WEBVTT - The Unsettling Depths of Bird Intelligence

0:00:03.080 --> 0:00:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind from how Stop

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Work dot com. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick. And

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Robert I want to ask you to go with them

0:00:20.160 --> 0:00:23.119
<v Speaker 1>on a mental durance to the pats. Let's do it, okay.

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>So I want to ask you to think about the

0:00:25.000 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 1>evolution of technological civilization in terms of the human hand. Okay,

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 1>well that is the not the only model we have

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:37.319
<v Speaker 1>for the evolution of technologically advanced civilization. Yeah, so I'm

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 1>totally down with it. Think about tool using intelligence, right, Yeah.

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:44.640
<v Speaker 1>So the earliest tools used by primates are primate ancestors

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:48.560
<v Speaker 1>that the apes we call our cousins. They're all things

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:51.479
<v Speaker 1>that can be manipulated by the fingers. You had, the

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 1>hand axes. I'm sure you've seen these things there, these

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 1>carved down stones, and there are different theories about what

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 1>exactly they were used for. Were they for process and carcasses,

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 1>where they for throwing it prey or some combination, you know,

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:07.400
<v Speaker 1>where they just merely useless status items. But they were

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:10.399
<v Speaker 1>these chipped stone tools used in the hand. And then

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:13.960
<v Speaker 1>of course we had handheld and thrown weapons, handheld tools

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:17.679
<v Speaker 1>for processing the carcasses of prey, like a stone cleavers,

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and then later on you had tools for cooking and

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 1>tools for farming, and all just kind of a spiral

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:29.760
<v Speaker 1>staircase of technology revolving around the solid core of the

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>shape of the human hand. Everything was based on the

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 1>assumption of thumbs, palms, fingers, even if you look at

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the beginnings of human culture, like if we go to

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the oldest examples of art, we know cave paintings show

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:45.679
<v Speaker 1>the use of handprints, pigments applied to cave walls by hand.

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>And then I don't know if you've ever seen this,

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 1>but finger fluting, where it's not painting, but where Stone

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>age artists would make patterns and cave walls and what

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 1>used to be soft cave walls by dragging their fingers

0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 1>through the soft surfaces which lay or hardened. And then,

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>of course some of the oldest known musical instruments appear

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 1>to be Paleolithic flutes made out of the bones of

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>bears or vultures. So you get a bare bone, you

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 1>bore some holes in it, and you could make a flute.

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 1>And of course what do you do with those holes?

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 1>You cover them with a fingertip to change the pitch

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:20.080
<v Speaker 1>of the note you're producing with the flute. So when

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:22.359
<v Speaker 1>you consider all this and then of course coming all

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:24.680
<v Speaker 1>all the way up to our our steering wheels and

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:27.919
<v Speaker 1>our gaming console controllers and every other thing you hold

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:31.680
<v Speaker 1>in your fingertips today, it's almost impossible to imagine the

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 1>evolution of a technological civilization and advanced intelligent culture without hands. Uh.

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I think some would say that it was

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:45.239
<v Speaker 1>our primate hands that made this trajectory possible for our species,

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Like it was only the fact that humans went by

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 1>peedle and started having free hands to work with that

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 1>encouraged the development in the brain the powerhouses for tool

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>use and innovation that made us who we are today.

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:01.680
<v Speaker 1>But I want to think about what if evolution had

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:05.520
<v Speaker 1>gone a different way? Ah, So what you have another

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 1>form of life on the planet managed to ascend that

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:12.639
<v Speaker 1>staircase we've mentioned earlier. What kind of the tools would

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 1>they have used? How would they have used them? Yeah,

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and that's stairs, So their spiral staircase might not have

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:20.640
<v Speaker 1>had hands. What if there was an advanced technological species

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 1>on Earth, but not one that evolved from primates, and

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 1>not even one that evolved from mammals. Is it possible

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 1>to imagine a technological civilization built by the cousins of

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>birds in the same way we have one now built

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 1>by the cousins of apes. Um like where you've got

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 1>highly intelligent cousins of pigeons conducting science and business and

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 1>art and education in these huge technological monstrosities of cities,

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 1>while you've got monkeys scampering around in flocks throughout the

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>city surfaces, pecking around for crumbs. And every now and

0:03:57.240 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>then you'd have a highly intelligent bird creature go out

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>on a slunch break and feed the monkeys some some breadcrumbs,

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 1>or feed on the monkeys. Could be because yeah, because

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 1>this is it's especially interesting when you when you when

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>you when you look back, say about fifty million years

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 1>uh to the to the early EO c. N Epoch,

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 1>and you'll find that this is the only time in

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:22.159
<v Speaker 1>history when birds ruled the world. They permeated most of

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the key positions on the food chain with a large

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 1>flightless terror birds stalking the land terror birds, terrib birds, massive, yeah,

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 1>top predator, just terrifying land birds. But I can imagine

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>something like what if something like that had been the

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 1>species that really took off, and maybe that was what

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 1>would live in these cities and eat the monkeys. But

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>but as for just birds in general, you know, why

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 1>not why not the birds? Because birds are builders, They

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:52.840
<v Speaker 1>build nests, they put them together, their tool users, as

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:56.919
<v Speaker 1>will discuss, they exhibit social behavior, trickery, in some cases

0:04:56.960 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 1>startlingly complex social behavior. So you know, I can imagine

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 1>on that end of things, I can imagine the bird

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:08.600
<v Speaker 1>brain being completely capable of ascending, uh, in terms of

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:11.720
<v Speaker 1>manipulating objects. Will certainly get more to the details in

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 1>a bit, but I instantly think of some of the

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:19.919
<v Speaker 1>controls that we see, uh for disabled individuals who do

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 1>not have the use of their hands, where they use

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>like a straw to to control the movements of say

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 1>a wheelchair. Yeah, I can imagine technology like that being

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 1>utilized by some sort of highly evolved bird creature, and

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 1>with the kind of intelligence that a highly advanced technological

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:40.280
<v Speaker 1>civilization would have. I wouldn't say that something like that

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:44.479
<v Speaker 1>is necessarily impossible. Uh. In fact, today I think we

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 1>want to make the case for why it's not completely

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:54.279
<v Speaker 1>insane to imagine a technological culture in a hypothetical alternate universe.

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Built around the core of wings, beaks, and claws instead

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 1>of fingers and thumbs and palms. Yeah, I don't think

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 1>it's even a little bit insane. That's what it is. However,

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:08.359
<v Speaker 1>is it's a little more alien than even most of

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 1>our science fiction dreamers want to want to want to

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:15.240
<v Speaker 1>play with. You know, we tend we're talking about this earlier.

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Even when you think of of alien species and science

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:22.280
<v Speaker 1>fiction that are avian, they're almost always the same sort

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:25.360
<v Speaker 1>of bird human hybrids that we've been dreaming about since

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 1>they know, since you know, Babylonian days. Yeah. Uh so

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 1>I should say at the beginning that this episode was

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:34.599
<v Speaker 1>inspired when I saw a recently published paper. And this

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 1>paper was called Cognition Without Cortex, and it was a

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:42.040
<v Speaker 1>review of recent findings on avian cognition and neuro anatomy,

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of collecting all of the literature of recent decades

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:49.280
<v Speaker 1>looking into how smart exactly are birds, what kind of

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:53.360
<v Speaker 1>cognitive traits and thinking to the exhibit and what are

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:56.039
<v Speaker 1>we learning, uh, what are we learning about how a

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 1>bird's brain works and how that compares to the mammalian brain.

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:03.160
<v Speaker 1>And and so this paper was written by owner Gunterkun

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 1>and Thomas Bugnier, and it was in Trends and Cognitive Sciences,

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 1>published on March on. Well you know this, Uh, this

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 1>raises the question of Joe, what is your attitude towards birds?

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 1>What is your experience with the perception of bird intelligence? Well,

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I know exactly what it is, because I've always thought

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 1>that birds looked kind of dumb, and I have to

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 1>admit it. I'm sorry now, I'm sorry now that I've

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 1>read all this research. But I always looked at them

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and said, oh man, there's something just kind of like

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 1>an ancient emptiness in the eyes of a bird. And

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I was not alone in this. Because you may have

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 1>heard this before, but I want to share it with you.

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 1>A quote from the famous film director of Werner Hertzog

0:07:46.720 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>speaking about chickens. Yes, can you please do it in

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 1>his voice? No, I can't do the accent, but I'm

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 1>going to read his quote. Hertzog says about chickens, the

0:07:56.800 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>enormity if they're flat brain, the enormity of their stupidity

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>is just overwhelming. You have to do yourself a favor.

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 1>When you're out in the countryside and you see chickens,

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Try to look at chicken in the eye with great intensity,

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and the intensity of stupidity that is looking back at

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 1>you is just amazing. By the way, it's very easy

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:21.920
<v Speaker 1>to hypnotize the chicken. They're very prone to hypnosis, and

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 1>in one or two films I've actually shown that. Okay,

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 1>so he's talking about chickens here, and I have heard

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>from people who have raised chickens before. I think my

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:34.200
<v Speaker 1>my grandmother was very much in this boat that the

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 1>chickens are are stupid and in a pain to keep.

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>And but chickens are just one of many many species. Yes,

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 1>that's that's true. There are there are one subspecies there also,

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:51.080
<v Speaker 1>we should point out domesticated and there is often something

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 1>that we see in biology that happens to domesticated animals.

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Animals that have kind of a cushy life where they're

0:08:56.720 --> 0:08:59.960
<v Speaker 1>fed every day tend to not be quite so quick

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:03.960
<v Speaker 1>in the in the thinking department as their wild cousins.

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know if that explains how people feel

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 1>about chickens. Maybe chickens are a lot smarter than we

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>give them credit for. But anyway, the conventional wisdom for

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 1>a long time has been in in sort of crude terms,

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 1>birds are dumb, birds are stupid because they do not

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 1>have the right kind of brain. Yeah, And I think

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of this boils down to just basic perception.

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Like my wife has often been kind of like freaked

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 1>out by birds, and the way she describes it is

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>that she grew up around dogs. She grew up around horses,

0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 1>and she says that those animals are easier to read.

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 1>You can you can you can get a better idea

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 1>about what a dog is going to do. You can

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:42.679
<v Speaker 1>tell if a dog is aggravated, excited, what have you?

0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:45.319
<v Speaker 1>A horse the same way. They are all these different

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:48.439
<v Speaker 1>cues that we can pick up on and really communicate

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 1>facially with them. It's more difficult to do with a bird.

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 1>And certainly the bird I can just seem like a

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 1>glassy um, you know, a cavern of nothingness. I think

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 1>of what Quint says in Jaws, the shark side. It's

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 1>like a doll's eyes. Yeah, yeah, very much. Though you

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:09.439
<v Speaker 1>get that kind of glassy dolls, I uh impression from them.

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I go to the zoo a lot

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:14.320
<v Speaker 1>with my my son, and there are a lot of

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:16.440
<v Speaker 1>birds there, and some of them, in particular, like the

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 1>ground hornbill that they have there. I'm just always startled

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 1>by how intelligent they seem to be, and that I am.

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I am observing them, but they seem to be observing

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:31.320
<v Speaker 1>me almost on equal footing. So in in in that area,

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I have to disagree with the perceived stupidity of the bird.

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Just talking about perceptions here at this point, But I

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:39.720
<v Speaker 1>think I would have to say that that your wife's

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:43.079
<v Speaker 1>intuition about the sort of disconnectedness of the bird. The

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:47.319
<v Speaker 1>space between you does make sense from a biological perspective,

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:52.920
<v Speaker 1>because there is a biological gap between humans and birds

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 1>much larger than our gap, the gap between humans and

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 1>other mammals. So the gap between humans and dogs is

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 1>you're still both mammals. You have a much more recent

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:08.439
<v Speaker 1>common ancestor. The gap between primates like us and birds

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:12.440
<v Speaker 1>is ancient. There are last common ancestor with birds is

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 1>believed to exist. It to have existed about three hundred

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>million years ago. We have not been related to birds

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>since before the dinosaurs, way before the dinosaurs. It goes

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:30.320
<v Speaker 1>back way back. These are these are just extremely different

0:11:30.480 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 1>branches of the tree of life on Earth, and so

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:35.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it makes sense to look on a vian

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 1>creatures with the with the kind of hesitance. So there

0:11:38.840 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 1>there there's an alien quality to it that's much like

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the quality of a reptile or a fish. They're just

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 1>not much like us. Yeah, there's a definite alien quality

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 1>to them. But I mentioned the conventional wisdom was that

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 1>when people used to think all birds were really stupid,

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:57.360
<v Speaker 1>they thought that they were stupid because of how their

0:11:57.400 --> 0:12:01.719
<v Speaker 1>brains were built. So where does human intelligence come from? What?

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Why are mammals smart? Typically people look at the cortex.

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:09.720
<v Speaker 1>The mammalian prefrontal cortex appears to be the seat of

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:13.319
<v Speaker 1>executive functions. So all the thinking you do that involves

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:17.760
<v Speaker 1>conscious control of thought, like using working memory and constituting

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the planning and execution of actions. That that that's cortex stuff.

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:24.959
<v Speaker 1>And so the old line of the of the neuroscientist

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:27.679
<v Speaker 1>or the nero anatomist was sort of that I can

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 1>look at your brain, and by looking at your brain,

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:32.319
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you how you're thinking works, how your

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:35.560
<v Speaker 1>cognition works. And if you don't have a cortex, you

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:38.599
<v Speaker 1>just don't have much cognition going on. I watched a

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 1>presentation by Owner Gunderkun, and he called attention to the

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:46.320
<v Speaker 1>work of the German neuro anatomist Ludwig Eddinger who lived

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 1>eighteen fifty five to nineteen eighteen, and he said that

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Eddinger was the leading comparative neuro anatomist of his time.

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:56.720
<v Speaker 1>UH and his project was sort of to understand the

0:12:56.720 --> 0:13:00.200
<v Speaker 1>evolution of the brain invertebrates. Vertebrates all creatures to have

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 1>a backbone. UM, so birds and mammals both vertebrates. Where

0:13:04.240 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>where do the differences in brain evolution come along? And

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Eddinger's theory was, first you got fish, and fish basically

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:12.559
<v Speaker 1>just have a spinal cord with a little you've got

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:14.440
<v Speaker 1>some brain stem on the end. Their fish don't have

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:17.480
<v Speaker 1>much going on brain wise. And then after that you

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:21.200
<v Speaker 1>had amphibians and and so they've got a part of

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:24.319
<v Speaker 1>the basal ganglia that's sort of a little bit extending

0:13:24.360 --> 0:13:27.559
<v Speaker 1>what the brains are capable of. And then you've got

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 1>reptiles and this adds more to the basal ganglia second

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:34.679
<v Speaker 1>component of it, and you've you've got slightly upgraded cognitive skills.

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 1>And then after reptiles, you've got the fourth thing, which

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 1>is birds. And then birds have uh, they sort of

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 1>developed the basal ganglia improve the skills more. And then

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 1>finally with mammals, you get the cerebral cortex, which gives

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:53.720
<v Speaker 1>them this unprecedented thinking power, intelligence, cognition, flexibility, the ability

0:13:53.760 --> 0:13:56.840
<v Speaker 1>to use their brains to adapt intelligence to all kinds

0:13:56.880 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 1>of different scenarios. And so, according to Edinger, you should

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 1>look at a monkey and you should see cognition. It's

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:07.319
<v Speaker 1>behaviors that come out of thinking. It's not all just instinct.

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:11.079
<v Speaker 1>It's weakly determined by the genes. But meanwhile, you should

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:13.440
<v Speaker 1>look at a bird, like a pigeon, that doesn't have

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:16.680
<v Speaker 1>a cortex, and it should have a little bit of intelligence,

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 1>but it's going to be a just instinct, you know,

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:25.960
<v Speaker 1>gene determined behaviors. Is that true? Well, on one hand,

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 1>this gets into the whole idea of the sort of

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 1>the ice cream scoop model of of neurophysiology, right, that

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 1>humans have the most scoops of brain ice cream and

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 1>therefore have the most powerful brains. But then also our

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 1>our understanding of how these brains are working has evolved

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 1>somewhat over the years too, and we've been forced to

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of think think outside of the of our own

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 1>uh uh, you know, anthropomorphic bias in terms of what

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>constitutes intelligence. Yeah, And of course We've conducted plenty of

0:14:57.080 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 1>experiments on top of that to really get down for

0:14:59.800 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 1>its to take apart intelligence, even human intelligence divided into

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 1>components that can then be tested for in other species. Yeah,

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and I think what we're learning in recent years, over

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 1>many experiments is not just like one experiment has changed

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the way we're thinking about this. There there are so

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 1>many more experiments than we could even talk about in

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 1>this episode and out on many of these areas. Right,

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>But there's so much new research showing that bird intelligence,

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 1>bird cognition seems to go far beyond what was previously assumed.

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 1>That this old theory of the determination of cognition by

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the by the structure of the brain does seem to

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 1>be flawed. It seems to be that this is not

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>correct anymore because it was based on a false premise.

0:15:46.160 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Birds are much smarter than we thought, and some cultural

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 1>traditions seem to have actually long associated birds like like corvids,

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:57.360
<v Speaker 1>which include crows with higher brain function. I know we

0:15:57.440 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 1>came across this, uh this great north Smith right, Oh yeah,

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Hohogan and moon in those are Odin's ravens, Yeah, companions.

0:16:05.480 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 1>He also had some of some lupine companions Gary and

0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>freki Um. But the interesting thing about to sound like

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>fraggle names. They do kind of the interesting thing about

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Whogan and Moon, and I also think of and maybe

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:19.320
<v Speaker 1>they were, but Whogan and moon and also sound like

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:23.440
<v Speaker 1>they should be like the the host characters in like

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>an old horror comic. You know, they should be chatting

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 1>with each other. Maybe i'm directly maybe they were. I

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Someone will have to fill me in on that.

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:35.360
<v Speaker 1>But they not only are they Odin's companions, they are

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 1>a part of him. They are his thoughts and memories, respectively.

0:16:39.560 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 1>And so some argue that Moonen is actually desire rather

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 1>than memory. But essentially the idea, here's that Hohoganum who

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 1>can represents the thoughts of Odin Moon and represents the memories. Man,

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 1>that's too cool, because they're they're embodied cognition, right yeah, yeah,

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 1>And uh, here's a little little bit of old Norse,

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 1>uh that has been a translated that tells you a

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:03.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit about Hoogan and Moon. And this is a

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:06.320
<v Speaker 1>parent This is supposed to be from Odin himself, who

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:08.800
<v Speaker 1>can and moon and fly every day over the world.

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:11.879
<v Speaker 1>I worry for Hohogan that he might not return, But

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I worry more from moon in oh, well that if

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:18.440
<v Speaker 1>you interpret moon into mean memory, and it's uh, that's

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:21.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of a bittersweet fact about the loss of memories

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 1>into time. Yeah, that these are just they're they're birds

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 1>that are out there in the world and hey, one

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 1>day one or both of them may not come back.

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 1>And and it's interesting too. I don't want to go

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 1>too far down the rabbit hole, but you apparently don't

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:37.879
<v Speaker 1>see animals playing a huge role in Old English Norse

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 1>heroic literature, except in the case of certain carrion animals,

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:44.879
<v Speaker 1>the beasts of battle, like the wolf which we mentioned earlier,

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Gary Frekie, the eagle, the raven. Uh. So it's interesting

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:50.679
<v Speaker 1>to think about these are the animals that fed on

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the battlefield dead, and therefore they have some sort of

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:57.359
<v Speaker 1>privileged status symbolically. That's weird. One might think that that

0:17:57.400 --> 0:18:00.440
<v Speaker 1>would make them taboo or something like that, but instead

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:04.879
<v Speaker 1>that elevates them to the being, uh the stuff of myth. Yeah,

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:07.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean it. You certainly we see we see some

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:09.680
<v Speaker 1>of that in other cultures, but yeah, I haven't looked

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 1>into it as much in terms in terms of Western culture, because,

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:16.920
<v Speaker 1>for instance, the vultures have elevated status uh in Tibetan

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 1>mythology because they're closer to the sky and they are

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:24.880
<v Speaker 1>involved in the rights of death. But the iberials right, well,

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it's time to actually look at some of

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:31.160
<v Speaker 1>these studies of of avian cognition, of exactly what bird

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>brains are capable of in practice, and the to summarize

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:38.359
<v Speaker 1>recent discoveries. We'll get into the details in a moment,

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 1>but basically what we have found, what scientists have found

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 1>is that some birds like parrots uh, and that that

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 1>would mean birds of the order Sa Taciforms that include

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 1>true parrots, cockatoos, and New Zealand parrots uh. And then

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:55.399
<v Speaker 1>also Corvid's which are birds of the family corvid A,

0:18:55.520 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 1>and that would include crows, ravens, rooks, magpies, cuffs, jay's,

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and nutcrackers. These bird groups display cognition on par with primates,

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 1>which means primates of course being the order containing monkeys

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 1>and apes like us, so on par with primates seriously,

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 1>and just just allow us to demonstrate with a selection

0:19:21.440 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 1>of findings what we are talking about is mental time travel. Yes,

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:28.679
<v Speaker 1>also known as chronosthesia. If you want to be fancy

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:31.680
<v Speaker 1>about it now that this is sort of it's something

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:34.080
<v Speaker 1>that you take for granted. It comes very easy to

0:19:34.520 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 1>advance primates like humans. But it's just being able to

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:41.720
<v Speaker 1>travel back and forth along a mental timeline. Yeah, it's

0:19:41.720 --> 0:19:45.199
<v Speaker 1>the ability to entertain alternate future scenarios, you know. You

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 1>that's how a creature ways option A versus option B.

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 1>It's how you're able to remember past events and anticipate

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:54.320
<v Speaker 1>and plan for future events. And that ability is core

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>to so much of human experience, you know, our ability

0:19:56.880 --> 0:20:00.359
<v Speaker 1>to or our our flaw and being able to just

0:20:00.840 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 1>regret the past, worry over the future, the entire wheel

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:07.040
<v Speaker 1>of suffering. It's a very human thing, it's yeah, And

0:20:07.080 --> 0:20:09.680
<v Speaker 1>it seems very easy to assume that because you look

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 1>at the behavior of most animals and they really do

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:14.359
<v Speaker 1>seem to live in the present moment, that they don't

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:19.160
<v Speaker 1>seem to be able to consider a hypothetical unless we're

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:21.400
<v Speaker 1>projecting it on them. Okay, so, especially in the case

0:20:21.480 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 1>of our pets. Um. But yeah, so is it president animals.

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:29.840
<v Speaker 1>It kind of depends on who you ask. Some say no,

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:32.439
<v Speaker 1>not at all, even some scientists. It's not just like

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:34.760
<v Speaker 1>a popular no no. If you just ask people. I

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:36.879
<v Speaker 1>have a feeling they're going to Yeah, they're gonna be.

0:20:36.880 --> 0:20:39.959
<v Speaker 1>It's you're gonna get into projection concerning the animals that

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:42.119
<v Speaker 1>we think we we understand the most and that we

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:46.200
<v Speaker 1>can read more easily. But with with scientists. Yeah, it depends.

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:50.920
<v Speaker 1>A December two paper published in Neuroscience and Behavioral Reviews

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:55.639
<v Speaker 1>titled mental time travel an exclusively human capacity lets you

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:58.920
<v Speaker 1>know where they stand. Yeah, it argues exactly that that

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:02.479
<v Speaker 1>that quote. Some animals indeed appear to possess episodic memory.

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 1>There is, however, no evidence that they are able to construct, reflect,

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:10.919
<v Speaker 1>and compare different future scenarios like humans are okay, So

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 1>episodic memory that just means having sort of not ingrained

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:18.480
<v Speaker 1>how it always was or learned behaviors from the past,

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:21.959
<v Speaker 1>but being able to recall a specific instance, like if

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 1>you can remember what you had for lunch yesterday, that's

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:29.680
<v Speaker 1>an episodic memory. And some evidence shows that some animals

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 1>have this, but they're saying that they can't. They can't

0:21:33.000 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 1>project thoughts into the future, right, Like, it's one thing

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 1>to remember what's happened, but then can you anticipate future

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 1>events and plan around them? But not all scientists agree

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:45.359
<v Speaker 1>with this conclusion is right. Um. So, back in two

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:48.399
<v Speaker 1>thousands seven or so, Nicola Clayton of the University of

0:21:48.440 --> 0:21:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Cambridge argued that scrub jays, which is a spacies of

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:54.879
<v Speaker 1>large brain crow, exhibit mental time travel. And then in

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:59.399
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eleven there's an interesting study from Karina Logan

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:03.199
<v Speaker 1>of the Universe of Cambridge and Sean O'Donnell of the

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:06.440
<v Speaker 1>University of Washington, and they argue that this mental time

0:22:06.480 --> 0:22:10.399
<v Speaker 1>travel is demonstrated in certain tropical birds who engage in

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 1>bivouac that's temporary ant nest sites checking, bivouac checking. So

0:22:16.080 --> 0:22:19.880
<v Speaker 1>basically the idea here is that the ants, the ant

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 1>colonies are moving around. They have like a cyclical raid

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 1>cycle that they go through. They have patterns of activity exactly,

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:30.360
<v Speaker 1>and so the animals hunting them in this case the birds,

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 1>they have to figure out how to anticipate those movements.

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:35.959
<v Speaker 1>The birds keep track of where the ants are, they

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 1>remember their past movements, and according to the these researchers,

0:22:39.040 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 1>they're actually using that data to anticipate future movements of

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:45.359
<v Speaker 1>the ants so they'll know where to go to score

0:22:45.400 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 1>their meal. Okay, so mental time travel and birds. Uh,

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:51.160
<v Speaker 1>that seems to be a toss up some some scientists

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:54.400
<v Speaker 1>say yes, some say no, But either way it's an

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 1>interesting lead for for continuing research. But there's one area

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:02.639
<v Speaker 1>where we can see birds excelling in higher cognitive function,

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 1>where there is no doubt whatsoever, and that's in tool use.

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:09.639
<v Speaker 1>The birds are freakishly handy. That's right. There are a

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 1>number of examples of tool use and birds, some more

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:17.440
<v Speaker 1>complex than others. For instance, Egyptian vultures use stones as

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 1>tools to bust open Ostrojaggs's great. Yeah. There are also

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 1>that you have, like the brush turkey builds. This is

0:23:25.080 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>rather simple, builds a gigantic mount of soil and decaying

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:30.440
<v Speaker 1>vegetation to lay their eggs in. But then they'll kick

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the garbage and enemies to drive them away. Yeah. Wait

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 1>what are their enemies? Things like monitor lizards? Uh? Yeah

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:43.480
<v Speaker 1>what Yeah, so they're they're kicking garbage at monitor lizards. Yeah.

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:45.920
<v Speaker 1>It's like I said, this is very basic tool use,

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:49.639
<v Speaker 1>Like but yeah, kicking rubbish, you're still making a tool

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:53.320
<v Speaker 1>out of something in your environment trash soccer. Yeah. Now,

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 1>one of the more elaborate examples here, you have the

0:23:56.840 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 1>woodpecker finch, which is one of Darwin's finches from the

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Lafcas Islands. Tool It uses cactus spines or wooden splinters

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:08.119
<v Speaker 1>to dig grubs or other insects out of holes and wood. So,

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 1>in other words, it obtains its food in the same

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:13.480
<v Speaker 1>manner as a woodpecker, but it hasn't involved the necessary

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:16.720
<v Speaker 1>long tongue to scoop them out. So it goes it

0:24:16.800 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 1>breaks off something sharp to get in there, and it

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:21.440
<v Speaker 1>may even trimm the twig. And this is key because

0:24:21.440 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 1>there are other examples of animals that say, like use

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 1>a muscle shell fragment to hammer open another muscle, or

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 1>use a piece of bark to pry another piece of

0:24:30.080 --> 0:24:33.000
<v Speaker 1>bark off we've all engaged when we we haven't all.

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:35.639
<v Speaker 1>But if you've ever used part of a crab claw

0:24:35.920 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 1>to dig out crab meat, you've engaged in like this

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:41.920
<v Speaker 1>level of simple tool use, which shouldn't be discounted. I mean,

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 1>even that's impressive, that is still impressive, but it goes

0:24:44.800 --> 0:24:48.439
<v Speaker 1>beyond that, right because they are actually trimming the twig,

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:52.119
<v Speaker 1>these finches, these finches, they're trimming the twig. They're they're

0:24:52.160 --> 0:24:55.680
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing a tool, so they're they're going from what's called

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 1>a nature fact to an artifact. And nature fact is

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 1>finding something in the world and using it as is okay,

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:06.400
<v Speaker 1>but the artifact, you're transforming it into a tool. Yeah,

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 1>So that's sort of the difference between a rock and

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:11.560
<v Speaker 1>a hand axe. So if you've got an ancient ancient

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:14.679
<v Speaker 1>primate who has managed to hunt down and kill a

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:16.679
<v Speaker 1>piece of prey, a large animal, and it wants to

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:19.199
<v Speaker 1>process the carcass to get some meat off of it,

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:21.359
<v Speaker 1>it could just pick up a kind of flat rock

0:25:21.440 --> 0:25:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and use that for help. That would be a nature fact.

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Or it could chip down a rock until it's got

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 1>a sharper edge. That's an artifact exactly. And just to

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 1>put this, you know, and then a framework of human

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:35.919
<v Speaker 1>tool used their four levels of artifact fact tool use.

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:38.960
<v Speaker 1>There's reduction that's where you reduce the mass of functional

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:41.919
<v Speaker 1>of the functional form, so you're chewing the stick downs

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:44.359
<v Speaker 1>within the bark, et cetera. That's what we just talked.

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:46.840
<v Speaker 1>That's what we definitely see in birds. Uh. Then there's

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 1>level two conjunction that's combining two or more units to

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 1>make a tool. This is like a flint headed spear

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:55.879
<v Speaker 1>or a hafted axe. Uh. Number three is replication, that's conjunction,

0:25:56.040 --> 0:25:59.199
<v Speaker 1>but with two or more from similar units required, So

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:03.320
<v Speaker 1>a double long fishing spear trident. Yeah. And number four

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:06.639
<v Speaker 1>is linkage that's physically distinct objects in combination, like a

0:26:06.720 --> 0:26:09.119
<v Speaker 1>bow and arrow. Obviously we're not going to see a

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 1>bow and arrow with birds here today. Now, what a

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 1>sling count is linkage? Yes, I think it would. Yeah,

0:26:15.280 --> 0:26:17.440
<v Speaker 1>you have two distinct objects that are coming together to

0:26:17.520 --> 0:26:21.920
<v Speaker 1>make something, uh even even more powerful, you know. Yeah,

0:26:21.960 --> 0:26:23.760
<v Speaker 1>but some some of the tool use you see in

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:27.159
<v Speaker 1>birds is really the word I would use as disturbing.

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:29.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean to give it a negative quality, but

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:32.879
<v Speaker 1>it's kind it's unsettling when you see it. Yeah, I mean,

0:26:32.920 --> 0:26:36.119
<v Speaker 1>if you're talking disturbing, the shrikes have always inspired a

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:38.639
<v Speaker 1>certain amount of terror. These are the these little birds

0:26:38.840 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 1>impale the bodies of insects and small vertebrates on thorns.

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:44.840
<v Speaker 1>It partially for storage, but also just so they can

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 1>better strip them apart as they you know, decided to

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:50.399
<v Speaker 1>eat them. Oh so it's like a leather face putting

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 1>somebody on a hook. Yeah, exactly, it is. It's like

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:55.400
<v Speaker 1>sometimes they're called butcher birds for this very reason because

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 1>it's like putting them on a butcher's foot's messed up. Now,

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:02.320
<v Speaker 1>crow is in ravens. I'm sorry. Let let me let

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:05.360
<v Speaker 1>me take the judgment off of that. That's nature. Yes,

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:08.360
<v Speaker 1>that's nature. Um and and yes, so there's nothing wrong

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 1>with LETI face crows and ravens. Uh. This is where

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 1>we see some some wonderful tool uses where well, crows

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:17.680
<v Speaker 1>have demonstrated tool use and even the creation of artifacts.

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 1>They've been deserved to fashion tools from twigs to fish, beetle,

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:24.479
<v Speaker 1>larva out of logs, and in lab environments they've been

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:27.640
<v Speaker 1>observed to use one tool to make another tool. Now

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:30.679
<v Speaker 1>this is weird. Okay, this is not just using a

0:27:30.680 --> 0:27:34.200
<v Speaker 1>tool to get the thing they want, but crafting tools,

0:27:34.320 --> 0:27:37.200
<v Speaker 1>like using one tool to craft a second tool, which

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:41.000
<v Speaker 1>is like a whole other layer of abstract thought. Yeah. Indeed, uh,

0:27:41.040 --> 0:27:45.119
<v Speaker 1>specifically the crowing question and this one study bent the

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:47.840
<v Speaker 1>end of a wire using the edge of a glass,

0:27:48.320 --> 0:27:52.160
<v Speaker 1>then use the hooked wire to retrieve another stick which

0:27:52.240 --> 0:27:54.880
<v Speaker 1>was long enough to read some food that it wanted.

0:27:55.600 --> 0:27:58.399
<v Speaker 1>So those different steps there in tool use in cognition,

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:01.880
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty advanced. That seems like something some people wouldn't

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:04.200
<v Speaker 1>be able to figure out how to do Yeah, I

0:28:04.320 --> 0:28:07.159
<v Speaker 1>kind of imagine myself in the lab trying to do

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:10.680
<v Speaker 1>some problem solving puzzle and just that failing. Yeah. I mean,

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:12.680
<v Speaker 1>it's the kind kind of steps that you can imagine

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:14.919
<v Speaker 1>just an individual on the street going through if they

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 1>dropped their keys down a sewer grate and I see them,

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:19.520
<v Speaker 1>They're like, how am I gonna get that back? All right? Well,

0:28:19.560 --> 0:28:21.680
<v Speaker 1>what's around me? Is there a code hanger can get

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:23.199
<v Speaker 1>a hold of? Is there some other you know, when

0:28:23.240 --> 0:28:25.440
<v Speaker 1>we begin to go through these these sort of basic

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:28.440
<v Speaker 1>tool you steps to do something we we normally don't

0:28:28.440 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 1>have to engage in. But some of these steps really

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:36.879
<v Speaker 1>do involve very strange ideas of the abstract conditionals of

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:39.640
<v Speaker 1>how to manipulate your environment. Like one of the examples

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 1>would be displacement of water. This is something that's been

0:28:43.120 --> 0:28:47.120
<v Speaker 1>observed in those New Caledonian crows. New Caledonian crows have

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 1>been documented to Uh so You've got a tube and

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:52.640
<v Speaker 1>it's got some water in it, and floating on the

0:28:52.640 --> 0:28:55.080
<v Speaker 1>top of the water is a yummy piece of food

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 1>that the crow wants, but it's down in the tube

0:28:57.640 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 1>and it can't reach it. So the crows figure out

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:04.720
<v Speaker 1>to drop rocks or heavy objects into the water to

0:29:05.000 --> 0:29:07.480
<v Speaker 1>raise the water level to fish out the piece of

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 1>food it that that's again something that I wonder if

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I would think to do well. I mean, it reminds me,

0:29:14.680 --> 0:29:17.600
<v Speaker 1>of course of asobs fable of the crow in the picture,

0:29:17.680 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 1>like just goes right back to some of our oldest

0:29:19.840 --> 0:29:23.240
<v Speaker 1>tails in which the crow is thirsty and has to

0:29:23.320 --> 0:29:25.960
<v Speaker 1>drop pebbles into the picture to raise the water level

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:28.560
<v Speaker 1>enough to drink from it. Yea, So we've been observing

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:30.960
<v Speaker 1>this for for ages, I imagined, and in fact, I

0:29:30.960 --> 0:29:33.680
<v Speaker 1>think there was a study we came across just this

0:29:33.800 --> 0:29:36.560
<v Speaker 1>month that was looking at the evolution of the beak

0:29:36.600 --> 0:29:40.280
<v Speaker 1>of the New Caledonian crow, essentially saying it evolved for

0:29:40.320 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 1>tool use, right, Yeah, I should mention that they that

0:29:43.120 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 1>we've also observed the New Caledonia crows forming beetle hooks

0:29:47.000 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 1>from the barbed edges of wide leaves. And in fact,

0:29:50.160 --> 0:29:53.239
<v Speaker 1>uh these Cornell researchers in this recent study they use

0:29:53.320 --> 0:29:57.160
<v Speaker 1>shape analysis and h CT scanning to compare the shape

0:29:57.160 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 1>and structure of the New Caledonia crow's bill, and they

0:29:59.680 --> 0:30:03.040
<v Speaker 1>found the unique bill contributes to the bird's ability to

0:30:03.280 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 1>use and probably make tools specialized for tool manipulation. Okay,

0:30:08.080 --> 0:30:10.640
<v Speaker 1>so it's not just the brain, but the crow is

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:15.160
<v Speaker 1>so specialized for being a technological creature that it has

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 1>evolved other body parts to aid in the creation of technology.

0:30:19.520 --> 0:30:21.440
<v Speaker 1>And this is where it gets interesting because it brings

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 1>us back to our original, uh ponderings about the possibility

0:30:25.480 --> 0:30:29.760
<v Speaker 1>of avian evolution to a you know, technological state. Yeah.

0:30:29.800 --> 0:30:31.760
<v Speaker 1>It makes me think about if we were to really

0:30:31.800 --> 0:30:36.240
<v Speaker 1>commit to this speculation about if birds became the ascendant

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 1>intelligent species on a planet, what would their technology look like?

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:43.520
<v Speaker 1>And I wonder if instead of every object being shaped

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 1>around the human hand, if you'd have all these objects

0:30:45.920 --> 0:30:49.720
<v Speaker 1>shaped around these specialized types of beaks. What would that

0:30:49.760 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 1>look like? How would be how would they control their technology,

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:56.080
<v Speaker 1>how would they hold things? How would they control all

0:30:56.120 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 1>of the aspects of their environment with a beak? Yeah,

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 1>because you would sort of be talking thing about the

0:31:00.760 --> 0:31:04.920
<v Speaker 1>like the the end result of of you know, just

0:31:04.920 --> 0:31:09.280
<v Speaker 1>just ages and ages of stick manipulation by beak, Like

0:31:09.320 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 1>what is the like what's the optimal formata? It's so

0:31:11.480 --> 0:31:14.040
<v Speaker 1>different than what we have to work with in terms

0:31:14.080 --> 0:31:17.320
<v Speaker 1>of thinking about the human hand and tool us as

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:21.080
<v Speaker 1>humans appreciate it. There's another thing that some studies have

0:31:21.160 --> 0:31:24.400
<v Speaker 1>found birds can do that even some humans struggle with,

0:31:24.720 --> 0:31:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's a delay of gratification. So I'm sure you've

0:31:28.600 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 1>seen these studies before. Like a kid is given the

0:31:32.080 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to have they put a marshmallow in the marshmallow

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:40.640
<v Speaker 1>test and say, if you can resist eating this marshmallow

0:31:40.720 --> 0:31:44.040
<v Speaker 1>for five minutes, you'll get two marshmallows. You know, so

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:46.760
<v Speaker 1>you'll get more, you'll get a better reward if you

0:31:46.800 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 1>can just wait a little bit. Animals are not good

0:31:49.840 --> 0:31:52.960
<v Speaker 1>at this task. Animals are not good at practicing restraint.

0:31:53.040 --> 0:31:55.520
<v Speaker 1>They can't delay gratification. If you put food in front

0:31:55.560 --> 0:31:59.480
<v Speaker 1>of them, typically they're just gonna eat it um. But some,

0:31:59.600 --> 0:32:03.239
<v Speaker 1>in some cases animals can be trained not to do this,

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:08.120
<v Speaker 1>especially some higher function higher cognitive functioning animals like primates

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 1>and in some cases like birds. Uh So, there was

0:32:12.280 --> 0:32:15.400
<v Speaker 1>one paper I came across that talked about how goffin

0:32:15.560 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 1>cockatoos were. They were essentially able to wait up to

0:32:19.760 --> 0:32:25.200
<v Speaker 1>about eighty seconds for food of a preferred quality, but

0:32:25.400 --> 0:32:28.120
<v Speaker 1>less time for a higher quantity. And this was something

0:32:28.160 --> 0:32:30.600
<v Speaker 1>that was also found in a study I read about

0:32:30.680 --> 0:32:34.600
<v Speaker 1>corvids waiting for food. They can delay gratification for longer,

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:37.560
<v Speaker 1>or in some cases, they can only delay gratification at

0:32:37.600 --> 0:32:41.520
<v Speaker 1>all if they're anticipating getting a better piece of food,

0:32:41.600 --> 0:32:44.560
<v Speaker 1>but not if they're anticipating getting more food, which is

0:32:44.600 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 1>interesting to me, like they'll they'll pay up in waiting

0:32:47.680 --> 0:32:52.120
<v Speaker 1>time for quality, but not for quantity. Okay, it's it's weird.

0:32:52.160 --> 0:32:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Anytime I think about this scenario or any of these

0:32:55.280 --> 0:32:58.120
<v Speaker 1>scenarios involving crows eating, I just think of them like

0:32:58.600 --> 0:33:02.520
<v Speaker 1>picking at corpses, like a medieval setting. Yeah yeah, well,

0:33:02.520 --> 0:33:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean it makes you think, like, so, what's the

0:33:04.280 --> 0:33:08.440
<v Speaker 1>equivalent in the of the quality versus quantity fact in

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:10.920
<v Speaker 1>like the marsh marshmallow experiments, So it would be like

0:33:11.200 --> 0:33:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the kid has given a marshmallow, and then it's instead

0:33:14.080 --> 0:33:17.120
<v Speaker 1>of you'll get two marshmallows, you'll get I don't know

0:33:17.200 --> 0:33:21.080
<v Speaker 1>what's better than a marshmallow human eyeball, human eyeball. I

0:33:21.120 --> 0:33:23.880
<v Speaker 1>just assume that is the ultimate treat, chocolate covered eyeball,

0:33:24.000 --> 0:33:26.840
<v Speaker 1>no huge, a piece of chocolate cake or something like

0:33:26.880 --> 0:33:31.480
<v Speaker 1>a much improved object overall, And so crows no quality

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:35.120
<v Speaker 1>when they see it and so do cockatoos. It's time

0:33:35.160 --> 0:33:38.920
<v Speaker 1>to hold the mirror up to avian cognition because we're

0:33:38.960 --> 0:33:42.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk a little bit about mirror self recognition tests

0:33:42.480 --> 0:33:44.600
<v Speaker 1>n s R. This is one of the most interesting

0:33:44.800 --> 0:33:48.080
<v Speaker 1>of these examples to me because it deals with not

0:33:48.200 --> 0:33:51.880
<v Speaker 1>just thinking about how to solve a task, but something

0:33:51.880 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 1>that's a kind of a different issue, which is self awareness. Yeah,

0:33:55.840 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 1>and uh, and this is something we could easily do

0:33:57.840 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 1>an entire episode on the mirror tests. It's pretty interesting.

0:34:00.400 --> 0:34:02.400
<v Speaker 1>It's it's one of Yeah, it's one of the more

0:34:02.760 --> 0:34:06.240
<v Speaker 1>common consciousness tests that we roll out with other species.

0:34:06.640 --> 0:34:09.239
<v Speaker 1>And there's certainly some species that it it works better with.

0:34:09.400 --> 0:34:12.399
<v Speaker 1>There are other things like the octopus where uh, they're

0:34:12.440 --> 0:34:16.320
<v Speaker 1>often difficulties in trying to make this test applicable to

0:34:17.160 --> 0:34:21.080
<v Speaker 1>to those two members of that species. But essentially, when

0:34:21.080 --> 0:34:24.920
<v Speaker 1>presented with a mirrors reflection of themselves, how is the

0:34:24.920 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 1>creature going to respond? Is it going to respond as

0:34:26.719 --> 0:34:28.959
<v Speaker 1>if there's nothing there at all? Is Are they gonna

0:34:28.960 --> 0:34:31.440
<v Speaker 1>respond as if oh, there's another there's another dog, there's

0:34:31.480 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 1>another fish right there looking at me. I better react accordingly,

0:34:35.360 --> 0:34:38.120
<v Speaker 1>or are they going to recognize that that is themselves.

0:34:38.160 --> 0:34:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Are they gonna look in the mirror and see themselves

0:34:41.200 --> 0:34:43.239
<v Speaker 1>and know it to be themselves? Which is sort of

0:34:43.400 --> 0:34:47.759
<v Speaker 1>a holy grail of self recognition intelligence? Like, what a

0:34:47.800 --> 0:34:50.680
<v Speaker 1>what a strange thing to be encouraged by nature? Why

0:34:50.719 --> 0:34:53.960
<v Speaker 1>would nature select for the ability to be able to

0:34:54.000 --> 0:34:58.359
<v Speaker 1>recognize yourself in a reflective surface. I mean, it just

0:34:58.480 --> 0:35:02.120
<v Speaker 1>does seem like a very an inherently, very complex thing

0:35:02.400 --> 0:35:04.920
<v Speaker 1>for a brain to do. Yeah, I mean it ties

0:35:04.960 --> 0:35:09.800
<v Speaker 1>into your ability to to recognize your own place within

0:35:09.840 --> 0:35:13.120
<v Speaker 1>a scenario, within a social structure, and then it also

0:35:13.320 --> 0:35:16.080
<v Speaker 1>bleeds over into some other cognitive abilities we're going to

0:35:16.160 --> 0:35:19.560
<v Speaker 1>discuss in a bit concerning not only how we perceive ourselves,

0:35:19.600 --> 0:35:22.480
<v Speaker 1>but how we perceive others. Now, for those creatures that

0:35:22.560 --> 0:35:25.360
<v Speaker 1>do react with hostility when they see their own reflection

0:35:25.400 --> 0:35:28.319
<v Speaker 1>in the mirror, they may actually be onto something. Oh yeah,

0:35:28.360 --> 0:35:33.920
<v Speaker 1>if in fact you're Haluis Borges rainbow fish story is true. Uh,

0:35:34.160 --> 0:35:36.480
<v Speaker 1>if you're not familiar with this one, it has to

0:35:36.520 --> 0:35:39.400
<v Speaker 1>do with the fact that that everything you see in

0:35:39.440 --> 0:35:43.399
<v Speaker 1>the mirror, that the mirror people, the mirror creatures are

0:35:43.440 --> 0:35:46.200
<v Speaker 1>merely repeating our actions, and they look like they look

0:35:46.239 --> 0:35:49.480
<v Speaker 1>like us, and they go through this silly mimicry because

0:35:49.520 --> 0:35:51.600
<v Speaker 1>they lost a war ages ago, and part of the

0:35:51.640 --> 0:35:54.759
<v Speaker 1>truth is that they have to just mime everything we

0:35:54.840 --> 0:35:58.440
<v Speaker 1>do but that. But one day they will rebel against us,

0:35:58.640 --> 0:36:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and the first thing we'll see in the mirror is

0:36:01.000 --> 0:36:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the brilliant rainbow fish with you know, colors that we've

0:36:04.280 --> 0:36:07.080
<v Speaker 1>never seen in this world. That'll be the sign that

0:36:07.160 --> 0:36:09.840
<v Speaker 1>opes it's about it's about to go nuts here and

0:36:09.920 --> 0:36:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the mirror world is about to invade ours. So maybe

0:36:13.239 --> 0:36:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the creatures that that that how and bark at the mirror,

0:36:17.520 --> 0:36:20.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe they just know what's up. Well, I look forward

0:36:20.239 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 1>to that day of reckoning. Now, what animals that we

0:36:24.239 --> 0:36:27.440
<v Speaker 1>know of other than humans can actually pass the mirror tests?

0:36:27.440 --> 0:36:29.919
<v Speaker 1>Which which ones can look in a mirror and say, hey,

0:36:29.960 --> 0:36:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that's me all right? Well, as of aside from humans,

0:36:35.120 --> 0:36:38.600
<v Speaker 1>you have a certain great apes. You have apparently a

0:36:38.719 --> 0:36:45.160
<v Speaker 1>single Asian elephant, their dolphins, orcas, uh, the Eurasian magpie um,

0:36:45.360 --> 0:36:49.520
<v Speaker 1>a few species of ants interestingly enough. Yeah, and that's

0:36:49.520 --> 0:36:51.320
<v Speaker 1>something we'll have to explore that in a in a

0:36:51.400 --> 0:36:54.480
<v Speaker 1>later episode. But there there's an argument that ants can

0:36:54.480 --> 0:36:58.080
<v Speaker 1>pass the mirror tests. I have some questions about that. Yeah,

0:36:58.600 --> 0:37:04.160
<v Speaker 1>uh and as well as mc cash um. Yeah. And

0:37:04.200 --> 0:37:06.359
<v Speaker 1>so one example I've seen it. You might be wondering, well,

0:37:06.560 --> 0:37:10.080
<v Speaker 1>how can you test to see if an animal recognizes

0:37:10.120 --> 0:37:12.520
<v Speaker 1>itself in the mirror. One example that I saw that

0:37:12.640 --> 0:37:16.799
<v Speaker 1>was actually presented by Professor Gunterkune was an example where

0:37:16.800 --> 0:37:20.040
<v Speaker 1>they have a magpie looking in a mirror and there

0:37:20.120 --> 0:37:23.120
<v Speaker 1>is a sort of dot of colored dye on the

0:37:23.160 --> 0:37:26.200
<v Speaker 1>magpies feathers underneath the head where it wouldn't be able

0:37:26.200 --> 0:37:28.520
<v Speaker 1>to see on itself, but it could see in a mirror.

0:37:28.840 --> 0:37:30.600
<v Speaker 1>And they try it with a couple of colors of dies.

0:37:30.680 --> 0:37:33.200
<v Speaker 1>One is a black colored dye that just matches the

0:37:33.239 --> 0:37:35.360
<v Speaker 1>color of the feathers, so it shouldn't be able to

0:37:35.400 --> 0:37:37.279
<v Speaker 1>see it in the mirror. And sure enough, they put

0:37:37.280 --> 0:37:39.560
<v Speaker 1>a magpie in a room with a black colored dye

0:37:39.640 --> 0:37:42.560
<v Speaker 1>under its chin, and it doesn't seem to do anything unusual.

0:37:43.080 --> 0:37:45.480
<v Speaker 1>But they do the same thing with a yellow colored

0:37:45.560 --> 0:37:48.520
<v Speaker 1>dye and the magpie starts scratching it itself. It looks

0:37:48.520 --> 0:37:51.720
<v Speaker 1>in the mirror, sees that it has a yellow patch

0:37:51.880 --> 0:37:54.320
<v Speaker 1>underneath its neck, and it starts scratching at the patch

0:37:54.400 --> 0:37:57.319
<v Speaker 1>trying to get it off. Now, they used the black

0:37:57.360 --> 0:37:59.719
<v Speaker 1>colored dyes that you know, control to show that Okay,

0:37:59.760 --> 0:38:02.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not just feeling something on itself, it's reacting to

0:38:02.640 --> 0:38:06.640
<v Speaker 1>what it sees and it sees it in the mirror

0:38:06.880 --> 0:38:09.839
<v Speaker 1>and says, I need to get that off me. Yes.

0:38:09.880 --> 0:38:12.319
<v Speaker 1>In forms of this this uh, this ain't method are

0:38:12.480 --> 0:38:16.359
<v Speaker 1>are utilized with a number of MSR tests, particularly those

0:38:16.400 --> 0:38:19.560
<v Speaker 1>aimed at at land based animals. And when it comes

0:38:19.560 --> 0:38:22.560
<v Speaker 1>to other birds, a handful species show self contingent behaviors

0:38:22.560 --> 0:38:25.919
<v Speaker 1>in front of mirrors. Magpies and jack DAWs they show

0:38:25.960 --> 0:38:29.600
<v Speaker 1>self contingent behaviors two out of five magpies past the

0:38:29.600 --> 0:38:34.720
<v Speaker 1>mirror tests. New Caledonian crows, gray parrots, and keys engage

0:38:34.719 --> 0:38:39.640
<v Speaker 1>in social behavior and mirror directed uh exploratory behavior, but

0:38:39.719 --> 0:38:43.200
<v Speaker 1>they lack self directed behavior in front of mirrors. And

0:38:43.280 --> 0:38:46.200
<v Speaker 1>New Caledonian crows and gray parents all parents also use

0:38:46.320 --> 0:38:50.719
<v Speaker 1>a mirror uh instrumentally to localized food, so they can

0:38:51.520 --> 0:38:53.840
<v Speaker 1>in these tests, they will they'll put them in a

0:38:53.840 --> 0:38:57.600
<v Speaker 1>position where they can use the mirror to better find

0:38:57.640 --> 0:38:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the food, and then they will utilize the mirror to

0:38:59.719 --> 0:39:03.480
<v Speaker 1>do huh interesting. Okay, so I got another one for you.

0:39:03.600 --> 0:39:06.640
<v Speaker 1>How about some bird math it's not going to be

0:39:06.760 --> 0:39:10.120
<v Speaker 1>very complex math, but it's math that's that's impressive for

0:39:10.200 --> 0:39:13.000
<v Speaker 1>a non human animal. So lots of animals can do

0:39:13.120 --> 0:39:16.880
<v Speaker 1>some basic form of counting objects, and I want to

0:39:16.920 --> 0:39:21.239
<v Speaker 1>emphasize basic, but far fewer animals can do more abstract

0:39:21.280 --> 0:39:25.080
<v Speaker 1>operations with number concepts, like comparing numbers and stuff like that.

0:39:25.360 --> 0:39:28.959
<v Speaker 1>But back in the scientists were able to successfully train

0:39:29.200 --> 0:39:32.960
<v Speaker 1>reciss monkeys to do this test where they look at

0:39:33.000 --> 0:39:36.000
<v Speaker 1>a group of objects on a computer screen and then

0:39:36.040 --> 0:39:39.359
<v Speaker 1>they'd rank the groups according to how many objects were

0:39:39.360 --> 0:39:42.920
<v Speaker 1>on the screen, and so a group of three objects

0:39:43.040 --> 0:39:46.000
<v Speaker 1>is greater than a group of of two. And then

0:39:46.200 --> 0:39:49.080
<v Speaker 1>after this training, the monkeys learned how to do this

0:39:49.200 --> 0:39:52.760
<v Speaker 1>task even when they were presented with unfamiliar large numbers.

0:39:53.080 --> 0:39:55.360
<v Speaker 1>So let's say they've been trained to point out that

0:39:55.480 --> 0:39:58.359
<v Speaker 1>three is more than two and two is more than one.

0:39:58.960 --> 0:40:01.720
<v Speaker 1>You can suddenly show them new numbers they've never seen before,

0:40:01.800 --> 0:40:05.000
<v Speaker 1>like eight and six, and they'll do the test correctly.

0:40:05.000 --> 0:40:07.080
<v Speaker 1>They'll point out that eight is more than six. So

0:40:07.160 --> 0:40:10.840
<v Speaker 1>basically checking for algorithmic thinking on the part of the animal,

0:40:10.880 --> 0:40:13.440
<v Speaker 1>like can I sort of deal with with quantities visual

0:40:13.520 --> 0:40:17.240
<v Speaker 1>quantities into the difference and and tell yeah, exactly. And

0:40:17.400 --> 0:40:20.560
<v Speaker 1>so there was a study in two thousand eleven published

0:40:20.600 --> 0:40:23.840
<v Speaker 1>in Science by Damian Scarff, Harlan Hayne, and Michael Colombo

0:40:24.280 --> 0:40:28.440
<v Speaker 1>that essentially found that pigeons pigeons, Now that the classic

0:40:28.680 --> 0:40:32.560
<v Speaker 1>dummies of our our jokes about bird intelligence did just

0:40:32.800 --> 0:40:35.960
<v Speaker 1>as good as reesus monkeys on this test. UH, that

0:40:36.120 --> 0:40:39.520
<v Speaker 1>birds do the the operation of magnitude comparison just as

0:40:39.560 --> 0:40:41.960
<v Speaker 1>well as primates. And the setup goes like this. You

0:40:42.000 --> 0:40:44.840
<v Speaker 1>get the birds and you train them over time to

0:40:45.000 --> 0:40:48.439
<v Speaker 1>peck at screens bearing numbers of objects in increasing order

0:40:48.440 --> 0:40:51.640
<v Speaker 1>of magnitude. So for the pigeon sees three screens, one

0:40:51.680 --> 0:40:54.759
<v Speaker 1>has one object, one has two objects, one has three objects,

0:40:55.000 --> 0:40:58.200
<v Speaker 1>and you train the bird with reinforcement to peck them

0:40:58.360 --> 0:41:03.480
<v Speaker 1>at going one to three. Then you introduce new numbers,

0:41:03.520 --> 0:41:05.640
<v Speaker 1>just like you did for the reciss monkeys, and they

0:41:05.719 --> 0:41:07.880
<v Speaker 1>can do the same thing. They can look at six

0:41:07.920 --> 0:41:11.080
<v Speaker 1>and nine and and compact them in ascending order. They

0:41:11.080 --> 0:41:15.880
<v Speaker 1>can extend their math skills to unfamiliar numbers. And so

0:41:15.960 --> 0:41:19.040
<v Speaker 1>this leads to two possible conclusions. The researchers pointed out,

0:41:19.040 --> 0:41:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I read this in uh. They were speaking to the

0:41:21.000 --> 0:41:24.359
<v Speaker 1>New York Times, they said, the birds and the mammals here,

0:41:24.440 --> 0:41:27.839
<v Speaker 1>obviously they've both got these number skills. The monkeys have them,

0:41:27.920 --> 0:41:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the pigeons have them. And they either separately evolved the

0:41:31.719 --> 0:41:36.200
<v Speaker 1>basic number skills, meaning the convergent evolution, two different evolutionary

0:41:36.239 --> 0:41:39.919
<v Speaker 1>solutions to reach the same goal in different creatures, because

0:41:40.000 --> 0:41:43.040
<v Speaker 1>ultimately both creatures live in the same world, a world

0:41:43.040 --> 0:41:46.640
<v Speaker 1>of fixed, immovable objects of varying quantities, and obviously that

0:41:46.719 --> 0:41:49.600
<v Speaker 1>plays into the survival advantage to be able to uh,

0:41:49.640 --> 0:41:53.439
<v Speaker 1>to determine these differences. Yeah, or if that's not the case,

0:41:53.440 --> 0:41:56.759
<v Speaker 1>if it's not convergent evolutions, separate solutions leading to the

0:41:56.760 --> 0:42:00.200
<v Speaker 1>same conclusion. They must have gotten these number skills from

0:42:00.239 --> 0:42:03.640
<v Speaker 1>their last common ancestor. As we mentioned earlier, that last

0:42:03.640 --> 0:42:07.520
<v Speaker 1>common ancestor between mammals and birds lived three hundred million

0:42:07.640 --> 0:42:13.040
<v Speaker 1>years ago or the terrible before the dinosaurs. Yeah, three

0:42:13.480 --> 0:42:16.080
<v Speaker 1>million years ago with number skills, I mean, before the

0:42:16.120 --> 0:42:21.000
<v Speaker 1>age of the dinosaurs. That's very creepy. But I think

0:42:21.000 --> 0:42:25.759
<v Speaker 1>we've got one that's even creepier, and that's theory of mine. Yes,

0:42:25.840 --> 0:42:28.040
<v Speaker 1>And this is where I definitely think back to standing

0:42:28.080 --> 0:42:30.040
<v Speaker 1>on one side of the glass and watching the ground

0:42:30.120 --> 0:42:32.680
<v Speaker 1>hornbills and and looking into the eye of the ground

0:42:32.680 --> 0:42:35.640
<v Speaker 1>hornbills as they walk up and and we'll often show

0:42:35.640 --> 0:42:38.239
<v Speaker 1>off like a dead mouse. They'll have it in their

0:42:38.239 --> 0:42:40.279
<v Speaker 1>beak and they'll want to show it to me. Or

0:42:40.719 --> 0:42:43.560
<v Speaker 1>if they don't have really they seem to be showing

0:42:43.560 --> 0:42:45.879
<v Speaker 1>it off. Yeah, they want to show that that dead

0:42:46.200 --> 0:42:47.879
<v Speaker 1>mouse to me. And if there's not a mouse, they'll

0:42:47.920 --> 0:42:49.600
<v Speaker 1>have a wood chip and they'll pick that up and

0:42:49.640 --> 0:42:52.960
<v Speaker 1>want to show it to me. Um. But but to

0:42:53.080 --> 0:42:56.600
<v Speaker 1>what extent is that hornbill actually could it possibly be

0:42:56.680 --> 0:43:00.600
<v Speaker 1>perceiving me as an entity that is perceiving it. This

0:43:00.640 --> 0:43:02.520
<v Speaker 1>is where we get into theory of mind, and it's

0:43:02.520 --> 0:43:05.200
<v Speaker 1>a pretty big deal in human cognition and the human

0:43:05.200 --> 0:43:08.360
<v Speaker 1>experience overall. Theory of mind allows us to see the world,

0:43:08.800 --> 0:43:12.919
<v Speaker 1>or attempt to, often quite poorly, through another person's eyes.

0:43:13.600 --> 0:43:17.520
<v Speaker 1>It allows us to attribute a mental state to our

0:43:17.600 --> 0:43:20.200
<v Speaker 1>not only to ourselves, but to other entities. Yeah, and

0:43:20.239 --> 0:43:24.640
<v Speaker 1>this is considered a crucial part of sort of human development,

0:43:24.719 --> 0:43:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Like when children at what age do children gain a

0:43:27.760 --> 0:43:31.480
<v Speaker 1>theory of mind? When are they not just reacting to stimuli?

0:43:31.560 --> 0:43:35.360
<v Speaker 1>When are they not reacting to uh, to a lighting

0:43:35.440 --> 0:43:37.520
<v Speaker 1>up toy and a human as if they're the same

0:43:37.560 --> 0:43:40.960
<v Speaker 1>type of thing, but recognizing that a human has intentions

0:43:41.040 --> 0:43:45.719
<v Speaker 1>and starting to imagine what the other humans intentions are. Yeah,

0:43:45.760 --> 0:43:47.640
<v Speaker 1>this is something we easily take for granted. I think

0:43:47.640 --> 0:43:49.719
<v Speaker 1>it's important to note that when we say theory of

0:43:49.760 --> 0:43:53.440
<v Speaker 1>mind it itself is not a theory. It is saying

0:43:53.520 --> 0:43:57.799
<v Speaker 1>that our perceptions of other mind states. All we have

0:43:57.960 --> 0:44:00.400
<v Speaker 1>is a theory of that individual's mind. Every one in

0:44:00.400 --> 0:44:03.440
<v Speaker 1>your life, from a stranger on the street to you know,

0:44:03.600 --> 0:44:06.439
<v Speaker 1>loved when you see every day, the best you have

0:44:06.880 --> 0:44:09.239
<v Speaker 1>is a theory of what their mind state consists of.

0:44:09.960 --> 0:44:12.720
<v Speaker 1>And uh, and I think a lot there's some interesting

0:44:12.760 --> 0:44:15.239
<v Speaker 1>studies out there that show that that even people we've

0:44:15.360 --> 0:44:18.319
<v Speaker 1>we've known for a long time, our vision of their

0:44:18.320 --> 0:44:21.040
<v Speaker 1>mind state isn't is far from perfect. It's just a

0:44:21.160 --> 0:44:22.960
<v Speaker 1>version of who they are, and we have to use

0:44:23.040 --> 0:44:27.439
<v Speaker 1>those in our our our calculations as we navigate our world. Yeah,

0:44:27.480 --> 0:44:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and that kind of strange. I mean, you think you

0:44:29.560 --> 0:44:31.400
<v Speaker 1>live in a world of other people, but really you

0:44:31.480 --> 0:44:34.839
<v Speaker 1>live in a world of what you imagine other people are. Like, Yeah,

0:44:34.880 --> 0:44:36.759
<v Speaker 1>you kind of live in your own little you know,

0:44:36.840 --> 0:44:42.200
<v Speaker 1>matrix simulation of the world. But but how about animals? Right?

0:44:42.440 --> 0:44:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Can animals do this? That's been one of the big questions.

0:44:45.280 --> 0:44:47.880
<v Speaker 1>To the degree to which non human animals can possess

0:44:48.000 --> 0:44:51.480
<v Speaker 1>theory of mind remains an open question, but some studies

0:44:51.480 --> 0:44:55.200
<v Speaker 1>suggest that ravens might have the gift. Yeah. Most recently

0:44:55.200 --> 0:44:58.440
<v Speaker 1>a two thousand sixteen study and this the year published

0:44:58.480 --> 0:45:02.800
<v Speaker 1>in Nature Communications suggest that ravens possess a basic theory

0:45:02.880 --> 0:45:05.239
<v Speaker 1>of mind. How on earth would they test for this?

0:45:05.320 --> 0:45:08.880
<v Speaker 1>And how can you figure out if a raven knows

0:45:09.040 --> 0:45:13.880
<v Speaker 1>that something else has intentions? Well, it comes down to this.

0:45:14.200 --> 0:45:17.839
<v Speaker 1>You often hear this phrase thrown around, Right, It's particularly

0:45:17.880 --> 0:45:21.120
<v Speaker 1>in uh in you know dramas where there's a lot

0:45:21.160 --> 0:45:24.160
<v Speaker 1>of deception. Right, does does he know that? I know

0:45:24.280 --> 0:45:26.759
<v Speaker 1>that he knows? You know? It all comes down to

0:45:26.880 --> 0:45:29.600
<v Speaker 1>a complex game of hide and seek among the ravens,

0:45:29.600 --> 0:45:32.720
<v Speaker 1>where they that where they're they're they're trying to hide

0:45:32.800 --> 0:45:37.360
<v Speaker 1>and acquire pilfer bits of carrying. Yeah, so they gorge

0:45:37.400 --> 0:45:40.360
<v Speaker 1>themselves on I don't know, like the eyeballs and whatever

0:45:40.440 --> 0:45:43.000
<v Speaker 1>they can get from these dead animals. All the best bits,

0:45:43.040 --> 0:45:45.280
<v Speaker 1>all the best bits, but there's still some nice nuggets

0:45:45.280 --> 0:45:47.440
<v Speaker 1>there that they want to come back with later, So

0:45:47.480 --> 0:45:49.960
<v Speaker 1>they tuck these into the throat pouches and they hide

0:45:49.960 --> 0:45:53.960
<v Speaker 1>them away. Now, subordinate ravens wait, hold on, just just

0:45:54.000 --> 0:45:56.280
<v Speaker 1>to clarify, they don't hide them in their throat pouches.

0:45:56.360 --> 0:45:58.960
<v Speaker 1>They take them in their throat pouch to hide them somewhere.

0:45:59.040 --> 0:46:00.920
<v Speaker 1>They just stick them in the throat their throat pouch,

0:46:00.960 --> 0:46:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and then they're gonna want to hide them in some

0:46:03.040 --> 0:46:07.000
<v Speaker 1>external place later on, like a dog burying a bone exactly. Yeah,

0:46:07.040 --> 0:46:09.160
<v Speaker 1>they want to create a you know, just to high.

0:46:09.200 --> 0:46:10.839
<v Speaker 1>They want to find a hiding place for the good

0:46:10.880 --> 0:46:13.720
<v Speaker 1>so they can come back. They want to bury that treasure. Now,

0:46:14.000 --> 0:46:17.880
<v Speaker 1>subordinate Ravens will spy on their superiors to see where

0:46:17.920 --> 0:46:23.160
<v Speaker 1>they're hiding. The choice spoils sniveling little because the Boss

0:46:23.239 --> 0:46:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Raven got the best parts. But then here's the thing.

0:46:25.120 --> 0:46:28.760
<v Speaker 1>The Boss Raven didn't become Boss Raven by being a dummy.

0:46:28.960 --> 0:46:32.479
<v Speaker 1>The Boss Raven knows that she's being watched, and she'll

0:46:32.480 --> 0:46:36.880
<v Speaker 1>often employ various strategies and deceptions in order to throw

0:46:37.200 --> 0:46:41.160
<v Speaker 1>off the others. So she she practices deceit and trickery. Right,

0:46:41.480 --> 0:46:44.560
<v Speaker 1>So she's doing things like doing a quick burial like,

0:46:44.560 --> 0:46:47.799
<v Speaker 1>I gotta bury this fast before anybody notices where I'm

0:46:47.840 --> 0:46:51.520
<v Speaker 1>putting the goods or digging behind a visual barrier so

0:46:51.560 --> 0:46:55.080
<v Speaker 1>you can't quite see what she's doing, avoiding the hiding

0:46:55.080 --> 0:46:58.680
<v Speaker 1>place after burial to avoid drawing attention to it. Alright,

0:46:58.719 --> 0:47:00.040
<v Speaker 1>so I'm gonna bury it over here, but I'm to

0:47:00.200 --> 0:47:01.719
<v Speaker 1>stand over here because I don't want you to think

0:47:01.719 --> 0:47:04.920
<v Speaker 1>that I'm guarding something precious. And then finally, this one

0:47:05.000 --> 0:47:08.360
<v Speaker 1>is really key. She'll pretend to dig a hole, but

0:47:08.520 --> 0:47:11.320
<v Speaker 1>keep the loot in her throat pouch until a better

0:47:11.400 --> 0:47:15.520
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to hide it presents itself. So I'm digging a

0:47:15.600 --> 0:47:17.480
<v Speaker 1>hole just pretending to bury it so you'll think I

0:47:17.560 --> 0:47:19.720
<v Speaker 1>buried it here. I'm going to do a little slide

0:47:19.719 --> 0:47:22.640
<v Speaker 1>of beak and actually bury it over on this side.

0:47:22.760 --> 0:47:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Now this is interesting because you could look at all

0:47:25.600 --> 0:47:27.799
<v Speaker 1>this and say, well, I don't know, maybe is I mean,

0:47:27.840 --> 0:47:30.040
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of these tests, you could say, is

0:47:30.080 --> 0:47:34.200
<v Speaker 1>this just some kind of instinctual behavior manifesting itself in

0:47:34.239 --> 0:47:37.080
<v Speaker 1>a very complex way, And so you'd almost have to

0:47:37.239 --> 0:47:41.600
<v Speaker 1>introduce unnatural scenarios to test and sy is this really?

0:47:41.680 --> 0:47:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Is this bird thinking flexibly or is it just carrying

0:47:45.320 --> 0:47:48.400
<v Speaker 1>out some instincts, right, Yeah, Is it just responding to

0:47:48.480 --> 0:47:51.399
<v Speaker 1>visual stimuli or is this theory of mind? Well that's

0:47:51.400 --> 0:47:54.240
<v Speaker 1>what the researchers in this study set out to discover.

0:47:54.719 --> 0:47:59.720
<v Speaker 1>So this study involved two experimental areas, one wall between

0:47:59.719 --> 0:48:02.719
<v Speaker 1>them with a peopole for viewing the human researchers who

0:48:02.719 --> 0:48:05.480
<v Speaker 1>brought them food, and a small window which could be

0:48:05.480 --> 0:48:08.440
<v Speaker 1>shut or open to make the other raven in the

0:48:08.480 --> 0:48:12.920
<v Speaker 1>experiment visible. So this was to test how they behaved

0:48:12.920 --> 0:48:15.600
<v Speaker 1>when they could see their competitor and when they couldn't,

0:48:16.160 --> 0:48:19.880
<v Speaker 1>and also how they factored in this peopole through which

0:48:19.960 --> 0:48:25.080
<v Speaker 1>somebody else human might be viewing them as well. So

0:48:25.120 --> 0:48:27.200
<v Speaker 1>they taught the birds to look through the peep hole

0:48:27.239 --> 0:48:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and spy on the humans as well. Afterwards, they that

0:48:30.920 --> 0:48:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the birds indeed hid their food and acted suspicious even

0:48:34.840 --> 0:48:37.400
<v Speaker 1>when they had they had only the peep hole to

0:48:37.440 --> 0:48:41.200
<v Speaker 1>contend with with the window to the other raven shut off.

0:48:41.239 --> 0:48:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Wait a minute, so they couldn't see the raven. They

0:48:43.719 --> 0:48:46.520
<v Speaker 1>just knew that it was possible for something to look

0:48:46.560 --> 0:48:49.200
<v Speaker 1>in at them, right, So yeah, so basically they're testing,

0:48:49.320 --> 0:48:51.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, through three different things, how are they behaving

0:48:51.520 --> 0:48:53.799
<v Speaker 1>when they know there's a raven there that could see

0:48:53.840 --> 0:48:56.880
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing. How do they behave when there's nothing

0:48:56.920 --> 0:48:59.320
<v Speaker 1>there that they're aware of? And how do they behave

0:48:59.320 --> 0:49:01.960
<v Speaker 1>when there's no sable raven? But there's the possibility that

0:49:02.120 --> 0:49:05.480
<v Speaker 1>something else, perhaps this human, is viewing them as well,

0:49:06.360 --> 0:49:10.120
<v Speaker 1>and they seem to infer that someone could be watching

0:49:10.120 --> 0:49:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and acted as if the possible watching entity might behave

0:49:13.800 --> 0:49:17.560
<v Speaker 1>like another crow. So they attributed theory of bird mind

0:49:17.760 --> 0:49:20.440
<v Speaker 1>to the unseen human. They thought that human might be

0:49:20.520 --> 0:49:23.279
<v Speaker 1>coming to steal their carry in exactly. Yeah, yeah, so

0:49:23.320 --> 0:49:26.120
<v Speaker 1>they were. They were according to the researchers. Here. The

0:49:26.160 --> 0:49:29.040
<v Speaker 1>argument here is that they are attributing theory of mind

0:49:30.000 --> 0:49:32.680
<v Speaker 1>to the human. I just want to issue a disclaimer

0:49:32.719 --> 0:49:35.520
<v Speaker 1>to any Corvid's listening. I don't want to steal your

0:49:35.560 --> 0:49:38.879
<v Speaker 1>delicious eyeballs. Those eyeball treats. You earned them, they're all

0:49:38.920 --> 0:49:41.680
<v Speaker 1>for you. Prove me wrong. It's probably what they would

0:49:41.719 --> 0:49:45.960
<v Speaker 1>say that. Okay, well, that's fascinating, and and if those

0:49:46.239 --> 0:49:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the interpretation of those results are indeed correct, that's uh.

0:49:51.080 --> 0:49:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that that's something else. Yeah, I mean,

0:49:53.719 --> 0:49:56.560
<v Speaker 1>of course it makes sense because they ravens from a

0:49:56.640 --> 0:49:59.320
<v Speaker 1>very early age, they have to engage in a u

0:49:59.480 --> 0:50:04.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, a fairly complex um um hierarchical group of

0:50:04.200 --> 0:50:08.359
<v Speaker 1>friends and frenemies and different factions. So they're like special birds. Yeah,

0:50:08.360 --> 0:50:11.640
<v Speaker 1>they're instantly thrust into like a mini Game of Thrones scenario,

0:50:12.080 --> 0:50:15.359
<v Speaker 1>and they have to be able to survive in that environment. Okay, Well,

0:50:15.360 --> 0:50:18.080
<v Speaker 1>there's another, perhaps lighter example we could throw too, but

0:50:18.239 --> 0:50:20.759
<v Speaker 1>that is also still pretty interesting, which is the fact

0:50:20.760 --> 0:50:22.959
<v Speaker 1>that it might not be impossible to have a bird

0:50:23.040 --> 0:50:26.480
<v Speaker 1>DJ your wedding. Yeah, you could book DJ bird Brain,

0:50:26.600 --> 0:50:31.160
<v Speaker 1>or perhaps DJ budgery guard buddery garza or the basically

0:50:31.160 --> 0:50:35.360
<v Speaker 1>the common pet parakeet, a vocal mimicking parrot species, the

0:50:35.360 --> 0:50:38.920
<v Speaker 1>one you teach to say bad words. Yeah, yeah, of course. Uh.

0:50:39.000 --> 0:50:42.360
<v Speaker 1>In a two thousand eleven study published in Scientific Reports,

0:50:42.360 --> 0:50:46.680
<v Speaker 1>a team of researchers trained eight budgery guards to perform

0:50:46.800 --> 0:50:50.520
<v Speaker 1>isochronus that means occurring at the same time tapping tasks

0:50:50.560 --> 0:50:53.359
<v Speaker 1>in which they picked a key to the rhythm of

0:50:53.440 --> 0:50:59.040
<v Speaker 1>audio visual metronome style stimuli, so keeping keeping time keeping

0:50:59.080 --> 0:51:01.799
<v Speaker 1>beat exactly. And now this has also been observed in

0:51:01.840 --> 0:51:07.080
<v Speaker 1>sea lions, Reese's monkeys, chimpanzees, and Binobo's uh. In this case,

0:51:07.120 --> 0:51:11.480
<v Speaker 1>though the Budgerty guards, they seemed inherently inclined to tap

0:51:11.480 --> 0:51:14.440
<v Speaker 1>it fast tempos which have a similar time scale to

0:51:14.480 --> 0:51:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the rhythm of their own natural vocalizations, and the researchers

0:51:17.480 --> 0:51:21.719
<v Speaker 1>suggest that the vocal learning might have contributed to their performance,

0:51:21.920 --> 0:51:24.839
<v Speaker 1>which resembles that of a human. Now that makes me

0:51:25.200 --> 0:51:29.080
<v Speaker 1>think about theories about the emergence of musical ability and humans,

0:51:29.600 --> 0:51:34.080
<v Speaker 1>and if our musical ability is inherently tied to language. Yeah. Yeah,

0:51:34.120 --> 0:51:37.160
<v Speaker 1>there's been all sorts of interesting studies. I'm particularly thinking

0:51:37.200 --> 0:51:40.239
<v Speaker 1>about those involving in Neanderthals and the idea that they

0:51:40.320 --> 0:51:44.960
<v Speaker 1>might have like sung instead of spoke. Yeah, it's a

0:51:44.960 --> 0:51:47.200
<v Speaker 1>fascinating material. Have you ever done an episode on the

0:51:47.200 --> 0:51:52.880
<v Speaker 1>origins of music before? I know I have explored it

0:51:53.000 --> 0:51:55.279
<v Speaker 1>some in past episodes, but it's one of those where

0:51:55.280 --> 0:51:57.640
<v Speaker 1>there's always new research coming out. I would I would

0:51:57.680 --> 0:51:59.919
<v Speaker 1>love to re explore it at some point. Yeah, I'd

0:52:00.120 --> 0:52:03.279
<v Speaker 1>to do that. Well, anyway, that's not the end. We

0:52:03.360 --> 0:52:06.200
<v Speaker 1>should probably pretty much leave it off there, But that's

0:52:06.239 --> 0:52:09.160
<v Speaker 1>not the end of the research into bird cognition. We

0:52:09.239 --> 0:52:12.080
<v Speaker 1>just have to stop because there's so much. But There's

0:52:12.120 --> 0:52:16.920
<v Speaker 1>also been research about birds observing object permanence, Like to

0:52:17.000 --> 0:52:20.680
<v Speaker 1>what extent birds can still remember an object is present

0:52:20.760 --> 0:52:22.839
<v Speaker 1>even if they can't see it. You know, for lots

0:52:22.880 --> 0:52:25.439
<v Speaker 1>of animals, it seems like all that exists is what's

0:52:25.440 --> 0:52:27.760
<v Speaker 1>in front of them at the moment. But can birds

0:52:27.880 --> 0:52:31.200
<v Speaker 1>remember something's there even if it's removed from view. Looks

0:52:31.280 --> 0:52:33.879
<v Speaker 1>like in some cases they probably can, though I think

0:52:33.880 --> 0:52:37.520
<v Speaker 1>not all scientists agree on that. One. Another interesting social

0:52:37.880 --> 0:52:40.959
<v Speaker 1>result we've come across is that crows and ravens seem

0:52:41.040 --> 0:52:43.680
<v Speaker 1>to be able to recognize when they're being treated unfairly.

0:52:44.080 --> 0:52:47.160
<v Speaker 1>They can respond to inequity and the reward of treats

0:52:47.360 --> 0:52:50.279
<v Speaker 1>and stuff like that. Uh. And then there there's also

0:52:50.360 --> 0:52:54.680
<v Speaker 1>been some research into the metacognition of corvids. Right, yeah,

0:52:54.719 --> 0:52:58.200
<v Speaker 1>this is a better cognition is essentially thoughts about thoughts,

0:52:58.280 --> 0:53:02.120
<v Speaker 1>thoughts about the limits of thought um and large build

0:53:02.160 --> 0:53:08.600
<v Speaker 1>crows succeed in retrospective but fail in perspective meta memory task,

0:53:09.080 --> 0:53:12.400
<v Speaker 1>So they haven't according to some of the studies we're

0:53:12.440 --> 0:53:16.280
<v Speaker 1>looking at here, they haven't quite pulled off like full

0:53:16.280 --> 0:53:21.359
<v Speaker 1>scale meta cognition, but they have limited abilities there. Um

0:53:21.400 --> 0:53:23.759
<v Speaker 1>And to put this in perspective of other animals. I've

0:53:23.760 --> 0:53:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I've read studies where um, where rodents have have demonstrated

0:53:29.600 --> 0:53:33.160
<v Speaker 1>possible meta cognition. Okay, well, I think one of the

0:53:33.160 --> 0:53:35.719
<v Speaker 1>takeaways from everything we've just been talking about is that

0:53:35.760 --> 0:53:39.960
<v Speaker 1>there is just so much research on the sophisticated cognition

0:53:40.000 --> 0:53:42.680
<v Speaker 1>of birds that even if some of this research turns

0:53:42.719 --> 0:53:46.920
<v Speaker 1>out to be misinterpreted or or refuted by future studies,

0:53:46.960 --> 0:53:49.560
<v Speaker 1>there's so much of it that there's obviously some real

0:53:49.600 --> 0:53:52.359
<v Speaker 1>phenomenon here. Yea. So many of these are things that

0:53:52.400 --> 0:53:55.960
<v Speaker 1>you see coming online with a young human child as there,

0:53:56.280 --> 0:53:59.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, as their brain powers up, and then you

0:53:59.640 --> 0:54:03.280
<v Speaker 1>see those same power ups taking place with the bird brain.

0:54:03.760 --> 0:54:05.920
<v Speaker 1>And so we should look at the brain itself, I guess,

0:54:05.920 --> 0:54:08.880
<v Speaker 1>because this comes back to the concept of cognition without

0:54:08.880 --> 0:54:12.160
<v Speaker 1>a cortex. As we mentioned before, for a long time,

0:54:12.200 --> 0:54:16.840
<v Speaker 1>neuroscientists thought that sophisticated cognitive powers only came from a

0:54:16.880 --> 0:54:20.560
<v Speaker 1>neo cortex also known as the neo pallium, which is

0:54:20.600 --> 0:54:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the most recent addition to the mammalian brain, the powerhouse

0:54:24.600 --> 0:54:27.000
<v Speaker 1>of higher human thought. It's, you know, the part of

0:54:27.040 --> 0:54:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the mammal brain that gives us our real intelligent flexibility

0:54:31.000 --> 0:54:34.319
<v Speaker 1>and ability to adapt to all kinds of environments and scenarios.

0:54:34.920 --> 0:54:39.279
<v Speaker 1>The topmost ice cream scoop exactly. Now, the cerebrum takes

0:54:39.360 --> 0:54:41.520
<v Speaker 1>up most of the volume of the brain in both

0:54:41.640 --> 0:54:45.600
<v Speaker 1>mammals and birds, and in the cerebrum in both classes

0:54:46.320 --> 0:54:49.080
<v Speaker 1>mammals and birds can be divided into two regions. You've

0:54:49.120 --> 0:54:51.919
<v Speaker 1>got the paliole region up on top and the sub

0:54:52.000 --> 0:54:56.200
<v Speaker 1>paliole region and the sub paliole region that's ancient. That's

0:54:56.280 --> 0:55:00.239
<v Speaker 1>extremely similar in mammals and birds can probably be trace

0:55:00.280 --> 0:55:03.480
<v Speaker 1>back to a common ancestor more than five million years ago,

0:55:03.520 --> 0:55:06.760
<v Speaker 1>like five thirty five million years ago. It's pretty similar

0:55:06.800 --> 0:55:10.040
<v Speaker 1>between animals as different as and this is the example

0:55:10.440 --> 0:55:13.600
<v Speaker 1>gunter Cune and buggy or give animals as different as

0:55:13.680 --> 0:55:17.360
<v Speaker 1>humans and lamprey's. So so this is clearly this is

0:55:17.600 --> 0:55:20.320
<v Speaker 1>what some people might call lizard brain kind of stuff.

0:55:20.320 --> 0:55:22.880
<v Speaker 1>It's it's deep, deep in there. It's one of the

0:55:22.920 --> 0:55:26.719
<v Speaker 1>older parts of how your nervous system works. But then

0:55:26.800 --> 0:55:29.200
<v Speaker 1>you've also got the pallium, the upper part of the brain,

0:55:29.280 --> 0:55:32.520
<v Speaker 1>and that's the upper surface of the cerebrum. So it's

0:55:32.560 --> 0:55:35.920
<v Speaker 1>got the cortex or things that are like the cortex,

0:55:35.960 --> 0:55:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the hippocampus, the paliol amygdala, the claws drum, and the

0:55:39.520 --> 0:55:44.080
<v Speaker 1>old factory bulb. And in the uh the paliole brain

0:55:44.200 --> 0:55:47.560
<v Speaker 1>is where the major differences between mammals and birds show up.

0:55:48.080 --> 0:55:51.360
<v Speaker 1>So in mammals this region is dominated by what's usually

0:55:51.400 --> 0:55:54.440
<v Speaker 1>called the neocortex that I've read apparently some the neo

0:55:54.560 --> 0:55:56.879
<v Speaker 1>nous of the neo cortex has actually been called into

0:55:56.960 --> 0:55:59.640
<v Speaker 1>question in recent years, so maybe instead we should just

0:55:59.680 --> 0:56:02.200
<v Speaker 1>call it something like the cortex or the six layered

0:56:02.239 --> 0:56:07.760
<v Speaker 1>cortex um. But the bird's palio brain doesn't have this cortex. Instead,

0:56:07.840 --> 0:56:10.359
<v Speaker 1>it's got these little groups of things that have been

0:56:10.360 --> 0:56:13.920
<v Speaker 1>called nuclear aggregations, which is a good name. And the

0:56:14.040 --> 0:56:17.640
<v Speaker 1>question is do birds have the equivalent to a cortex?

0:56:17.760 --> 0:56:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Do they? Do they have something that works like a

0:56:20.680 --> 0:56:25.760
<v Speaker 1>cortex does. And what Gunter, Cune and Buggy are conclude

0:56:25.760 --> 0:56:28.480
<v Speaker 1>by looking at all of this recent research is that

0:56:28.560 --> 0:56:30.880
<v Speaker 1>it seems to be, Yeah, the cognitive power of the

0:56:30.920 --> 0:56:34.080
<v Speaker 1>bird seems to be located in the A, V and pallium,

0:56:34.360 --> 0:56:36.759
<v Speaker 1>which does a lot of the same work as the

0:56:36.800 --> 0:56:41.160
<v Speaker 1>mammal cortex. And these are these are similar brain structures,

0:56:41.200 --> 0:56:45.440
<v Speaker 1>but the big question is why are they doing similar work?

0:56:45.719 --> 0:56:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Are they an example of convergent evolution? Like we've talked

0:56:49.040 --> 0:56:52.160
<v Speaker 1>about where convergent evolution would be something you know, one

0:56:52.200 --> 0:56:54.760
<v Speaker 1>example would be like wings. You've got wings on bees,

0:56:54.840 --> 0:56:57.799
<v Speaker 1>wings on bats, wings on birds. They obviously did not

0:56:57.960 --> 0:57:01.240
<v Speaker 1>get these wings from a common ancestor that they shared.

0:57:01.360 --> 0:57:05.439
<v Speaker 1>They separately evolved similar solutions to hey, I need to fly.

0:57:06.000 --> 0:57:09.719
<v Speaker 1>Recent findings say that we probably get some basic homologous

0:57:09.760 --> 0:57:13.160
<v Speaker 1>structures from the common ancestor between mammals and birds, but

0:57:13.480 --> 0:57:18.880
<v Speaker 1>these structures continued to evolve in parallel, eventually converging on

0:57:19.120 --> 0:57:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the mind structures that we see today cognition, intelligence, complex thought,

0:57:24.320 --> 0:57:29.320
<v Speaker 1>problem solving, executive function and uh. One thing that seemed

0:57:29.440 --> 0:57:33.480
<v Speaker 1>very interesting to me about this is, to whatever extent

0:57:33.560 --> 0:57:37.240
<v Speaker 1>this is an example of convergent evolution, it seems to

0:57:37.280 --> 0:57:40.880
<v Speaker 1>apply to the study of machine cognition because when you

0:57:40.920 --> 0:57:44.160
<v Speaker 1>look about at like computers and you ask the question

0:57:44.440 --> 0:57:47.560
<v Speaker 1>can computers really think? Can a machine really think? Could

0:57:47.560 --> 0:57:51.840
<v Speaker 1>an artificial intelligence program really be thinking if it doesn't

0:57:52.000 --> 0:57:56.160
<v Speaker 1>have a brain like us? Well, if birds can think

0:57:56.560 --> 0:58:00.000
<v Speaker 1>without having brains like us, why not other physical structure

0:58:00.040 --> 0:58:02.960
<v Speaker 1>years that give rise to information processing. Yeah, this just

0:58:02.960 --> 0:58:07.680
<v Speaker 1>gets into the idea that perhaps consciousness just simply something

0:58:07.720 --> 0:58:13.720
<v Speaker 1>that emerges from any significantly significantly complex system of information, right, Yeah, Yeah,

0:58:13.760 --> 0:58:18.000
<v Speaker 1>So you kind of can't say that there's a unique

0:58:18.120 --> 0:58:22.520
<v Speaker 1>magical architecture in the mammalian brain that creates the phenomenon

0:58:22.760 --> 0:58:25.880
<v Speaker 1>of thinking. If it looks for all, we can tell

0:58:25.920 --> 0:58:28.160
<v Speaker 1>like birds can actually do a lot of the same

0:58:28.240 --> 0:58:30.840
<v Speaker 1>stuff that we would think of as thinking, and maybe

0:58:30.880 --> 0:58:34.960
<v Speaker 1>given different evolutionary circumstances, they might have been as intelligent

0:58:35.120 --> 0:58:38.120
<v Speaker 1>or more intelligent than us. And so if there's nothing

0:58:38.280 --> 0:58:41.480
<v Speaker 1>unique about the mammal brain that gives rise to thinking,

0:58:42.080 --> 0:58:45.360
<v Speaker 1>why couldn't you know dick Hart's internal protagonist, the one

0:58:45.360 --> 0:58:49.160
<v Speaker 1>that says, I think, therefore my I am be any

0:58:49.200 --> 0:58:53.480
<v Speaker 1>type of physical architecture that gives rise to information processing,

0:58:53.800 --> 0:58:57.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe a swarm intelligence and a swarm of ant like

0:58:57.400 --> 0:59:01.680
<v Speaker 1>aliens or or a computer. It it really leads one

0:59:01.760 --> 0:59:06.080
<v Speaker 1>to some strange conclusions about what intelligence is and where

0:59:06.120 --> 0:59:10.080
<v Speaker 1>it emerges from physical reality. Indeed, indeed, it really it

0:59:10.120 --> 0:59:12.840
<v Speaker 1>really forces you to to rethink what we think we

0:59:12.920 --> 0:59:17.520
<v Speaker 1>know about about intelligence and thought. Okay, well, I think

0:59:17.520 --> 0:59:19.840
<v Speaker 1>we should come back and finish with that question, we

0:59:19.880 --> 0:59:25.760
<v Speaker 1>started with about the technological civilizations in that alternative reality

0:59:25.800 --> 0:59:29.280
<v Speaker 1>where the ascendant intelligent life form on Earth is avian

0:59:29.440 --> 0:59:32.760
<v Speaker 1>rather than mammalian. If it's not primates, but it's birds

0:59:32.840 --> 0:59:37.320
<v Speaker 1>that are the smartest creatures and create the machines and

0:59:37.360 --> 0:59:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the buildings and the cities and the social structures and

0:59:40.240 --> 0:59:43.800
<v Speaker 1>everything we think of as intelligent civilization. What would that

0:59:43.840 --> 0:59:46.800
<v Speaker 1>look like? How would it be different? Well, I instantly

0:59:46.840 --> 0:59:49.280
<v Speaker 1>when I when I think of sci Fi visions, like

0:59:49.680 --> 0:59:54.400
<v Speaker 1>existing sci Fi visions of of intelligent avian species. Uh,

0:59:54.440 --> 0:59:57.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, I instantly think to Flash Gordon the Hawkman,

0:59:58.040 --> 1:00:02.280
<v Speaker 1>particularly Prince uh Principle Alton played by Brian Blessed and

1:00:02.360 --> 1:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>one of his uh most uh spectacular, one of his

1:00:05.800 --> 1:00:09.120
<v Speaker 1>loudest roles, one of many loud roles over the years.

1:00:09.200 --> 1:00:11.919
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're still basically they're just humans, right, They've

1:00:11.960 --> 1:00:14.320
<v Speaker 1>got arms. Yeah, I mean it gets down to the

1:00:14.320 --> 1:00:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the age old reality that humans have looked at birds

1:00:18.800 --> 1:00:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and we've we've envied them, but only for one thing.

1:00:21.840 --> 1:00:23.920
<v Speaker 1>We just want the wings. We don't want the talions,

1:00:24.240 --> 1:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>we don't want the cloaca, we don't want any of

1:00:26.560 --> 1:00:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the other stuff. We just want to fly, And so

1:00:29.560 --> 1:00:34.120
<v Speaker 1>when we think of avian creatures and avian intelligent avian species,

1:00:34.320 --> 1:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>we tend to think of just people with wings, and

1:00:36.800 --> 1:00:38.320
<v Speaker 1>we want to have our cake and eat it too.

1:00:38.360 --> 1:00:40.000
<v Speaker 1>We want wings, but we don't want to give up

1:00:40.040 --> 1:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the arms. Yeah, We've got to choose. Yeah, that's one

1:00:42.800 --> 1:00:44.400
<v Speaker 1>of the things that I've looked in the past with

1:00:44.480 --> 1:00:48.680
<v Speaker 1>some of these high one plastic surgeon in particular, doctor

1:00:48.800 --> 1:00:51.440
<v Speaker 1>rosen Um, has argued that there's a way that you

1:00:51.440 --> 1:00:54.800
<v Speaker 1>could turn the human arm into into a wing. But

1:00:54.960 --> 1:00:56.960
<v Speaker 1>most people, really they don't want that. If they want

1:00:56.960 --> 1:00:59.240
<v Speaker 1>to become a bird, they want to still have arms. Yeah.

1:00:59.280 --> 1:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>They want to be an angel, not a bird exactly. Yeah,

1:01:02.000 --> 1:01:05.400
<v Speaker 1>And most angels are depicted with with arms um in

1:01:05.520 --> 1:01:09.400
<v Speaker 1>terms of like actual intelligent um, you know, in more

1:01:09.480 --> 1:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>considerate ideas about what a an avian alien species might

1:01:14.080 --> 1:01:17.720
<v Speaker 1>consistent or what they might think like um. The best

1:01:17.720 --> 1:01:20.680
<v Speaker 1>example I've run across is in the second book of

1:01:20.920 --> 1:01:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Richard K. Morrigan's Takishi Kovacs novels, the most stuff famous

1:01:24.640 --> 1:01:27.200
<v Speaker 1>of which is is Altered Carbon, which I understand is

1:01:27.240 --> 1:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>getting picked up by Netflix. The second book, Broken Angels.

1:01:30.960 --> 1:01:35.240
<v Speaker 1>It introduces a long extinct or at least absent elder

1:01:35.360 --> 1:01:38.000
<v Speaker 1>race referred to as the Martians. But they're only referred

1:01:38.040 --> 1:01:40.120
<v Speaker 1>to as the Martians by humans because that's where we

1:01:40.160 --> 1:01:44.440
<v Speaker 1>first encounter their ruins on Mars, mean on Mars. So

1:01:45.480 --> 1:01:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the species, in particular their Avian they're winged um. They

1:01:50.200 --> 1:01:52.560
<v Speaker 1>disappeared from our galaxy at some point in the long past.

1:01:52.560 --> 1:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>They left behind all these advanced artifacts and a few

1:01:54.800 --> 1:01:58.000
<v Speaker 1>functional items. But Morgan plays with the idea of a

1:01:58.080 --> 1:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>technological civilization that evolved from solitary predatory predatory at avian creatures.

1:02:04.560 --> 1:02:08.520
<v Speaker 1>So in their maps, the local settlement is always positioned

1:02:08.520 --> 1:02:11.560
<v Speaker 1>at the center of the universe. Uh. So they seem

1:02:11.600 --> 1:02:14.840
<v Speaker 1>to have existed in their most evolved state in a

1:02:14.920 --> 1:02:19.560
<v Speaker 1>form of highly advanced and automated fiefdoms controlled by and

1:02:19.600 --> 1:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>consisting of a lone individual Um. Which is all kind

1:02:23.760 --> 1:02:26.640
<v Speaker 1>of slightly slightly hard to fathom. It's so different from

1:02:26.640 --> 1:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>how we think of civilization and technologically advanced civilizations working.

1:02:31.400 --> 1:02:34.600
<v Speaker 1>But indeed, what how would the model differ if the

1:02:34.720 --> 1:02:38.439
<v Speaker 1>species was inherently solitary instead of social, I mean, would

1:02:38.440 --> 1:02:42.280
<v Speaker 1>it even be possible? Uh, It's it runs contrary to

1:02:42.360 --> 1:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>our to our only example of evolved, uh technological civilization. Yeah,

1:02:48.360 --> 1:02:51.680
<v Speaker 1>it's just another way of highlighting exactly how deep our

1:02:51.760 --> 1:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>mammalian influences run, the fact that we things we think

1:02:55.920 --> 1:02:59.840
<v Speaker 1>of as inherent to intelligence or inherent to civilization are

1:03:00.000 --> 1:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>really facts about mammals. And you know, you wonder how

1:03:03.360 --> 1:03:07.000
<v Speaker 1>different things would be if it weren't mammals though, you know,

1:03:07.040 --> 1:03:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the whole idea about the creature positioning itself at the

1:03:09.560 --> 1:03:11.240
<v Speaker 1>center of the universe. I mean, we all do that.

1:03:11.280 --> 1:03:13.360
<v Speaker 1>It comes back to the whole theory of mind and

1:03:13.400 --> 1:03:16.200
<v Speaker 1>how we're just all we all were doing is engaging

1:03:16.240 --> 1:03:19.960
<v Speaker 1>with this sort of mental simulation of who we are,

1:03:20.480 --> 1:03:23.600
<v Speaker 1>this idea of ourselves that may itself be flawed, and

1:03:23.640 --> 1:03:26.040
<v Speaker 1>then all these various flawed ideas of what these other

1:03:26.120 --> 1:03:28.760
<v Speaker 1>mammals in our lives are thinking. It's a very sense

1:03:28.800 --> 1:03:32.080
<v Speaker 1>of imagination from which we conjure up things like how

1:03:32.080 --> 1:03:36.240
<v Speaker 1>are the duck? Oh, yes, another great space faring avian species, now,

1:03:36.240 --> 1:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>but how are the duck? He just had hands, didn't

1:03:38.320 --> 1:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>he did he? Yeah? I guess he was kind of

1:03:39.800 --> 1:03:42.880
<v Speaker 1>like a cartoon failure of imagination. How are the duck?

1:03:42.920 --> 1:03:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Why didn't he have wings instead of arms with fingers. Yeah,

1:03:46.680 --> 1:03:49.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, they weren't quite it was this is not

1:03:49.240 --> 1:03:52.800
<v Speaker 1>really science fiction, but the Skexies in the Dark Crystal.

1:03:53.080 --> 1:03:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I think they had hands too, didn't they theyre swords

1:03:55.680 --> 1:03:58.560
<v Speaker 1>at each other, Yeah they did, but they were they

1:03:58.960 --> 1:04:03.960
<v Speaker 1>behaved the way that they behaved like bickering movie vulture creatures.

1:04:04.000 --> 1:04:07.800
<v Speaker 1>They their their attitude was seemed very avian. Yeah, they

1:04:07.800 --> 1:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>were essentially, well, they are a their their culture embodies

1:04:12.840 --> 1:04:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the scavenging impulse, like they're all squabbling over scraps. Yeah. Yeah,

1:04:17.680 --> 1:04:20.240
<v Speaker 1>and their their their outfits and their environments are all

1:04:20.320 --> 1:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>just kind of a big piles of junk. Really. I

1:04:23.040 --> 1:04:27.520
<v Speaker 1>do love The Dark Crystal. It's it's such a magically

1:04:27.680 --> 1:04:31.040
<v Speaker 1>non human story. It is, Yeah, for just the the

1:04:31.240 --> 1:04:34.040
<v Speaker 1>entire thing, like all the creatures, all the plants, it's

1:04:34.080 --> 1:04:36.920
<v Speaker 1>just a completely alien environment. And it was made at

1:04:37.000 --> 1:04:40.040
<v Speaker 1>just the right time. If you've made it a little earlier,

1:04:40.360 --> 1:04:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the practical effects wouldn't have been there to make it

1:04:43.160 --> 1:04:45.240
<v Speaker 1>look as good as it as it does. And if

1:04:45.280 --> 1:04:47.040
<v Speaker 1>it came before c G. Yeah, if you came a

1:04:47.040 --> 1:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>little later, they would have c G I the heck

1:04:48.640 --> 1:04:51.400
<v Speaker 1>out of it. So it was it's a movie, a

1:04:51.480 --> 1:04:54.160
<v Speaker 1>perfect movie that came out around it just the right time.

1:04:54.640 --> 1:04:57.520
<v Speaker 1>So I actually got in touch with owner Gintercune, one

1:04:57.520 --> 1:05:01.280
<v Speaker 1>of the authors of the Cognition Without Cortex paper, over email,

1:05:01.320 --> 1:05:04.440
<v Speaker 1>and we had a brief exchange and he answered some

1:05:04.520 --> 1:05:07.840
<v Speaker 1>questions very generously for us. So this whole interview will

1:05:07.880 --> 1:05:10.320
<v Speaker 1>be posted on stuff to Blow your Mind dot com.

1:05:10.360 --> 1:05:12.000
<v Speaker 1>But we just wanted to talk about a couple of

1:05:12.040 --> 1:05:14.560
<v Speaker 1>his answers here because I thought it was interesting. One

1:05:14.560 --> 1:05:16.680
<v Speaker 1>of the things we asked him about was the difference

1:05:16.720 --> 1:05:21.120
<v Speaker 1>between different species of birds in terms of cognition. Specifically,

1:05:21.120 --> 1:05:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I said, uh, we're now learning how intelligent corvids and

1:05:24.600 --> 1:05:27.800
<v Speaker 1>parrots are, but are the chicken and the pigeon probably

1:05:27.840 --> 1:05:30.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot smarter than we thought as well. I'm just

1:05:30.600 --> 1:05:33.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna read his answer here on this particular question, he says,

1:05:34.280 --> 1:05:36.120
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't make much sense to talk about birds and

1:05:36.160 --> 1:05:38.640
<v Speaker 1>mammals in general. It is much more useful to compare

1:05:38.960 --> 1:05:41.600
<v Speaker 1>some groups of birds with some groups of mammals. There's

1:05:41.640 --> 1:05:46.240
<v Speaker 1>practically no important difference in any cognitive repertoire between corvids

1:05:46.240 --> 1:05:49.080
<v Speaker 1>and parrots on one side and primates on the other side.

1:05:49.320 --> 1:05:51.600
<v Speaker 1>But obviously it would be a bit unfair to compare

1:05:51.640 --> 1:05:54.880
<v Speaker 1>a chicken and a pigeon with an eight, but this

1:05:54.960 --> 1:05:57.320
<v Speaker 1>is also true for mice and rats. So to put

1:05:57.320 --> 1:06:00.440
<v Speaker 1>it in a bit unscientific way, chicken and pigeon are

1:06:00.480 --> 1:06:03.840
<v Speaker 1>possibly comparable in many aspects with rats when it comes

1:06:03.840 --> 1:06:06.520
<v Speaker 1>to cognition. That said, it is important to state that

1:06:06.520 --> 1:06:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the cognitive differences between rats and monkeys on the on

1:06:10.200 --> 1:06:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the one side, and pigeons and corvettes on the other

1:06:12.200 --> 1:06:17.480
<v Speaker 1>side are often overestimated. Careful observations show that also chicken

1:06:17.680 --> 1:06:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and chickens and pigeons, as also rats, achieve much higher

1:06:21.080 --> 1:06:24.640
<v Speaker 1>levels of cognitive operations than often assumed. I thought that

1:06:24.720 --> 1:06:26.880
<v Speaker 1>was interesting because it highlights that there might be just

1:06:26.960 --> 1:06:31.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of like a general lack of awareness we have

1:06:31.640 --> 1:06:34.720
<v Speaker 1>about how smart all different kinds of species are, not

1:06:34.760 --> 1:06:38.920
<v Speaker 1>just birds, but that we we under or overestimate the

1:06:38.960 --> 1:06:42.680
<v Speaker 1>intelligence of animals across the board. Yeah, we we. It's

1:06:42.920 --> 1:06:46.360
<v Speaker 1>very difficult, even in scientific settings to set aside um,

1:06:46.400 --> 1:06:49.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, our our human bias on these things. Another

1:06:49.920 --> 1:06:52.880
<v Speaker 1>one of the questions he answered was that I specifically

1:06:52.920 --> 1:06:57.000
<v Speaker 1>asked what he thought the most impressive display of sophisticated

1:06:57.040 --> 1:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>cognition he'd seen in birds was and so he says,

1:07:01.280 --> 1:07:03.440
<v Speaker 1>imagine you're sitting in front of a table full of

1:07:03.440 --> 1:07:05.880
<v Speaker 1>tasty food and you're asked which of the many items

1:07:05.920 --> 1:07:08.520
<v Speaker 1>on the table is the most delicious one. That's my

1:07:08.640 --> 1:07:14.320
<v Speaker 1>situation now, Uh, just a feast of bird intelligence. But

1:07:14.720 --> 1:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>he says, if you force him to give an answer,

1:07:16.440 --> 1:07:18.560
<v Speaker 1>he says, I'd like to mention two points. The first

1:07:18.680 --> 1:07:22.040
<v Speaker 1>is self recognition in the mirror, as shown by magpies. Now,

1:07:22.080 --> 1:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>that was one of the ones we talked about and

1:07:23.560 --> 1:07:26.960
<v Speaker 1>we found pretty interesting. But he says this finding possibly

1:07:27.000 --> 1:07:31.480
<v Speaker 1>implies that magpies know about themselves, and they shared this

1:07:31.560 --> 1:07:35.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of knowledge with chimpanzees and a few other ape species.

1:07:35.720 --> 1:07:39.240
<v Speaker 1>The second aspect that I find fascinating is social cognition.

1:07:39.320 --> 1:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>We also talked about this one. He says. Corvids seem

1:07:42.280 --> 1:07:45.840
<v Speaker 1>to know in a lot of detail what other animals

1:07:46.080 --> 1:07:48.760
<v Speaker 1>can know and what they can't know. So this is

1:07:48.800 --> 1:07:52.320
<v Speaker 1>the theory of mind we discussed. Uh. He says, they

1:07:52.360 --> 1:07:55.040
<v Speaker 1>also seem to have a certain understanding of the intentions

1:07:55.040 --> 1:07:57.800
<v Speaker 1>of other corvid's, and they possibly are able to at

1:07:57.840 --> 1:08:02.440
<v Speaker 1>least anticipate how another bird is feeling in a certain situation.

1:08:02.960 --> 1:08:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Just a few years ago, nobody would have thought that

1:08:05.520 --> 1:08:08.080
<v Speaker 1>this was within the reach of a bird. Now. I

1:08:08.080 --> 1:08:09.760
<v Speaker 1>want to stress that we asked a number of other

1:08:09.840 --> 1:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>key questions related to the research. Here some of the

1:08:12.560 --> 1:08:14.280
<v Speaker 1>question we asked him about some of the questions that

1:08:14.320 --> 1:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>arose in our coverage of the topic. But I do

1:08:18.280 --> 1:08:20.799
<v Speaker 1>want to just touch on very briefly the more science

1:08:20.840 --> 1:08:24.720
<v Speaker 1>fiction oriented question that we asked him. UM. We asked

1:08:24.800 --> 1:08:27.439
<v Speaker 1>him about. You know, he said, revolution has got a

1:08:27.479 --> 1:08:30.240
<v Speaker 1>different way. Could avians rather than primates have become the

1:08:30.320 --> 1:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>dominant intelligence on planet or even developing a technological civilization?

1:08:34.640 --> 1:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>What might that look like? And I have to give

1:08:37.200 --> 1:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>him credit for taking our bait, you know, they're not

1:08:39.920 --> 1:08:41.960
<v Speaker 1>not every scientist out there is willing to play the

1:08:42.240 --> 1:08:45.639
<v Speaker 1>what if game um with interviewers. But uh, I thought

1:08:45.680 --> 1:08:47.559
<v Speaker 1>he was game. I thought he had a very practical

1:08:47.600 --> 1:08:50.519
<v Speaker 1>answer though. So he says, in principle, yeah, he thinks

1:08:50.520 --> 1:08:53.600
<v Speaker 1>in principle you could. But he says, however, birds have

1:08:53.680 --> 1:08:57.200
<v Speaker 1>a problem that all reptiles have. They are unable to

1:08:57.240 --> 1:09:00.280
<v Speaker 1>construct big brains. Uh. This could be related to the

1:09:00.320 --> 1:09:03.040
<v Speaker 1>fact that in reptile brains and so also in bird

1:09:03.080 --> 1:09:06.320
<v Speaker 1>brains the fore brain is not divided into gray matter

1:09:06.439 --> 1:09:09.679
<v Speaker 1>and white matter. In mammals, this division is very important,

1:09:09.720 --> 1:09:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and the mammalian cortex can grow like a folded carpet

1:09:13.200 --> 1:09:17.479
<v Speaker 1>theoretically endlessly. In the reptile slash bird brain, the upper

1:09:17.520 --> 1:09:20.120
<v Speaker 1>limit seems to be reached by a little more than

1:09:20.160 --> 1:09:23.720
<v Speaker 1>a hundred grams. We haven't understood this point completely yet,

1:09:23.760 --> 1:09:25.960
<v Speaker 1>but to be as smart as we humans are, birds

1:09:26.000 --> 1:09:29.120
<v Speaker 1>possibly would need a couple of hundred grams. And as

1:09:29.160 --> 1:09:31.040
<v Speaker 1>long as they're unable to come up with that, we

1:09:31.160 --> 1:09:34.680
<v Speaker 1>rule this planet. So it's just mass. It's yeah, you know,

1:09:34.800 --> 1:09:37.320
<v Speaker 1>that's all they lack. But we can still lord it

1:09:37.360 --> 1:09:39.800
<v Speaker 1>over them. Indeed. So hey, if you want to check

1:09:39.800 --> 1:09:41.640
<v Speaker 1>out the rest of this interview, you can head on

1:09:41.680 --> 1:09:43.720
<v Speaker 1>over to stuff to bow your mind dot com. Uh

1:09:43.720 --> 1:09:45.519
<v Speaker 1>that's where we will have the interview. If you're checking

1:09:45.520 --> 1:09:48.759
<v Speaker 1>this out within a week or two of this episode's publication,

1:09:48.760 --> 1:09:50.559
<v Speaker 1>it is probably gonna be on the front page somewhere.

1:09:51.000 --> 1:09:54.040
<v Speaker 1>We also really want to thank Dr Gunjakun for getting

1:09:54.080 --> 1:09:56.600
<v Speaker 1>back to us. His answers were very interesting and it

1:09:56.680 --> 1:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>was very generous of him to share his time and

1:09:58.400 --> 1:10:00.720
<v Speaker 1>his thoughts. That's right and We'll to include a link

1:10:00.760 --> 1:10:03.320
<v Speaker 1>to this on the landing page for this episode. All right,

1:10:03.400 --> 1:10:06.519
<v Speaker 1>so there you have it. Avian intelligence. We would love

1:10:06.600 --> 1:10:10.240
<v Speaker 1>to hear from our listeners about this topic. Um, how

1:10:10.280 --> 1:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>do you feel about the mind of bird? Do you

1:10:12.400 --> 1:10:15.040
<v Speaker 1>have birds in your life? And if so, how do

1:10:15.120 --> 1:10:20.120
<v Speaker 1>you objectively and subjectively um view their intelligence? And if

1:10:20.160 --> 1:10:22.840
<v Speaker 1>you're a science fiction fan or a fantasy fan, you

1:10:22.920 --> 1:10:27.440
<v Speaker 1>have you come across any models of a fictional avian intelligence,

1:10:27.439 --> 1:10:30.880
<v Speaker 1>particularly avian intelligence? Uh, then you know involves the use

1:10:30.920 --> 1:10:34.200
<v Speaker 1>of technology. If so, share those with us. We would

1:10:34.240 --> 1:10:35.960
<v Speaker 1>love to hear about them. And if you want to

1:10:36.000 --> 1:10:38.320
<v Speaker 1>get in touch with us with feedback about this episode

1:10:38.400 --> 1:10:40.600
<v Speaker 1>or any other recent episodes, you can always email on

1:10:40.680 --> 1:10:53.160
<v Speaker 1>us that blow the mind at how stuffords dot com

1:10:53.240 --> 1:10:55.680
<v Speaker 1>well more on this and thousands of other topics. Is

1:10:55.680 --> 1:11:12.719
<v Speaker 1>it how stuff works dot com? I think the bigot