WEBVTT - Ethan Hawke | Archive

0:00:03.850 --> 0:00:05.809
<v Speaker 1>What kind of a show are you guys putting on

0:00:05.850 --> 0:00:06.350
<v Speaker 1>here today?

0:00:06.470 --> 0:00:07.590
<v Speaker 2>You're not interested in art?

0:00:07.670 --> 0:00:09.490
<v Speaker 1>No. Well, look, we're going to do this thing. We're

0:00:09.539 --> 0:00:10.619
<v Speaker 1>going to have a conversation.

0:00:13.200 --> 0:00:17.700
<v Speaker 2>Hey, film spotters. Archive drop time, and we're thinking about

0:00:17.860 --> 0:00:20.460
<v Speaker 2>the new Ethan Hawke and Russell Crowe movie coming out,

0:00:20.739 --> 0:00:23.910
<v Speaker 2>The Wait. We also know that The Next Picture Show

0:00:24.110 --> 0:00:28.450
<v Speaker 2>is covering this film, and we thought, why not go

0:00:28.490 --> 0:00:33.809
<v Speaker 2>back to the interview, Josh, that I usually answer when

0:00:33.850 --> 0:00:38.840
<v Speaker 2>people ask me, what's your favorite interview that you've ever done?

0:00:40.340 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 2>I am a little bit hesitant to say it's my

0:00:42.860 --> 0:00:45.199
<v Speaker 2>favorite though, because I then have to follow that up

0:00:45.240 --> 0:00:48.740
<v Speaker 2>by saying, I didn't really have to do much. It's

0:00:48.820 --> 0:00:52.220
<v Speaker 2>not necessarily an interview where I can point to my

0:00:52.300 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 2>incredible skills as an interviewer and all the amazing preparation.

0:00:57.000 --> 0:01:01.580
<v Speaker 2>I did all my great questions. Ethan Hawke is just

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:06.220
<v Speaker 2>truly one of our most insightful artists and one of

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:09.500
<v Speaker 2>the great talkers of our time. And you can pretty

0:01:09.540 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 2>much let him go no matter what you throw at him.

0:01:13.770 --> 0:01:15.970
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it seems like he's developed that. I wouldn't say

0:01:16.010 --> 0:01:19.529
<v Speaker 3>it's his second career because he's still very active acting,

0:01:19.650 --> 0:01:22.370
<v Speaker 3>but yeah, he's developed that reputation, right? As someone who

0:01:22.410 --> 0:01:24.750
<v Speaker 3>you just bring in, give him a mic, ask him

0:01:24.770 --> 0:01:28.570
<v Speaker 3>a few good questions about art, and he'll return with

0:01:28.650 --> 0:01:29.810
<v Speaker 3>some really thoughtful stuff.

0:01:30.390 --> 0:01:33.850
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, a lot of wisdom here. This is from 2018

0:01:33.850 --> 0:01:38.130
<v Speaker 2>when he was doing press for his Blaze Foley biopic, Blaze,

0:01:38.150 --> 0:01:41.429
<v Speaker 2>a movie that he directed. On that same show, we

0:01:41.450 --> 0:01:44.530
<v Speaker 2>did our top five Ethan Hawke moments with Keith Phipps

0:01:44.590 --> 0:01:45.810
<v Speaker 2>from The Next Picture Show.

0:01:46.530 --> 0:01:56.220
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy. I don't know who Blaze Foley is. It's actually,

0:01:56.320 --> 0:02:00.580
<v Speaker 1>it's Blaze Foley. You really should know who Blaze was.

0:02:01.380 --> 0:02:03.900
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to open with kind of a long-winded one,

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:05.020
<v Speaker 2>so bear with me here a little bit. I like

0:02:05.060 --> 0:02:08.380
<v Speaker 2>it already. Watching your movie, I am immediately thinking about

0:02:08.780 --> 0:02:11.810
<v Speaker 2>the biopic as a genre, conventional ones anyway, which I

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:14.310
<v Speaker 2>would say your film is certainly not a conventional one.

0:02:14.870 --> 0:02:18.650
<v Speaker 2>And often they're concerned, to me, they seem concerned with psychology,

0:02:18.830 --> 0:02:23.010
<v Speaker 2>trying to explain behavior of these characters rather than maybe

0:02:23.110 --> 0:02:26.260
<v Speaker 2>trying to just observe behavior. But the other one that

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:28.940
<v Speaker 2>really hit me watching Blaze... and it's something I never

0:02:28.980 --> 0:02:32.060
<v Speaker 2>really considered before, is that biopics on some level are

0:02:32.100 --> 0:02:36.060
<v Speaker 2>excuses to enact or reenact these kind of signpost moments

0:02:36.100 --> 0:02:39.270
<v Speaker 2>from characters' lives that we as viewers have some attachment to.

0:02:39.310 --> 0:02:41.870
<v Speaker 2>They're kind of part of the cultural consciousness, so we

0:02:41.930 --> 0:02:44.910
<v Speaker 2>care about what's happening. And maybe we only care about

0:02:44.930 --> 0:02:48.549
<v Speaker 2>what's happening because we have that attachment to it. Biopics

0:02:48.590 --> 0:02:50.940
<v Speaker 2>then can be a little bit lazy. But when you're

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 2>making a movie like you did where the subject is

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:56.730
<v Speaker 2>someone who's not part of that collective consciousness... We have

0:02:56.750 --> 0:02:58.530
<v Speaker 2>to be invested the same way we would be with

0:02:59.070 --> 0:03:03.290
<v Speaker 2>a fictional character. So my question is, how deliberately did

0:03:03.330 --> 0:03:05.489
<v Speaker 2>you consider those things? How deliberately did you set out

0:03:05.630 --> 0:03:07.800
<v Speaker 2>to not make a conventional biopic?

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:11.779
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think in the DNA, as soon as you

0:03:11.900 --> 0:03:14.740
<v Speaker 1>say you want to make a biopic about Blaze Foley,

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:20.970
<v Speaker 1>you're shifting the paradigm a little bit because almost every

0:03:21.030 --> 0:03:26.990
<v Speaker 1>musical biopic that's ever been made is... about somebody who's famous. Yeah.

0:03:27.090 --> 0:03:31.209
<v Speaker 1>Who made it. And the subconscious, the subtext of that

0:03:31.750 --> 0:03:34.090
<v Speaker 1>is that your story is worth telling because you're famous.

0:03:34.890 --> 0:03:37.750
<v Speaker 1>And when I was working on this Chet Baker biopic,

0:03:38.450 --> 0:03:42.390
<v Speaker 1>I was interviewing guys who played with Chet and really

0:03:42.430 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 1>realizing they would say that, you know, to really know Chet,

0:03:45.570 --> 0:03:47.120
<v Speaker 1>you really had to play music with him. I mean,

0:03:47.140 --> 0:03:52.090
<v Speaker 1>that was where his best self was manifest. And a

0:03:52.150 --> 0:03:54.510
<v Speaker 1>couple of things happened to me, which was that, wow,

0:03:55.530 --> 0:03:56.990
<v Speaker 1>first of all, I want to make a movie about

0:03:57.070 --> 0:04:00.390
<v Speaker 1>these guys, the guys who played with Chet rather than

0:04:00.510 --> 0:04:03.490
<v Speaker 1>Chet himself. Cause the story of celebrity and drug addiction

0:04:03.530 --> 0:04:07.530
<v Speaker 1>and you know, the ups and downs of fame, it's

0:04:07.550 --> 0:04:10.870
<v Speaker 1>just a well-worn road. And I was like, wouldn't it

0:04:10.890 --> 0:04:13.550
<v Speaker 1>be awesome to see a biopic where the scene where they,

0:04:13.570 --> 0:04:16.230
<v Speaker 1>you know, we all know the narrative, right? He struggles,

0:04:16.300 --> 0:04:20.859
<v Speaker 1>something bad happens. These draws a great, well of creativity

0:04:20.940 --> 0:04:24.729
<v Speaker 1>from this pain. He gets discovered. He rises to the top.

0:04:24.850 --> 0:04:27.809
<v Speaker 1>Now he loses what's important to him. He falls from grace,

0:04:27.890 --> 0:04:31.770
<v Speaker 1>finds self, and movie, right? And that's a really boring narrative.

0:04:31.930 --> 0:04:34.370
<v Speaker 1>And it flies in the face of, I've spent my

0:04:34.430 --> 0:04:37.210
<v Speaker 1>life with artists, musicians, and most of them are met

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:40.739
<v Speaker 1>with just complete and utter indifference. That's not the story

0:04:40.779 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 1>of their life at all. Their story is that of

0:04:43.060 --> 0:04:47.530
<v Speaker 1>practicing constantly and trying really hard, having some minor little

0:04:47.650 --> 0:04:52.390
<v Speaker 1>ups and basically, you know, being ignored. That's most people's

0:04:52.450 --> 0:04:56.260
<v Speaker 1>experience in the arts. And I just thought Blaise Foley,

0:04:56.339 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 1>somehow I was like, wow, he's the perfect, you know,

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:04.779
<v Speaker 1>vehicle to tell a more true biopic. Because like you said,

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I find them often extremely lazy because they have a

0:05:07.820 --> 0:05:11.060
<v Speaker 1>great central performance because there's this very interesting human being

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 1>at the center of which we already know a lot about.

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:14.930
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of the work of the actor has

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:17.410
<v Speaker 1>already been done. All they have to do is imitate

0:05:17.470 --> 0:05:19.750
<v Speaker 1>this other person. They don't have to do any discovery.

0:05:20.410 --> 0:05:23.490
<v Speaker 1>And part of what I wanted from Ben Dickey was

0:05:23.630 --> 0:05:27.970
<v Speaker 1>I cast a real musician, a guy who has cried

0:05:28.070 --> 0:05:31.710
<v Speaker 1>real salty tears over the way his dreams have been

0:05:31.770 --> 0:05:34.970
<v Speaker 1>treated by the music industry. And he has something to

0:05:35.110 --> 0:05:38.710
<v Speaker 1>say about that. He's not going to watch some reheated meal.

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>He has something to offer you about his love of music.

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:46.890
<v Speaker 1>his love of blaze and he's lived this, this life.

0:05:47.610 --> 0:05:50.430
<v Speaker 1>And I didn't want him to impersonate blaze. And the

0:05:50.450 --> 0:05:53.170
<v Speaker 1>great thing about when blaze isn't famous, nobody would know anyway,

0:05:53.270 --> 0:05:57.330
<v Speaker 1>even if you did, you, you have to make, I

0:05:57.370 --> 0:06:00.540
<v Speaker 1>want you to put your blood into the movie. Use

0:06:01.140 --> 0:06:05.039
<v Speaker 1>blaze's music. Blaze gave us his music. That's where he lives.

0:06:05.140 --> 0:06:07.220
<v Speaker 1>That's where the, we will be true to the man

0:06:07.260 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 1>by honoring the music. Yeah. Now let's honor the spirit

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:15.130
<v Speaker 1>of what's vital about blaze. an artist's life when they,

0:06:15.750 --> 0:06:17.310
<v Speaker 1>where their dreams don't come true. Yeah.

0:06:17.350 --> 0:06:18.789
<v Speaker 2>I was going to ask you about how you settled

0:06:18.870 --> 0:06:21.170
<v Speaker 2>on kind of the framing device and that makes it

0:06:21.210 --> 0:06:23.370
<v Speaker 2>sound a little more mechanical than it is in this film.

0:06:23.390 --> 0:06:26.060
<v Speaker 2>There's nothing mechanical about it, but honoring the music, the

0:06:26.100 --> 0:06:29.280
<v Speaker 2>music is really not just the soundtrack. It's what holds

0:06:29.339 --> 0:06:30.060
<v Speaker 2>the entire narrative.

0:06:30.100 --> 0:06:31.780
<v Speaker 1>It holds it all together. I call it a country

0:06:31.820 --> 0:06:34.500
<v Speaker 1>Western opera, you know, which is, you know, a good musical.

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:38.870
<v Speaker 1>It tells the story of the characters through song. So

0:06:38.970 --> 0:06:42.250
<v Speaker 1>I studied Blaze's music and figure like, what's the character

0:06:42.290 --> 0:06:45.630
<v Speaker 1>inside the song? How could this song, uh, speak for

0:06:45.650 --> 0:06:51.050
<v Speaker 1>the movie? And, and I had this idea that when

0:06:51.130 --> 0:06:53.830
<v Speaker 1>people die, there's this kind of fight over the narrative.

0:06:54.529 --> 0:06:57.029
<v Speaker 1>You know, I've seen it happen over. What's the story.

0:06:57.350 --> 0:06:59.830
<v Speaker 1>And the wife tells one story and the best friend

0:06:59.870 --> 0:07:02.690
<v Speaker 1>tells another story. And the person who worked with them

0:07:02.750 --> 0:07:05.690
<v Speaker 1>tells another story. And often they don't match, you know,

0:07:05.710 --> 0:07:09.100
<v Speaker 1>that they don't describe the same human being. And, and I,

0:07:10.180 --> 0:07:12.860
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot about this, about past, present, and future.

0:07:13.460 --> 0:07:15.100
<v Speaker 1>And that was my idea. What if I made a

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:19.070
<v Speaker 1>movie where there really isn't one narrative? It's this braid

0:07:19.630 --> 0:07:22.690
<v Speaker 1>of the three of them. There's the past, there's the present,

0:07:22.710 --> 0:07:25.390
<v Speaker 1>the future, and they're always touching and affecting each other.

0:07:25.970 --> 0:07:29.810
<v Speaker 1>And what if I could tell Blaze's life posthumously, the

0:07:29.850 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 1>way people fight over the narrative after they're gone, the

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:36.140
<v Speaker 1>way the narrative is being created in the moment, and

0:07:36.180 --> 0:07:39.050
<v Speaker 1>the way that, you know, the the female point of view,

0:07:39.130 --> 0:07:41.090
<v Speaker 1>his lover's point of view, his point of view, how

0:07:41.130 --> 0:07:43.530
<v Speaker 1>they're all dancing off of each other. And I kind

0:07:43.550 --> 0:07:45.890
<v Speaker 1>of just, that was my device. Yeah.

0:07:46.270 --> 0:07:48.950
<v Speaker 2>Another touch that I really loved with the movie and

0:07:48.970 --> 0:07:51.420
<v Speaker 2>it's something I can't really recall ever seeing before is

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:55.020
<v Speaker 2>the way you show us characters in life happening outside

0:07:55.060 --> 0:07:57.460
<v Speaker 2>of the point of view of that main character, right?

0:07:57.480 --> 0:07:59.940
<v Speaker 2>So we get these little snippets sometimes where we follow

0:07:59.980 --> 0:08:02.140
<v Speaker 2>the angry guy in from his truck as he then

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:05.020
<v Speaker 2>gets into a fight with Blaze. And then the guy

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:06.670
<v Speaker 2>whose job it is to clean up the remnants of

0:08:06.700 --> 0:08:09.100
<v Speaker 2>the the beer bottle from that fight. And then we

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:11.100
<v Speaker 2>follow him outside a little bit. And it did reinforce

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:13.620
<v Speaker 2>for me anyway, the idea that everybody's the star of

0:08:13.660 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 2>their own story, right?

0:08:14.580 --> 0:08:16.620
<v Speaker 1>That's I, what I didn't want to do is make

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 1>another movie that deifies the individual that, Oh, Oh, isn't

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 1>it sad? Blaze wasn't discovered. You know what? Blaze lived

0:08:24.860 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 1>his life and there are blazes around you all the time.

0:08:29.420 --> 0:08:32.540
<v Speaker 1>That's what I wanted to do is like, who, who's

0:08:32.580 --> 0:08:35.100
<v Speaker 1>the waitress at the club where blaze fully works. I

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:37.459
<v Speaker 1>bet she's a musician too, or, What does she think

0:08:37.500 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 1>about this song? What does the busboy think about it?

0:08:40.020 --> 0:08:42.989
<v Speaker 1>What is the other person on the bus sitting about it?

0:08:44.070 --> 0:08:46.270
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully what you take away from that is not that

0:08:46.410 --> 0:08:49.370
<v Speaker 1>Blaze is special, but that we are special.

0:08:50.290 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 2>I do really love that touch, as I said. And

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:55.119
<v Speaker 2>you mentioned Born to be Blue. earlier one of my

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 2>favorite films of that year actually your performance i think

0:08:57.960 --> 0:09:00.060
<v Speaker 2>was my favorite of the year as chet baker and

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 2>i do want to ask you about one scene in

0:09:02.100 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 2>particular you'll know which one here my apologies for quoting

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 2>myself but on the show when i talked about that

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:09.300
<v Speaker 2>scene in my list of the year's best i said

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 2>that it starts with those familiar notes to my funny

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:13.540
<v Speaker 2>valentine on his horn then switches to vocals he's there

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:15.020
<v Speaker 2>to prove he can play the trumpet the way he

0:09:15.100 --> 0:09:17.439
<v Speaker 2>used to play he mostly sings instead he's not a

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:20.460
<v Speaker 2>particularly good singer but he commits to the performance he

0:09:20.500 --> 0:09:23.090
<v Speaker 2>connects with the music he internalizes not just the words

0:09:23.140 --> 0:09:25.330
<v Speaker 2>but the soul of the song And then expresses it

0:09:25.370 --> 0:09:28.250
<v Speaker 2>in his own idiosyncratic way, which is what great artists do.

0:09:28.290 --> 0:09:30.990
<v Speaker 2>And it's melancholy and haunting and gorgeous and weird and vulnerable.

0:09:31.610 --> 0:09:34.330
<v Speaker 2>And I could go on about that performance in that scene.

0:09:34.390 --> 0:09:37.330
<v Speaker 2>What I want to ask is how the performance scenes,

0:09:37.350 --> 0:09:39.690
<v Speaker 2>that one in particular maybe, and that entire experience of

0:09:40.050 --> 0:09:43.550
<v Speaker 2>playing Chet Baker did ultimately inform your making of this movie.

0:09:44.290 --> 0:09:48.550
<v Speaker 1>There was a review I read of Chet's singing that

0:09:48.590 --> 0:09:52.290
<v Speaker 1>gave me real inspiration, which was that it wasn't even

0:09:52.380 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 1>somebody singing. It was the... the memory of someone having

0:09:55.940 --> 0:09:59.050
<v Speaker 1>sung already. No sooner had it come out of his

0:09:59.110 --> 0:10:06.260
<v Speaker 1>mouth and there was this detachment that he didn't sing well.

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:14.170
<v Speaker 1>Like Nina Simone sings well. Louis Armstrong sings well. He communicates,

0:10:14.950 --> 0:10:18.910
<v Speaker 1>and he communicates something genuine, that there's a genuine loneliness there.

0:10:19.690 --> 0:10:24.740
<v Speaker 1>And there's a genuine fragility there. And he really liked

0:10:24.980 --> 0:10:28.140
<v Speaker 1>to sing, but that he really liked to sing because

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:31.070
<v Speaker 1>he was so worried about his teeth that he wanted

0:10:31.090 --> 0:10:34.510
<v Speaker 1>to give his horn playing a break. I found that

0:10:34.710 --> 0:10:39.170
<v Speaker 1>so interesting. It's kind of like Bob Fosse was this

0:10:39.230 --> 0:10:41.390
<v Speaker 1>amazing dancer. And then as you study him, you realize, oh,

0:10:41.890 --> 0:10:43.650
<v Speaker 1>He had a lot of problems with his legs. He

0:10:43.690 --> 0:10:46.730
<v Speaker 1>was pigeon-toed. And he developed, because he wasn't as good

0:10:46.770 --> 0:10:49.309
<v Speaker 1>a dancer as he wanted, he developed this real in-step

0:10:49.390 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 1>move that people found really sexy and cool. But it

0:10:52.900 --> 0:10:56.559
<v Speaker 1>came from trying to hide that he couldn't go out,

0:10:57.559 --> 0:11:00.459
<v Speaker 1>you know? And I find, it's this thing as a

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:02.100
<v Speaker 1>parent all the time, you're trying to say, don't be

0:11:02.179 --> 0:11:04.440
<v Speaker 1>scared of what makes you unique. It's actually what makes

0:11:04.500 --> 0:11:09.059
<v Speaker 1>you beautiful. And that's why when I was like, you

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:11.550
<v Speaker 1>know what? I wouldn't normally think I could play this

0:11:11.590 --> 0:11:17.150
<v Speaker 1>jazz musician, but because his secret was actually an actor's secret,

0:11:17.470 --> 0:11:20.330
<v Speaker 1>which is you have to actually just show him how

0:11:20.390 --> 0:11:23.580
<v Speaker 1>scared you are. And then it can work. And that

0:11:23.620 --> 0:11:24.220
<v Speaker 1>I thought I could do.

0:11:24.540 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, I use the word commits there and talking about

0:11:27.059 --> 0:11:30.660
<v Speaker 2>commitment to a performance. Maybe what I appreciate most about

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:32.939
<v Speaker 2>you as an actor is your level of commitment. I

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:35.100
<v Speaker 2>was talking with our producer, Sam, about this, that we

0:11:35.140 --> 0:11:37.600
<v Speaker 2>never doubt that you are 100% all the way in

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 2>on whatever it is that you're engaged in, whether it's

0:11:41.860 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 2>life or whether it's art, do you think that commitment,

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:49.100
<v Speaker 2>the act of committing to something is a choice you

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:51.319
<v Speaker 2>make or is it an instinct? Is that just who

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:51.660
<v Speaker 2>you are?

0:11:53.140 --> 0:11:57.179
<v Speaker 1>Some of us are predisposed to certain things. And some

0:11:57.220 --> 0:12:01.179
<v Speaker 1>of us, our fears and our insecurities are encouraged by life.

0:12:01.210 --> 0:12:07.449
<v Speaker 1>And sometimes we have people, I find confidence extremely fragile.

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:12.680
<v Speaker 1>And the difference between somebody who's good at something and

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:15.500
<v Speaker 1>somebody who's great at something often is confidence. And one

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:17.660
<v Speaker 1>in person it can leave. We see it in sports

0:12:17.710 --> 0:12:20.510
<v Speaker 1>all the time. A guy's on a hitting streak and

0:12:20.570 --> 0:12:24.050
<v Speaker 1>he can't miss. And then that confidence is the talent,

0:12:24.070 --> 0:12:28.370
<v Speaker 1>the body, the molecules, the parents, the practice. It's all

0:12:28.410 --> 0:12:31.490
<v Speaker 1>the same. But where's that magic confidence and where does

0:12:31.530 --> 0:12:39.059
<v Speaker 1>it come from? And so commitment, I think, a lot

0:12:39.100 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 1>of confidence can, confidence can come in from two places.

0:12:43.410 --> 0:12:48.790
<v Speaker 1>One is experience and another is commitment. There's a line

0:12:48.850 --> 0:12:52.530
<v Speaker 1>actually in the movie blaze about confidence. Cause it's, it's

0:12:52.570 --> 0:12:56.429
<v Speaker 1>a mystery to me how we, when we're at our worst,

0:12:56.600 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 1>it's usually because we don't, aren't confident when we, when

0:12:59.500 --> 0:13:03.440
<v Speaker 1>we lie to somebody, when we're, uh, hateful to somebody

0:13:03.460 --> 0:13:05.840
<v Speaker 1>we care about, or maybe somebody we just met, even,

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:09.179
<v Speaker 1>you know, something is, We're letting the worst parts of

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:13.380
<v Speaker 1>ourselves lead. And Ben Dickey, the lead actor, has this

0:13:13.420 --> 0:13:15.470
<v Speaker 1>thing that he, you know, one of the things that

0:13:15.490 --> 0:13:19.610
<v Speaker 1>gives you confidence is knowing that you're alive. Simply knowing

0:13:19.670 --> 0:13:22.750
<v Speaker 1>that you actually have air in your lungs and that

0:13:22.790 --> 0:13:24.530
<v Speaker 1>your heart is beating right now and that it actually

0:13:24.570 --> 0:13:27.610
<v Speaker 1>won't forever. Yeah. It actually puts your finger on something

0:13:27.710 --> 0:13:30.329
<v Speaker 1>very tangibly real. Like a sun, you know, one of

0:13:30.350 --> 0:13:32.130
<v Speaker 1>the things that I think that people love about a

0:13:32.170 --> 0:13:35.630
<v Speaker 1>sunrise or a sunset is it marks this day. Unlike

0:13:35.790 --> 0:13:41.650
<v Speaker 1>this is really happening. Um, and from that, you realize

0:13:41.690 --> 0:13:44.550
<v Speaker 1>that life is passing and that you can't waste these moments.

0:13:44.590 --> 0:13:48.110
<v Speaker 1>And for some mysterious reason, confidence can be drawn because you,

0:13:48.470 --> 0:13:51.170
<v Speaker 1>you can see the melodramas, the little things that shake

0:13:51.190 --> 0:13:54.500
<v Speaker 1>your confidence aren't real. Oh, she won't like me. Maybe

0:13:54.540 --> 0:13:59.579
<v Speaker 1>I'll fail. Um, failure feels so much better if you

0:13:59.780 --> 0:14:03.460
<v Speaker 1>know you were committed. Yeah. It's just true. Absolutely. You know,

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:05.320
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's the sports fan in me always.

0:14:05.340 --> 0:14:08.820
<v Speaker 1>I love you don't ever have to feel bad about

0:14:08.860 --> 0:14:10.860
<v Speaker 1>losing a game if you gave it your all, if

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:13.380
<v Speaker 1>you leave it all in the field. You know, it's

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:17.620
<v Speaker 1>the expression I heard watching an athlete once. Somebody said,

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 1>there's no quitting that guy. I thought, what a great expression.

0:14:22.860 --> 0:14:25.300
<v Speaker 1>Permission to fail. You know, I remember one of my,

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:28.460
<v Speaker 1>Richard Linkletter directing me one time said, you know, what

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 1>he didn't like about a certain actor he was talking

0:14:32.620 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>about is that something happened during the day and he

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:38.150
<v Speaker 1>gave himself permission to fail. That was the reason why

0:14:38.190 --> 0:14:40.510
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't going to do a good job today. And

0:14:40.530 --> 0:14:42.630
<v Speaker 1>he said, you just got to never give yourself permission.

0:14:42.870 --> 0:14:45.510
<v Speaker 1>You're going to fail. We're all going to fail all

0:14:45.570 --> 0:14:48.470
<v Speaker 1>the time. That's part of living, but don't give yourself permission.

0:14:49.820 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, go down swinging. And you know, I, I

0:14:52.260 --> 0:14:54.020
<v Speaker 1>try to do that. Even if it's one of the

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 1>things that is lousy about the film business. If you're

0:14:56.420 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 1>a painter, for example, and you're painting a picture and

0:14:58.700 --> 0:15:00.080
<v Speaker 1>you get about halfway through it and you're going to go,

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 1>this is not going to work. You stop and you

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:04.420
<v Speaker 1>put it in the, you know, garage or whatever you

0:15:04.460 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 1>paint over the canvas. You wait two years till you

0:15:06.460 --> 0:15:08.180
<v Speaker 1>have the idea to fix it. When you're halfway through

0:15:08.210 --> 0:15:09.930
<v Speaker 1>a movie, sometimes, you know, it's not going to work.

0:15:11.150 --> 0:15:12.670
<v Speaker 1>You just know it, you feel it in your mind,

0:15:12.970 --> 0:15:14.730
<v Speaker 1>but you got to finish it because all these people

0:15:14.770 --> 0:15:16.670
<v Speaker 1>are being paid. And you're like, damn it. I know

0:15:16.730 --> 0:15:17.310
<v Speaker 1>this isn't.

0:15:17.150 --> 0:15:17.570
<v Speaker 3>Going to work.

0:15:18.270 --> 0:15:20.330
<v Speaker 1>And you, but you, what you can't do, you know,

0:15:20.350 --> 0:15:23.590
<v Speaker 1>I actually heard Paul Schrader speak about this so beautifully. He, he,

0:15:24.010 --> 0:15:27.930
<v Speaker 1>he really believes that a big part of cinema is casting,

0:15:28.810 --> 0:15:30.850
<v Speaker 1>you know, and, and if you cast it wrong, he,

0:15:32.030 --> 0:15:33.890
<v Speaker 1>You figure it out about two weeks into the shoot,

0:15:34.010 --> 0:15:38.650
<v Speaker 1>and it's just over. And when you cast it right,

0:15:39.010 --> 0:15:41.650
<v Speaker 1>then everything starts working all by itself. And that's the

0:15:41.690 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 1>way I've come to feel that way.

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned Linklater, and I want to talk about him here.

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:48.780
<v Speaker 2>We have just a little bit of time left. I

0:15:48.820 --> 0:15:50.660
<v Speaker 2>kind of hate this trend on social media of parents

0:15:50.740 --> 0:15:54.380
<v Speaker 2>sharing funny or poignant things their precocious kids supposedly just said,

0:15:54.420 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 2>but now I'm going to be guilty of it. I

0:15:56.260 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 2>got a text from my daughter, Sophie, completely out of

0:15:58.700 --> 0:16:01.720
<v Speaker 2>the blue recently, and it said this. It is two

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:04.540
<v Speaker 2>weeks from my 14th birthday. This is exactly the age

0:16:04.660 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 2>Juliet fell in love with Romeo. Now, she was reading

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:10.220
<v Speaker 2>Shakespeare in school, but my first thought was, shoot me.

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 2>You know, I'm just, I'm not prepared for any of this.

0:16:12.060 --> 0:16:14.180
<v Speaker 2>But my second thought was, I think she's ready for

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:17.620
<v Speaker 2>Before Sunrise. And I'm actually, I'm really, I'm really now

0:16:17.830 --> 0:16:19.810
<v Speaker 2>eager to watch that film with her. So I want you,

0:16:19.870 --> 0:16:22.930
<v Speaker 2>Ethan Hawke, to guide me. Should we dive into that?

0:16:23.130 --> 0:16:28.810
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. First of all, you know, everybody does their own thing.

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:31.460
<v Speaker 1>but there's this thing that goes around with men that

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:34.100
<v Speaker 1>they're supposed to be scared of their daughter's sexuality. And

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:38.380
<v Speaker 1>it's like, some of them, they think it's a good quality. Uh, Oh,

0:16:38.440 --> 0:16:40.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, I remember when Maya, my oldest, when she

0:16:40.460 --> 0:16:42.780
<v Speaker 1>was turning 16, Oh, you better keep those guys away.

0:16:42.860 --> 0:16:44.780
<v Speaker 1>Keep a shotgun at the door or something. And I

0:16:44.780 --> 0:16:46.340
<v Speaker 1>was like, you know what? I'm going to give Maya

0:16:47.020 --> 0:16:49.830
<v Speaker 1>permission to be your own shotgun, you know? And if

0:16:49.870 --> 0:16:52.630
<v Speaker 1>you act all scared of her sexuality, then how is

0:16:52.730 --> 0:16:53.670
<v Speaker 1>she supposed to feel?

0:16:54.590 --> 0:16:54.870
<v Speaker 3>You know?

0:16:55.370 --> 0:16:58.540
<v Speaker 1>And, um, there's a great movie that Chris Christopherson plays

0:16:58.580 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>a dad and it's called a soldier's daughter never cries.

0:17:01.020 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 1>It's written by James Jones and Chris plays this old

0:17:04.100 --> 0:17:07.030
<v Speaker 1>war veteran and writer. And, and I saw it really

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:11.909
<v Speaker 1>affected me because Chris just, his character just loves his

0:17:11.970 --> 0:17:15.770
<v Speaker 1>daughter and gives her permission to be a hundred percent

0:17:15.850 --> 0:17:19.290
<v Speaker 1>human being. Meaning you are a sexual person. Julia did

0:17:19.350 --> 0:17:22.919
<v Speaker 1>fall in love with Romeo and you know what? It's beautiful. And,

0:17:24.340 --> 0:17:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Is she prepared to fall in love? No.

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:26.609
<v Speaker 3>Were you?

0:17:26.850 --> 0:17:30.930
<v Speaker 1>No. Nobody is. You're never going to do it all right,

0:17:31.390 --> 0:17:35.169
<v Speaker 1>but you can give her confidence. Confidence to know that

0:17:35.250 --> 0:17:37.030
<v Speaker 1>she's in charge and she doesn't need to be scared

0:17:37.070 --> 0:17:39.570
<v Speaker 1>of him. She doesn't need a dad with a shotgun

0:17:39.609 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 1>behind her. She can handle herself and she can go

0:17:41.580 --> 0:17:44.500
<v Speaker 1>have a good time and she can make mistakes and

0:17:44.540 --> 0:17:48.680
<v Speaker 1>she can recover from them. You know, that's this idea

0:17:48.859 --> 0:17:51.700
<v Speaker 1>of innocence and this idea that we're not allowed to

0:17:51.740 --> 0:17:55.100
<v Speaker 1>make mistakes and that, you know, We are allowed to

0:17:55.140 --> 0:17:56.699
<v Speaker 1>make mistakes and we're allowed to grow up. And if

0:17:56.720 --> 0:17:59.629
<v Speaker 1>we don't, if we don't, then we're just going to

0:17:59.710 --> 0:18:04.030
<v Speaker 1>live in a little tiny, tiny glass world. And I've

0:18:04.070 --> 0:18:06.149
<v Speaker 1>given my daughter permission to make a big fool of

0:18:06.190 --> 0:18:07.090
<v Speaker 1>herself if she wants.

0:18:07.230 --> 0:18:07.790
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:18:07.970 --> 0:18:10.490
<v Speaker 1>And to break some hearts and to get her heart broken.

0:18:10.540 --> 0:18:10.670
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:18:11.740 --> 0:18:14.409
<v Speaker 1>And I think I was really, I got to tell you,

0:18:14.420 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the best moments of my life was Maya

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:20.440
<v Speaker 1>was about 18. So just a year or so ago

0:18:20.500 --> 0:18:23.220
<v Speaker 1>and a couple of her and her friends decided, One

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 1>of her friends told her that Before Sunrise was a

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:28.399
<v Speaker 1>really good film. She's like, my dad's film? And they're like, yeah.

0:18:29.060 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 1>And she watched it and she loved it. And she

0:18:33.580 --> 0:18:36.260
<v Speaker 1>had all these interesting things to say about it. And

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:41.230
<v Speaker 1>I was so pleased to know that those, we had

0:18:41.250 --> 0:18:43.010
<v Speaker 1>a goal when we were making that movie to have

0:18:43.190 --> 0:18:46.410
<v Speaker 1>no pop culture references. We wanted it to be able

0:18:46.430 --> 0:18:49.250
<v Speaker 1>to not be, is it 1970? Is it 2010? You know,

0:18:49.270 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 1>we made it in whatever year it was, 94, 95

0:18:50.510 --> 0:18:53.990
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. But we wanted it to be able to

0:18:54.070 --> 0:18:56.570
<v Speaker 1>float through time because the way you feel when you

0:18:56.609 --> 0:18:59.550
<v Speaker 1>walk through an old European city, you almost feel like

0:18:59.609 --> 0:19:02.949
<v Speaker 1>a ghost. Because the past, present, future, when things are

0:19:03.010 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 1>so old around you, it feels a little different than

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:08.359
<v Speaker 1>it does here in America. So I say show your

0:19:08.380 --> 0:19:10.820
<v Speaker 1>daughter before sunrise. I hope she likes it. And tell

0:19:10.859 --> 0:19:14.640
<v Speaker 1>her she's right. She is the age of Juliet. And

0:19:14.740 --> 0:19:16.460
<v Speaker 1>things are happening. And it's for real.

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:18.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we're going to do that soon. And to her credit,

0:19:18.280 --> 0:19:21.780
<v Speaker 2>when I made some non-evolved comment back to her. She replied,

0:19:21.970 --> 0:19:24.359
<v Speaker 2>reminding me how young I was when I met her mother.

0:19:24.380 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 2>How old were you? I was 16. Wow, so there

0:19:27.580 --> 0:19:28.980
<v Speaker 2>you go. Put me in my place.

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 3>It's on.

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:31.300
<v Speaker 1>Very quickly. And you know, tell her to go see

0:19:31.340 --> 0:19:33.139
<v Speaker 1>Romeo and Juliet too because she'll learn a lot from that.

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:34.700
<v Speaker 1>For sure. That play teaches you a lot.

0:19:36.230 --> 0:19:38.870
<v Speaker 2>Okay, we're going to end with the film spotting five here.

0:19:38.910 --> 0:19:40.150
<v Speaker 2>Five rapid fire questions.

0:19:40.290 --> 0:19:40.530
<v Speaker 1>Hit me.

0:19:40.730 --> 0:19:42.899
<v Speaker 2>Last movie you saw in the theater other than your own?

0:19:44.410 --> 0:19:47.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what the last one I saw was.

0:19:47.700 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 1>The one that jumps to my mind is I saw the...

0:19:49.820 --> 0:19:54.399
<v Speaker 1>25th anniversary of Malcolm X in Brooklyn with a full house.

0:19:55.180 --> 0:19:57.780
<v Speaker 1>And it goes to show how much you can't watch

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:01.790
<v Speaker 1>how important it is going to the movies because... I

0:20:01.810 --> 0:20:04.389
<v Speaker 1>remember being told that that movie was too long. When

0:20:04.410 --> 0:20:08.120
<v Speaker 1>you see Denzel's performance in that movie with the music

0:20:08.190 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 1>blaring and the crowd laughing.

0:20:09.540 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I've never seen it with an audience, I can imagine.

0:20:11.380 --> 0:20:14.899
<v Speaker 1>It's like, it's better than a fireworks display, you know?

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:17.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's what cinema is supposed to be. So

0:20:17.660 --> 0:20:21.020
<v Speaker 1>that floored me. That was the most recent one I remember.

0:20:21.040 --> 0:20:21.859
<v Speaker 2>Okay, is there another one?

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:25.770
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I saw Claire Denis recently, her film with Juliette Binoche,

0:20:25.790 --> 0:20:27.130
<v Speaker 1>which was also staggering.

0:20:27.150 --> 0:20:28.150
<v Speaker 2>Let the Sunshine In, yeah.

0:20:28.190 --> 0:20:31.910
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this woman, Juliette Binoche, she's... The greatest, right? She

0:20:31.970 --> 0:20:34.190
<v Speaker 1>really is first ballot Hall of Famer, man. She just

0:20:34.290 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 1>keeps doing it.

0:20:35.090 --> 0:20:37.670
<v Speaker 2>Without a doubt. A movie then that you revisited recently,

0:20:37.690 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 2>not on the big screen, just threw it in the

0:20:40.380 --> 0:20:43.060
<v Speaker 2>DVD player. If anyone uses DVD players anymore, the iPad.

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, when Sam Shepard died, I had to watch Paris,

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:51.580
<v Speaker 1>Texas again. And God, you know, I didn't realize how

0:20:51.619 --> 0:20:54.959
<v Speaker 1>much that movie had. If you watch Blaze, which I'm

0:20:55.400 --> 0:20:57.629
<v Speaker 1>editing it, you know, I watched it a lot. I

0:20:57.630 --> 0:21:00.130
<v Speaker 1>didn't realize how much that movie was in my psyche.

0:21:00.210 --> 0:21:00.430
<v Speaker 2>Really?

0:21:00.609 --> 0:21:03.550
<v Speaker 1>And what a staggering work of art that movie is. Yeah.

0:21:03.609 --> 0:21:05.030
<v Speaker 1>It's just such a beautiful movie.

0:21:05.050 --> 0:21:06.070
<v Speaker 2>That's one I need to revisit very badly.

0:21:06.109 --> 0:21:06.649
<v Speaker 1>It's really worth it.

0:21:06.650 --> 0:21:09.500
<v Speaker 2>An underrated movie, new or old. Maybe one that you

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:11.179
<v Speaker 2>just love more than anyone else you know.

0:21:11.300 --> 0:21:19.810
<v Speaker 1>An underrated movie. Okay. Girls just want to have fun? Yeah. Okay.

0:21:20.180 --> 0:21:23.210
<v Speaker 1>I showed that movie. It's an 80s, you know, Sarah

0:21:23.230 --> 0:21:28.130
<v Speaker 1>Jessica Parker. Who else is it? Holly or... Helen Hunt.

0:21:28.250 --> 0:21:28.669
<v Speaker 2>Helen Hunt.

0:21:28.890 --> 0:21:31.659
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and she's amazing in it. It's a totally corny,

0:21:31.700 --> 0:21:33.640
<v Speaker 1>silly movie, but you want to have fun with your girls,

0:21:33.859 --> 0:21:34.500
<v Speaker 1>watch that movie.

0:21:34.540 --> 0:21:36.930
<v Speaker 2>There you go. So let's see if you can pull

0:21:36.990 --> 0:21:39.010
<v Speaker 2>another title here. Just a random movie you love.

0:21:40.700 --> 0:21:43.700
<v Speaker 1>I was wondering why nobody talks about Buffalo 66 anymore.

0:21:43.790 --> 0:21:45.670
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I, we just brought it up on the last

0:21:45.690 --> 0:21:47.989
<v Speaker 2>show we taped before this interview. We did. I want

0:21:48.010 --> 0:21:49.230
<v Speaker 2>to talk to you about this. We did our top

0:21:49.250 --> 0:21:52.310
<v Speaker 2>five classic rock moments in movies. Obviously dazed and confused

0:21:52.330 --> 0:21:54.570
<v Speaker 2>was a big part of that show, but the use

0:21:54.609 --> 0:21:56.570
<v Speaker 2>of a yes song at the end of Buffalo 66

0:21:56.570 --> 0:21:57.530
<v Speaker 2>was an honorable mention.

0:21:57.570 --> 0:22:01.449
<v Speaker 1>That's a terrific, terrific movie. I really liked the film. Uh,

0:22:01.550 --> 0:22:04.250
<v Speaker 1>bellflower came out a few years ago. That was a

0:22:04.330 --> 0:22:10.960
<v Speaker 1>really remarkable film. Um, I love, uh, You know, Schenectady,

0:22:11.010 --> 0:22:13.330
<v Speaker 1>New York really holds a place in my mind.

0:22:13.490 --> 0:22:13.870
<v Speaker 2>Mine too.

0:22:14.030 --> 0:22:17.750
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. You know, what's popping in my brain is really

0:22:17.830 --> 0:22:21.810
<v Speaker 1>strong films that people haven't seen as much. For sure.

0:22:21.830 --> 0:22:25.870
<v Speaker 1>You know, another, this is totally self-serving, but I don't

0:22:25.970 --> 0:22:28.710
<v Speaker 1>mean it to be. I did this movie called Predestination

0:22:28.730 --> 0:22:30.740
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of people haven't seen it. Inside of it,

0:22:30.850 --> 0:22:37.030
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Snook gives a performance. She plays a transgender person

0:22:37.150 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 1>inside a genre movie. And I mean, if it were

0:22:41.020 --> 0:22:43.380
<v Speaker 1>a little indie movie, people would talk about it like

0:22:43.660 --> 0:22:45.659
<v Speaker 1>they would recognize what a great performance it is. But

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:47.540
<v Speaker 1>I think because it's in a genre movie, they just,

0:22:48.320 --> 0:22:52.380
<v Speaker 1>it gets performances often, great performances get lost that way.

0:22:52.680 --> 0:22:53.900
<v Speaker 1>And she's incredible in that movie.

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:56.920
<v Speaker 2>No, great, great stuff. Last one, your favorite book about

0:22:56.960 --> 0:22:57.990
<v Speaker 2>movies or movie making.

0:22:59.790 --> 0:23:04.610
<v Speaker 1>A Life by Kazan. Yeah. That's the one, Linkletter says this,

0:23:04.690 --> 0:23:07.250
<v Speaker 1>and I agree, he thinks it should be required reading.

0:23:07.810 --> 0:23:09.830
<v Speaker 1>that if you're serious, you know, if you have a kid,

0:23:09.910 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>a son or daughter out there who's getting interested in

0:23:11.820 --> 0:23:14.919
<v Speaker 1>making movies or acting in them, or you yourself are

0:23:14.980 --> 0:23:19.480
<v Speaker 1>serious about it, you know, Kazan had a big life.

0:23:20.340 --> 0:23:25.119
<v Speaker 1>And he experienced a lot sociopolitically. He worked with, you know,

0:23:25.140 --> 0:23:29.630
<v Speaker 1>the last great movement in acting, Marlon Brando, James Dean, Strasberg,

0:23:29.910 --> 0:23:32.810
<v Speaker 1>group theater. He really touched on all this. And he's

0:23:32.850 --> 0:23:36.460
<v Speaker 1>one of the very few actors who excelled at a

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:39.699
<v Speaker 1>high level in the theater and in movies. And when

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 1>you listen to the way he talks about acting, you're like, oh,

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:48.530
<v Speaker 1>it's actually no surprise that he blew up James Dean,

0:23:48.609 --> 0:23:51.889
<v Speaker 1>Marlon Brando, Montgomery... I mean, like, he changed it. I

0:23:51.950 --> 0:23:55.330
<v Speaker 1>never had anybody, anybody in 30 years of acting talk

0:23:55.390 --> 0:23:59.359
<v Speaker 1>to me about acting the way that Aliyah Kazan talked

0:23:59.410 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 1>about acting in his book. And it makes you realize why...

0:24:05.020 --> 0:24:07.420
<v Speaker 1>Why all these British actors are so damn good. They

0:24:07.480 --> 0:24:11.020
<v Speaker 1>treat their profession with a tremendous amount of respect. And

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:14.370
<v Speaker 1>we have this whole cult of celebrity around things where

0:24:14.390 --> 0:24:19.890
<v Speaker 1>it just confuses things. And it really confuses young people. Yeah. Yeah.

0:24:20.810 --> 0:24:22.470
<v Speaker 2>There's so much more we could get to. We did

0:24:22.490 --> 0:24:24.940
<v Speaker 2>our top five link later scenes a while back. I

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:27.710
<v Speaker 2>think when everybody wants some. came out, and I just

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:29.560
<v Speaker 2>looking at that list again realized that four of my

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:32.859
<v Speaker 2>five scenes had you in it. And maybe another time

0:24:33.180 --> 0:24:34.240
<v Speaker 2>we'll be able to go through those.

0:24:34.260 --> 0:24:35.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to have to do my favorite that I've

0:24:35.920 --> 0:24:39.219
<v Speaker 1>ever been in is talking Julie to get off the

0:24:39.260 --> 0:24:40.400
<v Speaker 1>train and before sunrise.

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:40.740
<v Speaker 2>Oh, yeah.

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:43.439
<v Speaker 1>You know, telling her that she was going to be

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:45.409
<v Speaker 1>a time traveler and I was going to make her

0:24:45.430 --> 0:24:48.030
<v Speaker 1>feel better about her present marriage by revealing to her

0:24:48.150 --> 0:24:49.610
<v Speaker 1>what a loser I was. Yeah.

0:24:50.170 --> 0:24:52.370
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's a great scene. That film is filled with them.

0:24:52.410 --> 0:24:53.950
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much for your time, Ethan. Best of

0:24:54.010 --> 0:24:55.230
<v Speaker 2>luck with Blaze. Really enjoyed it.

0:24:55.350 --> 0:24:57.230
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. So listen, here's the deal. This is what

0:24:57.250 --> 0:24:58.510
<v Speaker 1>we should do. You should get off the train with

0:24:58.530 --> 0:25:00.530
<v Speaker 1>me here in Vienna and come check out the town. What?

0:25:00.730 --> 0:25:01.260
<v Speaker 1>Come on, it'll be fun.

0:25:01.830 --> 0:25:05.370
<v Speaker 2>From September 2018, that was my interview with Ethan Hawke.

0:25:05.430 --> 0:25:08.340
<v Speaker 2>We remind you that you can access interviews like that,

0:25:08.730 --> 0:25:11.659
<v Speaker 2>other great content, anytime you'd like in the Film Spotting Archive.

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:14.220
<v Speaker 2>That's just one of the benefits of being a Film

0:25:14.260 --> 0:25:18.060
<v Speaker 2>Spotting Family member, plus bonus shows, a weekly newsletter, early

0:25:18.140 --> 0:25:24.090
<v Speaker 2>access to events, and more. To join, visit filmspottingfamily.com. Thanks

0:25:24.109 --> 0:25:24.470
<v Speaker 2>for listening.

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:27.800
<v Speaker 1>This conversation can serve no purpose anymore.

0:25:27.820 --> 0:25:29.189
<v Speaker 2>Goodbye.