WEBVTT - Bloomberg Law Brief: Microsoft lawsuit over email surveillance

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Now it's time for our daily Bloomberg Law Brief, exploring

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>legal issues in the news, brought to you by American

0:00:05.680 --> 0:00:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Arbitration Association. Business disputes are inevitable, result faster with the

0:00:09.800 --> 0:00:14.520
<v Speaker 1>American Arbitration Association, the global leader in alternative dispute resolution

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:19.480
<v Speaker 1>for over ninety years. More at a d r dot org. Today,

0:00:19.480 --> 0:00:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg lawhost tum Grosso and Greg Store discuss why Microsoft

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:25.520
<v Speaker 1>is suing the US government over its use is so

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>called sneak and peak email searches, which allows the government

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>to conduct warrantless searches of user emails. They speak to

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Andrea Matuen, a professor at Northeastern University Law School. Andrea

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:41.879
<v Speaker 1>explain why the judge ruled Microsoft was able to go

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:45.160
<v Speaker 1>forward with its First Amendment claims but not its Fourth

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Amendment claims. Sure, so, in this case, we're talking questionally

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:56.280
<v Speaker 1>about an application, arguably of the Store Communications Act. And

0:00:56.320 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the history of the Stored Communications Act,

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:04.960
<v Speaker 1>when Congress past this statute, they were expressly trying to

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 1>create a bit of a protected space because Congress essentially

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 1>thought that the Fourth Amendment did not extend to this

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:17.399
<v Speaker 1>particular set of circumstances, and partially because of that history,

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>that congressional background, Microsoft has an uphill battle of being

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>able to prove that there is a credible argument under

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the Fourth Amendment. But the amendment provides them with arguably

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 1>a stronger set of arguments. So, particularly when we're talking

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:42.000
<v Speaker 1>about its own speech, Microsoft has the ability to assert

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:44.959
<v Speaker 1>standing in a way that it wouldn't on behalf of

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 1>its customers because it's not defending customers rights in that case,

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 1>it's talking about its own ability to convey information. Tell

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>us a little more about it. What exactly is it?

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft wants to say that that this law might prohibit

0:01:57.160 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 1>it from saying. So Microsoft is essentially arguing that it's

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>business interests, particularly going forward in things like it's cloud

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>computing markets, are impacted and it wants to give notice

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 1>to its customers who are the subject uh the sneak

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:19.519
<v Speaker 1>and peak warrants or sneak and peak requests. So the

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>challenge is that, um, there is a gag order Microsoft

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>alleges on it to that prevents the gag wars prevented

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:33.640
<v Speaker 1>from telling these customers that there's surveillance of their communications

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 1>going on, and also that the number of these things

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 1>is in essence escalating at a rate that is generating

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>a desire for Microsoft to speak. That's Andrea Matuition, a

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>professor at Northeastern University Law School, speaking to Bloomberg lawhost

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:53.119
<v Speaker 1>in Grosso. You can listen to Bloomberg Law week days

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:56.919
<v Speaker 1>at one pm all street time here on Bloomberg Radio Now.

0:02:56.960 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Among the top legal stories from Bloomberg Law, federal judge

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 1>is signed off on Volkswagen's billion dollars settlement and the

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 1>emissions cheating scandal. The deal covers about seventy eight thousand

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>drivers of diesel powered out East Porsches, and VW's v

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 1>W will buy back about twenty thousand of the cars

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:16.800
<v Speaker 1>and fix the rest. The lawsuit accuses the Oracle of

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 1>stiffing sales representatives on commissions. Suit claims business software giants

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Claud back millions of dollars from sales reps by rewriting

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 1>its commission formulas retroactively. It seeks more than a hundred

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 1>fifty million dollars in damages. Oracle denies the allegations and

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:33.639
<v Speaker 1>says it will vigorously defend against them. And that's this

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 1>morning's Bloomberg Law Reef. You can find more legal news

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg Law dot com and Bloomberg BNA dot com.

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Attorneys will find exceptional legal research and business development tools

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>there as well. Visit Bloomberg Law dot com and Bloomberg

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>BNA dot com for more information and futures. This morning,

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 1>they are little changed. The docks in Germany is up

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 1>to ten percent. Ten year treasury down to thirty seconds

0:03:58.120 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 1>EL two point for seven verse. Nimex screwed oil is

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>down six tenths per cent or thirty one cents this morning.

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 1>At eighty nine A barrel comes gold is up almost

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>two tenths per cent or a dollar eighty. This is

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg