WEBVTT - Marcelo Claure's New Venture and Microsoft's Activision Blizzard Takeover

0:00:01.560 --> 0:00:05.840
<v Speaker 1>From Marhart where Innovation, Money and power Collie in Silicon

0:00:05.960 --> 0:00:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Vallet NBN. This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Ed Ludlove.

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm Caroline Hyde at Bloomberg's world headquarters in New York, and.

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm Med Ludlow in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:34.879
<v Speaker 2>Coming up, we sit down with Marcello Clara's launching a

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 2>new venture firm focused on Latin America, aiming to raise

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 2>half a billion dollars for its inaugural fund.

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:47.800
<v Speaker 3>Plus bar hurdles facing the Microsoft's sixty nine billion dollar

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:51.599
<v Speaker 3>takeover of Activision Blizzard. We'll discuss why a US judge

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 3>is temporary blocking the deal and Google.

0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 2>Hit with charges by the EU for abusing its ad

0:00:56.560 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 2>tech dominance. We break down what's next with the process

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 2>that could take years to resolve. For first, let's check

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 2>in on these markets at the moment, Ed, because it

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 2>is a day of macro consequences, a day when we

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 2>wait for the Federal Reserve to.

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:11.039
<v Speaker 4>Come out, Will it pause the market expects?

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 2>So S and P five hundred on a roll on

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 2>its longest winning streak, So is November twenty twenty one.

0:01:15.160 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 2>If we hold onto these gains then a's like one hundred.

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 2>Also on the higher side, Big tech on top, we're

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:20.840
<v Speaker 2>up by five tenths of a percent. The US two

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 2>year are actually interestingly falling on the day as people

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:25.040
<v Speaker 2>really do think that the Federal Reserve is going to

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 2>be forced to pause that PPI data that focus on

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 2>inflation actually showing some easing once again today, So people

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 2>thinking good news is good news at the moment, and

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:35.039
<v Speaker 2>let's pick it on a look to the risk asset

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 2>of choice when it comes to our world of technology.

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:39.119
<v Speaker 2>Bitcoin having a bit of a volatile day, but look,

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 2>we're holding up to five tens of percent gains this

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 2>as we start to see maybe some reprieve and the

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 2>anxiety around finance in particular and their particular token we're

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 2>seeing at the moment are weekening the US dollar versus bitcoin.

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 2>We're at twenty nine hundred and seventy six. What have

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 2>you got in terms of the micro.

0:01:54.560 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 5>Ed Yeah, single names.

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 3>In terms of movers to the upside, Tesla, we continue

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 3>to track. It's kind of flirted between g and losses,

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 3>but if it is up at the close, it will

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 3>be a fourteenth straight day of gains for Tesla, more

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 3>than two hundred and forty billion dollars of market cap

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 3>has been added in that run. You get into the numbers,

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:12.800
<v Speaker 3>that two hundred and forty billion dollar market cap gain

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 3>is bigger than the standing market cap of ninety percent

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 3>of the Nasdaq one hundred. We look at RSI Relative

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:21.639
<v Speaker 3>Strength Index, and this is a stock that is very

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 3>much in over bought territory around eighty eight. Anything over

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:28.639
<v Speaker 3>seventy is over bought. Two kind of news movers out

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 3>there as well. First of all, Alphabet, parent company of Google,

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:34.520
<v Speaker 3>moving to the downside just three tenths of one percent,

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:38.800
<v Speaker 3>pairing some deeper losses. The EU has accused Google of

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:42.639
<v Speaker 3>abusing its dominant position in ad tech. We will bring

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 3>you those details from Brussels later in the program. And

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 3>in Vidia unstoppable on one point nine percent and a

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 3>fresh record for the name in AI. You think AI,

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 3>you're buying in video because you think the GPUs are

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 3>where it's at. If you want to get skin in

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 3>the game for LLLM building.

0:02:58.240 --> 0:02:59.679
<v Speaker 4>Tell you who else is unstoppable.

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:03.520
<v Speaker 2>Marcella Claring, the former chief operating officer of SoftBank, got

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:05.959
<v Speaker 2>a new gig executive chairman managing partner of his own

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:08.840
<v Speaker 2>bench firm, Bicycle Capital. The firm is already a mass

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:11.080
<v Speaker 2>four hundred and twenty million dollars in commitments so far

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 2>for it's inaugural fund, and I'm so pleased to say

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 2>that we're not only joined by Marcello, but Shuniata, Bicycle's

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:19.799
<v Speaker 2>other managing partner, also of SoftBank, someone that we've spoken

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 2>to previously on shows and Bloomberg events. Welcome both of

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 2>you racing to us. Asello, you're targeting five hundred million dollars,

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 2>you've already a mass of four hundred and forty million dollars.

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 4>What would you selling to people?

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:32.079
<v Speaker 6>Why?

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 4>Latin America? What is there?

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>So first, thanks for having us. I'll tell you that

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>it feels so good to be an entrepreneur again and

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 1>to have finalized my non compete and be able to

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:45.200
<v Speaker 1>do what I love. And as I shared with you

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>in the past, my passion is in Latin America. It's

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>a great place. It has size, it has great entrepreneurs,

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>it's already created some amazing technology companies that are world

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 1>numbers one, and I think always lacking his capital. So

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're lucky that this or first day of

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 1>a fund and we've only made a few phone calls

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's nice to launch with four hundred and forty million.

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 1>We should reach our target of five hundred million, which

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>is what we're targeting to get it done. And we're

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 1>proud to partner not only Shoe as my partner in

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:19.159
<v Speaker 1>launching this fund, but also to partner with Mubalala, who,

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 1>as you know, Middle Eastern funds have become a deep

0:04:22.760 --> 0:04:24.920
<v Speaker 1>placed for capital today and the fact that they are

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>trusting Latin America in the growth site in technology to

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 1>us is something that we're very proud of.

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:32.119
<v Speaker 4>I know we want to dig into that in a moment.

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:35.720
<v Speaker 2>But Shoe your experience, of course you mentioned already you've

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 2>shown that you can pick the right companies Rappi. You

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 2>did that over with soft Bank, both of you together

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 2>with the Latin American fund there as well.

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:43.280
<v Speaker 4>As New Bank.

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 2>What other types of technology are you excited about that?

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 2>Because everyone's talking about AI? Is it AI or is

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:50.719
<v Speaker 2>it really across the gamut of what's being built.

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 7>The interesting thing about times like now that are very

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:56.120
<v Speaker 7>uncertain is there's one thing you can count on as founders.

0:04:56.400 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 7>Founders are focused on problems they can solve, and that's

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 7>what makes them really interesting as an asset class in general,

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 7>in terms that are as uncertain as this, and in

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:06.680
<v Speaker 7>Latin America, it's not really about the cutting edge. It's

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:09.600
<v Speaker 7>about inclusive technologies. It's about bringing technology to people who

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 7>are deeply underserved consumers and businesses. So it's propagating technologies

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:16.719
<v Speaker 7>deep into the pyramid and that's a real green field

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:18.919
<v Speaker 7>opportunity across every market in Latin America.

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting. And we were just hearing about the money

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:24.799
<v Speaker 2>that's behind this. And last time I spoke to Marsello

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:27.360
<v Speaker 2>was out in Kata. It was all about Middle East

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:29.839
<v Speaker 2>and it's interesting where the money, the LP money is

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:30.799
<v Speaker 2>coming from at this moment.

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 3>Yes, Marcella, my understanding is you're able to launch because

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 3>your non compete with soft Bank for Latin America has expired.

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 3>So a comment on that, But Mabilala is interesting. Would

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 3>you guys take money or bring in LPs from Saudi

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 3>Arabia and China for example.

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 1>I think one is happy that now we can be

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 1>back in business. It's a great feeling and to me

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 1>happy that after you know, an exciting experience of being

0:05:57.200 --> 0:05:59.719
<v Speaker 1>within the soft bankkecosystem for many years, I can be

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>back how it all started in Latin Americas and entrepreneurs,

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 1>so could not be more excited as that as it

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 1>relates to the initial fund, I mean, this is the

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:09.919
<v Speaker 1>start of a journey and we tend to do a

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:12.159
<v Speaker 1>lot more in Latin America. This is our first fund

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and we thought five hundred million dollars is a good

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 1>way to start. And it's a combination of a Mvalalla,

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:22.800
<v Speaker 1>who to me is the premiere sovereign fund in the

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Middle East, and my family office and many other investors,

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 1>including founders from Latin America, founders from the United States.

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 1>So so far, everybody that we've asked has come through

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 1>in terms of, you know, the potential amount of capital

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 1>that we need. We really haven't discussed this with any

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:40.839
<v Speaker 1>other sovereign funds and at this point in time, I

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:43.159
<v Speaker 1>don't think there will be a need because we pretty

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 1>much have what we need for this first round. In

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the future, you know, we're going to look at where

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:51.039
<v Speaker 1>the businesses, where the pocuts of capital are in the

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 1>case that we raise you know, bicycle capital two and

0:06:54.440 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>three and four, But now we're focused on one. We

0:06:56.640 --> 0:06:58.279
<v Speaker 1>got to go find the founders, We got to deploy

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:00.719
<v Speaker 1>capital and more importantly, we got to make sure that

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 1>we generate the returns. You know, when people are crusting

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:06.359
<v Speaker 1>you with their capital is something that we got to

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 1>go generate returns.

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 3>And Sue, good afternoon, good morning to you from San Francisco.

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 3>Your friendship, your partnership with the guy next to you,

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 3>goes back to soft Bank. They were not in LP

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 3>or involved in the raising of this fund. But could you,

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 3>through Bicycle invest in any of the startups and names

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 3>that you were both involved in during your time at

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 3>SoftBank if they were to raise future funds?

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 5>Yes.

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely.

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 7>Our core is to keep good relationships with the entire

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 7>ecosystem that includes soft Bank. We have a lot of

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 7>gratitude to soft Bank. They helped put the Latin American

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 7>ecosystem on the map with our help and they continue

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 7>to be great partners. Marcelo I call the master of momentum.

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 7>He helps generate the drive to get things done and

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 7>then I helped execute it. And so we're just playing

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 7>that role again here, but on our own this time.

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:55.160
<v Speaker 4>I like the momentum.

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean the name Bicycle in many ways, I know

0:07:57.880 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 2>it comes from the idea of Steve Jobs thinking computer

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 2>There is a bicycle for the mind. But also you

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 2>guys bike together Mozllo when you're building together. Also you've

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 2>had interesting partnerships, for example Sheen, that's something that you're

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:11.680
<v Speaker 2>helping bringing a big company, a global company, almost the

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 2>supply side to Latin America, helping the manufacture in Brazil

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 2>and Mexico. When you're thinking about the companies you're investing,

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 2>and you're also thinking about global companies accessing that in America,

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 2>what kind of big companies you're thinking of, how much

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 2>of the fund would be dedicated to that.

0:08:25.240 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 1>So this fun is all about Latin America, and it's

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 1>about helping Latin American founders accelerate the momentum that they

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 1>have because there are great businesses in Latin America. But

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 1>it's also about helping global companies who having global momentum

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:44.840
<v Speaker 1>to basically land in Latin America. Latin America is close

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 1>to seven hundred million people. People in Latin America make

0:08:48.240 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 1>four times the amount of money that people make in India.

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 1>The GDP of Latin America is two exercise of India.

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 1>So Latin America is a great place if you understand

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 1>that it's not an easy place to do business. It's

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:01.440
<v Speaker 1>complex taxation and another thing. So we plan to invest

0:09:01.520 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 1>not only in Latin American founders, but also in companies

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 1>that are going to go into Latin America. And there

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:09.119
<v Speaker 1>are so many companies that you know, the current geopolitical

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:12.079
<v Speaker 1>landscape health for companies that you want to get into

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Latin America usually faster than they did before. So excited

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 1>about bringing companies, bringing you know, FinTechs, bringing companies like

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Shane who basically disrupted in the fashion industry. And there

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 1>are so many disruptors. Like I've always expressed, I think

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:27.560
<v Speaker 1>the next five years is going to be a world

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:31.079
<v Speaker 1>of disruption, not only because of AI but because of technology,

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:33.560
<v Speaker 1>and it's going to change pretty much every industry, every

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 1>very clos We know it, and we want to make

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 1>sure that if anything is being disrupted in Latin America,

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 1>we have some role to play in that sense.

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:44.439
<v Speaker 2>You've been the disruptors for Vision Fund appended VC in

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 2>a way and many people's mindset the size of checks

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:50.560
<v Speaker 2>you would write. So if you're getting into really small

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 2>companies but also really large ones and global companies, can

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:55.440
<v Speaker 2>the checkspe of any size? What are you thinking about

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 2>where in the lifespan of companies are going.

0:09:57.200 --> 0:09:57.680
<v Speaker 4>To be entering.

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 7>It's important to say the ecosystem in latam is really

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 7>good at the early stage. They're great funds that have

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:06.200
<v Speaker 7>been working for decades to set the foundation. We do

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 7>not intend to compete with them, so we come in

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:10.839
<v Speaker 7>at the Series B and later. Our checks range from

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 7>twenty to fifty million dollars in any given company. This

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:14.959
<v Speaker 7>is not going to be a big portfolio.

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 5>This is about really.

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 7>Choosing a few partners that we can work with for

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:20.560
<v Speaker 7>the long term. So we're talking about ten to fifteen

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 7>companies and the life of the fund. So it's really

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:25.440
<v Speaker 7>about a close partnership. And we won't invest more than

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 7>fifty million dollars in any given company, but we want

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:28.840
<v Speaker 7>to have a real seat at the table. So if

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:30.560
<v Speaker 7>you want big ownership, you have to go early. If

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 7>you're writing checks of that.

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 3>Size, Marcello, Latin America is more than six hundred and

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:39.960
<v Speaker 3>fifty million people. I get your history with it, but

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 3>what inside Latin America? Where is the San Francisco or

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 3>Silicon Valley of Latin America? Is there a Stamford equivalents

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:50.679
<v Speaker 3>churning out founders like we see where I am I

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 3>want to get some granular detail on where you see

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:56.200
<v Speaker 3>opportunities geographically and by which sectors.

0:10:56.880 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 1>So few things. There are so many lucky American founders

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:03.840
<v Speaker 1>who actually went to stand for, who come to Harvard,

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>come to Wharton, and then they go back and they

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 1>rather than become entrepreneurs in the United States, they basically

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 1>take that knowledge and take it back to Latin America.

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 1>And most of the stories that you've seen so far,

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:18.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of those founders were US educated. Most of

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 1>them want to stand for and then they go back

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 1>to Latin America with that entrepreneurial mindset, and that has

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:27.679
<v Speaker 1>given rise to a booming entrepreneurial ecosystem that's sitting in Sapaulo,

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 1>that's sitting in Mexico City, that's sitting in Bogota in Colombia.

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:33.719
<v Speaker 1>Because now there are huge stories of success. I mean,

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 1>you have Rappi, you have Eyefood to me, who's probably

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:38.320
<v Speaker 1>one of the best food delivery companies in the planet.

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 1>You got New Bank, which is a Colombian who emigrated

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 1>to Brazil and today is the most valuable digital bank

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 1>in the world and the one that makes money and

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the one that's worth tens of billions of dollars you have.

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Now you have the growth the Americati livery, who's a

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:56.959
<v Speaker 1>multi billion dollar marketplace that continues to grow. So today

0:11:57.040 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 1>there's enough stories of success that have created entrepreneurial ecosystems

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 1>that have shared employees for starting a new company. So

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:06.840
<v Speaker 1>there's the I think what we started a soft bank was,

0:12:07.040 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, we took Latin America from one and a

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:11.560
<v Speaker 1>half billion a year to close to sixteen billion dollars

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 1>a year of investment along other funds, and that gave

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 1>rise to a wooman entrepreneurial ecosystem that right now needs

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 1>our capital. And I think Latin America deserves the fund

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:24.679
<v Speaker 1>that is going to be focused only in Latin America

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and not the traditional tourist capital that comes in only

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:30.560
<v Speaker 1>when good times rolled and then they retrench when things

0:12:30.559 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 1>are not that good. Where there were committed, we're in

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 1>it for the next few years. I made it a

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:36.960
<v Speaker 1>point to focus the rest of my career in Latin America,

0:12:36.960 --> 0:12:37.840
<v Speaker 1>and that's what I want to do.

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 2>True you would deep be dedicated not just to Latin

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:43.840
<v Speaker 2>American founders, but diverse founders, minority founders.

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 4>With the sp Opportunity Fund, how much.

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:48.560
<v Speaker 2>When we are still seeing look and an environment where

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:51.200
<v Speaker 2>interest rates are going higher, where companies are slimming down,

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:54.200
<v Speaker 2>where people are wanting to put money into tried and

0:12:54.240 --> 0:12:57.079
<v Speaker 2>tested founders. How are you able to still focus on

0:12:57.120 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 2>a minority founder?

0:12:58.120 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 8>Do you?

0:12:58.520 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 4>Is that priority all?

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:03.319
<v Speaker 7>The interesting thing about founders who are underrepresented is they

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 7>have the grid it taste to succeed. They have been overlooked.

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 7>They're the perfect solution for this moment in time. They

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:11.560
<v Speaker 7>do not come from the typical mold. They have had

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:13.599
<v Speaker 7>to struggle to get where they are, and we like

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 7>to back those founders because we just think they're unfairly overlooked.

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:19.240
<v Speaker 7>So again, it's not about the macro for us, it's

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 7>about the micro and the people best suited to navigate

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 7>moments like this are people in places that are overlooked,

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 7>people who look like they're overlooked. And if you back

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:29.839
<v Speaker 7>those folks, we believe you can make a lot of money.

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 2>We thank you for spending some time with us talking

0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 2>about the vision a Selah Clay Juniata. They're running back

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:36.839
<v Speaker 2>for a plane. We thank them.

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 9>At Google's conduct distorted competition among ad exchanges, rather than

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 9>letting the best of the ad exchanges win the race.

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:57.679
<v Speaker 9>The helping hands of the powerful Google ecosystem gave Google's

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 9>own exchange a unique head start over all other rivals

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 9>in the industry, ann exclude a fort to keep its

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:09.520
<v Speaker 9>commission high without losing its advertisers.

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:13.439
<v Speaker 2>You Commissioner, Margaret Vesta, are there Google being accused of

0:14:13.520 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 2>abusing its dominance over advertising technology to crush competition? Now

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 2>that is the European Union now fires off an anti

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 2>trust charge sheet that threatens a breakup of the lucrative business.

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 2>But look, it's a process that can take years to resolve.

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 2>Let's dig into the details. Blue megs, Mark Bergen is

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 2>in London, Sam Stalton is in Brussels, and Mark with

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 2>the expertise of Google here. I immediately want to get

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 2>their response. We've just heard from Margaret Vesta and none

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 2>of this seems to come as that much of a

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 2>surprise to them, right.

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 6>No, certainly both things, both having vested your stand up

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 6>and accuse them of monopoly of the acting as a

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 6>monopoly and dominance, and then the same accusation around ad tech.

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 6>This is something that they actually had first in the

0:14:55.840 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 6>US and an identical case that they were using sort

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 6>of ball size of the market in this opig and

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 6>pretty powerful world of digital publishing. So I think that's

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 6>probably a contribution why the stack basically they move. Investies

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 6>have basically priced in this regulatory risk.

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 3>Sam just in Layman's terms, what is the European Commission

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 3>and the EU accusing Google of doing within the market's

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 3>so healy involved in.

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 10>Yes, yes, and hello here from Brussels. Well, Effectively, the

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:34.720
<v Speaker 10>European Commission today has filed formal antitrust charges against Google's

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 10>actions in the advertising technology space, and specifically it's focusing

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:44.000
<v Speaker 10>on Google services that match supply and demand for advertising

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 10>space online and it's really all about self preferencing.

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 5>What the European.

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 10>Commission says is that Google has effectively self preferenced its

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 10>own services to the detriment of other rivals in the market,

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 10>and this could obviously have aative effects further afield in

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 10>the online ecosystem. And these are formal antitrust charges. The

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 10>investigation was first launched by the European Commission in Brussels

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 10>in April twenty twenty one, and it's very much, as

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 10>I say, this first step in a procedure that could

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 10>go on for a number of years, Mark.

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 3>Explain, what is Google's advertising technology business different from its

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 3>broader ad offering.

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it's hard to unpack, in part because it is

0:16:32.960 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 6>that the ad tack is supervasive inside of Google. When

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 6>we think about the commissioner talks about it. It is

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 6>basically their machinery that deals with the buying and selling

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 6>of online ads. Everything that's sort of not Google's own

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:48.440
<v Speaker 6>and operated property. So the things that aren't Google Search,

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 6>aren't YouTube, aren't its play store maps. But at the

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 6>same time as using that same exact machinery to make

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 6>Google Search ads, to make YouTube ads much more powerful,

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:02.080
<v Speaker 6>much more effective. And I think that competitors argue sort

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 6>of elbow out these services that are playing the digital

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:10.639
<v Speaker 6>publishing field but don't have the tremendous data resources of

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 6>running the world's biggest search and video and mapping platforms.

0:17:14.880 --> 0:17:17.919
<v Speaker 2>What's interesting here, Sam is sort of how they're going

0:17:17.960 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 2>for the JUG leader the EU here saying, look, remedies

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:22.640
<v Speaker 2>on enough to your business model. You need to start

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 2>hiving parts of it off. But will that become some

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 2>sort of a reality because this is going to take

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:28.480
<v Speaker 2>a long time in the.

0:17:28.480 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 10>Course, Well, indeed, and I mean It was one of

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:36.159
<v Speaker 10>the main messages today from the press conference with the

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 10>EU's Commission for Competition, Margaretta Vestaga, and she effectively said

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 10>that behavioral remedies were insufficient in correcting the anti competitive

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:49.399
<v Speaker 10>abuse here. And what's really fascinating is to watch the

0:17:49.600 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 10>growing transatlantic sort of alliance around the option of structural

0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:57.000
<v Speaker 10>remedies or like you say, hiving off certain parts of

0:17:57.080 --> 0:17:59.919
<v Speaker 10>the business in order to correct the anti competitive abuses.

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:02.639
<v Speaker 10>Because as Mark just said, there are of course a

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:06.400
<v Speaker 10>number of lawsuits open in the United States against Google's

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 10>ad tech business, and the Department of Justice at least

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 10>in its lawsuit has recommended the option of potentially structural separations,

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:18.400
<v Speaker 10>and as I say, one of the core messages from

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:21.919
<v Speaker 10>the press conference from Vestagers today was that's very much

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 10>an option for us to and we're now going to

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:26.680
<v Speaker 10>engage with those discussions with Google to see if we

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 10>can make progress further afield in terms of correcting these problems.

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:35.920
<v Speaker 3>A bloom best, Mark Bergen and London, Sam Stulton in

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:38.639
<v Speaker 3>Brussels for us, Thank you very much. Now coming up,

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:43.200
<v Speaker 3>more regulatory headwinds and hurdles facing Microsoft's sixty nine billion

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:46.680
<v Speaker 3>dollar takeover of Activision Blizzard. We'll discuss why a US

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:49.160
<v Speaker 3>judge is temporarily blocking the deal.

0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 5>This is Bloomberg.

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:11.399
<v Speaker 2>More regulatory action Microsoft's sixty nine billion dollars acquisition of

0:19:11.440 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 2>Activision Blizzard. What it's temporarily blocked by a federal judge

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 2>in California who said a temporary restraining order was necessary

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:20.639
<v Speaker 2>to maintain the status quo while the FTC, the Federal

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 2>Trade Commission challenges the deal joining US now plums Anna

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 2>Juton and is.

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 4>This just part of normal process? Is this a surprise

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 4>all we expecting it?

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 11>Well, it's a really interesting development because you see how

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 11>the FTC is trying to make sure this deal doesn't

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 11>become a foregone conclusion. And part of the context of

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 11>this is that we have kind of competing decisions from

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 11>the other side of the Atlantic, where the UK competition

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:45.640
<v Speaker 11>authorities have said that this deal should not go forward

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:48.200
<v Speaker 11>they would be bad for market concentration, whereas in the

0:19:48.720 --> 0:19:51.720
<v Speaker 11>EU anti trust authorities have said this deal can go

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:55.119
<v Speaker 11>through with remedies and it's actually good for competition. So

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:58.120
<v Speaker 11>you definitely see the Federal Trade Commission trying to make

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:01.439
<v Speaker 11>sure that this doesn't go forward, that this deal doesn't

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 11>play out while they're trying to prosecute.

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 4>Their case here.

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:08.560
<v Speaker 3>I know it's a temporary holt because the FTC filed

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 3>that emergency motion Monday to hold the merger. There will

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:15.719
<v Speaker 3>be a hearing next week here in SF, an evidentiary

0:20:15.840 --> 0:20:20.359
<v Speaker 3>hearing for a longer term discussion around holding it. What

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 3>is Microsoft and Activision's response to this about having to

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:24.840
<v Speaker 3>go before a.

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 11>Judge, Well, we saw we heard from Microsoft president Brad

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 11>Smith yesterday where he said he's looking forward to presenting

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:36.359
<v Speaker 11>Microsoft's case in court. And one of the difference is

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 11>is that this is a federal court where the Federal

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 11>Trade Commission has to go and ask for this hold.

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:44.119
<v Speaker 11>Where is the actual case, the actual complaint filed by

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 11>the Federal Trade Commission is in there in house court.

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:50.639
<v Speaker 11>So there's a slightly different juridical situation for them. And

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 11>Microsoft has said that they look forward to presenting their

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 11>case in federal court and kind of see that this

0:20:55.800 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 11>is an opportunity to defend the deal that they say

0:20:58.600 --> 0:20:59.680
<v Speaker 11>would be good for competition.

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:05.119
<v Speaker 2>Briefly, Anna, this is a global narrative, right, absolutely.

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, Like I said, you know, we see kind of

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:09.639
<v Speaker 11>competing decisions from the other side of the Atlantic. And

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:13.880
<v Speaker 11>also you know, Microsoft positioning has solved very strongly there,

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 11>you know, criticizing the UK for their decision to block

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 11>the deal and praising the EU for letting this seal

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 11>go forward.

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 3>A right Bloomberg Xana editing out in DC, Thank you,

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:35.400
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology.

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 5>I am ed Ludlow here in San.

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:38.719
<v Speaker 2>Francisco and I'm Karin Hawd in New York. Let's check

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 2>in on these markets. It is FED day.

0:21:40.240 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 4>We're waiting for the all important decision.

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 2>We are looking at actually the market sustaining their higher

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:48.000
<v Speaker 2>inclination NASDAC cup four tenths of big tech managing to

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:50.200
<v Speaker 2>rally as many feel that there's a pause, it's likely

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:52.359
<v Speaker 2>to happen in terms of interest rates, of course, that

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 2>being helpful for some of the technology focus and future

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:57.160
<v Speaker 2>cash flows. We're looking at the two year yields actually

0:21:57.200 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 2>dropping some four basis points as people start to price in. Indeed,

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 2>the FED will go at what point we'll start to

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 2>see the rate hiking process being an end most factoring

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:07.760
<v Speaker 2>in September Now we're looking at Bitcoin just about five

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:10.680
<v Speaker 2>ten percent as well, so look, it's relatively weight and

0:22:10.760 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 2>see mode overall, but we're seeing some of the anxiety,

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 2>particularly around financy exchange. They're dialing back a little bit

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:17.960
<v Speaker 2>in cryptosphere. Let's move on and look at some of

0:22:18.000 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 2>the individual movers, because while we're getting Microsoft on the

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:23.440
<v Speaker 2>upside more than percentage point higher, maybe because of course,

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 2>there's a four stoppage on their plan to be purchasing

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 2>Activision Blazzon sixty nine billion dollars being dropped, So maybe

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 2>that's on the rally side, or maybe it's more of

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:33.679
<v Speaker 2>an AI theme that's happening with Microsoft today. Nikola, one

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 2>of ed's favorites and show focusing in on some sixteen

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:38.920
<v Speaker 2>percent higher, actually had been leading some of the charge

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:41.920
<v Speaker 2>in the other EV space, but largely Nikola having of

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:46.000
<v Speaker 2>late been pushed to pause any future supply side issuance

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:48.879
<v Speaker 2>of further shares. But on the upside today, as we

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:51.639
<v Speaker 2>see maybe more of an interest rate focus going on.

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking at AMD as well. This is AI front

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 2>and center. This is a company of course, is unveiling

0:22:57.160 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 2>its AI focused chips, processes that are going to be

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:03.639
<v Speaker 2>AI accelerate and being able to support generative AI and

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:06.200
<v Speaker 2>the processing of data there that much faster the market

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 2>seem to like what they were hearing from that particular CEO.

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:11.879
<v Speaker 3>Ed, all right, Caroline, bear with me. I'm going to

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:15.640
<v Speaker 3>do something now and combine two of our favorite topics,

0:23:16.520 --> 0:23:22.080
<v Speaker 3>AI and inflation, or rather AI and deflation. How are

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 3>those two things linked. Well, let's bring in pooblicist sapient

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 3>CEO Nigel Vaz. Your job is to work with technologists

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:34.920
<v Speaker 3>at all kinds of firms, banks, quick serve restaurants to

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 3>digitoually transform. You tell us how AI is deflationary.

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 8>Our belief right now is that when you think about

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:48.119
<v Speaker 8>the ability for businesses to serve customers in lower costs,

0:23:48.280 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 8>more efficient ways, AI is a huge accelerant to what

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 8>they're trying to do, which means the achieved growth with

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:58.840
<v Speaker 8>lower costs and efficiency and productivity. Pretty much every Western

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:02.840
<v Speaker 8>economy today is bring from population challenges, people dropping out

0:24:02.880 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 8>of the workforce. The hospitality sector in particular has been

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:11.080
<v Speaker 8>particularly hurt, so lots of check in lines orders heard incorrectly.

0:24:11.480 --> 0:24:14.160
<v Speaker 8>AI is helping with the work we're doing to start

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:18.880
<v Speaker 8>to make these simple, basic consumer experiences easier, more effective,

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 8>and frankly more efficient for these businesses. So to us,

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:26.640
<v Speaker 8>I feel like that is a real opportunity to drive

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 8>some of that growth at a lower cost.

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 3>Where do you sit in the debate around whether AI

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 3>will eliminate jobs versus sort of be supportive of existing roles.

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:42.120
<v Speaker 8>Well, you know, there's some research by David Artur talking

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:45.760
<v Speaker 8>about the fact that since nineteen forty we've now seen

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:50.639
<v Speaker 8>you know, sixty to eighty percent of jobs not exist today,

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:53.119
<v Speaker 8>and a lot of those jobs have been created by

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:55.959
<v Speaker 8>technologies that have come over the course of that period.

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:58.359
<v Speaker 8>When we think about AI, of course, there are going

0:24:58.440 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 8>to be some jobs that are impacted and governments and

0:25:01.920 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 8>public private partnerships. The kind of work we do to

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 8>bring in new skills and capabilities from younger people entering

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:10.639
<v Speaker 8>the workforce into this technology is going to need to

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 8>happen to continue to build skills. But we also think

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 8>this is going to be a huge opportunity for growth.

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:20.679
<v Speaker 8>We recently acquired fully publicly CPNAI Labs, a joint venture

0:25:20.720 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 8>we created a few years ago, because we feel like

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 8>that's going to help us bring in more people into

0:25:25.080 --> 0:25:29.200
<v Speaker 8>the workforce into this new space. What if I think GDP,

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 8>you know, Goldmansacs is talking about seven percent The National

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:36.159
<v Speaker 8>Bureau of Economic Research is talking about fourteen percent in

0:25:36.280 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 8>terms of impact on work our productivity. I think all

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:40.320
<v Speaker 8>of these things will create opportunities.

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Nigel, you just mentioned how you're training well the

0:25:43.840 --> 0:25:46.159
<v Speaker 2>future workforce. What about the future for What about the

0:25:46.200 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 2>workforce of the here and the now? Do the c

0:25:49.000 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 2>suite do the people below them have the skill set

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 2>to be adopting all the joys and risks of generative

0:25:55.000 --> 0:25:55.919
<v Speaker 2>AI in the here and now?

0:25:57.119 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 8>I don't think anybody was expecting the adoption of this

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:02.639
<v Speaker 8>technology to happen as quickly as it has, right But

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:04.960
<v Speaker 8>what it does tell you the fact that you have

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:07.359
<v Speaker 8>so many people engaging with this, making this one of

0:26:07.400 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 8>the fastest adopted technologies, is the potential is certainly there.

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:15.480
<v Speaker 8>With that come risks, management of ethics, understanding bias, all

0:26:15.560 --> 0:26:17.720
<v Speaker 8>of the issues that have to be worked through. But

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:20.760
<v Speaker 8>our belief is certainly now a lot of the existential

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:24.119
<v Speaker 8>threat that's being talked about AI, we're not in a

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 8>place right now where that is in the immediate future.

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 8>I think there are bigger issues in the immediate future

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 8>and the context of AI, like how do you ensure

0:26:31.560 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 8>that bias and things that brands wouldn't want associated with

0:26:36.680 --> 0:26:41.840
<v Speaker 8>them know how hallucinations. All of these ideas getting addressed today,

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:45.680
<v Speaker 8>and companies are making investments very very quickly because the

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 8>benefits on the other side are huge. You know, we're

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 8>seeing molecule identification in pharmaceuticals, We're seeing fraud detection in banking,

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 8>We're seeing risk management and risk assessments for mortgages. All

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 8>of these things now starting to be able to happen

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:04.879
<v Speaker 8>so much more seamlessly than was possible before.

0:27:05.240 --> 0:27:08.639
<v Speaker 2>Nigel, I'm kind of fascinated just the intricacies of exactly

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 2>what you go and do you set up a meeting

0:27:11.040 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 2>with a company who's new to you, What do you

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 2>go in and say, how do you start to assess

0:27:16.119 --> 0:27:19.480
<v Speaker 2>the need of each individual company where they're currently at,

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:21.960
<v Speaker 2>because mL and AI is already in our life, and

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:24.359
<v Speaker 2>then what they need to do to start to ensure

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:26.680
<v Speaker 2>that they're getting all the benefits of productivity.

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 8>You know, polic is say is fundamentally in the business

0:27:29.800 --> 0:27:32.879
<v Speaker 8>of digital business transformation right effectively, very simply. What that

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:37.200
<v Speaker 8>means is helping businesses that were established transform themselves to

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:40.359
<v Speaker 8>be increasingly digital in a world that is fast becoming

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:43.199
<v Speaker 8>entirely digital. So our approach centers around this notion at

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:46.760
<v Speaker 8>this idea called speed. It is an acronym and an

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:49.720
<v Speaker 8>idea about helping businesses move quickly. And one of the

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:53.080
<v Speaker 8>biggest challenges with enterprise businesses is the CEO would ask

0:27:53.200 --> 0:27:55.240
<v Speaker 8>for a strategy in a business case, and then that

0:27:55.320 --> 0:27:58.720
<v Speaker 8>would turn into requirements and then they'd linearly pass the

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:01.720
<v Speaker 8>baton onto the next rung and the next rung. So

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 8>for us, the S in speed is strategy, so being

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:06.920
<v Speaker 8>really clear about what use case you're trying to drive

0:28:07.359 --> 0:28:11.480
<v Speaker 8>the outcome from assessing that, and then moving very quickly

0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:13.760
<v Speaker 8>to this idea of P, which is products, so not

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:16.080
<v Speaker 8>thinking about the business and the context of a project

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:19.680
<v Speaker 8>that begins and ends, but a product that is constantly evolving.

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:22.240
<v Speaker 8>The E is experienced, so how do you think about

0:28:22.240 --> 0:28:25.120
<v Speaker 8>the experience of the employee and the experience of the customer,

0:28:25.240 --> 0:28:28.200
<v Speaker 8>the patient, the citizen that you're trying to affect. The

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 8>next D is engineering, which is all about how do

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:33.639
<v Speaker 8>you build these experiences in ways that allow you to

0:28:33.760 --> 0:28:36.600
<v Speaker 8>evolve ever so quickly. And then the D is data

0:28:36.680 --> 0:28:39.120
<v Speaker 8>and AI, so how do you create that closed loop

0:28:39.200 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 8>system almost like fagers in a hand where the data

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:46.760
<v Speaker 8>feeds back into helping you automate and build the efficiency

0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 8>we're talking about. And that conversation today in many organizations

0:28:50.680 --> 0:28:52.360
<v Speaker 8>is about yeah, we've got this and this and this,

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 8>but they don't work like fingers.

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:54.000
<v Speaker 5>In a hand.

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 8>You know, there's a strong thumb and a strong index

0:28:56.160 --> 0:28:57.720
<v Speaker 8>thing or but they don't connect to the pinky and

0:28:57.800 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 8>guess what, it becomes very hard lift and shift and

0:29:01.040 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 8>move things.

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 3>Yes, in that context, Nigel, for what it's worth, a

0:29:06.400 --> 0:29:10.120
<v Speaker 3>headline crossing the Bloomberg terminal from Black Rock CEO Larry Fink,

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 3>who's speaking at black Rocks Invested Ate. He says, AI

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:19.240
<v Speaker 3>maybe the tech that brings down inflation. When Nigel Vaz

0:29:19.360 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 3>goes into a company like that, be it, Walmart, JP, Morgan, Marriott,

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:26.560
<v Speaker 3>do you want the CEO sitting on the other side

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:29.240
<v Speaker 3>of the table from you to implement this change with

0:29:29.320 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 3>AI or do you want the CTO who's leading the

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 3>charge within these companies.

0:29:34.640 --> 0:29:36.920
<v Speaker 8>I think this is a business change, and of course

0:29:37.000 --> 0:29:40.640
<v Speaker 8>you need a very strong CTO CEO somebody he understands

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 8>how the technology works. But for us, AI is an

0:29:43.800 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 8>opportunity to reimagine the business. So, you know, the Bloomberg

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:51.400
<v Speaker 8>you know terminal headline that you were just calling out

0:29:51.440 --> 0:29:53.720
<v Speaker 8>there are are belief is that doesn't happen when it's

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:57.120
<v Speaker 8>a CMO or a CIO or CEO. This has got

0:29:57.200 --> 0:29:59.520
<v Speaker 8>to be something that is a CEO priority. And from

0:29:59.560 --> 0:30:01.720
<v Speaker 8>all of this EOS, I'm spending time with some of

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 8>the biggest companies in the world. I can tell you

0:30:04.080 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 8>this is the one technology that they themselves have started

0:30:07.960 --> 0:30:10.840
<v Speaker 8>to realize will force the choice for them to be

0:30:11.080 --> 0:30:16.040
<v Speaker 8>more transformative rather than digitizing what they already do, which

0:30:16.080 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 8>is has been the first wave of digital I think.

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:22.680
<v Speaker 2>Thus far whovers is Sapient CEO Nigel Vas. Great to

0:30:22.720 --> 0:30:24.760
<v Speaker 2>have some time with you, Larry Finking you on the

0:30:24.800 --> 0:30:26.880
<v Speaker 2>same page. Meanwhile, coming up now we're going to be

0:30:26.960 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 2>talking about the Swedish tech scene. We are so global

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 2>today standout tech companies that are currently being built in

0:30:32.400 --> 0:30:32.960
<v Speaker 2>that market.

0:30:33.200 --> 0:30:35.720
<v Speaker 4>Of Thomas is joining us partner at Ox. This is

0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 4>bring back.

0:30:56.560 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 3>All right time for talking tech first off, and you

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 3>study is shining the light on who may be the

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 3>biggest winners and losers in the global AI boom. Research

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:08.479
<v Speaker 3>from McKinsey says generative AI could apt to add up

0:31:08.520 --> 0:31:12.200
<v Speaker 3>to four point four trillion dollars annually to the world's economy. However,

0:31:12.320 --> 0:31:15.200
<v Speaker 3>AI tools will likely put more pressure on the labor

0:31:15.280 --> 0:31:18.560
<v Speaker 3>force and could especially be a disruption to higher wage

0:31:18.640 --> 0:31:22.480
<v Speaker 3>knowledge workers whose work would be threatened by automation.

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:23.800
<v Speaker 5>How often are we discussing that?

0:31:24.080 --> 0:31:27.479
<v Speaker 3>Plus Advanced micro Devices or AMD is hoping its new

0:31:27.560 --> 0:31:30.200
<v Speaker 3>line of AI processors can compete with the likes of

0:31:30.360 --> 0:31:34.960
<v Speaker 3>Nvidia in the AI computing market. During a presentation Tuesday,

0:31:35.200 --> 0:31:39.240
<v Speaker 3>the company showcase the MI three hundred x accelerator. It

0:31:39.240 --> 0:31:42.320
<v Speaker 3>will speed up processing for generative AI services and aims

0:31:42.360 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 3>to help data centers streamline a crunch of AI traffic.

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 3>And speaking of Nvidia, the company drawing is drawing made

0:31:49.760 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 3>some hefty stock buybacks last year after a three year hiatus,

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:56.920
<v Speaker 3>The chipmaker repurchased more than ten billion dollars in stock

0:31:57.080 --> 0:31:59.960
<v Speaker 3>ahead of a massive rally fueled by Wall Street's AI friends.

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:03.400
<v Speaker 3>Now the company is drawing attention because it's stopped buying

0:32:04.240 --> 0:32:07.960
<v Speaker 3>despite having more than seven billion on its buyback authorization.

0:32:08.080 --> 0:32:10.760
<v Speaker 3>In Vidia Space person declined to comment.

0:32:10.880 --> 0:32:14.680
<v Speaker 2>Carrot, let's go broader, Let's go to Europe for a moment,

0:32:14.840 --> 0:32:17.640
<v Speaker 2>because at the moment brilliant minds twenty twenty three years

0:32:17.680 --> 0:32:20.200
<v Speaker 2>upon us Look. It's the foundation and related event established

0:32:20.320 --> 0:32:23.880
<v Speaker 2>by Spotify founder CEO Daniel Eck and it's focusing this

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:27.480
<v Speaker 2>year on a theme of future gazing the slower speakers

0:32:27.600 --> 0:32:32.160
<v Speaker 2>ranging from tech startups, actors, activists, education, sustainability leaders and

0:32:32.320 --> 0:32:35.280
<v Speaker 2>much more. They've also got a program to highlight startups

0:32:35.320 --> 0:32:38.560
<v Speaker 2>in the European scene brilliant innovators and one of the

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:41.520
<v Speaker 2>men behind that is Ox partner Bob Thomas, who's joining

0:32:41.600 --> 0:32:44.840
<v Speaker 2>us for more on the event and indeed the innovator

0:32:44.920 --> 0:32:46.720
<v Speaker 2>that you singled out as the winner this year. Let's

0:32:46.720 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 2>start Bob with Brilliant Minds as an event first and foremost,

0:32:49.920 --> 0:32:51.240
<v Speaker 2>what is hoped to be achieved.

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:53.360
<v Speaker 4>This is about shining a light on Sweden, on.

0:32:53.400 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 2>The ecosystem, but also well Swedish principles in many ways.

0:32:57.560 --> 0:32:58.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, absolutely so.

0:32:58.800 --> 0:33:02.720
<v Speaker 12>Daniel initially set up the Brilliant Minds Foundation with his board,

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:07.400
<v Speaker 12>which consist of some influential Swedish families, to bring Swedish

0:33:07.480 --> 0:33:11.200
<v Speaker 12>values to creative builders, innovators from across the world. So

0:33:12.600 --> 0:33:16.880
<v Speaker 12>every June kind of mid June, actors, activists, you know,

0:33:16.960 --> 0:33:19.320
<v Speaker 12>some of the people who you've highlighted already descend on

0:33:19.400 --> 0:33:22.280
<v Speaker 12>Stockholm during one of the most beautiful periods of the

0:33:22.400 --> 0:33:26.560
<v Speaker 12>year and enjoy a two day conference where they discuss

0:33:26.680 --> 0:33:29.800
<v Speaker 12>kind of creative ideas and the vision for the future

0:33:29.840 --> 0:33:33.280
<v Speaker 12>of how the world might look in a positive sense. So,

0:33:34.160 --> 0:33:36.600
<v Speaker 12>you know, in Brilliant Innovators, what we're trying to do

0:33:36.760 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 12>is extend that to the startup ecosystem and say, you

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:44.400
<v Speaker 12>know how can Swedish ideals of sustainability, of inclusivity, you

0:33:44.440 --> 0:33:47.040
<v Speaker 12>know how can we highlight European startups that are promoting

0:33:47.120 --> 0:33:47.600
<v Speaker 12>these ideals.

0:33:47.680 --> 0:33:49.440
<v Speaker 2>And you've singled out as a winner this year a

0:33:49.520 --> 0:33:52.880
<v Speaker 2>French startup that is all about sustainability, particularly an aircraft

0:33:53.040 --> 0:33:55.719
<v Speaker 2>right you're shunning a line on one particular companies are

0:33:55.720 --> 0:33:58.800
<v Speaker 2>about hydrogen propulsion. What got you there for this particular

0:33:59.520 --> 0:34:02.160
<v Speaker 2>set of founders and business that they're trying to build,

0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:03.360
<v Speaker 2>It was a.

0:34:03.360 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 12>Combination both of the vision, which is to let me

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:09.359
<v Speaker 12>take a step back, so the businesses beyond arrow It's say,

0:34:09.480 --> 0:34:13.640
<v Speaker 12>as you say, French business focused on hydrogen fuel cell

0:34:13.800 --> 0:34:17.359
<v Speaker 12>transport in the private aviation space, and that business has

0:34:17.400 --> 0:34:21.040
<v Speaker 12>a massive opportunity to take an enormous amount of carbon

0:34:21.080 --> 0:34:24.000
<v Speaker 12>out of air travel and essentially kind of just you know,

0:34:24.080 --> 0:34:26.719
<v Speaker 12>one of the biggest polluters in terms of kind of

0:34:26.760 --> 0:34:30.960
<v Speaker 12>carbon emissions in the European landscape to take a huge

0:34:31.000 --> 0:34:32.760
<v Speaker 12>amount of carbon out of that. It was a combination

0:34:32.880 --> 0:34:36.640
<v Speaker 12>of that proposition, that vision, and then the quality of

0:34:37.000 --> 0:34:38.760
<v Speaker 12>the pitch and of the team. You know, a huge

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 12>number of industry experts aligning around around a shared cause

0:34:43.080 --> 0:34:46.280
<v Speaker 12>and again to you know, to speak to those ideals

0:34:46.360 --> 0:34:50.960
<v Speaker 12>of teamwork, of you know, having having a kind of

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:54.520
<v Speaker 12>collective long term principle in mind when you develop a product.

0:34:55.239 --> 0:34:56.400
<v Speaker 12>It really spoke to the judges.

0:34:57.000 --> 0:35:00.960
<v Speaker 3>Was there any commonality, Bob, between the founders and the

0:35:01.080 --> 0:35:05.080
<v Speaker 3>startups that entered the competition with a heavily AI focus

0:35:05.200 --> 0:35:05.840
<v Speaker 3>for example?

0:35:06.480 --> 0:35:10.200
<v Speaker 12>Interesting, So I've been watching your texto for some time

0:35:10.360 --> 0:35:12.200
<v Speaker 12>and obviously kind of in recent days, and thank you,

0:35:12.280 --> 0:35:16.600
<v Speaker 12>the focus has been very, very much on AI. Actually

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:19.160
<v Speaker 12>relatively little mention of AI in the startups that we

0:35:19.200 --> 0:35:22.040
<v Speaker 12>looked at, which was strange. There was a skew towards

0:35:22.719 --> 0:35:26.680
<v Speaker 12>materials science, you know, how to innovate in manufacturing, innovating

0:35:26.760 --> 0:35:31.319
<v Speaker 12>heavy industry with the thinking that you know, a big

0:35:31.400 --> 0:35:34.120
<v Speaker 12>part of the reason that startups were entering was part

0:35:34.160 --> 0:35:38.240
<v Speaker 12>of a sustainability theme, part of a long termism around

0:35:38.280 --> 0:35:41.400
<v Speaker 12>the environment and around other cultural issues related to pollution.

0:35:42.320 --> 0:35:44.000
<v Speaker 1>So actually AI, you know.

0:35:44.480 --> 0:35:47.000
<v Speaker 12>Despite the despite the focus of things kind of more

0:35:47.040 --> 0:35:50.200
<v Speaker 12>generally within tech and within MySpace in B to B software,

0:35:50.680 --> 0:35:54.399
<v Speaker 12>in the last few weeks, AI was absence Bob.

0:35:54.440 --> 0:35:57.480
<v Speaker 3>Earlier in the show, we had Marcello Claray on about

0:35:57.520 --> 0:36:00.360
<v Speaker 3>his new venture firm Bicycle. I'm sure you're familiar with Myllo,

0:36:00.560 --> 0:36:03.200
<v Speaker 3>and he's all about Latin America. Has talked a little

0:36:03.200 --> 0:36:05.759
<v Speaker 3>bit about Sweden with you. You know, I'm here in

0:36:05.840 --> 0:36:09.240
<v Speaker 3>San Francisco. The history of this place in Silicon Valley

0:36:09.320 --> 0:36:11.680
<v Speaker 3>is that you have Stamford, a lot of people focused

0:36:11.680 --> 0:36:15.560
<v Speaker 3>on computing and software. They found companies, the vcs all

0:36:15.640 --> 0:36:18.480
<v Speaker 3>moved here. Is there an equivalent thing going on out

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:20.279
<v Speaker 3>in Sweden and Nordic nations right now?

0:36:20.920 --> 0:36:23.239
<v Speaker 12>Yes, absolutely, and I would say to some extent it's

0:36:23.239 --> 0:36:28.120
<v Speaker 12>already happened. So the European Investment Fund and THES have

0:36:28.320 --> 0:36:31.160
<v Speaker 12>highlighted in their annual report that they do kind of

0:36:31.239 --> 0:36:34.760
<v Speaker 12>ranking European geographies on the basis of various innovation metrics.

0:36:34.960 --> 0:36:37.520
<v Speaker 12>You know, Sweden's been the top country in Europe for

0:36:37.600 --> 0:36:40.920
<v Speaker 12>a number of years, and that's driven by quality of education.

0:36:41.080 --> 0:36:44.680
<v Speaker 12>But also that first cohort of great Swedish startups has

0:36:44.760 --> 0:36:47.080
<v Speaker 12>now gone beyond the point where they've you know, a

0:36:47.120 --> 0:36:49.520
<v Speaker 12>lot of the founders have exited, they've become public businesses,

0:36:50.080 --> 0:36:53.040
<v Speaker 12>and you have those initial set of founders reinvesting in

0:36:53.239 --> 0:36:55.520
<v Speaker 12>the next cohort of startups. So you know, to take

0:36:55.640 --> 0:36:58.000
<v Speaker 12>Brilliant Minds as an example, it's a foundation set up

0:36:58.000 --> 0:37:00.520
<v Speaker 12>by Daniel Leck and you know, the support for that

0:37:00.640 --> 0:37:03.760
<v Speaker 12>foundation is driven by the fantastic success that he's achieved

0:37:03.760 --> 0:37:07.600
<v Speaker 12>with Spotify, So yeah, Spotify, klana Iz or you know,

0:37:07.719 --> 0:37:12.680
<v Speaker 12>these great Swedish technology institutions now are feeding back into

0:37:12.719 --> 0:37:15.719
<v Speaker 12>that early stage ecosystem. And also, I mean there's a

0:37:15.760 --> 0:37:18.960
<v Speaker 12>great private capital ecosystem that's developed here over you know,

0:37:19.040 --> 0:37:21.799
<v Speaker 12>over the course of really twenty years, which we're very

0:37:21.880 --> 0:37:23.440
<v Speaker 12>happy to play a small part of.

0:37:23.719 --> 0:37:25.120
<v Speaker 5>You know what's interesting, Caroline.

0:37:25.160 --> 0:37:28.160
<v Speaker 3>Every day on Venture Spotlight, we have vcs from around

0:37:28.160 --> 0:37:30.440
<v Speaker 3>the world, and if they're American, we pose the question,

0:37:31.000 --> 0:37:33.080
<v Speaker 3>are you looking outside of the US in terms of

0:37:33.160 --> 0:37:36.279
<v Speaker 3>where you're writing checks and looking for opportunity?

0:37:37.120 --> 0:37:39.400
<v Speaker 2>And what called my eye actually on LinkedIn today was

0:37:39.520 --> 0:37:40.400
<v Speaker 2>Nicholas Senstrom.

0:37:40.480 --> 0:37:41.359
<v Speaker 4>Of course another key.

0:37:41.800 --> 0:37:44.320
<v Speaker 2>So we just found a founded Skype gone on to

0:37:44.680 --> 0:37:47.280
<v Speaker 2>have a Tomaco, very successful VC in the space.

0:37:47.520 --> 0:37:49.160
<v Speaker 4>He's put out a thought leadership.

0:37:48.760 --> 0:37:51.680
<v Speaker 2>Piece today, Bob all about why Europe's going to be

0:37:51.719 --> 0:37:54.360
<v Speaker 2>the next area of innovation, why check shashould be being

0:37:54.400 --> 0:37:57.000
<v Speaker 2>written there. But Ed and I have both been based

0:37:57.040 --> 0:38:00.080
<v Speaker 2>in Europe. We both talked about technology there and it

0:38:00.200 --> 0:38:02.399
<v Speaker 2>was always this ringing of hands that there's never quite

0:38:02.560 --> 0:38:05.319
<v Speaker 2>been the moment that they powered through, that they were

0:38:05.360 --> 0:38:06.200
<v Speaker 2>able to put.

0:38:06.080 --> 0:38:08.520
<v Speaker 4>Their stamp on it. Do you think this is different?

0:38:08.560 --> 0:38:10.680
<v Speaker 2>Do you think ultimately that we shouldn't always be that

0:38:10.800 --> 0:38:13.760
<v Speaker 2>one area or region will win out visa via another

0:38:13.920 --> 0:38:17.160
<v Speaker 2>all can do well and will eventually American money come

0:38:17.480 --> 0:38:19.840
<v Speaker 2>in a more significant way to Europe.

0:38:20.440 --> 0:38:22.560
<v Speaker 12>I think we've definitely seen, particularly in a kind of

0:38:22.600 --> 0:38:25.480
<v Speaker 12>low interest rate environment, particularly during COVID in the B

0:38:25.520 --> 0:38:27.239
<v Speaker 12>to B software space, we've seen a huge amount of

0:38:27.280 --> 0:38:30.080
<v Speaker 12>American money come to Europe. And you know, I'll say,

0:38:30.280 --> 0:38:33.359
<v Speaker 12>to some extent we're seeing it leave again now given

0:38:33.440 --> 0:38:37.320
<v Speaker 12>the economy and given the pricing of technology businesses. But

0:38:37.680 --> 0:38:41.360
<v Speaker 12>I think the development of European ecosystems, you know, initially

0:38:41.360 --> 0:38:44.480
<v Speaker 12>in places like London and Berlin, but now in the Nordics,

0:38:44.560 --> 0:38:48.080
<v Speaker 12>you know, not just Stockholm but Copenhag and Helsinki. You know,

0:38:48.120 --> 0:38:51.840
<v Speaker 12>we're seeing a great startup ecosystem developing the Baltics, particularly

0:38:51.840 --> 0:38:54.719
<v Speaker 12>in Estonia and Talent, but more broadly than that, I

0:38:54.840 --> 0:38:57.680
<v Speaker 12>think it's really driven actually not by the influx of

0:38:57.719 --> 0:39:02.360
<v Speaker 12>American money, but by the recycling of capital from cohorts

0:39:02.400 --> 0:39:06.239
<v Speaker 12>of great technology businesses. You know, to take stop we've

0:39:06.320 --> 0:39:09.400
<v Speaker 12>given a Swedish example, but to take Estonia as an example.

0:39:09.640 --> 0:39:11.760
<v Speaker 12>You know, Pipe Drive, great B to B software business

0:39:12.120 --> 0:39:14.680
<v Speaker 12>sells globally, is now a global business. But a lot

0:39:14.719 --> 0:39:19.000
<v Speaker 12>of that capital gets recycled into the Estonian ecosystem and

0:39:19.040 --> 0:39:22.200
<v Speaker 12>becomes fuel for the next generation of seed stage Estonian staffs.

0:39:22.480 --> 0:39:25.240
<v Speaker 2>What's interesting, of course, we were looking at some pictures

0:39:25.320 --> 0:39:28.279
<v Speaker 2>of the company that's just one overall beyond Arrow and

0:39:28.880 --> 0:39:31.560
<v Speaker 2>it was a lot of guy engineers in the pictures,

0:39:31.760 --> 0:39:35.240
<v Speaker 2>and we're sat here with a white male VC of course,

0:39:35.320 --> 0:39:37.800
<v Speaker 2>but brilliant Minds in and of itself is very diverse

0:39:38.120 --> 0:39:40.799
<v Speaker 2>female CEO. And also thinking about the people that they

0:39:40.880 --> 0:39:43.760
<v Speaker 2>brought together in Sweden. How diverse is the European Talent

0:39:43.800 --> 0:39:45.839
<v Speaker 2>pol right now? How diverse are the founders that you're

0:39:45.880 --> 0:39:47.239
<v Speaker 2>coming and seeing pitched to you?

0:39:48.080 --> 0:39:49.160
<v Speaker 5>So I would say THEO.

0:39:49.280 --> 0:39:52.640
<v Speaker 12>Firstly, the CEO of beyond eerro Eloa, is a woman,

0:39:53.040 --> 0:39:54.839
<v Speaker 12>and unfortunately she wasn't pictured.

0:39:54.560 --> 0:39:57.520
<v Speaker 5>In the video, but you know, just to be clear

0:39:57.560 --> 0:39:57.880
<v Speaker 5>about that.

0:39:59.280 --> 0:40:02.280
<v Speaker 12>You know, I think when particularly does rank very highly,

0:40:02.880 --> 0:40:06.200
<v Speaker 12>particularly in terms of gender diversity and companies at a

0:40:06.280 --> 0:40:09.439
<v Speaker 12>point where you know, we're almost that kind of gender

0:40:09.640 --> 0:40:12.560
<v Speaker 12>parity in in terms of public company CEOs in Sweden,

0:40:12.760 --> 0:40:16.239
<v Speaker 12>and I think that you know, Sweden has been an

0:40:16.280 --> 0:40:20.200
<v Speaker 12>early mover in the right direction. I think there is,

0:40:20.400 --> 0:40:23.319
<v Speaker 12>you know, fundamentally in Europe but also particularly within tech,

0:40:23.400 --> 0:40:26.080
<v Speaker 12>still a long way to go in terms of diversity,

0:40:26.200 --> 0:40:28.279
<v Speaker 12>and I think it's important that we're you know, we're

0:40:28.320 --> 0:40:30.600
<v Speaker 12>doing more on that. Brilliant Minds is leading the way,

0:40:31.239 --> 0:40:32.759
<v Speaker 12>but you know, I think we as a fund also

0:40:32.840 --> 0:40:35.960
<v Speaker 12>lead away and we care very deeply about the diversity

0:40:36.000 --> 0:40:38.160
<v Speaker 12>of our team and the diversity of the companies we

0:40:38.239 --> 0:40:38.600
<v Speaker 12>invest in.

0:40:39.560 --> 0:40:42.600
<v Speaker 3>Ox partner, Bob Thomas and in Sweden, thank you so much.

0:40:42.640 --> 0:40:44.880
<v Speaker 3>When you write your next big check come back.

0:40:44.760 --> 0:40:47.280
<v Speaker 5>On the program. We talk more about the audicts in Europe.

0:40:47.280 --> 0:40:48.080
<v Speaker 5>Thank you for your time.

0:40:56.400 --> 0:40:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Time now for what's going viral? Fans are the Beatles,

0:40:59.239 --> 0:41:01.719
<v Speaker 2>You're in for a tree. So Paul McCartney says that

0:41:01.800 --> 0:41:04.360
<v Speaker 2>we can expect to hear one final song from the

0:41:04.400 --> 0:41:08.080
<v Speaker 2>British pop group and he's crediting guess what, artificial intelligence

0:41:08.120 --> 0:41:10.000
<v Speaker 2>for the help. In an interview at the BBC Radio

0:41:10.040 --> 0:41:12.759
<v Speaker 2>for McCartney said that the song was made using a

0:41:12.880 --> 0:41:16.040
<v Speaker 2>demo with John Lennon's voice and will were released later

0:41:16.160 --> 0:41:18.560
<v Speaker 2>this year and ed what's interesting, I was lucky enough

0:41:18.560 --> 0:41:21.240
<v Speaker 2>to be at Glastonbury this time last year Paul McCartney

0:41:21.400 --> 0:41:25.600
<v Speaker 2>was performing and at that time he performed alongside virtually

0:41:26.080 --> 0:41:29.080
<v Speaker 2>John Lennon and that was using an isolated Lenin vocal

0:41:29.160 --> 0:41:29.680
<v Speaker 2>at that time.

0:41:29.760 --> 0:41:31.560
<v Speaker 4>So already that we use the machine learning.

0:41:32.080 --> 0:41:34.240
<v Speaker 5>It's called AI to do d mixing.

0:41:34.360 --> 0:41:36.480
<v Speaker 3>So this was a demo tape that Lennon did on

0:41:36.560 --> 0:41:38.839
<v Speaker 3>a ACEPT before he died in nineteen eighty. He gave

0:41:38.880 --> 0:41:41.759
<v Speaker 3>it to Yoko Ono. Yokoona gave it to McCartney and

0:41:41.800 --> 0:41:44.680
<v Speaker 3>all the AI does is isolate the voice and so

0:41:44.840 --> 0:41:49.120
<v Speaker 3>interviews McCartney's talked about how it's so exciting because tracks

0:41:49.120 --> 0:41:51.200
<v Speaker 3>that they never quite finished and now can finish the

0:41:51.200 --> 0:41:53.880
<v Speaker 3>are available. But he's also admitted it's kind of scary

0:41:54.200 --> 0:41:56.919
<v Speaker 3>if you think about it, give infinite life to something

0:41:57.000 --> 0:41:58.799
<v Speaker 3>that wasn't quite quite done at the.

0:41:58.840 --> 0:42:02.239
<v Speaker 4>Time, and there is. It's been working with the artists right.

0:42:02.320 --> 0:42:05.160
<v Speaker 2>A lot of the other anxiety has been around copyright issues,

0:42:05.200 --> 0:42:08.920
<v Speaker 2>has been around deep fakes and really how the business

0:42:08.960 --> 0:42:13.000
<v Speaker 2>and industry navigates that. AI just keeps on giving us

0:42:13.280 --> 0:42:15.560
<v Speaker 2>new areas to contemplate, and we love it that it's

0:42:15.600 --> 0:42:16.399
<v Speaker 2>in music at least.

0:42:16.640 --> 0:42:18.520
<v Speaker 4>Wow, that does it for this addition Bloomberg.

0:42:18.160 --> 0:42:21.880
<v Speaker 3>Technology, Yeah, big, big show, so much to recap. So

0:42:21.960 --> 0:42:27.480
<v Speaker 3>don't forget about the podcast Spotify. iHeart this is Bloomberg