1 00:00:02,720 --> 00:00:09,879 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. There's a closing bill 2 00:00:09,960 --> 00:00:13,080 Speaker 1: for this Tuesday on Wall Street, where a renewed tech 3 00:00:13,240 --> 00:00:16,520 Speaker 1: selloff dragged down stocks from mere record levels. 4 00:00:17,280 --> 00:00:21,560 Speaker 2: Bring AI anxiety is coursing through the stock market right now. 5 00:00:22,160 --> 00:00:25,160 Speaker 2: The Nasdaq one hundred fell more than one percent Tuesday 6 00:00:25,600 --> 00:00:30,880 Speaker 2: as investors pulled back from tech and tech adjacent stocksby. 7 00:00:30,120 --> 00:00:31,360 Speaker 1: I'm not sure what they make on the. 8 00:00:31,320 --> 00:00:34,279 Speaker 3: Price action today, Yeah, pairing losses, but so we're down 9 00:00:34,360 --> 00:00:36,199 Speaker 3: nine tenths of a percent on the S and P 10 00:00:36,280 --> 00:00:38,320 Speaker 3: five hundred, even more when you take a look at 11 00:00:38,360 --> 00:00:38,839 Speaker 3: the NARASAQ. 12 00:00:39,400 --> 00:00:42,479 Speaker 2: Last week was topsy turvy two after some of the 13 00:00:42,479 --> 00:00:46,599 Speaker 2: world's largest tech companies released their latest quarterly earnings reports. 14 00:00:47,000 --> 00:00:50,279 Speaker 2: An investors process the results, Apple. 15 00:00:50,000 --> 00:00:52,199 Speaker 3: Earning really beating it out of the path. When it 16 00:00:52,240 --> 00:00:54,520 Speaker 3: comes to the quarterly earning. 17 00:00:54,400 --> 00:00:57,360 Speaker 2: Microsoft having a very hard day, biggest drop since March 18 00:00:57,360 --> 00:00:59,720 Speaker 2: of twenty twenty four hundred billion dollars in market cap. 19 00:00:59,760 --> 00:01:03,960 Speaker 1: Share shares of meta platforms are surging seven and a 20 00:01:04,000 --> 00:01:04,760 Speaker 1: half percent. 21 00:01:05,240 --> 00:01:09,160 Speaker 2: These reactions might seem all over the place, but Bloomberg's 22 00:01:09,160 --> 00:01:13,680 Speaker 2: Big Tech editor Sarah Fryer says there's an underlying anxiety 23 00:01:13,800 --> 00:01:15,000 Speaker 2: that explains them all. 24 00:01:15,319 --> 00:01:19,680 Speaker 3: It's all about this existential question of are we spending 25 00:01:19,760 --> 00:01:23,640 Speaker 3: quickly enough on AI? Are we spending too quickly? And 26 00:01:23,880 --> 00:01:28,240 Speaker 3: can we afford what we're spending on this massive infrastructure 27 00:01:28,280 --> 00:01:29,440 Speaker 3: built out? 28 00:01:30,160 --> 00:01:33,560 Speaker 2: Last year, investors were willing to be patient with companies 29 00:01:33,560 --> 00:01:37,000 Speaker 2: who are taking big swings on AI, building out huge 30 00:01:37,080 --> 00:01:41,240 Speaker 2: data centers, filling them with expensive technology, and hiring lots 31 00:01:41,280 --> 00:01:46,320 Speaker 2: of pricey talent. Now investors want to see big results. 32 00:01:46,600 --> 00:01:51,000 Speaker 3: Investors are looking not just at this spending, but also 33 00:01:51,120 --> 00:01:54,440 Speaker 3: at you know, are we seeing some return on investment 34 00:01:54,880 --> 00:01:58,960 Speaker 3: and are the legacy businesses growing fast enough to support 35 00:01:59,400 --> 00:02:00,000 Speaker 3: that investment. 36 00:02:00,840 --> 00:02:04,320 Speaker 2: Sarah says, all this pressure is putting tech companies in 37 00:02:04,400 --> 00:02:07,800 Speaker 2: a bind. If they spend too much without the cash 38 00:02:07,840 --> 00:02:10,760 Speaker 2: flow or the customers to show for it, their stock 39 00:02:10,880 --> 00:02:13,680 Speaker 2: could take a hit, And if they spend too little, 40 00:02:14,280 --> 00:02:15,920 Speaker 2: they risk falling behind. 41 00:02:16,480 --> 00:02:17,920 Speaker 3: I think this is the year where the chips are 42 00:02:17,919 --> 00:02:20,640 Speaker 3: going to fall. We're going to find out if the 43 00:02:20,760 --> 00:02:23,640 Speaker 3: spending that's occurring on AI is going to result in 44 00:02:23,840 --> 00:02:26,560 Speaker 3: real change for these businesses. What are you going to 45 00:02:26,639 --> 00:02:28,880 Speaker 3: build with this investment in AI? 46 00:02:31,800 --> 00:02:33,960 Speaker 2: I'm Sarah Holder, and this is the big take from 47 00:02:33,960 --> 00:02:38,320 Speaker 2: Bloomberg News Today on the show The AI Reckoning is Coming. 48 00:02:38,880 --> 00:02:41,680 Speaker 2: Why pressure is building on tech companies to prove all 49 00:02:41,760 --> 00:02:54,120 Speaker 2: their AI investment will pay off big and soon. If 50 00:02:54,120 --> 00:02:57,240 Speaker 2: you're looking for evidence that investors are getting antsy about 51 00:02:57,280 --> 00:03:00,640 Speaker 2: all this AI spending, just look at the reaction to 52 00:03:00,760 --> 00:03:05,200 Speaker 2: Microsoft's earnings last week. The company reported what would typically 53 00:03:05,200 --> 00:03:07,079 Speaker 2: be considered solid results. 54 00:03:07,560 --> 00:03:12,079 Speaker 3: CEO Satya Nadella says total sales increased seventeen percent and 55 00:03:12,160 --> 00:03:14,840 Speaker 3: more than eighty one billion dollars in the quarter. 56 00:03:15,200 --> 00:03:18,360 Speaker 2: But when investors read between the lines, they saw a 57 00:03:18,440 --> 00:03:21,919 Speaker 2: red flag. The company said it was planning to spend 58 00:03:21,960 --> 00:03:25,359 Speaker 2: more than one hundred billion dollars this year, even as 59 00:03:25,360 --> 00:03:29,200 Speaker 2: the growth of a core business, cloud computing, had slowed. 60 00:03:29,960 --> 00:03:31,800 Speaker 2: Investors wanted out. 61 00:03:31,960 --> 00:03:35,160 Speaker 1: The Microsoft move yesterday was incredible, the second biggest drop 62 00:03:35,160 --> 00:03:37,280 Speaker 1: in market cap that we got for that stock. 63 00:03:38,000 --> 00:03:42,200 Speaker 2: Microsoft stock price tumbled ten percent the next day. In 64 00:03:42,240 --> 00:03:45,680 Speaker 2: two sessions, three hundred and eighty billion dollars in market 65 00:03:45,760 --> 00:03:47,040 Speaker 2: value was gone. 66 00:03:47,240 --> 00:03:48,520 Speaker 3: This was a dramatic one. 67 00:03:48,720 --> 00:03:49,840 Speaker 2: Bloomberg Sarah Fryar. 68 00:03:50,120 --> 00:03:53,360 Speaker 3: Microsoft actually ended up dropping the most in six years 69 00:03:53,960 --> 00:03:57,440 Speaker 3: the day following this report, which showed that their cloud 70 00:03:57,480 --> 00:04:01,120 Speaker 3: business was slowing, and therefore their mass of spending on 71 00:04:01,600 --> 00:04:06,720 Speaker 3: AI infrastructure was a little suspected. Investors were uncomfortable with that. 72 00:04:07,240 --> 00:04:10,160 Speaker 2: Investors want to make sure that other parts of Microsoft's 73 00:04:10,200 --> 00:04:14,080 Speaker 2: business continue to grow to help fund these massive investments 74 00:04:14,120 --> 00:04:17,719 Speaker 2: in AI, and they also want to see the company 75 00:04:17,760 --> 00:04:21,039 Speaker 2: find ways to put AI to use to drive even 76 00:04:21,160 --> 00:04:21,880 Speaker 2: more growth. 77 00:04:22,120 --> 00:04:24,279 Speaker 3: There was a lot of scrutiny around how much have 78 00:04:24,760 --> 00:04:30,080 Speaker 3: customers taken on copilot, how much is Microsoft's integration of 79 00:04:30,200 --> 00:04:34,880 Speaker 3: AI into everyday tools resonating with customers, and if the 80 00:04:34,880 --> 00:04:38,760 Speaker 3: cloud business slows are if their growth is not as 81 00:04:38,839 --> 00:04:41,480 Speaker 3: high as expected that gives people pause. 82 00:04:41,880 --> 00:04:43,680 Speaker 2: Well, I want to talk about Meta too, because that 83 00:04:43,720 --> 00:04:48,239 Speaker 2: company is also making massive investments in AI. It's projecting 84 00:04:48,240 --> 00:04:50,799 Speaker 2: it'll spend between one hundred and fifteen and one hundred 85 00:04:50,839 --> 00:04:53,800 Speaker 2: and thirty five billion dollars in twenty twenty six, which 86 00:04:53,839 --> 00:04:56,000 Speaker 2: is nearly twice what it's spent in twenty twenty five, 87 00:04:56,000 --> 00:04:58,880 Speaker 2: which is already a record spending year for the company. 88 00:04:59,120 --> 00:05:02,120 Speaker 2: So how did an investor react to that news where 89 00:05:02,200 --> 00:05:03,960 Speaker 2: they similarly spooked? 90 00:05:04,240 --> 00:05:07,159 Speaker 3: You know, it's interesting because in this report they were 91 00:05:07,200 --> 00:05:10,000 Speaker 3: not spooked. In prior quarters, they have been spooked and 92 00:05:10,080 --> 00:05:13,640 Speaker 3: it all depends on how quickly the ad business is growing. 93 00:05:13,880 --> 00:05:16,560 Speaker 3: So in this quarter, the ad business grew quite well, 94 00:05:17,080 --> 00:05:21,120 Speaker 3: and so investors looked at that higher spending projection, which was, 95 00:05:21,400 --> 00:05:25,120 Speaker 3: as you note, a record insane, and they thought, okay, 96 00:05:25,440 --> 00:05:28,120 Speaker 3: that's fine. Meta had warned them that it was going 97 00:05:28,200 --> 00:05:32,720 Speaker 3: to be significantly higher than past years, so it was 98 00:05:32,760 --> 00:05:36,160 Speaker 3: sort of expected. But what was maybe not as expected 99 00:05:36,240 --> 00:05:41,840 Speaker 3: was how well the legacy business would perform, and specifically 100 00:05:42,880 --> 00:05:46,359 Speaker 3: how much it had been optimized by the implementation of 101 00:05:46,400 --> 00:05:50,119 Speaker 3: AI into making the algorithm better to show people posts 102 00:05:50,160 --> 00:05:52,159 Speaker 3: that they might care about, to show people ads that 103 00:05:52,200 --> 00:05:55,800 Speaker 3: are even more personalized than ever before. So it's using 104 00:05:55,920 --> 00:06:00,679 Speaker 3: AI to basically guess what people will want to see 105 00:06:00,839 --> 00:06:04,080 Speaker 3: and they're advertising, and they're also using it to make 106 00:06:04,120 --> 00:06:07,200 Speaker 3: the feed better, to make the content that you see 107 00:06:07,200 --> 00:06:12,520 Speaker 3: as you scroll more personalized. So forget about followers and following. 108 00:06:12,640 --> 00:06:17,320 Speaker 3: It is all algorithmically determined to entertain you. The more 109 00:06:17,360 --> 00:06:19,640 Speaker 3: you scroll, the more ads you see, the more effective 110 00:06:19,680 --> 00:06:24,040 Speaker 3: METASID business is. So investors saw that they thought, great, 111 00:06:24,200 --> 00:06:29,680 Speaker 3: AI must be not just contributing to their future prospects, 112 00:06:29,760 --> 00:06:32,680 Speaker 3: but with the current business we're seeing it really have 113 00:06:32,720 --> 00:06:36,279 Speaker 3: an effect on how well they can perform. 114 00:06:36,760 --> 00:06:38,640 Speaker 2: It seems like what you're describing as a tale of 115 00:06:38,680 --> 00:06:42,560 Speaker 2: two tech companies here right met Microsoft. They're both spending 116 00:06:42,680 --> 00:06:46,400 Speaker 2: a lot on AI, they're producing different results, and investors 117 00:06:46,400 --> 00:06:50,960 Speaker 2: are reacting differently. What does this tell you about where 118 00:06:50,960 --> 00:06:52,680 Speaker 2: we're at in the AI race right now? 119 00:06:53,360 --> 00:06:56,680 Speaker 3: I think that we are at this point where in 120 00:06:56,960 --> 00:06:59,760 Speaker 3: order to have a return on an investment on all 121 00:06:59,800 --> 00:07:02,599 Speaker 3: of the billions, the hundreds of billions, maybe even more 122 00:07:02,640 --> 00:07:05,440 Speaker 3: than trillion dollars that is going to be spent on 123 00:07:05,520 --> 00:07:09,360 Speaker 3: the AI build out, businesses need to become that much 124 00:07:09,440 --> 00:07:13,240 Speaker 3: more productive. They need to continue to accelerate. We need 125 00:07:13,280 --> 00:07:16,560 Speaker 3: to look at these tech businesses that have been growing 126 00:07:17,040 --> 00:07:20,600 Speaker 3: at unprecedented levels for the last two decades and expect 127 00:07:20,640 --> 00:07:24,880 Speaker 3: them to grow even faster, even more, get even bigger 128 00:07:25,440 --> 00:07:29,400 Speaker 3: in order to justify all that has been promised. AI 129 00:07:29,520 --> 00:07:34,360 Speaker 3: is such a such a dramatic industry shaking force that sure, 130 00:07:34,400 --> 00:07:36,640 Speaker 3: why not, Why couldn't they get that much more productive? 131 00:07:36,880 --> 00:07:38,840 Speaker 3: Or you could look at it and say, like everything 132 00:07:38,880 --> 00:07:45,320 Speaker 3: has already been so optimized and incrementally improved quarter over quarter, 133 00:07:46,040 --> 00:07:49,239 Speaker 3: Can this really continue? Can we really get that much 134 00:07:49,360 --> 00:07:55,120 Speaker 3: more value? Out of the businesses via AI and much 135 00:07:55,240 --> 00:07:58,720 Speaker 3: that much more value to these businesses customers, especially in cloud, 136 00:07:59,480 --> 00:08:02,200 Speaker 3: just by hosts, sting and helping them improve what they 137 00:08:02,240 --> 00:08:03,920 Speaker 3: do with these AI tools. 138 00:08:05,200 --> 00:08:07,880 Speaker 2: What about the rest of the mag seven We got 139 00:08:08,000 --> 00:08:11,520 Speaker 2: Apples earnings late last week. How did they fit into 140 00:08:11,560 --> 00:08:14,680 Speaker 2: this narrative? How much is Apple spending on AI and 141 00:08:14,800 --> 00:08:17,240 Speaker 2: how did that land with investors? 142 00:08:17,680 --> 00:08:22,640 Speaker 3: Well, I think Apple has really fallen behind on their 143 00:08:22,720 --> 00:08:27,560 Speaker 3: plan to integrate AI. Apple intelligence is not that intelligent, 144 00:08:28,080 --> 00:08:31,840 Speaker 3: and people are looking at this company that has been 145 00:08:32,760 --> 00:08:35,800 Speaker 3: such a leader in such a leader space. In other ways, 146 00:08:35,880 --> 00:08:39,839 Speaker 3: had an amazing holiday quarter with iPhone sales. They did 147 00:08:39,840 --> 00:08:41,960 Speaker 3: well in China. I mean, it was really like a 148 00:08:42,000 --> 00:08:46,000 Speaker 3: striking quarter in the traditional Apple business sense. But that 149 00:08:46,120 --> 00:08:51,280 Speaker 3: AI question is like looming over the company's future, which 150 00:08:51,320 --> 00:08:55,160 Speaker 3: is maybe why this share response to Apple's earnings was 151 00:08:55,200 --> 00:08:58,520 Speaker 3: not as celebratory as you might have expected. And they're 152 00:08:58,559 --> 00:09:00,760 Speaker 3: really going to be leaning on Google, well on Gemini 153 00:09:01,320 --> 00:09:04,400 Speaker 3: for the future of their AI business. You know, they're 154 00:09:04,400 --> 00:09:06,680 Speaker 3: saying they're going to still develop some stuff in house, 155 00:09:07,160 --> 00:09:10,040 Speaker 3: but that hasn't gone so well up to this point, 156 00:09:10,240 --> 00:09:13,839 Speaker 3: and they need help. And so I'm curious when Google 157 00:09:13,920 --> 00:09:16,280 Speaker 3: reports that we'll hear more about that Apple deal, I 158 00:09:16,320 --> 00:09:19,600 Speaker 3: guess as we probably will not, but that's something that 159 00:09:19,640 --> 00:09:21,800 Speaker 3: we're certainly going to be keeping an eye on. 160 00:09:22,440 --> 00:09:25,160 Speaker 2: So, I mean, you've talked a little bit about the 161 00:09:25,280 --> 00:09:28,559 Speaker 2: positive science that investors are seeing in these earning reports. 162 00:09:28,600 --> 00:09:31,840 Speaker 2: But I'm wondering, like, does what these companies are spending 163 00:09:31,840 --> 00:09:35,920 Speaker 2: their money on matter to investors? Are their kinds of 164 00:09:35,960 --> 00:09:39,560 Speaker 2: AI investments they're more comfortable with or less comfortable with, 165 00:09:39,760 --> 00:09:40,880 Speaker 2: and what determines that. 166 00:09:41,320 --> 00:09:47,440 Speaker 3: Well, so far, the most expensive aspect of the AI 167 00:09:47,559 --> 00:09:50,520 Speaker 3: build out is the data center, and I think that 168 00:09:50,679 --> 00:09:55,760 Speaker 3: investors understand that there needs to be this massive infrastructure 169 00:09:55,760 --> 00:09:58,480 Speaker 3: build out. The problem is we might just run out 170 00:09:58,559 --> 00:10:00,480 Speaker 3: of real estate, we might run out of chips, we 171 00:10:00,559 --> 00:10:02,720 Speaker 3: might run out of water, of power. 172 00:10:02,840 --> 00:10:05,320 Speaker 2: You know. There might see more resistance to data. 173 00:10:05,080 --> 00:10:07,600 Speaker 3: Similar resistance politically to data centers. It might become a 174 00:10:07,600 --> 00:10:10,720 Speaker 3: big issue in the midterm elections. So I think that 175 00:10:11,640 --> 00:10:14,360 Speaker 3: while these deals are getting announced like this may be 176 00:10:15,480 --> 00:10:18,360 Speaker 3: the beginning of a year of reckoning, I'm like, is 177 00:10:18,400 --> 00:10:21,800 Speaker 3: that capital really possible to deploy at the rate that 178 00:10:21,880 --> 00:10:25,719 Speaker 3: companies want to deploy it? It's really difficult to imagine 179 00:10:25,920 --> 00:10:28,800 Speaker 3: that all of the promises about how much will be 180 00:10:28,840 --> 00:10:30,839 Speaker 3: spent can be spent in that timeframe. 181 00:10:32,400 --> 00:10:36,240 Speaker 2: Why investors' AI nerves have spread beyond the mag seven 182 00:10:37,000 --> 00:10:48,880 Speaker 2: that's next. We've been talking a lot about investors' anxiety 183 00:10:49,080 --> 00:10:52,960 Speaker 2: that big tech companies investments in AI won't pay off, 184 00:10:53,800 --> 00:10:57,200 Speaker 2: but they're also anxious about what will happen if they do. 185 00:10:57,640 --> 00:11:02,199 Speaker 1: Anthropic unveil a new AI powered automation tool for legal 186 00:11:02,320 --> 00:11:05,719 Speaker 1: and data services, able to read through legal briefs and 187 00:11:05,800 --> 00:11:08,880 Speaker 1: contracts with these and that sent chairs have experienced Thompson 188 00:11:08,920 --> 00:11:12,040 Speaker 1: Reuter's Legal Zoom, the London Stock Exchange Group, and other 189 00:11:12,120 --> 00:11:12,760 Speaker 1: legal software. 190 00:11:12,840 --> 00:11:16,920 Speaker 2: On Tuesday, after the AI startup Andthropic released a productivity 191 00:11:16,920 --> 00:11:21,000 Speaker 2: tool for in house lawyers, investors started dumping stocks of 192 00:11:21,120 --> 00:11:25,720 Speaker 2: legal software and publishing firms. Thompson Reuter's corporation was down 193 00:11:25,800 --> 00:11:29,720 Speaker 2: sixteen percent and Legal Zoom dot Com plummeted twenty percent. 194 00:11:30,600 --> 00:11:33,920 Speaker 2: That sparked a broader sell off across the software sector, 195 00:11:34,800 --> 00:11:37,840 Speaker 2: and Bloomberg Sarah Fryar says this could be a sign 196 00:11:37,880 --> 00:11:38,880 Speaker 2: of what's to come. 197 00:11:39,559 --> 00:11:45,280 Speaker 3: Well, we have seen some skepticism around software companies that 198 00:11:45,440 --> 00:11:49,080 Speaker 3: building software has become somewhat democratized that anyone can do 199 00:11:49,120 --> 00:11:52,440 Speaker 3: it if you have the right kind of coding companion. 200 00:11:52,960 --> 00:11:56,120 Speaker 3: And so do you really need a salesforce SAP in 201 00:11:56,200 --> 00:11:59,679 Speaker 3: any of these like big software companies that are selling 202 00:11:59,679 --> 00:12:02,240 Speaker 3: this big enterprise software? Are you really going to need 203 00:12:02,240 --> 00:12:05,480 Speaker 3: those services of these companies that have grown into large 204 00:12:06,320 --> 00:12:11,520 Speaker 3: enterprise businesses selling to corporations that want to make their 205 00:12:11,559 --> 00:12:16,600 Speaker 3: processes more efficient with their software when you can use 206 00:12:16,720 --> 00:12:19,360 Speaker 3: AI for that, or you can build your own internal 207 00:12:19,400 --> 00:12:22,679 Speaker 3: tool that might be more effective. So I think that 208 00:12:22,760 --> 00:12:26,360 Speaker 3: there's going to be a lot of skittishness as we 209 00:12:26,440 --> 00:12:32,160 Speaker 3: see AI tools hit the market around companies that make 210 00:12:32,200 --> 00:12:35,000 Speaker 3: those tools or that provide those services, whether they'll still 211 00:12:35,000 --> 00:12:35,719 Speaker 3: be necessary. 212 00:12:37,160 --> 00:12:40,240 Speaker 2: As investors and the public try to measure how big 213 00:12:40,280 --> 00:12:44,000 Speaker 2: a threat AI poses to these software companies, they're also 214 00:12:44,040 --> 00:12:47,360 Speaker 2: trying to measure how valuable the AI winners could become. 215 00:12:48,280 --> 00:12:52,920 Speaker 2: What kind of results really matter here? Like what are 216 00:12:53,440 --> 00:12:57,120 Speaker 2: investors looking for to prove all the spending is worth it? 217 00:12:57,720 --> 00:13:01,080 Speaker 3: One metric that I'm looking forward to hear more from Google. 218 00:13:01,120 --> 00:13:04,160 Speaker 3: Sometimes they say how much of their code productivity has 219 00:13:04,200 --> 00:13:07,400 Speaker 3: come from AI, And that's like something that investors look 220 00:13:07,440 --> 00:13:10,240 Speaker 3: for as as a sign of like how good is 221 00:13:10,320 --> 00:13:14,520 Speaker 3: AI coding getting Another thing that you know investors have 222 00:13:14,600 --> 00:13:17,800 Speaker 3: looked at is Meta talking about AI specifically affecting its 223 00:13:17,840 --> 00:13:21,880 Speaker 3: AD business, making the AD business way more effective, especially 224 00:13:21,960 --> 00:13:25,559 Speaker 3: considering Meta can't get the same data on mobile users 225 00:13:26,000 --> 00:13:29,320 Speaker 3: as it used to under Apple privacy rules. They've still 226 00:13:29,320 --> 00:13:32,360 Speaker 3: been able to overcome that and have an even more 227 00:13:32,360 --> 00:13:35,600 Speaker 3: effective AD business just using AI. So I think that 228 00:13:35,720 --> 00:13:41,080 Speaker 3: when investors see changes like that that are directly attributed 229 00:13:41,160 --> 00:13:45,719 Speaker 3: to AI investment, that gets them excited. And when they 230 00:13:45,760 --> 00:13:51,280 Speaker 3: see businesses deploy or say they've deployed AI and not 231 00:13:51,400 --> 00:13:54,040 Speaker 3: have that much of a change, or not even had 232 00:13:54,080 --> 00:13:58,240 Speaker 3: to hire fewer people or been more efficient, then they 233 00:13:58,240 --> 00:14:00,679 Speaker 3: get really nervous that this is all kind of a 234 00:14:00,760 --> 00:14:01,320 Speaker 3: hype cycle. 235 00:14:01,840 --> 00:14:05,000 Speaker 2: Sarah says. Something that can make things even more interesting 236 00:14:05,040 --> 00:14:08,760 Speaker 2: this year would be the entrance of more publicly traded 237 00:14:08,880 --> 00:14:13,640 Speaker 2: AI players. Open Ai and Anthropic are both eyeing IPOs 238 00:14:14,160 --> 00:14:18,120 Speaker 2: and Elon Musk. SpaceX had been planning one too. On Monday, 239 00:14:18,400 --> 00:14:22,160 Speaker 2: Musk announced that SpaceX will be merging with Xai, which 240 00:14:22,160 --> 00:14:25,280 Speaker 2: makes the chatbot Grock, in a deal that values the 241 00:14:25,280 --> 00:14:29,200 Speaker 2: combined company at one point twenty five trillion dollars. A 242 00:14:29,240 --> 00:14:32,520 Speaker 2: person familiar told Bloomberg that the company still has plans 243 00:14:32,560 --> 00:14:34,400 Speaker 2: for an IPO later this year. 244 00:14:35,560 --> 00:14:38,680 Speaker 3: Well, it means that if you want exposure to a 245 00:14:38,800 --> 00:14:44,160 Speaker 3: fast growing AI company, you have another option, So that 246 00:14:44,280 --> 00:14:49,920 Speaker 3: could affect the investment in Microsoft, Amazon, Google Meta. It 247 00:14:50,000 --> 00:14:53,200 Speaker 3: also means that we'll get so much more transparency about 248 00:14:53,240 --> 00:14:58,720 Speaker 3: those businesses. Those businesses have been spending like crazy, growing 249 00:14:58,760 --> 00:15:01,560 Speaker 3: like crazy. What's our plan for making money down the road? 250 00:15:01,800 --> 00:15:03,720 Speaker 3: Are they going to be making money down the road 251 00:15:03,960 --> 00:15:07,200 Speaker 3: or are they going to continue spending at that level 252 00:15:07,200 --> 00:15:10,160 Speaker 3: for such a long time. Xai need to merge with 253 00:15:10,200 --> 00:15:14,680 Speaker 3: SpaceX in part because the cost of running an AI 254 00:15:14,760 --> 00:15:18,360 Speaker 3: business is so high, so resource intensive, so talent intensive, 255 00:15:18,760 --> 00:15:22,760 Speaker 3: that honestly they need the cash flow that SpaceX has 256 00:15:22,760 --> 00:15:27,479 Speaker 3: in order to keep going, and they need the fundraising 257 00:15:27,520 --> 00:15:31,320 Speaker 3: event of an IPO. Even for the richest man in 258 00:15:31,360 --> 00:15:33,840 Speaker 3: the world, you need some money. 259 00:15:34,040 --> 00:15:36,760 Speaker 2: So is that a bad sign? What does that say? 260 00:15:37,120 --> 00:15:39,240 Speaker 3: I think it just says that either investors are going 261 00:15:39,280 --> 00:15:42,680 Speaker 3: to have to get used to businesses that just spend 262 00:15:42,720 --> 00:15:45,200 Speaker 3: way more than they make in the hopes that they 263 00:15:45,200 --> 00:15:49,680 Speaker 3: will one day have an epiphany moment, or those businesses 264 00:15:49,760 --> 00:15:53,520 Speaker 3: are going to have trouble once people see their balance sheets. 265 00:15:53,960 --> 00:15:58,200 Speaker 3: But you know their companies like Amazon in their early days, 266 00:15:58,640 --> 00:16:02,160 Speaker 3: who didn't really have a profit for a while, and Meta, 267 00:16:02,680 --> 00:16:04,920 Speaker 3: you know, they had this thesis in the beginning, and 268 00:16:04,960 --> 00:16:06,880 Speaker 3: we want to have a lot of users for this 269 00:16:06,920 --> 00:16:09,560 Speaker 3: product before we even add advertising. So it's not unheard 270 00:16:09,640 --> 00:16:13,120 Speaker 3: of in tech for a business to not make a 271 00:16:13,120 --> 00:16:15,880 Speaker 3: ton of money when they're trying to grow fast. In fact, 272 00:16:16,040 --> 00:16:17,880 Speaker 3: some people would say it's spending on growth is the 273 00:16:17,880 --> 00:16:20,440 Speaker 3: smart thing to do right now when you're trying to 274 00:16:21,280 --> 00:16:25,640 Speaker 3: be the main choice for consumers. As people are coming 275 00:16:25,680 --> 00:16:28,640 Speaker 3: on to using this product for the first time. That 276 00:16:28,680 --> 00:16:30,920 Speaker 3: doesn't mean that it's going to last forever. 277 00:16:32,960 --> 00:16:35,160 Speaker 2: We've been talking a lot about the risks and rewards 278 00:16:35,320 --> 00:16:38,160 Speaker 2: for tech companies, but the mag seven is essentially propping 279 00:16:38,240 --> 00:16:41,320 Speaker 2: up the entire stock market right now. So what are 280 00:16:41,360 --> 00:16:44,600 Speaker 2: the consequences if these bets don't pay off long term? 281 00:16:45,120 --> 00:16:47,880 Speaker 3: I think, well, we will all feel it. There are 282 00:16:47,880 --> 00:16:51,160 Speaker 3: a lot of things that are shaky about our current economy, 283 00:16:51,800 --> 00:16:54,640 Speaker 3: and there's that saying that the stock market is not 284 00:16:54,680 --> 00:16:56,800 Speaker 3: the economy. But I think a lot of people do 285 00:16:57,200 --> 00:16:59,480 Speaker 3: feel that way when they look at their four one 286 00:16:59,560 --> 00:17:03,040 Speaker 3: K when I look at their accounts, like they see 287 00:17:03,400 --> 00:17:06,760 Speaker 3: their stock's going up. And so even when everything's getting 288 00:17:06,800 --> 00:17:09,359 Speaker 3: more expensive, even when it's hard to find a job, 289 00:17:09,440 --> 00:17:14,520 Speaker 3: there's that. And it also could really affect what happens 290 00:17:14,560 --> 00:17:17,919 Speaker 3: in the midterms. We could see a reckoning there. But 291 00:17:18,280 --> 00:17:20,600 Speaker 3: you know, this is a global story. It could also 292 00:17:20,640 --> 00:17:26,119 Speaker 3: affect US versus China long term. These companies. One reason 293 00:17:26,240 --> 00:17:30,840 Speaker 3: that they've gotten such social leeway from the administration to 294 00:17:30,880 --> 00:17:34,119 Speaker 3: do what they're doing is because the US wants to 295 00:17:34,160 --> 00:17:36,000 Speaker 3: get ahead of China and AI race. 296 00:17:37,720 --> 00:17:40,600 Speaker 2: Well, so I mean, looking forward, how do you expect 297 00:17:40,600 --> 00:17:43,520 Speaker 2: twenty twenty six, Well, compare it to twenty twenty five 298 00:17:44,160 --> 00:17:48,000 Speaker 2: when it comes to AI and the AI race. How 299 00:17:48,040 --> 00:17:50,040 Speaker 2: critical will this next year be? 300 00:17:50,480 --> 00:17:54,000 Speaker 3: I think twenty twenty five was a year of announcements 301 00:17:54,040 --> 00:17:58,159 Speaker 3: of standing alongside Donald Trump at the White House and 302 00:17:58,200 --> 00:18:01,680 Speaker 3: saying we're deploying Section drabil over this many years on AI. 303 00:18:02,320 --> 00:18:03,840 Speaker 3: This is going to be a year of like, okay, 304 00:18:03,840 --> 00:18:07,320 Speaker 3: so what now, who's getting that money? Are you spending 305 00:18:07,320 --> 00:18:09,120 Speaker 3: that money? And is it going to work? 306 00:18:16,040 --> 00:18:18,560 Speaker 2: This is the big take from Bloomberg News. I'm Sarah 307 00:18:18,640 --> 00:18:21,480 Speaker 2: Holder to get more from The Big Take and unlimited 308 00:18:21,520 --> 00:18:25,280 Speaker 2: access to all of bloomberg dot Com. Subscribe today at 309 00:18:25,320 --> 00:18:29,560 Speaker 2: Bloomberg dot com slash podcast offer. If you like this episode, 310 00:18:29,680 --> 00:18:32,320 Speaker 2: make sure to subscribe and review The Big Take wherever 311 00:18:32,320 --> 00:18:35,200 Speaker 2: you listen to podcasts. It helps people find the show. 312 00:18:36,080 --> 00:18:38,560 Speaker 2: Thanks for listening. We'll be back tomorrow