WEBVTT - Bloomberg Intelligence: Capital One, Discover Deal

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:09.960 --> 0:00:13.840
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:16.599
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Affo car Playing and

0:00:16.720 --> 0:00:19.600
<v Speaker 2>Broud Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand

0:00:19.680 --> 0:00:23.320
<v Speaker 2>wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 3>Nice m and a trade here in the financial space

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 3>here today we got Capital One Financial. They're acquiring Discover

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:34.560
<v Speaker 3>Financial and thirty five billion dollars all stock deals, so

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 3>the need to go to the bond market. They're going

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 3>to create the largest US credit card company by loan volume,

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:42.560
<v Speaker 3>giving the combined entity struggle foothold against some of the

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 3>big Wall Street behemos.

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:44.840
<v Speaker 4>Let's see what's.

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 3>Behind the deal here, and with the numbers show us

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 3>Ben Elliott, he's consumer finance anols for Bloomberg Intelligence. Jurnes

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 3>us via zoom from Washington, DC. All right, bet, what's

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:57.600
<v Speaker 3>Capital One thinking here? Is this another one of these

0:00:57.680 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 3>deals that's really driven by scale?

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so everything's driven by scale and the credit card business, Paul,

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 1>And the big thought here from Capital One is that

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>if they can acquire this sort of rare and valuable

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 1>thing that Discover has, which is a discrete proprietary payments network.

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Then they can sort of start to compete with the

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Visa and MasterCard on a much bigger scale over time,

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>and they're paying a premium for it.

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:27.479
<v Speaker 5>Ben is the timing at all surprise just given kind

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 5>of the issues that Discover had towards the end of

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty three.

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 1>So it leaves Capital One with a potential legal overhang.

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:41.400
<v Speaker 1>The legal issues are not settled yet at Discover. They've

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:43.200
<v Speaker 1>had a couple of new issues that are sort of

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:45.199
<v Speaker 1>outside of the scope of of what they've been dealing

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 1>with over the past couple of years. Discover's been talking

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 1>about sort of a five hundred million dollars a year

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 1>run rate of additional compliance expense. So that's sort of

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 1>a burden that Capital One is going to have to

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 1>take on with this acquisition. But I think it's probably

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty well understood the sc of that, and I think

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>it's it's probably priced into the deal.

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 3>All right, So give us a sense of the size

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:10.920
<v Speaker 3>of Visa, I guess, the Visa network, the master Card network,

0:02:11.000 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 3>and now this new combined network is it is it

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:16.800
<v Speaker 3>competitive to Visa and MasterCard?

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I guess even amics So historically it's completely non competitive.

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Visa and MasterCard together are about penn trillion in domestic

0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:30.360
<v Speaker 1>US credit and debit card volume, and Discover is about

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:33.679
<v Speaker 1>five hundred and fifty billion. So it's always been this

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of the tiny, you know, red headed stepchild of

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the of the large payment networks. But you know, if

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 1>you add to that capital ones hundreds of billions of

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:46.080
<v Speaker 1>dollars of credit card loans and you sort of extrapolate

0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 1>future growth there, it has the potential to sort of

0:02:49.760 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 1>compete more like an American Express, which is closer to

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:53.360
<v Speaker 1>one and a half trillion.

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 5>Then I feel like we can't talk about deals without

0:02:56.680 --> 0:03:00.679
<v Speaker 5>the threat of regulatory scrutiny. What does this bring and

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 5>what could the FTC raise any red flags about?

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so I'm obviously not a regulatory expert. Paul knows

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 1>well that we have a great m and a analyst

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence. Generally, I'm sure you guys will ask her later.

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 1>But overall, this deal I think will be relatively sort

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 1>of non offensive to regulators. You know, Discover is historically

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 1>not been very competitive with the large networks, so actually

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>bringing sort of the power of capital want to bear

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 1>will make it more competitive with the large networks was

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 1>as the potential to give customers a real sort of

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 1>fourth alternative, whereas in the past you really only had

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 1>one option. Right, you get a Discover card, it only

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 1>has one sort of set of of rewards. It's got

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 1>a relatively low credit line versus some of the other offerings.

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't have sort of you know, high end travel

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>rewards offerings. So I think if Capital One can start

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>to issue some of its sort of higher end cards

0:03:56.720 --> 0:04:00.080
<v Speaker 1>on the Discover network, that could be pro competitive, and

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>that might make the deal somewhat more attractive to regulators.

0:04:03.520 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 3>So I'm looking at MasterCard. The shares of MasterCard and

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 3>v so each down maybe two three percent. Do they

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 3>really care here in terms of a response.

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think they're looking at this as sort

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 1>of an interesting gambit. It's definitely like, you know, it's

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 1>a shot across the bow visa MasterCard. But this is

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:27.840
<v Speaker 1>a huge, probably decades long battle that Discover Network, backed

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:30.280
<v Speaker 1>by Capital One, will be fighting. You know, they plan

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>to keep the Discover branding in place for the most

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:38.239
<v Speaker 1>part and shift primarily debit card volume to Discover at first.

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 1>So you know, even in the first call, it three

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:42.920
<v Speaker 1>years of this transaction, They're not really going to be

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 1>issuing Capital One credit cards on the Discover network, and

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 1>so that really puts off any concern for Visa and MasterCard,

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, into the medium to long term.

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:58.240
<v Speaker 5>Ben in terms of kind of what these credit cards

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:02.600
<v Speaker 5>offer Discover from my understanding, mainly cash back. Capital One

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 5>has a range of some of those rewards cards. How

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 5>does that impact potentially acquiring new customers and new users

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 5>of for both companies or I guess the folded end company.

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so I think that will make it a challenge

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:17.840
<v Speaker 1>for Capital One to issue some of its sort of

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 1>high fee, high reward cards on the Discover network because

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 1>historically the Discover network's only been used for a very

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 1>limited cash back card with caps that I think it's

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 1>like fifteen hundred dollars a quarter of cash back. So

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 1>for your high spenders, people who are putting tens of

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 1>thousands of dollars on a credit card, that's not a

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 1>very attractive offering. So that means that the brand has

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:43.360
<v Speaker 1>not been sort of in their minds as you know,

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>a potential credit card they might acquire. So Capital One

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 1>is going to have to do some relatively heavy lifting

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and you see that in what is a very modest

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 1>run rate synergy assumption in their in their sort of

0:05:56.120 --> 0:06:00.679
<v Speaker 1>deal model which only cuts back discovers marketing costs ten percent.

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:04.360
<v Speaker 1>So you know one is gonna have to do some

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty heavy marketing I think to start to leverage that

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 1>network on the credit card.

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 3>Side, the American Express. What's the investment call there these days?

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 6>Ben?

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 4>What are investors thinking about MX?

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, MX is the super premium fashion of the

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:24.040
<v Speaker 1>highest spending, sort of most financially sound customers. So that

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 1>is a sort of you know, it's sort of a

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:33.479
<v Speaker 1>recession safe trade, if you will. So you know, when

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 1>people are looking at the forward curve and they're they're

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>seeing rate cuts, you know, they're expecting a recession. Potentially

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:42.800
<v Speaker 1>they look at the AMX spender and think that this

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>person will last the longest and have the sort of

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:50.600
<v Speaker 1>lowest level of charge offs through a potential recession. So

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 1>that makes it very attractive. And additionally, MX is a

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:59.040
<v Speaker 1>ton of momentum in acquiring millennial and gen Z high

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 1>earning customer, which is the most valuable sort of wallet

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 1>chair that's out there, and MX does it better than

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 1>anyone else, So that also kind of makes them attractive

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:08.200
<v Speaker 1>to investors.

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 3>Hey, Ben, here at Bloomberg LP, we recently switched our

0:07:12.840 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 3>corporate credit card from one vendor to another. Why did

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 3>that happen? Is that simply priced? Somebody came along and said, hey,

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:21.680
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg will do it cheaper.

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 4>Is that how that that business goes?

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 7>Well?

0:07:24.840 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Obviously I have no insight into that particular deal, but

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, that can be a number of things. That

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 1>can be the sort of reward structure, that can be

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the cost structure. That could even just be you know,

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>simple sort of customer service and applicability of sort of

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 1>technology on the on the corporate fulfillment side. So you know,

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't really have any insight into what that particular was.

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 4>It all works for me. It all goes to redo

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 4>keeper of the whatever the card is.

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 3>All right, Ben, So what is the big competitive overview

0:07:58.080 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 3>of kind of consumer finance? Are we using more credit,

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 3>more debit, more venmo what a kind of the big

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 3>trends there?

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So there's been a huge growth in credit volume

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 1>over the last couple of years, especially sort of in

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the post pandemic period. There's been even more of a

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 1>secular shift away from cash. As for the various sort

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:25.560
<v Speaker 1>of channels. Right, credit is really attracted to higher end consumers,

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 1>people with more discretionary income, because that offers the huge

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 1>valuable reward potential. And then if you step down to

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 1>debit cards, there's some cash back but for the most part,

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of rewards there, but there's some convenience.

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 1>And then sort of the lower tier kind of fintech

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 1>payments systems, you know, they offer they're sort of targeted

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:50.559
<v Speaker 1>at sort of youngers or gen Z lower spenders, and

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 1>they are the people who are exploring things like buy now,

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:54.679
<v Speaker 1>pay later, which is sort of a way to give

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>credit to people who don't really have a lot of

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>credit history or substantial earnings history.

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:01.319
<v Speaker 4>Ben, thanks so much for that. Appreciate it.

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:04.559
<v Speaker 3>Ben Elliott, consumer finance analysts for Bloomberg Intelligence is joining

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 3>us via zoom on from Washington, DC. And then there

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:09.599
<v Speaker 3>are those of us walk around with a lot of

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 3>cash because that's how you play.

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 5>You pay who do you pay in cash?

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 3>I got very few people, very few people now, And

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 3>it used to be I mean, but I mean, you

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:19.560
<v Speaker 3>walk into a bar in the Jersey short you got

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 3>to put a fifty down on the bar to make

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:22.679
<v Speaker 3>sure you let them know you have let them know

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:23.200
<v Speaker 3>you're serious.

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I'm not going to give them like tap

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 4>my phone. I mean they throw me out. But no,

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:30.320
<v Speaker 4>you're right. I mean you just don't use cash anymore now.

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:32.719
<v Speaker 5>I only use cash at wholal carts in New York

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:35.200
<v Speaker 5>City and my dive bars that I can't say their

0:09:35.280 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 5>names because otherwise people go to it, so we got

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 5>to keep it secreted.

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 4>But those are the only places I use cash.

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 3>I know it's crazy, so but I mean, now it's

0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 3>just I'm thinking. You know, one of the greatest companies

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:47.199
<v Speaker 3>or technologies in that space was Square. They're the ones

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 3>that revolutionized, I think for the local retailer. I mean,

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 3>because all you have to do is stick nothing on

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 3>your phone, and then a local retailer immediately has the

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:54.440
<v Speaker 3>ability to.

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 4>Kind of migrate to a you know, you know more

0:09:57.800 --> 0:09:58.720
<v Speaker 4>of electronic payment.

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 5>That completely changed, especially here in New York City, where

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 5>if you would go to a farmer's market before you'd

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 5>have to worry about do I have enough cash?

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:06.280
<v Speaker 8>What if I want to buy more things?

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 4>Just have to pay.

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:08.440
<v Speaker 5>It's so much more simple.

0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:13.000
<v Speaker 3>But so great company Square, great ticker symbol SQ.

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 4>What do you do then you change a name of

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 4>your company to block Plock.

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 5>You traded sixty five bucks, down from a high of

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 5>two to eighty one.

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:22.439
<v Speaker 4>Yep, just crazy, let's change our name.

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:10:31.800 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 2>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You can also listen

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 2>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 2>Just Say Alexa Play.

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 7>Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:45.680
<v Speaker 3>Talking about Home Depot Company reported some numbers here, let's

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:47.839
<v Speaker 3>bring in Drew Redding. Drew covers all the home building

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 3>stocks which had just been ripping really for the last

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 3>couple of years, because that's the only way to get

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 3>a home is you got to build a new one.

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 3>And he also covers all the companies that are around

0:10:55.800 --> 0:10:57.080
<v Speaker 3>the home building industry.

0:10:56.800 --> 0:10:57.760
<v Speaker 4>Including HD.

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 3>It's up about six tens of one percent here today, Drew,

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 3>thanks so much for joining us here. Break down what

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 3>you saw and heard from our good friends at Home Depot.

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:10.439
<v Speaker 6>Sure, so the three and a half percent decline and

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 6>same store sales was pretty much freight in line with

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 6>what was expected. You have to keep in mind though,

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 6>coming into the quarter, the bar was pretty low for

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 6>home depot. They continue to face the consumers who were

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 6>pulling back in big ticket discretionary categories, so think things

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:30.839
<v Speaker 6>like flooring, cabinets, countertops. Conversely, they're seeing relative strength in

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 6>some of the smaller scale projects, so there's big ticket

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 6>projects are being deferred. We do think eventually they get completed,

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:39.199
<v Speaker 6>but that may be more of a twenty twenty five story.

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 6>But coming into this quarter, the real debate was around

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:45.360
<v Speaker 6>how twenty twenty four was going to shape up. So

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:48.959
<v Speaker 6>they offered guidance suggesting that same store sales would fall

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 6>about one percent, and given what we heard from a

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 6>handful of their suppliers over the last couple of weeks,

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 6>which we're calling for a flat market, I think people

0:11:56.960 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 6>it caught people a little bit off guard. Ourselves included.

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 6>We do think that the first half is going to

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 6>be comparatively weaker than the second half as rates start

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 6>to pull back, and we think you could maybe get

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:11.440
<v Speaker 6>a little bit bit of a boost from the housing market. Drew.

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 5>This may be a dumb question, but when I look

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:15.199
<v Speaker 5>at some of the consumer data that we've been seeing,

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 5>we are seeing a rising ninety day credit card delinquencies.

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 5>How do things like that, What does the normal spender

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 5>at home depot look like? You're mentioning kind of a

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:27.319
<v Speaker 5>pullback on some of those bigger projects. What kind of

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:30.600
<v Speaker 5>demographic does home depot really see in terms of driving

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:33.079
<v Speaker 5>sales and kind of putting those numbers together.

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so about eighty percent of home depots customers or

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:40.600
<v Speaker 6>current homeowners. They typically have higher incomes, so they are

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 6>higher spenders and they're a little bit more resilient of

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 6>a customer. I think where we're seeing the relative weakness

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 6>is in some of the low end spending, which has

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 6>kind of gone away on the DIY side. But you know,

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:54.679
<v Speaker 6>if we look big picture, what's happening in the home

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 6>improvement market is we're seeing a reversion to more typical

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:02.200
<v Speaker 6>spending pattern. So if you think back to the pandemic,

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 6>we had the share of PCEE that went towards household

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:08.839
<v Speaker 6>durables was at all time record, and we've seen that

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 6>moderate since really the first half of twenty twenty three.

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:13.839
<v Speaker 6>So we think that there's a bit more of a

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:16.959
<v Speaker 6>reversion that needs to take place with the remainder of

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 6>this year, which is going to keep total industry sales muted,

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:22.680
<v Speaker 6>you know, but you talked about the consumer. You also

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:27.360
<v Speaker 6>have the consumer out there who's battling with the cumulative

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:30.319
<v Speaker 6>impact of massive inflation over the last couple of years. So,

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 6>you know, while we look at the head headline number

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:35.439
<v Speaker 6>and we see that it's moderating, it's really the cumulative

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 6>impact that's kind of pressuring spending in the category.

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:41.319
<v Speaker 3>Hey, Drew, what's the What do you think is a

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:44.200
<v Speaker 3>normalized top line growth rate for like a home depot.

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 4>I'm I'm looking.

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 3>You know, pre pandemic was kind of mid single digit grower,

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:49.959
<v Speaker 3>then of course exploded, you know, during the pandemic was

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:52.839
<v Speaker 3>some you know, big double digit gains. What do you

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:54.319
<v Speaker 3>think what do you kind of model out here for

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:55.079
<v Speaker 3>top line growth?

0:13:55.920 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think I think in a normalized environment, which

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:01.839
<v Speaker 6>we think we get back to in twenty twenty five,

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:04.679
<v Speaker 6>is probably in the three to four percent range as

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 6>a baseline. You know, there's a couple of industry factors

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 6>that we think will support that. Like I mentioned, we

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 6>think as rates start to moderate, perhaps as we get

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 6>through this year, we think that you could start to

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 6>see a boost from existing home sales. Remember, existing home

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 6>sales are the lowest level more than twenty five years,

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:26.160
<v Speaker 6>and we know that people who move spend about twice

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 6>as much on remodeling as those who don't. So while

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 6>we don't see total housing turnover returning to you know,

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 6>kind of that five and a half level anytime soon,

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 6>we do think the fact that things have been so

0:14:38.640 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 6>depressed does serve as a tail and as we move

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 6>through the year. At the same time, you know, we've

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 6>had over forty percent increases in home prices since the pandemic,

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 6>so homeowner's equity right now is at all time ties.

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 6>The average home has about three hundred thousand dollars in equity,

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:56.120
<v Speaker 6>So we think that's a source of pent up demand

0:14:56.240 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 6>for big ticket projects that once again, as rates start

0:14:59.520 --> 0:15:03.000
<v Speaker 6>to moderate, people will get more comfortable with tapping that equity.

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:05.440
<v Speaker 5>And drew with that in mind, you mentioned some of

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 5>those big purchases, bigger projects. How much of that was

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 5>pulled forward though during the pandemic when people were buying homes,

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 5>we saw a booming market around the US, and it

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 5>did seem like cash being relatively free with the surplus

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 5>spending and stimulus checks, that people were putting money into

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 5>home improvement.

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:27.840
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, great question, and I think that goes back to

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 6>the share of personal consumption that was spent on home improvement.

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 6>It was a lot of that stimulus money that was

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 6>out there for everybody. In terms of the big ticket project,

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 6>we think more of the pull forward was probably done

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 6>in the DIY segment. That's really where you saw the

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 6>boom early in the pandemic. That being said, we have

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 6>seen contractor backlogs over the last couple of years be

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 6>you know, elevated compared to more traditional levels. So to

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 6>some extent, it has been in both the DIY and

0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 6>big ticket category. But we do think that the big

0:15:57.360 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 6>ticket categories where we're likely to see more growth from

0:15:59.880 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 6>home depot as they go after the professional contractor, as

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 6>they leverage you know, the age investments consumers are making

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 6>because of the age of the housing stock that pentep

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 6>equity they have in their home.

0:16:11.080 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 3>He drew from an investment perspective, how do you differentiate

0:16:14.760 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 3>home depot versus lows.

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so, I mean both of the stocks that you

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:23.440
<v Speaker 6>mentioned earlier. The housing names have ripped recently. I think

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:26.600
<v Speaker 6>home depots since the end of October is up more

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:29.040
<v Speaker 6>than thirty percent because investors were placing their bets that

0:16:29.720 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 6>the fed of rat height cycle would come to an end,

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 6>so I think they're trying to get out ahead of

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:36.600
<v Speaker 6>that and out ahead of that. Improvement in home sales.

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 6>In terms of comparing the two, Home Depot has really

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 6>benefited relatives to the Lows recently because of their exposure

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 6>to that professional customer. It's driven you know, outside outside

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:52.720
<v Speaker 6>same store sales. It's driven better margins, and we expect

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 6>that the professional contractor is going to be a relative

0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 6>area of strength going forward. Now with that being said,

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 6>Home Depot is trading out a premium to the market

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 6>and one of the biggest premiums versus Lows over the

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 6>last decade, you know. So to the extent that Low's

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:12.119
<v Speaker 6>is able to leverage its investments in e commerce and

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 6>in their professional contractor business, that could be something to

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:16.359
<v Speaker 6>look out for.

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:20.119
<v Speaker 5>And drew, as we mentioned Dr Horden Toll Brothers, all

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:24.440
<v Speaker 5>these homebuilders building out new apartments, new homes. Does that

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:26.879
<v Speaker 5>benefit Home Depot or Lows or is that going to

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:28.680
<v Speaker 5>more benefit the likes of a whirlpool.

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:33.720
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so that's that's primarily more geared towards the building

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:38.119
<v Speaker 6>product manufacturers, and Lows business is more built around that

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 6>remodeling market and less so on the new construction side.

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:43.919
<v Speaker 5>So what's the.

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 3>Average ticket size of a home depot? And not recently

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:50.119
<v Speaker 3>ask is I'd never really go there? So what's like

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:53.400
<v Speaker 3>an average ticket size? And is it different between home

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 3>depot and lows?

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:58.479
<v Speaker 6>They're similar, probably somewhere between seventy five and ninety dollars.

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:02.159
<v Speaker 6>And what we've seen more recently is that that average

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 6>ticket size has come down and that's one of the

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 6>things that's pressuring same sotore sales. And the reason that

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 6>average tickets are coming down is because you don't have

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 6>the same leverage to big ticket spending those categories I

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:16.040
<v Speaker 6>mentioned earlier, like flooring, like cabinets, like countertops, Those are

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:18.680
<v Speaker 6>some of the things that really drive that growth. And

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 6>with that pullback, we've seen a moderation and ticket we're.

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:24.840
<v Speaker 5>Talking about the sales declining for a fifth quarter in

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:28.200
<v Speaker 5>a row. When does that break out? Is it just

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 5>easing cop numbers going to ultimately lead to a rebound.

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 6>So that'll be part of it. I mean, the way

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 6>we're looking at the market is that the second half

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 6>outperforms the first half. I think home depot and the

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:42.720
<v Speaker 6>industry can start to return to growth later this year,

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:45.360
<v Speaker 6>kind of exiting twenty twenty four, and we think once

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 6>we look ahead to twenty twenty five, that's when you

0:18:47.920 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 6>start to see a more normalized growth in my environment

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 6>in that low single digit range. Call it.

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:55.680
<v Speaker 3>All right, So home Depot they're primarily a US company.

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:58.399
<v Speaker 3>Did any of these companies think about opening stores outside

0:18:58.440 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 3>the US?

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, they have. I mean both home Depot and Lows

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 6>have had businesses outside of the US. Low's recently sold

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:11.160
<v Speaker 6>its business in Canada. Home Depot operates in Mexico as well.

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:13.200
<v Speaker 6>But for both of them, they've both made an effort

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 6>over the last several years to really focus on the

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:19.960
<v Speaker 6>US market. So that's been a strategic initiative for both

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 6>of them, just because they see that long term growth

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:25.400
<v Speaker 6>in the housing market and that's really where they want

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:26.399
<v Speaker 6>to focus their attention to.

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:29.200
<v Speaker 3>All Right, Drew, great stuff is always appreciate getting some

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:32.360
<v Speaker 3>time Drew reading. He's a home builder analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:36.920
<v Speaker 3>Joining us via zoom from the Bloomberg Intelligence headquarters in Princeton,

0:19:37.119 --> 0:19:37.679
<v Speaker 3>New Jersey.

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:44.880
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern.

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:47.200
<v Speaker 7>On Apple car playing and broud Otto with the Bloomberg

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:47.920
<v Speaker 7>Business App.

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:51.160
<v Speaker 2>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:52.480
<v Speaker 2>us live on YouTube.

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 3>At some economic data coming out. It's a little light today.

0:19:57.840 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 3>We got more coming up later this week. But the

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:03.399
<v Speaker 3>I Think Index came out negative zero point four percent.

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 3>The consensus was negative zero point three percent, So a

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:07.240
<v Speaker 3>little bit weaker there.

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:07.920
<v Speaker 4>Let's break it down.

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:09.920
<v Speaker 3>We had a negative revision as well to last month.

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 4>Dana Peterson, chief economist at the Conference Board.

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 3>So Dana talk to us about this leading index data

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 3>point that came out today.

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:17.760
<v Speaker 4>What is it and what does it tell you?

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:19.360
<v Speaker 6>Sure?

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:22.639
<v Speaker 9>Absolutely, while it was down again, it's been negative for

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:26.040
<v Speaker 9>more months than I can count over the last two years.

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 9>But the good news is that when we look at

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:34.680
<v Speaker 9>the six month average growth rate, it's no longer signaling recession,

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 9>but it's still quite negative.

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:41.439
<v Speaker 5>And how does this play into kind of the feeling

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:45.120
<v Speaker 5>around the economy and what this can mean for market watchers,

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 5>for people kind of trying to guess what the Fed

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 5>will er won't do just given kind of some of

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 5>the economic data we continue to be seen.

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:54.720
<v Speaker 10>Well, the thing is that it.

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:58.000
<v Speaker 9>Does signal that the US economy probably is going to slow,

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:01.800
<v Speaker 9>probably over the second and third quarter, maybe even starting now.

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:04.640
<v Speaker 9>In the first quarter, we did get that pretty weak

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:08.280
<v Speaker 9>retail sales data. But the thing is that the labor

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 9>market is still pumping out jobs, wages are rising, so

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 9>that could continue to support the consumer for some time.

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 9>But I think that, you know, we are going to

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 9>see slower economy, but that also means slower inflation. So

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 9>I think all these pieces give the FED cause to

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:25.920
<v Speaker 9>start looking at interest rate cuts, probably around the middle

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:26.360
<v Speaker 9>of the year.

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:29.960
<v Speaker 3>So I mean, again, I'm looking at just this over time,

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 3>and the leading index has kind of been you know,

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 3>negative here since kind of I don't know, March of

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:41.359
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty two. I mean, how often how predictive of

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 3>is this index for the overall economy.

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:48.600
<v Speaker 9>Usually the Lady Index does a really great job in

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 9>terms of poortending recessions, and that's because it captures a

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:57.240
<v Speaker 9>number of factors, certainly manufacturing activity, hours work which is

0:21:57.280 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 9>often linked to manufacturing activity, financial market indicators, and credit conditions,

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 9>and certainly expectations among businesses and consumers and so all

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 9>those things. It's done a very good job of pretending

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:12.920
<v Speaker 9>recession this time. I think it was a little challenge

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:16.320
<v Speaker 9>because we had a surge and services activity and also

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:19.159
<v Speaker 9>labor shortages meant that a lot of companies didn't let

0:22:19.240 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 9>people go, and those are things that aren't really captured

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:24.880
<v Speaker 9>in the Leading Economic Index. So maybe that's why it's

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:28.200
<v Speaker 9>been signaling for recession for a long time, but we

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:29.680
<v Speaker 9>haven't actually had one.

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:32.080
<v Speaker 3>All right, Danna, thanks so much for joining us. Appreciate

0:22:32.119 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 3>you hopping on breaking down this data point. Dana Peterson,

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:37.480
<v Speaker 3>Chief Economists for the Conference Board. Again, the Leading Economic

0:22:38.000 --> 0:22:41.200
<v Speaker 3>Indicator came in a little bit weaker than expected this morning.

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 3>It's kind of been again negative really since for many

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:46.919
<v Speaker 3>quarters now, so the question is what does that mean

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:47.920
<v Speaker 3>for the economy.

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:53.400
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:22:53.520 --> 0:22:56.440
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar.

0:22:56.080 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 7>Play and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app.

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:01.640
<v Speaker 2>You can also listen I have on Amazon Alexa from

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 2>our flagship New York station, just say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven.

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:09.480
<v Speaker 3>R J gallow joins is he's a senior portfolio manager

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:11.880
<v Speaker 3>fixed to them at Federider Hermes.

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:15.160
<v Speaker 4>You know, RJ, it's been a tough couple of years

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 4>for you.

0:23:15.400 --> 0:23:18.399
<v Speaker 3>Fixed income guys, twenty twenty two is just brutal, and

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 3>thanks to November December of last year, you had some

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:24.119
<v Speaker 3>positive games, some pretty nice positive returns this year starting

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 3>off in the red yet again.

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:27.880
<v Speaker 4>What's kind of your call here is as you look

0:23:27.880 --> 0:23:31.359
<v Speaker 4>ahead in your fixed income space, well.

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 10>Good morning.

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 8>You know it has been a wild ride.

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 11>But I think if you were looking at a fixed

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:40.879
<v Speaker 11>income one on one textbook, if you told a college

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 11>student reading that textbook that inflation would rise to over

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:46.640
<v Speaker 11>nine percent in short order, do you want to own

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 11>bond for rest or No? And then if you told

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:53.720
<v Speaker 11>them that that inflation would fall from over nine percent

0:23:54.200 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 11>to a three handle, maybe even a two handle in

0:23:57.000 --> 0:24:00.640
<v Speaker 11>short order, then your answer would be different. It's been

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:03.160
<v Speaker 11>a difficult time to be a fixed income portfolio manager.

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 11>But I also think we've re established value in a

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:09.800
<v Speaker 11>market where yields had been suppressed for so long due

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 11>to the subpar growth in the global global financial crisis environment.

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:17.920
<v Speaker 11>The pandemic demic unleashed many forces, the most important one

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 11>was a series of inflationary forces, and the bond market

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:25.000
<v Speaker 11>paid the price. I think that prices in the past,

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:29.919
<v Speaker 11>I think that the returns, respectively are much more attractive,

0:24:30.640 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 11>vastly superior.

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:33.760
<v Speaker 8>To what we saw in twenty twenty two.

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 11>The fourth quarter of twenty three was extraordinary, but I

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:40.440
<v Speaker 11>think we're expecting mid single digit kind of total returns

0:24:40.440 --> 0:24:43.159
<v Speaker 11>in a year that we face now as inflation is

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:47.480
<v Speaker 11>apt to settle its recent bubbling has been a little unwelcome,

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:51.440
<v Speaker 11>and the economy is doing relatively well. Recession doesn't seem

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:53.920
<v Speaker 11>to be in the offing, But we think that this

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:56.520
<v Speaker 11>environment for fixed income, given yields that have reset to

0:24:56.640 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 11>much more attractive real positive levels, still have a place.

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:03.440
<v Speaker 5>Investors, Rgie, what do you like in an environment that

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 5>I would say continues to be relatively warm from an

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:11.399
<v Speaker 5>economic data perspective, Well, I can tell you.

0:25:11.359 --> 0:25:14.400
<v Speaker 11>How we're positioning our fixed income portfolios. I mean, generally speaking,

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 11>the interest rate volatility that we just alluded to, we

0:25:18.400 --> 0:25:22.080
<v Speaker 11>think the worst is behind us. We've been constructed with

0:25:22.160 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 11>a neutral to a slightly long duration at various points

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 11>in the last six months. That's an expectation of the

0:25:29.000 --> 0:25:31.880
<v Speaker 11>fact that we think inflation will resume a downward march

0:25:32.720 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 11>and the FED will ease monetary policy, lowering rates because

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:41.920
<v Speaker 11>high positive real rates are not normal. The FED is

0:25:42.119 --> 0:25:45.119
<v Speaker 11>admitted that they're restrictive in their current positioning and that

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:49.439
<v Speaker 11>won't last. If inflation continues to march down towards two percent,

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:54.160
<v Speaker 11>the Fed will feel compelled to support lower real rates

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:56.800
<v Speaker 11>as well. They don't want to maintain a restrictive policy

0:25:57.240 --> 0:25:58.600
<v Speaker 11>when inflation's cooperating.

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:00.639
<v Speaker 8>The economy has been It's.

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:03.119
<v Speaker 11>Very true in the fixed income space, I think a

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:06.159
<v Speaker 11>lot of money has been put to work chasing credit.

0:26:07.040 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 11>Why because with the strong economies that support profits, we've

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:14.159
<v Speaker 11>been a little underweight credit number one. We had anticipated

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:16.000
<v Speaker 11>we'd have slower growth last year than we did, so

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:20.480
<v Speaker 11>that ended up being not helpful for our overall performance.

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:23.160
<v Speaker 11>At this point, though, we think the valuations have gotten

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 11>very rich, so some slow down in the economy we

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:30.119
<v Speaker 11>think is apt to produce opportunities where spreads might widen

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 11>a little bit and relative value will be more compelling

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:34.080
<v Speaker 11>than what we're seeing now.

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 8>So we are overweight higher grade products.

0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:39.280
<v Speaker 11>So we're still overweight mortgages for example, in our multi

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 11>sector funds leaning long duration, as I mentioned in an

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:46.400
<v Speaker 11>underweight ig high yield and commercial mortgage back securities, where

0:26:46.440 --> 0:26:49.920
<v Speaker 11>we think credit and valuation are not too compelling just yet.

0:26:51.240 --> 0:26:51.680
<v Speaker 6>You know r J.

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:53.920
<v Speaker 3>I would say, up until I don't know, a couple

0:26:53.960 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 3>of weeks ago, people were certainly pressing in cuts it.

0:26:57.080 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 3>It's just a question of whether it was March, and

0:26:59.640 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 3>then the took that off the table. Then it became

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:04.200
<v Speaker 3>if you look at the WORP function, maybe May, maybe June.

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:06.400
<v Speaker 3>Now on the last week or so, I've actually heard

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:08.119
<v Speaker 3>we had a guest com on say, hey, you have

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:10.920
<v Speaker 3>to have a scenario where the next move is a

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:12.280
<v Speaker 3>move higher in rates.

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:14.960
<v Speaker 4>Does that seem reasonable to you in any case.

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:17.639
<v Speaker 11>I can see why they would say that. I mean, so,

0:27:17.840 --> 0:27:20.320
<v Speaker 11>remember we finished last year with this like torred fixed

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:21.960
<v Speaker 11>income rally, and we were happy about it.

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:23.920
<v Speaker 8>You know, we were constructive on bonds.

0:27:23.960 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 11>It was great to see some positive returns which we

0:27:25.920 --> 0:27:27.199
<v Speaker 11>thought we would get by the end of the year.

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:30.800
<v Speaker 11>And it really all happened in that fourth quarter. But

0:27:30.920 --> 0:27:33.680
<v Speaker 11>the market overshot. The market had gotten to the point

0:27:34.119 --> 0:27:36.640
<v Speaker 11>that some of the justifications I just mentioned for being

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:39.879
<v Speaker 11>constructive had been fast forwarded and baked into prices to

0:27:39.960 --> 0:27:43.640
<v Speaker 11>a degree that wasn't sustainable by the data. Economic data

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:46.440
<v Speaker 11>is pretty clear, the economy is a pretty good shape.

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:48.680
<v Speaker 11>The labor market is still strong, inflation's a lot lower

0:27:48.720 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 11>than it was, but it's not low enough to justify

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:53.840
<v Speaker 11>six or seven eases that had been priced into the market,

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:57.480
<v Speaker 11>say by December of last year. We felt that data

0:27:57.520 --> 0:27:59.720
<v Speaker 11>would come along to probably push back on the market

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 11>a little bit more effectively than say, Fed speak pushbacked

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:07.160
<v Speaker 11>on the market. Ultimately, what we saw was that data

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:10.560
<v Speaker 11>has proven more powerful pushback than speeches from the FMC.

0:28:10.920 --> 0:28:13.639
<v Speaker 11>But the FMC has made clear they aren't going to

0:28:13.840 --> 0:28:17.200
<v Speaker 11>ease preemptively. They're only going to ease if the data

0:28:17.320 --> 0:28:21.639
<v Speaker 11>continues to back up justification that inflation is declining and

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:24.920
<v Speaker 11>the Fed should be normalizing policy at a lower level.

0:28:25.160 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 11>What is normal policy remains a key question. Obviously, the

0:28:30.000 --> 0:28:32.680
<v Speaker 11>Fed suggests three eases in this calendar year. As the

0:28:32.760 --> 0:28:35.720
<v Speaker 11>median got in the summary the economic projections, they still

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:37.760
<v Speaker 11>have a long run neutral FED funds rate of two

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:40.120
<v Speaker 11>and a half percent. I would argue the bond market,

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:42.200
<v Speaker 11>if you look at forward rates, thinks it's about one

0:28:42.240 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 11>hundred bases points higher than that, give or take. I

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 11>would side with the bond market on that. That means

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:50.520
<v Speaker 11>that the bond market can can rally some as the

0:28:50.560 --> 0:28:53.480
<v Speaker 11>FED eases and the economy slows, but absent a recession,

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:55.640
<v Speaker 11>I wouldn't be holding my breath for the ten year

0:28:55.720 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 11>to hit you three percent anytime too soon.

0:28:59.120 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 8>That's going to take a while.

0:29:01.000 --> 0:29:03.720
<v Speaker 5>Arjie, you mentioned economic data mattering. We have f MC

0:29:03.840 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 5>minutes tomorrow and then initial jobless claims pm I. What

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:09.600
<v Speaker 5>data points are you looking at to get a better

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:12.680
<v Speaker 5>read on what the FED can do and will do next.

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:17.120
<v Speaker 11>It's funny, you know, the FED looks at the totality

0:29:17.160 --> 0:29:19.600
<v Speaker 11>of the data. I love that expression. But if you

0:29:19.720 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 11>had to provide some insight on what you give greater

0:29:23.280 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 11>attention to or greater weight, what you assign greater weight to,

0:29:27.280 --> 0:29:30.920
<v Speaker 11>you know, the inflation data is fundamentally important. The FED

0:29:31.440 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 11>would be very happy to see real economic data data

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:39.480
<v Speaker 11>portraying an economy that is continuing to expand accompanied by

0:29:40.040 --> 0:29:40.880
<v Speaker 11>declining inflation.

0:29:41.360 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 8>That's that's the soft landing. That's what they that's what

0:29:44.720 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 8>they want.

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:48.160
<v Speaker 11>So I think the inflation data still is first and

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:52.120
<v Speaker 11>foremost the most important in the broader scope of data

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:53.360
<v Speaker 11>streams that's coming out.

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:54.040
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:29:54.280 --> 0:29:57.320
<v Speaker 11>You know that said, if the economy looks to be reaccelerating,

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 11>then the reason that's becomes a con or anything for

0:30:00.480 --> 0:30:04.200
<v Speaker 11>the bomb market is that you would be more cautious

0:30:04.240 --> 0:30:07.680
<v Speaker 11>about your expectations on inflation. Will inflation continue to decline

0:30:07.840 --> 0:30:10.920
<v Speaker 11>if the economy in fact reaccelerates, that would be a

0:30:11.000 --> 0:30:13.280
<v Speaker 11>real challenge for the market. That's the kind of data

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 11>set that might feed expectations that maybe the Fed will

0:30:16.840 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 11>tighten again.

0:30:18.320 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 8>I actually think that's highly unlikely.

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:22.120
<v Speaker 11>I think if Fed funds rate of five and a

0:30:22.200 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 11>quarter five fifty is already clearly restrictive, you don't need

0:30:25.960 --> 0:30:28.440
<v Speaker 11>to tighten again as much as keep it there longer.

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 11>So keeping it there longer, if you you know, Paul,

0:30:31.880 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 11>you mentioned the work function before, that would translate into

0:30:34.880 --> 0:30:36.719
<v Speaker 11>the work function having to move. You'd have to keep

0:30:36.800 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 11>pushing out further and further into the future. You're easing dates.

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:44.200
<v Speaker 11>So the Fed would react to data that portrays a stronger,

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 11>reaccelerating economy and or sticky inflation by just holding the

0:30:49.080 --> 0:30:50.920
<v Speaker 11>fort you know, stay at five and a quarter five

0:30:50.920 --> 0:30:54.400
<v Speaker 11>to fifty longer, and then that will reprice markets, as

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:57.240
<v Speaker 11>we've already seen this year, as the market had to

0:30:57.280 --> 0:31:00.520
<v Speaker 11>reprice to higher expected yields after the we're shooting of

0:31:00.640 --> 0:31:01.040
<v Speaker 11>last year.

0:31:01.280 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 3>All right, ur Ja, thanks so much, for joining us

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:05.040
<v Speaker 3>yet again. We all just appreciate getting your thoughts.

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:05.240
<v Speaker 10>R J.

0:31:05.360 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 3>Gallow, Senior portfolio manager, Fixed Income, Federated Hermes, joining us

0:31:09.440 --> 0:31:12.920
<v Speaker 3>via Zoom from Pittsburgh, PA, one of my favorite towns,

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:15.280
<v Speaker 3>great town there and Federate one of the big, big

0:31:15.920 --> 0:31:18.080
<v Speaker 3>money managers in Pittsburgh.

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:23.480
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:31:23.600 --> 0:31:26.680
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecard.

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:28.880
<v Speaker 7>Play and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business App.

0:31:29.000 --> 0:31:31.840
<v Speaker 2>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:31:31.880 --> 0:31:36.240
<v Speaker 2>flagship New York station just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:31:37.360 --> 0:31:40.480
<v Speaker 3>We had that surge surgeon the markets in November December

0:31:40.560 --> 0:31:44.040
<v Speaker 3>last year, where we had stocks just rallying dramatically continuing

0:31:44.080 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 3>here into this year to a certain extent, and even

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:49.320
<v Speaker 3>in a fixed income space. You major year in November

0:31:49.400 --> 0:31:52.840
<v Speaker 3>December last year. The question is did that pull some

0:31:52.920 --> 0:31:55.400
<v Speaker 3>performance from twenty twenty four? Let's check out somebody who

0:31:55.520 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 3>kind of does this stuff for a living. Terry Spath,

0:31:57.680 --> 0:32:02.400
<v Speaker 3>founder in CIO of Zoom of Wealth, based in Malibu, California,

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:03.360
<v Speaker 3>joining us via Zoom.

0:32:03.640 --> 0:32:05.280
<v Speaker 4>So, Terry, how did you start this year?

0:32:05.320 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 3>What was your view of twenty twenty four going into

0:32:07.880 --> 0:32:10.440
<v Speaker 3>the year, given that really strong finish we had to

0:32:10.520 --> 0:32:11.280
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty three.

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 10>Yes, thank you for having me on, Paul, And there

0:32:15.280 --> 0:32:17.440
<v Speaker 10>was a huge bond valley at the end of twenty

0:32:17.560 --> 0:32:21.080
<v Speaker 10>twenty three, and that was great, But that was on

0:32:21.120 --> 0:32:24.520
<v Speaker 10>the heels of the expectations of rate hikes in twenty

0:32:24.640 --> 0:32:28.320
<v Speaker 10>twenty four. And while we're not clear when that will happen,

0:32:28.920 --> 0:32:31.720
<v Speaker 10>when rate cuts will happen, how many we will get,

0:32:32.240 --> 0:32:34.320
<v Speaker 10>we're very confident that.

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:36.960
<v Speaker 12>The FED is going to cut rates in twenty twenty four.

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 12>And it's not just because.

0:32:40.360 --> 0:32:43.960
<v Speaker 10>They feel as though they need to, because maybe inflation

0:32:44.200 --> 0:32:47.880
<v Speaker 10>is contracting, our employment is getting our unemployment.

0:32:47.360 --> 0:32:49.960
<v Speaker 12>Is getting too high. I think the FED is really

0:32:50.000 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 12>going to have to do some.

0:32:51.640 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 10>Work and pencil out how expensive debt is becoming for

0:32:56.880 --> 0:32:59.720
<v Speaker 10>the federal government. We've got rates that are much higher

0:32:59.760 --> 0:33:02.360
<v Speaker 10>than the were three four years ago when the government

0:33:02.440 --> 0:33:05.440
<v Speaker 10>was issuing five year paper. We've got a debt level

0:33:05.520 --> 0:33:09.080
<v Speaker 10>that's double what it was in twenty twenty. So those

0:33:09.160 --> 0:33:11.440
<v Speaker 10>are going to be drags on the economy, and we

0:33:11.600 --> 0:33:14.320
<v Speaker 10>do think that that's going to result in cuts in

0:33:14.680 --> 0:33:18.600
<v Speaker 10>interest rates at the federal level and that will be

0:33:19.440 --> 0:33:23.360
<v Speaker 10>a great tailwind, a continued tail wind for even just

0:33:23.440 --> 0:33:25.720
<v Speaker 10>the safest bonds that you can buy out there.

0:33:26.200 --> 0:33:26.400
<v Speaker 6>Terry.

0:33:26.480 --> 0:33:28.800
<v Speaker 5>That's interesting because I feel like most times I've talked

0:33:28.800 --> 0:33:30.920
<v Speaker 5>to people about a need for a cut, it is

0:33:31.600 --> 0:33:36.480
<v Speaker 5>not spurred by the fact that the national debt has moved,

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:39.120
<v Speaker 5>has really picked up with the sharp move higher and

0:33:39.160 --> 0:33:41.160
<v Speaker 5>interest rates just looking at the warp function, which I

0:33:41.320 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 5>met reference far too often. Right now, we're penciling in

0:33:44.840 --> 0:33:47.960
<v Speaker 5>just south of fore cuts this year. You look back

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:50.360
<v Speaker 5>coming into the year it was north of six Terry,

0:33:50.360 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 5>where do we fall with these rate cuts and what

0:33:52.920 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 5>does that path look like?

0:33:55.480 --> 0:33:57.840
<v Speaker 10>Well, I mean, I think that's a tough question to answer.

0:33:58.600 --> 0:34:01.360
<v Speaker 10>You know exactly when we're going to see rate cuts. Obviously,

0:34:01.560 --> 0:34:03.920
<v Speaker 10>the markets got a little bit ahead of themselves looking

0:34:04.000 --> 0:34:07.120
<v Speaker 10>for six cuts ats sort of an unprecedented level, And

0:34:07.160 --> 0:34:07.760
<v Speaker 10>in fact.

0:34:07.560 --> 0:34:10.000
<v Speaker 12>That was worrisome in our view because if you're having

0:34:10.080 --> 0:34:13.560
<v Speaker 12>six cuts or something really wrong in the economy. That said,

0:34:13.719 --> 0:34:15.560
<v Speaker 12>you know, they they raised rates late.

0:34:16.640 --> 0:34:19.040
<v Speaker 10>I think the risk to our view is that they

0:34:19.160 --> 0:34:21.120
<v Speaker 10>cut rates a little bit too slowly.

0:34:21.560 --> 0:34:23.000
<v Speaker 12>But I do think that we're going to see that

0:34:23.160 --> 0:34:25.600
<v Speaker 12>in twenty twenty four, and the reason for that is

0:34:25.680 --> 0:34:26.840
<v Speaker 12>that unemployment is.

0:34:28.600 --> 0:34:32.040
<v Speaker 10>Low, meaning full employment has been achieved, which is one

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:33.680
<v Speaker 10>of the views of the Fed. We're in, you know,

0:34:34.560 --> 0:34:37.759
<v Speaker 10>knocking on the door of two percent inflation level that

0:34:37.800 --> 0:34:40.680
<v Speaker 10>they're looking for, and at you know, north of five percent,

0:34:40.719 --> 0:34:43.600
<v Speaker 10>and the FED funds rate and you've got it inverted,

0:34:43.800 --> 0:34:47.799
<v Speaker 10>meaning short term rates are higher than long term rates,

0:34:47.880 --> 0:34:49.719
<v Speaker 10>and that that's been the case now for a while.

0:34:49.840 --> 0:34:50.799
<v Speaker 12>That doesn't make sense.

0:34:50.880 --> 0:34:53.000
<v Speaker 10>I think the Fed is going to need to uninvert

0:34:53.520 --> 0:34:56.120
<v Speaker 10>the curve. And so we'll see that over the course

0:34:56.280 --> 0:34:58.520
<v Speaker 10>of this year. And just to do like a little

0:34:58.520 --> 0:35:00.200
<v Speaker 10>bit of math on that, if you've got a five

0:35:00.320 --> 0:35:03.440
<v Speaker 10>year treasury bond that's paying four percent and you get

0:35:03.440 --> 0:35:06.520
<v Speaker 10>a one percent cut, you're getting another you know, three

0:35:06.640 --> 0:35:09.680
<v Speaker 10>four percent in return. So on a five year treasury

0:35:09.760 --> 0:35:12.760
<v Speaker 10>you can earn a high single digit return. That'll probably

0:35:12.880 --> 0:35:15.359
<v Speaker 10>happen in twenty twenty four. And that's not a lot

0:35:15.480 --> 0:35:17.800
<v Speaker 10>less than what we would expect in the stock market,

0:35:17.880 --> 0:35:21.280
<v Speaker 10>but with a lot safer I guess characteristics.

0:35:21.719 --> 0:35:23.839
<v Speaker 12>So while you know, just to wrap it up, I mean,

0:35:24.440 --> 0:35:26.120
<v Speaker 12>when will that happen in twenty twenty four.

0:35:26.200 --> 0:35:28.440
<v Speaker 10>We're not sure, but we're pretty confident it will happen

0:35:28.600 --> 0:35:30.799
<v Speaker 10>over the course of this year that we'll see at

0:35:30.920 --> 0:35:32.000
<v Speaker 10>least three four cuts.

0:35:32.440 --> 0:35:34.680
<v Speaker 3>So, Terry, if I do think there's gonna be some cuts,

0:35:34.719 --> 0:35:38.040
<v Speaker 3>you're constructor for stocks for sure. Do I stick with

0:35:38.200 --> 0:35:42.440
<v Speaker 3>those Magnificent seven or maybe they're Magnificent five now names,

0:35:42.560 --> 0:35:45.040
<v Speaker 3>or do I try to find some performance elsewhere, whether

0:35:45.080 --> 0:35:46.800
<v Speaker 3>it's small to mid caps, whether it's value.

0:35:47.480 --> 0:35:48.239
<v Speaker 4>How do you think about that?

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:51.160
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I mean, listen, it's hard to, you know, make

0:35:51.239 --> 0:35:53.640
<v Speaker 10>a case against the Magnificent seven with the momentum that

0:35:53.719 --> 0:35:54.280
<v Speaker 10>it's enjoying.

0:35:54.320 --> 0:35:57.640
<v Speaker 12>But anytime there's magnificent in front of something, you know,

0:35:57.719 --> 0:35:59.760
<v Speaker 12>for an investment, it makes me a little bit worried.

0:36:00.760 --> 0:36:00.920
<v Speaker 6>You know.

0:36:01.040 --> 0:36:03.560
<v Speaker 12>I think even if you strip out if you look.

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:07.440
<v Speaker 10>At the Mac seven, the earnings have been spectacular and

0:36:07.600 --> 0:36:10.600
<v Speaker 10>that has really driven the returns for those stocks. But

0:36:10.680 --> 0:36:13.160
<v Speaker 10>even stripping those out, I think you can see some

0:36:13.239 --> 0:36:15.799
<v Speaker 10>strength and large cap stocks continue through this year.

0:36:16.120 --> 0:36:18.560
<v Speaker 12>And the reason for that, again comes back to interest rates.

0:36:18.920 --> 0:36:20.880
<v Speaker 12>The problem the.

0:36:20.920 --> 0:36:23.880
<v Speaker 10>Trouble for small stocks, and they've been really lagging, and

0:36:23.960 --> 0:36:27.000
<v Speaker 10>the trouble for that is that their access to capital

0:36:27.200 --> 0:36:31.040
<v Speaker 10>is weak. Interest rates are high, and they're just you know,

0:36:31.120 --> 0:36:33.719
<v Speaker 10>that's just a challenge. Whereas large cap names have a

0:36:33.800 --> 0:36:36.799
<v Speaker 10>lot more access to capital, they can handle a little

0:36:36.800 --> 0:36:39.320
<v Speaker 10>bit higher interest rates, and we're going to see some

0:36:39.480 --> 0:36:42.759
<v Speaker 10>nice earnings in the large cap stocks, you know, high

0:36:42.800 --> 0:36:45.319
<v Speaker 10>single digit type earnings along with a dividend yield.

0:36:45.640 --> 0:36:48.080
<v Speaker 12>So this is a nice situation where.

0:36:47.960 --> 0:36:51.640
<v Speaker 10>You've got a year where we can see nice gains

0:36:51.680 --> 0:36:54.840
<v Speaker 10>in large cap stocks as well as kind of barbelle

0:36:54.960 --> 0:37:00.600
<v Speaker 10>over to the strongest the quality treasury market and you.

0:37:00.600 --> 0:37:02.360
<v Speaker 12>Can have a really nice return in that type of

0:37:02.400 --> 0:37:03.080
<v Speaker 12>a portfolio.

0:37:03.440 --> 0:37:06.000
<v Speaker 5>Okay, So Terry, with leaning into some of the bigger

0:37:06.040 --> 0:37:11.279
<v Speaker 5>stocks or their industries or sectors that you prefer, you know,

0:37:11.400 --> 0:37:11.920
<v Speaker 5>I think.

0:37:11.760 --> 0:37:15.200
<v Speaker 12>That there's sectors that we don't prefer right now.

0:37:15.360 --> 0:37:17.520
<v Speaker 10>The energy sector has been weak, and the reason for

0:37:17.640 --> 0:37:19.879
<v Speaker 10>that is that inflation's coming down. And when we look

0:37:19.880 --> 0:37:22.160
<v Speaker 10>at the commodity sector, and that's another reason why we

0:37:22.200 --> 0:37:25.160
<v Speaker 10>think inflation will stay cool in twenty twenty four. If

0:37:25.200 --> 0:37:28.319
<v Speaker 10>you look at the prices of commodities, they've been weak,

0:37:28.400 --> 0:37:32.839
<v Speaker 10>they've been negative, and that is that's the market telling

0:37:32.960 --> 0:37:35.560
<v Speaker 10>us that inflation is going to be tame in twenty

0:37:35.680 --> 0:37:39.960
<v Speaker 10>twenty four. So those sort of inflationary plays are not

0:37:40.640 --> 0:37:45.400
<v Speaker 10>attractive right now. You know, the obvious choice on the

0:37:45.480 --> 0:37:48.560
<v Speaker 10>other end of the spectrum are those companies that do

0:37:48.760 --> 0:37:50.759
<v Speaker 10>well in a low inflation environment, and those are the

0:37:50.800 --> 0:37:55.680
<v Speaker 10>ones that we've seen in technology, in the higher dividend plays. Actually,

0:37:55.719 --> 0:38:01.200
<v Speaker 10>I think those have been underheld by investors, and I

0:38:01.239 --> 0:38:04.080
<v Speaker 10>think that's attractive as a kind of pseudo bond play

0:38:04.160 --> 0:38:04.520
<v Speaker 10>as well.

0:38:05.200 --> 0:38:06.719
<v Speaker 4>All right, Terry, thank you so much for joining us.

0:38:06.719 --> 0:38:07.160
<v Speaker 4>Appreciate it.

0:38:07.520 --> 0:38:09.560
<v Speaker 3>Terry Spatha, founder and CEO of zoom of Wealth that

0:38:09.600 --> 0:38:11.319
<v Speaker 3>they are based in Malibu, California.

0:38:12.080 --> 0:38:16.600
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on apples, Spotify,

0:38:16.800 --> 0:38:19.960
<v Speaker 2>and anywhere else you'll get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:38:20.040 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 2>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:38:23.520 --> 0:38:26.879
<v Speaker 2>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:38:27.040 --> 0:38:30.000
<v Speaker 2>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:38:30.280 --> 0:38:32.080
<v Speaker 2>and always on the Bloomberg terminal.