42.879
<v Speaker 1>replaced by Christian Saving. Correct, Yes, so, um, the problem

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 1>with him is okay, fine, he set us on a course,

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:49.360
<v Speaker 1>but he didn't execute in terms of the cost implementation

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:52.479
<v Speaker 1>and things weren't going fast enough. So um, you know,

0:25:52.800 --> 0:25:56.160
<v Speaker 1>going with an insider Christian Saving in this case, Um,

0:25:56.359 --> 0:25:59.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of, it's really a continuation of the strategy almost,

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 1>although it's put more hard numbers and you know, so

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:04.120
<v Speaker 1>so for him to execute, he has to come in

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:06.919
<v Speaker 1>at this you know, billion of costs for this year,

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:10.119
<v Speaker 1>twenty two billion next year. But it's it's only you know,

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe going down to twenty one billion one. But in

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:16.959
<v Speaker 1>terms of what is your profitability at that standpoint? And

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:20.120
<v Speaker 1>then the whole issue is, uh, for Deutsche Bank, they

0:26:20.160 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 1>don't have like a great thing outside of the corporate

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 1>investment bank asset management. Yes, good, but it's very small.

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 1>They the i P at a quarter of it um.

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:32.200
<v Speaker 1>But you know, unlike like a UBS or a Credit

0:26:32.240 --> 0:26:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Swiss which said all right, we're gonna scale back the

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 1>investment bank trading. Oh wow, this we have this great

0:26:37.320 --> 0:26:40.879
<v Speaker 1>wealth management business, highly profitable and uh you know, steady

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 1>business for Deutsche Bank where you have his core Germany,

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:46.760
<v Speaker 1>and the returns they're are very meager, right, and so

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:49.399
<v Speaker 1>and they're kind of more going into there with you know,

0:26:49.600 --> 0:26:53.159
<v Speaker 1>they they had the strategy reversal of Okay, initially they

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 1>wanted to sell post Bank. Now they're they said they're

0:26:56.320 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna keep it and now they've more integrated it with

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 1>their with their core Blue bank in Germany. So but

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:04.359
<v Speaker 1>but they are making progress, they're right. So they are

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:07.200
<v Speaker 1>making progress there, and so you know, they expect going

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:09.720
<v Speaker 1>forward that they'll have some expense savings down the line

0:27:10.200 --> 0:27:13.040
<v Speaker 1>um and and in terms of kind of adding to

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the pool of profitability, they can add the post bank

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:19.200
<v Speaker 1>um profitability to to help pay for their um you know,

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 1>additional two of one coupons. They're they're a T one cocos. Yeah,

0:27:22.359 --> 0:27:25.640
<v Speaker 1>talking about their cocos I'm looking right now at their

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 1>six perpetual bonds. Uh that mature well, their perpetuals uh.

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 1>And I remember people were watching these back in early

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:39.080
<v Speaker 1>they tanked unconcerns that Deutsche Bank would have to raise

0:27:39.119 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 1>more capital and these could potentially be wiped out. They

0:27:42.040 --> 0:27:45.440
<v Speaker 1>since recover their value, but they've been declining, and I'm

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:48.640
<v Speaker 1>wondering what this means. Does it mean that that investors

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:52.280
<v Speaker 1>think that perhaps Deutsche Bank will be forced to raise

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:55.800
<v Speaker 1>more capital again and that they will somehow be pressured

0:27:55.840 --> 0:27:59.280
<v Speaker 1>on that front. Well, there's definitely concern right. Um, you

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:01.440
<v Speaker 1>know in the US marketing, I followed the seven and

0:28:01.480 --> 0:28:04.159
<v Speaker 1>halfs and stuff, but the dB seven and a halfs

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:07.440
<v Speaker 1>and basically that that's down ten points on the year,

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:10.159
<v Speaker 1>right and peeking out about a hundred and seven. Now

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 1>it's about nineties seven. So it's kind of steady decline

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:15.720
<v Speaker 1>and you know one, yeah, but I mean still training

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:19.400
<v Speaker 1>about parts. It's not like okay, hey, you know there anytime.

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:21.520
<v Speaker 1>It's not gonna go bust any time, but you know

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:24.640
<v Speaker 1>when at your annual showhold meeting where you're like where

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the CEO is like we intend to pay the coupon,

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:30.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's not a great scene. That's the big

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:32.960
<v Speaker 1>news is that we're gonna remain current on our debt. Yes,

0:28:34.680 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 1>so um, but but but the concern is, hey, if

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:39.280
<v Speaker 1>you have a bank that you know, the past three

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:43.720
<v Speaker 1>years you had negative earnings, right, and so basically you're

0:28:43.760 --> 0:28:46.720
<v Speaker 1>in search of profit and so the pool to pay

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:50.000
<v Speaker 1>these profits, you know, unless your firm is profitable, you're

0:28:50.040 --> 0:28:52.640
<v Speaker 1>not adding to that, right. So there definitely is concerned

0:28:52.640 --> 0:28:55.080
<v Speaker 1>that hey, maybe you know there there might you know,

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the firm might have to kind of um stop paying coupons, right,

0:28:58.840 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 1>And so there's Ligalymking certain So in terms of where

0:29:01.160 --> 0:29:03.520
<v Speaker 1>their capital is right now, um, they're about a hundred

0:29:03.520 --> 0:29:06.239
<v Speaker 1>and fifty basis points above kind of where they need

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:10.160
<v Speaker 1>to be. So capital looks okay, but but you remember,

0:29:10.440 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 1>you know last year they did an a billion capital

0:29:12.480 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 1>rays right, And so Deutsch has a history of setting

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:18.480
<v Speaker 1>targets kind of falling short and then saying we don't

0:29:18.520 --> 0:29:21.960
<v Speaker 1>need capital. Oh huge capital rays right. So you can't

0:29:21.960 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 1>have this cycle repeating. And I think that's why you

0:29:24.160 --> 0:29:26.240
<v Speaker 1>have this new Seeo in place and hopefully he can

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:28.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, turn their ship around. But even even the

0:29:28.520 --> 0:29:31.720
<v Speaker 1>target that you're spying to is not not all that

0:29:31.760 --> 0:29:34.240
<v Speaker 1>all in swaring and I think you know the six

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:37.000
<v Speaker 1>percent stock down today, the reaction to that is, you

0:29:37.040 --> 0:29:38.960
<v Speaker 1>know it's not an on spine target, but can you

0:29:39.000 --> 0:29:41.880
<v Speaker 1>even get there? Right? That's I think the issue are

0:29:41.960 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 1>not just just a one last thing on on Deutsche Bank.

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at various league tagles, whether it's US investment

0:29:47.880 --> 0:29:52.920
<v Speaker 1>grade corporates, are high yield or even European bonds, loans,

0:29:53.080 --> 0:29:56.480
<v Speaker 1>equity or offerings and so on. They're not in the top.

0:29:56.760 --> 0:29:59.880
<v Speaker 1>They're not number one in anything. Well, I mean fixing

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:02.880
<v Speaker 1>come is where they're strong at right and uh, but

0:30:03.040 --> 0:30:06.440
<v Speaker 1>you know they have lost talent over the years. Um.

0:30:07.560 --> 0:30:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I guess looking back you can say, hey, you know,

0:30:09.400 --> 0:30:12.640
<v Speaker 1>they had a lot of really good entrepreneurial uh folks

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:14.960
<v Speaker 1>you know who are able to find, you know, ways

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:17.480
<v Speaker 1>to make money, but you know at what cost? Right,

0:30:17.680 --> 0:30:19.440
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's what they're paying for right now,

0:30:19.560 --> 0:30:22.440
<v Speaker 1>is Hey, you know, maybe sometimes the right compliance was

0:30:22.480 --> 0:30:25.080
<v Speaker 1>in place, or or sometimes they you know, they kind

0:30:25.080 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 1>of bordered on the close of the edge and so

0:30:27.400 --> 0:30:29.640
<v Speaker 1>but you know, fixed income is still an area that

0:30:29.640 --> 0:30:32.200
<v Speaker 1>they're strong and although you know kind of they didn't

0:30:32.160 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 1>announced they're going to pull back in the US rates,

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:37.040
<v Speaker 1>but some you know in the credit you know that's

0:30:37.160 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 1>that's a strong area structured credit that that's what they're gonna,

0:30:39.960 --> 0:30:42.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, still keep and they say they still are

0:30:42.240 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 1>going to maintain a global presence. So thank you so

0:30:45.120 --> 0:30:47.280
<v Speaker 1>much for being with us. An important story. We will

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 1>continue to follow it. Arnold Kukuda is a banking and

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:54.200
<v Speaker 1>credit analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence, talking Deutsche Bank on this

0:30:54.240 --> 0:31:10.280
<v Speaker 1>day when they do have their annual shareholder meeting. What

0:31:10.360 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 1>we also are waiting for from the White House and

0:31:13.360 --> 0:31:16.720
<v Speaker 1>from Congress is some kind of infrastructure bill, which we

0:31:16.760 --> 0:31:19.040
<v Speaker 1>had been talking about and then it kind of died

0:31:19.080 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 1>down as we talked about everything else. Joining us now

0:31:21.760 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 1>is someone who knows a lot about the needs of

0:31:24.200 --> 0:31:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the U s infrastructure, Gary Nomic. He has a vice

0:31:27.280 --> 0:31:30.720
<v Speaker 1>president of Engineering and American Water based in where he's

0:31:30.720 --> 0:31:33.120
<v Speaker 1>at New Jersey. Gary, thank you so much for being

0:31:33.400 --> 0:31:37.160
<v Speaker 1>with us. You know, we've heard not that much about

0:31:37.200 --> 0:31:39.719
<v Speaker 1>the infrastructure plan that we have in this country. Do

0:31:39.760 --> 0:31:42.520
<v Speaker 1>you have a better sense of what's happening and what

0:31:42.680 --> 0:31:45.160
<v Speaker 1>needs to get done? When we talk about the aging

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:48.479
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure of the United States. At first, it's a pleasure

0:31:48.560 --> 0:31:51.560
<v Speaker 1>to be here, happy, happy to be with you. UM.

0:31:51.680 --> 0:31:57.880
<v Speaker 1>The infrastructure situation is one with a lot of needs

0:31:58.000 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of support among the among the public,

0:32:00.960 --> 0:32:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's fair to say that UM, to

0:32:04.160 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 1>solve our problem, it's going to take a unified effort

0:32:07.920 --> 0:32:12.040
<v Speaker 1>not only from the federal government but also local funding

0:32:12.120 --> 0:32:17.160
<v Speaker 1>and private capital sources. The American Society of Civil Engineers

0:32:17.800 --> 0:32:21.320
<v Speaker 1>came out with their report and it rates our drinking

0:32:21.400 --> 0:32:26.800
<v Speaker 1>water UM infrastructure as a Grade D and so we

0:32:26.800 --> 0:32:29.640
<v Speaker 1>we have work to do now. I'll also say that,

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 1>to use a bad pun the glasses maybe half full,

0:32:33.640 --> 0:32:37.760
<v Speaker 1>is that we're blessed in the United States with plentiful

0:32:37.800 --> 0:32:40.960
<v Speaker 1>supply in many places and you can go UH many

0:32:40.960 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 1>places and not worry about the quality of the water

0:32:44.400 --> 0:32:49.120
<v Speaker 1>you drink. But our infrastructure is aging. We are facing

0:32:49.720 --> 0:32:54.080
<v Speaker 1>UM extreme weather events that our water systems need to

0:32:54.120 --> 0:32:57.880
<v Speaker 1>be resilient to. So so we have our challenges UH,

0:32:57.920 --> 0:33:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's going to take continued funding to to meet

0:33:00.920 --> 0:33:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the needy. Is the infrastructure that exists in the United

0:33:05.720 --> 0:33:10.720
<v Speaker 1>States ready to withstand an upcoming hurricane season? One of

0:33:10.800 --> 0:33:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the UH. One of the unique things about drinking water

0:33:14.200 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 1>is that it's so local. There are fifty thousand water

0:33:19.000 --> 0:33:22.960
<v Speaker 1>utilities across the country because water is so heavy to move.

0:33:23.040 --> 0:33:26.080
<v Speaker 1>It's not like electricity where you can send an electron

0:33:26.240 --> 0:33:29.320
<v Speaker 1>from Florida to Michigan. So it's all local, so fair

0:33:29.920 --> 0:33:33.880
<v Speaker 1>fair answer to that question is that many places are ready,

0:33:34.000 --> 0:33:38.200
<v Speaker 1>but there are there are probably towns that need to

0:33:38.200 --> 0:33:42.360
<v Speaker 1>do work to be ready for that. UM My company,

0:33:42.360 --> 0:33:47.120
<v Speaker 1>American Water, where we have a continuous UH investment program

0:33:47.160 --> 0:33:51.160
<v Speaker 1>capital investment. We're going to be investing over seven million,

0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:55.320
<v Speaker 1>seven billion dollars over the next five years for these

0:33:55.400 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 1>type of preparedness things, both the sustainability and the resiliency

0:33:59.840 --> 0:34:04.200
<v Speaker 1>of our assets. Gary, you also formerly worked at the

0:34:04.320 --> 0:34:08.759
<v Speaker 1>US Environmental Protection Agency, and putting money into the infrastructure

0:34:08.840 --> 0:34:12.680
<v Speaker 1>is one thing. Having oversight and making sure that the

0:34:12.719 --> 0:34:15.680
<v Speaker 1>regulations are such that people are ensured to get clean

0:34:15.719 --> 0:34:19.160
<v Speaker 1>water is another. I'm wondering do you feel like the

0:34:19.200 --> 0:34:21.400
<v Speaker 1>current e p A is doing what it needs to

0:34:21.440 --> 0:34:26.480
<v Speaker 1>be doing to make sure that Americans have clean drinking water? UM.

0:34:27.440 --> 0:34:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I think the the e p A, and speaking mainly

0:34:31.360 --> 0:34:36.719
<v Speaker 1>on the health protection side, UH, the e p A

0:34:36.800 --> 0:34:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I think has been UH proactive and and appropriate there

0:34:43.000 --> 0:34:48.200
<v Speaker 1>are There are ninety contaminants that are regulated, and there

0:34:48.200 --> 0:34:51.160
<v Speaker 1>are many others that they're giving health guidance. And for

0:34:51.440 --> 0:34:56.040
<v Speaker 1>utilities like ourselves, we take that guidance and we proactively

0:34:57.080 --> 0:34:59.759
<v Speaker 1>try to take measures that are protective of the of

0:34:59.800 --> 0:35:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the customers that we serve. Gary. Is there any estimate

0:35:03.160 --> 0:35:05.960
<v Speaker 1>as to how much needs to be spent in order

0:35:06.000 --> 0:35:10.760
<v Speaker 1>to secure the nation's infrastructure? Yes, UM, there have been

0:35:10.800 --> 0:35:14.440
<v Speaker 1>several studies. UM e p A has done, one of

0:35:14.440 --> 0:35:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the American Water Works Association, also the American Society's Civil

0:35:18.680 --> 0:35:21.839
<v Speaker 1>Engineers have come up with slightly different numbers, but they

0:35:21.840 --> 0:35:26.200
<v Speaker 1>all converge around a really really big number, somewhere around

0:35:26.600 --> 0:35:31.600
<v Speaker 1>a trillion dollars over the next twenty to twenty five years.

0:35:31.680 --> 0:35:36.360
<v Speaker 1>And the perception is that the amount of investment on

0:35:36.480 --> 0:35:41.160
<v Speaker 1>average in the US that's happening is probably about half

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:46.600
<v Speaker 1>of what the long term sustainable target should be. So

0:35:46.680 --> 0:35:52.160
<v Speaker 1>there is what is called the infrastructured gap. So I'm

0:35:52.200 --> 0:35:56.040
<v Speaker 1>just wanting you You said earlier that water and sort

0:35:56.080 --> 0:35:58.000
<v Speaker 1>of whether there could be a disruption really is a

0:35:58.000 --> 0:36:01.359
<v Speaker 1>local issue, and I'm wondering and given the fact that

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:04.680
<v Speaker 1>we have seen some climate disruptions and increase in the

0:36:04.719 --> 0:36:08.280
<v Speaker 1>amount of hurricanes, etcetera. I'm wondering whether there are certain

0:36:08.320 --> 0:36:12.080
<v Speaker 1>regions in the United States that you view as more

0:36:12.239 --> 0:36:15.600
<v Speaker 1>vulnerable to some sort of disruption in the face of

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:21.040
<v Speaker 1>some storm or frankly just rising tides. There are certainly

0:36:21.840 --> 0:36:28.359
<v Speaker 1>areas like coastal cities that have the potential impact from

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:33.440
<v Speaker 1>climate change in sea level rise. But our our company,

0:36:34.040 --> 0:36:38.800
<v Speaker 1>American Waterworks, serves over two hundred water systems all across

0:36:38.840 --> 0:36:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the country, so we see it all, and I think

0:36:41.680 --> 0:36:44.880
<v Speaker 1>just about everywhere there's something we need to be worried

0:36:44.920 --> 0:36:49.400
<v Speaker 1>about by. By its nature, water plants are near near rivers,

0:36:49.520 --> 0:36:55.400
<v Speaker 1>very awesome, subject to flooding, um or or droughts or

0:36:55.400 --> 0:36:59.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, wildfires out west. Well, to comfort you a

0:36:59.280 --> 0:37:04.400
<v Speaker 1>little bit again, because many utilities are doing the proactive investment.

0:37:04.600 --> 0:37:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Give you example, we have a treatment plan in central

0:37:07.480 --> 0:37:11.400
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey which was built in the fifties with a floodwall. However,

0:37:12.080 --> 0:37:15.719
<v Speaker 1>um the storms have been higher than they used to be,

0:37:15.760 --> 0:37:19.439
<v Speaker 1>and so we're investing thirty seven million dollars to raise

0:37:19.520 --> 0:37:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the floodwall above a level um the historic level to

0:37:23.640 --> 0:37:26.800
<v Speaker 1>protect it in the future. So it's really all about

0:37:26.960 --> 0:37:35.080
<v Speaker 1>this proactive investment UM by cities, by UH companies like

0:37:35.200 --> 0:37:38.040
<v Speaker 1>ours to be to be proactive on on many of

0:37:38.040 --> 0:37:42.719
<v Speaker 1>those needs. Carry would the creation of an infrastructure bank

0:37:42.760 --> 0:37:46.479
<v Speaker 1>at the federal level be useful to jump starting much

0:37:46.560 --> 0:37:51.360
<v Speaker 1>greater expenditure of money on the private side to help

0:37:51.440 --> 0:37:54.960
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure be improved. I think it can be. I think

0:37:54.960 --> 0:38:01.400
<v Speaker 1>it's in all of the above solution where UM federal

0:38:01.520 --> 0:38:07.160
<v Speaker 1>funds or and or things like UM loan guarantees by

0:38:07.200 --> 0:38:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the states and so forth, they can leverage that funding

0:38:10.080 --> 0:38:14.640
<v Speaker 1>to bring in higher amounts of investment. Is all. H

0:38:15.000 --> 0:38:17.799
<v Speaker 1>is all a positive step. The need is so big

0:38:17.840 --> 0:38:21.719
<v Speaker 1>that it's going to take an all of the above commitment.

0:38:22.560 --> 0:38:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Local communities are going to need to recognize the true

0:38:25.760 --> 0:38:28.799
<v Speaker 1>cost of the service and the true cost of of

0:38:29.400 --> 0:38:32.960
<v Speaker 1>investing in it, and the federal government can can, as

0:38:33.000 --> 0:38:35.759
<v Speaker 1>you said, help jump start that. All right, Since you're

0:38:35.760 --> 0:38:38.160
<v Speaker 1>an expert in water, I I need you to admit

0:38:38.239 --> 0:38:43.439
<v Speaker 1>something on public radio UM right now that anyone who

0:38:43.440 --> 0:38:45.360
<v Speaker 1>grew up in New York and has traveled to Florida

0:38:45.440 --> 0:38:49.400
<v Speaker 1>knows New York City has the best tasting water, doesn't it. UM.

0:38:49.440 --> 0:38:53.319
<v Speaker 1>I've been told that we have some places we might

0:38:53.360 --> 0:38:56.560
<v Speaker 1>give you, uh, we might give you a taste steff

0:38:56.600 --> 0:39:01.719
<v Speaker 1>to run for the money. Really where oh um, I'm

0:39:01.719 --> 0:39:03.680
<v Speaker 1>trying to think where we've won awards. I know we

0:39:04.000 --> 0:39:06.480
<v Speaker 1>every states generally have a best Tasting I think we

0:39:06.600 --> 0:39:10.560
<v Speaker 1>wore may have warn Yeah, yeah, we have the best

0:39:10.600 --> 0:39:15.800
<v Speaker 1>tasting awards. Um, all matter. I guess of Palette, New York, certainly,

0:39:16.040 --> 0:39:19.080
<v Speaker 1>uh certainly was strong because it was an upland source.

0:39:19.200 --> 0:39:23.040
<v Speaker 1>So uh, I guess a lot of people would uh

0:39:23.480 --> 0:39:26.960
<v Speaker 1>would support your conclusion. I think we're going to leave it.

0:39:26.960 --> 0:39:30.480
<v Speaker 1>They're very diplomatic. Well done. Gary now Mick is the

0:39:30.560 --> 0:39:35.680
<v Speaker 1>vice president of engineering for American Water and also a

0:39:35.880 --> 0:39:39.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty good water taster. I would imagine h absolutely has

0:39:39.680 --> 0:39:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the best aging water, I mean, compared to Florida. Certainly.

0:39:45.760 --> 0:39:48.279
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast.

0:39:48.600 --> 0:39:52.520
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:39:52.640 --> 0:39:56.080
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm

0:39:56.120 --> 0:40:00.000
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pim Fox, I'm on Twitter at Lisa

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm all it's one before the podcast. You can always

0:40:02.440 --> 0:40:04.480
<v Speaker 1>catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio.