1 00:00:00,680 --> 00:00:04,160 Speaker 1: Hi, I'm Mollie John Fast and this is Fast Politics, 2 00:00:04,400 --> 00:00:07,160 Speaker 1: where we discussed the top political headlines with some of 3 00:00:07,200 --> 00:00:11,120 Speaker 1: today's best minds and moms for liberty laws nearly every 4 00:00:11,200 --> 00:00:12,280 Speaker 1: race they were involved in. 5 00:00:12,760 --> 00:00:14,800 Speaker 2: We have such a great show for you today. 6 00:00:15,120 --> 00:00:20,200 Speaker 1: Inside Elections, Jacob Rubashkin talks about the hidden lessons from 7 00:00:20,239 --> 00:00:23,200 Speaker 1: the twenty twenty three election. Then we'll talk to George 8 00:00:23,280 --> 00:00:27,280 Speaker 1: Laws about new legislation to finally make Puerto Rico estate. 9 00:00:27,680 --> 00:00:31,680 Speaker 1: But first we have the Bulwarks. Charlie Sykes. Welcome back 10 00:00:31,720 --> 00:00:35,440 Speaker 1: to Fast Politics, the great Charlie Sykes. 11 00:00:35,600 --> 00:00:38,720 Speaker 3: Hey, it's good to be here, good to be anywhere. 12 00:00:38,760 --> 00:00:39,400 Speaker 4: Me too. 13 00:00:41,120 --> 00:00:44,080 Speaker 1: I just got your newsletter this morning. Morning Shots from 14 00:00:44,120 --> 00:00:46,760 Speaker 1: the Bulwark, that headline you're just scum. 15 00:00:47,159 --> 00:00:50,879 Speaker 3: Yeah, this is the debate we deserve. You know, I 16 00:00:51,000 --> 00:00:52,839 Speaker 3: was watching the debate last night, as I said, and 17 00:00:52,920 --> 00:00:55,080 Speaker 3: you know, I suppose I'm supposed to be watching for 18 00:00:55,120 --> 00:00:57,680 Speaker 3: all the nuance and the substance and you know who's 19 00:00:57,760 --> 00:01:00,840 Speaker 3: making this move on abortion or an on Ukraine, And 20 00:01:01,600 --> 00:01:04,240 Speaker 3: unfortunately I just got distracted by you know, asking you know, 21 00:01:04,240 --> 00:01:06,240 Speaker 3: what is what is Nikki heally gonna do? Is she 22 00:01:06,360 --> 00:01:08,399 Speaker 3: going to push Vivic into the locker, or is she 23 00:01:08,480 --> 00:01:11,840 Speaker 3: going to skewer him with a five inch heel because 24 00:01:11,880 --> 00:01:16,240 Speaker 3: the guy is such an insufferable prick. This is the 25 00:01:16,319 --> 00:01:19,959 Speaker 3: problem and the fact that five minutes ago anybody in 26 00:01:19,959 --> 00:01:22,920 Speaker 3: this country took him seriously as a plausible presidential candidate. 27 00:01:22,920 --> 00:01:24,840 Speaker 3: I mean it doesn't that say something about the times 28 00:01:24,840 --> 00:01:25,280 Speaker 3: we live in? 29 00:01:25,520 --> 00:01:29,440 Speaker 1: Obviously he's a complete joke, but there is a world 30 00:01:29,480 --> 00:01:32,000 Speaker 1: like I actually feel bad for you as like the 31 00:01:32,120 --> 00:01:34,520 Speaker 1: last of the normal Republicans. 32 00:01:34,720 --> 00:01:36,199 Speaker 2: I'm sorry, I'm sorry. 33 00:01:36,240 --> 00:01:38,319 Speaker 3: Does that mean I relish You're pity? 34 00:01:39,720 --> 00:01:40,920 Speaker 2: Here's Nikki Haley. 35 00:01:41,760 --> 00:01:45,280 Speaker 1: She is actually a good candidate who could win a 36 00:01:45,360 --> 00:01:48,440 Speaker 1: general election, and there's no way she's going to get 37 00:01:48,440 --> 00:01:49,080 Speaker 1: the nomination. 38 00:01:49,360 --> 00:01:51,720 Speaker 3: No, there isn't. Actually, that was something else I was watching, 39 00:01:51,760 --> 00:01:54,640 Speaker 3: you know, thinking that if you're a normal, rational Republican 40 00:01:54,760 --> 00:01:57,600 Speaker 3: and you're watching this debate, and look, you know, I 41 00:01:57,640 --> 00:01:59,280 Speaker 3: have a lot of problems with Nikki Haley. Have read 42 00:01:59,320 --> 00:02:01,720 Speaker 3: a lot about her. She's made some should we say, 43 00:02:01,920 --> 00:02:05,000 Speaker 3: compromises in her life. But yes, true, if you're a 44 00:02:05,040 --> 00:02:07,760 Speaker 3: Republican and you're looking at her, you're thinking, who would 45 00:02:07,800 --> 00:02:10,840 Speaker 3: you rather go into twenty twenty four with? Behind NICKI 46 00:02:10,919 --> 00:02:14,520 Speaker 3: Haley or Donald Trump, and for all of her flaws, 47 00:02:14,840 --> 00:02:17,680 Speaker 3: think about what a superior candidate she would be. By 48 00:02:17,720 --> 00:02:20,240 Speaker 3: the way, just think about how our politics would be 49 00:02:20,400 --> 00:02:23,840 Speaker 3: transformed in the blink of an eye if you swapped 50 00:02:23,840 --> 00:02:28,200 Speaker 3: out Donald Trump for some just reasonably normal Republican like 51 00:02:28,320 --> 00:02:30,240 Speaker 3: Nicki Haley. But it's not gonna happen. 52 00:02:30,280 --> 00:02:32,640 Speaker 1: As you point out, it's interesting because it's like the 53 00:02:32,720 --> 00:02:34,799 Speaker 1: thing I think about is, I don't agree with her 54 00:02:34,840 --> 00:02:38,200 Speaker 1: on almost everything, but you could see her like people 55 00:02:38,320 --> 00:02:42,400 Speaker 1: voting for her because she's offering them something right, and 56 00:02:42,440 --> 00:02:45,600 Speaker 1: she's also just making some of those policies which I 57 00:02:45,639 --> 00:02:49,680 Speaker 1: don't agree with, sort of palatable for mainstream people. 58 00:02:50,040 --> 00:02:52,440 Speaker 3: Well. Also, look, I mean she's got some substance. She's 59 00:02:52,480 --> 00:02:54,720 Speaker 3: able to speak with a good deal of authority on 60 00:02:54,880 --> 00:02:57,799 Speaker 3: foreign affairs. You know, her discussion of Israeli Ukraine I 61 00:02:57,840 --> 00:03:00,800 Speaker 3: thought was really solid. When she first talked about, you know, 62 00:03:00,919 --> 00:03:03,560 Speaker 3: getting a compromise on abortion, I think people thought she 63 00:03:03,800 --> 00:03:07,240 Speaker 3: was dancing and dodging, but I think it actually sounded 64 00:03:07,320 --> 00:03:10,400 Speaker 3: more reasonable last night. Now, whether or not you can 65 00:03:10,440 --> 00:03:13,359 Speaker 3: sustain that in a campaign, I don't know. I think 66 00:03:13,360 --> 00:03:15,200 Speaker 3: it's kind of silly to engage in the who's the 67 00:03:15,240 --> 00:03:17,920 Speaker 3: winner and who's the loser in the debate, although clearly 68 00:03:18,040 --> 00:03:20,320 Speaker 3: Tim Scott was the loser and vivek make him made 69 00:03:20,360 --> 00:03:23,000 Speaker 3: himself a joke, and I thought that she did about 70 00:03:23,040 --> 00:03:25,799 Speaker 3: as well as she could. As long as we recognize 71 00:03:25,919 --> 00:03:28,760 Speaker 3: this is a attemptiontion debate that they're just going through 72 00:03:28,760 --> 00:03:33,080 Speaker 3: the motions right exactly. This is a debate among people 73 00:03:33,240 --> 00:03:35,880 Speaker 3: who either want to be vice president or want their 74 00:03:35,920 --> 00:03:40,360 Speaker 3: own podcast or something else because they're not going to 75 00:03:40,360 --> 00:03:43,200 Speaker 3: be the Republican nominee. And by the way, nobody seems 76 00:03:43,240 --> 00:03:46,040 Speaker 3: to care the fact Donald Trump just completely blows off 77 00:03:46,080 --> 00:03:48,640 Speaker 3: these debates, does not even show up, has no intention 78 00:03:48,720 --> 00:03:51,320 Speaker 3: of ever showing up. And I guess I'm old enough 79 00:03:51,320 --> 00:03:53,280 Speaker 3: to remember when that would be a thing. And it 80 00:03:53,320 --> 00:03:56,840 Speaker 3: doesn't even register. It's we completely normalize the fact that 81 00:03:56,880 --> 00:04:02,040 Speaker 3: he's off with Roseanne Barr who's having the irrational meltdown 82 00:04:02,040 --> 00:04:04,600 Speaker 3: at one of his rallies, and people go, yeah, okay, 83 00:04:04,680 --> 00:04:09,000 Speaker 3: so I'm thinking that Donald Trump is the big winner tonight. Yes, okay, hello, people, 84 00:04:09,880 --> 00:04:11,840 Speaker 3: just can we focus on the crazy for a moment. 85 00:04:12,040 --> 00:04:14,000 Speaker 3: I just I'm sorry a little PTSD. 86 00:04:14,320 --> 00:04:16,159 Speaker 1: You're right to bring this up, and I want to 87 00:04:16,240 --> 00:04:20,120 Speaker 1: ask you because you have actual experience with a Republican party. 88 00:04:20,320 --> 00:04:23,560 Speaker 1: I mean, isn't this sort of a sign of how 89 00:04:23,720 --> 00:04:27,240 Speaker 1: weak the party is that they have no power over 90 00:04:27,360 --> 00:04:28,200 Speaker 1: their front runner? 91 00:04:28,560 --> 00:04:32,200 Speaker 3: Oh? Absolutely. I mean it's just like Donald Trump on 92 00:04:32,240 --> 00:04:36,760 Speaker 3: an hourly basis giving Ronna McDaniel, Romney or whatever her 93 00:04:36,839 --> 00:04:39,360 Speaker 3: name is, now, giving her a noogie and just reminding 94 00:04:39,480 --> 00:04:42,919 Speaker 3: her that you know, I own you, I own you. 95 00:04:42,960 --> 00:04:45,320 Speaker 3: What you want to have another debate, Kim here, let's 96 00:04:45,320 --> 00:04:48,520 Speaker 3: try this again. No, it's Hlili eating. But also the 97 00:04:48,560 --> 00:04:51,240 Speaker 3: fact that you have all of these candidates on stage. 98 00:04:51,320 --> 00:04:54,000 Speaker 3: And I'm sorry, Molly, You'll know where I'm coming from 99 00:04:54,080 --> 00:04:56,000 Speaker 3: on all of this. But as I'm reading a lot 100 00:04:56,040 --> 00:04:58,840 Speaker 3: of the punditry, I'm thinking, have we forgotten what we're 101 00:04:58,839 --> 00:05:01,640 Speaker 3: actually talking about? Here? The firm running candidate for President 102 00:05:01,680 --> 00:05:03,960 Speaker 3: of the United States on the Republican ticket. He is 103 00:05:04,240 --> 00:05:08,479 Speaker 3: facing more than ninety felony charges. He's on trial for fraud. 104 00:05:08,600 --> 00:05:12,480 Speaker 3: A federal judge has found him liable for rape. He 105 00:05:12,680 --> 00:05:15,200 Speaker 3: is being accused by the federal government of violating the 106 00:05:15,320 --> 00:05:19,800 Speaker 3: espionads AT. He is facing racketeering charges. The US government 107 00:05:20,120 --> 00:05:24,560 Speaker 3: is accusing him of trying to overthrow the election, engaging 108 00:05:24,680 --> 00:05:28,599 Speaker 3: in Lie's trickery, deceit, and fraud. And none of these 109 00:05:28,600 --> 00:05:31,080 Speaker 3: Republican candidates can figure out, huh, how do I run 110 00:05:31,080 --> 00:05:32,000 Speaker 3: against this guy? 111 00:05:32,880 --> 00:05:35,760 Speaker 2: How do I be this trying? They're not even trying. 112 00:05:35,839 --> 00:05:37,960 Speaker 1: I mean, New York is about to take away his 113 00:05:38,120 --> 00:05:42,120 Speaker 1: business license so he cannot have a business, and they're 114 00:05:42,120 --> 00:05:44,120 Speaker 1: not and they're like, oh, we shouldn't dare to try 115 00:05:44,160 --> 00:05:45,719 Speaker 1: to make a case against this guy. 116 00:05:45,960 --> 00:05:48,000 Speaker 3: I mean, Chris Christie does it, but I mean, you 117 00:05:48,040 --> 00:05:50,520 Speaker 3: know the problem is that if you're Chris Christie, you 118 00:05:50,720 --> 00:05:55,839 Speaker 3: needed Donald Trump there as a foil. And so it's 119 00:05:55,880 --> 00:05:59,120 Speaker 3: you know, as much as I want to root for Christie, can't. 120 00:05:59,240 --> 00:06:01,520 Speaker 3: You can't punch a punch bag that doesn't show up. 121 00:06:01,880 --> 00:06:04,880 Speaker 3: So yeah, so he's been saying the right things and 122 00:06:05,080 --> 00:06:08,040 Speaker 3: he'll go through you know, he'll he'll point out that 123 00:06:08,200 --> 00:06:10,480 Speaker 3: it seems like a bad idea to nominate somebody who's 124 00:06:10,480 --> 00:06:12,840 Speaker 3: gonna spend most of their time in the dock in 125 00:06:12,880 --> 00:06:16,080 Speaker 3: a criminal trial. I mean, yeah, you know again, five 126 00:06:16,120 --> 00:06:18,640 Speaker 3: minutes ago, a rational political party he would have said, yeah, 127 00:06:18,640 --> 00:06:20,680 Speaker 3: that makes sense. It's a really bad idea. And Chris 128 00:06:20,760 --> 00:06:22,080 Speaker 3: Christie says it'll. 129 00:06:26,120 --> 00:06:27,559 Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, that's true. 130 00:06:27,600 --> 00:06:30,839 Speaker 1: And I also think as we watch this, we see 131 00:06:31,120 --> 00:06:34,760 Speaker 1: Christy remember has like got COVID from Trump and was 132 00:06:34,960 --> 00:06:38,440 Speaker 1: I mean, you know, he nearly died because of Trump. 133 00:06:38,520 --> 00:06:40,719 Speaker 1: I mean, and he worked in the Trump administration. I 134 00:06:40,720 --> 00:06:43,000 Speaker 1: feel like the one thing I don't feel like we 135 00:06:43,040 --> 00:06:45,279 Speaker 1: talk about this enough again, it's like one of the 136 00:06:45,400 --> 00:06:49,000 Speaker 1: uncomfortable realities. But like, there are a bunch of people 137 00:06:49,000 --> 00:06:53,080 Speaker 1: who served in the Trump administration happily. I mean a 138 00:06:53,160 --> 00:06:56,320 Speaker 1: lot of people, and then they sort of decided it 139 00:06:56,360 --> 00:06:58,760 Speaker 1: was a bridge too far, or maybe it wasn't or 140 00:06:58,800 --> 00:07:01,320 Speaker 1: maybe they were about to get you with perjury, and 141 00:07:01,400 --> 00:07:03,440 Speaker 1: so they decided they'd write a book and get out 142 00:07:03,440 --> 00:07:06,400 Speaker 1: of it. Now, you know, there's something to be said 143 00:07:06,440 --> 00:07:09,440 Speaker 1: for that, and you know, what's good for people to 144 00:07:09,920 --> 00:07:12,680 Speaker 1: pull back the curtain. But it's also there's a percentage 145 00:07:12,680 --> 00:07:17,200 Speaker 1: of craven there. There's a big wallaping dose of craven there. 146 00:07:17,240 --> 00:07:20,360 Speaker 1: But on the other hand, you know, when when you're 147 00:07:20,400 --> 00:07:22,520 Speaker 1: in the foxhole, you you really, you know, can't be 148 00:07:22,600 --> 00:07:24,960 Speaker 1: checking the resumes of everybody that's jumping in with you. 149 00:07:25,120 --> 00:07:28,520 Speaker 1: I am willing to welcome any conrad. I continue to 150 00:07:28,560 --> 00:07:30,880 Speaker 1: be amazed at the fact that and this also is 151 00:07:31,120 --> 00:07:33,680 Speaker 1: I continue to be amazed that something's happening that has 152 00:07:33,680 --> 00:07:36,640 Speaker 1: never happened in American presidential history. The number of people 153 00:07:36,720 --> 00:07:38,880 Speaker 1: who have worked in the Trump White House or served 154 00:07:38,880 --> 00:07:41,000 Speaker 1: on the Trump cabinet who are out there saying this 155 00:07:41,040 --> 00:07:44,560 Speaker 1: man is nuts, this man is disconnected from reality, he 156 00:07:44,680 --> 00:07:47,160 Speaker 1: is dangerous, and it doesn't seem. 157 00:07:46,960 --> 00:07:48,840 Speaker 3: To be mattering. I mean, normally you would think, okay, 158 00:07:48,840 --> 00:07:51,120 Speaker 3: what would happen if his hand picked attorney general, if 159 00:07:51,120 --> 00:07:53,800 Speaker 3: his own chief of staff, if his secretary of state, 160 00:07:53,840 --> 00:07:57,800 Speaker 3: if his secretary of defense, if his national security advisor, 161 00:07:58,080 --> 00:08:00,680 Speaker 3: if one aid after another came out and said, guys, 162 00:08:00,880 --> 00:08:04,160 Speaker 3: this is terrible. This man is completely unfit to serve. 163 00:08:04,560 --> 00:08:07,600 Speaker 3: You would think that. Again, a rational political party in 164 00:08:07,640 --> 00:08:10,160 Speaker 3: a world we do not innhabit would say, yeah, maybe 165 00:08:10,160 --> 00:08:11,840 Speaker 3: we got to listen to the people who were in 166 00:08:12,160 --> 00:08:15,440 Speaker 3: the room while the shit was happening. And again, it 167 00:08:15,520 --> 00:08:17,280 Speaker 3: doesn't seem to be making much of a difference. 168 00:08:17,480 --> 00:08:21,400 Speaker 1: Yeah, that is unbelievable that a month ago there was 169 00:08:21,480 --> 00:08:24,200 Speaker 1: this news cycle where Trump said, you know, I think 170 00:08:24,240 --> 00:08:27,280 Speaker 1: we should execute Mark Milly and people were like, well, 171 00:08:27,320 --> 00:08:29,040 Speaker 1: this seems pretty bad. 172 00:08:29,400 --> 00:08:30,600 Speaker 2: And then it sort of went away. 173 00:08:30,800 --> 00:08:32,679 Speaker 3: Okay, we could play this game, and the one before 174 00:08:32,720 --> 00:08:35,360 Speaker 3: that there was a news cycle where I've lost track 175 00:08:35,400 --> 00:08:38,440 Speaker 3: of the new cycles. Remember, Mollie, do you remember when 176 00:08:38,520 --> 00:08:41,360 Speaker 3: he actually put in writing that we should suspend the 177 00:08:41,480 --> 00:08:44,840 Speaker 3: US Constitution to allow him to be returned to power? 178 00:08:45,320 --> 00:08:47,520 Speaker 3: And you remember that news cycle when he was having 179 00:08:47,640 --> 00:08:51,200 Speaker 3: dinner with Neo Nazis. Huh? And then there was a 180 00:08:51,240 --> 00:08:53,720 Speaker 3: new cycle. And this is part of the problem, is 181 00:08:53,760 --> 00:08:56,480 Speaker 3: that we keep moving on and the default setting of 182 00:08:56,720 --> 00:09:00,200 Speaker 3: most of our punditry now is just horse race up. No, 183 00:09:00,360 --> 00:09:02,600 Speaker 3: let's let's gaze a little bit more in our navel. 184 00:09:02,640 --> 00:09:04,440 Speaker 3: We'll talk about this pole, or we'll talk about that, 185 00:09:04,559 --> 00:09:06,679 Speaker 3: or we'll do this game theory about all of that. 186 00:09:06,760 --> 00:09:09,480 Speaker 3: It's like, hello, do you remember who Donald Trump is, 187 00:09:09,960 --> 00:09:14,200 Speaker 3: what Donald Trump has done, what Donald Trump tells us 188 00:09:14,280 --> 00:09:17,959 Speaker 3: on a regular basis, he's going to do. See, Mully, 189 00:09:17,960 --> 00:09:20,280 Speaker 3: you and I can engage in Trump derangement syndrome and say, 190 00:09:20,320 --> 00:09:22,720 Speaker 3: you know what second Trump term? He would be all 191 00:09:22,760 --> 00:09:26,040 Speaker 3: about revenge and retribution. Trump is like you know, says 192 00:09:26,080 --> 00:09:29,959 Speaker 3: hold my beer, absolutely, and we're going to execute the 193 00:09:30,000 --> 00:09:33,160 Speaker 3: top general. And I have this list of people that 194 00:09:33,240 --> 00:09:37,360 Speaker 3: would incredibly prosecute. It's like you can't come up with 195 00:09:37,400 --> 00:09:39,560 Speaker 3: something that he is not going. No, I'll do you 196 00:09:39,559 --> 00:09:42,199 Speaker 3: one better. You know you think I'm not going to 197 00:09:42,240 --> 00:09:44,800 Speaker 3: support you, creat I'm going to fuck NATO all together. 198 00:09:44,920 --> 00:09:47,119 Speaker 3: I'm going to amend it all of our allies. 199 00:09:47,720 --> 00:09:49,679 Speaker 1: And I want to point out for our listeners that 200 00:09:49,760 --> 00:09:52,439 Speaker 1: I'm not laughing because this is funny. I'm laughing because 201 00:09:52,480 --> 00:09:55,439 Speaker 1: it's just so upsetting that the only way I can 202 00:09:55,480 --> 00:09:58,200 Speaker 1: process it is and I mean, what you're saying is funny, 203 00:09:58,200 --> 00:10:00,520 Speaker 1: but it's funny tragic, not fun. 204 00:10:00,320 --> 00:10:03,840 Speaker 3: Oh no, no, it's it's also if you're not laughing 205 00:10:03,880 --> 00:10:05,679 Speaker 3: at it, what are you doing, You're like blowing your 206 00:10:05,720 --> 00:10:06,280 Speaker 3: brains out? 207 00:10:06,320 --> 00:10:09,320 Speaker 2: You know, It's like it's yeah, exactly, and it's it 208 00:10:09,400 --> 00:10:09,959 Speaker 2: really is. 209 00:10:10,200 --> 00:10:12,960 Speaker 1: You know, it's up to eleven, so there's no world 210 00:10:12,960 --> 00:10:15,440 Speaker 1: in which he disappears. The thing I wanted to ask 211 00:10:15,520 --> 00:10:19,080 Speaker 1: you is we've seen the polls. Again, we don't even 212 00:10:19,080 --> 00:10:21,679 Speaker 1: need to talk about the polls, but obviously they somehow 213 00:10:21,880 --> 00:10:25,200 Speaker 1: have American people deciding against It's three thousand people in 214 00:10:25,240 --> 00:10:28,640 Speaker 1: five states, but who answer their cell phones to unknown numbers. 215 00:10:28,679 --> 00:10:30,360 Speaker 1: So I'm just going to put that out there but 216 00:10:30,880 --> 00:10:33,600 Speaker 1: that group has decided they love Donald Trump and think 217 00:10:33,640 --> 00:10:38,480 Speaker 1: he has incredible mental acuity, which, okay, that's baffling. But 218 00:10:38,720 --> 00:10:41,679 Speaker 1: if Trump loses in twenty twenty four, which we really 219 00:10:41,720 --> 00:10:44,560 Speaker 1: need to happen so democracy survives, I don't think he 220 00:10:44,640 --> 00:10:45,240 Speaker 1: goes away. 221 00:10:45,559 --> 00:10:48,760 Speaker 3: Oh see, I was hoping I didn't have to go 222 00:10:48,840 --> 00:10:51,840 Speaker 3: here this early. I remember that moment when I was 223 00:10:51,880 --> 00:10:54,120 Speaker 3: doing my podcast back in twenty twenty and I said, 224 00:10:54,160 --> 00:10:56,880 Speaker 3: you know, even if he loses, he could run in 225 00:10:56,920 --> 00:10:59,400 Speaker 3: twenty twenty four. Nothing bands He's not going to have 226 00:10:59,520 --> 00:11:02,120 Speaker 3: He's not going to made loss because Donald Trump never loses. 227 00:11:02,320 --> 00:11:05,640 Speaker 3: He's gonna run in twenty nine. People, No, no, oh 228 00:11:05,679 --> 00:11:09,400 Speaker 3: my god. And so so you raise the question he 229 00:11:09,480 --> 00:11:12,520 Speaker 3: loses in twenty twenty four, there's no chance that he 230 00:11:12,600 --> 00:11:16,320 Speaker 3: graciously concedes. See, there is no chance that he acknowledges 231 00:11:16,360 --> 00:11:19,040 Speaker 3: his defeat. There's no chance that he does not press 232 00:11:19,080 --> 00:11:23,160 Speaker 3: the Republican Party in Congress to overturn the election. And 233 00:11:23,920 --> 00:11:27,200 Speaker 3: there is a very real chance that Donald Trump will 234 00:11:27,240 --> 00:11:31,880 Speaker 3: fully intend to run again in twenty twenty eight. Okay, 235 00:11:32,200 --> 00:11:34,920 Speaker 3: I need to start day drinking. Just you just have 236 00:11:34,960 --> 00:11:36,559 Speaker 3: pushed me right over the limit here. 237 00:11:36,800 --> 00:11:39,880 Speaker 1: I don't think he's a better candidate in twenty twenty eight. 238 00:11:40,000 --> 00:11:44,080 Speaker 1: I mean he's not a right, he'll be eighty two 239 00:11:44,280 --> 00:11:47,000 Speaker 1: that or no, he'll be eighty I don't know, he'll 240 00:11:47,000 --> 00:11:48,280 Speaker 1: be eighty five or something. 241 00:11:48,280 --> 00:11:51,360 Speaker 3: I mean he'll be the most robust candidate. He'll will 242 00:11:51,400 --> 00:11:55,120 Speaker 3: be the best and strongest candidate. This has been part 243 00:11:55,160 --> 00:11:57,880 Speaker 3: of this sort of this this cycle, this nightmare cycle 244 00:11:57,920 --> 00:12:00,920 Speaker 3: that we're in here evolving this. But and what I'm 245 00:12:00,920 --> 00:12:03,080 Speaker 3: also noting is that and I'm going to take a 246 00:12:03,080 --> 00:12:06,160 Speaker 3: shot at some of our never trump friends. I am 247 00:12:06,160 --> 00:12:08,520 Speaker 3: a never Trumper that because we've been doing this for 248 00:12:08,520 --> 00:12:11,560 Speaker 3: eight years. There's almost a PTSD about this where I 249 00:12:11,600 --> 00:12:15,360 Speaker 3: sense a bookend on social media between the triumphilism of 250 00:12:15,360 --> 00:12:17,640 Speaker 3: the MAGA folks we're going to win, nothing you will 251 00:12:17,679 --> 00:12:20,040 Speaker 3: do will stop us, and the never trumpers who go, 252 00:12:20,360 --> 00:12:22,160 Speaker 3: we will never win. There's nothing we can do to 253 00:12:22,160 --> 00:12:25,160 Speaker 3: stop them. It's a bookend. It's like the arrogance and 254 00:12:25,200 --> 00:12:29,240 Speaker 3: the despair. Let's swallow in our despair. At a certain point, 255 00:12:29,280 --> 00:12:31,160 Speaker 3: you just got to suck it up and go, Okay, 256 00:12:31,320 --> 00:12:33,839 Speaker 3: we're not the crazy ones. We don't have to buy 257 00:12:33,840 --> 00:12:37,679 Speaker 3: the bullshit. Let's not fall into the trap of assuming 258 00:12:38,040 --> 00:12:43,520 Speaker 3: that we are dealing with some other worldly genius who 259 00:12:43,559 --> 00:12:47,760 Speaker 3: has scoped out everything, and that we are incapable of 260 00:12:48,400 --> 00:12:51,280 Speaker 3: finding a way of stopping him, or blocking him, or 261 00:12:51,400 --> 00:12:55,200 Speaker 3: humiliating him. I mean, it is almost a Stockholm syndrome 262 00:12:55,240 --> 00:12:58,040 Speaker 3: that I'm seeing here, the people going, Hey, you know, 263 00:12:58,200 --> 00:13:01,200 Speaker 3: here's my hot take. Who won the elle? Donald Trump's 264 00:13:01,200 --> 00:13:03,040 Speaker 3: the big winner? Who won the debate? Donald Trump's the 265 00:13:03,040 --> 00:13:05,680 Speaker 3: big winner. What's gonna happen on abortionble? Donald Trump is 266 00:13:05,679 --> 00:13:08,400 Speaker 3: going to figure? No, this guy is he has this 267 00:13:08,520 --> 00:13:12,360 Speaker 3: reptilian instinct, which I do not underestimate. He does have 268 00:13:12,400 --> 00:13:16,480 Speaker 3: a reptilian instinct and a certain low cunning. But if 269 00:13:16,520 --> 00:13:20,960 Speaker 3: you watch him, which you also realize that his arrogance, 270 00:13:21,600 --> 00:13:26,240 Speaker 3: his narcissism, and his fundamental shallowness does catch up with 271 00:13:26,320 --> 00:13:28,800 Speaker 3: him occasionally. You know. You put him on the stand 272 00:13:28,800 --> 00:13:31,040 Speaker 3: in New York, and I'm sorry that was not a 273 00:13:31,160 --> 00:13:35,840 Speaker 3: master class in being a defendant. That was and raging 274 00:13:35,880 --> 00:13:37,040 Speaker 3: against the dark. 275 00:13:37,320 --> 00:13:39,920 Speaker 1: And screaming at the judge who was about to decide 276 00:13:39,960 --> 00:13:43,040 Speaker 1: his fate, which in my mind is not a great move. 277 00:13:43,840 --> 00:13:46,640 Speaker 3: Really. Huh See, I'm not a lawyer either, but VI 278 00:13:46,679 --> 00:13:47,720 Speaker 3: didn't seem smart to me. 279 00:13:49,280 --> 00:13:51,360 Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean that is the thing is, you know, 280 00:13:51,600 --> 00:13:54,839 Speaker 1: he is not some cunning genius. We only have a 281 00:13:54,840 --> 00:13:56,719 Speaker 1: few minutes left, and I don't want to just talk 282 00:13:56,760 --> 00:13:59,319 Speaker 1: about Trump because I want to talk to you about 283 00:13:59,480 --> 00:14:02,800 Speaker 1: this is theoretically a good Senate map Republicans. We have 284 00:14:03,200 --> 00:14:05,920 Speaker 1: twenty twenty three is over. We had this election where 285 00:14:05,920 --> 00:14:09,559 Speaker 1: Democrats really won. I'm hoping you can talk about gun 286 00:14:09,600 --> 00:14:12,760 Speaker 1: Youngkin was sort of shopped as this moderate. He never 287 00:14:12,960 --> 00:14:15,120 Speaker 1: was really a moderatey. I think he offered a sort 288 00:14:15,160 --> 00:14:17,080 Speaker 1: of more deluded form of trump Ism. 289 00:14:17,280 --> 00:14:20,040 Speaker 2: The people of Virginia's they sort of they did not 290 00:14:20,080 --> 00:14:21,040 Speaker 2: give him a mandate. 291 00:14:21,320 --> 00:14:23,440 Speaker 3: Well, he's a moderate in the sense of in terms 292 00:14:23,480 --> 00:14:26,000 Speaker 3: of where the windows moved. I mean, the definitions are 293 00:14:26,000 --> 00:14:28,600 Speaker 3: shifting here. But you know, there was the fever dream 294 00:14:28,600 --> 00:14:30,400 Speaker 3: of the donor class that he was going to be 295 00:14:30,440 --> 00:14:32,200 Speaker 3: able to come in and, you know, perhaps save them 296 00:14:32,240 --> 00:14:34,520 Speaker 3: from Trump. That was never going to happen. That's why 297 00:14:34,520 --> 00:14:36,920 Speaker 3: I said, no, his ambitions have gone to the rapidly 298 00:14:36,960 --> 00:14:40,280 Speaker 3: filling unicorn graveyard. He was a unicorn there. But I 299 00:14:40,280 --> 00:14:43,520 Speaker 3: think what's really rattled Republicans after this election is the 300 00:14:43,560 --> 00:14:46,560 Speaker 3: recognition they have two problems and they are separable problems. 301 00:14:46,600 --> 00:14:49,200 Speaker 3: I mean, number one is the obvious problem of abortion. 302 00:14:49,280 --> 00:14:52,760 Speaker 3: Abortion is not going away. It's still motivating voters. And 303 00:14:53,200 --> 00:14:55,600 Speaker 3: they had hoped that they had cracked the code in 304 00:14:55,680 --> 00:14:58,240 Speaker 3: Virginia by coming up with a fifteen week ban, figuring 305 00:14:58,240 --> 00:15:00,680 Speaker 3: that a fifteen week ban pulls much better than a 306 00:15:00,840 --> 00:15:03,880 Speaker 3: six week ban, right, which it does. Yeah, and you 307 00:15:03,880 --> 00:15:06,000 Speaker 3: can tell that you talk to Republicans that are thinking, hey, 308 00:15:06,040 --> 00:15:08,160 Speaker 3: this is the way out of this particular problem that 309 00:15:08,200 --> 00:15:11,400 Speaker 3: we have created. What you saw in Virginia was that 310 00:15:11,640 --> 00:15:14,120 Speaker 3: voters are not focusing on the number of weeks. They're 311 00:15:14,120 --> 00:15:16,760 Speaker 3: focusing on the word ban. And so the fifteen week 312 00:15:16,840 --> 00:15:20,280 Speaker 3: ban flopped and that was their default setting, that was 313 00:15:20,320 --> 00:15:23,400 Speaker 3: their off ramp, and now they're going, oh, we're screwed 314 00:15:23,440 --> 00:15:26,200 Speaker 3: on this. Their second problem, besides wars, which is not 315 00:15:26,280 --> 00:15:29,320 Speaker 3: going away, is that MAGA continues to be a loser. 316 00:15:29,680 --> 00:15:32,000 Speaker 3: You know, what happened in Kentucky is amazing really when 317 00:15:32,000 --> 00:15:35,040 Speaker 3: you think about it. Trump wins by twenty six points 318 00:15:35,200 --> 00:15:38,680 Speaker 3: deep red state Andy Basheer was elected governor by I 319 00:15:38,680 --> 00:15:41,880 Speaker 3: think bout five thousand votes. Four years ago. Donald Trump 320 00:15:41,920 --> 00:15:45,440 Speaker 3: goes all in Daniel Cameron, the Republican puts on the 321 00:15:45,520 --> 00:15:49,640 Speaker 3: MAGA red hat runs full out, full throatd MAGA. The 322 00:15:49,760 --> 00:15:54,120 Speaker 3: Democrats pushback, say, you know, we're running against MAGA extremists. 323 00:15:54,200 --> 00:15:56,960 Speaker 3: We have a centrist Democrat against MAGA extremists. And Andy 324 00:15:56,960 --> 00:16:00,680 Speaker 3: Basheer wins by five points. That is a comb margin 325 00:16:00,760 --> 00:16:02,640 Speaker 3: in that state, a state that Donald Trump won by 326 00:16:02,680 --> 00:16:06,280 Speaker 3: twenty six points. So MAGA continues to be a boat anchor. 327 00:16:06,520 --> 00:16:09,960 Speaker 3: Abortion is not going away, and they haven't figured out 328 00:16:10,000 --> 00:16:10,720 Speaker 3: how to handle it. 329 00:16:10,880 --> 00:16:13,760 Speaker 1: Yeah, and this is Kentucky. This is not Georgia. This 330 00:16:13,880 --> 00:16:15,720 Speaker 1: is not a sweet state. This is a red state. 331 00:16:15,880 --> 00:16:20,600 Speaker 1: Now Wisconsin, Yeah, wiscon Sorry. I think it's really a 332 00:16:20,640 --> 00:16:23,760 Speaker 1: good point that they can't win on abortion. I would 333 00:16:23,840 --> 00:16:25,800 Speaker 1: like to talk to you for a second about what 334 00:16:26,000 --> 00:16:29,840 Speaker 1: happened in Mississippi, because again I haven't seen enough reporting 335 00:16:29,880 --> 00:16:32,520 Speaker 1: about what happened in Mississippi, but I have some anxiety 336 00:16:32,920 --> 00:16:35,400 Speaker 1: that it was not so easy to vote in Mississippi. 337 00:16:35,640 --> 00:16:37,560 Speaker 3: I honestly don't know. I mean, I've seen the same 338 00:16:37,600 --> 00:16:40,080 Speaker 3: reports you've seen about running out of ballots. I do 339 00:16:40,120 --> 00:16:42,480 Speaker 3: think that there have been efforts to make it harder 340 00:16:42,520 --> 00:16:45,240 Speaker 3: to vote, particularly in urban areas. I was on a 341 00:16:45,240 --> 00:16:48,560 Speaker 3: conference call yesterday about voting in Wisconsin. No, voting in 342 00:16:48,600 --> 00:16:53,800 Speaker 3: Wisconsin is the vote turnout is dramatically up everywhere except 343 00:16:53,840 --> 00:16:57,080 Speaker 3: in the urban areas in places like Milwaukee, where they 344 00:16:57,080 --> 00:16:59,480 Speaker 3: have made it harder to vote the various changes in 345 00:16:59,520 --> 00:17:02,400 Speaker 3: state law. So I don't know, you know, how that 346 00:17:02,440 --> 00:17:05,280 Speaker 3: played out in Mississippi. If I remember my history, I 347 00:17:05,320 --> 00:17:08,199 Speaker 3: believe the Mississippi has kind of a checkered past when 348 00:17:08,240 --> 00:17:09,160 Speaker 3: it comes to voting rights. 349 00:17:09,640 --> 00:17:12,439 Speaker 2: Yes, I'm pretty sure it's. 350 00:17:12,359 --> 00:17:14,920 Speaker 3: Kind of a track record there. It is not implausible 351 00:17:14,960 --> 00:17:17,800 Speaker 3: to think that in Mississippi they made it more difficult. 352 00:17:17,800 --> 00:17:20,440 Speaker 3: But I simply don't don't have enough information, right. 353 00:17:20,560 --> 00:17:22,520 Speaker 1: But I do think that's a good point, and I 354 00:17:22,560 --> 00:17:25,800 Speaker 1: do think that the battle for voting rights, I think 355 00:17:25,840 --> 00:17:29,320 Speaker 1: people find it boring, but it is actually quite an important, 356 00:17:29,640 --> 00:17:31,760 Speaker 1: you know, thing that underscores all of those. 357 00:17:31,840 --> 00:17:34,320 Speaker 3: Well, yes, obviously, you know a lot of things that 358 00:17:34,359 --> 00:17:38,160 Speaker 3: we had taken for granted are now obviously at risk. 359 00:17:38,400 --> 00:17:40,239 Speaker 3: And I think this is we're living through an ror 360 00:17:40,280 --> 00:17:43,440 Speaker 3: in which, you know, our complacency has been shattered on 361 00:17:43,440 --> 00:17:46,080 Speaker 3: one issue after another, and certainly ought to be shattered 362 00:17:46,119 --> 00:17:49,280 Speaker 3: about our complacency about the robustness of our democracy. 363 00:17:49,400 --> 00:17:52,240 Speaker 2: Charlie Sikes, thank you so much. I hope you'll come. 364 00:17:52,119 --> 00:17:54,879 Speaker 3: Back anytime, Molly, anytime. Thank you. 365 00:18:00,520 --> 00:18:05,000 Speaker 1: Jacob Rubashkin is an analyst and reporter for Inside Elections. 366 00:18:05,400 --> 00:18:07,399 Speaker 2: Welcome to Fast Politics. 367 00:18:06,960 --> 00:18:08,359 Speaker 5: Jacob, Yeah, thanks for having me. 368 00:18:08,480 --> 00:18:11,280 Speaker 1: We are a few days out from an off here. 369 00:18:11,720 --> 00:18:15,359 Speaker 1: I think it's like an off off here election. First, 370 00:18:15,359 --> 00:18:17,439 Speaker 1: I want you to explain a little bit about what 371 00:18:17,480 --> 00:18:20,440 Speaker 1: you do, and then I'm going to make you interpret 372 00:18:20,520 --> 00:18:21,080 Speaker 1: the results. 373 00:18:21,440 --> 00:18:25,120 Speaker 5: I'm a reporter and analyst for Inside Elections. We exclusively 374 00:18:25,160 --> 00:18:29,760 Speaker 5: cover elections primarily for the House and Senate and governor, 375 00:18:29,840 --> 00:18:33,680 Speaker 5: but also some presidential and when the need arises a 376 00:18:33,760 --> 00:18:36,479 Speaker 5: state level things that can inform us about the national 377 00:18:36,480 --> 00:18:38,360 Speaker 5: political environment. So we spend our. 378 00:18:38,480 --> 00:18:40,879 Speaker 2: Whole day looking at data. 379 00:18:40,400 --> 00:18:44,040 Speaker 5: Looking at data, but also interviewing sources, interviewing candidates, talking 380 00:18:44,119 --> 00:18:46,919 Speaker 5: to people here in DC, but also out in all 381 00:18:46,960 --> 00:18:50,080 Speaker 5: of these districts and states where the races are taking place, 382 00:18:50,080 --> 00:18:53,360 Speaker 5: and combining the data that we see with those interviews 383 00:18:53,359 --> 00:18:55,560 Speaker 5: and on the ground reporting we do to paint as 384 00:18:55,600 --> 00:18:56,840 Speaker 5: full of picture as possible. 385 00:18:56,920 --> 00:19:00,960 Speaker 1: There were a few state elections, some very important, some 386 00:19:01,560 --> 00:19:06,639 Speaker 1: an indicator I was told that from the White House 387 00:19:06,680 --> 00:19:09,600 Speaker 1: world that this is the first time in thirty years 388 00:19:09,640 --> 00:19:14,560 Speaker 1: that a president's party has done this well consistently on 389 00:19:14,600 --> 00:19:17,399 Speaker 1: an off year. Talk to me about sort of the 390 00:19:17,560 --> 00:19:20,720 Speaker 1: meaning of these elections. I mean, were they from just 391 00:19:20,760 --> 00:19:25,040 Speaker 1: a sort of straight data, no opinion point of view. 392 00:19:25,560 --> 00:19:28,480 Speaker 1: Do you see this as having been a good cycle 393 00:19:28,520 --> 00:19:29,280 Speaker 1: for Democrats? 394 00:19:29,480 --> 00:19:30,120 Speaker 3: Absolutely? 395 00:19:30,160 --> 00:19:31,919 Speaker 5: I think for the most part, when you look at 396 00:19:32,000 --> 00:19:34,119 Speaker 5: kind of these disparate races that took place in a 397 00:19:34,160 --> 00:19:37,919 Speaker 5: handful of states across the country, Democrats did well in 398 00:19:38,000 --> 00:19:40,280 Speaker 5: almost all of them. Right. I think if you looked 399 00:19:40,280 --> 00:19:43,080 Speaker 5: at any individual contest, right, if you said, I'm only 400 00:19:43,080 --> 00:19:44,879 Speaker 5: going to look at Virginy R. I'm only going to 401 00:19:44,920 --> 00:19:47,960 Speaker 5: look at Kentucky, you would say, okay, well Democrats did 402 00:19:47,960 --> 00:19:49,840 Speaker 5: well in that race. But it's just one state, right, 403 00:19:49,880 --> 00:19:50,800 Speaker 5: it's a local race. 404 00:19:51,000 --> 00:19:53,879 Speaker 1: But Andy Burscher, let's talk about Kentucky for a minute. 405 00:19:53,960 --> 00:19:56,520 Speaker 1: He won by five thousand in that first race. In 406 00:19:56,560 --> 00:19:58,600 Speaker 1: this second race, he actually did better. 407 00:19:58,560 --> 00:20:00,720 Speaker 5: Right, Absolutely, I mean he got went from winning by 408 00:20:00,720 --> 00:20:03,560 Speaker 5: five thousand votes to five percent. And in Kentucky, no less, 409 00:20:03,680 --> 00:20:06,919 Speaker 5: which is obviously a very republican state these days. So 410 00:20:07,240 --> 00:20:09,760 Speaker 5: you know, I think that the sum total of everything. 411 00:20:09,800 --> 00:20:11,520 Speaker 5: The fact that they didn't just do well in one 412 00:20:11,600 --> 00:20:13,480 Speaker 5: or two of these states, but that they did well 413 00:20:13,720 --> 00:20:16,639 Speaker 5: in almost every state that was holding an interesting election. 414 00:20:16,760 --> 00:20:19,760 Speaker 5: Here is what makes it a good night for Democrats 415 00:20:20,160 --> 00:20:20,960 Speaker 5: across the board. 416 00:20:21,440 --> 00:20:24,560 Speaker 1: Virginia and Kentucky both have this issue of abortion. Right 417 00:20:25,160 --> 00:20:31,120 Speaker 1: for Chaer ran on abortion. He was an apologetically pro choice. 418 00:20:31,200 --> 00:20:34,760 Speaker 1: He talked about it. He really is a little bit 419 00:20:34,800 --> 00:20:37,680 Speaker 1: counterintuitive in a red state like that, but he really 420 00:20:37,760 --> 00:20:42,080 Speaker 1: ran on it. And in Virginia, you know, the idea 421 00:20:42,160 --> 00:20:45,600 Speaker 1: here was that Democrats needed to hold and we interviewed 422 00:20:45,640 --> 00:20:48,520 Speaker 1: a ton of people from both the state Senate races 423 00:20:48,640 --> 00:20:52,040 Speaker 1: and the House of Delegates races, because we are nothing 424 00:20:52,080 --> 00:20:54,760 Speaker 1: if not in the weeds. They needed to hold the 425 00:20:54,800 --> 00:20:58,399 Speaker 1: state Senate. Winning the House of Delegates didn't even in 426 00:20:58,480 --> 00:21:02,600 Speaker 1: my mind, I was prize the Democrats did that. They 427 00:21:02,720 --> 00:21:06,520 Speaker 1: really ran on this idea that if Youngkin was able 428 00:21:06,600 --> 00:21:10,520 Speaker 1: to have a rubber stamping state legislature, he would ban 429 00:21:10,600 --> 00:21:12,480 Speaker 1: abortion at fifteen weeks. 430 00:21:12,720 --> 00:21:12,920 Speaker 3: Yeah. 431 00:21:12,960 --> 00:21:17,359 Speaker 5: Absolutely, Abortion certainly the dominant issue in those Virginia races. 432 00:21:17,400 --> 00:21:19,439 Speaker 5: You know, it was really interesting. We saw for the 433 00:21:19,480 --> 00:21:22,919 Speaker 5: first time Republicans try and coalesce around a single message 434 00:21:22,960 --> 00:21:25,920 Speaker 5: on abortion right. Ever since the Dobbs ruling came down 435 00:21:25,920 --> 00:21:28,680 Speaker 5: a year and a half ago, Republican candidates have struggled 436 00:21:28,680 --> 00:21:31,240 Speaker 5: to get on the same page about what they're proposing 437 00:21:31,560 --> 00:21:34,200 Speaker 5: to fill the gap that you know, Roe versus Wade 438 00:21:34,280 --> 00:21:36,880 Speaker 5: used to fill. And some candidates wanted a total ban, 439 00:21:37,080 --> 00:21:40,800 Speaker 5: no exceptions, Oklahoma style, some wanted six weeks, ten weeks, 440 00:21:40,840 --> 00:21:43,080 Speaker 5: fifteen weeks, twenty weeks. It was all over the map, 441 00:21:43,119 --> 00:21:44,840 Speaker 5: and what they were trying to do in Virginia was 442 00:21:44,880 --> 00:21:47,520 Speaker 5: Youngkin basically said we're going to go fifteen weeks. That's 443 00:21:47,520 --> 00:21:51,000 Speaker 5: what the polling tells us is popular. Everyone who's running 444 00:21:51,040 --> 00:21:52,920 Speaker 5: for state legislature is going to get on the same 445 00:21:52,960 --> 00:21:55,399 Speaker 5: page about fifteen weeks. We're all going to run ads 446 00:21:55,600 --> 00:21:58,080 Speaker 5: fifteen weeks. It's not a ban, it's a reasonable limit, 447 00:21:58,240 --> 00:22:01,080 Speaker 5: and it was not enough to get over the finish line. 448 00:22:01,119 --> 00:22:03,440 Speaker 5: So I do think it'll be interesting to see what 449 00:22:03,480 --> 00:22:07,560 Speaker 5: Republicans do now that that experiment fell short. Do they 450 00:22:07,560 --> 00:22:09,720 Speaker 5: stay with this fifteen weeks because that's what the polling 451 00:22:09,800 --> 00:22:12,960 Speaker 5: numbers say, or are they back to a state of 452 00:22:12,960 --> 00:22:15,919 Speaker 5: disarray when it comes to what exactly the party as 453 00:22:15,920 --> 00:22:17,800 Speaker 5: a whole is proposing on abortion. 454 00:22:18,200 --> 00:22:21,040 Speaker 1: That is a really interesting point, right, because this is 455 00:22:21,160 --> 00:22:26,639 Speaker 1: here someone who took a more quote unquote moderate view. 456 00:22:26,960 --> 00:22:29,680 Speaker 1: There's a lot that's sort of supported by polling, right, 457 00:22:29,760 --> 00:22:33,560 Speaker 1: not like a Mike Johnson view, but a really kind 458 00:22:33,800 --> 00:22:41,320 Speaker 1: of careful view. And he too, really got his clock cleaned. 459 00:22:41,640 --> 00:22:44,000 Speaker 5: Yeah, you know, I think that. You know, it's been 460 00:22:44,040 --> 00:22:47,879 Speaker 5: fascinating to see Republicans kind of within this particular issue 461 00:22:47,920 --> 00:22:50,679 Speaker 5: sphere learn a lesson that I think Democrats have been 462 00:22:50,720 --> 00:22:52,760 Speaker 5: learning for quite some time. For instance, when it comes 463 00:22:52,800 --> 00:22:55,800 Speaker 5: to guns, right, Democrats talk all the time about how 464 00:22:55,880 --> 00:22:59,520 Speaker 5: universal background checks have a ninety percent approval rating in 465 00:22:59,560 --> 00:23:02,640 Speaker 5: the general public. Right, ninety percent of voters support more 466 00:23:02,760 --> 00:23:06,199 Speaker 5: restrictive gun laws like universal background checks, a saw weapon ban, 467 00:23:06,320 --> 00:23:08,720 Speaker 5: things like that. And yet when they go to the polls, 468 00:23:09,200 --> 00:23:11,080 Speaker 5: they aren't just going to vote for the candidate that 469 00:23:11,119 --> 00:23:14,920 Speaker 5: supports that policy, right. There are a lot of other considerations, 470 00:23:15,000 --> 00:23:17,960 Speaker 5: primarily whether they think they'll just stop at that, you know, 471 00:23:18,200 --> 00:23:20,359 Speaker 5: either the fifteen week ban when it comes to abortion, 472 00:23:20,600 --> 00:23:22,960 Speaker 5: or you know, just a universal background check. There's a 473 00:23:23,040 --> 00:23:26,120 Speaker 5: lack of trust when it comes to Republicans on abortion. 474 00:23:26,560 --> 00:23:29,080 Speaker 5: That meant that even though they were saying in these ads, 475 00:23:29,440 --> 00:23:32,160 Speaker 5: I'm only going to go fifteen weeks. Voters didn't necessarily 476 00:23:32,240 --> 00:23:35,080 Speaker 5: believe that, because they saw them cheering on the striking 477 00:23:35,119 --> 00:23:37,040 Speaker 5: down of Row versus way, they saw them take more 478 00:23:37,040 --> 00:23:40,240 Speaker 5: restrictive stances in the past, and so they weren't willing 479 00:23:40,440 --> 00:23:44,679 Speaker 5: to vote on faith that Republicans would just do that 480 00:23:44,800 --> 00:23:47,679 Speaker 5: and nothing more, at least the voters who might be 481 00:23:47,840 --> 00:23:49,679 Speaker 5: open to that. And then of course you've got a 482 00:23:49,720 --> 00:23:52,200 Speaker 5: lot of voters who don't support fifteen weeks and were 483 00:23:52,240 --> 00:23:54,560 Speaker 5: never going to back a Republican who they thought was 484 00:23:54,600 --> 00:23:56,800 Speaker 5: going to pass any sort of abortion restriction. 485 00:23:57,280 --> 00:24:00,480 Speaker 1: Is there a sense in which it's trump But I 486 00:24:00,520 --> 00:24:03,320 Speaker 1: think it's more than that. It's sort of because not 487 00:24:03,400 --> 00:24:05,719 Speaker 1: all of these people are Trumpet. But there is a 488 00:24:05,760 --> 00:24:10,720 Speaker 1: certain maga bravado, right, and we see it in Mike Johnson, 489 00:24:11,160 --> 00:24:14,480 Speaker 1: and we see it in Jim Jordan, this sort of 490 00:24:14,840 --> 00:24:18,760 Speaker 1: performative politics that is very crazy. 491 00:24:18,280 --> 00:24:19,440 Speaker 2: And very loud. 492 00:24:19,680 --> 00:24:24,080 Speaker 1: And Lauren Beaupert and MTG do you think that this 493 00:24:24,280 --> 00:24:28,679 Speaker 1: is creating an atmosphere of mistrust for the Republican Party. 494 00:24:28,880 --> 00:24:31,040 Speaker 1: I'm just thinking out loud when I think about like 495 00:24:31,320 --> 00:24:36,600 Speaker 1: voters not taking politicians at their word. Youngkin's whole thing 496 00:24:36,760 --> 00:24:39,240 Speaker 1: was that he was talked about as someone who could 497 00:24:39,320 --> 00:24:42,520 Speaker 1: sell himself as a moderate. What he was unable to 498 00:24:42,600 --> 00:24:45,879 Speaker 1: do in this election cycle was sell himself as a 499 00:24:45,880 --> 00:24:48,719 Speaker 1: motor right. They didn't trust him. So I just wonder 500 00:24:49,040 --> 00:24:52,640 Speaker 1: how you get to a place where voters really where 501 00:24:52,680 --> 00:24:55,960 Speaker 1: the R next to your name hurts you in your 502 00:24:56,000 --> 00:24:59,760 Speaker 1: inability to you know, sell the game. 503 00:25:00,560 --> 00:25:00,800 Speaker 3: Yeah. 504 00:25:00,840 --> 00:25:02,320 Speaker 5: Look, I think that there are a couple of things 505 00:25:02,400 --> 00:25:05,160 Speaker 5: going on, right. I think that specifically to this race 506 00:25:05,520 --> 00:25:08,359 Speaker 5: and this set of races, Junkin was not on the 507 00:25:08,400 --> 00:25:12,560 Speaker 5: ballot himself. I think he is still popular in Virginia 508 00:25:12,640 --> 00:25:17,040 Speaker 5: as an individual figure. And obviously he won that election narrowly, 509 00:25:17,119 --> 00:25:19,520 Speaker 5: but he still won two years ago, and he did 510 00:25:19,520 --> 00:25:21,639 Speaker 5: that by winning over a lot of voters who have 511 00:25:21,800 --> 00:25:24,959 Speaker 5: typically voted Democratic. But I do think that in the 512 00:25:25,560 --> 00:25:29,280 Speaker 5: Trump era, right, really ever since twenty sixteen, Yeah, there 513 00:25:29,320 --> 00:25:32,560 Speaker 5: has been a shift in the way that a lot 514 00:25:32,560 --> 00:25:36,360 Speaker 5: of voters, voters that are heavily represented in Virginia, right, 515 00:25:36,400 --> 00:25:38,480 Speaker 5: Virginia's kind of ground zero in a lot of ways 516 00:25:38,520 --> 00:25:41,399 Speaker 5: for a lot of the shifts that we've seen in 517 00:25:41,440 --> 00:25:44,640 Speaker 5: the two party coalitions over the last decade or so 518 00:25:45,000 --> 00:25:47,679 Speaker 5: have become more skeptical of Republicans. And I think everyone 519 00:25:47,720 --> 00:25:50,320 Speaker 5: is skeptical of their politicians in general, and that's. 520 00:25:50,040 --> 00:25:50,640 Speaker 3: Not a bad thing. 521 00:25:50,680 --> 00:25:53,720 Speaker 5: That's probably a good thing that voters don't just blindly 522 00:25:53,800 --> 00:25:55,920 Speaker 5: believe what a politician says they're going to do in 523 00:25:55,960 --> 00:25:56,480 Speaker 5: a campaign. 524 00:25:56,560 --> 00:25:59,960 Speaker 2: Ad Right, and they may be more skeptical of Democrats. 525 00:26:00,119 --> 00:26:03,040 Speaker 5: That's possible too, right, Yeah, absolutely, And I think look, 526 00:26:03,080 --> 00:26:05,639 Speaker 5: the Virginia races were very close. Right, We're going to 527 00:26:05,640 --> 00:26:08,000 Speaker 5: look at a state Senate that's twenty one to nineteen, 528 00:26:08,280 --> 00:26:10,720 Speaker 5: a state House that's fifty one forty nine. It doesn't 529 00:26:10,760 --> 00:26:13,239 Speaker 5: get much closer than that. So I do think that 530 00:26:13,400 --> 00:26:15,679 Speaker 5: this was a loss for Republicans. They put a lot 531 00:26:15,720 --> 00:26:19,080 Speaker 5: of political capital, a lot of financial capital behind trying 532 00:26:19,080 --> 00:26:22,040 Speaker 5: to flip the state Senate and get full control of government. 533 00:26:22,080 --> 00:26:25,119 Speaker 5: They felt short, absolutely, But this was not a wipeout. 534 00:26:25,200 --> 00:26:28,600 Speaker 5: This was a very very narrow result in favor of Democrats. 535 00:26:28,840 --> 00:26:30,760 Speaker 5: But they lost the House of Delegates. 536 00:26:31,200 --> 00:26:31,679 Speaker 3: They did, and. 537 00:26:32,000 --> 00:26:33,480 Speaker 5: That's why I'm saying it's not it's not a good 538 00:26:33,520 --> 00:26:36,040 Speaker 5: outcome for Republicans. It could have been a lot worse 539 00:26:36,080 --> 00:26:38,040 Speaker 5: for them. There were four or five seats that were 540 00:26:38,160 --> 00:26:41,640 Speaker 5: very narrow that went for Republicans that could have easily 541 00:26:41,640 --> 00:26:45,280 Speaker 5: flipped to Democrats. And so I wonder what the lesson 542 00:26:45,440 --> 00:26:48,680 Speaker 5: is going to be that Republicans draw from this, Whether 543 00:26:48,720 --> 00:26:51,479 Speaker 5: it's a lesson about abortion, or whether it's a lesson 544 00:26:51,680 --> 00:26:55,480 Speaker 5: about Virginia just not quite being there for them yet, 545 00:26:55,560 --> 00:26:57,520 Speaker 5: whether it's a lesson about vote by mail, which is 546 00:26:57,560 --> 00:27:00,159 Speaker 5: something that they invested in heavily this election cycle for 547 00:27:00,200 --> 00:27:02,880 Speaker 5: the first time. There are a lot of different lessons 548 00:27:02,920 --> 00:27:05,800 Speaker 5: that they might pull out of the results here that 549 00:27:06,000 --> 00:27:08,320 Speaker 5: might not just be We've got to totally rethink on 550 00:27:08,359 --> 00:27:09,399 Speaker 5: abortion again. 551 00:27:09,400 --> 00:27:13,880 Speaker 1: Right, And quite frankly, Republicans are really in a sticky 552 00:27:13,920 --> 00:27:17,280 Speaker 1: wicket when it comes to abortion because the people who 553 00:27:17,440 --> 00:27:19,840 Speaker 1: are their bread and butter are the people who they 554 00:27:19,960 --> 00:27:24,000 Speaker 1: must win in order to win elections. They have gone 555 00:27:24,000 --> 00:27:27,560 Speaker 1: to the Republican Party because they want abortion van. 556 00:27:28,000 --> 00:27:30,520 Speaker 5: Yeah, it's tough. It is not something that the party 557 00:27:30,520 --> 00:27:34,119 Speaker 5: has figured out how to solve yet. You know, I 558 00:27:34,119 --> 00:27:36,480 Speaker 5: think it was interesting for the five people who watched 559 00:27:36,480 --> 00:27:39,280 Speaker 5: the Republican primary debate last night. I don't know I 560 00:27:39,400 --> 00:27:40,720 Speaker 5: was one of them. I don't know if you were. 561 00:27:40,800 --> 00:27:43,200 Speaker 5: You know, we got to five on the podcast. Okay, 562 00:27:43,240 --> 00:27:43,720 Speaker 5: what a five? 563 00:27:43,920 --> 00:27:46,560 Speaker 2: They don't came enough to watch that debate, I'm sorry 564 00:27:46,600 --> 00:27:46,960 Speaker 2: to tell you. 565 00:27:47,680 --> 00:27:50,280 Speaker 5: One of the interesting moments was when abortion came up, 566 00:27:50,320 --> 00:27:52,560 Speaker 5: you know, an hour and forty five minutes, in which 567 00:27:52,600 --> 00:27:55,520 Speaker 5: I think was a little late for such a pressing issue. 568 00:27:55,640 --> 00:27:58,879 Speaker 5: You know, there was a real difference in opinion among 569 00:27:58,920 --> 00:28:01,960 Speaker 5: the people on this age that I thought was illustrative 570 00:28:02,160 --> 00:28:05,000 Speaker 5: of the kind of internal struggle that Republicans are going 571 00:28:05,040 --> 00:28:08,000 Speaker 5: on between people who want a national law, people like 572 00:28:08,080 --> 00:28:10,600 Speaker 5: Nikki Haley, who might vote for a national law or 573 00:28:10,640 --> 00:28:13,000 Speaker 5: sign a national law, but thinks it's not feasible and 574 00:28:13,040 --> 00:28:15,520 Speaker 5: so not worth you know, even talking about because it'll 575 00:28:15,560 --> 00:28:18,199 Speaker 5: turn voters off. People like Chris Christy, who are like, 576 00:28:18,359 --> 00:28:21,360 Speaker 5: whatever the states want. If New Jersey wants to have 577 00:28:21,400 --> 00:28:23,200 Speaker 5: no limits, that's fine with New Jersey. 578 00:28:23,400 --> 00:28:26,680 Speaker 1: Again, you don't have to say anything here, but because 579 00:28:26,760 --> 00:28:28,359 Speaker 1: I know you're not on the opinion side, but I 580 00:28:28,400 --> 00:28:31,080 Speaker 1: will say, because this is I'm on the opinion side. 581 00:28:31,280 --> 00:28:32,400 Speaker 2: This is a lie. 582 00:28:32,480 --> 00:28:35,800 Speaker 1: This whole thing about that it's the state's rights they 583 00:28:35,840 --> 00:28:39,680 Speaker 1: have right now, you know, a group trying to ban 584 00:28:39,840 --> 00:28:43,360 Speaker 1: the abortion pills, so yes, they shop it that way. 585 00:28:43,400 --> 00:28:44,720 Speaker 2: But that's not really what it is. 586 00:28:45,080 --> 00:28:47,000 Speaker 5: Yeah, I think that there was a lot missing from 587 00:28:47,000 --> 00:28:50,640 Speaker 5: that discussion. Obviously, the judge down in Texas that's trying 588 00:28:50,680 --> 00:28:54,040 Speaker 5: to ban life PRISTO and the dynamics there that went 589 00:28:54,080 --> 00:28:58,920 Speaker 5: totally unremarked upon are important, and Republicans really don't have 590 00:28:58,960 --> 00:29:01,640 Speaker 5: an answer for them. The movement to try and ban contraception, 591 00:29:01,840 --> 00:29:04,080 Speaker 5: I think, which is even as unpopular as a lot 592 00:29:04,120 --> 00:29:07,720 Speaker 5: of the abortion restrictions are right, contraception bans are times 593 00:29:07,760 --> 00:29:10,720 Speaker 5: ten unpopularity. Not not really, of course, but you know, 594 00:29:11,040 --> 00:29:14,160 Speaker 5: quite significant. They are not just all over the place 595 00:29:14,160 --> 00:29:16,440 Speaker 5: in terms of what they want, but they're all over 596 00:29:16,480 --> 00:29:18,120 Speaker 5: the place and how to talk about it and how 597 00:29:18,160 --> 00:29:22,200 Speaker 5: to try and sell voters on trusting them on abortion policy. 598 00:29:22,240 --> 00:29:22,840 Speaker 3: They have not. 599 00:29:23,000 --> 00:29:24,960 Speaker 5: Figured that out yet, and I don't think they're any 600 00:29:24,960 --> 00:29:28,440 Speaker 5: closer to figuring it out for next year's elections. 601 00:29:28,680 --> 00:29:31,720 Speaker 1: The thing I am struck by with this Republican contest 602 00:29:31,760 --> 00:29:35,120 Speaker 1: is there's no one who is offering a radically different 603 00:29:35,200 --> 00:29:36,320 Speaker 1: view of trump Ism. 604 00:29:36,760 --> 00:29:37,200 Speaker 2: Really. 605 00:29:37,760 --> 00:29:40,200 Speaker 5: Yeah, I mean, I think that the candidates who are 606 00:29:40,240 --> 00:29:44,840 Speaker 5: even slightly deviating have really struggled to gain traction. Obviously, 607 00:29:44,960 --> 00:29:47,760 Speaker 5: you know, someone like Asa Hutchinson, who's that right, the 608 00:29:47,800 --> 00:29:50,400 Speaker 5: former governor of Arkansas, who I think is still technically 609 00:29:50,440 --> 00:29:52,400 Speaker 5: running but hasn't made any of the debates since the 610 00:29:52,400 --> 00:29:56,240 Speaker 5: first one. Honestly, he probably had the most clearly articulated 611 00:29:56,360 --> 00:29:59,880 Speaker 5: kind of return to pre Trump Republicanism as his plat. 612 00:30:00,640 --> 00:30:02,360 Speaker 5: He was one of the only candidates other than Chris 613 00:30:02,440 --> 00:30:05,200 Speaker 5: Christy who basically has said Trump should be barred from 614 00:30:05,280 --> 00:30:07,440 Speaker 5: running for president. He is probably going to be a 615 00:30:07,440 --> 00:30:10,560 Speaker 5: convicted felon, you know. He obviously didn't get anywhere. But look, 616 00:30:10,600 --> 00:30:13,080 Speaker 5: I think that most of the people who see a 617 00:30:13,280 --> 00:30:18,280 Speaker 5: version of Republicanism that's different than trump Ism have voluntarily 618 00:30:18,360 --> 00:30:21,040 Speaker 5: or involuntarily left the party, and they've certainly left any 619 00:30:21,040 --> 00:30:23,920 Speaker 5: sort of real positions of power within the party. And 620 00:30:24,000 --> 00:30:26,360 Speaker 5: if they are still there in positions of power, they're 621 00:30:26,400 --> 00:30:29,280 Speaker 5: smart enough not to rock the vote too much because 622 00:30:29,280 --> 00:30:32,320 Speaker 5: they know which way the elector at swings. 623 00:30:32,800 --> 00:30:36,960 Speaker 1: But again, it does come back to this, the base 624 00:30:37,120 --> 00:30:39,880 Speaker 1: wants something different than what the general wants. 625 00:30:40,280 --> 00:30:43,560 Speaker 5: Yeah, I mean, I think that is probably the case. 626 00:30:43,960 --> 00:30:45,600 Speaker 5: I think there's a lot of data floating out there 627 00:30:45,680 --> 00:30:47,720 Speaker 5: right now to suggest that, you know, if the election 628 00:30:47,800 --> 00:30:50,600 Speaker 5: were held today, things might be a little closer than 629 00:30:50,640 --> 00:30:53,440 Speaker 5: perhaps anticipated. I don't think that's necessarily a reflection of 630 00:30:53,680 --> 00:30:56,840 Speaker 5: general election voters wanting trump Ism and more just they've 631 00:30:56,880 --> 00:30:59,400 Speaker 5: forgotten what trump Ism is and they don't like Biden, 632 00:30:59,480 --> 00:31:02,120 Speaker 5: and so they're just grasping for whatever altern it out. 633 00:31:02,240 --> 00:31:05,600 Speaker 1: Let's talk about that poll, because there's actually also there 634 00:31:05,640 --> 00:31:07,440 Speaker 1: was another one too. So there were two poles of 635 00:31:07,480 --> 00:31:09,080 Speaker 1: c and And poll and New York Times poll, and 636 00:31:09,080 --> 00:31:11,520 Speaker 1: they both basically said the same thing, which is that 637 00:31:11,720 --> 00:31:14,000 Speaker 1: voters are not very happy with Biden, and for a 638 00:31:14,040 --> 00:31:17,040 Speaker 1: number of reasons, him being old, being very high on 639 00:31:17,040 --> 00:31:20,120 Speaker 1: the list. So I just want to like take a 640 00:31:20,200 --> 00:31:22,840 Speaker 1: minute here to sort of look at this for a second. 641 00:31:23,280 --> 00:31:26,200 Speaker 1: So these poles compared Biden, they were sort of they 642 00:31:26,200 --> 00:31:28,880 Speaker 1: were like, how do you feel about Biden? Right? And 643 00:31:28,960 --> 00:31:33,200 Speaker 1: even like the exit polls, I don't totally trust the polls. 644 00:31:33,240 --> 00:31:36,840 Speaker 1: And again, three thousand people, six states, but they are 645 00:31:36,880 --> 00:31:40,080 Speaker 1: the states that matter. But the exit polling in Ohio, 646 00:31:40,440 --> 00:31:43,880 Speaker 1: for example, that's something I put more faith in, right, 647 00:31:43,960 --> 00:31:47,280 Speaker 1: because they're voting anyway, they're in there. This is the 648 00:31:47,320 --> 00:31:51,480 Speaker 1: exit polling. Biden got very poorer marks from them in Ohio, 649 00:31:51,520 --> 00:31:54,000 Speaker 1: which is a red state, but then they absolutely voted 650 00:31:54,200 --> 00:31:58,440 Speaker 1: for the abortion initiative. So is it a smart play 651 00:31:58,520 --> 00:32:01,640 Speaker 1: to put abortion on the back everywhere and will that 652 00:32:01,840 --> 00:32:03,880 Speaker 1: help Democrats on the ticket? 653 00:32:04,080 --> 00:32:06,760 Speaker 5: I think absolutely. It's not a silver bullet, right. It's 654 00:32:06,800 --> 00:32:10,440 Speaker 5: not like if there's an abortion right. Obviously, Ohio was 655 00:32:10,440 --> 00:32:12,560 Speaker 5: not going to vote fifty six percent for Joe Biden 656 00:32:12,600 --> 00:32:15,320 Speaker 5: if the abortion referendum were on the ballot next to Biden. 657 00:32:15,600 --> 00:32:18,200 Speaker 5: But I do think that from a turnout perspective, once 658 00:32:18,240 --> 00:32:21,440 Speaker 5: you get people into the voting booth for whatever reason, right, 659 00:32:21,440 --> 00:32:23,520 Speaker 5: whether it's to vote for Biden or to vote to 660 00:32:23,640 --> 00:32:26,920 Speaker 5: enshrine abortion rights in the state constitution, if they're a Democrat, 661 00:32:26,960 --> 00:32:28,959 Speaker 5: they're far more likely to vote for Joe Biden. 662 00:32:29,080 --> 00:32:29,200 Speaker 3: Right. 663 00:32:29,400 --> 00:32:31,200 Speaker 5: The worry that I think Biden has right now is 664 00:32:31,200 --> 00:32:33,280 Speaker 5: that people just aren't going to show up. Younger voters, 665 00:32:33,360 --> 00:32:36,280 Speaker 5: voters of color, people who are dissatisfied with the job 666 00:32:36,320 --> 00:32:38,680 Speaker 5: he's doing might just sit it out. It's not that 667 00:32:38,680 --> 00:32:40,760 Speaker 5: they're going to vote for Trump, because I think ultimately 668 00:32:41,080 --> 00:32:44,440 Speaker 5: those people dislike Trump far more than they dislike Biden. 669 00:32:44,640 --> 00:32:48,640 Speaker 5: But the thing that items like the ballot referenda helps 670 00:32:48,640 --> 00:32:50,760 Speaker 5: with is is getting those voters in the ballot box 671 00:32:50,760 --> 00:32:52,840 Speaker 5: in the first place, and once they're there, they're probably 672 00:32:52,840 --> 00:32:54,520 Speaker 5: not going to leave the top of the ticket, like 673 00:32:54,720 --> 00:32:56,720 Speaker 5: especially with Trump's name on the ballot. So I think 674 00:32:56,720 --> 00:32:59,000 Speaker 5: we're seeing in states across the country. I think the 675 00:32:59,040 --> 00:33:01,240 Speaker 5: most notable one is Florida. We'll see if they get 676 00:33:01,240 --> 00:33:03,040 Speaker 5: there or not, because it's a tough process to get 677 00:33:03,080 --> 00:33:05,600 Speaker 5: on the ballot, but we're seeing Democrats really try and 678 00:33:05,640 --> 00:33:09,160 Speaker 5: get abortion referenda on the ballot and as many states 679 00:33:09,160 --> 00:33:12,000 Speaker 5: as possible for next year so they can try and 680 00:33:12,000 --> 00:33:13,680 Speaker 5: get whatever boost out of it they can. 681 00:33:14,000 --> 00:33:16,240 Speaker 1: And there were a lot of tight races. But one 682 00:33:16,280 --> 00:33:19,800 Speaker 1: of the things that Dave Wasserman, as you and I 683 00:33:19,880 --> 00:33:24,600 Speaker 1: both know Blue Wave Dave or red Waves day, I 684 00:33:24,680 --> 00:33:26,840 Speaker 1: want to read this to you because I think it's 685 00:33:27,080 --> 00:33:31,800 Speaker 1: a little bit interesting. She said that it seems in 686 00:33:31,920 --> 00:33:36,000 Speaker 1: his mind that there was a turnout problem for Republicans 687 00:33:36,520 --> 00:33:40,480 Speaker 1: and that there was a sort of an enthusiasm problem, 688 00:33:40,800 --> 00:33:44,400 Speaker 1: And I was wondering if you had seen that, and 689 00:33:44,480 --> 00:33:46,200 Speaker 1: also what your take on that was. 690 00:33:46,720 --> 00:33:46,920 Speaker 3: Yeah. 691 00:33:47,000 --> 00:33:48,880 Speaker 5: Look, I think that one of the things that we 692 00:33:49,320 --> 00:33:52,920 Speaker 5: are beginning to grapple with in kind of the Trump 693 00:33:53,080 --> 00:33:57,880 Speaker 5: era of politics is this question of who is showing 694 00:33:57,960 --> 00:34:02,760 Speaker 5: up to vote in off year elections and special elections. 695 00:34:02,160 --> 00:34:05,960 Speaker 1: In Kentucky, Republicans had a turnout enthusiasm problem. 696 00:34:06,080 --> 00:34:07,320 Speaker 2: Sorry, that was what I was looking for. 697 00:34:07,480 --> 00:34:11,080 Speaker 5: Yeah, you know, I think that that is a very 698 00:34:11,160 --> 00:34:14,719 Speaker 5: reasonable question to ask. You know, I think that it's 699 00:34:14,760 --> 00:34:18,440 Speaker 5: become clear that one of the major shifts and coalitions 700 00:34:18,440 --> 00:34:21,239 Speaker 5: over the last ten years, right has been you We've 701 00:34:21,280 --> 00:34:25,160 Speaker 5: seen college educated voters move toward the Democratic Party, and 702 00:34:25,200 --> 00:34:28,960 Speaker 5: we've seen lower propensity, non college educated voters, more rural 703 00:34:29,040 --> 00:34:33,239 Speaker 5: voters moved toward the Republican Party. And that has resulted 704 00:34:33,360 --> 00:34:37,399 Speaker 5: in potentially, right, a special election electorate, an off year 705 00:34:37,440 --> 00:34:42,400 Speaker 5: election electorate that favors Democrats in some structural ways, because 706 00:34:42,560 --> 00:34:45,640 Speaker 5: the more educated you are, the more likely you're going 707 00:34:45,840 --> 00:34:48,280 Speaker 5: to show up to vote in an off year election. 708 00:34:48,920 --> 00:34:52,439 Speaker 5: The more engaged politically you are, right, the more likely 709 00:34:52,440 --> 00:34:54,240 Speaker 5: you are to show up in an off year election. 710 00:34:54,480 --> 00:34:57,319 Speaker 5: And so Republicans, I think, as they've lost some of 711 00:34:57,320 --> 00:35:00,200 Speaker 5: those voters in the suburbs of even in Stea. It's 712 00:35:00,280 --> 00:35:02,600 Speaker 5: like Kentucky, right, which you know, has a lot of 713 00:35:02,600 --> 00:35:06,160 Speaker 5: wealthy suburbs outside of Louisville and Lexington has wealthy suburbs 714 00:35:06,239 --> 00:35:10,080 Speaker 5: up by Cincinnati, places where Andy Basheer did significantly better 715 00:35:10,280 --> 00:35:12,800 Speaker 5: in twenty twenty three than he did in twenty nineteen. 716 00:35:13,320 --> 00:35:15,239 Speaker 5: That's a real problem for them when it comes to 717 00:35:15,280 --> 00:35:17,960 Speaker 5: these off year elections. Same thing in Virginia. You know, 718 00:35:18,000 --> 00:35:21,839 Speaker 5: we saw in northern Virginia Democrats ultimately did pretty well, 719 00:35:22,120 --> 00:35:24,279 Speaker 5: and you've got a lot of college educated voters. There 720 00:35:24,280 --> 00:35:27,120 Speaker 5: are a lot of government workers there. In Hampton Roads, 721 00:35:27,239 --> 00:35:30,719 Speaker 5: for instance, where the Democratic coalition skews a little bit 722 00:35:30,719 --> 00:35:34,600 Speaker 5: more rural, a little bit you know, reliant on black voters, 723 00:35:34,960 --> 00:35:38,000 Speaker 5: we saw Democrats not do as well in some of 724 00:35:38,040 --> 00:35:41,160 Speaker 5: those districts. So even within Virginia, we saw kind of 725 00:35:41,200 --> 00:35:45,760 Speaker 5: the effects of the change in coalitions on the turnout 726 00:35:46,239 --> 00:35:47,320 Speaker 5: and the ultimate results. 727 00:35:47,640 --> 00:35:51,279 Speaker 1: So Moms for Liberty and parental rights, let's talk about this. 728 00:35:51,480 --> 00:35:52,880 Speaker 2: Prontal rights quote unquote. 729 00:35:52,960 --> 00:35:55,880 Speaker 1: This was the sort of thing that a lot of 730 00:35:55,920 --> 00:35:59,360 Speaker 1: Republicans sought would win them elections. And Moms for a 731 00:35:59,400 --> 00:36:05,080 Speaker 1: Liberty a whole slight of school board candidates, including just 732 00:36:05,120 --> 00:36:09,279 Speaker 1: As Alito's daughter, and they all lost except for one 733 00:36:09,320 --> 00:36:12,160 Speaker 1: of them. Talk to me about that weirdness. 734 00:36:12,440 --> 00:36:17,440 Speaker 5: We have seen a segment of the Republican Party really 735 00:36:17,640 --> 00:36:21,880 Speaker 5: lean into social issues over the last couple of years, 736 00:36:22,239 --> 00:36:25,560 Speaker 5: be it issues about schools and the kind of books 737 00:36:25,600 --> 00:36:29,680 Speaker 5: that students are reading, transgender issues, treatment for trans kids. 738 00:36:30,080 --> 00:36:34,440 Speaker 5: We have seen Republicans lean into those issues as political 739 00:36:34,880 --> 00:36:39,600 Speaker 5: messaging tools to very very mixed, I would say, negative 740 00:36:39,640 --> 00:36:44,920 Speaker 5: results from a political perspective. I think what happened ultimately 741 00:36:45,080 --> 00:36:48,480 Speaker 5: was that there was a reaction to school closures during COVID. 742 00:36:48,520 --> 00:36:51,120 Speaker 5: There was a reaction to masking rules during COVID that 743 00:36:51,239 --> 00:36:54,319 Speaker 5: really did drive a lot of parents who otherwise would 744 00:36:54,360 --> 00:36:57,080 Speaker 5: have voted down the line for Democrats to consider voting 745 00:36:57,080 --> 00:36:59,360 Speaker 5: for Republicans. And when we look at like the twenty 746 00:36:59,400 --> 00:37:02,520 Speaker 5: twenty one Virginia elections, right, I think it's clear that 747 00:37:02,600 --> 00:37:05,360 Speaker 5: some of the things Terry mccauliffe said about parents and 748 00:37:05,440 --> 00:37:08,719 Speaker 5: schools hurt him and they contributed to that loss. But 749 00:37:08,840 --> 00:37:12,279 Speaker 5: I think the mistake Republicans made was they mapped that 750 00:37:12,520 --> 00:37:16,960 Speaker 5: anger onto a different issue, which is books and learning 751 00:37:17,000 --> 00:37:21,439 Speaker 5: about sexuality and learning about transgender people and like those 752 00:37:21,520 --> 00:37:24,600 Speaker 5: kinds of issues which which were very different, very different 753 00:37:24,640 --> 00:37:27,600 Speaker 5: than COVID restrictions. And they expected the same people who 754 00:37:27,600 --> 00:37:30,880 Speaker 5: were angry about COVID to be angry about those things 755 00:37:31,000 --> 00:37:33,680 Speaker 5: and they weren't right. And so we saw and it's 756 00:37:33,680 --> 00:37:35,600 Speaker 5: not just the Mom's for Liberty on the school board. 757 00:37:35,600 --> 00:37:39,400 Speaker 5: It was Daniel Cameron in Kentucky and his allies running 758 00:37:39,719 --> 00:37:43,720 Speaker 5: ads a sailing Andy Basheer for you know, the line 759 00:37:43,760 --> 00:37:46,840 Speaker 5: was that he supports gender change surgery for trans kids. 760 00:37:46,920 --> 00:37:47,080 Speaker 3: Right. 761 00:37:47,320 --> 00:37:49,560 Speaker 5: That was in millions of dollars. I think they ran 762 00:37:49,680 --> 00:37:53,799 Speaker 5: five million dollars in ads that mentioned those surgeries. And 763 00:37:54,400 --> 00:37:57,480 Speaker 5: it wasn't effective. It didn't even in deep red Kentucky. 764 00:37:57,560 --> 00:38:00,839 Speaker 5: That was not an issue that motivated people to go 765 00:38:00,880 --> 00:38:03,680 Speaker 5: out and vote against Andy Bisheer. So we saw that 766 00:38:03,719 --> 00:38:05,920 Speaker 5: at the school board level that they, you know, a 767 00:38:05,920 --> 00:38:08,960 Speaker 5: lot of these Moms for Liberty slates failed to capture 768 00:38:09,000 --> 00:38:11,080 Speaker 5: or retain control of school boards. We saw it at 769 00:38:11,080 --> 00:38:14,200 Speaker 5: the state level as well in Kentucky where it just 770 00:38:14,320 --> 00:38:15,879 Speaker 5: didn't click with voters at all. 771 00:38:16,120 --> 00:38:17,120 Speaker 2: Thank you, Jacob. 772 00:38:17,400 --> 00:38:17,840 Speaker 3: Of course. 773 00:38:20,000 --> 00:38:23,680 Speaker 1: George Laws is the executive director of the Puerto Rico 774 00:38:24,000 --> 00:38:28,280 Speaker 1: Statehood Council. Welcome, too fast politics, George. 775 00:38:28,040 --> 00:38:29,879 Speaker 4: Thank you so much, Molly. It's great to be here. 776 00:38:30,160 --> 00:38:32,520 Speaker 1: We are here to talk about something that isn't an 777 00:38:32,560 --> 00:38:35,000 Speaker 1: obsession of mine. I feel like it's like a low 778 00:38:35,080 --> 00:38:39,279 Speaker 1: key obsession of every Democrat we know, which is the 779 00:38:39,360 --> 00:38:44,000 Speaker 1: fifty first state. No, I'm not talking about South South 780 00:38:44,080 --> 00:38:48,600 Speaker 1: Dakota or North North Dakota or West West Dakota. I'm 781 00:38:48,640 --> 00:38:51,040 Speaker 1: dogging about an actual place with a lot of people, 782 00:38:51,520 --> 00:38:54,719 Speaker 1: which is part of America. Even though Donald Trump, I 783 00:38:54,760 --> 00:38:57,040 Speaker 1: think now he knows, let's talk. 784 00:38:56,920 --> 00:38:58,200 Speaker 2: About Puerto Rico. 785 00:38:58,640 --> 00:38:59,120 Speaker 3: Definitely. 786 00:39:00,080 --> 00:39:02,239 Speaker 2: Our project, tell me what is called, and tell me 787 00:39:02,280 --> 00:39:02,920 Speaker 2: all about it now. 788 00:39:03,040 --> 00:39:05,839 Speaker 4: Our project is called PR fifty first and you can 789 00:39:05,840 --> 00:39:08,080 Speaker 4: go to PR fifty first dot com to check us out. 790 00:39:08,280 --> 00:39:09,040 Speaker 2: And it makes a. 791 00:39:08,960 --> 00:39:12,240 Speaker 1: Lot of sense because this is all about the fifty 792 00:39:12,280 --> 00:39:13,719 Speaker 1: first date exactly. 793 00:39:13,800 --> 00:39:16,160 Speaker 4: It's a project by the nonprofit that I lead as 794 00:39:16,200 --> 00:39:18,920 Speaker 4: executive director, which is the Puerto Rico Statehood Council, and 795 00:39:19,000 --> 00:39:21,560 Speaker 4: our goal is to advance full equality and democracy for 796 00:39:21,560 --> 00:39:25,160 Speaker 4: the US citizens of Puerto Rico, which unfortunately, for over 797 00:39:25,160 --> 00:39:27,920 Speaker 4: one hundred and twenty five years, have been relegated to 798 00:39:27,960 --> 00:39:32,240 Speaker 4: a second class status by Congress because in American democracy 799 00:39:32,320 --> 00:39:35,319 Speaker 4: under the US Constitution, unless you're a US citizen that 800 00:39:35,360 --> 00:39:38,719 Speaker 4: lives in a state, you don't actually get voting representation 801 00:39:39,160 --> 00:39:41,960 Speaker 4: in the Senate or in the House of Representatives. And 802 00:39:42,000 --> 00:39:45,400 Speaker 4: you don't have any voting representation in the electoral College, 803 00:39:45,440 --> 00:39:48,360 Speaker 4: so you're subject to federal laws, but you're deprived of 804 00:39:48,400 --> 00:39:51,320 Speaker 4: any actual say in those laws. 805 00:39:51,160 --> 00:39:53,359 Speaker 3: And then at top of it, you're treated unequally under them. 806 00:39:53,400 --> 00:39:56,400 Speaker 4: And that's what we're seeking to end, and we support 807 00:39:56,440 --> 00:39:59,440 Speaker 4: statehood as the best solution for Puerto Rico and America. 808 00:39:59,480 --> 00:40:03,000 Speaker 1: Why is it that Puerto Rican statehood has such a 809 00:40:03,000 --> 00:40:03,840 Speaker 1: hard time. 810 00:40:03,760 --> 00:40:05,759 Speaker 4: Well, you know, this issue has been an issue that's 811 00:40:05,840 --> 00:40:08,640 Speaker 4: been around for one hundred and twenty five years, and 812 00:40:08,840 --> 00:40:11,839 Speaker 4: I think it has such a hard time because it's 813 00:40:11,920 --> 00:40:14,360 Speaker 4: out of sight and out of mind for the majority 814 00:40:14,400 --> 00:40:18,320 Speaker 4: of the American public most of the time. That changed 815 00:40:18,360 --> 00:40:23,440 Speaker 4: significantly in twenty seventeen when we had the hurricanes Irma 816 00:40:23,480 --> 00:40:27,759 Speaker 4: and Maria devastate Puerto Rico. Americans saw a lot of 817 00:40:27,800 --> 00:40:30,600 Speaker 4: the horrible footage of the damage that was happening on 818 00:40:30,640 --> 00:40:35,200 Speaker 4: the island and the lackluster response by President Trump and 819 00:40:35,280 --> 00:40:39,279 Speaker 4: his administration during that time, and as a result, a 820 00:40:39,320 --> 00:40:42,040 Speaker 4: lot of people were appalled that, hey, here are fellow 821 00:40:42,200 --> 00:40:45,840 Speaker 4: American citizens just as important to us as our fellow 822 00:40:45,880 --> 00:40:49,440 Speaker 4: citizens in Texas and in Florida and in Louisiana. When 823 00:40:49,480 --> 00:40:52,840 Speaker 4: they experienced natural disasters, we should be taking care of 824 00:40:52,880 --> 00:40:55,640 Speaker 4: them too. So I think that that's really elevated the 825 00:40:55,719 --> 00:40:58,360 Speaker 4: awareness about the fact that, you know, our fellow American 826 00:40:58,400 --> 00:41:01,600 Speaker 4: citizens in Puerto Rico are treated unequally, and then that's 827 00:41:01,680 --> 00:41:06,000 Speaker 4: increasing the visibility of this issue. But traditionally most people 828 00:41:06,080 --> 00:41:09,360 Speaker 4: a state side are just really unaware that our fellow 829 00:41:09,360 --> 00:41:13,239 Speaker 4: citizens on the island are treated unequally and deprived of 830 00:41:13,280 --> 00:41:15,320 Speaker 4: full democracy and full voting rates. 831 00:41:15,480 --> 00:41:18,360 Speaker 1: How would Puerto Rican statehood actually happen? Give us the 832 00:41:18,480 --> 00:41:19,399 Speaker 1: nuts and bolts here. 833 00:41:19,680 --> 00:41:23,000 Speaker 4: So the US Constitution's very clear that Congress has the 834 00:41:23,080 --> 00:41:26,279 Speaker 4: power to admit new states into the Union. They've done 835 00:41:26,360 --> 00:41:30,680 Speaker 4: so thirty seven times since the original thirteen colonies became 836 00:41:30,719 --> 00:41:34,120 Speaker 4: the first states, so there's a pretty clear precedent for 837 00:41:34,200 --> 00:41:37,680 Speaker 4: how this happens. Congress has to pass legislation. The way 838 00:41:37,719 --> 00:41:40,240 Speaker 4: that they did it in the case of Alaska and Hawaii, 839 00:41:40,239 --> 00:41:42,400 Speaker 4: which were the last two states to be admitted, is 840 00:41:42,400 --> 00:41:45,360 Speaker 4: that there were locally sponsored votes that were held in 841 00:41:45,360 --> 00:41:48,560 Speaker 4: those territories. Majority of the citizens there said that they 842 00:41:48,560 --> 00:41:51,280 Speaker 4: didn't want to continue being territories and that they wanted 843 00:41:51,280 --> 00:41:53,920 Speaker 4: to be states, and then took a lot of pressure 844 00:41:53,960 --> 00:41:56,160 Speaker 4: and a lot of work for Congress to finally get 845 00:41:56,200 --> 00:41:59,160 Speaker 4: around to passing what they called it Admission Bill, but 846 00:41:59,239 --> 00:42:02,120 Speaker 4: eventually they did. And what that bill said is, we're 847 00:42:02,160 --> 00:42:06,200 Speaker 4: offering you Alaska Hawaii admission into the Union, and if 848 00:42:06,239 --> 00:42:09,960 Speaker 4: your citizens vote yes in a final vote, then you're in. 849 00:42:10,160 --> 00:42:12,520 Speaker 4: And that's basically what happened in nineteen fifty nine, and 850 00:42:12,520 --> 00:42:14,720 Speaker 4: those were the last two states that joined the Union. 851 00:42:14,840 --> 00:42:18,640 Speaker 4: It doesn't require constitutional amendment, it doesn't require two thirds 852 00:42:18,760 --> 00:42:22,120 Speaker 4: vote in either chamber. It's a simple majority in the 853 00:42:22,120 --> 00:42:24,440 Speaker 4: House and the Senate and the signature of the President. 854 00:42:24,600 --> 00:42:28,080 Speaker 4: And Puerto Rico would beyond path to becoming America's fifty 855 00:42:28,120 --> 00:42:28,480 Speaker 4: first state. 856 00:42:28,800 --> 00:42:32,360 Speaker 1: So does that seem possible? And let's talk about the 857 00:42:32,600 --> 00:42:34,600 Speaker 1: sort of support you have in the government. 858 00:42:34,800 --> 00:42:38,000 Speaker 4: So it definitely seems more possible now than it has 859 00:42:38,040 --> 00:42:40,360 Speaker 4: ever been. And I'll tell you why because much the 860 00:42:40,360 --> 00:42:43,680 Speaker 4: same way that happened in Alaska Hawaii, in Puerto Rico. 861 00:42:43,800 --> 00:42:47,200 Speaker 4: Over the last decade, we've held three locally sponsored votes 862 00:42:47,280 --> 00:42:50,279 Speaker 4: they're called plubsites, where voters were given the option to 863 00:42:50,320 --> 00:42:53,560 Speaker 4: choose between continuing to be a territory and the non 864 00:42:53,680 --> 00:42:58,080 Speaker 4: territory options that are available under the Constitution, which are statehood, independence, 865 00:42:58,120 --> 00:43:02,560 Speaker 4: and free association. And each time voters rejected continuing under 866 00:43:02,600 --> 00:43:06,480 Speaker 4: the current territory status and they favored statehood over the 867 00:43:06,520 --> 00:43:11,080 Speaker 4: non territory options, and that has generated significant momentum for 868 00:43:11,120 --> 00:43:14,239 Speaker 4: this issue to advance. During the last session of Congress, 869 00:43:14,600 --> 00:43:18,839 Speaker 4: the House actually passed a bill that would essentially authorize 870 00:43:18,880 --> 00:43:22,120 Speaker 4: a federally sponsored vote that would give voters in Puerto 871 00:43:22,200 --> 00:43:26,080 Speaker 4: Rico that very choice to choose between statehood, independence, or 872 00:43:26,080 --> 00:43:29,799 Speaker 4: independence of free association. It passed with unanimous support among 873 00:43:29,920 --> 00:43:34,160 Speaker 4: House Democrats and even sixteen Republican votes, which, considering that 874 00:43:34,200 --> 00:43:36,759 Speaker 4: we were just a couple of weeks away from Republicans 875 00:43:36,800 --> 00:43:39,919 Speaker 4: taking over the House majority, was amazing to be able 876 00:43:39,960 --> 00:43:43,360 Speaker 4: to get that much bipartisan support. And it also passed 877 00:43:43,400 --> 00:43:47,080 Speaker 4: with a statement of administration policy by the Biden administration 878 00:43:47,200 --> 00:43:50,920 Speaker 4: saying that they endorsed this bill. So that passed in December, 879 00:43:50,960 --> 00:43:53,520 Speaker 4: and unfortunately the Senate obviously didn't have time to take 880 00:43:53,600 --> 00:43:55,960 Speaker 4: up the measure, and that's where we pick up with 881 00:43:56,000 --> 00:43:59,840 Speaker 4: what happened this week with a Senator Martin Heinrich introducing 882 00:43:59,880 --> 00:44:03,960 Speaker 4: a Senate companion bill that would allow for this process 883 00:44:04,000 --> 00:44:06,600 Speaker 4: to take place for Puerto Ricans to choose their future. 884 00:44:06,920 --> 00:44:09,759 Speaker 4: And the bill came out with a historic amount of 885 00:44:09,800 --> 00:44:14,239 Speaker 4: original co sponsors, with twenty one Senate members one fifth 886 00:44:14,239 --> 00:44:16,880 Speaker 4: of the Senate already saying that they endorse this idea 887 00:44:17,000 --> 00:44:19,040 Speaker 4: and that they want to have this happen. 888 00:44:19,360 --> 00:44:20,279 Speaker 2: What does that mean. 889 00:44:20,760 --> 00:44:24,680 Speaker 4: It means that right now we have the opportunity to 890 00:44:25,120 --> 00:44:30,360 Speaker 4: accumulate support for this legislation and have that legislation be 891 00:44:30,840 --> 00:44:33,520 Speaker 4: brought up in committees so it can be debated, and 892 00:44:33,840 --> 00:44:37,040 Speaker 4: other Senators aren't engaged on this issue can become aware 893 00:44:37,080 --> 00:44:40,160 Speaker 4: of it, and you know, when the right opportunity comes, 894 00:44:40,360 --> 00:44:43,399 Speaker 4: which you know, maybe during this session, but more likely 895 00:44:43,440 --> 00:44:46,040 Speaker 4: than not, we'll have to wait until the next session 896 00:44:46,080 --> 00:44:49,960 Speaker 4: of Congress. We have the opportunity to actually pass this legislation, 897 00:44:50,440 --> 00:44:54,439 Speaker 4: have Congress officially commit to offering voters in Puerto Rico 898 00:44:54,600 --> 00:44:58,600 Speaker 4: definitive choice among the non territory options, and then ultimately 899 00:44:58,840 --> 00:45:01,960 Speaker 4: let Puerto Rico decide its future. And I firmly believe 900 00:45:02,080 --> 00:45:04,839 Speaker 4: that if Congress offers the US citizens of Puerto Rico 901 00:45:05,040 --> 00:45:08,520 Speaker 4: the opportunity to choose between statehood, independence or independence with 902 00:45:08,600 --> 00:45:12,160 Speaker 4: free association, that an overwhelming majority of voters are going 903 00:45:12,200 --> 00:45:15,319 Speaker 4: to choose statehood because I think they think that that's 904 00:45:15,400 --> 00:45:18,840 Speaker 4: the best option for Puerto Rico, and they also feel 905 00:45:18,960 --> 00:45:22,880 Speaker 4: very strongly that it's the best option for strengthening American democracy. 906 00:45:22,880 --> 00:45:25,840 Speaker 2: Explain to me what happened yesterday. 907 00:45:26,320 --> 00:45:30,320 Speaker 4: So yesterday we had a historic press conference. A Senator 908 00:45:30,440 --> 00:45:34,120 Speaker 4: Martin Heinrich led the introduction of a bill called the 909 00:45:34,160 --> 00:45:38,120 Speaker 4: Puerto Rico Status Act. This is the Senate companion to 910 00:45:38,160 --> 00:45:40,040 Speaker 4: the House bill that I mentioned was passed in the 911 00:45:40,040 --> 00:45:44,040 Speaker 4: House last session, was introduced, reintroduced again this session of Congress. 912 00:45:44,440 --> 00:45:47,600 Speaker 4: He had twenty one members of the Senate in total 913 00:45:47,800 --> 00:45:51,239 Speaker 4: participating as sponsors of the bill. The Governor of Puerto Rico, 914 00:45:51,320 --> 00:45:55,240 Speaker 4: Pedro pier Luisi, who's a Democrat nationally, he was there 915 00:45:55,480 --> 00:46:00,560 Speaker 4: and was endorsing this completely. And Puerto Rico's a Resident Commissioner, 916 00:46:00,560 --> 00:46:04,560 Speaker 4: which is our non voting member in the House of Representatives, 917 00:46:04,680 --> 00:46:08,360 Speaker 4: Jennifer Gonzales Coloone who's a Republican, she was there endorsing 918 00:46:08,400 --> 00:46:12,520 Speaker 4: this too. So it really sets the stage for the 919 00:46:12,560 --> 00:46:17,160 Speaker 4: opportunity to build on what happened you know last session, 920 00:46:17,239 --> 00:46:19,560 Speaker 4: where the House passed this and the Senate didn't have 921 00:46:19,600 --> 00:46:21,719 Speaker 4: the opportunity to take action. Well, now we've got to 922 00:46:21,760 --> 00:46:24,399 Speaker 4: build in the Senate. We've got the opportunity to get 923 00:46:24,440 --> 00:46:27,960 Speaker 4: Senate members on it and be able to push for 924 00:46:28,320 --> 00:46:32,120 Speaker 4: that to be advanced in the legislative process. And one 925 00:46:32,160 --> 00:46:35,160 Speaker 4: fascinating fact is that if you look at the senators 926 00:46:35,200 --> 00:46:38,520 Speaker 4: who supported it, you have people from all the way 927 00:46:38,800 --> 00:46:43,560 Speaker 4: to the left like Bernie Sanders to Senator Bennett from Colorado, 928 00:46:43,640 --> 00:46:46,480 Speaker 4: which is, you know, one of the more centrist and 929 00:46:47,000 --> 00:46:49,880 Speaker 4: moderate Democrats. So it really shows kind of a wide 930 00:46:49,880 --> 00:46:53,279 Speaker 4: swath of ideological support for this legislation. 931 00:46:53,600 --> 00:46:56,759 Speaker 2: I mean, how would Republicans pass something like this? 932 00:46:57,480 --> 00:47:00,000 Speaker 4: Well, in the House, I think right now it's very 933 00:47:00,040 --> 00:47:00,479 Speaker 4: very tough. 934 00:47:00,760 --> 00:47:03,560 Speaker 2: You really have to have control of all three branches 935 00:47:03,600 --> 00:47:03,920 Speaker 2: to do. 936 00:47:03,920 --> 00:47:06,759 Speaker 4: This, right, I think that that's the most likely scenario. 937 00:47:07,040 --> 00:47:09,279 Speaker 4: But let's think a little bit here, and it has 938 00:47:09,320 --> 00:47:13,760 Speaker 4: to do with the Republican politics, right. So the common 939 00:47:13,840 --> 00:47:16,480 Speaker 4: knowledge that Republicans have is that if Puerto Rico were 940 00:47:16,480 --> 00:47:20,520 Speaker 4: a state, would practically add two Senate Democrats and you know, 941 00:47:20,719 --> 00:47:24,720 Speaker 4: four Democrat House members. The electoral politics in Puerto Rico 942 00:47:24,920 --> 00:47:28,719 Speaker 4: don't really back that up, right, So our current governor 943 00:47:28,920 --> 00:47:31,840 Speaker 4: is a Democrat, our current Resident Commission of Congress. As 944 00:47:31,880 --> 00:47:35,319 Speaker 4: a Republican, she has been the top vote getter in 945 00:47:35,400 --> 00:47:38,440 Speaker 4: Puerto Rico elections for the last three election cycles, and she 946 00:47:38,600 --> 00:47:42,960 Speaker 4: recently announced that she's actually challenging the governor in a 947 00:47:43,040 --> 00:47:46,399 Speaker 4: primary in Puerto Rico. Because in Puerto Rico, they're both 948 00:47:46,480 --> 00:47:49,440 Speaker 4: part of the pro statehood party right, which is the 949 00:47:49,480 --> 00:47:53,840 Speaker 4: one that fields candidates on the ballot, So Republicans actually 950 00:47:54,000 --> 00:47:57,879 Speaker 4: have a base of conservative support in Puerto Rico. They 951 00:47:57,920 --> 00:48:01,200 Speaker 4: just have to realize that it's there appeal to those 952 00:48:01,280 --> 00:48:04,640 Speaker 4: voters as opposed to just presuming that just because we're Hispanics, 953 00:48:04,680 --> 00:48:07,919 Speaker 4: we're going to automatically vote Democrat. So there's a little 954 00:48:07,960 --> 00:48:10,480 Speaker 4: bit of education that needs to happen there on the 955 00:48:10,520 --> 00:48:14,920 Speaker 4: Republican side. I believe that there is a possibility that, 956 00:48:15,360 --> 00:48:19,319 Speaker 4: looking at the close election that we're looking forward to 957 00:48:19,360 --> 00:48:22,080 Speaker 4: in twenty twenty four, our Republicans are going to have 958 00:48:22,160 --> 00:48:24,360 Speaker 4: to take a look at those Puerto Rican voters because 959 00:48:24,600 --> 00:48:28,359 Speaker 4: they're not just on the island in three point two million, right, 960 00:48:28,640 --> 00:48:32,200 Speaker 4: but stateside, there's a population of five point eight million 961 00:48:32,480 --> 00:48:36,160 Speaker 4: Puerto Ricans, and they're not just in solid Democrat states 962 00:48:36,239 --> 00:48:42,560 Speaker 4: like New York they're also in states like Florida, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Georgia, Wisconsin, Arizona, 963 00:48:42,719 --> 00:48:45,800 Speaker 4: and in all of those states, even just a few 964 00:48:45,880 --> 00:48:50,160 Speaker 4: thousand votes can tilt the balance of the electoral college right. 965 00:48:50,239 --> 00:48:54,400 Speaker 1: And it's also it's ultimately even more than that, like 966 00:48:54,560 --> 00:48:58,560 Speaker 1: this is a state. These are people who are American 967 00:48:58,800 --> 00:49:01,839 Speaker 1: citizens who don't have the same rights as everyone else. 968 00:49:02,040 --> 00:49:05,600 Speaker 4: Well, most definitely, I think that anyone on the Republican 969 00:49:05,640 --> 00:49:08,439 Speaker 4: side or the Democratic side that's looking at this from 970 00:49:08,440 --> 00:49:12,960 Speaker 4: a perspective of our core values as a country. America 971 00:49:13,000 --> 00:49:15,719 Speaker 4: has founded on the idea of government by consent of 972 00:49:15,719 --> 00:49:19,160 Speaker 4: the government. That's literally why we fought the American Revolution, 973 00:49:19,480 --> 00:49:24,440 Speaker 4: and territory status goes directly against that. Holding fellow US 974 00:49:24,520 --> 00:49:28,680 Speaker 4: citizens under a permanent territory status where they don't have 975 00:49:28,760 --> 00:49:31,600 Speaker 4: a say in the federal laws that they live under, 976 00:49:31,880 --> 00:49:34,360 Speaker 4: and then on top of that they're treated unequally and 977 00:49:34,520 --> 00:49:37,920 Speaker 4: worse than everyone else under those laws, that's un American. 978 00:49:38,160 --> 00:49:41,239 Speaker 4: So on a principal basis, I think it's absolutely one 979 00:49:41,280 --> 00:49:45,279 Speaker 4: hundred percent clear, and there's many Republicans that want you 980 00:49:45,480 --> 00:49:48,360 Speaker 4: talk about it from a constitutional perspective, and that principles 981 00:49:48,360 --> 00:49:50,719 Speaker 4: basis they really get it and they're on board with 982 00:49:50,760 --> 00:49:53,840 Speaker 4: it. It's the politics and the short term thinking that really 983 00:49:53,880 --> 00:49:57,120 Speaker 4: gets in the way of much of their potential for 984 00:49:57,480 --> 00:49:59,879 Speaker 4: supporting this further. And that's part of what we're trying 985 00:49:59,920 --> 00:50:03,160 Speaker 4: to to cut across now in our outreach efforts and 986 00:50:03,200 --> 00:50:06,320 Speaker 4: our education efforts in the port Eco fifty first. 987 00:50:06,440 --> 00:50:10,040 Speaker 1: Such an interesting project. I mean, do you need volunteers, 988 00:50:10,080 --> 00:50:12,040 Speaker 1: do you need money? What do you guys need? 989 00:50:12,320 --> 00:50:16,920 Speaker 4: So right now, our biggest need is for our fellow citizens' 990 00:50:17,200 --> 00:50:20,839 Speaker 4: stateside to contact their members of Congress, to reach out 991 00:50:20,880 --> 00:50:24,000 Speaker 4: to their representatives and senators. You can go onto our 992 00:50:24,040 --> 00:50:26,680 Speaker 4: website at PR fifty first dot com and click on 993 00:50:26,719 --> 00:50:29,640 Speaker 4: the take action button. We've got a web form that 994 00:50:29,680 --> 00:50:32,400 Speaker 4: you can use to reach out to your members of 995 00:50:32,440 --> 00:50:36,040 Speaker 4: Congress to let them know that America shouldn't be holding colonies. 996 00:50:36,360 --> 00:50:40,360 Speaker 4: That America needs to make sure that all its citizens 997 00:50:40,480 --> 00:50:42,959 Speaker 4: have the opportunity to have a say in the type 998 00:50:43,000 --> 00:50:45,480 Speaker 4: of government that they live under. And in the case 999 00:50:45,600 --> 00:50:48,000 Speaker 4: of the three point two million US citizens of Puerto Rico, 1000 00:50:48,360 --> 00:50:52,440 Speaker 4: we're being held as a territory on behalf of American 1001 00:50:52,520 --> 00:50:56,920 Speaker 4: citizens by Congress. So you guys have the power contacting 1002 00:50:56,920 --> 00:50:59,760 Speaker 4: your members of Congress to tell them, you know, sponsor 1003 00:50:59,800 --> 00:51:03,799 Speaker 4: this legislation, the Puerto Rico Status Act, and provide a 1004 00:51:03,840 --> 00:51:07,920 Speaker 4: pathway out of territory status for our fellow citizens in 1005 00:51:08,040 --> 00:51:10,800 Speaker 4: Puerto Rico. And that's not only going to help Puerto 1006 00:51:10,880 --> 00:51:15,680 Speaker 4: Rico significantly improve its local situation, but ultimately in a 1007 00:51:15,719 --> 00:51:20,120 Speaker 4: strengthen American democracy, because right now there's a lack of 1008 00:51:20,160 --> 00:51:25,160 Speaker 4: representation of US citizens in Congress, where we're passing laws 1009 00:51:25,200 --> 00:51:27,680 Speaker 4: that impact people in Puerto Rico, but we don't have 1010 00:51:27,840 --> 00:51:30,279 Speaker 4: any representation in the Senate, and in the House we 1011 00:51:30,360 --> 00:51:33,759 Speaker 4: only get one member that can speak on the flour 1012 00:51:34,040 --> 00:51:38,920 Speaker 4: but ultimately can't vote on bills that impact their constituents. 1013 00:51:38,960 --> 00:51:42,359 Speaker 2: So insane. Thank you so much for coming on. 1014 00:51:42,719 --> 00:51:45,120 Speaker 4: No, thank you so much, Molly. I greatly appreciate it, 1015 00:51:45,160 --> 00:51:49,040 Speaker 4: and definitely, if there's any opportunities to provide further updates 1016 00:51:49,080 --> 00:51:52,160 Speaker 4: on this issue or any other information that would be 1017 00:51:52,200 --> 00:51:54,480 Speaker 4: helpful for you or your audience, would love to be 1018 00:51:54,560 --> 00:51:59,440 Speaker 4: back here and continue showcasing the growth of this issue, 1019 00:51:59,440 --> 00:52:02,320 Speaker 4: which is, you know, not just an issue for elected officials, 1020 00:52:02,440 --> 00:52:05,439 Speaker 4: but it's really a citizens movement from people in Puerto Rico. 1021 00:52:05,640 --> 00:52:08,000 Speaker 4: As well as all of our allies and supporter state 1022 00:52:08,080 --> 00:52:10,600 Speaker 4: side that together are going to make the difference and 1023 00:52:10,840 --> 00:52:13,480 Speaker 4: change the course of American history for the better. Yeah, 1024 00:52:13,520 --> 00:52:21,680 Speaker 4: thank you, Thank you so much, Jesse Cannon. 1025 00:52:21,560 --> 00:52:26,480 Speaker 2: Molly junk Fest. The news just broke. That seems pretty disturbing. 1026 00:52:26,520 --> 00:52:31,880 Speaker 2: What do you see in here? Fucking guy? Can we 1027 00:52:31,920 --> 00:52:34,080 Speaker 2: just cue Nandor from what we do in the shadows? 1028 00:52:34,520 --> 00:52:38,920 Speaker 1: Yes? And guy, fucking guy, this fucking guy, as to 1029 00:52:39,080 --> 00:52:46,719 Speaker 1: quote Nandor Saten Island's best resident. That fucking guy, the 1030 00:52:47,000 --> 00:52:53,240 Speaker 1: Senator from West Virginia, Joe Manchin, messed up the Inflation 1031 00:52:53,400 --> 00:52:58,120 Speaker 1: Reduction Act, now trying to mess up the twenty twenty 1032 00:52:58,160 --> 00:53:02,880 Speaker 1: for president. See, Joe Manchin is not going to run 1033 00:53:03,239 --> 00:53:06,880 Speaker 1: for reelection, but instead he's going to going to do 1034 00:53:07,000 --> 00:53:09,840 Speaker 1: a listening tour, which means he's going to try and 1035 00:53:09,920 --> 00:53:13,200 Speaker 1: run for president and mess up the election for Joe 1036 00:53:13,280 --> 00:53:16,799 Speaker 1: Biden and bring us back into fascism. And that is 1037 00:53:16,880 --> 00:53:22,400 Speaker 1: why Joe Manchin occupies our moment of fuck. Right. That's 1038 00:53:22,440 --> 00:53:26,680 Speaker 1: it for this episode of Fast Politics. Tune in every Monday, Wednesday, 1039 00:53:26,719 --> 00:53:29,600 Speaker 1: and Friday to hear the best minds in politics makes 1040 00:53:29,680 --> 00:53:32,959 Speaker 1: sense of all this chaos. If you enjoyed what you've heard, 1041 00:53:33,360 --> 00:53:36,280 Speaker 1: please send it to a friend and keep the conversation going. 1042 00:53:36,680 --> 00:53:38,360 Speaker 1: And again thanks for listening.