WEBVTT - Robert Hoffman on the Markets (Radio)

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's get to Robert Hoffman, our guest to who joins

0:00:02.840 --> 0:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>us from Singapore. Robert is head of investment Counselors for

0:00:05.760 --> 0:00:09.480
<v Speaker 1>South Asia at City Private Bank. Robert, thanks for being

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 1>with us. I don't know whether you've been to the

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:14.160
<v Speaker 1>office yet, but I'm sure through your smartphones some clients

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:17.079
<v Speaker 1>have been in touch. They've seen the selldown and US

0:00:17.239 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 1>risk assets. They've got a lot of questions about recession,

0:00:20.920 --> 0:00:25.640
<v Speaker 1>earnings contraction. UM, what kind of questions are you fielding

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:28.720
<v Speaker 1>at this moment from your clients? I think, good morning,

0:00:28.720 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much for having me. I think the

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:32.559
<v Speaker 1>very first part of this is this is seasonal and

0:00:32.600 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 1>we typically see a slowdown in trading and a slowdown

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>in volumes at this time, and that's no different this year.

0:00:37.520 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>The big releases of economic data rolling through over the

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>last couple of weeks, they certainly have had an impact

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 1>on markets and direct positioning from clients, but by and large,

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 1>clients are willing to sit this one out through the

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:49.920
<v Speaker 1>end of the year until the next big data releases

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 1>start rolling in early January. The one notable exception is

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing in China. UM. Interestingly is we saw

0:00:55.720 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 1>before the Chinese reopening and the announcements of the Chinese

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>and Hong Kong reopening, we seen net sellers of Chinese equities,

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and given the run up we've seen an equity markets

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:06.680
<v Speaker 1>here in China, we would have expected those flows to change,

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>but actually what we've seen is selling into that strength

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 1>from clients who now have excess cash positions. So it

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>just further reinforces the theme clients are sitting in a

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of cash waiting for next year to start. And

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 1>prospect this for next year, what do you anticipate that

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 1>cash is gonna end up being deployed. Well, we obviously

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 1>fixed income markets have absorbed a lot of this with

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:27.039
<v Speaker 1>with the rise and interest rates over the course of

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:30.480
<v Speaker 1>this year and in the expectation for continuing FED pressures

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 1>on interest rates in the first half of next year. Uh,

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:35.679
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly going to attract more and more capital. So

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 1>I think clients are happy to sit on cash until

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 1>there's more clarity around the economic picture and the the

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:42.679
<v Speaker 1>endpoint for where the FED is going to stop. But

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>also I think that the focus will shift in the

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>new year as we get more and more clarity around

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese reopening and the potential for reopening with with

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong and more broadly to the to the global

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>trading environment. We'll see, But I think there's a lot

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 1>of dry powder there that could be put to work

0:01:57.680 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 1>very quickly, and so that's why we're fairly optimistic heading

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 1>in the next year for some parts of the world,

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>but relatively subdued on western countries such as the US

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>as well as UK and and more broadly in the

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Eurozone over the winter. So do you think the picture

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 1>on the mainline is not going to be really clear

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:13.959
<v Speaker 1>in the way that it ought to be, let's say,

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>for six months from now. I mean, it seems like this,

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:19.680
<v Speaker 1>this reopening, given the COVID infection situation, is going to

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 1>be something that's going to unraveled and fits and starts. Yeah. Look,

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 1>if you look to the U S right now, it's

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:28.359
<v Speaker 1>it's not just COVID itself, it's that people have really

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>been protected and insulated from viruses and illness more broadly,

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 1>and you're seeing this resurgence of illnesses which were typically

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:36.920
<v Speaker 1>very benign and mild, all of a sudden, affecting a

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>vast swath of the population in the US. China is

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 1>going to go through the same experience here, but on

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 1>an accelerated path. But just because given that that they've

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:46.399
<v Speaker 1>been through this process longer they've had they've they've lost

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:48.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of that immunity. Um they're going to

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 1>be some fits and starts over the course of the

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 1>first quarter, But largely, the biggest issue for us is

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:56.120
<v Speaker 1>that this is such a rapid change in policy, and

0:02:56.120 --> 0:02:58.959
<v Speaker 1>it's happened so quickly that it's it's hard to tell

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 1>what the next big appid changes are or the speed

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:04.359
<v Speaker 1>with which they could happen. So again, we're optimistic, but

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 1>we're it's hard to find a direct line as to

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 1>where we want to go. I will say the travel

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:11.800
<v Speaker 1>and leisure sector sectors as well as the services sectors

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:13.800
<v Speaker 1>are certainly ripe for investment at this point, and this

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 1>is where client should be looking to expand their holdings.

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>And what about the materials sactive because we've had a

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 1>few bullish calls around expectations around commodities prices for three, Yeah,

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>a bit more nuanced there. I think the housing sector

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>and we've gotten some stimulative measures there, but the overhang

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:31.960
<v Speaker 1>on the housing sector right now it could be a

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>long lived problem, and that is going to really affect

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 1>some of the materials demand their onshore in China, and

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>given the weakening the weakening situation in Europe as well

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 1>as in North America, that's likely not going to change

0:03:43.240 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 1>very quickly. However, other commodities, like energy commodities, coal, oil gas,

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 1>these are areas where there could be a rapid acceleration

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>in pricing and and I guess in a strange way

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 1>that actually probably worsens the environment for the FED to

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 1>be able to make decisions going forward with their rate policies.

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 1>They try to combat inflation on that front because it's

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 1>such a feed through to other asset classes. So how

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 1>do you want to be exposed to markets or economies

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 1>that are connected with the China and the trade dynamic.

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Paul is talking commodities, He's thinking Australia, I'm

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 1>imagining and then I'm thinking, uh, North Asia, I'm thinking Japan,

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:18.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking South Korea, I'm thinking Taiwan. At the same time,

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:20.280
<v Speaker 1>do you do you want to be able to to

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:24.480
<v Speaker 1>strategically put money to work in markets that are reliant

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 1>on trade with China. I don't know that that's a

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:29.279
<v Speaker 1>direct line that you want to use as the catalyst

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:31.480
<v Speaker 1>for driving, but it certainly is an accelerant for why

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>you'd want to have exposure to different economies. Australia, absolutely,

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's a real compelling case there for investment. However,

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>equity markets have already valued a little bit of that

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:42.279
<v Speaker 1>in and so you're seeing richer valuations in that market.

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 1>I do think the currency, the Azzi dollar is probably

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:47.559
<v Speaker 1>right for the best appreciation, so on a risk adjusted basis,

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:49.600
<v Speaker 1>that might be the most attractive asset class within the

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Australia market over the course of the next year. Japan, again,

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:55.240
<v Speaker 1>they they have not had the pressures as far as

0:04:55.279 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 1>raising rates, so they've seen a weakening in their currency

0:04:57.839 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>that is going to take a toll on some of

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Speaker 1>their corporate earnings over the coming months. Therefore, and Japanese

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 1>equities might be a little bit challenged here in the

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:06.600
<v Speaker 1>short term. Albeit the end again, the same story around

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:09.480
<v Speaker 1>currency markets could actually be the real investment opportunity there

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 1>in the near term. Other economies Singapore, Indonesia, Uh, there

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 1>are opportunities, I think, and you're going to see that

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 1>resurgence of service and travel help to lift those markets

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:21.479
<v Speaker 1>as well as other economies around the world have reopened,

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 1>but of course had to grapple with pandapics amount excuse me,

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:30.279
<v Speaker 1>and rising inflation. Is this something you see in China's future? Absolutely.

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:33.280
<v Speaker 1>I looked no further than the travel sector. I think

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 1>one of the areas of concern for for for us

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 1>here in Singapore as we sit today, is that it's

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:40.159
<v Speaker 1>hard to get flights into to pay a reasonable cost

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:42.280
<v Speaker 1>given some of the inflationary pressures we've seen on those

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:45.479
<v Speaker 1>travel services. As that market begins to reopen, you can't

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:48.039
<v Speaker 1>immediately flip the switch and get new pilots to hop

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:50.920
<v Speaker 1>into airplanes, or get new capacity at runways at airports.

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:53.400
<v Speaker 1>So there are gonna be some real logistical challenges that

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 1>we're going to face in the coming months, and there's

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 1>certainly going to be some inflationary pressures on some of

0:05:57.400 --> 0:06:00.120
<v Speaker 1>those countries and some of the surrounding economies, and I

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:01.720
<v Speaker 1>think that's one of the areas of focus that we're

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:03.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna have. How do you work through that and how

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 1>do you actually benefit as an investor from that. It's

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:07.799
<v Speaker 1>interesting you make that point because here in the States

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 1>we had that disappointing retail sales number, but a part

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>of that data indicated that there is a shift now

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>towards greater spending on services. And and then I'm looking

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:17.279
<v Speaker 1>at a new story that we had in the Bloomberg

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 1>terminal talking about the customer service agents at Southwest Airlines.

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>They've approved a new five year contract twenty general wage

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:31.360
<v Speaker 1>increase over four years. So maybe we're underestimating the stickiness

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 1>of these inflationary pressures, particularly when it comes to services.

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 1>And what does that say about maybe underestimating the resolve

0:06:38.040 --> 0:06:40.279
<v Speaker 1>that central banks will have to have to get it

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 1>back in the box. Yeah, and look higher for longer

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:45.599
<v Speaker 1>is definitely a risk, and this is maybe one of

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the most underappreciated risks as we head in the next year.

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:50.280
<v Speaker 1>But it's not a focus that I think investors are

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:53.359
<v Speaker 1>pricing in today. Uh, look at Lenar's earnings last night

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:55.120
<v Speaker 1>in the US, where they came out and said all

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:57.359
<v Speaker 1>of the weaknesses that we had, all of the constraints

0:06:57.360 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and pent up issues that we had, are actually now

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 1>supply gluts, so labor is coming back in and we're

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:04.720
<v Speaker 1>able to hire workers. So there are going to be

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:07.720
<v Speaker 1>some sectors where there's been that runaway inflationary pressure that

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>will start to be subdued in the first half of

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 1>next year. It just remains to be seen how pervasive

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 1>that is. Given the backdrop of China quickly re entering

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the global trade economy, might be a good moment to

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 1>talk about your top risk for three, what do you see?

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:24.680
<v Speaker 1>We have lots of risks were monitoring. We talked about

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 1>this in our midyear outlook, and we're going to mention

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:28.679
<v Speaker 1>it again in our two thousand and twenty three outlook,

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 1>which is there have been a lot of little fires

0:07:30.920 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 1>that have burned throughout the course of two some of

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:36.480
<v Speaker 1>those have become big fires. So the COVID situation in China,

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 1>the question is is what what are the next big

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 1>fires to to really erupt? And and there are so

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 1>many issues, whether it's the trade negotiations between the U.

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>S and China, or it could be geopolitical tensions, and

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 1>that again China tends to come to the forefront strengthening China,

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 1>where you've seen a more silent central government here recently.

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 1>If that should change and they become a little bit

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 1>more hawkish on the policy front, uh, it remains to

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:00.240
<v Speaker 1>be seen what the impact will be on economy, but

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 1>it certainly would be an overhang. And then the final

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 1>one that I think we're all monitoring right now is

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>that the Federal reserve as much as they want to

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>increase rates and we're seeing a softness in the CPI data.

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 1>What if that CPI number stays high and the Fed

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>does have to go higher than expectations, it could create

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 1>some negative consequences for everybody's for it seems to be

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 1>a consensus view that it's going to be a first

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>half weakness second half strength. That could actually delay that

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 1>story into okay, ten seconds on that last point to

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 1>sign a probability of of that that that the Fed

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>has got to continue going in a way that the

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:34.560
<v Speaker 1>market doesn't anticipate. And we've got that pegget about fifteen

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 1>percent right now in our probability spreadsheet. Robert, good stuff,

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for dropping by our studios in Singapore. Robert Hoffman,

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 1>head of Investment Counselors for the Asia Pacific at City

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Private Bank. This is Bloomberg