WEBVTT - Ig Nobels 2017: Liquid Cats, Didgeridoos & More

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind from house stuff

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com. Hey, welcome to stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:17.800
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb, I'm Christian, and I'm Joe McCormick,

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:20.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's the day after Halloween here in the house

0:00:20.120 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Stuff Works office. How is your Halloween, guys? Yeah, yeah,

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I had a good one. I had to go hunting

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 1>for like an actual Halloween experience though, because I my

0:00:28.960 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 1>wife and I got dressed up and we took the

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:33.440
<v Speaker 1>dogs out for a walk, and no one in like

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:36.199
<v Speaker 1>a like a mile radius of our house was was

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>really celebrating Halloween. You're not saying hunting hunting, well, I

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 1>was hunt You don't seem like a hunt humans. That's

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:45.400
<v Speaker 1>what you do on Halloween, right, for fine, but not

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>hunting them for fun, hunting them in hopes of food exactly.

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:50.160
<v Speaker 1>And I prefer the ones that are in costumes because

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 1>they taste better. So we had to get in the

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>car and drive to a suburban neighborhood where there was

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 1>like full on Halloween going and it was great. Well, well,

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>we just went around in our roborhood. UM, my son,

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>his his friend, uh, their parents, and we all just

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 1>walked around at the trick or treating thing and there,

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>but there was one moment that was there was a

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit legitimately creepy. I'll say that that kind of

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>goes in with our recent creepy Posta episode. So we

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 1>were finishing up, it was dark, uh you know, one

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 1>or two houses left, and there are a lot of

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:24.479
<v Speaker 1>kids on this particular street that we're trick or treating

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 1>on and one of the kids turns around and he

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:30.759
<v Speaker 1>points past me, behind my back and says says, he's

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:33.479
<v Speaker 1>dressed as slender Man. And I look around and there's

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:36.399
<v Speaker 1>clearly nobody dressed as slender Man. There's like nobody even

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:39.560
<v Speaker 1>tall enough to be slender Man. And it's like left

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 1>me confused for a second, and I for a brief moment,

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 1>I considered, is he seeing something that only children can see?

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>His slender Man back there? And that's actually that would

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>make the Slenderman thing even creepier if it was only

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 1>children could see slender Man. But I wanted to question him.

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 1>I didn't get a chance. I was like, like, hey, hey, kid,

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 1>where is slender Man? Point to slender Man. Let's have

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>a discussion about this. What hey, Joe, what did you do?

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I stayed home. Rachel and I stayed home. We gave

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:10.360
<v Speaker 1>out some candy to trig Re treaters. We we reheated

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:13.240
<v Speaker 1>some leftover chili. Kind of nice Halloween feast, and we

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 1>watched Toby Hooper's Salem's Lot in many series with all

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:24.800
<v Speaker 1>of the haircuts horror. Yeah, the seventies haircuts unbelievable. That

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:27.359
<v Speaker 1>movie scared the hell out of me when I first

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 1>saw it, but I was much younger. Yeah, it does

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:33.639
<v Speaker 1>the scene with the little boy floating up against the window. Yeah,

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the vampires in it are really freaky. Yeah. I I

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:38.239
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen it in forever, but I listened to a

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of Halloween mixes yesterday and there was one in

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:44.919
<v Speaker 1>particular that threw in some samples from the Salem's Lot movie,

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the bit where the showdown between the Master and the priest,

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Barlow and Callahan. Yeah, yeah, yeah, man, I would sample

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:56.919
<v Speaker 1>the heck out of James Mason in that movie because

0:02:56.919 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>he is so smooth. I love how they invert the

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:05.079
<v Speaker 1>classic monsters familiar, like in the Universal Dracula and well

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:08.960
<v Speaker 1>all the traditional Draculas. You get the crazy familiar. You

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 1>get Renfield who's out of control, but he's also like

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>imprisoned and not very potent as a character. In this one,

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 1>you've got this smooth, suave James Mason and these fancy suits.

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>He's basically Captain Nemo outside of the submarine. Hey, I

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:27.359
<v Speaker 1>got a question. Though, we're talking about Halloween and actually

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:31.119
<v Speaker 1>October's over, guys, that means that we can't do Halloween

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 1>episodes for another year. That's a bummer, though, you know us,

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 1>if you're a regular listener, we kind of slip some

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Halloween in all year long, and we'll we'll we'll sneak

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 1>it in, I'm sure. But of course we've been talking

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 1>about Halloween for a month and in doing that we

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 1>we managed to yet again let the Ignoble prizes slipped

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 1>past us. So we're gonna make up for that this

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 1>week and also provide maybe a kind of a palate cleanser.

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess for anyone who wishes to move on from

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Halloween episodes for a little bit, this will definitely be

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 1>like your silly science uh series of episodes. So let's

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 1>why don't we tell the audience Maybe some of them

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 1>haven't listened to our previous Ignoble episodes, but we generally

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 1>cover them every year. What are they Well, they have

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 1>been awarded since by the publication the Annals of Improbable Research.

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 1>The purpose of the award, according to the editors of

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the publication, is to quote honor achievements that first make

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 1>people laugh, then make them think. And furthermore, they stress

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 1>that the ten prizes aren't necessarily meant to pass judgment

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>on the winners. Instead, the official website emphasizes that the

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:42.679
<v Speaker 1>prizes quote celebrate the unusual, honor the imaginative, and spur

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 1>people's interest in science, medicine, and technology. And the principal

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 1>individual here and all of this is the editor of

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the of the Anials and Probable Research, Mark Abrams. And

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I would say that that goes along with our mission here,

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 1>and so these kind of work together nicely and that

0:04:57.720 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>like hopefully we give them a little bit of a boost.

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 1>They point out this bizarre research that we can take

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 1>a deeper look at, and we have more time on

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:09.039
<v Speaker 1>the podcast than they have in their live ceremony to

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 1>actually like dive into the research here. Yeah, and I

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 1>think one of the big take homes about it. I mean,

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:16.479
<v Speaker 1>obviously it is a it is a reference to the

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Nobel Prizes, where where the like a Nobel Prize, and

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:22.159
<v Speaker 1>chemistry or biology is a big deal, and it's usually

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:24.360
<v Speaker 1>a study that is going to have a huge impact

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:28.760
<v Speaker 1>with the Ignoble Prizes. I think it definitely highlights this

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 1>idea that we have touched on before, science as this

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 1>slime mold making its way through a maze or a labyrinth,

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and and the slime mold of science as it explores

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>the world, it is going to explore everywhere. It is

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:47.040
<v Speaker 1>going to look in every mundane pantry and closet, and

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 1>that is that's one of the things that the the Ignobel

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Prize celebrate, some of these studies that we're going to discuss.

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>It's one of those areas where you can say, why

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 1>why did science need to look into that? Why why

0:05:57.680 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 1>did money and effort and and scientific rigor approach this

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:05.119
<v Speaker 1>portion of the world. And the answer is, well, because

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 1>science must. Science must go in there. And in some

0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 1>of these cases it actually turns out to be important,

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:13.040
<v Speaker 1>like stuff that seems totally ludicrous, which I don't know

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:16.320
<v Speaker 1>about you guys, but some of mine seemed totally ludicrous.

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:19.480
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, and and in fact, like other episodes of

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:22.919
<v Speaker 1>our show have built off of the entire premise of

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Igno bells, like, for instance, our necrophilia episode. Uh, basically

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:30.159
<v Speaker 1>we got the jumping point off of that from I

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>think it was like an Igno bell from like five

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:36.599
<v Speaker 1>years ago maybe, yeah. Yeah, And and we were able

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 1>to find a whole ton of information. That's one of

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:41.840
<v Speaker 1>my favorite episodes. Yeah. I remember after you guys had

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 1>first been talking about doing that, we were in this

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:47.600
<v Speaker 1>long meeting and at the end of the meeting somebody

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 1>came over to talk to me about something and I

0:06:49.680 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 1>realized what was on my computer screen was all this

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:56.280
<v Speaker 1>stuff about duck necrophilia. Yeah. Yeah, I hope they liked it.

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 1>And if you out there haven't listened to the episode,

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 1>you should because it's really really surprisingly not as grim

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:05.159
<v Speaker 1>as you would think. I mean, it's grim, but it's

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:08.159
<v Speaker 1>also like really educational, both in terms of the animal

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>kingdom but also psychology of human beings. Yeah. It demystifies

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the topic, and I think I managed to do so

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:18.280
<v Speaker 1>in a non exploited way. So what, And it's a

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 1>great way to get through a meeting, boring meeting, hit

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 1>up the duck necrophilia. So what can we do that

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 1>with today? Oh, we have a we have a host

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 1>of studies here to touch on. There are ten awards, right,

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 1>so this is gonna be part one of a multi

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 1>part episode. Correct, how many episodes? Who knows it might

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 1>be too, It might be three. Well, we'll see how

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:39.840
<v Speaker 1>it goes. So the approach here, as in previous years,

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 1>is we divided these ten prizes up. We each took

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 1>three of them, and then there was one left over

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:46.720
<v Speaker 1>and I ended up taking that one just because I

0:07:46.720 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 1>had one of my other papers turned out to be

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 1>a bit short. Okay, well, it looks like I'm up

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:53.920
<v Speaker 1>to bat first. All right, what do you have for Joe? Well,

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>this would be the Physics Prize this year, which was

0:07:56.800 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>offered to Mark Antoine far Dan for use fluid dynamics.

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:04.320
<v Speaker 1>You probe the question can a cat be both a

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 1>solid and a liquid? This is a real Shroggger's cat

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 1>slash not scenario, right, Okay, Yeah, I can see that

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the cat's both a liquid and a solid until you

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 1>look at it. Okay, So it's for a paper called

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 1>on the rayology of Cats. So here's an experience I'm

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:24.240
<v Speaker 1>sure you've all had. You're at a restaurant, you get

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 1>some French fries, you want to put some ketchup on

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 1>your plate. But the ketchup at your table is the

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:33.319
<v Speaker 1>glass bottle. You know there may be trouble ahead. So

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>you turn it up, you unscrew the top, you shake, jiggle,

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:38.680
<v Speaker 1>tap and all that, but you can't get the stuff

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:41.440
<v Speaker 1>out of the bottle. It will not flow. You'll have

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>had this experience. Yeah, that's when you have to It's

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:47.199
<v Speaker 1>probably not very polite, but you have to get the

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 1>butter knife. I always take a butter knife. Jam the

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 1>knife in, and you did, but then you'd end up

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:55.160
<v Speaker 1>feeling like a real animal, which is always a shame

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 1>because I find that the glass bottle of ketchup, you

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:02.000
<v Speaker 1>tend to encounter it at not the highest level of restaurant,

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 1>because that kind of place is going to have it's

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna bring it out to you. And but it's also

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 1>not a super cheap restaurant because otherwise you would have packets,

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:11.959
<v Speaker 1>or you would have a plastic squeeze bottle, or you

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 1>would have a pump and a little little cups that

0:09:14.520 --> 0:09:17.080
<v Speaker 1>you fill it up with. So it's a nice enough

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 1>restaurant that you feel awkward jabbing of a knife into

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:24.199
<v Speaker 1>a bottle like an animal, you know, some restaurants take

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>those glass bottles and then just refill them at a restaurant.

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:32.599
<v Speaker 1>For four years while I was in college, that was

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 1>part of the job, was refilling those much cheaper to

0:09:35.280 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 1>buy in bulk and then just pump it back into

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:41.079
<v Speaker 1>But in that case, why wouldn't you use a scort bottle? Anyway,

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 1>So if if you have ever had this experience, and

0:09:44.200 --> 0:09:47.440
<v Speaker 1>you've ever wondered why won't the ketchup come out, your

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:51.679
<v Speaker 1>interest in the subject of yology has been ignited. Reyology

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>is the study of how matter flows. So given your

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:58.080
<v Speaker 1>experience with the ketchup bottles, you can probably guess that

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:01.160
<v Speaker 1>this is a surprisingly complex field. A lot of variables

0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:04.600
<v Speaker 1>are going to go into how a substance flows under

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:07.840
<v Speaker 1>various conditions. So you know that one glass catchup bottle

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of cleanly evacuates onto your plate, maybe even faster

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 1>than you wanted to, and then the next one, same brand,

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:18.080
<v Speaker 1>same content, same bottle, just will not budge until you

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:21.720
<v Speaker 1>jam the knife in. So what makes the difference. There

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of variables. Temperature is a big one.

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 1>You probably know this from cooking, right, You've got a

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:29.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of sauces, soups, so they're edible fluids that are

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 1>very runny at a high temperature but almost solid at

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:34.960
<v Speaker 1>a low temperature. And there are just tons of reology

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 1>characteristics that you can chart exactly how does a flowing

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:44.679
<v Speaker 1>material react to different types of substrate materials, Like how

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:48.199
<v Speaker 1>does it flow on glass versus on some other type

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:51.840
<v Speaker 1>of material, or how does it like how far will

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 1>it bubble up off the lip of a container before

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 1>it overflows? There are all kinds of questions like that.

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 1>So the measurement of a material's ability to flow is

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:05.959
<v Speaker 1>known as rheometry, And I think this paper technically qualifies

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:08.720
<v Speaker 1>as a foray into rheometry because it's going to be

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 1>measuring cats and how how well cats flow out of

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:15.319
<v Speaker 1>catchup bottles. Uh, not quite catchup bottles, but it gets

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 1>surprisingly close. Uh. So reology is actually kind of it's

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:22.440
<v Speaker 1>one of those things that seems kind of dry at first,

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 1>but it's more interesting the more you think about it.

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:28.080
<v Speaker 1>The Greek philosopher Heraclitis is famous for this insistence that

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 1>the fundamental nature of the universe is sort of constant change.

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:34.599
<v Speaker 1>It's sort of like the static change, since everything is

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 1>always changing in a way, everything is always the same.

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:39.719
<v Speaker 1>You've heard that quote that no man ever steps in

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the same river twice. That's attributed to Heraclidas. But another

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 1>way of expressing this idea is the aphorism panta ray,

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:50.079
<v Speaker 1>which is Greek for everything flows, like we all flow

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 1>down here will flow too, and uh and so everything changes,

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:56.679
<v Speaker 1>nothing remains still and far. Dwand points out that the

0:11:56.679 --> 0:12:00.240
<v Speaker 1>field of reology is sort of along the same same

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:03.679
<v Speaker 1>same lines as this idea by Heraclitus. States of matter

0:12:03.720 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 1>are not fixed features of the universe. They're expressed through

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:11.680
<v Speaker 1>a matter of time. So eventually forces act on every

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 1>massive particles to make those particles deform or flow in

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 1>some way. Uh. Solid matter tends to deform over time.

0:12:20.080 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Liquid or gas tends to flow. Gotcha. Okay, yeah, this

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. So I'm thinking about like we recently talked about,

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 1>like these massive glaciers in uh small Bard, and that

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:35.600
<v Speaker 1>some of these glaciers have different states inside of themselves,

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>so some of them are more liquid and more solid

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 1>than other states, and that causes them to move, the

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 1>entire glacier to move at different paces. This is somewhat related. Yeah,

0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 1>but that's a great example because on a long enough

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 1>time scale, glaciers do flow as well, even though they're

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:52.199
<v Speaker 1>solid and you can walk on them if you want

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 1>to look over hundreds of years, they're sort of flowing.

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, a major factor in how things flow or

0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:00.280
<v Speaker 1>resist flow is the state of matter at her. We

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 1>all remember this from you know, elementary school physics. But

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>by traditional definition, you've got solids, liquids, and gas. And

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:09.679
<v Speaker 1>a solid is the state of matter which has both

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:12.840
<v Speaker 1>a fixed volume it's not going to change in size,

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and a fixed shape it's not going to change in shape.

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Liquid is the state of matter that's got a fixed

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 1>volume but not a fixed shape, and instead it conforms

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:25.240
<v Speaker 1>to the shape of whatever contains it. And then gas

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:27.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have either one. It doesn't have a fixed shape

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 1>or a fixed volume, but expands to fill whatever container

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 1>it's in. Here's where the cat comes in. Now, being

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>an animal, I think you generally assume the cat is

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 1>more or less a solid, right, well, kind of complex.

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 1>It's a solid filled with liquids, that's true. Animals are

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of bags of juice, right and then, but then cats,

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I haven't read the study, but ever since I saw

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the title, I keep looking at my cat and watching

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 1>her move and she does have like a very flowy

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 1>liquid movement to totally, but it's not I would say

0:13:57.480 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>it comes through less when the cat is moving around

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 1>and walking, and more when the cat is at rest

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:06.560
<v Speaker 1>in various containers and substrates. So you guys are both

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 1>cat owners, haven't you seen the way a cat will

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:13.319
<v Speaker 1>sometimes seem to puddle in the bathroom sink or pour

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 1>itself into a basket or box. Oh definitely the baskets

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 1>and box like that seems to be universal. Yeah, definitely.

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 1>My my female cat rowing is she she has an

0:14:23.400 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 1>ability to, like she's a little overweight, which she has

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 1>an ability to kind of just make her her mounds

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 1>of flesh kind of form around her in a liquid status. Yeah,

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I remember this. I've seen lots of cats

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 1>that love to just sort of not just get into

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>depressions and cavities in various types of containers, but seemed

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 1>to fill them perfectly to every edge like a liquid would.

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 1>So that inspired some people on the internet to make

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 1>posts like cats are liquids, and then far Dan is

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 1>basically like I saw a thing on the internet that

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 1>said cats are liquids, let's find out. So he essentially

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 1>takes a bunch of photos of cats and analyzes them

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 1>using the criteria of reology the same way you'd measure

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I say, a massive ketchup or paint or mud to

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 1>understand the way it flows. A cat in a jar,

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 1>a cat spread across a lot of bars, a cat

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 1>in a basket, And what follows in the paper I

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 1>would say is mostly just a bunch of in jokes

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 1>for yologists, But I do think it's kind of interesting.

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 1>The results are obviously that cats can have some unique

0:15:32.400 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 1>reeological properties, combining apparent features of both solids and liquids.

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 1>But wouldn't that be true of basically any mammal Well,

0:15:41.520 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean part fur. Yeah, I think the fur, the

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 1>fur and the sort of soft body is very crucial

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>for the cat because probably a little bit solid and

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit liquid. Oh yeah, like, well, my bodies liquid. Well,

0:15:56.040 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean we are pretty much blood bags. But I

0:15:58.360 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>would say something about the shape of your body. So

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 1>imagine yourself trying to get into a sink or a

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 1>box or a basket and just fill it the way

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 1>a cat appears to like a liquid. It doesn't seem

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:13.680
<v Speaker 1>quite as easy for you and me. Right, One of

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the things about cats of course, is that they are

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 1>extremely flexible and uh and and then they have these

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of various resting states that they'll go into, these

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of uniform uh, you know, resting states. So there's

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 1>there's I like to think of it as you have

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the bread uh shape where the cat you know, kind

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 1>of tucks its legs in and it it's kind of busy,

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of cat bush cat loaf, Yeah, the cat or

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:38.120
<v Speaker 1>a cat loaf, you could call it. There's also the

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 1>bagel in which they curl up, and then there's one

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 1>there's one I think most of them do this, but

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:45.720
<v Speaker 1>my cat Mo, she definitely does this one where she

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:48.000
<v Speaker 1>just kind of like lays like she's been hit by

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:50.760
<v Speaker 1>a truck or something, you know, where it's just just

0:16:50.840 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 1>completely sprawled out. But all of these they do look

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 1>like different animals in these different shapes, and it's really

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 1>hard to nail down exactly what the shape of their

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:05.639
<v Speaker 1>body is. Yeah, but my flesh isn't as loosely hanging

0:17:05.680 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 1>off of my body as it does in my cat's right, Yeah,

0:17:08.560 --> 0:17:10.240
<v Speaker 1>and cats you feel like you can just move it

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:12.879
<v Speaker 1>all over the place, and the fur really helps. Also.

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:16.680
<v Speaker 1>The fur gives the illusion that there's like a much

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 1>more body there than there actually is, and that part

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 1>of the body obviously can be deformed into almost any shape.

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:24.680
<v Speaker 1>That's why when you give a cat of bath, it

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:27.639
<v Speaker 1>is like one of the saddest things ever because they're miserable.

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:30.120
<v Speaker 1>But also they lose this ability you're talking about, right,

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 1>So that's part of the thing. A shaved cat would

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 1>not appear to be a liquid in the same way

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:38.200
<v Speaker 1>a very furry cat is. But I I think it's

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty funny in the paper, Like a lot of

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:43.400
<v Speaker 1>these are obviously a lot of these things, he says

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:46.200
<v Speaker 1>in the paper are funnier if you are a reeologist

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 1>or you're familiar with all these concepts, but they're still

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty funny even to an outsider. Like one is a

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 1>picture of a cat in a basket, and it's a

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:57.679
<v Speaker 1>very small basket. So picture a large cat in like

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:01.920
<v Speaker 1>a small French fry basket, and it's it's gathered up

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:05.360
<v Speaker 1>into the basket, clearly filling it entirely, but puffing out

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:08.639
<v Speaker 1>over the top and hanging over the sides. And he

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 1>analyzes this photo by saying, quote cat on a super

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:19.720
<v Speaker 1>philadophobic substrate, showing a high contact angle. Another one, he's

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 1>got a jar turned on its side with the mouth

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 1>facing out, and there is a kitten pretty much completely

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>filling the jar, and he says, quote tilted jar experiment

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:33.639
<v Speaker 1>showing the yield stress of a kitten. So the yield

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 1>stress would be like what kind of stress has to

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 1>be put on a mass of liquid before it flows

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 1>out of a container at a certain angle. So, for example,

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the ketchup in the bottle, A lot of times the

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:46.879
<v Speaker 1>ketchup will not come out of the bottle because you

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 1>have not adequately met its yield stress in whatever form

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 1>it takes in the bottle. Here we've got the kitten

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 1>will not pour out of this jar because it's yield

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 1>stress has not been met. So while this is funny, right,

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 1>and it's written to be funny, it also seems like

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 1>it's probably important because it illustrates the principles of reology

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:08.200
<v Speaker 1>in a way that that basically backs up how well

0:19:08.240 --> 0:19:10.119
<v Speaker 1>they work. Yeah, I think that's a good point. I

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:12.400
<v Speaker 1>would say that this paper seems to me to be

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 1>jokier than most of the other papers were looking at

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>this time, Like he actually does do some math in

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the paper and actually applies the reheological principles does real analysis,

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 1>but it's mostly I think, just for the purpose of

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 1>being funny, especially to other reeologists. But I think it matters,

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 1>and he mentions in the paper some ways in which

0:19:32.840 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 1>it might matter. Like one thing is that cats are

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:38.840
<v Speaker 1>unlike most other types of liquids you would measure the

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 1>flow of because they are self powered and self moving.

0:19:43.160 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 1>And there are some analogies here to other things that

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:48.400
<v Speaker 1>you might actually want to study, like studying the flow

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 1>of self powered materials does matter in a lot of scenarios,

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 1>like studying the movement of large packs or flocks of animals,

0:19:55.680 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 1>or studying the flow of crowds of humans under various constraints.

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:02.200
<v Speaker 1>And this is sort of me extrapolating, because I think

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 1>that would also come into some different kinds of fields

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:07.200
<v Speaker 1>other than reyology. There's probably, you know, such a thing

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:10.119
<v Speaker 1>as just studying crowd dynamics. But but hold on, I

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 1>got an idea of how this connects. Okay, So remember

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:16.679
<v Speaker 1>that movie World War Z with the zombies like zombie

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 1>flow basically, yeah, exactly, like the zombies like came together

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:21.600
<v Speaker 1>as like a hive mind and could like didn't. There's

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:23.360
<v Speaker 1>even one point where like I think they turned into

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:25.359
<v Speaker 1>a hand or something something dumb like that, Right, They

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 1>formed structures kind of like firing'st you're talking about the movie,

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:30.920
<v Speaker 1>the movie, not the book at all. Yeah. Uh, well

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 1>they would climb walls by piling themselves up against the

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 1>wall and then scaling over. Yeah, exactly. And so you

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:40.119
<v Speaker 1>could Let's say you were one of the c g

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:43.119
<v Speaker 1>I operators on that film and you needed to figure

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 1>out how they would flow. You could probably use the

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 1>principles of reyology applied based on something like on crowd dynamics. Yeah. Possibly, Well,

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:55.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean I would say that crowd dynamics, studying the

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 1>flow of crowds and other self powered uh types of

0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:04.880
<v Speaker 1>flow could have real consequences, and say designing environments. For example,

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:08.640
<v Speaker 1>crowd crush and trampling are real things that happen when

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 1>you get a bunch of people together in a place

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:13.960
<v Speaker 1>and they start flowing in a non optimal an entire

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:16.919
<v Speaker 1>brain stuff episode on the science of crowd crushing. And

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 1>so I think maybe like understanding self directed flow of

0:21:20.640 --> 0:21:23.399
<v Speaker 1>bio materials, whether it's a single animal or lots of

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 1>animals acting as a pack, could help us better maybe

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe better design public spaces to accommodate sudden human crowd

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 1>flow without leading to tragedies. So cases where say a

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 1>large group of people are screaming and flowing out of

0:21:36.840 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 1>a movie theater, and also cases where the blob is

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:43.760
<v Speaker 1>flowing out of the same movie theater after them. Uh.

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Both both of these would be opportunities for reology of

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the blob would be a great paper. That's what this

0:21:49.640 --> 0:21:52.639
<v Speaker 1>guy should right next. I bet somebody has done that

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 1>out there. I bet that's one of those things you

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:58.359
<v Speaker 1>could find. But to your point about just raising awareness

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:01.199
<v Speaker 1>of reality, I think that's a great acent point on

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 1>this show. I do not believe we have ever discussed

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:06.879
<v Speaker 1>reeology before, and here we are discussing it. Well, I

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 1>think we should commit now we should try to find

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:12.960
<v Speaker 1>at least one really truly interesting yology topic to cover

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:16.200
<v Speaker 1>within the next year. Okay, yeah, maybe the blob. Alright,

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna take a quick breaking. When we come back,

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:26.159
<v Speaker 1>we will jump into another two thousand seventeen ignoble winning study. Alright,

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:29.439
<v Speaker 1>we're back, Robert, what do you have for us? Alright,

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:32.080
<v Speaker 1>so this one, this was actually the first one that

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I I snagged from from this year's offerings because it

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:38.879
<v Speaker 1>is a paper that I have covered before. Kind of

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 1>ad nausea because there is a stuff to blow your

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:46.200
<v Speaker 1>mind podcast episode. I believe that touches on this. There

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:48.439
<v Speaker 1>was a video and I'm pretty sure I did a

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 1>blog post as well. Oh I remember this, Yeah, yeah, yeah.

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:57.879
<v Speaker 1>The title of the paper is female penis, male vagina

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 1>and their correlated evolution in a have insect. And this

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:05.359
<v Speaker 1>was a Current Biology paper paper from two thousand and fourteen.

0:23:05.640 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 1>I gotta say, first of all, for our listeners, there's

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:11.440
<v Speaker 1>an image that's inserted here in our notes for Robert's referencing.

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Insert is a good Yeah. It is very difficult to

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:17.360
<v Speaker 1>tell what is happening here, but it is also very

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:20.960
<v Speaker 1>easy to imagine what is happening here. It's just these

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:25.480
<v Speaker 1>uh oregan like structures flowing into and out of each

0:23:25.480 --> 0:23:28.040
<v Speaker 1>other with a male and female symbol on them. It

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:31.119
<v Speaker 1>looks somewhat insectile, or maybe there's just hair on everything.

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I can't tell. Oh it is it is a cronenberg

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Ee world. This image attempts u this with so basically

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:42.919
<v Speaker 1>the reason that this the study was highlighted previously, the

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:45.879
<v Speaker 1>reason it want to ignoble UH this year is because

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 1>it concerns sex the sex swapped world of cave bugs,

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 1>which I think we can all get behind. Um. So specifically,

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about Brazilian cave insects of the neo Trogla genus.

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:01.800
<v Speaker 1>We're talking four to sink distinct species here, and they

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 1>mark the first documented example of an animal with sex

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 1>reversed genitalia. So as this as detailed in the Cell

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 1>pressed journal Current Biology, the females quote insert an elaborate

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 1>penis like organ into the males much reduced vagina like

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:23.200
<v Speaker 1>opening during forty to seventy hour long love making marathons.

0:24:23.720 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 1>So to clarify, would this mean that's the male still

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:30.000
<v Speaker 1>makes sperm cells, correct, and the female still makes egg cells,

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:34.440
<v Speaker 1>but they bring them into contact by the female inserting

0:24:34.480 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 1>an organ into the male to retrieve the sperm cells

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:42.200
<v Speaker 1>from inside. Exactly. It's a different like formation essentially, but

0:24:42.320 --> 0:24:44.239
<v Speaker 1>it's but it's unique, is the thing, Like, there are

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 1>no other examples of of a a sex or gender

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:51.200
<v Speaker 1>swapping like this robust right, yeah, and this is I

0:24:51.240 --> 0:24:54.680
<v Speaker 1>mean that's forty to seventy hours. I mean sting would

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 1>probably be embarrassed looking at us. Well, these cave bugs.

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 1>The thing is of that the sting is a lover.

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:06.439
<v Speaker 1>And uh, I think love making is a bit anthropomorphic

0:25:06.560 --> 0:25:09.720
<v Speaker 1>when you're talking about h I kind of agree, yeah,

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:12.679
<v Speaker 1>because the insect world is pretty brutal, and the love

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:14.639
<v Speaker 1>making world of really the love making world of a

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of organisms is fairly brutal. Uh. And is the

0:25:18.000 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I love how we've just landed on love making instead

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:23.960
<v Speaker 1>of mating. I don't know, you know, it just sounds

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 1>more romantic, right, I guess so? So um, But there's more,

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:32.200
<v Speaker 1>There's there's more. There's some more brutal details here. As

0:25:32.240 --> 0:25:35.399
<v Speaker 1>the team of Brazilian and Japanese researchers discovered, the female

0:25:35.440 --> 0:25:38.200
<v Speaker 1>inserts her phaalic gynosome into the mail and then the

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:42.680
<v Speaker 1>sex organ inflates, hooking a bevy of spines into the

0:25:42.800 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 1>male's body to anchor the two insects together. Now, this

0:25:46.200 --> 0:25:49.720
<v Speaker 1>is not the only organism with penis spines. No. In fact,

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 1>there there's evidence that human ancestors have had penis spines

0:25:55.080 --> 0:26:00.200
<v Speaker 1>and harmedid other hominids have had penis spines before. And

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I believe there is some genetic data you can point to. Robert,

0:26:03.800 --> 0:26:05.800
<v Speaker 1>tell me a little more about penis spines. I think

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm woefully under educated here, all right, So, yeah, it's

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:11.920
<v Speaker 1>like basically like a cactus penis. I guess you could

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:14.440
<v Speaker 1>describe it as a because basically there's sort of a

0:26:14.480 --> 0:26:18.040
<v Speaker 1>reproductive arms race in many organisms, and this is where

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:22.400
<v Speaker 1>spines may serve to stimulate or anchor, uh, the organism

0:26:22.440 --> 0:26:25.359
<v Speaker 1>into place, and or it may serve in sexual conflict.

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Now I think you're probably out there thinking, like, what,

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:31.560
<v Speaker 1>so some insects have penis spines. That's it, right, No,

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean like mammals have penis spines, like cats have

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:39.119
<v Speaker 1>pens have like penis spines. Kind of right. Yeah, humans

0:26:39.240 --> 0:26:41.639
<v Speaker 1>should wake up every day and just be thankful that,

0:26:41.920 --> 0:26:43.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, for a number of things, But one of

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the things on the list should be that we don't

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:49.639
<v Speaker 1>have to contend with penis spines um in this case

0:26:50.320 --> 0:26:53.720
<v Speaker 1>of the the cave insect. Of the researchers think that

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:56.680
<v Speaker 1>it may have other functions aside from just anchoring it

0:26:56.720 --> 0:26:59.360
<v Speaker 1>into place. It might have a role in genital stimulation

0:26:59.840 --> 0:27:02.800
<v Speaker 1>or or in or quote, in inflicting harm. So it's

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:05.639
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of hard to figure out that it's like

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:08.119
<v Speaker 1>the brundle fly told us. So there's no such thing

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:12.280
<v Speaker 1>as insect politics. It's all it. And so wait a minute,

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:14.119
<v Speaker 1>that like this could be a sex organ or a

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 1>defensive or offensive weapon, well only in so far as

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:22.040
<v Speaker 1>it plays into the the the war, the continual battle

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:25.240
<v Speaker 1>of sexual reproduction. Yeah, when whenever I've read about this

0:27:25.359 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 1>in the past, it's been a biological, uh, survival mechanism,

0:27:30.080 --> 0:27:33.359
<v Speaker 1>I guess. And it's this is horrible from an ethical

0:27:33.400 --> 0:27:36.440
<v Speaker 1>standpoint of humans, right, But the idea is that the

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 1>one without the penis barbs can't get away if they

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:43.080
<v Speaker 1>do not want to mate with the one with the

0:27:43.160 --> 0:27:47.840
<v Speaker 1>penis barbs. Once the barbs are attached, they're kind of stuck, right,

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:50.600
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's what you mean by the inflicting harm,

0:27:50.800 --> 0:27:53.719
<v Speaker 1>right that it's it's sort of along the lines of, uh,

0:27:54.560 --> 0:27:56.800
<v Speaker 1>if those are human beings, we would be referring to

0:27:56.880 --> 0:28:00.720
<v Speaker 1>this as like a masochistic act. Now, the the gynosome

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:03.480
<v Speaker 1>in this case, it again, it does not deposit material

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:07.240
<v Speaker 1>like a male penis. There's no semen coming out of it,

0:28:07.440 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 1>there's no sperm deposit. Instead, this gynosome it receives sperm

0:28:12.480 --> 0:28:15.240
<v Speaker 1>as well as capsules of nourishment, sort of a gift

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:17.800
<v Speaker 1>or a bribe to encourage lots of mating. That we

0:28:17.840 --> 0:28:21.320
<v Speaker 1>see this in a number of different um insects, typically

0:28:21.440 --> 0:28:23.879
<v Speaker 1>the spiders too, like they are the spiders that create

0:28:23.960 --> 0:28:27.560
<v Speaker 1>a wrapped up gifts. The males bring them to the

0:28:27.600 --> 0:28:30.359
<v Speaker 1>females to encourage mating, though sometimes they bring them something

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:33.920
<v Speaker 1>empty to trick them. So this is essentially like an

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:40.080
<v Speaker 1>inverted vagina dentata, you can think of it that way. Yeah,

0:28:40.240 --> 0:28:43.239
<v Speaker 1>so the would it be inverted, would it be an

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:48.000
<v Speaker 1>extroverted vagina dentata? Maybe that's yeah, that's probably the correct terminology.

0:28:48.200 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 1>It's probably not, by the way. Also, vegina dentata is

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>something that we've covered on the show separately, that that

0:28:53.680 --> 0:28:56.240
<v Speaker 1>that that was a joke that's not actual like biology.

0:28:56.480 --> 0:28:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I guess that you would say it's kind of aversion

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:02.960
<v Speaker 1>I believe diverted. Yeah, it was like turning the turning

0:29:03.000 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 1>out of a pocket, and yeah, that's exactly what I

0:29:05.480 --> 0:29:08.760
<v Speaker 1>was thinking of. Yeah, yeah, it's it's it's very complicated

0:29:08.800 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 1>to try and sort of fit the the tetris equation

0:29:13.160 --> 0:29:17.680
<v Speaker 1>here in one's mind, genital tetris. Now that that act

0:29:17.720 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 1>of gift giving that we're talking about the nourishment. The

0:29:20.000 --> 0:29:22.680
<v Speaker 1>researchers have argued here that this is likely what drove

0:29:22.760 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 1>the evolutionary development of the female penis. The dinosame here

0:29:25.800 --> 0:29:30.959
<v Speaker 1>to begin with, again getting into this phallic arms race. Now,

0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:34.840
<v Speaker 1>why is it funny? I think that's pretty obvious because

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 1>it is a study that involves sex and the idea

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:41.240
<v Speaker 1>of a female organism penetrating a male organism. So sex

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:45.680
<v Speaker 1>t Yes, basically, that's that's it. It's it's beenign violation.

0:29:46.520 --> 0:29:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Well yeah, as long as you're not one of the

0:29:48.560 --> 0:29:51.520
<v Speaker 1>male cave fugs, right yeah, but but yeah, it's it's

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:56.240
<v Speaker 1>basically just a a funny sex headline, right, but it

0:29:56.400 --> 0:29:58.960
<v Speaker 1>is still important. It's u it's I think it's such

0:29:59.000 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 1>a startling rever hursal of everything we've come to expect

0:30:01.680 --> 0:30:04.720
<v Speaker 1>from sexual reproduction. And as their researchers point out, the

0:30:04.840 --> 0:30:09.440
<v Speaker 1>reversal here is in the quote rapid evolution and diversification

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:13.480
<v Speaker 1>unquote of genitalia. So male genitalia is usually the one

0:30:13.560 --> 0:30:20.640
<v Speaker 1>to develop quote coercive adaptations, while female genitalia remains relatively simple. Plus,

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 1>it's the females doing the competition here for males and

0:30:24.640 --> 0:30:28.520
<v Speaker 1>their seminal gifts. So the biological reversal results in a

0:30:28.680 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 1>very robust behavioral reversal. So perhaps with this particular species,

0:30:33.600 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 1>there's more females than males, or there's some kind of

0:30:37.400 --> 0:30:39.960
<v Speaker 1>a I don't know if sociological is the right term,

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:41.840
<v Speaker 1>but there's a there's a set up in which like

0:30:41.920 --> 0:30:44.440
<v Speaker 1>they have to compete for the the attention of the

0:30:44.680 --> 0:30:46.800
<v Speaker 1>males in order to reproduce. Well, it sounds like the

0:30:46.880 --> 0:30:51.280
<v Speaker 1>females would be the ones doing the courtship activities. Yeah,

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's interesting to to look at that. It's

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:55.960
<v Speaker 1>like to say that the biological reversal and then that

0:30:56.200 --> 0:30:59.760
<v Speaker 1>reverses the behavior as well. Uh. I really like this

0:31:00.200 --> 0:31:02.760
<v Speaker 1>because I think flipping things around like this, it shows

0:31:02.840 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 1>us that sexual reproduction is all about just the combination

0:31:06.120 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 1>of these two things and the form those things take,

0:31:09.120 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 1>and all the behavior and culture associated with it is

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:15.840
<v Speaker 1>merely a product of natural selection. Yeah. Yeah, that's interesting

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and it makes me sort of think, like where's it

0:31:18.680 --> 0:31:21.600
<v Speaker 1>going as well, not just with insects, but with like

0:31:21.720 --> 0:31:24.160
<v Speaker 1>all species. You know, although for the most part, I

0:31:24.240 --> 0:31:26.880
<v Speaker 1>mean for the last like millions some odd years, most

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:29.680
<v Speaker 1>of our species have stayed the same reproductive wise, but

0:31:30.200 --> 0:31:32.320
<v Speaker 1>things can change well, and it especially when we start

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:34.440
<v Speaker 1>changing ourselves. It's also one of those studies that just

0:31:34.560 --> 0:31:36.959
<v Speaker 1>raises the possibility like what if what if things had

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:38.720
<v Speaker 1>gone the other way? What if we were in a

0:31:38.800 --> 0:31:44.960
<v Speaker 1>world where the vast majority almost all organisms that engage

0:31:45.000 --> 0:31:49.640
<v Speaker 1>in sexual reproduction entailed at the female penetration of the

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 1>male and uh and we were looking at a weird

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 1>cave bug that did the opposite, right, Yeah, yeah, exactly. Yeah,

0:31:57.760 --> 0:32:01.040
<v Speaker 1>it does put it all into perspective. Yeah, alright, we're

0:32:01.080 --> 0:32:02.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna take a quick break and we come back. We

0:32:03.120 --> 0:32:05.600
<v Speaker 1>have one more study here for you from the two

0:32:05.640 --> 0:32:10.240
<v Speaker 1>thousand seventeen Igno Bells. Thank you, Thank alright, we're back.

0:32:10.920 --> 0:32:15.360
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna take us from inverted genitals to an

0:32:15.560 --> 0:32:18.080
<v Speaker 1>entirely different place. This is the Peace Prize for the

0:32:18.160 --> 0:32:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Igno Bells this year. Uh and it revolves around the

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Dijury Do you guys familiar with the dijury do? Oh? Yes? Yeah,

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually can our producer Alex insert the sound of

0:32:31.080 --> 0:32:33.760
<v Speaker 1>a Dijury do in here so that our audience kind

0:32:33.760 --> 0:32:40.760
<v Speaker 1>of gets an idea of what we're talking about. No, wait,

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:52.920
<v Speaker 1>that was a digury don't. Here we go, and if

0:32:52.960 --> 0:32:55.920
<v Speaker 1>nothing else, I think everybody should recognize that sound from

0:32:56.160 --> 0:33:00.760
<v Speaker 1>any like Australian exploitation film or something mystical. Now, was

0:33:00.760 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 1>there a bunch of digury do and howling three the marsupials?

0:33:03.440 --> 0:33:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I feel like there was. I mean, if there wasn't

0:33:05.320 --> 0:33:07.880
<v Speaker 1>it was that was a colossal failure on their part. Well,

0:33:07.960 --> 0:33:12.400
<v Speaker 1>if there was, those marsupials would sleep better than most people.

0:33:12.560 --> 0:33:15.520
<v Speaker 1>No way. Yeah, we've got some facts here. Folks did

0:33:15.640 --> 0:33:20.000
<v Speaker 1>red playing as alternative treatment for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome

0:33:20.480 --> 0:33:23.240
<v Speaker 1>in a randomized control trial. That is the paper that

0:33:23.320 --> 0:33:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking to you about today. The essential idea here

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:29.280
<v Speaker 1>is they demonstrated that regular playing of the dig Rey

0:33:29.320 --> 0:33:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Do is an effective treatment for obstructive sleep apnea and snoring.

0:33:34.880 --> 0:33:38.000
<v Speaker 1>So do either you guys snore? Do you have sleep apnea?

0:33:38.240 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't have apnea. My dad does, but I snore

0:33:40.840 --> 0:33:43.560
<v Speaker 1>a decent amount I have. I have relatives who have

0:33:44.160 --> 0:33:46.360
<v Speaker 1>snoring issues. But yeah, I don't have it myself. So

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:48.800
<v Speaker 1>have you ever thought to yourself, like, what if I

0:33:48.840 --> 0:33:50.680
<v Speaker 1>just played the Digrey Do a little bit more? Would

0:33:50.680 --> 0:33:53.800
<v Speaker 1>that make it better? Science says yes. So this is

0:33:53.840 --> 0:33:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the the play that like you're playing the DIGITALI do

0:33:56.720 --> 0:33:58.640
<v Speaker 1>music to settle down for the evening. Are you listening

0:33:58.680 --> 0:34:00.560
<v Speaker 1>to it or you just have having it in your life.

0:34:00.640 --> 0:34:02.080
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't even have to be right before you go

0:34:02.160 --> 0:34:06.040
<v Speaker 1>to bed. Explain Okay, So these researchers, they took twenty

0:34:06.120 --> 0:34:10.800
<v Speaker 1>five patients who had apnea or hypopnia in an index

0:34:10.920 --> 0:34:15.040
<v Speaker 1>between fifteen and thirty. That's you know, a measurement system

0:34:15.080 --> 0:34:18.719
<v Speaker 1>that they use for like how bad these conditions can get. Uh,

0:34:18.840 --> 0:34:22.719
<v Speaker 1>And they had them do did red lessons for four

0:34:22.840 --> 0:34:25.920
<v Speaker 1>months and the participants played did you red for about

0:34:26.000 --> 0:34:28.640
<v Speaker 1>six days a week for about twenty five point three

0:34:28.719 --> 0:34:32.320
<v Speaker 1>minutes a day, and it's significantly improved both there and

0:34:32.360 --> 0:34:36.040
<v Speaker 1>their partners. Sleep disturbances. Now we might wonder, like what's

0:34:36.200 --> 0:34:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the biological function here, like what is going on? Well, okay,

0:34:39.480 --> 0:34:42.320
<v Speaker 1>sleep disorders of this type, they're caused by the collapse

0:34:42.360 --> 0:34:45.520
<v Speaker 1>of the upper airway. So the most effective intervention is

0:34:45.640 --> 0:34:49.560
<v Speaker 1>usually what's called positive airway pressure therapy. So that's like

0:34:49.640 --> 0:34:51.400
<v Speaker 1>when you see people who have the masks, they go

0:34:51.520 --> 0:34:54.960
<v Speaker 1>to sleep with positive pressure. Yeah. To be honest, like

0:34:55.000 --> 0:34:57.239
<v Speaker 1>when I have sinus problems, what I end up doing

0:34:57.360 --> 0:35:00.759
<v Speaker 1>is just pushing on my my sinuses round my nose.

0:35:00.880 --> 0:35:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a similar effect, but this is obviously

0:35:03.520 --> 0:35:07.040
<v Speaker 1>like more methodical than what I'm doing. Okay. Uh. For

0:35:07.160 --> 0:35:11.320
<v Speaker 1>some patients though, that's not suitable, so they need other interventions.

0:35:11.840 --> 0:35:15.680
<v Speaker 1>The researchers involved in this experiment they had heard just

0:35:15.840 --> 0:35:19.680
<v Speaker 1>heard from a Digredo instructor. He said, hey, um, my

0:35:19.800 --> 0:35:22.560
<v Speaker 1>students and I we've had a complete reduction in our

0:35:22.640 --> 0:35:25.920
<v Speaker 1>snoring and we're not sleepy during the daytime after we've

0:35:25.960 --> 0:35:29.799
<v Speaker 1>been practicing digre Do for several months. And they thought,

0:35:29.880 --> 0:35:32.600
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, is this because digre do is training

0:35:32.640 --> 0:35:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the muscles in their upper airways? So okay. They set

0:35:36.560 --> 0:35:39.960
<v Speaker 1>up this methodology and they recruited patients at study centers

0:35:40.000 --> 0:35:43.560
<v Speaker 1>in Switzerland. Then they randomized these patients into an intervention

0:35:43.640 --> 0:35:46.520
<v Speaker 1>group and a control group. And then they excluded candidates

0:35:46.760 --> 0:35:50.280
<v Speaker 1>who are currently trying out that positive airway pressure therapy

0:35:50.719 --> 0:35:53.719
<v Speaker 1>and any drugs that act on the central nervousism, as

0:35:53.760 --> 0:35:56.480
<v Speaker 1>well as anybody who was trying to lose weight or

0:35:56.960 --> 0:36:00.239
<v Speaker 1>way too much or drank too much alcohol, as all

0:36:00.320 --> 0:36:04.040
<v Speaker 1>these things could be contributing factors. The patients in the

0:36:04.160 --> 0:36:08.520
<v Speaker 1>intervention group took the dig red classes and they learned

0:36:08.760 --> 0:36:11.279
<v Speaker 1>the following things. I've never played a Digury do before,

0:36:11.320 --> 0:36:14.000
<v Speaker 1>so I didn't this was new to me. Uh. Circular

0:36:14.120 --> 0:36:18.120
<v Speaker 1>breathing is a technique that enables you to maintain sound

0:36:18.200 --> 0:36:21.080
<v Speaker 1>for a long period of time by inhaling through your

0:36:21.200 --> 0:36:25.399
<v Speaker 1>nose while maintaining airflow through the instrument itself and use

0:36:25.480 --> 0:36:28.440
<v Speaker 1>your cheeks as bellows. Okay, so this is like the

0:36:28.640 --> 0:36:31.800
<v Speaker 1>first kind of important part of this, and then the

0:36:31.920 --> 0:36:37.040
<v Speaker 1>second is to optimize the complex interaction between your lips,

0:36:37.440 --> 0:36:40.360
<v Speaker 1>your vocal tract, and the circular breathing I just mentioned,

0:36:40.400 --> 0:36:43.920
<v Speaker 1>so that the vibration in the upper airway is more

0:36:44.000 --> 0:36:47.440
<v Speaker 1>readily transmitted down to the lower airway. Well, I guess

0:36:47.480 --> 0:36:48.680
<v Speaker 1>one thing to keep in mind here is that with

0:36:48.920 --> 0:36:51.600
<v Speaker 1>dig redo music, you don't hear a bunch of a staccata.

0:36:51.680 --> 0:36:55.920
<v Speaker 1>You don't hear you don't heart, you hear long droning tone.

0:36:56.040 --> 0:37:00.200
<v Speaker 1>It's sustained. Yeah, yeah, exactly, which I imagine also helps

0:37:00.200 --> 0:37:02.560
<v Speaker 1>contribute to this. Right now, I've got a question, are

0:37:02.640 --> 0:37:05.960
<v Speaker 1>there any drone or doom metal bands that incorporate digury

0:37:06.000 --> 0:37:08.279
<v Speaker 1>Do they have to be there have to be I'm

0:37:08.360 --> 0:37:11.200
<v Speaker 1>almost positive there is. Yeah, And but do you think

0:37:11.239 --> 0:37:13.880
<v Speaker 1>they're from Australia or somewhere else? I don't know. You

0:37:13.960 --> 0:37:16.000
<v Speaker 1>get into an interesting area where it would be like

0:37:16.120 --> 0:37:20.879
<v Speaker 1>a like a an aboriginal uh subset of drone music,

0:37:21.000 --> 0:37:23.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of like traditional drawne music, like what happens when

0:37:23.560 --> 0:37:25.760
<v Speaker 1>you run a digury do through an R and JAMP.

0:37:26.200 --> 0:37:28.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I have to admit, like most sun Oh

0:37:28.920 --> 0:37:32.160
<v Speaker 1>records sound like they have digitally do in the background anyways.

0:37:32.600 --> 0:37:36.120
<v Speaker 1>But so here's the thing, how do you measure this? Well,

0:37:36.160 --> 0:37:39.440
<v Speaker 1>it turns out there's several indexes to measure the effect

0:37:39.880 --> 0:37:42.960
<v Speaker 1>on sleep, and so they brought these patients in, they

0:37:43.040 --> 0:37:46.960
<v Speaker 1>gave them these indexes as surveys, and then they used

0:37:47.160 --> 0:37:51.759
<v Speaker 1>cardio respiratory sleep studies on them, and finally they gave

0:37:51.840 --> 0:37:54.839
<v Speaker 1>the patients just a generic health and quality of life

0:37:54.920 --> 0:37:56.880
<v Speaker 1>survey just to find out, you know, what's all going on,

0:37:57.480 --> 0:38:00.360
<v Speaker 1>making sure everything's working the right way. They found this

0:38:00.840 --> 0:38:05.400
<v Speaker 1>The patient's quality of sleep actually didn't differ significantly between

0:38:05.440 --> 0:38:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the people who played Didjury Do and the people who didn't,

0:38:08.480 --> 0:38:14.280
<v Speaker 1>but their partners reported less sleep disturbance. They also observed

0:38:14.440 --> 0:38:19.360
<v Speaker 1>a significant effect of the digury Do playing on apnea

0:38:19.560 --> 0:38:23.560
<v Speaker 1>or hypopnia. Uh. And so actually when they compared this

0:38:23.920 --> 0:38:27.640
<v Speaker 1>to the positive airway pressure therapy, they found they're similar,

0:38:28.040 --> 0:38:32.160
<v Speaker 1>but the dijury Do has a slightly smaller effect. But essentially,

0:38:32.280 --> 0:38:34.359
<v Speaker 1>like if you're out there and you're listening and you're like, oh,

0:38:34.440 --> 0:38:36.200
<v Speaker 1>this is a problem for me, maybe you have to

0:38:36.239 --> 0:38:38.160
<v Speaker 1>wear one of those masks at night or something like that,

0:38:38.560 --> 0:38:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Maybe play digury do instead, Like you know what it

0:38:41.200 --> 0:38:43.799
<v Speaker 1>reminds me of, Well, we would say, obviously, following your

0:38:43.840 --> 0:38:49.160
<v Speaker 1>doctor's recommendation, but yeah, give dijury do a try. Yeah, yeah,

0:38:49.400 --> 0:38:51.640
<v Speaker 1>do do both well and then imagine how well you

0:38:51.760 --> 0:38:53.799
<v Speaker 1>sleep if you do. One of the great things about

0:38:53.840 --> 0:38:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the digury Do that I've I've picked up on is

0:38:56.680 --> 0:38:58.719
<v Speaker 1>that even if you don't play it, or you never

0:38:58.800 --> 0:39:01.600
<v Speaker 1>play it, uh, it still looks great propped up in

0:39:01.640 --> 0:39:05.279
<v Speaker 1>a corner. Always. Discussion started, well, I was thinking about

0:39:05.360 --> 0:39:08.360
<v Speaker 1>how this reminds me of. This leads us back to cats.

0:39:08.719 --> 0:39:12.080
<v Speaker 1>We've done some research into cats before on this and

0:39:12.200 --> 0:39:15.840
<v Speaker 1>on brain stuff, talking about cat purring and the function

0:39:15.960 --> 0:39:18.600
<v Speaker 1>of cat purring as like a method of healing both

0:39:18.640 --> 0:39:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the cat and maybe people who are on the cat

0:39:21.600 --> 0:39:23.560
<v Speaker 1>or like the cats laying on or something like that.

0:39:24.000 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 1>So the digury Do kind of made me think the

0:39:25.600 --> 0:39:27.480
<v Speaker 1>same thing, like, there's something there's an act of the

0:39:27.600 --> 0:39:30.919
<v Speaker 1>vibration that's that's working on here. But obviously also they're

0:39:31.000 --> 0:39:35.760
<v Speaker 1>building up actual muscles and responses inside the respiratory system.

0:39:36.120 --> 0:39:38.480
<v Speaker 1>So why is it funny? Well, because the sound and

0:39:38.520 --> 0:39:41.839
<v Speaker 1>the look of the instrument is abusing. Everybody giggles at

0:39:41.840 --> 0:39:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the dig re Do, right, because but why is it important?

0:39:45.880 --> 0:39:49.160
<v Speaker 1>This is an actual thing that can relieve a disorder

0:39:49.239 --> 0:39:51.879
<v Speaker 1>that many people suffer from. You know, most people would

0:39:51.920 --> 0:39:54.479
<v Speaker 1>go that's a ridiculous thing. Why would we Why would

0:39:54.520 --> 0:39:57.319
<v Speaker 1>re research that? If the dig rey Do instructors said hey,

0:39:57.400 --> 0:40:00.399
<v Speaker 1>this may actually have some benefits to your pati most

0:40:00.400 --> 0:40:03.000
<v Speaker 1>people would just go, oh yeah, sure, that's anecdotal. But

0:40:03.080 --> 0:40:05.000
<v Speaker 1>they did the research and they found out that it's

0:40:05.000 --> 0:40:07.160
<v Speaker 1>a real thing. Well it comes back around the idea

0:40:07.320 --> 0:40:10.560
<v Speaker 1>of of science as the slime mold. You know, opening

0:40:10.640 --> 0:40:12.960
<v Speaker 1>every cabinet and even the cabinets that seem a bit

0:40:13.000 --> 0:40:15.840
<v Speaker 1>silly that we seem reluctant to, you know, to to

0:40:16.000 --> 0:40:19.040
<v Speaker 1>to give much credence to the science, is going to

0:40:19.120 --> 0:40:22.320
<v Speaker 1>look in there and see if there's anything worth happening.

0:40:22.400 --> 0:40:24.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, this makes me think we could do probably

0:40:24.640 --> 0:40:28.800
<v Speaker 1>whole episodes on the medical science of wind instruments, Like

0:40:29.120 --> 0:40:32.080
<v Speaker 1>we gotta go from this to bagpipe long right, you

0:40:32.120 --> 0:40:34.759
<v Speaker 1>know the the inverse is that a condition like I'm

0:40:34.760 --> 0:40:38.200
<v Speaker 1>suffering from bagpipeline. Oh man. So you're a bagpipe player

0:40:38.640 --> 0:40:41.320
<v Speaker 1>and you maybe it's actually not funny because this is

0:40:41.440 --> 0:40:44.440
<v Speaker 1>literally killed people. But yeah, bagpipe along is a thing

0:40:44.560 --> 0:40:48.759
<v Speaker 1>that where your bagpipe becomes infested with fungus without you

0:40:48.920 --> 0:40:53.200
<v Speaker 1>realizing because you're continually, yeah, as you as you're continually

0:40:53.280 --> 0:40:58.360
<v Speaker 1>experiencing this constricted airflow through this fungus filled cavity, you

0:40:58.520 --> 0:41:01.759
<v Speaker 1>are feeding all of these these horrible particles into your

0:41:01.880 --> 0:41:05.040
<v Speaker 1>lungs and people don't realize what's going on, and it

0:41:05.120 --> 0:41:08.279
<v Speaker 1>can kill you. Oh man, that sounds like a great

0:41:08.320 --> 0:41:10.600
<v Speaker 1>idea for an episode. Not to be a downer, guys,

0:41:11.160 --> 0:41:14.239
<v Speaker 1>remember that they can help people. Good ay mate. If

0:41:14.280 --> 0:41:18.359
<v Speaker 1>you play bagpipes, also play the digit do I don't think.

0:41:18.440 --> 0:41:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that they reverse the conditions. But you'll

0:41:21.120 --> 0:41:23.520
<v Speaker 1>feel better about one thing while you're feeling worse about

0:41:23.520 --> 0:41:25.959
<v Speaker 1>the other. Al Right, we actually have one more before

0:41:26.000 --> 0:41:29.560
<v Speaker 1>we close out this installment of our two thousand seventeen

0:41:29.640 --> 0:41:34.279
<v Speaker 1>Ignobell series, and it is the fluid dynamics prize that

0:41:34.360 --> 0:41:37.440
<v Speaker 1>sounds exciting. Wait, we already did fluid dynamics with those

0:41:37.520 --> 0:41:41.720
<v Speaker 1>cats somehow. I guess rayology is slightly different than fluid dynamics,

0:41:41.840 --> 0:41:45.560
<v Speaker 1>or maybe fluid dynamics is a is a larger subset category.

0:41:45.760 --> 0:41:49.320
<v Speaker 1>I know fluid dynamics is. Certainly it's an area that

0:41:49.719 --> 0:41:53.160
<v Speaker 1>always intrigues me because for starters that they do have

0:41:53.320 --> 0:41:55.960
<v Speaker 1>a at least one huge conference a year, and you

0:41:56.000 --> 0:41:57.520
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of cool papers coming out of it,

0:41:57.880 --> 0:42:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and it ranges tremendously because, for instance, one of the

0:42:02.200 --> 0:42:04.640
<v Speaker 1>best fluid dynamic papers and the most enthralling that I

0:42:04.719 --> 0:42:08.279
<v Speaker 1>came across, was a paper that dealt with how uh

0:42:08.719 --> 0:42:15.080
<v Speaker 1>nuclear fallout moves through a metropolitan environment, you know, with

0:42:15.200 --> 0:42:19.560
<v Speaker 1>like flows of radioactive material hitting buildings like cascading up

0:42:19.600 --> 0:42:21.960
<v Speaker 1>buildings and so forth, and how we might be able

0:42:22.040 --> 0:42:27.440
<v Speaker 1>to to map the flow of these materials. Yeah, hey,

0:42:27.560 --> 0:42:30.759
<v Speaker 1>I got a fun footnote to that. The most expensive

0:42:30.800 --> 0:42:33.000
<v Speaker 1>book in the world is a book that was written

0:42:33.000 --> 0:42:35.760
<v Speaker 1>by Leonardo da Vinci and it's owned by Bill Gates,

0:42:35.800 --> 0:42:40.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's about fluid dynamics, and it's written backwards. You

0:42:40.120 --> 0:42:43.719
<v Speaker 1>have to you have to read mirror to left. It's well, yeah,

0:42:43.760 --> 0:42:45.440
<v Speaker 1>it's written so that you have to use a mirror

0:42:45.520 --> 0:42:49.080
<v Speaker 1>to actually read it. Wow. Yeah, it's impressive. Well you

0:42:49.080 --> 0:42:52.279
<v Speaker 1>should ask Bill Gates sometime. Yah. Sounds point and the

0:42:52.320 --> 0:42:55.800
<v Speaker 1>whole things actually standing on well you know. But but

0:42:55.880 --> 0:42:57.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the great things about fluid dynamics is that, yeah,

0:42:58.160 --> 0:43:01.880
<v Speaker 1>it certainly touches on some some rather grandiose topics, but

0:43:02.000 --> 0:43:05.239
<v Speaker 1>it also is just everywhere around us. Like I I

0:43:05.320 --> 0:43:07.359
<v Speaker 1>have not looked up a study about this, but every

0:43:07.400 --> 0:43:10.960
<v Speaker 1>time I'm making a smoothie in the morning in the blender,

0:43:11.280 --> 0:43:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I think about fluid dynamics. Somebody out there has surely

0:43:14.400 --> 0:43:17.840
<v Speaker 1>applied some serious scientific thinking to what's going on with

0:43:17.920 --> 0:43:21.120
<v Speaker 1>my blender, Like how how the stuff blends or in

0:43:21.160 --> 0:43:23.239
<v Speaker 1>many cases doesn't blend. How you end up with that

0:43:23.560 --> 0:43:26.120
<v Speaker 1>section of smoothie on the top that's doing nothing while

0:43:26.160 --> 0:43:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the bottom part is swirling around. I would imagine they

0:43:28.160 --> 0:43:31.520
<v Speaker 1>need a better blender or whatever. Those like chains are

0:43:31.800 --> 0:43:33.440
<v Speaker 1>like those smoothie kings, the one we have here and

0:43:33.840 --> 0:43:38.560
<v Speaker 1>with the big square looking they must have like scientists

0:43:38.719 --> 0:43:40.799
<v Speaker 1>on their teams whose whole job is to figure out

0:43:40.840 --> 0:43:42.960
<v Speaker 1>like how well these things can come up through straws.

0:43:43.120 --> 0:43:45.320
<v Speaker 1>I've read about this. I think the best solution is

0:43:45.400 --> 0:43:49.319
<v Speaker 1>to stick your hand down in there while it's going. Yeah, well,

0:43:49.360 --> 0:43:51.279
<v Speaker 1>that's what I was thinking. You were going with the

0:43:51.360 --> 0:43:54.480
<v Speaker 1>cat thing. Don't follow my advice, folks. All right, Well,

0:43:54.560 --> 0:43:58.080
<v Speaker 1>this particular study is titled A Study of the Coffee

0:43:58.120 --> 0:44:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Spilling Phenomena in the Impulse Regime. So are we in

0:44:04.080 --> 0:44:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the low impulse regime right now? I think we're in

0:44:06.160 --> 0:44:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the high impulsori. I love that that phrase of the

0:44:10.000 --> 0:44:11.960
<v Speaker 1>low impulse regime sounds like a band. I would be

0:44:12.040 --> 0:44:14.759
<v Speaker 1>really into it. It sounds like something Captain Piccard would say.

0:44:15.800 --> 0:44:19.480
<v Speaker 1>So basically, this paper asked the question, from a fluid

0:44:19.560 --> 0:44:23.960
<v Speaker 1>dynamic standpoint, why does spillage occur with coffee also with wine?

0:44:24.320 --> 0:44:27.160
<v Speaker 1>And how might we limit it? This is the great

0:44:27.160 --> 0:44:29.560
<v Speaker 1>thing about the papers. It touches on a universal experience.

0:44:29.800 --> 0:44:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I am the guy who inevitably always spills coffee on themselves.

0:44:33.520 --> 0:44:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what it is A trail of brown

0:44:35.640 --> 0:44:38.480
<v Speaker 1>look like. And to the point where my wife like

0:44:38.719 --> 0:44:40.920
<v Speaker 1>knows when I've bought coffee and have been driving in

0:44:40.960 --> 0:44:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the car because she's just like, there's coffee stains everywhere.

0:44:43.120 --> 0:44:45.840
<v Speaker 1>What is wrong with you? I eat like a raccoon,

0:44:46.080 --> 0:44:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and apparently with coffee, I just like throw the cup

0:44:49.080 --> 0:44:51.359
<v Speaker 1>at my face. I guess I don't know, but yeah,

0:44:51.440 --> 0:44:53.400
<v Speaker 1>even just like when it has a lid on it

0:44:53.960 --> 0:44:56.680
<v Speaker 1>and I move it around, it somehow gets everywhere. This

0:44:56.840 --> 0:44:59.560
<v Speaker 1>is one of my favorite features of classic animation. If

0:44:59.600 --> 0:45:04.520
<v Speaker 1>you watch old Disney movies, they're always depicting cups of

0:45:04.760 --> 0:45:09.080
<v Speaker 1>liquids sloshing around crazily while people are consuming them. You

0:45:09.120 --> 0:45:11.600
<v Speaker 1>know what I'm talking about, Like people swinging a beer

0:45:11.760 --> 0:45:14.200
<v Speaker 1>stein or a wine glass or something like that, and

0:45:14.280 --> 0:45:17.160
<v Speaker 1>it's just splashing and slashing all over the place. When

0:45:17.200 --> 0:45:20.800
<v Speaker 1>that kind of movement tends to uh, it tends to

0:45:20.840 --> 0:45:23.040
<v Speaker 1>be everywhere in these old cartoons, like the people are

0:45:23.120 --> 0:45:25.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of slashing back and forth. The action is kind

0:45:25.480 --> 0:45:28.719
<v Speaker 1>of slashing. I guess animation historians have probably have a

0:45:29.280 --> 0:45:32.080
<v Speaker 1>have some terminology to throw behind them. Yeah. I would

0:45:32.080 --> 0:45:34.600
<v Speaker 1>imagine it has something to do with like the form

0:45:34.680 --> 0:45:37.400
<v Speaker 1>at the time that like the animators and illustrators are

0:45:37.480 --> 0:45:41.520
<v Speaker 1>probably trying to figure out how best to render liquid

0:45:41.880 --> 0:45:44.759
<v Speaker 1>in cartoon format, same as like with c G. I

0:45:44.960 --> 0:45:48.080
<v Speaker 1>like when it's super impressive how great water is rendered.

0:45:48.920 --> 0:45:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess part of what I'm thinking of is that

0:45:50.800 --> 0:45:55.320
<v Speaker 1>it's always like in classic animation, actions and the themes

0:45:55.400 --> 0:45:58.560
<v Speaker 1>they signify or exaggerated. Like if you watch old Disney movies,

0:45:58.600 --> 0:46:01.440
<v Speaker 1>whenever somebody's drinking some thing, usually it's in some kind

0:46:01.480 --> 0:46:05.040
<v Speaker 1>of feast scene that's signaling gluttony or something like that.

0:46:05.239 --> 0:46:08.080
<v Speaker 1>And so there's all this depiction of excess, and maybe

0:46:08.160 --> 0:46:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the slashing is one aspect of that. I immediately thought

0:46:11.080 --> 0:46:18.880
<v Speaker 1>of Fantasia and Mickey carrying. So this particular paper is

0:46:18.920 --> 0:46:21.680
<v Speaker 1>a South Korean paper and it was published in Achievements

0:46:21.840 --> 0:46:24.719
<v Speaker 1>in the Life Sciences, and it's by you On Han

0:46:26.040 --> 0:46:29.480
<v Speaker 1>from two thousand sixteen. And I'm not going to summarize

0:46:29.480 --> 0:46:30.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the paper because a lot of the

0:46:30.560 --> 0:46:33.120
<v Speaker 1>paper is just sort of breaking it down in from

0:46:33.120 --> 0:46:35.799
<v Speaker 1>a fluid, dynamic standpoint, what's happening with a slashing cup

0:46:35.840 --> 0:46:40.120
<v Speaker 1>of coffee or a slashing goblet of wine. But the

0:46:40.239 --> 0:46:43.360
<v Speaker 1>fun part is that this article doesn't just doesn't just

0:46:43.440 --> 0:46:48.399
<v Speaker 1>describe what's happening. It presents solutions. So wait, you're telling

0:46:48.440 --> 0:46:50.960
<v Speaker 1>me I might have some solutions from my coffee problems. Yeah,

0:46:51.040 --> 0:46:54.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying that when you when we're done with this section,

0:46:54.440 --> 0:46:58.840
<v Speaker 1>you will have new ideas to implement in your coffee consumption.

0:46:58.960 --> 0:47:05.000
<v Speaker 1>And you're handling of a coffee mug apart from sippy cups. Um, basically, well,

0:47:05.200 --> 0:47:06.520
<v Speaker 1>they get there in a way. There's sort of the

0:47:06.560 --> 0:47:09.000
<v Speaker 1>cipy cup. They do recommend you could you could hold

0:47:09.040 --> 0:47:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the coffee mug with a like a small plate on

0:47:11.560 --> 0:47:14.360
<v Speaker 1>top of it, just cover the coffee mug. That seems obvious.

0:47:14.400 --> 0:47:17.279
<v Speaker 1>You don't a scientist to point that out. But yeah,

0:47:17.360 --> 0:47:20.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe if we didn't have an open container of liquid,

0:47:20.560 --> 0:47:22.480
<v Speaker 1>we wouldn't have to deal with sloshing. But I assume

0:47:23.040 --> 0:47:26.200
<v Speaker 1>solutions than that. They well, we'll see if you think

0:47:26.200 --> 0:47:30.760
<v Speaker 1>they're better. Uh, here's a quote from the paper. Moreover,

0:47:31.160 --> 0:47:35.319
<v Speaker 1>we showed that either walking backwards or holding the cup

0:47:35.400 --> 0:47:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the cup with a claw hand posture lead to significant

0:47:39.120 --> 0:47:43.360
<v Speaker 1>changes in the driving force frequency spectrum, suggesting a method

0:47:43.480 --> 0:47:47.920
<v Speaker 1>to suppress residents. So one of the ideas here is, yes,

0:47:48.000 --> 0:47:51.640
<v Speaker 1>simply walk backwards with your coffee mug. But the other

0:47:51.880 --> 0:47:53.640
<v Speaker 1>is that I have a feel like I would spell

0:47:53.680 --> 0:47:56.480
<v Speaker 1>even more with that, but okay, I'm listening. The other

0:47:56.680 --> 0:47:59.879
<v Speaker 1>is to have your make a claw with your hand

0:48:00.400 --> 0:48:04.040
<v Speaker 1>and hold the coffee mug top down, not bottom up,

0:48:05.000 --> 0:48:07.880
<v Speaker 1>so you're holding your coffee like you're some sort of

0:48:08.239 --> 0:48:12.520
<v Speaker 1>like a cartoon vampire carrying it around from the top.

0:48:13.560 --> 0:48:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Crane game. Yeah, it's like the crane game where instead

0:48:16.160 --> 0:48:19.040
<v Speaker 1>of grabbing a bunch of like cheap stuffed animals, you're

0:48:19.040 --> 0:48:21.239
<v Speaker 1>grabbing a single coffee mug. I know this is a

0:48:21.280 --> 0:48:24.200
<v Speaker 1>better method. It makes you look kind of stupid, but

0:48:24.760 --> 0:48:27.640
<v Speaker 1>it is a better method according to the scientific data. Now.

0:48:27.719 --> 0:48:29.759
<v Speaker 1>I know, Robert, you haven't seen the new season of

0:48:29.800 --> 0:48:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Twin Peaks. Joe, you have, right. No, actually, okay, so

0:48:32.440 --> 0:48:34.400
<v Speaker 1>neither of you going to don't spoil it. I'm just

0:48:34.440 --> 0:48:36.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna say it. There is a character named Dougie in it,

0:48:37.160 --> 0:48:39.840
<v Speaker 1>and Dougie holds coffee in the claw method, but he

0:48:39.920 --> 0:48:42.239
<v Speaker 1>does two handed claw where he grabs it from the

0:48:42.360 --> 0:48:44.879
<v Speaker 1>side and he holds it with both of his hands

0:48:44.920 --> 0:48:47.719
<v Speaker 1>are clawed and he holds onto it tightly like that. Man,

0:48:47.800 --> 0:48:50.279
<v Speaker 1>I have a totally different idea of the claw hold,

0:48:50.440 --> 0:48:52.919
<v Speaker 1>and it comes from my day's serving in restaurants. Where

0:48:53.000 --> 0:48:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the claw was. How you fit three water glasses in

0:48:56.239 --> 0:49:00.399
<v Speaker 1>the same hand. You've got this clutch, but it's underneath, right, Yeah,

0:49:00.480 --> 0:49:02.680
<v Speaker 1>from the bottom where they each like they fit between

0:49:02.760 --> 0:49:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the first finger and that. Well, I'm not going to

0:49:04.640 --> 0:49:06.279
<v Speaker 1>describe all that, but yeah, you can get three water

0:49:06.360 --> 0:49:08.759
<v Speaker 1>glasses in one hand if you use the claw. What

0:49:08.920 --> 0:49:12.000
<v Speaker 1>was the spillage like with that? Not too much? Actually, okay,

0:49:12.040 --> 0:49:14.160
<v Speaker 1>it might have hit on a similar property. But that's

0:49:14.160 --> 0:49:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the other thing that comes to mind. In the service industry,

0:49:17.800 --> 0:49:20.160
<v Speaker 1>you can't really use the top down claw method to

0:49:20.200 --> 0:49:22.279
<v Speaker 1>bring someone their coffee at a restaurant. They're going to

0:49:22.360 --> 0:49:25.640
<v Speaker 1>think you're yeah, they're gonna say, take that back. You're

0:49:25.719 --> 0:49:27.880
<v Speaker 1>you're basically sticking your hand in my beverage. But it

0:49:27.960 --> 0:49:29.680
<v Speaker 1>looks like here that they have come up with a

0:49:29.800 --> 0:49:33.400
<v Speaker 1>design that could fix that problem. Yes, let's carry it

0:49:33.520 --> 0:49:35.360
<v Speaker 1>in your mouth and then spit it out into the

0:49:35.400 --> 0:49:37.400
<v Speaker 1>cup at the table. Well, at least it would be closed, right,

0:49:37.600 --> 0:49:41.200
<v Speaker 1>and then you're prepared for a wonderful cinematic response to

0:49:41.239 --> 0:49:45.359
<v Speaker 1>any jokes that that the customer may may share. But now,

0:49:45.800 --> 0:49:50.439
<v Speaker 1>in addition to providing new ways to carry existing coffee mugs,

0:49:50.840 --> 0:49:55.520
<v Speaker 1>this study does present an alternate coffee cup design. Quote.

0:49:55.560 --> 0:49:57.680
<v Speaker 1>It is evident that a decrease in the radius of

0:49:57.719 --> 0:50:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the cup can significantly increase the resonance frequency by dividing

0:50:02.080 --> 0:50:07.239
<v Speaker 1>the cup into smaller cylindrical cells. So there's like, how

0:50:07.320 --> 0:50:09.879
<v Speaker 1>this looks. It's like a coffee cup, but it looks

0:50:09.880 --> 0:50:12.520
<v Speaker 1>like it's got a bunch of like syringes with the

0:50:12.560 --> 0:50:15.320
<v Speaker 1>top sawed off inside of Its possible to drink out of.

0:50:15.440 --> 0:50:17.719
<v Speaker 1>It looks impossible to drink off. It looks a bit

0:50:17.920 --> 0:50:21.960
<v Speaker 1>silly for sure, I mean straw. Yeah, basically the picture

0:50:22.000 --> 0:50:28.080
<v Speaker 1>looks like a glass like cocktail tumbler, and inside it

0:50:28.200 --> 0:50:31.719
<v Speaker 1>there are all of these glass vials. It's packed with

0:50:31.840 --> 0:50:35.399
<v Speaker 1>test tubes. So imagine if you drink your coffee out

0:50:35.440 --> 0:50:38.120
<v Speaker 1>of a bunch of test tubes that have been lashed together,

0:50:38.600 --> 0:50:42.160
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to a single broad drinking vest. I mean,

0:50:42.360 --> 0:50:44.400
<v Speaker 1>what this looks like is you'd be sipping out of

0:50:44.480 --> 0:50:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the bottom two test tubes and the rest would just

0:50:47.120 --> 0:50:50.320
<v Speaker 1>be pouring into your eyes. Yeah, exactly what. You couldn't

0:50:50.320 --> 0:50:53.319
<v Speaker 1>throw it back, and that's for sure, and it would

0:50:53.360 --> 0:50:55.200
<v Speaker 1>be really you would have to mix your cream and

0:50:55.320 --> 0:50:58.239
<v Speaker 1>sugar in a different cup. Entirely before you even pour it.

0:50:58.680 --> 0:51:00.840
<v Speaker 1>The thing that gets me about this, really, both of

0:51:00.920 --> 0:51:03.840
<v Speaker 1>these suggestions, both the coffee cup design and the coffee

0:51:04.040 --> 0:51:10.239
<v Speaker 1>mug handling UH method, is that what if these what

0:51:10.320 --> 0:51:11.680
<v Speaker 1>if this is the way? What if these are the

0:51:11.760 --> 0:51:14.640
<v Speaker 1>changes we need for a better system of drinking and

0:51:14.760 --> 0:51:18.279
<v Speaker 1>carrying coffee around. But we're ultimately going to just be

0:51:18.440 --> 0:51:22.600
<v Speaker 1>too vain to to change, because, yes, drinking out of

0:51:22.680 --> 0:51:24.799
<v Speaker 1>this bizarre contraption that looks like a bunch of test

0:51:24.840 --> 0:51:27.880
<v Speaker 1>tubes look silly. Carrying your coffee mug around with a

0:51:28.040 --> 0:51:32.040
<v Speaker 1>claw hole looks silly, and but there are other things

0:51:32.080 --> 0:51:34.880
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen in life where the sillier looking method

0:51:35.080 --> 0:51:37.840
<v Speaker 1>is more successful and we don't do it because it

0:51:37.920 --> 0:51:40.759
<v Speaker 1>looks silly. I'm gonna offer a really stupid method, but

0:51:40.920 --> 0:51:43.640
<v Speaker 1>it's my method. I pretty much never spilled my coffee

0:51:43.680 --> 0:51:46.120
<v Speaker 1>because I never fill my cup more than two thirds

0:51:46.200 --> 0:51:48.359
<v Speaker 1>of the way, well, because I don't want to get

0:51:48.400 --> 0:51:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the fear. But the thing is, Joe, I I have

0:51:51.280 --> 0:51:54.080
<v Speaker 1>there's been so many times where I've been coming in

0:51:54.200 --> 0:51:56.200
<v Speaker 1>from my front porch, So I work on my front

0:51:56.239 --> 0:51:59.279
<v Speaker 1>porch a lot. What I'm teleworking and I always have

0:51:59.320 --> 0:52:01.719
<v Speaker 1>a coffee mug with me, and sometimes the coffee mug

0:52:01.800 --> 0:52:03.880
<v Speaker 1>you know it's down to the last little bit, but

0:52:04.320 --> 0:52:06.680
<v Speaker 1>you can still, trust me, you can still slash the

0:52:06.800 --> 0:52:08.840
<v Speaker 1>heck out of a cup of coffee when you have

0:52:09.440 --> 0:52:12.759
<v Speaker 1>less than a fourth of a cup. Yeah. So if

0:52:12.800 --> 0:52:15.000
<v Speaker 1>you're like trying to grab hold of a child or

0:52:15.080 --> 0:52:16.719
<v Speaker 1>something like, yeah, or if you you know, you you

0:52:16.840 --> 0:52:19.000
<v Speaker 1>have a laptop and you have the coffee mug of

0:52:19.040 --> 0:52:22.360
<v Speaker 1>the laptop. But the thing that this reminded me of,

0:52:22.480 --> 0:52:24.120
<v Speaker 1>and I am not a sports person at all, but

0:52:24.440 --> 0:52:26.600
<v Speaker 1>but I heard it was either a radio lab or

0:52:26.719 --> 0:52:29.440
<v Speaker 1>this American Lonfe episode in the last several years about

0:52:29.680 --> 0:52:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the granny shot in basketball about how this is the

0:52:33.160 --> 0:52:35.680
<v Speaker 1>most effective way to make a free throw. So describe

0:52:35.680 --> 0:52:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the granny shot. The granny shot is the it's generally

0:52:38.520 --> 0:52:41.239
<v Speaker 1>associated with if you don't know how to bowl, or

0:52:41.320 --> 0:52:43.440
<v Speaker 1>you don't know how to throw a basketball, you simply

0:52:43.480 --> 0:52:45.319
<v Speaker 1>hold it in your hands and you just you sort

0:52:45.360 --> 0:52:48.440
<v Speaker 1>of stand legs apart, legs of kimbo. Yeah, and you

0:52:48.560 --> 0:52:50.640
<v Speaker 1>just dangle it down there between your legs and then

0:52:50.719 --> 0:52:55.680
<v Speaker 1>throw it up underhanded, underhanded, a double handed, underhand throw

0:52:56.200 --> 0:52:58.919
<v Speaker 1>with legs of kimbo so you're saying that people using

0:52:59.040 --> 0:53:02.080
<v Speaker 1>this method to get a higher frequency percentage of shots

0:53:02.280 --> 0:53:04.880
<v Speaker 1>than people who don't use it. Yeah. Basically, the idea

0:53:04.960 --> 0:53:06.879
<v Speaker 1>is that it's been proven that this is the most

0:53:06.920 --> 0:53:11.400
<v Speaker 1>effective method even in the really especially in the NBA.

0:53:12.200 --> 0:53:16.920
<v Speaker 1>UM and those who utilize this method um make more

0:53:17.000 --> 0:53:19.719
<v Speaker 1>free throws. But it's pretty rare that you'll see this

0:53:19.840 --> 0:53:22.640
<v Speaker 1>during a game because it looks stupid. Yeah, because there's

0:53:22.680 --> 0:53:24.680
<v Speaker 1>this idea that if you throw the ball that way,

0:53:24.760 --> 0:53:27.120
<v Speaker 1>you don't know what you're doing, that it it has

0:53:27.239 --> 0:53:29.600
<v Speaker 1>less than next to it. Even if it's more effective,

0:53:29.920 --> 0:53:32.880
<v Speaker 1>even if it could ultimately, you know, make a difference

0:53:32.920 --> 0:53:36.360
<v Speaker 1>in winning games, it's still something. It's a line that

0:53:36.600 --> 0:53:39.120
<v Speaker 1>most basketball players are not willing to cross. Sounds like

0:53:39.200 --> 0:53:41.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a window for somebody to come in and moneyball

0:53:41.880 --> 0:53:45.359
<v Speaker 1>all this thing. I guess, Yeah, but but I wonder

0:53:45.400 --> 0:53:47.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, I just use moneyball as a verb like

0:53:47.920 --> 0:53:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm some ad executive. Well, let's quickly pivot away from

0:53:51.080 --> 0:53:53.759
<v Speaker 1>that and we'll move back to the Yeah. But but

0:53:53.840 --> 0:53:55.960
<v Speaker 1>it it raises the question, what again, what if this

0:53:56.080 --> 0:53:58.719
<v Speaker 1>is the best way, this is the scientifically verified way

0:53:58.760 --> 0:54:01.400
<v Speaker 1>to drink coffee and We're just all going to ignore

0:54:01.440 --> 0:54:03.840
<v Speaker 1>it as we've been ignoring it because, like I said this,

0:54:04.080 --> 0:54:07.240
<v Speaker 1>this this came out last year and nothing has changed.

0:54:07.840 --> 0:54:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Now that it's getting it's making the rounds with the

0:54:09.880 --> 0:54:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Ignoble prizes, is it more likely that people will listen

0:54:13.719 --> 0:54:15.520
<v Speaker 1>to it? Will you? Will there be like one person

0:54:15.760 --> 0:54:20.760
<v Speaker 1>in a given workplace that embraces the crazy test tube

0:54:20.880 --> 0:54:23.759
<v Speaker 1>filled the coffee mug. If those tubes were available on

0:54:23.840 --> 0:54:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the market and they weren't like prohibitively expensive, I'd give

0:54:26.600 --> 0:54:29.040
<v Speaker 1>it a shot. Yeah, maybe we should. We could, we

0:54:29.080 --> 0:54:31.879
<v Speaker 1>could be an experiment. Well, maybe listeners out there will

0:54:31.920 --> 0:54:34.680
<v Speaker 1>try it themselves. If you don't try the test tube

0:54:35.600 --> 0:54:38.800
<v Speaker 1>oriented coffee mug been, try the top down claw method

0:54:38.840 --> 0:54:41.440
<v Speaker 1>of holding the cup and let us know how it goes.

0:54:41.880 --> 0:54:45.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, So there you have it. Four down, um,

0:54:46.040 --> 0:54:49.560
<v Speaker 1>six to go. Yeah, So follow us on our next

0:54:49.600 --> 0:54:53.319
<v Speaker 1>episode about Ignobles. We're gonna release this right one after

0:54:53.400 --> 0:54:55.719
<v Speaker 1>the other, sequentially, I believe, is how they say it.

0:54:56.680 --> 0:54:58.680
<v Speaker 1>But you know what, if you've got any questions for

0:54:58.760 --> 0:55:02.640
<v Speaker 1>us about coffee mug or weird insect genitalia or how

0:55:02.719 --> 0:55:05.239
<v Speaker 1>you make liquid cats, where can they get in touch

0:55:05.280 --> 0:55:07.279
<v Speaker 1>with us? Joe, Well, you can go to stuff to

0:55:07.320 --> 0:55:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Blow your Mind dot com, where you've got everything we do,

0:55:09.960 --> 0:55:13.560
<v Speaker 1>including Robert's excellent blog posts. He'll do some space music,

0:55:13.640 --> 0:55:15.719
<v Speaker 1>he'll do some monsters. I don't know we're gonna get

0:55:15.719 --> 0:55:18.200
<v Speaker 1>any monsters in November. Surely we will, even though we've

0:55:18.239 --> 0:55:21.120
<v Speaker 1>just Yeah, surely I can find a monster too to

0:55:21.200 --> 0:55:23.719
<v Speaker 1>throw in the November mix. But that's, of course where

0:55:23.760 --> 0:55:25.320
<v Speaker 1>you can get all of our podcasts. But also you

0:55:25.400 --> 0:55:28.000
<v Speaker 1>can go wherever you get your podcasts. You're listening to

0:55:28.120 --> 0:55:29.960
<v Speaker 1>us right now, so you probably know how to do that.

0:55:30.080 --> 0:55:32.840
<v Speaker 1>If you're not subscribe, subscribe and you can always email

0:55:33.000 --> 0:55:35.480
<v Speaker 1>us at blow the Mind at how stuff works dot

0:55:35.560 --> 0:55:48.520
<v Speaker 1>com for more on this and thousands of other topics.

0:55:48.719 --> 0:56:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Does it how stuff works dot com, November twenty four,

0:56:06.000 --> 0:56:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Arro