1
00:00:00,200 --> 00:00:04,519
Speaker 1: Democrat big donors have been grumbling about the uninspiring Democrat

2
00:00:04,600 --> 00:00:08,400
Speaker 1: presidential field. The top tier Biden, Sanders, Warren mayor Pete

3
00:00:08,840 --> 00:00:11,760
Speaker 1: They're all cringe worthy bunch of dryballs for a host

4
00:00:11,840 --> 00:00:15,520
Speaker 1: of reasons. Those on the bottom tier are even worse. Now.

5
00:00:15,600 --> 00:00:18,120
Speaker 1: Deval Patrick has thrown his hat and ring, and Michael

6
00:00:18,120 --> 00:00:22,440
Speaker 1: Bloomberg's expected to do so, so the supposedly centrist moderates

7
00:00:22,480 --> 00:00:26,120
Speaker 1: should be the answer. Right, Well, not so fast. Washington

8
00:00:26,200 --> 00:00:30,080
Speaker 1: Post columnist David Byler says neither Patrick nor Bloomberg are

9
00:00:30,120 --> 00:00:34,280
Speaker 1: the disruptors that high roller Democrats are looking for. He

10
00:00:34,320 --> 00:00:36,760
Speaker 1: says they probably will not be able to build a

11
00:00:36,800 --> 00:00:41,080
Speaker 1: winning campaign infrastructure because they jumped in so late. But

12
00:00:41,159 --> 00:00:44,400
Speaker 1: the problem is not just lateness. The truth is these

13
00:00:44,400 --> 00:00:47,120
Speaker 1: two guys are just as lame as the lame candidates

14
00:00:47,120 --> 00:00:52,200
Speaker 1: already running. So Mr Biler lists some Democrats that could

15
00:00:52,240 --> 00:00:56,600
Speaker 1: disrupt things. Michelle my Belle Obama, who doesn't need infrastructure

16
00:00:56,640 --> 00:01:02,040
Speaker 1: because she's Michelle Oh, the one, Larie Clinton, Wartz and

17
00:01:02,360 --> 00:01:05,680
Speaker 1: all would still be stronger than Deval Patrick or Michael Bloomberg.

18
00:01:05,680 --> 00:01:08,679
Speaker 1: Did this guy, she would at least shake things up

19
00:01:08,680 --> 00:01:12,880
Speaker 1: and Buyler lists another name that we all know, Al Gore. Yeah,

20
00:01:12,959 --> 00:01:16,839
Speaker 1: the single issue claimate change candidate. But even he would

21
00:01:16,840 --> 00:01:19,000
Speaker 1: be better than the current crop. According to this guy,

22
00:01:19,240 --> 00:01:22,720
Speaker 1: what's it all to it? They've gotten nobody, They literally

23
00:01:22,880 --> 00:01:25,160
Speaker 1: have nobody, and they know it.