1 00:00:05,840 --> 00:00:13,520 Speaker 1: Crime Stories with Nancy Grace. In a stunning appellate decision, 2 00:00:14,000 --> 00:00:20,880 Speaker 1: the Scott Peterson murder conviction death penalty sentence has been reversed. 3 00:00:21,640 --> 00:00:24,479 Speaker 1: This is a punch to the stomach for victims rights 4 00:00:24,480 --> 00:00:28,040 Speaker 1: advocates and for the family of the murdered mom to 5 00:00:28,120 --> 00:00:33,640 Speaker 1: be Lacy Peterson, her unborn son Connor, a victim as well. 6 00:00:42,640 --> 00:00:45,239 Speaker 1: I'm Nancy Grace. This is Crime Stories. Thank you for 7 00:00:45,320 --> 00:00:48,320 Speaker 1: being with us here at Fox Nation and Serious XM 8 00:00:48,360 --> 00:00:52,160 Speaker 1: one eleven. First of all, take a listen to our 9 00:00:52,240 --> 00:00:56,360 Speaker 1: friend at Fox News. He was convicted and sentenced to 10 00:00:56,440 --> 00:00:59,280 Speaker 1: die in two thousand and five, and now we're finding 11 00:00:59,280 --> 00:01:03,560 Speaker 1: out some fifteen years later today the California Supreme Court 12 00:01:03,600 --> 00:01:07,920 Speaker 1: has overturned the death sentence. Peterson's lawyers had contended all 13 00:01:07,959 --> 00:01:10,040 Speaker 1: along he was not able to get a fair trial 14 00:01:10,120 --> 00:01:12,959 Speaker 1: because of all the pre trial publicity with the case, 15 00:01:13,400 --> 00:01:16,600 Speaker 1: but the court rejected that argument. Yet it did say 16 00:01:16,640 --> 00:01:19,240 Speaker 1: that the trial judge made a series of clear and 17 00:01:19,400 --> 00:01:24,360 Speaker 1: significant errors in jury selection that undermined Peterson's right to 18 00:01:24,440 --> 00:01:28,319 Speaker 1: an impartial jury during the penalty phase, and that potential 19 00:01:28,440 --> 00:01:32,320 Speaker 1: jurors were improperly dismissed from the jury pool. After saying 20 00:01:32,319 --> 00:01:35,520 Speaker 1: they personally disagreed with the death penalty, but that they 21 00:01:35,560 --> 00:01:39,080 Speaker 1: would be willing to follow it and impose it. Peterson 22 00:01:39,160 --> 00:01:41,640 Speaker 1: is now forty seven years old. He was convicted of 23 00:01:41,680 --> 00:01:45,280 Speaker 1: first degree murder. From everything we understand, it seems that 24 00:01:45,400 --> 00:01:49,880 Speaker 1: murder conviction will stand, but not the death penalty. Prosecutors 25 00:01:49,880 --> 00:01:52,080 Speaker 1: will have the right to try again for a death 26 00:01:52,080 --> 00:01:55,040 Speaker 1: penalty conviction. Although keep in mind there are more than 27 00:01:55,120 --> 00:01:59,080 Speaker 1: seven hundred prisoners on California's death row and the last 28 00:01:59,120 --> 00:02:02,520 Speaker 1: time anyone was put to death was January of two 29 00:02:02,560 --> 00:02:05,040 Speaker 1: thousand and six. Here hearing are afraid to need a 30 00:02:05,120 --> 00:02:08,760 Speaker 1: vogal at Fox News, and what she said is exactly correct. 31 00:02:08,800 --> 00:02:12,680 Speaker 1: Over seven hundred people language on California's death row. The 32 00:02:12,880 --> 00:02:19,120 Speaker 1: current governor, Gavin Newsom, has decided, against the majority of 33 00:02:19,160 --> 00:02:23,880 Speaker 1: the public, to put a moratorium on the death penalty. 34 00:02:24,080 --> 00:02:27,480 Speaker 1: While he is governor, anyway, there will be no death penalties. 35 00:02:27,639 --> 00:02:30,680 Speaker 1: So the reality is that right now there will be 36 00:02:30,720 --> 00:02:34,280 Speaker 1: no death penalty for Scott Peterson anyway until Newsom is 37 00:02:34,320 --> 00:02:38,720 Speaker 1: out of office, even though California voters voted to keep 38 00:02:39,040 --> 00:02:42,240 Speaker 1: the death penalty. But what does it all mean? I 39 00:02:42,280 --> 00:02:45,600 Speaker 1: can tell you this It all started with this. Take 40 00:02:45,600 --> 00:02:51,239 Speaker 1: a listen to a nine one one call by Lacy's stepfather, 41 00:02:51,800 --> 00:03:01,600 Speaker 1: Ron Grantsky. Yes, my fellow, low callaballood morning, my thirty. 42 00:03:02,040 --> 00:03:04,280 Speaker 1: My daughter has been lifting since this morning and she 43 00:03:04,400 --> 00:03:06,480 Speaker 1: eight months pregnant. You took her dog for a walk 44 00:03:06,520 --> 00:03:10,320 Speaker 1: from apart. The dog came always getting police shot and 45 00:03:10,480 --> 00:03:12,839 Speaker 1: the dog came back without your daughter. Right, I get 46 00:03:12,840 --> 00:03:18,400 Speaker 1: a daughter, got Peters, your step daughter, Thank Peter, thank you? 47 00:03:19,200 --> 00:03:25,760 Speaker 1: Right ez a wife lat the sanic agent. She's portugues away. 48 00:03:26,000 --> 00:03:29,440 Speaker 1: How old I came? She's twenty six? What can you 49 00:03:29,520 --> 00:03:32,240 Speaker 1: hear me? The halfman and come back that we don't know. 50 00:03:32,480 --> 00:03:34,239 Speaker 1: We just got a call from our front in law 51 00:03:34,600 --> 00:03:36,520 Speaker 1: that he left the morning and night. There's the play 52 00:03:36,640 --> 00:03:41,880 Speaker 1: off about a half hour ago nowhere around he went 53 00:03:41,920 --> 00:03:44,520 Speaker 1: to up the dog boys walked it if me in 54 00:03:44,600 --> 00:03:51,480 Speaker 1: that heart and he gatement of pregnant. He said, parent, Yeah, 55 00:03:51,520 --> 00:03:55,720 Speaker 1: I am eight months pregnants. Straight out to high profile 56 00:03:57,000 --> 00:04:01,240 Speaker 1: La California defense attorney law you're at seeing Laura. Wait, 57 00:04:01,320 --> 00:04:05,000 Speaker 1: did I get that wrong? Wait? Scott Peterson told his 58 00:04:05,120 --> 00:04:09,320 Speaker 1: father in law he was playing golf, but then after 59 00:04:09,480 --> 00:04:12,280 Speaker 1: he was spotted at San Francisco Bay where Lacy's body 60 00:04:12,360 --> 00:04:16,280 Speaker 1: turned up. He then said he was fishing. Did I 61 00:04:16,400 --> 00:04:17,960 Speaker 1: hear that? Right? On the nine one one call? He 62 00:04:18,040 --> 00:04:20,799 Speaker 1: first told his father in law that he was playing 63 00:04:20,920 --> 00:04:25,360 Speaker 1: golf when Lacy went missing. The colonel doesn't tell us 64 00:04:25,520 --> 00:04:28,960 Speaker 1: what Scott Peterson told his father. The father in law 65 00:04:29,200 --> 00:04:34,520 Speaker 1: is telling the dispatcher, and the father telling the dispatcher 66 00:04:34,680 --> 00:04:37,520 Speaker 1: what whatever it is that he's telling him. It doesn't 67 00:04:37,560 --> 00:04:40,160 Speaker 1: necessarily mean that that's what scottled him. Scott early on, 68 00:04:40,279 --> 00:04:43,479 Speaker 1: from the beginning, when talking to the law enforcement, told 69 00:04:43,520 --> 00:04:45,400 Speaker 1: him exactly where he had been. That had never been 70 00:04:45,440 --> 00:04:49,720 Speaker 1: a secret. He was very truthful about it as far 71 00:04:49,800 --> 00:04:52,400 Speaker 1: as where he had been. You know that. That's really 72 00:04:52,480 --> 00:04:56,080 Speaker 1: interesting because at the beginning he told people that he 73 00:04:56,200 --> 00:05:00,040 Speaker 1: had been playing golf, just like he told his I 74 00:05:00,160 --> 00:05:04,120 Speaker 1: was gonna the day before he was signing. The evidence 75 00:05:04,200 --> 00:05:08,560 Speaker 1: was showing that the day before he talked about actually 76 00:05:09,160 --> 00:05:13,640 Speaker 1: playing golf, but he changed his plan based on the weather. 77 00:05:14,640 --> 00:05:18,560 Speaker 1: My recollection of evidence is that the next day he 78 00:05:18,839 --> 00:05:21,680 Speaker 1: changed his mind and decided to go to the Brookley Marina. 79 00:05:22,320 --> 00:05:25,240 Speaker 1: You know what you're saying, And with me as high 80 00:05:25,279 --> 00:05:29,600 Speaker 1: profile defense lawyer, Laura Yaretzien. So the weather was so 81 00:05:29,960 --> 00:05:33,360 Speaker 1: bad he couldn't play golf, so he went out on 82 00:05:33,480 --> 00:05:37,120 Speaker 1: the San Francisco Bay to go fishing with me, an 83 00:05:37,200 --> 00:05:38,960 Speaker 1: all star panel to break it down and put it 84 00:05:39,000 --> 00:05:43,400 Speaker 1: back together again. Lauraretzien, who you've already heard from, la lawyer, 85 00:05:44,960 --> 00:05:50,240 Speaker 1: Doctor Debbie Joffey Ellis psychologists as professor Columbia University A 86 00:05:50,480 --> 00:05:55,720 Speaker 1: doctor Debbie Joffe Ellis dot com. Stephen A. Lampley, detective, 87 00:05:55,920 --> 00:05:59,680 Speaker 1: author of twelve and Murdered on Amazon at Stephen Lampley 88 00:05:59,720 --> 00:06:04,000 Speaker 1: dot com. Jennifer Schen forensic pathologist, former San Diego Police 89 00:06:04,000 --> 00:06:09,080 Speaker 1: Department Crime Lab director, but now to crime online dot com. 90 00:06:09,240 --> 00:06:15,560 Speaker 1: Investigative reporter Alexis terres Chuck, joining me from California. Alexis 91 00:06:15,720 --> 00:06:20,120 Speaker 1: terres Chuck. You and I went through the entire trial together. 92 00:06:20,760 --> 00:06:25,240 Speaker 1: We never missed a day of court, Alexis terres Chuck. 93 00:06:25,440 --> 00:06:28,279 Speaker 1: As a matter of fact, the evidence did prove at 94 00:06:28,440 --> 00:06:32,200 Speaker 1: trial that what the father in law Lacy's father in 95 00:06:32,279 --> 00:06:36,360 Speaker 1: law father was saying is what Scott Peterson told him. 96 00:06:36,839 --> 00:06:40,480 Speaker 1: That morning, Peterson did not call to report his wife missing. 97 00:06:40,839 --> 00:06:45,560 Speaker 1: He called Lacy's parents instead and said he'd been playing golf, Alexis, 98 00:06:46,600 --> 00:06:50,440 Speaker 1: You're exactly right. This is Scott's first story was presented 99 00:06:50,480 --> 00:06:52,400 Speaker 1: in court, and it was that he was playing golf. 100 00:06:52,440 --> 00:06:55,040 Speaker 1: He called the family Lacy, Foum and Dad and said, 101 00:06:55,440 --> 00:06:58,080 Speaker 1: I haven't seen Lacy. I've been out all day. I 102 00:06:58,240 --> 00:07:00,240 Speaker 1: was golf, saying I can't get much with her. Y'all 103 00:07:00,279 --> 00:07:04,560 Speaker 1: seen her, and they immediately panicked. They called the police. 104 00:07:04,960 --> 00:07:07,840 Speaker 1: The husband, the father of a baby who was about 105 00:07:07,880 --> 00:07:12,320 Speaker 1: be born any second, did not call the police. Guys, 106 00:07:12,360 --> 00:07:16,320 Speaker 1: for those of you just joining us, a bombshell in 107 00:07:16,400 --> 00:07:21,440 Speaker 1: the Scott Peterson double murder conviction in the last hours, 108 00:07:21,560 --> 00:07:25,480 Speaker 1: we learn a California appellet court has reversed the death 109 00:07:25,640 --> 00:07:31,360 Speaker 1: penalty portion only apparently in taking the death penalty off 110 00:07:31,400 --> 00:07:35,200 Speaker 1: the table for Scott Peterson on a technicality, the California's 111 00:07:35,200 --> 00:07:40,640 Speaker 1: Supreme Court never says that he did not kill his wife. 112 00:07:40,920 --> 00:07:43,640 Speaker 1: As a matter of fact, they make it very clear 113 00:07:44,080 --> 00:07:47,080 Speaker 1: they do think he killed his wife. They go on 114 00:07:47,240 --> 00:07:52,760 Speaker 1: to say in the ruling quote they point to considerable 115 00:07:53,240 --> 00:07:59,320 Speaker 1: circumstantial evidence incriminating Peterson and the Christmas Eve disappearance and 116 00:07:59,560 --> 00:08:03,680 Speaker 1: death of his pregnant, twenty seven year old wife Lacy. 117 00:08:04,480 --> 00:08:06,520 Speaker 1: For those of you just joining us, take a listen 118 00:08:06,560 --> 00:08:10,560 Speaker 1: to our friends a KABC seven LA. We start with 119 00:08:10,680 --> 00:08:14,040 Speaker 1: breaking news out of northern California where convicted killer Scott 120 00:08:14,080 --> 00:08:18,640 Speaker 1: Peterson has won his death row appeal. The California Supreme 121 00:08:18,680 --> 00:08:21,800 Speaker 1: Court this morning has overturned his death sentence, but not 122 00:08:22,040 --> 00:08:25,880 Speaker 1: the conviction on first degree murder. Sixteen years ago, Peterson 123 00:08:25,960 --> 00:08:29,160 Speaker 1: was found guilty of murdering his pregnant wife, Lacy in modesto. 124 00:08:29,640 --> 00:08:33,360 Speaker 1: He challenged both the murder conviction and the death sentence, 125 00:08:33,400 --> 00:08:37,760 Speaker 1: claiming widespread media attention and errors in jury selection deprived 126 00:08:37,840 --> 00:08:41,480 Speaker 1: him of a fair triumph. The Stanislaus County Prosecutor can 127 00:08:41,559 --> 00:08:43,920 Speaker 1: decide to retry the penalty phase of the case, but 128 00:08:44,040 --> 00:08:47,000 Speaker 1: a decision will likely not be made until next year. 129 00:08:57,600 --> 00:09:03,280 Speaker 1: Crime Stories with Nancy Grace For those of you just 130 00:09:03,440 --> 00:09:07,319 Speaker 1: joining us, the Bomb's Shell decision by the California Supreme 131 00:09:07,360 --> 00:09:11,360 Speaker 1: Court that the sentencing portion of Scott Peterson trial alone 132 00:09:11,880 --> 00:09:16,920 Speaker 1: will be reversed. He can either accept life behind bars, 133 00:09:17,240 --> 00:09:21,720 Speaker 1: or the state can move forward with a death penalty 134 00:09:21,800 --> 00:09:25,800 Speaker 1: phase trial with an all new jury. How does it 135 00:09:25,880 --> 00:09:29,040 Speaker 1: all start? Take a listen to our friends at ABC's 136 00:09:29,080 --> 00:09:32,120 Speaker 1: twenty twenty the last time I saw Lacy, she and 137 00:09:32,160 --> 00:09:33,840 Speaker 1: I were sitting inside by side and Scott was sitting 138 00:09:33,840 --> 00:09:37,719 Speaker 1: on the floor and we were watching TV. And she 139 00:09:37,800 --> 00:09:39,480 Speaker 1: said the baby was kicking, so I put my hand 140 00:09:39,520 --> 00:09:42,120 Speaker 1: on her stomach because I'd never felt him kick. She 141 00:09:42,280 --> 00:09:43,640 Speaker 1: leaned over to me and she said, Mom, She said, 142 00:09:43,640 --> 00:09:45,760 Speaker 1: Scott doesn't like to do this. She said, I'm asked 143 00:09:45,840 --> 00:09:49,880 Speaker 1: him to feel my stomach when when the baby kicks, 144 00:09:49,920 --> 00:09:53,560 Speaker 1: and he never wants to touch my stomach. That really 145 00:09:54,080 --> 00:09:55,599 Speaker 1: really bothered me, And that was the last time I 146 00:09:55,600 --> 00:10:00,160 Speaker 1: saw her. It seems as if Lacy had planned all 147 00:10:00,160 --> 00:10:04,559 Speaker 1: along to have children and that was understood going into it. 148 00:10:06,760 --> 00:10:11,640 Speaker 1: But if you analyze their marriage, seems that when she 149 00:10:11,800 --> 00:10:18,360 Speaker 1: got pregnant with Connor, things started going sideways. Going sideways 150 00:10:18,640 --> 00:10:22,160 Speaker 1: is one way of putting it back to you, Alexa's 151 00:10:22,160 --> 00:10:26,000 Speaker 1: Torrest Chuck Crime online dot Com investigative reporter. The court 152 00:10:26,080 --> 00:10:28,800 Speaker 1: made it very clear that there's a mountain of evidence 153 00:10:28,880 --> 00:10:33,360 Speaker 1: to convict Peterson for the murders of Lacy and Connor, 154 00:10:33,440 --> 00:10:37,280 Speaker 1: the baby, their bodies washed ashore twenty four hours apart, 155 00:10:38,600 --> 00:10:41,640 Speaker 1: and it's quite the coincidence, isn't it. Alexis Terrest Chuck 156 00:10:41,679 --> 00:10:46,080 Speaker 1: that Scott Peterson is fishing in the exact same spot 157 00:10:47,000 --> 00:10:50,040 Speaker 1: in the body of water where his wife's body and 158 00:10:50,160 --> 00:10:55,400 Speaker 1: his baby's body are found at the time of their disappearance. 159 00:10:55,440 --> 00:10:58,000 Speaker 1: And this was a place where he lied about going. 160 00:10:58,080 --> 00:10:59,839 Speaker 1: First he said he was golfing. Then when there was 161 00:11:00,000 --> 00:11:02,800 Speaker 1: evidence that he was there, then he fessed up that 162 00:11:02,920 --> 00:11:05,439 Speaker 1: he was there. This is shocking, but this is what 163 00:11:05,679 --> 00:11:08,839 Speaker 1: the court did say. They are saying none, none of 164 00:11:08,880 --> 00:11:11,679 Speaker 1: your nonsense, Scott, none of his pre trial the trials. 165 00:11:11,760 --> 00:11:14,440 Speaker 1: You blaming Nancy Grays, blaming all the recorders that were 166 00:11:14,520 --> 00:11:16,640 Speaker 1: there that had nothing to do with the fact that 167 00:11:16,800 --> 00:11:19,640 Speaker 1: you are guilty, killed your wife and killed your baby, 168 00:11:19,960 --> 00:11:21,880 Speaker 1: and you lied about it. And when you were caught, 169 00:11:22,240 --> 00:11:24,559 Speaker 1: you were at the bottom of the state. You had 170 00:11:24,640 --> 00:11:27,079 Speaker 1: bleached blonde hair, yet sixteen thousand dollars in cash, you 171 00:11:27,120 --> 00:11:31,720 Speaker 1: had your brother's ID on you. You were not doing anything. 172 00:11:31,800 --> 00:11:34,040 Speaker 1: You weren't out trying to help find your wife or 173 00:11:34,080 --> 00:11:37,400 Speaker 1: you're missing baby, like the parents and the thousands that 174 00:11:37,520 --> 00:11:40,240 Speaker 1: we know that are innocent. You know, I always just 175 00:11:40,400 --> 00:11:43,000 Speaker 1: think of those people, especially I always think of poly 176 00:11:43,080 --> 00:11:47,200 Speaker 1: Klaus's dad, who was just to do anything. I will 177 00:11:47,240 --> 00:11:49,120 Speaker 1: do anything to let you know that I had nothing 178 00:11:49,160 --> 00:11:52,120 Speaker 1: to do with this, not Scott Peterson. He was doing 179 00:11:52,240 --> 00:11:54,079 Speaker 1: nothing to make people think he was innocent, and the 180 00:11:54,200 --> 00:11:57,680 Speaker 1: Court of help that he is not innocent of murder. 181 00:11:57,760 --> 00:12:00,880 Speaker 1: He is guilty of murder. To Stephen a play detective, 182 00:12:00,920 --> 00:12:05,400 Speaker 1: author of twelve and Murdered on Amazon, I want you 183 00:12:05,440 --> 00:12:09,600 Speaker 1: to take a listen to really compelling evidence in my mind. 184 00:12:09,760 --> 00:12:13,280 Speaker 1: This is from Fox News special to Scott Peterson case. 185 00:12:13,320 --> 00:12:15,599 Speaker 1: Take a listen. He takes his new boat that he 186 00:12:15,679 --> 00:12:18,959 Speaker 1: had purchased, and he comes here to launch the boat. 187 00:12:19,240 --> 00:12:21,640 Speaker 1: Her husband reported her missing after he returned from a 188 00:12:21,720 --> 00:12:24,679 Speaker 1: fishing trip, a trip he took by himself or husband 189 00:12:24,720 --> 00:12:28,320 Speaker 1: says he went fishing at marina the day she disappeared, 190 00:12:28,679 --> 00:12:31,760 Speaker 1: so investigators are searching that marina, but the mystery here 191 00:12:31,800 --> 00:12:35,600 Speaker 1: in Modesto, fueled in large part by Scott Peterson's alibi, 192 00:12:35,800 --> 00:12:39,599 Speaker 1: which remains flimsy at best. He comes home later in 193 00:12:39,679 --> 00:12:43,040 Speaker 1: the day, realizes that she's not there, figures she's somewhere 194 00:12:43,080 --> 00:12:46,480 Speaker 1: else running errands, doing something for Christmas Eve, and takes 195 00:12:46,520 --> 00:12:48,800 Speaker 1: the time to put his clothes in the wash, take 196 00:12:48,840 --> 00:12:52,599 Speaker 1: a shower, have a snack, and then realizes maybe I 197 00:12:52,640 --> 00:12:55,880 Speaker 1: should call somebody. So here's what's unusual. Scott decides to 198 00:12:56,040 --> 00:12:59,920 Speaker 1: call Lacy's mother. Doesn't say have you spoken to Lacy today? 199 00:13:00,320 --> 00:13:05,120 Speaker 1: Do you know where she is? He says, Lacy is missing. 200 00:13:05,720 --> 00:13:08,760 Speaker 1: I want to go to Stephen Lampley and doctor Debbie Joffey, 201 00:13:08,920 --> 00:13:13,680 Speaker 1: l a psychologist and professor Columbia University. You know, when 202 00:13:13,840 --> 00:13:17,800 Speaker 1: I have not been able to find let's just say 203 00:13:19,240 --> 00:13:23,040 Speaker 1: John David, I call my husband, say do you have 204 00:13:23,200 --> 00:13:27,960 Speaker 1: John David. I don't say John David is missing. That's 205 00:13:28,000 --> 00:13:33,400 Speaker 1: a very critical, subtle but critical point, doctor Debbie. Maybe 206 00:13:33,480 --> 00:13:38,240 Speaker 1: it isn't. Maybe it isn't Nancy's I really could only 207 00:13:38,880 --> 00:13:42,520 Speaker 1: give a more substantial opinion if I heard him use 208 00:13:42,840 --> 00:13:46,280 Speaker 1: or not use that phrase often. You know, sometimes we 209 00:13:46,440 --> 00:13:50,680 Speaker 1: bandy around words and phrases and they may indicate something 210 00:13:50,760 --> 00:13:55,400 Speaker 1: as you're implying or not interesting. Stephen Lampley, what do 211 00:13:55,520 --> 00:14:01,280 Speaker 1: you make of Peterson placing himself where the body is 212 00:14:01,360 --> 00:14:07,400 Speaker 1: found and placing himself there at the time she goes missing. Well, 213 00:14:07,400 --> 00:14:10,560 Speaker 1: I see, I'm guessing perhaps that he's thinking, and again 214 00:14:10,600 --> 00:14:12,760 Speaker 1: I don't know, I don't know what Scott was thinking. 215 00:14:13,600 --> 00:14:17,880 Speaker 1: Perhaps he knows that he was not golfing. Maybe he's 216 00:14:17,960 --> 00:14:21,480 Speaker 1: making an excuse for where he really really was at 217 00:14:21,520 --> 00:14:26,200 Speaker 1: the time, an alibi of sorts to cover the fact 218 00:14:26,280 --> 00:14:29,000 Speaker 1: that he was fishing instead of dumping a body. Perhaps 219 00:14:30,520 --> 00:14:34,040 Speaker 1: that would be my idea that he thinks he was 220 00:14:34,080 --> 00:14:36,800 Speaker 1: going to be caught by not golfing, so he faces 221 00:14:36,880 --> 00:14:39,160 Speaker 1: up to the fact that he was at the ocean 222 00:14:39,840 --> 00:14:43,600 Speaker 1: for whatever reason. In reality, he was really there. Take 223 00:14:43,600 --> 00:14:46,760 Speaker 1: a little star friends at Fox Knees. I realized that 224 00:14:46,840 --> 00:14:49,800 Speaker 1: they were zeroing in on Scott. We just knew his 225 00:14:49,960 --> 00:14:53,280 Speaker 1: actions were suspicious and something was going on, and clearly 226 00:14:53,600 --> 00:14:56,160 Speaker 1: his fishing story was not adding up. One of the 227 00:14:56,240 --> 00:14:58,360 Speaker 1: things you do as a reporter as you go up 228 00:14:58,400 --> 00:15:00,720 Speaker 1: and down, you talk to everybody that you possibly can. 229 00:15:01,040 --> 00:15:03,120 Speaker 1: I went over to the neighbor's house that lives directly 230 00:15:03,200 --> 00:15:06,120 Speaker 1: across the street. The neighbor remembered Scott coming over to 231 00:15:06,240 --> 00:15:09,440 Speaker 1: her house looking for Lacey, and she said, well, where 232 00:15:09,480 --> 00:15:11,440 Speaker 1: were you? It's Christmas Eve and he said, I was 233 00:15:11,560 --> 00:15:15,000 Speaker 1: playing golf. So the fact that that story differed from 234 00:15:15,080 --> 00:15:17,040 Speaker 1: what we then heard was his alibi and where he 235 00:15:17,120 --> 00:15:20,960 Speaker 1: says he was was very upsetting. Back out to high 236 00:15:21,000 --> 00:15:24,920 Speaker 1: profile criminal defense attorney No stranger to a courtroom law 237 00:15:25,240 --> 00:15:30,040 Speaker 1: Urett Cyn. That makes two people. He told he was 238 00:15:30,120 --> 00:15:32,680 Speaker 1: playing golf that morning. What do you make of it? 239 00:15:33,080 --> 00:15:34,680 Speaker 1: What I make of it is what did you tail 240 00:15:34,720 --> 00:15:37,120 Speaker 1: law enforcement? When he was being questioned. Those are the 241 00:15:37,160 --> 00:15:39,360 Speaker 1: people he used to tell the truth to the people 242 00:15:39,400 --> 00:15:42,480 Speaker 1: who were investigating, and he was extremely honest with him. 243 00:15:42,760 --> 00:15:46,440 Speaker 1: He told him exactly where he'd been, no hesitation, and 244 00:15:46,680 --> 00:15:51,640 Speaker 1: he also was very helpful that he was searching for 245 00:15:51,800 --> 00:15:55,280 Speaker 1: his wife. He was making calls. This idea that he 246 00:15:56,200 --> 00:16:01,960 Speaker 1: took Lacey's body and dumped it at the bay in 247 00:16:02,040 --> 00:16:07,120 Speaker 1: San Francisco Bay is ridiculous. There's zero, zero forensic evidence 248 00:16:07,320 --> 00:16:10,000 Speaker 1: showing that he did it. There was nothing, zero forensic 249 00:16:10,040 --> 00:16:13,640 Speaker 1: evidence in its truck, zero forensic evidence really leading and 250 00:16:13,760 --> 00:16:18,520 Speaker 1: showing that there was a body or her body in 251 00:16:18,640 --> 00:16:21,200 Speaker 1: that boat, or that he was even able to dump 252 00:16:21,480 --> 00:16:26,440 Speaker 1: that body from that small boat, an exposed boat, not covered. 253 00:16:26,760 --> 00:16:29,680 Speaker 1: Anyone could have seen it. So this idea that he 254 00:16:29,840 --> 00:16:32,680 Speaker 1: did that, you mean anyone out in the middle of 255 00:16:32,800 --> 00:16:37,400 Speaker 1: San Francisco Bay during wind and storm and rain, I 256 00:16:37,680 --> 00:16:41,440 Speaker 1: a nobody would have seen it. Nobody was out where 257 00:16:41,520 --> 00:16:44,440 Speaker 1: he was. We're assuming it was storm and rain there 258 00:16:44,560 --> 00:16:46,640 Speaker 1: was no evidence. It was storm and rain. It wasn't 259 00:16:46,680 --> 00:16:48,400 Speaker 1: the greatest of the weather. I thought, that's why I 260 00:16:48,440 --> 00:16:50,920 Speaker 1: didn't a golfing because of the bad weather. Well we're 261 00:16:51,000 --> 00:16:54,120 Speaker 1: talking about bad weather where he was living in Modesto. 262 00:16:54,320 --> 00:16:58,080 Speaker 1: This is not Medesto. You know. That's why you are 263 00:16:58,160 --> 00:17:02,360 Speaker 1: such a great law lawyer, Laura eurets him because my 264 00:17:02,520 --> 00:17:05,600 Speaker 1: question to you was why did he tell some people 265 00:17:05,680 --> 00:17:10,240 Speaker 1: he was playing golf then change his story till he 266 00:17:10,359 --> 00:17:13,879 Speaker 1: was fishing? And you said what mattered was what he 267 00:17:13,960 --> 00:17:17,800 Speaker 1: told cops. But what I'm saying is, and my question 268 00:17:18,040 --> 00:17:23,320 Speaker 1: is why did he change his story? Not that he 269 00:17:23,520 --> 00:17:27,320 Speaker 1: told cops first he was golfing. He didn't. By the 270 00:17:27,440 --> 00:17:31,080 Speaker 1: end you realized people had spotted him at the bay, 271 00:17:31,200 --> 00:17:34,320 Speaker 1: he had to tell them. But he told other people 272 00:17:34,880 --> 00:17:38,040 Speaker 1: that day, not the day before I was planning to 273 00:17:38,080 --> 00:17:43,040 Speaker 1: go golfing, but that day that he had been golfing. 274 00:17:43,280 --> 00:17:47,480 Speaker 1: You also mentioned that he was so forthcoming and so helpful. 275 00:17:47,680 --> 00:17:50,680 Speaker 1: In fact, he told the cops what a great marriage 276 00:17:51,000 --> 00:17:54,200 Speaker 1: he had. But seems like he left something out. Take 277 00:17:54,240 --> 00:17:58,000 Speaker 1: a listen to our friends at court TV. Ambertells the 278 00:17:58,080 --> 00:18:00,960 Speaker 1: detectives she's been seeing Scott Peterson only a few weeks, 279 00:18:01,320 --> 00:18:05,840 Speaker 1: but they're already talking marriage. On December ninth, she recalls 280 00:18:06,000 --> 00:18:08,960 Speaker 1: he broke down sobbing that he had quote lost his 281 00:18:09,119 --> 00:18:12,680 Speaker 1: wife once. The same day, Scott secretly bought his boat. 282 00:18:13,200 --> 00:18:16,800 Speaker 1: Detective Brocchini knows he's onto something. I mean, he told 283 00:18:16,880 --> 00:18:20,680 Speaker 1: Amber that he had lost his wife once. She wasn't lost, 284 00:18:21,480 --> 00:18:24,360 Speaker 1: and so that I mean to me, that was a key. 285 00:18:25,600 --> 00:18:29,480 Speaker 1: The detectives ask Ambert to secretly report all future conversations 286 00:18:29,560 --> 00:18:33,679 Speaker 1: with Scott. She agrees. They're also determined that no one 287 00:18:33,800 --> 00:18:37,000 Speaker 1: will find out about her. That afternoon, the detectives take 288 00:18:37,040 --> 00:18:40,760 Speaker 1: Amber to buy their reporting equipment, and then her phone rings. 289 00:18:41,240 --> 00:18:56,320 Speaker 1: It's Scott. He's caught everyone off guard. Crime stories with 290 00:18:56,480 --> 00:19:00,920 Speaker 1: Nancy Grace for those of you just joining us. In 291 00:19:01,160 --> 00:19:06,720 Speaker 1: a major bombshell to the Scott Peterson conviction, a California 292 00:19:06,840 --> 00:19:10,879 Speaker 1: court has ruled the death penalty sentence is out. What 293 00:19:11,000 --> 00:19:15,360 Speaker 1: are the choices? Will he now go into general population 294 00:19:15,560 --> 00:19:18,439 Speaker 1: and no longer have the protections he had on death row? 295 00:19:19,119 --> 00:19:22,240 Speaker 1: Will there be a new penalty phase? Now we saw 296 00:19:22,359 --> 00:19:25,120 Speaker 1: that happen in the Jodi Arias trial. If you will 297 00:19:25,240 --> 00:19:30,720 Speaker 1: recall what lays ahead. But I know this. I know 298 00:19:30,840 --> 00:19:35,959 Speaker 1: that Lacy's mother, Sharon Roacha, is devastated. Now, we were 299 00:19:36,000 --> 00:19:40,400 Speaker 1: just speaking to high profile lawyer, lawyer Laura Uretsian, who 300 00:19:40,480 --> 00:19:45,679 Speaker 1: stated that Peterson was completely honest, forthcoming, and helpful about 301 00:19:45,720 --> 00:19:48,760 Speaker 1: finding his wife. The reality is he didn't call nine 302 00:19:48,840 --> 00:19:52,960 Speaker 1: one one. He waited for hours before he even called 303 00:19:53,480 --> 00:19:55,760 Speaker 1: Lacy's parents to tell them he couldn't find her, that 304 00:19:55,840 --> 00:19:59,640 Speaker 1: she was missing. He immediately asked if his family would 305 00:19:59,640 --> 00:20:05,720 Speaker 1: have grief counseling. But there's this little thing he left 306 00:20:05,920 --> 00:20:09,639 Speaker 1: out when he was being so forthcoming with the cops. Listen, 307 00:20:11,359 --> 00:20:16,840 Speaker 1: glove yes. Scott continues to call Amber, and detectives are 308 00:20:16,880 --> 00:20:19,639 Speaker 1: intent on getting him to repeat something he told her 309 00:20:19,800 --> 00:20:24,680 Speaker 1: just before Lacy disappeared. Those four short but incriminating words, 310 00:20:25,359 --> 00:20:27,960 Speaker 1: I lost my wife, and you came and told me 311 00:20:28,040 --> 00:20:31,440 Speaker 1: this elaborate life about her missing and this tragedy and 312 00:20:31,600 --> 00:20:34,560 Speaker 1: that and that that this will be the first holidays 313 00:20:34,600 --> 00:20:39,240 Speaker 1: without her. Never said Amber, I ain god, I don't 314 00:20:39,280 --> 00:20:44,560 Speaker 1: want to play with you. You know that. I never said, oh, yes, 315 00:20:44,640 --> 00:20:49,160 Speaker 1: you said you've lost your wife, obviously without me saying much. 316 00:20:49,640 --> 00:20:53,200 Speaker 1: But we were my wife, Yes you did. I did 317 00:20:54,160 --> 00:20:59,159 Speaker 1: bingo this is what investigators needed for us. That was 318 00:20:59,200 --> 00:21:04,080 Speaker 1: a huge statement on his part, because you how do 319 00:21:04,160 --> 00:21:06,080 Speaker 1: you predict that? I mean, how do you know you're 320 00:21:06,080 --> 00:21:08,040 Speaker 1: going to come up with a lie about that to 321 00:21:08,200 --> 00:21:11,080 Speaker 1: try and woo some girl into a romance that you're 322 00:21:11,119 --> 00:21:12,960 Speaker 1: not supposed to be part of, and then all of 323 00:21:13,000 --> 00:21:16,080 Speaker 1: a sudden it comes true. So Laura Euretsian with me, 324 00:21:16,200 --> 00:21:19,600 Speaker 1: high profile criminal defense attorney out of la Laura, do 325 00:21:19,800 --> 00:21:24,639 Speaker 1: you believe in clairvoyance? So Scott Peterson said just before 326 00:21:24,800 --> 00:21:29,840 Speaker 1: Lacy goes missing and ends up murdered, that he had 327 00:21:29,920 --> 00:21:32,080 Speaker 1: just lost his wife and this would be the first 328 00:21:32,240 --> 00:21:35,200 Speaker 1: Christmas without her and it all turned out to be true. 329 00:21:35,520 --> 00:21:40,160 Speaker 1: Do you think he's psychic? My question is, if Scott 330 00:21:40,200 --> 00:21:43,680 Speaker 1: Peterson was really planning on murdering his wife, is that 331 00:21:43,840 --> 00:21:47,000 Speaker 1: what he would be telling someone who's only he's only 332 00:21:47,080 --> 00:21:49,920 Speaker 1: been dating for a couple of weeks and literally that's 333 00:21:49,960 --> 00:21:52,800 Speaker 1: all it was a few weeks and sleeping with and 334 00:21:52,960 --> 00:21:56,640 Speaker 1: talking about getting married. Yeah, how many men have said 335 00:21:56,680 --> 00:21:58,480 Speaker 1: that to women just to get into bed with them. 336 00:21:58,520 --> 00:22:02,440 Speaker 1: I mean it's not yes, was he being was aligned 337 00:22:02,560 --> 00:22:05,240 Speaker 1: or was he cheating on his wife? But the idea 338 00:22:05,359 --> 00:22:08,000 Speaker 1: that he would tell someone who just he'd been with 339 00:22:08,320 --> 00:22:11,920 Speaker 1: just a couple of weeks that um, you know, and 340 00:22:12,119 --> 00:22:15,359 Speaker 1: whatever he said is really and a glimpse into what 341 00:22:15,480 --> 00:22:17,680 Speaker 1: he was thinking, and that he was planning to kill 342 00:22:17,720 --> 00:22:21,320 Speaker 1: his wife is ridiculous. Yes, of course the prosecution made 343 00:22:21,359 --> 00:22:24,000 Speaker 1: a huge deal out of that, because it is huge deal. 344 00:22:24,600 --> 00:22:27,560 Speaker 1: He says his wife is dead and that this is 345 00:22:27,560 --> 00:22:30,399 Speaker 1: the first Christmas he'll have without her, and then a 346 00:22:30,520 --> 00:22:34,000 Speaker 1: couple of days later she is dead and it's the 347 00:22:34,080 --> 00:22:39,240 Speaker 1: first Christmas without her. She goes missing that Christmas. Abe, 348 00:22:39,720 --> 00:22:43,359 Speaker 1: I don't care why with him that, you know what, 349 00:22:43,480 --> 00:22:46,480 Speaker 1: It almost doesn't matter that just just because he said 350 00:22:46,520 --> 00:22:48,720 Speaker 1: that to her, it doesn't mean that he was planning 351 00:22:48,800 --> 00:22:52,320 Speaker 1: to kill his wife. It really shows you that he'll 352 00:22:52,359 --> 00:23:00,239 Speaker 1: do anything to be with you said, you said, your 353 00:23:00,280 --> 00:23:04,760 Speaker 1: rhet said, you said it. He'll do anything, including killing things. 354 00:23:04,840 --> 00:23:10,480 Speaker 1: Why you said no? Apparently the jury disagree. Week this 355 00:23:10,680 --> 00:23:16,639 Speaker 1: wasn't his first affair, so they no. It just doesn't 356 00:23:16,680 --> 00:23:19,560 Speaker 1: mean just because someone's had an affair, it doesn't Yes, 357 00:23:19,640 --> 00:23:24,080 Speaker 1: it looks awful, it doesn't look great. It does Let's 358 00:23:24,119 --> 00:23:27,280 Speaker 1: talk about the other evidence, Laura. Your rhet seen is 359 00:23:27,400 --> 00:23:31,879 Speaker 1: right in the sense that one nail does not a 360 00:23:32,119 --> 00:23:37,200 Speaker 1: coffin seal. What else is the evidence? Well, the evidence 361 00:23:37,320 --> 00:23:42,159 Speaker 1: that they had was that they had a dog. And 362 00:23:42,280 --> 00:23:44,560 Speaker 1: I know that this is controversial, but there was a 363 00:23:44,680 --> 00:23:47,600 Speaker 1: dog and they found the scent as Lacy at her 364 00:23:47,640 --> 00:23:52,920 Speaker 1: home obviously, but the scent stopped, she didn't it. The 365 00:23:53,000 --> 00:23:55,320 Speaker 1: dog determined that she'd got into a vehicle, not that 366 00:23:55,480 --> 00:23:58,360 Speaker 1: she walked away. So it wasn't that she was kidnapped 367 00:23:58,359 --> 00:24:01,879 Speaker 1: in the park or if something happened somewhere else. You 368 00:24:01,960 --> 00:24:04,240 Speaker 1: know what. Let's talk about that. Hold your thought, Alexis, 369 00:24:04,240 --> 00:24:05,960 Speaker 1: because I want to go through what you're saying. And 370 00:24:06,040 --> 00:24:08,440 Speaker 1: then we'll have Laura Yaretzi in way in because I'm 371 00:24:08,520 --> 00:24:11,879 Speaker 1: sure she's going to discredit the dog. Guys, don't be 372 00:24:12,000 --> 00:24:15,000 Speaker 1: angry with her. She's a defense lawyer. This is what 373 00:24:15,119 --> 00:24:17,960 Speaker 1: she does for a living, and she is a master 374 00:24:18,240 --> 00:24:22,040 Speaker 1: at it. To Jennifer Shen forensic pathologists, the former San 375 00:24:22,080 --> 00:24:27,480 Speaker 1: Diego Police Department Crime Lab director Jennifer Shen, the dog 376 00:24:28,160 --> 00:24:33,119 Speaker 1: followed Lacy's scent to where the car was parked, and 377 00:24:33,280 --> 00:24:38,480 Speaker 1: then it seemingly cut off. The dog followed a scent 378 00:24:39,480 --> 00:24:44,720 Speaker 1: all the way to the San Francisco Bay from the 379 00:24:44,800 --> 00:24:48,879 Speaker 1: home all the way to the bay. What do you 380 00:24:48,960 --> 00:24:52,040 Speaker 1: make of it, Jennifer Shen, Well, you'm at the dog 381 00:24:52,119 --> 00:24:56,720 Speaker 1: if they're incredibly they are incredibly sensitive and they can 382 00:24:57,160 --> 00:25:01,400 Speaker 1: really give investigators a lot of information. I think it's 383 00:25:01,560 --> 00:25:03,760 Speaker 1: reasonable that if she was taken away in a car, 384 00:25:03,880 --> 00:25:05,960 Speaker 1: that the dog would be able to smell her from 385 00:25:06,040 --> 00:25:08,040 Speaker 1: the house to the car, and then whence they were 386 00:25:08,080 --> 00:25:10,400 Speaker 1: at the bay, that he could then pick that sent 387 00:25:10,560 --> 00:25:14,520 Speaker 1: up again. And I obviously they found the bodies where 388 00:25:14,600 --> 00:25:18,080 Speaker 1: the dogs said they were, so there certainly was a 389 00:25:18,160 --> 00:25:20,760 Speaker 1: lot of delidity to that. Doctors for this sort of 390 00:25:20,800 --> 00:25:23,240 Speaker 1: thing all the time. It is very very successful. But 391 00:25:23,320 --> 00:25:27,200 Speaker 1: they are dogs, and you know, there's certainly it isn't 392 00:25:27,280 --> 00:25:31,120 Speaker 1: a hundred percent obviously, and there's some there's some there's 393 00:25:31,160 --> 00:25:33,600 Speaker 1: some talk about the fact that they aren't as scientifically 394 00:25:33,720 --> 00:25:35,320 Speaker 1: valid as you might want them to be. But in 395 00:25:35,400 --> 00:25:37,400 Speaker 1: this case, I think the dog did a very good job. 396 00:25:37,840 --> 00:25:41,720 Speaker 1: To Stephen Lampley, former detective, author of twelve and Murdered 397 00:25:41,760 --> 00:25:46,440 Speaker 1: at Stephen Lampley dot com, a search dog handler testified 398 00:25:47,040 --> 00:25:51,399 Speaker 1: that her canine picked up Lacy Peterson sent at a 399 00:25:51,480 --> 00:25:57,000 Speaker 1: pylon at the Berkeley Marina where Scott Peterson launched what 400 00:25:57,280 --> 00:26:00,920 Speaker 1: he says was a solo fishing trip the day his 401 00:26:01,160 --> 00:26:05,960 Speaker 1: wife vanished. The dog handler was Eloise Anderson. She was 402 00:26:06,080 --> 00:26:09,800 Speaker 1: with the Contra Costa County Search and Rescue Team. Her 403 00:26:09,960 --> 00:26:15,399 Speaker 1: dog was a lab name Tremble, and Tremble hit on 404 00:26:15,480 --> 00:26:19,800 Speaker 1: the scent four days after Peterson reported his pregnant wife 405 00:26:20,119 --> 00:26:25,040 Speaker 1: missing to her parents, not the police. What do you 406 00:26:25,160 --> 00:26:28,920 Speaker 1: make of dog evidence, Stephen Lampley? I've used it many 407 00:26:29,160 --> 00:26:34,080 Speaker 1: many times in court, and it's sanctioned by the court, 408 00:26:34,280 --> 00:26:39,080 Speaker 1: just like polygraphs in civil cases, just like fingerprints, just 409 00:26:39,200 --> 00:26:42,359 Speaker 1: like DNA. This is a form of evidence that is 410 00:26:42,480 --> 00:26:46,000 Speaker 1: court sanctioned. What do you make of it? In fact, 411 00:26:46,040 --> 00:26:49,000 Speaker 1: I've told people the best witness I've ever put on 412 00:26:49,080 --> 00:26:52,520 Speaker 1: the stand was a dog. Go ahead, Steve, That's right. 413 00:26:52,600 --> 00:26:55,919 Speaker 1: Many dogs have no reason to lie. So the dogs 414 00:26:55,960 --> 00:26:58,680 Speaker 1: are really accurate. Now, some dogs are more accurate than others. 415 00:26:58,720 --> 00:27:03,920 Speaker 1: We know that the dog dog tracking and dogs evidence 416 00:27:04,480 --> 00:27:08,360 Speaker 1: is very reliable for the most part. It's very accurate 417 00:27:08,560 --> 00:27:10,520 Speaker 1: for the most part. Again, like I said, we have 418 00:27:10,640 --> 00:27:13,080 Speaker 1: some animals that are better than others. But if this 419 00:27:13,240 --> 00:27:16,760 Speaker 1: dog in this case picks up her scent at home, 420 00:27:17,520 --> 00:27:20,760 Speaker 1: then we skip to the to the merino or on 421 00:27:20,880 --> 00:27:23,239 Speaker 1: the on the ocean, and he picks her scent up 422 00:27:23,400 --> 00:27:29,040 Speaker 1: there or doesn't. It's it's a very reliable evidence. N'swer 423 00:27:29,440 --> 00:27:32,080 Speaker 1: very it's very reliable. Okay, everybody buck or your seatbelt. 424 00:27:32,160 --> 00:27:35,560 Speaker 1: Here she comes. Laura, you're at sim what's wrong with 425 00:27:35,640 --> 00:27:39,000 Speaker 1: the dog? Well, this is the same dog that failed 426 00:27:39,320 --> 00:27:43,760 Speaker 1: twice out of three times and vehicle trails right, So 427 00:27:44,200 --> 00:27:46,920 Speaker 1: this is not a very accurate dog, and this is 428 00:27:47,000 --> 00:27:50,080 Speaker 1: not one that's very reliable and any you can't argue 429 00:27:50,960 --> 00:27:52,600 Speaker 1: it really is far as I should argue that this 430 00:27:52,760 --> 00:27:56,080 Speaker 1: is reliable evidence. Okay, So let me understand something. Laura. 431 00:27:56,480 --> 00:27:59,440 Speaker 1: You agree that the death penalty, that the court was 432 00:27:59,600 --> 00:28:03,080 Speaker 1: right by reversing the death penalty. Of course I disagree, 433 00:28:03,240 --> 00:28:06,960 Speaker 1: But you disagree with the same court that agreed with 434 00:28:07,040 --> 00:28:12,800 Speaker 1: the prosecution's version, including as they said, dog sent an 435 00:28:12,880 --> 00:28:17,600 Speaker 1: ocean current evidence. So you agree with the court, but 436 00:28:18,040 --> 00:28:20,359 Speaker 1: not when it suits you. I agree with the court 437 00:28:20,400 --> 00:28:25,200 Speaker 1: as far as overturning the death penalty, but clearly you 438 00:28:25,280 --> 00:28:28,880 Speaker 1: are right. I disagree with the court on their assessment. 439 00:28:28,960 --> 00:28:30,919 Speaker 1: But this is the appellate court. The standard is very 440 00:28:30,960 --> 00:28:35,240 Speaker 1: different than what it is for a jury and a 441 00:28:35,359 --> 00:28:40,080 Speaker 1: jury trial, and it would take more than If there's 442 00:28:40,280 --> 00:28:42,800 Speaker 1: enough circumstantial evidence, of course, it's going to leave. It's 443 00:28:42,800 --> 00:28:49,560 Speaker 1: not going to touch the conviction. What hopefully it may 444 00:28:49,640 --> 00:28:53,600 Speaker 1: happen in the future is if there's some evidence that 445 00:28:54,400 --> 00:28:58,080 Speaker 1: was not known at the time, new evidence that's come forth, 446 00:28:58,960 --> 00:29:01,200 Speaker 1: and that's brought and the court can look at this 447 00:29:01,320 --> 00:29:05,520 Speaker 1: again and decide based on that evidence. If we added 448 00:29:05,640 --> 00:29:11,280 Speaker 1: all of that into the mix, what the jury's decision. 449 00:29:11,760 --> 00:29:13,960 Speaker 1: You know what, you lost me a long time ago. 450 00:29:14,160 --> 00:29:16,520 Speaker 1: And I've got a j d and a master's from NYU. 451 00:29:17,200 --> 00:29:19,760 Speaker 1: Uh So I'm going to try to figure out what 452 00:29:20,080 --> 00:29:23,560 Speaker 1: that very long sentence I'm talking about a rich. What 453 00:29:23,680 --> 00:29:29,760 Speaker 1: I'm talking is about a future rich. Okay, there you go. 454 00:29:41,640 --> 00:29:45,600 Speaker 1: Crime Stories with Nancy Grace for those of you just 455 00:29:45,800 --> 00:29:51,320 Speaker 1: joining us. In a bombshell decision, a California pelt Court 456 00:29:51,400 --> 00:29:55,480 Speaker 1: has reversed the penalty phase and the Scott Peterson double 457 00:29:55,600 --> 00:30:02,760 Speaker 1: murder conviction. Katie Johnson at CBS thirteen News Sacramento today, 458 00:30:02,880 --> 00:30:06,640 Speaker 1: the California Supreme Court overturned Scott Peterson's death sentence for 459 00:30:06,680 --> 00:30:09,480 Speaker 1: the murder of his pregnant wife, saying the trial judge 460 00:30:09,520 --> 00:30:13,360 Speaker 1: made a series of clear and significant errors during jury selection. 461 00:30:13,760 --> 00:30:17,120 Speaker 1: The court upheld Peterson's murder conviction and said prosecutors may 462 00:30:17,200 --> 00:30:20,240 Speaker 1: try again for the same sentence. Twenty seventy year old 463 00:30:20,280 --> 00:30:22,880 Speaker 1: Lacy Peterson was eight months pregnant when she was killed. 464 00:30:22,960 --> 00:30:26,520 Speaker 1: Investigators say Christmas Eve two thousand and two, Peterson dumped 465 00:30:26,600 --> 00:30:29,720 Speaker 1: their bodies from his fishing boat into the San Francisco Bay, 466 00:30:29,800 --> 00:30:33,360 Speaker 1: where they resurfaced months later. Peterson is now forty seven 467 00:30:33,440 --> 00:30:39,680 Speaker 1: years old. When Connor's body was found, as I recall, 468 00:30:40,720 --> 00:30:44,880 Speaker 1: his body was found first, but that my point is 469 00:30:45,080 --> 00:30:53,080 Speaker 1: their bodies were drastically different. Connor's body, according to eyewitnesses, 470 00:30:53,880 --> 00:31:04,200 Speaker 1: look like a little naked baby doll Pristaine there on 471 00:31:04,280 --> 00:31:15,280 Speaker 1: the beach. Lacy's body, however, was horribly decomposed, but even 472 00:31:15,520 --> 00:31:23,280 Speaker 1: in death, she protected her baby. Some of the strongest 473 00:31:23,560 --> 00:31:29,960 Speaker 1: muscle and tissue in the human body is the uterus 474 00:31:30,080 --> 00:31:34,840 Speaker 1: that surrounds the baby, and for all the months that 475 00:31:35,120 --> 00:31:41,040 Speaker 1: Lacy drifted in the tides, her body slowly decomposing, that 476 00:31:41,760 --> 00:31:48,160 Speaker 1: strong muscle tissue protected Connor until in the end he 477 00:31:49,720 --> 00:31:58,120 Speaker 1: floated out of her uterus as it decomposed. Therefore, his 478 00:31:58,320 --> 00:32:06,680 Speaker 1: little body was pristine. Her body was greatly decomposed, and 479 00:32:06,840 --> 00:32:11,240 Speaker 1: the States says she was still wearing the same clothes 480 00:32:11,880 --> 00:32:17,120 Speaker 1: she was wearing the night before she disappeared. Part of 481 00:32:17,280 --> 00:32:21,120 Speaker 1: the defense at trial was that someone else murdered Lacy 482 00:32:22,120 --> 00:32:26,520 Speaker 1: for what and then framed went to the trouble to 483 00:32:26,760 --> 00:32:32,800 Speaker 1: frame Scott Peterson. That was after many many other ploys 484 00:32:33,640 --> 00:32:36,920 Speaker 1: were tested out on the public via the media and 485 00:32:37,080 --> 00:32:41,280 Speaker 1: they didn't work. For instance, drug dealers, a Hawaiian gang, 486 00:32:41,840 --> 00:32:45,720 Speaker 1: a burglar across the street, thugs. In the part I 487 00:32:45,760 --> 00:32:48,960 Speaker 1: mean it went on a mother, a woman who wanted 488 00:32:48,960 --> 00:32:52,160 Speaker 1: to be a mother somewhere, cut the baby out and 489 00:32:52,320 --> 00:32:55,120 Speaker 1: then kept Lacy alive for a while and killed her. 490 00:32:55,280 --> 00:32:57,760 Speaker 1: There were so and then got rid of the baby too. 491 00:32:58,200 --> 00:33:03,200 Speaker 1: There were so many any theories, but finally it was 492 00:33:03,280 --> 00:33:06,479 Speaker 1: decided that defense would go with someone else killed her 493 00:33:06,640 --> 00:33:11,800 Speaker 1: and then decided to frame Peterson. Joining me an all 494 00:33:11,840 --> 00:33:16,040 Speaker 1: star panel, Laura Euretzian, high profile criminal defense attorney, LA doctor, 495 00:33:16,120 --> 00:33:21,320 Speaker 1: Debbie Joffe, Ellis, psychologist, Stephen Lampley, detected Jennifer Shenn, forensic pathologists, 496 00:33:21,440 --> 00:33:25,760 Speaker 1: and Alexis Terrestchuck Crime online dot Com investigative reporter, Jennifer Schenn, 497 00:33:25,960 --> 00:33:29,640 Speaker 1: could you explain the forensic evidence we know of in 498 00:33:29,720 --> 00:33:34,480 Speaker 1: the case and how the bodies had decayed so differently 499 00:33:34,600 --> 00:33:37,680 Speaker 1: at the time of their discovery and there really wasn't 500 00:33:37,760 --> 00:33:40,800 Speaker 1: less forensic evidence in this case. I think one that 501 00:33:41,000 --> 00:33:44,520 Speaker 1: was somewhat important was it one of Lacy's Apparently one 502 00:33:44,520 --> 00:33:47,320 Speaker 1: of Lacy's hair is found on some choirs in the boats, 503 00:33:47,440 --> 00:33:49,000 Speaker 1: and there was a boat she didn't know about it 504 00:33:49,000 --> 00:33:53,120 Speaker 1: and hadn't visited, so that was certainly of interest. They 505 00:33:53,160 --> 00:33:56,760 Speaker 1: did mitochondrial DNA on that, which is not as as 506 00:33:58,560 --> 00:34:02,040 Speaker 1: as good as a nuclear DNA, but still there's still 507 00:34:02,080 --> 00:34:05,400 Speaker 1: have a good piece of evidence the bodies the dead. 508 00:34:05,600 --> 00:34:09,239 Speaker 1: Are you saying that it was Lacy's hair and appliers 509 00:34:09,320 --> 00:34:12,919 Speaker 1: based on mitochondrial DNA, that it's what the mitochondrial DNA show. 510 00:34:13,200 --> 00:34:16,520 Speaker 1: And isn't it true that mitochondrial DNA is used every 511 00:34:16,719 --> 00:34:20,760 Speaker 1: single day? It is based on the lineage of the mother. Correct? 512 00:34:21,160 --> 00:34:24,239 Speaker 1: That is correct? Go ahead, place quite as accurate. It's 513 00:34:24,239 --> 00:34:29,480 Speaker 1: I'm quite as accurate as identifying the nuclear DNA. Right 514 00:34:29,560 --> 00:34:32,840 Speaker 1: where you have the father and the mother, the decomposition 515 00:34:32,920 --> 00:34:36,880 Speaker 1: of the bodies isn't it true, Jennifer that you yourself 516 00:34:37,040 --> 00:34:40,600 Speaker 1: have advanced cases that had mitochondrial DNA. Yes, who definitely 517 00:34:40,640 --> 00:34:44,719 Speaker 1: works with medochondrial DNA, both on humans and on animals, 518 00:34:44,880 --> 00:34:48,960 Speaker 1: So you accept it as established science? Is that correct? Oh? Absolutely? 519 00:34:49,120 --> 00:34:51,279 Speaker 1: Oh okay, because by the way you were talking, I 520 00:34:51,360 --> 00:34:54,680 Speaker 1: thought there was something wrong with mitochondrial DNA, but actually 521 00:34:55,040 --> 00:34:58,040 Speaker 1: there's not. Let me go to you, Alexis Estric. I 522 00:34:58,080 --> 00:35:02,080 Speaker 1: want to clear something up. The reason for this reversal 523 00:35:02,719 --> 00:35:07,279 Speaker 1: is that not because of media, not because of blaming me. 524 00:35:07,400 --> 00:35:09,480 Speaker 1: I forgot about that one. Thank you for reminding me, 525 00:35:10,080 --> 00:35:12,880 Speaker 1: but it's always your fault. Don't forget at times. But 526 00:35:13,800 --> 00:35:19,320 Speaker 1: because the court said that while the jury was okay 527 00:35:19,640 --> 00:35:22,400 Speaker 1: as far as guilt innocence, the jury was fine for that, 528 00:35:23,680 --> 00:35:27,160 Speaker 1: but the jury was not okay for the penalty phase. 529 00:35:27,600 --> 00:35:34,800 Speaker 1: Because about thirteen out of how many thirteen fourteen hundred 530 00:35:35,120 --> 00:35:43,640 Speaker 1: jurars that were first gleaned, we're not questioned separately when 531 00:35:43,719 --> 00:35:46,400 Speaker 1: they said I don't believe in the death penalty, but 532 00:35:46,520 --> 00:35:49,239 Speaker 1: I would follow the law. Is that what happened? They 533 00:35:49,280 --> 00:35:57,360 Speaker 1: were not voidirreed? Jury questioned. Jurar questioned separately? Is that right? Explained? 534 00:35:57,360 --> 00:36:00,239 Speaker 1: To me why they're doing this. So the d those 535 00:36:00,280 --> 00:36:04,000 Speaker 1: were actually let go by the judge when they when 536 00:36:04,040 --> 00:36:06,759 Speaker 1: they gave that statement that they they personally didn't believe 537 00:36:06,760 --> 00:36:08,320 Speaker 1: in the def penalty, but they could consider it for 538 00:36:08,400 --> 00:36:11,640 Speaker 1: this case. He automatically let them go. And he didn't. 539 00:36:11,680 --> 00:36:15,959 Speaker 1: This wasn't counted against the prosecution or the defense's number 540 00:36:16,040 --> 00:36:18,800 Speaker 1: of strikes that they can have. You can't can't have 541 00:36:18,960 --> 00:36:21,000 Speaker 1: unlimited number. So then you say, oh, it's we're out 542 00:36:21,000 --> 00:36:23,560 Speaker 1: of juris, can't have a case. Um, you'll only get 543 00:36:23,600 --> 00:36:27,040 Speaker 1: a certain amount. So the judge let the thirteen go. 544 00:36:27,320 --> 00:36:29,600 Speaker 1: And what the Appeals Court has said is that that 545 00:36:29,880 --> 00:36:34,720 Speaker 1: goes against everything that should be the process during jury 546 00:36:34,760 --> 00:36:37,560 Speaker 1: selection and that this is a Supreme Court. This is 547 00:36:37,560 --> 00:36:39,839 Speaker 1: obviously that something the Supreme Court has been very clear 548 00:36:39,880 --> 00:36:41,960 Speaker 1: about for a very long time. That the judge made 549 00:36:41,960 --> 00:36:46,200 Speaker 1: an error in allowing these jurors to be dismissed, not 550 00:36:46,480 --> 00:36:49,160 Speaker 1: allowing he dismissed them, got it, and that they should 551 00:36:49,200 --> 00:36:53,520 Speaker 1: not have been missed. So the appellate courts cancel Peterson's 552 00:36:53,640 --> 00:36:57,320 Speaker 1: death sentence because Judge de Lucy, according to them, and 553 00:36:57,560 --> 00:37:05,800 Speaker 1: properly excused the prospective gurars in a pool of fifteen hundred, 554 00:37:05,920 --> 00:37:09,480 Speaker 1: one thousand, five hundred people who had filled out written 555 00:37:09,719 --> 00:37:14,840 Speaker 1: JURRR questionnaires. The thirteen professed that they were opposed to 556 00:37:14,960 --> 00:37:19,560 Speaker 1: the DP, but the court said the judge should have 557 00:37:20,480 --> 00:37:27,000 Speaker 1: verbally questioned them instead of dismissing them. So what will 558 00:37:27,120 --> 00:37:33,839 Speaker 1: life be like for Scott Peterson in general population? We'll 559 00:37:33,920 --> 00:37:39,200 Speaker 1: see Nancy Grace crime story signing off goodbye friend,