WEBVTT - The No Downside ETF

0:00:05.760 --> 0:00:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Trallians.

0:00:06.480 --> 0:00:12.479
<v Speaker 2>I'm Joel Webber and I'm Eric Valchunis Eric.

0:00:12.480 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Every once in a while we come across the thing

0:00:14.840 --> 0:00:19.360
<v Speaker 1>that feels like a big deal, maybe a good thing,

0:00:19.800 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 1>really good thing for investors, and this one really piqued

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:23.799
<v Speaker 1>my interest.

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:27.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's a new category that's getting big quickly and

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 2>it's really we call them the buffer ETFs. Target out

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 2>target outcome is another name for them, and there's been

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 2>there's dozens of them. But there was a story written

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:38.239
<v Speaker 2>by Bloomberg News that had a headline that really just

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 2>caught people's attention. This story got a lot of reads

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 2>and it was basically along the lines of, hey, here's

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 2>a new fund that offers one downside protection.

0:00:47.720 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Downside protection.

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:52.880
<v Speaker 2>That's what I like, Yeah, everybody does. I think there's

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 2>also a too good to be true element to it

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 2>as well, and so clearly you're going to click on

0:00:57.200 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 2>that and say what's going on here? And I think

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 2>it's just excuse to get into the buffer funds and

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 2>what they do and the audience they serve. I just

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 2>looked recently they've taken in over five billion this year.

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:10.839
<v Speaker 2>That's a twenty three percent organic growth rate. That's about

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:13.120
<v Speaker 2>triple the ETF industry as a whole. They're now up

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 2>to about thirty billion dollars. And this search I did

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 2>isn't even catching them all. It's only the ones with

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 2>buffer in the name. But anyway, it's a whole big category.

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 2>Black Rocks jumped in and so I think it's a

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 2>good time to revisit this, in particular this one that

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:26.959
<v Speaker 2>has one hundred percent downside protection.

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Joining us on this episode. We're gonna have Bruce Bond,

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the CEO and founder of Innovator Capitol Management, as well

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:37.959
<v Speaker 1>as Graham Day, the chief investment officer, and we're going

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the Innovator equity defined protection ETF with

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the ticker t Jewel, this time on trillions no downside Bruce, Graham,

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Trillions.

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 3>Great to be here, guys, really happy to be here.

0:01:56.280 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for having us guys.

0:01:57.360 --> 0:02:00.919
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Bruce, I'm gonna start with you. Do you prefer

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the term buffer ETF or defined outcome?

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 4>We prefer the term defined outcome to cover the whole

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:18.359
<v Speaker 4>category of these defined outcome type ETFs, which includes buffers, accelerated,

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:24.080
<v Speaker 4>income based and now you know the defined protection ETFs

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:26.840
<v Speaker 4>as well, so we look at defined outcome kind of

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 4>as an umbrella, and buffers is a category within that.

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so is this too good to be true? I

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:35.680
<v Speaker 1>mean I put money in and then a little bit later,

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:39.639
<v Speaker 1>like chaos unfolds. There's no downside. I only get upside.

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 1>That seems like there's a catch.

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well there really is no catch. It is a

0:02:46.080 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 4>great product. It took us a while to get it out,

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:51.079
<v Speaker 4>and I think to be able to tell people that

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 4>you can now participate in the equity markets with no

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 4>downside risk and with upside now you are giving a

0:02:58.360 --> 0:02:59.239
<v Speaker 4>couple things up.

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 1>One of the Oh there's the catch, okay, yeah, what

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 1>do I give up?

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 4>So I guess, yeah, I mean catch you're giving up

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:09.359
<v Speaker 4>the dividend, so you don't receive the dividend, and you're

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 4>also giving up the upside over two years above sixteen

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 4>point six percent, you know, so any performance over sixteen

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:20.519
<v Speaker 4>and a half percent, let's say you're giving that up.

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 4>So you're giving up the dividend and that and so

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 4>those are the gives up. So there's nothing free within

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:29.520
<v Speaker 4>the investing world, as we all know. But to be

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:32.959
<v Speaker 4>able to understand you don't have downside, but you get

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 4>that amount of upside is a huge benefit to many

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 4>many people in the investing world.

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Do you keep whatever's above sixteen percent.

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 4>No, we don't keep it. What happens is we take

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 4>the dividend and we buy part of the options with

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 4>the dividend. But then we don't quite have enough money

0:03:52.120 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 4>just using the dividend to buy the options, and so

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 4>we have to sell a call and we determine where

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 4>the cap is by how much money we have to

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 4>raise in order to finance this package. We want the

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 4>options package to be a zero cost package for investors,

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 4>and so we set the cap there. So where's really

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 4>We're selling off the upside to get a little more

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:16.360
<v Speaker 4>money to finance the package. And that's really what happens,

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 4>and the way we're able to give you the downside

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:21.600
<v Speaker 4>protection and give you a certain amount of the upside.

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Gram Let's come in here. That was a deep endo

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:26.039
<v Speaker 1>the swimming pool. Can you break that down a little

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 1>bit before.

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:30.360
<v Speaker 3>Me, guys, It's really simple. All we're doing is, as

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:35.600
<v Speaker 3>Bruce was saying, in giving up unlimited upside potential, you're

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 3>exchanging that for the certainty of having a one hundred

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 3>percent buffer and if you think about long term the

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:48.279
<v Speaker 3>ability to get some equity upside in today's market where

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 3>it's at all time highs, where people are really scared

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:55.279
<v Speaker 3>of what do I do. Do I just keep giving

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:57.279
<v Speaker 3>my money to the banks and letting them sit in

0:04:57.279 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 3>the deposits, or do I invest in the markets but

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 3>also have that one hundred percent protection and so to

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:08.839
<v Speaker 3>have a sixteen percent upside over two years, history suggests

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 3>that's a better spot to be than if you were

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 3>just sitting on the sidelines in cash.

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:16.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, there's a lot of questions on where this fits

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 2>into portfolio, who it's for, But before we get there,

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 2>just while we're on the product itself, just explain as

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 2>best you can what you're doing in the portfolio. You

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 2>talked about selling the upside. What kind of options are

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 2>you using, how often are you changing the options, what

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:33.839
<v Speaker 2>kind of options are they?

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 3>It's really simple at the end of the day, these

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 3>are three options positions that we're holding. And the beauty

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:43.679
<v Speaker 3>of the defined outcome ets is that once that basket

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 3>of options is set, it is fixed for the entirety

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 3>of the outcome period. There's no active management, there's no

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 3>one pulling levers behind the curtain. That's what gives all

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:57.040
<v Speaker 3>investors a defined outcome. And so we start with a

0:05:57.120 --> 0:05:59.600
<v Speaker 3>deepend the money call on the S and P five

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 3>hundred that gives you the long exposure to the S

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 3>and P five hundred, and then, as Bruce mentioned, we

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 3>use the implied dividend inside that deep in the money

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 3>call to help fund the at the money put so

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 3>and at the money put is what gives you that

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 3>one hundred percent downside protection. Now the dividend is not

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 3>enough to cover that cost of that protection, and so

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 3>that's where we go out and we put the market

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 3>makers on the option side into competition and tell them, look,

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 3>we need to finance this downside protection. At what level

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 3>can we sell a call the highest level possible to

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 3>finance the remainder of the cost of the protection. In

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:47.279
<v Speaker 3>this case, it was sixteen point six percent. We sell

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 3>that call. That's what gives the cap to investors, but

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:54.880
<v Speaker 3>it's also what helps finance that at the money put.

0:06:56.160 --> 0:06:59.040
<v Speaker 2>When these products come out they sometimes have dates around them.

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 2>Is this is this one T jewel, which by the way,

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:03.480
<v Speaker 2>sounds like a like a rapper. It's a cool name,

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:05.479
<v Speaker 2>it's like a It just kind of rolls off the tongue.

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:07.039
<v Speaker 2>Whoever got that took your good job?

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Do you?

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 2>These are designed to start on the day that they

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 2>come out, kind of right. It's not a lot of

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 2>other ETFs, including leveraged the leverage resets every day. This

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 2>is a little different. Can you just explain how the

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 2>timing works.

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and Eric, maybe even before we do that, we

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 4>didn't really talk about, Okay, what is this product and

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 4>how does it work a little bit, you know, just

0:07:27.880 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 4>kind of the overview for everyone. Yeah, basically, t jewel

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 4>It was listed on the first of July, and you

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:40.920
<v Speaker 4>have to hold this product for two years in order

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 4>to get the sixteen point six percent. So you buy

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 4>that and then over a two year period, if the

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 4>market is up twenty percent, you get sixteen point six

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:53.240
<v Speaker 4>If the market is up ten percent, you just get

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 4>ten percent, So you get all the way up to

0:07:57.320 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 4>sixteen point six percent. Now, the beauty of this product

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:04.120
<v Speaker 4>is that you can't lose money on the downside if

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 4>you buy day one. So if the market's down five percent,

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 4>you don't lose. If it's down ten percent, you don't lose.

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:11.960
<v Speaker 4>If it's down twenty percent from July first, you don't

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 4>lose any money, and I think that's what people are

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 4>so excited about. So I just want to make sure

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 4>everybody understands this. Although what Graham's talking about with the

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 4>call bonds, and I mean with the calls and the

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 4>options and all this stuff, it's not kind of confusing

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 4>for some people. What they really need to do is

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 4>look at this at face value. You buy it on

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 4>the first of July, or you can really buy it anytime.

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:34.320
<v Speaker 4>If you look at the website, you get the upside

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 4>of the market up to sixteen and a half percent

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:38.880
<v Speaker 4>and you have no risk on the downside. But you

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:40.840
<v Speaker 4>have to stay in it for two years in order

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 4>to receive that. And that's really what people are so

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:46.439
<v Speaker 4>excited about. So storry to interrupt. I just want to

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 4>make sure everybody understood where we were.

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 2>Do people religiously buy on the first day and then

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 2>nobody buys it? Or do you find some people come

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:03.400
<v Speaker 2>into these products after a couple months or a year.

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Is there a benefit to buying it a year in

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 2>let's say the market is down or up, like, is

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 2>there a trading crowd that gets into this even if

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:15.200
<v Speaker 2>they're not sort of maybe the older investor looking to

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:17.720
<v Speaker 2>protect their wealth and they go in day one, Is

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 2>there any thing you can do with this after day one?

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 3>Eric? Yes. For the most part, though, we do find

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:29.440
<v Speaker 3>advisors like to buy at the very beginning of the

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:32.320
<v Speaker 3>outcome period. They like to understand that they have the

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 3>full downside buffer, they have the full upside cap. And

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 3>I think one of the things that we realized early

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:42.440
<v Speaker 3>on when we brought these products back in twenty eighteen

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:45.720
<v Speaker 3>was that what I alluded to before, when you look

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 3>at the defined outcome, that package of options is fixed

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 3>for the entirety of the outcome period. That means it's

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 3>someone who buys, say six months into an outcome period,

0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:59.959
<v Speaker 3>they can still achieve a defined outcome. Now, their outcome

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 3>may look a little different. The price of the underline

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 3>and the options have moved, so the price of the

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:08.080
<v Speaker 3>ETF has moved. But now if they had a one

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 3>year out from pater to start and they're six months in,

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 3>now they have a unique six month defined outcome that

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 3>they can achieve. And so we've seen a growing number

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 3>of advisors who have grown comfortable with using these ets.

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 3>Maybe they started buying at the very beginning of the

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 3>outcome period, but now they look and realize, well, this

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 3>payoff is really intriguing to me and my clients for

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:37.319
<v Speaker 3>this next six months. In terms of the trading community,

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 3>I think there's definitely some and we've been talking with

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 3>some institutions that have used options in sophisticated ways, but

0:10:45.920 --> 0:10:49.560
<v Speaker 3>the ability to access a package of options via single

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:54.440
<v Speaker 3>ETF is far more efficient for them than it is

0:10:54.480 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 3>to recreate the options package, trade those individual option legs

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 3>tax full event every single time you're managing this portfolio options.

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:07.839
<v Speaker 3>And so we're seeing the application of these ets extending

0:11:07.960 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 3>from simply using day one the people using throughout the

0:11:12.040 --> 0:11:16.600
<v Speaker 3>outcome period, to now getting some of these institutions involved

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 3>as well.

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:19.840
<v Speaker 4>One other thing I would add to you guys too,

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 4>just to think about. So let's say you bought in

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 4>day one and then at a at the year point,

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:28.560
<v Speaker 4>let's say the market's up ten or fifteen percent and

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 4>the ETF's up eight percent. You know it's not going

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:33.679
<v Speaker 4>to be up as much as the EGF. Listeners need

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:35.960
<v Speaker 4>to understand that it's going to trail a little because

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 4>there's a lot of time value in there. Only at

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 4>the very end of the outcome period you're going to

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 4>get one to one on the upside with the SMP.

0:11:43.920 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 4>And but just think about anytime you could use this

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 4>if the market's up, and if the ETF is up,

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:51.960
<v Speaker 4>you can roll it into a new one at the

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 4>reset time and you lock in whatever that gain is.

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 4>You can't lose it after that, you know, so you

0:11:57.360 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 4>just step up, you continue to lock your gains in.

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:02.320
<v Speaker 4>I can see a lot of people using it like

0:12:02.400 --> 0:12:04.080
<v Speaker 4>that into the future if the market's up.

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 2>And so this to me, especially after last year, because

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 2>sometimes I see a product like this and I'm like,

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:13.960
<v Speaker 2>why not just like diversify old school, have some treasuries,

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 2>have some stocks. But after last year, treasuries and stocks

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:20.679
<v Speaker 2>both went down a lot, And so how big of

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 2>an opening did that create? Because I get the appeal here, right,

0:12:23.679 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 2>You've got older investors especially who have a lot of gains.

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I was going to say, like a retiree.

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 2>This just seems like, yeah, what is the average age

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:33.719
<v Speaker 2>in these funds? Got to be like seventy? I mean

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 2>I can't I mean, you wouldn't use this if you're

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 2>thirty years old, right.

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's hard to track. But you know one other thing,

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 4>you know, because they're ETOs, we don't know everybody that

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:45.679
<v Speaker 4>owns them. But the thing to remember is that like

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 4>seventy five percent of investable assets are in pre retirement

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 4>and retirement accounts. That's where most of the money is located.

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 4>And so those people that are getting ready are looking

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:02.199
<v Speaker 4>at retirement, are almost in retirement or saying I don't

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:04.439
<v Speaker 4>want to put my money at risk, and Eric, you're right.

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:06.560
<v Speaker 4>Typically you would say, you know, let's say you get

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 4>a windfall, you get a million blocks, and you're like, okay,

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 4>well I need to buy a little bond. I got

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 4>to buy a little You don't have to think about

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 4>that anymore.

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 3>If you don't want to.

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 4>You can just buy this and say, Okay, I get

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:20.199
<v Speaker 4>all the upside up to sixteen percent over the next

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 4>couple of years. I got no risk on the downside. Why,

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 4>I think about what I want to do, and I

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 4>think those are the options that this gives people that

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 4>they didn't have access to before. One other thing, Eric,

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:35.560
<v Speaker 4>you can appreciate this. The SEC has never approved the

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 4>name protection and the name of any other ETF until now.

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 4>It's called defined protection ETFs that innovators bringing. That's a

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 4>big deal. It tells you a lot about how the

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 4>SEC has seen them as well.

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 2>How were those conversations. Did it take a lot to

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 2>convince them, because they are pretty conservative when it comes

0:13:57.040 --> 0:13:58.840
<v Speaker 2>to putting certain words in the name.

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:05.840
<v Speaker 3>Eric, you know, really know. In fact, what you'll find

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 3>when you bring a lot of products to market is

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 3>that the SEC has a significant amount of input when

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:14.600
<v Speaker 3>it comes to the final name, and so you are

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:18.200
<v Speaker 3>it's almost a collaboration with them. And so we were

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 3>actually very surprised that this was one of the iterations

0:14:21.200 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 3>that they had come back to us with. And so

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 3>I think to Bruce's point, that kind of reaffirms that

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 3>they understand the value add proposition of this ETF and

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 3>it being the first ETF that for this outcome period

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 3>is going to provide investors what they have one hundred

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 3>percent buffer on the downside.

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so here's the question that I really want to know.

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 1>What took so long?

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 4>Exactly. Well, you know, if good things take time, y'all,

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 4>you know that, so it uh, yeah, it took a while.

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 4>And you know, I think in our approach to the business,

0:14:57.600 --> 0:14:59.520
<v Speaker 4>what we do is we look at the market and

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 4>we say what do people need, what do they really want?

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 4>What are they using today that we might be able

0:15:04.520 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 4>to do better. And so if you look at the

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 4>annuity business, this is why do people buy annuities for

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 4>the insurance. They want to know they're not going to

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 4>lose that money, right, and so this provides that to them.

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 4>Or even market link CDs that banks issue, why do

0:15:21.000 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 4>people buy those because they want to know they can't

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 4>lose money. Well, guess what's insurance companies? I mean, heaven forbid,

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 4>we have a huge environmental calamity in these insurance companies.

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:33.560
<v Speaker 4>So of them go down or something, I mean, it's

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 4>a real concern on people's minds these days. These do

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 4>not have credit risk. You don't have to wonder what

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 4>they're invested in. You can see what's in there and

0:15:44.160 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 4>it's not tax will when it resets, and so you

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:50.240
<v Speaker 4>don't have the credit risk, you don't have the tax risk.

0:15:50.520 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 4>You just let it go into the future and you

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 4>know when you sell it you have to pay the

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:57.200
<v Speaker 4>tax that's there, but you don't have to pay the

0:15:57.240 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 4>tax until you sell it.

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 2>I remember looking through some teachers retirement plans with some

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 2>of variable annuities, and the fees were ridiculous. I mean,

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 2>these teachers were getting gouged in my opinion, Can you

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 2>talk a little bit about that industry versus the fees

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:16.680
<v Speaker 2>on this and what the savings is.

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 3>Like, Eric, I think that's you kind of hit the

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 3>nail on the head when you look at the way

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 3>the ETF industry has evolved. It's been taking these exposures

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 3>that have been less liquid, more expensive, less tax efficient,

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 3>and making them accessible to all investors at the same price.

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 3>And that price is often significantly lower than what you

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 3>see in the insurance market. And so that's really no

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 3>different of what we've done here with Tjewel. We've taken

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 3>a look at an area of the market where we

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 3>were looking at the numbers twenty twenty two eighty billion

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 3>dollars of fixed index annuity sales. So that's products in

0:16:59.040 --> 0:17:01.720
<v Speaker 3>the insurance market that give you some of the equity upside,

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:05.960
<v Speaker 3>but give you that principle protection on the downside. The

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 3>problem is the fees are high. They tend to be

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:11.399
<v Speaker 3>five six years in duration. Your money is locked up,

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:13.040
<v Speaker 3>you want to get out after a year, you're going

0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:16.920
<v Speaker 3>to have a hefty surrender charge. And that doesn't even

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 3>take in consideration the tax implications of those structures. And

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:27.119
<v Speaker 3>again the ETF has shown the power of deferring taxes

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 3>and what that can do for the end investor. You

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:34.679
<v Speaker 3>add that, uh, you know, you add that dynamic to

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 3>this ETF, the tj U L there's a massive value

0:17:39.000 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 3>added potential that investors can unlock because when you look

0:17:42.600 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 3>at market link CDs, when you look at insurance products,

0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:50.480
<v Speaker 3>market link CDs have what's called phantom income. Now that's

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 3>a fancy term for you. Essentially are going to be

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:56.639
<v Speaker 3>paying taxes along the way on gains that you have

0:17:56.720 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 3>not yet received at an ordinary income rate. You look

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 3>at fixed indextinuities. Once those policies come due in five

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:09.960
<v Speaker 3>or six years, you're going to be paying ordinary income

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 3>taxes on gains the ETF you defer those gains. You

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:17.639
<v Speaker 3>choose if you want to sell after a year in

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:20.960
<v Speaker 3>a day, it's going to be long term cap gains.

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 3>And so you think about the tax alpha potential that

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:28.639
<v Speaker 3>the ETF wrapper delivers on top of the liquidity, on

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 3>top of the fact that there's no credit risk, on

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 3>top of the fact that there's no surrender charges. There's

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 3>a huge benefit that we think we are giving to

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 3>the end investor. And there's a huge market for this

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:48.919
<v Speaker 3>type of participation in the market. But having that known goffer.

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:52.720
<v Speaker 1>In place, Okay, strong pitch, I think I understand the

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:55.719
<v Speaker 1>product a little bit better. Now, what could go wrong?

0:18:56.320 --> 0:18:58.920
<v Speaker 1>What could make me not get the protection?

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:03.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, of March twenty twenty, or like a black Swan event,

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:05.760
<v Speaker 2>or I don't know, what would make me.

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:08.719
<v Speaker 3>There's there's none of Yeah, there's yeah, Joel, It's I mean,

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 3>it's a great question. And again a lot of people

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:13.879
<v Speaker 3>will say this just sounds too good to be true.

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:20.200
<v Speaker 3>That the ETF owns options. Those options are exchange traded options.

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:25.200
<v Speaker 3>They are guaranteed for settlement by the OCC. The OCC

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 3>has been identified by the US government as a too

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 3>important to fail institution, and so that's your counterparty when

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:37.479
<v Speaker 3>it comes to the underlying options. The OCC has been

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 3>around since the seventies. They have never defaulted on any

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 3>of their obligations. So that's your counterparty. Now obviously contrasts

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:50.680
<v Speaker 3>that to a bank or insurance company. We have found

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 3>investors saying we would much rather prefer having our counter

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 3>party be the OCC, as opposed to an insurance company

0:19:59.000 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 3>or a bank.

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:02.040
<v Speaker 4>So what can go wrong? Let me let me run

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 4>at that real quick guys, I don't mean to jump in,

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:08.440
<v Speaker 4>but so really on the downside, you own to put

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:11.920
<v Speaker 4>one hundred percent put at the money, can't lose money

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:14.960
<v Speaker 4>if the market goes down. To remember, these are spy options,

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:19.400
<v Speaker 4>most liquid options in the world right, so unbelievably adopted

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:22.919
<v Speaker 4>a deep pool of options, so you really have no

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:26.399
<v Speaker 4>risk there. So the only risk someone really has if

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 4>the market goes up significantly above the cap.

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:30.520
<v Speaker 3>That's it.

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 4>That's your risk. And we find most people that are saying, Okay,

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:38.960
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to get one hundred percent downside protection. I'm

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:41.679
<v Speaker 4>good with sixteen. I can live with that. I'm happy

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 4>with that, and I don't need more than that, and

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:47.399
<v Speaker 4>I'm willing to give up what is above that to

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:51.120
<v Speaker 4>know I can't lose going down. That's that's really your risk.

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 2>And that's sixty percent over two years, sixteen over two years.

0:20:55.400 --> 0:20:58.440
<v Speaker 2>What's interesting is the S and P annually I think

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 2>going back fifty one hundred years returns about eight point

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 2>five nine percent, So it's almost the average return of

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 2>the S and P. So I get it.

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's actually to that end. You guys must

0:21:11.040 --> 0:21:13.480
<v Speaker 1>have done a lot of back testing on this, like

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:15.480
<v Speaker 1>what did you learn from that process.

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:19.879
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think you know what we found is and

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:23.359
<v Speaker 3>you look at today's market and you've got a JP

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 3>Morgan in their second half outlook, they said that twenty

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:28.960
<v Speaker 3>five to thirty percent of their client's in bestible assets

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 3>in cash. And I think that people have had this

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 3>idea of gosh, cash is paying me four percent. Now,

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:37.879
<v Speaker 3>what a great place to be. But history shows that

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 3>you do not want to overweight cash in your portfolio.

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:44.439
<v Speaker 3>Look what happened in twenty twenty three. People experience all

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:47.399
<v Speaker 3>that downside. They moved to cash markets. The shots on

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:50.920
<v Speaker 3>nineteen percent, it's on a tear. And even you look

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:54.959
<v Speaker 3>at bonds, people were talking about bonds generational opportunities. Core

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:56.960
<v Speaker 3>bonds are up two percent, two and a half percent.

0:21:57.000 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 3>That doesn't sound like a generational opportunity to be And

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 3>so that's that's the beauty of these products is equity

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:09.320
<v Speaker 3>exposure is where where the where it happens in terms

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 3>of the portfolio. That's where you get the bulk of

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:15.120
<v Speaker 3>your returns, especially now that interest rates have normalized.

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, that was what I was going to say, Like

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:18.760
<v Speaker 1>when I asked that question of like what took so long?

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 1>It really was interest rates, right, we needed that to

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:24.920
<v Speaker 1>go up for strategy, right, yeah.

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, you know, and Joel, that's a that's a

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:29.880
<v Speaker 3>fair point. And one of the reasons why it took

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:32.920
<v Speaker 3>a while. And again you look at the insurance market,

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 3>the reason why they brought partially protected products is because

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:41.359
<v Speaker 3>it was too expensive to bring products that had one

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 3>hundred percent downside protection. That was a function of interest rates.

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 3>And so as interest rates have risen, that has really

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:54.440
<v Speaker 3>led to this new proliferation of insurance products that give

0:22:54.480 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 3>you equity upside with the full downside protection. And now

0:22:57.600 --> 0:23:01.480
<v Speaker 3>we can offer that in the ef rapper. But in

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:05.359
<v Speaker 3>terms of back testing looking we have seen that this

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:11.920
<v Speaker 3>type of strategy significantly outperforms cash, which you would expect. Again,

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 3>people think, well, gosh, I'm guaranteed to get four percent

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 3>of my money market fund. Why would I give that

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:22.200
<v Speaker 3>up for potentially getting sixteen point six percent over two years?

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 3>And that's the hurdle that people can't get over. But

0:23:25.880 --> 0:23:29.199
<v Speaker 3>that's why that these strategies actually do better than if

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 3>you're just sitting in cash. And you, guys, Eric, you

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 3>pointed out eight percent a year, eight nine percent a

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:37.520
<v Speaker 3>year over fifty years. That's the average an you'll return.

0:23:37.840 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 3>You look over two year time frames, the SMP is

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:44.960
<v Speaker 3>positive ninety percent of those times, and the average return

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 3>in positive markets is thirty two percent over two years.

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 3>So the math and the probability history tells you that

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 3>this is a better spot to be in than simply

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:01.639
<v Speaker 3>sitting in bonds or on the side sidelines in cash.

0:24:01.800 --> 0:24:05.400
<v Speaker 3>And by my dad, the money market funds are four percent.

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm not getting paid that at my JP Morgan Chase account.

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:11.359
<v Speaker 3>And that's where a lot of people have moved to.

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:14.919
<v Speaker 3>They've moved from these regional banks. They've moved they put

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 3>their money in these big banks that are flush with cash,

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 3>that are still paying ten twenty bases points on deposits.

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:23.639
<v Speaker 3>And so again this is a tool to get that

0:24:23.760 --> 0:24:26.479
<v Speaker 3>money off the sidelines and into the market.

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 4>Now, remember that's pre tax. I mean, I got to

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:31.640
<v Speaker 4>remind people that all the time they try to compare

0:24:31.680 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 4>this to that, you know, I mean, if you did

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 4>an after tax comparison, like buying a one year or

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 4>to your T bill, you need really about eleven percent

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:45.639
<v Speaker 4>after you know, pre tax, So after tax you hit

0:24:45.680 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 4>about eight percent. Where we're saying we're going.

0:24:47.760 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 3>To be.

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 2>All right, Let's talk a little bit about the size

0:24:56.760 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 2>of this market. Because you guys were first I got

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:01.439
<v Speaker 2>to get you credit, and I've ember seeing these roll

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:03.960
<v Speaker 2>out and go. These are just probably too complex for advisors.

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:06.200
<v Speaker 2>I was wrong. I'm not wrong much, and I.

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:07.200
<v Speaker 3>Really admit it when I am.

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:10.120
<v Speaker 2>I was wrong on this. This was this category is ballooning.

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:12.920
<v Speaker 2>Then you had a bunch of copycats come after you.

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 2>First Trust now Blackrock, now you know Blackrock. First Trust

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 2>is really good at selling ETFs. Blackrock is Blackrock. What

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 2>if this category goes to one hundred billion, two hundred billion,

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:28.719
<v Speaker 2>does that change the expensiveness of buying that insurance and

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:31.120
<v Speaker 2>or could the trade get too crowded? Is there any

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:32.439
<v Speaker 2>risk to the size of this.

0:25:33.920 --> 0:25:35.880
<v Speaker 4>I think one of the things we've done is we've

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:38.480
<v Speaker 4>tried to stay in or we are in, and I

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:40.439
<v Speaker 4>think most of the others as well, are in the

0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 4>most liquid pools. You know, we're really not looking to

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:46.639
<v Speaker 4>go into thinly traded areas. Like I said, you know

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:51.440
<v Speaker 4>the spy options ESPX options, that pool is the most

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 4>liquid pool in the world. You know, we're talking in

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:59.439
<v Speaker 4>the multiples of billions of dollars daily. So I don't think, really,

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 4>we also have something you know, in the queues, in

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:06.679
<v Speaker 4>the small cap and EFA and emerging markets, you know,

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 4>for the buffers, So we don't think so we you know,

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 4>these options they trade an enormous size, so we don't

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 4>think it's going to be an issue. And I think

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 4>we have the flexibility to adjust, you know, where the

0:26:18.680 --> 0:26:21.400
<v Speaker 4>trades occur. So we think we'll be fine for quite

0:26:21.440 --> 0:26:22.520
<v Speaker 4>a while. Eric.

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:24.720
<v Speaker 3>What I would say too, is you look at how

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 3>much is traded in SPY and SPX options you're talking about.

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:33.400
<v Speaker 3>There's seven eight nine trillion dollars of open interest. There's

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 3>almost eight hundred, nine hundred billion dollars traded every single

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:40.359
<v Speaker 3>day in these options. And so again to Bruce's point,

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:44.879
<v Speaker 3>we're bringing these exposures on the most liquid markets. Now.

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:48.680
<v Speaker 3>The beauty of what we've done, too, is we've diversified

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:52.520
<v Speaker 3>that liquidity across all of our series of products. We're

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 3>not rolling all the options at one time. That's we

0:26:55.880 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 3>have monthly series with buffers of nine fifteen thirty percent.

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 3>We have buffer here of one hundred percent on teedool,

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 3>but we're not rolling all these at the same time,

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:10.280
<v Speaker 3>and that spreads out the liquidity risk. Now we will say,

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:12.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, we heard through the Grape find there was

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:18.919
<v Speaker 3>a there's a large mutual fund that's issued by JP Morgan.

0:27:19.480 --> 0:27:23.320
<v Speaker 3>It's a great fund. They were rolling twenty billion dollars

0:27:23.480 --> 0:27:27.719
<v Speaker 3>of SMP options every single quarter, and we've noted that

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:30.880
<v Speaker 3>they closed that fund to new investors and opened up

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:34.879
<v Speaker 3>similar to what Innovator's done a few other series. And

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:38.240
<v Speaker 3>I think that was to diversify, you know, some liquidity

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 3>if you want to call it risk, or that they

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:43.000
<v Speaker 3>saw that their calfs that they were getting were maybe

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 3>lower because the amount of size and risk that they

0:27:47.119 --> 0:27:49.280
<v Speaker 3>were putting on the market at a one time. But

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:52.879
<v Speaker 3>that was at twenty billion dollars. We have almost one

0:27:53.000 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 3>hundred to find out comyts and so that gives us

0:27:56.800 --> 0:28:00.040
<v Speaker 3>a huge opportunity to continue to scale the business. I

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:02.640
<v Speaker 3>think our largest ETF is just knocking on the door

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:05.439
<v Speaker 3>of a billion dollars. So we feel like we have

0:28:05.560 --> 0:28:06.640
<v Speaker 3>a long ways to go.

0:28:07.400 --> 0:28:09.800
<v Speaker 2>And just getting back to Blackrock, I know they came

0:28:09.840 --> 0:28:13.240
<v Speaker 2>out there's are a little cheaper than the rest of

0:28:13.240 --> 0:28:16.160
<v Speaker 2>the group their Blackrock. Do they worry you at all?

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:17.679
<v Speaker 2>What'd you think when you saw that filing?

0:28:20.000 --> 0:28:23.040
<v Speaker 4>I don't think we were surprised, you know, we we

0:28:23.160 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 4>knew that they were very interested in the space. We

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:30.800
<v Speaker 4>are really pleased to see them talking about talking a

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:33.480
<v Speaker 4>lot like how we talk about investors and how much

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:36.159
<v Speaker 4>risk investors should be willing to take or want to

0:28:36.240 --> 0:28:40.120
<v Speaker 4>take in the markets. And so really it's a real

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:43.480
<v Speaker 4>credibility booster for us, for you know, the largest asset

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 4>manager in the world to come in and say, you

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 4>know what, this makes a lot of sense for investors,

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:52.080
<v Speaker 4>and we think they will continue to do this. But

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:56.320
<v Speaker 4>as you said, JP, Morgan and the like you know,

0:28:56.400 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 4>have all come into the space saying yeah, Ali once

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:03.240
<v Speaker 4>know to do products along these lines because they really

0:29:03.240 --> 0:29:04.000
<v Speaker 4>see the value.

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 1>All right, last question, Graham, what is your favorite ETF

0:29:09.240 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 1>ticker other than any of your own?

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:20.760
<v Speaker 3>That's a that's a good one. Oh, I can't think

0:29:20.800 --> 0:29:22.120
<v Speaker 3>of one off the top of my head.

0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:24.800
<v Speaker 1>It's your next. But we'll let Graham kind of be

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:26.880
<v Speaker 1>quiet here for a second. Will he racks his brain?

0:29:30.800 --> 0:29:34.840
<v Speaker 4>Well, I'm a big tech investor. Uh so, uh, you know,

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:38.880
<v Speaker 4>I'm way overweighted into tech, and so probably something along

0:29:39.040 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 4>the lines of a r KK.

0:29:40.920 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 2>I'll take arc from Bruce. I think that's an out

0:29:43.040 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 2>of the box. I wasn't expecting it, Graham.

0:29:45.360 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Would you come up.

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:49.280
<v Speaker 3>With yeah, you know what, guys, I would probably have

0:29:49.360 --> 0:29:52.360
<v Speaker 3>to say cows the fun from Pacer.

0:29:53.480 --> 0:29:55.240
<v Speaker 1>How did that go down with move head to head

0:29:55.360 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 1>cows versus.

0:29:56.120 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 3>Move Cole's mood, Yeah, exactly, moves.

0:29:59.240 --> 0:30:02.160
<v Speaker 2>In all top par That's the first time someone pick cows.

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:04.680
<v Speaker 1>But that is a good one, all right, Graham Bruce,

0:30:04.800 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us on Trillions.

0:30:06.480 --> 0:30:15.080
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for having us guys.

0:30:13.200 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 5>Thanks for listening to Trillions. Until next time. You can

0:30:16.160 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 5>find us on the Bloomberg Terminal, Bloomberg dot com, Apple Podcasts, Spotify,

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:22.520
<v Speaker 5>or wherever else.

0:30:22.400 --> 0:30:24.600
<v Speaker 1>You'd like to listen. We'd love to hear from you.

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 1>We're on Twitter, I'm at Joel Webber Show. He's at

0:30:28.840 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Eric Bauchuns. This episode of Trillions was produced by Magnus Hendrickson.

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 5>Bye