WEBVTT - Lawfare Continues 

0:00:00.000 --> 0:00:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Hour or two Sean Hannity Show, eight hundred and ninety

0:00:02.279 --> 0:00:04.720
<v Speaker 1>four one. Shawn is on number if you want to

0:00:04.760 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>be a part of the program. A federal judge Clinton appointee,

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Cameron Mcowan Curry dismissing the charges against former FBI Director

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:18.960
<v Speaker 1>James Comy and New York Attorney General Letitia James on Monday.

0:00:19.880 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>The judge dismissing the case brought in the Northern Virginia

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 1>area by Lindsay Halligan on the basis that Halligan is

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>quote not lawfully serving as serving as the interim US

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:35.559
<v Speaker 1>attorney for the Eastern District of New Jersey. Let me

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 1>go specifically to some of the cuts. And you know,

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:42.839
<v Speaker 1>one of the problems with all of the issues involving

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:47.160
<v Speaker 1>James Comy is the statute limitations have run out. And

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:49.560
<v Speaker 1>as I've been telling you, this is the low hanging fruit.

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>And this is because the testimony he gave back in

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:56.279
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty, so the statute limitations had not run out

0:00:56.320 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 1>at the time. And he's testifying to Ted Cruz that

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>he denied he approved the leak of classified information, of

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:07.039
<v Speaker 1>which I believe I've been convinced it seems to be

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>a more than prima facia case against him. Here's what

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 1>he said to Ted Kruz.

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:15.560
<v Speaker 2>He then asked you, quote, have you ever authorized someone

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:18.320
<v Speaker 2>else of the FBI to be an anonymous source in

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 2>news reports about the Trump investigation or the Clinton administration?

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 2>You responded again under oath No. Now, as you know,

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:30.200
<v Speaker 2>mister McCabe, who works for you, has publicly and repeatedly

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:33.759
<v Speaker 2>stated that he leaked information to the Wall Street Journal

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:36.319
<v Speaker 2>and that you were a directly aware of it and

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:40.480
<v Speaker 2>that you directly authorized it. Now, what mister McCabe is

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 2>saying and what you testified to this committee cannot both

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:47.319
<v Speaker 2>be true. One or the other is false. Who's telling

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 2>the truth.

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I can only speak to my testimony.

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 3>I stand by what the testimony you summarized that I

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 3>gave in May of twenty seventeen.

0:01:54.560 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 2>So your testimony is you've never authorized anyone to leak.

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 2>And mister mccab when if he says contra tray is

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 2>not telling the truth?

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 4>Is that correct?

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 3>Again, I'm not going to characterize Andy's testimony, but mine

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 3>is the same. Today, now we.

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Do have an update as this Clinton appointed judge in

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 1>this particular case, Judge Cameron Curry dismissed the false charges

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 1>charge against Comy and bank fraud charges against James without prejudice,

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 1>meaning the charges could be brought again. Curry, nominated by

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Bill Clinton to a seat on the US District Court,

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:31.800
<v Speaker 1>was confirmed by the US Senate in nineteen ninety four.

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Here's a clip of that's pretty viral at this point.

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Twenty twenty, again testifying to Lindsey Graham, he did not

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>recall receiving intel on Hillary Clinton's camp pushing Russian disinformation.

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 5>So do you recall getting an inquiry from the CIA,

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 5>excuse me, the in diligence community in September twenty sixteen

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 5>about a concern that the Clinton campaign was going to

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:03.679
<v Speaker 5>create a scandal regain guarding Trump in Russia. I do not.

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:11.240
<v Speaker 5>You don't remember getting an investigatory lead from the intelligence community.

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:17.360
<v Speaker 5>September the seventh, twenty sixteen, the US intelligence officials forded

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 5>an investigative referral of to FBI Director James Gummy and

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 5>Direct Assistant Director of Counter Intelligence Peter Struck regarding US

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 5>presidential candidate Hillary Clinton's approval of a plan concerning US

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 5>presidential candidate Donald Trump and Russian hackers hampering US elections

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 5>as a means of distracting the public from her use

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 5>of a private email server. You don't remember getting that

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 5>or being taught that doesn't Okay, that's a pretty stunny thing.

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 5>It didn't ring a bell, but it did come to you.

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Now, if you go back to the burned bags that

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 1>were found in the at the FBI, these are bags

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 1>that were supposed to be incinerated. But if you go back,

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 1>there was pretty self incriminating notes and written notes of

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 1>James Comy. I'm sure he thought they were long gone.

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 1>In many ways, I think pretty damning that he knew

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 1>almost you know, from the get go that it was

0:04:16.120 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 1>this whole Clinton narrative, you know, was was garbage. Anyway,

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 1>here to weigh in on this and what are the

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:26.600
<v Speaker 1>next steps in a likely appeal in this case. David Shown,

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>former counsel for President Trump. Greg Jarrett, Fox News legal analyst,

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>New York Times bestselling author, Greg, Start with you. You wrote

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 1>a column about all of this, and it seemed that

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:40.600
<v Speaker 1>those the information in the burn bags contradict what he

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>testified to.

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 6>Oh, it absolutely does. And you know, the more that

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 6>the FBI discovers evidence that was hidden away, the more

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 6>incriminating it is for James Comy. But you know today's

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:59.279
<v Speaker 6>decision by the Virginia judge. I think it's the wrong decision.

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:02.359
<v Speaker 6>It will will likely be appealed to a higher court.

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 6>But in the meantime, since Judge Curry dismissed the case,

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:10.280
<v Speaker 6>as you point out, Shawn, without prejudice, that means the

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 6>statute of limitations, which has now expired, is told or

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:22.040
<v Speaker 6>extended for six more months, so that both Comey and

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 6>James can be re indicted with the exact same charges,

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:31.720
<v Speaker 6>but with a different US attorney signing onto it. In fact,

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:36.600
<v Speaker 6>given the additional evidence discovered against Cumy, I think additional

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 6>charges could be added. Look, this was entirely foreseeable that

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:44.279
<v Speaker 6>this Clinton appointed judge would rule against the Trump administration.

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 6>I think Judge Curry is misinterpreting the law and the

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 6>constitution and ruling that Lindsay Halligan was invalidly appointed. The

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:56.480
<v Speaker 6>president has the sole power of appointment whenever there's a vacancy,

0:05:56.880 --> 0:06:02.600
<v Speaker 6>and that's what happened. Eric Sebert, who was interim appointed, expired.

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:06.160
<v Speaker 6>He was kept on by as US Attorney by a

0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:09.040
<v Speaker 6>vote of the judges in the district, which the law provides,

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 6>but he later departed that left of vacancy, which President

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 6>Trump filled with Halligan. There is nothing in the law

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 6>that forbids a president from making multiple appointments. But you know,

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:25.479
<v Speaker 6>this Democrat judge was looking for an excuse to toss

0:06:25.520 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 6>the case and conjured one up. But it's a pyrrhic

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:31.040
<v Speaker 6>victory because they'll be reindicted.

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:32.960
<v Speaker 1>What are your thoughts, David chum I.

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 7>Agree one hundred percent they will be re indicted. The

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 7>statute Greg talks about in the eighteen USC thirty two

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 7>to eighty eight allows them six months now to reindict,

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:43.720
<v Speaker 7>so the statute limitations doesn't become an issue, and if

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:46.920
<v Speaker 7>they appeal it, then sixty days from when the decision

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 7>will become final. Aft the Court of Appeals to the

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:50.920
<v Speaker 7>Supreme Court has weighed in. But you know, there are

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 7>many arguments that he made here, some very distinguished professor's professors.

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:59.159
<v Speaker 7>Stephen Calabresi has said this section of this statute that

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 7>allows federal judge's authority in here to appoint the US

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:07.360
<v Speaker 7>attorney is unconstitutional. Another judge, Paul Castell. Former Judge Paul

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 7>Castell said even if it's constitutional, that it still is

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 7>not lawful for this. Uh, this statue not lawful. So

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 7>there are a number of arguments to be made still,

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 7>but I think they will be reindicted. I have to

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 7>tell you. I mean, Lindsay Halligan showed great courage in

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:25.240
<v Speaker 7>stepping up here on short notice, uh, filling the shoes.

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 7>Remember in this office, Coney had a relative working in

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 7>the office when Siebert was the US attorney. That relative left.

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 7>So Lindsay Halligan, you know, came into a situation that

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 7>was hostile from the start. I have to be, you know,

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 7>to be perfectly candid from everything in all the media

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 7>reports that we've seen, the Justice Department should have given

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 7>her much more support. She she did what she was

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 7>asked to do, and she did it because she believed

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 7>in it, and because the facts were there and the

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 7>evidence is there supported. I have no question that there'll

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 7>be reindictments in both cases. You might say me than

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 7>you might say, why not address the things on the merits?

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 7>If you're a public figure like Letitia James Racomi, wouldn't

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 7>you want this aired on the merits? If you think

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 7>you're right now?

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>I would think so. Yeah. But I mean, as I

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 1>pointed out many times on this program that this is

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the low hanging fruit. Moving on to a separate issue,

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>separate and apart, is we have this issue of you know,

0:08:21.120 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 1>six lawmakers, senators and congressman, this tape that they put

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 1>out at demanding that, in fact, that the military and

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:36.559
<v Speaker 1>the CIA have a duty and an obligation to disobey

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the orders of the commander in chief. When confronted on

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:44.320
<v Speaker 1>this issue this weekend, Elie Slockin, Senator Michigan, said she's

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:48.440
<v Speaker 1>not aware of President Trump making any illegal orders. She

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>made this comment on ABC. Here's what she said.

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 3>So let's talk right now.

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:56.679
<v Speaker 8>Do you believe President Trump has issued any illegal orders?

0:08:57.320 --> 0:09:00.199
<v Speaker 9>To my knowledge, I am not aware of things that

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 9>are illegal, but certainly there are some legal gymnastics that

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 9>are going on with these Caribbean strikes and everything related

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 9>to Venezuela.

0:09:07.280 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Okay, now the president has you believes that this is

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 1>seditious behavior. It's been making the rounds all over the place.

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:19.959
<v Speaker 1>Eighteen USC. Twenty three, eighty seven. We have talked about

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:24.319
<v Speaker 1>it on this program, and the idea that it's optional

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:27.720
<v Speaker 1>to obey the president's orders. She's admitting that she doesn't

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 1>have a specific example. I don't know what the proper

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:34.680
<v Speaker 1>analysis of this is in terms of a legal effect.

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 1>But here, if you look at the statute, it activities

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>affecting the Armed Forces general. It makes it a federal

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:45.600
<v Speaker 1>crime to do any of the following with the intent

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:49.559
<v Speaker 1>to interfere with US military operations, advise urge or attempt

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 1>to cause insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty among

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:57.839
<v Speaker 1>members of the US military, or obstruct or attempt to

0:09:57.880 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 1>obstruct recruiting, enlistment, general milleritary operations, or three distribute materials

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:06.079
<v Speaker 1>advocating any of the above. The law does not require

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:10.559
<v Speaker 1>advocating the overthrow of the government. It's specifically about undermining

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the functioning of the US military. Do you think that

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:17.440
<v Speaker 1>that particular code greg Jarrett, eighteen USC. Twenty three eighty

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 1>seven is applicable to the senators In Congressman.

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 6>Percent, it is well established that orders by the President

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 6>are presumed to be lawful and must be obeyed at

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:36.199
<v Speaker 6>all times by service members. Now one can reasonably debate

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 6>whether calling on those service members to disobey unlawful orders

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:45.560
<v Speaker 6>actually rises to the level of sedition, which is a

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:50.960
<v Speaker 6>very high threshold. But Sean, you're correct it does violate

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:55.439
<v Speaker 6>a very specific different law passed by Congress, which makes

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 6>it a crime to undermine the loyalty in the morale

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:04.200
<v Speaker 6>or the discipline of US forces by encouraging or urging

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 6>or advising them to disobey orders. Eighteen Usc. Twenty three

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:14.720
<v Speaker 6>eighty seven. What's so dishonest and diabolical about what these

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 6>six members of Congress did is that their statements insinuated

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 6>that Trump had issued unlawful orders, when in fact there's

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 6>no evidence that he has done that. And when questioned,

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 6>you played the clip, none of them has cited a

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 6>single illegal order. So you know, it's like the old

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:37.320
<v Speaker 6>prosecutor who asks an innocent man, how often do you

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 6>beat your wife? The question contains a false statement, so

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 6>it sounds incriminating. That's what they did to Trump here

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 6>in their videotape statements. They tried to pretend that he's

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:55.200
<v Speaker 6>done something unlawful when in fact he hasn't.

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 7>Your take, David Shan, Yeah, I mean, I hate to

0:11:57.120 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 7>be just a yes man on the show, but you

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 7>and Greg are both correct. Eighteen Usc. Twenty three eighty seven.

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 7>Applicable penalty is up to ten years. I think there's

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 7>another statute that could apply. Eighteen USC. Thirteen eighty one

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:12.560
<v Speaker 7>makes it a crime to entice to procure someone to dessert.

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 7>That's the logical conclusion here would be desertion the service

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 7>member him or herself. First of all, you have an

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 7>absolute duty not to obey a manifestly unlawful order. And

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 7>it's no defense to say I'm just obeying orders. That's

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 7>not what we have here. And so for a service

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 7>member to disobey disorder all kinds of punishments. There's non

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 7>judicial punishments under Article fifteen, administrative penalties so on, or

0:12:35.280 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 7>there's a court martial confinement up to two years if

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 7>it's a general order up to five years, if you

0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:44.679
<v Speaker 7>willfully disbey a commissioned officer discharge maybe and in times

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:46.679
<v Speaker 7>of war, frankly, it's death penalty, which I think is

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 7>what President Trump was referring to. The penalty is out

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 7>there under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. If you

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 7>disobey a superior off willfully disobey a superior off commissioned

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 7>officers order in time of war, you do are subject

0:12:59.040 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 7>to the death penalty.

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:01.959
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's going to be interesting to watch. By the way,

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Letitia James It's simple. Either she claimed on papers that

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:10.480
<v Speaker 1>it was her primary residence or she didn't. It's really

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 1>that simple. Anyway. We continue now with David Shoon and

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Greg Jareder with us last question for you only, David,

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and I only have about thirty seconds for you to answer.

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:22.560
<v Speaker 1>You were Jeffrey Epstein's attorney in the final days of

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 1>his life. You specifically asked him, and you've said it

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 1>on this program before, whether he had anything any incriminating

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 1>information on Donald Trump. He told you what he told me.

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:35.320
<v Speaker 7>He absolutely did not. And what I've said many times

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:37.720
<v Speaker 7>is you can try to interpret all of these emails

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 7>and so on, and the mention of names and putting

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:42.839
<v Speaker 7>innocent people into it because their name is mentioned without

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:46.440
<v Speaker 7>any question. Jeffrey Epstein had an absolute interest, if it

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 7>were true, in bringing forth any dirt he had on

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 7>Donald Trump, to try to gain leverage in his face.

0:13:51.480 --> 0:13:52.839
<v Speaker 7>The fact that at that point.

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Is, but he also hated Donald Trump because Donald Trump

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:59.319
<v Speaker 1>humiliated him by throwing him out of his club publicly

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:02.559
<v Speaker 1>and spectac acculately and loudly. Would he do that if,

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 1>in fact he knew he had incriminating information on him?

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:07.840
<v Speaker 7>If he had incriminated information. He certainly would have tried

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:10.480
<v Speaker 7>to hurt him if he could, but he didn't have

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 7>that information. And you know, I know people have painted

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 7>a monst and so on. He was not in the

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 7>business of just making up something about somebody else, and

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 7>he wasn't going to do that to President Trump. And

0:14:20.440 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 7>that's what it would have been required. So that to

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 7>me speaks louder than anything. He had the incentive then

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 7>to use it if he had it, and he didn't.

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, we appreciate both of you, Greg Jarrett and

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 1>David Chan Thank you both. Eight hundred nine four one.

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Shawn is on number. If you want to be a

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:36.120
<v Speaker 1>part of the program, we'll get to your calls coming

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 1>up here. Eight hundred nine to four one, Shawn.

0:14:38.640 --> 0:14:38.960
<v Speaker 4>All right.

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Let us well before I get there, you know MS

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 1>DNC never going to change. They're like apparently going through

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 1>some name change. We're not going to change our name,

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 1>MS DNC, MS Socialist DNC, I don't know whatever you

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 1>want to call it. So listen to one guest says

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 1>that the Trump administration is going to bring back hate speech.

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I want you to pay close er to mention to this.

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 9>But my point is that there's been a broader effort

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 9>here obviously to sort of like bring back or destigmatize

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 9>I guess, hate speech and restigmatize or or stigmatize anew

0:15:15.440 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 9>you know, American heroes and rainbows and other you know DEI.

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 9>There's been a lot going on within this Department of

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 9>Defense and DHS in this particular case, to try to

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 9>basically get rid of, get rid of diversity, get rid

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:35.480
<v Speaker 9>of like any sort of recognition that there should be something,

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 9>you know, that we should celebrate our difference.

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Yea and crum is trying to bring back hate speech.

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's stay on the same network. And a commentator uh

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 1>celebrating ANTII protesters that were slashing tires, casing agents out

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 1>of buildings. Is this hate speech? Listen.

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 8>My MVP of the week is all of the students

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 8>who walked out in Charlotte this week in protest of ICE.

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Rates remind us because we didn't talk about it.

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 8>So Charlotte's web is basically ICE Department of Homeland Securities

0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 8>plan to arrest thousands of supposedly undocumented people in Charlotte.

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 8>It has terrorized the city. It is shut down traffic.

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 8>You have schools where thirty forty percent of the kids

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 8>are not showing up. And these young people on their own,

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:23.040
<v Speaker 8>without politicians, without mom, without mom and dad, said we're

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 8>standing against this. We want our country to be better.

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 8>And thousands of them walk out of their schools in

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 8>protests to say we don't want ICE here. In addition

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 8>to the fact, and I won't say that I'm suggesting

0:16:32.520 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 8>this behavior, but ICE agents have found that their tires

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 8>are slashed. They have been found that they have been

0:16:37.160 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 8>chased out of it. Yes, they have been chased out

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 8>of buildings, chased out.

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Of WRESTLERUS behavior.

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 8>It is dangerous behavior, but it is a demonstration that

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 8>the American public, when they're not being listened to, these

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 8>are the options that will take I hope this administration

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 8>listens and pulls back these ICE rates.

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh you either do what we say or well, slash

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 1>your tires and we'll get violent okay from the you know,

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the same network saying, oh, this is hate We're worried

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 1>about hate speech. How about hate actions? James in Texas,

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:08.920
<v Speaker 1>God bless Texas. How are you, James? Glad you called?

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm doing all right, mister Sean. How about you.

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:16.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm hanging in there. I'm dealing with a compressed nerve

0:17:16.400 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 1>in my neck from lifting. Not fun.

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, hey, I just want to let you know

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 3>I've been listening to you ever since President Trump walked

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:26.480
<v Speaker 3>down or went down the escalators with his wife back

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 3>on his first his first run when he won. So

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 3>I guess I had a question, but now it's more

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 3>of a statement. Maybe it'll be a question later. I

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 3>don't know. I have so much I would love to

0:17:36.240 --> 0:17:39.080
<v Speaker 3>talk to you about. But you know, we know that

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 3>there's well I'm pretty sure that there's laws on the books,

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 3>federal laws on the books about all the stuff that

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 3>has taken place since he first ran for president. And

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:53.360
<v Speaker 3>what's really disheartening is, after all these years, not one

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:57.399
<v Speaker 3>of the people that played a role in trying to attack,

0:17:57.600 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 3>trying to do things to him, the spye, the stuff

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 3>that was going on, we all you know, I mean,

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 3>you've talked about it over and over and over again.

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 3>These people violated federal hall. They they did things way way,

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:12.120
<v Speaker 3>way way out and you know, the out of bounds.

0:18:12.200 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 3>And not one of them, not one of them is

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:17.040
<v Speaker 3>going to be held or has been held accountable, None

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 3>of them that have really you know, like been on

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 3>TV a lot or on these liberal media stations where

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 3>they talk and they talked this nonsense and just like

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 3>what you got through just talking about going out and

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 3>slashing tires. This is supposed to be celebrated for some reason.

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 3>It drives me nuts. And then you know Friday, you

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 3>were talking about, you know, our our hard working congressmen

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:39.399
<v Speaker 3>and senators phone wreckerds being you know, being spied on,

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:42.400
<v Speaker 3>you being spied on. They were all they all violated

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 3>laws and not none of them are going to be

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:47.880
<v Speaker 3>held accountable. And now we got James Coney. What the charges

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:50.199
<v Speaker 3>were dropped? I'm you know, it's just.

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 1>It's very well, let me just tell you. And I

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 1>was very straightforward with everybody. The statute of limitations on

0:18:56.680 --> 0:19:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the major issues involving call me had long since expired.

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 1>The only reason I always felt and I said that

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 1>this is low hanging fruit lying to Congress. As serious

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 1>as that is, other people go to jail for that.

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:13.720
<v Speaker 1>And he's an FBI director, and I think, you know,

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 1>those burn bags are burning HOMEI I am pretty confident

0:19:18.440 --> 0:19:22.160
<v Speaker 1>that this the charges will be reinstated in both cases.

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:27.359
<v Speaker 1>But the frustrating part, and so many people ask me,

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:33.320
<v Speaker 1>how come nothing ever happens. And the answer is we've

0:19:33.359 --> 0:19:38.159
<v Speaker 1>not been in power to enforce the laws of our

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:43.119
<v Speaker 1>land and you know enforce you know, our constitutional republic.

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:46.879
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of horrible, dangerous, terrible things have happened.

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 1>The only the only way this can happen is a

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 1>very difficult legal maneuver, which is what FBI Director Cash

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Pattel discussed, has not talked about it recently, which is

0:19:58.720 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 1>it has there can they be proven a grand conspiracy

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:07.360
<v Speaker 1>to undermine Donald Trump from that moment you described when

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 1>he came down the escalator with his wife Milania, and

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:13.439
<v Speaker 1>what they tried to do with a dirty dossier that

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:17.680
<v Speaker 1>they knew was dirty and political in nature, and how

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:21.160
<v Speaker 1>they used it to spy on Canada Trump transition team

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Trump President Trump. You know, now we know about the

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:29.640
<v Speaker 1>declassification from Tulci Gabbard that they took, you know, career

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:33.920
<v Speaker 1>intelligence officials and their assessment that there was no Trump

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:38.879
<v Speaker 1>Russia collusion. And according to what we know from Tulsi

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Gabbard and this declassification, then they ordered a new intelligence

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:46.920
<v Speaker 1>assessment report because they didn't like what the real one said,

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:50.120
<v Speaker 1>and that one came to a very different conclusion. Then

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:53.359
<v Speaker 1>you have Hunter Biden laptop. They had verified its authenticity

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 1>March at twenty twenty. They go through the whole summer,

0:20:56.080 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 1>meeting weekly with big Tech to prebunk what they knew

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 1>to be very very true. Are they putting center blocks

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 1>on the scale of an election? Did they weaponize our

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 1>justice system as a means of ever making ever allowing

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:13.919
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump even an opportunity to become the president of

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:18.840
<v Speaker 1>our country? And they did everything humanly possible in terms

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:21.639
<v Speaker 1>of the use of law, fair and the weaponization of

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 1>justice to destroy this man, and in spite of all

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:29.400
<v Speaker 1>of those attempts, he was still elected. It's a very

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 1>dangerous time for a constitutional republic when all of this

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:36.440
<v Speaker 1>happens and people don't get held accountable. You know, look

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 1>at Arctic Frost, look at all these senators, and you know,

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 1>all these conservative groups and Jim Jordan and all these

0:21:44.359 --> 0:21:47.919
<v Speaker 1>other people you know that are being flat out spied

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:52.960
<v Speaker 1>on just because they support Donald Trump. You know, I've

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 1>not complained, you know, outwardly that much about all the

0:21:56.800 --> 0:21:59.040
<v Speaker 1>stuff they did to me, but it's it's not been

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 1>exactly pleasant. But you know, does anyone really want to

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:04.639
<v Speaker 1>hear me whine? I don't want to hear me whine

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:10.879
<v Speaker 1>ungrateful that that. You know, I chose this life. I

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 1>chose this career to be a public figure. I get it. However,

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:18.480
<v Speaker 1>I never thought my private personal text messages that they

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:21.400
<v Speaker 1>never got from me would ever be released to the public.

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 1>And we're talking about thousands of messages. I kind of

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 1>view that as an invasion of privacy, don't you absolutely?

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:32.880
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely? I mean you were absolutely. That's what That's what's

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:33.679
<v Speaker 3>so frustrating.

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:36.679
<v Speaker 1>There are two things that I'm going to warn you about.

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it's Thanksgiving week. Everybody's on vacation this week.

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:44.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm spending most of my spare time trying

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:47.119
<v Speaker 1>to get this next straightened out. It's been impacting my

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 1>life for a month. And I will tell you that

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:53.159
<v Speaker 1>we're going to hit the We're going to hit the

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:56.040
<v Speaker 1>ground running in January. It's going to be the most

0:22:56.080 --> 0:22:58.920
<v Speaker 1>important mid terms of our lifetime, and it's going to

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 1>take all hands on debn Otherwise it's going to be

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:09.439
<v Speaker 1>two years of never ending lawfare, weaponization, investigation, impeachment, and

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the Trump agenda will be stopped in its tracks. And

0:23:13.840 --> 0:23:16.880
<v Speaker 1>then when we get through that election, then I'm going

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 1>to do my own vetting like I did in twenty

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:24.399
<v Speaker 1>fifteen and sixteen, and I will I will give my

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:27.959
<v Speaker 1>best recommendation who I think is the best person who

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 1>carry on the mantle of President Trump. And I'm sure

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 1>people will spend years probably criticizing me. That happened the

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 1>last time when I supported Trump ahead of most other people.

0:23:38.600 --> 0:23:41.679
<v Speaker 1>That's a preview of coming attractions. Linda, how right am

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I on that prediction? I'd say you're pretty spottling on that. Yeah,

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Linda doesn't say she doesn't say many complimentary things, so

0:23:50.359 --> 0:23:55.720
<v Speaker 1>that's a good thing. Hey, that's not true. Easy, it easy.

0:23:55.760 --> 0:23:56.400
<v Speaker 1>What are you doing?

0:23:57.040 --> 0:23:57.359
<v Speaker 4>Listen?

0:23:57.359 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 10>If you were looking for a cupcake producer, you definitely

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 10>the wrong show.

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Well you were a cupcake for for the first five years.

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Did you think you talked? I was just quiet. It's different. Yeah,

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I can't. I can't even imagine that person, James, Thank you,

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 1>buddy Mac in New Orleans. Mac, how are you glad

0:24:13.320 --> 0:24:13.640
<v Speaker 1>you called?

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 4>Wonderful? Thank you for taking ma call. How are you today?

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 4>And I hope everything is great there where you are

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 4>in sunny South Florida?

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 1>It's good. What's going on with you?

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:25.960
<v Speaker 4>My friend, Well, every day is Saturday. But I'd like

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:33.720
<v Speaker 4>to point something out. These wonderful patriotic politicos who have

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:36.480
<v Speaker 4>been in federal civil service, who've been in the military

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:39.760
<v Speaker 4>and stuff. Great for their service, grateful for that. However,

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 4>where was all they're upset when the Obama administration was

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:48.520
<v Speaker 4>droning US citizens? Where was their upset whenever the Biden

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 4>White House was creating malicious prosecution against you know, President Trump.

0:24:56.920 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 4>Where was their upset when members of the staff, members

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:08.080
<v Speaker 4>of the administration were prosecuted for bs Where was.

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 1>The I mean, why, why don't you answer your own question?

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:14.359
<v Speaker 1>Because you're you're very smart. What's the answer to the question?

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:19.399
<v Speaker 4>Oh? I understand that, But that's my point. Where's the

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 4>where's the the upset with the wrongdoing? There's no wrongdoing

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:27.399
<v Speaker 4>set forth in the in the in these people that

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:31.160
<v Speaker 4>are pointing out what they want done supposedly.

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:35.639
<v Speaker 1>Well said, and and here's the thing, what they what

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:40.000
<v Speaker 1>they've done here is dangerous. What they've done here is

0:25:40.040 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 1>extraordinarily dangerous. The question is does it does it cross

0:25:43.800 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the threshold into law breaking? And will they help be

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 1>held accountable? That's the question.

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:50.359
<v Speaker 4>Uh.

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:53.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't like to give false. Hope, I hope, I

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:57.119
<v Speaker 1>hope they are Mac. We love New Orleans, We love you,

0:25:57.240 --> 0:25:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Thank you have a great Thanksgiving All right, quick break

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 1>right back to our phones eight hundred and nine four one,

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Shawn our number as we continue.

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:12.480
<v Speaker 4>The final hour roundup is next. You do not want

0:26:12.560 --> 0:26:15.280
<v Speaker 4>to miss it, and stay tuned for the final hour

0:26:15.440 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 4>free for all on the Sean Hannity Show.

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:49.040
<v Speaker 1>At back our busy phones eight hundred nine four one, Shawn.

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:50.400
<v Speaker 1>If you want to be a part of the program,

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Steph in California.

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 10>High Hi, Sean. I've been a listener for many years

0:26:56.000 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 10>and I appreciate how much I learn every time I listen.

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:05.199
<v Speaker 10>I wanted to bring to light just the tactics that

0:27:05.280 --> 0:27:08.600
<v Speaker 10>they use, and it was used in that when those

0:27:08.640 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 10>senators made that video plug and also in just the

0:27:12.920 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 10>last clip you played. And what they tend to do

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:18.200
<v Speaker 10>is they they usually make some statements that are very

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:20.679
<v Speaker 10>muddy and then they get to what they want you

0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:24.160
<v Speaker 10>to do, which, of course, in the case of those senators,

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:27.360
<v Speaker 10>it was to defy the orders. And here's how they

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 10>do it. I'll just bring that as the example. Their

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 10>first statement, they said that this administration was pitting the

0:27:34.119 --> 0:27:39.399
<v Speaker 10>military against citizens. And then they go on with another

0:27:39.440 --> 0:27:43.240
<v Speaker 10>statement that says, here goes more fear, another false claim,

0:27:43.680 --> 0:27:47.480
<v Speaker 10>threats to the constitution are now here at home, was

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 10>coming from within, And then they went on with you

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 10>can refuse, and then of course you must refuse the orders,

0:27:56.600 --> 0:28:00.880
<v Speaker 10>and your last clip with them talking about the same

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:04.479
<v Speaker 10>type of thing with the with the ice. They just

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:06.800
<v Speaker 10>did the same exact thing. And this is this is

0:28:06.880 --> 0:28:11.120
<v Speaker 10>right out of the Marxist playbook. They make you fearful.

0:28:11.320 --> 0:28:16.400
<v Speaker 10>They make statements that are are muddy or untrue, but palatable,

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 10>and of course to the cult on the left, these

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 10>statements are very palatable, and they believe them wholeheartedly, that

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:27.920
<v Speaker 10>this administration is a threat to the constitution, that they're

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:31.879
<v Speaker 10>pitting the military against poor innocent citizens, and that everyone

0:28:32.000 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 10>must just get up and fight, and you know, and say.

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:41.280
<v Speaker 1>They are they are pushing our military to violate their

0:28:41.360 --> 0:28:45.280
<v Speaker 1>oath and the Constitution by what they're doing, and I

0:28:45.320 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 1>should I believe they should all be held accountable. And

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:50.680
<v Speaker 1>for Slotgun to admit there's no justification that she can

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 1>think of makes it more reckless. Well said Steph, I'm

0:28:54.200 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 1>just running out of time. I'm up on the Clock

0:28:56.960 --> 0:28:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I do appreciate your call