WEBVTT - How Lavonte David & Devin White Stop Christian McCaffrey  | Bucs Insider Live

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in to Buccaneers and Sadur Live presented by Miller

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:04.400
<v Speaker 1>like Casey Phillips and Scott Smith here and this is

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:06.640
<v Speaker 1>where we answer all of your questions. If you're not

0:00:06.640 --> 0:00:08.480
<v Speaker 1>already watching on Facebook, head on over there to the

0:00:08.520 --> 0:00:11.560
<v Speaker 1>live video and make your comment underneath in all that

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:13.840
<v Speaker 1>area all of the questions. We're already getting a bunch

0:00:13.880 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>of people that are in here in the chat. So again,

0:00:15.920 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>we love hearing where everybody's watching from as well, which

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:19.880
<v Speaker 1>is always great, so as we give people a chance

0:00:19.880 --> 0:00:22.319
<v Speaker 1>to actually start asking some of the questions. Um, we

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 1>know that that was the not the way the team

0:00:24.079 --> 0:00:26.239
<v Speaker 1>wanted to start the season for sure. Um, what were

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:28.600
<v Speaker 1>some of the big takeaways that you got that that

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 1>especially we could see where they could have it already,

0:00:31.160 --> 0:00:33.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, potentially even turned around before Thursday. Is it

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 1>is this stuff that's easily fixable? Is it a little

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:38.279
<v Speaker 1>bit longer term? Just kind of your initial thoughts on

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>on what that game is. I don't. I don't think

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:42.200
<v Speaker 1>anything's easy in the NFL. The good things to build

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:44.600
<v Speaker 1>on was that the offensive line played pretty well. I

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:48.199
<v Speaker 1>know there were moments where James was under durest, but

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:50.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of those were with the ball held for

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:52.519
<v Speaker 1>a decent amount of time. And I think the biggest

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 1>problem for the Bucks offense in that game, and it's

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>it created a bunch of ancillary problems, was the past

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>catch is really weren't getting a lot of separation. UM.

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't exactly know how you fix that other than

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>to play better, run routes better or whatever. But considering

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:10.960
<v Speaker 1>what we think of our past catching corps, our receivers

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:13.480
<v Speaker 1>and our tight ends and even our running backs, I

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't expect that to be a persistent problem. Can you

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 1>would you expect us to have trouble getting separation with

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Mike Evans and Chris Godwin and O. J. Howard and

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:24.559
<v Speaker 1>all that. So it didn't seem like there are hardly

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 1>any times, even with play action, when Jamis was throwing

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 1>to just wide open guys, which you tend to get

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 1>from time to time during the game. I watched other

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:34.039
<v Speaker 1>games last night, and you see that from time and time,

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 1>and I didn't see a lot of that. So there

0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 1>were a lot of Jamis holding the ball, Jami's having

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:41.039
<v Speaker 1>to throw into tight windows, and sometimes that worked out

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:45.040
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes it didn't. UM. Obviously, the biggest problem in

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the game, as everybody knows, was the turnovers. Uh, And

0:01:49.920 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 1>you want to your menia reaction, it's fair is to

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 1>say this is what we were trying to get out

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 1>of Jamis Winston's game. This is the big thing. You

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 1>look at it. You don't want to make excuse is.

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>But one of the interceptions went right through a person's hands,

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>and another one, according to coach Arians, and he would

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 1>know better than I would, was a perfectly thrown ball

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 1>right to where it was supposed to be. That was

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the one that Richard Sherman took the house because Peyton

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Barber apparently ran his route about two yards too deep.

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 1>And you see that he turns around late and too far,

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:21.640
<v Speaker 1>and the ball is in front of him, and Richard Sherman,

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:24.519
<v Speaker 1>because he has his eyes on the quarterback, sees where

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the pass is going in the pass catcher doesn't and

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 1>ends up being an easy pick six. And you think

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:31.079
<v Speaker 1>James just threw one right to the other guy. Now,

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the last one was his fault according to Bruce Arians,

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 1>and it was just a bad decision. He thinks he

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:37.640
<v Speaker 1>was trying to throw it away when screen pass just

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't work and he needed to find a better way

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 1>to get rid of that ball, so live to find

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 1>another day. So that's the one. And is that easily fixable? Well,

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anything like that is easy. Playing quarterback

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>isn't easy, but it's certainly something you can stress. Yeah,

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:55.079
<v Speaker 1>that's a really great point. And then the defense, Um,

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:57.240
<v Speaker 1>that was something we were really excited to see coming

0:02:57.240 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 1>into the game, just because again, they we know they

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:01.519
<v Speaker 1>hold a lot back in preseason, you know, they don't

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 1>want to show their whole hand, and we had this

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 1>whole new scheme with Todd Bowls coming in and and

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 1>then they really I mean, if you looked at just

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the score and didn't watch the game, you'd say the

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 1>defense played terrible. But I feel like it's really important

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:15.359
<v Speaker 1>to stress, you know, how well they played and how

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>some of those things weren't there. Well, I mean it's

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:18.640
<v Speaker 1>right there in the numbers. The defense played great. They

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:22.640
<v Speaker 1>gave up one touchdown that was after a third and

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 1>ten past interference call on a deep ball deep down

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:29.239
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the field where the ball was well overthrown. Um,

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:31.360
<v Speaker 1>here's another thing. The penalties were a problem, and they

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>were a problem for the defense, and they kept him

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>from getting out the field. Several times, and you do

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 1>want to harp on them, don't do certain things. But

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>penalties are a little bit hard to control because sometimes

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 1>you get calls that you don't necessarily agree with. So

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 1>did you did you do something wrong? We had two

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns to Cambray called back on penalties to Damar Dotson. Now,

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the officials are right there on the field. They know

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 1>better than I do. But to the naked eye, it

0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>certainly looked like that was just a really good play

0:03:57.520 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 1>by DeMar. He's supposed to kick out on that play

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>and that guy and it looks like he just drives

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>him and that's it, and it worked. Cambridge scores. He

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 1>gets by that guy in the first second and and

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 1>and uh, DeMar keeps pushing his guy. I didn't see

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>a hold there. But again, the officials are there, so

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:16.799
<v Speaker 1>maybe they know better than me. But that's what I'm saying.

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 1>You want to say, man, they really hurt themselves with

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>penalties offense and defense. And it's true, but how much

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:27.280
<v Speaker 1>of that could you really help? If dMar actually did

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 1>what he was supposed to do there, how could you

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:32.279
<v Speaker 1>really help that? Um? But the defense, as you asked,

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 1>I think two sixty four yards allowed. Here's one big thing,

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 1>and this is a problem. Last year oh for three

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 1>in the red zone. We were the worst red zone

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:42.559
<v Speaker 1>defense in in the league last year, and it seemed

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:47.040
<v Speaker 1>like anytime a team got there, they scored um a touchdown.

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:49.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean to say, oh for three is fantastic. I

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>went back three years. It took me back to the

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 1>first game of two thousand sixteen or the second game

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:56.120
<v Speaker 1>to find another game where we held an imponent to

0:04:56.560 --> 0:04:59.840
<v Speaker 1>no touchdowns and at least three red zone trips. It's

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:02.839
<v Speaker 1>it's a big thing. Uh. The pass rush only generated

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 1>one sack and one other quarterback hit, but Todd Boll

0:05:05.600 --> 0:05:07.920
<v Speaker 1>said he was happy with the pass rush considering how

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:09.479
<v Speaker 1>the game went. There was a lot of quick throws

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of running place. So um, really, there's

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:13.159
<v Speaker 1>not a lot bad to say about the defense. They

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 1>look good, Yeah, which is great. Um. Francois asked do

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:19.480
<v Speaker 1>you think Rojo would be starting moving forward? I knew

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:21.040
<v Speaker 1>that question is come and I would have bet anything,

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:23.279
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna get that. You know, it could just

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 1>be a matter of time if he continues to play

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 1>like that. I don't think they make that decision one

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:32.119
<v Speaker 1>week that That's an interesting question though, because coach Arian

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 1>said several times during the offseason in training camp, when

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Royal Jones was looking really good, he said, if somebody

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>has the hot hand, we will stick with him, and

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 1>that clearly happened. Uh. Peyton Barber started the game. At

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:46.919
<v Speaker 1>one point in the third quarter, he had maybe eight carries,

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:49.360
<v Speaker 1>nine carries to four for Rojo, and then the rest

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 1>of the game, Rojo got all the carries and he

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>got hot. You know, he's ripping off eleven and sixteen

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:55.359
<v Speaker 1>yard runs. They were all up the middle practically, because

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 1>he's a bigger guy now, he's got more muscular, he's

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:01.160
<v Speaker 1>he was breaking tackles. So he's stuck with a hot

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:05.160
<v Speaker 1>hand in that game. Does that strategy also apply across

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 1>from one game to the next. You say Ronald Jones

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 1>is the hot hands, the start him in week two,

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 1>it's probably a little bit too soon. That's probably a

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 1>quicker reaction than I would expect. But if he keeps

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>playing like that, it's just a matter of time. Yeah,

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:17.599
<v Speaker 1>that's a great point. Jay had said, I'm happy the

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>defense is playing better. How do we improve our red

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:22.039
<v Speaker 1>zone scoring? Though? So we talked about how we held

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the other team in the red zone. But then we

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>struggle a little bit, which is it's hard to say

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:28.839
<v Speaker 1>because yes, because the penalties, but technically it's like Cambraid

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:31.840
<v Speaker 1>gout to red zone touchdowns back to back. So we

0:06:31.920 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 1>clearly have the plays that will work in the red zone.

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Is that's sort of the optimism there, But then the penalties. Yeah,

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:40.279
<v Speaker 1>Donald Donovan Smith was asked this exact question yesterday and

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 1>he just said two words and then went on the

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:46.599
<v Speaker 1>next question. He said, execution, execution. So they, like you said,

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:48.359
<v Speaker 1>they think they have the right strategy, they have the

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:51.800
<v Speaker 1>right plays, they had the right place called on several occasions,

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 1>they just didn't execute again twice on penalties on plays

0:06:55.680 --> 0:06:58.480
<v Speaker 1>that did work. Um, the fourth down play, remember that

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Chris Godwin, it was almost intercepted. Apparently according to Bruce Arians,

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:04.480
<v Speaker 1>that was a player where Chris Godwin is supposed to

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:07.800
<v Speaker 1>stop a little sooner, and if he had, then Jamis

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have been dragged into throwing the ball into danger

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 1>like he did. Now that's as to say it was

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 1>a good decision to throw that ball because the safety

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 1>jumped it and could have gone about one yards. But um,

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 1>so little things like that. Now, Chris Godwin had a

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>good game and he made a nice touchdown catch and all,

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>but apparently he was supposed to stop a little sooner.

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>That That's the thing you see in practice. You'll see, uh,

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the receivers running routes and the coaches will say zone

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 1>or man, and they're supposed to They're supposed to react

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 1>based on if they see that the defense is zone

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 1>or man. And if it's zone, oftentimes you stop and

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 1>sit down in a in an open area, and if

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 1>it's man, you keep going because you're trying to beat

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 1>your man. Right. Yeah, that's a great point. Um. Another

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 1>area that I wanted to talk about with special teams,

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 1>very much a mixed bag there in some ways. But um,

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:55.160
<v Speaker 1>first of all, let's talk about Matt Gay. That I

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 1>feel like that's that's got to be something that fans

0:07:57.240 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 1>are excited about. So what you've seen from him and

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>then some of the struggles on the special team side

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>of a blocked punt and you know, the return game

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 1>never really got going to overall that that whole unit,

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 1>How would you kind of grade the game and where

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 1>you feel like they could go movie, Yeah, I mean

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Matt Gay didn't have any really high different high level

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 1>of difficulty kicks, but he made all what three he

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:17.960
<v Speaker 1>made two extra points and I think a thirty one

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 1>yard or so. They're all about the same range of kicks,

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:23.240
<v Speaker 1>but he made him. I mean, you know, that's his

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 1>first game as rookie. He didn't seem like a guy

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 1>in the preseason that was bothered by jitters. But you

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 1>never know. First game that actually counts, first kicks that

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 1>are really really important. Although I suppose the preseason kicks

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 1>were important to him because he was fighting for a job. Right, Um,

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 1>so that was fine, there's nothing, nothing bad to see.

0:08:39.800 --> 0:08:41.200
<v Speaker 1>We still haven't had a chance to see him kick

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 1>a long one, but I'm sure that he will. Um

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the punt obviously, getting the punt blocked deflected, I guess

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:50.720
<v Speaker 1>it's technically a deflection because the ball went forward about

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:52.320
<v Speaker 1>three yards, but we all know it was a punt block.

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:55.680
<v Speaker 1>That's bad. Um. It looked like one guy got run

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 1>over on the play. Um And yeah, the return game

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 1>was kind of man, but that we're kind of used

0:09:01.520 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 1>to that at this point. We'd like to see some

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 1>breakout there, right. We had a few different questions about

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Um injury updates. People asked about how Blaine Gabbert's doing.

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Justin Evans I saw a few more so overall, Um,

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 1>what do we know about injury situations? And when will

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 1>we know a little bit more for the Thursday. This

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:17.320
<v Speaker 1>is the week where you actually get information early. Since

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:19.560
<v Speaker 1>we're playing on Thursday. We actually had an official injury

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 1>report on Monday, didn't have to wait until Wednesday. Well,

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Justin Evans is done. He's on I R now. I

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 1>suppose with today's roles he could come back at some

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 1>point if he's designated to return. But they put Justin

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:32.840
<v Speaker 1>on i R yesterday with that Achilles problem. It's just

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:35.840
<v Speaker 1>been a long rule back for him. Um, Blaine Gabbert

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 1>still is not practicing as of yesterday, so one would

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 1>suspect that for at least one more week. Ryan Griffin

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:44.079
<v Speaker 1>is still your number two and then when Blaine's healthy,

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 1>they'll have to make a decision. Other than that, though

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the teams in really good shape. There wasn't a single

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 1>other person who was even limited in practice yesterday. You know,

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the guys that were sick are better now, and there

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 1>was some You're not going to come out of a

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 1>game without some bumps and bruises. So you had guys

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 1>like O. J. Howard with an ankle and Ronald Jones

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 1>with a toe injury, but they practice without problems. So yeah,

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:08.319
<v Speaker 1>and market asked, is Mike Evans percent healthy. Yeah, he

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 1>just had like a twenty four hour bug, right, which

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 1>is a lot better. So for you looking at I

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 1>think he was a little affected by it though. Yeah.

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:16.679
<v Speaker 1>I have to imagine because especially with it being so

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 1>incredibly hot down on the field, that even if you're

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:21.200
<v Speaker 1>over it, like you're not having the symptoms anymore. I mean,

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:23.559
<v Speaker 1>everybody knows when you've been saying, yeah, you don't feel

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 1>hard to say exactly. Yeah, you're probably lesson in jetty.

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah you aren't completely hundred percent in just one day. Um.

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 1>I know they do a great job with the training

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:33.600
<v Speaker 1>staff and everything, getting them, you know, ready to go.

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:36.560
<v Speaker 1>But there's a shame because he loves Richard Sherman. He

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:38.680
<v Speaker 1>loves going against Sherman, and he actually had a couple

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 1>of really good games against Richie. Yeah, that is when

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Mike tends to be at his best. I mean he

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 1>is one of the most competitive people. Well, this week

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 1>should be good then, because James Bradberry has had some

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 1>good games against him, and now he's got another shot

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 1>at him, right, and that was gonna actually be So

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the next question I was gonna ask, is this matchup

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 1>on Thursday. I think it's an interesting point that Um,

0:10:55.920 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Dave Moore actually made on the radio show that we

0:10:57.440 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 1>had last night, how normally you talked about a short

0:10:59.800 --> 0:11:02.560
<v Speaker 1>game week and it's hard to prepare. And I was like, well,

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, at least it's a more familiar opponent in Carolina,

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 1>But normally people would just say, well, they're familiar with

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 1>us too, so it's not really advantage. But he pointed out, well,

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:12.320
<v Speaker 1>we're the ones with new schemes, new coaches and all

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:13.840
<v Speaker 1>of that, So do you feel like there could be

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:15.679
<v Speaker 1>some advantage there in terms of preparing for that game?

0:11:16.160 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Familiarity our end? Right, they have a lot less of

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Todd Bowls as tape to work with, although they can

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 1>go back and look at former Todd Bowls teams and

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:25.440
<v Speaker 1>bigot an idea of his schemes, and they I'm sure

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 1>they will do that. We probably did a short week.

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:30.959
<v Speaker 1>They knew that preparing, so they probably did some preparation

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:33.679
<v Speaker 1>ahead of time. Um, yeah, I could see that being

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:38.840
<v Speaker 1>a slide advantage. Another thing. Last year, Carolina's offense was

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:41.200
<v Speaker 1>new with Norv Turner. Now it's the second year and

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 1>they had a lot of misdirection stuff. Remember some of

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 1>those plays right and thens and things like that that

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 1>really got ye, they really got us in. Um Vidave

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 1>was asked about that yesterday and he said, well, yeah,

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 1>we're preparing for that. But also we're a different team.

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:58.560
<v Speaker 1>It's like we've got a totally different scheme. Uh, you know,

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 1>we'll be approaching this in different way. So one can

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 1>hope that that the defense is better equipped to handle

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:06.679
<v Speaker 1>those plays now, because that's a problem, and Christian McCaffrey

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:09.560
<v Speaker 1>is a problem, right, yeah, as always, So for you

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 1>looking at Cam Newton and Christian McCaffrey especially first and foremost,

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 1>who on our defense will most have to step up

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 1>to contain them? And how does this new scheme match

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:20.959
<v Speaker 1>up against that? Carolina? I think you saw it with

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 1>George Kittle, And I know that George Kittle and Christian

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 1>McCaffrey are played different positions, but both of them are

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:29.960
<v Speaker 1>are non wide receivers who are the obvious focal point

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 1>of their team's passing attack. And when you have somebody

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:35.040
<v Speaker 1>in the backfield or a tight end on the line

0:12:35.880 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 1>becoming you know, going out and running routes and becoming

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 1>a focal point of the past attack. You generally don't

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 1>have just one guy you don't take. You know, you

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 1>could say Richard Sherman's gonna cover Mike Evans the whole game.

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:48.320
<v Speaker 1>You don't. You can't do that with a tight end

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:51.160
<v Speaker 1>or especially a running back. Uh, it's going to be

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:54.080
<v Speaker 1>so Christian McAffrey is going to stress various parts of

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:56.840
<v Speaker 1>this defense, all of it at some point during the game.

0:12:57.120 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 1>But I do think that the linebackers Lavonte David and

0:13:00.800 --> 0:13:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Devin White are gonna be the most important players and

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 1>stopping him particularly run. You saw Lavonte David, I assume

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>you saw it too. He looked like he was a

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:11.680
<v Speaker 1>great fit in this defense. I mean, especially in the

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 1>first half. He was free to fly around. He made

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:16.959
<v Speaker 1>five tackles, I think all of them are most of

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 1>them were in the first half on running plays, and

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 1>those plays gained one yard, zero yards, Negati tive yards,

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 1>one yard and four yards. So he he's free to

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:29.680
<v Speaker 1>run around clearly, and we all know he diagnoses plays

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 1>quickly and gets there quickly, and so he's the guy

0:13:32.440 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 1>that in the running game with McCaffrey, him and Devin

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:37.680
<v Speaker 1>White are gonna probably be the most important players when

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:39.320
<v Speaker 1>it comes to stopping in the passing game. It could

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:41.560
<v Speaker 1>just it could be just about anybody. Um France while

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 1>had also asked, is there any update on the new

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:46.320
<v Speaker 1>veteran offensive tackle that was signed. Does he seem like

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:48.959
<v Speaker 1>he could be a contributor? Well? Yeah, he I think

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 1>the problem he had in Jacksonville is he was injured.

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 1>He had some bad injury luck. He went on the

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 1>i R like four times in three years, which doesn't

0:13:57.120 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 1>seem possible, but he came back once and then went

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:01.080
<v Speaker 1>back on i R. So he did when he was

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:03.080
<v Speaker 1>on the field. He did start nine games the last

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:06.959
<v Speaker 1>two years for Jacksonville. Um, so that's an experienced guy,

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:09.319
<v Speaker 1>has been in the league five years already. It's it's

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 1>a guy that has a lot of experience and starting experience.

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 1>And so I think that is a nice edition. Yeah,

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 1>and we'll close on this. We had two questions almost

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 1>backed back about the offensive game plan essentially where Brian

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 1>had asked, with the defense playing better than the offense

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 1>in that first game, does that mean you game plan differently?

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 1>And then Rodney had asked, do you think it was

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 1>a balanced offensive game plan last week? Or should they

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 1>have run the ball more? No, we ran the ball

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty six times. I think that's and there weren't a

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 1>ton of plays. I think we had around sixty alan sixties,

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 1>so sixties sixty two something like that, so that that

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 1>was pretty balanced. We ran. I noticed that we ran

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 1>on first and ten quite a bit, especially in the

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 1>early going. Now at the very end you're down one

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 1>touchdown with not much time, and then of course two touchdowns.

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 1>So to throwing the ball. It's before we had to

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 1>throw the ball on virtually every snap the last few drives.

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 1>It was a really balanced attack, so and that's a

0:14:57.840 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 1>good thing. So it's a good question. But no, I

0:14:59.800 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 1>think we're already balanced. And no, I don't think you

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 1>changed the game plan because you think we're a defensive

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 1>lead team. Now. You don't expect your offense to struggle again.

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 1>You plan to succeed, and I think that they will

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 1>plan to succeed and hopefully we'll see a better output

0:15:13.880 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 1>on that part of that side of ball this week.

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, thanks so much for joining us, and

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 1>we'll be back next week and hope you guys enjoy

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 1>watching the game in Carolina. We'll see you then