WEBVTT - Boeing CEO to Step Down in Overhaul

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:10.799
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Affo, CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Business app. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:25.079 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 2>Let's go to that top story of the morning, and

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 2>that is Boeing. So that's doc up. But see, I

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:32.320
<v Speaker 2>think we're just up by about one percent here as

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 2>David cal Hun will be stepping down as CEO, but

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 2>not until the end of the year. Apparently he's going

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 2>to be intimate and intimately I made that word up,

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:41.839
<v Speaker 2>but he's going to be involved into a replacement, which

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:44.479
<v Speaker 2>I also think is quite interesting. So I want to

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 2>go to George Ferguson. He's the guy. He's the airline

0:00:47.720 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 2>guy that you got to go to. He is senior aerospace,

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 2>defense and airlines analysts joining us now in Princeton. All right, George,

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:56.680
<v Speaker 2>your reaction to the news that we saw earlier, and

0:00:56.680 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 2>then we'll walk up to what's next.

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So my action was, you know, I think we

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:05.640
<v Speaker 3>we thought Dave Calhoun probably would be going I hate

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:08.480
<v Speaker 3>to sort of wish that in anybody. But it seemed that,

0:01:08.640 --> 0:01:12.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, the problems in the manufacturing business just there

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 3>were just too many of them over too long a

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 3>period of time to say that he was as effectual,

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:19.480
<v Speaker 3>if that's a right word, as he as he should

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 3>have been at bringing everything, you know, back into order.

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 3>It does seem weird that it's going to take them

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:29.040
<v Speaker 3>till the end of twenty twenty four define his replacement.

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:30.960
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot of things that have to happen between

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 3>now and then that the company just can't wait for.

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 3>Things like the purchase of Spirit Aerosystems, which should improve

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 3>reporting lines should have been improved, the stability of the

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 3>you know, the production process, uh, and the quality process.

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:46.479
<v Speaker 4>That's super important.

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 3>They've got the they've got to you know, serve to

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 3>the FAA their view and how they're gonna they're gonna

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 3>stabilize their production process. That that's coming due here too.

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 3>And at the same time, right they've got to start

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 3>to increase build rates so they can improve profits and

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 3>cash flow.

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 4>They can't wait a year on that either.

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:08.920
<v Speaker 3>So there's a lot of super important things that are

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:11.359
<v Speaker 3>happening this year to wait till the end of the

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 3>year to replace the CEO that doesn't seem to have

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 3>been able to get that job done well. It seems

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 3>like a lengthy timeline to me, But it may just

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 3>be that the board was flat footed and realizing that

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 3>the CEO had to go and as nowhere in a

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 3>search and so they've got to start from scratch here

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 3>and figure out who the next person is.

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 5>What can you tell us about Stephanie Pope, She's gonna

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 5>be stepping up and taking a big role with the

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:37.360
<v Speaker 5>aircraft business.

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:40.079
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so she's been around for a while and she's

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 3>been CFO of that aircraft business. So it seems like

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 3>a logical inside choice. You know, it may not be

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:54.320
<v Speaker 3>the final choice there, although it may well be. But

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:56.799
<v Speaker 3>I think when you have a you know, a head

0:02:56.800 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 3>of that department, stand deal who's leaving after thirty us

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 3>heres at the company, they're hard shoes to fill, and

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 3>then you know, you look around internally for who could

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 3>be the next person. The CFO is always in particularly

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:11.919
<v Speaker 3>decent shape because they understand at least all the financials

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 3>about the business. She's also had, you know, had positions

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 3>at blowing Boeing Global Services, which is a super successful

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:23.800
<v Speaker 3>business inside Boeing High teens margins. To me, the only

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 3>thing I don't see in her background is that manufacturing

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 3>skill set. I think the next CEO and the next

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 3>head of Boeing Commercial Airplanes has to really have a

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 3>manufacturing engineering mindset background, and I think that's that's what

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't quite see.

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:41.760
<v Speaker 2>There, sort of like Larry culp.

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 3>No, I mean, Lowry obviously is pretty busy, and honestly,

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 3>the job he has now a GE could be better, better, profits,

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 3>more fun than Boeing because there's a lot of great

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 3>technology inside GE and there's a huge bow wave of

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:00.360
<v Speaker 3>a lot of maintenance coming that's really high mind margin.

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 4>I think you'd really have to work hard.

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 2>To get like But George, I mean, does he like

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 2>fun or does he like a challenge? I mean he

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 2>was the one that went did GE to begin.

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 4>With, Sorry you were you broke up a little bit there.

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 2>Said Oh, it's saying that does he like fun or

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 2>does he like a challenge because he was the one

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:17.360
<v Speaker 2>that went to GE in the first place when it

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 2>was a hot mess.

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 3>I do think he likes a challenge, and I think

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 3>he showed his ability to navigate it really.

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:23.839
<v Speaker 4>Well at GE.

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:26.159
<v Speaker 3>But again, you know they're just kind of getting to

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 3>the super fun part. I think there's still challenge inside

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 3>ge but he's just getting to the point where he's

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 3>got aerospace broken out and he can really make a

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:38.600
<v Speaker 3>lot of hay here. So I don't someone like him

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:42.040
<v Speaker 3>is absolutely what I think Boeing needs. I don't know,

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 3>maybe he's got a you know, maybe there's a protege

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 3>somewhere inside there that they could tap or something.

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 5>So thinking about who could be the next CEO, here

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 5>is the expectation, George, that it'll come from an external

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 5>candidate or or internally And are there any early front runners?

0:04:58.160 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 5>Do you think?

0:04:59.040 --> 0:04:59.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 3>So, I definitely think it's going to come external, right.

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 3>I just think the fact that you've seen this purge

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 3>of the of the CEO, you see the purge of

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:11.279
<v Speaker 3>commercial airplane president, means that we've depleted some you know,

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 3>we've depleted some talent there you look, you know, there

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:19.160
<v Speaker 3>there was you know, former heads of Boeing's commercial airplanes

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 3>that had left, you know when when Muhlenberg came on,

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 3>they could potentially be, you know, in the running for

0:05:27.040 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 3>something like this. I know a couple of them wanted

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:32.279
<v Speaker 3>the CEO job and didn't get it, but I'm almost

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 3>positive you're talking about something that's going to be outside.

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 3>It's Ray Connor is the name that comes to mind.

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 3>Used to be the head of Boeing Commercial. I'm not

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:41.719
<v Speaker 3>sure what he's doing now, but he might be on

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 3>the list similar.

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 2>What's the culture like at a Boeing in terms of

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 2>getting an outsider?

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 4>You know, I think Boeing is one of those companies.

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 3>I think you get a job and you stick around

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 3>for lots and lots of years, and so, you know,

0:05:57.600 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 3>I think that bringing people in from outside is something

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:04.800
<v Speaker 3>you do only when you have a breakdown like you've

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:08.599
<v Speaker 3>had now. Right under normal circumstances, there would be very

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:12.719
<v Speaker 3>clean lines of succession inside Boeing. You know, you would

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 3>move up through the ranks and expect opportunities as you

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 3>as you rose. But there's been so much tumult in

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:21.120
<v Speaker 3>this business over the last I don't know, you know,

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:24.279
<v Speaker 3>four years or so, that I think that it's a

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 3>time in their history where they're going they're going to

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 3>be going outside a lot more to replenish some of

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 3>some of these senior management ranks that they've just they've turned.

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 5>Over a bunch of it and George it seems like

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:38.280
<v Speaker 5>this is no quick fix here. It seems like it

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:41.599
<v Speaker 5>was years, maybe even decades in the making in terms

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 5>of maybe the deterioration of some of their quality controls.

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:48.559
<v Speaker 5>Here when you talk to in an industry folks, people

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:51.920
<v Speaker 5>at Boeing, is there a pathway to kind of get

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 5>back to where they were in terms of quality?

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 3>I think there is, But it's a lot of attention

0:06:56.960 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 3>to detail. And like you said, it's slow work, so

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 3>you can't you can't sort of wave a wand I

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:06.719
<v Speaker 3>think and make it, you know, happen overnight. Really, you know,

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 3>I think has a lot to do with people and processes, right,

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 3>And that's why I think you want someone like a

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 3>Larry Koppe who loves people and processes. You need and

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:18.679
<v Speaker 3>I mean that just takes time. You need a lot more.

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 3>You need training, you need, you need you know in

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 3>the interm you probably need to beef up some of

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 3>the oversight. You need to get into your supply chain.

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 3>You need to give them a hug, you need to

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 3>help them out, you know, help them bring you quality products.

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's not a it's not a hey, how

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 3>are you going to make my margins work better? In

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 3>the next couple of years discussion. Right, it's really like

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 3>I said, it's people and processes. It's a softer side

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 3>of management. I think Boeing over the last decade or

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 3>two really was more into the how do I squeeze

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 3>you to get you know, you to give me products

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 3>at a cheaper price so I can build my margins.

0:07:54.920 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 3>There's a you know, it's what is its recipe for success?

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 3>It wasn't that wasn't quite the term, but there was

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:06.520
<v Speaker 3>a term like that that Boeing was using with their suppliers.

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 3>It was all about squeezing them. So the supply chain

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 3>is all you know, they've been scarred, they're you know,

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 3>they're they're they're worried about when Boeing comes to talk

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 3>to them. And I think they need to get to

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 3>a world where when Boeing shows up that they think

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 3>someone's there to help them and is looking out for

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 3>their best interests partnering for success.

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, I love that idea though. It's like you just

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:26.920
<v Speaker 2>need a hug and be like we got this guys,

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:29.480
<v Speaker 2>versus like squeezing out of the suppliers. It's just like

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 2>a great visual for a manufacturing giant like Boeing George

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 2>Ferguson joining us. He is Bloomberg Intelligence is senior Aerospace,

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:41.440
<v Speaker 2>Defense and airline analyst. I think that's gonna be so interesting, Like,

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:43.199
<v Speaker 2>how do you even start a search like this?

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, you know, I guess, as George was suggesting, you know,

0:08:46.360 --> 0:08:51.079
<v Speaker 5>a couple of attributes. You need engineering expertise and manufacturing expertise.

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 5>This is not a marketing story, you know, it doesn't

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 5>feel like it's a strategy story that you go to

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 5>like a consultant or something. It's just nuts and bolts

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 5>manufacturing at the as George has told us in the past,

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:05.400
<v Speaker 5>at the highest tolerance levels you can ever imagine, making

0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:07.439
<v Speaker 5>an airplane's a little bit different than making an automobile

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 5>in terms of tolerances and things like that. So I

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 5>would guess that there's relatively a small pool of people

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 5>that kind of that kind of fifill that.

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 2>So I wonder where the timing is for that, Like

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 2>knowing that there's a small pool of people, Like why

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 2>do this write like today but then wait for the

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:23.079
<v Speaker 2>rest of the year.

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 5>I don't just get I think this it just feels

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 5>like this was tied into the news we got Friday

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 5>about oh, the certain members of the board are going

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:31.200
<v Speaker 5>to go on a listening tour with our big clients

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 5>without the CEO. I think that it feels to me,

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 5>at least some of these big airlines said, you know what,

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 5>you need to make a change there at the top,

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 5>and you need to see that started now. And I

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 5>think they probably just kind of stooed on that over

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:45.320
<v Speaker 5>the weekend, and this is the decision we come up,

0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 5>so we'll stay on top of that.

0:09:47.800 --> 0:09:51.679
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:58.079
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:04.719
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:08.839
<v Speaker 5>Alex. I'm seeing a red headline cross to Bloomberg turmoil here.

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 5>Trump bond reduced to one hundred and seventy five million

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 5>dollars in New York fraud case. So I guess that's

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:17.439
<v Speaker 5>a piece of good news for the former President's a

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:19.200
<v Speaker 5>lot better than the four hundred and fifty four million

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 5>he was.

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:21.160
<v Speaker 2>There and then it was one hundred and twenty percent

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 2>to post. It was even more than that. He has

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:27.560
<v Speaker 2>said last week that President Trump has almost I'm quoting

0:10:27.920 --> 0:10:30.800
<v Speaker 2>five hundred million dollars in cash, and that he will

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 2>use a substantial amount of that to fund his campaign

0:10:34.120 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 2>to return to the White House. In a court Finally,

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 2>he did claim that he'd need closer to one billion

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 2>dollars in reserves to cover the bond and still have

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 2>enough cash on hand to run his sprawling real estate company.

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 2>So I mean anything at that point three hundred million

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 2>dollar reduction potentially helping him as well. Trump has said

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 2>that the cash crunch had emerged after thirty insurance companies

0:10:56.360 --> 0:10:58.560
<v Speaker 2>that arranged such bonds refused to take any of his

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:02.440
<v Speaker 2>properties as collateral. So the latest headline is that his

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:05.959
<v Speaker 2>bond reduced payment for President Trump now to one hundred

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:09.079
<v Speaker 2>and seventy five million dollars in that New York fraud case.

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:12.080
<v Speaker 2>Remember the overall penalty was one hundred and fifty four million,

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:14.679
<v Speaker 2>and you usually have to pay more for that bond.

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, So the question is does he have the cash

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:20.080
<v Speaker 5>with you know where wherewithal to make that one hundred

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 5>and seventy five million dollars satisfy that seventy five hundred

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:25.240
<v Speaker 5>million bond. I guess that's the next question. But that's

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 5>something I think they would have to be answered again today, right.

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:30.319
<v Speaker 2>I have no idea. This is this is why I'm

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 2>not a lawyer. And also I just pointed, but he's

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 2>also a sitting for one of his criminal cases too.

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 5>Yes, the I guess. I see some video shots of

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 5>the courthouse in Manhattan. I guess this on the hush

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:46.839
<v Speaker 5>money payments. Apparently that is also going on today down there.

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 5>So again, so I guess I think on the margin,

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 5>a piece of good news for the former president his

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 5>bond reduced to one hundred and seventy five million dollars

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:56.680
<v Speaker 5>in the New York fraud case. So again, I guess

0:11:56.760 --> 0:11:59.679
<v Speaker 5>the next steps will be just how do they How

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:02.200
<v Speaker 5>does former President Trump and his team, how do they

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 5>satisfy that that bond?

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:06.679
<v Speaker 2>Do they keep fighting it? Or I think he's ten

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:09.200
<v Speaker 2>days right to deliver that money? So is there anything

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:09.720
<v Speaker 2>that's needful?

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 5>Well, something was due today, I thought today was on

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:14.199
<v Speaker 5>the former bond. Maybe this is a new bond or something.

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, this is that President Trump must pay that one

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 2>hundred and seventy five million dollars bond within ten days. Yes,

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 2>that's the court, So it gives him some time, I

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 2>think to get it together. So I wonder like where

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:26.040
<v Speaker 2>that comes from, yep, and how that winds up coming

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 2>from there? You're joining us now. As Eric Clarson, Bloomberg

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:33.559
<v Speaker 2>Legal reporter, I saw him, he literally ran from his desk,

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 2>So don't mind if he's a little out of breath.

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:38.319
<v Speaker 2>Were you expecting or reduced bond here?

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 6>You know, I would have thought that if they were

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 6>going to reduce it, they would have put it at

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:46.440
<v Speaker 6>the one hundred million dollar request that Trump had made,

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 6>because he had said that that was the maximum he

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 6>was able to actually arrange. So it'll be interesting to

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:54.320
<v Speaker 6>see if Trump says that he can go ahead and

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:56.280
<v Speaker 6>do this a larger one.

0:12:57.040 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 5>So but if nothing else, it buys him another ten days.

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 5>Are we reading that correctly? That he had had to

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 5>satisfy that foreurner fifty four million dollars bond today, But

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:07.840
<v Speaker 5>now with this reduction, it kind of starts to clock again.

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 4>Is that exactly?

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:12.439
<v Speaker 6>So that definitely, for now the New York Attorney General

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:15.079
<v Speaker 6>won't be trying to seize his assets, which was the

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 6>big fear of starting today.

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 2>So can you just wrap this in? So what was

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 2>the argument, like how did they arrive at that one

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 2>seventy five from the four fifty four, Like, what is

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 2>a conversation around that? And is that the normal conversation

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 2>we would hear from anybody who was going and trying

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:32.440
<v Speaker 2>to get the fine reduced.

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 6>Well, it's a pretty unusual situation to begin with, just

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 6>because normally, with damage awards of this big and bonds

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 6>this big, they involve like really big fortune five hundred

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 6>companies or things like that. And as Trump's lawyers argued,

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 6>you know, for a privately held company, the Trump organization

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:51.080
<v Speaker 6>is huge, but not you know, as massive as some

0:13:51.120 --> 0:13:54.199
<v Speaker 6>big corporations. That it was just really difficult for them

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 6>to arrange a bond of this size. So it's all

0:13:56.520 --> 0:14:00.480
<v Speaker 6>kind of novel. It's an unusual situation all around. I

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 6>haven't had a chance to read the whole decision yet,

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 6>but I think the appeals court just decided to have

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 6>a little bit of mercy on him while still putting

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 6>him under some pressure to arrange a bigger bond than

0:14:10.200 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 6>he says he was able to.

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:15.320
<v Speaker 5>Okay, so that's that. So we have I guess ten

0:14:15.400 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 5>days to get to the next chapter here. But he's

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 5>still former president shub is still going to be down

0:14:20.880 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 5>in a courtroom in Manhattan today, right.

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 4>Right, that's correct.

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 6>He has a hearing in what is probably going to

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 6>be his first criminal trial. They haven't scheduled the new

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 6>date for that yet. It was supposed to start today,

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 6>but they delayed it because of some new evidence. So

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 6>he's been in court with his lawyers this morning. His

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 6>lawyers are getting grilled a bit by the judge in

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 6>that case. That it'll be interesting to see what happens

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 6>with that trial. They could set a new date for

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 6>that today, it could be as soon as next month.

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 2>And what is the argument here?

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 7>Like?

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 2>Which one is this one?

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 6>This is the so called hush money case. He's accused

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 6>of falsifying business records to conceal hush money payments to

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 6>a porn star before the twenty sixteen election.

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 5>And he still had such Okay, so we get this one,

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:04.360
<v Speaker 5>and there's still some other things going on right right there?

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 5>I mean the January I guess that the January sixth

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:09.600
<v Speaker 5>case is that federal in Washington. And do we have

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 5>any sense of timing on that?

0:15:11.560 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 6>I wish, I wish I knew we still have any

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 6>dates for the other three trials, not yet other three

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 6>trials you gotta keep on top of me.

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean, do you like an Excel spreadsheet?

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay, you do. Okay, he's literally not kidding. There's one

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 2>more question on the on the on the bond here,

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 2>What is your question now, Like, now that we know

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 2>the actual number and it's in that weird spot, higher

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:34.920
<v Speaker 2>than he said he could pay, but much lower than

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 2>the original what is your question?

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 6>My question now is are they going to stand by

0:15:39.000 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 6>what they said, which was that there was no way

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 6>in the world that could get a bigger bond than

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 6>one hundred million, or are they going to say okay,

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 6>fine and circle back and try to see what they

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 6>can do because he said that if there was anything

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 6>more than one hundred million, he'd be forced to sell

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 6>some assets in order to raise that extra cash because

0:15:56.200 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 6>those companies that arrange bonds won't take his real estate

0:15:59.160 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 6>as collateral.

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 2>It's a head scratcher. Oh, I guess seventy five millions

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 2>better than you know, adding on four hundred months, right, Yeah,

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean there is.

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 5>That'd be a good day for the for the president today,

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 5>just from how the math works. Eric, thanks so much

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 5>for literally running down from your news desks. To get

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 5>the latest. Here, Eric covers all the legal stuff for

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg News.

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Affo, card Play and

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 2>On Friday, SMP posting it's best week of the year,

0:16:37.720 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 2>plus last week saw the most amount of SMP fifty

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 2>two week highs in nearly three years. I thought that

0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 2>was a really fun step, right, that's a good one.

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 5>It goes to the breath of the.

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:48.960
<v Speaker 2>Market exactly, So it's not just about tech, and we'll

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 2>kind of see you this play out as well as

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 2>tech comes under attack in Europe as well as the

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 2>chips in China. So joining us sound to discuss is

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 2>Katerina Simonetti, a Senior vice president Private wealth advisor over

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 2>at Morgan Stanley Private Wealth Management. Keterina, are we going

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 2>to expect the same kind of momentum within the S

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:07.399
<v Speaker 2>and P and the overall US DOC market next quarter?

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:11.119
<v Speaker 8>Alex, thank you for having me on the show. You

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:13.359
<v Speaker 8>know what, an incredible start of the year, but really

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:18.960
<v Speaker 8>first three months in and now is already approaching forty thousand.

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:22.440
<v Speaker 8>You know, at least we're you know, seemingly a few

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:25.960
<v Speaker 8>training sessions away, and the real question is going to

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 8>be are these price levels of equities are going to

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 8>be supported by earnings? You know, we're about to approach

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:36.439
<v Speaker 8>this you know, quiet time, which usually what happens. The

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:40.160
<v Speaker 8>bit of an information vacuum is something that we see

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 8>between the earning sessions. But when we come back with

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 8>new earning session in mid April, you know, the question

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 8>really for the the the that pricing, that that tailwind

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:55.920
<v Speaker 8>for the prices and equities to continue going higher will

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 8>be all up to earnings and we're priced to perfection. Now,

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 8>the question is, you know, what can we expect going forward?

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:03.199
<v Speaker 7>So?

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:05.879
<v Speaker 5>How how do you feel about valuation in this market?

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:06.159
<v Speaker 4>Are you?

0:18:06.520 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 5>A lot of some folks are saying, hey, if you

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 5>strip out some of those magnificent four, five, six, whateverever

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 5>the name names are today, you pull those out, the

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 5>market's you know that valuation seems okay? Do you do

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:19.879
<v Speaker 5>that or how do you think of that valuation?

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:23.920
<v Speaker 8>Well, the biggest question that we get from our clients

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 8>is when is it the good time to take the

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 8>profits of the table. When is the good time, you know,

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 8>to really realize some of these earnings. And it's a

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 8>really difficult question to answer because we can never effectively

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:37.399
<v Speaker 8>pull either the top or the bottom of the market.

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 8>But we know that there are certain prices, you know,

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:43.040
<v Speaker 8>that are higher than we've expected them to be in

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:46.320
<v Speaker 8>certain areas of the market because of AI, because you know,

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 8>some technologies, some companies that are you know, looking to

0:18:49.840 --> 0:18:53.479
<v Speaker 8>increase their profitability through this investments in AI. You know so,

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 8>but this is not the time to be enamored with growth.

0:18:56.920 --> 0:18:59.399
<v Speaker 8>This is the time to take the total picture into

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 8>account and not give up on value just because this

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:04.920
<v Speaker 8>bullish outlook in the market.

0:19:05.200 --> 0:19:07.199
<v Speaker 2>What does value mean to you? I feel like this

0:19:07.320 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 2>is like a meal, This is like a deep question.

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:10.720
<v Speaker 2>But what is value to you right now?

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 8>Alex? You know, for many, many years, you know, one

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 8>of the stables of the ever suppried portfolios have been

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 8>this blue chip dividend being stocks. And this is the

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:23.399
<v Speaker 8>sector in the market that has not performed quite as

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:27.040
<v Speaker 8>well as these exciting growth names. But you know, the

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 8>areas like consumer stables, healthcare, financials, materials, industrials. You know,

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 8>in the long run. When we think of AI story

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:38.640
<v Speaker 8>as a whole, all of these sectors tend to benefit

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:42.679
<v Speaker 8>and the value of having these bluechip dividend being stocks

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:45.119
<v Speaker 8>in the portfolio, you know, plays a huge role in

0:19:45.240 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 8>risk management. The other side of it this is, you know,

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:50.960
<v Speaker 8>beyond your questions about the value, but also small and

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:54.119
<v Speaker 8>MidCap you know stocks and the role they play, you know,

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 8>in this total portfolio construction. So there are a lot

0:19:56.800 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 8>of areas in the market that did not have this

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:01.359
<v Speaker 8>huge drawn up. So this will be a good time

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:03.399
<v Speaker 8>to take maybe a little bit of a profit and

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:06.360
<v Speaker 8>move into some of the areas that are positioned for growth.

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 5>You know, looking for maybe different sectors that might be opportunistic.

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:12.120
<v Speaker 5>You know, one of them is energy. I just look

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 5>at WTI crude oil up another one point seven percent today,

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 5>We're just about eighty two dollars a barrel in WTI

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:20.360
<v Speaker 5>crude oil. How do you think about the the energy

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:23.199
<v Speaker 5>space here? Again, people, I think there's a little bit

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 5>of concern about where are we in this transition to

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:27.919
<v Speaker 5>green energy? Is it's slowing down? How do we think

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:28.320
<v Speaker 5>about that?

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:33.879
<v Speaker 8>Now we're enthusiastic about the green energy and sustainable energy,

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 8>but you know, we're not quite there yet, and yet

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 8>the broader energy sector is under pressure because of the

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 8>overall geopolitical environment, you know. With that said, the demand

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 8>for energy is very strong, you know, so we like

0:20:48.320 --> 0:20:51.639
<v Speaker 8>energy as this sector that plays the role in the portfolio.

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 8>Energy companies, you know, pay excellent dividends. And because of

0:20:56.040 --> 0:21:00.159
<v Speaker 8>the strong demand and increasing demand in the world and

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:03.119
<v Speaker 8>the fact that we're not quite ready to switch into

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 8>the green and energy sources quite yet, you know, we

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:08.639
<v Speaker 8>hope this happens soon, you know, but for now, you know,

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:12.080
<v Speaker 8>we love him and having energy exposure and our portfolios.

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:14.920
<v Speaker 2>So to that point, Paul, for the quarter to date,

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:17.480
<v Speaker 2>we have communications services in tech. Okay, they're the top

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:19.400
<v Speaker 2>performers in the S and p right, it's an Amazon

0:21:19.440 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 2>big tech story. But energy is up over eleven percent,

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 2>Financials up ten percent, industrials up ten materials up six.

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, and if you just look at the last month,

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 2>it's really been those guys, the financials and energy industrials

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:33.919
<v Speaker 2>that have really been outperforming. Do you think, Keterina, that

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 2>the movement into those kind of names will help offset

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:40.440
<v Speaker 2>any weakness in tech?

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:44.200
<v Speaker 8>Well, of course, Alex, and this is not to say

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:45.360
<v Speaker 8>that we should give up on.

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:47.679
<v Speaker 2>Tech, sure, sure, but like but the rotation will be

0:21:47.760 --> 0:21:49.399
<v Speaker 2>enough to support the headline level.

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 8>Absolutely, it is really the story. The real story, in

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 8>my opinion, is really the fact that all these innovations

0:21:56.240 --> 0:21:59.159
<v Speaker 8>in tech are going to have across the other industries,

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:01.880
<v Speaker 8>and the fact that when we look at the previous year,

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:05.879
<v Speaker 8>the underperformance in these sectors, the valuations that look attractive,

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:09.160
<v Speaker 8>the competitive positioning, the fact that these companies have been

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 8>very smart with their costs. You know, they're running you know,

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 8>the good, good models, and their prices are looking attractive.

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:19.160
<v Speaker 8>You know, especially when we think about the environment, where

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:22.640
<v Speaker 8>we're expecting few rate cuts and you know, it will

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:26.439
<v Speaker 8>be easier for these companies to broader their profit margin

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 8>in the environmental rates are a little bit lower than where

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 8>they are today.

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:33.199
<v Speaker 5>And ketterine it last week was a week of for

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 5>much of us to hear from the central bankers around

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:38.199
<v Speaker 5>the world, and I guess the tone coming out of

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 5>not only the FED but some other central banks is

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:43.360
<v Speaker 5>probably a little bit more dubbish than maybe people had

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 5>thought going into last week. What's your take about how

0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:49.119
<v Speaker 5>the FED is going to kind of behave over the

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 5>coming months.

0:22:50.960 --> 0:22:53.639
<v Speaker 8>Well, it's hard to know what they're going to do it.

0:22:53.720 --> 0:22:56.679
<v Speaker 8>Even if we look at the projection of expectations this

0:22:56.880 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 8>year alone, we started in January expecting for rate cuts,

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:02.879
<v Speaker 8>and right now there are opinions out there that there

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 8>will not be rate cuts at all. At Morgan Stanley,

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 8>we still expect that we're going to have three rate cuts,

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:11.200
<v Speaker 8>and that FED is, you know, at this point his

0:23:11.359 --> 0:23:14.399
<v Speaker 8>position to do just that, you know, But what we

0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:18.240
<v Speaker 8>tell our clients is that they should not necessarily, you know,

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:22.119
<v Speaker 8>adjust or make drastic changes in their portfolios based on

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 8>the FED action. You know, in the going forward, of course,

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:27.199
<v Speaker 8>any type of right cuts we get is going to

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:29.639
<v Speaker 8>be the economic stimulus. It's something that is going to

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 8>benefit the economy in the long run, but in the

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 8>short run it is really more earnings, labor market overall,

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 8>you know, strength of the economy that is proven to

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 8>be much more resilient that you know.

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:41.600
<v Speaker 4>That we thought.

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:44.399
<v Speaker 2>And then to that point, I wonder that if the

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:47.880
<v Speaker 2>way to express rate cuts, whether it's three, two or one,

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 2>because I think it was Bostic was really talking about

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:53.200
<v Speaker 2>maybe one cut. You also have Lisa Cook speaking right now.

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:56.359
<v Speaker 2>She says disinflation has been bumpy and uneven, and cutting

0:23:56.359 --> 0:23:59.320
<v Speaker 2>too late could wind up hurting, and cutting too soon

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 2>could also so heard on the growth and then the

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 2>inflation front. So if you're trying to gain that out,

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:05.200
<v Speaker 2>how do you express that?

0:24:07.600 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 8>Well, you know, I think that that one clear action

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 8>right now is to take advantage of the higher uelds

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:15.439
<v Speaker 8>and fixed income while they're still available, because you know,

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:18.119
<v Speaker 8>the it seems like we've had money market rates at

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 8>five percent forever, but it really only has been a

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:24.439
<v Speaker 8>short time the timeframe while this has been available, you know,

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 8>and FED is going to react based of economic data.

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:31.120
<v Speaker 8>They I think that that we can expect some type

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 8>of right cuts and there is that also immediate reaction.

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 8>Historically large cap stocks react very positively. There's almost this

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:43.200
<v Speaker 8>delayed reaction in small and midcaps, you know. So if

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:45.919
<v Speaker 8>we look at the effect of the rate cuts, you know,

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 8>whether we get three this year, whether we get less,

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:52.959
<v Speaker 8>whether they're pushed into twenty twenty five. But FED is

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:56.680
<v Speaker 8>going to react to economic data, and you know, we're

0:24:56.680 --> 0:24:58.840
<v Speaker 8>paying attention to the same numbers, all.

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 5>Right, Katerina, thanks so much for joining us. Really appreciate it.

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 5>As always kind of read a Semonettie She's a senior

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:07.160
<v Speaker 5>vice president private wealth advisor at Morgan Stanley Private Wealth Management.

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 5>Joining us from the town of Brotherly Love, Philadelphia via Zoomier.

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:16.960
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple car Play and

0:25:20.080 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 1>listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 1>station Just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:34.199
<v Speaker 5>All right, a story that is out there for the

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 5>technology companies. It seems like we've seen this play before.

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:42.400
<v Speaker 5>The European regulators they're not too happy or they take

0:25:42.440 --> 0:25:44.959
<v Speaker 5>a much heavier hand in terms of a regulatory oversight

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:48.440
<v Speaker 5>to some of the big US technology companies. I'm thinking Apple,

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 5>I'm thinking Google, I'm thinking Meta and that's back in

0:25:51.520 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 5>the news here today. Mandy Singh joins US senior tech

0:25:54.359 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 5>analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. Joinings here in a Bloomberg Interactive

0:25:57.320 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 5>Brokers studio. So, Mandy, those of a certain vintage like myself,

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:04.120
<v Speaker 5>I can remember back to the late eighties early nineties

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 5>when it was Microsoft that really was under the regulatory

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:12.359
<v Speaker 5>microscope of the European regulators. And the net result, it seems,

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 5>if I think back, was just a lot of checks

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 5>being written, a lot of fines being paid, but nothing

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:20.399
<v Speaker 5>more than that. To the overall business model of Microsoft.

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:22.879
<v Speaker 5>I either still that office, you know, bundle and so

0:26:22.960 --> 0:26:25.440
<v Speaker 5>on and so forth. Talk to us about what's going

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:28.199
<v Speaker 5>on from Europe today as European regulars look at some

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 5>of these big US technology companies.

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, and just to you know, start off with that

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 7>Microsoft comparison, I think one thing that did happen was

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 7>a change in behavior. So you could expect something similar

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 7>with these companies, even though you know it's unlikely they're

0:26:43.080 --> 0:26:45.680
<v Speaker 7>going to be broken up because of this, but you

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:48.200
<v Speaker 7>can expect a change in behavior in terms of how

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:51.400
<v Speaker 7>they operate. And the reason I say that is Microsoft

0:26:51.720 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 7>was an operating system company.

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:53.400
<v Speaker 1>YEP.

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:57.560
<v Speaker 7>They were layering on their Internet Explorer browser. What the

0:26:57.640 --> 0:27:00.320
<v Speaker 7>regulation intended to do was to decouple the two in

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:03.520
<v Speaker 7>terms of giving more choices to the users. You're seeing

0:27:03.640 --> 0:27:07.160
<v Speaker 7>EU kind of pretty much play to that point where

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:11.920
<v Speaker 7>these companies Apple and Google, they have the operating system,

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:14.960
<v Speaker 7>they have the app store. They bundle a lot of

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 7>their own apps, right, so you have to use their

0:27:17.840 --> 0:27:20.159
<v Speaker 7>app store, give them a thirty percent commission, you have

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 7>to use Safari browser, you have to use Google Maps.

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:26.919
<v Speaker 7>So that's what I think regulators are focused on. I

0:27:26.920 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 7>think they are probably five ten years too late. I mean,

0:27:29.640 --> 0:27:32.640
<v Speaker 7>look at you know all these The reason why they're

0:27:32.680 --> 0:27:34.879
<v Speaker 7>so big is because they operated like this for the

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:35.800
<v Speaker 7>last ten years.

0:27:36.119 --> 0:27:38.200
<v Speaker 2>This is such a great point because like, I don't

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 2>want any of that to change because it'll make it

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:42.879
<v Speaker 2>more annoying for me to do stuff on my phone. So,

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:44.879
<v Speaker 2>like to your point of it being too late in

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:47.240
<v Speaker 2>the beginning when I was adopting the iPhone, maybe, but

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:50.200
<v Speaker 2>now that's just a pain. Is this going to hurt

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:51.280
<v Speaker 2>them to make this case?

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:55.240
<v Speaker 7>I mean regulation is always an afterthought. We have seen

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:57.960
<v Speaker 7>that time and again. It comes in too late. And

0:27:58.480 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 7>look in this case, they are vouching for more open

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 7>app stores. So instead of Apple taking a thirty percent

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:09.640
<v Speaker 7>cut and forcing everybody to use their payments platform, it's

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:11.640
<v Speaker 7>about having third party platforms.

0:28:11.840 --> 0:28:11.959
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:28:12.000 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 7>The one caveat there is if you bring in third

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:17.800
<v Speaker 7>party platforms, gets what Google can launch their own app

0:28:17.840 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 7>store on iOS right now, Google, you know app store

0:28:22.359 --> 0:28:26.120
<v Speaker 7>is used in Android. If you start opening up the platform,

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:29.159
<v Speaker 7>who does it benefit the most. I would argue Google

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:32.320
<v Speaker 7>because then they can put their app store on iOS.

0:28:32.440 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 7>You can pay through the Google Android App Store on iOS.

0:28:36.240 --> 0:28:39.760
<v Speaker 7>So I think in effect, then even though the regulation

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:43.920
<v Speaker 7>is well intended, it may actually end up, you know,

0:28:44.040 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 7>favoring Google if it turns out to the way I

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:50.960
<v Speaker 7>think it is because the likes of Spotify and Netflix,

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:53.960
<v Speaker 7>they're not going to create a new app store. It's

0:28:54.080 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 7>peanuts when it comes to saving on payments costs, Like,

0:28:57.640 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 7>what are you getting out of investing so much into

0:29:00.400 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 7>your own app store. Yes, it's good to have an

0:29:02.840 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 7>open platform. That's what Epic has been arguing. And you

0:29:05.560 --> 0:29:09.240
<v Speaker 7>know all the gaming companies, but I think the one

0:29:09.280 --> 0:29:11.320
<v Speaker 7>company it benefits the most here is Google.

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 5>That's actually pretty funny, all right, So just for thirty seconds,

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 5>how our investors thinking about this risk, the regulatory risks

0:29:19.840 --> 0:29:21.880
<v Speaker 5>to these big tech companies. How are they thinking about it?

0:29:21.880 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 7>I mean it's different from different companies. I think the

0:29:24.120 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 7>operating system gatekeeper analogy applies to Apple and Google specifically

0:29:29.320 --> 0:29:33.720
<v Speaker 7>for meta. They want you to pay to subscribe to

0:29:33.800 --> 0:29:36.320
<v Speaker 7>the apps if you don't want to be tracked. Now

0:29:36.360 --> 0:29:39.560
<v Speaker 7>that's interesting, right, we are so accustomed to using social

0:29:39.640 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 7>media apps as free because our data is what they

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:44.680
<v Speaker 7>use for targeting. If you don't want to be tracked,

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:46.959
<v Speaker 7>you have to pay meta, and I think that's not

0:29:47.000 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 7>going to be palatable for users.

0:29:49.120 --> 0:29:51.240
<v Speaker 2>So I love Mandy cuts through it right now. I

0:29:51.320 --> 0:29:53.400
<v Speaker 2>get it all right, Mandy, thanks lot really appreciate it

0:29:53.440 --> 0:29:55.920
<v Speaker 2>and keep saying Joining us from Bloomering Intelligence.

0:29:58.400 --> 0:30:01.959
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg and Intelligence Podcast. Catch us

0:30:02.000 --> 0:30:05.400
<v Speaker 1>live weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and

0:30:05.400 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also

0:30:08.400 --> 0:30:11.560
<v Speaker 1>listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York

0:30:11.640 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 1>station Just Say Alexa, playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:30:16.720 --> 0:30:18.560
<v Speaker 5>Thirty five years on Walstreet. I've had the pleasure of

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:22.240
<v Speaker 5>working some really really good groups of people, and none

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:25.240
<v Speaker 5>better Mount Rushmore type where the people of Payne Webber

0:30:25.280 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 5>nineteen eighty six and nineteen eighty nine, the Management, Audit

0:30:27.960 --> 0:30:31.280
<v Speaker 5>and Control group, don't ask, it's top secret. Mike Sullivan

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 5>ran that group, and pretty much everybody in that group

0:30:33.760 --> 0:30:35.959
<v Speaker 5>went on to have a pretty darn good career, and

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 5>none more than my man Joe DEGROSSI he's the chairman,

0:30:39.400 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 5>He's the Sea of Axis Capital I'm scared to ask

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:44.760
<v Speaker 5>what Access Capital is. But he is in Miami, Florida,

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:47.880
<v Speaker 5>and he did that decades before that it became trendy here.

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:49.560
<v Speaker 5>He's been down there kind of running money down there

0:30:49.560 --> 0:30:51.720
<v Speaker 5>for a long time. Joe, thanks so much for joining us.

0:30:51.720 --> 0:30:53.400
<v Speaker 5>You're one of the off time greats. Tell us what

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:56.080
<v Speaker 5>you're up to at Axis Capital these days?

0:30:56.480 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 9>Got well, first of all, that throwback to the mid

0:30:59.760 --> 0:31:03.160
<v Speaker 9>eight's just just dated me. So but it's nice here,

0:31:03.200 --> 0:31:06.400
<v Speaker 9>your boy. It's been way too long. So in a

0:31:06.400 --> 0:31:08.920
<v Speaker 9>few things. I've been down here in Miami twenty six

0:31:09.000 --> 0:31:12.360
<v Speaker 9>years now. I moved from Paineweber and joined a private

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:15.480
<v Speaker 9>equity firm that turned out to be pretty successful, and

0:31:15.760 --> 0:31:18.160
<v Speaker 9>launched my own firm some years ago, and so run

0:31:18.200 --> 0:31:21.280
<v Speaker 9>a family office as well as private equity shop down

0:31:21.320 --> 0:31:21.880
<v Speaker 9>here in Miami.

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:25.600
<v Speaker 5>So what do you guys doing in the markets here today.

0:31:25.640 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 5>I'm guessing you're not running a sixty forty portfolio, Joe.

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:33.480
<v Speaker 9>Clearly not running a sixty forty portfolio. Are main focused today,

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:35.680
<v Speaker 9>as you can probably see by the background, at least

0:31:35.720 --> 0:31:38.720
<v Speaker 9>for viewers who are watching the live stream, you know,

0:31:38.760 --> 0:31:42.960
<v Speaker 9>we're focused on with Access Capital introducing Interval Funds really

0:31:43.000 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 9>focused on this massive underserved market of accredited investors, folks

0:31:47.640 --> 0:31:50.680
<v Speaker 9>with sort of one to five million that represent the

0:31:51.000 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 9>mass affluent that up to now really have not been

0:31:54.440 --> 0:31:57.200
<v Speaker 9>able to invest in private investment. So we think the

0:31:57.240 --> 0:32:00.520
<v Speaker 9>next big wave in the capital markets will be a

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 9>significant reallocation among i'll called the mass affluent into private investing.

0:32:06.040 --> 0:32:09.480
<v Speaker 9>Because they're living longer, they need to match assets and

0:32:09.600 --> 0:32:13.760
<v Speaker 9>liabilities to make sure they don't outlive their income. And

0:32:13.880 --> 0:32:16.560
<v Speaker 9>so we're building a suite of products that we believe

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:20.360
<v Speaker 9>will serve that accredited investor market very well.

0:32:20.520 --> 0:32:23.200
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let's just we're burying all the leads here. People.

0:32:23.720 --> 0:32:25.280
<v Speaker 2>What was Paul like in the eighties.

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:29.880
<v Speaker 9>Paul was fantastic. I mean, I have nothing but thought

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:32.200
<v Speaker 9>memories Paul. And it's been too long, and I know

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:34.600
<v Speaker 9>we're due to have a reunion pretty soon. But Paul

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 9>was a great out to work with.

0:32:36.320 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 4>He really was.

0:32:37.440 --> 0:32:39.360
<v Speaker 5>It's funny we had a great group.

0:32:39.400 --> 0:32:39.640
<v Speaker 4>Again.

0:32:39.640 --> 0:32:41.240
<v Speaker 5>If I got my Pain Weber group, I've got my

0:32:41.320 --> 0:32:43.640
<v Speaker 5>Chase Manhattan group, my Salomon Brothers group. That the Pain

0:32:43.680 --> 0:32:47.040
<v Speaker 5>Weber group almost person for person, I'm talking to a

0:32:47.040 --> 0:32:50.160
<v Speaker 5>couple dozen people went on to have really good careers.

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:51.480
<v Speaker 5>We kind of thought Joe was going to be the

0:32:51.480 --> 0:32:54.120
<v Speaker 5>black cheep, but he's ended up doing the best here.

0:32:54.160 --> 0:32:57.800
<v Speaker 5>He's still added here, Joe. You mentioned private credit here.

0:32:58.160 --> 0:33:01.360
<v Speaker 5>That's been a market that I've been really amazed to

0:33:01.400 --> 0:33:04.360
<v Speaker 5>watch developerally over the last ten to fifteen years. It

0:33:04.440 --> 0:33:06.160
<v Speaker 5>used to be kind of private equity is the place

0:33:06.200 --> 0:33:08.120
<v Speaker 5>you go to for some outsize returns. How do you

0:33:08.120 --> 0:33:09.520
<v Speaker 5>guys think about private credit?

0:33:11.240 --> 0:33:14.400
<v Speaker 9>Well, you know, look, I think private credit has stepped

0:33:14.440 --> 0:33:17.880
<v Speaker 9>in where the banks have walked away, and regulations on

0:33:17.920 --> 0:33:20.640
<v Speaker 9>the banking side have made it, you know, challenging for

0:33:21.080 --> 0:33:24.320
<v Speaker 9>banks to maintain market share in that space. And so

0:33:24.400 --> 0:33:29.760
<v Speaker 9>you've had a you know, a proliferation of funds credit

0:33:29.760 --> 0:33:32.080
<v Speaker 9>funds getting into this space. And of course, Paul, as

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:33.920
<v Speaker 9>you know, you know, interest rates have been on the

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:37.000
<v Speaker 9>side of credit for a long time up until recently,

0:33:37.080 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 9>up until twenty two, but they wrote a ten to

0:33:39.040 --> 0:33:42.239
<v Speaker 9>fifteen year wave of a declining interest rate environment. So

0:33:42.280 --> 0:33:45.760
<v Speaker 9>the total returns have looked particularly strong in that space.

0:33:46.000 --> 0:33:49.640
<v Speaker 9>I think what we're going to see now prospectively is,

0:33:50.240 --> 0:33:54.080
<v Speaker 9>you know, the major comeback of private equity. I think

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:56.120
<v Speaker 9>that's going to be the place to be over the

0:33:56.160 --> 0:33:59.080
<v Speaker 9>next five to ten years, notwithstanding a lot of talk

0:33:59.120 --> 0:34:01.800
<v Speaker 9>about capital flow into that space over the years.

0:34:02.160 --> 0:34:04.040
<v Speaker 2>Okay, first of all, you guys are both serious and

0:34:04.040 --> 0:34:07.040
<v Speaker 2>disappointing me of what Paul is like twenty forty years ago.

0:34:07.080 --> 0:34:09.880
<v Speaker 2>But whatever, we'll let that slide. We use a private

0:34:09.880 --> 0:34:12.000
<v Speaker 2>equity because because I feel like it hasn't the whole

0:34:12.040 --> 0:34:14.160
<v Speaker 2>thing been none on private credit, not private equity.

0:34:14.200 --> 0:34:18.040
<v Speaker 9>Now, well, it's interesting. I mean, there's I don't know,

0:34:18.120 --> 0:34:21.080
<v Speaker 9>eighty or ninety interval funds now in the credit space,

0:34:21.440 --> 0:34:25.560
<v Speaker 9>maybe a dozen equity funds. So you know, people have

0:34:25.600 --> 0:34:28.319
<v Speaker 9>been chasing returns and they've been looking in the rear

0:34:28.400 --> 0:34:32.200
<v Speaker 9>view mirror. I think the future looking forward is is

0:34:32.239 --> 0:34:34.800
<v Speaker 9>allocations to private equity. And I'll tell you for a

0:34:34.880 --> 0:34:38.919
<v Speaker 9>very simple reason. You know, people are living longer. They

0:34:39.120 --> 0:34:42.800
<v Speaker 9>you know clearly, you know, there's this massive generational transfer

0:34:42.800 --> 0:34:46.680
<v Speaker 9>of wealth from a risk averse generation to a risk

0:34:46.719 --> 0:34:50.040
<v Speaker 9>tollering generation that I think is more informed. They know

0:34:50.080 --> 0:34:52.640
<v Speaker 9>they're going to live on average three to five years longer,

0:34:53.080 --> 0:34:55.920
<v Speaker 9>you know, than their parents or certainly their their grandparents,

0:34:55.960 --> 0:34:58.759
<v Speaker 9>and they're going to have to allocate capital accordingly. And

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:00.680
<v Speaker 9>that means over the long term, you know, as we

0:35:00.719 --> 0:35:04.800
<v Speaker 9>know equities over the long term, you know, trounce fixed income,

0:35:05.120 --> 0:35:07.520
<v Speaker 9>notwithstanding what's happened over the past ten years.

0:35:07.960 --> 0:35:10.040
<v Speaker 5>So Joe, you were, as you mentioned, you got down

0:35:10.120 --> 0:35:13.719
<v Speaker 5>to South Florida way before it became trendy. Here talk

0:35:13.719 --> 0:35:17.279
<v Speaker 5>to us about how Miami has changed just over the

0:35:17.360 --> 0:35:20.319
<v Speaker 5>last four or five years. I mean, you know, kind

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:22.719
<v Speaker 5>of pandemic. It seems like everybody and the brothers moving

0:35:22.760 --> 0:35:23.160
<v Speaker 5>down there.

0:35:24.239 --> 0:35:26.560
<v Speaker 9>It's it's really been incredible. I mean I've been down here,

0:35:26.560 --> 0:35:28.560
<v Speaker 9>as I said, you know, roughly twenty six years, and

0:35:28.760 --> 0:35:32.399
<v Speaker 9>we've seen more change in the past five years than

0:35:32.440 --> 0:35:35.560
<v Speaker 9>we saw on the prior all of twenty twenty one years.

0:35:35.719 --> 0:35:38.640
<v Speaker 9>And I think that's you know, certainly driven by COVID,

0:35:38.840 --> 0:35:42.640
<v Speaker 9>A no question about it. But I think COVID, you know,

0:35:42.840 --> 0:35:47.359
<v Speaker 9>in concert with technology, has made people realize and has

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:50.719
<v Speaker 9>accelerated the understanding that you can be most anywhere in

0:35:50.760 --> 0:35:53.640
<v Speaker 9>the world and work and why not be in a

0:35:53.680 --> 0:35:56.040
<v Speaker 9>beautiful place. I mean when I moved down here, it

0:35:56.200 --> 0:35:58.759
<v Speaker 9>was really driven by the fact that an opportunity to

0:35:58.840 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 9>join a private equity shop, and it could have been

0:36:01.160 --> 0:36:05.080
<v Speaker 9>in Tuscaloosa, could have been in Idaho. Now what we're

0:36:05.120 --> 0:36:08.120
<v Speaker 9>seeing is is I called the sort of that Malcolm

0:36:08.160 --> 0:36:12.200
<v Speaker 9>Gladwell tipping point here in Miami, where you almost have

0:36:12.239 --> 0:36:14.000
<v Speaker 9>to be here as a firm, if you're in the

0:36:14.440 --> 0:36:17.040
<v Speaker 9>wealth management space, if you're in the private equity space,

0:36:17.719 --> 0:36:19.560
<v Speaker 9>you have to be here because this is where the

0:36:19.600 --> 0:36:22.000
<v Speaker 9>action is and it's a great quality of life. And

0:36:22.120 --> 0:36:24.279
<v Speaker 9>you know, we all know taxes are far lower down here.

0:36:24.680 --> 0:36:30.200
<v Speaker 2>So now you're fairly killing him, Joe exactly.

0:36:30.239 --> 0:36:35.080
<v Speaker 5>I'm sorry, Yeah, all right, So talk to what is

0:36:35.160 --> 0:36:38.600
<v Speaker 5>that you mentioned? Interval Capital, Joe, What's what is that concept?

0:36:40.120 --> 0:36:42.760
<v Speaker 9>Well, it's it's Access Capital is our firm, but we're

0:36:42.840 --> 0:36:45.759
<v Speaker 9>really focused on launching a suite of interval funds, and

0:36:45.760 --> 0:36:48.560
<v Speaker 9>it's really this, you know, this simple. The Investment Company

0:36:48.560 --> 0:36:52.359
<v Speaker 9>Act in nineteen forty basically says, if you're super rich,

0:36:52.560 --> 0:36:55.680
<v Speaker 9>qualified purchaser with five million or more, you can invest

0:36:55.719 --> 0:36:59.600
<v Speaker 9>in private equity and private credit funds. There's that line

0:36:59.640 --> 0:37:02.279
<v Speaker 9>of dem otion though. If you are not a you know,

0:37:02.360 --> 0:37:06.120
<v Speaker 9>a wealthy investor five million or more, you're basically shut out,

0:37:06.200 --> 0:37:10.480
<v Speaker 9>and there's there's only one way to offer products to

0:37:10.760 --> 0:37:13.680
<v Speaker 9>accredited investors. You know, folks with between one and five million,

0:37:13.880 --> 0:37:17.080
<v Speaker 9>and that's to register your vehicles. And that's the safe

0:37:17.080 --> 0:37:19.759
<v Speaker 9>harbor under the Investment Company Act of forty that says,

0:37:19.760 --> 0:37:22.200
<v Speaker 9>if you register your vehicles just like sort of like

0:37:22.239 --> 0:37:25.880
<v Speaker 9>an IPO, then you can bring in an unlimited number

0:37:25.920 --> 0:37:29.319
<v Speaker 9>of you know, I'll call them smaller investors. And you know,

0:37:29.400 --> 0:37:34.240
<v Speaker 9>what we're seeing is there's fifteen trillion dollars among accredited investors,

0:37:34.239 --> 0:37:37.239
<v Speaker 9>about one percent invested in private investments.

0:37:37.760 --> 0:37:38.040
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:37:38.360 --> 0:37:41.520
<v Speaker 9>Compare that to qualified purchasers, folks with five million or more,

0:37:41.680 --> 0:37:45.040
<v Speaker 9>who were at ten percent allocated to private investments. Goldman

0:37:45.160 --> 0:37:48.680
<v Speaker 9>Sachs's most recent Family Office report says that the family

0:37:48.719 --> 0:37:52.400
<v Speaker 9>offices are twenty seven percent invested in private investment. So

0:37:52.800 --> 0:37:55.000
<v Speaker 9>we believe the future is in the smaller investor.

0:37:55.960 --> 0:37:58.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, Joe, great to talk to you again, buddy. Always

0:37:58.480 --> 0:38:00.960
<v Speaker 5>good and always knew you're doing well down there in

0:38:00.960 --> 0:38:03.879
<v Speaker 5>South Florida, doing it way before anybody else. Was Joe

0:38:03.880 --> 0:38:06.360
<v Speaker 5>de Grossi. He's a chairman and CEO of Access Capital

0:38:06.880 --> 0:38:10.560
<v Speaker 5>based out in Miami, Florida. We both started our career

0:38:10.600 --> 0:38:13.080
<v Speaker 5>as Payne Webber June sixteenth, nineteen eazing.

0:38:13.239 --> 0:38:14.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so what was Joe like.

0:38:15.800 --> 0:38:18.719
<v Speaker 5>Funny, the really funny guy in our group. We had

0:38:18.719 --> 0:38:20.479
<v Speaker 5>a lot We actually just had a great group of people,

0:38:20.600 --> 0:38:23.359
<v Speaker 5>still very tight. We get together every year or two

0:38:23.520 --> 0:38:26.280
<v Speaker 5>dinner at Smith and Lenski's in mid time ahen people

0:38:26.280 --> 0:38:28.440
<v Speaker 5>come in flying from all over the world to come

0:38:28.480 --> 0:38:30.279
<v Speaker 5>in and kind of hook up because for a lot

0:38:30.320 --> 0:38:32.880
<v Speaker 5>of us it was the first job out of college

0:38:32.920 --> 0:38:34.920
<v Speaker 5>and it was a really tight group and we stayed

0:38:34.960 --> 0:38:38.319
<v Speaker 5>tight throughout the throughout the year. So it's a good group,

0:38:38.360 --> 0:38:41.279
<v Speaker 5>good way to start your career. Ye story. And see

0:38:41.320 --> 0:38:44.040
<v Speaker 5>that's the example I bring up. If you're working from

0:38:44.080 --> 0:38:46.200
<v Speaker 5>home and you don't get that, and I don't, and

0:38:46.239 --> 0:38:48.240
<v Speaker 5>I'll tell you what that's That's what it's all about

0:38:48.280 --> 0:38:49.920
<v Speaker 5>for me. So good stuff checking up.

0:38:50.160 --> 0:38:54.759
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on Apples, Spotter, Pye,

0:38:54.880 --> 0:38:57.800
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you will get your podcasts. Listen live

0:38:57.880 --> 0:39:01.480
<v Speaker 1>each weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:39:01.600 --> 0:39:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:39:05.120 --> 0:39:08.120
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:39:08.320 --> 0:39:10.200
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal