Speaker 1: You're listening to the Buck Sexton Shoe podcast, make sure
Speaker 1: you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. With an economy in crisis,
Speaker 1: gas prices sky high, and a president who's at a
Speaker 1: loss or how to stop any of it, Americans are
Speaker 1: beginning to lose confidence in Joe Biden. Failure so apparent
Speaker 1: that even Democratic candidates are starting to run away from
Speaker 1: the president just ahead of the midterm elections. I'll bring
Speaker 1: you the latest edition of Why Biden Is a Terrible
Speaker 1: President in Tonight's On the Line, new CNN reporting this
Speaker 1: morning about an overwhelming sense of frustration among Democrats over
Speaker 1: what is being described as mismanagement inside the Biden administration.
Speaker 1: One member of Congress calls the White House rudderless, aimless
Speaker 1: and hopeless. Welcome to hold the line on buck Sexton.
Speaker 1: That was CNN's John Berman reporting on the growing frustration
Speaker 1: among Democrats with the failures of the Biden White House.
Speaker 1: The realization that he sucks at this, he really does.
Speaker 1: This is not going well, folks. Their ideas have resulted
Speaker 1: in failure. Their promises, they have not fulfilled the things
Speaker 1: they said We're gonna go right, have gone wrong? You
Speaker 1: can do this all day. You look around at the metrics.
Speaker 1: The things that we all have to understand are the
Speaker 1: only databased ways that we can assess the presidency, and
Speaker 1: they're really bad across the board pretty much. Joe Biden
Speaker 1: must know this at some level, which is why so
Speaker 1: many people are starting to say, among Democrats, mind, you
Speaker 1: can this guy really run for a second term? Is
Speaker 1: that really where we're heading? The average national price of gas,
Speaker 1: for example, just to give you a little snapshot, four
Speaker 1: dollars and seventy eight cents a gallon. This is a
Speaker 1: little bit down from the five a gallon threshold that
Speaker 1: we had been at recently. But this is only part
Speaker 1: of the problem, you see, because I understand what the
Speaker 1: Democrat talking point will be. They'll say, oh, you know,
Speaker 1: gas prices aren't the president's fault. Here's some truth to that,
Speaker 1: But there's also some truth to the reality that gas
Speaker 1: prices are actually related to energy policy and economic policy
Speaker 1: from the administration, clearly because they started to go up
Speaker 1: a lot when Joe Biden took office. Gee, I wonder
Speaker 1: how that happens. But then there's something even more troubling,
Speaker 1: which is the lack of a fundamental understanding from this
Speaker 1: White House about how gas prices actually work. It's one
Speaker 1: thing to say, hey, it's not all Biden's faults, nothing
Speaker 1: to say, well, he doesn't even understand why the prices
Speaker 1: are high and makes it worse by trying to bully
Speaker 1: producers and in this case, gas stations with just gibberish.
Speaker 1: I mean, here is Biden tweeting out that gas stations
Speaker 1: are to blame for high prices, wrote he wrote, over
Speaker 1: the fourth or July weekend, my message to the companies
Speaker 1: running gas stations and setting prices at the pump is simple.
Speaker 1: This is a time of war and global peril. Bring
Speaker 1: down the price you are charging at the pump, reflect
Speaker 1: the cost you are paying for the product, and do
Speaker 1: it now. Does Joe Biden really not understand that the
Speaker 1: gas stations are at the very tail end of the
Speaker 1: whole production and selling mechanism to get fossil fuels to
Speaker 1: all of us that we need. Does he not understand
Speaker 1: that they don't just jack up prices because they feel
Speaker 1: like In fact, they usually gas stations make very little
Speaker 1: money profit off the gas they sell. It's much more
Speaker 1: driven by the convenience stores that gas stations operate as well,
Speaker 1: which is why pretty much all gas stations have them.
Speaker 1: M interesting, isn't it? But it's amazing as well to
Speaker 1: see not only Joe Biden but the top advisors around
Speaker 1: him clearly have no idea what the heck is going on.
Speaker 1: I mean, here is White House Press Secretary Karine Jean Pierre,
Speaker 1: who had no idea that there was some oil from
Speaker 1: US reserves actually being sent to China. Watchum. And then
Speaker 1: there's a Reuters report out this morning that says that
Speaker 1: more than five million barrels of oil that were released
Speaker 1: from the emergency of oil reserves were export to Europe
Speaker 1: and Asia last month, and some of it reportedly was
Speaker 1: actually heading to China. Is the administration aware of those reports?
Speaker 1: And does the president of mind some of this oil
Speaker 1: that was meant to ease pay for consumers is headed overseas.
Speaker 1: I have not seen that report, so I would honestly
Speaker 1: have to go look into it and see what the
Speaker 1: truth is that in that statement that you just laid
Speaker 1: out and see exactly what's happening. I just have not
Speaker 1: seen that report. Yes, I haven't seen it. No idea
Speaker 1: what's going on? Right? And then there's some of the
Speaker 1: places where this administration is really falling down on the job,
Speaker 1: but somehow wants to tell us that it's actually good
Speaker 1: this say this with the economy all the time. Oh,
Speaker 1: Biden's created millions of jobs. No, actually hasn't created millions
Speaker 1: of jobs. The end of the artificial COVID lockdown restrictions
Speaker 1: on the economy and on hiring have allowed jobs to
Speaker 1: return that were shut down by the stupid government that
Speaker 1: never should have done in the first place. But Biden's
Speaker 1: created millions of jobs. They say this is absurd. But
Speaker 1: perhaps the place where the numbers are even more obvious
Speaker 1: that the Biden administration is just in complete freefall than
Speaker 1: anywhere else is at the border. You have all time
Speaker 1: record last year illegal crossings in the United States. You
Speaker 1: have gotaways as well as illegal entries that are being
Speaker 1: tabulated at just sky high numbers. And the DHS secretary
Speaker 1: under Biden may orchis somehow things they're doing a good job.
Speaker 1: Watch southern border. Just a simple question, do you think
Speaker 1: it's working. I think that we are doing a good job.
Speaker 1: We need to do better. We're doing a good job.
Speaker 1: They aren't actually doing a terrible job. And it's because fundamentally,
Speaker 1: the Democrats don't want to change the incentive structure that's
Speaker 1: currently in place for illegal crossings in the United States.
Speaker 1: Come to America illegally across the southern border right now,
Speaker 1: you will get to stay. Most likely you will get
Speaker 1: to stay. That is the situation. So guess what, More
Speaker 1: and more people keep coming until they change that. The
Speaker 1: situation just continues to deteriorate. And speaking of deteriorating situations,
Speaker 1: Democrats are going into an election where they are likely
Speaker 1: to get absolutely destroyed. They deserve to be clear, they
Speaker 1: deserve to be destroyed. Their ideas are idiotic and they
Speaker 1: have hurt the country. They have no good ideas under
Speaker 1: the Biden administration that have come to fruition. It has
Speaker 1: all been spend spend, spend, regulate and ideologically driven climate change.
Speaker 1: We hate the Supreme Court when it doesn't give us
Speaker 1: exactly what we want, non sense. And people that are
Speaker 1: swing voters and people that are thinking about who they're
Speaker 1: going to cast their ballot for the next time around,
Speaker 1: well they're not so excited about this Biden regime, which
Speaker 1: is why Karen Jean Pierre here again was asked, why
Speaker 1: are Ohio candidates Nan Whale and Tim Ryan, Tim Ryan
Speaker 1: running for Senate don't want to. Why is it they
Speaker 1: don't want to be seen with Biden when he's in Ohio?
Speaker 1: Watch breenon Ohio and Tim Ryan, the Senate candidate, is
Speaker 1: not joined the president today. Neither is the Democratic governatorial
Speaker 1: nominee Nan Whaley. I know you need to listen to
Speaker 1: people who are, but those are the main state wide candidates.
Speaker 1: And what does that say about the president's cloud in
Speaker 1: Ohio that they're not joining him today? We'll say this.
Speaker 1: We're in close contact with the Congressman Tim Ryan in
Speaker 1: particular and work with him and also also Nan Whalen.
Speaker 1: We work We work closely with him on just as
Speaker 1: it released to Tim Ryan on a variety of issues.
Speaker 1: What does that even do we're in close contact with
Speaker 1: What does that mean? Why don't they want to be
Speaker 1: seen with Biden? Well, we all know because Biden is
Speaker 1: toxic politically, that's why. And the middle class is picking
Speaker 1: up on this too, because Biden hasn't been good for them.
Speaker 1: Recent Monmouth pole shows the majority of the American middle
Speaker 1: class do not believe they have benefited from Biden's policies.
Speaker 1: Fifty four percent not at all, thirty four percent a
Speaker 1: little That is eighty eight percent of the middle class
Speaker 1: saying Biden has not been good for us. One another
Speaker 1: really interesting. I believe it also adds up to eighty
Speaker 1: eight and it does Monmouth same pole. What country Americans
Speaker 1: think the country is? What direction Americans think the country
Speaker 1: is headed in? Right direction? Eleven percent wrong direction. Eighty
Speaker 1: eight percent of people think that Joe Biden, good old Joe,
Speaker 1: going to unite the country, slaps them back, shake some hands,
Speaker 1: kiss some babies. What a buffoon? A buffoon? People who
Speaker 1: voted for him should be ashamed. All right, Well, the
Speaker 1: failure to prevent the four of July shooting in Highland
Speaker 1: Park is highlighting the ineffectiveness of Illinois and Chicago's gun
Speaker 1: control laws. We'll take a look at that with senior
Speaker 1: editor at The Federalist David Harsani in a moment. But first,
Speaker 1: let's talk about protecting your most viable asset, your home.
Speaker 1: I don't know if you saw this, but there was
Speaker 1: a recent story about an Arizona real estate agent found
Speaker 1: the home she lived and was listed for sale. The
Speaker 1: problem was she wasn't selling her home. She was the
Speaker 1: victim of home title fraud a devastating crime happening all
Speaker 1: over the country. According to the experts at home title lock,
Speaker 1: the crime is incredibly profitable and hard to detect. An
Speaker 1: identity thief simply creates a fake title transfer for your
Speaker 1: home and refiles as the new owner. Then he can
Speaker 1: take out loans on your home or sell it. Typical
Speaker 1: identity theft services don't cover you, and neither his homeowners insurance.
Speaker 1: Home title lock does. Home title luck puts a barrier
Speaker 1: around your home's title the instant they detect anyone tampering
Speaker 1: with your home's title. They helped shut it down and
Speaker 1: help get your home back in your name. So here's
Speaker 1: what you should do. But a home title lock dot
Speaker 1: com and read the testimonials from FBI agents and government officials.
Speaker 1: Then register your address to see if you're already a
Speaker 1: victim and don't even know it. When you protect your
Speaker 1: hometell him Buck sent you to get thirty three days
Speaker 1: of protection. Home titlelock dot Com Again, Home titlelock dot Com.
Speaker 1: We'll be right back with Moore hold the line. April
Speaker 1: of twenty nineteen, an individual contacted Highland Park Police Department
Speaker 1: a week after learning of mister Cremo attempting suicide. This
Speaker 1: was a delayed report, so Highland Park still responded to
Speaker 1: the residence a week later, spoke with Cremo, spoke with
Speaker 1: Primo's parents, and the matter was being handled by mental
Speaker 1: health professionals. At that time, there was no law enforcement
Speaker 1: action to be taken. The second occurred in September of
Speaker 1: twenty nineteen. A family member reported that Cremo said he
Speaker 1: was going to kill everyone, and Cremo had a collection
Speaker 1: of knives. The police responded to his residence. The police
Speaker 1: removed sixteen knives, a dagger, and a sword from Cremo's home.
Speaker 1: At that time, there was no probable cause to risk
Speaker 1: there were arrest. There were no complaints that were signed
Speaker 1: by any of the victims. The Highland Park Police Department, however,
Speaker 1: did immediately notify the Illinois State Police of the incident.
Speaker 1: Deni Chief of the Lake County Sheriff's Department, detailing there
Speaker 1: the chilling past of the Highland Park man who allegedly
Speaker 1: killed eight people and injured dozens more during a July
Speaker 1: fourth parade this past weekend. After announcing the alleged shooter
Speaker 1: will be charged with many counts of murder, the state
Speaker 1: attorney praised illinois failed red flag laws and called for
Speaker 1: a nationwide assault weapons ban watch. Illinois has a strong
Speaker 1: red flag law that keeps community safe and respects everyone's rights.
Speaker 1: We must vastly increase awareness and education about this red
Speaker 1: flag law. The goal of this tool is to ensure
Speaker 1: the safety of the individual and those around them. But
Speaker 1: separate from these red flag laws, which are very powerful
Speaker 1: in Illinois, should also ban assault weapons in Illinois and beyond.
Speaker 1: So if a red flag law doesn't stop someone like
Speaker 1: this shooter, who exactly does it stop? Let's ask senior
Speaker 1: editor at The Federalist David Harsani and David Good to
Speaker 1: see again my pleasure to be or thanks. So, the
Speaker 1: red flag law here in Illinois clearly did not stop
Speaker 1: somebody who was visibly insane, had a record of lethal
Speaker 1: threats against people, including his own family members. Police visited him.
Speaker 1: But the state Attorney general is praising the red flag law.
Speaker 1: I don't understand what's going on with that one. I
Speaker 1: don't understand either. I mean, clearly, the red flag law,
Speaker 1: which in Illinois is quite strong, did not work. But
Speaker 1: the truth is that studies show or some studies show
Speaker 1: that they almost never work anyway red flag laws. But
Speaker 1: you know, it's very hard to know when it works
Speaker 1: because you can't hell what someone is going to do
Speaker 1: or not do. But it doesn't seem like it does
Speaker 1: must much. The Washington Post went through every shooting at
Speaker 1: mass shooting since twenty fifteen, I think, and found two
Speaker 1: instances where possibly a red flag law might have helped,
Speaker 1: and now there'll be three, obviously. But if they don't
Speaker 1: work as they are in the state where it's the strongest,
Speaker 1: I think New Jersey might have a stronger one, then
Speaker 1: I'm not sure what it's supposed to do or why
Speaker 1: we would pass more. And you know, I saw the
Speaker 1: guy mentioned that you know, it doesn't undermine people's rights.
Speaker 1: That's not true either. It does. And if we're undermining
Speaker 1: the rights and due process of people of people who
Speaker 1: don't commit crimes, and then we let people like this
Speaker 1: get through and do it, then what is the point
Speaker 1: of having a red flag law at all? I asked
Speaker 1: that question. I sit around wondering we just we just
Speaker 1: went through this whole national debate David about red flag
Speaker 1: laws and without even looking at the I think clear
Speaker 1: due pros concerns that they pose and honestly constitutional issues
Speaker 1: that they raise. If it doesn't work in a case
Speaker 1: like this, well, you know, I would want to know
Speaker 1: specifically in the case of Illinois. So this guy's crazy,
Speaker 1: he's got weapons, he says he wants to kill everyone.
Speaker 1: That was I think the quote I'm going to kill everyone,
Speaker 1: And he was able to go in and buy a
Speaker 1: gun legally, completely legally. So what does the red flag
Speaker 1: law doing. Well, I think we're learning more right, but
Speaker 1: I think that his father vouched for him or something
Speaker 1: like that, which, you know, I am for enforcing laws
Speaker 1: that exist on the books when it comes to guns.
Speaker 1: So if you have someone dangerous and the father knows
Speaker 1: that that kid is dangerous and still vouches for them
Speaker 1: and allows them to have weapons, I mean maybe we
Speaker 1: have to look at at holding them responsible as well
Speaker 1: for this kind of thing, though I don't know all
Speaker 1: the specifics to that. We should also mention. I know
Speaker 1: this didn't happen in Chicago, but Illinois has red flag
Speaker 1: laws and has all kinds of gun control laws. Chicago
Speaker 1: has literally like every gun control law imaginable. And yet
Speaker 1: you know they're talking about red flags laws work and
Speaker 1: also about banning a are fifteens, which are rarely used
Speaker 1: in criminality in those states, and blaming places like Indiana
Speaker 1: and other states for why there are guns in Illinois.
Speaker 1: And that's not true either. Most weaponry used in Chicago
Speaker 1: comes from Illinois. If anything, the crime from Chicago spreads
Speaker 1: and go see Indiana, not the other way around. So
Speaker 1: it's like, again, we're just constantly talking about these laws
Speaker 1: and policies that don't aren't doing anything to mitigate mass
Speaker 1: shootings or criminality in general. Here is the Lake County
Speaker 1: States Attorney saying that what we've really learned here with
Speaker 1: the Highland Park shooting are the gaps in the states
Speaker 1: gun laws. Why? Well, yeah, the gap in the States
Speaker 1: gun laws would be that we don't ban uss all weapons.
Speaker 1: So yes, with respect of the red flag laws, you
Speaker 1: have to look at the individual. You have to look
Speaker 1: at it on a case by case basis, when the
Speaker 1: information is input into two people who are working on
Speaker 1: all types of public safety issues, and how that information
Speaker 1: is stored, how that information is flagged later. But with
Speaker 1: respect to but with respect to holes and gun laws,
Speaker 1: we need an assault weapon ban and we need to
Speaker 1: make sure that the community. We need to make sure
Speaker 1: that law enforcement is using the red flag law, the
Speaker 1: fire armors tra anymore alots, I mean, just this guy.
Speaker 1: The fact this guy's in law enforcement is honestly disconcerting
Speaker 1: because I can't even it's not even clear to me
Speaker 1: what he thinks this is really going to do. When
Speaker 1: he says an assault rifle ban, do we even know?
Speaker 1: When Democrats talk about this, what is that even supposed
Speaker 1: to mean? Meaning? Does that just mean no assault rifles
Speaker 1: allowed to be possessed? Or is it no assault rifles
Speaker 1: allowed to be sold in the state of Illinois? For example?
Speaker 1: Are you supposed to turn in your assault rifle if
Speaker 1: you have lit it will be grandfather? Do they make
Speaker 1: that clear? Do we know? I don't think there has
Speaker 1: been any assault weapon ban, which obviously is a malleable term,
Speaker 1: could mean them all kinds of things. We don't really
Speaker 1: know what they're talking about, because it's just basically about
Speaker 1: what the gun looks like. But I don't think any
Speaker 1: of them gone to you know, I think that it's
Speaker 1: just to sell new new ones in the state. I
Speaker 1: don't think anyone's ever gone around trying to confiscate them,
Speaker 1: which would not probably work out very well. So I
Speaker 1: don't know what this guy means. I don't know why
Speaker 1: he thinks that a person, a kid, this kid, this
Speaker 1: murderer had swords and knives and all kinds of weapons
Speaker 1: that he wouldn't get some kind of nine millimeter handgun
Speaker 1: and do the same thing. And he's in law enforcement,
Speaker 1: so he knows what he's saying is ridiculous. But you know,
Speaker 1: they're just taking it incrementally, and they use these tragedies
Speaker 1: to try to pass laws that would not have stopped them,
Speaker 1: that would stop law abiding citizens from practicing their rights.
Speaker 1: And here is the Vice President Kamala Harris making a
Speaker 1: visit to Highland Park yesterday and of course calling for
Speaker 1: stronger gun laws. Watch. Congress needs to have the courage
Speaker 1: to act and renew the assault weapons ban. An assault
Speaker 1: weapon is desire mind to kill a lot of human
Speaker 1: beings quickly. There is no reason that we have weapons
Speaker 1: of war on the streets of America. We need reasonableut
Speaker 1: gun safety laws. We need to have Congress stop protecting
Speaker 1: those gun manufacturers with the liability shield. Repeal it, repeal it.
Speaker 1: I mean, so much of what she says is so
Speaker 1: stupid that I honestly am flabergasted. It's getting tedious to
Speaker 1: go over it every time, not tedious to be here
Speaker 1: and talking to you. It's just like they constantly line.
Speaker 1: It doesn't matter how many times you mentioned that there
Speaker 1: is no special manufacturing liability shield for gun manufacturers. They
Speaker 1: are liable for their products in the way that every
Speaker 1: other industry is. It would be like being able to
Speaker 1: see a car company because you're because someone you know engage,
Speaker 1: you know as a hidden run, and then you can
Speaker 1: see them for it. It It doesn't make any sense. Assault weapons,
Speaker 1: the air fifteens are not weapons of war. They have
Speaker 1: never been used in Americans have never used that gun
Speaker 1: in war. They have a military style. I'm sixteen. That's different.
Speaker 1: And you know all guns are made to kill people,
Speaker 1: that's true. That was the most amazen I'm sitting here, like,
Speaker 1: does she think that you know glock is manufacturing pistols
Speaker 1: That just sting. No, they're lethal devices meant to kill people,
Speaker 1: and they do kill people all the time all over
Speaker 1: the country who use them incorrectly or illegally. Rather and
Speaker 1: it's just David, I don't we keep going over this,
Speaker 1: but they keep pushing. We gotta push back. Thanks for
Speaker 1: being here and bringing some sanity to it thanks for
Speaker 1: having me. With a growing economic crisis, the sky high
Speaker 1: price of gas, and Biden's presidency running on fumes, it's
Speaker 1: easy to forget. The government is continuing it's COVID nineteen
Speaker 1: fear mongering. We come back. I'll take a look at
Speaker 1: the latest on COVID nineteen and the ongoing efforts to
Speaker 1: vaccinate all of them America in the buck brief. First,
Speaker 1: I want to talk to you about for checking your
Speaker 1: online data. A lot of companies promise your privacy is guaranteed.
Speaker 1: We know that's not true. That's why you need a
Speaker 1: new privacy and cybersecurity application tool called Secure. It's spelled SEK.
Speaker 1: You are. Secure is using proprietary encryption and offering secure
Speaker 1: instant messaging and email with Secure all of your communications
Speaker 1: based on servers and data centers hosted in Switzerland, without
Speaker 1: using any of the big tech platforms. Privacy is a
Speaker 1: big issue now. Without real security, people can read your emails, messages,
Speaker 1: even your bank information. Secure will never mind your data,
Speaker 1: never ask your phone number. You can send emails to
Speaker 1: your doctor, banker, lawyer, anybody with total confidence you're not
Speaker 1: being spied on by big tech. Go to secure dot com.
Speaker 1: Now take back your privacy Sekure dot com. Use promo
Speaker 1: code buck for twenty five percent off. We'll be right
Speaker 1: back with more. Hold the line. With all that's going
Speaker 1: on in the world, it's easy to forget that COVID
Speaker 1: nineteen is still a thing. Just last month, the government
Speaker 1: was busy gearing up to vaccinate millions of American children
Speaker 1: under the age of five, and it appears, at least
Speaker 1: for now, parents aren't very enthusiastic about giving their young
Speaker 1: children the JAB. I'll take a look at the latest
Speaker 1: on COVID nineteen. It's still a thing, folks, and we
Speaker 1: need to look at it. Coming up on the buckbrief.
Speaker 1: So I happened to be in the small city of Asheville,
Speaker 1: North Carolina, over the Fourth of July holiday. Now some
Speaker 1: of you may have noticed this, actually because I happened
Speaker 1: to remark on the high level of masking, particularly N
Speaker 1: ninety five masking by people in businesses in downtown Asheville.
Speaker 1: I just said, Hey, a lot of ninety five masks here,
Speaker 1: more so than I see per capita in New York City.
Speaker 1: What's going on? That? Was it more or less what
Speaker 1: I said? And boom the libs when nuts. They freaked out.
Speaker 1: It trended nationally on Twitter. There are numerous North Carolina
Speaker 1: based newspapers that were saying, I was sneering at the
Speaker 1: people of Asheville. I wasn't steering at anybody. I just
Speaker 1: want to know, why is it you go to, you know,
Speaker 1: this little communist enclave and they're all masked up. Do
Speaker 1: they know something we don't know? Well, actually they know
Speaker 1: less than anybody who reads and as honest with themselves
Speaker 1: would know about COVID, that's for sure. But they're not done, folks.
Speaker 1: This is what I want. There're still in New York
Speaker 1: City some mask mandates. Uber has a mask mandate for
Speaker 1: New York City Transit if you're gonna use the Uber
Speaker 1: service guy to wear a mask. Still, the Roosevelt Island Tram,
Speaker 1: the New York City Subway, mask mandates in these places.
Speaker 1: Still they're not done with this stuff. So I think
Speaker 1: it's important. Ever understands. You may think it's all good now,
Speaker 1: but that's just because Democrats are laying a little low
Speaker 1: on this stuff in advance of the mid term elections.
Speaker 1: But they still have the federal government with Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: they had the executive branch more specifically, and Biden might
Speaker 1: just as signed to sign another you know, executive branch
Speaker 1: order for this winter. You may see states like New
Speaker 1: York mandating vaccines in schools, the new version of the vaccine.
Speaker 1: Mind you, in schools. You've got a lot of big
Speaker 1: challenges I had here. This issue is not over Democrats though,
Speaker 1: because they've been so wrong about so much don't want
Speaker 1: to talk about it very much. We will continue to
Speaker 1: talk about it because it's important and because they're planning
Speaker 1: a whole lot more for you, whether you realize it
Speaker 1: or not. If you think you're safe from this, just
Speaker 1: remember federal overreach. Whatever state you live in, whatever town
Speaker 1: you live in, they're coming for you. Here is, for example,
Speaker 1: the CEO of Fiser, Albert Borlaw, who does sound like
Speaker 1: a James Bondville and when he talks about this stuff,
Speaker 1: he's just letting everybody know recently that we're gonna have
Speaker 1: new COVID shots every year, and unlike the flu shot,
Speaker 1: these are going to be mandatory for a lot of
Speaker 1: people probably watched. Do you think we're going to get
Speaker 1: updated mRNA vaccines every season that will be directed to
Speaker 1: each new variation of the coronavirus? And what we have
Speaker 1: to take those shots every year. I'm almost certain about it.
Speaker 1: And I say almost certain because of course regulators have
Speaker 1: the final say in all of that. But that's the
Speaker 1: beauty of mRNA. You can adopt your vaccine just by
Speaker 1: change in the sequencing, which is a very minor change
Speaker 1: either manufacturing or in the properties of the vaccine safety
Speaker 1: or efficacy, but it can make a huge difference in
Speaker 1: the way that responds to the virus. So for this reason,
Speaker 1: I'm very confident. But we'll be able to respond very
Speaker 1: very fast to every new variant. The vaccines are trash basically.
Speaker 1: I mean, they help a little bit, we think at
Speaker 1: prevention of hospitalization and death for those at risk. Remember,
Speaker 1: your chance of death from COVID is small as a
Speaker 1: general matter, to begin with, by the numbers, it's less
Speaker 1: than one percent, and beyond that substantially as the one percent,
Speaker 1: and beyond that, if you are not in a high
Speaker 1: risk aage category, your risk is far, far, far lower.
Speaker 1: I mean for children, it's for small children, it's like
Speaker 1: one in a million. So what are we even doing here?
Speaker 1: Votes he's talking about the beauty of the mr Anda vaccines.
Speaker 1: Mr Anda vaccines didn't stop the last wave of COVID
Speaker 1: at all. Didn't stop it. Our buddy Alex Berenson, by
Speaker 1: the ways, back on Twitter, he actually sued Twitter for
Speaker 1: kicking him off for saying things about vaccines that turned
Speaker 1: out to be true. Now Barrenson is back and he's
Speaker 1: letting everybody know that guess what. It does not stop
Speaker 1: infection the vaccine or transmission. He wrote today, don't think
Speaker 1: of it as a vaccine. Think of it at best
Speaker 1: as a therapeutic with a limited window of efficacy in
Speaker 1: a terrible side effect profile that must be dosed in
Speaker 1: advance of illness. And we want to mandate it. Insanity, Yeah,
Speaker 1: it is crazy both. Okay, this is nuts. They made
Speaker 1: us do something that was unjust to begin with, and
Speaker 1: they were wrong on the basis of why they made
Speaker 1: us do it. People need to understand this. They were wrong.
Speaker 1: And they can say, oh, but it was an emergency
Speaker 1: and we were scared of it the app but they
Speaker 1: always think it's an emergency. They always are scared. It's
Speaker 1: why they're libs. Biden administration still pandering to them, refusing
Speaker 1: to speak the truth to them. You know, if Fauci
Speaker 1: gave a crap about people he would come out and
Speaker 1: say that if you're still wearing a mask, honestly, get
Speaker 1: a grip, get a life, stop being crazy. But he won't.
Speaker 1: He won't. So when I go to Asheville on vacation
Speaker 1: in North Carolina, I see all these loons walking around
Speaker 1: with N ninety five masks on. I'm think when people
Speaker 1: were twenty five years old. Oh, I know. Then you
Speaker 1: get in the common section, what if they have immuneists?
Speaker 1: Or really everybody there, just in the place that votes
Speaker 1: for Bertie Sanders for president every every election cycle, just there,
Speaker 1: suddenly everybody with an immune disorder shows up. Give me
Speaker 1: a break. Ridiculous what these people are saying. It's crazy talk.
Speaker 1: Biden illustration panters to it. Though. Here's a statement by
Speaker 1: Biden from June eighteenth, when vaccines became available for kids
Speaker 1: under five. Today is a monumental step forward in our
Speaker 1: nation's fight against the virus. With every American now eligible
Speaker 1: for the protections of COVID nineteen vaccines, provide wasn't a
Speaker 1: monumental step forward because guess what, we actually know that
Speaker 1: parents are not choosing, overwhelmingly not choosing to get their
Speaker 1: small children the vaccine. Here you go, this is a
Speaker 1: graph showing vaccinations by age group in Ohio. About one
Speaker 1: percent of kids one to four have been vaccinated nationwide,
Speaker 1: Just so you know, it's about the same, it's about
Speaker 1: one percent of kids one to four so far have
Speaker 1: been vaccinated. So ninety nine out of one hundred kids
Speaker 1: in that that age group of parents have said, you know what,
Speaker 1: I don't think we're gonna do this, and they're making
Speaker 1: the right decision. Their children do not need this shot.
Speaker 1: The shot does not stop them from getting it, does
Speaker 1: not stop them from spreading it, and they are not
Speaker 1: at risk. It is very straightforward. But the medical community
Speaker 1: of the blue check Libs who vote for Biden and
Speaker 1: think they're so smart, they still back this stuff up.
Speaker 1: They're appalling, and they're using whatever propaganda tools are at
Speaker 1: their disposal to try to get kids to take this stuff.
Speaker 1: Sesame Street, for example, is using Elmo, the most annoying
Speaker 1: Sesame Street character, to try to sell the vaccine. You
Speaker 1: were super duper today getting your COVID vaccine, Almo. That
Speaker 1: was a little pinch, but that was okay, and I
Speaker 1: was really glad to have data and baby David there
Speaker 1: with him. I had a lot of questions about Elmo
Speaker 1: getting the COVID vaccine? Was it safe? Was it the
Speaker 1: right decision? I talked to our pediatrician so I could
Speaker 1: make the right choice. I learned that Elmo getting vaccinated
Speaker 1: is the best way to keep himself, our friends, neighbors,
Speaker 1: and everyone else healthy and enjoying the things they love.
Speaker 1: This is not true. I mean that you're being lied
Speaker 1: to by puppets there. But who cares? All right, there's
Speaker 1: a new voicemail recording of Joe Biden from his son's
Speaker 1: laptop that's raising new questions about what the president knew
Speaker 1: about his son's business dealings. We'll have more on that
Speaker 1: with commentary writer for The Washington Examiner and First TV
Speaker 1: contributor t and A Low In a moment, stay with
Speaker 1: us a PUSDA. It's a fifteen on Wednesday, nineteen two.
Speaker 1: Chance can be called. Nothing doesn't hurt you. Just want
Speaker 1: to talk to you. I thought the article at least
Speaker 1: a thing on online. It's gonna be printed one time.
Speaker 1: It's good. I thank you. Clear recently released voicemail left
Speaker 1: by President Joe Biden on his son Hunter's phone, Well,
Speaker 1: it has surfaced, and it is raising new questions about
Speaker 1: the president's knowledge and involvement in his son's shady business dealings.
Speaker 1: The White House is refusing to give the public a
Speaker 1: statement on the latest revelations. Obviously, it seems covering up
Speaker 1: for the big guy. Ten percent for the big guy.
Speaker 1: Join me now to discuss contributor here at the first
Speaker 1: TV Tina low, Tina, good to see him and back.
Speaker 1: So let's just sort of start at the thirty thousand
Speaker 1: foot level here, right, Let's just let's take a Joe
Speaker 1: Biden line right when he said that he didn't know
Speaker 1: anything about Hunter's business dealings abroad, didn't know a thing, obviously,
Speaker 1: and this is information that free dates even the discovery
Speaker 1: of the laptop. Back in twenty nineteen, you would multiple
Speaker 1: Biden staff or anonymously and named go on the record
Speaker 1: as he was gearing up for his presidential campaign. They
Speaker 1: had concerns about Hunter's business dealings, including Amos hog Steen,
Speaker 1: who works for both Vice President Biden and now works
Speaker 1: again for the Biden administration. Weren't specifically about Hunter Biden
Speaker 1: with that Barisma deal, but now we know that there
Speaker 1: was more concerned not just about Hunter, but also about
Speaker 1: Joe Biden's brother and their business dealings with China, which
Speaker 1: now you have Christopher Ray, the head of the FBI,
Speaker 1: and the head of m I six coming out to
Speaker 1: talk about that they're concerned about Chinese espionage in the
Speaker 1: Western world. So these are all things that are directly
Speaker 1: tied to our national security. And we have been gaslet
Speaker 1: lied to for more than two years now about this
Speaker 1: laptop and about Hunter Biden's role more generally. I mean,
Speaker 1: even his ex wife has said has confirmed that she
Speaker 1: has been investigated by law enforcement with regards to Hunter's
Speaker 1: business dealings. It's just something that is now you know,
Speaker 1: they're looking into criminality here, criminality, but things that directly
Speaker 1: implicate the leader of the free world about his vulnerabilities
Speaker 1: with americasented enemies. Representative James Comer of Kentucky, who serves
Speaker 1: as a ranking member on the House Oversight Committee, wrote
Speaker 1: a letter to yell And Wednesday demanding details about shady
Speaker 1: business dealings conducted by Hunter Biden, his associates, and other
Speaker 1: Biden family members which have been flagged and reported by
Speaker 1: US banks. So there's clearly smoke, right, and we're trying
Speaker 1: to see if there's fire, and I think that probably
Speaker 1: is fire. This question of what people want to call it,
Speaker 1: but we're looking for more information here. We know there's
Speaker 1: a grand jury that has that has been convened in
Speaker 1: the state of Delaware over Hunter Biden, they say, over
Speaker 1: his tax issues, but who knows what's going on there?
Speaker 1: Does the Democrat apparatus go all in? Do you think
Speaker 1: to continue to stonewall or I mean, this is from
Speaker 1: my co host Clay. You know very well he thinks
Speaker 1: that maybe this starts to become the opening for them
Speaker 1: to push old man Biden out so he doesn't run
Speaker 1: for a second term and lose. So we already know that.
Speaker 1: So much for Biden, you know, unifying the country. His
Speaker 1: Treasury Department responded to that request saying that they will
Speaker 1: only release information if they get if republic if House
Speaker 1: Republicans can get Democrats on board. So per your point,
Speaker 1: will Democrats start getting on board? I'm not sure it
Speaker 1: would be awfully convenient, because it would be a way
Speaker 1: of getting Biden out without having the same political blowback
Speaker 1: of you know, targeting him for how he handled inflation,
Speaker 1: targeting him for how he handled Afghanistan, because those would
Speaker 1: implicate other Democrats. Right, if you're Gavin Newsom, it's very
Speaker 1: politically expedient to get Biden out on the basis of
Speaker 1: something other than his own personal political performance, because it
Speaker 1: doesn't that's not tied to the Democratic Party as a whole.
Speaker 1: But who are the front runners? How much whole do
Speaker 1: they have over House Democrats? Because it's really going to
Speaker 1: have to start with House Democrats who are willing to
Speaker 1: work with Republicans right now they don't want to give
Speaker 1: Republicans another win. And furthermore, it's sort of shortsighted because
Speaker 1: it's kind of too late for Democrats to change their
Speaker 1: tune on this now, considering that again, these concerns about
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden have gone back since the Obama administration among
Speaker 1: Biden's own allies. So what do they say all of
Speaker 1: a sudden now that the Washington Post finally acknowledges that
Speaker 1: the laptop is real, Now they have to pretend to care.
Speaker 1: We have to wonder how long they can pull this routine.
Speaker 1: I mean, here's Karine Jean Pierre, who, when he is
Speaker 1: asked about it's very straightforward, Joe Biden said, when he's
Speaker 1: running for president, I knew nothing, not a single thing
Speaker 1: about Hunters overseas business dealings. Here he is before he's
Speaker 1: running for president, saying on a voicemail, Yeah, your business
Speaker 1: dealings that are shady. I think you're gonna be okay.
Speaker 1: Here's what happens with the White House Press secretary. He's
Speaker 1: asked about this, Tina, if that's what the president said,
Speaker 1: that that is what stands. And second secondly, but secondly, secondly,
Speaker 1: business dealings, he says, I think you're clear. How is
Speaker 1: that not him talking to his son about his overseas
Speaker 1: business dealings. We're not from this podium. I am not
Speaker 1: going to talk about alleged materials from the laptop. I will.
Speaker 1: I am not. I am not going to talk about
Speaker 1: alleged materials on the laptop or it's not happening. Then
Speaker 1: that it is not Peter, I refer you to his
Speaker 1: son's representative. Just I love. It's also alleged material from
Speaker 1: the laptop. I don't think that really flies anymore. I
Speaker 1: gotta say no. I mean, the alleged laptop at this
Speaker 1: point has been verified by law enforcement itself, multiple mainstream
Speaker 1: media news papers, and if you were willing to listen
Speaker 1: to us way back when, publications including my own Washington
Speaker 1: Examiner and first and foremost the New York Post with
Speaker 1: regards to how Biden has always dealt with the media
Speaker 1: and his family. One of the most fascinating reeves that
Speaker 1: I've taken a look at recently was the memoir from
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden's ex wife, Kathleen Buell, who now goes by
Speaker 1: her maiden name because then it She does address how
Speaker 1: the Biden family machine handled her ex husband's affair with Boe,
Speaker 1: Biden's widow, and she says that, quite frankly, that statement
Speaker 1: that came out in twenty seventeen where where Joe Biden
Speaker 1: said luckily Hunter and Hallie found each other after they
Speaker 1: were no longer with their respective spouses was another lie.
Speaker 1: So we know that that the Biden family machine doesn't
Speaker 1: care much about lying to the press of it protects
Speaker 1: their own. So yes, this is something that directly implicates
Speaker 1: the president, his own effics and his ties to foreign governments,
Speaker 1: just his vulnerabilities. We have a little montage here, time
Speaker 1: for a montage, Tina, of just some of the some
Speaker 1: of the things that make it seem like maybe Joe
Speaker 1: and Hunter, you know, we're doing some bad stuff. Watch
Speaker 1: then Vice President Joe Biden at dinner with his son Hunter,
Speaker 1: along with Hunter's business associates from Ukraine, Russia and Kazakhstan,
Speaker 1: and the day after the dinner, a Barisma executive said
Speaker 1: a note to Hunter, quoting dear Hunter, thank you for
Speaker 1: inviting me to DC and giving an opportunity to meet
Speaker 1: your father and spend some time together. Hunter's lucrative business
Speaker 1: dealings often included giving as much as fifty percent of
Speaker 1: his earnings to his dad. The text read quote, I
Speaker 1: hope you all can do what I did and pay
Speaker 1: for everything for this entire family for thirty years. It's
Speaker 1: really hard, but don't worry. Unlike pop, I won't make
Speaker 1: you give me half your salary. That looks pretty bad.
Speaker 1: Of course it does, and it comes amid you know.
Speaker 1: With regards to all of this, you cream nonsense. I mean,
Speaker 1: part of the reason why Zelenski is in office is
Speaker 1: specifically because of this sort of corruption, because Ukrainian politicians
Speaker 1: notoriously are running around finding any America impossible who they
Speaker 1: can you know, give bags of cash to get bags
Speaker 1: of cash from and Hunter Biden made himself a very
Speaker 1: vulnerable target. Look, I'm sympathetic to folks who struggle with addiction,
Speaker 1: but the fact is there is a reason why we
Speaker 1: are very careful about who we grant security clearances to
Speaker 1: based on their past substance abuse. And that is because
Speaker 1: you don't want Hunter Biden high on crack giving out
Speaker 1: money to prostitutes or worse, honeypots, which is something that
Speaker 1: we know that he did. And you know that Joe
Speaker 1: Biden was wiring him money while he was abroad. We
Speaker 1: know whether he was coorting with Russian hookers and whatnot,
Speaker 1: and who knows what valuable intelligence has been compromised as
Speaker 1: a result of this. The direct financial implications alone are dangerous,
Speaker 1: dangerous again, not just politically for this presidency, but as
Speaker 1: always for national security of the country. Gotta find out
Speaker 1: what the what not is, Tina, thanks for being with us.
Speaker 1: Thank you Buck. After publicly cursing out Supreme Court Justice
Speaker 1: Clarence Thomas, Chicago's mayor Laurie Lightfoot is lamenting the toxicity
Speaker 1: of America's public discourse. Oh yeah, we have that video
Speaker 1: for you. In quick hit Stay with us, Chicago Mayor
Speaker 1: Laurie Lightfoot calls for a less toxicity in our public
Speaker 1: discourse and Elizabeth Warren calls for an end to prices
Speaker 1: pregnancy centers. Those stories on quickheads, let's get into it.
Speaker 1: Lry Lightfoot might be the worst mayor in the whole country.
Speaker 1: And she's the mayor of Chicago, our third largest city
Speaker 1: and a great city that has been ruined by the
Speaker 1: just outrageous levels of violent crime in that city. And
Speaker 1: Lord Lightfoot has done nothing to make any of this better.
Speaker 1: It seems she's just awful at her job, shows no leadership,
Speaker 1: no vision whatsoever. But she thinks that she's in a
Speaker 1: position now to tell everybody, you know, let's let's tone
Speaker 1: it down, Let's let's get rid of the toxicity in
Speaker 1: our public discourse. Watch this one. The toxicity in our
Speaker 1: public discourse is a thing that I think we should
Speaker 1: all be concerned about, right And it's ironic, obviously that
Speaker 1: we're having this conversation and what happened on Independence Day.
Speaker 1: You know, we're not like a lot of other countries
Speaker 1: were independence. Their version of Independence Day is marked with
Speaker 1: troops and tanks. And now what we do in the
Speaker 1: United States is we come together as a community. Ah.
Speaker 1: This is interesting because Lory Lightfoot last June or this
Speaker 1: past June. Last month, had this to say about Supreme
Speaker 1: Court Justice Clarence Thomas after a decision came down from
Speaker 1: that court that she did not like. Watch you, Clarence
Speaker 1: Thomas said, thank you, Clarence Thomas. Were highly by what
Speaker 1: they take our wife f Clarence Thomas, she said at
Speaker 1: a public concert recently, the mayor of Chicago, appearing as
Speaker 1: the mayor on a microphone. But she wants to get
Speaker 1: rid of the toxicity you see in our public discourse,
Speaker 1: That's what she said. Yeah. And then there's Elizabeth Warren,
Speaker 1: who was an abortion zealot, really really believes that everybody
Speaker 1: should just be having abortions for any reason, no reason,
Speaker 1: as much as they want as many abortions as possible.
Speaker 1: I was someone should ask lis with Warren, what do
Speaker 1: you think it's just some of the twenty abortions? Okay,
Speaker 1: of course she'd say yes, so twenty abortions, no problem
Speaker 1: at all. He's sick. But she represents a mentality among
Speaker 1: leftist women of her age that is really troubling to see.
Speaker 1: And she also hates, it seems crisis pregnancy centers, which
Speaker 1: are trying to help women that are dealing with an
Speaker 1: unplanned pregnancy and actually help them have babies. That's awful
Speaker 1: to Elizabeth Warren. Washed Senator Warren also taking aim at
Speaker 1: pregnancy crisis centers here in Massachusetts, These so called crisis
Speaker 1: pregnancy centers out number genuine abortion clinics by three to one.
Speaker 1: She says, women walk into the centers believing they'll get abortions. Instead,
Speaker 1: they try to talk women out of it. She calls
Speaker 1: it a bait and switch. They are giving it over
Speaker 1: to people who wish them hard, and that has to stop.
Speaker 1: We need to put a stop to that in Massachusetts
Speaker 1: right now. Wish them harm. People are trying to encourage
Speaker 1: a baby to be born life. What a sicko. I mean, honestly,
Speaker 1: she is grotesque. He's not a good person. And this
Speaker 1: goes beyond politics. I mean, what she's saying there is awful.
Speaker 1: He has no moral core whatsoever, and she should be ashamed,
Speaker 1: but she's not. Instead, you know, she's lionized by shrill
Speaker 1: cat ladies in their sixties and seventies all across America.
Speaker 1: Then there's these morons that just stop oil activists who
Speaker 1: are gluing themselves to Leonardo da Vinci's the last Supper
Speaker 1: at the Royal Academy to protest you know, climate or something. Watch,
Speaker 1: ladies and gentlemen, we are sorry to the disruption. Leonardo
Speaker 1: da Vinci says, out of all the sciences, off is
Speaker 1: the queen of communication, and now more than ever, at
Speaker 1: this day and age, communication for the truth and on
Speaker 1: the experience of humanity during these times of cat stop
Speaker 1: climate change is needed now more than ever. Climate change
Speaker 1: people are civilizational arsonists, and they are dangerously stupid, as
Speaker 1: every time I told the line the no Spinoos that
Speaker 1: Bill A. Raley is next. She'll t high