WEBVTT - Why investors avoid developing countries, and how to change that: Moving Money

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to zero I am Aksha Tarti this week. How

0:00:03.800 --> 0:00:19.759
<v Speaker 1>to unblock the private money taps. The world is pouring

0:00:19.800 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>money into the clean energy transition at an unprecedented rate.

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Last year, more than two trillion dollars was invested in

0:00:26.239 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 1>low carbon technologies, according to bloombergenf Over half of that

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 1>went into renewable energy and grid infrastructure. Another third went

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 1>into electric cars. This year, those investments might slow down

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 1>in the US, but the signs remained bullish in other

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 1>parts of the world. In developed countries, the private sector

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:48.479
<v Speaker 1>is leading the charge, with hundreds of billions of dollars

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:52.160
<v Speaker 1>each year flowing to profitable clean tech opportunities and large

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 1>scale projects. Meanwhile, only a tiny trickle of private capital

0:00:56.200 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>goes to developing countries, with investors scared off by unfamiliar,

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:04.679
<v Speaker 1>volatile exchange rates, and markets that at times seem too risky.

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 1>At COP twenty nine in November last year, all countries,

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:11.120
<v Speaker 1>even the US, agreed to triple the money that goes

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>from rich countries to poor countries, reaching three hundred billion

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:18.759
<v Speaker 1>dollars annually by twenty thirty five. But the United Nations

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 1>experts have found that the finance gap is closer to

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:25.960
<v Speaker 1>one point three trillion dollars each year. The upcoming COP

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>thirty presidency is working on a roadmap that will hopefully

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 1>fill that void. And while we don't have the specifics yet,

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 1>we know that most of that gap will have to

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:37.679
<v Speaker 1>be filled by the private sector. So how do we

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:41.759
<v Speaker 1>unlock private capital for developing nations where clean energy investments

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>are most needed. For this episode of Moving Money, we're

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 1>welcoming back avin Ashbasod, special advisor on climate risks to

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the President of the Inter American Development Bank. In this episode,

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 1>he shares his ideas on how to de risk investments,

0:01:56.240 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>attract private capital, and accelerate the clean energy transition globally. Avinash,

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>welcome back to the show.

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Actually, when we typically talk about climate finance, we end

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 1>up talking about rich countries versus poor countries. But there

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:16.919
<v Speaker 1>is a third group that we don't consider often, which

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 1>is private industry. One of the things that you have

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:24.240
<v Speaker 1>suggested could be a solution for getting private investors to

0:02:24.320 --> 0:02:28.919
<v Speaker 1>invest in developing countries is to get a currency exchange guarantee,

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 1>because rich investors with dollars or pound don't find it

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:35.839
<v Speaker 1>as attractive to invest in a roupe year rand, which

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 1>is fluctuating quite a lot. But if you could provide

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:43.399
<v Speaker 1>a funding guarantee that would ensure that that exchange rate

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 1>is fixed, then that could be a much more attractive proposition.

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Now that was just an idea when we talked about

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:52.839
<v Speaker 1>it last time around on this podcast. You've actually put

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:55.639
<v Speaker 1>it into action. Tell me more about how it's working.

0:02:56.080 --> 0:02:58.800
<v Speaker 3>So yes, indeed, we launched with the Government of Brazil,

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 3>Ministry finals and the Central Bank a FX liquidity facility.

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 3>It's just started. We're looking for investors, but the platform

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 3>is established. Now let me just make one step backwards.

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:15.800
<v Speaker 3>I think you described this very well. We have a

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:20.920
<v Speaker 3>trillion dollar target, maybe six hundred seven hundred billion of

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 3>that one trillion, so sixty or seventy percent could come

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 3>from the private sector investing in things that generates a revenue,

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 3>most of which looks like mitigation. So the farmers make money,

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 3>hydroelectric power stations make money. Now they're actually the private

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 3>sector is doing this in rich countries. Eighty one percent

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 3>of mitigation is funded by the private sector in rich countries.

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 3>So it's not like this is something that can't be

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 3>funded commercially and you got to blend it with public money.

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 3>It's being funded, it's commercially viable stuff, but it's not

0:03:55.320 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 3>happening in developing countries because the private investors feel that

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 3>the country risk, the currency risk, not something they're experts in,

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 3>is large and they don't have an ability to absorb

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 3>that risk very well, and so they stay away.

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 2>At the moment.

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 3>What happens is there's a bit of a market structure

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 3>problem in finance. So, as your listeners will know today,

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:28.279
<v Speaker 3>investors don't say they will find the best investments in

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 3>the world. They've all been specialized. So you go to

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:35.359
<v Speaker 3>a global infrastructure fund or a global energy fund or

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:39.719
<v Speaker 3>global renewables fund, and that fund sells to its investors

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 3>that they're experts in this sector. They don't say, oh,

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 3>we're experts in currencies, we're experts in hedging. They say

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:52.440
<v Speaker 3>we're experts in infrastructure, and that's why they get the money.

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 3>So then they say, all these other risks we are

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:57.600
<v Speaker 3>going to farm out to somebody else, And so they

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 3>go to the banks, and the banks say currency risk

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:04.039
<v Speaker 3>in Brazil for twenty five years for your solo farm.

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 3>The problem is that's long term and the banks are

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:11.720
<v Speaker 3>short term. The problem is Brazil is highly pro cyclical.

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 3>When in the upcycle many emojory markets are doing well,

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:19.480
<v Speaker 3>so are the banks. But in the downcycle, all of

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 3>these risks collide together. The countries have a bad time,

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:27.039
<v Speaker 3>the banks have a bad time. So the banks know this,

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 3>and they're saying, well, you know when you need money,

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 3>when I need money, so I'm going to charge you

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:35.720
<v Speaker 3>a lot for me providing you a guarantee on the

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:40.160
<v Speaker 3>currency side. So we've come in, we being the Inter

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:44.159
<v Speaker 3>American Develoment Bank and part of the Multilateral Development Bank

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 3>system and saying, well, we've got a triple A rating

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 3>and we need to make sure we're using the benefits

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 3>of that triple A rating. And one of the benefits

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:57.919
<v Speaker 3>of that is in the downcycle, when people are fleeing risk,

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 3>they're flying into our instruments because they're looking for safety,

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:05.599
<v Speaker 3>and we represent safety. So that's a perfect time for

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 3>us to lend to renewable energy projects the dollars they

0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 3>may need.

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:12.600
<v Speaker 2>To pay their investors.

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:18.039
<v Speaker 3>So our commitment to lend dollars to good projects when

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:19.600
<v Speaker 3>they need in the down.

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 2>Cycle means that they don't.

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 3>They no longer need to go to the banks and

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 3>ask for expensive hedging. They've got this pre commitment and

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 3>we are lending, you know, only in the down cycle

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 3>when people are coming to us anyway, and we are

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 3>picking the right projects, we're picking the right countries, and

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 3>so we've limited our risks. So we've launched that with

0:06:41.360 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 3>a backing of five point two billion dollars. So this

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 3>isn't a five million dollar pilot. This is a serious

0:06:47.760 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 3>Some serious money is behind this, and we're working with

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:53.839
<v Speaker 3>some new investors on potentially coming in. Some of the

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:57.839
<v Speaker 3>investments are actually not things we expected as an interesting

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:01.840
<v Speaker 3>biodiversity type investment. So that is looking at the waste

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 3>products of sugar cane processes. Those byproducts are currently poured

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 3>into the rivers and the sea, creating all kinds of pollution,

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 3>and they could be turned into something more useful than

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 3>where we're working with one investor on that, and they're

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 3>a foreign investor and they are looking at the need

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 3>to not have to hedge the foreign exchange of that investment.

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 1>And then another idea that you are currently working on

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 1>haven't yet launched, is to figure out how foreign investors

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 1>can go into developing countries, but perhaps not directly down

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 1>to the project level, but perhaps through local banks, because

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 1>you're right, right now, most of the money that is

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 1>going in the energy transition on reducing emissions is going

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>in rich countries, whereas most of the money that we

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 1>need needs to go in developing countries, and so we

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 1>need to solve that problem. How exactly is it that

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 1>going to banks will make that happen rather than going

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:00.240
<v Speaker 1>directly to project.

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 3>One of the things I've enjoyed about getting older is

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 3>a realization of what matters.

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 2>Is listening rather than speaking.

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 3>When I was thirty years younger, I used to think,

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, the triumph of a meeting was I spoke

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:17.560
<v Speaker 3>all the time. And now I realize you have to

0:08:17.640 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 3>listen all the time. And so I'm listening to all

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 3>these people who say, oh, I would love to invest

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 3>in emerging markets, I'd love to invest in climate, I'd

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 3>love to invest in biodiversity. But the risks are the

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:32.320
<v Speaker 3>risks of going here, and the risks of will I

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 3>get the permit, will I be able to construct, will

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 3>I get all of these things. I'm listening to this

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 3>and thinking, hmm, okay, how do we come up with

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:44.080
<v Speaker 3>ways of the risking? And then I'm looking at some

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 3>numbers and I realized, well, the banks in Latin America

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 3>own around thirty to forty billion dollars of assets today

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 3>on their balance sheets, they've leant thirty to forty billion

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:05.400
<v Speaker 3>dollars in projects that are actually producing a revenue. So

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:08.959
<v Speaker 3>the best thing for foreign investors to do is to

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 3>buy those things that are ready there. They're ready performing,

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 3>They don't need to deal with permitting risk, construction risk.

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 3>These are instruments already performing. Now it seems less sexy

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 3>to be buying something that's already there. There's no origination pioneer.

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 3>But so what we say is, okay, we're going to

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 3>create a fund that will buy the performing assets in

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:40.560
<v Speaker 3>the banks today, but at a premium, on condition that

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 3>the banks reinvest the money that they've got from selling

0:09:44.200 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 3>their loans into the same sector. So this allows us

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:51.720
<v Speaker 3>to do is to double the investment very quickly. And

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 3>the way to think about this is it's a little

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:55.840
<v Speaker 3>bit like, you know, I'm an economist that I know

0:09:55.920 --> 0:09:59.200
<v Speaker 3>no actual science, so it's always a marvel when I

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:02.959
<v Speaker 3>discover something hid like fluid mechanics. So you know, you

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:07.559
<v Speaker 3>get you get the water going uphill by creating a vacuum,

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:10.560
<v Speaker 3>you get water going uphill in a pipe by creating

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 3>a vacuum at the top. So what we'll be doing

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 3>is creating a vacuum at the top. We're moving all

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 3>of the loans, existing loans of performing renewable energy projects,

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 3>creating this vacuum at the top, allowing the same banks

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:26.439
<v Speaker 3>that originated the first loan to go out looking for another.

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:28.680
<v Speaker 3>And the reason why this is important actually that is

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:31.319
<v Speaker 3>the banks are saying in Latin America and in India

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:33.960
<v Speaker 3>another place where the banks have a lot of these acids,

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 3>we've done this, it's fine, but we're now running out

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 3>of runway to do any more. We're you know, we've

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:45.200
<v Speaker 3>got concentration limits, We've got a limited amount of savings

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:49.079
<v Speaker 3>there is. And so by coming in and creating that vacuum,

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 3>we're giving them the space to do more as well

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:54.960
<v Speaker 3>as the need to do more. And so I think

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 3>that's a way in which we can go from thirty

0:10:57.200 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars invested in renewables in Latin America to sixty

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 3>billion in a couple of years, and then one hundred

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 3>and twenty billion in a couple of years time, and

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 3>two hundred and forty billion in a few years after that.

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 3>So I think that that is a way that we

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 3>can really accelerate. You have all of these ideas about

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 3>accelerating in brand new projects, in brand new logations that

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 3>investors have never been before, and the reality is they're

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:23.600
<v Speaker 3>too afraid to go.

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Trying to invest in performing assets is exactly what finance does.

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:30.200
<v Speaker 1>And so why is it that you have to come

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 1>up with this idea and why isn't finance already doing it?

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 3>We are quite right, ninety seven percent of finance is

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 3>refinancing something that it's a sad reality, and finance loves

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 3>to refinance and refinance over and over again. So I

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 3>actually think that we when we get this fund up

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 3>and running, people are going to come to it. Now,

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 3>the reality is today someone has to do this hard

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:59.960
<v Speaker 3>work because these loans, you know, they're not defined as renewable.

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 3>So some of that to go round, go into these

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 3>bank ballot sheets and say here's the thing that I'm

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 3>prepared to buy and filter them out and one fund

0:12:09.320 --> 0:12:12.960
<v Speaker 3>that needs to do us At the moment, there is

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:16.720
<v Speaker 3>no capital market in which this is happening in these countries,

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 3>But I'm going to take it to a capital market

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 3>in which would want that an international capital market that

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going to have a portfolio of performing loans

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 3>in a wide variety of countries in renewable energies. I

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 3>believe we'd be able to package that into an instrument

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:38.320
<v Speaker 3>that the investors in the capital markets internationally will want.

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:40.960
<v Speaker 3>And if I can then sell on the loans that

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:45.320
<v Speaker 3>I have bought, having packaged them into nice packages that

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 3>investors are looking for with the right degree of diversification

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 3>and the right degree of spread of credit, I will

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 3>then have money that could go and reinvest by buying

0:12:56.120 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 3>some new loans. And so we do think that this

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:03.239
<v Speaker 3>has scalability because I think my first point of departure

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:05.680
<v Speaker 3>in this space a few years ago with the bridge

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 3>shown initiative, was about how do we move the needle.

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:14.440
<v Speaker 3>There's no shortage of clever, small ideas. How do we

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 3>come up with a small number of big ideas that.

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 2>Move the needle?

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 1>After the break, can carbon markets become the big idea

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:29.200
<v Speaker 1>to move the needle? Or are they forever stuck in

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the doldrums. By the way, if you've been enjoying this episode,

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 1>please take a moment to rate and review the show

0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. It helps other listeners find

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the show. So we've talked so far about currency exchange

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:56.079
<v Speaker 1>guarantees as an idea trying to get loan portfolios in

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 1>developing countries sold to international investors and freeing up care

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 1>capital in developing countries to do more green stuff. But

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:06.960
<v Speaker 1>there are other private sector instruments that do exist, and

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:10.679
<v Speaker 1>they exist at pretty large scale. So green bonds are

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:15.840
<v Speaker 1>one where basically an investor buys into the bond which

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:20.800
<v Speaker 1>is targeted for use in green stuff. So it could

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 1>be building a renewable energy project, it could be building

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 1>even adaptation projects sometimes are funded by green bonds, and

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 1>that's hundreds of billions of dollars on an annual basis.

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 3>Calling it green hmmm, doesn't make it green, And I

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 3>think that to me, the impact of that market, the

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 3>force of that market, is a function of how lower

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 3>is the infrast rate on that money. So I've called

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 3>something green, I'm going to use it for green purposes

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 3>and as a result, I can get money in the

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 3>marketplace at fifty basis points less one hundred basis points less,

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 3>and that's important because that means I could do more stuff,

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 3>more of this stuff. Right, The reality is the green

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 3>premium sometimes awkwardly called the gremium, is a few basis points.

0:15:19.680 --> 0:15:21.720
<v Speaker 3>And I look at that and I think that's really

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 3>two possible reasons why. Firstly, maybe people don't trust my

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:30.120
<v Speaker 3>definition of green, and we need better definitions of green.

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 3>In economics, we're always saying that things are caused by

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 3>lack of information transparency, and so any economists hearing this

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 3>will say, ah, you have an information problem. No one

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 3>already believes that it's green. The other alternative is there

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:48.920
<v Speaker 3>isn't a market for someone to accept a lower return

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 3>for doing something green. And I fear that that is

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 3>even more important, and that certainly seems to have been

0:15:57.640 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 3>the case in the last few years when interest rates

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 3>shut up.

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 1>And at the same time, there have been two things

0:16:05.040 --> 0:16:09.720
<v Speaker 1>that happen simultaneously. There's been backlash against ESG environmental social

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 1>governance on a political level in places like the US,

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 1>but outside the US, but there isn't a political backlash.

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Investors have been moving away from ESG investments because they

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 1>can make money in just normal interest linked derivatives.

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 2>Like exactly right.

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 3>And it suggests that this issue is cyclical rather than linear,

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 3>so that there will be a time in the future,

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 3>the interest rates come down again and we should probably

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 3>issue some more more green bonds then, because, as you say,

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 3>when interest rates were very low, remember the zero interest

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 3>rate policy zup. It seems such a long time ago,

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 3>but actually only a few years ago. Then people began thinking, well,

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm not getting much cash from my bond, I might

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 3>as well to get something else as well, right, And

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 3>so there was a whole explosion of social impact investing.

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 2>And these other instruments.

0:17:03.320 --> 0:17:07.120
<v Speaker 3>It has, as you say, really declined, and I think

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 3>that decline is because people can now get decent rates

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 3>of return and they're not bothered about getting something extra.

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:16.680
<v Speaker 3>I think that that we're in that environment for the

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 3>next few years. I don't think going back down to zero,

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:21.520
<v Speaker 3>but they will go back down low at some point

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:24.200
<v Speaker 3>in the future, and we should issue those instruments again.

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 3>But it's not therefore a reliable or at the moment's

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:29.159
<v Speaker 3>scalable solution.

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:31.439
<v Speaker 1>Why is there a lack of demand for green bones?

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Isn't it clear now with these global climate goals that

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 1>we have to be investing in these places and smart

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:41.679
<v Speaker 1>investors try and get to the place where the trends

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:43.879
<v Speaker 1>are where future money is to be made, and the

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:45.920
<v Speaker 1>earlier you get in, the more money you can make.

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 3>But remember the equation here is not someone saying I'm

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 3>going to do some smart investing. I'm thinking about the

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:57.159
<v Speaker 3>fact that in the future this thing I'm doing is

0:17:57.200 --> 0:17:59.440
<v Speaker 3>going to be valued better, It's going to be seen

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 3>as important, and therefore I will get a higher rate

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 3>of return. This equation is different. This is like saying,

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 3>accept a lower rate of return because you're doing something good,

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:13.399
<v Speaker 3>and unfortunately, for whatever reason, that market does not seem

0:18:13.440 --> 0:18:16.399
<v Speaker 3>to be there. They're not people lining up to accept

0:18:16.400 --> 0:18:20.320
<v Speaker 3>a lower rate of return for doing good, and indeed,

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:25.879
<v Speaker 3>in some places some pension fund trustees are being taken

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:30.160
<v Speaker 3>to court saying that their job is to maximize rates

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:31.360
<v Speaker 3>of return for their members.

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 1>The other idea that has been floated by clever financial

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:38.680
<v Speaker 1>people is that green bonds as they had been defined,

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:41.120
<v Speaker 1>because they are restricted for that money to be spent

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:44.919
<v Speaker 1>on green activities, are perhaps a too restrictive instrument, and

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 1>perhaps that lower interest rate is not good enough. So

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 1>they created another instrument called a sustainability linked pond, where

0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the bond's money can be used for whatever a corporation

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:58.359
<v Speaker 1>or a country wants it to use, except the interest

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 1>rate would be tied to the goals that the company

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:08.159
<v Speaker 1>or the country has, and now bond investors get to

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:13.119
<v Speaker 1>essentially drive whether the country or the company actually meets

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:16.200
<v Speaker 1>those goals, because if it doesn't, then the interest rate

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:19.479
<v Speaker 1>that the bond investors get paid rises and the company

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 1>or the country has to pay more. And that instrument

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 1>took off like a rocket over the past few years.

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 1>It's about one hundred million dollar market. We did an

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>investigation looking at how some of those goals were not

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:34.639
<v Speaker 1>strong enough and that kind of halted the growth of

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the market, but it's still a pretty robust market. All

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:41.439
<v Speaker 1>the people I've spoken to have said fundamentally, it is

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:46.360
<v Speaker 1>an interesting instrument, but there is an information problem that

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 1>once sorted, it will rise again. What do you think

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:51.360
<v Speaker 1>about sustainability link ponds.

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:55.240
<v Speaker 3>I think that, as with green bonds, there are some

0:19:55.280 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 3>people out there who are prepared to accept a or

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 3>changed interest rate based around sustainability. Government donors can be

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:10.479
<v Speaker 3>part of that, philanthropists can be part of that, and

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 3>I believe that we need these instruments to tap that interest.

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 3>Is there a mass marketplace for that, I'm not sure.

0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:23.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't think I've seen evidence to say it is.

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 3>And in my current job at the Inter American Development Bank,

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:31.879
<v Speaker 3>we're finding lots of opportunities to tap into a particular

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:36.199
<v Speaker 3>donors interest and create a bond around that. So, for example,

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 3>that the current thing we're looking at is a loan

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:44.120
<v Speaker 3>to adapt all schools in Latin America and the Caribbean

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 3>to enable them to deal with extreme heat. There's lots

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 3>of donors concerned about that. I mean, kids are not

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 3>going to be able to learn in forty degrees integrade.

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:57.200
<v Speaker 3>It's going to have a huge impact on their future,

0:20:57.359 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 3>their potential. The American government and the British government, and

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 3>the French and German and the Qataris and others are

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 3>concerned enough about that to say, oh, I will back

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:14.159
<v Speaker 3>an instrument that funds the change of these schools. And

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 3>once you've certified, because certification is important in all these

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 3>processes that the school has now adapted, I will pay

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:27.639
<v Speaker 3>some interest and therefore can reduce the cost for the country.

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 3>So I think that those things. It's great that if

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:34.679
<v Speaker 3>I can tap into a particular demand, I can do more.

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:38.399
<v Speaker 3>But I think that is there a massive market of

0:21:38.640 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 3>ordinary retail investors who want to do that, I'm not sure.

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 3>I think also going to have some issues and we're

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:52.400
<v Speaker 3>seeing this with debt swaps. Is the more bespoke they are, interesting, sophisticated,

0:21:52.960 --> 0:21:56.440
<v Speaker 3>the less liquid they are, and so that can mean

0:21:56.480 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 3>that they're not as helpful. And what I mean that

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 3>is that liquidity is partly about people understanding that. Right,

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 3>So I've got a marketplace and my coupon has every

0:22:06.840 --> 0:22:10.160
<v Speaker 3>single coupon in this marketplace has got some different link

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 3>based on something else, some other metric that's hard for

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:18.760
<v Speaker 3>investors to understand, and so that reduces the potential marketplace

0:22:18.800 --> 0:22:21.560
<v Speaker 3>who are buying and selling these instruments. And if those

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 3>markets are small, they're going to have less liquidity and

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 3>be more costly. Yeah, And that sort of makes sense

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 3>to me from an equity perspective, which is a much

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:32.479
<v Speaker 3>simpler market because you're looking at a company like Apple

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 3>and you're seeing, oh, they're going to produce a new iPhone,

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 3>and that's about the information you need because people love

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 3>a new iPhone, and so you're going to bet that

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:42.639
<v Speaker 3>Apple's going to make more money and you buy the

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:45.359
<v Speaker 3>stock in the price rises and you're happy. But in

0:22:45.400 --> 0:22:49.880
<v Speaker 3>these sustainability linked instruments, You're going to have to think, oh,

0:22:50.720 --> 0:22:55.600
<v Speaker 3>this Indian electric company is going to be reducing its

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:59.639
<v Speaker 3>emissions by two hundred and fifty million tons by twenty thirty,

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 3>and that is going to be its goal. And that's

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 3>just already that is too much information for any normal

0:23:06.320 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 3>person to think about and deciding with it to sell

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:13.440
<v Speaker 3>that bond, to buy another bond. Because there's a Korean

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 3>company who's got a similar target, but for a different

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:20.160
<v Speaker 3>years and a different it's hard for investors to really

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:23.160
<v Speaker 3>understand how they're getting in the best deal. To use

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:25.959
<v Speaker 3>the power of the market to drive good deals and

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:27.440
<v Speaker 3>good investments.

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 1>There's another private sector instrument that has got a lot

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 1>of backing at COP twenty nine. Article six rules would

0:23:35.080 --> 0:23:38.120
<v Speaker 1>agree this Article six sits under the Paris Agreement. It's

0:23:38.160 --> 0:23:43.720
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be a way for countries to trade carbon credits.

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 1>So Norway could be buying carbon credits from Indonesia and

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:52.359
<v Speaker 1>reducing its own emissions from its balance sheet, while Indonesia,

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 1>which has many for USTs, even now gets to make

0:23:56.880 --> 0:24:00.879
<v Speaker 1>money and perhaps put it to an energy transition investment fund.

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 1>But companies could do it to a Microsoft that wants

0:24:03.800 --> 0:24:06.440
<v Speaker 1>to reach carbon negative by twenty thirty could be buying

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the same forest credits from Indonesia. We've had, at least

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 1>from a corporate level, a voluntary market that has existed,

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:17.400
<v Speaker 1>and we've covered that plenty on Bloomberg Green, but also

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 1>this podcast about how there are problems with that market.

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:23.560
<v Speaker 1>But this new un back market was thought to be

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 1>one that will bring better rules and higher integrity and

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 1>then allow investment flows to happen, the thing that we

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:34.879
<v Speaker 1>want trillions of dollars going to developing countries. How do

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:36.200
<v Speaker 1>you feel about carbon markets?

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:40.159
<v Speaker 3>In thinking a lot about the issue, I've come to

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:43.199
<v Speaker 3>believe that there are really two things we need to

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:47.639
<v Speaker 3>think about. One is the border and the other one

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:49.119
<v Speaker 3>is the voluntary nature.

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 2>So within the same tax border like the.

0:24:55.920 --> 0:25:02.160
<v Speaker 3>EU, or within the same tax jurisdictional uk U, US Canada,

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 3>you can have some very substantial carbon markets which operate

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:13.439
<v Speaker 3>with very high prices for carbon. The European market is

0:25:13.440 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 3>worth probably about eight hundred billion dollars, the US Cap

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:20.919
<v Speaker 3>and Trade Canada. Those are significant markets.

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, these are called compliance carbony, compliance carbon markets, and

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:26.479
<v Speaker 1>I think the border is important now.

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 3>The problem is we don't have a compliance system operates

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:34.320
<v Speaker 3>cross border, and so we created sophisticated voluntary systems. So

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:37.720
<v Speaker 3>the reason why we have a voluntary market is because

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 3>of the border problem.

0:25:40.520 --> 0:25:43.919
<v Speaker 1>Well, but there are compliance markets like in Canada and

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the US for example, like British Columbia with California and

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:53.120
<v Speaker 1>with Oregon and Washington across borders, and it's a compliants.

0:25:52.800 --> 0:25:56.199
<v Speaker 3>Very limited and subject to a specific treaty. It's not

0:25:56.240 --> 0:26:00.399
<v Speaker 3>that it's impossible, but it is that it's easy for

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 3>national tax jurisdictions to basically price carbon through their tax system.

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 3>And basically it's a political problem, it's not it's not

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 3>a technical problem. So the fundamental issues is a taxpayer

0:26:12.520 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 3>in America prepared to pay for emission reduction activity in

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:24.920
<v Speaker 3>Canada or vice versa, and the fact that the taxpayer,

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, there may be a voluntary agreement to do that,

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:29.880
<v Speaker 3>but not a taxpayer enforced agreement.

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:33.200
<v Speaker 2>And that's the fundamental problem with this market.

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:36.399
<v Speaker 1>And it's not about the integrity or the credits and

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 1>how the carbon accounting is done and whether the promises

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:39.640
<v Speaker 1>are met or not.

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:42.440
<v Speaker 3>To me, the line works this way, so people think

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:44.639
<v Speaker 3>the line works and it's a lack of integrity.

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:47.040
<v Speaker 2>These these these.

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:49.840
<v Speaker 3>Naves are out there, these bad people doing bad things,

0:26:49.840 --> 0:26:51.440
<v Speaker 3>and as a result, there's no integrity.

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:53.680
<v Speaker 2>And because there's no integrity, the price is low.

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 3>No, it's because it's voluntary and no one's required to

0:26:58.600 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 3>do it. So what is this marketplace? As someone who's saying, oh,

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:04.680
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't mind buying some credits to offset my activity,

0:27:05.200 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 3>and it's voluntary, I'm looking around. I don't have to

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 3>do it and not be required to do it, and

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:13.160
<v Speaker 3>so I will buy the cheapest credit I can find.

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 3>So the price of this voluntary market is very, very low.

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:19.600
<v Speaker 3>It's about two percent of the price of the compliant markets.

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:22.239
<v Speaker 3>When the price is so low, there's no money in

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:26.000
<v Speaker 3>there to do integrity properly. Because to do integrity properly

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 3>you need monitoring, evaluation. You need to consider also what

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 3>happens when the thing was reducing emissions stops reducing emissions,

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:40.199
<v Speaker 3>So you need a bunch of staff that costs some money.

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:42.800
<v Speaker 3>And if he has no money in this credit because

0:27:42.840 --> 0:27:46.360
<v Speaker 3>it's so it's voluntary and low priced, you're not investing

0:27:46.359 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 3>in integrity in that case. This will never work. No,

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:53.160
<v Speaker 3>it will never work as long as it's voluntary. Now

0:27:53.200 --> 0:27:57.479
<v Speaker 3>you can make something nonvoluntary in a multiple ways. So

0:27:57.520 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 3>it could be there is a specific acts around the carbon,

0:28:02.160 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 3>but it could be that carbon is highly priced. Any

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:10.000
<v Speaker 3>scheme in which has got a high price is part

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 3>of what's called an approved scheme, and approved schemes count

0:28:14.600 --> 0:28:17.720
<v Speaker 3>for something and they get some kind of tax benefit again,

0:28:17.920 --> 0:28:21.720
<v Speaker 3>some benefit which allows people to pay up.

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:24.719
<v Speaker 1>So you can think of an approved scheme, say in

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the UK, where there's an industry wide approved scheme that

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:32.160
<v Speaker 1>says you have to reduce your emissions by this much

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:34.639
<v Speaker 1>because we have our climate targets to meet. If you

0:28:34.760 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 1>don't reduce those emissions, we will create this approved scheme

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 1>that is in Indonesia that us the UK government is

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 1>working with Indonesian government to monitor and verify that those

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 1>carbon emissions are being reduced. You can buy credits from

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 1>that approved scheme and they will cost just about the

0:28:52.160 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 1>same as perhaps the money you will have to put

0:28:54.920 --> 0:28:58.600
<v Speaker 1>in reducing your emissions at home, and that would be workable.

0:28:59.080 --> 0:28:59.280
<v Speaker 2>Yes.

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:03.840
<v Speaker 3>So the issue is enforcement across the border. How do

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 3>you enforce it across the border? How do you enforce

0:29:08.120 --> 0:29:13.680
<v Speaker 3>your taxpayers sending money abroad for activities.

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:16.480
<v Speaker 2>Taxpayers don't want to do that. Governments don't want to

0:29:16.560 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 2>do that. That's the problem to solve.

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:20.920
<v Speaker 3>And until we solve that, those markets are going to

0:29:20.960 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 3>remain low priced and integrity is going to be always low.

0:29:25.280 --> 0:29:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Thank you having nush, Thank you, Thank you for listening

0:29:31.320 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 1>to Zero. If you've not done it already, please check

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:37.080
<v Speaker 1>out the other episodes in the Moving Money series. If

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:40.200
<v Speaker 1>you have, we hope you've enjoyed the series. Please write

0:29:40.200 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 1>to us with any feedback at zero port at bloomberg

0:29:42.560 --> 0:29:44.520
<v Speaker 1>dot net. Let us know if you have any more

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:47.160
<v Speaker 1>questions about climate finance that you'd like us to answer

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 1>in a future episode of Moving Money. And now for

0:29:50.400 --> 0:29:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the sound of the week, that's not the sound of

0:29:59.640 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 1>a gun, but the sound of a cash counting machine

0:30:02.600 --> 0:30:05.920
<v Speaker 1>used in banks. If you like this episode, please take

0:30:05.920 --> 0:30:07.800
<v Speaker 1>a moment to rate and review the show on Apple

0:30:07.840 --> 0:30:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Podcasts or Spotify. Share this episode with a friend or

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:16.040
<v Speaker 1>with someone who still believes in carbon credits. This episode

0:30:16.080 --> 0:30:19.120
<v Speaker 1>was produced by Oscar Boyd. Noomberg's head of podcast is

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Sage Bowman and head of Talk is Brendan newnham. Our

0:30:22.200 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 1>theme music is composed by Wonderly Special. Thanks to might

0:30:25.480 --> 0:30:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Lee Rao Soamersadi Mosses, Andem, Blake Maples, and Shawan Wagner.

0:30:30.440 --> 0:30:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm Akshadrati back soon.