WEBVTT - This ETF is Rated R

0:00:06.120 --> 0:00:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcot Chillians. I'm Joel Webber and I'm Eric bell Tunis. Eric.

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes we've talked about a certain type of E t

0:00:15.280 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 1>F that are that is rated are, and that is

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>a term or a category that that you've actually come

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:24.120
<v Speaker 1>up with, And we're gonna spend some time on this

0:00:24.160 --> 0:00:28.120
<v Speaker 1>episode talking only about that that category, if you will. Yeah,

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>So these are the we we call them rated are

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 1>or the exotic or the power tools of the Yeah,

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>because in the right hands they can work wonders and

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>really get the job done. But in the wrong hands,

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 1>they can actually cut your hand off right like a

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:47.199
<v Speaker 1>chainsaw or worse or worse right, So we want to

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 1>demystify these products. Um, you know, to me, they're demonized

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. But I get why they're demonized. I think,

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:56.280
<v Speaker 1>you know. The reason rated R to me is a

0:00:56.280 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 1>good metaphor is because I believe that in our classification system,

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 1>we give them a red light just to say, hey, look,

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:06.319
<v Speaker 1>there's some some stuff you need to know about these

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:09.279
<v Speaker 1>So let's pause. But like in the movies, just because

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 1>ten year olds exist doesn't mean Quentin Tarantino should have

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:16.040
<v Speaker 1>to stop making movies. So we were okay, with leverage, ETFs,

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 1>vix ETPs. These these products that are for professionals, we

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 1>just think they need a rating like a movie. So

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>again we've got green yellow red because we can't use

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the movie ratings because it's like a copyright unfortunately, so

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>we use green yellow red power. These E T F

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 1>s UM are basically all instant red lights except for

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the why. The reason is because their triple leveraged or

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:40.560
<v Speaker 1>double leveraged, and that means that they'll move twice as

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>much as the index in a day, but they only

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 1>promise it per day. The way their structure, which we'll

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>get into, you don't actually get that two or three

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 1>times over the long haul. Like there's a corrosion element

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 1>that's like a ticking time bomb. So the longer you

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 1>hold it, the more you could just lose money because

0:01:55.560 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 1>of this sort of um the math of rebalancing every

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 1>day and sometimes most of the time all the time.

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 1>These products come with xs, and that's one way that

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you can know that you're playing with Yeah, they had

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:12.800
<v Speaker 1>they literally say two x or three x UM. They

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>even have the word daily in them to like sort

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>of accentuate that you need to use these for the

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:20.240
<v Speaker 1>short term. And who's going to help us understand this world? Um,

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Sylvia Jablonski. She is from Direction, which makes the most

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:26.840
<v Speaker 1>chainsaw of the chainsaws, the three X. So there's like

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:30.119
<v Speaker 1>the big chainsaw. Well there was, Look, there was there

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:32.519
<v Speaker 1>was the regular like the little tiny electric chainsaw, and

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 1>then there's the big big chainsaw. Then pro Shares came

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:38.520
<v Speaker 1>out with two X, and then Directions says, oh yeah,

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>three X. Just you know, if you're really feeling lucky today, okay,

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 1>on this episode of Trillians playing with power tools. Okay, Sylvia,

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>welcome to trillions, Thanks for joining, Thanks so much for

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:56.920
<v Speaker 1>having me. So you're the head of capital markets at Direction. L. E.

0:02:57.040 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 1>T s. Yes, okay, So why I do these products exist?

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:04.640
<v Speaker 1>So the quick answer is that we would like to

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:08.920
<v Speaker 1>democratize leverage. How does that sound? I mean, I don't

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:12.240
<v Speaker 1>know what that means. So what is that? Yeah? Exactly? So,

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>um so there there are three beta products, as you

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 1>guys were discussing. So for every hundred dollars you invest,

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:20.640
<v Speaker 1>you get three hundreds of exposure to the underlying index

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 1>for a one day period. So why is that interesting? Well,

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>clients can use these to express high conviction on short

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 1>term tactical opportunities. So, for example, if you think that

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 1>you know semi conductors are gonna get crushed for the

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 1>next three days or so, you might look at a

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 1>three x bear fund and express the view that you

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>think semi conductors will be both low vaulatile downward trending

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and have high performance in that day period, and generates

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>some MALFA from that trade. So leverage effectively amplifies my

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 1>it amplifies your view for the day, and not only that,

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>it allows you to allocate capital efficiently. So you put

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 1>down a hundred dollars and you get three hundred dollars

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>of exposure. Maybe I'll walk you through an example just

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 1>to give you a sense of real world what actually happens.

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:11.120
<v Speaker 1>So let's say um SMH is down, semiconductor et F

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 1>is down five percent in a day, So we have

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:16.719
<v Speaker 1>a bear fund. It's called s o x s now.

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 1>If the underlying e t F that we track is

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:21.360
<v Speaker 1>down five percent in a day, you have a hundred

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 1>dollars three hundred of exposure five percent move three beta fund,

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 1>so you earn fifteen percent as that e t F

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:31.479
<v Speaker 1>or index goes down five percent in a day. Now

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 1>on day two, if you have another move downward of five,

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:37.600
<v Speaker 1>you make seventeen point to five. And this is what

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:39.679
<v Speaker 1>Eric was referring to. This is sort of the positive

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 1>side of it, where the compounding and the rebalance work

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 1>in your favor. So the market has been trending downward,

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:48.480
<v Speaker 1>you got the direction right. Five percent in two days

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 1>gives you thirty two point to five over a two

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:52.840
<v Speaker 1>day period because of the three x and because of

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:56.359
<v Speaker 1>the rebalance. Now the other side of that, or where

0:04:56.560 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>you don't do quite as well is if semiconductor is

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:02.559
<v Speaker 1>down five percent on day one and up five percent

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 1>on day two, you're not flat. So it's not like

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:07.159
<v Speaker 1>buying and selling apple apples up five, down five, you

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>make zero. In this case, you're actually down two point

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:12.719
<v Speaker 1>to five because on day one we rebounds the fund.

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 1>So you had a hundred three hundred, you made fifteen,

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:17.679
<v Speaker 1>you have one fifteen. We need to rebounce the fund

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and buy an additional forty thirty dollars of exposure from

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 1>three or fifteen to five. So this is like you

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 1>go to home depot rents rent a power tool, but

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 1>it comes with like compounding problems that you might not

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:34.160
<v Speaker 1>know about or compounding benefits and let me jump in

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 1>on the daily rebouncing. That is essentially what is makes

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the screwy math. People assume you buy it and then oh,

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 1>a year later, why am I not up or down

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>three x? The reason it has to reset daily is

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:48.720
<v Speaker 1>because people come in and out of it. Right. It's

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 1>not like you make it for one day and then

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:52.600
<v Speaker 1>you close it up for a year. That would make

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 1>sense then, right to have it that long term, But

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:57.480
<v Speaker 1>because it's a daily trading vehicle, you have to reset

0:05:57.560 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>every day because of people coming in for absolutely right,

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:03.279
<v Speaker 1>and that's a good point. So there are actually monthly

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 1>rebounds mutual funds that are leveraged so you can hold

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>them for thirty days and on day thirty the funds

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:11.479
<v Speaker 1>rebalanced and you get two times one month's performance of

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 1>whatever index you're tracking. With the daily funds, it is

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>rebalanced on a daily basis, so you know, for example,

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>if if you had the smp FI this year, it

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:23.719
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that the bull fund is up thirty, and

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't mean that the bare fund is down thirty.

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 1>It can be anything. It depends on the path that

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:30.480
<v Speaker 1>it took to get there. So trend is your front.

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the Obama bottom two thousand nine

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Tech until today it's up two. I know you love

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:40.359
<v Speaker 1>this e t F tech out. We've talked about it before.

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:42.600
<v Speaker 1>But if you look at gold miners Techo. By the way,

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:48.279
<v Speaker 1>techle is, I believe the goat performance wise because TECH

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 1>has done nothing but go up. So in this daily rebouncing,

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 1>as long as it keeps going up every day, you

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:55.839
<v Speaker 1>actually compound that daily resetting that the daily resetting starts

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 1>to work in your favor, you can get four or

0:06:57.240 --> 0:07:00.800
<v Speaker 1>five times. It's the volatility that will USU up. That's

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:03.920
<v Speaker 1>called volatility drag right exactly. So so trend is your

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:06.479
<v Speaker 1>friend and range bound volatility is essentially the enemy of

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Levern University tfs because what happens is during those periods

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the e t F s de kay. So you have

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 1>the market going up for a couple of days, the

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>bull funds increased exposure, the bear funds reduce it, and

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 1>then all of a sudden you have a down day.

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 1>You have too much exposure in the bull, not enough

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:22.120
<v Speaker 1>exposure in the bear, and it doesn't ever catch up.

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of hedge funds, for example, have figured

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 1>out that during those periods, you know they'll shore both

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the Bear and the bull fund because they know that

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 1>neither will do well in that market environment. So I

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 1>have to have low volatility and training markets. I want

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 1>to get to that trade. It's called the double short.

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 1>That's like some like hardcore stuff. But well, let's just

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 1>for one second go over tackle, because tackle, to me

0:07:41.400 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 1>is the ultimate um siren. I mean, you look at

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the returns and it is seducing. So this is dale

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 1>this is the compounding effect in effect. So the ten

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 1>years tackle is up four thousand percent, but the index

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 1>that it tracks is only up fos so it returned

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 1>ten times. If you and in ten years ago, however,

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 1>if we found some volatile area, you may find the

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 1>index was up, but the three x CTF was down

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>because it was a volatile road. Tech just happens to

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>be a much more smooth path up. And I think

0:08:15.760 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>that's the big takeaway. Is it safe to say? The

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>compounding effect, which is you know, this is like a

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:24.720
<v Speaker 1>full moon. It's beautiful when it happens, but it's not

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the norm. It's well, it's been it's been the norm

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 1>for the last decade, right, it's no longer than yeah,

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 1>because of the FED and we didn't have Chinese trade wars.

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:34.840
<v Speaker 1>But if you look, I just looked this up this morning. Actually, okay,

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:37.560
<v Speaker 1>so a year to date tackle up fifty three, Bloomberg

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:40.600
<v Speaker 1>told a return, but the month of May tech s

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the bare fund up and Tech l down, so it

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:47.960
<v Speaker 1>lost its year to date return because markets are volatile

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 1>and the index is moving down. So those two things

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 1>together have essentially created a perfect storm. And that's obviously

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 1>around the macro backdrop and China and Huawei and all that.

0:08:56.840 --> 0:08:58.840
<v Speaker 1>But so I used a word a few minutes ago,

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:02.720
<v Speaker 1>I said bet, and you use the word view, yes,

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 1>And I'm interested in that because I think one of

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the like a layman perspective on this, it really feels

0:09:07.280 --> 0:09:11.199
<v Speaker 1>like gambling, right, So so how is it not gambling?

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 1>So I would I'd throw the question you, how is

0:09:14.520 --> 0:09:18.319
<v Speaker 1>investing not gambling? You know, if you view buying IBM

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 1>or Apple, you know, a hundred percent risk concentration in

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 1>one name, as an investment or a gamble, then I

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 1>would say your definition is fair either way. You know,

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:29.319
<v Speaker 1>they work just like stocks, do. I think because they

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 1>have amplified exposure, there's this sense that the risk is

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 1>certainly a lot higher and people might equate that risk

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:38.560
<v Speaker 1>to say, a gambling risk. But these are you know,

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:43.440
<v Speaker 1>investment tools. They're they're very you know, strategic portfolio allocation

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 1>tools for short term tactical traders. You know, I think

0:09:45.840 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them use a whole lot of math

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and signals to make their decisions on short term trends,

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:52.960
<v Speaker 1>long term trends, you know, hedging over the long term,

0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:55.160
<v Speaker 1>things like that. So I would consider it as much

0:09:55.200 --> 0:09:58.679
<v Speaker 1>of a trade as buying buying a tech soccer or

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:01.840
<v Speaker 1>a high beta stock in a volatile market. But the

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:04.600
<v Speaker 1>key word is that they are trading tools, and to

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 1>that end, who's using them. So the mix of individuals

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:10.960
<v Speaker 1>using them is across the board. So you have the

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 1>retail community, you have hedge funds, you have are a s,

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:18.679
<v Speaker 1>you have large asset managers. So it's everyone from you know,

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 1>my mom to x y z hedge fund to x

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 1>y z R market making shop. What is your mom

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>say when when when you talk to her about my

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:32.200
<v Speaker 1>mom loves leverage, loves direction, loves tech trading. Now but

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:34.960
<v Speaker 1>three X China, Yeah, of course, of course, you know

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 1>we wouldn't be related if she wasn't trading that. No,

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:39.719
<v Speaker 1>But you know, so, actually it's a fair question. But

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:41.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, so, my mom is not a short term

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:44.839
<v Speaker 1>tactical investor, right, She's probably saving for entirement and she's

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:47.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, a long term buy and whole investor. So

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 1>for her, she would have to have a short term conviction.

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 1>She would have to be an active day trader looking

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 1>at her account all day long to use these funds.

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:57.680
<v Speaker 1>That's who we say is sort of the safe person,

0:10:57.800 --> 0:10:59.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, the person who stops at the red light

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:02.679
<v Speaker 1>knows it's going to turn green, but sitting there watching it. Right,

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 1>It's it's not somebody who's gonna, you know, put in

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 1>a trade and then go golf or play tennis for

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 1>a month or two. That's not not the to that.

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>And like what what is um if not your mom,

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe my mom? Like what what does she need to

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:18.200
<v Speaker 1>know before she were to ever touch something like this?

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>So she needs to know the basis of how the

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:23.200
<v Speaker 1>products work, which we talked about that trend is your friend.

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Low trending, low volatility trending markets are the best environment

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>for these e t f s to be held longer

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:33.839
<v Speaker 1>than a day. Volatility means trade very actively. But either way,

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 1>she needs to know that she has to actively monitor

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:40.440
<v Speaker 1>her position rebounds frequency or frequently, and she needs to

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 1>have essentially a very high risk tolerance. She has to

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 1>understand that the losses could be magnified as well as

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the games. For the record, I don't think my mom

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 1>is ready for an um um. Let me just give

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:52.840
<v Speaker 1>one example here by the way Yin and Yang, which

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned earlier, there's the three X long and short

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 1>China there. Over the past ten years, they're both down.

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Yan is down, Yang is down, and f x I,

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the big China et F is up. So I think

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that's an example because China has been volatile. Absolutely, So

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 1>that's the sort of major warning. That's the hand getting

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:15.080
<v Speaker 1>cut off. If you went in there, you were probably

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 1>unhappy after a couple of years, whereas Teckle you looked

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:20.960
<v Speaker 1>out because it went up nicely. Absolutely. And if you

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:22.680
<v Speaker 1>look at the if you look at Yin and Yang

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:26.320
<v Speaker 1>and the China products year to date prior to UH

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:28.439
<v Speaker 1>that late day in April, ware Trump came out and

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:31.559
<v Speaker 1>said no deal. Those ETFs were actually we saw a

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>volume increase twenty day average daily volume increased by plus

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 1>and those products the performance was or more. In the

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Bull Fund and it completely switched on to your point,

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 1>there was this macro event and there was volatility. So

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 1>now both funds have essentially over the long term experienced losses.

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 1>And Nugget and Dust are another good example. You know,

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:52.960
<v Speaker 1>those are the most volatile et F s and they're

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 1>very much for a term trading tools. So there are

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:58.960
<v Speaker 1>three X gold miners, bowl and bear et F products

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:01.319
<v Speaker 1>and for those, you know, they were definitely one day

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:03.839
<v Speaker 1>hold periods, you know, intra day trades. If they were

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 1>held for the long term, you would have lost on

0:13:05.440 --> 0:13:07.440
<v Speaker 1>both the bull and the bare product. But if you

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:09.960
<v Speaker 1>were looking at sectors like SMP five hundred and tech

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 1>L three x tech for the last decade when it's

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 1>been low, volatile and trending, those trades have really paid off.

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of Nugget and Dust there those are tracking gold

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 1>miners stocks. There's great great tickets. By the way, well

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>there's jay nug which tracks junior gold miners, which we

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:29.559
<v Speaker 1>all call like the ultimate like that is like the

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>hardest of the hardcore. At one point in the first

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:36.000
<v Speaker 1>half of the year it was up six and the

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 1>volatility on this thing sometimes gets to fifteen times the

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:42.559
<v Speaker 1>SMP five hundred I mean this thing should they you

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 1>should ship as an X with the by order when

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:48.080
<v Speaker 1>you you know what I mean, you need so you know,

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:50.320
<v Speaker 1>you've got to really be able to handle a lot.

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's that's way more vaulatle than bitcoin even

0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 1>at the time. Uh So some of these get into

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>some really even like the underlyings volatile, right right, so

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 1>more the more volatile the underlying is the more volatile.

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Obviously the three x CTF will be um. And what

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I would say about that though, is what's really sort

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 1>of good is that it's evolved over time and that

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the holding periods for J nugg and J dust and

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 1>nugget and dust are a day or less, whereas the

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 1>holding periods for three x SMP could be a couple

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 1>of days to a week. So the average holing periods

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 1>in general for leberty tfs have come in a lot,

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:24.960
<v Speaker 1>which is great. People are trading them and not you know,

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of blindly buying them and hoping for the best.

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 1>And that's what we look for. We want to make

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 1>sure there's a lot of turnover, and if so, we're like, okay,

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the people are probably using those correctly. There's examples of

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 1>ones that should be traded that aren't um like USO

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 1>is a good example, but leverage mostly I think the

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 1>shares trade every day, so that means the average holding

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 1>periods a day or two to that point. Just to

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 1>give some wide numbers here, there's two D and thirty

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 1>leverage inverse ETFs, but the only account for fifty billion dollars,

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 1>which is one point five percent of all e t

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 1>F sets. However, they make up probably eight nine of

0:14:57.880 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 1>all e t F trading, right, so again they're people

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 1>trade the crap out of them, which is what you

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 1>that's being used correctly for the most part. Yeah, absolutely,

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 1>that's what we want to see. And if you look

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:11.080
<v Speaker 1>at the last couple of weeks when we've seen all

0:15:11.120 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 1>come back into the market, we've traded about a third

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 1>of our assets under management almost on a daily basis.

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 1>So people are definitely investors are definitely trading and turning

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 1>these over in the last few days when volatility is there,

0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 1>which is great because again I've been doing this for

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:26.280
<v Speaker 1>I've been with Direction for about a decade now. When

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I first started, I think that the concern around education

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 1>and how to use them was, you know, less than

0:15:31.520 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>it is now. People are definitely trading now and the

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 1>holding periods have come in, which is and most ets

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 1>hold stocks, bonds or futures. Um, these don't these hold swaps.

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Can you explain what a swap is and who it's

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 1>with and whatnot, Like what's in the fund? Sure, So

0:15:46.880 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 1>we have bull funds and bear funds. So in the

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:52.239
<v Speaker 1>bull funds it's about two hundred and fifty percent swap.

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 1>And then the remainder of the position is a basket

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 1>of stocks or a very liquid one day to e

0:15:56.480 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 1>t F So for example, SMP five hundred basket might

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>be or spy might and the rest is a swap

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 1>on spy. In the bare fund, it's essentially one or

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:11.000
<v Speaker 1>three percent exposure via swap. So the way that swaps

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 1>work is on the long side we essentially received performance

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 1>on the index. On the short side, we owe performance

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 1>on the index. Two banks. So we have seven counterparties

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 1>right now, um, and you know our competitor has the

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 1>similar group of counterparties as well. So this is like yes,

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Golman Credit Suites, UM BMP Party, Boss City Group, UM,

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Morgan's you know, Morgan Stanley, BAM, l U b S.

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Those are some of our some of our counterparties UM,

0:16:39.560 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 1>and what we do on a daily basis is we

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 1>look at what's going on with the underlying index. So

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 1>let's say SMPS rallying today, UM, and you have two factors,

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the primary market in the secondary market, so secondary is

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the index itself and primary is creation and redemption activity.

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 1>So that's authorized participants essentially creating or redeeming shares. And

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:00.720
<v Speaker 1>we have a number at the to the day. So

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:03.640
<v Speaker 1>if let's say the SMPS up and there are a

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:07.639
<v Speaker 1>lot of creates, we go to whichever bank City Ubs

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Meryl credits with and we say we need to buy

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 1>fifty million of exposure and swap to SMP. If there

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:16.119
<v Speaker 1>are redemptions, that number could be you know, five million,

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is. UM. We're buying and selling swap on

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:20.679
<v Speaker 1>a daily basis and managing the fund that way, so

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the bank does the trading. That's the important thing. We

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:36.679
<v Speaker 1>touched on gold China Tech. What isn't leverage used for

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:40.840
<v Speaker 1>So the issue or something that would hold us back

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:43.159
<v Speaker 1>from launching a new fund would be liquidity in the

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 1>underlying and options for us to create the fund. So,

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 1>for example, one of the most top popular topics out

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:52.200
<v Speaker 1>there has been bitcoin related products or marijuana related ETFs.

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, the liquidity and the availability of underlyings is

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:59.160
<v Speaker 1>just not there to support a three beta fund, So

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:01.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, things like that we tend to stay away from.

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:03.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, direction is kind of risk averse in terms of,

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, we don't want to launch a product that

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:09.359
<v Speaker 1>if there was an underlying move of we couldn't rebounce

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 1>on Daihi basis. So, for example, we stay away from

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 1>vix because we just worry about what would happen with

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the futures market and we kind of saw that blow

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>up UM a couple of times in history here, So

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 1>we tend to stick to very liquid. They can be volatile,

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:23.879
<v Speaker 1>but they have to be liquid and there has to

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:26.120
<v Speaker 1>be a lot of options to build e TF. That's

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:28.280
<v Speaker 1>how crazy the VIX area is. But the three X

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 1>people will they're like, we're not, we don't go there. Yeah,

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 1>that we gotta have Velocity shares in here. I mean

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 1>that's like that's NC seventeen territory. Yeah. And how lucrative

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 1>is the leverage space. Well, the management fee on the

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 1>majority of three beta et F products, and we have

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 1>about thirteen billion a u M. Most of that is

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:53.160
<v Speaker 1>in three x CTF. So that gives you a sense

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:55.359
<v Speaker 1>of you know, the profit on on the e t

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:57.680
<v Speaker 1>f s. Of course they're financing expenses and things like that.

0:18:57.720 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 1>But um, you know, when we we look at the

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 1>revenue of the E t F industry, it's something we

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:03.400
<v Speaker 1>do every year we called welcome to the jungle because

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 1>there's just not a lot of revenue, so be warned.

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:08.640
<v Speaker 1>But the leverage providers do the best. Uh, they punch

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 1>way above their weight. They might rank eleventh and twelfth

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:14.359
<v Speaker 1>asset wise, but they probably rank fifth and sixth revenue wise,

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:17.239
<v Speaker 1>because that when you trade, traders don't really care what

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the fees are. That's why black Rock still makes the

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:21.679
<v Speaker 1>most money from e M even though most people are

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:24.440
<v Speaker 1>going to i MG, because the traders that they don't

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:27.480
<v Speaker 1>really care that it costs whatever seventy basis points. So

0:19:27.720 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I think you guys are a good takeover target. Frankly

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 1>for a company looking to get a foothold into e

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:37.359
<v Speaker 1>t f s steady ready revenue stream. Janice bought Velocity Shares,

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 1>which was a wild head scratching acquisition, but it honestly,

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 1>those Velocity shares are contribute like the revenue of janiss

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 1>et F line. So what's the player? Are you guys

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:51.399
<v Speaker 1>gonna are you looking for for bigger fish or or

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:53.880
<v Speaker 1>are you happy where you are? We are the big

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 1>fish right now, there you go. I definitely tell you right,

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>yeah you should. Here's some inside information and I am

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:07.639
<v Speaker 1>now fired. Um just quickly before we go onto some

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 1>other topics. The double short, yes, Now, this is a

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:12.359
<v Speaker 1>trade that hedge funds love to do, where they short

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:14.640
<v Speaker 1>both the three X long and the short. Basically, it's

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:18.639
<v Speaker 1>a bet on volatility. What percentage of your three x

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 1>et F family volume is the double short versus regular use?

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I would say it's about and in a way it's

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:29.879
<v Speaker 1>probably shrinking, which sort of seems counterintuitive because that trade

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 1>is now working. So a lot of hedge funds have

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>been doing that trade for many years, but as we said,

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the market has been low, volatile and trending. So the

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 1>problem that they face now is that you know, the

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:43.800
<v Speaker 1>trade definitely works if you have volatile markets and you

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 1>have say a three x gold miners bull fund and

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:49.240
<v Speaker 1>goal miners bear fund. They're both decaying, so if you're

0:20:49.280 --> 0:20:52.480
<v Speaker 1>sure both of them, in theory will generate alpha. The trick, though,

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 1>is the borrow, and as we have more volatility, the

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 1>cost of the borrow for the hedge funds to employ

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 1>that trade goes up. So you need some serious returns

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 1>to make up for what they're charging you to short

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the products. But you know that being said, the biggest

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:10.399
<v Speaker 1>double short trades are still in you know, tax semiconductors,

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:14.399
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets, China, and it's probably about ten of the

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>e T F A U. I'm out there. So the

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 1>way that we you know, people always say, why do

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:20.240
<v Speaker 1>you talk about the double shore you work for the company.

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:22.879
<v Speaker 1>Isn't that an opinion that it's it's bad. It's absolutely not.

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:25.880
<v Speaker 1>The products are tactical trading tools. If you shore both

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:28.440
<v Speaker 1>of them, it's a way to generate alpha. And for us,

0:21:28.840 --> 0:21:31.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, when when you go to or a client

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 1>goes short nugget or dust or whatever it might be,

0:21:35.000 --> 0:21:37.879
<v Speaker 1>someone behind the scenes has to create those shares so

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:42.119
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't hurt our A U M. Actually like I'm

0:21:42.160 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm really intrigued by the idea. It's I love that

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 1>has a name totally and that you can do it,

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:53.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, in multiple different uh, with multiple different funds. Uh.

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 1>It takes Cojones. I think that well, I think it

0:21:55.600 --> 0:21:57.240
<v Speaker 1>was a credit space or somebody just study on the

0:21:57.240 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 1>double short and they found that it does work most

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:01.159
<v Speaker 1>of the time. But when it does work, when that

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 1>compounding effect kicks in and you start to that starts

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 1>to kick in and your short, you know, that downside

0:22:07.600 --> 0:22:09.920
<v Speaker 1>is unlimited, right, and that's when it's not one hand

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:13.040
<v Speaker 1>is two hands. Yeah, it's exactly right. The tail risk

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 1>on the double short is is scary. Yeah. So the

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:18.679
<v Speaker 1>two big risks for the trade are basically a trend

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 1>that you catch a trend on one side or the other.

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 1>And the second thing is is borrow risk. So recall

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:27.640
<v Speaker 1>risk and rewrate risk. And you know, we we saw

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 1>that this trade. You know, the borrow was very um efficient.

0:22:31.359 --> 0:22:34.359
<v Speaker 1>It was cheap, i would say, for you know, prior

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:36.199
<v Speaker 1>to this year, in the last decade or so. But

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:39.399
<v Speaker 1>that's changing. It's becoming more expensive to finance these trades,

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 1>so that increases your risk too. Um. So, you know,

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 1>unless you're in a position where you're a huge hedge

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:49.080
<v Speaker 1>fund and you have awesome borrow, it's it's it's not

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 1>an everyday trade, right, It's it's definitely more of a

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:56.040
<v Speaker 1>sophisticated um you know, hedge fun type of trade. UM.

0:22:56.200 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 1>So one question on some concerns about leverage besides the

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:03.240
<v Speaker 1>usage which we just went over. UM. The Boston Fed

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 1>did a study but I've seen this before, which is

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:07.640
<v Speaker 1>basically they looked at different ways et f s could

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 1>actually increase structural risk to the market. And one of

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the ways they did they said that there could be

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:16.679
<v Speaker 1>some extra risk is the amplifying of volatility by leverage

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>ets because here's the quote. Basically, at the end of

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the day, you rebalance and both must trade in the

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 1>same direction as the market moves earlier that day. So

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:28.119
<v Speaker 1>that provides a little amplification of what just happened. And

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:29.879
<v Speaker 1>I think it's that daily rebalancing at the end of

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the day that some people have concerned about. I know

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:35.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of maybe histrionics around it. Can you

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:37.359
<v Speaker 1>just set a straight about what's going on and whether

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:39.720
<v Speaker 1>there is some extra risk there? Sure? So there there

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 1>are three factors. One is that you have both funds

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 1>and bare funds, so the trade at the end of

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the day on either side is not as big as

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 1>you think because you have to rebalance both funds, right,

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 1>so there's a net position there. The second thing is

0:23:51.560 --> 0:23:55.480
<v Speaker 1>that there are often contrarian trades. If everything is sort

0:23:55.480 --> 0:23:58.960
<v Speaker 1>of down today, let's say tech semiconductors SMPR downstay we

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:02.679
<v Speaker 1>often see creates come in, so people are taking a

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:05.239
<v Speaker 1>contrarian view, or else they're unwinding a hedge, so that

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 1>reduces the buy into the end of the day trading. Um,

0:24:09.080 --> 0:24:10.879
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot less than you would think. So I

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:14.440
<v Speaker 1>looked back at this and on our most volatile day,

0:24:14.520 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 1>we were one half of one percent of the close activity.

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 1>On an average day where one tenth of one percent

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Speaker 1>of the end of day activity. So we basically are

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:28.520
<v Speaker 1>an absolute blip on the radar. This is for e

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 1>t fs in general when you look at them. I

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 1>mean even all ETFs combined only own maybe eight percent

0:24:34.080 --> 0:24:36.680
<v Speaker 1>of the stock market, and if leveraged is one point

0:24:36.720 --> 0:24:39.440
<v Speaker 1>five percent of that eight percent, and you're down to

0:24:39.520 --> 0:24:42.960
<v Speaker 1>some pretty small numbers. Usually context calms people down with

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 1>e t F worries. When you start to show the

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:48.880
<v Speaker 1>whole big picture, they're like, okay, um, but that's something

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 1>that comes up repeatedly. I'm sure you get questions on

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 1>this a lot. Yeah. I think I think that you

0:24:53.320 --> 0:24:55.040
<v Speaker 1>know when you see big moves in the market and

0:24:55.119 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 1>you think of three beta funds or any kind of

0:24:57.640 --> 0:25:01.200
<v Speaker 1>product that has a tendency to have high volatility and

0:25:01.320 --> 0:25:03.960
<v Speaker 1>needs to buy or sell in the market, and especially

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day. There's this general thesis that, oh, well,

0:25:06.760 --> 0:25:09.120
<v Speaker 1>it must impact the clothes. But the truth is, again,

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:12.159
<v Speaker 1>on the most volatile day, we were one half of

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:15.760
<v Speaker 1>one percent, So that's a two thousand and eight end

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 1>of day trade. So what when you talk to your

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 1>power users, what do they want that they can't get yet?

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:27.440
<v Speaker 1>So well, a lot of people want, you know, three

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 1>x anything tacky like three x five G, three x POD,

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 1>three x bitcoin. Um. But there have been you know,

0:25:34.160 --> 0:25:36.200
<v Speaker 1>we're always getting good ideas. We have a lot of

0:25:36.240 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 1>traders that trade internationally and they would like to see,

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:41.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, more bowl and bear funds on single country

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:44.639
<v Speaker 1>They would like to see, um, you know, more bone

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 1>bear funds on specific regions that might be impacted by say,

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:51.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, European politics, Brexit, things like that. So there

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:54.879
<v Speaker 1>are symptomatic ideas. UM. We were actually pushed to use

0:25:54.960 --> 0:25:56.879
<v Speaker 1>leverage in different ways for buy and hold clients. So

0:25:56.960 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 1>we have light leverage to so one point to five

0:25:59.840 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 1>for traders who don't trade, but want a little bit.

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 1>So is that single x it's one five x exactly. Yeah,

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:10.200
<v Speaker 1>so you're getting a little bit of enhancement over the

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 1>long run. And that's that's just you know, a lot

0:26:12.359 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 1>of clients said, Hey, I just think that I'd like

0:26:15.320 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 1>to be invested in the SMP five hundred for the

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 1>next hundred years because it's twelve annulyzed return no matter

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:21.800
<v Speaker 1>what happens in between. But I don't know if I

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:23.879
<v Speaker 1>want to amplify it. I don't want to three x,

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 1>but two point t five extra makes sense to me.

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:31.280
<v Speaker 1>The amount of momb taking on diet Coke, Yeah, diet Coke, Yeah,

0:26:31.840 --> 0:26:36.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, both both leverage companies. UM. I frequently compared

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:39.880
<v Speaker 1>to the Godfather and Godfather too when he's like, we're

0:26:39.920 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to take the family legit, you know, that's his

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 1>big thing. They both came out with the line of

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 1>plain vanilla E T F direction has some some somewhat

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:52.200
<v Speaker 1>successful ones that are just normal, right, Like you have

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 1>q q QI, which is the equal weighted cues, which

0:26:54.640 --> 0:26:57.359
<v Speaker 1>we just analyzed a couple of weeks ago in the show. Um,

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:01.080
<v Speaker 1>what's behind that? Why not just be like that leverage provider?

0:27:01.119 --> 0:27:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Why do those other ones. It's like a little off

0:27:03.960 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 1>brand because I think that I think we've done really

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:08.720
<v Speaker 1>well with the tactical clients. So there's three types of

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:11.560
<v Speaker 1>clients I think out there. One is tactical, their short

0:27:11.680 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 1>term traders. They love us, they know us, they're comfortable

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 1>with three X. Then you have thematic and strategic. So

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:20.960
<v Speaker 1>thematic are the six to twelve month guys, and they're

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:24.920
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily using leverage. They're more less looking to express

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:28.119
<v Speaker 1>thematic views or macro views, and they might do something like,

0:27:28.359 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, we launch relative way e t F there

0:27:30.080 --> 0:27:32.879
<v Speaker 1>one fifty fifty, so they're looking to you know, express

0:27:32.880 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 1>a view that they like value over growth for the

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 1>next six months and they'd like to you know, get

0:27:37.880 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the benefit of value performing and then the spread between

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 1>value and growth performing and one product. So that's a

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 1>thematic you know, not high leverage products. Standard deviation is

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:49.200
<v Speaker 1>similar to the underlying one beta product. It can be

0:27:49.280 --> 0:27:51.520
<v Speaker 1>bought and hold for long periods of time. And then

0:27:51.560 --> 0:27:54.240
<v Speaker 1>there's the strategic client, which is Eric, you know, the

0:27:54.880 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 1>guy or girl who uses q k q E, which

0:27:56.600 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 1>is crushing it right now because fang is getting crushed

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:02.240
<v Speaker 1>right now. So that's you know, a Nazaki product and

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and that's really you know, the long and I would

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:07.640
<v Speaker 1>consider portfolio plus in that group too. It's the long

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:11.440
<v Speaker 1>term strategic asset allocator, you know, holding periods of years.

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:14.400
<v Speaker 1>They might just want a little bit of additional exposure

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:16.639
<v Speaker 1>to an index like one point to five, or they

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:19.760
<v Speaker 1>might want you know, strategic beta like an insider et

0:28:19.920 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 1>f A Nazakia something like that. So we touched. We

0:28:22.600 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 1>we basically realized, you know, hey, we're really good at

0:28:25.119 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 1>doing this one thing for this one group of clients.

0:28:27.440 --> 0:28:30.280
<v Speaker 1>But that's there's other player types. There's other player types too,

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:32.800
<v Speaker 1>and they're the you know, massive areas and asset managers

0:28:32.840 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 1>out there. So so because this is by and large

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:39.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of a daily ritual with folks, and you describe

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:42.240
<v Speaker 1>these different player types when you guys look at the

0:28:43.000 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of the I guess the inflows and the trading patterns.

0:28:46.120 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 1>How big of of of views are people expressing? How

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 1>much are they putting in? There are some pretty big views.

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 1>There are some pretty big views. You know, we can

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:58.200
<v Speaker 1>we have days of twenty million or forty million shares

0:28:58.240 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 1>traded in some of our top ets. Said lately, we've

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 1>seen you know, massive increases across the board and everything

0:29:04.120 --> 0:29:07.640
<v Speaker 1>that has to do with anything you know, growthy, high beta,

0:29:08.200 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 1>China trade terraff related. So um, the trades could be

0:29:12.040 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, anywhere from a million to sixty million. They're

0:29:14.600 --> 0:29:17.800
<v Speaker 1>big tickets. They're definitely big tickets as compared to you know,

0:29:17.880 --> 0:29:20.400
<v Speaker 1>a newer product that we might launch where somebody puts

0:29:20.440 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 1>in fifty. These tend to be bigger trades. And what

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 1>do you attribute that increase in the size of the

0:29:26.520 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 1>trades to. I think opportunity. I think short term opportunity.

0:29:30.200 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 1>So we really see big bumps in an AUM and

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 1>trading around UM times like earnings for example, where people

0:29:36.440 --> 0:29:39.920
<v Speaker 1>have very strong conviction about certain names coming out, we'll

0:29:39.920 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of flow and we'll also see a

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:43.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of performance and then just big macro events that

0:29:43.960 --> 0:29:46.680
<v Speaker 1>move the market. You know, the tactical technical traders are,

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:49.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, the people who understand the products and have

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 1>a strong opinion. It's a great way. You know, where

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 1>are you gonna make thirty three percent in a month

0:29:53.240 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 1>right now? Well? Semi conductor bare fund that trades not

0:29:56.320 --> 0:29:58.880
<v Speaker 1>for everyone, but for the sophisticated trader who has a

0:29:58.960 --> 0:30:01.280
<v Speaker 1>view on semi conductors. It plays out. It's it's a

0:30:01.360 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 1>great short term outh opportunity. Yeah, there's a hedge fund

0:30:03.880 --> 0:30:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I interviewed from my book UM Metropolitan Capital I believe

0:30:07.000 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 1>is the name, and Sharon Snow who was a great interview.

0:30:10.520 --> 0:30:14.080
<v Speaker 1>This hedge fund does nothing but leveraged ETFs, but they

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:17.480
<v Speaker 1>only invest once in a while, like like eighteen different

0:30:17.520 --> 0:30:20.000
<v Speaker 1>metrics have to line up, and then they know they

0:30:20.200 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 1>want that. They they're so convicted they go all in

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:25.640
<v Speaker 1>with the three x UM. So it's sort of like

0:30:25.720 --> 0:30:27.640
<v Speaker 1>they just wait and wait and wait, and they see

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:29.760
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity and then they just use the leverage GTF

0:30:29.880 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 1>to make it. And it's a really interesting way of investing.

0:30:32.840 --> 0:30:35.760
<v Speaker 1>It takes a lot of discipline and patience, but when

0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:38.920
<v Speaker 1>you pounce, you pounce hard. Yeah. So I know Sharon

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:41.200
<v Speaker 1>very well. They are very very disciplined in their views.

0:30:41.240 --> 0:30:44.000
<v Speaker 1>And as you said, they don't trade often, but when

0:30:44.040 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 1>they trade, they trade with high conviction, and they trade

0:30:46.720 --> 0:30:50.959
<v Speaker 1>in size, and they have mythical mathematical models which give

0:30:51.040 --> 0:30:53.760
<v Speaker 1>them a signal and you know, until they get to

0:30:54.000 --> 0:30:56.960
<v Speaker 1>a sweet spot, perfect environment to go longer short a

0:30:57.000 --> 0:30:59.440
<v Speaker 1>bull er bear ETF. You know, they're sort of hands

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:02.080
<v Speaker 1>off and it's really worked out for them because they

0:31:02.200 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 1>have called a lot of the crack trends, so they've

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 1>they've been doing a great job. So now that we're

0:31:07.880 --> 0:31:09.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of closing here, let's have a little fun here.

0:31:09.680 --> 0:31:11.840
<v Speaker 1>One of the things with leverage ETFs that rules is

0:31:11.880 --> 0:31:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the tickers. I mean, every time they have a new one,

0:31:14.800 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the tickers are amazing. I mean there are home runs

0:31:17.160 --> 0:31:20.960
<v Speaker 1>every time. So recently you had talk and mute t

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:23.120
<v Speaker 1>A w K and mute. That's going to be three

0:31:23.240 --> 0:31:27.400
<v Speaker 1>x communications and three x bear communications. Want and need

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:31.120
<v Speaker 1>are good, Ying and yang, dig and doug, drip and gush.

0:31:32.720 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 1>What's that one for? What are those four oil, chiff

0:31:35.080 --> 0:31:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and gush? Yeah, they're they're three x SMP oil and

0:31:37.240 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 1>energy ETF. There you go. Cure and sick is six

0:31:40.280 --> 0:31:45.720
<v Speaker 1>little round that close sick, sick up the flu. Only

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:49.360
<v Speaker 1>cure survives. So good ticker. Great band reminds me of

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the band the Cure. Yeah, actually a great trade now too?

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:55.760
<v Speaker 1>How many how many of those tickers can you take

0:31:55.800 --> 0:32:00.920
<v Speaker 1>credit for? You know? I the tickers that I come

0:32:01.000 --> 0:32:03.400
<v Speaker 1>up with are terrible, So I can't really, guys can't. Really.

0:32:04.440 --> 0:32:07.360
<v Speaker 1>It's the staff. We we send emails around, we argue

0:32:07.400 --> 0:32:10.320
<v Speaker 1>about it. Really, Yeah, we we have different opinions on it,

0:32:10.400 --> 0:32:12.280
<v Speaker 1>but I have to say it's it's more or less

0:32:12.280 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 1>our trading desk that comes up with the great you know,

0:32:14.640 --> 0:32:16.719
<v Speaker 1>if there's ever a round table meeting that we can

0:32:16.760 --> 0:32:19.719
<v Speaker 1>be flies on the wall for. Yeah, well, are there

0:32:19.720 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 1>any tickers that were on the cutting room floor that

0:32:22.280 --> 0:32:24.960
<v Speaker 1>that are just interesting or should have made it? I

0:32:25.000 --> 0:32:26.800
<v Speaker 1>mean for the healthcare one of the one of the

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:29.800
<v Speaker 1>names we have lab you and lab D that's three

0:32:29.960 --> 0:32:32.960
<v Speaker 1>X biotech and you know, rat and rats was on

0:32:33.080 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the table for a while, but then we thought, you know,

0:32:36.000 --> 0:32:40.960
<v Speaker 1>that gets into some animal treatment issues and yeah, we

0:32:41.040 --> 0:32:44.320
<v Speaker 1>try to be careful. Sounds like because they're fun, but

0:32:44.400 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 1>they're not over the PC linel be careful. Yeah, Rat

0:32:47.800 --> 0:32:50.320
<v Speaker 1>would would definitely speak to that. I think. So how

0:32:50.440 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 1>often will you sit on a ticker that you like

0:32:53.080 --> 0:32:55.320
<v Speaker 1>even though you don't have that product yet? So we

0:32:55.440 --> 0:32:57.800
<v Speaker 1>filed for a whole bunch of products, and you know,

0:32:57.880 --> 0:33:00.760
<v Speaker 1>we do reserve tickers along the way. So it's you know,

0:33:00.840 --> 0:33:03.000
<v Speaker 1>when we have an idea that we think is absolutely brilliant,

0:33:03.040 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 1>will do it. And a lot of et F providers

0:33:05.200 --> 0:33:08.080
<v Speaker 1>do that actually, so, yeah, there's a lot reserved. It's

0:33:08.080 --> 0:33:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing. I've heard that they trade tickers. Now

0:33:10.400 --> 0:33:12.440
<v Speaker 1>that you have on loan or that you've reserved, you

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:14.320
<v Speaker 1>can actually like go find the person and make an

0:33:14.360 --> 0:33:16.600
<v Speaker 1>offer or something. Yeah, right right, And if you have

0:33:16.680 --> 0:33:19.280
<v Speaker 1>a product that another et F provider would like to

0:33:20.000 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 1>launch and use your product for an underlying you know,

0:33:22.880 --> 0:33:24.560
<v Speaker 1>they might kind of bait you with, hey, we have

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:28.520
<v Speaker 1>this great idea. So and you know when you talk

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:30.520
<v Speaker 1>about new launches, I do find sometimes, you know, when

0:33:30.560 --> 0:33:32.560
<v Speaker 1>e t F has arrived, when there's a three X version,

0:33:32.960 --> 0:33:35.240
<v Speaker 1>like I think cybersecurity. Do you have a three x

0:33:35.280 --> 0:33:37.840
<v Speaker 1>cybersecurity now? Yeah? But I'll give you an even better

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:42.680
<v Speaker 1>example than that. We have, um you bought which exactly

0:33:42.920 --> 0:33:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and that e t F. It was sort of we

0:33:45.440 --> 0:33:47.720
<v Speaker 1>launched it. It was admittedly a bit sleepy, but I

0:33:47.840 --> 0:33:49.840
<v Speaker 1>just I absolutely love this idea. I think it's the

0:33:49.880 --> 0:33:52.960
<v Speaker 1>way of the future, right, Robotics and and AI and

0:33:53.280 --> 0:33:55.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, bots really started to crush it. And and

0:33:55.880 --> 0:33:57.640
<v Speaker 1>we had, you know, prior to all this China stuff

0:33:57.680 --> 0:33:59.400
<v Speaker 1>that e t F was up close to a and

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:02.080
<v Speaker 1>still up about thirty year a date. But you Bought

0:34:02.200 --> 0:34:04.600
<v Speaker 1>has really picked up and steam with a UM and

0:34:04.680 --> 0:34:07.200
<v Speaker 1>trading and you know it's on the map because it's

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:10.280
<v Speaker 1>it's popular and topical. But yeah, it hit its shride.

0:34:10.360 --> 0:34:12.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, we talked about ques being like the sun

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:14.840
<v Speaker 1>in this sort of like mini solar system. That's the

0:34:15.040 --> 0:34:17.640
<v Speaker 1>three X leverage is like something that else would there

0:34:17.640 --> 0:34:20.399
<v Speaker 1>would orbit a hit E t F usually and then

0:34:20.680 --> 0:34:24.320
<v Speaker 1>you bought sends some volume assets and interest to the

0:34:24.400 --> 0:34:27.640
<v Speaker 1>underlying as well, so uh that it all feeds into

0:34:27.719 --> 0:34:30.440
<v Speaker 1>that main body. But first you've got to get the assets,

0:34:30.480 --> 0:34:33.000
<v Speaker 1>like I think robo and bots together hit five billion,

0:34:33.080 --> 0:34:35.400
<v Speaker 1>and then you start to see options on them, the

0:34:35.560 --> 0:34:38.719
<v Speaker 1>three x E t F s launching UM, et cetera,

0:34:38.760 --> 0:34:40.360
<v Speaker 1>and then copycats and then all of a sudden you

0:34:40.400 --> 0:34:43.239
<v Speaker 1>got a whole new category that just was born. Yeah,

0:34:43.280 --> 0:34:45.160
<v Speaker 1>and on the flip side, there's so many good ideas

0:34:45.200 --> 0:34:48.080
<v Speaker 1>out there right now, Like I'm a big enthusiast in

0:34:48.120 --> 0:34:49.719
<v Speaker 1>the office and we have to launch this. Look at

0:34:49.760 --> 0:34:51.640
<v Speaker 1>this idea. It's so cool and whatever. But you know,

0:34:51.760 --> 0:34:55.080
<v Speaker 1>there are some regulatory hurdles too. So within the case

0:34:55.160 --> 0:34:57.239
<v Speaker 1>of bots, we had to wait for it to get

0:34:57.280 --> 0:34:58.719
<v Speaker 1>big enough in order for us to be able to

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:00.880
<v Speaker 1>launch the three x CTF prot but there are some

0:35:00.960 --> 0:35:03.719
<v Speaker 1>awesome ideas out there right now they're too small, not

0:35:03.840 --> 0:35:07.160
<v Speaker 1>liquid enough, but will someday be three extremes? And um,

0:35:07.320 --> 0:35:09.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, some people would ask me like, is there

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:11.360
<v Speaker 1>ever going to be a four x E t F?

0:35:11.520 --> 0:35:14.000
<v Speaker 1>And there was a filing by a company called four Shares,

0:35:14.400 --> 0:35:16.840
<v Speaker 1>what a great name for four x and they filed

0:35:16.880 --> 0:35:19.200
<v Speaker 1>for four x S and P I believe, but the

0:35:19.400 --> 0:35:22.960
<v Speaker 1>SEC initially said okay, but then they rescinded. I think

0:35:23.000 --> 0:35:26.000
<v Speaker 1>there was a mini freak out in social media on it,

0:35:26.160 --> 0:35:28.160
<v Speaker 1>and uh, I don't think the s SEC one of

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the pr issue around that. But do you know anything

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:33.320
<v Speaker 1>about the four shares or four x or would you

0:35:33.400 --> 0:35:35.200
<v Speaker 1>ever do that if you could? Well, I look, there's

0:35:35.280 --> 0:35:37.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of leverage in the environment, right features

0:35:38.040 --> 0:35:41.640
<v Speaker 1>or ten x mortgages on your house or are you know,

0:35:41.880 --> 0:35:44.360
<v Speaker 1>essentially leverage and it's more in its purest form, So

0:35:44.680 --> 0:35:48.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that leverage in the ecosystem is generally good. Um,

0:35:48.760 --> 0:35:50.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, the reason we stopped at three is because

0:35:51.000 --> 0:35:54.840
<v Speaker 1>we thought that it's probably not going to happen. But

0:35:55.000 --> 0:35:57.360
<v Speaker 1>if there was a thirty percent move in an underlying

0:35:57.440 --> 0:36:00.920
<v Speaker 1>index and you know it's stuck. It could wipe out

0:36:00.960 --> 0:36:04.319
<v Speaker 1>a fund. So when you talk about moving a day,

0:36:04.560 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 1>we started to worry that, okay, that could actually you know,

0:36:07.760 --> 0:36:10.719
<v Speaker 1>that could actually happen. So that would really be my

0:36:11.120 --> 0:36:14.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, my sort of reserve on launching four X

0:36:14.080 --> 0:36:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and and more. But I think, you know, for the regulators,

0:36:16.560 --> 0:36:19.360
<v Speaker 1>it's it's smart about product structure, you know, where they

0:36:19.360 --> 0:36:20.880
<v Speaker 1>want to kind of draw the lines, and you know,

0:36:20.920 --> 0:36:23.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure what their final final thoughts on it are,

0:36:23.440 --> 0:36:25.840
<v Speaker 1>but it didn't launch though. Four X, S and P

0:36:26.160 --> 0:36:29.400
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't even rank in the top fifty of volatility though,

0:36:29.400 --> 0:36:31.799
<v Speaker 1>because the SMP probably would never go down of a day,

0:36:31.800 --> 0:36:34.520
<v Speaker 1>and if it did, society would have more problems than

0:36:34.600 --> 0:36:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the four shares. Yeah. Absolutely, but I think I think

0:36:37.719 --> 0:36:40.399
<v Speaker 1>it's let's start with SMP. Well, why don't we make

0:36:41.000 --> 0:36:44.840
<v Speaker 1>right you know, yeah, it's open. Yeah, absolutely, And also

0:36:45.000 --> 0:36:47.880
<v Speaker 1>again I think that there's just the PR worry. You know,

0:36:47.960 --> 0:36:50.920
<v Speaker 1>what's the sec level. You know, Sylvia, thanks for joining tricks,

0:36:51.000 --> 0:36:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for having me, Thanks for listening to trillions.

0:36:57.520 --> 0:36:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Until next time, you can find us on the Bloomberg terminal,

0:37:00.040 --> 0:37:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Umberg dot com, Apple podcasts, Spotify, and wherever else you

0:37:03.760 --> 0:37:06.200
<v Speaker 1>like to Elisa, we'd love to hear from you. We're

0:37:06.239 --> 0:37:10.520
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, I'm at Joel Webber Show, He's at Eric Calltunist,

0:37:10.880 --> 0:37:15.279
<v Speaker 1>and you can find Sylvia and Direction at Direction L

0:37:15.480 --> 0:37:18.800
<v Speaker 1>E T S. That's Direction with an X trillions is

0:37:18.840 --> 0:37:22.279
<v Speaker 1>produced by Magnus Hendrickson. Francesca Levie is the head of

0:37:22.320 --> 0:37:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg podcast. Bye.