WEBVTT - Trains & Deterence

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio, the George

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong and Joe, Katty arms Strong

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and Jattie and he Armstrong and Yetty. This is an

0:00:22.920 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>open question and we'll you know, you decide for yourself

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:32.200
<v Speaker 1>after we play it. Did Trump drop an ultimatum on Putin?

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Yesterday in his little mini press conference when he was

0:00:35.760 --> 0:00:40.559
<v Speaker 1>asked about the Russia Ukraine ceasefire? Et cetera? Here we go?

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Do you believe the Russians are.

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 2>Being disrespectful when they say that your criticisms of Putin

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 2>are simply an emotional response.

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:51.519
<v Speaker 1>And do you still believe that Putin actually wants to

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:51.879
<v Speaker 1>end up?

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 3>I can't tell you that, but I'll let you know

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 3>in about two weeks. Within two weeks, we're going to

0:00:56.320 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 3>find out very soon, we're going to find out whether

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 3>he's tapping us along or not. And if he is,

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 3>we'll respond a little bit differently. But it'll take about

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 3>a week and a half. Two weeks. We have mister

0:01:08.920 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 3>Whitcoff is here is doing a phenomenal job, is dealing

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 3>with them very strongly. Right now, they seem to want

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:20.319
<v Speaker 3>to do something, but until the document is signed.

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:27.720
<v Speaker 1>I can't tell you. Nobody can. As usual, a little

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:31.120
<v Speaker 1>difficult to figure out exactly what he's saying or not saying. There.

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Is he saying there's a ceasefire agreement to sign in

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 1>two weeks and if they don't, then sanctions or continuing

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:43.480
<v Speaker 1>to arm Ukraine? Is that what he's saying. I don't know.

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:46.319
<v Speaker 4>The idea that in two weeks he'll know whether Putin

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 4>wants peace. That's insane, that's loopy. Putin doesn't want peace,

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 4>There's not a chance.

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I really don't get his thinking. Just

0:01:54.560 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>to remind you in case you don't remember, he did tell,

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>for instance, if you don't this or that, like in

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the next week, all hell fire is going to come

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:07.919
<v Speaker 1>down on you. And they didn't do whatever he asked,

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>and all hell fires not come.

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 4>Down on them.

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:10.919
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:16.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, there have been some uh as yet unfulfilled threats.

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh how about Hamas Hamas all the hostages back by

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:24.959
<v Speaker 1>Monday or the likes of which you've never seen, et cetera,

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:29.600
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. Did not bothers me. Hell yeah, obviously if

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:34.600
<v Speaker 1>you've ever parented a child, yeah, you do that threat

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 1>without any follow through, and you get a result, as in,

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:39.079
<v Speaker 1>they don't listen to you next time.

0:02:40.000 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 4>Right, So we asked yesterday Jack and I are both

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 4>of the mind, with some subtle differences, but of the

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 4>mind that we the West need to back Ukraine to

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:56.360
<v Speaker 4>halt Russian aggression lest they become emboldened and try to

0:02:56.360 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 4>gobble up even more territory. Also to send the message

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 4>to China and others that we are not a fair

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:03.799
<v Speaker 4>weather friend.

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:05.520
<v Speaker 1>If we say we're going to back you, we're going

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 1>to back you, and you.

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:08.840
<v Speaker 4>Can't just string us along for a year or two.

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 4>We get bored and move on. Then you get whatever

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:13.520
<v Speaker 4>you want. No matter how evil you are and how

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 4>bent on the conquest of the world you are. There

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 4>are those who disagree somewhat or completely. Call them isolationists,

0:03:22.560 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 4>which I think is probably a little unfair.

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Or what do they call them?

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 4>Interventionists, non interventionists or restrainers less America being the world's

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 4>policeman type people. And we said, all right, what are

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 4>we getting wrong? What are we missing? Drop us an

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 4>email and so we're going to hit you with a

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 4>couple of those. We'll see how strong you think the

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:49.720
<v Speaker 4>arguments are. Let's see justin truck drivers a semi regular correspondent, Right,

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 4>So I'm not going to go into a long detailed

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 4>argument because in the past you have straw manned my

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 4>arguments and taking them out of context. Well, there's the

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 4>victim card right up front. Typically a year sort anyway.

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 4>But then I read on Tucker and others use Christianity

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 4>as a euphemism for white Europeans. We're talking about how

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 4>absurd it is to look at Vladimir Putin as the

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 4>protector of or savior of Christianity, as he's posturing himself

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 4>to be having formed an alliance with the Russian Orthodox Church,

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 4>which is corrupt and evil.

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 1>But I want to go ahead and give in Justin's argument.

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 1>And if the whatever they call the leader of the

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Russian Orthodox christ Bishop or whatever he is, if he

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:33.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't go along with Putin, he'd fall out of a

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 1>window until they got somebody who would go along with him.

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:39.360
<v Speaker 1>All right, So anyway, here's Justin the truck driver's whole argument.

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Tucker and others used Christianity as a euphemism for white Europeans.

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 1>They do this to win over boomers, who are snowflakes

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the idea of race realism. Your

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>analysis of what's happening with foreign policy and tariffs are

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:55.480
<v Speaker 1>very surface level because all of your sources are mainstream media.

0:04:55.640 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 4>That's not even close to true, Justin, but I will

0:04:57.520 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 4>read on the dissident right isn't happy with mo to

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 4>what Trump is doing, but the good he is doing

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 4>against the military industrial complex and globalism outweighs the bad.

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 4>The soft right is fine with Israel's ethno state and

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:14.839
<v Speaker 4>their greater Israel expansion, but apoplectic at the idea of

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:19.160
<v Speaker 4>strong men in Europe defending white European ethno states.

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>How is Putin defending his country? He attacked Ukraine, Ukraine

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't attack him. He would say NATO got too close

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:31.719
<v Speaker 1>and they were warned over and over again not to

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 1>do that. I think, let's see, here's another point of view.

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Good morning, gentlemen.

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 4>Regarding Putin's advances in your premise that he's not going

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 4>to stop invading Ukraine, a very simple question, yes, and

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:44.919
<v Speaker 4>what do you propose we do about it? Seriously, what

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 4>is the alternative scenario other than a full blown kinetic

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 4>war with Russia? Are you proposing that we should deploy

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:52.479
<v Speaker 4>men and material to stop him? If not what else

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 4>can we do? Listeners since day one, you guys should

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:58.040
<v Speaker 4>be household names across our great land. Well, I certainly

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:03.279
<v Speaker 4>agree with you with that last point, Chris, A very

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 4>very short answer to your question is deterrence.

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I would say men definitely not, but material support

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 1>of Ukraine absolutely. And again my thinking is it makes

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:18.360
<v Speaker 1>it more likely that we end up in a full

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:21.160
<v Speaker 1>kinetic war against Russia if we let him take Ukraine,

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 1>not less likely.

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 4>Well, although he's asking about advances into NATO countries, are

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 4>you saying no men for that? If well, that is

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 4>the starts in marching on warsaw that that's where we

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 4>end up in a real tough situation. That's why you

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:40.920
<v Speaker 4>gotta push him out of Ukraine or make it clear

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:43.280
<v Speaker 4>that you don't get to take all of Ukraine. Because

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 4>if he does take Ukraine, I think if he if

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 4>he gets to keep what he's got. Now, even he's

0:06:49.720 --> 0:06:53.040
<v Speaker 4>gonna make that minor incursion like we as Joe Biden

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:56.159
<v Speaker 4>called it, that we talked about yesterday, into a stony

0:06:56.279 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 4>or one of those NATO countries, and that is going

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:00.599
<v Speaker 4>to be the big decision point for NATO.

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Is Article five for real or not? Is an attack

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 1>on one, an attack on all, and we all come

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:09.640
<v Speaker 1>to their support. And if that's the case, then yeah,

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 1>we would have to send troops because that's our obligation.

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 4>Which would prevent a full on kinetic war with Russia.

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 4>In my opinion, you let him take a bite after

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 4>bite after bite. As the old saying goes, his hunger

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 4>grows with the eating moving along. In the Ukraine War,

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 4>Chris writes, all we need to do is give Ukraine

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 4>their nukes back.

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's right.

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 4>Under the Clinton administration, we per is persuaded Ukraine in

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 4>the name of non nuclear proliferation to give up their

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 4>nukes without giving them any real specific security guarantees. And

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:48.760
<v Speaker 4>they have suffered suffered for trusting the United States of America,

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 4>which makes me sick.

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm constantly referencing monocham Began because I've read

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 1>way too much about him and the peace process. I

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 1>just finished the Lawrence Rte book Thirteen Days. If you

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 1>have any interest in the Middle East or any peace process,

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 1>I think I learned a lot from that book about

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 1>what they're going to try to do here with Russian

0:08:11.080 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 1>and Ukraine. These peace processed talks are can be crazy,

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 1>and you got wild human emotions involved. It's not all

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 1>high level college PhD foreign policy this and that. It's

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>just like people being butt hurt or feeling wounded, or

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 1>it's like a fight between a husband and a wife,

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 1>as much as anything else. But anyway, my point being,

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 1>monockme began why he did a lot of crazy s

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 1>over the years as a prime minister, was the world says,

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:46.959
<v Speaker 1>never again, bulls, They'll let it happen again if it

0:08:47.120 --> 0:08:50.840
<v Speaker 1>be inconvenient for him. Only we can protect ourselves, and

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 1>we got to do whatever we have to do to

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 1>protect ourselves. And when I was reading that, I mean

0:08:55.280 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 1>that was his ultimate philosophy. He didn't say that specifically,

0:08:57.880 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 1>that was his ultimate philosophy. When I was reading that,

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking Ukraine. Ukraine's said giving up their nukes

0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>because the world will protect us never again. Yeah, not

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 1>so much?

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:13.680
<v Speaker 4>Right right, Let's see, Pollo writes, this really isn't an

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 4>answer to your why is it wrong to back you

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:17.680
<v Speaker 4>and Crane question, just the thoughts about a few things

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 4>I need. I think we need to keep in mind

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:23.200
<v Speaker 4>we aren't the dominant military power we were post WW two.

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 4>We no longer have the ability to police the world

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 4>and impose our will to whatever extent we deem necessary. True, Yeah,

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 4>that's true. There are nuances there. I tell you this,

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:33.960
<v Speaker 4>and maybe we'll get to it on another day. Just

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 4>read some unbelievable stuff about the state of our manufacturing

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 4>capabilities and our stockpiles of weapons, which is something we've

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 4>talked about before and others have too. But we in

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 4>some of our key weapons systems, our stockpiles would run

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 4>out in days and to replenish them would take years.

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 4>How the hell are you going to fight a war

0:09:57.559 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 4>with that situation? You spend all of your artillery shells

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 4>in say, ten days, and then say, can y'all hang

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 4>on till twenty twenty eight because we got to work

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 4>on getting some more shells.

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 1>We're in a terrible state. But more on that another time.

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:16.679
<v Speaker 4>How we might deal with that crazy interesting I'll give

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 4>you the five second version. We figure out every manufacturer

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 4>in the United States and what they're good at, and

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:28.560
<v Speaker 4>code them and understand how they could be tweaked and

0:10:28.600 --> 0:10:32.199
<v Speaker 4>then scaled up to manufacture weaponry, and then we can

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:35.680
<v Speaker 4>immediately say, all two c's, we're gonna call them and

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 4>give them incentives to stop manufacturing, you know, bicycle spokes

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 4>and start manufacturing bullets or whatever.

0:10:42.760 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, we have a huge, huge challenge with that. It's

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:46.720
<v Speaker 1>a good point.

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 4>Anything we do to support Ukraine in a way that

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 4>would truly threaten Russia will be viewed by Russia as

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 4>an attack on Russia.

0:10:55.360 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's like his problem, sounds like a hymn problem. Yeah,

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:02.199
<v Speaker 1>how are you gonna You're gonna fight NATO in the

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:02.840
<v Speaker 1>United States.

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you don't want to be reckless or an idiot,

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 4>but the whole well, we don't want them to escalate,

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 4>make them afraid we're going to escalate. That kept the

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 4>world at peace for your generation and five others, and

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 4>we've forgotten. Let's see, there's more on that topic. It's

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:23.680
<v Speaker 4>good stuff, but I want to hit a couple more

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 4>very briefly. Let's see Jeff says Putin's a terrible scum

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:30.679
<v Speaker 4>of a human who's hell bent on being bullied of

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:32.440
<v Speaker 4>the world. My issue, as an American who was born

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 4>in the early eighties and seen and heard firsthand about

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 4>the issues and mostly unsuccessful large scale military interventions we've

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:41.199
<v Speaker 4>been in the last sixty five years, I don't think

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:44.080
<v Speaker 4>it's worth one single American soldier's life to be involved

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 4>in this conflict war tragedy. I'm not even happy with

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:50.960
<v Speaker 4>hundreds of billions of dollars tax being money taxpayer money

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:51.839
<v Speaker 4>being used either.

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Ah.

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 4>The unwillingness to engage in large scale military action is

0:11:59.800 --> 0:12:02.559
<v Speaker 4>what brings on large scale military actions.

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Right, and an oversimplification, Absolutely true. I understand how having

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 1>lived through the wars you've lived through, but you'd have

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 1>that point of view. But us getting involved in Iraq

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 1>has nothing to do with whether or not you get

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:20.680
<v Speaker 1>You can let Russia start gobbling up countries nearby and

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:23.200
<v Speaker 1>sending the message message to China that you can take

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Taiwan unopposed.

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:28.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, the problem with Iraq, and the problem with all mistakes,

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 4>is the danger of over learning lessons. You can do

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 4>the right thing in the wrong way. You can do

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 4>the right thing in the right way. You can do

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:37.840
<v Speaker 4>the wrong thing in the right way. You can do

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 4>the wrong thing in the wrong way. And you got

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 4>to figure out which of all of those are and

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 4>then or each one of those might be, and then

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:47.680
<v Speaker 4>drill down on the particulars and learn the correct lessons.

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:50.680
<v Speaker 4>But if thanks for the thoughts, keep them coming. Mail

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:53.360
<v Speaker 4>Bag at Armstrong and Getty dot com. We are absolutely

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 4>not about having one viewpoint here and it's the only one,

0:12:57.080 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 4>and we're occultists in one way or another. No, this

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:01.840
<v Speaker 4>stuff is hard. We like none on the problems. Thanks

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:02.960
<v Speaker 4>for your assistance.

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 1>We'll leave it alone from now. But man, as I

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:10.320
<v Speaker 1>kept saying yesterday, the ball is in Trump's court. What

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 1>is he going to do. Is he going to throw

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:15.440
<v Speaker 1>up his hands and say that's it. You guys don't

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 1>want peace figured out yourselves, which is a win for Putin?

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Or is he going to back the sanctions that Europe

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:23.720
<v Speaker 1>has already come with and we continue to arm Ukraine.

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:30.559
<v Speaker 1>And next segment one very short email, extremely controversial but powerful.

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Okay and Tim the lawyer this hour which everybody loves,

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 1>say here.

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:45.080
<v Speaker 2>Macy's now warning shoppers the prices will be going up,

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:48.559
<v Speaker 2>the CEO announcing the hikes will offset tariffs in competition.

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 2>Macy's not yet revealing which items will cost more. The

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 2>retailers saying the tariffs are dampening their earnings forecast as well.

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:57.079
<v Speaker 1>So remember Walmart a couple of weeks ago said they're

0:13:57.080 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 1>going to raise prices on a whole bunch of different stuff. Obviously.

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:04.079
<v Speaker 1>That's was before the Court came out yesterday and said

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Trump doesn't have the power to do that. One guy

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:09.440
<v Speaker 1>can't do that, and so most of the tariffs are off.

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 1>So where does that leave us on raising prices? I

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 1>wonder who knows?

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 4>This is the Court of International Trade. A few people

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 4>understood it existed. We talked about it a couple of

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 4>weeks ago, warning you that this might happen. It now

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 4>goes to the Court of Appeals and then the Supreme Court.

0:14:23.400 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, they've said no, the President doesn't have unilateral

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 4>emergency powers to do what he's doing.

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 1>But will Walmart still raise prices? And Macy's and everybody else? Sir,

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 1>don't know.

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:35.120
<v Speaker 4>It's all up in the air now, Well, it's still

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 4>up in the air. I should say one more email

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 4>on the Russia Ukraine thing. Different perspectives, Kevin writes on

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 4>a couple of different topics, but he says, finally, and

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 4>this is where I put my tinfoil hat on. I'm

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 4>not sure that's true, Kevin, He says, is Europe so

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 4>far gone that doesn't make sense for us to sink

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 4>blood and treasure into helping them?

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:56.120
<v Speaker 1>If I play out the demographic reality of the UK.

0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 4>For instance, in fifty to seventy five years, there'll be

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 4>a nuclear armed disigy power.

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh maybe that's tomorrow's problem.

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 4>But I don't know that we can bank on our

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 4>European allies being around in the coming generations unless they

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 4>course correct.

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Good good point.

0:15:09.440 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 4>Uh, Cabinet's uncomfortably close to the truth. I yeah, I

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 4>told his story. I think there is course correction going

0:15:18.360 --> 0:15:19.800
<v Speaker 4>on immigration wise, go ahead.

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 1>So I told this story many years ago. I actually

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>met a tinfoil hat guy. If you're familiar with that phrase,

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 1>how did he even get started to become kind of

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:32.960
<v Speaker 1>a common term people who.

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 4>Used like aluminum foil to reflect various government rays they

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 4>thought were being trained upon them.

0:15:39.000 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Or space aliens. In the case of this dude, I

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 1>know he was a PhD at the university, super smart guy,

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 1>but he would wear a tinfoil on his head and

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:50.680
<v Speaker 1>on the tops of his shoes. He would ride his

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 1>bike to my house with tinfoil and tops of his

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 1>shoes on top of his head to reflect I think

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 1>it was extraterrestrial stuff. And he also had it on

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the seat of his and he talked about it endlessly

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 1>in very serious tones.

0:16:03.480 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 4>Wouldn't the foil on the seat of his bike reflect

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 4>the rays back up into his grundle area.

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 1>And tain't that a problem? I don't know.

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 4>Ain't that a shame coming up? Tim Sander for the

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 4>Goldwater Foundation? By the way, just in the side, on

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 4>a lighter note, my wife and I are having a

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 4>bit of a remodel done. Expanding our back patio, pushing

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 4>out a wall, redoing the kitchen, that sort of thing

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 4>really outdated.

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 1>For a minute, you guys do I don't know whatever

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 1>we did yet.

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 4>But although it's funny when they were just building things

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 4>like expanding the patio. Oh look they're pouring the footing,

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 4>they're building up, the cinder blocks, the bricks they're building.

0:16:41.120 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 1>That's nice, it was. It was all find and good.

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 4>But now that they're dismantling my house and tearing it apart,

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 4>it's getting real in here. I feel like, you know,

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 4>like a bride who was saving yourself for the wedding.

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 4>And the courtship was wonderful and the wedding ceremony was

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 4>beautiful and their reception was so much fun.

0:16:57.920 --> 0:17:00.840
<v Speaker 1>But now we're in the marital bed and it's like, oh,

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 1>that's right, Yeah, this is real, This is actually happening.

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Hello plastic walls. Oh man. Uh. Tim the Lawyer, which

0:17:11.480 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 1>if you haven't heard of, you're gonna love it, fan favorite,

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 1>coming up to talk about a whole bunch of different things.

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Law Wise, Armstrong and Getty Tox six fifty KSDV. Too

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 1>much news. We've been saying that for a while the

0:17:28.720 --> 0:17:31.120
<v Speaker 1>government needs to step in. There's too much news every

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:33.800
<v Speaker 1>day and too many good books. I was thinking that too.

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:35.960
<v Speaker 1>If you're abode one, one or two a week.

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:40.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, all the government should permit to discuss a number

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 4>of important constitutional issues before various courts these days. Please

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:47.879
<v Speaker 4>welcome Tim the Lawyer Sandover. Tim's the vice president for

0:17:48.000 --> 0:17:51.120
<v Speaker 4>legal affairs with the Goldwater Institute, also an adjunct scholar

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:52.639
<v Speaker 4>with the Cato Institute.

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Always a pleasure, Tim, How are you?

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 5>I'm just great. You know you joke about the limiting

0:17:58.000 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 5>the number of books to be published every years? Actually

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:01.200
<v Speaker 5>does do that?

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Really? What's the theory behind that?

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:08.160
<v Speaker 5>The way it forces people to read better books?

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:11.359
<v Speaker 1>Well, if you know, it's it's classic censorship. If I

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 1>could trust who was making the list, that would be fine.

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:17.879
<v Speaker 1>But you can't. It's totally freaking French. Am I wrong?

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:21.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm not wrong. Wow, I don't tell that they actually

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 1>have a limit on how many books can be published.

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 4>That's insane, My god, I hate collectivism so much. So, Tim,

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:32.119
<v Speaker 4>before we get into some really interesting stuff that the

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:35.160
<v Speaker 4>Goldwater Institute and you are involved in personally, is there

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 4>anything in the Supreme Court docket, because they make all

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 4>sorts of big announcements in June, anything particularly exciting that

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:43.239
<v Speaker 4>you're looking forward to.

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 5>None of the big cases have been decided yet they

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 5>are going to except for there was the case about

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 5>a religious discrimination in schools. It was a charter school

0:18:55.119 --> 0:19:00.399
<v Speaker 5>that wanted to operate in Oklahoma as an officially church

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:05.200
<v Speaker 5>oriented school. But in Oklahoma the law deems charter schools

0:19:05.200 --> 0:19:08.120
<v Speaker 5>to be public schools. And the question therefore was can

0:19:08.240 --> 0:19:13.919
<v Speaker 5>the government officially charter explicitly religious school or does that

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:17.360
<v Speaker 5>violate the First Amendment? And the Supreme Court said, yes,

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:22.439
<v Speaker 5>that's not allowed. But they did so on an even split.

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:25.479
<v Speaker 5>Four justices went way when one way and four justices

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:28.200
<v Speaker 5>went the other way, and Justice Barrett was recused from

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 5>the case. So that means it sets no legal precedent,

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 5>and that means it's still up in the air about

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:39.639
<v Speaker 5>the constitutionality of government basically allowing private religious schools to

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:41.479
<v Speaker 5>operate under the government's aegis.

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 1>It was one of the.

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 5>Things we'd all been watching for very closely, and it

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 5>kind of ended with a fizzle, which means that next

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 5>year we're going to have to be arguing this issue

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 5>all over again.

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:51.919
<v Speaker 1>So one quick question on this before we get to

0:19:51.960 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 1>what I know you want to talk about. And there's

0:19:54.840 --> 0:19:57.919
<v Speaker 1>not an Obamacare or a gay marriage every year, obviously,

0:19:58.320 --> 0:20:00.239
<v Speaker 1>but there's usually a big case we're waiting for. Or

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:03.159
<v Speaker 1>is it just like an anomaly that there's not a

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:06.360
<v Speaker 1>big case, or did this court decide to issue their

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>big ones rather than wait till the last day in

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 1>a way that most courts don't.

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:14.720
<v Speaker 5>Well, the justices can release an opinion at any time,

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:17.480
<v Speaker 5>they usually hold the controversial one to the last day,

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 5>primarily because the dissenting justices want to write their disagreement

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 5>as thoroughly as possible, and so out as a courtesy,

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:28.880
<v Speaker 5>they hold off until everybody's comfortable. We like to joke

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:30.399
<v Speaker 5>that the reason they hold off is so that they

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:32.440
<v Speaker 5>can get out of town the July fourth holiday, when

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 5>they make everybody angry, but have been. There has been

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:39.120
<v Speaker 5>a number of kind of controversial decisions that have already

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 5>come out, and I think the reason why is because

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:44.359
<v Speaker 5>there are there We now have a more conservative court,

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:47.679
<v Speaker 5>there are fewer liberal justices, so there's fewer reasons to

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:50.520
<v Speaker 5>hold off and wait, you know, and so we're starting

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:52.879
<v Speaker 5>to see the cases get front loaded more into the summer.

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:55.680
<v Speaker 5>I mean, it's kind of inside baseball as to why

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 5>they do that, But I think the court is also

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 5>more interested to nowadays in culture issues. You see these

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 5>issues about you know, sex education in schools and whether

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:09.359
<v Speaker 5>parents have a constitutional right to withdraw their children from

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:12.600
<v Speaker 5>the schools that sort of issue, and less of the

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:15.679
<v Speaker 5>property rights oriented issues that we saw on previous terms.

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 5>But it's really hard to say, because then they can

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 5>take whatever path they want in deciding what cases to

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:22.639
<v Speaker 5>hear and how they decide.

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:25.680
<v Speaker 4>I find it curious that you, as a non sports

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 4>fan who does not use many sports metaphors, use use

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:32.920
<v Speaker 4>the sports metaphor that refers to getting far too into

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:33.919
<v Speaker 4>sports metaphors.

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, inside baseball.

0:21:38.680 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 5>Baseball is my one exception, Joe, I enjoy a baseball game.

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 5>The reason I'm okay with baseball is because when you

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:46.440
<v Speaker 5>go to a baseball game, nobody expects you to pay

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:48.919
<v Speaker 5>attention and so much time. You know.

0:21:49.080 --> 0:21:50.879
<v Speaker 1>I was funny, I was at a baseball game Friday

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:52.400
<v Speaker 1>night and I was thinking about I can see why

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:54.959
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't work for young people. It is kind of

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:57.399
<v Speaker 1>a you kind of sit around and talk and you

0:21:57.440 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 1>don't have to pay close attention. It's like listening to

0:21:59.880 --> 0:22:02.399
<v Speaker 1>all long jazz solo. You almost kind of have to

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:03.920
<v Speaker 1>tune out to get into it or what.

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 5>You and I being jazz fans, that's cool with it.

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I pay attention to every pitch and assess it

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 4>on a number of different metrics. So you're not holding

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:15.480
<v Speaker 4>your breath for any particular Supreme Court decision in the

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:16.119
<v Speaker 4>next few weeks.

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:19.400
<v Speaker 5>Well, no, not for the next few weeks, but there

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:22.200
<v Speaker 5>are a lot of interesting cases coming up. This tariff

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:26.640
<v Speaker 5>decision yesterday is really it's a fantastic win for freedom.

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:29.719
<v Speaker 5>Got to give congratulations to my friends at the Liberty

0:22:29.800 --> 0:22:32.359
<v Speaker 5>Justice Center in Illinois who brought this case and struck

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:36.159
<v Speaker 5>down these illegal, unconstitutional tariffs. It's a big win. But

0:22:36.200 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 5>that case is going to be appealed to the Court

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:40.640
<v Speaker 5>of Appeals next and then of course to the US

0:22:40.680 --> 0:22:43.200
<v Speaker 5>Supreme Court, so excited about.

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:46.000
<v Speaker 4>As you know, we're big around here, whether quote unquote

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:48.160
<v Speaker 4>our guy is an office or the other side's guy

0:22:48.320 --> 0:22:49.680
<v Speaker 4>or somebody nobody likes.

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Just limiting executive power is good anyway.

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:58.080
<v Speaker 4>Goldwater Institute doing some good stuff with protecting privacy, specifically

0:22:58.160 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 4>of donors.

0:22:58.800 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to tell us about that?

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:03.920
<v Speaker 5>So you know, there's these efforts that the progressives especially

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:08.199
<v Speaker 5>are pursuing to force people to list their names, addresses,

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 5>and telephone numbers and their employment information on a publicly

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:17.200
<v Speaker 5>accessible government list whenever they donate to a nonprofit organization

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:20.160
<v Speaker 5>like the gold Daughter Institute, for example, that's out there

0:23:20.320 --> 0:23:24.680
<v Speaker 5>making statements about politics or endorsing or opposing ballid initiatives.

0:23:25.080 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 5>And the progresses want to expose people's private information in

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 5>this way because they say, well, this will keep the

0:23:30.600 --> 0:23:33.680
<v Speaker 5>money out of politics, which is nonsense. I mean, as

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 5>long as the government can redistribute wealth, there's going to

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 5>be money in politics, because that's why people invest money

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 5>in positives. They want to get a profit from it.

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:44.240
<v Speaker 5>The only way to get money out of politics is

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:46.639
<v Speaker 5>to get the government out of the business of picking

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:49.200
<v Speaker 5>winners and losers in the marketplace and taking money from

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 5>some people and giving it to other people. But the

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:53.600
<v Speaker 5>progresses don't want to do that, so instead what they

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 5>want to do is name and shame anybody who supports

0:23:57.080 --> 0:24:00.199
<v Speaker 5>a cause that progresses don't like. And the result, of

0:24:00.240 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 5>course is harassment and intimidation and violence against people who

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 5>donate to nonprofits that are conservative and orientation primarily. And

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 5>there have been cases, the big one a few years

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 5>ago in the US Supreme Court called AFP versus Bonta,

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:19.360
<v Speaker 5>where California forced these nonprofits to turn over their private

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 5>IRS documents not redacted, and then posted them on their

0:24:23.680 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 5>Internet and distributed them. And once you put people's names

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:29.639
<v Speaker 5>and addresses out there, they are targeted for harassment and

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:31.000
<v Speaker 5>intimidation and violence.

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I was going to say that back in the day

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:36.439
<v Speaker 1>this would have been bad, but not nearly as in

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:39.919
<v Speaker 1>the Internet age, where wow, they can they can figure

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 1>out what caused Jenny and accounting uh donated money to

0:24:44.000 --> 0:24:46.400
<v Speaker 1>and and and and get that out there and people

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 1>can start you know, attacking or online or go and

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 1>buy our house or whatever. That's horrifying.

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:54.119
<v Speaker 5>Oh yeah, and you know Prop eight in California, the

0:24:54.160 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 5>single the same sex anti same sex marriage initiative. The

0:24:57.960 --> 0:25:00.520
<v Speaker 5>people who donated to that campaign had their names and

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 5>addresses posted on the Internet, and they were subjected to

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:07.400
<v Speaker 5>a campaign of intimidation and harassment, vandalism of their houses,

0:25:07.520 --> 0:25:10.479
<v Speaker 5>the damage to their churches. People who track down these

0:25:10.520 --> 0:25:14.200
<v Speaker 5>churches and knock their signs and statues over, and graffiti

0:25:14.240 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 5>on all these sorts of things. And that was years afterwards.

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 5>I mean, care information is out there, It's always out there.

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 5>So a cause that is today considered perfectly normal. Remember

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 5>President Obama himself right post the same second.

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 1>He and Hillary both ran on a marriage is between

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 1>a man and a woman. That wasn't that long aga.

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 5>So then twenty years later that becomes a politically anathema,

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:39.200
<v Speaker 5>politically incorrect, as bad as segregation, et cetera, et cetera. Right,

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 5>And so now people can track down who donated to

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:44.240
<v Speaker 5>that campaign and harass them and threaten them. This is

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 5>all intended to silence conservative voices, to stop them from

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 5>donating to causes they believe in. And then the progressives

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:53.480
<v Speaker 5>can go out there and say, see, we got money

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 5>out of politics because we get our way.

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:25:56.480 --> 0:25:58.960
<v Speaker 4>Just as a quick aside, you mentioned Rob Bonta the

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:01.480
<v Speaker 4>Attorney General of California. If I were to state that

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 4>I think he's a rotten human being who would willingly

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:05.920
<v Speaker 4>urinate on an original.

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Copy of the Constitution. What would your response be.

0:26:08.400 --> 0:26:11.479
<v Speaker 5>Tim, it's your First Amendment right to say that, Joe,

0:26:11.600 --> 0:26:17.280
<v Speaker 5>and and to donate to a cause that supports that position. Well,

0:26:17.320 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 5>what we're doing in Arizona. So Arizona passed on these

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 5>laws that says you have to put your name on

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:25.639
<v Speaker 5>a government list if you donate to a nonprofit. We

0:26:25.840 --> 0:26:27.919
<v Speaker 5>sued over this, and this case is now going to

0:26:27.960 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 5>the Arizona Supreme Court, which is going to hear the

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 5>case argued in September, arguing that this law violates the

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:39.439
<v Speaker 5>state constitutions protection protections for free speech and privacy. And

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 5>this is a new wrinkle because most of these cases

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:45.120
<v Speaker 5>have been argued under the federal First Amendment. People tend

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:49.359
<v Speaker 5>to forget that the state constitutions protect your freedom more

0:26:49.440 --> 0:26:52.440
<v Speaker 5>broadly than the federal Constitution does. So we're going to

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:55.400
<v Speaker 5>the Arizona Supreme Court to argue that ignore the federal law,

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:59.680
<v Speaker 5>this violates the state Constitution's free speech and privacy rights guaranteed.

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting that as a statement that you just made.

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 1>The state constitution protects you more than the federal constitution.

0:27:07.800 --> 0:27:10.440
<v Speaker 5>That's the whole reason for federalism is to ensure that

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:14.399
<v Speaker 5>the government can't deprive you of your federal Bill of

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 5>Rights protections. Of course, it can't go below that floor,

0:27:17.480 --> 0:27:19.960
<v Speaker 5>but it can provide a higher level of protection. And

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:23.960
<v Speaker 5>most state constitutions do. They have protections like the privacy.

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 5>We have a clause in the Arizona Constitution that protects

0:27:26.400 --> 0:27:30.159
<v Speaker 5>your private affairs against the government intruding on it. The

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 5>California Constitution has a privacy right in its Bill of Rights.

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:36.879
<v Speaker 5>So the state constitutions protect your rights more than the

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:39.640
<v Speaker 5>federal constitution does. And yet we always sit around talking

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 5>about the federal First Amendment, and lawyers often forget even

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:44.920
<v Speaker 5>to make these arguments in court. And that's one of

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:47.399
<v Speaker 5>our missions at the incident the Goaldwarnter Institute is to

0:27:47.440 --> 0:27:51.520
<v Speaker 5>try emphasize that the importance of state constitutional protections that

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 5>can often secure you against the federal government.

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Someday, I hope you and I can sit on the

0:27:57.320 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 1>bullet train from Palmdale to Gilroy and discuss these things.

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:07.200
<v Speaker 5>You know, it's so sad, It's so said California history

0:28:07.400 --> 0:28:10.879
<v Speaker 5>is if you read California, it's nothing but the taxpayer

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:14.159
<v Speaker 5>being screwed by the railroads in eighteen fifty, In the

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:18.000
<v Speaker 5>eighteen ninety and nineteen ten, it's the same story. And

0:28:18.040 --> 0:28:20.920
<v Speaker 5>here we are in the twenty twenties and California taxpayers

0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:24.200
<v Speaker 5>are being screwed by the railroads all over again, and

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:26.919
<v Speaker 5>this time it's the progressives who think it's a great idea.

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:30.399
<v Speaker 4>Tim Sanderfers, the vice president for legal affairs at the

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:33.280
<v Speaker 4>Goldwater Institute. Tim, as long as we're on the topic,

0:28:33.520 --> 0:28:39.800
<v Speaker 4>and you passed on my colorful rob Banta query, Jack

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:45.360
<v Speaker 4>and I have called the continuation of the horrific, mountainous

0:28:45.400 --> 0:28:48.800
<v Speaker 4>squandering of taxpayer dollars on the It'll never be a

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:53.760
<v Speaker 4>bullet train train the most egregious failure of democracy we

0:28:53.800 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 4>have ever seen. How is it, briefly, from what you've observed,

0:28:58.480 --> 0:29:01.480
<v Speaker 4>that the people of californ you have been unable to

0:29:01.640 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 4>stop this.

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Vampire.

0:29:05.480 --> 0:29:10.920
<v Speaker 5>Well, the complicated answer is what a phenomenon economists called

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 5>rent seeking, which is that when the government can take

0:29:13.480 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 5>a bunch of money from a large number of people

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:17.479
<v Speaker 5>and then give it to a small number of people,

0:29:17.960 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 5>the people who receive it. The small number of people

0:29:19.840 --> 0:29:22.520
<v Speaker 5>who get that money, they have a huge incentive to

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:25.840
<v Speaker 5>lobby the government for more. Whereas the average taxpayer they

0:29:25.840 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 5>only lose a dollar or two per year, it's not

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:30.680
<v Speaker 5>worth them to spend a lot of time rallying against

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:33.760
<v Speaker 5>what the government is doing. They call that concentrated benefits

0:29:33.840 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 5>and dispersed costs. And it creates this one way road

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:40.240
<v Speaker 5>sort of where the government is always going in the

0:29:40.240 --> 0:29:43.560
<v Speaker 5>direction of more and more wealthy distribution because there's all

0:29:43.560 --> 0:29:46.120
<v Speaker 5>this lobbying in favor of it from the few people

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:48.640
<v Speaker 5>who benefit from it, and there's not a lot of

0:29:48.680 --> 0:29:51.800
<v Speaker 5>lobbying against it by the people who suffer from it.

0:29:52.200 --> 0:29:55.479
<v Speaker 5>And that explains not just the bullet trained fiasco, but

0:29:55.800 --> 0:29:59.080
<v Speaker 5>all sorts of different regulatory welfare state system. You know,

0:29:59.480 --> 0:30:02.040
<v Speaker 5>my friend that my friend Josh Thompson at the Pacific

0:30:02.160 --> 0:30:04.840
<v Speaker 5>Legal Foundation. A few years ago, he calculated that it

0:30:04.880 --> 0:30:08.440
<v Speaker 5>would actually be cheaper to take every person in California,

0:30:08.480 --> 0:30:11.720
<v Speaker 5>buy them a plane ticket to Japan, fly them to Japan,

0:30:12.040 --> 0:30:14.240
<v Speaker 5>let them buy them a ticket on their bullet train,

0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:18.000
<v Speaker 5>and then fly them back. Then it would to complete

0:30:18.040 --> 0:30:20.480
<v Speaker 5>the California bullet Train. And that was ten years ago.

0:30:20.760 --> 0:30:22.440
<v Speaker 1>It's gotten worth oh by a lot.

0:30:23.680 --> 0:30:25.200
<v Speaker 5>Is pathetic. It's just so sad.

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Right, you could.

0:30:26.320 --> 0:30:28.120
<v Speaker 4>Probably get them a nice plate of sushi in a

0:30:28.160 --> 0:30:32.200
<v Speaker 4>sex spot while they're over there in Tokyo, Tim said

0:30:32.240 --> 0:30:34.080
<v Speaker 4>to her from the Goldwater Institute.

0:30:34.240 --> 0:30:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Tim always great, stay in touch.

0:30:35.960 --> 0:30:38.800
<v Speaker 4>Anytime you got something that's that's hot, call us, So

0:30:38.920 --> 0:30:40.040
<v Speaker 4>don't wait for us to call you.

0:30:40.800 --> 0:30:42.040
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely, thanks for having me back.

0:30:42.080 --> 0:30:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Guys, always pleasure. I can just picture Tim and I

0:30:45.480 --> 0:30:49.160
<v Speaker 1>whisked along at high speed on the bullet train from

0:30:49.160 --> 0:30:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Gilroy to Palmdale, discussing the Constitution.

0:30:53.320 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 4>It's a beautiful dream because we have and that's exactly

0:30:56.160 --> 0:30:57.280
<v Speaker 4>what it is, a dream.

0:30:57.040 --> 0:30:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Because we have an important appointment in Palmdale, but we

0:30:59.800 --> 0:31:04.560
<v Speaker 1>need to get back to Gilroy the same day. You

0:31:04.680 --> 0:31:07.080
<v Speaker 1>laugh to keep from crying. Huh, we've got more on

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the waist to hear.

0:31:10.880 --> 0:31:12.320
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for taking the money.

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong and.

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 6>Harvard professor was fired for making up data in research

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 6>on dishonesty. Doctor Francesca Gino says she's never been dishonest, adding.

0:31:32.520 --> 0:31:33.600
<v Speaker 1>She's only being.

0:31:33.400 --> 0:31:35.720
<v Speaker 6>Targeted because she's a black male.

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh, she must have had a picture of her there.

0:31:40.440 --> 0:31:42.920
<v Speaker 1>She is a white female yes, yes, that's true. And

0:31:42.960 --> 0:31:45.400
<v Speaker 1>as we mentioned earlier, it is revealed that she made

0:31:45.640 --> 0:31:51.720
<v Speaker 1>a million dollars a year, fifth highest paid person in Harvard. Wow.

0:31:51.880 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 1>And in her dishonesty studies she was cheating. Well, she's

0:31:57.120 --> 0:32:00.480
<v Speaker 1>an expert in the field. That's true, that's true, exactly

0:32:00.840 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 1>what expect. So I wish I didn't have to be

0:32:06.120 --> 0:32:08.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't have to be vague about this, but it'd

0:32:08.480 --> 0:32:11.320
<v Speaker 1>be kind to be vague because it would be better

0:32:11.360 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 1>for the story and easier to understand. But and you

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:17.520
<v Speaker 1>can probably guess if you've been listening for a long time,

0:32:17.560 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 1>but two people in my orbit, very close orbit, have

0:32:23.520 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 1>had panic attacks in the last couple of weeks. And

0:32:26.880 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 1>did you know much about panic have you? Is anybody

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:32.840
<v Speaker 1>like close to you ever had a panic attack? Yeah?

0:32:33.240 --> 0:32:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I've only known a few people in my life. It's

0:32:38.280 --> 0:32:41.560
<v Speaker 1>very helpful to me though, that the first person I

0:32:41.640 --> 0:32:43.840
<v Speaker 1>ever knew that had a panic attack, that dealt with

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:48.600
<v Speaker 1>panic attacks was a really big, really tough guy, because

0:32:48.600 --> 0:32:50.960
<v Speaker 1>otherwise I would have a certain view of panic attacks.

0:32:51.080 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 1>I know I would, because I know my personality that

0:32:53.880 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 1>it is for, you know, a certain type of personality,

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and he was he was not that guy at all.

0:32:58.320 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean he was a college football player, tough guy,

0:33:02.880 --> 0:33:08.760
<v Speaker 1>bar fight guy. I mean, he was absolutely not the

0:33:08.800 --> 0:33:10.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of guy. And he just started having him in

0:33:10.680 --> 0:33:12.680
<v Speaker 1>his twenties and had no idea why and had to

0:33:12.680 --> 0:33:14.520
<v Speaker 1>do a bunch of research on it and everything like that,

0:33:15.040 --> 0:33:19.800
<v Speaker 1>and how horrible they were. So but man, I've never

0:33:19.840 --> 0:33:21.800
<v Speaker 1>had one. I've never come close to having one. I

0:33:21.800 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 1>don't think I'm capable of one. I think there must

0:33:24.240 --> 0:33:26.480
<v Speaker 1>be something in your brain, chemistry, your body chemistry, or

0:33:26.480 --> 0:33:29.160
<v Speaker 1>something that allows it to happen for some people and

0:33:29.200 --> 0:33:31.640
<v Speaker 1>not others. It doesn't seem to be even according to

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the people I know who've had panic attacks, it doesn't

0:33:34.240 --> 0:33:41.480
<v Speaker 1>seem to be situational. It happens. It can happen out

0:33:41.560 --> 0:33:46.000
<v Speaker 1>of nowhere. It's not like you just got the news

0:33:46.080 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 1>that your car's being repossessed or you know something that

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:51.720
<v Speaker 1>sets it off. It's more, at least in the cases

0:33:51.720 --> 0:33:53.560
<v Speaker 1>that I know, maybe you have a different story. It

0:33:54.080 --> 0:33:59.239
<v Speaker 1>just can come out of nowhere. Yeah, my experience with

0:33:59.280 --> 0:34:03.200
<v Speaker 1>it by proxy, he's a little different. But really, yeah,

0:34:04.280 --> 0:34:06.360
<v Speaker 1>if you know anything, but like, what what what have

0:34:06.440 --> 0:34:09.080
<v Speaker 1>you done that has worked for you? Text Line four

0:34:09.200 --> 0:34:12.920
<v Speaker 1>one five two nine five KFTC. Well four one five

0:34:12.960 --> 0:34:15.239
<v Speaker 1>two nine five KFTC. One person I know went to

0:34:15.320 --> 0:34:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the hospital because they thought they were dying, which is

0:34:18.440 --> 0:34:20.120
<v Speaker 1>what it feels like when you have a panic attack,

0:34:20.640 --> 0:34:22.239
<v Speaker 1>is uh. They give you lots of better drill. That's

0:34:22.239 --> 0:34:23.960
<v Speaker 1>about all they do, and you wait for it to pass.

0:34:24.000 --> 0:34:28.240
<v Speaker 1>And there's not a particular at least in the cases

0:34:28.280 --> 0:34:31.080
<v Speaker 1>that I know of, personally, not a particular like remedy

0:34:31.440 --> 0:34:33.000
<v Speaker 1>for how to not have it again. So you get

0:34:33.040 --> 0:34:34.520
<v Speaker 1>to live for the rest of your life kind of

0:34:34.560 --> 0:34:36.200
<v Speaker 1>like a heart attack. You get to live for the

0:34:36.239 --> 0:34:37.759
<v Speaker 1>rest of your life wondering if one's going to come

0:34:37.800 --> 0:34:39.520
<v Speaker 1>out of nowhere again, which sounds awful.

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:43.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I know there are coping mechanisms that you can

0:34:43.360 --> 0:34:44.600
<v Speaker 4>uh and awareness.

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Awareness helps a lot.

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:49.920
<v Speaker 4>If you can name precisely what's going on and understand

0:34:49.960 --> 0:34:53.920
<v Speaker 4>it on a more scientific level, it makes it harder

0:34:53.920 --> 0:34:55.120
<v Speaker 4>to get overwhelmed by it.

0:34:55.560 --> 0:34:58.480
<v Speaker 1>So I'm told, well, if you feel like you can't breathe,

0:34:58.719 --> 0:35:03.239
<v Speaker 1>that's got to be bad for minutes. Thinking you're going

0:35:03.280 --> 0:35:06.440
<v Speaker 1>to suffocate to death and die for minutes sounds really horrible.

0:35:06.440 --> 0:35:09.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad I don't have them and have never had one. Yeah, Yeah,

0:35:09.320 --> 0:35:13.319
<v Speaker 1>I agreed, And I don't know if one out of

0:35:13.320 --> 0:35:16.640
<v Speaker 1>a thousand people have panic attacks or one out of ten.

0:35:16.760 --> 0:35:18.759
<v Speaker 1>I don't really have any idea on that. Maybe now

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:20.759
<v Speaker 1>at this point I should start looking into it, since

0:35:20.760 --> 0:35:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I've had no clue. Two people in my tight circle

0:35:23.360 --> 0:35:24.480
<v Speaker 1>have one recently.

0:35:25.320 --> 0:35:30.319
<v Speaker 4>Next Hour a gender bending Madness update The Madness. It's

0:35:30.320 --> 0:35:32.279
<v Speaker 4>still on the March. If you can't stick around or

0:35:32.280 --> 0:35:34.080
<v Speaker 4>you don't get Next Hour, grab it via a podcast.

0:35:34.120 --> 0:35:41.640
<v Speaker 4>Subscribe Armstrong and Getty on demand Armstrong and Getty