Speaker 1: Democrat big donors have been grumbling about the uninspiring Democrat
Speaker 1: presidential field. The top tier Biden, Sanders, Warren mayor Pete
Speaker 1: They're all cringe worthy bunch of dryballs for a host
Speaker 1: of reasons. Those on the bottom tier are even worse. Now.
Speaker 1: Deval Patrick has thrown his hat and ring, and Michael
Speaker 1: Bloomberg's expected to do so, so the supposedly centrist moderates
Speaker 1: should be the answer. Right, Well, not so fast. Washington
Speaker 1: Post columnist David Byler says neither Patrick nor Bloomberg are
Speaker 1: the disruptors that high roller Democrats are looking for. He
Speaker 1: says they probably will not be able to build a
Speaker 1: winning campaign infrastructure because they jumped in so late. But
Speaker 1: the problem is not just lateness. The truth is these
Speaker 1: two guys are just as lame as the lame candidates
Speaker 1: already running. So Mr Biler lists some Democrats that could
Speaker 1: disrupt things. Michelle my Belle Obama, who doesn't need infrastructure
Speaker 1: because she's Michelle Oh, the one, Larie Clinton, Wartz and
Speaker 1: all would still be stronger than Deval Patrick or Michael Bloomberg.
Speaker 1: Did this guy, she would at least shake things up
Speaker 1: and Buyler lists another name that we all know, Al Gore. Yeah,
Speaker 1: the single issue claimate change candidate. But even he would
Speaker 1: be better than the current crop. According to this guy,
Speaker 1: what's it all to it? They've gotten nobody, They literally
Speaker 1: have nobody, and they know it.