WEBVTT - Uber Earnings and New Call of Duty

0:00:02.200 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power collive

0:00:06.320 --> 0:00:10.880
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:28.159
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay. I'm Emily Chang in San Francisco, and this

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Technology. Coming up the next hour. Uber rises

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>after third quarter sales jumped seventy two. I'll ask CEO

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>dark Kazra Shah he why he's saying the business is

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>now quote stronger than ever. Plus, Elon Musk is now

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the Twitter complaint hotline operator that according to his Twitter

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 1>bio and giving us an idea of what the subscription

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 1>model for the platform will look like. And he founded

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>one of Uber's biggest competitors and wrote the book on

0:00:56.640 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 1>at Grubhub founder Mike Evans joins us to talk about

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 1>his journey from then to now. For more on Uber's results,

0:01:03.680 --> 0:01:07.400
<v Speaker 1>let's bring in the man himself. Uber CEO Dara Causashi. Dara,

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 1>great to have you with us, as always, So let's

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:13.039
<v Speaker 1>start with the good stuff. Active writers back to pre

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:15.560
<v Speaker 1>pandemic levels. Tell us the trends that are driving this

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:19.040
<v Speaker 1>and how well you see it keeping up in a downturn. Well,

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:21.479
<v Speaker 1>the big meta trend that we're seeing now is that

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the U S consumer consumer in general and especially at

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:27.720
<v Speaker 1>the U S consumer is still spending, but you're seeing

0:01:27.760 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 1>a shift of that spend from spend on retail goods

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 1>UH during the pandemic, people who were at home, etcetera.

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Back to services, travel sectors incredibly strong, restaurant, hospitality sector

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:44.199
<v Speaker 1>is strong. People are going back to work, and all

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>of that is benefiting the Uber business. Our mobility business

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>is incredibly strong. Delivery is proving to be a really

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>sticky habit. All of that translates into growth bookings of

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine billion dollars up thirty two percent on a

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>year on your Bay assis and then of course adjusted

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>EBA DAUM coming in super super strong UH in terms

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:10.359
<v Speaker 1>of you know, over five million and adjusted IBIDA on

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the quarter. And then what we indicated for next quarter

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:16.800
<v Speaker 1>is adjusted IBIDA range of six hundred to six hundred

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and thirty million, so even more strength ahead for US. Still,

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 1>writers aren't taking as many rides as they used to.

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:28.639
<v Speaker 1>What else needs to happen before uberseas of full recovery

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>or do you ever get back to those numbers? I

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 1>think we will absolutely get back to those numbers and

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:37.080
<v Speaker 1>hopefully beyond and you're seeing signs of that, which is

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>trips per monthly active. Pre pandemic, we're about five point

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 1>seven trips per monthly active. Uh, they were stuck at

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 1>about five trips per monthly active, and you've seen that

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 1>come up to five point three now and it's absolutely

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:57.080
<v Speaker 1>headed in the right direction as the world opens up,

0:02:57.160 --> 0:02:59.919
<v Speaker 1>as you know, again people go out to restaurants, etcetera.

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:02.399
<v Speaker 1>What we also have is a power of the platform.

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:06.240
<v Speaker 1>In that pre pandemic, we were essentially a rides only business.

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Now our rides and our eats business are of equal size,

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:14.919
<v Speaker 1>and essentially we are moving our riders up selling them eats,

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:17.639
<v Speaker 1>and we're up selling our eaters to grocery and then

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:22.119
<v Speaker 1>back to rides as well with the Uber one membership program,

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:25.079
<v Speaker 1>which now has launched an eight markets. So we're confident

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 1>that we can drive higher frequency, higher engagement with our

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:31.800
<v Speaker 1>platform just because of the breadth of use cases that

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>we have. Now, let's talk about delivery demand holding up.

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>As you said, it's a very sticky habit. Profit looking

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>really good, but we're not saying notable growth. Is this

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 1>an area where you're seeing the impact of inflation set

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>in where some customers might be saying, you know, maybe

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to order out one less time this week

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>or this month, just to be more conservative. Well, we're

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>definitely seeing the impact of comps. Remember, so last year

0:03:56.480 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 1>we weren't fully opened up or recovered. So when you

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 1>look at our a very growth x foreign exchange, because

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 1>foreign exchange has hurt us, it's her, Google, it's her

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>basically any global company out there. Our growth on the

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 1>delivery side actually accelerated from twelve this last quarter. We

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:16.919
<v Speaker 1>think that Q four will be similar slightly higher in

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 1>terms of your over your x f X growth. And

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing there is that our audience of delivery

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 1>continues to grow. Basket sizes are higher. Some of that

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 1>is inflationaries where as well, and when we look at

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 1>the frequency of ordering of users, that's stable. So users

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 1>are continuing to use their delivery UH product as they

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:43.600
<v Speaker 1>have before. And really we're comping against pandemic comps, and

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:47.840
<v Speaker 1>we're also being hurt by foreign exchange. But the underlying

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 1>growth of the business is healthy and we think it's

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:52.280
<v Speaker 1>going to keep healthy for some period of time. Now.

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 1>I've been traveling a lot lately, and yes, my rides

0:04:55.440 --> 0:04:58.279
<v Speaker 1>per month are going up, but prices are still elevated.

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>When our prices going to fully come back down, will

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:04.360
<v Speaker 1>they ever really come back down to where they were? Well,

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 1>I do think that inflation has affected um everybody and

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I think has re baseline to some extent prices. Uh

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think that prices are going to go

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>down to pre pandemic levels. But we have seen pricing ease.

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:22.839
<v Speaker 1>For example, Q three pricing versus Q two pricing, surge

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>levels came down. Our average E T A s in

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 1>terms of you know, when you push a button, when

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 1>is when do you get your car? That's improved as well.

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Service quality levels have improved. So we're hoping that pricing

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:39.719
<v Speaker 1>continues to ease, going to key form next year. But

0:05:40.040 --> 0:05:42.720
<v Speaker 1>I do think that this is a new baseline, and

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:46.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, our consumers are riders or eaters. They're willing

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 1>to pay. As you can see from the growth rates

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:51.040
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen as it relates to both audience up

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 1>four trips up and then obviously gross bookings which are

0:05:56.279 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 1>dollars in the bank, so to speak, up drivers supply

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:04.479
<v Speaker 1>is materially improving. What's what's happening with incentives? Are we

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 1>going to see you pull back on incentives. Will they

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 1>go away completely? Will you keep some around? Well? I

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 1>think incent we are going to keep incentives around. But

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:18.159
<v Speaker 1>driver supplies improving because we've made real investments and the

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:23.159
<v Speaker 1>driver experience. We have radically improved our onboarding process so

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:27.360
<v Speaker 1>it's faster, so higher percentage of drivers who's shown interest

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:31.039
<v Speaker 1>in driving for Uber actually make that first trip. We're

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 1>making that onboard flow faster, easier customer service available to

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 1>help you in case you're having any issues with documents, etcetera.

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 1>UM driver earnings levels are quite robust. Drivers in the US,

0:06:44.760 --> 0:06:49.599
<v Speaker 1>for example, on average, make thirty six dollars per hour

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 1>engaged on the platform. Those are very robust earnings level,

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:58.440
<v Speaker 1>especially with an activity as completely flexible. You can drive

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 1>when you want, where you want as well. And then

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 1>we're also innovating for drivers. Drivers previously they can for example,

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 1>see the upfront price or the destination that they're headed at.

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 1>That was one of the most requested features, and we

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 1>ship that feature for our drivers UH this last quarter,

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>so that they can see the upfront destination. They can

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 1>see the upfront price, and they can pick and choose

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>what's the trip that's right for them. UH and if

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a trip is not right for them, they can move

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 1>on to the next trip as well. All of that

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 1>is adding to more drivers coming onto the platform. But

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>not only are they coming onto the platform, Churn rates

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 1>are down almost on a year on your basis, and

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 1>they're more engaged with us. The UH supply hours per

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 1>driver or up sixteen percent on a year on your basis.

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 1>If churn is down and engagement is up, it tells

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 1>you that we're doing something right. It is earnings levels

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 1>that are really good, but we're very, very much focused

0:07:58.120 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 1>on improving the driver experience on Uber and to be

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the platform for earners to come and earn flexibly and safely.

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask your thoughts on Prop thirty Lift

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 1>A big backer of it, Gavin Newsom, the governor, wants

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 1>it to fail. The revenue from this generated taxing wealthy

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 1>people would go to e V charging infrastructure subsidies to

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 1>buy electric cars, which it seems that Uber has invested

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 1>interest in. Why haven't you taken a strong stance on

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Prop thirty yet? I saw you ran into Governor Newsom

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter. Have you talked to him about this? Yeah?

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 1>I have talked to him about this and and it's

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 1>our feeling that California is making very substant substantial investments

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 1>in terms of incentivizing EV ownership, in terms of charging infrastructure,

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's definitely showing up in our business. As you know,

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:54.199
<v Speaker 1>we've made very significant investments in moving more of our

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 1>fleet over to e vs UH. We have a great

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:02.600
<v Speaker 1>partnership with hurt for example, to get more Tesla's onto

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:06.679
<v Speaker 1>the Uber fleet, and California is leading the pack in

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 1>terms of miles for the percentage of our miles that

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:14.960
<v Speaker 1>are EV miles. It's now nine of miles driven on

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:18.439
<v Speaker 1>the Uber network in California are now e v s,

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 1>which is a pretty extraordinary number. It's really second only

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:25.679
<v Speaker 1>to London. That's a fift So we feel like we're

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 1>making the right investments. We are, for example, lowering our

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 1>own booking fee and making sure that drivers can make

0:09:31.440 --> 0:09:34.719
<v Speaker 1>more on a trip basis when they move over to

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 1>e vs UH, and in partnership with both public and private,

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 1>we think California is headed in the right direction, which

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:44.600
<v Speaker 1>is why you know we've stayed out of Prop thirty

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 1>one way or the other. The economy, on the other hand,

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe headed in the wrong direction. Bloomberg Data showing that

0:09:49.679 --> 0:09:53.320
<v Speaker 1>a recession is very likely. How concerned are you, How

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:55.600
<v Speaker 1>are you thinking about costs and spending? I mean, you

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 1>do have I believe, double the free cash flow that

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 1>at Meta Report did this quarter. Will you be opportunistic

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:06.200
<v Speaker 1>and look for potential M and A opportunities out there

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 1>despite everything that's going on? More broadly, yeah, I think

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 1>this is one of the most uncertain environments I've been

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:15.320
<v Speaker 1>a part of. You know, we it's very difficult to

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:17.839
<v Speaker 1>tell where things are going to wind up. I think

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Europe is certainly going to be weaker and is likely

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 1>headed into a recession. We're preparing for that. In the

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 1>U S it's unclear recession might happen, it might be

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:30.439
<v Speaker 1>a soft landing, etcetera. So I think from our standpoint,

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 1>we want to be prepared for any eventuality. And I

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:37.719
<v Speaker 1>think as a company and as a technology company, we

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 1>have been relatively forward thinking and making sure that we

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:44.200
<v Speaker 1>prepare ourselves for an uncertain world, making sure we're conservative

0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:46.440
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the investments that we're making. And an

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:49.960
<v Speaker 1>investment isn't paying off, pull back, pull your money where

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the growth is. And I think it's showing in the

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 1>results in terms of top line and free cashualow generation

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:59.080
<v Speaker 1>and one. Our outlook, even in an uncertain environment, is

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 1>a super strong look and we want to keep it

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 1>that way. All right to our cash CEO of uber

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:06.080
<v Speaker 1>as always are great to have you with us, Thank

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 1>you for stopping by. Thank you very much. Let's get

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:20.439
<v Speaker 1>to Arista Networks now. It's just reported third quarter results

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 1>beating expectations and even prompted at Bank of America to

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 1>upgrade the stock. Shares were up five point seven percent

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>or thereabouts at the close. Let's bring in president and

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 1>CEO J Street u Lal now for more. J Cre

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>is so great to have you back with us. I

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:36.680
<v Speaker 1>believe it's been a year since we last talked, and

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 1>your sales growing fifty You're on path to grow for

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the year, which is even bigger than you projected at

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the start of this year. What are the leading drivers

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:53.240
<v Speaker 1>of this? Given continuing supply issues, inventory issues, macro concerns,

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 1>how are you bucking the trend? Good to be back,

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 1>em leave. We've got to keep this anniversary trend going.

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Um well, I'll tell you, first of all, it's great

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 1>to have our own little micro momentum in a larger

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>set of issues that you just described from a macro

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 1>and I would attribute it to great products and technology,

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 1>a great set of customers headlined by Microsoft and Meta,

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 1>or as I affectionately called them M and M since

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 1>I like candy, and I think the confluence so of

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 1>all these diverse use cases that were now part of

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:27.199
<v Speaker 1>Arista has been been well known as a data center company,

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:30.200
<v Speaker 1>and today we're becoming more of a centers of data

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 1>company where we're bringing that data to every location. Speaking

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>of M and m's which is fitting around Halloween, Microsoft

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:40.319
<v Speaker 1>and Meta are leading customers, and I'm curious why do

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:43.560
<v Speaker 1>they rely on Arista so much when more broadly they

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:46.839
<v Speaker 1>seem to go with white box retailers for a lot

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:49.560
<v Speaker 1>of this back end stuff. Now, I think it's a

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 1>very good question, but I think it's a bit of

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 1>a misnomer that they only want white box or low cost.

0:12:56.280 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>The tricker is to embrace their requirements. And Code developed

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 1>a partnership that has been on more than a decade.

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:06.840
<v Speaker 1>In both cases, we actually do co engineering with them.

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 1>We partner with them on the supply chain, we partner

0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:12.560
<v Speaker 1>and procurement. We work with them on different designs and

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 1>use cases, and in some use cases obviously they look

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 1>for diversity and they build on their own or use

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 1>other vendors. But the key in both cases that we

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:24.200
<v Speaker 1>are in many diverse use cases from the data center

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:27.000
<v Speaker 1>to the whend, to the regional spine, to the interconnect

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 1>to a new use case that's coming up more and

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:33.559
<v Speaker 1>more for AI and m L workloads. And the partnership

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 1>is indeed not a classical vendor customer one, but we

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:41.080
<v Speaker 1>truly take that partnership very strategically and not likely now

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:45.319
<v Speaker 1>the tight supply environment has really dented the growth for

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 1>most tech bell weathers unlike Arista, give us an update

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:54.200
<v Speaker 1>on supply issues and inventory issues. And when you think

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 1>those normalized, well, I tell you these are the times

0:13:56.679 --> 0:13:58.679
<v Speaker 1>I wish I were just a software company and didn't

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:00.720
<v Speaker 1>have to worry about hardware. But as you know, Arista

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 1>is really a platform company. We build a lot of hardware.

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:08.120
<v Speaker 1>We have hundreds of manufacturers and vendors we work with,

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 1>and we have thousands of components on our hardware. So

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years ago Arista really put a plan

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 1>together which we had approved by our board, to spend

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 1>to the tune of four to five billion dollars in

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 1>man in in getting components and inventory, which is, you know,

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 1>in order of magnitude greater than our revenue. This is

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of unheard of, and we really took a multi

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 1>year view on this, and as we got the approval,

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 1>we started planning well ahead of our demand in twenty

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 1>one and twenty two. And the good news is that

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 1>has paid off some, but the bad news is we're

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>not getting enough of it. We would still like more components,

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 1>and despite our best planning efforts, are lead times are prolonged,

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 1>and we're still waiting for what we often called the

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>golden screw. The last ten or twenty components are still

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 1>not available, and it's hard to build a system without

0:14:58.400 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>all the components. It would be a little bit like

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 1>a car without the tires, and so we're looking forward

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 1>to overcoming that. But as we have crossed our first

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar quarter in Q two and marching ahead, we

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 1>do need more and more of these components to get

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 1>stronger this year and next year. Meta is raising its

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 1>capacs for Arista along within Video and a few others

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 1>were called out as beneficiaries. Tell us a little bit

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 1>more about the changing nature of your partnership and how

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 1>that we should expect that to evolve. And I think

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 1>that's a really good question, Emily. I think we all

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 1>know Meta for the strength they have brought as a

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 1>social networking company and ads, etcetera. But every company has

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 1>to redefine and reinvent itself and Mark is doing just that,

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:44.480
<v Speaker 1>and he's looking forward um at where to invest and

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 1>where to put his money where his mouth is, if

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 1>you will. And one of the important areas for companies

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 1>like in Video and Arista is that this area of

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 1>AI and m L applications that will tremendously test the

0:15:57.360 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 1>network itself. When you put in hundreds, if not thousands,

0:16:00.960 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 1>of GPUs and DPUs and storage etcetera. The pressure you

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 1>put on the network in bandwidth, latency, dynamically load balancing

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 1>your flows is huge. It's an order of magnitude more

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 1>than anything that even we have developed and shipped so

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 1>far to Meta. So the Arista seventy eight hundred spine,

0:16:21.200 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 1>as an example, will give them that kind of delivery

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of hundreds of four hundred gig ports at very predictable latency,

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 1>at a buffer and architectural level where they don't drop

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>packets anymore, where they can handle the applications that come in. Now,

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 1>this is long term planning. We are only in the

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 1>first innings of that, but I think a lot of

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the meta investment will go into AI and m L

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 1>which will have a direct impact on the Arista network

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure as well, and how we designed for them, develop

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 1>for them, and they procure from us. You've got your

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 1>analyst day coming up, talk to us about how we

0:16:56.720 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 1>should be looking at growth in the next year. Will these,

0:17:01.160 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, really dreadful macro economic um concerns be a

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:10.160
<v Speaker 1>headwind for Ariska, How will it all impact cloud adoption

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 1>if we're heading into a recession. Yeah, no, that's a

0:17:13.280 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 1>really good question. We've just had one of our best

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 1>quarters ever, as you pointed out, but the rest of

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:22.360
<v Speaker 1>the world around us is as not as beautiful um,

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 1>So as we look at it, we're going to be

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:27.920
<v Speaker 1>thoughtful and vigilant of is there a macro recession and

0:17:28.119 --> 0:17:30.119
<v Speaker 1>what is a riskless part in it? Because to some

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:33.800
<v Speaker 1>degree we're having micro momentum. We think some of the

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 1>key trends has not affected the data center and the

0:17:37.119 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 1>networking infrastructure. It remains strategic and relevant. But should a

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:44.879
<v Speaker 1>recession come, obviously we won't be immune to it. But

0:17:45.000 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 1>at the moment, we're feeling really good and we have

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:50.000
<v Speaker 1>good visibility for the next six to twelve months, and

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:52.400
<v Speaker 1>we're looking forward to a great analyst day to give

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 1>our three projections. Alright, well, good luck at good luck

0:17:56.560 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 1>at Analyst Day later this week. J Street Lall, CEO

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 1>of Risk and Networks. Great to have you back. Thank you.

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna be right back with more of Bloomberg technology

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 1>after this quick break. This is Bloomberg. TikTok should be banned.

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:16.920
<v Speaker 1>That's according to FEC Commissioner Brendan Carr, as reported earlier

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 1>by Axios, a comment that set chairs of Meta rising

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 1>as much as four point one percent to session highs

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Snap spiking as well, Axio saying it's the strongest language

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Car has used so far to urge acting on TikTok.

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:33.720
<v Speaker 1>And while the SEC has no authority to regulate TikTok directly,

0:18:33.880 --> 0:18:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Congress previously acted after Car voiced concerns about Chinese tech

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 1>companies telecom companies like Huawei. Bloomberg has learned that Tesla

0:18:43.000 --> 0:18:45.200
<v Speaker 1>is sending workers from China to help with an expansion

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 1>at its factory in Fremont, California, a move that could

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:51.359
<v Speaker 1>help the US facility ramp up production. Got two hundred

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 1>people from Tesla Shanghai plant will head to the Fremont

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 1>facility on assignments that will last at least three months.

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology. Emily changing in San Francisco.

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:12.639
<v Speaker 1>Twitter owner Elon Musk is teasing a new subscription model

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:17.320
<v Speaker 1>for users eight dollars per month. He's also making major changes,

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 1>including limiting content enforcement work just before mid terms next

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 1>week by freezing employee access to internal tools used for

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 1>content moderation. All while advertisers are being urged by dozens

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 1>of advocacy groups to boycott the platform if it's new

0:19:31.960 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 1>billionaire owner, lower safety standards for content, into it, into

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 1>it all with bloomb x, Alex Brinka and add Ludlow,

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:41.200
<v Speaker 1>So ed give us the very latest here. Let's start

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:45.120
<v Speaker 1>with job cuts. We've been waiting for more. Have they happened?

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean at all levels of the company. Yes, we're

0:19:47.920 --> 0:19:51.440
<v Speaker 1>hearing that a number of director and senior manager level

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:54.359
<v Speaker 1>people have departed, including j Sullivan, who is the GM

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 1>for product for the revenue product and the consumer products.

0:19:57.520 --> 0:20:00.119
<v Speaker 1>Nick cool Well, whose head of engineering his depart t

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 1>bloom bows reported the VP of Gloefol sales as report

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:08.440
<v Speaker 1>has departed during the day on Tuesday. So this is

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 1>all happening, you know. A source told me over the

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 1>weekend that across the products and engineering groups they were

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 1>asked to put together a list for layoff candidates that

0:20:17.760 --> 0:20:21.719
<v Speaker 1>will reduced headcount by fifty We have not seen a

0:20:21.720 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 1>broad wave of layoffs, but what I'm told by sources

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:29.240
<v Speaker 1>is that when determining who should be laid off, they've

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:33.879
<v Speaker 1>been assessing an individual based on the code contributions, the

0:20:33.960 --> 0:20:37.359
<v Speaker 1>contributions and individuals made to the underlying source code for

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:40.359
<v Speaker 1>the Twitter platform during the duration of their time at

0:20:40.359 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 1>the company. We know there's an all hands meeting called

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 1>for Wednesday morning, and that's pretty much it. I know

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of insiders at Twitter, a lot of staff

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:51.919
<v Speaker 1>are bracing for that. So let's talk about content moderation, Alex.

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:57.399
<v Speaker 1>What's happening, what can what's being moderated, what's not being moderated. Well,

0:20:57.640 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 1>it seems like Elon Musk is self moderate ding if

0:21:00.280 --> 0:21:03.879
<v Speaker 1>you're following the Nancy Pelosi tweets of this weekend. But

0:21:04.200 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 1>it seems like there has been According to Bloomberg, sources

0:21:08.040 --> 0:21:12.160
<v Speaker 1>a slowdown and what's being moderated because they basically told

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 1>that team to pause what they're working on. You'll remember

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 1>that Elon Musk said that they will create a content

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 1>moderation system with a group of diverse perspectives, which for

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:24.720
<v Speaker 1>me and somebody who follows social media closely reminds me

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:27.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of what they already have. So I think

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 1>this will be one of the areas that Elon Musk

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:33.640
<v Speaker 1>will absolutely have to lay out what the plans will be,

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 1>because it's not just users and the posters of content

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:41.120
<v Speaker 1>who really care about this. It is importantly the advertisers

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 1>where Twitter makes most of their money. Those advertisers won't

0:21:44.119 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 1>want to be, you know, paying to have their brand

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:50.680
<v Speaker 1>show up alongside content that they view as unsavory. So

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:53.440
<v Speaker 1>that moderation piece is a piece that is widely talked

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:56.119
<v Speaker 1>about in the few days since Elon Musk has been

0:21:56.119 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the de facto owner of this company, but we are

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:02.439
<v Speaker 1>yet to see kind of exactly the roadmap that he

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:05.440
<v Speaker 1>plans to take up for Twitter going forward. Then, of course,

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:08.399
<v Speaker 1>there have been these developments about Twitter Blue and the

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:12.920
<v Speaker 1>subscription service eight dollars a month, and what's the latest there. Yeah.

0:22:12.920 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I think Elon Musku's arguing on Twitter because remember he

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 1>set this all out in tweets that a those compelled

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 1>to pay for the privilege of blue check mor verification

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:26.199
<v Speaker 1>will want to do so to kind of separate themselves

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 1>out from the rest of the crowd. He talked about

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:33.120
<v Speaker 1>blue carrying with it priority in terms of where responses appear,

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:36.200
<v Speaker 1>having fewer ads appear in the timeline. You know, Twitter

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:38.879
<v Speaker 1>is verified user base right now is about four hundred

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:42.119
<v Speaker 1>and fifty thousand if you go to the app verified account,

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 1>so a few times that eight dollars by four fifty thousand,

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:47.919
<v Speaker 1>and new times that by twelve. It's not really this

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:50.680
<v Speaker 1>meaningful shift in business model. It's not going to sort

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 1>of displace the necessity to have a revenue stream from advertising.

0:22:55.320 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 1>But I think the idea is to kind of elevate

0:22:57.359 --> 0:23:00.919
<v Speaker 1>premium content to have its stand out on what we

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 1>know must believes is a pervasive issue, which is bots

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:06.639
<v Speaker 1>on the platform. What about this teasing of Vine coming

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 1>flat back to the platform, which of course was this

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 1>short form video product that Twitter bought, uh and then

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:19.440
<v Speaker 1>quickly dissolved. Alex Is is this really potentially happening? I mean,

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 1>it's been tweeted about, and that seems to be um

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:24.439
<v Speaker 1>where the latest is happening from Elon Musk. So I

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:27.159
<v Speaker 1>will point out that sources told Bloomberg that Vine You're right,

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:30.160
<v Speaker 1>the short form video app that Twitter bought. Um, it

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:33.880
<v Speaker 1>can be revived, but there are some turtles to doing that.

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:36.359
<v Speaker 1>It runs on the old source code. There's been a

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:39.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of updates behind the scene, So UM, I think

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:42.160
<v Speaker 1>folks are in place kind of looking at the viability

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 1>of that option right now. I will tell you, if

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:47.400
<v Speaker 1>you spend time on TikTok like I do, people talk

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:50.240
<v Speaker 1>about Vine energy. There's still a big nostalgia with that.

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 1>It was the very first kind of real short form

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 1>video app that got that type of content really popularized

0:23:57.840 --> 0:24:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and woven into the cultural fabric of conversations online. So

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:04.919
<v Speaker 1>it seems like UM and Ellen has kind of joked

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 1>about this that he is kind of taking recommendations or

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:10.880
<v Speaker 1>questions about what could be coming back. But our sources

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:13.399
<v Speaker 1>are telling us that that is one of the possibilities

0:24:13.480 --> 0:24:17.199
<v Speaker 1>on the table. There's definitely some excitement out there about

0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the possibility of Vying becoming Twitter's version of TikTok, And

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 1>are these changes going to impact the midterms at all.

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're literally a week away when a lot

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:32.640
<v Speaker 1>of moderating is normally happening. How could this play out

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:35.119
<v Speaker 1>over the next seven days. Yes, so, I think I

0:24:35.160 --> 0:24:37.359
<v Speaker 1>think it's really important to be clear on what we've reported.

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:40.159
<v Speaker 1>That the group of people who have access to the

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:43.960
<v Speaker 1>dashboard and the tools that allow for policy actions to

0:24:44.000 --> 0:24:47.480
<v Speaker 1>be taken against accounts that have breached policy has gone

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:49.560
<v Speaker 1>from like a group of a hundred fifties to fifteen

0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 1>people inside of Twitter. There's a lot of concern that

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:57.480
<v Speaker 1>effectively Twitter will be short staffed in its ability to

0:24:57.560 --> 0:25:01.119
<v Speaker 1>deal with content moderation over the course of the mid

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 1>terms next Tuesday and Wednesday. That said, um, you know,

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:07.879
<v Speaker 1>we reported that over the weekend, according sources, there was

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:12.159
<v Speaker 1>some content moderation in a limited way going on with

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the Brazilian election, despite the suspension of those tools and

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the freezing of access for some employees. If you also

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:22.359
<v Speaker 1>got on your Twitter timeline, you'll start to see basically

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 1>alerts from Twitter about the upcoming midterm elections and explaining

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 1>some of the work they've already done. And we'd imagine

0:25:29.640 --> 0:25:31.680
<v Speaker 1>that they have got policies in place I guess the

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 1>question is whether Elon Musk, since he's come into Twitter,

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 1>agrees with the plan and the policies that were set

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 1>to deal with the mid terms, which are next week.

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:43.159
<v Speaker 1>Twitter CMO leslie Berland, also the head of People, is

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 1>leaving Twitter um this, of course, along with a number

0:25:47.600 --> 0:25:51.399
<v Speaker 1>of top executives, including Paraguaggi, Wall, the CEO, Ned Siegel,

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the CFO, vidigade Um, Sean Edgett on the legal team again.

0:25:57.240 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Twitter CMO leslie Berland also leaving the company, and she

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 1>certainly won't be the last one, if our reporting is correct.

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:09.439
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's Alex Brinka and Ed Ludlow thank you both. Turning

0:26:09.480 --> 0:26:12.960
<v Speaker 1>now to the world of gaming, Activision Blizzard said it's

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Call of Duty Modern Warfare two ranked in eight hundred

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 1>million dollars in the first three days of launch, the

0:26:19.080 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 1>best in franchise history. Here for an exclusive interview is

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Johanna Ferris, senior vice president at Activision Blizzard. Johanna, thank

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us so obviously a huge weekend.

0:26:31.040 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 1>What do you think is driving this given the broader

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 1>mackerel concerns and the pressures on consumers, why are we

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:39.960
<v Speaker 1>seeing this show up with Call of Duty. It's amazing.

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 1>This is a testament to the community worldwide that we have.

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:46.159
<v Speaker 1>There's so much passion built into this franchise and in

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:49.200
<v Speaker 1>particular for modern Warfare too. But to be hitting these

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:52.280
<v Speaker 1>numbers out the gates the way that we've launched here

0:26:52.320 --> 0:26:56.560
<v Speaker 1>has been tremendous. It just reflects how powerful a community

0:26:56.560 --> 0:26:59.680
<v Speaker 1>of players we we have, but also the magic that's

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:02.200
<v Speaker 1>been it in by all the development teams around the

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 1>world here at Activision Blizzard and uh, you know, we're

0:27:05.400 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 1>we're just in a very celebratory moment here to do

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:10.359
<v Speaker 1>these types of numbers, as you mentioned, and it proves

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:12.640
<v Speaker 1>that we have a blockbuster on our hands across all

0:27:12.640 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 1>of entertainment, and we couldn't be prouder. And it's topping

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:19.360
<v Speaker 1>some of the big movie theater blockbusters, Top Gun, Maverick,

0:27:19.400 --> 0:27:23.320
<v Speaker 1>and Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness combined. What

0:27:23.400 --> 0:27:26.000
<v Speaker 1>does that tell you about the popularity of games versus

0:27:26.400 --> 0:27:32.160
<v Speaker 1>other kinds of entertainment as audiences evolves, I often say

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:35.000
<v Speaker 1>it feels like it's the modern medium for entertainment. It's

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:39.040
<v Speaker 1>how people are gathering, they're creating friendships, they're creating lifelong

0:27:39.200 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 1>connections through call of duty. And again, this is just

0:27:43.400 --> 0:27:46.040
<v Speaker 1>that moment where we couldn't be more proud to see

0:27:46.080 --> 0:27:49.840
<v Speaker 1>so many different regions of the globe connect in this way.

0:27:50.119 --> 0:27:52.440
<v Speaker 1>You're right, I think some of the numbers are really staggering.

0:27:52.640 --> 0:27:56.639
<v Speaker 1>It proves the power of gaming. We certainly have fierce

0:27:56.680 --> 0:28:00.800
<v Speaker 1>competition ourselves, right, so we know that we are all

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:03.600
<v Speaker 1>fighting for consumers time um and for how they make

0:28:03.600 --> 0:28:07.240
<v Speaker 1>their choices. And to see so many of our players

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:11.359
<v Speaker 1>rally together here and and pour in their feedback or

0:28:11.400 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 1>in their connections just three days out of launch has

0:28:14.600 --> 0:28:17.800
<v Speaker 1>been amazing and we're incredibly excited for what's to come.

0:28:18.119 --> 0:28:20.479
<v Speaker 1>It's no secret that Activision has been working through some

0:28:20.520 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 1>cultural issues, and I'd love to hear your perspective on

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:26.639
<v Speaker 1>how that is evolving and what it's like being a

0:28:26.720 --> 0:28:30.479
<v Speaker 1>senior woman in gaming at Activision. Look, we've had our

0:28:30.560 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 1>challenges and a lot of companies have their own challenges

0:28:33.840 --> 0:28:37.160
<v Speaker 1>as well. When you think about how big our workforce is,

0:28:37.240 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's not um something that we take lightly. This

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:42.400
<v Speaker 1>is a priority for us to make sure that we

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:46.600
<v Speaker 1>continue to improve in workplace culture. I for one, you know,

0:28:46.640 --> 0:28:50.760
<v Speaker 1>I've always felt um so welcomed here. I've been here

0:28:50.800 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 1>for about four years now, and I've just been so

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:56.120
<v Speaker 1>blown away by the caliber of the talent, the collaboration

0:28:56.160 --> 0:28:58.880
<v Speaker 1>that we continue to see pouring in. And we've made

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 1>this a top priority. We have no you know, um

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 1>tolerance at all for bad behavior. We've already said that

0:29:04.800 --> 0:29:07.200
<v Speaker 1>in many statements before, and we're gonna continue to make

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:09.240
<v Speaker 1>these investments to make sure that this is the place

0:29:09.280 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 1>that people want to continue to work. And it all

0:29:12.040 --> 0:29:14.400
<v Speaker 1>comes down to talent. I always come back to that,

0:29:14.480 --> 0:29:16.960
<v Speaker 1>as we need the best and brightest here. We're lucky

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 1>to have so many of them under the active Activision

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Blizzard umbrella already. This is why Modern Warfare two has

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 1>done what it's done, because we have amazing talent all

0:29:25.800 --> 0:29:27.960
<v Speaker 1>over the world pouring in, and yet we want to

0:29:28.000 --> 0:29:29.960
<v Speaker 1>continue to get better and continue to attract the best

0:29:30.000 --> 0:29:34.360
<v Speaker 1>talent we can. Meantime, you're navigating a potential huge acquisition

0:29:34.360 --> 0:29:38.320
<v Speaker 1>by Microsoft. UK regulators are scrutinating nizing the deal. What

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:40.920
<v Speaker 1>can you tell us about any signal that you've gotten

0:29:41.000 --> 0:29:43.400
<v Speaker 1>from regulators about whether or not and when this deal

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:45.760
<v Speaker 1>is going to happen. All of my eyes have really

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:47.600
<v Speaker 1>been on Call of Duty. I promised you that I

0:29:47.960 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 1>know the statements are out there. As you know, Microsoft

0:29:51.320 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 1>has already commented on this quite a bit. The possibilities

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:57.800
<v Speaker 1>are very exciting, UM, I think where we all understand

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the scope of that, and yet we are here focused

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:02.840
<v Speaker 1>to do what we came here to do, which is

0:30:02.880 --> 0:30:06.720
<v Speaker 1>to deliver the best possible player experiences we can. UH.

0:30:06.760 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 1>And the Call of Duty milestones we've hit here have

0:30:09.480 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 1>been just tremendous and a testament again to how much

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 1>work has poured in so more to come. Um, but

0:30:16.280 --> 0:30:18.920
<v Speaker 1>all eyes on on this moment and again I just

0:30:18.960 --> 0:30:20.840
<v Speaker 1>really feel very honored and humbled to be a part

0:30:20.880 --> 0:30:22.760
<v Speaker 1>of it. More to come, indeed, Well, thank you for

0:30:22.800 --> 0:30:25.480
<v Speaker 1>sharing those new numbers on Call of Duty with us.

0:30:25.520 --> 0:30:29.000
<v Speaker 1>We will stay tuned. Activision. Blizzard Senior vice president Johannah Ferris,

0:30:29.120 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 1>thank you all right. Coming up, Mike Novograts, is Galaxy

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Digital mulling a big restructuring we're going to discuss next.

0:30:37.160 --> 0:30:57.280
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg, the crypto firm. Galaxy Digital currently has

0:30:57.360 --> 0:31:02.320
<v Speaker 1>three employees, but that number could soon change. Bloomberg Shonali

0:31:02.360 --> 0:31:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Bossik here to explain, Shinale, what's happening pretty enormous scoop

0:31:06.480 --> 0:31:09.080
<v Speaker 1>today here, Emily by our colleagues led by U At Yang,

0:31:09.160 --> 0:31:13.080
<v Speaker 1>because Galaxy maybe laying off fifteen to twenty cent of

0:31:13.080 --> 0:31:16.400
<v Speaker 1>their workforce, that could amount to as much as seventy people.

0:31:17.000 --> 0:31:20.560
<v Speaker 1>I want to point out here that pretty recently Galaxy

0:31:20.560 --> 0:31:23.600
<v Speaker 1>had actually been hiring, and so this is definitely a

0:31:23.600 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 1>new plan that we are seeing. The stock is off

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 1>more than seventy percent this year. Remember earlier this year

0:31:29.080 --> 0:31:30.960
<v Speaker 1>they also had that plan to buy a bit Go,

0:31:31.280 --> 0:31:33.120
<v Speaker 1>but that had fallen through as well. That would have

0:31:33.160 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 1>added more staff. So really a reversal in trajectory here

0:31:36.320 --> 0:31:40.040
<v Speaker 1>and seventy five positions could go at Galaxy. Now. Galaxy

0:31:40.080 --> 0:31:44.040
<v Speaker 1>reports results next week, so hearing what Mike no Regrats

0:31:44.040 --> 0:31:46.600
<v Speaker 1>has to say will be interesting. Remember, Galaxy is one

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:49.120
<v Speaker 1>of the earliest investment banks in this space. They have

0:31:49.200 --> 0:31:52.320
<v Speaker 1>become a very large operation with principle investing, with venture

0:31:52.360 --> 0:31:56.040
<v Speaker 1>capital investing, a huge research arm So where exactly they're

0:31:56.080 --> 0:31:58.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to trim some of that will

0:31:58.120 --> 0:32:00.200
<v Speaker 1>be of interest. I think also of interest to your

0:32:00.240 --> 0:32:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Emily is what they will say in terms of their

0:32:02.680 --> 0:32:05.720
<v Speaker 1>liquidity positions. You have them having one point five billion

0:32:05.760 --> 0:32:08.640
<v Speaker 1>as of one billion of that was in cash. But

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:09.960
<v Speaker 1>if you take a look here, we have a board

0:32:10.000 --> 0:32:11.560
<v Speaker 1>on the screen of all the job cuts that are

0:32:11.560 --> 0:32:14.240
<v Speaker 1>spreading across the entire crypto industry. Coin based, Robin Hood,

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Block five, Genesis, and now Galaxy. The question is we've

0:32:18.000 --> 0:32:20.160
<v Speaker 1>talked about their evolving door on the C suite and

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:22.400
<v Speaker 1>then now maybe on the younger side as well, and

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the junior ranks as well. Does those jobs? Where do

0:32:26.280 --> 0:32:28.880
<v Speaker 1>those jobs go? Next? Is their capacity of the crypto

0:32:28.920 --> 0:32:31.320
<v Speaker 1>industry to pick up those jobs as we're seeing some

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:34.960
<v Speaker 1>large firms start to scale back given that range bound

0:32:35.600 --> 0:32:39.400
<v Speaker 1>trading you've seen in the largest cryptocurrencies. All right, Sonali,

0:32:39.560 --> 0:32:41.479
<v Speaker 1>thanks for helping us dig in there. We'll see how

0:32:41.520 --> 0:32:54.479
<v Speaker 1>it evolved. Saliot. Appreciate it. The founder of food delivery

0:32:54.520 --> 0:32:57.520
<v Speaker 1>giant Grubhub is out with a new book well about

0:32:57.600 --> 0:33:02.320
<v Speaker 1>his food business, Angry A Startup Legacy, details the step

0:33:02.360 --> 0:33:04.960
<v Speaker 1>by step grind of building an innovative business, with each

0:33:05.040 --> 0:33:09.000
<v Speaker 1>chapter including lessons for entrepreneurs and startups. Mike Evans joins

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:13.720
<v Speaker 1>me now to discuss more so, after everything you've been through, Mike,

0:33:13.760 --> 0:33:15.800
<v Speaker 1>what inspired you to put it all in a book? Yeah?

0:33:15.800 --> 0:33:18.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the book is just the story of starting

0:33:18.320 --> 0:33:19.840
<v Speaker 1>in my apartment and running all the way through the

0:33:19.880 --> 0:33:22.720
<v Speaker 1>I p O. And it's an intense experience to take

0:33:22.760 --> 0:33:25.200
<v Speaker 1>something from create something from nothing, and then go all

0:33:25.240 --> 0:33:27.720
<v Speaker 1>the way through all the venture capital investments and all

0:33:27.760 --> 0:33:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the things that come to it. And Uh, I wanted

0:33:30.000 --> 0:33:32.440
<v Speaker 1>to share that experience and if I can sort of

0:33:32.480 --> 0:33:35.800
<v Speaker 1>change a few people's minds about the importance of really

0:33:35.800 --> 0:33:37.880
<v Speaker 1>thinking about what it is they're trying to accomplish as

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:40.240
<v Speaker 1>they build the thing that they're building, that's really my

0:33:40.280 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 1>goal with the book, and that's why I wrote it

0:33:41.520 --> 0:33:44.120
<v Speaker 1>all down. What are I mean? Obviously we've heard Elon

0:33:44.200 --> 0:33:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Musk say things like starting a company is staring into

0:33:46.800 --> 0:33:50.360
<v Speaker 1>the abyss of death and swallowing shards of shattered glass.

0:33:50.600 --> 0:33:56.240
<v Speaker 1>What are some less Okay, okay, I want your I

0:33:56.280 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 1>want your metaphors. What do you got? Yeah, I mean

0:33:59.080 --> 0:34:00.880
<v Speaker 1>it's I guess it's no piece of cake since it's

0:34:00.880 --> 0:34:03.760
<v Speaker 1>food dealer. I gotta, I gotta, I gotta related to food. Yeah.

0:34:03.800 --> 0:34:06.640
<v Speaker 1>It was challenging for sure, and uh and that's one

0:34:06.640 --> 0:34:08.920
<v Speaker 1>of the things that I've had to remember again as

0:34:08.960 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I started a new business that you know, every step

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:13.240
<v Speaker 1>of the way. It's the path from sort of start

0:34:13.320 --> 0:34:15.600
<v Speaker 1>to success is not just a straight path. It's a

0:34:15.640 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit more like a drunken ramble. You try things,

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:20.319
<v Speaker 1>you experiment. It's important to be able to quit the

0:34:20.360 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 1>things that aren't working and really double down on the

0:34:22.640 --> 0:34:25.680
<v Speaker 1>things that are. But it takes an an iterative and

0:34:26.080 --> 0:34:29.520
<v Speaker 1>experimental approach to really take a business and and and

0:34:29.560 --> 0:34:33.640
<v Speaker 1>make it something that customers love. Hungry is something I've

0:34:33.680 --> 0:34:39.160
<v Speaker 1>certainly felt, and food delivery companies have helped a piece.

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Why did you call it that? Yeah, so I started

0:34:42.560 --> 0:34:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the business because I wanted a pizza and I was hungry,

0:34:46.160 --> 0:34:48.959
<v Speaker 1>and uh, it started out as a hobby, and I

0:34:49.000 --> 0:34:52.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't love working for another person, sort of being just

0:34:52.680 --> 0:34:55.000
<v Speaker 1>a software developers. I was called a few times and

0:34:55.280 --> 0:34:57.719
<v Speaker 1>in that early part of my sort of work experience,

0:34:58.200 --> 0:35:01.879
<v Speaker 1>and so that that is really where the idea came from.

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I was trying to solve a problem for myself. And

0:35:03.520 --> 0:35:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I make the point in the book that you know,

0:35:05.640 --> 0:35:08.160
<v Speaker 1>if entrepreneurs tend to not be happy people because you

0:35:08.200 --> 0:35:10.960
<v Speaker 1>look around and you see that something is wrong, and

0:35:11.000 --> 0:35:13.920
<v Speaker 1>you're more annoyed by it than maybe some of your

0:35:13.920 --> 0:35:17.840
<v Speaker 1>friends and family are. And the difference between that, uh,

0:35:17.880 --> 0:35:20.400
<v Speaker 1>that person being just a miserable grump and an entrepreneur

0:35:20.600 --> 0:35:22.520
<v Speaker 1>is sort of getting off the couch and doing something

0:35:22.520 --> 0:35:25.239
<v Speaker 1>about it. And so a lot of that motivation came

0:35:25.280 --> 0:35:27.920
<v Speaker 1>from just really kind of being sick of having a

0:35:27.960 --> 0:35:30.839
<v Speaker 1>call on the phone and having orders like get messed

0:35:30.920 --> 0:35:33.080
<v Speaker 1>up and reading a credit card upon all those things.

0:35:33.320 --> 0:35:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I can't cook. I can't stand cooking, and so I

0:35:36.000 --> 0:35:38.680
<v Speaker 1>had to solve the problem. And so that's why I

0:35:38.719 --> 0:35:41.920
<v Speaker 1>started the food the food delivery you know, online ordering business,

0:35:42.360 --> 0:35:44.560
<v Speaker 1>um And ultimately I did solve the problem. And so

0:35:44.920 --> 0:35:47.120
<v Speaker 1>it's that it's it's really just sort of goes through

0:35:47.160 --> 0:35:50.880
<v Speaker 1>the experience of just what it's like emotionally to to

0:35:50.880 --> 0:35:53.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of do these eight nine weeks and over the

0:35:53.840 --> 0:35:57.360
<v Speaker 1>course of a decade. Startups are hard. Food delivery startups

0:35:57.360 --> 0:35:59.680
<v Speaker 1>are hard. As you said, we just had uber ceo

0:35:59.760 --> 0:36:03.200
<v Speaker 1>dar causeroshaw on earlier in the show. Uber eats still

0:36:03.239 --> 0:36:08.760
<v Speaker 1>doing well, good profit, but not a huge amount of growth.

0:36:09.160 --> 0:36:11.520
<v Speaker 1>So I'm curious when you look at the food delivery

0:36:11.560 --> 0:36:15.680
<v Speaker 1>wars today between grub Hub and uber eats and door dash,

0:36:15.680 --> 0:36:19.560
<v Speaker 1>do they all survive? Do they co exist? At this

0:36:19.719 --> 0:36:23.960
<v Speaker 1>current size or is their consolidation, How does the industry change?

0:36:24.120 --> 0:36:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they can co exist in the the

0:36:26.040 --> 0:36:28.880
<v Speaker 1>way things are currently going. Ultimately, the winner in the

0:36:28.920 --> 0:36:30.719
<v Speaker 1>space is going to be the one that creates the

0:36:30.719 --> 0:36:33.279
<v Speaker 1>best product for customers, And the one that creates the

0:36:33.280 --> 0:36:35.520
<v Speaker 1>best customers is going to be the one that creates

0:36:35.520 --> 0:36:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the best product for restaurants and for the drivers. And ultimately,

0:36:39.080 --> 0:36:42.520
<v Speaker 1>that's really I think where innovation and differentiation is going

0:36:42.560 --> 0:36:44.880
<v Speaker 1>to come from, and the company that does that the

0:36:44.920 --> 0:36:48.680
<v Speaker 1>best will ultimately win the loyalty and frequency of the

0:36:48.719 --> 0:36:51.919
<v Speaker 1>diners that use the platforms um and I'm looking forward

0:36:51.920 --> 0:36:54.600
<v Speaker 1>to seeing how it shakes out, because you know, I

0:36:54.680 --> 0:36:57.560
<v Speaker 1>think there's room for differentiation among those three right now.

0:36:57.719 --> 0:37:02.240
<v Speaker 1>So you're not unbiased, but who wins who doesn't survive?

0:37:02.320 --> 0:37:05.919
<v Speaker 1>Grob has this partnership with Amazon, Is that a real

0:37:06.160 --> 0:37:10.280
<v Speaker 1>differentiator or not? I think grow but I am not biased.

0:37:10.360 --> 0:37:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I think grow hub has an edge because it has

0:37:12.239 --> 0:37:15.200
<v Speaker 1>more relationships with independent restaurants, and I think ultimately the

0:37:15.200 --> 0:37:18.880
<v Speaker 1>neighborhood gems and the independent restaurants and the you know,

0:37:18.920 --> 0:37:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the those businesses that sort of make up the heart

0:37:21.719 --> 0:37:24.560
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of downtowns whether it's in big cities

0:37:24.600 --> 0:37:26.960
<v Speaker 1>or small cities, those are the things that customers love

0:37:27.000 --> 0:37:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the most. And I think that grub has an advantage

0:37:29.840 --> 0:37:32.839
<v Speaker 1>there and so my that's my hope. Obviously I'm not

0:37:32.960 --> 0:37:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not biased, but ultimately, really, ultimately, really it just

0:37:36.520 --> 0:37:39.080
<v Speaker 1>comes down to which company is going to invest in

0:37:39.120 --> 0:37:42.319
<v Speaker 1>those things the most. So last quick question, you talk

0:37:42.400 --> 0:37:45.360
<v Speaker 1>about stepping down. Why was? Why was when you stepped

0:37:45.400 --> 0:37:48.279
<v Speaker 1>down the right time? And as you say, stepping down

0:37:48.320 --> 0:37:50.279
<v Speaker 1>isn't quitting. Yeah, I talked about this in the book

0:37:50.360 --> 0:37:52.719
<v Speaker 1>The You know, my goal when I started grow hub

0:37:52.800 --> 0:37:55.360
<v Speaker 1>was to pay up my school debt, and I overshot

0:37:55.480 --> 0:37:57.480
<v Speaker 1>by a little bit, right. I ran the company from

0:37:57.480 --> 0:38:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the from the apartment, my my apartment, all the way

0:38:00.239 --> 0:38:02.400
<v Speaker 1>up to the I p O. I was myself and

0:38:02.440 --> 0:38:05.080
<v Speaker 1>my co founder Matt. We ran the company together, and

0:38:05.239 --> 0:38:07.080
<v Speaker 1>as I got towards the end of that journey, as

0:38:07.120 --> 0:38:09.200
<v Speaker 1>I approached the I p O. For me, the reason

0:38:09.280 --> 0:38:10.879
<v Speaker 1>that I decided to go on to do the next

0:38:10.920 --> 0:38:12.680
<v Speaker 1>thing is I really wanted to work on a business

0:38:12.680 --> 0:38:15.360
<v Speaker 1>where the impact of what I was doing from a

0:38:15.400 --> 0:38:18.440
<v Speaker 1>social perspective and the profit I was creating were the

0:38:18.480 --> 0:38:21.000
<v Speaker 1>same thing. In whatever business model that was that's really

0:38:21.080 --> 0:38:23.080
<v Speaker 1>challenging to do in a public company. I'm not even

0:38:23.120 --> 0:38:25.560
<v Speaker 1>sure it's actually possible a lot of the time. And

0:38:25.640 --> 0:38:27.919
<v Speaker 1>so um, I wanted to start a new company where

0:38:27.920 --> 0:38:29.680
<v Speaker 1>we can make that the d n A of the

0:38:29.760 --> 0:38:33.560
<v Speaker 1>company from scratch, and so that's why I went off

0:38:33.719 --> 0:38:35.399
<v Speaker 1>to start my new I have to leave it there, Mike,

0:38:35.560 --> 0:38:37.560
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. Great to have you.

0:38:37.600 --> 0:38:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Congrats on the pluck. We'll see you tomorrow. Mrs mob