1 00:00:00,040 --> 00:00:02,400 Speaker 1: The resilience of the US economy has a pride sum, 2 00:00:02,720 --> 00:00:05,320 Speaker 1: and it comes as the economic and financial gap with 3 00:00:05,360 --> 00:00:09,479 Speaker 1: Europe continues to widen. Now GDP growth and productivity levels 4 00:00:09,680 --> 00:00:12,280 Speaker 1: are now much further ahead in the US, something which 5 00:00:12,360 --> 00:00:15,760 Speaker 1: my next guest says is a once in a generation phenomenon. Well, 6 00:00:15,840 --> 00:00:19,440 Speaker 1: Daniel Pinto is the chairman and chief executive of Stanhope 7 00:00:19,440 --> 00:00:22,280 Speaker 1: Capital and asset management firm. He started in two thousand 8 00:00:22,320 --> 00:00:24,959 Speaker 1: and four with more than forty one billion dollars of 9 00:00:25,000 --> 00:00:27,520 Speaker 1: assets under management. So Daniel, as always thank you so 10 00:00:27,600 --> 00:00:29,800 Speaker 1: much for joining us and welcome back to the pulse. 11 00:00:30,040 --> 00:00:32,080 Speaker 1: When you look at what you're expecting from the Fed, 12 00:00:32,120 --> 00:00:34,200 Speaker 1: I mean it's a little bit of an outlier call. 13 00:00:34,640 --> 00:00:37,560 Speaker 1: You're expecting the Fed to cut quicker than the market 14 00:00:37,600 --> 00:00:40,880 Speaker 1: is pricing. Would they cut because there's a slowdown or 15 00:00:40,880 --> 00:00:42,600 Speaker 1: because of inflation is under control? 16 00:00:43,479 --> 00:00:46,280 Speaker 2: My first comment for Seeinge is that who would have 17 00:00:46,320 --> 00:00:49,120 Speaker 2: said that watching central bankers would have become as exciting 18 00:00:49,159 --> 00:00:55,000 Speaker 2: as watching Gothrilla. We listen to each and every word. Look, 19 00:00:55,880 --> 00:00:58,319 Speaker 2: my sense is that the US economy is slowing down. 20 00:00:58,360 --> 00:01:00,520 Speaker 2: It's still doing okay, but it is slowing down. Let's 21 00:01:00,560 --> 00:01:03,800 Speaker 2: remember that the market was expecting two point five percent 22 00:01:03,840 --> 00:01:06,319 Speaker 2: GDP growth for Q one, it came out at one 23 00:01:06,319 --> 00:01:09,720 Speaker 2: point six percent, So it is slowing down. You have 24 00:01:10,280 --> 00:01:13,880 Speaker 2: pmis coming down, which is a short sign that there 25 00:01:13,920 --> 00:01:17,440 Speaker 2: is a slowdown. You have unemployment picking up a bit, 26 00:01:17,680 --> 00:01:20,320 Speaker 2: still very low, but picking up a bit, and two 27 00:01:20,319 --> 00:01:22,920 Speaker 2: more things which in my view are very important. The 28 00:01:22,959 --> 00:01:25,759 Speaker 2: first one is that saving rates in America have collapsed. 29 00:01:26,760 --> 00:01:31,039 Speaker 2: Post COVID. Americans had plenty of savings and that sustained 30 00:01:31,040 --> 00:01:33,800 Speaker 2: the economy for the last two years. Right now they 31 00:01:33,840 --> 00:01:37,039 Speaker 2: have three point five percent of savings, which is the 32 00:01:37,120 --> 00:01:40,520 Speaker 2: lowest point in the last ten or fifteen years, which 33 00:01:40,560 --> 00:01:43,600 Speaker 2: basically means that you no longer have this buffer in 34 00:01:43,640 --> 00:01:47,640 Speaker 2: the form of the domestic consumer to support economy growth 35 00:01:47,680 --> 00:01:49,200 Speaker 2: in the next few months. And I think the FED 36 00:01:49,320 --> 00:01:51,600 Speaker 2: knows that, and the FED will cut rate in my 37 00:01:51,640 --> 00:01:53,880 Speaker 2: opinion September probably twice. 38 00:01:54,200 --> 00:01:56,520 Speaker 1: So Daniel, we allspoke to Jamie Damond yesterday and he 39 00:01:56,640 --> 00:02:00,000 Speaker 1: was saying, look, it's the market makes it a give up, 40 00:02:00,240 --> 00:02:03,919 Speaker 1: that we have a slowdown, that is a soft landing, 41 00:02:04,080 --> 00:02:06,840 Speaker 1: and that's not given. But is there the worst case 42 00:02:06,840 --> 00:02:10,519 Speaker 1: scenarios that inflation actually stays up and that these indicators 43 00:02:10,560 --> 00:02:13,400 Speaker 1: come down. So what does the FED choose then, and 44 00:02:13,480 --> 00:02:15,079 Speaker 1: what kind of economy are we left with. 45 00:02:15,680 --> 00:02:18,959 Speaker 2: I think the FED will be under pressure for another reason, 46 00:02:19,040 --> 00:02:21,200 Speaker 2: which is that, let's remember that a year ago we 47 00:02:21,280 --> 00:02:25,280 Speaker 2: had a banking crisis in the US. We are not 48 00:02:25,480 --> 00:02:28,520 Speaker 2: hearing anything about it anymore, but you have dozens of 49 00:02:28,639 --> 00:02:32,760 Speaker 2: small regional banks in America that are exposed to real estate, 50 00:02:33,800 --> 00:02:39,200 Speaker 2: writing our loans, and the longer for the higher, for 51 00:02:39,280 --> 00:02:43,680 Speaker 2: longer a phenomenon is having a direct impact on this 52 00:02:44,400 --> 00:02:47,720 Speaker 2: second tier of the banking sector in America, and I 53 00:02:47,760 --> 00:02:50,119 Speaker 2: think that the FED will in addition to the slowdown 54 00:02:50,120 --> 00:02:53,400 Speaker 2: that I described, the FED will very much be aware 55 00:02:53,520 --> 00:02:56,440 Speaker 2: that if they keep raised at this high level, they 56 00:02:56,480 --> 00:03:00,800 Speaker 2: may have another banking crisis on their hands, which obviously 57 00:03:00,800 --> 00:03:01,720 Speaker 2: they would like to avoid. 58 00:03:02,120 --> 00:03:03,600 Speaker 1: There's also a question of why the fact is not 59 00:03:03,639 --> 00:03:06,120 Speaker 1: pushing back against some of the market exuberants that we've seen. 60 00:03:06,639 --> 00:03:08,440 Speaker 1: Do you see this as being problematic. 61 00:03:09,919 --> 00:03:11,800 Speaker 2: I don't think it is problematic. I mean, there is 62 00:03:11,840 --> 00:03:14,440 Speaker 2: some exuberants in the market, but I don't think that 63 00:03:14,600 --> 00:03:17,440 Speaker 2: we are in bubble territory. If you look at stocks 64 00:03:17,440 --> 00:03:21,080 Speaker 2: in America, they are trading on multiples of about twenty times, 65 00:03:21,120 --> 00:03:23,919 Speaker 2: which is higher than the average. But if you streep 66 00:03:23,960 --> 00:03:28,000 Speaker 2: out the technology sector of the Magnificent seven, the valuation 67 00:03:28,080 --> 00:03:30,760 Speaker 2: levels in the US are in line with the average 68 00:03:30,760 --> 00:03:32,360 Speaker 2: of the last twenty five years. You don't have a 69 00:03:32,360 --> 00:03:34,280 Speaker 2: bubble in the equity market in the US. 70 00:03:35,040 --> 00:03:37,080 Speaker 1: I don't believe so, Daniel. I know. There are some 71 00:03:37,520 --> 00:03:39,680 Speaker 1: charts actually that you look at, which we love showing 72 00:03:39,680 --> 00:03:41,760 Speaker 1: because it gives us a glimpse into kind of what 73 00:03:41,880 --> 00:03:43,800 Speaker 1: kind of template you look at to look at growth 74 00:03:43,800 --> 00:03:46,880 Speaker 1: and valuations. There's a mismatch between the US and Europe. 75 00:03:47,040 --> 00:03:49,440 Speaker 1: I mean, if you're expecting, actually the US to slow 76 00:03:49,480 --> 00:03:53,680 Speaker 1: down significant, not significantly, but enough to pull forward expectations 77 00:03:53,720 --> 00:03:56,360 Speaker 1: of a count where do you see the biggest play 78 00:03:56,360 --> 00:03:58,360 Speaker 1: do you get into European stocks? 79 00:03:58,840 --> 00:04:01,680 Speaker 2: So European stocks cheap at the moment as compared to 80 00:04:01,720 --> 00:04:04,120 Speaker 2: the US. In fact, you are at the point where 81 00:04:04,160 --> 00:04:07,440 Speaker 2: the discount between Europe and the US is at its 82 00:04:07,560 --> 00:04:11,400 Speaker 2: highest in the last probably twenty years. You basically have 83 00:04:11,440 --> 00:04:14,280 Speaker 2: a thirty five percent discount between the valuation of European 84 00:04:14,280 --> 00:04:18,560 Speaker 2: stocks and the valuation of US stocks. It makes certain 85 00:04:18,600 --> 00:04:23,120 Speaker 2: segments of the European equity markets attractive, and it could be, 86 00:04:23,160 --> 00:04:25,000 Speaker 2: and we've seen that in the last few months that 87 00:04:25,400 --> 00:04:28,560 Speaker 2: for a short period of time European equities could outperform 88 00:04:28,600 --> 00:04:33,839 Speaker 2: the US. But for any long term investor, I would 89 00:04:33,880 --> 00:04:37,840 Speaker 2: recommend having the majority of their exposure to US stocks 90 00:04:38,080 --> 00:04:40,760 Speaker 2: for reasons that have to do both with the US 91 00:04:40,800 --> 00:04:46,440 Speaker 2: economy that has decaupled from the European economy and as 92 00:04:46,480 --> 00:04:51,840 Speaker 2: a result as well of market dynamics which are much 93 00:04:51,880 --> 00:04:55,800 Speaker 2: better in the US than in Europe. So short term, yes, 94 00:04:56,240 --> 00:04:59,360 Speaker 2: European equity is attractive. Long term, I think investors should 95 00:04:59,440 --> 00:05:02,279 Speaker 2: keep the vast majority of their equity exposure into the US. 96 00:05:02,440 --> 00:05:04,200 Speaker 1: I mean this, and this is actually the chart of 97 00:05:04,200 --> 00:05:06,119 Speaker 1: the day that we're just showing, one of the charts 98 00:05:06,160 --> 00:05:08,839 Speaker 1: that you're looking at. I mean, does this explain why 99 00:05:08,880 --> 00:05:12,000 Speaker 1: certain companies, I mean we're talking with actually chief executive 100 00:05:12,080 --> 00:05:15,479 Speaker 1: of Total Energy just on Tuesday, but other companies would 101 00:05:15,520 --> 00:05:17,279 Speaker 1: look at a listing in the US and does that 102 00:05:17,320 --> 00:05:20,040 Speaker 1: even make sense for big European companies. 103 00:05:20,279 --> 00:05:25,040 Speaker 2: They would, and it should worry a lot of politicians 104 00:05:25,040 --> 00:05:28,160 Speaker 2: in Europe when you hear Total Energy, which is kind 105 00:05:28,200 --> 00:05:31,680 Speaker 2: of a national champion for France, saying we would like 106 00:05:31,760 --> 00:05:34,480 Speaker 2: to move to list in the US. It is a 107 00:05:34,480 --> 00:05:37,400 Speaker 2: shock when you hear a shell saying the same thing. 108 00:05:37,520 --> 00:05:39,520 Speaker 2: It is a shock. And the reason why they are 109 00:05:39,560 --> 00:05:42,880 Speaker 2: saying that is very simple. The capital markets in the 110 00:05:42,960 --> 00:05:46,680 Speaker 2: US are so much deeper that they get better valuations. 111 00:05:46,680 --> 00:05:49,479 Speaker 2: You cannot blame them for saying, I'm working for my 112 00:05:49,560 --> 00:05:53,560 Speaker 2: shareholders and with shaholders in mind, our interests is to 113 00:05:53,640 --> 00:05:57,599 Speaker 2: list in the US. And the reason why the capital 114 00:05:57,640 --> 00:06:00,840 Speaker 2: markets are so much deeper is that they have a 115 00:06:00,880 --> 00:06:06,120 Speaker 2: pension system the drive savings into the real economy, whereas 116 00:06:06,160 --> 00:06:08,960 Speaker 2: in Europe, in most countries, we have a pension system 117 00:06:09,000 --> 00:06:13,880 Speaker 2: that is still public and is not driving savings into 118 00:06:13,880 --> 00:06:16,400 Speaker 2: the productive economy. And that's a major issue. Just take 119 00:06:16,440 --> 00:06:20,320 Speaker 2: the case of the UK. Twenty five years ago, pension 120 00:06:20,320 --> 00:06:23,840 Speaker 2: funds in the UK were investing forty five percent of 121 00:06:23,880 --> 00:06:28,120 Speaker 2: their portfolios into UK equities. Now it is four percent 122 00:06:28,240 --> 00:06:33,880 Speaker 2: five percent, and that has a massive impact on appetite 123 00:06:33,880 --> 00:06:38,320 Speaker 2: for equities overall and therefore valuations. And that is something 124 00:06:38,400 --> 00:06:42,359 Speaker 2: that the CEOs across the UK and across Europe have 125 00:06:42,480 --> 00:06:43,200 Speaker 2: in mind. 126 00:06:43,440 --> 00:06:45,880 Speaker 1: I mean, what should be the priorities of politicians and 127 00:06:45,920 --> 00:06:49,200 Speaker 1: policy makers in Europe to be more competitive and keep 128 00:06:49,240 --> 00:06:50,360 Speaker 1: the good companies here. 129 00:06:50,880 --> 00:06:53,320 Speaker 2: So most of the savings in Europe are in the 130 00:06:53,360 --> 00:06:57,279 Speaker 2: hands of insurance companies and pension funds, and right now 131 00:06:57,320 --> 00:07:01,040 Speaker 2: this capital is locked up and able to deploy itself 132 00:07:01,279 --> 00:07:06,120 Speaker 2: in private equity, public equities, et cetera. That's a major 133 00:07:06,160 --> 00:07:08,120 Speaker 2: difference with what's going on in the US. And I 134 00:07:08,120 --> 00:07:10,560 Speaker 2: think it is happening not just as valuations, but the 135 00:07:10,560 --> 00:07:13,440 Speaker 2: capacity of these company is to invest, and that's really 136 00:07:13,800 --> 00:07:16,360 Speaker 2: not just in economic issues, a political issue as well. 137 00:07:16,800 --> 00:07:20,360 Speaker 2: So I think the priority for politicians right now should 138 00:07:20,400 --> 00:07:23,679 Speaker 2: be to address this very issue. Make sure that insurance 139 00:07:23,760 --> 00:07:28,000 Speaker 2: companies have more leeway to invest in you know, private 140 00:07:28,000 --> 00:07:31,640 Speaker 2: equity and public equity. Make sure that pension funds are 141 00:07:31,680 --> 00:07:35,400 Speaker 2: not just focused on investing in bonds which are not 142 00:07:35,600 --> 00:07:39,360 Speaker 2: necessarily helping the economy at large, but investing more in 143 00:07:39,440 --> 00:07:42,800 Speaker 2: smaller n kepped companies and in large companies. That should 144 00:07:42,800 --> 00:07:43,560 Speaker 2: be the priority. 145 00:07:43,640 --> 00:07:45,480 Speaker 1: Yeah, it's not easy because it goes really to the 146 00:07:45,520 --> 00:07:47,600 Speaker 1: heart of risk taking. But talk to me a little 147 00:07:47,600 --> 00:07:49,440 Speaker 1: bit about what you're seeing the pipeline. Are there more 148 00:07:49,480 --> 00:07:52,400 Speaker 1: IPOs or is there more mina deal? Is it waking up? 149 00:07:52,760 --> 00:07:57,160 Speaker 2: So clearly after eighteen months two years of a pretty 150 00:07:57,200 --> 00:07:59,640 Speaker 2: much just stand still in the IPO market, sleeping bin 151 00:08:00,160 --> 00:08:03,480 Speaker 2: absolutely and private equity funds not doing much. Frankly, what 152 00:08:03,600 --> 00:08:06,600 Speaker 2: you see now is private equally funds being very keen 153 00:08:06,680 --> 00:08:11,480 Speaker 2: to deploy more and sellers more open to selling. So 154 00:08:11,680 --> 00:08:14,640 Speaker 2: you'll see deal flow picking up, which is great news. 155 00:08:15,040 --> 00:08:18,640 Speaker 2: The IPO market is slowly opening up, more in the 156 00:08:18,760 --> 00:08:21,560 Speaker 2: US than in Europe. I was supposed to see that 157 00:08:21,720 --> 00:08:25,400 Speaker 2: the Chinese company Shine is contemplating doing an IPO in 158 00:08:25,400 --> 00:08:27,840 Speaker 2: London as opposed to the US. It's a good sign, 159 00:08:27,920 --> 00:08:30,440 Speaker 2: but sadly we have to do notted on deal and 160 00:08:30,480 --> 00:08:33,200 Speaker 2: we need to do much much more to make London 161 00:08:33,200 --> 00:08:37,319 Speaker 2: more attractive. But clearly the trend is going in the 162 00:08:37,360 --> 00:08:39,880 Speaker 2: right direction in terms of IPOs and deals. 163 00:08:40,120 --> 00:08:42,240 Speaker 1: I mean, does it make a difference who comes into 164 00:08:42,280 --> 00:08:44,400 Speaker 1: power in terms of businesses right now or. 165 00:08:44,320 --> 00:08:45,920 Speaker 2: Do you see both parties in the UK? 166 00:08:46,080 --> 00:08:47,520 Speaker 1: In the UK pretty much in the middle. 167 00:08:48,240 --> 00:08:53,120 Speaker 2: I think the two sides want to reform London and 168 00:08:53,160 --> 00:08:55,480 Speaker 2: the city in general. The question is, well, they've been 169 00:08:55,480 --> 00:08:58,640 Speaker 2: talking about it for a while, not much has happened. 170 00:08:59,360 --> 00:09:03,240 Speaker 2: The question is that any new government, probably from Labor, 171 00:09:03,440 --> 00:09:06,600 Speaker 2: would actually implement the reforms that are absolutely necessary. I 172 00:09:06,600 --> 00:09:08,600 Speaker 2: hope they will if they seem to be more market 173 00:09:08,640 --> 00:09:12,240 Speaker 2: friendly than people expected. Let's see what do. 174 00:09:12,240 --> 00:09:13,760 Speaker 1: You do with gold right now? So it's a play 175 00:09:13,800 --> 00:09:16,280 Speaker 1: against everything, but it's also I guess, you know, there's 176 00:09:16,360 --> 00:09:20,440 Speaker 1: movements maybe from other countries to such treasures and by. 177 00:09:20,320 --> 00:09:25,480 Speaker 2: Gold, So there is something structural happening in the gold market. 178 00:09:25,559 --> 00:09:28,439 Speaker 2: But beyond the gold market, in trade in general and 179 00:09:28,960 --> 00:09:32,160 Speaker 2: currencies in general. You've seen the price of gold going 180 00:09:32,240 --> 00:09:36,280 Speaker 2: up dramatically over the last I would say twelve months 181 00:09:36,760 --> 00:09:40,840 Speaker 2: as a result of central banks buying more and more gold. 182 00:09:41,559 --> 00:09:46,079 Speaker 2: And the biggest buyers of gold have been probably the Chinese. 183 00:09:46,400 --> 00:09:48,400 Speaker 2: And the reason why they are buying more gold is 184 00:09:48,440 --> 00:09:50,439 Speaker 2: that they don't want to be in the position of 185 00:09:50,480 --> 00:09:54,240 Speaker 2: the Russian Central Bank, which given what was going on 186 00:09:54,280 --> 00:09:57,880 Speaker 2: in Ukraine, ended up being sanctioned and ended up having 187 00:09:57,920 --> 00:10:02,560 Speaker 2: their reserves frozen by the US. The Chinese have trillions 188 00:10:02,559 --> 00:10:05,960 Speaker 2: of reserves. The last thing they want is to, you know, 189 00:10:06,040 --> 00:10:09,000 Speaker 2: here one morning that the Federal Reserve decided to block 190 00:10:09,720 --> 00:10:12,280 Speaker 2: this money, so they buy more and more gold. The 191 00:10:12,280 --> 00:10:15,000 Speaker 2: Indian Central Bank is doing the same and that is 192 00:10:15,040 --> 00:10:19,280 Speaker 2: what's sustaining the gold market. Beyond that, I think we 193 00:10:19,320 --> 00:10:24,480 Speaker 2: should read behind, you know, the rise of gold, an 194 00:10:24,520 --> 00:10:28,200 Speaker 2: increasing riek of currency walls, and an increasing rieks of 195 00:10:28,320 --> 00:10:32,400 Speaker 2: trade wars. Tariffs, that would be my biggest concern for 196 00:10:32,440 --> 00:10:37,880 Speaker 2: the next twelve eighteen months. You had President Biden announcing 197 00:10:38,679 --> 00:10:45,000 Speaker 2: last week very high tariffs on electric vehicles, hundred percent tariffs, 198 00:10:45,320 --> 00:10:49,240 Speaker 2: tariffs on microschips made in China, and then you heard 199 00:10:49,280 --> 00:10:51,600 Speaker 2: Trump basically saying we one hundred percent is not enough, 200 00:10:51,640 --> 00:10:54,800 Speaker 2: it should be two hundred percent. So that rhetoric is 201 00:10:54,840 --> 00:10:57,640 Speaker 2: giving you the direction of travel. Direction of travel is 202 00:10:57,679 --> 00:11:01,320 Speaker 2: more and more trade tension and trade time and tariffs 203 00:11:01,400 --> 00:11:04,480 Speaker 2: are a very very bad thing for everyone. We should 204 00:11:04,480 --> 00:11:05,480 Speaker 2: be very careful about. 205 00:11:05,280 --> 00:11:07,559 Speaker 1: That and possibly inflationary. Daniel, thank you so much as 206 00:11:07,559 --> 00:11:09,920 Speaker 1: always for joining. Is Staniel Pinto there the Chairman and 207 00:11:10,000 --> 00:11:12,120 Speaker 1: chief executive of Stanhope Capital