1 00:00:00,840 --> 00:00:04,000 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside 2 00:00:04,040 --> 00:00:05,240 Speaker 1: my co host Matt Miller. 3 00:00:05,640 --> 00:00:09,720 Speaker 2: Every business day we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros, 4 00:00:09,720 --> 00:00:13,600 Speaker 2: and Bloomberg experts, along with essential market moven news. 5 00:00:14,160 --> 00:00:17,279 Speaker 1: Find the Bloomberg Markets podcast called Apple Podcasts or wherever 6 00:00:17,360 --> 00:00:20,520 Speaker 1: you listen to podcasts, and at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. 7 00:00:20,680 --> 00:00:22,919 Speaker 3: It's Nathan Deana Bloomberg Intelligence. 8 00:00:22,960 --> 00:00:25,320 Speaker 2: Look Look, look, look, look see there in the I 9 00:00:25,400 --> 00:00:28,400 Speaker 2: see him lower the right hand corner, I see him. Indeed, 10 00:00:28,520 --> 00:00:30,960 Speaker 2: are streaming live on YouTube dot com. By the way, 11 00:00:31,040 --> 00:00:33,280 Speaker 2: so if you type in Bloomberg Radio on the search 12 00:00:33,400 --> 00:00:35,440 Speaker 2: on YouTube dot com, you can see us. You see 13 00:00:35,880 --> 00:00:38,200 Speaker 2: me my bright green shirt there, and you'll see Nathan 14 00:00:38,240 --> 00:00:39,479 Speaker 2: Dean in a moment, Nathan. 15 00:00:39,520 --> 00:00:40,920 Speaker 3: We got headlines. 16 00:00:40,479 --> 00:00:43,400 Speaker 2: Across the terminal that the SEC is going to finally 17 00:00:43,400 --> 00:00:48,400 Speaker 2: impose these new hedge fund and private equity rules fee 18 00:00:48,479 --> 00:00:53,199 Speaker 2: disclosure treatment of certain investors, and the hedge fund industry 19 00:00:53,240 --> 00:00:54,800 Speaker 2: has threatened to sue over this proposal. 20 00:00:54,840 --> 00:00:55,280 Speaker 1: What do we know? 21 00:00:56,160 --> 00:00:58,880 Speaker 4: So, essentially, this is a proposal that would require the 22 00:00:59,040 --> 00:01:02,320 Speaker 4: hedge funds and private equity funds private funds to disclose 23 00:01:02,360 --> 00:01:07,520 Speaker 4: a lot of information including compensation, fees, performance and so 24 00:01:07,600 --> 00:01:10,720 Speaker 4: forth like that expenses, and this is a standardization or 25 00:01:10,760 --> 00:01:15,160 Speaker 4: a standardized disclosure so that an investor can essentially compare 26 00:01:15,200 --> 00:01:19,760 Speaker 4: and contrast the performance of one fund versus another. In 27 00:01:19,800 --> 00:01:23,000 Speaker 4: addition to this, it would also prohibit certain conflicts of interests. 28 00:01:23,120 --> 00:01:25,679 Speaker 4: One of the more interesting aspects of the proposal is 29 00:01:25,800 --> 00:01:28,920 Speaker 4: if you're going to cash out an investor and you're 30 00:01:28,920 --> 00:01:31,320 Speaker 4: going to give a certain rebate or allow that investor 31 00:01:31,319 --> 00:01:33,920 Speaker 4: to cash out at a certain percentage, you have to 32 00:01:33,920 --> 00:01:37,399 Speaker 4: make that available to all different types of investors. Now, 33 00:01:37,440 --> 00:01:40,000 Speaker 4: like you said before, the Managed Funded Association and the 34 00:01:40,040 --> 00:01:43,880 Speaker 4: trade associations hate this rule. It's going to be significant 35 00:01:43,920 --> 00:01:46,920 Speaker 4: costs in terms of compliance headaches. The big funds should 36 00:01:46,959 --> 00:01:49,520 Speaker 4: be okay, but this is really also going to increase 37 00:01:49,560 --> 00:01:53,440 Speaker 4: competition amongst the smaller funds. We certainly anticipate the funds 38 00:01:53,480 --> 00:01:56,680 Speaker 4: will sue. They've said that they could sue within the 39 00:01:56,720 --> 00:01:59,920 Speaker 4: first two weeks. In fact, the Managed Funds of Associations 40 00:02:00,040 --> 00:02:03,280 Speaker 4: comment letter before it was finalized said that they were 41 00:02:03,320 --> 00:02:06,480 Speaker 4: attacking the cost benefit analysis of the rule. For those 42 00:02:06,520 --> 00:02:08,960 Speaker 4: of us in Washington, that's essentially a keyword. We're going 43 00:02:09,040 --> 00:02:11,680 Speaker 4: to sue you. Now, the SEC did make some changes. 44 00:02:11,760 --> 00:02:14,160 Speaker 4: They actually took out some language that made it a 45 00:02:14,160 --> 00:02:17,480 Speaker 4: little bit easier for people to sue funds, but I 46 00:02:17,480 --> 00:02:19,359 Speaker 4: certainly don't think that's going to keep the MFA and 47 00:02:19,400 --> 00:02:22,520 Speaker 4: the other types of fund industries from taking this to 48 00:02:22,560 --> 00:02:23,000 Speaker 4: the courts. 49 00:02:23,680 --> 00:02:26,960 Speaker 1: So again, just give us the history here, and Nathan, 50 00:02:27,360 --> 00:02:29,520 Speaker 1: is this a solution in search of a problem or 51 00:02:29,639 --> 00:02:32,760 Speaker 1: is there really concern out there about disclosure from the 52 00:02:32,800 --> 00:02:33,360 Speaker 1: hedge funds. 53 00:02:33,800 --> 00:02:36,080 Speaker 4: So I think what this is that they took a 54 00:02:36,360 --> 00:02:42,519 Speaker 4: consumer level initiative, which is disclosures to consumers, and thinking, 55 00:02:42,639 --> 00:02:46,880 Speaker 4: you know, just not sophisticated investors, but just disclosures to 56 00:02:47,000 --> 00:02:49,680 Speaker 4: individual consumers, and then they applied that to the private 57 00:02:49,680 --> 00:02:52,480 Speaker 4: fund industry. Now, the SEC will say, look, there's eighteen 58 00:02:52,600 --> 00:02:55,200 Speaker 4: you know, trillion dollars in assets under management in these funds. 59 00:02:55,440 --> 00:02:58,079 Speaker 4: Investors need to know what's happening here. But the funds 60 00:02:58,080 --> 00:03:00,799 Speaker 4: come back and say, look, we're dealing with sophistic get investors. 61 00:03:00,800 --> 00:03:03,360 Speaker 4: We already give them these types of disclosures anyway. So 62 00:03:03,680 --> 00:03:06,000 Speaker 4: I'm not exactly sure that the you know, this was 63 00:03:06,120 --> 00:03:08,680 Speaker 4: really like, I think the most important rule that the 64 00:03:08,720 --> 00:03:11,400 Speaker 4: SEC should have been working on, but obviously it's one 65 00:03:11,400 --> 00:03:14,600 Speaker 4: of the biggest and more dramatic impacts to the fun industry. 66 00:03:15,080 --> 00:03:17,040 Speaker 4: This is something the SEC has wanted to do for 67 00:03:17,080 --> 00:03:19,760 Speaker 4: a while now, and you know, we will see when 68 00:03:19,800 --> 00:03:21,600 Speaker 4: we get the final language, when these funds have to 69 00:03:21,600 --> 00:03:23,840 Speaker 4: start complying with it. I should also note that if 70 00:03:23,880 --> 00:03:26,400 Speaker 4: you are a non US fund, as long as you 71 00:03:26,440 --> 00:03:28,359 Speaker 4: take in US money or US clients, you're gonna have 72 00:03:28,360 --> 00:03:29,320 Speaker 4: to adhere to this as well. 73 00:03:29,919 --> 00:03:32,880 Speaker 2: I mean, if they already give them these disclosures, I 74 00:03:32,880 --> 00:03:37,880 Speaker 2: can't imagine why compliance costs would climb, right, If you 75 00:03:38,000 --> 00:03:44,920 Speaker 2: already are transparent about your fees and expenses, then you 76 00:03:44,960 --> 00:03:48,240 Speaker 2: should just be able to publish that. It seems like 77 00:03:48,280 --> 00:03:51,520 Speaker 2: they might be fighting back more Nathan, against rules that 78 00:03:51,560 --> 00:03:54,640 Speaker 2: would prohibit them from allowing favored investors to cash out 79 00:03:54,680 --> 00:03:55,800 Speaker 2: more easily than others. 80 00:03:56,280 --> 00:03:56,520 Speaker 5: Yeah. 81 00:03:56,560 --> 00:03:59,040 Speaker 4: Absolutely. I mean for the big funds, the compliance costs 82 00:03:59,040 --> 00:04:01,080 Speaker 4: looks they already do this, But for a lot of 83 00:04:01,120 --> 00:04:03,120 Speaker 4: smaller funds out there, they don't have this type of 84 00:04:03,200 --> 00:04:06,080 Speaker 4: legal compliance expertise. They're certainly going to have to ramp 85 00:04:06,160 --> 00:04:07,920 Speaker 4: up there. But like you said before, I mean this 86 00:04:08,200 --> 00:04:10,920 Speaker 4: the biggest issue here is the comparison angle. You know, 87 00:04:11,080 --> 00:04:13,640 Speaker 4: if there is some type of secret deal that's going 88 00:04:13,680 --> 00:04:15,640 Speaker 4: on out there, well that deal now needs to be 89 00:04:15,680 --> 00:04:18,520 Speaker 4: made public. And if you're going to compare against one 90 00:04:18,520 --> 00:04:21,200 Speaker 4: fund versus the other, and some of these comparisons also 91 00:04:21,279 --> 00:04:23,960 Speaker 4: have to go down to the portfolio levels, so not 92 00:04:24,080 --> 00:04:27,400 Speaker 4: just the entity level. You know, if you're looking to 93 00:04:27,480 --> 00:04:29,599 Speaker 4: invest in a hedge fund or a private equity fund, 94 00:04:29,640 --> 00:04:32,520 Speaker 4: anytime soon, you're going to get a lot more information 95 00:04:32,680 --> 00:04:35,640 Speaker 4: on how to make those decisions, and competition is going 96 00:04:35,640 --> 00:04:38,280 Speaker 4: to increase as a result. You know, we've seen some 97 00:04:38,320 --> 00:04:40,919 Speaker 4: economic evidence. I'm not sure if I actually buy into this, 98 00:04:41,040 --> 00:04:43,880 Speaker 4: but we've seen some economic evidence cited by the SEC 99 00:04:44,040 --> 00:04:45,960 Speaker 4: that fees will go down as a result of this. 100 00:04:46,720 --> 00:04:49,040 Speaker 4: But you know that will have to be played out 101 00:04:49,080 --> 00:04:49,880 Speaker 4: over the next few years. 102 00:04:50,640 --> 00:04:52,960 Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly, all right, Nathan, Hey, thanks so much for 103 00:04:53,040 --> 00:04:55,599 Speaker 1: joining us. Nathan Dean, He's a senior US policy analyst 104 00:04:55,760 --> 00:04:58,760 Speaker 1: with Bloomberg Intelligence. Absolutely spot on this news. 105 00:04:58,760 --> 00:04:58,960 Speaker 6: Here. 106 00:05:00,120 --> 00:05:03,520 Speaker 7: You're listening to the team Ken's are Live program Bloomberg 107 00:05:03,560 --> 00:05:06,960 Speaker 7: Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, 108 00:05:07,000 --> 00:05:10,200 Speaker 7: the iHeartRadio app, and the Bloomberg Business app, or listening 109 00:05:10,240 --> 00:05:12,360 Speaker 7: on demand wherever you get your podcasts. 110 00:05:15,800 --> 00:05:20,680 Speaker 1: Eric Adelberg, mortgage backed security strategist for Bloomberg Intelligence, joins 111 00:05:20,720 --> 00:05:23,320 Speaker 1: us Erica. We had some new home sales data come 112 00:05:23,360 --> 00:05:26,400 Speaker 1: out today. What's what's your sense of what we saw 113 00:05:26,480 --> 00:05:27,200 Speaker 1: builders are building? 114 00:05:27,240 --> 00:05:30,000 Speaker 8: It looks like, yeah, you know, it actually surprised me, 115 00:05:30,200 --> 00:05:33,280 Speaker 8: we saw I mean, to be fair, this is actually 116 00:05:33,279 --> 00:05:37,680 Speaker 8: reflecting mortgage prices probably that were maybe prior to the 117 00:05:37,760 --> 00:05:42,000 Speaker 8: latest jump up. Yep, but we're still seeing the share 118 00:05:42,240 --> 00:05:45,160 Speaker 8: of new homes increasing. They're about sixteen percent of total 119 00:05:45,240 --> 00:05:48,359 Speaker 8: sales now. And what the things that surprised me today? 120 00:05:48,400 --> 00:05:50,640 Speaker 1: So sixteen sorry a round sixteen percent of total sales? 121 00:05:50,680 --> 00:05:52,599 Speaker 1: Is that higher than average? Lower than average? 122 00:05:52,600 --> 00:05:52,919 Speaker 5: Were we? 123 00:05:53,200 --> 00:05:55,080 Speaker 8: Yeah? It was down to like six percent like a 124 00:05:55,080 --> 00:05:56,080 Speaker 8: couple of years ago. 125 00:05:56,240 --> 00:05:58,520 Speaker 1: Right, and so the long term average new homes built 126 00:05:58,600 --> 00:06:02,119 Speaker 1: maybe ten percent of the stuff being bought and sold. Yeah, okay, 127 00:06:02,160 --> 00:06:05,120 Speaker 1: so now it's higher. Yeah, because Matt's not going to 128 00:06:05,160 --> 00:06:08,240 Speaker 1: sell his west Chester retreat because he'd have to. 129 00:06:08,279 --> 00:06:10,200 Speaker 3: Goes I locked in at three and a quarter percent? 130 00:06:10,279 --> 00:06:10,720 Speaker 5: Are right? 131 00:06:10,920 --> 00:06:12,920 Speaker 1: So that's the problem, right, or that's the issue. 132 00:06:13,000 --> 00:06:15,000 Speaker 8: Well, the other things that surprised me were the fact 133 00:06:15,040 --> 00:06:18,000 Speaker 8: that the home prices actually, and these are a bit 134 00:06:18,040 --> 00:06:20,560 Speaker 8: of more of a jumpy series than existing home prices. 135 00:06:20,760 --> 00:06:24,440 Speaker 8: But existing home prices and new home prices in the 136 00:06:24,520 --> 00:06:27,680 Speaker 8: last month's report were more like median prices, call it, 137 00:06:28,240 --> 00:06:31,000 Speaker 8: were more or less equal. Usually new homes traded about 138 00:06:31,040 --> 00:06:34,760 Speaker 8: twenty five to thirty percent higher than existing homes, and 139 00:06:34,800 --> 00:06:38,320 Speaker 8: then this month that completely reversed. So the median price 140 00:06:38,400 --> 00:06:40,440 Speaker 8: for the new homes is now like four thirty six 141 00:06:40,520 --> 00:06:43,440 Speaker 8: and for the existing homes now back to four h six. 142 00:06:44,080 --> 00:06:47,400 Speaker 8: The existing home price fell a little bit, as you'd 143 00:06:47,400 --> 00:06:50,440 Speaker 8: expect season late, but new home prices actually jumped a 144 00:06:50,480 --> 00:06:53,240 Speaker 8: bunch from four to fifteen last month to four to 145 00:06:53,279 --> 00:06:56,560 Speaker 8: thirty six this month, So that's interesting. So it's not 146 00:06:56,640 --> 00:06:57,960 Speaker 8: just that they're cutting prices. 147 00:06:58,200 --> 00:07:01,640 Speaker 2: Erica, what is the your mortgage rate you look at, 148 00:07:01,680 --> 00:07:05,800 Speaker 2: because obviously it varies depending on a borrower's credit quality 149 00:07:06,120 --> 00:07:10,360 Speaker 2: and you know, the asset, et cetera. But I can see, 150 00:07:10,560 --> 00:07:13,760 Speaker 2: you know, in official Bloomberg stories, a much lower rate 151 00:07:13,920 --> 00:07:16,880 Speaker 2: sited than I see on the bank rate thirty year 152 00:07:16,920 --> 00:07:21,840 Speaker 2: mortgage right, So we're saying seven point three percent right 153 00:07:21,880 --> 00:07:24,680 Speaker 2: now and sounding an alarm. Meanwhile, the bank rate is 154 00:07:24,720 --> 00:07:27,520 Speaker 2: over seven point six. Yeah, what's the rate that you 155 00:07:27,520 --> 00:07:28,400 Speaker 2: look at, and why. 156 00:07:28,680 --> 00:07:30,240 Speaker 8: I do like to look at bank rate because it's 157 00:07:30,240 --> 00:07:34,000 Speaker 8: available daily Mortgage news daily also. But the big difference 158 00:07:34,000 --> 00:07:36,840 Speaker 8: when you're looking at mortgage rates is looking at what 159 00:07:36,880 --> 00:07:40,160 Speaker 8: they call effective rates, what you're paying if you hadn't 160 00:07:40,200 --> 00:07:44,440 Speaker 8: paid points, versus what the contract rate rates, which is 161 00:07:44,480 --> 00:07:47,040 Speaker 8: where a lot of people actually take out the mortgage 162 00:07:47,080 --> 00:07:50,720 Speaker 8: because they are paying points. So once you adjust for 163 00:07:51,080 --> 00:07:54,440 Speaker 8: the points and look at a no point adjusted rate, 164 00:07:54,440 --> 00:07:57,679 Speaker 8: it's always closer to the bank rate number. So even 165 00:07:57,760 --> 00:08:01,560 Speaker 8: even on the NBA thirty year fixing an index that 166 00:08:01,600 --> 00:08:04,280 Speaker 8: they released today, we have an index in Bloomberg that 167 00:08:04,320 --> 00:08:08,120 Speaker 8: they also release called MB thirty er effective rate and 168 00:08:08,200 --> 00:08:11,720 Speaker 8: similarly we back out and no point freddimack rate and 169 00:08:11,760 --> 00:08:14,280 Speaker 8: those are all above seven and a half percent. Now, 170 00:08:14,400 --> 00:08:17,720 Speaker 8: so yeah, mortgage borers might be able to get a 171 00:08:17,720 --> 00:08:21,320 Speaker 8: lower rate, but that's because they or somebody else is 172 00:08:21,360 --> 00:08:24,280 Speaker 8: paying points. Now, one of the reasons new home sales 173 00:08:24,320 --> 00:08:26,640 Speaker 8: has been doing as well as it has is because 174 00:08:26,720 --> 00:08:29,120 Speaker 8: the builders have come up with this great strategy where 175 00:08:29,120 --> 00:08:32,360 Speaker 8: they're actually buying down the mortgage rate for a lot 176 00:08:32,400 --> 00:08:36,760 Speaker 8: of their buyers. So until recently, some buyers were able 177 00:08:36,800 --> 00:08:40,120 Speaker 8: to get mortgage rates closer to five percent. It's a 178 00:08:40,120 --> 00:08:42,000 Speaker 8: good deal for the home builder. They don't have to 179 00:08:42,040 --> 00:08:44,440 Speaker 8: reduce their prices, and you know, make other people who 180 00:08:44,440 --> 00:08:47,920 Speaker 8: want prices on homes that higher prices mad. But at 181 00:08:47,920 --> 00:08:50,000 Speaker 8: the same time it makes it more affordable for new 182 00:08:50,000 --> 00:08:50,720 Speaker 8: home buyers. 183 00:08:51,200 --> 00:08:52,000 Speaker 3: So the builders. 184 00:08:52,320 --> 00:08:56,000 Speaker 2: It's not like the builders are extending lines of credit 185 00:08:56,040 --> 00:08:58,920 Speaker 2: to buyers. They're not giving mortgages to buyers. They're just 186 00:08:59,080 --> 00:09:01,320 Speaker 2: turning to the bank and saying, we'll buy points for them. 187 00:09:01,440 --> 00:09:03,559 Speaker 8: I mean, in some cases they have a relationship with 188 00:09:03,600 --> 00:09:07,720 Speaker 8: a lender. In a few cases they actually can probably 189 00:09:07,800 --> 00:09:09,920 Speaker 8: offer them mortgage. Have their own financing arms, they have 190 00:09:09,920 --> 00:09:10,960 Speaker 8: their own financing arms. 191 00:09:11,240 --> 00:09:14,520 Speaker 1: It's been a tough month for fixed income, really tough 192 00:09:14,559 --> 00:09:16,840 Speaker 1: month for mortgage of backed securities, off two point six percent. 193 00:09:17,280 --> 00:09:19,560 Speaker 1: What's it like out there in the NBS market these. 194 00:09:19,520 --> 00:09:23,880 Speaker 8: Days, It's it's probably pretty tough for some investors. It's 195 00:09:23,880 --> 00:09:26,560 Speaker 8: an interesting time for strategists. But one of the things 196 00:09:26,600 --> 00:09:29,319 Speaker 8: I'm looking at this morning is actually just how different 197 00:09:29,480 --> 00:09:32,400 Speaker 8: the current coupon, which is kind of where things are 198 00:09:32,400 --> 00:09:37,120 Speaker 8: being issued, is versus the mortgage index. And while the 199 00:09:37,120 --> 00:09:41,439 Speaker 8: mortgage index has underperformed because it's very long duration now, 200 00:09:41,480 --> 00:09:44,160 Speaker 8: because people are just sitting on their mortgages forever. 201 00:09:44,000 --> 00:09:47,719 Speaker 1: Matt I will be on it for years. 202 00:09:47,520 --> 00:09:51,040 Speaker 8: So from a duration standpoint, it's going to trade pretty 203 00:09:51,080 --> 00:09:56,960 Speaker 8: similarly to the tenure treasury, if you will. In fact, 204 00:09:57,200 --> 00:09:59,840 Speaker 8: mortgage spreads for the whole index aren't widening that much. 205 00:10:00,000 --> 00:10:04,160 Speaker 8: The same divergence between what you said about where mortgages 206 00:10:04,200 --> 00:10:06,600 Speaker 8: are being issued right now versus what most people have 207 00:10:06,960 --> 00:10:10,440 Speaker 8: is reflected in the mortgage index right now. The current 208 00:10:10,559 --> 00:10:13,000 Speaker 8: coupon or where the yield egals to the coupon around 209 00:10:13,080 --> 00:10:16,160 Speaker 8: par is about six percent for the first time again 210 00:10:16,240 --> 00:10:20,280 Speaker 8: for many, many years. But the mortgage index coupon is 211 00:10:20,320 --> 00:10:23,600 Speaker 8: below three percent. All right, So that yeah, I mean, 212 00:10:23,640 --> 00:10:25,880 Speaker 8: I'm not saying it's not underforming, but yeah. 213 00:10:25,920 --> 00:10:29,679 Speaker 1: All right, Erica, great stuff again, Erica Adelberg, NBS Strategists, 214 00:10:29,679 --> 00:10:31,680 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Intelligence joining us here. 215 00:10:32,400 --> 00:10:35,520 Speaker 7: You're listening to the tape cans are live program Bloomberg 216 00:10:35,600 --> 00:10:39,200 Speaker 7: Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the 217 00:10:39,240 --> 00:10:41,319 Speaker 7: tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the. 218 00:10:41,280 --> 00:10:42,480 Speaker 5: Bloomberg Business App. 219 00:10:42,520 --> 00:10:45,320 Speaker 7: You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our 220 00:10:45,360 --> 00:10:49,760 Speaker 7: flagship New York station just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty. 221 00:10:51,280 --> 00:10:54,120 Speaker 1: So it looks like BAA slash Merrill. They're trying to 222 00:10:54,120 --> 00:10:57,560 Speaker 1: make a push on across their trading business. What did 223 00:10:57,600 --> 00:10:58,120 Speaker 1: you find out? 224 00:10:58,520 --> 00:11:02,280 Speaker 9: So it's funny baa second largest bank by assets, but 225 00:11:02,440 --> 00:11:05,960 Speaker 9: when you talk to folks cross Wall Street about trading, 226 00:11:06,440 --> 00:11:09,960 Speaker 9: they're not the first name that comes up in conversation. 227 00:11:10,240 --> 00:11:13,720 Speaker 9: And really that just comes down to their risk tolerance. 228 00:11:13,840 --> 00:11:17,440 Speaker 9: Since the financial crisis, since they bought Merrill, since there's 229 00:11:17,480 --> 00:11:20,640 Speaker 9: been so much integration, they've kind of held back. And 230 00:11:21,000 --> 00:11:24,800 Speaker 9: while they're still serving clients and they are one of 231 00:11:24,800 --> 00:11:30,520 Speaker 9: the largest firms that is trading with buyside investors, they're 232 00:11:30,559 --> 00:11:34,240 Speaker 9: not taking as much market share as let's say JP Morgan, 233 00:11:35,040 --> 00:11:38,240 Speaker 9: But that's starting to change. About three years ago they 234 00:11:38,320 --> 00:11:41,280 Speaker 9: named a new head, Jim Damar. He took over for 235 00:11:41,480 --> 00:11:44,640 Speaker 9: Tom Montag who was really running that trading business along 236 00:11:44,679 --> 00:11:48,040 Speaker 9: with investment banking. And in the last three years they've 237 00:11:48,080 --> 00:11:52,280 Speaker 9: added some talent, some key talent from those firms that 238 00:11:52,480 --> 00:11:57,960 Speaker 9: take risk your bets, from Goldman Morgan Stanley, and they've 239 00:11:58,000 --> 00:12:01,080 Speaker 9: also been able to get more capital. They went all 240 00:12:01,080 --> 00:12:04,400 Speaker 9: the way up to CEO moynihan to their head of 241 00:12:04,640 --> 00:12:08,840 Speaker 9: risk to ask for basically more room to run. And 242 00:12:09,040 --> 00:12:15,040 Speaker 9: while they're still in a narrower risk tolerance than others 243 00:12:15,440 --> 00:12:19,240 Speaker 9: with more capital and with these key hires, they've been 244 00:12:19,240 --> 00:12:22,840 Speaker 9: able to slowly chip away and gain more market share 245 00:12:22,960 --> 00:12:25,160 Speaker 9: over the last two three years. 246 00:12:26,040 --> 00:12:30,040 Speaker 2: So have they built up a bigger team? I know 247 00:12:30,160 --> 00:12:31,719 Speaker 2: there is a speech at least I read in a 248 00:12:31,760 --> 00:12:33,959 Speaker 2: Bloomberg story that there was a speech last year where 249 00:12:34,000 --> 00:12:37,880 Speaker 2: Damar said, listen, if you're not willing to give it 250 00:12:37,920 --> 00:12:41,160 Speaker 2: your all and you work your butt off to build 251 00:12:41,200 --> 00:12:43,160 Speaker 2: this business, you might want to work somewhere else. 252 00:12:43,400 --> 00:12:45,720 Speaker 9: Yeah, exactly So about a year ago is when he 253 00:12:45,760 --> 00:12:48,680 Speaker 9: gave that speech, and it was after second quarter results 254 00:12:48,720 --> 00:12:51,880 Speaker 9: where some of the other banks had posted pretty impressive 255 00:12:52,080 --> 00:12:55,800 Speaker 9: results within fixed income. Especially this was after the war 256 00:12:55,800 --> 00:12:58,360 Speaker 9: in Ukraine had broke out, and you had banks on 257 00:12:58,400 --> 00:13:01,160 Speaker 9: Wall Street taking advantage of all the volatility. They were 258 00:13:01,200 --> 00:13:04,800 Speaker 9: helping clients place bets tied to Russia. Bank of America 259 00:13:04,880 --> 00:13:07,960 Speaker 9: did not. They had a mandate from high up that said, 260 00:13:08,040 --> 00:13:10,160 Speaker 9: you guys got to hang back. You can't get involved 261 00:13:10,160 --> 00:13:12,560 Speaker 9: in these types of trades. You can help clients unwind 262 00:13:12,600 --> 00:13:15,440 Speaker 9: their positions, but you can't help people profit and we 263 00:13:15,480 --> 00:13:19,160 Speaker 9: can't profit off of this war. So this was why 264 00:13:19,320 --> 00:13:21,680 Speaker 9: Jim was getting up and saying, hey, we have progress 265 00:13:21,720 --> 00:13:23,920 Speaker 9: that we still have to make. And that comment was 266 00:13:23,960 --> 00:13:27,000 Speaker 9: made to his group, the entire trading team, to say, 267 00:13:27,400 --> 00:13:29,959 Speaker 9: if you're not willing to put your best foot forward 268 00:13:30,280 --> 00:13:34,000 Speaker 9: and to act, maybe not aggressively in the form of 269 00:13:34,000 --> 00:13:36,160 Speaker 9: taking more risk, but you got to be willing to 270 00:13:36,520 --> 00:13:40,439 Speaker 9: be top three, then yeah, maybe you should look elsewhere. 271 00:13:40,440 --> 00:13:43,080 Speaker 9: And he's not making this statement to say here's the 272 00:13:43,120 --> 00:13:46,640 Speaker 9: door and you should be going to somewhere else get 273 00:13:46,640 --> 00:13:48,480 Speaker 9: out of here. He's just saying we want to have 274 00:13:48,520 --> 00:13:50,200 Speaker 9: people that really want to be here and that we 275 00:13:50,240 --> 00:13:55,719 Speaker 9: want to make headway. And one year later they have. 276 00:13:55,840 --> 00:13:58,760 Speaker 9: They've shown that their second quarter results this year, so 277 00:13:58,840 --> 00:14:00,880 Speaker 9: this is one year after the the kind of tepid 278 00:14:00,920 --> 00:14:03,880 Speaker 9: results they saw year ago. They were up ten percent 279 00:14:03,960 --> 00:14:06,319 Speaker 9: when all the other banks on Wall Street were down. 280 00:14:06,880 --> 00:14:09,680 Speaker 9: Now that's also because you're comparing it to the record 281 00:14:09,800 --> 00:14:13,440 Speaker 9: quarter again a year ago post the war in Ukraine. 282 00:14:14,320 --> 00:14:15,760 Speaker 10: So it's it's. 283 00:14:15,600 --> 00:14:19,200 Speaker 9: Really going to be a story that we'll keep tracking 284 00:14:19,360 --> 00:14:23,840 Speaker 9: and if this group can continue to maintain the growth 285 00:14:23,920 --> 00:14:26,400 Speaker 9: and the market share that they have chipped away at again, 286 00:14:26,920 --> 00:14:29,600 Speaker 9: then it might be something that they are able to sustain. 287 00:14:29,680 --> 00:14:32,400 Speaker 9: But that's still a question mark. It's not a foregone 288 00:14:32,680 --> 00:14:33,800 Speaker 9: furgone conclusion. 289 00:14:34,200 --> 00:14:34,360 Speaker 5: You know. 290 00:14:34,360 --> 00:14:35,960 Speaker 1: When I was at Meryl, we were going to go 291 00:14:36,000 --> 00:14:38,960 Speaker 1: pitch a company, a public company, on a follow on offering, 292 00:14:39,000 --> 00:14:40,760 Speaker 1: and that one of the things was we wanted to 293 00:14:40,840 --> 00:14:42,840 Speaker 1: be a top trader in stock. We want to say 294 00:14:42,840 --> 00:14:44,440 Speaker 1: we were your number number one trade, which we weren't 295 00:14:44,480 --> 00:14:46,600 Speaker 1: really like three, third, third or fourth. So I went down. 296 00:14:46,640 --> 00:14:48,400 Speaker 1: My job was to go down and talk to the trader. 297 00:14:48,600 --> 00:14:50,560 Speaker 1: It was probably my same age, young and they said, 298 00:14:50,600 --> 00:14:53,040 Speaker 1: you know, if you can, we'd appreciate it if you 299 00:14:53,080 --> 00:14:56,040 Speaker 1: could take a bigger profile on XYZ stock from that 300 00:14:56,320 --> 00:14:58,800 Speaker 1: day forward until we pitched the IP in like two months. 301 00:14:59,040 --> 00:15:02,000 Speaker 1: Number one, every you're singing every single day trading the 302 00:15:02,000 --> 00:15:04,120 Speaker 1: stock and not just a commitment of capital, you know, 303 00:15:04,200 --> 00:15:06,720 Speaker 1: So that trader that desk was willing to put up 304 00:15:06,720 --> 00:15:08,640 Speaker 1: to capital to make our jobs of getting the follow 305 00:15:08,680 --> 00:15:11,320 Speaker 1: and offering easier, which we did get and made a 306 00:15:11,360 --> 00:15:14,160 Speaker 1: big print. Looking at the comp function, No for the stock, 307 00:15:14,840 --> 00:15:17,040 Speaker 1: Bab's kind of flat over the last five years, Morgan 308 00:15:17,080 --> 00:15:20,080 Speaker 1: Stanley up fifteen percent, Goldman Sacks up nine percent. So 309 00:15:20,400 --> 00:15:23,040 Speaker 1: if you go to Brian moynihan, now do you feel 310 00:15:23,040 --> 00:15:24,880 Speaker 1: like if I'm a trader and I asked for some 311 00:15:24,920 --> 00:15:27,000 Speaker 1: more capital, you think he's going to be more open 312 00:15:27,080 --> 00:15:27,280 Speaker 1: to that. 313 00:15:27,840 --> 00:15:28,880 Speaker 8: So there's a lot that's. 314 00:15:28,800 --> 00:15:32,560 Speaker 9: Changed in the last year and capital has become more 315 00:15:32,600 --> 00:15:36,120 Speaker 9: constrained across Wall Street. But the bank, if if you 316 00:15:36,160 --> 00:15:38,120 Speaker 9: were to ask them, I'm sure that they would say, 317 00:15:38,120 --> 00:15:40,920 Speaker 9: we have enough cash on the balance sheet. They will 318 00:15:41,120 --> 00:15:44,280 Speaker 9: show you that with the numbers, and they will say 319 00:15:44,320 --> 00:15:47,640 Speaker 9: that if the capital is needed and the group, whether 320 00:15:47,680 --> 00:15:50,440 Speaker 9: it's the trading group or the investment banking group, comes 321 00:15:50,440 --> 00:15:52,960 Speaker 9: to us and has a good pitch and they explain 322 00:15:53,040 --> 00:15:55,440 Speaker 9: why they need what they need, we'll give it to them. 323 00:15:55,520 --> 00:15:58,280 Speaker 9: But I think that that's probably getting harder to do. 324 00:15:58,360 --> 00:16:02,000 Speaker 9: Those pitches need to be pretty clear, pretty persuasive. But 325 00:16:02,080 --> 00:16:05,120 Speaker 9: what you just described is exactly what they're trying to 326 00:16:05,160 --> 00:16:08,760 Speaker 9: focus on, which is making sure that the groups within 327 00:16:08,800 --> 00:16:11,760 Speaker 9: this huge organization are working together. So if you have 328 00:16:11,800 --> 00:16:15,080 Speaker 9: someone in investment banking that's working with a client, it's 329 00:16:15,120 --> 00:16:18,160 Speaker 9: a corporate client, and then they need to hedge their 330 00:16:19,240 --> 00:16:23,160 Speaker 9: risks whether it's their currency risk or their rates, They're 331 00:16:23,200 --> 00:16:25,360 Speaker 9: going to want to say, hey, you should talk to 332 00:16:25,400 --> 00:16:27,960 Speaker 9: our trader who can help you out. And I think 333 00:16:28,000 --> 00:16:30,280 Speaker 9: that when you have such a big organization this is 334 00:16:30,320 --> 00:16:33,840 Speaker 9: not specific to be of a but anywhere often communication 335 00:16:33,920 --> 00:16:36,200 Speaker 9: lines can break down. So they're just trying to communicate 336 00:16:36,240 --> 00:16:41,320 Speaker 9: better in order to either get clients to interact with 337 00:16:41,360 --> 00:16:44,000 Speaker 9: them more or to tap new clients that they might 338 00:16:44,040 --> 00:16:46,640 Speaker 9: not even know that they can be working with and 339 00:16:46,720 --> 00:16:47,920 Speaker 9: that they should be working with. 340 00:16:48,440 --> 00:16:50,360 Speaker 3: So who's the best and biggest trading desk on the 341 00:16:50,360 --> 00:16:50,800 Speaker 3: street and. 342 00:16:50,760 --> 00:16:53,640 Speaker 9: What do they do right well, right now, JP Morgan 343 00:16:53,760 --> 00:16:57,040 Speaker 9: does have the most market share and that's been kind 344 00:16:57,080 --> 00:17:00,000 Speaker 9: of the same for as long as I've tracked. 345 00:17:00,400 --> 00:17:02,680 Speaker 1: It's really which is in the long time, No, it's long, 346 00:17:02,680 --> 00:17:04,520 Speaker 1: but yet they have the big capital behind them. It's 347 00:17:04,520 --> 00:17:05,960 Speaker 1: all about how much capital you can put up. So 348 00:17:06,040 --> 00:17:08,480 Speaker 1: JPM Morgan gold and Sacks Morgan Stanley, you know, those 349 00:17:08,480 --> 00:17:10,760 Speaker 1: are things. And if you're Merrill Lynch and you've got 350 00:17:10,800 --> 00:17:13,320 Speaker 1: the Bank of America balance sheet, but Catherine is just 351 00:17:13,600 --> 00:17:17,520 Speaker 1: reporting less less ready to put up you know, some 352 00:17:17,560 --> 00:17:20,159 Speaker 1: incremental capital here, but maybe that's changing a little bit. So, 353 00:17:20,960 --> 00:17:22,520 Speaker 1: but it's good stuff. I remember, it just took me 354 00:17:22,640 --> 00:17:24,360 Speaker 1: like a forty five minutes to find where this kid 355 00:17:24,440 --> 00:17:27,200 Speaker 1: sat on the trading floor. That's how big the Maryland's 356 00:17:27,200 --> 00:17:28,800 Speaker 1: trading floor was and how many people were there. I 357 00:17:28,840 --> 00:17:31,760 Speaker 1: had to find it. You know, it's crazy, but anyway, 358 00:17:31,760 --> 00:17:33,320 Speaker 1: that was a good, good story. Catherine, thanks so much 359 00:17:33,320 --> 00:17:35,199 Speaker 1: for the reporting here. That's story just jumped off the 360 00:17:35,240 --> 00:17:38,080 Speaker 1: termino for me this morning. Katherine Dherty, Finance reporter for 361 00:17:38,119 --> 00:17:42,200 Speaker 1: Bloomberg News, Bank of America, Merrill Lynch, the thundering Herd 362 00:17:42,240 --> 00:17:44,080 Speaker 1: of Merrill Lynch, maybe stepping up a little bit more 363 00:17:44,160 --> 00:17:44,920 Speaker 1: on the margin. 364 00:17:45,960 --> 00:17:49,359 Speaker 7: You're listening to the team Ken's are Live program Bloomberg 365 00:17:49,400 --> 00:17:52,800 Speaker 7: Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com, 366 00:17:52,880 --> 00:17:56,000 Speaker 7: the iHeartRadio app and the Bloomberg Business App, or listen 367 00:17:56,080 --> 00:17:58,200 Speaker 7: on demand wherever you get your podcasts. 368 00:18:00,000 --> 00:18:02,240 Speaker 1: The question I have is, why is all these countries 369 00:18:02,280 --> 00:18:04,199 Speaker 1: tripping over themselves to get to the moon. Did we 370 00:18:04,359 --> 00:18:06,800 Speaker 1: do that like more than fifty years ago? I don't 371 00:18:06,800 --> 00:18:08,520 Speaker 1: know what the big deal is, but our next guest 372 00:18:08,520 --> 00:18:11,719 Speaker 1: will help us out here. Lauren Grush, Space reporter. That's right, 373 00:18:11,760 --> 00:18:14,280 Speaker 1: Bloomberg has a Space report. Why because we have twenty 374 00:18:14,320 --> 00:18:16,720 Speaker 1: four hundred journalists accrown around the world. 375 00:18:16,760 --> 00:18:19,600 Speaker 3: We cover everything and fifty countries. 376 00:18:19,640 --> 00:18:22,040 Speaker 2: But also, I mean it's a huge and emerging. 377 00:18:22,160 --> 00:18:25,480 Speaker 3: It's a business industry. I mean, look, I think. 378 00:18:26,320 --> 00:18:27,439 Speaker 1: It's not just NASA anymore. 379 00:18:27,760 --> 00:18:30,639 Speaker 2: Let me ask Lauren. I'm pretty sure, Lauren. First of all, hello, 380 00:18:30,720 --> 00:18:34,240 Speaker 2: welcome to the program. Thanks for joining us. Didn't Elon 381 00:18:34,320 --> 00:18:38,120 Speaker 2: Musk and SpaceX just raise new money at an even 382 00:18:38,200 --> 00:18:41,879 Speaker 2: higher evaluation in what is for most startups of down market? 383 00:18:43,520 --> 00:18:46,639 Speaker 11: They did, But they also have quite a lot on 384 00:18:46,680 --> 00:18:48,760 Speaker 11: their plate in terms of what they're trying to develop. 385 00:18:48,800 --> 00:18:51,200 Speaker 11: You know, they're working on Starship, which is this massive 386 00:18:51,280 --> 00:18:55,320 Speaker 11: vehicle supposed to take humans and cargo into deep space 387 00:18:55,680 --> 00:18:57,879 Speaker 11: and to the Moon, as you guys have been talking about. 388 00:18:58,359 --> 00:19:01,440 Speaker 11: And they're also expanding when it comes to their Starlink 389 00:19:01,440 --> 00:19:02,240 Speaker 11: initiative as well. 390 00:19:02,280 --> 00:19:04,200 Speaker 8: So they have quite a lot to work on. 391 00:19:04,320 --> 00:19:07,760 Speaker 11: And so that's ultimately why part of the reason why 392 00:19:07,800 --> 00:19:08,640 Speaker 11: they did that raise. 393 00:19:08,800 --> 00:19:10,600 Speaker 1: All right, Laurence, So help me out here. What's the 394 00:19:10,640 --> 00:19:14,040 Speaker 1: attraction to the south pole of the Moon? We had 395 00:19:14,560 --> 00:19:18,040 Speaker 1: Russia crash didn't quite do it, but India today reported 396 00:19:18,119 --> 00:19:21,840 Speaker 1: a successful landing. What are they after right. 397 00:19:21,880 --> 00:19:23,840 Speaker 11: So, the south pole of the Moon has been a 398 00:19:23,840 --> 00:19:27,240 Speaker 11: bit of a tantalizing place for scientists over the last 399 00:19:27,280 --> 00:19:30,760 Speaker 11: few years because more and more research has come out 400 00:19:31,160 --> 00:19:34,960 Speaker 11: and evidence has come out that the region might have 401 00:19:35,240 --> 00:19:40,879 Speaker 11: large quantities of water ice and these permanently shadowed cratered regions, 402 00:19:40,920 --> 00:19:44,359 Speaker 11: so areas that never see the sun, they get extremely cold, 403 00:19:44,920 --> 00:19:50,560 Speaker 11: and that's tantalizing for people, especially those looking to send 404 00:19:50,720 --> 00:19:53,959 Speaker 11: humans to the Moon, because there's the possibility that we 405 00:19:54,000 --> 00:19:57,960 Speaker 11: could mine this water ice and use it as resources. 406 00:19:58,000 --> 00:20:00,480 Speaker 11: We could use it as drinking water, could use it 407 00:20:00,520 --> 00:20:04,600 Speaker 11: as water for plants if we wanted to grow crops 408 00:20:04,680 --> 00:20:08,920 Speaker 11: on the Moon for lunar habitat, and it can also 409 00:20:08,960 --> 00:20:11,440 Speaker 11: be used as rocket fuel. You can break apart water 410 00:20:11,480 --> 00:20:14,800 Speaker 11: into its constituents and to make it into fuel that 411 00:20:14,840 --> 00:20:17,520 Speaker 11: could be used to send rockets off of the Moon. 412 00:20:18,040 --> 00:20:19,120 Speaker 8: The issue is we just. 413 00:20:19,160 --> 00:20:22,680 Speaker 11: Don't know what kind of form the water ice is in, 414 00:20:22,720 --> 00:20:25,000 Speaker 11: how much is there, So we need to get there 415 00:20:25,040 --> 00:20:28,119 Speaker 11: in order to prospect and to see, you know, is 416 00:20:28,160 --> 00:20:33,159 Speaker 11: this a viable option to use for future exploration initiatives. 417 00:20:33,760 --> 00:20:38,159 Speaker 2: So older listeners, Lauren are going to be wondering, is 418 00:20:38,200 --> 00:20:42,440 Speaker 2: this the dark side of the moon. Nice, I don't know, 419 00:20:42,800 --> 00:20:45,879 Speaker 2: like about the polarity, and apparently one side of the 420 00:20:45,880 --> 00:20:49,520 Speaker 2: moon never what never faces the Earth or what's the. 421 00:20:49,480 --> 00:20:50,000 Speaker 1: Story with this? 422 00:20:50,760 --> 00:20:52,440 Speaker 11: So it's not the dark side of the moon. There 423 00:20:52,440 --> 00:20:54,400 Speaker 11: actually is no dark side of the moon. I hate 424 00:20:54,440 --> 00:20:57,800 Speaker 11: to break that news every what. Yes, you are correct, though, 425 00:20:57,840 --> 00:21:00,159 Speaker 11: there is a far side of the Moon that we 426 00:21:00,280 --> 00:21:03,359 Speaker 11: never see from Earth because it is tidally the Moon 427 00:21:03,440 --> 00:21:06,800 Speaker 11: is tidally locked, and so it is constantly facing our 428 00:21:06,880 --> 00:21:10,160 Speaker 11: planet in one direction. So you might be very familiar 429 00:21:10,240 --> 00:21:11,680 Speaker 11: with the face that faces us. 430 00:21:11,800 --> 00:21:12,640 Speaker 8: You may not be so. 431 00:21:12,600 --> 00:21:14,680 Speaker 3: Familiar with the face and the south pole is where 432 00:21:14,800 --> 00:21:18,439 Speaker 3: is that? Do we see that one? Or do we 433 00:21:18,480 --> 00:21:19,280 Speaker 3: see parts of it? 434 00:21:19,320 --> 00:21:22,760 Speaker 11: But yes, it is within our part of it is 435 00:21:23,119 --> 00:21:23,720 Speaker 11: within our site. 436 00:21:23,760 --> 00:21:24,120 Speaker 1: All right. 437 00:21:24,119 --> 00:21:26,399 Speaker 3: Listen, Tucker's laughing at us because he knows all this stuff. 438 00:21:26,400 --> 00:21:30,879 Speaker 1: He does two videos on this. Yeah, yeah, all right. Lauren, 439 00:21:31,359 --> 00:21:34,159 Speaker 1: you're a space reporter. What are the big stories that 440 00:21:34,200 --> 00:21:36,280 Speaker 1: you're kind of following. What are the themes that you're 441 00:21:36,320 --> 00:21:39,280 Speaker 1: following as it relates to your space beat. 442 00:21:40,680 --> 00:21:42,679 Speaker 8: Well, you know, there's quite a bit going on. 443 00:21:42,760 --> 00:21:45,119 Speaker 11: As you've mentioned, the moon is a very popular place 444 00:21:45,160 --> 00:21:48,359 Speaker 11: these days, so you know, it's not just India, not 445 00:21:48,400 --> 00:21:50,280 Speaker 11: just Russia that are looking to go back. The US 446 00:21:50,400 --> 00:21:53,879 Speaker 11: is actively looking to go back to the Moon. A 447 00:21:53,920 --> 00:21:57,680 Speaker 11: lot of those efforts stem from the from NASA's Artemis program, 448 00:21:57,720 --> 00:22:01,879 Speaker 11: which is a concerted f to send the first woman 449 00:22:01,920 --> 00:22:04,280 Speaker 11: in the first person of color to the surface. 450 00:22:03,960 --> 00:22:04,400 Speaker 5: Of the Moon. 451 00:22:06,080 --> 00:22:09,320 Speaker 11: Right now, they're targeting landing in twenty twenty five. I 452 00:22:09,359 --> 00:22:13,480 Speaker 11: think that is extremely ambitious and doubtful that it will 453 00:22:13,520 --> 00:22:17,119 Speaker 11: be achieved, but that is the outward goal at the moment. 454 00:22:18,160 --> 00:22:20,000 Speaker 11: And then through that initiative, there are a lot of 455 00:22:20,320 --> 00:22:25,000 Speaker 11: private companies that are also hoping to send their robotic 456 00:22:25,080 --> 00:22:28,320 Speaker 11: spacecraft to the Moon. So we have astrobotic and intuitive 457 00:22:28,359 --> 00:22:31,480 Speaker 11: machines who are also trying to reach this region of 458 00:22:31,520 --> 00:22:36,199 Speaker 11: the Moon with their own uncrude landers, and those are 459 00:22:36,240 --> 00:22:38,440 Speaker 11: supposed to happen. Those are supposed to launch before the 460 00:22:38,520 --> 00:22:38,959 Speaker 11: end of the year. 461 00:22:40,280 --> 00:22:43,760 Speaker 2: So hard, I don't get you know, by twenty twenty five, 462 00:22:43,800 --> 00:22:44,880 Speaker 2: couldn't we do it next week? 463 00:22:44,920 --> 00:22:46,240 Speaker 3: We did it in the sixties. 464 00:22:48,040 --> 00:22:50,399 Speaker 11: I hate to breakage everyone, but it's still quite hard 465 00:22:50,440 --> 00:22:51,240 Speaker 11: to reach the Moon. 466 00:22:52,119 --> 00:22:53,400 Speaker 8: You know, Yes, it is. 467 00:22:53,359 --> 00:22:55,240 Speaker 11: Something that we did in the sixties, but you have 468 00:22:55,280 --> 00:23:00,000 Speaker 11: to understand we were we had increased NASA's budget significantly. 469 00:23:00,160 --> 00:23:03,840 Speaker 11: At the time. There was an extreme focus on reaching 470 00:23:03,880 --> 00:23:06,520 Speaker 11: the Moon during that time. You know, we put a 471 00:23:06,560 --> 00:23:09,800 Speaker 11: lot of resources into it, and so now we don't 472 00:23:09,880 --> 00:23:12,920 Speaker 11: really have that same sense of urgency and NASA is 473 00:23:12,960 --> 00:23:15,800 Speaker 11: working with a much lower budget than it had at 474 00:23:15,800 --> 00:23:18,679 Speaker 11: the time the space race was going on. 475 00:23:19,320 --> 00:23:22,400 Speaker 2: But my Nintendo, we has more computing power than NASA 476 00:23:22,400 --> 00:23:23,040 Speaker 2: did back then. 477 00:23:23,119 --> 00:23:24,760 Speaker 3: I mean, that's true, that's. 478 00:23:24,680 --> 00:23:27,399 Speaker 11: True, and that's and that's ultimately why we're making a 479 00:23:27,440 --> 00:23:30,480 Speaker 11: lot of strides in terms of, you know, who is 480 00:23:30,520 --> 00:23:33,960 Speaker 11: able to reach the Moon with these with those companies 481 00:23:34,000 --> 00:23:36,919 Speaker 11: I just mentioned, they're hoping to be the first commercial 482 00:23:37,000 --> 00:23:39,679 Speaker 11: companies to reach the surface of the Moon. That title 483 00:23:39,720 --> 00:23:42,200 Speaker 11: has not been claimed yet so far, it's only been 484 00:23:42,280 --> 00:23:47,760 Speaker 11: Nation States. But ultimately, you know, we are getting there. 485 00:23:47,760 --> 00:23:49,959 Speaker 11: It's just taking a while, and we're trying to do 486 00:23:50,000 --> 00:23:53,800 Speaker 11: it in a in a smarter way that doesn't rely on, 487 00:23:53,920 --> 00:23:56,359 Speaker 11: you know, that big influx of cash. 488 00:23:56,400 --> 00:23:59,120 Speaker 1: So Lauren, of all the private companies out there, because 489 00:23:59,119 --> 00:24:01,520 Speaker 1: that's what's different When I was a kid and we're 490 00:24:01,560 --> 00:24:04,560 Speaker 1: all fixated on NASA and we all want to be astronauts. 491 00:24:04,560 --> 00:24:08,200 Speaker 1: Back in the day, private space travel. Are there viable 492 00:24:08,400 --> 00:24:11,439 Speaker 1: economic models out there? I mean, how do any of 493 00:24:11,440 --> 00:24:14,760 Speaker 1: these companies? Is it space tourism? Is it just taking 494 00:24:14,760 --> 00:24:16,160 Speaker 1: garbage out there? I mean, what are we doing? 495 00:24:17,119 --> 00:24:20,760 Speaker 11: I mean, I think that's ultimately the prime question right now, 496 00:24:20,920 --> 00:24:24,040 Speaker 11: as more and more companies are trying to turn space 497 00:24:24,080 --> 00:24:28,439 Speaker 11: into a business. Can these businesses make money? The answer 498 00:24:28,480 --> 00:24:31,120 Speaker 11: we're getting from the few companies that have gone public 499 00:24:31,280 --> 00:24:37,160 Speaker 11: is not a lot. You know, they're bringing some are 500 00:24:37,160 --> 00:24:40,200 Speaker 11: bringing in revenue, some are not even bringing in revenue. 501 00:24:40,440 --> 00:24:43,760 Speaker 11: It's a very hard market to break through in because 502 00:24:43,760 --> 00:24:47,560 Speaker 11: it does require a lot of capital upfront, and to 503 00:24:47,720 --> 00:24:52,639 Speaker 11: develop these vehicles and these capabilities takes many, many years. 504 00:24:53,160 --> 00:24:56,879 Speaker 11: It's besought with delays, and so you know, we are 505 00:24:56,920 --> 00:24:59,560 Speaker 11: in an era that we're trying to prove that we can, 506 00:25:00,520 --> 00:25:04,359 Speaker 11: you know, make these companies into viable businesses. But there's 507 00:25:04,400 --> 00:25:07,760 Speaker 11: going to be a lot of casualties along the way, 508 00:25:08,600 --> 00:25:13,639 Speaker 11: business casualties, not human casualties. And you know, it's I 509 00:25:13,680 --> 00:25:16,280 Speaker 11: think it still remains to be seen if these companies 510 00:25:16,320 --> 00:25:18,160 Speaker 11: can really turn a significant product. 511 00:25:18,240 --> 00:25:22,400 Speaker 1: And Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, you know, a couple of gajillionaires. 512 00:25:22,480 --> 00:25:26,959 Speaker 1: They're all in on this business. I guess it kind 513 00:25:27,000 --> 00:25:28,240 Speaker 1: of feels for a lot of to a lot of 514 00:25:28,240 --> 00:25:31,080 Speaker 1: critics that it's just kind of a billionaire's game out 515 00:25:31,080 --> 00:25:33,640 Speaker 1: there for for space. And you know, is there any 516 00:25:33,680 --> 00:25:35,040 Speaker 1: other real model out there? 517 00:25:36,320 --> 00:25:39,280 Speaker 11: Well, you have to understand, we've been we've been in 518 00:25:39,320 --> 00:25:41,439 Speaker 11: the business of space for a really long time. The 519 00:25:41,520 --> 00:25:45,960 Speaker 11: earlier models, uh, focused more on defense contractors, you know, 520 00:25:47,000 --> 00:25:52,120 Speaker 11: building these vehicles and helped with NASA, but they were 521 00:25:52,200 --> 00:25:56,240 Speaker 11: not as vertically integrated as some of these newer players. 522 00:25:56,320 --> 00:25:56,520 Speaker 4: You know. 523 00:25:56,560 --> 00:25:59,280 Speaker 11: That seems to be one of the bigger changes that 524 00:26:00,400 --> 00:26:04,920 Speaker 11: and Jeff and these other companies are implementing his vertical integration, 525 00:26:05,000 --> 00:26:09,919 Speaker 11: so keeping everything in house. But as I mentioned, you know, 526 00:26:10,040 --> 00:26:13,520 Speaker 11: these companies require a lot of capital, and so that's 527 00:26:13,640 --> 00:26:15,800 Speaker 11: ultimately what they are able to help with, you know, 528 00:26:15,880 --> 00:26:18,040 Speaker 11: the billionaires is being able to give that kind of 529 00:26:18,040 --> 00:26:21,160 Speaker 11: big cash injection up front and to help out whenever 530 00:26:21,359 --> 00:26:22,360 Speaker 11: you know, money is tight. 531 00:26:23,000 --> 00:26:25,959 Speaker 1: All right, Lauren, you're a graduate of the University of Texas. 532 00:26:26,000 --> 00:26:28,320 Speaker 1: Are you one of those crazy Longhorn alumni? 533 00:26:29,040 --> 00:26:31,080 Speaker 11: I'm sorry, are we crazy? 534 00:26:31,200 --> 00:26:31,639 Speaker 5: I think. 535 00:26:33,840 --> 00:26:35,440 Speaker 11: Regular college graduates? 536 00:26:35,520 --> 00:26:37,600 Speaker 1: Okay, because we have a Jess Metton who comes in 537 00:26:37,640 --> 00:26:39,800 Speaker 1: here and does a lot of work with us reporting 538 00:26:39,800 --> 00:26:41,960 Speaker 1: on the equities at Texas A and m GRAD. So 539 00:26:42,560 --> 00:26:44,160 Speaker 1: she's the only in her family. 540 00:26:44,240 --> 00:26:45,480 Speaker 8: I can't I can't speak to that. 541 00:26:45,680 --> 00:26:50,639 Speaker 2: Okay, Hey, what's the next cool launch you're gonna go watch? 542 00:26:50,800 --> 00:26:52,040 Speaker 3: Do you go down there and watch those? 543 00:26:52,760 --> 00:26:53,120 Speaker 8: I do. 544 00:26:53,240 --> 00:26:56,480 Speaker 11: I've I've been to quite a few, you know. Kennedy's 545 00:26:56,520 --> 00:27:00,679 Speaker 11: Space Centers kind of my second home sometimes. I'm in Austin, 546 00:27:00,720 --> 00:27:05,919 Speaker 11: Texas though, and SpaceX has been building their Starship vehicle 547 00:27:06,080 --> 00:27:08,600 Speaker 11: down in Bocachica, which is on the border of Texas 548 00:27:08,600 --> 00:27:11,400 Speaker 11: and Mexico, and I have been there to see their 549 00:27:11,440 --> 00:27:15,439 Speaker 11: first test launch. We're gearing up for that second test launch. 550 00:27:16,320 --> 00:27:20,520 Speaker 11: SpaceX is going through the motions of kind of fixing 551 00:27:20,560 --> 00:27:23,440 Speaker 11: what went wrong during the first one. They're undergoing tests, 552 00:27:23,760 --> 00:27:26,560 Speaker 11: but signs seem to be pointing that we could be 553 00:27:26,760 --> 00:27:30,119 Speaker 11: seeing another test launch from Texas in the near future. 554 00:27:30,280 --> 00:27:32,920 Speaker 11: So we're just getting ready for that and seeing how 555 00:27:32,920 --> 00:27:33,320 Speaker 11: that will go. 556 00:27:33,600 --> 00:27:37,520 Speaker 1: All right, Lauren Grushy, Space reporter, Bloomberg News. Hook them horns, right, 557 00:27:37,640 --> 00:27:40,560 Speaker 1: another big football season coming up, and I'm sure they're 558 00:27:40,600 --> 00:27:42,359 Speaker 1: all fired up down there. I love that we have 559 00:27:42,440 --> 00:27:43,840 Speaker 1: a space reporter that's so cool. 560 00:27:44,280 --> 00:27:47,399 Speaker 7: You're listening to the tape cans are live program Bloomberg 561 00:27:47,480 --> 00:27:51,080 Speaker 7: Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the 562 00:27:51,119 --> 00:27:53,080 Speaker 7: tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and. 563 00:27:53,040 --> 00:27:54,359 Speaker 5: The Bloomberg Business App. 564 00:27:54,400 --> 00:27:57,199 Speaker 7: You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our 565 00:27:57,240 --> 00:28:01,520 Speaker 7: flagship New York station. Just say Alexa, you play Bloomberg eleven. 566 00:28:02,000 --> 00:28:04,600 Speaker 1: Matt Miller, Paul swing here in a Bloomberg Interactive worker studio. 567 00:28:04,600 --> 00:28:06,040 Speaker 1: Want to get right to our next guest, because there's 568 00:28:06,040 --> 00:28:08,080 Speaker 1: a million ways we can go. Ronnie has set Home 569 00:28:08,320 --> 00:28:10,960 Speaker 1: Joints us. She's a managing partner of set Home Law Group. 570 00:28:11,720 --> 00:28:13,280 Speaker 1: A lot of things to talk about, Ronnie, but I 571 00:28:13,320 --> 00:28:15,760 Speaker 1: like to start with something near and dear to my heart, 572 00:28:15,760 --> 00:28:18,600 Speaker 1: which is the media companies in the Hollywood studios strikes 573 00:28:18,600 --> 00:28:22,399 Speaker 1: with the writers and the actors, and where are we 574 00:28:22,520 --> 00:28:24,399 Speaker 1: on this thing? Because it seems like both sides are 575 00:28:24,480 --> 00:28:27,320 Speaker 1: really entrenched. Although I believe the studios did come with 576 00:28:27,359 --> 00:28:30,720 Speaker 1: a proposal that seemed reasonable to me, but I'm not 577 00:28:30,760 --> 00:28:32,600 Speaker 1: in vob so well. 578 00:28:33,160 --> 00:28:36,600 Speaker 12: I think that both are holding pretty steadfast in the 579 00:28:36,640 --> 00:28:39,560 Speaker 12: direction that they want to go. I don't think anything 580 00:28:39,600 --> 00:28:41,680 Speaker 12: has been resolved at all since I've last been here 581 00:28:41,800 --> 00:28:45,320 Speaker 12: or since the strike went underway. It is true that 582 00:28:45,360 --> 00:28:49,600 Speaker 12: the studios did propose some changes. However, I believe the 583 00:28:49,680 --> 00:28:52,320 Speaker 12: union wouldn't come to the table, which is, you know, 584 00:28:52,640 --> 00:28:54,120 Speaker 12: a way of rejecting it outright. 585 00:28:54,600 --> 00:28:57,360 Speaker 2: Yeah, and so these so there's been no talks. They 586 00:28:57,400 --> 00:29:00,000 Speaker 2: haven't been in the same room officially, I don't believe. 587 00:29:00,240 --> 00:29:02,959 Speaker 1: So, no, no, But they came back with what I 588 00:29:03,000 --> 00:29:05,640 Speaker 1: thought were certainly I don't know what the word is, 589 00:29:05,640 --> 00:29:08,800 Speaker 1: but they were substantive. They addressed a lot of issues. 590 00:29:09,080 --> 00:29:12,440 Speaker 1: Whether they went far enough as the union, I don't know. 591 00:29:12,520 --> 00:29:15,200 Speaker 1: But if I were the studios and I put this 592 00:29:15,280 --> 00:29:19,080 Speaker 1: on the table, I would certainly expect a professional response, 593 00:29:19,120 --> 00:29:23,040 Speaker 1: wouldn't I? You would, And I'm not a negotiator. 594 00:29:23,120 --> 00:29:27,400 Speaker 12: Yeah, the negotiating table has to be went to in 595 00:29:27,440 --> 00:29:30,880 Speaker 12: good faith. Under the National Labor Relations Board rules, you 596 00:29:30,960 --> 00:29:35,920 Speaker 12: can't just refuse to engage in any kind of discord. However, 597 00:29:36,880 --> 00:29:39,560 Speaker 12: if someone comes back to you with what you deem 598 00:29:39,680 --> 00:29:43,600 Speaker 12: is a wholly unreasonable solution, you can take the position 599 00:29:43,640 --> 00:29:45,680 Speaker 12: that I guess that's what the union is taking at 600 00:29:45,680 --> 00:29:48,840 Speaker 12: this time. But you're right, everything was addressed, whether or 601 00:29:48,880 --> 00:29:51,720 Speaker 12: not it was addressed properly or thoroughly enough for the union. 602 00:29:52,000 --> 00:29:53,440 Speaker 3: I guess the answer is no, Ronnie. 603 00:29:53,520 --> 00:29:56,400 Speaker 2: Let's just reset for listeners who haven't been following this 604 00:29:56,600 --> 00:30:02,880 Speaker 2: very closely. You work with the actors side, and what 605 00:30:03,040 --> 00:30:07,360 Speaker 2: are the demands that they've made, you know, just you 606 00:30:07,360 --> 00:30:10,000 Speaker 2: know elementary in sort of the elementary demands. 607 00:30:10,080 --> 00:30:11,160 Speaker 3: What exactly do they want? 608 00:30:12,120 --> 00:30:14,840 Speaker 12: Well, I think some of the celebrities who I represent 609 00:30:14,920 --> 00:30:18,880 Speaker 12: their individuals, just to be clear for the listeners, they 610 00:30:19,000 --> 00:30:22,880 Speaker 12: want to protect themselves and their image. They don't want 611 00:30:22,920 --> 00:30:25,160 Speaker 12: you to be able to take whatever image you've seen 612 00:30:25,840 --> 00:30:28,200 Speaker 12: in a movie, a TV show or whatnot and just 613 00:30:28,440 --> 00:30:31,600 Speaker 12: change it, right. I mean, AI can do so much 614 00:30:31,680 --> 00:30:35,800 Speaker 12: we don't even realize as the viewers. But you don't 615 00:30:35,840 --> 00:30:38,959 Speaker 12: need to take additional takes. For example, you can just 616 00:30:39,120 --> 00:30:43,440 Speaker 12: use whatever take was provided and then make whatever changes 617 00:30:43,440 --> 00:30:45,400 Speaker 12: you want to change, as long as you have the 618 00:30:45,440 --> 00:30:48,080 Speaker 12: image of the person, the motion of the person, and 619 00:30:48,320 --> 00:30:50,680 Speaker 12: the tone and sound of the person, which clearly you 620 00:30:50,720 --> 00:30:53,600 Speaker 12: would have when you take your first take. So I 621 00:30:53,640 --> 00:30:58,360 Speaker 12: think they want to protect themselves from being seen incorrectly, 622 00:30:58,440 --> 00:31:00,840 Speaker 12: right because who knows what you're going to do with 623 00:31:00,880 --> 00:31:04,600 Speaker 12: the image. But also it's about money as well. Every 624 00:31:04,640 --> 00:31:07,880 Speaker 12: time their image is used, they want to receive a royalty. 625 00:31:07,920 --> 00:31:10,200 Speaker 12: And I think that's like a huge debate right now, 626 00:31:10,600 --> 00:31:13,560 Speaker 12: you know what are we paying for exactly? And typically 627 00:31:14,160 --> 00:31:18,680 Speaker 12: contracts do state we control this image that you've provided 628 00:31:18,760 --> 00:31:21,400 Speaker 12: us with whatever it is for the show, for anything 629 00:31:21,680 --> 00:31:25,200 Speaker 12: in whatever medium exists now or shall exist. So we 630 00:31:25,240 --> 00:31:27,080 Speaker 12: don't even know what else is coming after a hour. 631 00:31:27,120 --> 00:31:32,360 Speaker 1: Well that's even that's an I would say most content areas. 632 00:31:32,400 --> 00:31:34,920 Speaker 1: So for example, as a research channels Stall Wall Street, 633 00:31:34,920 --> 00:31:37,400 Speaker 1: I did not own my research. It belonged to the 634 00:31:37,440 --> 00:31:40,960 Speaker 1: firm I work for the models I created, the earnings 635 00:31:41,000 --> 00:31:44,840 Speaker 1: models belong not to me but to the company. And 636 00:31:44,880 --> 00:31:47,920 Speaker 1: so what you'd see before any analyst went from company 637 00:31:47,920 --> 00:31:49,640 Speaker 1: A to company B is he or she would take 638 00:31:49,640 --> 00:31:53,400 Speaker 1: their earnings models which they created, download them to the 639 00:31:53,400 --> 00:31:55,440 Speaker 1: little floppy disc so they could take them to the 640 00:31:55,480 --> 00:31:58,360 Speaker 1: next spot, which was a no no, But everybody does it. 641 00:31:58,760 --> 00:32:01,080 Speaker 12: If you do that, I might send you a nasty letter. 642 00:32:01,200 --> 00:32:03,920 Speaker 3: Yes, Paul should maybe hire you. 643 00:32:04,520 --> 00:32:08,720 Speaker 1: Yes exactly, But so that's isn't that kind of is 644 00:32:08,720 --> 00:32:11,760 Speaker 1: that law already created and aren't exists, We're just now 645 00:32:11,760 --> 00:32:14,840 Speaker 1: applying it to a different medium. I guess yes, in. 646 00:32:14,800 --> 00:32:17,880 Speaker 12: A way, that is true. But no one anticipated what 647 00:32:17,920 --> 00:32:21,000 Speaker 12: you can do with this technology. So for example, if 648 00:32:21,040 --> 00:32:24,360 Speaker 12: you sent me research and I, let's say I discarded 649 00:32:24,440 --> 00:32:27,080 Speaker 12: it or I changed it, I may not attribute it 650 00:32:27,120 --> 00:32:31,280 Speaker 12: to you. And so your your your research findings, if 651 00:32:31,280 --> 00:32:34,640 Speaker 12: they were not what I wanted, You're you're left out 652 00:32:34,640 --> 00:32:35,920 Speaker 12: of it. Nobody knows about it. 653 00:32:35,920 --> 00:32:36,320 Speaker 8: Here. 654 00:32:36,520 --> 00:32:39,400 Speaker 12: It's your picture, it's your voice, it's your movement, and 655 00:32:39,480 --> 00:32:41,800 Speaker 12: we're doing something with it and you may or may 656 00:32:41,880 --> 00:32:43,240 Speaker 12: just may or may not agree with. 657 00:32:43,200 --> 00:32:45,600 Speaker 2: It, right, So that's something that's one of the things 658 00:32:45,640 --> 00:32:47,880 Speaker 2: that they want you to change. Then on the money side, 659 00:32:48,400 --> 00:32:54,040 Speaker 2: you know, there's I think we don't understand exactly how 660 00:32:54,120 --> 00:32:59,320 Speaker 2: much money. For example, sag Aftra estimates that these streaming 661 00:32:59,360 --> 00:33:03,520 Speaker 2: companies are making. Their representative was telling Paul that she 662 00:33:03,640 --> 00:33:05,920 Speaker 2: thinks they're making thirty billion dollars a year in profit, 663 00:33:05,920 --> 00:33:08,200 Speaker 2: but when we look at these earnings reports, that's not 664 00:33:08,800 --> 00:33:13,480 Speaker 2: readily apparent. So is that something that needs to be 665 00:33:13,680 --> 00:33:16,120 Speaker 2: solved how much money they're making off streaming, or does 666 00:33:16,160 --> 00:33:19,560 Speaker 2: it just not matter to your clients they want a 667 00:33:19,600 --> 00:33:20,560 Speaker 2: bigger take anyway. 668 00:33:21,040 --> 00:33:24,360 Speaker 12: Well, honestly, money's always a factor. So I think, of 669 00:33:24,400 --> 00:33:28,600 Speaker 12: course that does matter, and I think that there's I 670 00:33:28,600 --> 00:33:31,080 Speaker 12: don't know if it's a worldview, but certainly a US 671 00:33:31,240 --> 00:33:35,239 Speaker 12: view that the gap between the owners and in this 672 00:33:35,280 --> 00:33:37,840 Speaker 12: case they're not employees, but we'll just use that analogy 673 00:33:38,760 --> 00:33:39,560 Speaker 12: should be smaller. 674 00:33:40,240 --> 00:33:43,160 Speaker 1: All right, So is this something like when we think 675 00:33:43,200 --> 00:33:48,000 Speaker 1: about AI and all the uses and therefore misuses that 676 00:33:48,120 --> 00:33:51,040 Speaker 1: could be had of AI. Does law need to be created, 677 00:33:51,040 --> 00:33:54,560 Speaker 1: do you think? Or just existing laws applied to a 678 00:33:54,640 --> 00:33:56,920 Speaker 1: much wider view now because of AI. 679 00:33:58,440 --> 00:34:00,680 Speaker 12: I think laws should be created, but I think it's 680 00:34:00,720 --> 00:34:03,600 Speaker 12: also too early. Who really can stand up and say 681 00:34:03,640 --> 00:34:07,080 Speaker 12: I thoroughly understand this technology and how it works. You 682 00:34:07,080 --> 00:34:09,560 Speaker 12: can't create a law around something you don't comprehend. 683 00:34:09,600 --> 00:34:12,239 Speaker 1: And what makes these discussions with the actors and the 684 00:34:12,239 --> 00:34:15,360 Speaker 1: writers is you know, I think an executive could stand up. 685 00:34:15,360 --> 00:34:18,560 Speaker 1: I would defend a media executive standing up saying I 686 00:34:18,600 --> 00:34:21,040 Speaker 1: don't know what this stuff is worth. I don't know 687 00:34:21,080 --> 00:34:23,200 Speaker 1: how we're going to generate revenue off of this stuff. 688 00:34:23,360 --> 00:34:26,200 Speaker 1: All I can tell you is when we think it up, 689 00:34:26,440 --> 00:34:29,000 Speaker 1: you'll get your cut. So you write up the language 690 00:34:29,040 --> 00:34:30,200 Speaker 1: that does that is what. 691 00:34:30,120 --> 00:34:30,520 Speaker 5: I would do. 692 00:34:30,840 --> 00:34:35,200 Speaker 12: Yes, that could be one way, but it's always the 693 00:34:35,200 --> 00:34:38,680 Speaker 12: devil that's, you know, in details, and everybody wants those details. 694 00:34:39,040 --> 00:34:41,880 Speaker 12: But I think you can start from a contractual position 695 00:34:41,960 --> 00:34:45,759 Speaker 12: moving forward that says, I'm not giving you rights to 696 00:34:45,920 --> 00:34:49,520 Speaker 12: my entire likeness. I'm only giving your rights to this 697 00:34:49,760 --> 00:34:52,320 Speaker 12: particular season movie. 698 00:34:52,400 --> 00:34:52,800 Speaker 3: Whatever. 699 00:34:53,200 --> 00:34:55,080 Speaker 12: We can define it and slice it differently. 700 00:34:55,560 --> 00:34:57,799 Speaker 1: I don't know. I think it's something well, I don't know. 701 00:34:58,040 --> 00:34:59,839 Speaker 1: I think there's language. I think there's language out there 702 00:34:59,880 --> 00:35:01,920 Speaker 1: that they can get things done, but it seems like 703 00:35:02,400 --> 00:35:04,640 Speaker 1: they're not a lot of movement there. So we'll keep 704 00:35:04,680 --> 00:35:07,600 Speaker 1: on on top of this thing in Hollywood, the whole 705 00:35:07,640 --> 00:35:11,239 Speaker 1: AI issue, which is just you know, mind numbing to 706 00:35:11,280 --> 00:35:14,080 Speaker 1: think about where this could all go and the applications 707 00:35:14,120 --> 00:35:17,480 Speaker 1: of AI across a range of industries, and the lawyer's 708 00:35:17,480 --> 00:35:18,560 Speaker 1: got to figure it out. 709 00:35:18,640 --> 00:35:21,040 Speaker 2: Rania set Home, like Ronia exactly great to have you 710 00:35:21,040 --> 00:35:22,719 Speaker 2: in the studio. Ronia, thanks so much for joining us. 711 00:35:22,719 --> 00:35:24,839 Speaker 1: It's awesome. Ronnie set Home managing a partner at set 712 00:35:24,840 --> 00:35:28,760 Speaker 1: Home Law Group, live in a Bloomberg Interactive broker's studio. 713 00:35:29,080 --> 00:35:32,200 Speaker 7: You're listening to the tape Can's Are Live program Bloomberg 714 00:35:32,280 --> 00:35:35,880 Speaker 7: Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the 715 00:35:35,920 --> 00:35:38,000 Speaker 7: tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the. 716 00:35:37,960 --> 00:35:39,160 Speaker 5: Bloomberg Business app. 717 00:35:39,200 --> 00:35:42,000 Speaker 7: You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our 718 00:35:42,040 --> 00:35:46,440 Speaker 7: flagship New York station, Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty. 719 00:35:47,480 --> 00:35:49,920 Speaker 1: Scott Kelly joins us. He's a founder and CEO of 720 00:35:49,920 --> 00:35:53,319 Speaker 1: ATOS Capital real Estate. But Scott, thanks for coming into 721 00:35:53,320 --> 00:35:56,040 Speaker 1: our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio. But I want to this dude. 722 00:35:56,120 --> 00:35:59,600 Speaker 1: Was that Morgan Stanley, Morgan Stanley, Dean Witterard, Dean Whitdter. Now, 723 00:35:59,800 --> 00:36:03,640 Speaker 1: for people who don't know of the investment banks, Morgan 724 00:36:03,680 --> 00:36:06,919 Speaker 1: Stanley has always been is the biggest player I think 725 00:36:06,960 --> 00:36:09,600 Speaker 1: in commercial real estate. When I think about investment banks 726 00:36:09,600 --> 00:36:11,320 Speaker 1: swinging and around in commercial real estate, I think of 727 00:36:11,360 --> 00:36:14,160 Speaker 1: these guys. So you were there during the heyday. You're 728 00:36:14,160 --> 00:36:18,120 Speaker 1: now at Ato's Capital. Thanks for joining us. You're welcome, 729 00:36:18,280 --> 00:36:21,560 Speaker 1: all right, commercial real Estate. I walk to Penn Station 730 00:36:21,680 --> 00:36:26,960 Speaker 1: every day. Nobody's in their office. It's dark. I've never 731 00:36:26,960 --> 00:36:28,600 Speaker 1: seen it like this. Nobody's ever seen it like this. 732 00:36:28,920 --> 00:36:31,239 Speaker 1: But at some point some smart people are going to 733 00:36:31,320 --> 00:36:35,720 Speaker 1: come in and say enough, this is where you start banking. 734 00:36:35,719 --> 00:36:37,840 Speaker 1: You talk to us, how you guys view the commercial 735 00:36:37,880 --> 00:36:39,240 Speaker 1: real estate business. 736 00:36:39,120 --> 00:36:41,160 Speaker 6: Well, I think there are a number of factors that 737 00:36:41,239 --> 00:36:45,080 Speaker 6: are cutting against any kind of rapid improvement in the 738 00:36:45,120 --> 00:36:45,920 Speaker 6: commercial real estate. 739 00:36:45,920 --> 00:36:49,600 Speaker 2: And we're talking specifically office here, right, Well, yeah, and. 740 00:36:49,520 --> 00:36:55,040 Speaker 6: More generally, but basically, real estate's a cyclical business. Office 741 00:36:55,120 --> 00:36:58,840 Speaker 6: is probably the most cyclical of all of that in retail, 742 00:37:00,080 --> 00:37:02,440 Speaker 6: and I think everybody agrees, whether it's a soft landing 743 00:37:02,480 --> 00:37:05,480 Speaker 6: or hard landing, we're at a difficult time in the 744 00:37:05,640 --> 00:37:11,640 Speaker 6: economic cycle. Second, there are huge secular and demographic shifts. 745 00:37:12,080 --> 00:37:15,360 Speaker 6: One of the reasons New York offices are emptier because 746 00:37:15,360 --> 00:37:18,360 Speaker 6: a lot of people are leaving New York. And again, 747 00:37:18,719 --> 00:37:23,319 Speaker 6: those shifts impact different real estate classes vastly differently. So 748 00:37:23,840 --> 00:37:27,960 Speaker 6: as an example, office and retail have been hurt by 749 00:37:28,000 --> 00:37:32,440 Speaker 6: the secular shift to work from home and online shopping, 750 00:37:33,200 --> 00:37:38,640 Speaker 6: and warehouses logistics facilities have done well. 751 00:37:39,280 --> 00:37:41,480 Speaker 10: So Scott, let's throw in rates because it's not just 752 00:37:41,600 --> 00:37:44,239 Speaker 10: these demographics. It's also you're making the point that the 753 00:37:44,239 --> 00:37:46,880 Speaker 10: cost of capital or the Fed fund rate has basically 754 00:37:46,880 --> 00:37:49,680 Speaker 10: gone up five hundred percent. I mean, that's got to 755 00:37:49,719 --> 00:37:50,560 Speaker 10: create a lot of pain. 756 00:37:51,040 --> 00:37:53,520 Speaker 6: Well, I think there are two aspects. So that one 757 00:37:53,880 --> 00:37:58,520 Speaker 6: you've got an unbelievable amount of commercial real estate debt maturity, 758 00:37:59,120 --> 00:38:01,880 Speaker 6: something like set one hundred and fifty billion in the 759 00:38:01,960 --> 00:38:06,200 Speaker 6: next year and something like one point seven trillion in 760 00:38:06,239 --> 00:38:09,680 Speaker 6: the next four years. And a lot of those loans 761 00:38:09,680 --> 00:38:13,239 Speaker 6: were made in essentially a zero interest rate environment, and 762 00:38:13,480 --> 00:38:17,759 Speaker 6: they're not refinancible at seven percent, so there's just not 763 00:38:18,000 --> 00:38:22,200 Speaker 6: So you've got this enormous amount of debt maturity coming 764 00:38:22,800 --> 00:38:25,319 Speaker 6: very high interest rates, and it's going to create a 765 00:38:26,360 --> 00:38:29,000 Speaker 6: I think a great investing opportunity. 766 00:38:28,800 --> 00:38:29,480 Speaker 3: In a reset. 767 00:38:29,520 --> 00:38:31,880 Speaker 2: I mean, I have happened to be involved in a 768 00:38:31,920 --> 00:38:38,200 Speaker 2: small family real estate company in Columbus in Columbus, Ohio, 769 00:38:38,239 --> 00:38:44,160 Speaker 2: and we have a lot of office space, mostly medical, thankfully, 770 00:38:44,520 --> 00:38:47,239 Speaker 2: and we have also a lot of student housing for 771 00:38:47,360 --> 00:38:52,160 Speaker 2: the Ohio State University. But I know that, you know, 772 00:38:52,680 --> 00:38:55,960 Speaker 2: our refis are going to be very difficult at these levels, 773 00:38:56,120 --> 00:38:59,319 Speaker 2: and I'm hoping that, you know, we can get through it. 774 00:38:59,360 --> 00:39:01,600 Speaker 2: But there's going to be the other family real estate 775 00:39:01,960 --> 00:39:03,800 Speaker 2: trusts that are not going to be able to refine. 776 00:39:03,800 --> 00:39:05,520 Speaker 2: They're going to have to sell to somebody who has money. 777 00:39:05,800 --> 00:39:10,040 Speaker 6: Yes, And interestingly, when you're talking about Columbus, which has 778 00:39:10,080 --> 00:39:12,719 Speaker 6: a very strong economy, because of the university, because of 779 00:39:12,760 --> 00:39:15,600 Speaker 6: the state, because you know, it's a good place to 780 00:39:15,640 --> 00:39:18,239 Speaker 6: work and live. There are a lot of cities like 781 00:39:18,280 --> 00:39:21,160 Speaker 6: that that continued that will be okay. You know, the 782 00:39:21,520 --> 00:39:25,600 Speaker 6: demographic shifts don't cut against the Columbus Ohios. They don't 783 00:39:25,600 --> 00:39:29,279 Speaker 6: cut against the big cities in Florida, you know, but 784 00:39:29,320 --> 00:39:34,320 Speaker 6: they do cut against the high tax, increasingly crime ridden 785 00:39:34,520 --> 00:39:38,040 Speaker 6: big cities of the North. So certainly they're going to 786 00:39:38,080 --> 00:39:40,400 Speaker 6: be different. Real estate is still a local game, and 787 00:39:40,440 --> 00:39:45,880 Speaker 6: they're going to be different impacts on different property types 788 00:39:45,920 --> 00:39:48,960 Speaker 6: and markets. But certainly they're going to be lots of 789 00:39:48,960 --> 00:39:51,200 Speaker 6: people that aren't going to be able to refinance the debt. 790 00:39:52,440 --> 00:39:57,319 Speaker 6: And interestingly, in previous crashes in the late eighties and 791 00:39:57,360 --> 00:40:00,560 Speaker 6: early nineties, that was driven by the essen else which 792 00:40:00,560 --> 00:40:03,240 Speaker 6: were essentially put out of business in the big money 793 00:40:03,239 --> 00:40:06,839 Speaker 6: center banks which had too much exposure. In eight it 794 00:40:06,920 --> 00:40:09,239 Speaker 6: was Wall Street, which had a lot more leverage than 795 00:40:09,280 --> 00:40:14,160 Speaker 6: anybody thought because of essentially derivatives and other matters. 796 00:40:14,680 --> 00:40:16,520 Speaker 2: Are the regional banks going to have I mean, I know, well, 797 00:40:16,600 --> 00:40:18,080 Speaker 2: Huntington just got a big bond. 798 00:40:17,880 --> 00:40:21,000 Speaker 3: Issue out yesterday, right, But there are some regional banks 799 00:40:21,040 --> 00:40:22,680 Speaker 3: that have been downgraded by S and P and Moodys. 800 00:40:22,719 --> 00:40:24,600 Speaker 2: There's some regional banks that probably have too many whole 801 00:40:24,600 --> 00:40:26,880 Speaker 2: to maturity bonds in their portfolio. 802 00:40:26,920 --> 00:40:30,240 Speaker 3: I mean, they're going to be tightening their credits. 803 00:40:30,520 --> 00:40:33,680 Speaker 6: That's exactly the right point. You know that the big 804 00:40:33,680 --> 00:40:35,879 Speaker 6: money center banks are okay. If you look at their 805 00:40:35,920 --> 00:40:39,680 Speaker 6: commercial real estate exposure relatives to their loans, you know 806 00:40:39,719 --> 00:40:42,480 Speaker 6: they've kind of learned their lesson. The problems are going 807 00:40:42,560 --> 00:40:45,440 Speaker 6: to be in the mid size and the smaller banks, where, 808 00:40:45,800 --> 00:40:49,319 Speaker 6: particularly during the COVID era, there wasn't a lot of 809 00:40:49,320 --> 00:40:51,480 Speaker 6: commercial loan demand, and they made a heck of a 810 00:40:51,520 --> 00:40:54,040 Speaker 6: lot of real estate loans and they made them in 811 00:40:54,080 --> 00:40:56,640 Speaker 6: a lot of cases to people unlike your family, but 812 00:40:56,680 --> 00:41:00,560 Speaker 6: a lot of people that weren't particularly good. So they're 813 00:41:00,600 --> 00:41:03,719 Speaker 6: going to be the problem is going to be not 814 00:41:03,800 --> 00:41:08,840 Speaker 6: as concentrated as it was in the crisis of the 815 00:41:08,960 --> 00:41:13,960 Speaker 6: late nineties the late eighties early nineties, as concentrated into 816 00:41:14,120 --> 00:41:16,279 Speaker 6: as it was in two thousand and eight, but very 817 00:41:16,280 --> 00:41:19,680 Speaker 6: widespread because of the fact that these loans sit in 818 00:41:20,440 --> 00:41:23,000 Speaker 6: medium to smaller size banks around the country. 819 00:41:23,080 --> 00:41:25,279 Speaker 10: So you're making some really big comparisons there from a 820 00:41:25,320 --> 00:41:27,799 Speaker 10: cyclical standpoint. So going back to the idea that you 821 00:41:27,800 --> 00:41:29,960 Speaker 10: think that there's going to be this huge opportunity, some 822 00:41:30,000 --> 00:41:33,319 Speaker 10: of the dominoes have to start to fall. When do 823 00:41:33,360 --> 00:41:38,240 Speaker 10: you see that happening? How long does this distress cycle happen? 824 00:41:38,320 --> 00:41:39,719 Speaker 10: And is your firm. 825 00:41:39,600 --> 00:41:41,719 Speaker 8: How do you actually go about this? 826 00:41:41,840 --> 00:41:44,719 Speaker 10: Are there properties that you're identifying, modeling out and then 827 00:41:44,760 --> 00:41:48,520 Speaker 10: you're ready to jump on when they potentially go into distress. 828 00:41:49,000 --> 00:41:53,800 Speaker 6: Well, we've formed a new company called Waivertree Property Partners 829 00:41:53,880 --> 00:41:57,680 Speaker 6: with a group called PTM, guys that I've worked with 830 00:41:57,719 --> 00:42:01,880 Speaker 6: for a long time. They're great developers because and they've 831 00:42:01,920 --> 00:42:05,760 Speaker 6: developed twenty two billion and invest in twenty two billion 832 00:42:05,760 --> 00:42:09,080 Speaker 6: with their predecessor companies and now as an independent company, 833 00:42:09,280 --> 00:42:12,200 Speaker 6: very strong, you know, kind of dirt under the fingernail 834 00:42:12,280 --> 00:42:15,480 Speaker 6: type real estate folks. And we think that a lot 835 00:42:15,520 --> 00:42:18,480 Speaker 6: of these opportunities are going to involve not just buying 836 00:42:18,520 --> 00:42:22,160 Speaker 6: things cheap, you know, not just you know, we buy 837 00:42:22,160 --> 00:42:24,560 Speaker 6: it at ten cents of the dollar, hold it out 838 00:42:24,600 --> 00:42:26,240 Speaker 6: for a little while, and send it'll sell our twenty 839 00:42:26,239 --> 00:42:29,320 Speaker 6: cents on the dollar. But because of these projects needing 840 00:42:29,360 --> 00:42:33,920 Speaker 6: real work, because a lot are ill conceived, a lot 841 00:42:33,920 --> 00:42:36,720 Speaker 6: of buildings are going to be have to be repurposed. 842 00:42:37,440 --> 00:42:41,200 Speaker 6: We formed this venture to really both be a partner 843 00:42:41,280 --> 00:42:46,440 Speaker 6: to existing financial institutions which have problems, and to you know, 844 00:42:46,520 --> 00:42:50,360 Speaker 6: raise additional outside capital to augment our capital and investing in. 845 00:42:50,360 --> 00:42:52,239 Speaker 10: These So you believe in this so much that you're 846 00:42:52,280 --> 00:42:54,480 Speaker 10: raising capital for. And what's so interesting about it, Scott, 847 00:42:54,520 --> 00:42:56,640 Speaker 10: Because of course I know that Atos, you've only been 848 00:42:56,640 --> 00:42:58,799 Speaker 10: in Asia over the last twenty years, ten billion dollars 849 00:42:58,840 --> 00:43:00,279 Speaker 10: of real estate over there. But you think that this 850 00:43:00,320 --> 00:43:03,080 Speaker 10: opportunity is so attractive, as painful as it could be, 851 00:43:03,160 --> 00:43:04,480 Speaker 10: that you're forming this. 852 00:43:04,600 --> 00:43:08,520 Speaker 6: New Yes, exactly. Look, I think Japan. We have really 853 00:43:08,560 --> 00:43:14,560 Speaker 6: scaled our Asian operation to invest solely in Japan. We 854 00:43:14,680 --> 00:43:18,440 Speaker 6: put you know, six hundred billion of equity into China 855 00:43:18,560 --> 00:43:22,920 Speaker 6: over the past fifteen years. Every deal we did made money. 856 00:43:23,239 --> 00:43:28,480 Speaker 6: I wouldn't do another one of them year, which too painful. 857 00:43:28,840 --> 00:43:32,560 Speaker 6: Japan is a place I think where in a slow growth, 858 00:43:34,160 --> 00:43:39,560 Speaker 6: stable economy, they don't have the work from home mentality 859 00:43:39,600 --> 00:43:45,319 Speaker 6: that we have here. The people go to the office more. So, 860 00:43:46,120 --> 00:43:49,479 Speaker 6: you know, we think that that's kind of, with reasonable risk, 861 00:43:49,560 --> 00:43:52,719 Speaker 6: a good place to earn kind of load to mid 862 00:43:52,760 --> 00:43:55,919 Speaker 6: teen returns. Which is a good thing. But we see 863 00:43:56,040 --> 00:44:00,840 Speaker 6: this opportunity in the US as being exponential, really bigger, 864 00:44:01,719 --> 00:44:05,560 Speaker 6: with the possibility of making really significant money if you 865 00:44:05,600 --> 00:44:09,840 Speaker 6: can combine the financial acumen of being able to underwrite 866 00:44:09,840 --> 00:44:16,840 Speaker 6: this stuff with the operational skills to reposition, to to 867 00:44:17,880 --> 00:44:21,640 Speaker 6: repurpose in a lot of cases properties that need to 868 00:44:21,640 --> 00:44:23,240 Speaker 6: be significantly changed. 869 00:44:23,280 --> 00:44:25,720 Speaker 1: So, Scott, do you think this new group will be 870 00:44:26,040 --> 00:44:32,040 Speaker 1: acquiring properties, real properties or the debt of distress properties 871 00:44:32,160 --> 00:44:33,759 Speaker 1: or both. How do you think you're going to play 872 00:44:33,800 --> 00:44:34,799 Speaker 1: a capital you. 873 00:44:34,760 --> 00:44:38,480 Speaker 6: Know, just over my whole career. In doing this, you 874 00:44:38,560 --> 00:44:41,320 Speaker 6: have to be flexible as to what the seller wants. 875 00:44:41,840 --> 00:44:45,160 Speaker 6: In some cases, the seller wants to just sell alone, 876 00:44:45,360 --> 00:44:48,360 Speaker 6: be done with it, move on you guys, you know, 877 00:44:48,440 --> 00:44:50,440 Speaker 6: take them through bankruptcy or do whatever you're going to do, 878 00:44:51,160 --> 00:44:53,520 Speaker 6: and we've done a lot of that. In other cases 879 00:44:53,680 --> 00:44:58,640 Speaker 6: they're like just bid as the debt or the asset, 880 00:44:59,120 --> 00:45:01,280 Speaker 6: and we'd like to get rid those. In some cases 881 00:45:01,440 --> 00:45:03,560 Speaker 6: it's a big portfolio. We want to take care of 882 00:45:03,600 --> 00:45:06,240 Speaker 6: everything in one fell swoop. You have to be able 883 00:45:06,280 --> 00:45:08,680 Speaker 6: to be flexible to what the seller. 884 00:45:08,719 --> 00:45:11,239 Speaker 1: Are This is just a personal question that I'm dying 885 00:45:11,280 --> 00:45:13,480 Speaker 1: to know. In a city like New York City. If 886 00:45:13,560 --> 00:45:17,719 Speaker 1: a big trophy property on Fifth Avenue or Lexington commercial 887 00:45:17,719 --> 00:45:20,840 Speaker 1: property were to trade today, what percentage haircut would it 888 00:45:20,840 --> 00:45:22,040 Speaker 1: be from pre pandemic, do you think? 889 00:45:23,320 --> 00:45:26,400 Speaker 6: Well, again, I think a lot of that has to 890 00:45:26,440 --> 00:45:28,200 Speaker 6: do with the quality of the asset. 891 00:45:28,520 --> 00:45:32,880 Speaker 2: The trophy property. They're still going for, not a discount, right. 892 00:45:32,719 --> 00:45:33,840 Speaker 5: Right, Yes, B and C. 893 00:45:34,040 --> 00:45:36,759 Speaker 1: How about the Benz Third Avenue all that stuff on 894 00:45:36,800 --> 00:45:40,000 Speaker 1: Third Avenue from Dunk, No, it's not junk. It was, 895 00:45:40,640 --> 00:45:42,839 Speaker 1: it's not. My question is like on that stuff from 896 00:45:42,840 --> 00:45:46,239 Speaker 1: Grand Central up here, that's you know, the last twenty 897 00:45:46,280 --> 00:45:50,200 Speaker 1: thirty years construction. Yeah, no, hedge fund hotels them until 898 00:45:50,200 --> 00:45:50,960 Speaker 1: fifteen minutes ago. 899 00:45:51,480 --> 00:45:55,120 Speaker 6: You know, I think it's interesting. They're really high quality buildings. 900 00:45:55,160 --> 00:45:57,399 Speaker 6: One of the things I was just said an event 901 00:45:57,480 --> 00:46:00,480 Speaker 6: over the GM building a couple of weeks ago, heavily 902 00:46:00,600 --> 00:46:05,520 Speaker 6: amendetizing office cookings. Now if you look at one Vanderbilt, 903 00:46:05,600 --> 00:46:08,640 Speaker 6: you know, yeah, that's all great restaurants. They have great 904 00:46:08,680 --> 00:46:11,960 Speaker 6: amenities for the you know, for the tenants, and I think, 905 00:46:12,239 --> 00:46:14,200 Speaker 6: you know, I think that's the way you really compete. 906 00:46:14,600 --> 00:46:17,200 Speaker 6: Hudson Yards would fall into that Chameter streat. 907 00:46:17,040 --> 00:46:19,480 Speaker 1: And see something a big property trade. I don't know 908 00:46:19,480 --> 00:46:21,200 Speaker 1: if it's gonna be thirty cents on a dollar, fifty 909 00:46:21,200 --> 00:46:22,959 Speaker 1: cents on the dollar, sixty cents on the dollar. 910 00:46:23,040 --> 00:46:24,799 Speaker 10: When do you think we see the trade, because that's 911 00:46:24,800 --> 00:46:26,040 Speaker 10: exact the anticipation. 912 00:46:26,360 --> 00:46:29,239 Speaker 6: Yeah, it's when the dead comes due, yep, and it 913 00:46:29,280 --> 00:46:31,680 Speaker 6: can't be refinanced. That's when you see the trade. 914 00:46:31,719 --> 00:46:33,239 Speaker 1: All right, Scott, thanks so much for joining us. We 915 00:46:33,280 --> 00:46:35,120 Speaker 1: got to go, but the fascinating we want to hear 916 00:46:35,160 --> 00:46:37,040 Speaker 1: back when you get this seeing role in. Scott Kelly, 917 00:46:37,040 --> 00:46:39,560 Speaker 1: founder and CEO of Atos Capital Real Estate. 918 00:46:40,880 --> 00:46:44,000 Speaker 2: Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcasts. You can 919 00:46:44,040 --> 00:46:47,800 Speaker 2: subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever 920 00:46:47,880 --> 00:46:49,400 Speaker 2: podcast platform you prefer. 921 00:46:49,760 --> 00:46:50,560 Speaker 3: I'm Matt Miller. 922 00:46:50,840 --> 00:46:54,239 Speaker 2: I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three and 923 00:46:54,360 --> 00:46:54,920 Speaker 2: on Fall. 924 00:46:54,760 --> 00:46:57,600 Speaker 1: Sweeney I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast. 925 00:46:57,640 --> 00:46:59,760 Speaker 1: You can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg. 926 00:46:59,760 --> 00:46:59,920 Speaker 7: Great