WEBVTT - It’s Not Over Yet

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Hello, I'm Senator Lindsay Graham. Welcome to Verdict with Ted Cruise,

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the number one podcast in the entire country. What is

0:00:07.560 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 1>a podcast? Welcome back to Verdict with Ted Cruise. I'm

0:00:19.040 --> 0:00:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Michael Knowles. I'm joined by not one, but two US

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:25.959
<v Speaker 1>Senators to help us break down the most shocking day

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 1>of the entire impeachment trial. Senator Graham, thank you so

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 1>much for being here. Gentlemen. The last time that we

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>sat down, I was told this impeachment was going to

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:37.559
<v Speaker 1>drag on for weeks. We were going to get witnesses.

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:39.600
<v Speaker 1>We were gonna get Bolton, we were gonna get Hunter Biden.

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:42.200
<v Speaker 1>This was gonna get long and ugly. I go to sleep.

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:46.559
<v Speaker 1>I wake up today and the senators are voting no

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:49.280
<v Speaker 1>more witnesses. This thing could be over next week, Senator Cruise,

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:51.879
<v Speaker 1>what happened? Well, today was a big day. And let

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 1>me say, lindsay, thank you. Well. You appreciate your coming.

0:00:55.600 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>This is late at night. We spent all day, all

0:00:57.520 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 1>day in the setting, a lot of money on production. Sorry, well,

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>this was you're right yesterday. If the vote had gone

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:09.319
<v Speaker 1>differently today, this trial could have gone on for months.

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:12.119
<v Speaker 1>We could have seen a drag on and on and on,

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and it was a big deal. It was up in

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the air, and today was the most important vote we've

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 1>had in the entire trial. It really came down to

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:25.400
<v Speaker 1>we knew we had forty seven Democrats that wanted more witnesses.

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Why because they hadn't proved in the case. They're losing

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 1>and so the only hope they have is extended, going

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:33.839
<v Speaker 1>a fishing expedition and see if they can find something.

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 1>The big open question was were four Republicans going to

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 1>join them? We knew that two Republicans were, they'd announced

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:42.600
<v Speaker 1>it already, Mitt Romney and Susan Collins were voting with them.

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:45.760
<v Speaker 1>There were two other senators who were in play, Lamar

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Alexander Lisa Murkowski, and it was close. Last night. Lamar

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 1>announced that he was going to come out and say

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>enough is enough. And we just found got a final

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 1>decision from Lisa today just a few minutes before she voted.

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely So I saw the update on my phone when

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Senator Murkowski finally decided she was going to vote no

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>more witnesses. How does that work? Well, that's what I

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:11.359
<v Speaker 1>was going to ask you, because it's Michael. Have you

0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:14.360
<v Speaker 1>ever seen his phone. You hang in there. That's worth

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>worth the way. Oh you know it is. The Russians

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>can't get in this. You'll all have one in a

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:26.359
<v Speaker 1>five years. Senator Grant, you're clearly a fiscal conservative if

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 1>you were using that kind of cell phone. What happened

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:33.399
<v Speaker 1>with Senator Murkowski? I know that you two gentlemen were

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 1>kneeling and dealing a little bit on the Senate floor.

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 1>So unless number one Ted was awesome, we had a

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:42.519
<v Speaker 1>little team trying to convince people. Can you say shit

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:45.359
<v Speaker 1>show on podcasts? I think you just did that all right?

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:47.640
<v Speaker 1>So what would happened if you call witnesses being a

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 1>shit show? Yeah, you're just not gonna call John Bolton.

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 1>If you're gonna call a witness, we're gonna call all

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:55.359
<v Speaker 1>the witnesses. What do you want to know a little

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 1>bit about the Bidens? You know, I like Joe Biden,

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 1>but give me a break. If Mike pen this son

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 1>was making three million dollars a year from the most

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:05.520
<v Speaker 1>corrupt gas company in the U Train, don't you think

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 1>you might hear about it. You're only gonna hear about

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the Bidens on this podcast. So the bottom line here

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:15.360
<v Speaker 1>is Ted made a very eloquent argument that it throwes

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the courts in the chaos to be the first impeachment

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:23.640
<v Speaker 1>in history. If you have executive privilege, we'll be decided

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>by the United States Senate that if you call one witness,

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:30.080
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna call a bunch of witnesses. The president didn't

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:32.960
<v Speaker 1>get to call one witness in the House, so you

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 1>open up Pandora's bogs and number two, the whole idea

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:41.760
<v Speaker 1>of legitimizing an impeachment in the House that took seventy

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 1>eight days. You can't get a parking ticket in seventy

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 1>eight days if you can test it. Not one witness

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 1>allowed to be called by the president, no cross examination.

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>The bottom line is the whole thing was at sham,

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>and we were trying to convince Lisa and everybody else

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>don't legitimize this, don't do their work for them. They're

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 1>accusing you of being unfair because you did not call

0:04:02.800 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>a witness. They chose doctor call. Why didn't they call

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 1>John Bolton because it would be inconvenient. They couldn't impeach

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the president by Christmas. That's not a good reason to

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 1>ignore the courts. Do you think that it was the

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:16.840
<v Speaker 1>public arguments well, we all saw on TV that moved

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:20.159
<v Speaker 1>Senator Murkowski or was it more private conversations? So I

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 1>think the pivotal moment happened day before yesterday. Day before yesterday,

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:27.679
<v Speaker 1>Adam Schiff made a mistake. He was standing up arguing

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and he said, he said, listen, the White House defense

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 1>team had made John Bolton relevant because they have contradicted

0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:38.159
<v Speaker 1>what he said. And then he threw a little aside.

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>He said, if they'd a stipulated to it, then they'd

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 1>have an argument. And it was interesting. I heard that

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Jay Sekulo's eyes got real wide when he said that,

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 1>and I got up and went back to the cloak room.

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Lindsay went back to the close. Well, I opened my

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:53.600
<v Speaker 1>eyes at that point. So for those of us who

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:55.920
<v Speaker 1>were not us senators, why is that the big light

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:58.719
<v Speaker 1>bulb moment? So well, I'll tell you. So, I immediately

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 1>in the cloak room, got my phone, texted my team

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and said, give me the transcript of exactly what Shift

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 1>just said. And I went to Lindsay and we began talking, saying, look,

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 1>we need to get Lamar, we need to get Lisa.

0:05:12.520 --> 0:05:16.160
<v Speaker 1>This idea of if you stipulate to a quid pro quo.

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 1>If you agree, even if there is a quid pro quo,

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:21.599
<v Speaker 1>we win. That might get their vote, that might give them,

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:24.159
<v Speaker 1>give them a ground to become comfortable. So we got

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the script, Lindsay and I together in the cloak room.

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 1>We talked with Lamar. We showed him exactly what he said.

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>We said, what do you think about this? We talked

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>with Lisa, He said, hey, what do you think about this?

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 1>They were open to the idea. They weren't convinced, but

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:38.960
<v Speaker 1>they were thinking about it. They were listening. We kept

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 1>talking the next day in the question period, I think

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the most important question is a question Lindsay wrote that

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I helped him write, and it was a question that

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:50.240
<v Speaker 1>was to the White House team that essentially said, if

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>you assume, for sake of argument, then John Bolton testifies

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and everything he says is right, that we just assume

0:05:56.640 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 1>everything's right, that there's a quid pro quo, is that

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 1>impeachable offense or not? And the White House lawyers that

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>they didn't want to go down this road. They had

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 1>to be dragged, kicking and screaming to this point. And

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you there was some kicking and screaming that

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Lindsay and I were both engaged with but they got

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:16.839
<v Speaker 1>up and they gave the answer, the most important answer,

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:19.840
<v Speaker 1>where they said, look, even if he testified, even if

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:22.479
<v Speaker 1>he says it's a quid pro quo, it doesn't change

0:06:22.480 --> 0:06:26.480
<v Speaker 1>that it's an impeachable offense, which means his testimony isn't necessary.

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:28.479
<v Speaker 1>And they walked through, as we've been talking about on

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 1>this podcast, that a president can always investigate corruption, and

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>if that's right, that a president can always investigate corruption,

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>there was more than enough evidence of corruption. And I

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:41.480
<v Speaker 1>think that played. That exchange where the White House lawyers

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:44.840
<v Speaker 1>made that argument in response to the question we teed up,

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:48.799
<v Speaker 1>I think was pivotal to getting both Lisa and Lamar,

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 1>especially Lisa, to yes, which we need. So what you're

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 1>saying the White House team was pushing back, They didn't

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 1>necessarily want to go down this road of if there

0:06:57.240 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 1>was a quid pro quo, then X, Y and Z right. However,

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:05.159
<v Speaker 1>if you address that that argument and it still doesn't

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 1>matter if there was a quid pro que, then there

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 1>is no basis whatsoever for the impeachment. Well, there's no

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 1>basis to call John Bolton. So what brought all this up?

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, Ted was very proud. I'm a practical guy.

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Lisa mccowski is independent from Alaska. We're Republicans from Texas

0:07:22.600 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 1>and South Carolina. A little different politics. And here's the problem.

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 1>They could have called John Bolton and others, but they

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 1>chose not to because they wanted to impeach the president

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 1>before Christmas. The president would declared executive privilege. It had

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 1>gone to court like Nixon and Clinton did, but that

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 1>got in the way of this railroad right job. But

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the problem is, there's a blurb in the New York Times,

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>as they always do, saying John Bolton has direct evidence

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 1>that the President asked him to condition the AID on

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 1>investigating the bidens looking at interference by the Ukraine. That

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 1>was different. The defense team of the President said there

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 1>is no evidence and there right, there was no direct

0:08:01.680 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 1>evidence in the record that the House chose to establish.

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 1>And from just a common sense point of view, it

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:11.960
<v Speaker 1>raises a question. Lamar is an institutionalist. He wanted to

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 1>make sure that the Senate was a body that was

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 1>open minded, fair and Lisa had to go back home

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 1>and explained, well, why didn't you call any witnesses? And

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 1>here's the point. If we call John Bolton. Now want

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the president raise executive privilege? Because if he doesn't, he

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 1>forfeits that for future presidence. Do we as senators destroy

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the privilege? To be the first impeachment in history where

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 1>there was no court access, we would have to decide

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:43.720
<v Speaker 1>executive privilege. And I think that made Lamar feel uncomfortable.

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:45.439
<v Speaker 1>So walk me through that just a little bit more,

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:47.679
<v Speaker 1>because this is now not an argument. So this is

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:51.559
<v Speaker 1>really important right here. So this is about what happens

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:55.960
<v Speaker 1>if we try to capture this testimony. The president was

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 1>denied the chance to go to court in the House,

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 1>they shut him out. What if we say now we

0:09:01.520 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 1>want to call him for a new reason, and if

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 1>he asked to go to court, the logic is the

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 1>court of impeachment de sized not Article three courts. It

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 1>may be the first time in history a president was

0:09:13.080 --> 0:09:16.320
<v Speaker 1>impeached without ever being able to avail the courts. Right,

0:09:16.440 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 1>So what's the answer this assuming for a moment arguendo podcast,

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 1>people look up, Okay, you showed off your Latin and

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:29.319
<v Speaker 1>the episode so arguing, I am like it is a

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 1>lawyer word. You put it in race all the time

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:35.199
<v Speaker 1>where you say assume arguendo, which is I'm not admitting it. Yeah,

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:37.679
<v Speaker 1>but assume for case of argument this is true. We

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 1>still win. And so you do that in briefs all

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:41.839
<v Speaker 1>the time. Yeah, that's right in South Carolina. What if

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:46.600
<v Speaker 1>he said it is assuming arguendo, would it matter? So

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 1>why I assume for a moment for arguendo, for the

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 1>sake of argument, that if John Bolton did, if he

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 1>was told by the President, I want to suspend AID

0:09:57.520 --> 0:09:59.800
<v Speaker 1>until I find more about what the Bidens did. He

0:09:59.840 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>had every reason in the world because if you're in charge, Ted,

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 1>if I put you in charge of fixing corruption in

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the Ukraine and I find out that your son, who's

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, until I'm told that job pays a million

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 1>bucks here, Okay, so it's better than podcasting, don't you

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 1>think When Joe Biden gets in front of the Ukrainian

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 1>parliament says we got in corruption in the Ukraine, particularly

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:26.439
<v Speaker 1>the energy sector, and everybody said, well, why is your

0:10:26.480 --> 0:10:28.720
<v Speaker 1>son on the border breeze by making a million dollars,

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 1>it kind of undercuts your argument. It destroyed our ability

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 1>quite frankly, to be credible agents of change. And that's

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:38.080
<v Speaker 1>a public policy. And you know, all Lamar said, that's right.

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:40.319
<v Speaker 1>There's a reason to look at that. And there was

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:43.200
<v Speaker 1>all kind of evidence that the Ukraine UH didn't like

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Trump and like Clinton at least parts of it. So

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the president had a legitimate public purpose. And that gets

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 1>back to Dershowitz. He says, if there's a mixed motive,

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the reason it's impeachment sucks so much. We got to

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>get into Trump's brain and find out how much of

0:10:56.920 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 1>it was personal and how much it was public and what.

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 1>And I said, you know, they said, there's not a

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:05.599
<v Speaker 1>sentilla of evidence that the Biden said anything wrong. I said, no,

0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>there's not. There's a herd of zendillas. You know, if

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 1>you find one of these little suckers rumming around, you win.

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 1>So like even I could prove this doesn't pass the

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 1>smell test. And they started thinking, and I said, assume

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 1>for a moment that the conversation was most beneficial to

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the house managers. You wind up right where you are today.

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:31.000
<v Speaker 1>There was a legitimate public purpose to suspend the AID

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:33.560
<v Speaker 1>and this is not an impeachable fence. Do you think

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the founders really meant to throw the president out of

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 1>office who could never run again because for forty days,

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 1>he's suspended age of the Ukraine. They wind up getting

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the money and they didn't investigate anybody. But this is

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 1>this is a real trick, a real political trick here,

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:52.560
<v Speaker 1>because you've got Senator Alexander, who you say cares about

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the institutions. He's a wonderful man of credibility. Absolutely, and

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:59.840
<v Speaker 1>you've got Senator Murkowski, who's independent, she's gonna go back home.

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Had real problems. So they have separate problems. And I

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:07.280
<v Speaker 1>understood maybe differently than others. And now I let ted

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 1>talk here. You've got to address the problem in front

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:13.320
<v Speaker 1>of you. From Lisa Murkowski's point of view. If we

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:16.679
<v Speaker 1>could show Lisa that if you had the New York

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Times article in front of you and I tried to

0:12:18.880 --> 0:12:22.199
<v Speaker 1>get a stipulation the day before, would it really matter.

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Wouldn't it still fall short of the impeachment? Is this

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:27.439
<v Speaker 1>really what they meant to throw a president out? That

0:12:27.559 --> 0:12:30.440
<v Speaker 1>you suspend AID when they got the money, never did

0:12:30.559 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 1>investigation the big picture stuff. Then I think that turned

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the thinking that you really didn't need Bolton because it

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't change the outcome. So one of the things that

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 1>I think was really potent is Lindsay is a trial lawyer.

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm an a pellet lawyer. Those are different worlds, those

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 1>are different arenas. I say shit show and he says stuff.

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 1>So that's the difference between a trial lawyer and at lawyer. Look, look,

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 1>trial lawyers talk to jury's a pellet lawyers talk to judges.

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Those are different ways of framing, framing things. But he

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 1>and I teamed up very close. We probably wrote a

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:04.320
<v Speaker 1>dozen questions together, some of which we asked, some of

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:06.560
<v Speaker 1>which we gave to our colleagues and they asked. But

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:09.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it we were aiming over and over

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:13.239
<v Speaker 1>and over again. We had a purpose at Lamar and Lisa,

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to move them, but trying to also give them.

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:18.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, we talked on this podcast a lot of

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 1>times about framing the narrative and choosing, choosing the terrain

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:24.960
<v Speaker 1>on which you fight, if the whole fight. Early on

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the White House spent hours an hour saying there's no

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:28.960
<v Speaker 1>quid pro quo, there's no quid pro quote. Well, you

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 1>know what if that's their argument, The fact that the

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 1>New York Time says John Bolton says there is a

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 1>quid pro quo that suddenly makes if someone they even handed.

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 1>If that's the central dispute, it's really hard to say, well, God,

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:46.840
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't we bring him in to testify? What was important?

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 1>And it took a couple of days to get us

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 1>there is to make clear it doesn't matter if there

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 1>was a quid pro quo or not. That's not the issue.

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:57.959
<v Speaker 1>So I'm start to interrupt. There were these competing strategies.

0:13:58.080 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Were these two? Okay? So here's the point. You got

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 1>to know who you're talking to. Lisa Murkowski is very independent.

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 1>She's not going to do something because somebody tells her to.

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 1>It's inconvenient. If you want a witness, that's not gonna matter.

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 1>It may hurt the team if you call a witness.

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 1>And Lamar loves the institution, he's about to retire. He's

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 1>going to do what he thinks best. And what we

0:14:21.080 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 1>try to do is explain play it out. They're playing

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 1>a game here. They set us up. They could have

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 1>called the witness. They chose not to because it's inconvenient.

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Now they're asking you to deal out Article three courts bad.

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>So assume for a moment you had Bolton in front

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 1>of you, would it really change the outcome? Here? Does

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 1>it make it an ippeachable offense for Bolton to say

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 1>what he's going to say, and the answer is clearly Now.

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 1>There was another argument that I think moved them quite

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 1>a bit, yes, and it was that what the Democrats

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 1>were trying to do if we'd have been a fifty

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 1>fifty this is a big one here. The Democrats were

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 1>trying to go after the US Supreme Court because if

0:14:58.680 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 1>it had been fifty fifty, and we talked about this

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 1>on the show last time, it's completely unclear if they

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>would have tried to make John Roberts decide, and whatever

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 1>he did, it would have been viewed through a political lens.

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 1>And so look, one case that a number of us

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 1>made is we're in a world where people have lost

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 1>faith in Congress, they've lost faith in the presidency. And

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 1>if we come through this and let the Democrats tarnish

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court two, where they lose faith in every

0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 1>institution of government, that that's a real problem. And Michael,

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:34.920
<v Speaker 1>I think we've got a clip here that will give

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 1>an example of the Democrat's strategy. Question from Senator Warren

0:15:39.320 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 1>is for the House managers at a time when large

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>majorities of Americans have lost faith in government. Does the

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 1>fact that the Chief Justice is presiding over an impeachment

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 1>trial in which Republican Senators have thus far refused to

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:59.239
<v Speaker 1>allow witnesses or evidence contribute to the loss of legitimacy

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 1>of the Chief Justice, the Supreme Court, and the Constitution.

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Now that is an insulting question. Now, Michael, I'm going

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 1>to tell you something surprising. Yeah, Elizabeth Warren helped defeat

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the impeachment of the President of the United States. That

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 1>little stunt she pulled was a campaign stunt. That was

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 1>a fundraising stunt that was designed to thrill the left

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 1>wing activist in the Iowa caucus. There ain't nothing else

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:28.160
<v Speaker 1>going on than that. But I'll tell you what. That

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 1>stunt helped deliver the votes of Lisa and Lamar. It

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 1>did because it made clear this is a political game

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and if John Roberts doesn't vote the way Elizabeth Warren wants,

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>she's going to call him a political hack and throw

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>him into politics. And it suddenly raised the price of

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 1>their voting and making it fifty fifty. Because you don't

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 1>want to see the court thrown into that political swamp?

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Do you agree with that? All you gotta do is

0:16:57.400 --> 0:17:00.360
<v Speaker 1>look at her statement, she said, a fair trial and

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the sentence impossible because of them. This is Lisa, So

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:07.200
<v Speaker 1>her statement was that they're going to set up the

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:10.879
<v Speaker 1>Chief Justice because they hate Trump so much. So the

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 1>difference between fifty one and fifties enormous. If it's fifty

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:16.439
<v Speaker 1>to fifty, then you put the Chief Justice in the

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 1>crosshairs of history, you begin to corrupt the court. As

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:23.399
<v Speaker 1>Ted said, they could give a damn on the other side.

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:25.919
<v Speaker 1>They just want an outcome here. And I think it

0:17:25.960 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 1>really mattered to Lamar and Lisa that Ted explained the

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:34.640
<v Speaker 1>historic nature of what the Chief Justice would be required

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:38.240
<v Speaker 1>to decide. And I think I explained, honest to God,

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 1>if you believed every word of John Bolt wouldn't matter,

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and the truth is, it wouldn't be. A left wing

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 1>attack group today put out an attack ad with John

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Robert Farr and a Maga Hath Yeah, and that ticked

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:55.359
<v Speaker 1>off Republican senators that helped produce the vote we had today.

0:17:55.400 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 1>So you think it was just an overreach by people

0:17:57.600 --> 0:18:00.159
<v Speaker 1>like Senator Warren, by these left wing groups. So what

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:02.880
<v Speaker 1>I want to know, I mean, this was a truly

0:18:02.920 --> 0:18:06.960
<v Speaker 1>shocking day. What happens now, Well, I just want to

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 1>fill out with what you said. It wasn't just an

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:13.119
<v Speaker 1>overreach by them. They helped. It was two senators or

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:16.679
<v Speaker 1>good people thinking it through, and Ted bringing to the

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 1>table and expertise that very few people have, quite frankly,

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 1>and I just try to say, listen, I try to

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:26.480
<v Speaker 1>be fair. I supported the Mueller investigation. I actually co

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:30.439
<v Speaker 1>sponsored legislation that would prevent Mueller from being fired without

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:33.960
<v Speaker 1>causing Yeah, what the thin, Well, just to tell Trump,

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 1>what the hell are you thinking? If you fire this guy,

0:18:37.119 --> 0:18:40.720
<v Speaker 1>you're dead. And I thought Mueller would be fair, but

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 1>this whole process has not been fair. So I could say, listen, guys,

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 1>it's not like I think the presence beyond being looked at.

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 1>What they did in the House is dangerous to the country.

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:54.359
<v Speaker 1>It's a partisan impeach, but no due process, and we

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 1>need to end it the right way. Do not make

0:18:56.880 --> 0:18:59.399
<v Speaker 1>it worse. And what would make it worse is to

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:02.160
<v Speaker 1>do what d said, put the court in the crossairs

0:19:02.160 --> 0:19:04.359
<v Speaker 1>of history in the wrong way. And what would make

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 1>it worse is to let them go to us into

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 1>calling a witness. That wouldn't matter because they think we're unfair.

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:14.159
<v Speaker 1>You've done nothing wrong here it was the other side

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:17.640
<v Speaker 1>who did something wrong well, And as a consequence, John

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Roberts is not in a position where he has to

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 1>make any controversial rulings where they get where he's being

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>set up to be attacked as being political. He simply

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 1>he presided over a fair trial and it was the

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Senators who are voted. And look, we're elected to make

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 1>policy decisions and political decisions and also to apply the

0:19:37.119 --> 0:19:39.880
<v Speaker 1>constitutional standards, and that's what we did. In some way,

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:41.719
<v Speaker 1>it feels like we dodged a bullet if it were

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:46.960
<v Speaker 1>you have no idea. No, you dodged a candid truck. Yeah,

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:51.160
<v Speaker 1>but because really just play it out. We call witnesses.

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Then you're not just going to call John Bolton, You're

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 1>going to have the whistleblower. Is going to be a

0:19:56.840 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 1>nightmare for the country. You have all kind of issues

0:19:59.280 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 1>decided by the Senate should be decided by the courts,

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:04.200
<v Speaker 1>and you would set a president that I think would

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>make impeachment of every president in future almost a certainty.

0:20:07.720 --> 0:20:10.359
<v Speaker 1>And it seemed actually in some of the arguments we

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 1>heard during the trial that there was a threat there

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:15.800
<v Speaker 1>or an acknowledgement that if we continue down this path.

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 1>We're going to impeach every president from now on. Well,

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and that remains a real risk that we've opened the

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:24.479
<v Speaker 1>door to. So how do you stop that if the

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 1>House loses? And one of the reasons they lost just

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:30.200
<v Speaker 1>because they've gone crazy. Donald Trump's changed the Republican Party,

0:20:30.240 --> 0:20:34.359
<v Speaker 1>but he's driven the Democratic Party completely nuts. So what

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:38.160
<v Speaker 1>would happen if President Trump gets reelected? That's exoneration. Well,

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:40.680
<v Speaker 1>and let me underscore that, because that's a very good point.

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I actually think Bill Clinton helped keep Barack Obama from

0:20:46.520 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 1>getting impeached. So now why is that Republicans impeach? And

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 1>actually Lindsay was manager, you don't reve this at home, okay,

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 1>And it backfired. It it hurt Republicans, it got Bill

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:02.679
<v Speaker 1>hunt and reelected. It didn't work, and a lot of

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Republicans took that message. Hey, wait a second, being seen

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:10.360
<v Speaker 1>being two partisan, too aggressive of using impeachment. That's a problem.

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:13.359
<v Speaker 1>And so when it came to Obama, look, Obama on

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the abuse of power theory that we've heard from the

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 1>House managers. Obama abused his power in many respects, and

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:23.119
<v Speaker 1>yet all of us agreed we shouldn't be impeaching Obama

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:24.720
<v Speaker 1>we should beat him at the ballot box, which we

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 1>tried to do, but impeachment wasn't the right tool. If

0:21:28.520 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Republicans hadn't gotten burned so bad on the Clinton impeachment,

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 1>there would have been some loud voices to impeach Obama.

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:37.880
<v Speaker 1>But as it was, people said, let's not go down

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 1>that road. So if you want to stop partisan impeachments

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:43.760
<v Speaker 1>going forward, the best way in lindsay, you're right, I

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:46.000
<v Speaker 1>hadn't thought about it and connected it like this. The

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 1>best way to stop it is for Democrats to get

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:54.080
<v Speaker 1>walloped in November, because then the next Democrats will say, okay, wow,

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 1>this this impeaching business. And by the way, the Republicans

0:21:57.119 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 1>will too. Well. You know, we still remember. Lamar asked

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:06.400
<v Speaker 1>a question, what's the partisan difference between Nixon, Clinton and Trump?

0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:12.920
<v Speaker 1>A lot, a little nun a lot of bipartisanship for Nixon. Yeah,

0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:15.440
<v Speaker 1>that's the kind of thing the founders had in mind.

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:19.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, this is a constitutional death penalty for a politician.

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:23.440
<v Speaker 1>You should use exparingly. Clinton had thirty three Democrats say

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:28.640
<v Speaker 1>let's look at it, bipartisan impeachment, and Clinton basically cheated

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Paula Jones out of her day in court, hid evidence, perjury,

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:35.120
<v Speaker 1>you name it. You can't have the most spowerful person

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>in the country to story a private citizen's right to

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:40.399
<v Speaker 1>have their day in court. Now Here we are with

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:45.399
<v Speaker 1>Trump bipartisan rejection of the articles of impeachment, and I

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:47.879
<v Speaker 1>think that bothered Lamar, that it was the way it

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:50.880
<v Speaker 1>was done and the outcome in the House. We don't

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 1>want to be joined with Lamar on a question exactly.

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Lamar really rose to the occasion because what you're saying

0:22:57.359 --> 0:23:00.119
<v Speaker 1>is there was a bipartisan rejection of rejection. But in

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:02.119
<v Speaker 1>terms of the people who actually voted for impeachment, it

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 1>was the first time in US history you had a

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:08.119
<v Speaker 1>purely partisan impeachment. Yeah, and I hope it's the last

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:12.880
<v Speaker 1>c Clinton was in his second term Nixon resigned. If

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Trump wins, he'll be the first person impeached in his

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 1>first term to get reelected. That will exonerate him. Now,

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I want to know, obviously, the impeachment hearings have been

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:25.760
<v Speaker 1>so dreary and tedious, and it's gonna be kidding me.

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 1>It's you. I know, you'll admit if you're watching this podcast,

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:33.440
<v Speaker 1>you're loving this. Well, the podcast maybe c SPAN. I

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:36.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Well, actually people listen to this because they

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:38.480
<v Speaker 1>can't watch c SPAN for thirteen hours and it makes

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 1>their eyes and ears bleed. But this way, this is

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:46.639
<v Speaker 1>somewhere between c SPAN and the trial. Was there any

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:50.240
<v Speaker 1>moment that was that had some levity to it? The

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:54.680
<v Speaker 1>some voibles? I think the funniest moment was last night,

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the very last of the question, sixteen hours of questions,

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Amy Klobuchar submits the last question ends the card down number.

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Once she sends the wrong card down, so the chief

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't read it. She realizes that she screwed up. She

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:06.920
<v Speaker 1>has to run down and write her name on the car.

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 1>So that starts off cracking up at that. And it's

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 1>not that hard. You literally write your name on it,

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:20.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, kindergart okay, and I didn't screw up, you know,

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:23.560
<v Speaker 1>put your name on the top block letters. I think

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:26.040
<v Speaker 1>she was thinking about Iowa. Maybe she wasn't saying attention,

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:28.440
<v Speaker 1>So Phil, this is a good one. Keep going. So

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:32.400
<v Speaker 1>her question was with the house managers give a closing argument.

0:24:32.600 --> 0:24:34.880
<v Speaker 1>So Adam Schiff stands up. You seem kind of puff

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 1>at his chest. He starts walking forward and Jerry Nadler

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 1>was sitting like four seats behind him, runs behind him,

0:24:41.840 --> 0:24:44.199
<v Speaker 1>push a shift out of the leg and goes to

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the microphone, and and Schiff is literally going, Jerry, Jerry, Jerry.

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:55.080
<v Speaker 1>And he stands there behind Adler, I mean glaring. He

0:24:55.240 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 1>wanted to punch or strangle him. These are the two

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 1>how stamach right, impeachment manager that they're the leads. And

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Nadler just went and gave his closing arguments, and Ship

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 1>stood there for a good ten seconds, and then he

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:11.560
<v Speaker 1>just sat down and glared at Nadler the whole time.

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, Roberts he had his reading glasses

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 1>on the tip of his nose. And I know I've

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:20.639
<v Speaker 1>known John Robert twenty five years. You saw a slight smile,

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 1>which for him is cracking up because they almost had

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:26.360
<v Speaker 1>a fist. This band has never smiled in his luck.

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:33.680
<v Speaker 1>So he's actually wickedly fun I know, John, You're right,

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 1>he's a bring Mitch McConnell's funny in his own way.

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:43.160
<v Speaker 1>So so here's the deal. Jerry's wife is sick it. Yeah,

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 1>she's got she got pinkeran it cancer. Now I'm praying

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:48.200
<v Speaker 1>for driving known him for a long time, but Jerry

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:50.199
<v Speaker 1>can throw a punch. He can take a punch. So

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 1>number one shift. If Jerry Nadler's out running, you need

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 1>to get in better shape. So but the deal is,

0:25:58.520 --> 0:26:01.359
<v Speaker 1>it was just shocking and we were all pulling for

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Nadler to win the race. We'd heard enough of shifts,

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:08.119
<v Speaker 1>so Shift started good. But after about thirty hours or shift,

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:10.880
<v Speaker 1>you're ready to turn the channel. You know, it's bad

0:26:11.040 --> 0:26:14.640
<v Speaker 1>when people want to hear Nadler, not not Shift. So

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:18.919
<v Speaker 1>the bottom line, here's the classic story. And I know

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:21.400
<v Speaker 1>we gotta go because y'all gotta do whatever you do

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:28.400
<v Speaker 1>in a podcast, wolf drink and drive. So here's the deal.

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Flipflowing shut Chumber trying to be clever. Sometimes he is.

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes we all fall short in this business. He invites uh,

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 1>he gives his ticket to be a spectator at the

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:47.960
<v Speaker 1>trial to part us. This is crooked at Snake Guy

0:26:49.880 --> 0:26:52.240
<v Speaker 1>in the Ukraine has said that I'm in on it.

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Lindsay Graham knew it all. And they said, have you

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:56.680
<v Speaker 1>ever talked to Lindsay Graham? No, but I heard he

0:26:56.760 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 1>knew it all, so so I don't know at all.

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:03.639
<v Speaker 1>So they invite him to come. He shows up to

0:27:03.680 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 1>get his ticket. He can't get in because he's got

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:11.480
<v Speaker 1>an anklet bracelet from the court. You can't mate this

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:14.280
<v Speaker 1>one up. That is you know, I almost wish the

0:27:14.440 --> 0:27:17.160
<v Speaker 1>humors guess can't come into the drial couse he's got

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:18.960
<v Speaker 1>an ankle brace that's par for the course. Well, you

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 1>know State of the Union. I heard Schumer's bringing Charles Manson.

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:26.880
<v Speaker 1>That'd be good. I'd be inter as anything guy's did so. Um, anyway,

0:27:26.920 --> 0:27:29.199
<v Speaker 1>I've never done this before. If you're number two in

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the podcast world, you need to up your game because

0:27:32.440 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 1>this is uber were number one. I know that. I'll

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:42.919
<v Speaker 1>take that as a compliment. Maybe, you know, speaking up,

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 1>We've got to get you out of here because the

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:46.840
<v Speaker 1>senators are off. You get a couple of days off. Now,

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 1>weird Union. I'm headed to Texas, Heading to Texas. Senator Graham,

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:55.360
<v Speaker 1>you're done this one in South Carolina? One last store.

0:27:55.440 --> 0:27:58.400
<v Speaker 1>You know the two guys that led the Alamo, both

0:27:58.400 --> 0:28:00.680
<v Speaker 1>of them are from South Carolina. What does that mean?

0:28:00.720 --> 0:28:04.400
<v Speaker 1>We'll go a long way for a lost cause. And uh,

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I was an impeachment Maxas heroes. It would love Texas heroes.

0:28:07.880 --> 0:28:10.119
<v Speaker 1>God blessed Texas. But Henry I was giving us the

0:28:10.760 --> 0:28:13.479
<v Speaker 1>take the hill boys. We're gonna go over the Senate.

0:28:13.800 --> 0:28:17.240
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna stand for truth, justice in the American way.

0:28:17.560 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 1>You know the brave men and women at the Alamo,

0:28:21.440 --> 0:28:25.520
<v Speaker 1>you know they stood their ground, and you know that's

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 1>our charge, that's our charter. I said, hey, Henry, didn't

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:31.480
<v Speaker 1>they all get killed? And he says, that's that's something

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:34.240
<v Speaker 1>I ignored. But it's a good point. But he did

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:37.480
<v Speaker 1>say we're still talking about him did this day? It's true.

0:28:37.520 --> 0:28:40.240
<v Speaker 1>In a final point wrapping up, there will be another

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:42.840
<v Speaker 1>bomb show. There will be an all Seen now and

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Havin all times too. Do you think i'mis you? Something

0:28:45.640 --> 0:28:49.760
<v Speaker 1>else is coming between now and and and the verdict

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 1>on impeachment that will be voted on on Wednesday. There'll

0:28:52.120 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 1>be another bomb show in the New York Times probably,

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:56.880
<v Speaker 1>but something else is going because I when I when

0:28:56.880 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I saw it today, I just thought, Okay, it's over right.

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't need to worry about it anymore. You're saying, oh,

0:29:02.920 --> 0:29:05.240
<v Speaker 1>we both were on Kavanagh and you ask what's next

0:29:05.560 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 1>after this? Is that we're going to ask some hard

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:10.560
<v Speaker 1>questions State Department, Why didn't you understand this conflict? Of interest.

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Why didn't you do something about it. We're going to

0:29:13.200 --> 0:29:15.320
<v Speaker 1>get to the bottom of the FISA warrant abuse. We're

0:29:15.320 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 1>going to do all that stuff. But by the way,

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:20.200
<v Speaker 1>this is breaking news. Yeah, we cannot live in a country.

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:22.200
<v Speaker 1>So you're because a lot of questions in the mailback

0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:26.840
<v Speaker 1>people are asking now, trust me, not because I actually

0:29:27.000 --> 0:29:29.520
<v Speaker 1>like Joe Budden. I traveled the world with him. But

0:29:29.640 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, if it had been Mike Pence or Vice

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:34.680
<v Speaker 1>President Cheney, they'd be all over. We can't live in

0:29:34.680 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 1>a world where just one side gets looked at. I

0:29:37.040 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 1>don't have any animosity in my heart toward toward anyone,

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 1>But the truth of the matter is you gotta have

0:29:42.840 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 1>a country where the rules matter for everybody, not just

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:50.120
<v Speaker 1>President Trump. I mean not for Democrats. President Trump from

0:29:50.120 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the day he took office and now has gone through hell.

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:55.440
<v Speaker 1>His family's gone through hell. And I promise you to

0:29:55.440 --> 0:29:57.160
<v Speaker 1>those who care, we're going to get to the bottom

0:29:57.200 --> 0:30:00.920
<v Speaker 1>of barisma because it's important we find doubt about Bison.

0:30:00.920 --> 0:30:02.440
<v Speaker 1>But we're going to find out how could you an

0:30:02.480 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 1>issue a warrant four times against an American citizen. Here's

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the world if Trump goes to a Russian restaurant to

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 1>have dinner. He's a Russian. Yeah, you know, and you

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 1>know you can have three million dollars paid to your

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 1>son in the Ukraine and nobody cares. Now if President

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Trump gets acquitted, you're saying, the Senate Republicans are not

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:22.680
<v Speaker 1>going to give up on this. What can be done

0:30:22.760 --> 0:30:25.720
<v Speaker 1>over to get to the bottom of Jim Rash's Chairman

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 1>of Foreign Relations community. The first witness I want to

0:30:27.920 --> 0:30:30.920
<v Speaker 1>call is John Carey's chiefest staff. When you were told

0:30:31.120 --> 0:30:33.960
<v Speaker 1>that there was a conflict of interest by John Carey

0:30:34.000 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 1>steps on, who is their business partner? Why don't you

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:39.160
<v Speaker 1>do something about it? And last I checked, both you

0:30:39.200 --> 0:30:41.320
<v Speaker 1>and I are on foreign relations. Last time I checked,

0:30:41.320 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 1>we're on judiciary and we're on foreign relations. This is

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of a day of reckoning. This is not

0:30:49.840 --> 0:30:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the end. Maybe the end of the

0:30:51.400 --> 0:30:54.240
<v Speaker 1>beginning we're moving on. Is the end of the podcast.

0:30:54.560 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 1>And at the end of the one thing I want

0:30:56.440 --> 0:30:58.360
<v Speaker 1>to know before we let you get out of here

0:30:58.360 --> 0:31:01.719
<v Speaker 1>and hop onto a plane. One last is I noticed

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:04.360
<v Speaker 1>it's much earlier tonight. Usually we're here at two o'clock

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:07.760
<v Speaker 1>in the morning. It's only eleven o'clock at night. Why

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 1>is it that Mitch McConnell that all these senators are

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:12.920
<v Speaker 1>letting people get out of here so early? Was there

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 1>some I think the Democrats wanted to go to Iowa?

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:21.040
<v Speaker 1>The Democrats three democrat jumping to go to Iowa. Did

0:31:21.680 --> 0:31:24.960
<v Speaker 1>you talk to any of your colleagues? Were they well,

0:31:25.080 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, let's look at it this way. I'm not married,

0:31:28.920 --> 0:31:31.480
<v Speaker 1>So why can't you get everything done the way you

0:31:31.480 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 1>want it? I'll let Ted answer that question. We've got

0:31:34.280 --> 0:31:37.360
<v Speaker 1>one hundred people in the Senate. Everybody has different agendas.

0:31:37.880 --> 0:31:41.960
<v Speaker 1>But Monday, so Sunday's super Bowl, right Monday is the

0:31:42.000 --> 0:31:45.719
<v Speaker 1>Iowa Caucus. Tuesdays the State of the Union. Bottom line is,

0:31:45.760 --> 0:31:47.440
<v Speaker 1>this is the best Mitch could do. And I think

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Mitch McConnell did a brilliant job handle of this. I

0:31:50.160 --> 0:31:52.920
<v Speaker 1>really do bets on the Super Bowl before we go. Look,

0:31:52.960 --> 0:31:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm rooting for the Chiefs just because they beat the

0:31:55.360 --> 0:31:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Texans and so on that principle. If they go on

0:31:57.880 --> 0:32:00.000
<v Speaker 1>to win it all, I get to say the Texans

0:32:00.120 --> 0:32:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the second best in in my reckond puem for the Falcons.

0:32:03.640 --> 0:32:05.680
<v Speaker 1>There we are, that's our show, that's the that's the

0:32:05.720 --> 0:32:08.120
<v Speaker 1>final verdict on the Super Bowl. We've got a whole

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:15.280
<v Speaker 1>lot more coming out. I'm Michael knowles on, behalf of

0:32:15.320 --> 0:32:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Senator Lindsey Graham, so gracious to spend the night in

0:32:17.920 --> 0:32:21.080
<v Speaker 1>our bunker over here. Yeah, this is Verdict with Ted Cruz.

0:32:29.680 --> 0:32:32.720
<v Speaker 1>This episode of Verdict with Ted Cruz is being brought

0:32:32.720 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 1>to you by Jobs, Freedom and Security Pack, a political

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:40.920
<v Speaker 1>action committee dedicated to supporting conservative causes, organizations, and candidates

0:32:40.920 --> 0:32:44.200
<v Speaker 1>across the country. In twenty twenty two, Jobs, Freedom and

0:32:44.280 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Security Pack plans to donate to conservative candidates running for

0:32:47.800 --> 0:32:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Congress and help the Republican Party across the nation.