WEBVTT - #679 Packers Unscripted: Work in Washington

0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Hi, everybody. Welcome to another edition of Packers Unscripted from

0:00:11.160 --> 0:00:14.159
<v Speaker 1>Packers dot Com. I am like Spofford Heat is the

0:00:14.200 --> 0:00:16.440
<v Speaker 1>one on only Wes Hodkowitz. We're coming to you here

0:00:16.480 --> 0:00:20.320
<v Speaker 1>from our studios at Lambele Field. Ready to talk Green

0:00:20.400 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Bay and Washington. Packers and Commanders will kick off at

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:28.440
<v Speaker 1>FedEx Field, UM Sunday noon Central, one o'clock Eastern for

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 1>those of us who will be out there. And when

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:34.319
<v Speaker 1>you talk about this Washington team West, it starts with

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>that defensive front. Because Jonathan Allen Monte sweat Deron Payne.

0:00:41.040 --> 0:00:44.159
<v Speaker 1>That's quite the group. And Chase Young, who's probably the

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:47.199
<v Speaker 1>best and the highest of the high draft picks in

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:50.879
<v Speaker 1>that group, hasn't even rejoined it yet. Um. This Washington

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 1>defensive front is really the crux of the team. It

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 1>is one of the most impressive units I think I've

0:00:56.440 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 1>seen in terms of how they've built up, you know,

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>the defensive side of the ball. Certainly, offensively, there's been

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:05.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot to be desired there, especially with their production

0:01:05.440 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 1>earlier this season. But defensively, we've seen it time and

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:14.039
<v Speaker 1>time again during this Jonathan Allen Duran Pain era. They

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 1>can win up front, they can push the line of

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 1>scrimmage and going back to one of the biggest old

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 1>adages of all Mike, if you don't give up points,

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>if you don't give up yards, your team is going

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:26.680
<v Speaker 1>to be in the football game. In the Washington football

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 1>team that is now the Commanders, I should say, uh,

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 1>when they've been successful under Ron Rivera here the last

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:34.039
<v Speaker 1>three years, it's been when they've been able to win

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 1>tight in hotly contested games and every single time, you know,

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:40.560
<v Speaker 1>with that defensive front on the field, it gives their

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:43.600
<v Speaker 1>team a chance. Yeah, And last Thursday was certainly one

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 1>of those for Washington. It was sort of the typical

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 1>what's been the typical ugly Thursday night football game here

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL in two but Washington was able to

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>hold the Bears to seven points, hold them off on

0:01:57.800 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the last play of the game as the Bears completed

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>past but came up just inches shy of the goal

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 1>line in Washington gets a twelve to seven victory to

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 1>snap a four game losing streak. The Commanders had won

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 1>their season opener against the Jacksonville Jaguars, then lost four

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 1>in a row. Now got to win over the Bears.

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Sitting at two and four and with this this defensive front.

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Five different guys have at least three sacks on this

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Washington defense so far this year. And when you're looking

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:30.080
<v Speaker 1>at the Packers, the performance the offensive line is coming

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>off of last week and some potential changes. We'll see

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 1>what happens with regard to the offensive line, if some

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:39.959
<v Speaker 1>guys are gonna be moving around, shuffling to some different spots,

0:02:40.000 --> 0:02:43.919
<v Speaker 1>whatever the case might be. The uh, the key to

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:47.359
<v Speaker 1>victory almost screams at you right that this that it's

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 1>it's this Packers offensive line and whatever transition or flux

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 1>that it's in against the absolute strength of the opponent

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:57.160
<v Speaker 1>in Washington, that defensive front, that's where this game is

0:02:57.200 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 1>going to be one or loss. Yeah, the Packers have

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:01.680
<v Speaker 1>actually played walk, it feels like, quite a few times

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the past few seasons. And you know, we don't need

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 1>to go into chapter and verse again about what kind

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 1>of player Jonathan Allen is. But I'm gonna throw these

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>stats that you, Mike. I mean, this is for a

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:14.360
<v Speaker 1>defensive tackle in this league, just quite remarkable. Twenty four

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 1>combined tackles, seven quarterback hits, three and a half sacks,

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 1>six I should say six quarterback kicks second, seven tackles

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>for a loss, three passes defense, a force fumble, and

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>an interception this season. I haven't seen the film of

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the interception, but that's a big man picking off passes

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 1>and and that's just the beginning. Even a guy like

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 1>James Smith Williams, the former seventh round pick, who's kind

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 1>of been the guy that's had to go into the

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 1>lineup now without Chase Young, he has two sacks this season.

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's a culture that they developed on that

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>side of the ball, and it's gonna be something that

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay is really gonna have to contest with because,

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 1>as we've talked about, Mike, I don't care what shape

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the offensive line looks like. We know you're gonna have

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>David Botieri left tackle. You know it's gonna be Josh

0:03:57.480 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Meyers at center. The rest is left to be scene.

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 1>But the communication of this thing is going to be

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>so important because the Washington commanders are going to look

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 1>at that film last week, the issues that Green Bay

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>had picking up the stunts, being able to, you know,

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>get some penetration on Aaron Rodgers. They're going to take

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 1>some cues from that as they dial up their schemes

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:22.279
<v Speaker 1>for this week, and I expect a very multiple varied

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 1>pass rush against green Bay. In addition to the fact

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:28.919
<v Speaker 1>that when you have that much that that much beef

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>on the offensive or defensive line, it's not the easiest

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 1>group to run against either. So momentum, rhythm, tempo is

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be so critical for green Bay in this game.

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 1>And as Aaron Rodgers said when you talked to the

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:43.840
<v Speaker 1>media on Wednesday, when the ball he doesn't care about

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 1>what happens with the offensive line. When the ball comes

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 1>out of his hands quicker, that's when the offense is

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:52.040
<v Speaker 1>in its most best rhythm, and ultimately, I think that's

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna be their best key to victory in this game,

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:56.360
<v Speaker 1>is being able to get the ball out quickly and

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:59.039
<v Speaker 1>run and take advantage of the opportunities that the that

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the commanders give you well, and you mentioned it earlier.

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:04.600
<v Speaker 1>On the offensive side of the ball, Washington has had

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 1>its struggles. Carson Wentz has been the quarterback. He now

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>has a fractured finger and is going to be out

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 1>for several weeks, so Taylor Heineke is stepping in. Heinek

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 1>ended up starting the bulk of the games for Washington

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 1>last year due to UH the quarterback situate, the quarterback

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:26.479
<v Speaker 1>injury situation. He won seven games. Last year. He played

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:29.839
<v Speaker 1>in the game at Lambeau Field here which the Packers won.

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:33.279
<v Speaker 1>But obviously what stood out from that game his Taylor

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Heineke was the game's leading rusher with ninety five yards.

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 1>The Packers did not handle his his scrambling ability very well,

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 1>so that's something the Packers will need to be on

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 1>alert for. But here's here's some statistics to ponder going

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 1>into this one. Washington has not run the ball very

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:54.160
<v Speaker 1>well this year at all nine yards per game on

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:59.159
<v Speaker 1>the ground through six games. Not very impressive there. But

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:04.159
<v Speaker 1>Terry mclau and is a legitimate threat at wide receiver

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 1>at any time. He had a hundred and twenty two

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:09.160
<v Speaker 1>yards including a forty yard touchdown against the Packers at

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Lambeau last season. He is averaging sixteen point seven yards

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>per catch this year. He is their big play guy,

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:19.160
<v Speaker 1>um and that is the guy that Taylor Heinek is

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 1>looking for. What maybe a little different with Heineke as

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:25.119
<v Speaker 1>opposed to wins at quarterback is Heinek might be looking

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:27.000
<v Speaker 1>for him when he gets out of the pocket and

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:30.359
<v Speaker 1>the scrambles, the extended plays, the busted plays, whatever you

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:32.840
<v Speaker 1>wanna call it. Mclauren is going to be the guy

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 1>he's watching for. But on balance, this Washington offense has

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>struggled the most early in games. Washington has been outscored

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 1>seventy five to thirty four in the first half of games.

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Now that in some senses bodes well for the Packers,

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 1>because defensively, the Packers have been better early in games

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:55.279
<v Speaker 1>than later in games recently. Obviously, Green Bay is trying

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>to put together that that more complete game defensively, But

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 1>this is an opportunity for the Packers defense to once

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 1>again start fast and if the offense can get some

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:09.479
<v Speaker 1>things going, you can potentially take control of this game,

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 1>which is which is what was happening to Washington during

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 1>its four game losing streak. Yeah, and and to kind

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 1>of go off that point too. I mean, Washington also

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:24.120
<v Speaker 1>is outscoring its opponent to sixty in the second half,

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>So being able to establish some momentum early is going

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>to be critical. Being able to get production. Yeah, they've

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:30.880
<v Speaker 1>scored twice as many points in the second half as

0:07:30.920 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 1>they have in the first half through the first six

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>games the year, and the thing about McLaurin that is

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be most fascinating for me. Again, Matt Lafleur

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 1>was not biting on the hey, is Taylor Heineke actually

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>a worst matchup than Carson Wentz. Carson Wentz and McLaurin

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 1>had had a hard time kind of finding their rhythm

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 1>early this season. McLaren, as you said, sixteen points seven

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 1>yards per catch, but he only has twenty two on

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 1>this catches on the season so far. McLaurin was the

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>go to target for Heineke last season. He was one

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of the re s. That's why that McLaren kind of

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 1>broke onto the national scale was the scent, you know,

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of the synergy and the chemistry that they have together.

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 1>They do have weapons, though, as you mentioned, mclauren can

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 1>hurt you. Curtis Samuel has had a renaissance this season

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 1>in this offense as a kind of a gadget player,

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>being able to use them in a multitude of different ways.

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 1>He's a guy that coming out I was incredibly high

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 1>on when he started his career, I think in Carolina.

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Brian Robinson returned last week during that Thursday night football game. Obviously,

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 1>if you know the story with him was shot before

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the season, ends up having to miss the first month

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:34.319
<v Speaker 1>of the year, and now he's back. And this was

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:36.079
<v Speaker 1>a guy that I think a lot of people expected

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 1>to really usurp Antonio Gibson as the premier back, the

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 1>primary back in this offense. This season. A slower start

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 1>for him. I think it was only like three and

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:47.239
<v Speaker 1>about what was at three point two yards per carry.

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't like he torched the world there in the

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 1>first game back. But he's a guy that Washington felt

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 1>really good about before that incident. Going into the season.

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 1>There are guys that they're going to be able to

0:08:57.840 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 1>move the football with the key, as Kenny Clark talked about,

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:04.079
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of these players on the Packers defenses

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 1>being smart with how you approach Heineke. He's a guy

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 1>that if you keep him in the pocket, you're going

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:12.080
<v Speaker 1>to have a good chance to be able to stop him.

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:16.200
<v Speaker 1>If you are getting undisciplined in your rush lanes, that's

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 1>where he's going to hurt you, not only because he

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:20.839
<v Speaker 1>can look downfield, but if he needs to, he will

0:09:20.880 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 1>pull the ball down and tuck it himself. I thought

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:26.679
<v Speaker 1>it was very interesting Mike three rushing yards last year

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 1>for him, five of them in that game against Green Bay.

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 1>That was in sixteen games, fifteen starts. Thirty percent of

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 1>his rushing yards for the entire season came against Green Bay.

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:39.200
<v Speaker 1>It just shows you that he is a gamer. I

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:41.840
<v Speaker 1>said that last season Taylor Heineke might not be the

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 1>type of quarterback that a team is going to ride

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:46.560
<v Speaker 1>as their starter, not going to have any competition during

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 1>training camp. But he is the quintessential NFL number two, reliable,

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:54.720
<v Speaker 1>I will win you a football game backup quarterback, and

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 1>that's what Washington needs right now. Ron Rivera has won

0:09:57.280 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 1>sixteen games as the Commander's head coach. Seven of them

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 1>have come when Heineke is a starting quarterback. And if

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>you want to know how much of a gamer Heineke is,

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 1>all you have to do is think back to two

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 1>years ago when he had taken over at quarterback late

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 1>in the season and Washington was playing in the wild

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:19.319
<v Speaker 1>card round against Tampa Bay, the eventual Super Bowl champion,

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay Buccaneers. And it was Taylor Heineke against Tom

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Brady in the wild card round and that was a

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 1>two point game after three quarters, it was a five

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 1>point game with five minutes to go. Taylor Heineke gave

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Washington a heck of a chance to pull that upset

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:37.200
<v Speaker 1>there against Tampa Bay when nobody was giving them a

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 1>chance to knock off the Buccaneers in that game. From

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the Keys to victory standpoint, we already mentioned obviously, the

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Packers offensive line against this defensive front of Washington. I'm

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>also wondering based on what we saw last week where

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Jaire Alexander pretty much took Garrett Wilson, the rookie wide

0:10:57.280 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 1>receiver from Ohio, stayed out of the game for the Jets,

0:10:59.800 --> 0:11:01.720
<v Speaker 1>only one catch for eight yards, and it was not

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:06.200
<v Speaker 1>against Alexander. I wonder how much we're going to see

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:10.439
<v Speaker 1>Alexander against McLaurin. Do you think the Packers match him

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 1>up against that guy just because and to take nothing

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 1>away from Curtis Samuel, but when you look at when

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:21.080
<v Speaker 1>you look at the statistics and the big play possibility,

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:23.440
<v Speaker 1>McLaurin is the guy who can really hurt you. And

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:25.679
<v Speaker 1>Samuel is not a guy you can match anyway, because

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:27.680
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna move around in so many different areas and

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 1>he's and he's gonna he's gonna play behind the line

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 1>of scrimmage a lot as well. Yeah, so, I mean

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 1>he's he's just going to be a problem that the

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>defense as a whole, all eleven guys, all you know,

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 1>six seven, eight guys in the secondary are going to

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 1>have to make sure they know where he's at. I

0:11:40.280 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 1>think this game, Mike, maybe more than any other game

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:45.319
<v Speaker 1>this season, makes the most sense to have Jr. Alexander

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:48.200
<v Speaker 1>plastering him because not only is he your your best

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:50.440
<v Speaker 1>option press man coverage, he's the guy that can run

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 1>with him the longest. And you know, Mike, when we

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>talk about it all the time with Aaron Rodgers and

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, third downs, who's he looking to Randall Cobb

0:11:59.760 --> 0:12:03.960
<v Speaker 1>as granble drill, what's he looking for Robert Tunyan, Alan Lazard.

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:08.199
<v Speaker 1>That's that's that's McLaurin in this offense, especially with Heineke

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 1>as the starting quarterback right now. My biggest thing for

0:12:11.200 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 1>this game, Mike, again, I will never, ever, ever, ever

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 1>ever say a game is a must win in October.

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe it. The game these seasons too long

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:23.840
<v Speaker 1>at this point. But defensively, this is the get right opportunity.

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Washington has the fourth fewest points scored this season. There

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:30.800
<v Speaker 1>has been issues trying to find a rhythm with you know,

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 1>this kind of rotating door of quarterbacks they've gone through.

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:36.199
<v Speaker 1>Remember last year, Taylor Heineke wasn't supposed to be the

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 1>starting right back. It was gonna be Ryan Fitzpatrick, and

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Heineke ended up starting fifteen out of seventeen games. So

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:44.319
<v Speaker 1>and actually, and he wasn't eve supposed se the backup.

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 1>I think what was it? Um Kyle Allen was supposed

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 1>to be the backup before he got hurt. So a

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of different things going to orbit there. For me,

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:55.680
<v Speaker 1>it's this defense doing what it needs to do against

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:57.839
<v Speaker 1>this offense. Packers offense is gonna be in for a

0:12:57.920 --> 0:13:00.200
<v Speaker 1>rough day. It's gonna be a tough assignment. Not saying

0:13:00.200 --> 0:13:02.040
<v Speaker 1>they can't win it, not saying they can't score points,

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 1>not saying they can't beat that defensive front. Washington only

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 1>has the seventeenth ranked defense in the league. It's not

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>like this is the number one ranked unit. But defensively,

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 1>this thing for Green Bay, I think that's the thing

0:13:13.160 --> 0:13:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that people haven't talked enough about. Yes, they're having issues

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:19.080
<v Speaker 1>right now, taken away the football, Washington's kind of had

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:22.200
<v Speaker 1>those issues too. They've been able to, you know, play

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 1>really good stretches in the first half. Second half has

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 1>been a different, different situation. But you need to look

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 1>at what Green Bay has done well that points this year.

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 1>They've been good on third downs, They've been able to

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:35.080
<v Speaker 1>limit the passing game, and they aren't going up against

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 1>a world beater running back like they have the last

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 1>few weeks. For the Packers defense, I feel like this

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 1>is the one where Joe Barry needs to sit his

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 1>guys down, give them the game plan, and tell them,

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:46.560
<v Speaker 1>you guys need to have the confidence in yourselves right

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 1>now that you can be the dominating unit that everyone

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 1>believed you to be, because this is the perfect dance

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:55.200
<v Speaker 1>partner to do that against. Yeah, I think I would expect,

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 1>even even with the Packers coming off of these back

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 1>to back losses, I would expect we're going to see

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 1>a very confident Packers team on Sunday, because here's the thing.

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 1>As as frustrating as these last two losses are, six

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 1>quarters ago, this was a Packers team that was three

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and one with a ten point halftime lead in London.

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:17.679
<v Speaker 1>The whole the whole season. Doesn't just suddenly go up

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 1>and smoke because of a rough game and a half, right,

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean this, this Packers team, they know, they know

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 1>what they know what they're capable of. They know they

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 1>haven't lived up to it in the last game and

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 1>a half, and this is you know, and and maybe

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to get into a whole discussion about,

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, the booing at lambeau Field and everything like that,

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 1>but maybe playing on the road isn't the worst thing

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 1>in the world for this team right now as it

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 1>tries to straighten itself out. Three straight road games is

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 1>no easy task. But maybe with what this team is

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 1>going through, you get that US against the world mentality

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 1>when you go on the road. Maybe that's maybe that's

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 1>what this team needs. Yeah, I agree with you, Mike,

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 1>because this Washington game next week against Buffalo is going

0:14:59.800 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 1>to be as road games go, that's gonna be as

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 1>difficult as Green Bay's gonna see all season. Washington. There

0:15:05.400 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 1>might be some friendlies, you know, a couple of years

0:15:07.120 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 1>ago when we're there, there were some friendlies in terms

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 1>of how that that crowd balanced out. But at the

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 1>same time, we gotta understand where Washington is at right now.

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to call it a neutral site game.

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 1>It's not that it will be a road matchup for them,

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 1>but this is a This is as good of an

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 1>opportunity as any to get right with a road game,

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 1>and I just feel like, for the Packer's sake, they

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 1>have to understand right now, Okay, we technically had sort

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 1>of a three game homestand certainly that was a very

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 1>favorable crowd for them in London. Now you get three

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 1>straight weeks in a row where you're gonna have the

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Commanders Buffalo who's riding high in the Detroit Lions, whose

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 1>fan base is energies. You hear about the sellouts that

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 1>they've had there, despite the fact that they've gone one

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:50.680
<v Speaker 1>and four to start this season. There is a lot

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 1>of motivation here for Green Bay to find its way

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:56.440
<v Speaker 1>here before coming back home for those two games in

0:15:56.480 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 1>five days. This is the stretch, Mike, This is the gauntlet.

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 1>But that being said, you only can worry about the

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 1>team in front of you, and right now, as it stands,

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 1>they got Washington. You need to be able to beat

0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 1>that football team. Yeah, as much as as much as

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 1>the Packers fans, you want you want to see the

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Packers get back on the right track. You want to

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 1>put this two game losing streak in the rear view mirror.

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 1>But the bottom line is you can't. You can't have

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 1>a two game or a three game winning streak this week.

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 1>All you can do is win one game and try

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 1>to get things going back in the right direction. That's

0:16:28.240 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the objective. Did you see that stat not to and again,

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Packers gotta win football games, no question about. But did

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 1>you see that stat about the Giants now? About how

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 1>they've erased three ten point deficits now in the second

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 1>half to win games this season? While I mean I

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 1>saw that they did it again against Baltimore, they had

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 1>done it, they had done it earlier year as well.

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know which opponent, but five wins this season

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 1>and three of them they've come back in the second

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 1>half from ten plus points behind to be able to

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 1>to win it. Yeah, that's that says something. They're there,

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 1>there are teams that there are teams out there that

0:16:56.200 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 1>that show their grittiness. But it's also it's a really

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:00.720
<v Speaker 1>long season. You never know how things are going to

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 1>unfold over the course of four long months. Some sponsor

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 1>business here West Serious x M NFL Radio delivers hard

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:10.400
<v Speaker 1>hitting analysis and up to the NFL news that true

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:14.919
<v Speaker 1>football fanatics need seven three and at Cousin Subs, we

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 1>have something for everyone, like our Wisconsin Cheese Kurds, mac

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:20.399
<v Speaker 1>and Cheese, golden fries, and creamy shakes, all paired with

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:23.200
<v Speaker 1>your favorite sub or sub in a bowl. Cousins Subs

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 1>fifty years of better. Alright, looking at the rest of

0:17:29.119 --> 0:17:33.359
<v Speaker 1>Week seven, there's actually not a whole lot that interests me,

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:36.359
<v Speaker 1>quite frankly. But I say that because three teams that

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:39.480
<v Speaker 1>we normally talk about quite a bit in this segment

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 1>of the show. The Minnesota Vikings, who are on top

0:17:41.640 --> 0:17:44.480
<v Speaker 1>of the NFC North at five and one, the Philadelphia Eagles,

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:47.080
<v Speaker 1>who have the best record in football at six and oh,

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:50.119
<v Speaker 1>and the Los Angeles Rams, the defending Super Bowl champions.

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 1>All three of those teams on a by this week

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:56.919
<v Speaker 1>not playing from the Packers perspective, sorry, including the Packers

0:17:57.000 --> 0:18:00.200
<v Speaker 1>next opponent, Buffalo, right but and Buffalo is also yeah,

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 1>buf Buffalo is also on a buy. So from the

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Packers perspective, either you win this game and you get

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 1>within one and a half of Minnesota, or you lose

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and you fall two and a half back. Right now,

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:15.200
<v Speaker 1>it's obviously a two game deficit at with the five

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and one, three and three records. Two games that I

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 1>am looking at though with some interest. Detroit you mentioned

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:24.840
<v Speaker 1>off to a one in four start, the Lions coming

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 1>off there by week traveling to Dallas, and it sounds

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 1>like Dallas might be getting Dak Prescott back at quarterback. Obviously,

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:34.159
<v Speaker 1>we know the Cowboys are coming to lambeau Field in

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:36.479
<v Speaker 1>a few weeks, so that will be interesting. And the

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:38.480
<v Speaker 1>other one I have my eye on is Kansas City

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 1>at San Francisco. Kansas City coming off of a home

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:45.439
<v Speaker 1>loss to the Buffalo Bills having to go on the

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:49.520
<v Speaker 1>road to the West Coast, and San Francisco, a team

0:18:49.520 --> 0:18:53.160
<v Speaker 1>that of course reached the NFC Championship Game a year ago,

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 1>sitting at three and three, just like the Packers with

0:18:56.400 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 1>a very very tough matchup, um to try to have

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 1>way falling below fire at three and four out there

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:05.159
<v Speaker 1>in the NFC West. Just any thoughts you have on

0:19:05.200 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>those couple of games. This is what I was just

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 1>saying about Washington. The Packers are three and three, I

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 1>get it. Fans want to be four and to five

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:17.400
<v Speaker 1>and one, seven and oh if they could, right San

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Francisco forty Niners three and three onto their old starting

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 1>quarterback that became their backup that almost got traded. But

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:28.359
<v Speaker 1>now as they're starting quarterback again because the one of

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:32.159
<v Speaker 1>the futures out for the season going up against Kansas City,

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 1>and you have to imagine Kansas City is going to

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:36.959
<v Speaker 1>be motivated for this game, not only because of what

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:38.720
<v Speaker 1>it means going out on the road, but also coming

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:41.680
<v Speaker 1>off the loss against the Bills. That's a tough assignment, right.

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 1>That's why again I point towards this game for Green Bay,

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the situation the table can look a lot differently for them. Otherwise.

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 1>The other matchup that I think is very interesting is

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Monday Night Football, the Chicago Bears going to New England. Obviously,

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:58.680
<v Speaker 1>there's the implications there for the division, as there always are,

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>But you want to talk, Mike, how a three and

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 1>three record can really, depending on what the aftertaste is

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:08.159
<v Speaker 1>into your mouth, can make you feel one way or

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:10.879
<v Speaker 1>another about your football team. Packers are at three and

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 1>three after two losses to two teams that both are

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:16.440
<v Speaker 1>in the playoff hunts in their respective conference. New England

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 1>was not looking so hot when they lost that game

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 1>in Green Bay. A lot of questions about what was

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:24.200
<v Speaker 1>going to happen at quarterback after Brian Hoyer gets the concussion.

0:20:24.680 --> 0:20:28.639
<v Speaker 1>Now Bailey's Appy has a really nice performance. They you know,

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:32.200
<v Speaker 1>against Cleveland they are kind of feeling their winds turn

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, and now they're going up against a

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:36.879
<v Speaker 1>Chicago Bears team that has a lot of question marks.

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:40.359
<v Speaker 1>That's why these three and three records, again we talked

0:20:40.359 --> 0:20:42.440
<v Speaker 1>about on Tuesday's show, But it can go so many

0:20:42.440 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 1>different ways because it really just comes down to how

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:49.360
<v Speaker 1>your football team is playing in which direction you feel

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 1>they're going. The record doesn't matter so much as the momentum,

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:54.919
<v Speaker 1>and that's in green based circumstance, and a team like

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots circumstances, that's where they want to be able

0:20:58.280 --> 0:21:01.920
<v Speaker 1>to keep those things going. It's a week to week league,

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:04.919
<v Speaker 1>so it always is and uh and this week is

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:07.480
<v Speaker 1>certainly no different. Well, with that, we'll call it a

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:09.879
<v Speaker 1>wrap on this edition of Packers on Script. To be

0:21:09.880 --> 0:21:12.399
<v Speaker 1>sure to follow all of our coverage of the team.

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Will have everything for you from FedEx Field on Sunday

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 1>on Packers dot com For West I Am Mike. Thank

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 1>you for tuning in everybody. We'll see you next time.